|
|
|
|
|
VOTE
JUNE
4 -2009
FOR
www.LIBERTAS.eu
Who wish to
CHANGE the EU which will be impossible
because its foundation is the Nazi blueprint
from the Nazi
Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1943
when Himmler knew the war was lost and
prepared for the take-over of EUROPE in
peace time with the collaboration of the
European People's. But it will at
least prove to the hardened EU fanatics
the
'useful idiots'
who constantly utter the word change
THAT
THEY WERE MISTAKEN.
and
face the TRUTH at last and come on side and
join the majority who wish
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
TO RECLAIM
YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR
THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
www.LIBERTAS.eu
OR
SMALL
PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
IT
IS SAID ONLY AT ELECTION TIME ARE THE
ENGLISH PEOPLE FREE BUT IN THE PAST BECAUSE
OF THEIR INDIFFERENCE THEY ARE NOW FACED
WITH LOSING THEIR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND
COUNTRY SHOULD THE LISBON TREATY BE RATIFIED
BY GERMANY AS THEY ARE BY AGREEMENT THE LAST
NATION STATE TO ENTER THE
DESPOTIC-UNACCOUNTABLE - SOVIETISED - SATANIC
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE. THOSE
MILLIONS OF THE ENGLISH WHO HAVE DIED IN
DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY OVER 1500 YEARS
MUST BE TURNING IN THEIR GRAVES. WE ALL NOW
KNOW WHAT MAKES THE MAJORITY OF TRAITORS
CLING TO THEIR HIGHLY REMUNERATIVE
SALARY AND EXPENCES AND GOLD-PLATED PENSION.
BUT IT IS TIME THE ENGLISH PEOPLE SPAKE AND
TURNED THE GANG OF THREE OUT OF THE VERY
PARLIAMENT OF WHICH A MAJORITY THOUGHT SO
LITTLE AS TO HAVE SOLD YOUR COUNTRY
WITHOUT
YOUR REFERENDUM
TO A
FOREIGN
POWER.
*
www.LIBERTAS.eu
WE
WANT A CO-OPERATIVE NOT A CONCENTRATION CAMP
EUROPE
[Each
underlined word has a separate bulletin]
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MESSAGE TO GORDON
BROWN
IN
JUNE-2009
WHAT TREATMENT IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IN THE USA
IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE BANK OF
ENGLAND
MONEY CONTROLS the WORLD. We have in the BANK of ENGLAND a CENTRAL
BANK which loves TO PRINT MONEY because it is a MONEY MAKING MACHINE for
those INTERNATIONAL BANKERS who for over hundreds of years have
CONTROLLED EVENTS such as WARS-ASSASSINATIONS-FINANCIAL SCANDALS and
DEPRESSIONS and TOPPLED REGIMES.
IN 1811 --- It
became clear to Thomas Jefferson,
John Adams, and other patriots that,
"The Bank of The United States", was
operated for the benefit of foreign
banking interests. So, when the
Bank's 20 year Charter came up for
renewal in 1811, it was refused by
Congress. The War of 1812 followed!
It was expected that America would
be impoverished by the war and
forced to come to the
Rothschild-controlled Bank of
England
for funds. The condition upon which
money would be supplied was renewal
of the Charter of the Bank of the
U.S. A subservient Congress granted
a renewal of the Charter in 1816.14
The second "Bank of the United
States" ...was largely controlled by
foreigners through "front men"; John
Jacob Aster, Stephen Girard, and
David Parish (who was the New York
agent for the Vienna branch of the
Rothschild banking dynasty during
the War of 1812).
*
VOICE FROM AMERICA
Texas Straight Talk
by
Senator Ron Paul
A
weekly column
Audit the Fed, Then End It!
I have been very pleased with
the progress of my legislation,
HR 1207, which calls for a
complete audit of the Federal
Reserve and removes many
significant barriers towards
transparency of our monetary
system. This bill now has
nearly 170 cosponsors, with
support from both Republicans
and Democrats. Senator Bernie
Sanders has introduced a
companion bill in the Senate S
604, which will hopefully begin
to gain momentum as well. I am
very encouraged to see so many
of my colleagues in Congress
stand with me for greater
transparency in government.
Some have begun to push back
against this bill, and I am very
happy to address their concerns.
The main argument seems to be
that Congressional oversight
over the Fed is government
interference in the free
market. This argument shows a
misunderstanding of what a free
market really is.
Fundamentally, you cannot defend
the Federal Reserve and the free
market at the same time. The
Fed negates the very foundation
of a free market by artificially
manipulating the price and
supply of money – the lifeblood
of the economy. In a free
market, interest rates, like the
price of any other consumer
good, are decentralized and set
by the market. The only
legitimate, Constitutional role
of government in monetary policy
is to protect the integrity of
the monetary unit and defend
against counterfeiters.
Instead, Congress has abdicated
this responsibility to a cabal
of elite, quasi-governmental
banks who, instead of
stabilizing the economy, have
destabilized it. It took less
than two decades for the Federal
Reserve to bring on the Great
Depression of the 1930’s. It
has also inflated away the value
of our currency by over 96
percent since its inception. It
has invisibly stolen from the
poor and given to the rich
through this controlled
inflation, and now openly stolen
through recent bank bailouts.
It has predictably exacerbated
the very problems it was meant
to solve.
Detractors have also argued that
the Fed must remain immune from
the political process, and that
that more congressional
oversight would distort their
very important decisions. On
the contrary, the Federal
Reserve is already heavily
entrenched in the political
process, as the Fed chairman is
a political appointee. High
level officials routinely make
the rounds between positions at
the Fed, member banks, Treasury
and back again, taking care of
friends and each other along the
way.
As far as the foolishness of
placing complex monetary policy
decisions in the hands of
politicians – I couldn’t agree
more. No politician or central
banker, no matter how brilliant,
is smart enough to know more
than the market itself. The
failure of central economic
planning has been witnessed over
and over. It is frankly beyond
me why we ever agreed to try it
again.
To understand how unwise it is
to have the Federal Reserve, one
must first understand the
magnitude of the privileges they
have. They have been given the
power to create money, by the
trillions, and to give it to
their friends, under any terms
they wish, with little or no
meaningful oversight or
accountability. Thus the
loudest arguments against
greater transparency are likely
to come from those friends, and
understandably so.
However, it is the
responsibility of every member
of Congress to represent the
interests of the people that
sent them to Washington and find
out what has been happening with
our money. As the branch of
government with the power of the
purse, we really have no other
reasonable choice when the
economy is in the shape it is
in.
[WE HEARTEDLY
AGREE WITH RON PAUL AND WE HOPE
HE WILL GIVE OUR BILDERBERGER
GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND
MERVYN KING HIS GOOD ADVICE]
Posted by
Senator Ron Paul (05-18-2009,
12:42 PM) filed under
Monetary POLICY
*
www.house.gov/paul
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining Used-Comments in
Brackets.]
www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG
*
-
Author: Christopher Story FRSA
In 1992, the Illuminati orchestrated the raising
of a targeted $27.5 trillion from 200+
international institutions, in the biggest
‘secretive’ ‘private placement’ financing
operation in world history. The ‘mainstream’
media unfortunately failed to report this
operation – so the general public is ignorant of
it. The aim was to provide finance for the
imposition of the New World Order, a.k.a., the
New Underworld Order, for its use throughout the
21st century. The euphemism for this programme
is the ‘global security environment’. The
consequent monumental ‘Global Security Fund’,
which is managed in Brussels, and is directed on
behalf of the global Illuminati’s controllers by
financial intelligence operatives, now disposes
of secret financial resources of approximately
$65 trillion for this purpose, probably far
more. Equipped with such limitless resources,
the directors of the
New Underworld
Order
have now amassed sufficient finance to bribe
every leader, ruler, policymaker, intelligence
operative and political figure worldwide, for
the rest of this century, in pursuit of their
aims.
More...
ILLUMINATI
masterplan 1
|
EVERYONE IN THE WORLD MUST WATCH THIS
VIDEO. The Illuminati, a group of Super Rich that
control scientific research, banking system, all forms
of media,... |
Don't forget to get this message to everyone on your
E-mail list.
NOW! |
You can't rely on keeping your internet connection
open so form an LIBERTY ASSOCIATION in YOUR AREA so that
when your screen goes blank for good you have your
contact details to continue the FIGHT for REAL. It is
better to stand firm with friends rather than cower to
those who consider themselves YOUR MASTER. |
|
|
JUNE-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAILY MAIL STATES NO
TIME FOR PR- WEAK GOVERNMENT
Daily Mail
Comment-Saturday,
May 30,2009.
As we have already
stated if we could go back four decades to a time when
politicians were not in politics just to fleece the
taxpayer but were there to SERVE THE PEOPLE and they
would certainly not then have sold OUR FREEDOM -OUR
CONSTITUTION-OUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER.
With regard to the
question of STRONG GOVERNMENT we have had enough of what
is called STRONG GOVERNMENT over the past 12 years which
has apart from our loss of LIBERTIES has virtually
destroyed OUR VALUES-OUR FREEDOMS and COUNTRY.
Tony Blair said he
wanted to implant his DEMOCRACY into IRAQ and they have
a PR system of government. At home we have the Scottish
Parliament and the Welsh Assembly. WHY is it acceptable
for PR in these cases but NOT in ENGLAND.
Of course whichever
text book one looks at over the past hundred years one
is left in no doubt that PR is not strong government but
they were other times and with different attitudes and
different values in society. What we have to face today
is that millions of people have had their full of what
is supposed to be effective strong democratic[?]
government and now realise that it is time to move on
and introduce PR in order that those millions of voters
and non-voters in their millions who had nowhere to go
to get their just complaints dealt with.
As we have said many
times if PR had been in existence there would have been
NO EEC in January 1973 because there would have been a
strong anti-EU party in existence with many Members in
YOUR HOUSE OF COMMONS.
The reasons that the
editorial of the Daily Mail puts before the English
people is tainted by past history and as part of the
Establishment in our country the supposed FREE PRESS are
in cahoots with those who have connived to entrap us all
in a nightmarish satanic, undemocratic
UNITED
STATES OF EUROPE
We can see that those
who speak in such derogatory terms about PR are
themselves part of the plot of the destruction of a once
world respected unique parliamentary democracy in a 1500
year nation state of England and its total eradication
from the map of Europe and the World.
We only have to look
what has happened across the seas to a once Land of the
Free with their written constitution which has been
virtually destroyed because the American Constitution is
now what the President says it is and not what Congress
should demand it is . They have so-called STRONG
GOVERNMENT in the USA and the PEOPLE loath it because it
has taken away almost all their rights in their once
world acclaimed
DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE.
www.house.gov/paul
So the Daily Mail
needs urgently to take into account the history of the
past two centuries and particularly over the past decade
before being so adamant that their answer to the
treachery and thieves which now abound in our once
respected Westminster depends on STRONG GOVERNMENT when
it is that very premise which has landed us all in such
a gigantic political and financial swindle from the
political classes on the once free people in our Island
Home of ENGLAND.
*
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten EU truths we must tell the public
1. The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties
have been taken over by pro-Europeans. These leaderships implement
the EU's policy, and ignore the wishes of their voters.
That's why your vote doesn't make a
difference.
2. The European Union has the
Constitution of a dictatorship, and the laws of a police state.
Dictatorships lead to oppression and poverty. The EU Constitution is
similar to the old Soviet Union's.
3. Once the Queen has signed the
sixth and final EU Treaty in June,2008
[SHE did against HER
CORONATION OATH] the very much alive EU
Constitution makes it clear the EU will abolish the nations of
Britain and England (and our Lib, Lab and Con
parties, Reform Treaty clause 8A-4).
4.
The EU is illegal under British
law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have committed five acts of
Treason by signing five EU treaties [6
in 2008 with the signing of the LISBON TREATY] which will abolish our nation
and replace it with the EU; they had to
secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape
prosecution.
5. The police state growing around
you, and reported on by some national newspapers, is the EU police
state. We've been in the EU for 37 years, we
are harmonising our laws with the EU, the emerging police state is
the result.
6. Political correctness, the
undermining of parents, the family and teachers, the teaching of sex
and homosexuality to under tens, the promotion of single parent
families etc. is subversion by the EU or its
Common Purpose organisation over the
last 34 years, using the plans of the German Frankfurt School.
7. The EU will be an economic
disaster. We now lose £30 billion a year trading with Europe; before
we joined we broke even. The EU's 111,000 regulations cost us £100
billion a year (Better Regulation Commission Annual Report 2005);
they will
bring us a soviet style command economy and poverty.
Our politicians lied to us.
8. If you have voted Conservative,
Labour or Lib Dem over the last 37 years you
have voted for the EU police state, and for the abolition of your
own party.
9. German Chancellor Angela Merkel
ensured our government signed the “Reform Treaty;” which will
abolish the British Constitution and ENGLAND to enforce the EU’s
reforms from 1st
January 2009.
The EU treaties don’t allow for a British General
Election, which isn't due until 5th May 2010, so it is unlikely
another will be permitted. You will by then be imprisoned inside the
EU police state, where you will be ruled by
unelected EU dictators, who will control the nuclear weapons of what
used to be Britain and
France.
10. Britain is the fifth largest
economy amongst the world's 200 nations. Forget elections and
parties, whose leaderships are controlled by the EU. Fight the
direct anti EU campaigns on eutruth to get Britain back before its
too late. Start by visiting
your MP in his local surgery and warn him he will lose his £240,000
salary and expenses when the EU closes Westminster on 5th May 2010.
www.eutruth.org.uk
David Noakes. http://eutruth.org.uk
07974 437 097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constitutional change? I
wouldn't trust this lot to
reform a parish council
By
Stephen
Glover
21st May 2009
Revolution! A new order!
Sweep it all away! These are
the sentiments emanating
from the mouths of MPs and
party leaders, and the pens
of diligent and enlightened
scribes.
And I must admit that I,
too, have been momentarily
seized by revolutionary
fervour over the past few
days. The evidence of the
corruption of MPs is so
stunning - and a few of them
were men I had revered -
that one feels tempted to
pull down the entire rotten
edifice and start all over
again.
But why? Why, when one
thinks about it, should the
fiddling or greed of a
significant minority of MPs
be allowed to turn into a
general call, amplified by
Gordon Brown, to reinvent
the whole system of
government?
Gordon Brown has
amplified calls to
reinvent the system of
Government in the wake
of the MPs' expenses
scandals
The
political class, or at any
rate some of them, have been
caught trousering money that
was not rightfully theirs.
Almost everyone seems to be
agreed that MPs must now be
subjected to a much tighter
and more transparent
expenses regime which is
independently monitored. In
so doing, they will join the
rest of the human race.
Yet
this vital reform is quickly
being subsumed into demands
for a written constitution
or proportional
representation, or any other
fashionable cause you may
care to mention. We've
almost left expenses behind
as we surge forward to a new
revolutionary dawn. The next
Speaker is spoken of as a
figure who must be able to
direct this process of
transformation.
What seems to have been
forgotten is that since 1997
this Government, far from
being wedded to the
constitutional arrangements
it inherited, has
relentlessly interfered with
them as it has gone along.
New Labour has a restless,
never-ending appetite for
change. We have been living
through a permanent
constitutional revolution
for the past 12 years. Why
on earth should we want
another one?
Look
what has happened to the
concept of Cabinet
government and collective
responsibility. Admittedly
it was already looking a bit
battered in 1997, but Tony
Blair dismantled the work of
centuries in a trice. The
minutes of one Cabinet
meeting early in the New
Labour era show John
Prescott, the Deputy Prime
Minister, pathetically
anticipating the wishes of
the absent Mr Blair about
the Millennium Dome.
More from
Stephen
Glover...
When he was Prime Minister,
Mr Blair persistently
relegated or ignored the
Cabinet, often preferring to
conduct great affairs of
state from his sofa in No
10, surrounded by a few
hand-picked, unelected
chums. The Cabinet seems
scarcely to have been
involved in the decision to
go to war against Iraq in
March 2003. Mr Blair had
already made up his mind.
The
security services had been
squared by Alastair
Campbell, who had leant on
his friend John Scarlett,
then head of the Joint
Intelligence Committee, to
come up with a dossier
representing Saddam Hussein
as a potentially lethal
threat to this country.
The
Blair Government also
politicised the Civil
Service, partly by greatly
increasing the scope and
power of political advisers
such as Jonathan Powell in
No 10, who was empowered to
give orders to civil
servants.
Mr
Campbell, who enjoyed the
same privileges, took over
and dominated the entire
government information
service, which had hitherto
been independent of
ministers, let alone No 10.
Spin doctors became an
accepted arm of government.
With
the help of its huge
majority, the Government
continually bullied its MPs,
many of whom were either dim
or ambitious - or both - and
pliable. Independent-minded
Labour MPs were too few in
number to make much impact,
though as time went on, and
Mr Blair's star began to
fade, they began to assert
themselves.
And whenever New Labour did
enact formal constitutional
reforms - rather than merely
abusing the system - it has
made a botch of things. They
deprived hundreds of
hereditary peers of the
right to sit in the House of
Lords for reasons that had
more to do with class envy
than principle, but ten
years later the second
chamber remains unreformed
and unelected, and
impossible to justify in its
present form.
Devolution, intended by New
Labour to kill off Scottish
nationalism, has had the
opposite effect. The
Government believed that the
system of proportional
representation would prevent
the Scots Nats from ever
taking power, but they were
wrong.
'New Labour has a
restless, never-ending
appetite for change. We
have been living through
a permanent
constitutional
revolution for the past
12 years...'
_______________________________________
Rather than deepening the
Union, as Labour said it
would, devolution has set
the English against the
Scots, as those south of the
border wonder why they
should not enjoy the same
lavish educational and
medical advantages as those
north of it.
And so
it goes on. No Government in
recent times has so
disregarded the
constitutional conventions
that had previously
commanded widespread
respect. Its attempts at
constitutional reform have
been laughable.
So
while others may welcome the
cry of revolution from
Labour thinkers and its
commentariat, I am afraid it
makes my blood run cold.
The
system that Labour inherited
in 1997 was of course very
far from perfect, but it was
a lot better than the one we
have now. That should be the
Conservatives' line. Not
revolution but restoration.
Depoliticise the Civil
Service. Give power back to
Parliament. Defend the
notion of collective Cabinet
responsibility against that
of presidential government.
The problem is not, as Mr
Brown asserts, that the
House of Commons is 'a
gentleman's club'. It was
always so. The problem is
that many MPs do not behave
like gentlemen - who are not
supposed to cheat and steal
what is not theirs.
As Prime Minister, Tony
Blair persistently
relegated or ignored the
Cabinet
The
Tory so-called gentlemen
claiming for their moats and
their swimming pools and
their horse manure are the
biggest disappointment of
all.
Incidentally, I can't help
wondering whether it was
very gentlemanly - or shall
we settle for fair-minded? -
of David Cameron to claim
over £20,000 a year from the
taxpayer towards the
mortgage on his Oxfordshire
country house.
He and
his wife appear to be quite
rich. Their house in the
country is big. Should the
public be helping to fund
it? All the colourful
stories about trouser
presses and flat-screen
televisions may have
diverted us from the deeper
issues.
My
argument is not that there
should never be any
constitutional reform. One
welcome measure would be to
reduce the number of MPs,
who easily outnumber the
number of people in the
United States Congress.
However, this may not be
high on the wish list of
most MPs, on the basis that
turkeys do not usually vote
for Christmas.
But
whatever reforms there are,
let them be few in number,
and well- considered. The
system that New Labour
inherited and has so abused
was the product of gradual
evolution over decades and
centuries. One can be
certain that a new
constitution brewed up by
politicians and academics in
a few weeks would be a
defective one.
Most
constitutional change
conceived in haste turns out
to be regretted. Besides,
this is a tired and
intellectually exhausted
government that can barely
get through a week without
some new mishap. I wouldn't
trust it to come up with a
workable constitution for a
parish council.
Teach MPs to be honest, and
not to rip off the public.
That is a big enough
challenge to be going on
with. Then let's have an
election, and only then
start the process of reform
by reinstating the
constitutional conventions
that this manic, abysmal
Government has destroyed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE RIGHT TO BE
CONSULTED-THE RIGHT TO ENCOURAGE-THE RIGHT
TO WARN
Yes! you have
guessed who we are talking about Her Majesty The Queen who
in 2008 traitorously signed the Lisbon Treaty ending over
1500 years of the rule of a MONARCH in England but for the
brief time when ENGLAND was governed by the great reformer
Oliver Cromwell who's fundamentals led to the Glorious
Revolution of 1689 and constitutional parliamentary
democracy.
Since that time we
have had many Monarchs on the throne but as far as we are
aware none who would have sold their people and country to
a foreign power as the present Queen who contrary to HER
OATH has done .
As a result of this
treasonable action by the Queen in 2008 in exchanging
English citizenship for European citizenship Her Majesty no
longer in reality is able to ask to be consulted by HER
equally traitorous PARLIAMENT who by a majority destroyed
the Constitution and therefore the immemorial
'Rights and
Liberties of Englishmen.
So prized by so many people the world over.
Once the members of PARLIAMENT knew that they
and its INSTITUTION would soon no longer exist what a golden
opportunity to make hay while the sun shines and fill their
pockets of taxpayer's money and for the greater majority it
was their own prize money for selling the people's
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY.
It appears there are
those who still believe the Ancient Constitution is in place
but the very Act of Parliament and signing by the Queen in
2008 of the EU TREATY with the connivance of the majority in
Parliament (unless the Lisbon Treaty is not ratified by
those nations who have yet to sign) our
CONSTITUTION is DEAD.
WHY this charade of conveying the impression
THAT THE QUEEN RULES
appears to be still maintained we are at a
loss to understand.
The following from the
respected
International Currency Review
has the following to say about the question
DOES THE QUEEN STILL
REIGN
and more specific
IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
SOVEREIGN?
Under Article 17 of the
collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the
European Union are citizens of the EU Collective. It
follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the
EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE
as well
This provides the twisted
rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of
the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence
that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he
continued to serve as President.
Dr Herzog's subversive
remarks have special resonance for Britain, where
QUEEN ELIZABETH II
is the
SOVEREIGN AND
CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD
of the
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT
BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.
She is the custodian, in
her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which
was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her
father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH of
ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised
at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been
recognised and universally accepted as the undoubted and
rightful
SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH
PEOPLE
In November 2000 -after a
correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case
thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair;
to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the
Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness jay; and
to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders
and dignitaries -asking:
Is Her Majesty the Queen
Sovereign?
HE
RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL
or else a non-committal
weak, diversionary reply.
Mr Blair being unable to
answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry to the
Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark
of the
BLAIR GOVERNMENT
has been its Ministers'
arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary
questions. Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point
on occasion, of'
' standing the Queen up'
by failing to turn up on
time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.
WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT
AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE
AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.
www.worldreports.org
By
the very signing in 2008 of the Lisbon treaty by Her
Majesty The Queen
She is no longer the
custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British
people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death
of her father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH
of ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised at the QUEEN'S
CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognised and
universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful
SOVEREIGN
of the BRITISH PEOPLE
The
EU is ille gal
under British law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have
committed five acts of Treason by signing five EU treaties
which will abolish our nation and replace
it with the EU.
In
order to avoid the charge of HIGH TREASON against the
QUEEN and PARLIAMENT in 1998 Tony Blair
had
to secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape
prosecution.
THE
Queen
has signed the sixth
and final EU Treaty in June,2008 the very much alive EU
Constitution makes it clear the EU will abolish the nations
of Britain and England
(and our Lib, Lab and Con parties, Reform Treaty clause
8A-4).
So with the above
information before our eyes we can but iterate our previous
conclusion which Simon Heffer so graphically described when
he stated that the MONARCHY would be a THEME PARK. We agreed
with him then and we would agree with him NOW! in
May-2009.
Our conclusion is that the once QUEEN does not REIGN but is
seeing before HER eyes the penalty of loss of HER COUNTRY
because SHE served other MASTERS who were interested in a
NEW WORLD ORDER and a WORLD GOVERNMENT. The Queen declined
to ACT to PROTECT HER PEOPLE and when the time came hid
behind the secrecy of the REPEAL of two LAWS of TREASON.
In
the words of our greatest poet William Shakespeare:
'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it
out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the
ensuing age abhorred.'
ALL who signed the Lisbon Treaty are as far as any
Englishman is concerned are guilty of HIGH TREASON because
without consulting the ENGLISH PEOPLE to release THEM from
THEIR OATHS they still are and will always remain TRAITORS.
*
WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
CONTINENT?
*
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH?
*
A MESSAGE from a PATRIOTIC HISTORIAN you can TRUST
EUROPEAN UNION
'worse
than its worst components'
*
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005 William Rees
-Mog stated "Thank God we elected a Monarch."
How this can change in only 4
years.
[IT IS MAY
2009-LAST YEAR HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE
LISBON TREATY WITHOUT PUTTING PRESSURE -'TO WARN'
THAT SHOULD THE PRIME MINISTER DENY THE PEOPLE A
REFERENDUM THEN SHE WOULD VETO THE TREATY. IT HAS
NOW ONLY RECENTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THE
QUEEN IS ONE OF THE PROMINENT MASONIC FIGURES IN THE
NEW WORLD ORDER SO THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CHEATED
FOR 47 YEARS THINKING THAT THEIR QUEEN WOULD STAND
BY HER SOLEMN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HER PEOPLE AND
COUNTRY.]
*
Thank God we elected a Monarch
By
William Rees-Mogg
(Independent Peer)
Daily Mail
Sunday, April 3, 2005.
…I am glad to be an Independent peer;
I do not have a party and do not have a vote. Of
course, I always support my children wherever they
may be standing. None of the above criticisms
applies at this Election to the admirable
Conservative candidate for Aberavon. But she shall
remain anonymous.
It is not the least of the merits of a hereditary
Monarchy that the Queen, and the other senior
members of the Royal Family, are above the fray.
The Monarchy would not have lasted for well over a
thousand years if the Monarch had been involved in
the General Election every four years and been
forced to use stale and mendacious arguments to
discredit some alternative line.
In the 18th century, the House of Hanover
did have to defeat the House of Stuart on two
occasions, 1715 and 1745. Even those dates are 30
years apart. No Stuart rebellion has been attempted
since. That is just as well as they were a very
unfortunate family.
Constitutional Monarchy is one of the
great English discoveries. It separates the struggle
for power from the ultimate
authority.
The Monarch has no power, decides nothing except the
choice of her Ladies- in -Waiting, the membership of
the Garter and Order of Merit, the seating at State
banquets and which statesman to call to office if
the General Election produces a tie.
When I come to think of it, that
might be a good outcome, with 207 MP’s for Labour,
207 Conservatives, 207 Liberal Democrats, 25 others
and the Speaker. The Queen
would have some arithmetic to perform; that will not
happen, though it would correspond more closely to
voters’ real preferences than any result we are
likely to get. Arguably it might also produce a
better government.
It is sometimes said, particularly by Scottish
patriots that in English theory sovereignty belongs
to the Monarch, but in Scotland, as in the United
States, to the people.
I
do not know for sure about Scottish constitutional
theory. I do know that as recently as 1689 - the day
before yesterday by standards of our national
history -William and Mary
were crowned King and Queen of England at
Westminster before they had heard whether they were
also to be King and Queen of Scotland.
Until 1707 and the Act of Union, the
parliamentary process was separate and different for
both kingdoms.
Most of us think of England as having a purely
hereditary Monarchy, but
England does not. Our
constitutional Monarchy is itself elective and
therefore democratic. The
Queen sits on her throne by virtue of an Act of
Parliament, the Act of Settlement 1701.
That is her title deed to the Crown.
It was passed, like any other Act of Parliament, by
both Houses.
According to the historian Bishop Burnet, Sir John
Bowles ‘who was then disordered in his senses and
soon after quite lost them’, was put up to propose
Sophia, the Electress Dowager of Brunswick, and her
heirs as the line that would eventually follow Queen
Anne. That was carried in Committee of the House of
Commons; the Act went through the Lords with only
four dissenters and Sophia’s son eventually became
George I.
The history goes back much further than that. In
1399, King Richard II was forced to abdicate in
favour of his cousin, King Henry IV, who was John of
Gaunt’s eldest son. Parliament, sitting in
Westminster Hall, then elected Henry as King. He was
our first elected Monarch.
[Since
that of King Alfred -
Alfred the Great in 871. Many would say one of
the greatest Kings of the English.]
In 1571, Queen Elisabeth’s Parliament
resolved that it alone had the right to determine
the succession, and that it would be high treason
for anyone to question Parliament’s right.
In 1642, Parliament fought and won the Civil War to
determine the issue of ultimate power. In 1660,
Parliament invited King Charles II to return.
Britain does have a hereditary Monarchy but it is
established by parliamentary votes.
Parliaments have made the Monarchy
the keystone to our democratic constitution.
The Act of Settlement
itself could be amended, or on theory, repealed by a
further Act of Parliament. There is no head of steam
for republicanism, but amendment is now probable.
Even in this General Election, Michael Howard has
proposed that the Act’s bar on Roman Catholics
should be removed. It is, I
suspect, already unenforceable.
[Like
almost anything in what is left of our Constitution
- the Rock has been chipped away at for the past 32
years]
If Prince William wanted to marry a
Roman Catholic, which he does not, it would be
politically impossible to keep him from the throne
on those grounds. [We
expect the existence of Human
Rights Act will be
invoked.]
Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry now
come first in the line of succession; if they were
to fail, there would be a strong movement to put the
Princess Royal next in line rather than her younger
brothers. Parliament does not believe in gender
discrimination, nor does the Human Rights Act.
Fortunately this is a very remote possibility.
The Monarchy contributes six key
virtues to our Constitution. These are:
Impartiality,
Duty,
Personality,
Authority,
Unity
And
Permanence.
The idea of a national authority
which is personal humanises the inevitable
bureaucracy of the State.
Few of us would watch a Christmas broadcast by the
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
However high-minded they are, politicians can never
be genuinely impartial, as impartial journalists who
become politicians have repeatedly found.
There is a choice of loyalties to be
made.
No political leader has permanence however powerful
or imposing he may seem at the time - I doubt
whether Tony Blair, Michael Howard or Charles
Kennedy will be leading their parties into the
General Election after this one.
Politicians are mayflies, creatures for the day.
The Crown is for centuries.[?]
The Monarch exchanges power, which belongs to the
Prime Minister with a majority in the House of
Commons, for permanence and authority. Their two
functions are quite different. For my part, I feel
like saying:
‘God bless our politicians; thank God
for the Queen.’
[We would say most sincerely:
‘God help our politicians; thank God
for the Queen.
[How wrong we were to believe we
could count on a Queen with the illustrious name of
ELIZABETH of ENGLAND]
*
[Font altered-bolding &underlining
used-comments in brackets]
APRIL/05
* * *
[IT
IS MAY 2009-LAST YEAR HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED
THE LISBON TREATY WITHOUT PUTTING PRESSURE
-TO WARN THAT
SHOULD THE PRIME MINISTER DENY HER PEOPLE A
REFERENDUM THEN SHE WOULD VETO THE TREATY. IT
HAS NOW ONLY RECENTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THE
QUEEN IS ONE OF THE PROMINENT MASONIC FIGURES IN THE
NEW WORLD ORDER SO THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CHEATED
FOR 47 YEARS THINKING THAT THEIR QUEEN WOULD STAND
BY HER SOLEMN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HER PEOPLE AND
COUNTRY.]
[ADDED TO BULLETIN IN MAY-2009]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A TRAGEDY OF THE HISTORY OF OUR TIME
OUR
SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN ARE TOLD THEY ARE DYING FOR THEIR COUNTRY.
OUR
ECONOMY HAS BEEN TORPEDOED BY GREED AND UNACCOUNTABILITY.
OUR
POLITICAL SYSTEM AND MONARCHY LACK LOYALTY-MORALITY AND
PATRIOTISM.
OUR
PRESS AND MEDIA ARE CONCEALING THE TRUTH BECAUSE THEY ARE
CONTROLLED BY NEW WORLD ORDER ENTHUSIASTS.
OUR
FREEDOM ,CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY SOLD TO A FOREIGN POWER.
OUR
FUTURE WILL BE CONTROLLED BY THE MASONIC ILLUMINATI AND NEW
WORLD ORDER WHO ARE CLOSE TO ACHIEVING THEIR CENTURIES OLD
STRATEGY OF A NEW WORLD ORDER AND WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE MOST
POWERFUL AND RICHEST CORPORATIONS IN A WORLD DICTATORSHIP.
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
WAKE UP!
BUT THEN MANY OF YOU
HAVE DECIDED NOT TO SEE THE TRUTH AND HAVE DECIDED THAT FREEDOM
MATTERS LITTLE SO LONG AS YOU RECEIVE YOUR BRIBES FROM THE STATE
BUT ONE DAY YOU WILL REGRET YOU DID NOT MAKE A STAND NOT SO MUCH
FOR YOURSELF BUT FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE FUTURE.
'There is a law above all human enactments,
written upon the heart by the finger of God; and while men
despise fraud, loath rapine, and abhor blood, they shall reject
with indignation the wild and guilty phantasy , that man can
hold property in man.'-
Lord Brougham (1778-1868)
*
'Whatever makes a man a slave takes half
his worth away.'
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
*
Slavery is a system of the most complete
injustice.-
Plato. (427-347 B.C.)
*
To remind you what the situation was in the
USA in 1941 and the growing power of the Corporations across
America we include the following:
Whenever men of great
financial and political interests COMBINE then FREEDOM of
SPEECH is the FIRST CASUALTY.
Our greatest 18th century parliamentarian Edmund Burke spoke
of such things when he said:
"WHEN BAD MEN COMBINE, THE GOOD MUST
ASSOCIATE; ELSE THEY WILL FALL, ONE BY ONE, AN UNPITIED
SACRIFICE IN A CONTEMPTIBLE STRUGGLE.
Alex Jones is not the first to feel the anger of those bad
men. As he himself says the TRUTH MUST OUT if all stand
together and refuse to be daunted by the powerful elite who will
broke no resistance to it'S plans.
A speech by Senator Norris which was printed in
the Congressional Record of November
30, 1941, said:
"J. P. Morgan, with the
assistance and cooperation
of a few of the interlocking
corporations which reach all
over the United States in
their influence, controls
every railroad in the United
States. They control
practically every public
utility, they control
literally thousands of
corporations, they control
all of the large insurance
companies. Mr. President, we
are gradually reaching a
time, if we have not already
reached that point, when the
business of the country is
controlled by men who can be
named on the fingers of one
hand, because those men
control the money of the
Nation, and that control is
growing at a rapid rate."
[American President John F Kennedy publicly
stated that he was going to destroy the powerful
elite who could use their power against a
democratically elected President and put into
motion Bills to counter their influence. He also
issued an order for the troops to be WITHDRAWN
from VIETNAM. For these far-sighted and just
decisions HE WAS ASSASSINATED on the
instructions of that ELITE.
Over the past six decades this cancer has
grown into the BILDERBERGERS who meet each year
to DECIDE the FATE of the WORLD. It is TIME the
LITTLE MAN in the WHITE SUIT joined with HIS OWN
and THEMSELVES brought into being THEIR OWN
BANKS and which will counter the THREAT to
THEIR LIBERTY. The WEALTH of the LITTLE MAN
combined can COUNTER that of THOSE exponents of
a NEW WORLD ORDER and WORLD GOVERNMENT on THEIR
OWN TERMS.
If EVERY MAN in the WHITE SUIT put his money
in a PEOPLE'S BANK then the BANKERS who took us
for a ride and are still laughing and still
receiving their perks would soon lose THEIR
ARROGANCE and in TIME their WEALTH.
LET US SHOW THAT THE LITTLE MAN HAS THE
POWER BY WITHDRAWING EVERY POUND and DOLLAR
FROM THE BANKERS AND OVERNIGHT OUR PEOPLE'S BANK
WILL QUICKLY PUT THE OTHER CHEATS OUT OF
BUSINESS. As SENATOR RON PAUL maintains YOUR
MONEY is SAFER in GOLD or SILVER but even here
the supply can be greatly restricted by those
who do not want the LITTLE MAN in the WHITE SUIT
to be INDEPENDENT of THEIR RAPACIOUS CLUTCHES.
We all need to remember Edmund Burke's good
advice and take action NOW! as soon it will be
TOO LATE! to do ANYTHING! Possibly Alex Jones
could be OUR MAN in a WHITE SUIT but he will
need massive SUPPORT.
WILL YOU
DO IT! NOW!
www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG
[EXTRACT]
4) The Zionists claim that they are
the savers of Israel, but this is refuted by
twelve things.
FIRST - If one contemplates
the two thousand years of our exile, take any
hundred years even the hardest, one will not
find as much suffering, bloodshed, and
catastrophes for the People of Israel as in the
period of the Zionists. And it is known that
most of the suffering of this century was caused
by the Zionists as our Rabbis warned us would be
the case.
SECOND - It is openly stated
in the books written by the founders of Zionism
that the means by which they planned to
establish a state was by instigating
anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of
the Jews in all the lands of the world, until
they would be forced to flee to their state. And
thus they did. They intentionally infuriated the
German people and fanned the flames of Nazi
hatred, and then helped the Nazis, with trickery
and deceit, to take whole Jewish communities off
to the concentration camps, and the Zionists
themselves admit this. (See books Perfidy, Min
Ha Meitsor, etc.). The Zionists continue to
practice this strategy today, they incite
anti-Semitism and then they present themselves
as the "saviors". Here are two replies given by
leaders of the Zionists during World War II,
when they were asked for money to help ransom
Jews from the Nazis. Greenbaum said "One cow in
Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in
Poland." (G-d Forbid). Weitzman said, The most
important part of the Jewish people is already
in the land (of Israel) and those who are left,
are unimportant (May we be spared).
*
[We
ourselves have for some years been puzzled by
the contradictions of history as to the fate of
the Jewish People before we became aware of the
above account in May-2009 which clarified those
same contradictions. We were at a loss to
understand how the Jewish People could have
suffered so tragically over the past hundred
years when so much wealth and influence was
controlled by them and above we have the
answer.]
www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG
*
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THEY ARE
RETURNING THE MONEY THEY STOLE BUT WHAT ABOUT OUR FREEDOM-OUR CONSTITUTION AND
COUNTRY
MONEY is important but it is
NOTHING when
compared to the SELLING by those many TRAITORS in WESTMINSTER of one's
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY. The
majority of those who decided that the people had no right
to a Referendum because they knew best as the greatest
parliamentarian of the 18th century that
"Your representative
owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment: and he
betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your
opinion."
(Speech to the electors of Bristol, 3
Nov.1774.)
There can be little doubt
that Edmund Burke would NOT have considered that members of
the House of Commons would vote to sell their country to a
FOREIGN POWER. His many quotes on the subject confirm
this view. What we
have to ask in the present situation where it appears the
greater member of MPs are guilty of THEFT and FRAUD which
had it been a citizen outside of PARLIAMENT they would have
found themselves returning the money and spending a few
years inside.
When such an atrocious Act
of Parliament was passed last year which destroys a unique
parliamentary democracy of 1500 years in the making against
the Constitution and the Oaths taken particularly by Her
Majesty The Queen and in May 2009 we learn that many
of those who were required to give the matter their judgment
we have to ask the question
How can such a
decision now stand?
As we now know that the
very individuals who have traitorously sold of
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER were
themselves not fit to be members of that Parliament and as a
consequence any involvement of those individuals should be
stricken from the record and such ACTS of PARLIAMENT should
be REPEALED and a NEW PARLIAMENT instituted with persons who
have the HONESTY-INTEGRITY and PATRIOTISM in order to make
the decisions that are the LIFE or DEATH of a MOTHER of
PARLIAMENTS and all that it implies to the freedom-loving
people of our ISLAND HOME.
A NEW GOVERNMENT should be instituted WITHOUT
DELAY of those who are prepared
TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY
for HALF the present salary and sensible expenses. Those who
look on a place in the hallowed HOUSE OF COMMONS as a
mulched cow should find employment elsewhere if they are
able to get it-and
GOOD RIDDANCE TO THEM!
Edmund Burke stated" If you ask me what a free government
is, I answer, that for any practical purpose it is what the
People think it is."
This has nor been so
these last 12 years as a greater number of the population
want to leave the EU and now the UNITED STATES of EUROPE as
soon as possible.
WHERE IS OUR
REFERENDUM?
WHERE IS OUR CHOICE?
WHERE IS JUSTICE?
A NEW PARLIAMENT
WHICH LISTENS TO THE PEOPLE IS WHAT IS NEEDED AND WE HOPE
AND PRAY THAT ALL GOOD CITIZENS WILL MAKE THEIR CHOICE ON
JUNE 4 WITH THEIR FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY IN THEIR
MIND AND WE HOPE TO GOD THAT AT THIS LATE HOUR THAT JUSTICE
WILL BE DONE.
You
Can't Separate Politics From Morals
*
For Over 36
years they have tried to GIVE AWAY YOUR COUNTRY. YOU pay them over £200,000 per
year-We call them MPs *
WHO CARES about MORALITY?
In
the Daily Mail on Wednesday the 1st December 2004 an article by
Simon Heffer comments: -
*
POLITICIANS ASKING FOR A SALARY
INCREASE OF 20 %
*
EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE
BILLIONS OF
EURO FRAUD -
BUT
NOTHING IS DONE.
(The same EU which Tony Blair will
refund £5 billion of YOUR hard fought for rebate’.
[Could it be that at
the time the MPs knew that they were also fiddling that if they pursued the
matter too vigourously it might reveal that they also were at it!
*
Why The British People
Must Have THEIR Referendum on EUROPE.
Tuesday, May 31 -2005
*
*
MP’s demand parliamentary
inquiry into voting reform.
Friday 13 May-2005.
by
[WE
NEED IT NOW!
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
TO SERVE ONE TERM
ONLY
[In the US in the
House of Representatives it is two years only -then
re-election]
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW LABOUR MINISTER DENIS MAC SHANE SCORES AN
OWN GOAL BY GIVING PROMINENCE TO BNP JUST BEFORE ELECTIONS.
His article in the Daily Telegraph on
Wednesday 13th May , 2009 in such a conspicuous spot under
the Letters section and opposite the excellent article by
Simon Heffer must have pleased the High Command of the BNP.
It would have cost them a packet to have bought such space.
If his object was to stop many floating
voters from voting for that party at the local and European
Elections he will soon hear that
HE FAILED!
What he failed to understand is that the greater number of
those voters going to the BNP are driven to them after 12
years of New Labour's disastrous rule with them ignoring the
worries of millions of voters on a number of issues but
particularly IMMIGRATION and EUROPE. It has been stated by a
number of MPs from both New Labour and Conservative parties
that it is no use complaining about the increased vote for
the
BNP
which is the result of the GANG of THREE in Westminster
ignoring their concerns. To state that anyone who joins the
BNP is a
racist no longer stands up to scrutiny as much publicity has
demonstrated over the past few years. They are a political
party and they are entitled to have their say in a
democracy. One of our greatest poets John Milton has much to
say about allowing everyone to have their say and that the
TRUTH will OUT by doing so.
Mr
Mac Shane must be completely out of touch with reality when
he covers up the fact that Hollywood and the majority of
Major corporations and Press and Media are owned and run by the Jewish
community. There is no secret here the evidence is clear
for all to see. Of course as is usual some have changed
their names in order to not attract undue attention. We can
see no problem with this fact because they are as a race an
industrious and cultured people. What we are concerned
about is their manipulation behind the scenes and their
express purpose some one call it a common purpose to create
a NEW WORLD ORDER and
WORLD GOVERNMENT
of an ELITE with no place for the INDEPENDENT NATION STATE
or INDIVIDUALISM. To have a WORD GOVERNMENT of INDEPENDENT
NATION STATES is a good idea as one day THE WORLD may be
attacked from outer space and UNITY would be the way that an
enemy could be defeated.
It
is an established fact that there are a number of
JEWS
who
are not part of the conspiracy of the
Zionist Movement
and
hold entirely different views and are critical of their
fellow citizens and there are a number of publications to
this effect
On
the political scene particularly in the USA the Jewish lobby
are all powerful in the GOVERNMENT and in the
CORPORATIONS/INDUSTRY and many say that they control the
PRESIDENT and not the other way round. For example as we
have shown on our website recently referring to the powerful
COUNCIL on
FOREIGN RELATIONS which directs American Foreign Policy
the greater number in the Committee are of Jewish
extraction. The PRESS and the major NETWORKS are also run
by the same elite. THIS IS NO SECRET so why Dennis Mac
Shane should be so ignorant of the matter beggars belief.
But then when one considers what NEW LABOUR and the majority
of their MPs have been up to it over the past 12 years it
only supports what many have said of NEW LABOUR all the GANG
OF THREE in PARLIAMENT. They are DISHONEST and TRAITORS to
their country in passing an ACT of PARLIAMENT which destroys
a unique parliamentary democracy of 1500 years in the making
in order to join an unaccountable -undemocratic - wasteful
-expensive - totalitarian satanic
UNITED STATES OF
EUROPE a plan a
NAZI
blueprint which
Himmler
arranged in 1943 when he realised that the WAR CANNOT BE
WON.
After the scandals of dishonesty in YOUR PARLIAMENT it has
shown the corruption underneath the surface which has no
doubt grown over the past 36 years when we were dishonestly
lied to by the then Prime Minister
Edward
Heath a Nazi
traitor for over 60 years when he died in 2005. his fellow
conspirators were Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon and Arthur
(Madron) Seligman, who were together at Balliol College
Oxford University. it is also stated that Harold Macmillan
like Edward Heath, had been exposed by intelligence sources
as a secret agent of the German Abwehr (Department of
Defence, or military apparat.]
At
the forthcoming Local and European elections voters and
those who have not voted in the past which are in many
millions having found that
ALL THE PARTIES ARE THE SAME.
on
matters which concern the greater population of our Island
Home. They NOW have a chance to put matters right by voting
in their millions for ANYONE but those in the GANG OF THREE
in WESTMINSTER who have shown that they have only in their
minds to make a buck or two and many are a disreputable and
dishonest band of TRAITORS who gladly SOLD YOUR FREEDOM
-YOUR CONSTITUTION and YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER.
Of
course there will be a few MPs who have not followed the
behaviour of the dishonest majority but they are equally to
blame because if one keeps silent when a great wrong is
happening then unfortunately for them they are as guilty as
those who filled their pockets to the full and still like
Oliver Twist asked for MORE! We have to ask why has this
dishonest practise continued for so long without an HONEST
WHISTLEBLOWER speaking out?
Mr
Mac Shane has offered the BNP a massive publicity by his
prominently placed article in the Daily Telegraph and we are
astonished that so close to Local and European elections
that Mr Mac Shane had decided to do the BNP such a wonderful
election broadcast on their behalf. What ever the Labour
Minister's intention was it has back- fired and has
certainly alerted many readers of the DT that the BNP are
looking for votes. We happened to discuss this article with
others and one response was 'I wonder if there is a BNP
candidate standing in our area and that individuals like so
many millions in our country can see that when the main
parties are worried about their election results they
automatically attack the BNP which has attracted many who
have given up on the dishonest-deceitful and traitorous GANG
OF THREE and want someone to hear their concerns about
IMMIGRATION and EUROPE which have been ignored for over a
decade.
But we hope they will all VOTE for the smaller parties as a
sign that they have had enough of the main parties and want
a breath of fresh air in the hallowed hall of Westminster
which has been polluted by the damaged goods which have been
rotting at the heart of PARLIAMENT for DECADES.
THE PEOPLE WILL
DECIDE NOT MACSHANE
In Milton's words we urge those who have not voted in the
past to as John Milton would say" AWAKE, arise, or be for
ever fallen"
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAVE YOU RECEIVED DAVID
CAMERON'S EU ELECTION MANIFESTO -ITS THE OLD TUNE WITH NO
DEFINITE DATE FOR AN EU REFERENDUM.
As they say we have heard
it all before and if voter's believe David Cameron's slip of
the tongue of a REFERENDUM they are living in cloud cuckoo
land.
It is over 36 years since a
Conservative
Prime Minister
Edward Heath told the people
that there would not be a
loss of
sovereignty by joining the EEC which in reality was the
road to the
UNITED STATES of EUROPE. Just before his death in 2005
he admitted that he had lied to the British people. This
same individual had been a
Nazi
spy for our
60 years
having been part of a ring of traitors which included Roy
Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon.
The Conservative Foreign
Ministers since 1972 have signed every EU TREATY that has
been put in front of them. And if you thought that they knew
what they were signing you would be wrong as demonstrated
after the signing of the Maastricht Treaty
OPEN DOOR to the ultimate
United States of Europe.
when Douglas Hurd was
overheard saying to his colleague Francis Maud '
'We'd better find
out what we've just signed'
Even Kenneth Clark the most
ardent eurofanatic admitted he had not read the EU Treaty.
Both of the above MPs have
attended the annual event of the
BILDERBURGERS which as
you know is shrouded with secrecy. Even photographing its
membership will get you arrested.
For over three decades we
have been getting the same idiotic statement from
prospective Conservative MEPS that they will change the EU.
They haven't but they continue with the same mantra year
after year. It is always in the future as is the so-called
promise of a REFERENDUM.
If the electors fall for
the message from the Conservative party which has been
repeated over the last 36 years they will soon learn that
their
PROMISES mean
NOTHING.
Why
not ask David Cameron to name a specific date for a
REFERENDUM as it is better to have it BEFORE the
TREATY
has
been ratified by ALL EU member states and of course the
Germans will be the last to sign as it appears is their
right which they will gloat over when it occurs and be in
their eyes the surrender of the European powers plus of
course their enemies in TWO WORLD WARS - particularly
ENGLAND which embraced the UK at that time.
We are reminded of a
possible situation where a friend has stated that he
intended to CHANGE his life and year after year one hears
the same mantra but after 36 years it becomes intolerable to
have hear yet again the same message. This is exactly what
the Conservative MEPs have been saying for 36 years. There
is certainly need FOR CHANGE but David Cameron and the
Conservative Party are incapable because at rock bottom they
support the EU and the coming UNITED STATES of EUROPE which
YOU allowed to happen because you trusted promises instead
of demanding proof of their TRUE FAITH which they have been
unable to give.
The irony of the whole
situation is that it fits the purpose of the
NEW WORLD ORDER
enthusiasts to have the most unique parliamentary democracy
of over 700 years discredited before the world which suits
their purpose as within a short period of the final
ratification of the EU
TREATY
the emphasis will be on
REGIONS not of PARLIAMENT which will soon disappear out of
sight. Absolutely nothing happens in this world which the
advocates of the NEW WORLD ORDER has not already planned
and the expenses scandal could have been under most intense
scrutiny since 1998 but within months of a possible
ratification of the TREATY. What a wonderful way to destroy a
unique parliamentary democracy which has been destroyed from
WITHIN.
At the JUNE4 EU election
place your vote with the smaller parties and NOT with the
GANG of THREE at WESTMINSTER the majority of whom have been
fleecing the taxpayer for years and should the EU Treaty be
finally ratified later this year they can count on even
higher rewards at REGIONAL level of government from an EU
which has not had its accounts passed for 14 years.
[We notice that the Daily Telegraph are
making hay while the sun shines by its extensive explosive
revelations but one wonders if there is more to this
campaign than disclosing the flagrant abuse of expenses at
Westminster which cannot have been a recent discovery
because it must have been known and tolerated for years.
Possibly the Editor had a call from up high to make the
maximum damage possible at this important time in our
Island's History in order that the population will be more
likely to accept governance at REGIONAL level with any
national aspirations discouraged. Those under close scrutiny
who have broken the law must be dealt with in a Court of Law
as any other citizen of our country. What has surprised us
is that there are many members of the legal profession in
the House who should have know better and given a lead as to
what is reasonable and what is excessive. But when the
majority of one's representatives have traitorously deprived
a people of THEIR FREEDOM -THEIR COUNTRY and THEIR COUNTRY
without their right of a REFERENDUM it is no wonder that
many of them cannot understand what is RIGHT and what is
WRONG. We believe that there should be an immediate GENERAL
ELECTION so that the people's voice is heard so that JUSTICE
IS SEEN TO BE DONE. Unless this action is taken
history will not be so forgiving knowing what example the
Mother of Parliaments has portrayed to emerging nations in
the past. Dictators around the world will be giving our
Foreign Secretary David Milliband an earful and we shall be
the laughing stock of the whole world for some time to come.
Gordon Brown should be honourable and seek an immediate
General election so that the stain on the institution of
parliamentary democracy can be if not erased at least
minimised by the introduction of new honourable
members of the House of Commons who are there to SERVE THE
PEOPLE and NOT THEMSELVES. ]
*
So Why Don't We Leave the EU
Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally
And Cease Payments Says Queen's Counsel.
*
CONSERVATIVE
MEPs IN 2009 - STILL HAVE THEIR INACCURATE, NAIVE AND
PERVERSE PERCEPTIONS OF CHANGE IN THE EU
*
WHY
NEW LABOUR
AND THE
CONSERVATIVE PARTY
NEED
EACH
OTHER
*
*
ON JUNE 4-2009
YOU CAN REGAIN CONTROL
OF YOUR PARLIAMENT IF YOU SEND AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OF THE
GANG OF THREE OUT OF WESTMINSTER.
*
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardened as I am
to the absurd
behaviour of the
semi-official
media, I have
seldom heard or
seen such an
amazing
collective
missing of a
major story -
and such a
collective
effort to
protect a public
figure and a
political party
from harm - as
has taken place
in the last
three days.On
Monday, and then
again on
Tuesday, a
former Chairman
of the
Conservative
Party urged
Conservative
voters to
withdraw their
votes from that
party at the
coming European
Parliament
elections.
Nor was this
some titular
figure of whom
nobody had
heard. It was
Lord Tebbit,
once known as
Norman Tebbit, a
much-celebrated
former Cabinet
Minister who -
if the IRA had
not severely
injured him and
even more
severely hurt
his wife during
their attempt to
massacre the
entire Cabinet
in Brighton -
might well have
become Prime
Minister. Many
of you will
remember the
moving (and
typical)
stoicism he
displayed as he
was rescued,
agonisingly,
from the ruins
on live TV.
Thanks to that
same stoicism,
few of you will
know how much
pain, physical
and emotional,
he has endured
since, not least
because it was
his wife who
suffered so much
more than he. So
I'll just
mention it here.
You may have
guessed that I
rather like him.
In fact I
would go so far
as to say that
Lord Tebbit is
probably the
single most
significant
survivor of the
Thatcher
government, and
the man who
speaks most
cogently for the
traditional
Conservative
voter, still
loyal, but
increasingly
dismayed and
puzzled by his
party's
direction.
His decision
(taken, I have
no doubt, after
much thought) to
urge Tories to
withhold their
votes from the
Tory Party is
news by
anybody's
measure. It is
somebody
important doing
something he is
a) not expected
to do and b) not
supposed to do.
I can confess
that I tried
very hard to
make him do
something of the
kind when I
interviewed him
for my Channel
Four programme
about David
Cameron. He
wouldn't oblige.
You can
criticise your
party from
within, but to
urge people not
to vote for it
tends to be an
unforgivable sin
and an expulsion
offence.
Nor is it the
result of a
secret briefing,
which can later
be denied. It
was done, more
than once, on
the record. The
Daily Mail
carried it on
Tuesday morning,
and the BBC
Radio Four Today
programme then
got him to
repeat it on air
in a recorded
interview -
though in a
bizarre mess-up
which has caused
the BBC some
embarrassment,
'Today' managed
to cut a crucial
section out of
its recording -
the section in
which Lord
Tebbit made it
clear that he
also strongly
(and rightly)
advised voters
to stay away
from the
repellent BNP
rabble.
Yes, of
course I
rejoiced over
this. For the
first time, a
genuine crack
has appeared in
the facade of
the Tory Party,
which all
insiders know to
be profoundly
split. It
appeared on the
same day that a
Populus Poll in
The Times showed
Tory and Labour
support
plummeting side
by side as a
result of the
expenses
revelations
engulfing both
parties.
There's been
a lot of silly
argument
(familiar to me)
about whether
Lord Tebbit was
secretly urging
people to vote
for UKIP. Why do
people find it
so hard to
believe that not
voting for your
former party is
itself a
powerful
political act,
highly effective
on its own, and
that no
alternative vote
is necessary?
Not voting can
be an extremely
potent form of
protest.
More
interesting is
his very narrow
condition - that
his advice
should apply
only to the
European vote,
not to local
elections or to
the next General
Election. Others
will have to
judge, or Lord
Tebbit will have
to say, whether
this is a
sustainable
position, and
whether disgust
can be contained
in so small an
area. In fact
it's quite
clever, since
the EU
elections, being
held under
proportional
representation
and in regions,
are much more
open to changes
in public
opinion than
first-past-the-post
polls. If the
Tories do
unexpectedly
badly, UKIP will
be the
beneficiaries
whether Tory
dissidents vote
for them or not,
and Lord Tebbit
will be able to
take credit for
it (and take the
blame and fury
from the
Cameroons). Lord
Tebbit cannot
fail to realise
that, however
narrow his
specific advice
is, a trickle of
this kind can
swiftly turn
into a torrent.
In current
conditions, when
the credit and
standing of all
established MPs
is exhausted,
who can say
where it might
end?
Why was this
enormous story
not at the very
least near the
top of every
bulletin and
every front page
yesterday? Why
was the bizarre
non-story, that
David Cameron
was
(understandably
but predictably)
trying to
minimise the
damage done by
the revelations
of his own
party's greed,
both pushed to
the front and
treated with
such reverence.
Why wouldn't he?
It would have
been news if he
hadn't. It
wasn't news that
he did. It's his
job and he is,
after all, a PR
man by
profession. But
this predictable
and obvious
action was
treated as if he
had
single-handedly
rescued a group
of menaced women
from the hands
of the Janjaweed
in Darfur, or
scaled
Kanchenjunga
without oxygen.
Even the
left-wing
'Independent'
carried a
leading article
on Wednesday
saying how
decisive etc Mr
Cameron had
been. Had he?
Had he sacked
anyone? No. Was
he himself
super-clean? No.
He had, in
effect, ordered
himself to pay
back money he
shouldn't have
claimed for
repairs to his
conservatory.
Conservatory?
Honestly, how
could anyone
have ever
thought it was
the taxpayer's
job to fix his
conservatory? I
shall return to
this at the
weekend, but it
simply isn't a
surprising or
unexpected story
that the leader
of a wounded
party seeks to
stem the damage
done to it by a
swirling
scandal. Gordon
Brown was
likewise seeking
to stem the
damage done to
his party, but
his efforts were
rightly
considered to be
of minor
importance and
not specially
impressive. Nor
were Mr
Cameron's. So
why the
difference in
coverage?
My new book
'The Broken
Compass',
explains how
political
journalism
operates in this
country, and I
do urge those
who are
interested to
get hold of a
copy. But in
brief, two
forces are
operating here.
One, the liberal
elite actively
wish for a Tory
government,
which they see
as the best hope
of safeguarding
the left-wing
policies of
Blairism and
two, many
ambitious
journalists have
invested a great
deal of time,
and many
lunches, in
making close
contacts with
the Tory
leadership. Now
they want their
pay-off, in the
form of a future
close
relationship
with a Tory
government.
The other
interesting
story about
Norman Tebbit
is: ‘Why didn't
David Cameron
move to expel or
at least suspend
him from the
Conservative
Party?’
This is not
explored because
the answer is:
‘He didn't
dare.’ And
journalists in
the liberal
elite don't want
to write such a
story, as it
reflects
discredit on
their chosen
hero. Remember
Michael Howard's
disgraceful
sacking of
Howard Flight,
or Mr Cameron's
equally wrong
dismissal of
Patrick Mercer
from his front
bench, (both
recently
defended to me,
very vigorously,
by a certain
Cameroon A-List
candidate)?
Norman Tebbit is
much bigger than
them, and
remains a canny
and
quick-thinking
political
operator. In any
fight between
them, Cameron
would end up
looking like a
callow teenager
who'd tried to
mug an elderly
war veteran and
been beaten off
with a few blows
of an umbrella.
Also the truth -
that Mr Cameron
has hijacked the
Tory Party for
the liberal
cause - would be
shockingly
evident. In my
view, Lord
Tebbit could
actually have
gone quite a lot
further and got
away with it. I
hope he does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, that's why I just
can't trust David
Cameron on the European
Union. Yesterday he gave
a speech meant to warn
the British that an
incoming Tory government
would make so many cuts
to spending that it
would preside over 'an
age of austerity.' This
apparently was all meant
to sound fierce and
determined about cutting
costs. Yet if the Tory
leader wants to start
cutting costs, the
obvious first place to
look is at the costs the
EU imposes on Britain.
You have to wonder why
he is happy to talk
about cutting
middle-class tax credits
and pensions and the
rest, but hesitates to
mention cutting EU
costs.
How much does
membership cost this
country? In the Lords
last month, Lord Pearson
of Rannock quoted
figures put together by
the TaxPayers' Alliance
from official
statistics. The figures
show that the cost per
year to each
UK
citizen is £2,000 --
that is, £300m a day for
the country as a whole,
or £120,000m a year.
Over at
the Open Europe
thinktank,
researchers have
calculated that EU
regulation alone between
1998 and 2008 cost the
British economy
£148.2bn: 'Of the
cumulative cost of
regulations introduced
over the past decade,
£106.6bn, or nearly 72%,
had its origin in EU
regulation.'
I'll believe Cameron
is serious about cutting
costs when he promises
to start untangling
Britain from this
utterly unnecessary
burden of euro-costs.
Meanwhile, William
Hague, [BILDERBERGER] the shadow
foreign secretary,
inspires no more trust
than does Cameron.
Yesterday, while his
leader was promising
cuts, Hague was
promising that a
Conservative government
would hold a referendum
on the Lisbon Treaty --
but only if the treaty
had not yet been
ratified by all 27
member states.
What a weasel
promise, and not least
because Hague knows that
the Irish and the others
who have not yet
completed the
ratification of the
treaty will be
bludgeoned into saying
'Yes' months before the
next election here.
What Hague is saying
is that the freedom of
the British people to
vote on what is in fact
a new Constitution must
depend on what the
Irish, and the Czechs,
and even the German
constitutional court,
finally decide on
Lisbon. If the Tories
had any spine they would
simply say the British
will be allowed a vote
to stay in the Lisbon
Treaty, or withdraw from
it, no matter what any
other country decides.
[THEY DON'T DESERVE YOUR VOTE ON
JUNE 4-2009]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH
ABOUT THE EU FROM INDEPENDENT SOURCES
Publications
Joint publications with the
TaxPayers' Alliance
Click here to visit the
The TaxPayers' Alliance website
'What next for Britain and
Europe'
-
A conference
sponsored by Global Vision and The Daily
Telegraph
Full details
EU
Reform Treaty Documents
Perspectives
- Professional insights into
specific EU issues.
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
|
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
*
[We have included the above
information on the EU which will enable
everyone to look objectively at the question WHY
ARE WE IN THE EU the totalitarian police state
calling itself the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE? ]
*
EU QUANGOS
COSTING US ALL
£1,800.000.000
[Daily Mail,
Monday, February 23,2009]
DOZENS of
European Union QUANGOS costing taxpayers £1.8
billion a year are attacked today as 'not fit
for purpose'.
A report into
the growth of publicly funded EU AGENCIES said
many are duplicating work carried out at
NATIONAL LEVEL, and some were squeezing out
PRIVATE SECTOR rivals.
Until 1990,
there were only 2 EU QUANGOS. Then came 34 more
in 18 years, such as the COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY
OFFICE.
Most expensive
is the EUROPEAN RESEARCH AGENCY with an annual
budget of
£460,000,000
The Essential Guide to EU QUANGOS
2009, by the Economic research Council
think-tank and research group
recommended
curbing their activities and even closing some.
It said the
QUANGOS were costing taxpayers £1.8billion a
year even though some-such as the EU's trademark
registration office-were self-financing. Ruth
Lee of GLOBAL VISION said the QUANGOS were
'symptomatic of an EU which fails to appreciate
that MEMBER STATES' economies can only RECOVER
and eventually PROSPER in a world which favours
INNOVATION over BUREAUCRACY and FLEXIBILITY over
CENTRALISED RIGIDITY'.
They are simply
not fit for purpose in the 21st century.'
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining used-Comments in
Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
EU
wipes England
off the map - as
Gordon Brown flies the
flag of St George
over Downing Street
Brought
forward from 23 April 2008
[This
bulletin will remain in this space until
after the EU election on June 4, 2009
and until after the next GENERAL
ELECTION as a reminder that the best way
forward is to deny the main
parties and their EU enthusiasts a
reward for selling YOUR COUNTRY to a
FOREIGN POWER.
www.MailOnline.co.uk
The
Tories have issued a St George's Day
rallying cry against plans by Brussels
to "wipe England off the map" and create
a United Europe.
[What a cheek they have! It is
more than a little late for the
CONSERVATIVE
PARTY which has signed every EU TREATY
put before them and in particular the
MAASTRICHT TREATY the OPEN DOOR to the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE and the
destruction of our Monarchy-Parliament
and Country of 1500 years in the making
ENGLAND.
After the signing the Treaty in 1992,
Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd was
overheard saying to his fellow
conspirator in crime Francis Maud
'We'd
better find what we have just signed'
Conservative MEP's are obsessed with
changing the EU but have nothing
substantial to show after 36 years for it. In the eyes
of the EU they are the ''' useful idiots
'
who year after year promise change
without any success.]
As
Gordon Brown hoisted the English
national flag over 10 Downing Street to
celebrate St George's Day, it was
revealed that EU officials had revised a
map wiping out the country
[of ENGLAND]
and the
[ENGLISH]
Channel.The
change splits England into three and
lumps those parts together with chunks
of other countries to create
"transnational regions".
Flying the flag: The cross of St
George over No 10 Downing Street
today
It is claimed these zones - which have
been allocated their own budgets - are
intended to boost trade between EU
nations.
[The true
fact is that our trade with EU is less
than they with us. They could not
continue to pay the bills if we were not
in the EU. The trade deficit since
joining the EU in 1973 is £383.7
Billion. How many
hospitals-schools-higher pensions for
pensioners who receive a pittance
compared to those in GERMANY and FRANCE and many
other European Regions. We
are the second major contributor to the
EU funds. That is WHY if a GOVERNMENT
had the grit and guts of Margaret
Thatcher they could change the EU by
withholding their contribution until
those changes had taken place. The Iron
Lady in her day had a Bill of Parliament
printed ready to implement should they
turn down HER REQUEST for a reduction in
OUR CONTRIBUTION and SHE WON but that
war monger and nation destroyer and now
candidate for Presidency of the United
States of Europe Tony Blair gave much of
it away
FOR
NOTHING in RETURN. ]
But the Tories yesterday accused the
Government of trying "to create a
European super state via the back door".
['We've
heard it all before'
[Well!
the so-called Conservative Party has
been doing just this since
Edward
Heath -a
Nazi
traitor for over 60 years was
reported to MI5 by the MASTER of Balliol
College A .D. Lindsay just before the
Second World War. When Heath was Prime
Minister he lied to the people about the
true intentions of the EUROPEAN UNION
which included a UNITED STATES of EUROPE
based a a plan by Himmler at the Nazi
Geopoliticall
Centre in
Madrid
in 1943 when the Germans realised that
they would lose the war but they were
determined to conquer by stealth with
their new weapon of a UNITED EUROPE to
win their objective of a German
controlled Europe which had to include
their most feared enemy- as many would
say ENGLAND as it would be a threat to
its political and economic ambitions.
What two World Wars could not achieve
the majority of MPs of the GANG of THREE
and with the QUEEN against their OATHS
in JUNE 2008 destroyed OUR
CONSTITUTION-OUR FREEDOM- OUR COUNTRY
and now wish to be rewarded with YOUR
VOTE for THEIR TREACHERY]
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG,
counties along England's south coast
form the "Manche Region" along with
northern France.
Divide and rule: How the South-East
has been paired up with regions
across the Channel
The "Atlantic Region" takes in western
England, along with Ireland, Wales and
parts of Portugal, Spain, France and
Scotland.
Meanwhile eastern England is part of the
"North Sea Region", which covers areas
of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium,
Norway and the Netherlands.
Gordon Brown: Celebrating
Englishness
The UK Government is fully behind the
project, even though the words "England"
and "Britain" are left off official maps
of each area and the Manche Region
renames the English Channel "The Channel
Sea".
Each region, which will be given
taxpayers' money to promote trade links,
cultural ties, transport policies and
tourism, is to be run by a "managing
authority" of unelected officials
overseen by a director.
None will be based in the UK, with
Manche ruled by the French, Atlantic by
the Portuguese and North Sea by the
Danes.
The regions have legal status and Manche
has a budget of £261million between 2007
and 2013, Atlantic £127million and North
Sea £219million.
Every project funded by a region must
have a publicity campaign which ensures
"there is provision for flying the EU
flag at least one week every year".
Eric Pickles, the Conservatives'
communities spokesman, said: "We already
knew that Gordon Brown had hoisted the
white flag of surrender to the European
Constitution.
[What nonsense the
Conservative
spokesman speaks when their party has
been flying the white flag of surrender
to the EU for over 36 years.
St
George, played by historical
interpreter Alan Larson, does his
best at dispatching the Dragon at
Scarborough Castle
"Now the Labour Government has been
caught red-handed conspiring with
European bureaucrats to create a
European superstate via the back door.
"Gordon Brown literally wants to wipe
England off the map."
But a spokesman for the Department for
Communities and Local Government
insisted: "It has nothing to do with
altering names on maps.
"It is about support for business,
helping boost employment and turning
around deprived areas... helping firms
in Kent do business with people in
Northern France or promoting joint
tourism initiatives between different
countries."
[The fact
of the matter is that WALES and SCOTLAND
will retain their territorial integrity
but as already explained ENGLAND will
for the first time for over 1500 years
be divided up and given over to our past
enemies while as our Great War leader
Winston Churchill challenged the House
before the Second World War
' GERMANY
IS GROWING STRONGER
and
WE ARE
GROWING WEAKER'
WE have been BETRAYED
by the GANG of THREE in WESTMINSTER and
they should NOT be REWARDED for their
TREACHERY.
Winston Churchill
warned in a speech in the Mansion House
London in 1953 that we should be careful
of those who are always looking for
change, and history has as so often in
the past proved him correct .But
he would have been astonished to put it
mildly that his own party had ignored
his
WARNING.
A
St George's Day flag flies next to a
statue of Sir Winston Churchill in
London's Parliament Square today
The
move came as Gordon Brown ordered that
all UK Government buildings with two
flag poles should fly the cross of St
George alongside the union banner.
It
follows a review of flag flying
practices. Number 10 will in future fly
the Scottish and Welsh flags on their
patron saints' days.
Northern Ireland does not have an
official national flag, and so the same
practice will not apply on St Patrick's
Day.
"The
Prime Minister's view is that of course
we should celebrate our Britishness, but
celebrating our Britishness does not
mean we cannot also celebrate our
Englishness, Scottishness, Welshness or
Northern Irishness," said the spokesman.
The
English flag last flew over Downing
Street during the 2006 World Cup.
*
[The
Conservatives have their eye on
the forthcoming
2009 European
Elections and could even include
a General Election and their
pretence of being a patriotic
party was blown away over 36
years ago. Vote for the smaller
parties for a change and throw
the majority unpatriotic
expensive time wasters out on
the dole. A look at the Regions
/States of Germany will show
that the integrity of their
territory is intact.
It is said
what the Pan-Germans mean when
they say other Europeans can
tame the naturally aggressive
and acquisitive tendency to
augment the German race -in
translation is that the
Lebensraum' they seek is the
space vacated by abolishing
the sovereignty of all the other
regional nation states,
with the exception of
Germany hiding behind a 'mask of
federalism':
THIS: is the new
'Lebensraum'. The Germans
have got clean away with their
dastardly plan because of the
stupidity over 36 years of
British politicians who still in
2009
in the forthcoming European
Election will continue to be
'useful
idiots'
by claiming they can change the
EU for the better. They have no
chance whatsoever to do so and
they know so but they cannot
admit they have been fooled for
so long. We shall no doubt have
the same plea 'of change'
from the prospective
Conservative MEP for the West
Midlands Philip Bushill-Mathews.
He needs taken quietly to one
side and told that
Brussels rules Britannia
as he
appears to have some doubt about
it.
The Germans
have yet to ratify the Lisbon
Treaty because their
Constitutional Court has matters
yet to be dealt with before that
can take place. They seem
intent to ratify their treaty
ONLY after every other country
has done so. What a wonderful
propaganda victory and their
revenge for losing TWO WORLD
WARS as to accept the surrender
of all their previous foes but
particularly a country called
England which they have longed
to cut up to destruction.]
*
VOTE!
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
Who will
either change the EU for the
better or finally show all EU
fanatics that in Margaret
Thatcher's phrase
[They're]
not for change.
We believe
that the FUNDAMENTALS cannot be
changed because the Nazi
blueprint does not allow for
such change. They will
tinker around the edges and give
concessions as they will offer
to IRELAND in order to get them
on side but the reality is that
whatever they offer CAN BE LATER
TAKEN AWAY.]
*
TREATY OF
TREASON
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
LATEST!
MAY-2009
OUR MONTHLY
TOP TOPICS
CLICK
HERE
LISTS VIEWERS
TOP TOPICS BULLETINS OVER THE PAST YEAR AND BEYOND
*
[Each word underlined word /words has a separate
bulletin but where each LETTER of a word has a bulletin
it will be followed by the number of bulletins
within
red
SQUARE BRACKETS
as above and below
EU
COLLECTIVE [12]
.
OR
THE
EU
COLLECTIVE [15]
.
OR
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
COLLECTIVE
[ 26 ] .
*
WITH EU
ELECTIONS ON JUNE 4-2009
THE GOVERNMENT HAS IT'S
EUROPE MINISTER-WHY HAVEN'T THE EUROSCEPTICS THEIR OWN SUPREMO?
*
TOTALITARIAN
POLICE STATE.
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR MAY-2009 |
|
What a fantastic speech which
encompasses virtually everything we have said about ENGLAND over the past 12
years. It is powerful and persuasive and it naturally is addressed to the
AMERICAN PEOPLE but almost all that is said is as true in England as it is in
America. We have hoped that such a speech could be delivered in England
with such strength of delivery and passion of a man who loves his CONSTITUTION
and COUNTRY.
www.house.gov/paul
[Hi! Bob and Phil in Emporia ,Kansas -Hope you are ALL well. We Don't know if it
is a case of us coming to rescue you or you coming to rescue us?-(A Bridge Too Far)
MAY -2009 |
U.S. NATIONAL
DEBT
CLOCK
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 11 May 2009 at
10:26:26 AM GMT is:
US Debt Clock
The estimated population of the
United States is 306,161,084
so each citizen's share of this debt is
$36,809.85.
The National Debt has
continued to increase an average of
$3.83 billion per day since September 28, 2007!
Concerned? Then
tell Congress and the White House!
Do you have any questions about the National
Debt or this Debt Clock?
Here are
some answers. The Treasury Department's
Bureau of Public Debt also has their own
Public Debt FAQ.
WHERE IS GORDON BROWN'S UK DEBT CLOCK OR
MORE SIGNIFICANTLY THE
ENGLISH DEBT CLOCK?
MAY-2009
|
12 YEARS IN NEW LABOUR'S HELL HOLE
BIG BROTHER FANTASY ISLAND.
Daily Mail
COMMENT
Saturday, February
21,2009 |
How
our liberties have been destroyed.
Since Labour was elected 12 years ago, a massive and frightening array of powers
have been introduced which curtail Britain's long-fought-for commitment to the
FREEDOM OF THE
INDIVIDUAL
There are
56 such
freedom-destroying powers ,
(brought forward to:)
May-2009
[F1531] |
BRITISHNESS IS
DEAD! NEW LABOUR KILLED IT! AND NOW THEY WISH TO KILL ENGLISHNESS AND THEY HAVE
ALMOST DONE SO
Under
cover of the term Britishness Gordon Brown used this term to destroy
Englishness and the very English Constitution and finally sell England to a
FOREIGN POWER which had already obliterated the name from the map of the
United States of Europe .WHY this TRAITOR has not been brought to book for his
TREASON against the country of which he is not a countryman will for
future generations be an indication of how little many of the ENGLISH felt about
THEIR FREEDOMS and COUNTRY for which millions have died for . Many of them are
sheep to the slaughter and many will regret that they didn't want to know when
it came to defending their unique Constitution and Country.
MAY-2009 |
Hard to believe, but youtube
suspended this guy's channel. Dave
had
thousands of A...
3 days ago
1,536 views
WakeUpBritain2009
[As Alex Jones knows so well there is no
better way to fight a CAUSE than to have your
marching feet squarely on the ground with millions
of others who share your view. The Internet is
a good tool for immediate contact and intelligence
but it can so easily become non-existent tool
overnight to those who use the service to maintain
contact with others of like minds. What must
happen , if it is not already happening ,which would
be impossible, is that everyone makes personal
contact with those of like minds in their locality.
It could for instance be something along the lines
of The Voluntary Association for DEFENCE of
LIBERTY - CONSTITUTION and STATE, which would act
immediately to assemble its members if a
blanket censorship was placed on all those who were
opposed to the NEW WORLD ORDER. One could use
the word FREEDOM on a global basis which could
read
FRIENDS
REVOLUTIONISTS ENGAGE EVIL DOMINATION OF MANKIND.
When the day comes when the forces of evil come to take away people at the
dead of night they would aim at one sector of the population as Hitler did as
history has shown that people don't take alarm until they are themselves are
targeted hoping their turn will not come. It is therefore
critical that who is targeted first must be supported by ALL which sends out the
message that what happens to one is the concern of ALL.
MAY-2009 |
*
The TEXANS are in a fighting mood and are on the streets in force but
the English consider their balloons and letters would save them and not a
million blocking the approaches to Westminster with the result the
Scottish prime minister Gordon Brown and his tartan clan behind him he
knew he was in the main dealing with mice and put up his two fingers to
the so compliant English people and the the majority simply slowly turned
over and went back to sleep.. The People fearlessly on the move in the STATES
against their spendthrift and war-mongering and domineering Federal
Government that has over many years got too big for its own good and has usurped
their Constitution which is now what the president says it is rather than what
it has always meant to the individual States and that of the American people who
want no interference from the major corporations and money
lenders who run the Federal Government.
MAY-2009 |
A SUCCESS STORY THAT NEW
LABOUR AND GORDON BROWN MUST BE PROUD OF - A DE-STABILISATION
PLAN OF THE KGB.
A look at the following
plan of the KGB for de-stabilising a once proud independent democratic
state which has all but been achieved by 12 years of New
Labour. They must be thoroughly pleased with their
success. If there was any justice the majority of their
comrades should find themselves on the dole queue on June
4-2009.
MAY-2009 |
by
Senator Ron Paul-Republican
-
known as DR NO in the Congress of the United States because of his NO VOTE i to
the implementation of the iniquitous PATRIOT ACT which was a danger to all FREE
AMERICANS by the withdrawal of their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
A
weekly column
MAY-2009 |
GOOD ADVICE TO GORDON BROWN
Ron Paul:Stimulus Packages Will Turn Recession
|
AN APOLOGY
to visitors fr om around the
world that visited Warwick Castle
AND LATER
TOURED THE TOWN
on
St.
Ge ORGE'S
DAY
April 23rd - 2009
but there was
NO FLAG
of
ST.GEORGE flying from the
WARWICK COUNCIL
OFFICES.
SHIRE HALL
WARWICK
ENGLAND
MAY-2009 |
WHY WONT THE
EUROSCEPTICS UNITE- UNTIL THEY DO THEY ARE PLAYING INTO THE HANDS OF THE
EUROPHILES.
For a number
of years now we have been advocating that there should be an umbrella
organisation under which ALL eurosceptics can give THEIR VOTE! a Eurosceptic
Movement. But regrettably this measure has been constantly ignored so that at
the forthcoming European Election on June 4-2009 we will find that there will be
a number of smaller parties who will be showing their eurosceptic colours.
WHAT A WASTE!
MAY-2009 |
SERIOUS
ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY (SOCA) OR (SO OUTRAGEOUS CATACLYSMIC ACTION) IN TREATING
OUR FISHERMEN AS DRUG DEALERS.
French demonstrators
have shown more interest in the plight of two jailed UK fishermen than Britain's
mainstream political parties.
MAY-2009 |
DID YOU KNOW THAT BOTH
SIDES IN THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR WERE BACKED BY NEW WORLD
BANKERS IN ORDER TO MAXIMISE THEIR PROFITS
It is stated that without
this colossal investment in the Civil War
(1862-1865) it would not have lasted so long or have been so
costly in lives and expenditure.
[details
in PART 2 ]
Thomas Jefferson speaking
in 1801
for all believers in State rights as against national
rights, and for those who feared great corporations and a
money power-objected. He was a born popular leader, had
steadily gathered behind him the great mass of small
farmers, mechanics, shopkeepers, and other workers. They
meant to see that the nation had
a people's government, not
a government of special interests, and they asserted
themselves with tremendous power .As over 220 years later in
2009 the Texas Republican Ron Paul
-known as
Mr NO!
because he refused to vote for the inquisitive and intrusive
PATRIOT ACT which is used as is our TERRORISM ACT to curb
LIBERTY.
www.house.gov./paul
is gathering around him
millions of the American people who wish for less government and
the need to reclaim THEIR CONSTITUTION away from
SPECIAL INTERESTS(1)
WE ASK WHERE
IS OUR RON PAUL?
MAY-2009 |
Before we commence our journey of the life of 'a Man called Peter' we wish to
explain that it was a screening of the 1955 Fact-based drama
on JUNE 6-2008]
A MAN CALLED
PETER
which prompted
this mission into the life of a Man of God.
A SCOTSMAN WHO FILLED THE
CHAPLAINCY OF THE SENATE OF THE USA.
The
distinguished actor portraying Peter Marshal is Richard Todd of The Dambusters
and The Longest Day and many other fine films since the Second World . He was
himself fighting at Pegasus Bridge a vital objective on D Day June 6-1944.
[*Brought forward from
June 2008. Now showing again on Tuesday 5th May 2009 on CHANNEL4 .
WE wish the reclusive respected actor still amongst us our
sincere thanks for his many memorable portrayals of the values we still hold so
dear in our hearts and they are a constant reminder which still
gives us hope that all is still not lost, with faith in God and Country.]
MAY-2009 |
W HY
DO EUROSCEPTIC MPS AND MEPS REMAIN IN THEIR PARTY INSTEAD OF
FORMING A
TRUE CONSERVATIVE
ALTERNATIVE.
We have asked
this question many times over the past two decades and it is obvious that the
so-called Conservative party have tolerated their eurosceptics because it
enabled them to keep their party in power. In the forthcoming European
Election on June4-2009 the eurosceptic 'Conservative' prospective MEPs will
again support their party rather form their own 'Real' conservative party. It
has been so for over 36 years.
MAY-2009 |
|
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR APRIL-2009 |
|
|
HOW
TO POLICE OUR CRIME RIDDEN STREETS BY THE
'NONSENSE MAN' THE MAN OF 'STRAW' AND NO
SUBSTANCE
THE SO-CALLED JUSTICE MINISTER
JACK OF ALL TRADES MASTER OF NONE -JACK STRAW
WHO AFTER LEAVING THE STREETS TO THE
CRIMINALS
AFTER
TAKING AWAY THE LOCAL BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT HE
IS NOW ASKING THE VICTIMS OF CRIME TO POLICE
THE STREETS THEMSELVES BY LETTING THEM KNOW
WHERE THE THOUSANDS OF CRIMINALS
ARE. MR STRAW -NO DOUBT
MANY OF THEM IF JUSTICE HAD BEEN DONE THEY
WOULD BE IN PRISON FOR YEARS BUT THEN DUE TO
YOUR INCOMPETENCE AND SOFT JUSTICE THERE ARE
MORE CRIMINALS ON THE STREET NOW THAN THERE
HAS EVER BEEN FOR DECADES OR EVEN LONGER.
APRIL-2009 |
By
Richard Pendlebury
on 30th April 2009 |
ON
St George's Day 23 April
by
John Boyd
APRIL-2009 |
Opportunity of an epoch for tough
Toryism
byBy
APRIL-2009
|
Anthony Coughlan
APRIL-2009
|
APRIL-2009 |
Urgent: The Obama New
World Order Threat?
"The
Evidence Provided on Obama's Frightening
Involvement with the New World Agenda is Under a
threat of Being Taken Offline. You Must Act Now to
Receive it...FAST! !
APRIL-2009 |
THE GOVERNMENT HAS IT'S
EUROPE MINISTER-WHY HAVEN'T THE EUROSCEPTICS THEIR OWN SUPREMO?
APRIL-2009 |
|
|
ARE YOU HAVING A
RADIO MOBILE MAST IN YOUR VILLAGE RIGHT NOW?
AN
SOS.
APRIL-2009
|
INDIVIDUALISM
IS HATED BY TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENTS -RACISM ENCOURAGED BY SUPPORTING GROUP
COLLECTIVISM .
The SINGLE VOICE
in CONGRESS against the PATRIOT ACT and stout defender of LIBERTY
and the CONSTITUTION and
much else .To curb the Presidential edict which is undermining the true
spirit of that CONSTITUTION and protect the RIGHTS of the STATES to decide those
matters which are not within the province of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT -by Senator Ron Paul .
APRIL-2009 |
[DANGER]
TO
Is a Radio
mobile phone mast being installed in your village at
short notice?
APRIL-2009 |
By Declan J. Ganley
-The
leader of www.LIBERTAS.org.uk .Ireland's
'NO!'
to the EU unless they make the changes necessary for a more
DEMOCRATIC and ACCOUNTABLE EU.
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
APRIL-2009 |
THE
BROTHERHOOD
AND THE MANIPULATION OF SOCIETY
[Editor's Note: A ten part series
Contains
written articles explaining the makeup and organization of the Illuminati
elites who are behind the New World Order/Globalization scheme.
[What kind of world would it be if every
living soul on the PLANET had to obey a WORLD GOVERNMENT which would destroy
INDIVIDUALITY and CHOICE. Those that advocate this system instead of
holding their meetings in SECRECY should throw OPEN THEIR DOORS and
OPINIONS for us ALL to HEAR and DISCUSS.]
APRIL-2009
|
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
APRIL-2009 |
A CONSPIRACY
YOU WILL WANT TO
IGNORE!
-OR
WILL
YOU?
*
The New
World Order
(NWO)
An Overview
APRIL-2009
|
BANKERS RULE THE WORLD.
WHY WE NEED A PEOPLE'S BANK
WHICH LENDS MONEY TO GOVERNMENT WITHOUT INTEREST
APRI L - 2009 |
By
Andrew
Alexander
8th April 2009
|
AMERICAN PRESIDENTS HAVE
BETRAYED THEIR WRITTEN CONSTITUTION TO OBTAIN TOTALITARIAN
RULE
Secret Organisations beyond the control of the President -FEMA
APRIL-2009
|
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR MARCH-2009 |
|
A NEW INTERNET POLITICAL
PARTY-OF THE PEOPLE -TO RECLAIM PARLIAMENT FOR THE PEOPLE. *
Tycoon's vision to smash party politics with
Independent MPs
[Daily Mail, Monday ,March
9, 2009]
A FORMER
Tory tycoon yesterday launched an X-Factor-style political party
which he claimed would restore the public's faith in Parliament.
MARCH-2009
|
A WARNING TO THE PEACE LOVING PEOPLE
OF AMERICA.
FOR MANY IN HIGH POSTS
IN WASHINGTON - WAR HAS BEEN WONDERFUL FOR THEIR BUSINESSES
*
Revolving door keeps the WAR CASH
rolling in
Andrew Alexander
COLUMN
[Daily Mail -Friday,March2, 2007]
|
NEW LABOUR SCRAPPED
EFFECTIVE HOUSE OF LORDS-THE RESULT- JOBS FOR LOANS.
*
[Brought forward 30th January 2008 from:
-Thursday March 23 -2009
|
GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING ENABLES GERMANY TO
BE LAST TO SIGN EU TREATIES.
From
a historical perspective the EU treaties with Germany shown as the final
signatory, this is tantamount to Germany accepting the surrender of the member
states but particularly her victorious enemy ENGLAND with her sister nation
states of Wales and Scotland in TWO WORLD WARS.
MARCH-2009 |
MARCH-2009
|
UKIP LOST THE WAR TO FREE ENGLAND FROM
THE EU BUT THEY ARE STILL TALKING.
We have
for many years campaigned for ALL eurosceptic parties
/organisations [36] to unite under an unbrella label at
election time in order that EVERY NO VOTE is put into
ONE POT to recover our FREEDOM and COUNTRY.
The majority of the members of the GANG OF THREE
in PARLIAMENT should not receive YOUR VOTE as they
are a traitourous and deceitful and dishonest enemy of
the PEOPLE.
MARCH-2009 |
|
WHAT
IS THE POINT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION?
A
brief study of our relationship with ‘Brussels’ including
the case for the United Kingdom to leave the EU, and
the case to stay?
By
Lord Pearson
of Rannoch
|
WHAT
WE CAN LEARN AS WITH UNITED STATES OUR FOREIGN POLICY IS THREAT
TO LIBERTY AT HOME.
The
comparisons between our two countries are a mirror image at what
has happened to our society when foreign policy is decided by
the hawks and not the doves.
In the
173 pages of the 2008 edition of THE REVOLUTION-A MANIFESTO by
Ron Paul a best seller in the USA and as stated by the NEW YORK
TIMES -a BESTSELLER. And we know WHY?
MARCH-2009 |
THE REVOLUTION
A MANIFESTO
[2008]
by
Senator Ron Paul
-Republican of Texas-The People's Choice-Defender of the
American Constitution which has been undermined by Congress
and past Presidents since the days of Woodrow Wilson
who signed the Federal Reserve Bill which gave the world's
wealthiest bankers/corporation-a cartel a share of the bank
with unlimited plunder for years to come. Shortly
after he had signed the Federal Reserve Bill President
Woodrow Wilson realised the gravity of his action and
admitted later that on reflection he would NOT have done it
had he looked into the matter more closely. The American
taxpayer today is learning to its cost the effect of that
action from almost a century ago which placed THEIR BANK in
the hands of speculators and the enormous interest that has
been and still being paid by the American taxpayer on a debt
which will most likely never will be paid.
We now learn
that there are now Central Banks in Iraq and Afghanistan which will bring in
many more
billions in the years to come to those wealthy partners in the new adventures so
though one country was illegally invaded and another not left when the original
objective was obtained and the one country devastated with great loss of life
and displacement of population and infrastructure and the other now after
18years which we learn in April 2009 is almost controlled by the Taliban except
for a few areas around the capital. So in the midst of such barbaric
and illegal destruction some of those with a New World Order in mind are
investing in the future without delay
Federal Reserve Bank
[The purpose of showing
the work of Senator Ron Paul is that we applaud his mission
to Liberty and small government. Though the American
People have a written Constitution they have been for
decades witnessing the growth of BIG GOVERNMENT which
is threatening the true spirit of the original constitution.
The fight back by millions of Americans to stem or even
retard the intrusion of numerous government agencies is now
their biggest challenge. A message from Ron Paul on our
website gives his confident assurance that the tide of the
encroachment of Government can be turned around if all
who love LIBERTY join the FIGHT to regain control of our own
lives with the Government our SERVANTS and not as now in
America and England our MASTERS.]
*
Senator Ron
Paul identifies the problems on both sides
of the Atlantic;
'Ours is not
a fated existence, for nowhere is our
destiny etched in stone. In the final
analysis, the last line of defense in
support of FREEDOM and the CONSTITUTION
consists of THE PEOPLE themselves. IF THE
PEOPLE WANT TO BE FREE, if they want to lift
themselves out from underneath a STATE
apparatus that THREATENS THEIR LIBERTIES,
squanders their RESOURCES on
NEEDLESS WARS,
destroys the value of the DOLLAR, and spews
forth endless PROPAGANDA about how
indispensable it is and how lost we would be
without it, there is no force that can stop
them.
IF FREEDOM IS
WHAT YOU WANT, IT IS OURS FOR THE TAKING.
LET THE
REVOLUTION BEGIN.'
[last paragraphs of THE REVOLUTION-A
MANIFESTO by Ron Paul]
* www.gov.house/paul
MARCH-2009 |
WHAT YOU NEED
TO KNOW
DANGER
NOW!
*
Latest Info On The Microwave
Vertical Array
ELF Towers Being Erected Countrywide
ARE
THEY NEAR
YOU?
MARCH-2009 |
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
MARCH-2009 |
FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT MILLIONS OF CHRISTIANS WOULD
BE BARED FROM ISLAMIC STATES SO MUSLIMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DENIED ENTRY TO
ENGLAND.
Because of the stupidity of New
Labour who had an OPEN DOOR for immigration from the Muslim world
we now have within our country what one can term an
ENEMY WITHIN.
March-2009
|
[WORK IN PROGRESS] |
|
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
over Downing Street
|
WE AGREE WITH
FOREIGN SECRETARY DAVID MILIBAND THAT THE CASE OF
BINYAM MOHAMMED IS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY.
*
Jihadis
checking into rehab? I say NO!-NO!-NO!
by
LITTLEJOHN
[Daily Mail-Friday,
February 6, 2009.]
|
Boast that shows
the ignorance of Mandy Antoinette
by
Peter Oborne
[Daily Mail-February 2, 2009]
|
A WEEKLY VIEW OF THE EU
WHAT KIND OF EUROPEAN UNION IS IT?
FEBRUARY-2009 |
WORKERS OF
ENGLAND SCOTLAND AND WALES
YOU HAVE BEEN
BETRAYED!
FEBRUARY-2009 |
The EU plan
to ban our political parties and close down
PARLIAMENT?
FEBRUARY-2009 |
A WEEKLY VIEW OF THE EU
WHAT KIND OF EUROPEAN UNION IS IT?
EU FISHING POLICY
COSTS US BILLIONS
[Daily Mail-Monday, February 4-2009]
|
TIME IS NOW
RUNNING OUT TO SAVE YOUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY
*
GENERAL ELECTION IN
2010- EUROPEAN ELECTION IN JUNE-2009 -THE LAST
CHANCE BATTLE OF A UNITED EUROSCEPTIC VOTE
*
The VOTE must be
for COUNTRY and NOT for PARTY
FEBRUARY-2009 |
APPEASEMENT
IN 1938 TO NAZI PLAN FOR EUROPE -WAR IN 1939.
APPEASEMENT TO NAZI PLAN FOR EUROPE IN 2009 -SLAVERY
IN EUROPE IN 2010.
TIME IS
RUNNING OUT!
DON'T LET THEM GET WHAT TWO WORLD
WARS FAILED TO ACHIEVE
FEBRUARY-2009 |
YOU HAVE NO CHOICE
EITHER YOU HAVE A TRUE CHRISTIAN COUNTRY OR YOU WILL
HAVE A DEMONIC COUNTRY
WE HAVE ALL SEEN THE RESULT OVER
THE PAST DECADE WHERE WRONG IS REWARDED AND RIGHT IS NO
LONGER RECOGNISED.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
Hitler's 1940 blueprint for a German
dominated EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE has
almost been completed.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
A MATTER OF FAITH
-NOT ABSOLUTE TRUTH.
*
Faith, hope and
what's become of the new religion.
by
Andrew Alexander
[Daily Mail, February 6, 2009]
|
The Law Lords have betrayed their
sacred trust to uphold the 'Rights and Liberties of
Englishmen'
FEBRUARY-2009 |
IF YOUR FAVOURITE
FOOTBALL TEAM WAS TO BE DISBANDED IN A YEAR YOU WOULD
LOOK FOR ANOTHER TEAM TO SUPPORT. THE
CONSERVATIVE-LABOUR OR LIBDEMS ARE TO BE DISBANDED BY
THE EU
FEBRUARY-2009 |
BAN THE BANK
PAYOUTS FOR BANK FAILURE
FEBRUARY-2009 |
THE TRADE UNIONS
-DID IT; THE EMPLOYERS-DID IT; THE PUBLIC SECTOR
-DID IT- SO WHY WONT THE EUROSCEPTICS DO IT.
IT IS NO SECRET IT
IS CALLED
UNITY.
FEBRUARY-2009
|
NEW
LABOUR WHEN UNDER PRESSURE BASH THE FAR -RIGHT BUT
THEIR FAR-LEFT IS AS MURDEROUS AS HISTORY HAS AND
STILL SHOWS.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
THE DAY OF
THE JACKALS!
How four
so-called top bankers brought the country to
its knees and wonder what the fuss is all about.
'Never has
so few in a dire economic conflict suffered so
little and repenteth so little for so much disaster
to so many.'
FEBRUARY-2009 |
LORD RATS SCAMPER
AWAY FREE FOR CHANGING THE LAW FOR A FEE-
WHY?
FEBRUARY-2009 |
GORDON BROWN'S CITY
CRONIES
*
Revealed: the roll
call of bankers rewarded by Brown and Blair.
by
James Chapman
Deputy
Political Editor
[Daily Mail,
Thursday, February 12, 2009]
*
|
www.dailymail.co.uk/debate
FEBRUARY-2009 |
MELANIE
PHILLIPS- WRITING
EXCLUSIVELY FOR MAIL ONLINE
10th February
2009
|
By
James Slack, Home Affairs
Editor
12th February 2009
|
FEBRUARY-2009 |
By
Archbishop of York -John Sentamu
13th February 2009
|
DAILY TELEGRAPH
LEADER MISLEADS THE PEOPLE SUGGESTING REGIONS CAN BE
DISSOLVED WHEN THEY ARE TO REPLACE PARLIAMENT UNDER
LISBON TREATY.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
FEBRUARY-2009 |
HOW WELL DOES THE
EU MANAGE YOUR MONEY?
eurofacts@junepress.com
VOL 14 NO 9
13th February ,2009.
|
A FORMER OF MI5 HAS
CONFIRMED WE LIVE IN A POLICE STATE- IF ANYONE
WOULD KNOW SHE WOULD.
THE GOVERNMENT IS SIMPLY PREPARING US FOR THE
ULTIMATE POLICE STATE THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
Labour is
creating a police state, says former spy chief Dame
Stella
by
Kirsty Walker
Political reporter
[Daily
Mail-Tuesday, February 17,2009] ,
|
EUROPEAN UNION Q & A
|
THE THIRD
GREAT WONDER FROM THE NEW WORLD AFTER-MAN OF ALL
SEASONS -CROMWELL - NOW YOUNG QUEEN
VICTORIA-WHEN WILL MIRACLES CEASE?
*
Hollywood learns a
history lesson at LAST!
by
Andrew Roberts
[Daily
Telegraph-Wednesday, February 18, 2009]
|
Britain can be fixed-but not by a PM who wants to save the world.
by
Irwin Stelzer
[telegraph.co.uk/personal view]
[Daily Telegraph-Wednesday, February 18, 2009]
|
EUROPE, NATO AND THE 'FORMER'
REPUBLICS 'FALSE 'INDEPENDENCE'
FEBRUARY-2009 |
HOUSE OF LORDS COST US
£121 MILLION A YEAR -£18
MILLION ON
EXPENSES.
THEY GAVE AWAY OUR
CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY IN LEAGUE WITH THEIR
SOVEREIGN AND COMMONS -TRAITORS
ALL!
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
|
[WORK IN PROGRESS] |
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR JANUARY-2009 |
|
HE IS PART
IRON AND PART CLAY- HE IS THE LEADER OF THE
OPPOSITION- HE IS AN OPPORTUNIST AND NOT TO BE
TRUSTED BY EUROSCEPTICS
*
Dave
talks tough on Europe.
eurofacts-
30th January,2009
|
The Queen,
Treason and the
Coronation oath
JANUARY-2009 |
THEY HAVE SOLD YOUR
CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY TO A FOREIGN POWER - LEFT
US IN A MIGHTY MESS-BUT THEY WON'T
DEPART.
|
No2
-SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
JANUARY-2009 |
No 3
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 4
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 5
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 6
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 7
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 8
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 9
SOUND reasons to REJECT
the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 10
SOUND reasons to REJECT
the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
No 11
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
GREEDY BANKERS-AN
ARISTOCRACY OF CONFIDENCE TRICKSTERS.
*
Hanging bankers
from lamp-posts would do no one any good -but this
bonus gravy train is just an INSULT TO ALL OF US
by
MAX HASTINGS
[Daily
Mail-Tuesday, January 27,2009]
|
TINKER -TAILOR-
SPY?
*
The Bluebloods and
the Russians
Special REPORT
by
Ben Lawrence
JANUARY-2009 |
INSENSITIVE BASTARDS!
MOD TREAT BRITISH
WOUNDED BACK TO BACK WITH TALIBAN.
*
TROOPS ON SAME WARD
AS TALIBAN.
by
Matthew Hickley
Defence
Correspondent.
[Daily Mail
-Friday, January 23,2009]
|
A REAL JOB FOR OUR
EQUALITIES COMMISSION WHICH NEEDS THEIR HELP
NOW!
*
SPECIAL INVESTIGATION
from Andrew Malone
IN MUMBAI-INDIA.
JANUARY-2009
|
AN
APPEAL!
TO ALL
EUROSCEPTICS
AT HOME AND IN
EUROPE
THE
JUNE 2009 EU ELECTIONS
WILL SOON BE UPON US.
JANUARY-2009
|
OSTPOLITIK: DIALECTICAL GERMAN
ORIENTATION TO THE EAST.
As discussed in Part One,
Germany and the 'former' Soviet
Union are today bound together today
by bilateral treaties and secret
agreements concluded in 1990.
JANUARY-2009 |
HEAD OF
STATE OF THE FREE WORLD SITS OVER A CESSPOOL OF
CORRUPTION AND EVIL PURPOSE IT USES 'COMMON PURPOSE'
A TRAP TO SNARE THE RIGHTEOUSNESS
JANUARY-2009 |
MANY ARE DOING IT
-WHY NOT YOU?
*
RENUNCIATION
OF EU CITIZENSHIP
& EU CONSTITUTION
JANUARY-2009 |
MY LORDS-YOU ARE
COMMON CRIMINALS EVEN IF YOU DON'T THINK SO.
*
Nobles who are so
very obliging...
by
Peter McKay
[Daily Mail-Monday,
January 26,2009]
|
EUROPE, NATO AND THE 'FORMER'
REPUBLICS 'FALSE 'INDEPENDENCE'
As already discussed, the sudden
political rather than 'independence'
of the Soviet Republics 'declared'
one after the other in the course of
1991, conformed to the Leninist
model
JANUARY-2009 |
THE PUBLIC
PURSE IS BEING PLUNDERED BY PRIVATE BANKS -
POLITICIANS -PEERS -POLICE- PARTY DONORS- PUBLIC
PENSIONS and PRACTICALLY EVERYONE...
*
For quite a
few Coppers more
by
Peter McKay
[Daily
Mail-Monday, January 26,2009]
|
EUROPEAN BILATERAL TREATIES DRAFTED
BY THE GRU -SOVIET INTELLIGENCE.
When the author Christopher Story
interviewed Lady Thatcher in the
House of Commons in July 1991,
she had no knowledge of the
bilateral treaties which President
Gorbachev had been signing with key
targeted Western countries, and was
astonished at the
information
about these treaties shown to her
JANUARY-2009 |
cc. The
Home Secretary
Sir,
JANUARY-2009 |
THIS WAS OUR EIGHTH BULLETIN ON
INTRODUCING OUR BULLETIN FILE IN 2003 -WE ASK THE
SAME QUESTION TODAY IN JANUARY 2009.
PARLIAMENT IS OURS -A
LEGACY FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS
JANUARY-2009 |
The best summary of the six
EU treaties is the
Constitution
JANUARY-2009 |
THE
PRICIEST PEERS
TOP TEN
JANUARY-2009 |
30 YEAR SECRETS RULE
MAY BE REDUCED TO 15 -BUT WE NEED TIGHTER RULES TO
ENSURE ALL INFORMATION IS RETAINED.
Mr Paul Dacre
the Editor of the Daily Mail was a member of the Committee who where looking at
a reduction in the length of time before the release of sensitive
information. In the USA it is 5 years and we believe that that it the more
accountable time for the information to be made public. Our term of Parliament
is for a maximum of 5 years so why should we not know what dirty tricks they
have played with us then instead of 30 years later or even 15 years later?
JANUARY-2009 |
BLACK
OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU.
*
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW
www.worldreports.org
JANUARY-2009 |
IS GERMANY AWAITING
THE SYMBOLIC TRIUMPH OF ACCEPTING THE UNCONDITIONAL
SURRENDER OF THE OTHER EU STATES BEFORE COMPLETING
HER OWN RATIFICATION?
As over the past
hundred years and in January 2009 what matters to
the Germans is that their plans for a German
dominated Europe as the inheritance of Bismarck
- Kaiser and Hitler and in the aftermath of the
Second World War the First post-war Chancellor of
German Dr Konrad Adenauer up to the present day
German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
JANUARY-2009 |
THE EQUALITIES BILL
MUST BE STOPPED -IT IS ALL ABOUT MIND CONTROL AND
PRESERVING A DISCREDITED BAND WAGON.
We now have Trevor
Philips once chairman of the RACE RELATIONS BOARD
and later critic of MULTICULTURALISM and now head of
the replacement EQUALITIES and HUMAN RIGHTS
COMMISSION.
THIS IS AN
ORGANISM THAT FEEDS ON ITSELF.
JANUARY-2009 |
A WARNING
FROM HISTORY WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED
When Nick
Leeson bankrupted Barings Bank a few years
ago, he went to prison. yet the current
bunch of merchant bankers, who have brought
Britain to the verge of bankruptcy are
still in place
[WHY?]
and their
hoovering up waste salaries and nbonuses -at
TAXPAYER'S
EXPENCE.
JANUARY-2009 |
WHY KENNETH CLARKE
IS STILL THE ENEMY WITHIN WHO WOULD SELL OUR POUND
EVEN IF POLL SHOWS 71% ARE AGAINST.
This is not about
COUNTRY but about PARTY and that is how the
CONSERVATIVE
PARTY have been since 1972.
This
is a politician who made a point of stating that he
had never read the Maastricht Treaty, or as we have
often mentioned of Douglas Hurd (now Lord Hurd) who,
when he was Foreign Secretary was overheard after he
had signed the Maastricht Treaty -the OPEN DOOR to a
UNITED STATE OF EUROPE
'Well, we'd
better find out w hat we have just signed'
JANUARY-2009 |
A FOREIGN
CORRESPONDENT
In the
SOVIET
UNION
REPORTER SHOT
DEAD IN RUSSIA
INVESTIGATING
NEO-NAZISM
IN RUSSIA,
JANUARY-2009
|
DID YOU KNOW?
No
38
(Christopher Story of International
Currency Review)
EUROPE, NATO AND THE 'FORMER'
REPUBLICS 'FALSE 'INDEPENDENCE'
As
already discussed, the sudden
political rather than 'independence'
of the Soviet Republics 'declared'
one after the other in the course of
1991, conformed to the Leninist
model rather than to the
wishful-thinking of Western policy
makers.
www.worldreports.org
JANUARY-2009 |
HOUSE OF LORDS COST
US £121 MILLION A YEAR -£18 MILLION ON EXPENSES.
THEY GAVE AWAY OUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY IN
LEAGUE WITH THEIR SOVEREIGN AND COMMONS -TRAITORS
ALL!
*
THE LORDS of
EXCESS
by
Michael Lea
JANUARY-2009
|
DID YOU
KNOW!
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
Come with us for a
short travel through the 123 pages of the 295
Reasons of Vernon Coleman's
ENGLAND OUR
ENGLAND
www.vernoncoleman.com
JANUARY-2009 |
Index | Bill
of Rights | Additional
Amendments
[Constitution for the United
States of America][1]
We the People of the United
States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defence, promote the general
Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish
this Constitution for the United States of America.
JANUARY-2009 |
OUR ONCE
COMFORTABLE PLEASANT LAND IS NOW A VAST CROWDED
CHICKEN PEN.
Why Britain
[ENGLAND] mustn't
get any more crowded.
January- 2009
|
AN APPEAL!
TO ALL
EUROSCEPTICS
AT HOME AND IN
EUROPE
THE
JUNE 2009 EU ELECTIONS
WILL SOON BE
UPON US. WHATEVER YOUR PRESENT PARTY OR ORGANISATION
YOUR VOTE IS NEEDED FOR UNITY AND SUCCESS. TOO
MANY TIMES IN THE PAST THE EUROSCEPTIC VOTE HAS BEEN
WASTED FOR PARTY ADVANTAGE INSTEAD OF UNDER ONE
BANNER.
BE UNITED WITH ONE
VOICE
VOTE!
www.LIBERTAS.eu
JANUARY-2009 |
JANUARY-2009
|
[WORK IN PROGRESS] |
[As we have done on many occasions we
have given a list of bulletins which are available at the click of the button.
We also, as you are aware, have a system of open bulletins which enables you to
scroll through as you pass down through the web-site -This we will continue to
do but in general those bulletins which are OPEN will be those which it is most
important for you to consider. As we have said on many occasions the
CHOICE IS
YOURS!.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE RIGHT TO BE
CONSULTED-THE RIGHT TO ENCOURAGE-THE RIGHT
TO WARN
Yes! you have
guessed who we are talking about Her Majesty The Queen who
in 2008 traitorously signed the Lisbon Treaty ending over
1500 years of the rule of a MONARCH in England but for the
brief time when ENGLAND was governed by the great reformer
Oliver Cromwell who's fundamentals led to the Glorious
Revolution of 1689 and constitutional parliamentary
democracy.
Since that time we
have had many Monarchs on the throne but as far as we are
aware none who would have sold their people and country to
a foreign power as the present Queen who contrary to HER
OATH has done .
As a result of this
treasonable action by the Queen in 2008 in exchanging
English citizenship for European citizenship Her Majesty no
longer in reality is able to ask to be consulted by HER
equally traitorous PARLIAMENT who by a majority destroyed
the Constitution and therefore the immemorial
'Rights and
Liberties of Englishmen.
So prized by so many people the world over.
Once the members of PARLIAMENT knew that they
and its INSTITUTION would soon no longer exist what a golden
opportunity to make hay while the sun shines and fill their
pockets of taxpayer's money and for the greater majority it
was their own prize money for selling the people's
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY.
It appears there are
those who still believe the Ancient Constitution is in place
but the very Act of Parliament and signing by the Queen in
2008 of the EU TREATY with the connivance of the majority in
Parliament (unless the Lisbon Treaty is not ratified by
those nations who have yet to sign) our
CONSTITUTION is DEAD.
WHY this charade of conveying the impression
THAT THE QUEEN RULES
appears to be still maintained we are at a
loss to understand.
The following from the
respected
International Currency Review
has the following to say about the question
DOES THE QUEEN STILL
REIGN
and more specific
IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
SOVEREIGN?
Under Article 17 of the
collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the
European Union are citizens of the EU Collective. It
follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the
EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE
as well
This provides the twisted
rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of
the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence
that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he
continued to serve as President.
Dr Herzog's subversive
remarks have special resonance for Britain, where
QUEEN ELIZABETH II
is the
SOVEREIGN AND
CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD
of the
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT
BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.
She is the custodian, in
her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which
was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her
father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH of
ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised
at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been
recognised and universally accepted as the undoubted and
rightful
SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH
PEOPLE
In November 2000 -after a
correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case
thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair;
to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the
Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness jay; and
to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders
and dignitaries -asking:
Is Her Majesty the Queen
Sovereign?
HE
RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL
or else a non-committal
weak, diversionary reply.
Mr Blair being unable to
answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry to the
Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark
of the
BLAIR GOVERNMENT
has been its Ministers'
arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary
questions. Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point
on occasion, of'
' standing the Queen up'
by failing to turn up on
time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.
WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT
AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE
AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.
www.worldreports.org
By
the very signing in 2008 of the Lisbon treaty by Her
Majesty The Queen
She is no longer the
custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British
people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death
of her father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH
of ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised at the QUEEN'S
CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognised and
universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful
SOVEREIGN
of the BRITISH PEOPLE
The
EU is ille gal
under British law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have
committed five acts of Treason by signing five EU treaties
which will abolish our nation and replace
it with the EU.
In
order to avoid the charge of HIGH TREASON against the
QUEEN and PARLIAMENT in 1998 Tony Blair
had
to secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape
prosecution.
THE
Queen
has signed the sixth
and final EU Treaty in June,2008 the very much alive EU
Constitution makes it clear the EU will abolish the nations
of Britain and England
(and our Lib, Lab and Con parties, Reform Treaty clause
8A-4).
So with the above
information before our eyes we can but iterate our previous
conclusion which Simon Heffer so graphically described when
he stated that the MONARCHY would be a THEME PARK. We agreed
with him then and we would agree with him NOW! in
May-2009.
Our conclusion is that the once QUEEN does not REIGN but is
seeing before HER eyes the penalty of loss of HER COUNTRY
because SHE served other MASTERS who were interested in a
NEW WORLD ORDER and a WORLD GOVERNMENT. The Queen declined
to ACT to PROTECT HER PEOPLE and when the time came hid
behind the secrecy of the REPEAL of two LAWS of TREASON.
In
the words of our greatest poet William Shakespeare:
'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it
out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the
ensuing age abhorred.'
ALL who signed the Lisbon Treaty are as far as any
Englishman is concerned are guilty of HIGH TREASON because
without consulting the ENGLISH PEOPLE to release THEM from
THEIR OATHS they still are and will always remain TRAITORS.
*
WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
CONTINENT?
*
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH?
*
A MESSAGE from a PATRIOTIC HISTORIAN you can TRUST
EUROPEAN UNION
'worse
than its worst components'
*
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH
ABOUT THE EU FROM INDEPENDENT SOURCES
Publications
www.globalvision.net
Joint publications with the
TaxPayers' Alliance
Click here to visit the
The TaxPayers' Alliance website
'What next for Britain and
Europe'
-
A conference
sponsored by Global Vision and The Daily
Telegraph
Full details
EU
Reform Treaty Documents
Perspectives
- Professional insights into
specific EU issues.
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
|
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
www.globalvision.net
*
[We have included the above
information on the EU which will enable
everyone to look objectively at the question WHY
ARE WE IN THE EU the totalitarian police state
calling itself the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE? ]
*
EU QUANGOS
COSTING US ALL
£1,800.000.000
[Daily Mail,
Monday, February 23,2009]
DOZENS of
European Union QUANGOS costing taxpayers £1.8
billion a year are attacked today as 'not fit
for purpose'.
A report into
the growth of publicly funded EU AGENCIES said
many are duplicating work carried out at
NATIONAL LEVEL, and some were squeezing out
PRIVATE SECTOR rivals.
Until 1990,
there were only 2 EU QUANGOS. Then came 34 more
in 18 years, such as the COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY
OFFICE.
Most expensive
is the EUROPEAN RESEARCH AGENCY with an annual
budget of
£460,000,000
The Essential Guide to EU QUANGOS
2009, by the Economic research Council
think-tank and research group
www.globalvision.net
recommended
curbing their activities and even closing some.
It said the
QUANGOS were costing taxpayers £1.8billion a
year even though some-such as the EU's trademark
registration office-were self-financing. Ruth
Lee of GLOBAL VISION said the QUANGOS were
'symptomatic of an EU which fails to appreciate
that MEMBER STATES' economies can only RECOVER
and eventually PROSPER in a world which favours
INNOVATION over BUREAUCRACY and FLEXIBILITY over
CENTRALISED RIGIDITY'.
They are simply
not fit for purpose in the 21st century.'
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining used-Comments in
Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
EU
wipes England
off the map - as
Gordon Brown flies the
flag of St George
over Downing Street
Brought
forward from 23 April 2008
[This
bulletin will remain in this space until
after the EU election on June 4, 2009
and until after the next GENERAL
ELECTION as a reminder that the best way
forward is to deny the main
parties and their EU enthusiasts a
reward for selling YOUR COUNTRY to a
FOREIGN POWER.
www.MailOnline.co.uk
The
Tories have issued a St George's Day
rallying cry against plans by Brussels
to "wipe England off the map" and create
a United Europe.
[What a cheek they have! It is
more than a little late for the
CONSERVATIVE
PARTY which has signed every EU TREATY
put before them and in particular the
MAASTRICHT TREATY the OPEN DOOR to the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE and the
destruction of our Monarchy-Parliament
and Country of 1500 years in the making
ENGLAND.
After the signing the Treaty in 1992,
Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd was
overheard saying to his fellow
conspirator in crime Francis Maud
'We'd
better find what we have just signed'
Conservative MEP's are obsessed with
changing the EU but have nothing
substantial to show after 36 years for it. In the eyes
of the EU they are the ''' useful idiots
'
who year after year promise change
without any success.]
As
Gordon Brown hoisted the English
national flag over 10 Downing Street to
celebrate St George's Day, it was
revealed that EU officials had revised a
map wiping out the country
[of ENGLAND]
and the
[ENGLISH]
Channel.The
change splits England into three and
lumps those parts together with chunks
of other countries to create
"transnational regions".
Flying the flag: The cross of St
George over No 10 Downing Street
today
It is claimed these zones - which have
been allocated their own budgets - are
intended to boost trade between EU
nations.
[The true
fact is that our trade with EU is less
than they with us. They could not
continue to pay the bills if we were not
in the EU. The trade deficit since
joining the EU in 1973 is £383.7
Billion. How many
hospitals-schools-higher pensions for
pensioners who receive a pittance
compared to those in GERMANY and FRANCE and many
other European Regions. We
are the second major contributor to the
EU funds. That is WHY if a GOVERNMENT
had the grit and guts of Margaret
Thatcher they could change the EU by
withholding their contribution until
those changes had taken place. The Iron
Lady in her day had a Bill of Parliament
printed ready to implement should they
turn down HER REQUEST for a reduction in
OUR CONTRIBUTION and SHE WON but that
war monger and nation destroyer and now
candidate for Presidency of the United
States of Europe Tony Blair gave much of
it away
FOR
NOTHING in RETURN. ]
But the Tories yesterday accused the
Government of trying "to create a
European super state via the back door".
['We've
heard it all before'
[Well!
the so-called Conservative Party has
been doing just this since
Edward
Heath -a
Nazi
traitor for over 60 years was
reported to MI5 by the MASTER of Balliol
College A .D. Lindsay just before the
Second World War. When Heath was Prime
Minister he lied to the people about the
true intentions of the EUROPEAN UNION
which included a UNITED STATES of EUROPE
based a a plan by Himmler at the Nazi
Geopoliticall
Centre in
Madrid
in 1943 when the Germans realised that
they would lose the war but they were
determined to conquer by stealth with
their new weapon of a UNITED EUROPE to
win their objective of a German
controlled Europe which had to include
their most feared enemy- as many would
say ENGLAND as it would be a threat to
its political and economic ambitions.
What two World Wars could not achieve
the majority of MPs of the GANG of THREE
and with the QUEEN against their OATHS
in JUNE 2008 destroyed OUR
CONSTITUTION-OUR FREEDOM- OUR COUNTRY
and now wish to be rewarded with YOUR
VOTE for THEIR TREACHERY]
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG,
counties along England's south coast
form the "Manche Region" along with
northern France.
Divide and rule: How the South-East
has been paired up with regions
across the Channel
The "Atlantic Region" takes in western
England, along with Ireland, Wales and
parts of Portugal, Spain, France and
Scotland.
Meanwhile eastern England is part of the
"North Sea Region", which covers areas
of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium,
Norway and the Netherlands.
Gordon Brown: Celebrating
Englishness
The UK Government is fully behind the
project, even though the words "England"
and "Britain" are left off official maps
of each area and the Manche Region
renames the English Channel "The Channel
Sea".
Each region, which will be given
taxpayers' money to promote trade links,
cultural ties, transport policies and
tourism, is to be run by a "managing
authority" of unelected officials
overseen by a director.
None will be based in the UK, with
Manche ruled by the French, Atlantic by
the Portuguese and North Sea by the
Danes.
The regions have legal status and Manche
has a budget of £261million between 2007
and 2013, Atlantic £127million and North
Sea £219million.
Every project funded by a region must
have a publicity campaign which ensures
"there is provision for flying the EU
flag at least one week every year".
Eric Pickles, the Conservatives'
communities spokesman, said: "We already
knew that Gordon Brown had hoisted the
white flag of surrender to the European
Constitution.
[What nonsense the
Conservative
spokesman speaks when their party has
been flying the white flag of surrender
to the EU for over 36 years.
St
George, played by historical
interpreter Alan Larson, does his
best at dispatching the Dragon at
Scarborough Castle
"Now the Labour Government has been
caught red-handed conspiring with
European bureaucrats to create a
European superstate via the back door.
"Gordon Brown literally wants to wipe
England off the map."
But a spokesman for the Department for
Communities and Local Government
insisted: "It has nothing to do with
altering names on maps.
"It is about support for business,
helping boost employment and turning
around deprived areas... helping firms
in Kent do business with people in
Northern France or promoting joint
tourism initiatives between different
countries."
[The fact
of the matter is that WALES and SCOTLAND
will retain their territorial integrity
but as already explained ENGLAND will
for the first time for over 1500 years
be divided up and given over to our past
enemies while as our Great War leader
Winston Churchill challenged the House
before the Second World War
' GERMANY
IS GROWING STRONGER
and
WE ARE
GROWING WEAKER'
WE have been BETRAYED
by the GANG of THREE in WESTMINSTER and
they should NOT be REWARDED for their
TREACHERY.
Winston Churchill
warned in a speech in the Mansion House
London in 1953 that we should be careful
of those who are always looking for
change, and history has as so often in
the past proved him correct .But
he would have been astonished to put it
mildly that his own party had ignored
his
WARNING.
A
St George's Day flag flies next to a
statue of Sir Winston Churchill in
London's Parliament Square today
The
move came as Gordon Brown ordered that
all UK Government buildings with two
flag poles should fly the cross of St
George alongside the union banner.
It
follows a review of flag flying
practices. Number 10 will in future fly
the Scottish and Welsh flags on their
patron saints' days.
Northern Ireland does not have an
official national flag, and so the same
practice will not apply on St Patrick's
Day.
"The
Prime Minister's view is that of course
we should celebrate our Britishness, but
celebrating our Britishness does not
mean we cannot also celebrate our
Englishness, Scottishness, Welshness or
Northern Irishness," said the spokesman.
The
English flag last flew over Downing
Street during the 2006 World Cup.
*
[The
Conservatives have their eye on
the forthcoming
2009 European
Elections and could even include
a General Election and their
pretence of being a patriotic
party was blown away over 36
years ago. Vote for the smaller
parties for a change and throw
the majority unpatriotic
expensive time wasters out on
the dole. A look at the Regions
/States of Germany will show
that the integrity of their
territory is intact.
It is said
what the Pan-Germans mean when
they say other Europeans can
tame the naturally aggressive
and acquisitive tendency to
augment the German race -in
translation is that the
Lebensraum' they seek is the
space vacated by abolishing
the sovereignty of all the other
regional nation states,
with the exception of
Germany hiding behind a 'mask of
federalism':
THIS: is the new
'Lebensraum'. The Germans
have got clean away with their
dastardly plan because of the
stupidity over 36 years of
British politicians who still in
2009
in the forthcoming European
Election will continue to be
'useful
idiots'
by claiming they can change the
EU for the better. They have no
chance whatsoever to do so and
they know so but they cannot
admit they have been fooled for
so long. We shall no doubt have
the same plea 'of change'
from the prospective
Conservative MEP for the West
Midlands Philip Bushill-Mathews.
He needs taken quietly to one
side and told that
Brussels rules Britannia
as he
appears to have some doubt about
it.
The Germans
have yet to ratify the Lisbon
Treaty because their
Constitutional Court has matters
yet to be dealt with before that
can take place. They seem
intent to ratify their treaty
ONLY after every other country
has done so. What a wonderful
propaganda victory and their
revenge for losing TWO WORLD
WARS as to accept the surrender
of all their previous foes but
particularly a country called
England which they have longed
to cut up to destruction.]
*
VOTE!
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
Who will
either change the EU for the
better or finally show all EU
fanatics that in Margaret
Thatcher's phrase
[They're]
not for change.
We believe
that the FUNDAMENTALS cannot be
changed because the Nazi
blueprint does not allow for
such change. They will
tinker around the edges and give
concessions as they will offer
to IRELAND in order to get them
on side but the reality is that
whatever they offer CAN BE LATER
TAKEN AWAY.]
*
TREATY OF
TREASON
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
Write Down this Mirror web site
address of educate-yourself.org in Switzerland in case you
cannot access any page at this web site (our thanks to Stephanie
Meier for maintaining this mirror): http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org/
[Editor's Note: May 31, 2006.
Somewhere between May 18 and May 30, 2006, this mind control index
page was surreptitiously erased from my web server and even from my
hard drive. Apparently, someone doesn't want this topic ventilated
before the public. I had to retrive an old copy of this Mind Control
index page from a disc which I had saved in November 2005, therefore
the more recent articles which I had posted on this page up to April
2006 will not appear in this version, but will be restored shortly
after I've had a chance to retrive this page from a mirror site
which was recently established in Europe. Thankfully, the
synchronistic offer to set up the mirror site in early May from a
very thoughtful person in Switzerland, came at just the right time.
I will publish the url of the mirror site as soon as I find the
e-mail sent to me by the person who set up the mirror site. .
For victims of electronic or psychic assault,
Be
sure to see section titled "Countermeasures to
Psychotronic and Demonic Attack.
We give
but two paragraphs of the article here:
The topic of mind control is
elaborate, multifaceted, and multi layered. For the casual
reader, it can quickly become numbing, overwhelming the senses
and creating a desire to exit the topic, but avoiding this
subject is the most foolish thing you could possibly do since
your only chance of surviving this hideous and insidious
enslavement agenda, which today threatens virtually all of
humanity, isto understand how it functions and
take steps to reduce your vulnerability.
The plans to create a mind
controlled workers society have been in place for a long time.
The current technology grew out of experiments that the Nazis
started before World War II and intensified during the time of
the Nazi concentration camps when an unlimited supply of
children and adults were available for experimentation. We've
heard about the inhumane medical experiments performed on
concentration camp prisoners, but no word was ever mentioned by
the media and the TV documentaries of the mind control
experiments. That was not to be divulged to the American public.
Mind control technologies can be broadly divided into two
subsets: trauma-based or
electronic-based.
Don't
complain in the future as you will about losing YOUR FREEDOM-YOUR
CONSTITUTION -YOUR COUNTRY and soon if you are still not AWAKE
YOUR MIND!
Please
Note: Should you at any time be unable to access www.educate-yourself
website articles on our pages then go to:
http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org
.Ken]
By Ken Adachi <Editor@educate-yourself.org>
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/index.shtml
*
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
BANKERS RULE THE WORLD.
WHY WE NEED A PEOPLE'S BANK
WHICH LENDS MONEY TO GOVERNMENT WITHOUT INTEREST
Throughout history international bankers have
influenced the events of the day. We are particularly interested
with the period since 1775 when the Colonists in the New World were
forced to obtain their loans from the Bank of England at INTEREST
,whereas the Americans had introduced their own system which allowed
the Colonies to obtain money from their own resources for GOVERNMENT
spending WITHOUT INTEREST. It was a major cause of the eventual
split with the MOTHER COUNTRY.
Why should we be concerned by this today in
April,2009? Because Gordon Brown is on a great spending spree which
international bankers love to see as the more the Bank of England
and Reserve Bank of America prints their currency which is borrowed
by their GOVERNMENT at INTEREST there follows the extra interest
which must be added which accumulates over time so that the
outstanding DEBT never can be PAID but continue remorselessly out of
control.
And as the narrator on the
video below emphasises we are
ALL NOTHING more than SLAVES
The Act for Federal Reserve Bank of America was
passed in 1913, by President Woodrow Wilson while almost everyone
was enjoying Christmas. Years later he regretted his action as he
soon realised his great mistake as he saw that the real power broker
of his country was not CONGRESS but the international BANKERS.
IMAGINE if you could if we could next week
do what the early colonists did by having THEIR BANK which loaned
GOVERNMENT without INTEREST.
The saved billions could transform the lives of those in our Island
Home and if the system was world-wide would benefit everyone on our
PLANET.
SO in SUBSTANCE we already have a WORLD GOVERNMENT
of INTERNATIONAL BANKERS who CONTROL GOVERNMENTS the WORLD OVER.
The history of this sorry tale is explained by the
following video:
Federal Reserve Bank
Notice if you will that you are most unlikely to
hear this matter discussed in the financial papers of the day.
Remember NOTHING HAPPENS in this WORLD that is not in the 'INTEREST'
of those INTERNATIONAL BANKERS.
*
Federal Reserve Bank
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
Europe’s Constitutional Treaty: A
Threat to Democracy and How to Avoid It
By
Declan J. Ganley
Volume 4, Number 5
December 2003
Declan J. Ganley is
an Irish entrepreneur and founder of wireless broadband and cable TV
businesses in Western, Central, and Eastern Europe. In the early
1990s he built what became the largest private forestry company in
the former Soviet Union. He serves on the Futures Group of the Irish
Government’s Information Society Commission.
Many observers view former president of France
Valery Giscard d’Estaing as having labored tirelessly in the
interests of his nation and Europe over the course of his life of
public service. But Giscard d’Estaing now presides over the Brussels
convention charged with producing a draft constitution for the
future of Europe, the very concept of which is an attack on
democracy in Europe and a subversion of Europe’s citizenry.
“Democracy” derives from the ancient Greek word
for “the rule of the people.” Invented in Europe, its ideals have
spread to the far corners of the globe. It has become our way of
life in Europe and something we take for granted. It cannot be taken
from us or relegated to the role of symbolic chattel while Giscard
d’Estaing and his convention transfer its key functions to Brussels.
Throughout Europe’s history, those who attempt to take from the
people that which is theirs ultimately fail; one can only hope that
the convention’s usurpation of the European agenda seems similarly
destined to fail.
Benjamin Franklin famously said, “Any society that
would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will
deserve neither and lose both.” European citizens must pay attention
to and act on the draft constitution for the future of Europe that
the convention’s logrolling has produced. Unless they do, a serious
assault will have been carried out by the European elite represented
by the convention, which will further encroach on Europe’s
libertarian democratic society and its ability to hold those who
govern accountable for their actions. If the convention succeeds,
Europe’s future may be headed down a very dangerous path.
The draft constitution represents the political
bureaucracy’s attempt to consolidate its hold over the
decision-making process in the EU, which affects Europeans’ daily
lives in fundamental ways. Should it come to pass, the constitution
would call for a presidential head of Europe, in the role of the
president of the European Council, who will have global recognition
as president of the Union, in whose election the people will have no
say. Their vote and opinion are neither required nor desired.
A foreign affairs minister would oversee the tract
in the draft, that “member states shall actively and unreservedly
support the Union’s common foreign and security policy in a spirit
of loyalty and mutual solidarity. They shall refrain from action
contrary to the Union’s interests or likely to undermine its
effectiveness.” Of course, the (non-popularly elected) president and
his or her foreign minister would be unlikely to display what Chirac
earlier this year identified as the “bad behavior” and signs of
being “badly brought up” of the annoying, democratically elected
leaders of Central and Eastern European states.
The president and minister will be hand-picked by
the Brussels bureaucracy. The European minister for foreign affairs,
who will represent European interests to the world, will not have
been appointed by a president elected by Europeans. It is already
the case that Europeans did not elect those responsible for the
policy that underpins the Euro. The governor of the European Central
Bank is neither directly nor indirectly accountable to the
citizenry. This means that Western Europeans live in a far less
accountable society than they did only a decade or so ago. Sweden’s
rejection of the Euro in its recent referendum is a sign that
Europeans recognise this fact and require accountability from those
setting monetary and other policy. The many areas over which they
have ceded or will be ceding power to Brussels include employment
regulation, industry, transport, communications, justice, health,
agriculture, fisheries, and important aspects of defence. The
national veto is to be abolished in no fewer than 50 new areas,
including immigration and asylum. The draft constitution also
ratifies that EU law will have primacy over member states.
[As we have already pointed out it would be
impossible for the EU to make any major changes to its CONSTITUTION
because it is the exact copy of Himmler's PLAN for EUROPE which was
finally put into being in the Nazi
Geopolitical Centre in
Madrid in
1943 when it was accepted that the Nazis would lose the WAR. Our
support of
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
is because that even those who agree about a
EUROPEAN UNION which WE DO NOT nevertheless it WILL PROVE to the EU
FANATICS that the FAULT is in their passionate adherence to a
TOTALITARIAN ideal which any Nazis still living will smile with
quiet satisfaction that what they could not complete in TWO WORLD
WARS they have DONE by the willing cooperation of ENGLAND'S
QUEEN and the majority of members of our once respected and
honourable Houses of PARLIAMENT.]
FOR FULL TRANSCRIPT
and
Bureaucracy vs. Democracy
*
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
TREATY OF TREASON
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments
in brackets]
APRIL-2009
|
|
INDIVIDUALISM IS HATED BY TOTALITARIAN
GOVERNMENTS -RACISM ENCOURAGED BY SUPPORTING GROUP COLLECTIVISM
.
*
Senator Ron Paul a
consistently lone voice in the Congress of the United States of
America becoming known as Dr NO in defending the Constitution
from violations because of overbearing Presidents, wrote the
following in his book
THE REVOLUTION-The Manifesto.
Our purpose is to show that whatever is
brought to light by the above defender of the People has a
connection with what has happened in our country over the past
few decades but particularly under New Labour.
The following section of which we are
wholeheartedly with him is from his work on THE CONSTITUTION:
No form of political organisation,-is immune
to cruel abuses like the Jim Crow laws, whereby government sets
out to legislate on how groups of human beings are allowed to
interact with one another. peaceful civil disobedience to
unjust laws, which I support with every fiber of my being, can
sometimes be necessary at any level of GOVERNMENT.
IT FALLS UPON THE PEOPLE IN THE LAST RESORT
TO STAND AGAINST INJUSTICE NO MATTER WHERE IT OCCURS.
In the long run, the only way racism can be
overcome is through the philosophy of
INDIVIDUALISM.
[In the run-up to the 1997 General Election
and as prospective candidate for the English Democratic Party in
the Warwick/Leamington constituency we were interviewed by a BBC
reporter who was intent by his questioning to reveal a racist
attitude and our answer was in substance not so different from
that of Senator Ron Paul as we laid great emphasis on the
INDIVIDUAL Englishman or Women of whatever background but united
as one PEOPLE.]
which I have promoted throughout my life. our
rights come to us not because we belong to some group, but our
rights come to us as
INDIVIDUALS.
And it is as individuals that we should judge
one another. Racism is a particularly odious form of
collectivism whereby individuals are treated not on their merits
but on the basis of
GROUP IDENTITY.
Nothing in my political philosophy, which is
the exact opposite of the racial totalitarianism of the
twentieth century, gives aid or comfort to such thing. To the
contrary, my philosophy of
INDIVIDUALISM
is the most radical intellectual challenge to
racism ever posed.
GOVERNMENTS exacerbates racial thinking and
undermines INDIVIDUALISM because its very existence encourages
people to organize along racial lines in order to lobby for
benefits for
THEIR GROUP.
That LOBBYING, in turn creates animosity and
suspicion among all groups, each of which believes that it is
getting LESS of its FAIR SHARE than the OTHERS.
INSTEAD, we should quit thinking in terms of
RACE - YES. in 2008 it is still necessary to say that we should
STOP THINKING in terms of RACE - and recognize that FREEDOM and
PROSPERITY benefit all Americans. As Thomas Sowell points out,
LOBBYISTS for various RACIAL GROUPS will spend all their time
trying to enact programs that specifically HELP THEIR GROUP,
even though that group would reap far more benefit from
advancing ECONOMIC FREEDOM in general.
[We have looked at every
statement in Ron Paul's 173 page Declaration of Common Sense and
we find that we are in complete agreement with him on ALL the
issues he has raised. His staggering success in the USA has
meant that he is constantly before the MEDIA as the principled
opponent of the YES! brigade who question little and ignore
THEIR CONSTITUTION as we find happens in ENGLAND in 2009 where
they have gone one step further and the GANG OF THREE in
PARLIAMENT have sold THEIR CONSTITUTION and THEIR COUNTRY to a
FOREIGN POWER. Apart from a few GOOD MEN and WOMEN the majority
should find themselves out on the street after the coming
elections. That is WHY we have said that those parasite's who
have betrayed us and robbed us, should be shown the door at the
next EUROPEAN and GENERAL ELECTIONS and give YOUR VOTE to the
smaller parties who WILL LISTEN to YOU!. ]
PART 2
*
http://www.house.
gov/paul
*
APRIL -2009
|
|
ARE YOU HAVING A MOBILE MAST IN YOUR VILLAGE RIGHT
NOW?
AN
SOS.
Well! with just a few week's notice give to our
village on the edge of the South Warwickshire countryside we have
been informed that they intend to decorate a tree standing on high
ground with a magnificent view of the un-spoilt English landscape with a
40foot mobile phone mast, there being NO other monstrosity evident
on the road encircling the unblemished village. They also state
that it must be painted black and not green which would at least
disguise the existence of its intrusive existence. Possibly as this
tactic has been used so many times they are embarrassed by the whole
affair.
We are told there is no proven case that the radio waves
DO HARM.
whereas there is a growing international research
which disputes this fact. A few clicks into GOOGLE will bring up a
great deal of pertinent information, there is even an instance of a
cancer cluster with one death in a Warwickshire village all ready and
no doubt there are many others throughout the country. In this
particular tragedy the mast WAS REMOVED. Only lower emissions can reduce the risk
as shown by the Switzerland study.
Our case is :
1] there is a children's play area within 20
metres approximately 60 feet.
2] the location of the antenna & boxes is on a
place where children are prone to play and in themselves pose a
hazard; the adjacent Severn Trent Water station acts as a place for
them to congregate being so close to the playing field, and there
appear to be no measures to protect against this corner which is busy and
unsighted to pedestrians/ children crossing at this place.
3] the antenna themselves when wet crackle and
would be
A NOISE NUISANCE.
4] The main mobile companies including O2, have
a mast sharing agreement; there is no evidence that any action has
been taken to
USE EXISTING MASTS.
The nature of 3g or g3 radio waves is currently a
matter of concern in particular & one of our group has a special
interest being already experiencing a danger to health in an area
already known to be a health risk which could be fatal should the
project be implemented.
From our brief search on the internet there does
not appear to be a nation-wide organisation which can be called upon
to coordinate action against the growing curse of mobile phone
masts.
A doctor in the local practice was one of the
first to raise concerns of the matter has contacted the relevant
authorities. We are expecting that we have only a few weeks to
mobilise our villagers to show
THAT THEY ALSO CARE.
A PETITION is being passed around the village and
has already shown that people do care about their community . Their
support can stop this diabolical mischief which is a danger to OUR
HEALTH and a blot on the landscape which should NOT be permitted in
our beautiful Warwickshire countryside.
What is also most alarming is that local
accountability is being undermined by what appears a change of
attitude of many councillors who seem to consider that they owe
their allegiance elsewhere and instead of with their fellow
citizens. We found it necessary to speak to the councillors and
explain that they cannot leave it to one lady to lead the fight back
and that they should take a lead and we have been told that we will
hear next Wednesday the 15th April with ONLY five days left . They
appeared to be shell shocked because no member of the parish council
had yet taken a decision to lead the important action which without
exaggeration was a matter of LIFE and DEATH as we had already
learned that in another Warwickshire village a cancer cluster had
appeared and one person had died and as a result the mast WAS
REMOVED.
Fortunately, there is now a swell of support
gaining ground within the community itself without their councillor's
active support, who are now aware of the danger to their community
and are fighting back. To show how arrogant the powers that be are
we went into the Ofcom- sitefinder of Radio masts in Warwickshire
which brought up the site being contested as already a notified site
in existence.
If there had been an emergency of another kind we
are sure that the matter would have been dealt with by the councillor's without delay but because one cannot SEE the danger
which with its emissions can be compared if we could see it to what
one would see in a dense smog which has resulted by an industrial
chimney stack which is sending into the atmosphere volumes of thick black acrid
smoke. To those who know about radiation it is called e-smog.
What is also a matter for concern is that this
attitude of not realising the greater danger has meant that a
connecting village which is pursuing another matter of dispute has
to some of the persons involved in its leadership not considered
that the greater enemy to their village is in the fact the matter of
LIFE and DEATH which involves the Radio mobile mast but they
are so fearful of distracting from their own objective that they do
not appear to be rising to the dangers to everyone in the village
which will affect them 24 hours a day throughout their lives. Should
the Radio mobile mast be erected they will soon learn to their cost
their partisan attitude had possibly contributed to the failure to
prevent the installation in the first place.
In a case mentioned in the website
www.computor-clear.com/radiation_and_health.pdf
In a Leicestershire village of Countesthorpe they
have been campaigning for three years to move a mobile phone mast
which they say is a health hazard.
More than 1,000 people have signed a petition
opposing the mast. At the meeting, residents hoped that they would
hear that removal was now possible option, but instead given the
news that 60 days must pass while a statutory consultation exercise
goes on .
It is far better to prevent the installation of
the health hazard from the beginning as the above case study has
revealed.
We have compared the dilatory way which is
happening over Radio mobile masts as similar to the early years of
the battle to find out the truth about the tobacco threat to health
which was obscured for years by the powerful and wealthy industry
which is still paying out claims of compensation which are now no
doubt being paid for by the profits from the considerable
number of new customers in the Third World.
In a decade or less the litigation of those proved
to have been affected by emissions will amount to millions at first
and later as with the cigarette industry to billions. The greatest
tragedy of the whole affair is that it will affect every living
being from the child in the womb and to an even even greater extent
to the young children who are now using mobile phones which have
become a common necessity and where their brains will be adversely
affected and their general health deteriorate to make them old
before their time.
The only beneficiaries will be the LEGAL
PROFESSION who as they did on smoking and asbestos and other
complaints must be already gearing up to make millions in processing
the number of claims that will soon be flooding into their offices.
With regard to our own battleground we shall keep you all posted as to the outcome
which we hope will be in our favour but the evidence already before
us is not at all comforting - but the fight goes on.
If there are any others which have been affected
by the same callous behaviour and have information which could be of
help in our CAUSE would you PLEASE sent the details to:
Pat Beal
6 , Friary Road, Hampton Magna, Budbrooke,
Warwick, Warwickshire England, CV 35 8TD
TEL 01926/498924.
*
There are many studies from across the world on
the effects of
RADIATION to HEALTH
The internet has many other studies to support the
study below.
www.computor-clear.com/radiation_and_health.pdf
*
www.educate-yourself.org
But GOOGLE will have many others for you to view.
In is only in the last few
weeks that we have displayed the dangers inherent in mobile phone
masts and the following articles below will remind YOU of the
DANGERS which exist under a totalitarian regime.
Should we be victims of
their evil satanic plans you will see our website being plagued with
viruses and we have already come under attack in the last few days
and if their mobile mast works as it should we shall not be getting
many comfortable nights in the future and our minds will have to fend
for themselves. But we must not be gloomy as for the people of our
island home are just beginning to awaken from their long sleep and
they will not like what they see happening around them and will we
hope question the actions of those who are turning our country into
a TOTALITARIAN STATE.
*
A visit to the ofcom website:
http://www.sitefinder.ofcom.org.uk/
will show that the post code CV35 8TD brings up
the map of the village as an already existing site.
*
APRIL -2009
|
|
www.hese-project.org/en/
h.e.s.e.-UK News
THE
Dangers
TO
Children in an
electromagnetic environment
It is an inescapable fact that the planet
today is a complete cacophony of man-made electromagnetic fields
and signals. It is as if a wild party is going on in what used
to be a quiet open space. Maybe it seems that many of us can
stand the noise and are resilient to the fields, and
particularly to the structures within modern digital
communications signals that lie within the range of frequencies
that our bodies use for normal healthy well-being.
All living things on Earth evolved over many
millions of years through a wildly changing environment,
surviving many changes, such as an oxygen-rich environment,
which once were competely toxic to most of life, but became
essential for our form of life. Slow adaptation over such
prolonged periods changed the nature of organisms; life itself
survived but few life forms did. We need therefore to be very
aware that the electromagnetic environment today is grossly out
or proportion to that we evolved within, filtered by natural
magnetic fields and our ionosphere.
If survival of the fittest is an acceptable
price for modern conveniences, we should be aware that the ‘less
fit’ includes our children, whose development in this changed
environment may affect their whole-life chances. In this
context, a home where everyone uses a mobile phone, uses DECT
phones and wireless routers and accepts everything wireless is
easier, better and without consequence, has become a blind spot
of natural precaution. At one very obvious end of the spectrum
is the hard sell of mobile phones to toddlers. Part of the sell
is that no-one is safe without one. Not true of course, but it
sounds persuasive. Perhaps, rather, no-one is safe with
one. Certainly, clamping a microwave transmitter of highly
structured signals onto your head is not a good idea, if you do
it very often, or for very long. And a very bad idea for a young
child. Some countries are becoming more precautionary at this
level, advising against it (even the UK, though it is not
government-endorsed action).
So what about wireless games? These too are an
addition to the electromagnetic burden in the home, and despite
the sell (again) that games improve the mind or the body, they
too are an unwise addition for a growing child. Music, books and
exercise with a ball will achieve the same healthy outcomes, but
of course make rather less money. The social context is another
aspect: children’s lives are more complex, more difficult, and
according to recent research reports, probably less happy
(though more entertained) than they used to be. We, the adult
world, the parents, are responsible for being duped by eternal
consumerism and pursuit of wealth and possessions, and it is we
who are imposing an increasingly dangerous electromagnetic
environment on this planet – and our children.
Do you think that the wealth of research
showing that life interacts with the environment
elctromagnetically, leaves us immune to the enormous changes we
have made? Like man-made climate change, we are not too small
and insignificant to alter the well-being of our planet and our
species. Can you recommend these developments?:
BioInitiative Report
A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public
Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)
An international working group of scientists,
researchers and public health policy professionals (The
BioInitiative Working Group) has released its report on
electromagnetic fields (EMF) and health. They document serious
scientific concerns about current limits regulating how much EMF
is allowable from power lines, cell phones, and many other
sources of EMF exposure in daily life.
The report concludes the existing standards
for public safety are inadequate to protect public health.
Europe-wide survey of public perceptions about
mobile phone and mast radiation
Two in three believe radiation from phones
damaged their health according to a
European survey reported in the Independent on Sunday, 8
July 2007.
‘Two-thirds of Britons believe radiation from
mobile phones and their masts has affected their health, a
startling official survey shows. And huge majorities are
dissatisfied with government assurances about the potential
threat.’
The EU Eurobarometer survey polled more
than 27,000 people across the continent, 1,375 of them in
Britain. Chair of the Health Protection Agency, Sir William
Stewart appears not to have the support of the Agency’s
Radiation Protection Division. Whilst their statements remain
questionable and unconvincing (eg,
about
wi-fi, Sir William recently said on BBC Panorama, ‘I
believe that there is a need for a review of the Wi-Fi and other
areas ... I think it’s timely for it to be done
NOW!
I believe mobile phones /
masts have affected my health
|
mobile phones
|
phone masts
|
UK |
65% |
71% |
Europe |
73% |
76% |
EU, 2002 |
55% |
58% |
Source: EU Eurobarometer
*
[ FOR FULL TRANSCRIPT WHICH WILL NOT
DISAPPOINT YOU CLICK]
PART 2
|
|
THE TRUTH
CAMPAIGN
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
STRANGER THAN FICTION
AN
INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM
By: Dr. Albert D. Pastore Phd.
(Appeared in Truth Campaign issues 27 and
28 - then attributed to 'Anonymous')
Author hereby
grants full permission to reproduce
and mass distribute this paper for
non-commercial use.
“All truth passes through three
stages. First, it is ridiculed,
second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as
self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher, 1788-1860
"History is indeed little more
than the register of crimes,
follies, and misfortunes of mankind
- Edward Gibbon British historian,
1737-1794 From Decline and Fall of
Roman Empire
OPENING STATEMENT
The ancient Greek
philosopher Socrates taught his
students that the pursuit of truth
can only begin once they start to
question and analyze every belief
that they ever held dear. If a
certain belief passes the tests of
evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the
belief should not only be discarded,
but the thinker must also then
question why he was led to
believe the erroneous information in
the first place. Not surprisingly,
this type of teaching didn't sit
well with the ruling elite of
Greece. Many political leaders
throughout history have always
sought to mislead the thinking of
the masses. Socrates was tried for
"subversion" and for "corrupting the
youth". He was then forced to take
his own life by drinking poison.
It's never easy being an independent
thinker! Today, our ruling
government/media complex doesn't
kill people for pursuing the truth
about the world (at least not
yet!) They simply label them as
"extremists" or "paranoid",
destroying careers and reputations
in the process. For many, that's a
fate even worse than drinking poison
hemlock!
Every news story
you are about to review in this
research paper is true and easily
verifiable. This investigation
represents 10 months of careful
study, research, analysis, source
verification and logical deduction.
Every event and quote presented here
is 100% accurate. There are about
200 detailed footnotes which I
encourage, no, urge, readers
to explore and verify for
themselves. The Internet version of
this paper will allow users to
obtain instant verification
for each and every footnote by
clicking on the footnotes/links.
Others can obtain easy verification
by entering the key search words
(provided at the end of the paper)
into the Yahoo or Google.com
search engines. Due to the fact that
well organized efforts are under way
to suppress these facts, some of
these news links are mysteriously
disappearing even as we speak.
Fortunately, this information has
all been transcribed by many
websites and has therefore been
preserved from the censors. These
footnote searches will take you
directly to the news sites of many
well known established media
organizations throughout the world
as well as opening up doors to a
world of knowledge and information
that has been concealed from you.
With just a little common sense and
a few clicks of a mouse, Google and
Yahoo now enable anyone with an
ounce of curiosity to become a
Sherlock Holmes.
This is no opinion
piece. Rather it is a collection of
buried, but undeniable facts,
events, and quotes which, when
assembled in one place, will state
their own conclusions. In putting
together this research in a logical
and sequential format,
great care was taken to confirm,
double confirm, and triple confirm
every piece of information.
Any and all questionable data which
could not be independently verified
to this author’s satisfaction was
discarded.
Taken
individually, each story, quote and
event may not amount to a full case.
But when taken collectively, this
mountain of facts should hammer home
the truth to even the most skeptical
reader. There are of course those
who have fallen under the hypnotic
spell of the TV talking-heads and
"experts" whom they worship as
authority figures. Unaccustomed to
thinking for themselves, no amount
of truth can sway them from their
preconceived prejudices. They
will even deny that which they see
with their own eyes. They
are victims of a psychological
affliction known as "the lemming
effect". Lemmings are small rodents
who have been observed to follow
each other as they charge to their
deaths into raging rivers or even
off of cliffs. Lemminghood is an
innate psychological phenomenon,
present in most mammals and
observable in common people as well
the most sophisticated and educated
elites. Lemminghood is not an
intellectual phenomenon - it is
psychological. As such, no
socio-economic class is immune to
its strangulating effect. A grant-
seeking university scientist can be
a lemming just as much as a fashion
obsessed teen-age girl. One blindly
follows the latest trendy theory
while the other follows the latest
clothing style. What's the
difference? Neither can resist the
force of nature.
The power to fit
in with one's social peers can be
irresistible. To a human lemming,
the logic behind an opinion doesn't
count as much as the power and
popularity behind an opinion.
Man, like lemming, behaves
collectively. And it could be no
other way. Naturally, the individual
must be equipped with this trait.
Otherwise, the smallest steps toward
civilization could never have been
made. Lemminghood is a survival
trait, an inborn instinct in the
majority of people. However, as with
all natural phenomena, this tendency
can be manipulated and used for
harmful purposes. It is this lemming
effect which enables entire segments
of a society to lose their sense of
judgment all at the same time.
This research
paper will likely be wasted on many
lemmings. For lemmings, denial
is a basic psychological defense
mechanism used to not only shield
themselves from unpleasant
realities,
but also to reassure
themselves that they will still fit
within the acceptable range of
opinion held by their peer group.
Lemmings are absolutely terrified at
the thought of being labeled as an
"extremist" or a "conspiracy
theorist". At all costs, their
beliefs must always be on the
“right” side of the issue and
conform within the boundaries of
their lemming peers. Lemmings simply
cannot bear the burden of
responsibility, or the social
discomfort, which comes with
thinking independently. They will
resist any efforts to change their
misguided beliefs with all their
mental energy. We can try to open
their closed minds and free them
from their self-imposed blindness,
but it’s not easy fighting the force
of human nature. The chains of
ideological conformity have too
strong of a grip, and breaking them
is a difficult task. With the
limited resources at our disposal,
it is next to impossible to compete
with the media lemming-masters. The
lie of the emperor is always
believed before the truth of the
peasant. Nevertheless, some of us
must make the meager attempt, and
thus lay the foundation upon which
the truth might one day rise again.
There are those
few among us who do possess both the
courage and intellectual capacity to
break free of the shackles of
lemminghood and accept the truth
when it is presented in a clear and
logical sequence. To those open
minded and independent thinkers I
wish to state clearly and
unequivocally. I intend to set
forth in this paper an overwhelming
body of evidence which should
forever destroy the ridiculous
notion that some Saudi Arabian
caveman and his band of
half-trained, nerdy Arab flight
school attendees, orchestrated the
most sophisticated terror operation
in world history. The very
idea is utterly laughable. And yet,
due to the blithering barrage of
bullshit dished out by the
government/media complex, millions
of "patriotic" Americans have
accepted this fantastic fairy tale,
this moronic mendacity, this silly
superstition, this dangerous
delusion, with a religious
conviction bordering on insanity. As
an admittedly useless public service
to my helplessly misinformed
countrymen of today, and as a gift
to a posterity which will hopefully
be more enlightened than my
bewildered contemporaries, I have
published this research so as to
liberate as many people as I can
from the oppressive yoke of media
brainwashing and state sponsored
lies. Do you have what it takes to
break free from the lemming mob? If
so, read on!
SOCRATES TAKES
POISON CUP. ARE YOU A THINKER……. OR
A LEMMING?
THE DANCING
ISRAELIS
[while the TWIN
TOWERS were collapsing]
TO FOLLOW in PART 2
*
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
[MAKE SURE YOU ARE
SITTING COMFORTABLY FOR THE
'EXPLOSIVE' ACCOUNT OF 9/11 -YOU
WONT FORGET IT!]
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining &
Bolding-Comments in Brackets]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
|
Learning pride in national
identity
St
George's Day 23 April
by
John Boyd
[This
article has been brought forward from 1999 and we all know how
things have gone from bad to worse to the point that in 2008 our
country was sold to a FOREIGN POWER aginst the CORONATION OATH
of HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and the Oaths of the majority of
TRAITOROUS members of YOUR PARLIAMENT. It is with great regret
that we have not a OLIVER CROMWELL in our day to clear the
dishonourable traitorous majority from the most HALLOWED piece
of ENGLAND to which ALL ENGLISHMEN looked for THEIR FREEDOM and
JUSTICE with the world's unique parliamentary democracy which
is today in April 2009 but a past memory, Soon there
will be but REGIONS which themselves will be short lived if the
NEW WORLD ORDER are able to complete their sinister plan of a
WORLD GOVERNMENT.
A PEOLE who are NOT VIGILANT about THEIR FREEDOMS are themselves
the unwitting supporters of the instigators of their OWN DESTRUCTION.
'The condition upon which God
hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance'
John Philpot Curran
(1730-1817)
The
23rd April is taken to celebrate both St George’s day, patron
saint of England, and birthday of the great English bard,
William Shakespeare. In fact not much is known about either the
knight or the playwright. St George was probably not English and
hardly stepped on English soil and certainly did not kill a
dragon.
Without doubt it is now
commonly accepted in sports, athletic circles and events that
the English Cross represents England. The incorrect waving of
the Union Flag, or Jack, for England is fast disappearing.
Painting of faces with the English cross at recent world cup
events was an expression of national sentiment, English national
sentiment, by ordinary and working class people. The Scots,
Welsh and Irish have no qualms about who they are and what
nation they belong to and what flag they fly they certainly do
not consider themselves British except some Unionists in the six
counties of Northern Ireland. Although it is becoming clearer,
we the English, are still a little mixed up about whether we are
English or just "British". This is because England was the apex
of the British Empire which in fact was an English Empire where
fag ends persist today in Gibraltar, Northern Ireland, Falkland
Isles and several other spots around the world.
The
term "British" was highlighted in the days of imperialism to rub
out the idea of nations and nationalities. The apt and current
parallel form of imperialism is now being consolidated by
European Union. Wales and Scotland are to be merely regions and
not nations. England is divided into several regions like the
rest of the EU. Some Euro-regions straddle national boundaries.
According to the Treaty on European Union we are all supposed to
become "European Citizens" with duties and rights as yet
unspecified. Apart from one or two exceptions, according to
international law, you cannot be a citizen of two states at the
same time. This means we are intended to be citizens of a
superstate and lose our national identity as part of the process
of taking away the powers of nation states and national
governments, thereby national democracy and all forms of
democracy.
To
progress democracy into the economic and other fields requires
real socialism. The prerequisites of socialism are therefore
national independence and national democracy. Hence the thrust
to European Union is the antithesis of democracy, national
independence and socialism.
A nation state and
national government is strongest when the nation is the
strongest.
In the case of Britain
this entails several nations and peoples whatever class they
come from. A current example of the strength of a nation
irrespective of class is that of the Serb nation who have united
against the illegal and barbaric NATO bombing.
Socialism and
nationalism are not comparable just as flour and electricity are
not comparable. Socialism is an economic system where production
and appropriation proceed together in common but where personal
consumption is related to personal contribution. Nationalism or
patriotism does not define a system of society but can define a
sentiment, doctrine or movement. In the context of today’s
political situation, nationalism or patriotism has the aim of
securing national independence, an aim which is democratic but
not inherently socialist. Therefore it is the duty of all
socialists to be the best democrats and the best nationalists or
patriots.
The action of NATO in
the Balkans and intense rivalries between the imperialist powers
involved is to shred the UN Charter and international law,
especially the right to self determination of nation states. The
object of European Union with a single currency and single army
is to completely take away the right of EU member states to
their own self determination. European Union is being
consolidated as a capitalist corporatist superstate to suit
transnational capital. It is big capital which is opposed to
nationalism, nation states, national democracy and all forms of
democracy. The anti-thesis of transnational capital is therefore
the nation state, nationalism or patriotism and democracy.
Some of the factors
which bind a nation together include a common language, history,
geographical area, economic system, culture and democracy.
Democracy requires the minority to accept majority decisions and
can only happen within a nation state and not between nation
states. Britain is a multi-cultural, multi-racial, multi-nation
state comprises three predominant nations and part of the Irish
nation. This mini-Common Market is dominated by England. Britain
in turn is now subjugate over vast areas of economic, political
and military life to the European Union superstate. This is done
through common policies, laws, directives and regulations on
foreign policy and a European Army, a single currency even
though we have not joined the last stage of economic and
monetary union, agriculture, steel , shipbuilding, coal
production, fishing grounds, trans-European roads, judicial
system, taxation via VAT and so on.
A full understanding of
the importance of what is called the "National Question" is
required to broaden the anti-EU movement in Britain where all
classes take part, especially the working class and the
organisations of the labour movement who normally represent
them.
The Irish, Scots, Welsh
and ethnic minorities in Britain are mostly clear who they are
and proud of their nationality. It is the English who have to
learn further their nationality and that is why the English
cross and the English national day of St George are important.
There should b a national holiday on 23rd April in addition to
May Day and alongside St Andrew’s Day, St David’s Day and St
Patrick’s Day. The peasants in their 1381 revolt had no problem
in flying the English cross in their irregular army and we today
should not be afraid to do so either, whether this be an
expression of our utter disgust and opposition to Britain’s part
in NATO or in the struggle to extricate ourselves from the
prison of European Union.
[1999]
[THE
SPIRIT OF ENGLAND]
The words of Henry, Lord Brougham
in 1844 in his work on the Constitution had the following advice
to future generations:
...the chief advantage
of free institutions is their enabling men to obtain a wise and
an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of
Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps
those who live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers,
aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and above all,
that no
Constitution, however excellent, can supersede the necessity or
dispense with the duty of this constant vigilance.
WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED
*
First published in the
Morning Star on 23 April 1999 - a paper opposed to
Britain's membership of European Union, opposed the undeclared
war and NATO bombing in the Balkans and is a daily paper of the
left.
Partly based on a CAEF
discussion pamphlet by John Boyd - "European Union, National
Independence and Democracy"
Available for £1.27 (or 5x27p stamps) post free from CAEF, 57
Green Lane, Merseyside CH45 8JQ
----------
Democrat contents page
CAEF details page
Home page
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
THE
TRUTH CAMPAIGN
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
STRANGER THAN
FICTION
AN
INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND
THE WAR ON TERRORISM
By: Dr. Albert D.
Pastore Phd.
(Appeared in Truth
Campaign issues 27 and 28 - then
attributed to 'Anonymous')
PART
1
THE DANCING ISRAELIS
Like most Americans, I was
gripped by senses of profound shock,
horror, revulsion, sadness, and rage
as I watched the horror of September
11, 2001 unfolding live on my
television screen. Watching the mass
murder of thousands of innocent
people live on television was the
most upsetting experience of my
life. How could any person of sound
moral character not be enraged at
witnessing this horrific act of
barbarism? To read about some
faraway, long-ago genocide in a
newspaper or a book is distressing
enough. But to actually witness
the mass murders of what was, at
first, believed to have been tens of
thousands of innocent people is
truly heart stopping and traumatic.
I barely slept for two nights
afterwards and suffered nightmares.
Polling data would later reveal that
65% of Americans actually shed tears
on 9-11.
(1)
But not all of the eye-witnesses
to the 9-11 slaughter were so
saddened. On September 11, five
Israeli army veterans were arrested
by the FBI after several witnesses
saw them “dancing“,
“high-fiving“, and “celebrating”
as they took pictures of the
World Trade Center disaster from
across the river in New Jersey.
Steven Gordon was the lawyer who
volunteered to represent the five
Israelis. He was asked by a Hebrew
newspaper why the five men were
being detained by the FBI. Here’s
what Gordon told Yediot America:
"On the day of the disaster,
three of the
five boys went up on
the roof of the building where the
company office is located," said
Gordon. "I'm not sure if they saw
the twin towers collapse, but, in
any event, they photographed the
ruins right afterwards. One of the
neighbors who saw them called the
police and claimed they were posing,
dancing and laughing, against the
background of the burning towers….
"Anyhow, the three left the roof,
took an Urban truck, and drove to a
parking lot, located about a
five-minute drive from the offices.
They parked, stood on the roof of
the truck to get a better view of
the destroyed towers and took
photographs. A woman who was in the
building above the lot testified
that she saw them smiling and
exchanging high-fives. She and
another neighbor called the police
and reported on Middle-Eastern
looking people dancing on the truck.
They copied and reported the license
plates.
(2)
The Ha’aretz new service of
Israel reported:
“The Foreign Ministry said it had
been informed by the consulate in
New York that the FBI had arrested
the five for "puzzling behavior."
They are said to have had been
caught videotaping the disaster and
shouting in what was
interpreted as cries of joy and
mockery.”
(2b)
(emphasis added)
Ha’aretz went on to describe how
the FBI field agents then subjected
the five Israelis to days of brutal
interrogation, torture, and solitary
confinement.
When their photos were developed,
it was revealed that the dancing
Israelis were smiling in the
foreground of the New York massacre.
(3)
According to ABC’s 20/20 attempted
whitewash of the incident, in
addition to their outrageous and
highly suspicious behavior, the five
also had in their possession the
following items; box-cutters,
European passports, and $4700 cash
hidden in a sock.
(4)
Why were these Israeli agents so
happy about the horrible massacre
that was unfolding right before
their very eyes? What evil spirit
could possess people who are
supposed to be America's "allies",
and who receive billions of dollars
in financial and military aid from
US taxpayers each year , to publicly
rejoice as innocent people
(including many American Jews)
were burning to death and jumping
out of 110 story buildings? Could it
be that these happy Israeli army
veterans were in some way linked to
this monstrous attack? That’s what
officials close to the investigation
initially told The Bergen Record
newspaper of New Jersey.
(5)
As incredible, as ridiculous,
and as "paranoid" as that belief may
appear to you at this point, the
fact is that certain elements within
the Israeli government, and
International Zionist movement in
general, have a long history of
attacking the USA and framing Arabs
in order to gain support from the
US. Before we begin to piece
together what really transpired on
9-11, it is absolutely critical that
we first review some historical
precedents regarding Israel's and
International Zionism's treacherous
history of manipulating America (and
other nations) for their own selfish
purposes. Without a basic
understanding of this history, it
would be impossible to understand
the truth as it is today. So put
aside your preconceived notions,
your psychological defense
mechanisms, and your prejudices, and
step into my time machine for a
journey down the memory hole.
SHOCK. RAGE.
GRIEF. HORRIFIED WITNESS REACT TO
9-11
*
FULL TRANSCRIPT in
PART 2
[SIT COMFORTABLY BECAUSE IT IS A LONG
READ WHICH WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE- AND FORGET IT -YOU WILL NOT]
*
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining Used-Comments in
Brackets]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
THE GOVERNMENT HAS IT'S
EUROPE MINISTER-WHY HAVEN'T THE EUROSCEPTICS THEIR OWN SUPREMO?
Over the past years we have mentioned this on
countless occasions as it is obvious to anyone that the EUROSCEPTIC
strategy-if they ever had one-HAS FAILED.
All that was needed was a CONFERENCE to form a
CONGRESS of sorts where ALL EUROSCEPTICS across the political
spectrum to co-ordinate to select candidates for the umbrella
organisation under a unifying banner for example
FREEDOM IN EUROPE
or other suitable appendage bearing in mind the
multiplicity of views amongst the EUROSCEPTICS.
But as we have seen over the decades there have
been numerous contenders at the EU ELECTIONS each fighting their own
corner for the plum jobs in the EU PARLIAMENT.
What we have seen is each party pursuing its own
glory instead of fighting with others to FREE EUROPE from TYRANNY.
They have been building up their own EMPIRE by
putting PARTY before COUNTRY.
They should ALL UNITE under ONE BANNER in order
that ALL who wish to see change in the EU (which is impossible
because the fault is in its blueprint) which was planned in
Madrid in 1943 at the
Nazi
International
Geopolitical Centre
which Himmler realised that the
WAR CANNOT
BE WON.
That is why when the Czech President addressed the
EU PARLIAMENT and suggested CHANGE the majority of MEPS left the
HALL. They all know which side their bread was buttered and no way
are they going to relinquish such a wonderful job with such benefits
which has made them all millionaires before they are up for
election again. And they can never lose as the pensions will see
them secure for life.
Anyone who has taken the trouble to research the
evil-satanic monstrosity going by the name of the UNITED STATES OF
EUROPE knows that it is incapable of FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE. It will
however give way temporary on certain matters in order to complete
its plans of a concentration camp EUROPE which will as they had
hoped destroy the INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM and CONSCIENCE so that there is
no dissension or barrier to their final plans of NEW WORLD ORDER
leading to a WORLD GOVERNMENT.
WHY NOT ask your party why they have not decided
to UNITE with OTHERS for the GREATER GOOD and take a leaf out of the
INDEPENDENT LABOUR PARTY in the late 19th century and early 20th
century and the LABOUR MOVEMENT which in order to bring the mass of
workers under ONE BANNER felt the obvious need of a NATIONAL
CONGRESS to achieve their means for CHANGE.
Whether you are LEFT-RIGHT
or CENTRE or any other combination you must yourselves have no
trouble in seeing that only a UNITED MOVEMENT can achieve their
final VICTORY.
.
Might we suggest a slogan
'WE ARE ONE AND WE HAVE THE EU ON THE RUN.'
and
'AT PRESENT IT IS JUST A GAME BUT SOON WE WILL
BREAK THE CHAIN'
BUT WILL THEY DO IT !
www.worldreports.org.uk
*
[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]
APRIL-2009
|
|
A VIEW FROM AMERICA
No
1
ON
Freedom From Government
President Obama signed an
executive order last week continuing the faith-based initiatives
program created by former President Bush. When the program was
created, I warned that giving taxpayer money to private religious
organizations would eventually lead to political control and
manipulation of them. This week has provided some evidence that
this was a justified concern.
The logic behind funding
faith-based initiatives seemed reasonable to some. Private
organizations are much more effective in charitable endeavors than
government programs and bureaucracies. Therefore, why not
“outsource” some of the government’s welfare-state activities to
these worthy organizations? This appealed to many conservatives,
especially after the follow-up executive order exempting recipients
from discriminatory hiring laws, which assured many that taking
federal funds would not jeopardize their control over their own
operations. But beware the government program started under an
administration you like, for it may look a lot different under the
one you don’t. Exemptions that Bush gave, Obama can take away.
But now, dependencies on
federal money have been set, operations have been expanded
accordingly, and many charities are waiting breathlessly for the
administration to tell them what new conditions they will have to
meet. With the stroke of a pen, religious charities might not be
able to take into consideration a job applicant’s faith, sexual
orientation or lifestyle if they wish to remain eligible for that
taxpayer money that was so enticing a few years ago. Similarly, if
FOCA (Freedom of Choice Act) is passed, will Catholic Church
hospitals be forced to offer abortion services to retain their
federal funding? Can they remain solvent without it?
This is the major problem with
basing a private business model on the receipt of government funds.
This money does not come without control, or the future possibility
of control. We are seeing parallel control grabs in industries that
have recently been the recipients of taxpayer largess. Government
officials are now discussing executive compensation on Wall Street,
banking, and in the auto industry. How much is too much to pay
someone? When is a bonus deserved? But because politicians have
bought their way into these industries, these are now political
decisions. It is easy to utilize class envy to whip up public
support for these interventions, but government always slides down
the slippery slope. Politicians are also discussing other aspects
of these businesses in which they are not expert, such as, what
should lending standards be? What sort of cars should we direct the
auto industry to make? Once government money infiltrates a balance
sheet, “taxpayers” meaning “politicians” have a say in how you
operate.
Money is the Trojan horse that
government uses to infiltrate and infect organizations. Funding
that, on the outset, is designed to strengthen and support, will
bureaucratize and regulate in the end. It is sad to see charities
now having reason to focus on lobbying, regulatory compliance and
paper pushing to get and retain money taken by force, rather than
beefing up private, voluntary fundraising activities.
Those tempted to join
Washington’s ongoing bailout bonanza should instead take the famed
advice of former First Lady Nancy Reagan on the acceptance of
harmful and addictive substances and
“Just Say No” to government money.
This
is the best protection from government control.
*
Posted
by Ron Paul-Republican
Http://house.gov/paul
(02-09-2009, 12:04 PM)
filed under
Civil Liberties
[It all sounds so
familiar here in England at the present time. Everything that is
destructive of society first comes from the LAND OF THE FREE[?]-not
any longer with their own so-called mischievous and freedom
destroying
PATRIOT ACT.]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets.]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
A VIEW FROM AMERICA
No2
Texas Straight Talk
A weekly column
End the War on Drugs
[We
have always been of the opinion
that allowing an open market on
drugs would not work but as the
many replies to this article
have stated the matter should be
dealt with as with alcohol.
Further evidence has proved
conclusively that GOVERNMENTS
who themselves deal in drugs
through their security services
who use their profits for their
hidden agenda [www.worldreports.org]
In an open market the value of
the drugs will fall and those
who have used the restrictions
in order to capture the market
at great profit and with
increased power will see their
evil fortunes smashed and their
influence dissipate overnight]
*
We have recently heard many
shocking stories of brutal
killings and ruthless violence
related to drug cartels warring
with Mexican and US officials.
It is approaching the fever
pitch of a full blown crisis.
Unfortunately, the
administration is not likely to
waste this opportunity to
further expand government.
Hopefully, we can take a deep
breath and look at history for
the optimal way to deal with
this dangerous situation, which
is not unprecedented.
Alcohol prohibition in the
1920’s brought similar violence,
gangs, lawlessness, corruption
and brutality. The reason for
the violence was not that making
and selling alcohol was
inherently dangerous. The
violence came about because of
the creation of a brutal black
market which also drove profits
through the roof. These profits
enabled criminals like Al Capone
to become incredibly wealthy,
and militantly defensive of that
wealth. Al Capone saw the
repeal of Prohibition as a great
threat, and indeed smuggling
operations and gangland violence
fell apart after repeal. Today,
picking up a bottle of wine for
dinner is a relatively benign
transaction, and beer trucks
travel openly and peacefully
along their distribution routes.
Similarly today, the best way to
fight violent drug cartels would
be to pull the rug out from
under their profits by bringing
these transactions out into the
sunlight. People who, unwisely,
buy drugs would hardly opt for
the back alley criminal dealer
as a source, if a
coffeehouse-style dispensary was
an option. Moreover, a
law-abiding dispensary is likely
to check ID’s and refuse sale to
minors, as bars and ABC stores
tend to do very diligently.
Think of all the time and
resources law enforcement could
save if they could instead focus
on violent crimes, instead of
this impossible nanny-state
mandate of saving people from
themselves!
If these reasons don’t convince
the drug warriors, I would urge
them to go back to the
Constitution and consider where
there is any authority to
prohibit private personal
choices like this. All of our
freedoms – the freedom of
religion and assembly, the
freedom of speech, the right to
bear arms, the right to be free
from unnecessary government
searches and seizures – stem
from the precept that you own
yourself and are responsible for
your own choices. Prohibition
laws negate self-ownership and
are an absolute affront to the
principles of freedom. I
disagree vehemently with the
recreational use of drugs, but
at the same time, if people are
only free to make good
decisions, they are not truly
free. In any case, states
should decide for themselves how
to handle these issues and the
federal government should
respect their choices.
My great concern is that instead
of dealing deliberatively with
the actual problems, Congress
will be pressed again to act
quickly without much thought or
debate. I can’t think of a
single problem we haven’t made
worse that way. The panic
generated by the looming crisis
in Mexico should not be
redirected into curtailing more
rights, especially our second
amendment rights, as seems to be
in the works. Certainly, more
gun laws in response to this
violence will only serve to
disarm lawful citizens. This is
something to watch out for and
stand up against.
We
have escalated the drug war
enough to see it only escalates
the violence and profits
associated with drugs.
It is time to try freedom
instead.
Posted
by Ron Paul-Republican
Http://house.gov/paul
(02-09-2009, 12:04 PM)
filed under
Civil Liberties
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets.]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
The
Bilderbergers
A
NEW WORLD ORDER
AND
WORLD GOVERNMENT
In 1954, the most powerful men in the world
met for the first time under the auspices of the Dutch royal
crown and the Rockefeller family in the luxurious Hotel
Bilderberg of the small Dutch town of Oosterbeck. For an
entire weekend they debated the future of the world. When it
was over, they decided to meet once every year to exchange
ideas and analyze international affairs. They named
themselves the Bilderberg Club. Since then, they have
gathered yearly in a luxurious hotel somewhere in the world
arrogantly plotting the subversion and silent takeover of
constitutional governments everywhere. Their goal is a World
Government run exclusively by their hand-picked puppets.
Shrewd
and calculating, their hearts are filled with lust for power
and consumed by greed for money. Rich and aristocratic, they
despise Christians and they loathe the lowly working class.
They control the world's press and virtually all our banks
and financial institutions. They screen and choose who
America's leaders will be and even determine who will run on
the Democratic and Republican Party tickets. It was shortly
after attending the 1991 Bilderberger meeting, Governor Bill
Clinton was selected to be the next President of the United
States. Bill Clinton and White House advisor Vernon Jordan's
relationship goes back to it's Bilderberger connections.
Among the elitist membership or attendees at Bilderberg
meetings is David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Lloyd
Bentsen, Helmut Kohl, Prince Charles, Prince Juan Carlos,
Katharine Graham, Alice Rivlin, Gerald Ford, Bill Clinton,
Hillary Clinton, Dan Quayle, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin L.
Powell, John Edwards, Bill Bradley, Bill Richardson,
Christopher Dodd, Dianne Feinstein, Kathleen Sebelius
(Kansas governor and Obama pick for HHS secretary),
Alexander Haig, Ralph E. Reed, George Stephanopoulos,
William J McDonough & Timothy F. Geithner (Presidents,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York), George Soros, Paul
Volcker & Alan Greenspan (former Chairman of the Federal
Reserve), H. J. Heinz II (CEO of H. J. Heinz Company), Peter
A. Thiel (Co-Founder, PayPal), Eric E. Schmidt (Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, Google), Lloyd Blankfein (CEO of
Goldman Sachs), Rupert Murdoch, Donald E. Graham (Chairman
of the Board of The Washington Post Company), William F.
Buckley, Jr. (founder of National Review and former host of
Firing Line), Peter Jennings, George Will, Lesley Stahl,
Bill D. Moyers, and many others. The list includes prominent
persons in politics, the military, financial institutions,
major corporations, academia, and the media.
Leaders of the Bilderberg Club argue that
discretion is necessary to allow participants in the debates
to speak freely without being on the record or reported
publicly. Wikipedia recently deleted the Bilderberg
attendees list, citing it to be possibly defamatory towards
living persons.
Why are the Davos World Economic Forum and G8 meetings
carried in every newspaper, given front page coverage, with
thousands of journalists in attendance, while no one covers
Bilderberg Club meetings even though they are annually
attended by Presidents of the International Monetary Fund,
The World Bank, Federal Reserve, chairmen of 100 most
powerful corporations in the world such as DaimlerChrysler,
Coca Cola, British Petroleum, Chase Manhattan Bank, American
Express, Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, Vice Presidents of the
United States, Directors of the CIA and the FBI, General
Secretaries of NATO, American Senators and members of
Congress, European Prime Ministers and leaders of opposition
parties, top editors and CEOs of the leading newspapers in
the world.
"We
are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times,
Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors
have attended our meetings and respected their promises of
discretion for almost forty years. It would have been
impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we
had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those
years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared
to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is
surely preferable to the national auto-determination
practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller
Bilderbergers Planned Kosovo War in 1996
Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And
Resources For A New Century
A premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' was
planned by George Bush and his cabinet long before
the
events of 9/11 and even before he took power in
January 2001. The blueprint for the creation of a 'global
Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld,
Paul Wolfowitz, and others in September 2000 by the
neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American
Century (PNAC).
Links to other sites exposing the New
World Order
Links to the Left promoting the New
World Order
OTHER
MARCH-2009
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
MARCH-2009
|
|
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
Write Down this Mirror web site
address of educate-yourself.org in Switzerland in case you
cannot access any page at this web site (our thanks to Stephanie
Meier for maintaining this mirror): http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org/
[Editor's Note: May 31, 2006.
Somewhere between May 18 and May 30, 2006, this mind control index
page was surreptitiously erased from my web server and even from my
hard drive. Apparently, someone doesn't want this topic ventilated
before the public. I had to retrive an old copy of this Mind Control
index page from a disc which I had saved in November 2005, therefore
the more recent articles which I had posted on this page up to April
2006 will not appear in this version, but will be restored shortly
after I've had a chance to retrive this page from a mirror site
which was recently established in Europe. Thankfully, the
synchronistic offer to set up the mirror site in early May from a
very thoughtful person in Switzerland, came at just the right time.
I will publish the url of the mirror site as soon as I find the
e-mail sent to me by the person who set up the mirror site. .
For victims of electronic or psychic assault,
Be
sure to see section titled "Countermeasures to
Psychotronic and Demonic Attack.
We give
but two paragraphs of the article here:
The topic of mind control is
elaborate, multifaceted, and multi layered. For the casual
reader, it can quickly become numbing, overwhelming the senses
and creating a desire to exit the topic, but avoiding this
subject is the most foolish thing you could possibly do since
your only chance of surviving this hideous and insidious
enslavement agenda, which today threatens virtually all of
humanity, isto understand how it functions and
take steps to reduce your vulnerability.
The plans to create a mind
controlled workers society have been in place for a long time.
The current technology grew out of experiments that the Nazis
started before World War II and intensified during the time of
the Nazi concentration camps when an unlimited supply of
children and adults were available for experimentation. We've
heard about the inhumane medical experiments performed on
concentration camp prisoners, but no word was ever mentioned by
the media and the TV documentaries of the mind control
experiments. That was not to be divulged to the American public.
Mind control technologies can be broadly divided into two
subsets: trauma-based or
electronic-based.
Don't
complain in the future as you will about losing YOUR FREEDOM-YOUR
CONSTITUTION -YOUR COUNTRY and soon if you are still not AWAKE
YOUR MIND!
Please
Note: Should you at any time be unable to access www.educate-yourself
website articles on our pages then go to:
http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org
.Ken]
By Ken Adachi <Editor@educate-yourself.org>
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/index.shtml
*
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
Neocon & CSIS Agenda for World
Domination!
The CSIS Agenda to Control US Policy and the
World
WRITTEN BY: ANGELA VALKYRIE
[Above: CSIS logo]
SIS Contact Information:
Center for Strategic and International Studies
1800 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
ph: 202-887-0200 | fax: 202-775-3199 | email: webmaster@csis.org
csis.org
For over forty years now, the Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS) has been influencing the US
government and world leaders about foreign policy issues that
not only affect America, but the entire world.
The CSIS is composed of non-elected officials.
The fact that the CSIS is an organization led by un-elected
officials who consult our government on US foreign policy and
thus influence government decision making without our knowledge
is unconstitutional.
The governing system under which we live should be made up
solely of elected officials.
The
CSIS is a privately funded, nonpartisan tax-exempt organization
with its headquartered in Washington, D.C. No one is really sure
who pays these guys’ salaries. Many suspect their salaries
inadvertently come from America’s tax-payers. Because CSIS is so
influential within the confines of the US Department of Defense
it is more than likely that they are a beneficiary of taxpayer
dollars. Although this has yet to be proven, we definitely need
to have someone trace the money.
The US government takes its direction from these CSIS
un-elected individuals. There is little if any mention of these
people in the media.
Since the post WWII era, many organizations just like the
CSIS have been manipulating the US government to their own power
hungry advantage and to their own agenda, without our knowledge.
It is time we recognize who these people are and their strategic
effects on the US government. It is time to put a stop to their
control over America, now! To do this, we need to inform the
American people of each organization one by one, alerting
Americans to the organizations involved in affecting changes in
our country that are illegal and unconstitutional.
Although I will illustrate how other various Neoconservative
groups are working together with the CSIS to affect our US
government, this article will focus first and mostly on the
Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The CSIS is made up of Neoconservatives.
Neoconservatives are
the bad guys.
The CSIS consists mostly of un-elected Neoconservative
individuals who affect
US GOVERNMENT POLICY.
The CSIS Advisory Board is composed of both public- and
private- sector policymakers, including several members of
Congress.
The CSIS Washington Roundtable meets three to four times a year
with members of Congress, executive branch officials, and other
Washington experts to discuss pressing policy issues of the day.
Neoconservative views dominate the media.
CSIS Neoconservatives are mostly former leftists/liberals
who converted to conservatism during the ’70’s and 80’s when
Ronald Reagan became President.
“Neoconservatives are followers of Leo Strauss and are
commonly known as Straussians. Leo Strauss, a Jew from Nazi
German arrived in the US in 1938 and taught at the New School
for Social Research. Later he taught at the University of
Chicago where he managed to gather about a 100 Ph.D. students
who later became disciples of Straussian philosophy and took up
important posts in various institutions.”
– Paul Webster, “What it is and how it came about…”
In domestic policies Neocons tend to be “liberal” while being
extremely militant about foreign affairs. They cross party lines
and tend to be either “Compassionate Conservative” Republican
Christian Conservatives & Jewish Neoconservatives: Two
sides of the same coin.
Regardless of their domestic “liberal” leanings, their major
concern is always foreign policy specifically US relations with
Israel in the Middle East. They strongly favor US military
global interventions which would lead to America becoming the
leader in a “New World Order.”
US Vice-President Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Henry
Kissinger, James Schlesinger are all current CSIS members.
Mark Neuman, a longtime Jewish Republican activist and White
House official during the Reagan administration, in reference to
his support of George W. Bush, was quoted as saying this about
George W. Bush, “He will surprise people with how diverse his
administration will actually be.”
Diverse meaning the coalition between Jewish Neoconservative
Democrats, Christian Compassionate Conservative Republicans,
Jewish Republicans, Black Republicans and Black
Neoconservatives. All of these movements divide party lines
because they all have the same political agenda, which is, in a
nutshell, US global domination with Israel by its side. These
guys are always blaming the “evil terrorists” for everything
that is wrong in the world and assert America as the
“good-guy-super-power-super-hero” of the world.
Now, that all sounds nice and dandy but it’s just not true.
We’d all love America to be the “good-guy-super-hero” of the
world. But, sadly, it’s not real, it’s not the truth, it’s just
a pretty picture painted with propaganda and lies, framed by
your television set. What is real? What they do not show us on
TV. The blood, the oil, the money, the power, the greed, land
grabbing, hatred and Zionism.
“There are no necessary evils in government.” –
Andrew Jackson ( July
10, 1832)
Neoconservatives
believe that there are necessary evils in the name of “defense”
that need undertaking. These “defense” strategies are almost
always offensive pre-emptive strikes.
“Happily the Government of the United States, which gives to
bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.” -
President George
Washington (1790)
The US Government has
been giving military and monetary aid to Israel in their
persecution of Palestinians and in the occupation of Palestinian
land.
Palestinians have the
right to return to their homeland. Because they are not being
allowed to return to their native land, this angers many Arabs,
many who’ve become “terrorists” in retaliation for Israeli
occupation. These Arab revolutionaries or “terrorists” know that
the United States of America is aiding Israel in the oppression
of their people. This makes them very angry at the United
States. They want the US to mind its own damn business. Under
the US constitution that would be the right thing for us to do.
“Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances, with
any portion of the foreign world.” - President George Washington
(September 17,
1796)
Our alliance with
Israel is immoral, corrupt and unconstitutional.
CSIS Neocons are
notorious for avoiding all explanations for terrorists’ hatred
towards America, because that would bring questions about US
globalization and imperialism. So they “explain” terrorists as
“freedom haters” or “anti-Semitics” (ignoring the obvious fact
that Arabs can’t be anti-Semitic since they are Semitic) who are
insane suicide bombers that enjoy killing people and themselves
just because they oppose freedom and American values. The reason
for terrorist activity is vastly more complicated than this
Neocon explanation. Alternative media sources are trying to get
the real news out but in these paranoid “Patriot Act” times, it
can be very difficult.
“In spite of constant
reassurances about the term ‘democracy’ one is rarely allowed to
criticize the country of Israel without suffering some punishing
consequence for it. If you are a Jew you may survive the
accusations of anti-Semitism but if you consistently express
yourself online in any dissidence about Israel’s current
politick, you will probably not be immune to cyber attack.”
- Mary La Rosa, The Chomskybot Code: Conduct in the Time of
Terror
In the Middle East, CSIS Neocons support the most extremist
elements in Israel such as the Likud Party. The Likud party is
made-up of Jewish Zionists.
“The war in Iraq was
conceived by 25 Neoconservative intellectuals, most of them
Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of
history.”
[Written in 2004]
NEO-CONSERVATIVES BAD! @
http://www.geocities.com/neoconsbad/
*
PART 2
[Font Altered-Bolding
& Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets
MARCH-2009
|
|
Ten principles of democracy
The Nation, State Sovereignty
and the European Union
by
Anthony Coughlan
[We are pleased to be able to offer to those
who are still undecided about the need for a EUROPEAN UNION the
well known work of Anthony Coughlan whose research is impeccable
and succinct in his work which has and will inform the many who
still are unable to understand the dangers which are resulting
in the destruction of the once FREE NATION STATES in EUROPE and
most of all our own NATION STATE of 1500 years in the making.
Our
BULLETIN FILE and
EU FILE have over 1000 bulletins on
the subject of the EU from independent sources such as Anthony
Coughlan.
We have recently asked the question how can
the FREE PEOPLE throughout the world be sure that the INTERNET
is not taken over by the NEW WORLD ORDER elite who have as their
aim the destruction of FREE NATION STATES to be replaced by an
elitist run WORLD GOVERNMENT and we know already that they go by
the name of the
The Bilderberg Group
who meet in secret every year
since 1952. Details of their membership listed in PART 2 and no
doubt many who's names are yet to surface. We have a prominent
member of that conspiracy visiting our shores at the present
time and as to why the QUEEN would not consider it a break of
decorum and custom with that helpful arm is because they
are all part of the same team which goes by the name of the
Illuminati
At the present time we hear that two of the
INTERNET PROVIDERS have forbidden certain information which hits
close to home while GOOGLE is at present doing its rightful duty
in not censoring CONSPIRACY information which is not to the
taste of those WHO WISH TO ENSLAVE US. How long this will last
will no doubt depend on how close the NEW WORLD ORDER is to
reaching its sinister objective.
Should ALL INTERNET PROVIDERS close ranks in
order to be obedient to the DESTROYERS of FREE INDEPENDENT
NATION STATES and FREE EXPRESSION then PLANS need to be put in
place to PROTECT that FREEDOM which the INTERNET has a DUTY to
FREE PEOPLE everywhere on our shrinking PLANET to HONOUR before
MAMMON. ]
*
Nations and Nation
States make up the international community.
The trends constituting "globalisation,"
or the supranationalism of the European Union, affect
the environment of Nation States, but do not make them
out-of-date. Shared nationhood is the normal basis of
democratic States in the modern world, as is shown by
the advent of many new Nation States since 1989, and the
likely advent of many more in coming decades. These ten
democratic principles are proposed as fruitful ways of
approaching questions of nationhood, State sovereignty
and the European Union.
1.
INTERNATIONALISM, NOT NATIONALISM,
IS THE PRIMARY CATEGORY
We are internationalists on the basis
of our solidarity as members of the human race. As
internationalists we seek the emancipation of mankind.
The human race is divided into nations. Therefore we
stand for the self-determination of nations. The right
of nations to self-determination was the basis of the
American Revolution. It was formally proclaimed in 1789
in the Declaration of the Rights of Man of the French
Revolution.
It is now a
basic principle of international law, enshrined in the
United Nations Charter.
[See our statement above between
President Roosevelt of the USA and Winston Churchill in
the UN in 1941 emphasing the right of SELF
-DETERMINATION of NATION STATES something the NEW WORLD
ORDER lunatics wish to
DESTROY.]
As democrats and internationalists we
assert the right of those nations that wish it to have
their independence, sovereignty and a Nation State of
their own, so that they may relate to one another
internationally on the basis of equal rights with other
nations.
The democratic principle of
internationalism does not mean that we are called upon
to urge people of other nations to assert their right to
self-determination; but that we respect their wishes and
show solidarity with them if they decide to do that. It
is as true of the life of nations as of individuals that
separation, mutual recognition of boundaries, and mutual
respect - i.e. political equality, neither dominance nor
submission - are the pre-requisite of free and friendly
cooperation, of internationalism in other words. Good
fences make good neighbours.
2.
NATIONS AND NATIONALITY COME
BEFORE NATIONALISMS AND NATION STATES
Nations exist as communities before
nationalisms and Nation States. To analyse nations and
the national question in terms of "nationalisms" is
philosophical idealism, looking at the mental reflection
rather than the thing it reflects. Nations evolve
historically as stable, long-lasting communities of
people, sharing a common language and territory and the
common culture and history that arise from that.
On this basis develop the
solidarities, mutual identification and mutual interests
that distinguish a people from its neighbours. Some
nations are ancient, some young, some in process of
being formed. Like all human groups - for example the
family, clan, tribe - they are fuzzy at the edges. No
neat definition will encompass all cases. The empirical
test is to ask people themselves. If they have passed
beyond the stage of kinship society, where the political
unit is the clan or tribe, people will invariably know
what nation they belong to. That is the political and
democratic test too.
If enough people in a nation wish to
establish their own independent State, they should have
it. For democracy can exist normally only at the level
of the national community and the Nation State. The
reason is that it is within the national community alone
that there exists sufficient solidarity, mutual
identification and mutuality of interest among people as
to induce minorities freely to consent to majority rule
and obey a common government based upon that.
Such solidarity is the basis of shared
citizenship. It underpins a people's allegiance to a
government as "their" government, and their willingness
to finance that government's tax and income-transfer
system, thereby tying the richer and poorer regions and
social classes of particular Nation States together.
The solidarities that exist within
nations do not exist between them, although other
solidarities may exist, international solidarity, which
becomes more important with time, as modern
communications, trade, capital movements and common
environmental problems link all nations together in
international inter-dependence as part of today's
"global village."
3.
MANKIND IS STILL AT THE RELATIVELY EARLY STAGE
OF THE FORMATION OF NATION STATES,
AS THE DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLE OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
- THE RIGHT OF NATIONS TO SELF-DETERMINATION -
WORKS ITSELF OUT IN HISTORY
Fewer than a dozen contemporary Nation
States are more than a few centuries old. The number of
States in the United Nations has gone from fewer than 60
in 1946 to nearly 200 today. The number of European
States has gone from 30 to 50 since 1989. This process
is not ended even in Western Europe, where people have
been at the business of Nation State formation for
centuries. It is still ongoing in Eastern Europe. It has
scarcely begun in Africa and Asia, where the bulk of
mankind lives, where most people still form part of
clan-tribal society, and where State boundaries were
drawn by the colonial powers after World War 2, with
little consideration for the wishes of indigenous
peoples.
There are some 6000 distinct languages
in the world. At their present rate of disappearance
there should still be 600 or so left in a century's
time. These will survive because in each case they are
spoken by several million people. There clearly are many
embryonic nations. There are also long-established
nations without Nation States, which have a national
identity but no political independence.
A nation can
keep its identity in servitude as well as freedom. Many
new Nation States, probably a couple of hundred or more,
are likely to come into being during the twenty-first
century. They will thereby acquire those two classical
pillars of independent statehood, the sword and the
currency - the monopoly of legal force over a territory
and the monopoly of the issue of legal tender for that
territory. A world of several hundred Nation States will
also be a world of several hundred currencies.
10.
PEOPLE ON THE POLITICAL RIGHT AND LEFT
HAVE AN OBJECTIVE COMMON INTEREST IN
THE ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY
AND
IN UPHOLDING NATIONAL DEMOCRACY
The political Right wish the State to
legislate right-wing measures, the political Left
left-wing ones; but neither can get their wishes unless
they are citizens of an independent State with the
relevant power and competence in the first place.
Likewise within each State different social interests
align themselves for and against the maintenance of
State sovereignty, seeking either to uphold or to
undermine national democracy.
This is the central theme of the
politics of our time. That is why democrats in every
country today, whether on the political Right or Left,
form part of an international movement in defence of the
Nation State and national democracy.
PART 2
[ For Sections 4-9- Don't miss it]
And FULL TRANSCRIPT
by Anthony Coughlan
[Return
to Democrat index]
[To
subscribe to Democrat] (members receive
each issue free through the post)
[Membership
form]
[Order
form for material]
[Details
about our Campaign against Euro-federalism]
[Home
page] [top]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
MARCH-2009
|
|
Urgent: The
Obama New World Order Threat?
"The
Evidence Provided Below on Obama's Frightening
Involvement with the New World Agenda is Under a threat
of Being Taken Offline. You Must Act Now to Receive
it...Fast" |
WARNING: This Report is under threat of being
taken offline due to its content. It is important that
you read below to know how to access the rest of the
information before the Report is taken offline.
Click here for a Sneak
Preview
PART 2
|
According to Henry Kissinger, the Nobel Peace
Prize winner and former secretary of state under
President Nixon,
"conflicts across the globe and an international
respect for Barack Obama have created the
perfect setting for establishment of “a New
World Order.”
Remark
in a 2008 interview with CNBC’s “Squawk on the
Street” hosts Mark Haines and Erin Burnett at
the New York Stock Exchange |
|
Obama New World Order?
Download Antichrist Identity
About Us
Frequently Asked Questions
Terms and Conditions
©2008 Prime Republic Ltd All Rights Reserved
Email:admin@primerepublic.com |
|
|
Hatred and
Discrimination of Christians
AS IN THE USA SO
ALSO IN THE UK
"Then you will be
handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will
be hated by all nations because of me. At that time many
will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each
other, and many false prophets will appear and deceive many
people. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of
most will grow cold, but he who stands firm to the end will
be saved."
[Matthew 24:9-13]
Reaping What We've Sown
Because we have allowed the censorship
of our public officials, our teachers, our elected
representatives and our judges of expressing their faith in
public, the predictable is happening: a generation of young
people growing up with very little understanding of the
spiritual principles on which our country was founded.
Our culture has taught them that right and wrong are
abribrary - subjective - changing.
Many people today have willfully and
philosophically turned away from the covenantal vision and
biblical principles of our Founders and have been
promoting as 'constitutional' those things which God
condemns (Matt. 24:10). Our society now openly endorses the
killing of babies,
homosexuality as an acceptable life-style, and
encourages the
pagan worship of Mother Earth.
The Scriptures state that "Blessed is
the nation whose God is the Lord." (Psalm 33:12). The nation
who honors the one true Jehovah God will experience His
blessings of protection, provision, peace, and stability.
But, as Pastor Jeremiah Wright said, "America has failed."
This nation has forsaken God and as a result we can see in
our families, our schools, the inner-cities, our government,
our national security, our Constitutional rights, indeed in
all areas of our lives, the removal of Gods blessing.
The demise of morality, the
loss of our freedom, the crime in our streets,
increased drug use, the poverty in the inner-cities, the
war zones in our homes and the
violence of our children is a result of our disobedience
to the Word of God and will not improve until we take
responsibility for our actions. Contrary to liberal
propaganda, we don't have an economic problem, we have a
problem of our spirit. We have willfully and systematically
rejected God and as a result, we are now experiencing the
fruit of that sin.
The Battle for the Hearts and Minds of Christians
Across our country today and indeed
around the world, there is a battle being waged by those who
hate Christ and the truth contained in the Bible (Mat.
24:9). The scheme is a propaganda campaign that
depersonalizes and minimizes Christians. Depersonalization
makes it easier for people to accept negative stereotypes,
pigeonholed, and, in the extreme, tolerate abuse and
persecution of the people who have been depersonalized.
Historical precedent for this can be found in Nero's
treatment of Christians, racism in all forms, and Hitler's
treatment of the Jews.
Secularists appear to have agreed upon three specific
mechanisms to complete the task of immobilizing and
silencing Christians. You can find
evidence of these strategies in your own communities and
schools.
1. Deny
our Judeo-Christian roots and rewrite our historical record.
Children in public schools never hear the expressions of
faith made by the founders of our country. They celebrate
the pilgrim's first Thanksgiving but are not told to whom
those early settlers were thankful. Christ and His church
has been banned and any mention of Christianity is
forbidden.
2.
Convince the American people that Christians are in
violation of the Constitution.
Liberal activists would have us believe our founding fathers
were terrified at the prospect of Christians participating
in the political process. This led them, we're told, to
establish a
wall of separation between church and state. But no such
provision appears in the Constitution or any of the
foundational documents. The principle of separation of
church and state is found only in one of Jefferson's
letters, and referred, not to the exclusion of religious
people from government, but to the protection of religion
from governmental interference.
"[The religious right] are demanding
their rightful seat at the table, and that is what the
American people fear the most." [Rep. Vic Fazio, D-CA,
"God as a Wedge Issue," Norfold Virginian-Pilot, June
24, 1994]
Liberals in Congress formed a so-called
"Radical Right Task Force" in 1994, paid for with American
tax dollars. This "Task Force" meets in the U.S. Capitol to
plan how to intimidate Christians from going to the polls
and to deny churches tax-exempt status if they distribute
Christian voter education literature. They have focused on
"non-profit groups vs. Advocacy groups" and "when do
non-profits cross the line and become advocacy groups?" The
law provides tax exemptions for non-profit groups but not
for advocacy groups.
"People of traditional faith have
become effective, and this makes the left quake." [Sen.
Dan Coats]
3.
Embarrass, insult, shout down and mischaracterize
Christians, hoping to intimidate them into silence.
Those who reject Jesus will also shun
Christians, for faithful believers carry the presence of the
Holy Spirit who brings conviction of sin as well as God's
love. Any mention of sin grates against today's relativistic
values and the kind of "freedom" where anything goes. That's
why Christians, who are "the aroma of Christ" to believers,
are also "the smell of death to those who are perishing."
They hate the true Jesus.
George Gardner of College Hill United
Methodist Church in Wichita, Kansas said, "The evangelical
Christian right does not represent the religion of America.
We have to deal with the Christian evangelical religious
right that would take the love of God and turn it into the
wrath of God ... that would take the equality of men, women
and children and would turn it into a male-dominated
hierarchy that would subjugate women and intimidate
children." [The Wichita Eagle, January 22, 1994]
Leading political and cultural groups
have mounted a campaign to misrepresent and discredit the
religious right in hopes of undermining the growing
political influence of religious conservatives. President
Bill Clinton called religious conservatives
"obstructionist right-wing fanatics"
who embrace a message of
"hate and fear."
Hillary Clinton claimed that those who were
bringing charges against her husband for his extra-marital
sexual adventures are part of a
"Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy"
or simply are
prejudiced against anyone from
Arkansas. Texas
governor Ann Richards labeled them
"mongers of hate" who
"preach their anger" and
"have turned the party of Lincoln into the party of
Operation Rescue." Also, Congressman, Vic Fazio, chairman of
the Democratic Congresional Campaign Committee, said the
"intolerant,"
religious right wants
"to carry views that are distinctly
religious over into government and try to impose them as
law" using "stealth candidates" and
"subterranean tactics" to advance its ruthless agenda. U.S.
Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders spoke of the
"unchristian religious right"
as "those people who are
selling our children out in the name of religion."
Writing on the op-ed page of the New York
Times, Robert H. Meneilly writes,
"The religious right confronts
us with a threat far greater then the old threat of
Communism."
The Christian Right has oftentimes been compared with Nazism
and they point out that Nazi's were Christian. But, were
they?
Martin Borman was a very high Nazi official in Hitler's
government and he wrote,
"National
Socialism and Christian concepts are irreconcilable. The
Christian churches build upon man's ignorance and are
endeavoring to keep the greatest number of people in a
state of ignorance....Our National Socialist concept of
the world is on a far higher plane than are the ideas of
Christianity, whose essential points have been taken
from the Jews. For that reason too, we have no need of
Christianity....." (The NAZI YEARS, Joachim Remak, pp.
103-104, Prentice-Hall, 1969)
Ludwig Von Mises described socialism
under the Nazi's [increasingly similar in America].
"There are,
however, no longer entrepreneurs but only shop managers
(Betriebsfuhrer). These shop managers do the buying and
selling, pay the workers, contract debts, and pay
interest and amortization. There is no labor market;
wages and salaries are fixed by the government [Labor
unions, minimum wage]. The government tells the shop
managers what and how to produce [FDA, OSHA], at
what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to
whom to sell. The government decrees to whom and under
what terms the capitalists must entrust their funds and
where and at what wages laborers must work. Market
exchange is only a sham. All the prices, wages, and
interest rates are fixed by the central authority
[Federal Reserve]. They are prices, wages, and
interest rates in appearance only; in reality they are
merely determinations of quantity relations in the
government's orders. The government, not the consumers,
directs production. This is socialism in the outward
guise of capitalism. Some labels of capitalistic market
economy are retained but they mean something entirely
different from what they mean in a genuine market
economy." (Omnipotent Government,
Ludwig Von Mises, p. 56)
[emphasis added
by author]
Any Christian who has stood his ground
on Biblical faith has grown uncomfortably accustomed to
being called all sorts of names:
|
Judgmental
or Biggot: People say, "You criticize our way
- you don't think we're good enough for God!"
(Romans 3:23-24) |
|
Arrogant:
"You think you're better than us - that you have
found the only way to eternal life!" (John 14:6)
|
|
Narrow-minded:
"You think you have the only handle on truth. If you
practiced the love you preach, you would see all
people as worthy of salvation" (1 Timothy 4:1)
|
|
Ignorant:
"You don't know there are other paths to
enlightenment" (2 Timothy 4:3-4) |
|
Old-Fashioned:
"You cling to obsolete myths" (Hebrews 13:8)
|
The names "radical right," "far right,"
"extreme right"and "Christian right" are also
part of the effort to marginalize and demoralize those with
traditional views. When was the last time you heard
homosexual activists or abortionists referred to as the
"Radical Left?
The Media Assault on Christianity
When Reggie White, an ordained minister
and All-Pro defensive end for the Green Bay Packers, stated
in a speech his Christian beliefs regarding homosexuality,
CBS almost immediately cancelled his pending sportscasting
contract. During his speech, White declared that he is
"offended" by the comparison of struggles of homosexual
groups to those of blacks. "Homosexuality is a decision.
It's not a race," he said. At about the same time, CBS
announced plans to air the Howard Stern Show, featuring
raunchy language, nudity and graphic sexual content. Nike
agreed to retain Reggie as a spokesman, but Nike Chairman
Phil Knight denounced Reggie as "crazy." Campbell Soup
Company declines to renew Reggie's endorsement contract,
saying that his "comments are not consistent with the
principles of the Campbell Soup Company."
Supported by the Justice Department, the news media
characterizes Christians who choose to believe in the Bible
as cultists. Numerous examples of this bigotry is evidenced
by the endless reports of people who believe the "end of the
age" is near is responsible for all sorts of terrorists
acts. Some of the more apparent examples includes the
burning of the Davidian compound in Waco Texas and the
murder of the family at Ruby Ridge.
Following the tragedy in Oklahoma City,
Americans watched in disbelief as liberal pundits attempted
to portray the maniac bombers with conservative and
religious Americans - especially those who fight for the
unborn child.
Writing in The Washington Post, Michael Lind made
that connection between the bombers and pro-lifers. He
wrote,
"The story of Oklahoma City and the
militias should not make us forget that the main form of
political terrorism in the United States is perpetuated
by right wing opponents of abortion."
Washington Post
columnist Carl Rowan wrote one of the most unbelievable
columns stating:
"I am absolutely certain the harsh
rhetoric of the Gingriches and Doles … creates a climate
of violence in America."
Bruce Morton of CNN attempted to link the
bombers with religious Americans:
"What do you suppose the odds are
that when they finally know who did it, they will say,
"Well, I was following God's will?"
Eleanor Clift, the loud voice of the left
on PBS's The McGlaughlin Report, predicted the bombers were
from...
"a loose cabal of gun extremists,
religious extremists."
In the wake of the murder of Nicole
Simpson, Wall Street Journal columnist Al Hunt attributed
part of the blame for domestic violence against women on Pat
Robertson's teaching on the headship of the husband over the
wife.
A government report blamed Christianity for causing teenage
suicides. Published in 1989 by the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, it accused Catholics, Baptists, and
other Christian groups of depicting homosexuality as morally
wrong, thus creating "unresolvable internal conflicts for
youth who adhere to their faith but believe they will not
change their sexual orientation." The recommendation:
churches must change their beliefs.
"Religion needs to reassess
homosexuality in a positive context..."
["Government Tells Churches What to
Teach," AFA Journal (October 1989).]
In 1989, the U.S. government released a
report by a committee of the National Research Council which
called the Christian perspective of homosexuality a
"deep-rooted social pathology" and further blamed Christians
for "stigmatizing" homosexuals and thus contributing to the
spread of AIDS.
Dan Rather, CBS News anchor, blamed Christians for attacks
on homosexuals in an April 11 editorial for the magazine
Nation. He wrote,
"Gays and lesbians are beaten to
death in the streets with increasing frequency - in part
due to irrational fear of AIDS but also because
hatemongers, from comedians to the worst of the
Christian Right, sent the message that homosexuals have
no value in our society."
You can't overlook the
massive public and media response generated following Rev.
Jeremiah Wright’s reference concerning the scientific and
political imposition of HIV/AIDS as a genocidal plague
created by the Anglo-American ruling elite. Scientific
support for Rev. Wright's concerns was published in 1998 by
Dr. Leonard Horowitz, a Harvard degree expert in public
health who spent three years investigating links between the
first cases of AIDS and the first hepatitis B vaccines given
to gay men in New York and central Africans between 1972 and
1974.
Indeed, name calling has become the
defacto standard for liberals when describing their
opponents. But, their derogatory terms, "biggot," "racist,"
"sexist," and "homophobic" must be loosing their
effectiveness because recently they have begun a new
campaign: calling their opponents "crazy."
Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen says that Charlton
Heston is nuts because his views on the culture war
contradict today's notion of political correctness.
Jesse Jackson says that Mayor Rudy Giuliani "sounds like a
mentally disturbed person" because the Mayor had defended
police action in New York City respecting the shooting of
unarmed suspects.
Mind you, these people are not saying
that their opponents' ideas are crazy. That is perfectly
legitimate. They are rather labeling the proponents of ideas
they oppose as crazy. Their intent of course is to convince
the American public that since these people are crazy, as
opposed to the idea being crazy, then they do not deserve to
be listened to at all. [Paul Weyrich, "Liberals resort to
calling names," Christian Crusade, June 2000]
The defenders of all that is fine and
decent indict Bible-believing activists as "hate mongers,"
"fire-breathing radicals," "unchristian," "merchants of
hate" who would establish "a Christian version of the
Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran" and "fanatics" with a message of
"hate and fear." By stigmatizing the values movement, the
Left hopes to avoid the issues in debate. Its subliminal
message is: "Don't listen to what these extremists are
saying. Don't take them seriously." They're militants
and bigots - and that's all you need to know about them."
[Don Feder, "The Religious Right? That's You," Christian
American, September 1994.]
The frustrating
thing is that those who are attacking religion claim
they are doing it in the name of tolerance, freedom, and
open-mindedness. Question: Isn't the real truth that
they are intolerant of religion? They refuse to tolerate
its importance in our lives. -
Ronald Reagan
*
MARCH-20009
|
|
PROTECTION OF WHITE ENGLISH
RACE
Over the last decade we have been seen a
proliferation of people's in our country from around the world who
now form themselves into associations in order to fight for what
they term
THEIR
RIGHTS.
These bodies must run into thousands and growing
by the day. But we have to ask ourselves if we are white whether we
too should have our associations to protect our interests in a
country who's GOVERNMENT appears to have forgotten that the majority
of citizens in
ENGLAND are WHITE.
Those that call for diversity cannot complain if
the white English who are discriminated against but have no rallying
League to fight their corner should decide to take a leaf out of the
numerous other races in our small island and fight our corner as the
others have done with Government Assistance.
As we ourselves said many years ago we look on
anyone who joins us in our island home and observes our customs and
culture and loyalty to England is English by their own actions. But
over the last decade particularly the White English are considered
the least and have been castigated and ridiculed and made them feel
that they were no longer living in their own country.
Even a decade ago we would not have believed in
putting up this agenda which is the direct result of what we now
find around us where every interest is taken care of by the NEW
LABOUR GOVERNMENT except that of the majority of WHITE indigenous
people who are made to feel unwelcome in
THEIR OWN COUNTRY
It is said
the 'fault is in our stars' whereas in reality it is because the
white indigenous population has itself been tolerant of the
'Gathering Storm' of FOREIGN origin which knows how to fight its
corner whereas the white English have not realised that they also have
RIGHTS.
We hope
our article will result in a serious DEBATE which will reveal the
true ENEMY WITHIN and what we must do to reclaim OUR COUNTRY.
There
needs to be a concerted fight back by the white English because they
are looked on as fair game in the liberty stakes.
*
Of course
we will hear the usual exaggerated claims that the white English are
racist. If that was the case many of those freely critising would not be
here. Our history disputes this accusation.
[Possibly someone could produce the
listing of all political and other needs by those who fight for
their so-called RIGHTS under their own racial banner?]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
A CONSPIRACY
YOU WILL WANT TO
IGNORE!
-OR WILL
YOU?
*
The New
World Order
(NWO)
An Overview
By Ken Adachi Editor@educate-yourself.org
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
Translated versions:
Introduction
There is a
worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an
extremely powerful and influential group of
genetically-related individuals (at least at the
highest echelons) which include many of the world's
wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate
elite, as well as members of the so-called Black
Nobility of Europe
(dominated by the British
Crown)
whose goal is to create a One World
(fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic
and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their
agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and
total control over every human being on the planet
and
to dramatically reduce the world's population by 5.5
Billion people. While the name New World Order
is a term frequently used today when referring to this
group, it's more useful to identify the principal
organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up
this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.
The
Illuminati is the oldest term commonly used
to refer to the 13 bloodline families (and
their offshoots) that make up a major portion of this
controlling elite. Most members of the Illuminati are
also members in the highest ranks of numerous secretive
and occult societies which in many cases extend straight
back into the ancient world. The upper levels of the
tightly compartmentalized (need-to-know-basis)
Illuminati structural pyramid include planning
committees and organizations that the public has little
or no knowledge of. The upper levels of the Illuminati
pyramid include secretive committees with names such as:
the Council of 3, the Council of 5, the
Council of 7, the Council of 9, the
Council of 13, the Council of 33, the
Grand Druid Council, the Committee of 300
(also called the "Olympians") and the Committee of
500 among others.
In 1992,
Dr John Coleman published Conspirators'
Hierarchy:
The Story of the Committee of 300. With
laudable scholarship and meticulous research,
Dr Coleman
identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control.
On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr
Coleman accurately
summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of
300 as follows:
"A One World Government and one-unit monetary
system, under permanent non-elected hereditary
oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in
the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle
Ages. In this One World entity, population will be
limited by restrictions on the number of children per
family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people
who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will
be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total
world population.
There will be no middle class, only rulers and
the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal
system of world courts practicing the same unified code
of laws, backed up by a One World Government police
force and a One World unified military to enforce laws
in all former countries where no national boundaries
shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a
welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to
the One World Government will be rewarded with the means
to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved
to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for
anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms
or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit
surrounding the individuals and organizations involved
in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most
astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and
skepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have
been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with
skepticism by institutional and media influences that
were created by the Mother of All mind control
organizations:
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in
London. Author and de-programmer
Fritz Springmeier (The Top 13 Illuminati
Bloodlines ) says that most people have built in
"slides" that short circuit the mind's critical
examination process when it comes to certain sensitive
topics. "Slides", Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for
a conditioned type of response which
dead ends a person's thinking and terminates debate or
examination of the topic at hand. For example, the
mention of the word "conspiracy" often solicits a slide
response with many people. (Springmeier has co-authored
three books on trauma-based programming which detail how
the Illuminati employs highly tuned and extrememly
sophisticated
Mind Control (MC) training programs that begin the
programming process while the intended victim is still
within the womb.
Mind Control is a much greater
problem than most people realize. According to
Cisco Wheeler,
a former Illuminati mind control
programmer, there are 10 million people
who have been programmed as mind controlled slaves using
trauma-based MC programs with names
like Monarch and MK Ultra.
The newer, non-trauma, electronic means of MC
programming that grew out of the Montauk Project,
may include millions more.
Al Bielek,
who played a principle role in the development of the
Montauk Project, said that there likely 10 million
victims of Montauk style mind control programming
worldwide, the majority located in the USA. He also said
that there are covert Montauk Programming 'Centers' in
every major city in the U.S. )
What most Americans believe to be "Public Opinion" is
in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda
designed to elicit a desired behavioral response
from the public. Public opinion polls are
really taken with the intent of gauging the public's
acceptance of the Illuminati's planned programs.
A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that
the programing is "taking", while a poor showing tells
the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or "tweak"
the programming until the desired response is achieved.
While the thrust and content of the propaganda is
decided at Tavistock, implementation of the propaganda
is executed in the United States by well over 200
'think tanks' such as the Rand Corporation and
the Brookings Institute which are overseen and
directed by the top NWO mind control organization in
the United States, the Stanford Research
Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California.
The NWO global conspirators manifest their agenda
through the skillful
manipulation of human emotions, especially
fear. In the past centuries, they have
repeatedly utilized a contrivance that NWO researcher
and author
David Icke
has characterized in his latest book,
The Biggest Secret, as
Problem,
Reaction, and Solution.
The technique is as follows: Illuminati strategists
create the Problem- by funding , assembling, and
training an "opposition" group to stimulate turmoil in
an established political power (sovereign country,
region, continent, etc.) that they wish to impinge upon
and thus create opposing factions in a conflict that
the Illuminati themselves maneuvered into existence.
In recent decades, so called "opposition" groups are
usually identified in the media as 'freedom fighters' or
'liberators' (recently the KLA-Kosovo
Liberation Army).
At the same time, the leader of the established
political power where the conflict is being orchestrated
is demonized and, on cue, referred to as 'another
Hitler' (take your pick: Saddam Hussein, Milosevic,
Kadaffi, etc.). The 'freedom fighters' are not
infrequently assembled from a local criminal element
(i.e. KLA, drug traffickers). In the spirit of true
Machiavellian deceit, the same NWO strategists are
equally involved in covertly arming and
advising the leader of the established power as well
(the Illuminati always profits from any armed conflict
by loaning money, arming, and supplying all
parties involved in a war).
The conflict is drawn to the world stage by the
controlled media outlets with a barrage of photos and
video tape reports of horrific and bloody atrocities
suffered by innocent civilians. The cry goes up
"Something has to be done!" And That is the
desired Reaction
(note: the same
technique is presently being used to bring about
gun control
in the United States).
The NWO puppeteers then provide the Solution
by sending in UN 'Peace Keepers' (Bosnia) or a UN
'Coalition Force' (Gulf War) or NATO Bombers and then
ground troops (Kosovo).
Once installed, the 'peace
keepers'
never leave
(Bosnia, Kosovo). The idea is to have NWO controlled ground troops in all major countries or
strategic areas where significant resistance to the New
World Order takeover is likely to be encountered.
[Senator Ron
Paul Republican has identified over 700 locations world
-wide which have American troops stationed over 50,000
in Germany in March,2009-makes one think!]
East Timor, Indosnesia.
(9/14/99) Virtually , the same strategy used to
occupy Kosovo with UN/NATO troops was applied by the NWO
manipulators to take military control of East Timor.
Once again, the same morality play is trotted out for
public consumption: the local evil and demonic
Indonesian Army trained militias responsible for
the slaughter of innocent civilians following the August
30 vote for Independence (from Indonesian control),
must be stopped at all costs. This time,
Australia (to keep up the appearance of an
'international' humanitarian effort) will lead the charge
with 'peacekeeping' troops. Of course, it didn't take
long for Madeline Albright to announce that US 'support
assets' will be part of the "UN Peacekeeping Team". In
a front page story in the LA Times (9/13/99), Mike
Jendrzejczyk of Human Rights Watch (an
Illuminati front group) in Washington DC said
that it's "crucial" that "peacekeepers have the
authority to disarm militia forces and any Indonesian
soldiers actively working with them". ]
The local, sovereign military force is either
defeated (i.e. Yugoslavia) or, as in the case of
the United States itself, replaced by
foreign UN "Partnership For Peace" (PFP) troops
who take over the jobs of US soldiers who have
been sent overseas on 'peacekeeping' missions. In
addition to being killed in ground conflicts on foreign
soil, US military forces will likely be reduced in the
next few years through disease induced attrition
(i.e. from mandatory Anthrax Vaccinations
required of all US military personnel). These
vaccinations will, in all probability, eventually
produce the symptoms of the so-called Gulf War
Illness, which was acquired by a certain percentage
of Gulf War soldiers who were given a "special" anthrax
vaccine (intended by the Illuminati/CIA as a test run
to ascertain how quickly (and fatally) the disease would
progress with a substantial population of healthy young
men and women).
The corporate portion of the NWO pyramid seems to be
dominated by
international bankers and the big
pharmaceutical cartels, as well as other major
multinational corporations. The Royal Family of
England, namely Queen Elizabeth II and the
House of Windsor, (who are, in
fact, descendants of the German arm of
European Royalty -the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
family-changed the name to Windsor in 1914 ), are high
level players, along with the
British oligarchy
which controls the upper strata of
the Illuminati. The decision making Illuminati nerve
centers of this effort are in the London
(especially the City of London), Basel
Switzerland, and Brussels (NATO headquarters).
The United Nations, along with all the
agencies working under the UN umbrella, such as the
World Health Organization (WHO), are full time
players in this scheme. Similarly, NATO is a
military tool of the NWO.
The leaders of all major industrial
countries like the United States, England,
Germany, Italy, Australia, New
Zealand, etc. (E.g. members of the "G7/G8" ) are
active and fully cooperative participants in this
conspiracy.
In this century, the degree of
control exerted by the Illuminati has advanced to the
point that only certain hand-picked individuals,
who are groomed and selected by the Illuminati
are even eligible to become the prime minister or
president of countries like England, Germany, or The
United States. It didn't matter whether Bill Clinton or
Bob Dole won the Presidency in 1996, the results would
have been the same (except maybe for Zipper Gate ). Both
men are playing on the same team for the same ball club.
Anyone who isn't a team player is taken out: i.e.President Kennedy, Ali Bhutto (Pakistan)
and Aldo Moro (Italy). More recently,
Admiral Borda and William Colby were also killed
because they were either unwilling to go along with the
conspiracy to destroy America, weren't cooperating in
some capacity, or were attempting to expose/ thwart the
Takeover agenda.
Most of the major wars, political upheavals,
and economic depression/recessions of the past
100 years (and earlier) were carefully
planned and instigated by the machinations of these
elites. They include The Spanish-American War
(1898), World War I and World War II;
The Great Depression; the Bolshevik Revolution of
1917; the Rise of Nazi Germany; the Korean
War; the Vietnam War; the 1989-91"fall"
of Soviet Communism, the 1991 Gulf War;
and the recent War in Kosovo. Even the
French Revolution was an orchestrated into
existence by the Barvaian Illuminati and the House of
Rothchild.
FEMA
In America, the
Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA)
was created in 1979 under Presidential Memorandum 32
authored for President Carter by Prof. Samuel P.
Huntington, a Harvard professor and former FEMA
Advisory Board chairman. Huntington wrote the
Seminal Peace for the Trilateral Commission in
the mid 70's, in which he criticized democracy and
economic development as outdated ideas. As co-author of
the book, Crisis in Democracy, Huntington
wrote:
"We have come to recognize that there are
potential desirable limits to economic growth. There
are also potentially desirable limits to the
indefinite extension of political democracy. A
government which lacks authority will have little
ability short of cataclysmic crisis to impose on its
people the sacrifices which may be necessary."
Huntington's ideas were rewritten into National
Security Decision Directive #47 (NSDD47), which was
enacted in July 1982 by President Reagan. Treated as a
passing footnote by the media, this law identified
legitimate areas to be upgraded to maintain national
defense, but it also laid the groundwork for
Emergency Mobilization Preparedness, a plan under
which existing socio/economic regulations or other legal
constraints would be waived in the event of a
national emergency. This plan was further
strengthened in Public Law 101-647, signed by
President Bush in November 1990.What it boils down to is
this: in the event that the President declares a
national emergency, for any reason (from
major earthquakes to increased international tensions or
economic /financial crisis of any stripe), FEMA can
then, at their discretion, implement Executive
Orders 10995 through 11005.
These Executive Orders
permit a takeover by FEMA of local, state, and national
governments and the suspension of constitutional
guarantees. FEMA will have the authority to
exert any sort of control that it deems necessary upon
the American public. A trained National
Police Force, formally referred to by the name of
Multi Jurisdictional Task Force (MJTF), wearing
black uniforms and composed of:
1. specially selected US military personnel
2. foreign military units carrying United Nations ID
cards, and
3. specially trained existing police groups from
larger metropolitan American cities.
These members of the MJTF will implement and enforce
martial law under the direction and controlof FEMA.
The President and Congress are out of the loop.
FEMA is the Trojan Horse by
which the New World Order will implement overt,
police-state control over the American populace.
War on Drugs
The "War on Drugs" is a cruel
joke. The US government,
specifically the CIA, is the biggest 'drug lord' on
the planet. Drug money is used to pay for innumerable
'black projects', including the
construction of huge underground cities housing both
humans and aliens working with the secret US government.
The instigation of a trumped-up war as a cover for
amassing fortunes can be dated back to at least the
12th Century when only a core group of nine
members of an Illuminati group called the Knights
Templar, the military arm of an Illuminati secret
society known as the Priory of Sion, kicked off
the The Crusades that lasted for over a century
and a half. A rift later developed between the Templars
and the Priory of Sion when Jerusalem was lost to
Saracen Turks in 1187. In 1307, the king of France,
Philippe the Fair (a Merovingian Illuminati),
coveted the wealth and was jealous of the Templars'
power. The French king, being a puppet of the Priory of
Sion, set out to arrest all the Templars in France on
October 13. While many Templars were seized and
tortured, including their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay,
many other Templars (who had been tipped off) escaped.
They eventually resurfaced in Portugal, in Malta (as the Knights of Malta) and later in Scotland as The
Scottish Rites of Free Masonry.
The acquisition and consolidation of ever greater
wealth, natural resources, total political
power, and control over others are the
motivating forces which drives the decisions of the
Illuminati. The toll in human suffering and the loss
of innocent lives are non issues for these individuals,
who are aligned with very dark and malevolent 4th
dimensional aliens. The dominant group of 4th
dimentional malevolent aliens controlling and
manipulating the human Iluminati are known as
Draconians or Drakos Reptilians. Not all
alien reptilians are of a negative spiritual
orientation.
Mind Control
Recent revelations from deprogrammed Illuminati
(government) mind controlled individuals such as
Arizona Wilder (The
Biggest
Secret),
Cisco Wheeler (
The Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable
Total Mind Control Slave), Cathy O'Brien
(Trance
Formation of America), and Brice Taylor (Thanks
for the Memories) leave NO DOUBT that the upper
levels of the Illuminati engage in Satanic rituals
which usually include the killing of young children,
the drinking of human blood and the consuming of flesh
and human organs.
The details of the Illuminati conspiracy are
brilliantly laid out in the books of David Icke (Tales
from the Time Loop,
Children of the
Matrix,
Alice in Wonderland and the World Trace Center Disaster,
The Biggest Secret,
The Truth Shall
Set You Free, and
I am Me, I am Free;
and in three books by Dr. John Coleman (Conspirators'
Hierarchy: The Story of The Committee of 300; One
World Order: Socialist Dictatorship; and
Diplomacy by Deception
To be Continued & Expanded...
This Page Last Updated: September 02, 2008
*
At the forthcoming elections if you vote for either
Gordon Brown or David Cameron remember they are both
members of the
BILDERBERGERS
the front for the
NEW WORLD
ORDER
planned and instigated by the machinations of these
elites
*
worldwide conspiracy
*
'Can you imagine an all powerful group that knows no
national boundaries, that has set itself above the laws
of all countries, one that controls every aspect of
politics, religion, commerce and industry, banking,
insurance, mining, the drug trade, the petroleum
industry, a group answerable to no one but its members?'
Dr John Coleman
*
The
Supreme World Council.
This
council is already set up as a prototype of the one
that will rule when the NWO comes into being. It
meets on a regular basis to discuss finances,
direction, policy, etc. and to problem-solve
difficulties that come up. Once again, these leaders
are heads in the financial world, OLD banking money.
The Rothschild family in England, and in France,
have ruling seats. A descendant of the Hapsburg
dynasty has a generational seat. A descendant of the
ruling families of England and France have a
generational seat. The Rockefeller family in the US
holds a seat.
*
A MILITIA BILL
We now learn on Friday March 20-2009 that the
Government is to bring into being a militia force as a
counter to expected terrorism. This measure is
obviously a copy of what many Americans consider an
infringement of their LIBERTY as the force could be used
to control the population should they decide to revolt
against a growing dictatorship with its speech and mind
on their wonderful plans for a NEW WORLD ORDER.
The force will be 60,000 strong but it no doubt will
not remain so for long it could be 600,000 or even
6,000,000 which will become an elite to put down any
opposition to the Government. Those who are not with
them will no doubt become expendable, as history in
totalitarian states have demonstrated over the past
centuries.
The reasons for the terrorism is plain to everyone
except the Governments of the U.S. and Britain -illegal
wars and interference in the affairs of other sovereign
nation states. U.S. troops are located in over 700
locations throughout the world
.What are they doing there?
All that is required for peace to return to our
streets is for our troops to leave Iraq and Afghanistan.
Of course there will be other terrorist activities but
these no doubt will be the work of the SECURITY SERVICES
on the instructions of their Governments.
See:
War on Terror
*
DON'T YOU
AGREE?
*
MARCH-2009
[Since 1994
the EDP has been fighting like so many others for
England to remain an Independent Nation State and not as
regions of a United States of Europe. Rather late
in the day we now realise that we have an even greater
enemy who wishes to rule the world under their satanic
NEW WORLD
ORDER.
When one is
attacked from two sides one concentrates on the bigger
threat which comes from the Anglo/American conspiracy of
a WORLD GOVERNMENT.
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
When a bishop has to leave
the Church of England to stand up for
Christians, what hope is left for Britain?
By
Melanie Phillips
Last updated at 9:51 PM on 29th March 2009
Shock: Michael Nazir-Ali is leaving his post
as the Bishop of Rochester
The resignation of Michael
Nazir-Ali as Bishop of Rochester is a terrible
blow, not just for the Church of England but for
Britain.
The bishop says he is
resigning so that he can work for endangered or
beleaguered Christian minorities both abroad and
in the UK.
What a shocking rebuke to the
church, that he has to leave his post of
influence and authority as a bishop in order to
carry out the church's core duty to defend its
own against attack.
Shocking - but hardly
surprising. Across the world, in countries such
as Nigeria and Sudan, millions of Christians are
being persecuted at the hands of militant Islam,
with forced conversions, the burning of churches
and widespread violence.
Yet in the face of this global
onslaught, the Church of England makes scarcely
a peep of protest.
Worse
still, when Dr Nazir-Ali warned last year that
Islamic extremists had created 'no-go areas'
across Britain where non-Muslims faced
intimidation, he was disowned by his fellow
churchmen who all but declared that he was a
liar - even though he was telling the truth.
Courage
For this act of moral courage,
he and his family had to be put under police
protection, while his own church left him to
swing in the wind of bigotry and intimidation.
Dr Nazir-Ali
is one of the very few inside the church to make
explicit the link between Christian and British
values, and to warn publicly that they are being
destroyed through the prevailing doctrine of
multiculturalism.
That strong voice of protest
has never been needed more than it is now. For
Christianity in Britain is under attack from all
sides.
Last month, the bishop
protested that the arrival in Britain of so many
from other faiths had led to the closure of
chapels, the retrenchment of Christian
chaplaincy and the advent of a 'doctrinaire
multi-faithism' - not through pressure from the
incoming minorities, but from British
secularists who wanted to destroy Christianity.
That agenda is becoming ever
more oppressive. Yesterday, it was revealed that
a Christian council worker was suspended for
encouraging a terminally ill woman to turn to
God. He says he was also told it was
inappropriate to 'talk about God' with a client
and that he should not even say 'God bless'.
This follows the case of the
nurse who was suspended for offering to pray for
an elderly patient's recovery, the Christian who
lost her role on an adoption panel because she
disapproved of gay adoption, and Christian
adoption agencies which lost their public
funding because they had the same approach.
With multiculturalism
discriminating in favour of all who challenge
the established values of this country, it would
appear that it is Christians who have become the
oppressed minority.
Defender of the faith: Dr Rowan Williams,
has told the BBC Director General that the
corporation should not ignore its Christian
audience
At every level, Christianity
is being displaced from its core position in
this country's national story. The BBC
Director-General, Mark Thompson, sent
dog-collars spinning last year when he suggested
that the media should treat Islam more
sensitively than Christianity.
Now the Archbishop of
Canterbury, Rowan Williams, has protested to Mr
Thompson that the BBC must not ignore its
Christian audience. Recently, it sacked its head
of religious programmes, Methodist preacher
Michael Wakelin.
The emergence of a Muslim as
the frontrunner to succeed him, along with the
recent appointment of a Sikh to produce Songs Of
Praise, has deepened fears within the church
that Christianity is being sidelined.
Meanwhile the Government is
flirting with changing the Act of Settlement so
that it no longer 'discriminates' against
Catholics - for all the world as if the monarchy
is a council diversity outreach programme.
But
Protestantism is a core element of this
country's identity.
Identity
No wonder the Queen - as
opposed to Prince Charles, who notoriously said
he wanted to be not 'Defender of the Faith' but
'defender of faith' - is reportedly not amused.
But it's no use Dr Williams
squeaking in protest at the BBC when the
church's habitual posture towards the onslaught
is to sink to its knees with its cassock over
its head.
Take for example the proposal
by a regular churchgoer that the churches should
ring their bells on St George's Day, to proclaim
that the Christian element of English identity
is in robust health.
More from Melanie
Phillips...
Only five out of the church's
44 bishops back the plan while the rest have
scuttled for cover. The Bishop of Chester frets
about the danger of such 'public displays' of
confidence, while the Bishop of Ripon and Leeds
murmurs faintly: 'I am not sure assertiveness is
a Christian value.'
Such cultural cringe would be
comical were it not so tragic. For this is
precisely how the church has all but destroyed
itself. Instead of asserting its core beliefs
against aggressive secularism, it has tried to
accommodate its own destroyer.
As a result, it stopped doing
God and spirituality and holding the line for
Biblical values and mutated instead into a
branch of nonjudgmental social work - a kind of
Guardian newspaper at prayer. The resulting
moral vacuum now threatens not just the church
but the nation itself.
Although
most people may no longer be churchgoers,
Christianity infuses all this country's
institutions, traditions and values.
These have been systematically
attacked by a secular culture of unlimited
self-indulgence and self-destructive behaviour,
resulting in the collapse of the married family,
rising crime, drug and alcohol abuse and a
grievous erosion of the sanctity of human life.
With the
church refusing to assert itself, this vacuum
has allowed radical Islam to promote itself as
an influential force in public life. Indeed it
is rubbing its hands at the opportunity. And in
the longer term that risks destroying our basic
values of individual freedom and equality - and
with them the identity of Britain itself.
Miseries
Dr Nazir-Ali understands this
very clearly. This might be thought all the more
remarkable since he was born not in Britain but
in Pakistan. But that is precisely why he does
understand what is at stake.
Back in the Eighties, he
warned of the rise of radical Islamism. No-one
listened. Now he urges an 'ideological battle'
against fundamentalist Islam, which he likens to
the Western struggle against Marxism. But the
church still isn't listening, and is falling
over itself to accommodate it instead.
Thus Dr Williams's lamentable
statement that there was no reason why sharia
law should not be accepted in Britain over
certain areas of Muslim life - thereby
abandoning British Muslim women, in particular,
to the miseries of the second-class existence
dictated by such religious law.
Dr Nazir-Ali's outspoken
opposition to such developments has made him
powerful enemies within the church. Last summer,
a group of influential churchmen met to work out
how to sideline those 'aggressive' Christians
who were 'increasing the level of fear' by
talking about the threat from radical Islam.
Among those in their sights was the Bishop of
Rochester.
In any sane world, Michael
Nazir-Ali - a church leader whose intellect is
matched by his courage and insight - should be
appointed Archbishop of Canterbury to defend our
society at this most dangerous time. Instead, he
is out.
The question now arises
whether he will become the effective leader of
the church in the Third World, which is on the
edge of schism over gay rights and women
priests.
If that were to happen, he
could become a formidable adversary of the
current craven church leadership and the
prevailing doctrine of appeasement and religious
submission.
But for
the meantime, his departure threatens to make
the church even more irrelevant, and its
capacity to prevent this country from going
under weaker than ever before.
*
[There
is no doubt that all the excellent articles we
constantly see in the Daily Mail have the true
message but will have no effect because the
society we now have in place after a decade of
New Labour has been virtually destroyed before
our eyes. They must all know that the real
enemy are the BILDERBERGERS and others who since
1950's has encouraged the breakdown of society
in order to pursue their plans for a satanic NEW
WORLD ORDER to an eventual WORLD GOVERNMENT.
It is in their interest that our Christian
values should be ridiculed and other religions
respected because it is the home grown values
which they must destroy before they finalise
their EVIL DEEDS. The massive influx of
IMMIGRATION has assisted their common purpose -a
phrase you will hear from the converted to
SATAN. As we have shown on our website over
the last week we have finally become aware of
the real enemy before us which goes by the name
of the
Illuminati
and
we have now seen that what we see all around us
is the direct result of their true intentions to
destroy FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY and NATION STATES
and even REGIONS as they want only microchip
implanted sheep to their design tended by an
ELITE who are all powerful and SATANIC to the
core.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
*
PROJECT FREEDOM
www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/index.html
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
A
sinister plot to protect the pension pot?
by
Peter Oborne
www.Dailymail.co.uk/Online
I believe I have stumbled across
one of the most remarkable stories of the entire
credit crunch.
At the end of 2006, the Bank of
England pension fund made a sudden and very
extraordinary decision. It sold all the equities in
its portfolio and invested them in index-linked
gilts - even though it realised that such a move
would increase the annual cost of the pension fund
by some
£45million.
Looking back, this was a
brilliantly farsighted decision because shares have
since fallen in value by
almost 50 per cent.
It
seems clear the the Bank of England fund managers
understood the nature of the looming economic crisis
well before anyone else.
At the time, they said their
decision was based on concerns about 'unsustainable'
positions in credit markets and the consequences of
a possible credit crunch. When I put this story to a
Bank press officer yesterday, it was dismissed as
'absolute nonsense'.
But I remain confident of my
sources. Indeed, the move from equities to gilts
raises a very awkward question: did the Bank of
England foresee what was coming as early as 2006 -
yet did little about the impending crash, apart from
protect its staff's own pension fund?
*
[Well! a little
undercover work into the movement of investments of
others in 2006 may turn out to be fruitful as there
must have been many who were also nudged to take
care because the ordinary saver and investor was to
be taken to the cleaners in the coming months. Why
not start at the top with the Queen as surely HER
advisers would have got a nudge. Then what about the
richest men in the world did they also come out of
the crisis with a smile on their faces. How did
Gordon Brown-Angela Merkel- George Bush and a host
of others do who seem so dedicated to the NEW WORLD
ORDER and WORLD GOVERNMENT. Now this would be a
scoop to be proud of-but as the Daily Mail's Richard
Littlejohn so often warns - MIND HOW YOU GO!
While we are on the
subject of Good Luck! we instance the case of the
Israeli business which vacated its premises in the
Twin Towers complex shortly before the 9/11 attack.
It appears that they vacated their offices at short
notice which cost them $50,000. What was even
more strange is that a group of five apparently
Middle Eastern men were photographed jumping up and
down with glee on a white van at the time of the
attack and where arrested by the police who later
found them to be Israeli agents. We leave you to
make up your own minds about this strange and
opportune occurrence. What is equally noticeable is
that the so-called FREE PRESS and MEDIA in the USA
and in England did not consider it newsworthy enough
to dig deeper into the strange happennings.]
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in
Brackets] *
MARCH-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAJOR ISSUES
BULLETIN
ON
NEW WORLD ORDER
TACTICS. No 1
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT YOU NEED
TO KNOW
NOW!
*
Latest Info On The Microwave
Vertical Array
ELF Towers Being Erected Countrywide
ARE
THEY NEAR
YOU?
[Editor's Note: The
info you are about to read was posted today (May 25,
2002) by Don Croft. The explanation for the ELF towers
discussed below from the anonymous source makes perfect
sense to me. The erection of these microwave towers
around the world are part of a huge electronic deception
operation known as
Project Blue Beam. I had already learned from
Sterwart Swerdlow that the kickoff date for the NWO
takeover was supposed to have been year 2000, but the
date was pushed up to 2003 due to unforseen obstacles
impeding the agenda; gun control in America being one of
them. It's worthwhile to note from the anonymous writer
that Kevlar suits, lined with lead, can
effectively block these ELF waves and prevent brain
entrainment. Don Croft is convinced that the presence of
DOR (Wilhelm Reich's acronym for Deadly Orgone
energy) is necessary for these mind control towers to
work. Don maintains that an
orgone generating device called a Holy
Handgrenade can transmute DOR into the more
positive, life affirming form of orgone called "OR" by
discoverer Wilhelm Reich. Don and his wife feel that
removing the DOR component from the environment of an
ELF tower, will mitigate the mind control function. He
may be right. I can't say for sure, but it's worth your
time to at least read about this easy-to-build orgone
generator and acquaint yourself with the topic. I have
seen the effectiveness of another orgone generating
device, the
Chembuster, to disperse and clear the sky of
chemtrails. Many people have reported that the
Chembuster can break up chemtrails and return the sky to
a
normal color of blue.
If you've been looking into the NWO
takeover story for any amount of time, you may know by now
that negatively orientated aliens, especially the
negative Reptillians (see David Icke's
The
Biggest Secret), are the hidden controllers behind
the
Illuminated humans pushing for the NWO
enslavement/genocide agenda. The Rule of Polarity or Duality
requires an opposite force in place to offer an alternative
choice and so it seems that friendly alien groups have been
assisting certain energetic individuals in this harrowing
period of our evolution to counter the negative agenda...Ken
Adachi]
From Don & Carol Croft <terminatorthree@earthlink.net>
http://educate-yourself.org/dc/dclatestonmctowerarrays25may02.shtml
May 23, 2002
Are you curious about why those new towers
are going up in all populated areas? We've gathered a lot
of information to indicate that the arrays are intended for
mind control purposes. My wife and I found a way to
neutralize them with a simple device called a Holy
Handgrenade and have been doing so in recent months in
various locations around the country. We place them in an
inconspicuous location within effective range of the tower.
We often bury them, base down with the pointed end up, to
maximize its concealment. If you read the `chembuster'
story, it includes
instructions to build the Holy Handgrenades or "HHg."
I borrowed that term from the movie, Monty Python's Holy
Grail, but I'm dead serious about this work.
There are people in
12 countries now making and deploying HHg's
to neutralize these ELF towers, but
this is just a start, of course. I figure that if one person
in every populated area decides to do this, the whole tower
network will be disabled in a short time. The effective
range of the device described in Metatech's material is at
least a quarter mile, so don't put it close enough where a
team of searchers would find it. It's best if the person
making and deploying his own HHg's doesn't discuss it with
me or many others and keeps their activities to themselves.
This will only succeed as a grassroots effort.
Here's some skinny on these towers from a
friend of mine who has had access to some crucial inside
information. My comments are in squared brackets( [ ] ) He's
not fully informed, yet, of what our HHg's can do
Don Croft
The Purpose Behind The Neighborhood ELF
Microwave Towers
Sent To Don Croft By an unnamed source
May 23, 2002
Think grid triangulation.
Like the old grid paper, put a dot at each corner. expand
the box outward. Each level of panel acts also dimensionally
(not like 4th, but in 3rd space dimensions, don), or to put
it another way, pitch, yaw, up, down, right, left, x, y,
intensity, duration, frequency pulse, etc, those kind of
dimensions.
The whole damn dumb show was
supposed to go down in late 99,
but they didn't get people's guns,
that big final
obstacle to fascism. That's when they hit upon these ELF
towers. Tested them in Ventura, Africa, and the Sudan. They
had
GWEN operational in '92, but it did entire counties and
would affect their own people, who have body suits they were
(lined with lead-impregnated kevlar- which blocks elf and
piggyback freqs.).
So
they found out that the little towers, by the tens of
thousands, they could literally aim any energy like a gun
to a single home, a given range area, and so forth. Big
places run by FEMA/NORAD run it all from computers. But they
can also go remote, with the proper clearance and hookup.
They found out they didn't need to get the guns (that's
why the push and schoolyard shootings stopped here; they
no longer needed that scare op that worked so well in
England, Australia, Germany, ....)
Now...how can you fire a gun or load it, if you are crawling
on the ground begging for mercy? If you can imagine the
worst abdominable pain there is, then you know how
debiliating it is - you simply can't do anything, but lie on
the ground and pray for relief [Editor's Note: this
assertion has been corroborated by Al Bielek, Stewart
Swerdlow, Col. Fletcher Prouty, and even Major Ed Dames.
During the 1991 Gulf War, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi
troops spontaneously surrendered without even attempting to
fight. It was this very ELF mind control technology which
had been applied and rendered them impotent... Ken Adachi].
Then they can clean up entire streets, districts, small
towns, enclaves, as needed. They don't need to pulse the
whole country at once. Only as they do sweeps would they
need to fire the machine up. And it is great for little
revolts as they are sure to spring up. You can aim this grid
like a net, down to the meter's distance. Got a neighborhood
or backwoods community that isn't cow towing the NWO line?
Simple, fire up the machine and down they go...as you walk
through, kill the ringleaders, disarm the rest, then the
lesson is taught to the survivors
These towers ARE very important to their plans this year.
THIS IS NOT EVEN A QUESTION.
The French pioneered this
technology in the late 70s from Bell Labs. They created a
device for crowd control that looks like a big baseball
stadium loudspeaker. It fits into the back of a van. Then
they'd open the doors, pointing the van at the crowd. I've
seen the device.
It operates on a 5 cycle
bass wave, elf. Made everyone drop to their knees with
stomach nausea. [Carol felt that frequency as we drove by
one of the towers, which was operating above the usual 15%
capacity, apparently, on a recent trip]
Your towers are the same
thing, but with bi-phase polarity freqs that can induce
hallucinations, nausea, herpes outbreaks (every organism has
its own cellular freq) or whatever they want you to feel
that day...horniness, anger, whatever.
Or stupefication...the walking dumb...look around, Don, and
tell me what you SEE. Even though our spirit is full of fire
and life, it has to, by nature of the 3D prison planet,
function through the brain. YOU CAN'T EVADE THAT FACT AND
NO AMOUNT OF METAPHYSICS WHATEVER can change that. I can
make you brilliant or stupid, just by inserting a chemical
or frequency wave into your brain. The potential of Einstein
is within us all - the brain is the GREAT BARRIER REEF to
this.
NO AMOUNT OF METAPHYSICS
WHATEVER can change that
[I believe that if we have a
HHg in our energy field this won't be effective against us,
personally]
I can prove it with an
icepick under your left eye [lobotomy]. Ask Frances Farmer
about that.
It's the brain we have to
work for and with. if the instrument is defective (****** is
an example you have to understand here) no amount of good
spirit can affect a positive outcome UNTIL THE BRAIN, THE
ETHERIC WEB, AND ALL THAT is fixed. This isn't dogma, this
is metaphysical fact, taught to us no matter what degree we
were or what the org was that trained us.
FACTOID
They need only enter your brain, and your good heart
notwishtanding, YOU ARE theirs. I don't care how many lives
of service you have or what your radiance factor is. Once
they manipulate the brain on an ELF level, you are f****d.
And...that is your towers, so to say. It's the final trump
card and they have it in full. Just stick around
awhile...especially as winter approaches.
The Brainwashed, the Proud,
the Few- the Cannon Fodder.
We can't make enough elmers [Holy
Handgrenades] to stop it in most places. And according to my
SIGHT, they plan on going around and collecting these little
gifts [HHg's] when the time comes, by using privates in the
military who are immune to hhgs and all that, cuz they are
the brainwashed, the proud, the few, the cannon fodder.
[Since these towers have a
range of up to a mile or more, now might be a good time to
dowse locations farther away the tower base than right up
against the tower fence, since the minimum range of a HHg is
about a quarter mile (equivalent to 1,300 feet or the length
of four football fields) . Don Croft ]
Related
Disguising
Cell Phone Towers
http://www.waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=5df351c0-98ea-4b8c-9a84-844f67beb552
Total Population Control by Nicholas Jones (July 12, 2002)
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/mctotalcontrol12jul02.shtml
*
['It is the mind that maketh
good or ill,
that maketh wretch or happy,
rich or poor.'
The Fairy Queen-Edmund Spenser
(1552-1599) In that day a Queen of
England-Queen Elizabeth I stood with HER PEOPLE when
invasion was threatened and did not sign a treaty to sell
her country to European powers as her named successor had
done in 2008.]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets.]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
A NIGHTMARE WORLD WORSE EVEN THAN THE EU
The world would be far more stable and
prosperous with a thin veneer of international cooperation
superimposed on strong national regulations than attempts to
construct a global regulatory framework.
Eurofacts-27th March,2009
Vol14 No12
Eurofacts@junepress.com
[This article has come at a crucial moment in
the debate in which those with the power and influence wish to use
the present crisis in the economy to put in effect their centuries
old plans for a WORLD GOVERNMENT under an ELITE who owe no
allegiance to FREE NATION STATES and on the contrary they have done
their best to destroy. These same exponents of world government and
their followers couldn't have made that mission more possible with
their powerful and wealthy elite which had only to look the other
way while the present disastrous and most grave financial debacle
took place. We will need to watch them closely as to them FREE
NATION STATES will lead to their downfall. But they and with the
fruits of their ancestors have almost completed their task of world
domination where the individual must conform or be terminated with
as much feeling as sacrificing a lamb to slaughter.]
Readers may find it hard to comprehend a worse
political nightmare than the EUROPEAN UNION, but there is one and
that is called WORLD GOVERNMENT. [Or what you will have heard out of
the mouths of U.S. Presidents Bush and Obama and many others since
the Second World War. We have our own Gordon Brown and Angela
Merkel, Gorbachev and many others who adore the equally poisoness
and satanic term of a NEW WORLD ORDER] Moreover, it is one which in
his day-dreams our prime minister imagines himself to be the
principle architect and even project manager. The project of WORLD
GOVERNMENT reflects the same trans-national progressivism as the EU
but it is one which for personal and political reasons Mr Brown
finds considerably more congenial. Were WORLD GOVERNMENT to come
about it would be run by people more privileged, more distant and
less accountable than the BRUSSELS bureaucracy. The principal
building blocks are at hand:
1] The agencies of the UNITED
NATIONS
2] The INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
3] The WORLD BANK
4] and the INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL
COURT.
Its creation would sound the final death knell for
SELF-GOVERNMENT more certainly and comprehensively than the EU
TREATIES...
*
[There are now on our website a proliferation of
articles on the subject of World Government and the NEW WORLD ORDER
in view of the importance and urgency involved in alerting those
vast millions across the globe of the danger to their LIBERTY and
NATIONHOOD we are now putting a greater emphasis on the greater
danger which we now face. As regards the EU there can be little if
anything which has not been highlighted in our 1,000,000 pages
viewed over the past 5 years. We expect to see
' you stand like greyhounds in the slips.
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot: Follow your spirit; and
upon this charge Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!. (Henry
V III.i.17) BUT
WILL YOU?
As those who take the time to digest the
voluminous matter that we have, you will soon be aware that the U.S.
and British Government have in place the technical means to turn the
majority of its citizens into zombies. It is more than possible that
millions have already fallen to the high-frequency weapons disguised
as Elf/ mobile phone towers which are capable of mind changes and
death which are now available to the both governments. The majority
of people in our country and we include ourselves with them have not
been as attentive and observant of what dirty tricks our Government
is capable of. Those protesting before the G20 need to be aware of
what can happen to them should the police /security services decide
to use such weapons. We have all heard lately of a so-called
British resident being tortured while under the protection of our
laws. We ask how would you prove torture by innocuous phone masts or
towers many disguised to blend in with the surroundings such as
false trees - chimneys-flag posts or whatever.]
As the Daily Mail's Richard Littleton would say
Mind how you GO!
PART 2
*
eurofacts@junepress.com
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & underling Used-Comments in
Brackets]
MARCH-2009
|
|
NEW WORLD ORDER
STRIKES BACK!
*
[The following bulletin was placed on our
bulletin board in November,2006 being concerned of political
interference in a matter of a satisfactory conclusion to a motor
claim which has not been settled for over 27months.]
*
A QUESTION OF
INSURANCE
We all
need it and with the service providers spending millions to get your
business it is no doubt a competitive business
BUT: WHAT ABOUT THE
SERVICE
Has your vehicle been involved
in an accident in the following circumstances:
You where proceeding along the
HIGHWAY when your vehicle was struck by a vehicle coming from a
side road on the left.
HOW LONG DID YOUR INSURANCE
COMPANY TAKE TO COMPLETE ITS CASE?
ONE MONTH?
TWO MONTH'S
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
SIX
SEVEN
EIGHT
NINE
TEN ELEVEN
We will let you know -When we
know
IN
MARCH-2009
IT HAS REACHED -
27 MONTHS
The HIGHWAY Code (Section 146) states the
following:
'not assume, when waiting at a
junction, that a vehicle coming from the right and signalling left
will actually turn,
WAIT AND MAKE SURE'.
We are aware of a case where
the accident occurred in November 2006 and IS STILL NOT SETTLED in
March, 2009
What is most surprising about the
circumstances is that there had been months of SILENCE and then in
August 2007 a firm of solicitors said they had been instructed to
take the matter to COURT as the other party contested the claim but
NO WORD from the INSURANCE COMPANY. The damage to the vehicle on the
HIGHWAY was consistent with the vehicle being struck at right-angles
from the left and the final positioning of the damaged vehicle was
approximately 50 feet away on the HIGHWAY in QUESTION.
WHAT WE QUESTION IS WHY THE
EXCESSIVE TIME in order to complete on the evidence a
straightforward case
The
party concerned has written to his insurance company to ask WHY!
The complainant has asked us to
address the
hopping
'red telephone'
to the urgency of the matter and
take off its red hat and ring through to the CUSTOMER and explain
WHY the MATTER has STILL NOT BEEN RESOLVED.
The person concerned feels there may be some
dark forces
at work here?
Should there be interference with
the legal process by anyone for their own purpose we remind them
that there is such a law of
CONSPIRACY
Conspiracy is both a TORT and a CRIME
Criminal conspiracy has been authoritatively defined
as:
"the agreement of two or more persons to do an
unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means"
Knowing the underhand methods of
GOVERNMENT
to their opponents we would
not be at all surprised if their
dirty tricks department
is working overtime at this crucial hour in the life of our NATION
STATE.
We will keep you all in the picture as the events
unfold.
We hope you are having better luck with
YOUR INSURER
As the above case should have been handled
A GOOD DEAL BETTER
*
[This could be scoop for
Ephraim Hardcastle COLUMN of the Daily Mail or a misunderstanding
that has taken up at least ten months and will no doubt reach over
twelve months AT LEAST.
*
SEPTEMBER 8-2007
*
Unreserved Apology received
September, 28 , 2007
As in a any well conducted company
the reputation of that company depends on the people it employs. And
the above case exemplifies what damage can be done if those
responsible for supervising its work fail to do so. The person
concerned with the above case because of the trauma of the accident
was unable to read the letter from the company but a close friend
was able to read the contents and assure him that the company had
investigated the case and had found that their normal high standard
of working practice had been in the above mentioned case had been
undermined and therefore they had sent their
UNQUALIFIED APOLOGY.
*
LATEST!
MARCH-2009
It is only days since we have brought
to the attention of our many viewers the dirty tricks of those who
aspire to a
NEW WORLD ORDER
and a
WORLD GOVERNMENT
of an ELITE.
So we were not surprised when we
heard of the following developments which confirmed beyond doubt
that they in a colloquial way 'Don'T Like It Up Them!'
Since receiving the apology
on September 28th 2007 the party concerned had been in
contact with Irwin Mitchell-Solicitors who we believe have links
with Cherie Blair's Matric Chambers as confirmed on the
ephraim.hardcastle@dailymail.co.uk column not so long ago.
Also other correspondence has also
been transacted with other associated companies over the past twelve
months and we were of the opinion that the rejection of the
acceptance of a 50% liability had been noted.
It is now Thursday 26th
March 2009 and a phone call from a
solicitor at 10.30 am acting for Direct Line has asked yet again
whether the particular individual would accept 50% liability and the
complainant again made it perfectly clear that he had from the very
beginning decided it was not acceptable. The person contacted
remembered the voice of the contact and asked had he dealt with the
case during the time when the case was not dealt with in Direct
Lines usual efficient manner and he replied that he was in fact the
person concerned. Thereupon he asked why the case was still at the
same stage as when Direct Line sent an apology in September 28th,
2007. He replied that he wished to close the file and his request
for a 50%/50% settlement would enable him to do so. You can guess
the answer that he received from the unfortunate customer of
DIRECT LINE.
We are aware that DIRECT LINE in a
recent poll as to service did not do so well and it is no wonder if
the case above is typical of their idea of service.
As far as we are concerned it is a
politically inspired motive involved in this case and the very fact
that after months of silence and within days of opening the can of
worms about the NEW WORLD ORDER that a call should be received by
the individual concerned on a matter which should have been resolved
within a few months of its occurrence in OCTOBER 2006..
WE WILL KEEP YOU POSTED!
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
It was in 1770
that the professional money lenders, the then
recently organized
House of Rothschild,
retained him to revise and modernize the age-old
Protocols of Zionism,
[ARE FREE PRESS FREE?]
Top of Protocols
PROTOCOL No. 12
1. The word "freedom," which can
be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows -
2. Freedom is the right to do
what which the law allows. This interpretation of the word will
at the proper time be of service to us, because all freedom will
thus be in our hands, since the laws will abolish or create only
that which is desirable for us according to the aforesaid
program.
3. We shall deal with the press
in the following way: what is the part played by the press
to-day? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are
needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of
parties. It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority
of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press
really serves. We shall saddle and bridle it with a tight curb:
we shall do the same also with all productions of the printing
press, for where would be the sense of getting rid of the
attacks of the press if we remain targets for pamphlets and
books? The produce of publicity, which nowadays is a source of
heavy expense owing to the necessity of censoring it, will be
turned by us into a very lucrative source of income to our
State: we shall law on it a special stamp tax and require
deposits of caution-money before permitting the establishment of
any organ of the press or of printing offices; these will then
have to guarantee our government against any kind of attack on
the part of the press. For any attempt to attack us, if such
still be possible, we shall inflict fines without mercy. Such
measures as stamp tax, deposit of caution-money and fines
secured by these deposits, will bring in a huge income to the
government. It is true that party organs might not spare money
for the sake of publicity, but these we shall shut up at the
second attack upon us. No one shall with impunity lay a finger
on the aureole of our government infallibility. The pretext for
stopping any publication will be the alleged plea that it is
agitating the public mind without occasion or justification. I
BEG YOU TO NOTE THAT AMONG THOSE MAKING ATTACKS UPON US WILL
ALSO BE ORGANS ESTABLISHED BY US, BUT THEY WILL ATTACK
EXCLUSIVELY POINTS THAT WE HAVE PRE-DETERMINED TO ALTER.
WE CONTROL THE PRESS
4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL
REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already
being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by
a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts
of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours
and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.
5. If already now we have
contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY
communities to such an extent the they all come near looking
upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of
those spectacles we are setting astride their noses; if already
now there is not a single State where there exist for us any
barriers to admittance into what GOY stupidity calls State
secrets: what will our positions be then, when we shall be
acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person of our
king of all the world ....
6. Let us turn again to the
FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS. Every one desirous of being a
publisher, librarian, or printer, will be obliged to provide
himself with the diploma instituted therefore, which, in case of
any fault, will be immediately impounded. With such measures THE
INSTRUMENT OF THOUGHT WILL BECOME AN EDUCATIVE MEANS ON THE
HANDS OF OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH WILL NO LONGER ALLOW THE MASS OF
THE NATION TO BE LED ASTRAY IN BY-WAYS AND FANTASIES ABOUT THE
BLESSINGS OF PROGRESS. Is there any one of us who does not know
that these phantom blessings are the direct roads to foolish
imaginings which give birth to anarchical relations of men among
themselves and towards authority, because progress, or rather
the idea of progress, has introduced the conception of every
kind of emancipation, but has failed to establish its limits
.... All the so-called liberals are anarchists, if not in fact,
at any rate in thought. Every one of them in hunting after
phantoms of freedom, and falling exclusively into license, that
is, into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest ....
FREE PRESS DESTROYED
7. We turn to the periodical
press. We shall impose on it, as on all printed matter, stamp
taxes per sheet and deposits of caution- money, and books of
less than 30 sheets will pay double. We shall reckon them as
pamphlets in order, on the one hand, to reduce the number of
magazines, which are the worst form of printed poison, and, on
the other, in order that this measure may force writers into
such lengthy productions that they will be little read,
especially as they will be costly. At the same time what we
shall publish ourselves to influence mental development in the
direction laid down for our profit will be cheap and will be
read voraciously. The tax will bring vapid literary ambitions
within bounds and the liability to penalties will make literary
men dependent upon us. And if there should be any found who are
desirous of writing against us, they will not find any person
eager to print their productions in print the publisher or
printer will have to apply to the authorities for permission to
do so. Thus we shall know beforehand of all tricks preparing
against us and shall nullify them by getting ahead with
explanations on the subject treated of.
8. Literature and journalism are
two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our
government will become proprietor of the majority of the
journals. This will neutralize the injurious influence of the
privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a
tremendous influence upon the public mind .... If we give
permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and
so on in the same proportion. This, however, must in no wise be
suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published
by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies
and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing
over to us quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into
our trap and be rendered harmless.
9. In the front rank will stand
organs of an official character. They will always stand guard
over our interests, and therefore their influence will be
comparatively insignificant.
10. In the second rank will be
the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the
tepid and indifferent.
11. In the third rank we shall
set up our own, to all appearance, off position, which, in at
least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very
antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this
simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.
12. All our newspapers will be of
all possible complexions - aristocratic, republican,
revolutionary, even anarchical - for so long, of course, as the
constitution exists .... Like the Indian idol "Vishnu" they will
have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger
on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse
quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our
aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and
easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are
repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be
repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for
us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of
their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang
out for them.
13. In order to direct our
newspaper militia in this sense we must take special and minute
care in organizing this matter. Under the title of central
department of the press we shall institute literary gatherings
at which our agents will without attracting attention issue the
orders and watchwords of the day. By discussing and
controverting, but always superficially, without touching the
essence of the matter, our organs will carry on a sham fight
fusillade with the official newspapers solely for the purpose of
giving occasion for us to express ourselves more fully than
could well be done from the outset in official announcements,
whenever, of course, that is to our advantage.
14. THESE ATTACKS UPON US WILL
ALSO SERVE ANOTHER PURPOSE, NAMELY, THAT OUR SUBJECTS WILL BE
CONVINCED TO THE EXISTENCE OF FULL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND SO GIVE
OUR AGENTS AN OCCASION TO AFFIRM THAT ALL ORGANS WHICH OPPOSE US
ARE EMPTY BABBLERS, since they are incapable of finding any
substantial objections to our orders.
ONLY LIES PRINTED
15. Methods of organization like
these, imperceptible to the public eye but absolutely sure, are
the best calculated to succeed in bringing the attention and the
confidence of the public to the side of our government. Thanks
to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time
may be required, to excite or to tranquilize the public mind on
political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now
truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as
they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling
our ground before stepping upon it .... WE SHALL HAVE A SURE
TRIUMPH OVER OUR OPPONENTS SINCE THEY WILL NOT HAVE AT THEIR
DISPOSITION ORGANS OF THE PRESS IN WHICH THEY CAN GIVE FULL AND
FINAL EXPRESSION TO THEIR VIEWS owing to the aforesaid methods
of dealing with the press. We shall not even need to refute them
except very superficially.
16. Trial shots like these, fired
by us in the third rank of our press, in case of need, will be
energetically refuted by us in our semi-official organs.
17. Even nowadays, already, to
take only the French press, there are forms which reveal masonic
solidarity in acting on the watchword: all organs of the press
are bound together by professional secrecy; like the augurs of
old, not one of their numbers will give away the secret of his
sources of information unless it be resolved to make
announcement of them. Not one journalist will venture to betray
this secret, for not one of them is ever admitted to practice
literature unless his whole past has some disgraceful sore or
other .... These sores would be immediately revealed. So long as
they remain the secret of a few the prestige of the journalist
attacks the majority of the country - the mob follow after him
with enthusiasm.
18. Our calculations are
especially extended to the provinces. It is indispensable for us
to inflame there those hopes and impulses with which we could at
any moment fall upon the capital, and we shall represent to the
capitals that these expressions are the independent hopes and
impulses of the provinces. Naturally, the source of them will be
always one and the same - ours. WHAT WE NEED IS THAT, UNTIL SUCH
TIME AS WE ARE IN THE PLENITUDE POWER, THE CAPITALS SHOULD FIND
THEMSELVES STIFLED BY THE PROVINCIAL OPINION OF THE NATIONS,
I.E., OF A MAJORITY ARRANGED BY OUR AGENTEUR. What we need is
that at the psychological moment the capitals should not be in a
position to discuss an accomplished fact for the simple reason,
if for no other, that it has been accepted by the public opinion
of a majority in the provinces. 19. WHEN WE ARE IN THE PERIOD OF
THE NEW REGIME TRANSITIONAL TO THAT OF OUR ASSUMPTION OF FULL
SOVEREIGNTY WE MUST NOT ADMIT ANY REVELATION BY THE PRESS OF ANY
FORM OF PUBLIC DISHONESTY; IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE NEW REGIME
SHOULD BE THOUGHT TO HAVE SO PERFECTLY CONTENDED EVERYBODY THAT
EVEN CRIMINALITY HAS DISAPPEARED ... Cases of the manifestation
of criminality should remain known only to their victims and to
chance witnesses - no more...
Protocols of Zionism,
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
NEW WORLD ORDER
STRIKES BACK!
*
[The following bulletin was placed on our
bulletin board in November,2006 being concerned of political
interference in a matter of a satisfactory conclusion to a motor
claim which has not been settled for over 27months.]
*
A QUESTION OF
INSURANCE
We all
need it and with the service providers spending millions to get your
business it is no doubt a competitive business
BUT: WHAT ABOUT THE
SERVICE
Has your vehicle been involved
in an accident in the following circumstances:
You where proceeding along the
HIGHWAY when your vehicle was struck by a vehicle coming from a
side road on the left.
HOW LONG DID YOUR INSURANCE
COMPANY TAKE TO COMPLETE ITS CASE?
ONE MONTH?
TWO MONTH'S
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
SIX
SEVEN
EIGHT
NINE
TEN ELEVEN
We will let you know -When we
know
IN
MARCH-2009
IT HAS REACHED -
27 MONTHS
The HIGHWAY Code (Section 146) states the
following:
'not assume, when waiting at a
junction, that a vehicle coming from the right and signalling left
will actually turn,
WAIT AND MAKE SURE'.
We are aware of a case where
the accident occurred in November 2006 and IS STILL NOT SETTLED in
March, 2009
What is most surprising about the
circumstances is that there had been months of SILENCE and then in
August 2007 a firm of solicitors said they had been instructed to
take the matter to COURT as the other party contested the claim but
NO WORD from the INSURANCE COMPANY. The damage to the vehicle on the
HIGHWAY was consistent with the vehicle being struck at right-angles
from the left and the final positioning of the damaged vehicle was
approximately 50 feet away on the HIGHWAY in QUESTION.
WHAT WE QUESTION IS WHY THE
EXCESSIVE TIME in order to complete on the evidence a
straightforward case
The
party concerned has written to his insurance company to ask WHY!
The complainant has asked us to
address the
hopping
'red telephone'
to the urgency of the matter and
take off its red hat and ring through to the CUSTOMER and explain
WHY the MATTER has STILL NOT BEEN RESOLVED.
The person concerned feels there may be some dark
forces at work here?
Should there be interference with
the legal process by anyone for their own purpose we remind them
that there is such a law of
CONSPIRACY
Conspiracy is both a TORT and a CRIME
Criminal conspiracy has been authoritatively defined
as:
"the agreement of two or more persons to do an
unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means"
Knowing the underhand methods of
GOVERNMENT
to their opponents we would
not be at all surprised if their
dirty tricks department
is working overtime at this crucial hour in the life of our NATION
STATE.
We will keep you all in the picture as the events
unfold.
We hope you are having better luck with
YOUR INSURER
As the above case should have been handled
A GOOD DEAL BETTER
*
[This could be scoop for
Ephraim Hardcastle COLUMN of the Daily Mail or a misunderstanding
that has taken up at least ten months and will no doubt reach over
twelve months AT LEAST.
*
SEPTEMBER 8-2007
*
Unreserved Apology received
September, 28 , 2007
As in a any well conducted company
the reputation of that company depends on the people it employs. And
the above case exemplifies what damage can be done if those
responsible for supervising its work fail to do so. The person
concerned with the above case because of the trauma of the accident
was unable to read the letter from the company but a close friend
was able to read the contents and assure him that the company had
investigated the case and had found that their normal high standard
of working practice had been in the above mentioned case had been
undermined and therefore they had sent their
UNQUALIFIED APOLOGY.
*
LATEST!
MARCH-2009
It is only days since we have brought
to the attention of our many viewers the dirty tricks of those who
aspire to a
NEW WORLD ORDER
and a
WORLD GOVERNMENT
of an ELITE.
So we were not surprised when we
heard of the following developments which confirmed beyond doubt
that they in a colloquial way 'Don'T Like It Up Them!'
Since receiving the apology
on September 28th 2007 the party concerned had been in
contact with Irwin Mitchell-Solicitors who we believe have links
with Cherie Blair's Matric Chambers as confirmed on the
ephraim.hardcastle@dailymail.co.uk column not so long ago.
Also other correspondence has also
been transacted with other associated companies over the past twelve
months and we were of the opinion that the rejection of the
acceptance of a 50% liability had been noted.
It is now Thursday 26th
March 2009 and a phone call from a
solicitor at 10.30 am acting for Direct Line has asked yet again
whether the particular individual would accept 50% liability and the
complainant again made it perfectly clear that he had from the very
beginning decided it was not acceptable. The person contacted
remembered the voice of the contact and asked had he dealt with the
case during the time when the case was not dealt with in Direct
Lines usual efficient manner and he replied that he was in fact the
person concerned. Thereupon he asked why the case was still at the
same stage as when Direct Line sent an apology in September 28th,
2007. He replied that he wished to close the file and his request
for a 50%/50% settlement would enable him to do so. You can guess
the answer that he received from the unfortunate customer of
DIRECT LINE.
We are aware that DIRECT LINE in a
recent poll as to service did not do so well and it is no wonder if
the case above is typical of their idea of service.
As far as we are concerned it is a
politically inspired motive involved in this case and the very fact
that after months of silence and within days of opening the can of
worms about the NEW WORLD ORDER that a call should be received by
the individual concerned on a matter which should have been resolved
within a few months of its occurrence in OCTOBER 2006..
WE WILL KEEP YOU POSTED!
*
* *
By Myron C. Fagan
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagendabestoverviewyet8jun02.shtml
June 8, 2002
Part 1
(Original title: The Illuminati and the
Council on Foreign Relations
)
The question of how and why the United Nations
is the crux of the great conspiracy to destroy the sovereignty
of the United States and the enslavement of the American people
within a U.N. one-world dictatorship is a complete and unknown
mystery to the vast majority of the American people.
The reason for this unawareness of the
frightening danger to our country and to the entire free world
is simple. The masterminds behind this great conspiracy have
absolute control of all of our mass communications media,
especially television, the radio, the press, and Hollywood.
We all know that our State Department, the
Pentagon, and the White House have brazenly proclaimed that they
have the right and the power to manage the news, to tell us not
the truth but what they want us to believe.
They have seized that power on orders from
their masters of the great conspiracy and the objective is to
brainwash the people into accepting the phony peace bait to
transform the United States into an enslaved unit of the United
Nations' one-world government....
Click above for full transcript.
We noticed on Channel 4 news yesterday Wednesday
the 25th March-2009 one of the main adherents of the NEW WORLD ORDER
-the satanic Henry Kissinger with one of his rare appearances in
public and we were shown the effects of drug wars in Mexico and USA.
As mentioned previously there is little that is happening in the
world which is not of the making of the NWO as to spread chaos is
their chosen method of achieving THEIR ENDS. You will witness
over the coming months and possible years a break down in law and
order in many countries possibly even in our own which will more
than likely be the actions of the satanic NEW WORLD ORDER. SO!
when you see disorder around you just bear in mind that it has been
created for a common purpose-WORLD GOVERNMENT. Of course many people
will shrug their shoulders and murmur So What!. They will soon
realise that in the end they will suffer but were TOO LATE! to do
anything about it.
MARCH-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
ON
NEW WORLD ORDER
No 6 |
|
|
|
|
Change?
Obama Inner Circle Filled With Bilderbergers
By
Victor Thorn
FOR TWO YEARS, Americans have
heard an unrelenting mantra of change emanating
from the campaign trail. But now that
President-elect Barack Obama has begun forming
his cabinet, we’re seeing a cadre of more deeply
entrenched insiders than any administration that
has preceded it.
In regard to key foreign policy advisors, all
three of Obama’s selections either initially
supported the Iraq war, or still do. On the
economic front, each appointee maintains a close
relationship with the Jewish triad of Ben
Bernanke, Robert Rubin and Alan Greenspan—as
well as bailout engineer Henry Paulson. Barack
Obama himself is a Council on Foreign Relations
member, has strong ties to Zbigniew Brzezinski,
and participated in a clandestine meeting with
Hillary Clinton at Bilderberg member Diane
Feinstein’s house at the time when 2008
Bilderberg members were congregating only a few
miles away.
Below is an overview of Obama’s top 14
selections to date. When considering their
collective histories, a trend becomes clear,
proving that the more things change under Obama,
the more they stay
THE SAME.
|
1.
TIMOTHY GEITHNER – TREASURY SECRETARY
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations,
Trilateral Commission, president and CEO of
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, director of
policy development for IMF, member Group of
Thirty (G30), employed at Kissinger &
Associates, architect of the recent 2008
financial bailouts, mentored by Lawrence Summers
and Robert Rubin.
2. PAUL VOLCKER – ECONOMIC RECOVERY ADVISORY
BOARD
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, North
American chairman of Trilateral Commission,
Federal Reserve chairman during Carter and
Reagan administrations, president of Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, G30 member, chairman
Rothschild Wolfensohn Company, key figure in the
collapse of the gold standard during the Nixon
administration, longtime associate of the
Rockefeller family.
3. RAHM EMANUEL – CHIEF OF STAFF
Member of Israeli Defense Force, staunch
Zionist, congressman, Board of Directors for
Freddie Mac, member of Bill Clinton’s finance
campaign committee, made $16.2 million during
2.5 years as an investment banker for
Wasserstein Perella. His father was a member of
the Israeli Irgun terrorist group.
4. LAWRENCE SUMMERS – NATIONAL ECONOMIC COUNCIL
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations,
Trilateral Commission, treasury secretary during
Clinton administration, chief economist at World
Bank, former president of Harvard University,
Brookings Institute board member, huge proponent
of globalization while working for the IMF, prot駩
of David Rockefeller, mentored by Robert Rubin.
5. DAVID AXELROD – SENIOR ADVISOR
Political consultant whose past clients include
Sens. Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and
Christopher Dodd; main Obama fixer in the
William Ayers and Reverend Wright scandals.
6. HILLARY CLINTON – SECRETARY OF STATE
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations,
Trilateral Commission, clandestine CIA asset
used to infiltrate the anti-war movement at Yale
University and the Watergate hearings, senior
partner at the Rose Law Firm, key figure in the Mena drug trafficking affair, architect of the
Waco disaster, implicated in the murder/
cover-up of Vince Foster, and many other deaths.
7. JOSEPH BIDEN – VICE PRESIDENT
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, U.S.
Senator since 1972, member of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, current chairman of the
U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations,
strong Zionist sympathizer who recently told
Rabbi Mark S. Golub of Shalom TV, “I am a
Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a
Zionist.”
8. BILL RICHARDSON – COMMERCE SECRETARY
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former
U.S. congressman, chairman of the Democratic
National Convention in 2004, employee of
Kissinger Associates, UN ambassador, governor of
New Mexico, energy secretary, major player in
the Monica Lewinsky cover-up with Bilderberg
luminary Vernon Jordan.
9. ROBERT GATES – DEFENSE SECRETARY
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former
CIA Director, defense secretary under President
Bush, co-chaired CFR task force with Zbigniew
Brzezinski, knee-deep in the Iran-Contra
scandal, named in a 1999 class action lawsuit
pertaining to the Mena drug trafficking affair.
10. TOM DASCHLE – HEALTH SECRETARY
Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former
Senate majority leader, Citibank lackey,
mentored by Robert Rubin.
11. ERIC HOLDER – ATTORNEY GENERAL
Key person in the pardon of racketeer Marc Rich,
deputy attorney general under Janet Reno,
facilitated the pardon of 16 Puerto Rican FALN
terrorists under Bill Clinton.
12. JANET NAPOLITANO – HOMELAND SECURITY
DIRECTOR
Council on Foreign Relations, Arizona governor,
attorney for Anita Hill during the Clarence
Thomas hearings, U.S. attorney during the
Clinton administration, instrumental in the OKC
cover-up, where she declared, “We’ll pursue
every bit of evidence and every lead,” described
as another Janet Reno, soft on illegal
immigration (i.e. pro-amnesty and drivers
licenses to illegals).
13. GEN. JAMES L. JONES – NATIONAL SECURITY
ADVISOR
Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, European
supreme allied commander, special envoy for
Middle-East Security during Bush administration,
board of directors for Chevron and Boeing, NATO
commander, member of Brent Scowcroft’s Institute
for International Affairs along with Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Bobby Ray Inman, Bilderberg luminary
Henry Kissinger and former CIA Director John
Deutch.
14. SUSAN RICE – U.N. AMBASSADOR
Council on Foreign Relations,
Rhodes scholar,
campaign foreign policy advisor to presidential
candidates John Kerry and Michael Dukakis,
member of Bill Clinton’s National Security
Council and assistant secretary of state for
Africa, member of the Brookings Institute
(funded by the Ford Foundation and the
Rockefellers), and member of the Aspen Strategy
Group (teeming with Bilderberg insiders such as
Richard Armitage, Brent Scowcroft, and Madeleine
Albright).
Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher,
journalist and the author of many books on 9-11
and the New World Order. These include
9-11 Evil: The Israeli Role in 9-11 and
Phantom Flight 93.
Subscribe to American Free Press.
Online subscriptions: One year of weekly
editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC
BOOK - HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR - By Michael Piper.
By Myron C.
Fagan
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagendabestoverviewyet8jun02.shtml
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
ON
NEW WORLD ORDER
No 3
|
|
|
|
|
Looking for
Allies to Resist the
New World Order
[Editor's Note: This
started out as a contact page for people in the England, but now
will include other countries as well. So far, the list includes
the United Kingdom, Germany, Lithuania, Australia, New Zealand,
Mexico, South Africa, the USA, Switzerland, Norway, Finland,
Turkey, Serbia, Croatia, Canada, and Spain.
The New World Order enslavement
and genocide agendas are going forward worldwide, but it seems
that the aggressiveness of Big Brother coercion is more
pronounced in the U.K. and in the United States. England,
especially, has been imposing Big Brother controls on her
citizens a few years before they show up here in the USA. You
might recall that the proliferation of street cameras bloomed
first in London before they started showing up in American
cities. England's national ID system will eventually entail the
loss of possessing a passport if Britons don't submit to Big
Brother's biometric ID requirements. We will see the same thing
in America in a few short years. Recently,
UK's Big Brother has installed loudspeakers (in some areas) next
to their ubiquitous surveillance cameras. When someone drops
a gum wrapper on the street in London, a policeman comes on the
loudspeaker and tells that person to pick it up. I heard a
British official tell a radio interviewer just how 'beneficial'
this sort of monitoring will be for British society. It will
"protect" those who obey the rules and "catch" those who don't.
How wonderful. We now have something to look forward to here in
America.
The slaughter of all of those
cows and sheep in the UK a few years ago under the pretext of
the super-hyped and manufactured Mad Cow
Disease 'epidemic' was intended to reduce the
total availability of FOOD stock, so Britons will be
forced to accept government restrictions in order to obtain food
(from the government of course) when Crunch Time comes. They are
killing off hundreds of thousands of animal food stock resources
(chickens, turkeys, etc) in a number of countries under the
pretext of a Bird-flu "epidemic" which simply does NOT exist.
The whole Bird-flu "pandemic' is nonsense. It's
hyperbole from top to bottom; it's all smoke and mirrors.
Limiting and controlling who gets the available food is the real
agenda. A similar ploy is underway to make is appear that
water will soon become a scarce commodity as
well.
The only way to stop
these agendas nationally, is to organize LOCALLY and force LOCAL
politicians to heel. When you have a political base locally, you
can then pressure middle level politicians, who in turn can
pressure those at the top.
Signing petitions is meaningless and a total waste of time.
Organizing at the grass roots level for political
and lawsuit activity is the only thing to think
about. If times become lean and mean, it would be a good idea to
be prepared by cultivating a 'Victory' garden in your back yard
and perhaps think about creating a fish pond, an easy source of
protein that is not likely to be "seized" from you. .
I'll post a contact sheet for
anyone who's hoping to find allies in their local area. Just
send me whatever contact information you want posted, tell me
your country and city (region) and I'll put it up. I'll create a
special e-mail address just for this purpose, but for now, send
you info to <pitari(at)
peoplepc(dot)com> and write "Allies Contact Sheet" in the
subject line.
If ordinary citizens don't become
involved in countering the
NWO enslavement agenda in
their home country, ...then who will? The politicians and
"leaders" who are betraying you?... ...Ken Adachi]
http://educate-yourself.org/lte/lookingforUKallies06apr07.shtml
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAJOR ISSUES
BULLETIN
ON
NEW WORLD ORDER
TACTICS. No 1
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT YOU NEED
TO KNOW
NOW!
*
Latest Info On The Microwave
Vertical Array
ELF Towers Being Erected Countrywide
ARE
THEY NEAR
YOU?
[Editor's Note: The
info you are about to read was posted today (May 25,
2002) by Don Croft. The explanation for the ELF towers
discussed below from the anonymous source makes perfect
sense to me. The erection of these microwave towers
around the world are part of a huge electronic deception
operation known as
Project Blue Beam. I had already learned from
Sterwart Swerdlow that the kickoff date for the NWO
takeover was supposed to have been year 2000, but the
date was pushed up to 2003 due to unforseen obstacles
impeding the agenda; gun control in America being one of
them. It's worthwhile to note from the anonymous writer
that Kevlar suits, lined with lead, can
effectively block these ELF waves and prevent brain
entrainment. Don Croft is convinced that the presence of
DOR (Wilhelm Reich's acronym for Deadly Orgone
energy) is necessary for these mind control towers to
work. Don maintains that an
orgone generating device called a Holy
Handgrenade can transmute DOR into the more
positive, life affirming form of orgone called "OR" by
discoverer Wilhelm Reich. Don and his wife feel that
removing the DOR component from the environment of an
ELF tower, will mitigate the mind control function. He
may be right. I can't say for sure, but it's worth your
time to at least read about this easy-to-build orgone
generator and acquaint yourself with the topic. I have
seen the effectiveness of another orgone generating
device, the
Chembuster, to disperse and clear the sky of
chemtrails. Many people have reported that the
Chembuster can break up chemtrails and return the sky to
a
normal color of blue.
If you've been looking into the NWO
takeover story for any amount of time, you may know by now
that negatively orientated aliens, especially the
negative Reptillians (see David Icke's
The
Biggest Secret), are the hidden controllers behind
the
Illuminated humans pushing for the NWO
enslavement/genocide agenda. The Rule of Polarity or Duality
requires an opposite force in place to offer an alternative
choice and so it seems that friendly alien groups have been
assisting certain energetic individuals in this harrowing
period of our evolution to counter the negative agenda...Ken
Adachi]
From Don & Carol Croft <terminatorthree@earthlink.net>
http://educate-yourself.org/dc/dclatestonmctowerarrays25may02.shtml
May 23, 2002
Are you curious about why those new towers
are going up in all populated areas? We've gathered a lot
of information to indicate that the arrays are intended for
mind control purposes. My wife and I found a way to
neutralize them with a simple device called a Holy
Handgrenade and have been doing so in recent months in
various locations around the country. We place them in an
inconspicuous location within effective range of the tower.
We often bury them, base down with the pointed end up, to
maximize its concealment. If you read the `chembuster'
story, it includes
instructions to build the Holy Handgrenades or "HHg."
I borrowed that term from the movie, Monty Python's Holy
Grail, but I'm dead serious about this work.
There are people in
12 countries now making and deploying HHg's
to neutralize these ELF towers, but
this is just a start, of course. I figure that if one person
in every populated area decides to do this, the whole tower
network will be disabled in a short time. The effective
range of the device described in Metatech's material is at
least a quarter mile, so don't put it close enough where a
team of searchers would find it. It's best if the person
making and deploying his own HHg's doesn't discuss it with
me or many others and keeps their activities to themselves.
This will only succeed as a grassroots effort.
Here's some skinny on these towers from a
friend of mine who has had access to some crucial inside
information. My comments are in squared brackets( [ ] ) He's
not fully informed, yet, of what our HHg's can do
Don Croft
The Purpose Behind The Neighborhood ELF
Microwave Towers
Sent To Don Croft By an unnamed source
May 23, 2002
Think grid triangulation.
Like the old grid paper, put a dot at each corner. expand
the box outward. Each level of panel acts also dimensionally
(not like 4th, but in 3rd space dimensions, don), or to put
it another way, pitch, yaw, up, down, right, left, x, y,
intensity, duration, frequency pulse, etc, those kind of
dimensions.
The whole damn dumb show was
supposed to go down in late 99,
but they didn't get people's guns,
that big final
obstacle to fascism. That's when they hit upon these ELF
towers. Tested them in Ventura, Africa, and the Sudan. They
had
GWEN operational in '92, but it did entire counties and
would affect their own people, who have body suits they were
(lined with lead-impregnated kevlar- which blocks elf and
piggyback freqs.).
So
they found out that the little towers, by the tens of
thousands, they could literally aim any energy like a gun
to a single home, a given range area, and so forth. Big
places run by FEMA/NORAD run it all from computers. But they
can also go remote, with the proper clearance and hookup.
They found out they didn't need to get the guns (that's
why the push and schoolyard shootings stopped here; they
no longer needed that scare op that worked so well in
England, Australia, Germany, ....)
Now...how can you fire a gun or load it, if you are crawling
on the ground begging for mercy? If you can imagine the
worst abdominable pain there is, then you know how
debiliating it is - you simply can't do anything, but lie on
the ground and pray for relief [Editor's Note: this
assertion has been corroborated by Al Bielek, Stewart
Swerdlow, Col. Fletcher Prouty, and even Major Ed Dames.
During the 1991 Gulf War, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi
troops spontaneously surrendered without even attempting to
fight. It was this very ELF mind control technology which
had been applied and rendered them impotent... Ken Adachi].
Then they can clean up entire streets, districts, small
towns, enclaves, as needed. They don't need to pulse the
whole country at once. Only as they do sweeps would they
need to fire the machine up. And it is great for little
revolts as they are sure to spring up. You can aim this grid
like a net, down to the meter's distance. Got a neighborhood
or backwoods community that isn't cow towing the NWO line?
Simple, fire up the machine and down they go...as you walk
through, kill the ringleaders, disarm the rest, then the
lesson is taught to the survivors
These towers ARE very important to their plans this year.
THIS IS NOT EVEN A QUESTION.
The French pioneered this
technology in the late 70s from Bell Labs. They created a
device for crowd control that looks like a big baseball
stadium loudspeaker. It fits into the back of a van. Then
they'd open the doors, pointing the van at the crowd. I've
seen the device.
It operates on a 5 cycle
bass wave, elf. Made everyone drop to their knees with
stomach nausea. [Carol felt that frequency as we drove by
one of the towers, which was operating above the usual 15%
capacity, apparently, on a recent trip]
Your towers are the same
thing, but with bi-phase polarity freqs that can induce
hallucinations, nausea, herpes outbreaks (every organism has
its own cellular freq) or whatever they want you to feel
that day...horniness, anger, whatever.
Or stupefication...the walking dumb...look around, Don, and
tell me what you SEE. Even though our spirit is full of fire
and life, it has to, by nature of the 3D prison planet,
function through the brain. YOU CAN'T EVADE THAT FACT AND
NO AMOUNT OF METAPHYSICS WHATEVER can change that. I can
make you brilliant or stupid, just by inserting a chemical
or frequency wave into your brain. The potential of Einstein
is within us all - the brain is the GREAT BARRIER REEF to
this.
NO AMOUNT OF METAPHYSICS
WHATEVER can change that
[I believe that if we have a
HHg in our energy field this won't be effective against us,
personally]
I can prove it with an
icepick under your left eye [lobotomy]. Ask Frances Farmer
about that.
It's the brain we have to
work for and with. if the instrument is defective (****** is
an example you have to understand here) no amount of good
spirit can affect a positive outcome UNTIL THE BRAIN, THE
ETHERIC WEB, AND ALL THAT is fixed. This isn't dogma, this
is metaphysical fact, taught to us no matter what degree we
were or what the org was that trained us.
FACTOID
They need only enter your brain, and your good heart
notwishtanding, YOU ARE theirs. I don't care how many lives
of service you have or what your radiance factor is. Once
they manipulate the brain on an ELF level, you are f****d.
And...that is your towers, so to say. It's the final trump
card and they have it in full. Just stick around
awhile...especially as winter approaches.
The Brainwashed, the Proud,
the Few- the Cannon Fodder.
We can't make enough elmers [Holy
Handgrenades] to stop it in most places. And according to my
SIGHT, they plan on going around and collecting these little
gifts [HHg's] when the time comes, by using privates in the
military who are immune to hhgs and all that, cuz they are
the brainwashed, the proud, the few, the cannon fodder.
[Since these towers have a
range of up to a mile or more, now might be a good time to
dowse locations farther away the tower base than right up
against the tower fence, since the minimum range of a HHg is
about a quarter mile (equivalent to 1,300 feet or the length
of four football fields) . Don Croft ]
Related
Disguising
Cell Phone Towers
http://www.waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=5df351c0-98ea-4b8c-9a84-844f67beb552
Total Population Control by Nicholas Jones (July 12, 2002)
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/mctotalcontrol12jul02.shtml
*
['It is the mind that maketh
good or ill,
that maketh wretch or happy,
rich or poor.'
The Fairy Queen-Edmund Spenser
(1552-1599) In that day a Queen of
England-Queen Elizabeth I stood with HER PEOPLE when
invasion was threatened and did not sign a treaty to sell
her country to European powers as her named successor had
done in 2008.]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets.]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
ON
NEW WORLD ORDER
No 4
|
|
|
|
|
The Illuminati Agenda
(Best Historical Overview Yet- Transcript of 1967
Recording)FOR A
NEW WORLD ORDER
[This is no secret to many of you because you
are constantly hearing the above term out of the mouths of such as
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown in the UK and Barrack Obama and all
presidents since President Kennedy who changed his mind and fought
against the ILLUMINATE by issuing his own American currency instead
of relying on the ILLUMINATI controlled FEDERAL RESERVE BANK and for
his patriotism he was assassinated. So there is nothing here you do
not know. What follows will take an open mind to fully understand
the fullest consequences of the behind the centuries double -dealing
which has led to a UN which is but an instrument to achieve their
aims of an elite with such restricted numbers of zombies that they
will allow to live -within a World Government dictatorship-now read
on.-]
[Editor's Note: The following is a transcript of
a recording distributed in 1967 by
Myron C. Fagan. He had hoped that if enough Americans had
heard (or read) this summary, the Illuminati's
plan to destroy
America would have been aborted, just as Russia's Alexander I
had torpedoed the Illuminati's plans for a One World, League of
Nations at the Congress of Vienna from 1814-15. Fagan correctly
describes those members of congress, the executive branch, and
the judicial branch of that time as TRAITORS for their role in
assisting to implement the downfall of America's sovereignty.
It's understandable that most listeners of that period would
have found it difficult to believe that the Kennedy's, for
instance, were (are) part of the Illuminati plot, but he did say
that Jack had a spiritual rebirth and attempted to rescue the
country from the Illuminati's stranglehold by issuing US silver
certificates, which apparently greatly contributed to the
Illuminati's decision to assassinate him (his son, John Jr., was
also murdered because he had intended to expose his father's
killers after he gained public office).
Today we realize that the Illuminati exerts
almost 100% control over all three branches of the American
government and the few remaining congressional defenders of
America can be counted on one hand as the intense public
vilification and disparagement recently directed at Rep. Cynthia
McKinney of Georgia will bear witness to. It's too late in the
game now to expect any patriot remaining within government
service to rescue us from the brutal destruction that lies
ahead, but the American people can save themselves from these
satanic destroyers of liberty & life through NON-COOPERATION
and NON-COMPLIANCE. The Illuminati plans to incorporate
MIND
CONTROL to force compliance, but their
ELF mind control towers can be neutralized before that
happens if enough people become aware of the enslavement agenda.
The current crop of traitors with names like
Rumsfeld, are merely stooges for hidden
corporate satanists who, in turn, are themselves stooges for
repressive alien overlords as described in the latest books of
David Icke and the
lectures of Al Bielek. You must play some role to help save
your children and this world from these madmen. Help fulfill
Fagan's Hope and distribute this article far and wide. My
gratitude to Dr. Kanya Vashon McGhee <drkanya9@hotmail.com>
of the
Tree of Life bookstore for forwarding this important
transcript to me...Ken Adachi]
By Myron C. Fagan
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagendabestoverviewyet8jun02.shtml
June 8, 2002
Part 1
(Original title: The Illuminati and the
Council on Foreign Relations )
The question of how and why the United Nations
is the crux of the great conspiracy to destroy the sovereignty
of the United States and the enslavement of the American people
within a U.N. one-world dictatorship is a complete and unknown
mystery to the vast majority of the American people.
The reason for this unawareness of the
frightening danger to our country and to the entire free world
is simple. The masterminds behind this great conspiracy have
absolute control of all of our mass communications media,
especially television, the radio, the press, and Hollywood.
We all know that our State Department, the
Pentagon, and the White House have brazenly proclaimed that they
have the right and the power to manage the news, to tell us not
the truth but what they want us to believe.
They have seized that power on orders from
their masters of the great conspiracy and the objective is to
brainwash the people into accepting the phony peace bait to
transform the United States into an enslaved unit of the United
Nations' one-world government.
First of all, bear in mind that the so-called
U.N. police action in Korea, fought by the United States in
which 150,000 of our sons were murdered and maimed, was part of
the plot; just as the undeclared by Congress war in Vietnam in
which our sons are dying is part of the plot; just as the plot
against Rhodesia and South Africa in which our sons will be
dying is part of the U.N. plot.
However, the vitally important thing for all
Americans, all you mothers of the boys who died in Korea and are
now dying in Vietnam, to know is that our so-called leaders in
Washington, who we elected to safeguard our nation and our
constitution, are the betrayers and that behind them are a
comparatively small group of men whose sole objective is to
enslave the whole world of humanity in their satanic plot of
one-world government.
Now in order to give you a very clear picture
of this satanic plot, I will go back to its beginning, clear
back in the middle of the 18th century and name the men who put
that plot into action and then bring you down to the present -
today's status of that plot. Now as a matter of further
intelligence, a term used by the FBI, let me clarify the meaning
of the expression "he is a liberal."
The enemy, meaning the one-world conspirators,
have seized upon that word "liberal" as a cover-up for their
activities. It sounds so innocent and so humanitarian to be
liberal. Well, make sure that the person who calls himself a
liberal or is described as a liberal is not in truth a "red."
Now then, this satanic plot was launched back
in the 1760's when it first came into existence under the name "Illuminati."
This Illuminati was organized by one Adam Weishaupt, born
a Jew, who was converted to Catholicism and became a Catholic
priest, and then, at the behest of the then newly organized
House of Rothschild, defected and organized the Illuminati.
Naturally, the Rothschilds financed that
operation and every war since then, beginning with the French
Revolution, has been promoted by the Illuminati operating under
various names and guises. I say under various names and guises
because after the Illuminati was exposed and became notorious,
Weishaupt and his co-conspirators began to operate under various
other names. In the United States, immediately after World War
I, they set up what they called the "Council on Foreign
Relations," commonly referred to as the CFR, and this CFR is
actually the Illuminati in the United States and its hierarchy.
The masterminds in control of the original
Illuminati conspirators, but to conceal that fact, most of them
changed their original family names to American sounding names.
For example, the true name of the Dillons, Clarence and
Douglas Dillon (one Secretary of the U.S. Treasury
Department), is Laposky. I'll come back to all this
later.
There is a similar establishment of the
Illuminati in England operating under the name of the "British
Institute of International Affairs." There are similar
secret Illuminati organizations in France, Germany, and other
nations operating under different names and all these
organizations, including the CFR, continuously set up numerous
subsidiary or front organizations that are infiltrated into
every phase of the various nations' affairs. But at all times,
the operations of these organizations were and are masterminded
and controlled by the Internationalist Bankers, they in turn
were and are controlled by the Rothschilds.
One branch of the Rothschild family had
financed Napoleon; another branch of the Rothschilds financed
Britain, Germany, and the other nations in the Napoleonic wars.
Immediately after the Napoleonic wars, the
Illuminati assumed that all the nations were so destitute and so
weary of wars that they'd be glad for any solution, so the
Rothschild stooges set up what they called the Congress of
Vienna and at that meeting they tried to create the first
League of Nations, their first attempted one-world
government, on the theory that all the crowned heads of European
governments were so deeply in debt to them that they would
willingly or unwillingly serve as their stooges.
But the Czar of Russia caught the stench of
the plot and completely torpedoed it. The enraged Nathan
Rothschild, then the head of the dynasty, vowed that some
day he or his descendants would destroy the Czar and his entire
family, and his descendants did accomplish that very threat in
1917.
At this point, bear in mind that the
Illuminati was not set up to operate on a short-range basis.
Normally a conspirator of any type enters into a conspiracy with
the expectation of achieving his objective during his own
lifetime. But that was not the case with the Illuminati. True,
they hoped to accomplish their objective during their lifetime,
but paraphrasing "The show must go on," the Illuminati operates
on the very long-range basis. Whether it will take scores of
years or even centuries, they have dedicated their descendants
to keep the pot boiling until they hope the conspiracy is
achieved.
Now, let's go back to the birth of the
Illuminati. Adam Weishaupt was a Jesuit-trained professor of
canon law, teaching in Engelstock University, when he defected
from Christianity to embrace the luciferian conspiracy. It was
in 1770 that the professional money lenders, the then recently
organized House of Rothschild, retained him to revise and
modernize the age-old
Protocols of Zionism, which from the outset, was designed
to give the Synagogue of Satan, so named by Jesus Christ,
ultimate world domination so they could impose the luciferian
ideology upon what would remain of the human race after the
final social cataclysm by use of satanic despotism.
Weishaupt completed his task May 1, 1776.
Now you know why May 1 is the great day with all communist
nations to this very day (May 1 is also "Law Day" as declared by
the American Bar Association). That was the day, May 1, 1776,
that Weishaupt completed his plan and officially organized the
Illuminati to put the plan into execution. That plan required
the destruction of all existing governments and religions. That
objective was to be reached by dividing the masses of people,
whom he Weishaupt, termed: "goyism" or human cattle into
opposing camps in ever increasing numbers on political, social,
economic, and other issues - the very conditions we have in our
country today.
The opposing sides were then to be armed and
incidents provided which would cause them to fight and weaken
themselves and gradually destroy national governments and
religious institutions. Again I say, the very conditions in the
world today.
And at this point let me stress a prime
feature of the Illuminati plans. When and if their blueprint
for world control, the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion,
is discovered and exposed, they would wipe all the Jews off the
face of the earth in order to divert suspicions from themselves.
If you think this is far fetched, bear in mind that they
permitted Hitler, a liberal socialist himself, who was
financed by corrupt Kennedy, the Warburgs, and the
Rothschilds, to incinerate 600,000 Jews.
Now just why did the conspirators choose the
word: "Illuminati" for their satanic organization? Weishaupt
himself said that the word is derived from Lucifer and means:
"holder of the light." Using the lie that his objective was to
bring about a one-world government to enable those with mental
ability to govern the world and prevent all wars in the future.
In short, using the words: "peace on earth" as
his bait, exactly as that same bait as: "peace" was used by the
1945 conspirators to force the United Nations on us, Weishaupt
financed, I repeat, by the Rothschilds, recruited some 2,000
paid followers. These included the most intelligent men in the
field of arts and letters, education, the sciences, finance, and
industry.
He then established Lodges of the Grand
Orient; Masonic Lodges to be their secret headquarters and I
again repeat, that in all of this he was acting under orders
from the House of Rothschild. The main features of the Weishaupt
plan of operation required his Illuminati to do the following
things to help them to accomplish their purpose:
Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control
of men already in high places in the various of levels of all
governments and other fields of endeavor. Once influential
persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the
Illuminati they were to be held in bondage by application of
political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial
ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even death to themselves
and loved members of their families. Do you realize how many
present top officials in our present government in Washington
are controlled in just that way by the CFR? Do you realize how
many homosexuals in our State Department, the Pentagon, all
federal agencies, even in the White House are controlled that
way?
Illuminati and the faculties of colleges and
universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional
mental ability belonging to well-bred families with
international leanings and recommend them for special training
in internationalism. Such training was to be provided by
granting scholarships to those selected by the Illuminatists.
That gives you an idea what a "Rhodes scholarship" means.
It means indoctrination into accepting the idea that only a
one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife.
That's how the United Nations was sold to the American people.
One of the most notable Rhodes scholars we have in our country
is Senator William J. Fulbright, sometimes referred to as
half-bright. His entire voting record spells Illuminati. All
such scholars were to be first persuaded and then convinced that
men of special talent and brains have the right to rule those
less gifted on the ground that the masses don't know what is
best for them fiscally, mentally, and spiritually.
In addition to the Rhodes and similar
scholarships, today there are three special Illuminati schools
located in Gordonstown in Scotland, Salem in
Germany, and Annavrighta in Greece. These three are known
ones, but there are others that are kept undercover. Prince
Philip, the husband of Britain's Queen Elizabeth, was
educated at Gordonstown at the instigation of Lord Louis
Mountbatten, his uncle, a Rothschild relative, who became
Britain's Admiral of the Fleet after World War II ended.
All influential people trapped into coming
under the control of the Illuminati, plus the students who had
been specially educated and trained, were to be used as agents
and placed behind the scenes of all governments as experts and
specialists so they would advise the top executives to adopt
policies which would in the long run serve the secret plans of
the Illuminati one-world conspiracy and bring about the
destruction of the governments and religions they were elected
or appointed to serve.
Do you know how many such men operate in our
government at this very time? Dean Rusk, Robert
McNamara, Hubert Humphrey, Fulbright, Keekle,
and goes on and on and on.
Perhaps the most vital directive in
Weishaupt's plan was to obtain absolute control of the press, at
that time the only mass communications media, to distribute
information to the public so that all news and information could
be slanted so that the masses could be convinced that a
one-world government is the only solution to our many and varied
problems.
Do you know who owns and controls our mass
communications media? I'll tell you. Practically all the movie
lots in Hollywood is owned by the Lehmans; Kuhn, Loeb, and
Company; Goldman-Sachs; and other internationalist
bankers. All the national radio and TV channels in the nation
are owned and controlled by those same internationalists
bankers.
The same is true of every chain of
metropolitan newspapers and magazines, also of the press wire
services, such as Associated Press, United Press
International, etc.. The supposed heads of all those media
are merely the fronts for the internationalist bankers, who in
turn compose the hierarchy of the CFR, today's Illuminati in
America.
Now can you understand why the Pentagon Press
agent, Sylvester, so brazenly proclaimed that the
government has the right to lie to the people. What he really
meant was that our CFR controlled government had the power to
lie to and be believed by the brain-washed American people.
Let us again go back to the first days of the
Illuminati. Because Britain and France were the two greatest
world powers in the late years of the 18th Century; Weishaupt
ordered the Illuminati to foment the colonial wars, including
our Revolutionary War, to weaken the British Empire and organize
the French Revolution to start in 1789.
However; in 1784, a true act of God placed the
Bavarian government in possession of evidence which proved the
existence of the Illuminati and that evidence could have saved
France if they, the French government, hadn't refused to believe
it.
Here is how that act of God happened. It was
in 1784 that Weishaupt issued his orders for the French
Revolution. A German writer, named Zweig, put it
into book form. It contained the entire Illuminati story and
Weishaupt's plans. A copy of this book was sent to the
Illuminists in France headed by Robespierre whom
Weishaupt had delegated to foment the French Revolution.
The courier was struck and killed by
lightening as he rode through Rawleston on his way from
Frankfurt to Paris. The police found
the subversive documents on his body and turned them over to the
proper authorities. After a careful study of the plot; the
Bavarian government ordered the police to raid Weishaupt's newly
organized Lodges of the "Grand Orient" and the homes of his most
influential associates.
All additional evidence thus discovered
convinced the authorities that the documents were genuine copies
of the conspiracy by which the Illuminati planned to use wars
and revolutions to bring about the establishment of a one-world
government; the powers of which they, headed by the Rothschilds,
intended to usurp as soon as it was established, exactly in line
with the United Nations' plot of today.
In 1785, the Bavarian government
outlawed the Illuminati and closed the Lodges of the "Grand
Orient." In 1786; they published all the details of the
conspiracy. The English title of that publication is: "The
Original Writings of the Order and the Sect of the Illuminati."
Copies of the entire conspiracy were sent to all the heads of
church and state in Europe. But the power of the Illuminati,
which was actually the power of the Rothschilds, was so great
that this warning was ignored. Nevertheless; the Illuminati
became a dirty word and it went underground.
At the same time, Weishaupt ordered
Illuminists to infiltrate into the Lodges of "Blue Masonry" and
formed their own secret societies within all secret societies.
Only Masons who proved themselves internationalists and those
whose conduct proved they had defected from God were initiated
into the Illuminati. Thenceforth; the conspirators donned
the cloak of philanthropy and humanitarianism to conceal their
revolutionary and subversive activities.
In order to infiltrate into Masonic Lodges in
Britain; Weishaupt invited John Robison over to Europe.
Robison was a high degree Mason in the "Scottish Rite." He was a
professor of natural philosophy at Edinburgh University and
Secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Robison did not
fall for the lie that the objective of the Illuminati was to
create a benevolent dictatorship; but he kept his reactions to
himself so well that he was entrusted with a copy of Weishaupt's
revised conspiracy for study and safekeeping.
Anyway; because the heads of state and church
in France were deluded into ignoring the warnings given them;
the revolution broke out in 1789 as scheduled by Weishaupt. In
order to alert other governments to their danger, in 1798,
Robison published a book entitled: "Proof of a Conspiracy
to Destroy all Governments and Religions" but his warnings
were ignored exactly as our American people have been ignoring
all warnings about the United Nations and the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR).
Now here is something that will stun and very
likely outrage many who hear this; but there is documentary
proof that our own Thomas Jefferson and Alexander
Hamilton became students of Weishaupt. Jefferson was
one of Weishaupt's strongest defenders when he was outlawed by
his government and it was Jefferson who infiltrated the
Illuminati into the then newly organized lodges of the "Scottish
Rite" in New England. Here is the proof.
In 1789; John Robison warned all Masonic
leaders in America that the Illuminati had infiltrated into
their lodges and on July 19, 1789; David Papen, President
of Harvard University, issued the same warning to the graduating
class and lectured them on how the influence of Illuminism was
acquitting on American politics and religion, and to top it off;
John Quincy Adams, who had organized the New England
Masonic Lodges, issued his warnings.
Adams wrote three letters to Colonel
William L. Stone, a top Mason, in which he exposed how
Jefferson was using Masonic lodges for subversive Illuministic
purposes. Those three letters are at this very time in
Whittenburg Square Library in Philadelphia. In short;
Jefferson, founder of the Democratic Party, was a member
of the Illuminati which at least partly accounts for the
condition of the party at this time and through infiltration of
the Republican Party; we have exactly nothing of loyal
Americanism today.
That disastrous rebuff at the Congress of
Vienna created by the Czar of Russia, Alexander I, did
not by any means destroy the Illuminati conspiracy. It merely
forced them to adopt a new strategy realizing that the one-world
idea was, for the moment, killed. The Rothschild's decided that
to keep the plot alive they would have to do it by heightening
their control of the money system of the European nations.
Earlier; by a ruse the outcome of the
Battle of Waterloo had been falsified, Rothschild had
spread a story that Napoleon had one bad battle which
precipitated a terrific panic on the stock market in England.
All stocks had plummeted down to practically zero and Nathan
Rothschild bought all the stocks for virtually a penny on its
dollar values.
That gave him complete control of the
economy of Britain and virtually of all Europe.
So immediately after that Congress in Vienna had boomeranged;
Rothschild had forced Britain to set up a new "Bank of England"
which he had absolute control exactly, as later through Jacob
Schiff; he engineered our own "Federal Reserve Act" which
gave the House of Rothschild a secret control of the economy in
the United States. But now for a moment; let's dwell on the
activities of the Illuminati in the United States.
In 1826; one Captain William Morgan
decided it was his duty to inform all Masons and the general
public what the full proof was regarding the Illuminati, their
secret plans, intended objectives, and to reveal the identities
of the masterminds of the conspiracy. The Illuminati promptly
tried Morgan in absentia and convicted him of treason.
They ordered one Richard Howard, an
English Illuminist, to carry out their sentence of execution as
a traitor. Morgan was warned and he tried to escape to Canada,
but Howard caught up with him near the border; near the Niagara
Gorge to be exact, where he murdered him. This was verified in a
sworn statement made in New York by one Avery Allen to
the effect that he heard Howard render his report of the
execution to a meeting of "Knights Templers" in St. John's Hall
in New York. He also told how arrangements had been made to ship
Howard back to England.
That Allen affidavit is on record in New York
City Archives. Very few Masons and very few of the general
public know that general disapproval over that incident of
murder caused approximately half of all the Masons in the
northern jurisdiction of the United States to secede. Copies of
the minutes of the meeting held to discuss that matter are still
in existence in safe hands and that all that secrecy
emphasizes the power of the masterminds of the Illuminati to
prevent such terrible events of history from being taught in our
schools.
In the early 1850's; the Illuminati
held a secret meeting in New York which was addressed by
a British Illuminist named Wright. Those in
attendance were told that the Illuminati was organizing to
unite the Nihilist and Atheist groups with all other subversive
groups into an international group to be known as Communists.
That was when the word: "communist" first came into being and it
was intended to be the supreme weapon and scare word to terrify
the whole world and drive the terrorized peoples into the
Illuminati one-world scheme.
This scheme: "communism," was to be used to
enable the Illuminati to foment future wars and revolutions.
Clinton Roosevelt, a direct ancestor of Franklin
Roosevelt; Horace Greeley; and Charles Dana;
foremost newspaper publishers of that time were appointed to
head a committee to raise funds for the new venture. Of course,
most of the funds were provided by the Rothschilds and this fund
was used to finance Karl Marx and Engels when they
wrote "Das Kaptial" and the "Communist Manifesto"
in Soho, England. And this clearly reveals that communism is not
a so-called ideology, but a secret weapon; a bogy man word to
serve the purpose of the Illuminati.
Weishaupt died in 1830; but prior to his
death, he prepared a revised version of the age-old conspiracy,
the Illuminati, which under various aliases was to organize,
finance, direct, and control all international organizations and
groups by working their agents into executive positions at
the top.
In the United States we have Woodrow Wilson,
Franklin Roosevelt, Jack Kennedy, Lyndon
Johnson, Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara,
William Fulbright, George Bush etc., as prime
examples.
In addition, while Karl Marx was writing the
"Communist Manifesto" under the director of one group of
Illuminists, Professor Karl Ritter of Frankfurt
University was writing the antithesis under the direction of
another group.
The idea was that those who direct the overall
conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called
ideologies to enable them to divide larger and larger members of
the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed
and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.
And particularly, to destroy all political and religious
institutions.
The work Ritter started was continued after
his death and completed by the German so-called philosopher
Freidrich Wilhelm Nietzache who founded Nietzscheanism.
This Nietzecheanism was later developed into Fascism and
then into Nazism and was used to foment World War I and
II.
In 1834; the Italian revolutionary leader,
Guiseppe Mazzini, was selected by the Illuminati to direct
their revolutionary program throughout the world. He served in
that capacity until he died in 1872, but some years before he
died; Mazzini had enticed an American General named Albert
Pike into the Illuminati. Pike was fascinated by the idea of
a one-world government and ultimately he became the head of
this luciferian conspiracy.
Between 1859 and 1871 he, Pike, worked out
a military blueprint for three world wars and various
revolutions throughout the world which he considered would
forward the conspiracy to its final stage in the 20th century.
Again I remind you that these conspirators were never concerned
with immediate success. They also operated on a long-range view.
Pike did most of his work in his home in
Little Rock, Arkansas. But a few years later; when the
Illuminati's Lodges of the Grand Orient became suspect and
repudiated because of Mazzini's revolutionary activities in
Europe, Pike organized what he called the New and Reformed
Palladian Right.
He set up three Supreme Councils; one
in Charleston, South Carolina, one in Rome, Italy, and a third
in Berlin, Germany. He had Mazzini establish 23 subordinate
councils in strategic locations throughout the world. These have
been the secret headquarters of the world revolutionary movement
ever since.
Long before Marconi invented the radio; the
scientists in the Illuminati had found the means for Pike and
the heads of his councils to communicate secretly. It was
the discovery of that secret that enabled intelligence officers
to understand how apparently unrelated incidents, such as the
assassination of an Austrian Prince [Arch Duke Ferdinand
I ] at Serbia, took place simultaneously throughout the world
which developed into a war or a revolution.
Pike's plan was as simple as it has
proved effective. It called for Communism, Nazism,
political Zionism, and other international movements to
be organized and used to foment three global world wars
and at least two major revolutions.
The First World War was to be fought so
as to enable the Illuminati to destroy Czarism in Russia, as
vowed by Rothschild after the Czar had torpedoed his scheme at
the Congress in Vienna, and to transform Russia into a
stronghold of atheistic communism. The differences stirred up by
agents of the Illuminati between the British and German Empires
were to be used to foment this war. After the war would be
ended; communism was to be built up and used to destroy other
governments and weaken religions.
World War II,
when and if necessary, was to be fomented by using the
controversies between Fascists and political zionists, and here
let it be noted that Hitler was financed by Krupp,
the Warburgs, the Rothschilds, and other
internationalist bankers and that the slaughter of the supposed
600,000 Jews by Hitler didn't bother the Jewish internationalist
bankers at all.
That slaughter was necessary in order to
create worldwide hatred of the German people and thus bring
about war against them. In short; this second world war was
to be fought to destroy nazism and increase the power of
political zionism so that the state of Israel could be
established in Palestine.
During this World War II; international
communism was to be built up until it equalled in strength to
that of the united Christendom. When it reached that point; it
was to be contained and kept in check until required for the
final social cataclysm. As we know now; Roosevelt,
Churchill, and Stalin put that exact policy into
effect and Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy,
Johnson, and George Bush continued that same exact
policy.
World War III is
to be fomented by using the so-called controversies, the agents
of the Illuminati operating under whatever new name, as are now
being stored up between the political Zionists and the
leaders of the Moslem world. That war is to be directed in
such a manner that all of Islam and political Zionism (Israel)
will destroy each other while at the same time; the remaining
nations once more divided on this issue will be forced to fight
themselves into a state of complete exhaustion; physically,
mentally, spiritually, and economically.
Now, can any thinking person doubt that the
intrigue now going on in the near Middle and far East is
designed to accomplish that satanic objective? Albert Pike
himself foretold all this in a statement he made to Mazzini on
August 15, 1871. Pike stated that after World War III is
ended; those who will aspire to undisputed world domination will
provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world has ever known.
Quoting his own words taken from the letter he wrote to Mazzini
and which letter is now catalogued in the British Museum in
London, England; he said:
"We shall unleash
the nihilists and the atheists and we shall provoke a great
social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly
to all nations the effect of absolute atheism; the origins
of savagery and of most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the
people will be forced to defend themselves against the world
minority of the world revolutionaries and will exterminate
those destroyers of civilization and the multitudes
disillusioned with Christianity whose spirits will be from
that moment without direction and leadership and anxious for
an ideal, but without knowledge where to send its adoration,
will receive the true light through the universal
manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer brought
finally out into public view. A manifestation which will
result from a general reactionary movement which will follow
the destruction of Christianity and Atheism; both !
conquered and exterminated at the same time."
When Mazzini died in 1872; Pike made another
revolutionary leader named Adrian Lemmy; his successor.
Lemmy, in turn, was succeeded by Lenin and Trotsky,
then by Stalin. The revolutionary activities of
all those men were financed by British, French, German, and
American international bankers; all of them dominated by
the House of Rothschilds.
We are supposed to believe that the
international bankers of today, like the money changers of
Christ's day, are only the tools or agents of the great
conspiracy, but actually they are the masterminds behind all the
mass communications media leading us into believing that
communism is a movement of the so-called workers; the
actual fact is that both British and American intelligence
officers have authentic documentary evidence that international
liberals, operating through their international banking houses;
particularly the House of Rothschilds, have financed both
sides of every war and revolution since 1776.
Those who today comprise the conspiracy (the
CFR in the United States); direct our governments whom they hold
in usury through such methods as the Federal Reserve System in
America to fight wars, such as Vietnam (created by the United
Nations), so as to further Pike's Illuminati plans to bring the
world to that stage of the conspiracy when atheistic communism
and the whole of Christianity can be forced into an all out
third world war within each remaining nation as well as on an
international basis scale.
The headquarters of the great conspiracy in
the late 1700's was in Frankfurt, Germany where the House
of Rothschild had been established by Mayar (or Mayer)
Amschel who adopted the Rothschild name and linked together
other international financiers who had literally sold their
souls to the devil. After the Bavarian government's exposure in
1786; the conspirators moved their headquarters to
Switzerland then to London. Since World War II (after
Jacob Schiff, the Rothschild's boy in America died); the
headquarters of the American branch has been in the Harold
Pratt Building in New York City and the Rockefellers,
originally proteges of Schiff, have taken over the manipulation
of finances in America for the Illuminati.
In the final phases of the conspiracy;
the one-world government will consist of the king-dictator; the
head of the United Nations, the CFR, and a few billionaires,
economists, and scientists who have proved their devotion to the
great conspiracy. All others are to be integrated into a vast
conglomeration of mongrolized humanity; actually slaves.
Now let me show you how our federal government
and the American people have been sucked into the one-world take
over plot of the Illuminati great conspiracy and always bear in
mind, that the United Nations was created to become the housing
for that one-world, so-called, liberal conspiracy. The real
foundations of the plot of the takeover of the United States
were laid during the period of our Civil War. Not that
Weishaupt and the earlier masterminds had ever overlooked the
new world, as I have previously indicated; Weishaupt had his
agents planted over here as far back as the Revolutionary War,
but George Washington was more than a match for them.
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
*
[When you have read ALL
parts of this article you will suddenly realise how so many have
been fooled by so few]
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
MARCH-2009
|
|
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagendabestoverviewyet8jun02.shtml
|
|
|
|
|
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
ON
NEW WORLD
ORDER
No 2
|
|
|
|
|
Stealth Microwave Towers
& The 2004 Presidential Election
by Bruce Conway
http://www.lightwatcher.com
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/stealthmwtowers29jul04.shtml
July 29, 2004
Stealth Cell towers and the 2004
Presidential Elections
by Bruce Conway
http://www.lightwatcher.com
Late
last fall, I watched bemused as several plainclothes geeks
installed a cell tower behind our N.W. Island's Masonic Hall. It
went up quickly, and without any fanfare. The twist was that the
cell tower was disguised as an ordinary Flagpole. This was
patriotic, and very suspicious. The camouflaged stealth tower
was erected without any protests, warnings or announcements to
local businesses or residents.
Being
a curious person I investigated, and discovered to my great
surprise that "stealth towers" are being hastily erected
throughout the country, by the thousands. Camouflaged microwave
and cell phone towers are being disguised as cacti, palm trees,
church crosses, rock formations, water towers, and pine trees.
This is happening without any of the dissent or protest usually
surrounding cell tower erections.
Companies like Stealth Concealment Solutions of Charleston,
S.C., are doing a brisk business. They custom-disguise cell
towers to blend into their surroundings. It is estimated that up
to 30% of the new cell tower erections now going up are being
stealthily concealed.
When
one considers the rapid advancements in electromagnetic and
psychotronic mind control technology, this trend in utility
concealment is rather sinister. If researchers could
successfully project human speech into the minds of the deaf, as
Dr. Joseph C. Sharp of the Walter Reed Army Institute of
Research did in 1974, think of their present capabilities.
Consider this quote by a
pioneer in electromagnetic mind control: "Man does not have the
right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation
has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some
day armies and generals will be controlled by electric
stimulation of the brain." - Dr. Jose Delgado -1974
Congressional Record, No. 262E, Vol. 118.
Here is another
eye-opening quotation: "Contemporary neuroscience suggests the
existence of fundamental algorithms by which all sensory
transduction is translated into the intrinsic, brain-specific
code. Direct stimulation of these codes within the human
temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic patterns
may require energy levels which are within the range of both
geomagnetic activity and contemporary communication networks. A
process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain temperature
could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a
sub-harmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz would only
vary by 0.1 Hz." - On the Possibility of Directly accessing
every human brain by electromagnetic induction of fundamental
algorithms - by M.A. Persinger, Laurentian University /
Perceptual and Motor Skills, June 1995, 80, 791-799.
And now, one final
quotation to put the issue of stealth cell towers into a proper
political perspective: "As an expert and juridical personality I
declare: In Kiev was launched a mass production of
Psychotronical Biogenerators and their tests. I cannot assert
that during the coup d'etat were used exactly the Kiev
generators. All the same the fact that they were used is evident
to me. What are the Psychotronical generators? They are
electrical equipment which produces the effect of guided control
in human organisms. It affects especially the left and right
hemisphere of the cortex. This is also the technology of the
U.S. project Zombie 5 . . . I draw on my personal experience
since I am myself the designer of such a generator." Quote by
Victor Sedleckij, the Vice President of the League of
Independent Soviet Scientists / Komsomolskaya Pravda / August
27, 1991
With the U.S.
Presidential election coming up in a few short months, it is
likely that the stealth cell tower network being rapidly
constructed is destined to play an important role in remotely
influencing the perceptions, thoughts and decisions of American
voters.
Stealth Tower online
resources:
http://napps.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0202widernetcelltowers.html
http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,57199,00.html
http://www.stealthsite.com/
http://www.stealthsite.com/products/gallery.html
Mind Control Documentation
"A Method for the Remote Control of Electrical Stimulation of
the Nervous System." E.L. Chaffee and R.U. Light. Yale Journal
of Biology & Medicine, 1934, 7.
"Multichannel Transdermal Stimulation of the Brain." J.M.R.
Delgado. Technical Documentary Report No. ARL-TR-70-1, New
Mexico: Holloman Air Force Base, 1970.
Psychotechnology: Electronic Control of Mind and Behavior.
Robert L. Schwitzgebel and Ralph K. Schwitzgebel (Editors). New
York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1973.
Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control. Harvey
Weinstein, M.D. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press,
1990.
"U.S. Explores Russian Mind-Control Technology." Barbara Opall.
Defense News, January 11-17, 1993.
(The following info is
courtesy of Stan Cayer< stan@opal-essence.com>
. The mind
control microwave towers used in England are called the "Tetra"
system)
See also:
"I'll be able to affect
the behavior of 80 per cent of the people in this town without
their knowing it"
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/326834
/
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
From:
http://www.starweave.com/ecologist/
A popular Revolt
17 September 2004
Costing £2,9 millions,
the UK's new police communication system Tetra has been
described by one independent scientist as likely to cause 'more
civilian deaths than all the world's terrorist organisations put
together.'
Llanidloes is a small,
open-hearted market town in a damp and lovely valley in mid
Wales. It is a town with a strong identity and a long memory;
some people still live in the street where they were born.
Solidly Welsh, and
surrounded by farmland, Llanidloes also has a smattering of
English blow-ins; people who are into organic veg and eco-design
and jazz, and who chirpily co-exist with no more than the odd
grumble from locals about the 'hippy contingent'.
And then, stealthily, on
a bank holiday weekend in May, the mobile phone company O2
(through its subsidiary MMO2) erected a Tetra mast in the heart
of the town. O2's idea of 'consultation' was legal but risible:
it did little more than inform the mayor and town council that
it was putting the mast up, whether Llanidloes liked it or not.
And Llanidloes did not.
There was an outcry.
Posters were put up in windows, a march held, banners made. (One
banner flew from the top of the mast itself.) Llanidloes joined
what The Times has described as a 'popular revolt' against
Tetra.
The local people felt
bullied by a giant of a company. For many of them, it's an issue
of local democracy: they should have the right to refuse. 'In
Llanidloes,' says the stalwart and thoughtful local councillor
Morgan, 'we have a history of David beating Goliath.' Someone
else tells me that the town was the site of a Chartist riot in
the 19th century.
And then the people of
Llanidloes began educating themselves. What they discovered,
just like hundreds of communities around the country, is the
full staggering story of Tetra. A story that involves science
being 'perverted for political ends', chronic illness and
agonising death, one of the country's leading scientists
performing an extraordinary U-turn, a company that openly
confesses to taking no responsibility for the safety of what it
produces, a financial scandal, a political scandal and, above
all else, a health scandal. ^
If you live near a Tetra
mast, then this story affects you directly. And considering that
there will eventually be at least 3,200 such masts erected in
the UK, there will be one near you.
Tetra stands for
'Terrestrial Trunked Radio'. It is the new police communication
system using microwave radiation and low-frequency
electromagnetic pulsing, and is operated by O2 under the brand
name Airwave.
'Airwave,' says a police
source, 'is better than the old system for voice traffic: at
least we don't get interference from Dutch cabbies anymore.' It
also prevents criminals from listening in, as it has it's own
private, digitally encrypted frequency. At present, police
forces run their own analogue radio system, and it can be
difficult for neighbouring forces to communicate with each
other. By the end of 2005 this will no longer be a problem, as
by then all the country's constabularies will have switched over
to Tetra.
Not everyone, however,
is so enthusiastic about Tetra. Dr Gerard Hyland, an expert in
low-level radiation, member of the International Institute of
Biophysics and prominent Tetra critic, states: 'With the Tetra
roll-out we could be seeing a pandemic of brain tumours in 10
years.' Low-frequency radiation, says Hyland, affects brain
function and the blood-brain barrier and degrades the immune
system..
Children are known to
absorb far more radiation than adults. Writing in the medical
journal The Lancet in November 2000, Hyland stated: 'Radiation
is known to affect the brain rhythms, and children are
particularly vulnerable... The main effects are neurological,
causing headaches, memory loss and sleeping disorders.'
See also:
Antipersonnel weapons
from EMRF
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/329640/
(...) British policemen are now suffering from insomnia,
headaches, nausea, vertigo and hearing loss whilst using
handsets with the new Tetra masts. As have villagers in
Kensworth (as well as painful, bloodshot eyes; nose-bleeds;
strokes etc.) ever since the Orange mast was activated in
September 2001. CLIP
Health problems from
Cell phones
http://www.cprnews.com/worldnews.cfm?id=172
(...) Radiation from mobile phones causes changes to human cells
which could pose risks to health, an authoritative two-year
study has concluded. CLIP
The invisible disease
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/328268/
The dangers of environmental illnesses caused by electromagnetic
fields and chemical emissions.
ELECTRO -
HYPERSENSITIVITY & THE CHEMICAL CONNECTION
http://www.geocities.com/emrsafety/electromagnetic_radiation.htm
ELECTRO-HYPERSENSITIVITY
HYPER SENSITIVE PEOPLE
http://www.geocities.com/emrsafety/electrohypersensitivity.htm
http://www.buergerwelle.de
http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/00omega.htm
http://teleline.terra.es/personal/kirke1/pagact.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EMR-EMF/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emf-omega-news
*
UNITE AGAINST THE COMMON ENEMY
BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
MARCH-2009
|
|
WHAT DOES
IT MATTER IF WE ARE GOVERNED
BY BLUE LABOUR OR NEW LABOUR
by
Peter
Hitchins
The diehard Tory complaints
are starting to come in
again. They still think a
Tory government is on the
side of conservative British
people, rather than their
devious and dishonest foe.
How can I
say 'Don't vote Tory?' they
demand. Surely I cannot want
another five years of new
Labour? But why should I
care if we are run by New
Labour or Blue Labour. A
Tory government will not be
a conservative government
(don't you remember John
Major, a man whose counsels
are now very welcome in the
Cameron inner circle)?
David
Cameron actually says he is
the 'heir to Blair' and all
he has done since he came to
the leadership has confirmed
this. Even now, his party is
entangled in a row about how
heavily we should be taxed,
and relies on the Europhile
fanatic Kenneth Clarke to
provide the only evidence of
governing experience on its
largely teenage front bench.
However we
vote at the next election,
we will get a socialist,
liberal, PC, pro-crime,
pro-EU, anti-education
anti-marriage government,
which believes in selling
the country to Brussels.
Your vote cannot change
that. In fact a Tory victory
would enthrone David Cameron
as the party saviour, and
crush for years to come all
those still in the party who
have genuine conservative
beliefs.
But it can
sack the opposition, a
unique chance to use your
vote to change the course of
history, to take control of
a political process
currently dominated by a
liberal elite, a liberal
elite which is more than
content for the Tories to
win the next election
because they have abandoned
the last traces of
conservatism. Why else has
the liberal leftish BBC now
fallen in love with David
Cameron? The Tories cannot
survive a fourth election
defeat. If they collapse and
split, their tribal voters
will be up for grabs by
anyone with a serious
patriotic and conservative
agenda. It is a unique
chance, probably
unrepeatable in my lifetime
and many of yours. Why not
take it? You will not get
another.
I
reproduce below my October
2007 posting on this site
which explain in full why
proper conservatives should
be doing all they can to
bring about the collapse of
the Tory Party which has
spent the last 40 years
systematically betraying
them. I urge my critics (who
seem to believe a vote is an
act of personal
self-indulgence rather than
a practical deed designed to
have consequences) to at
least read it.
The Tories are still useless
I give myself
a great deal of trouble by
attacking the Tories, the
party most of my readers
want to support. Why do I do
this, condemning myself to
many angry and often
personally rude messages
from affronted people? I
could easily make everyone
happy by quietly dropping
this campaign. It would save
me hours spent writing
letters and e-mails to Tory
loyalists who absurdly
accuse me, of all people, of
wanting to keep Labour in
power.
But I
cannot, because I think we
now have a unique
opportunity to remake
British politics and
recapture Britain from the
people who have messed it up
and trashed it for so long.
The next election cannot
change the government. But
it can change the opposition
- from an ineffectual,
useless, compromised one,
into an effective one
genuinely opposed to what
New Labour is doing.
And such
an opposition, no longer
weighed down by the awful
record of the Tories and
their miserable reputation,
could throw New Labour into
the sea, perhaps within five
years of coming into being.
The destruction of the Tory
Party, which is now both
possible and desirable, is
the essential first step to
this. In our two-party
system, new parties arise
out of the collapse and
splitting of those they seek
to replace. They cannot be
created until that collapse,
and that split, have begun.
A serious, undoubted and
decisive defeat for the Tory
Party at the next election
would make this possible and
likely. Such a defeat is
possible, despite the events
of the past few weeks, and
can be aided by voters
simply refusing to waste
their votes on a party that
is both likely to lose, and
certain to betray them if it
wins.
This view
is based on careful study of
British voting patterns,
constituency boundaries,
polls and the age
distribution of voters. It
is influenced by the
experienced pollster Peter
Kellner's observation that
no opposition party has ever
reached power unless at some
stage it touched 51% in the
opinion polls, during its
period out of office. The
Tories are still a long way
from this figure. In 1979,
the Tories were far ahead of
Labour in the polls. In
1997, Labour, likewise was
far ahead of the Tories.
'Leads' of four per cent, of
the kind being achieved now,
mean little at general
election time.
Even if
the Tories could win an
election (I speculate on
this unlikely event at
greater length because so
many people now seem to
believe that this is the
case), what would that mean?
I predict a government very
similar to that of John
Major, only even more torn
by its unhealable division
over the EU. People forget
now, but Major's government
was one of political
correctness, weakness on
crime, failure on education,
high taxes and conflict over
the EU.
It is
claimed that the Tories are
now more anti-EU. In truth,
this is not really the case.
Many Tories have shifted
from passive acceptance of
the EU to what is called 'Euroscepticism',
an unrealistic belief that,
while the EU is bad for
Britain, it is possible for
us to negotiate ourselves a
safe corner within it, which
does not threaten our
independence and laws, or
the control of our borders.
This 'in Europe but not run
by Europe' view simply
doesn't stand up to
practical politics. The EU
demands of its members a
constant and accelerating
surrender of national
independence. If you win a
small battle, you will
rapidly find that the EU
tries another attack from a
different direction to
achieve the same end. Don't
like the Euro? How about a
constitution? The end
result, the whittling away
of sovereignty, is the same.
Why shouldn't it be?
Ever-closer union is the
EU's stated purpose.
In
practice, those who are
honestly in favour of EU
membership and all that it
entails, or honestly against
it (the only two honourable
positions in this debate)
still cannot possibly agree
- and it cannot be long, in
the nature of the EU, before
any government is confronted
with the choice of continued
reduction of national
independence, or departure.
There is no doubt which
option Mr Cameron would
choose.
The Tories are also
fundamentally,
irreconcilably divided over
several other issues -
grammar schools, the unique
privileges due to marriage,
political correctness in
general, immigration, the
size and nature of the
state, levels of taxation,
the Iraq and Afghan
interventions. But Mr
Cameron is on the left-wing
of all these issues,
(including his support for
the Iraq war), and so are
his most influential
colleagues. His authority,
were he to win an election,
would be similar to that of
Mr Blair in 1997, based on
the gratitude of a party
that had waited too long for
office, so his 'right-wing'
opponents would not be
well-placed to oppose or
obstruct him.
The result
would be a government mainly
similar to New Labour. Is
that worth making any great
sacrifices for? Not in my
view. Worse, such a victory
would ensure, for the
foreseeable future, that
Parliamentary politics
remained - as it is now -
under the control of a very
narrow elite, committed to
liberal political, cultural
, moral and social positions
and hostile to conservative
ones. It would confirm Mr
Cameron and his media
friends in their belief that
the future for the
Conservative Party is in
aping New Labour.
It would be the end, for
some time, of any
opportunity for radical
change. It would cement -
under a Tory government -
the deep leftward shift in
this country under Mr Blair
and Mr Brown, not least
their republican
constitutional reforms and
their huge increase in the
size of the public sector.
It would also mean that
nothing serious would be
done about mass immigration,
about education or about
crime and disorder. The
restoration of the idea of
personal responsibility, and
its corollary, punishment
for wrongdoing, is not
possible in the social
democratic state supported
by both major parties. This
insists that 'offenders' can
blame their actions on
circumstances, that victims
are sometimes at least
partly responsible, and
sometimes wholly responsible
for the crimes committed
against them ( see police
campaigns to get law-abiding
citizens to hide their
possessions, behave
cautiously on the street in
case of attracting criminal
attention, and fortify their
homes). These people see the
law as a mechanism for
negotiating between
'offenders' and victims'
rather than a machine for
punishing criminals.
I have set out this argument
before, but the current
craze for David Cameron
makes it very urgent that I
set it out again.
For those
who say that by doing so I
help the left stay in
office, I have a simple
answer that none has ever
rebutted. The result of the
next election is already
decided - the Left will be
in office, either with a
Labour majority, or a
Lib-Lab pact, or a Lib-Con
pact, or a Tory government
in thrall to left-wing
ideas. No radical change, on
the areas which Tory voters
care about most, will take
place.
But it is
far more likely that it will
be either a Labour
government or a Lab-Lib
pact.
I first
made this case in October
2003, and I reproduce here
the article I then wrote,
all of which still seems to
me to be as true as it was
four years ago:
"NO POWER
on earth can sustain an idea
whose time has gone. Can we
all please stop pretending
that the Conservative Party
is worth saving or keeping,
or that it can ever win
another Election? This
delusion is an obstacle to
the creation of a proper
pro-British movement,
neither bigoted nor
politically correct, which
is the only hope of ending
the present one-party State.
The
continued existence of the
Tory Party as a bogeyman
with which to frighten
dissenters is one of the few
things that holds together
the equally bankrupt Labour
Party.
Tory
division and decay also feed
the growth of the Liberal
Democrats, whose votes grow
daily not because of what
they are but because of what
they are not. The Tories are
an impossible coalition of
irreconcilables. No coherent
government programme could
ever unite them.
Euro-enthusiast and Euro-sceptic
cannot compromise without
betraying their deepest
beliefs. Supporters of
marriage and supporters of
the sexual revolution have
no common ground.
Enthusiasts for mass
immigration, on the grounds
that it expands the
workforce, cannot agree with
those who fear that such
immigration will damage an
ancient culture. Those who
believe in rehabilitating
criminals are bound to fight
those who believe in
punishing them. Those who
wish to legalise narcotics
cannot make peace with those
who wish to imprison
drug-users. All parties are
coalitions full of
conflicts, but they cannot
function without something
fundamental that unites
them. Nothing unites the
Tories.
This has actually been going
on for a long time. Many let
the Tories off during the
Cold War. They ignored their
cowardice over the big
social issues, their failure
to save or restore the
grammar schools, to stand up
for marriage, to understand
the European issue, to
preserve, protect or defend
anything old, beloved or
beautiful.
They
looked the other way as Tory
governments and local
authorities encouraged or
permitted the destruction of
ancient beauty and supported
the concreting over of towns
and countryside. They
swallowed their outrage at
the Tories' ugly, expensive
- and suicidal - local
government reforms.
They even tolerated their
stealthy rundown of the
conventional armed services
and their enthusiasm for
appeasement in Northern
Ireland. They did this
because, after all, we could
rely on the Tories to stand
up against the greatest
danger to our liberty and
independence, namely the
Soviet Union. Then came the
unnerving moment when the
USSR collapsed and Mikhail
Gorbachev's gently smiling
spokesman, Gennadi Gerasimov,
taunted us with the words:
'We have done the most
terrible thing to you that
we could possibly have done.
We have deprived you of an
enemy.' Gerasimov was
appallingly right. With the
Kremlin menace gone, the
Left could no longer be
accused of treacherous
flirtation with the national
enemy, as he had ceased to
exist. This meant that the
Conservative Party could no
longer claim a monopoly on
easy patriotism. But much
more serious was the
realisation that it was
social conservatives, rather
than the Left, who now
risked unpopularity if they
stuck to their principles.
Confronting the permissive
society, whose creation they
had winked at, was risky
even if it was right. So
many people had now got
divorced or had abortions or
had children out of wedlock
- or could easily conceive
of themselves doing so -
that attacking these things
cost valuable votes.
Having
failed to defend the 11-plus
when it mattered, they found
that the consequences -
lowered school standards,
worthless examinations and
the absurd expansion of the
universities - could not be
criticised without
attracting accusations of
offending and upsetting the
children involved, and their
voting parents too. Having
invented life peers, and by
implication attacked the
hereditary principle, they
could not really defend the
independence of the House of
Lords when it came under
serious assault. They knew
in their hearts that they
could not ultimately defend
the Monarchy either.
Having
responded to rising crime
with the cheapest and most
crowd-pleasing measures -
destroying the right to
silence, threatening the
protection against double
jeopardy, considering
identity cards and
attempting to limit jury
trial - they could not
convincingly stand up for
liberty.
Having pretended that
national sovereignty was not
threatened by the EU, and so
having given away great
quantities of that
sovereignty, they could not
even convincingly oppose the
Euro. In short, their
unprincipled uselessness had
now come back to haunt them
and the end of the Cold War
left them politically naked
and ashamed.
The
wretched Major years, in
which Britain experienced
its first New Labour
government without realising
it, are a warning to anyone
who imagines that a Tory
victory at the next Election
would end our national
decline or reverse the
damage done by Blairism. The
Conservative Party has had
ineffectual, directionless
leaders since 1990 because
it is an ineffectual and
directionless party. It is
idle and silly to imagine
that a different leader
might change things now. Get
rid of Mr Duncan Smith and
the best they can hope for
is a chief who will be
despised and undermined by a
different section of the
party. The man or woman does
not exist who can unite the
irreconcilables now trapped
in this dying movement and
lead it to victory.
Yet victory is highly
unlikely. The Tory Party
faces a colossal task if it
wishes ever to command a
parliamentary majority
again. The political
scientist Professor Ivor
Crewe has pointed out that
Labour MPs are elected by a
much smaller vote on average
than Conservative MPs
because they typically
represent smaller
constituencies with a lower
turnout.
In 2001,
had the Tory and Labour
votes been equal, the latter
would have had 80 more seats
than the Conservatives and a
workable overall majority of
17. This mathematical
problem will be just as bad,
if not worse, whenever the
next Election takes place.
The rise of the Liberal
Democrats will almost
certainly deepen the woe.
The near-collapse of
Conservatism and Unionism in
Scotland and Wales does not
help much either. There is
no reason at all to hope for
a recovery.
So why bother to do so? Why
should conservative-minded
people make themselves
miserable by enlisting in
this shambling movement
whose chiefs loathe each
other more than they hate
the enemy? Why should they
fool themselves any longer
that the Tory Party shares
their concerns or can
capture political power?
Why should
they spend heart and nerve
and sinew on a cause that is
not only lost but
discredited? Why should they
all fight and fight and
fight again to save a Party
they hate?
The Tory Party is a train
wreck, not a train, an
obstacle rather than a
vehicle. There are many good
and intelligent people
trapped in the twisted ruins
who would flourish if only
they were released, but are
now prevented from doing so
by a pointless discipline.
There are many voters,
currently unable to vote
Tory even while holding
their noses, who long for a
party that speaks for them
and the country. Such a
party cannot begin to grow
until the Tory delusion is
dispelled and this movement,
whose time is gone, splits
and disappears. Let it be
soon."
That was
in October 2003. The Liberal
Democrats, it is true, have
run into troubles of their
own since then - but it is
by no means guaranteed that
they will not recover
between now and the next
election. In fact, I think
we can pretty much rely on
it.
I then
redoubled the message in
June 2005, when I wrote:
"The
haggard patient heaves
himself into a sitting
position and, with painful
slowness, takes a little
gruel, swallowing the
disgusting pap with
difficulty. He, who until
recently was consuming rare
beef and good red wine,
smiles wanly at this minor,
toothless triumph. The
relatives around the bed
exclaim with forced delight
how well he has done and how
good it is to see him eating
heartily again. They make
weak jokes and excessively
cheerful remarks about how
he will soon be home again.
The whole
scene is a ghastly,
flesh-crawling deception.
Everyone present knows that
death is hovering a few beds
away and there is no hope.
Yet nobody
will say it. Such is the
position of the Conservative
and Unionist Party. Now, if
the Tory Party were a person
and we were its family,
there would be a good excuse
for this polite fraud. But
the Tory Party is not a
person and we are not its
wife and children, or even
its friends. There is no
point in pretending that the
Tory Party is going to
recover.
The
pretence only delays the
construction of a new
movement, which cannot
flourish until we have said
goodbye to the old one. It
also gives the Liberal
Democrats the freedom to
supplant the Tory Party,
unobstructed, in many of its
former strongholds, a
freedom they are
enthusiastically using.
The Tories' position is
hopeless. No man living
could conceivably unify the
party's contradictory wings.
Europhile or Eurosceptic,
pro or anti-marriage, market
enthusiast or moralist, each
of these quarrels is
fundamental and cannot be
settled by compromise. To
refuse to resolve them is to
ask to be dragged, by events
beyond our control, into
places we never decided to
go.
So David
Davis, who is opposed to
European integration if he
means anything at all, is
compelled to seek the
support of federalists.
This, the modified Molotov-Ribbentrop
Pact approach, has been
tried before – but only by
people who forget how that
pact ended.
Similarly,
Kenneth Clarke is seriously
put forward as the saviour
of a party he plainly hates.
While it is hard not to
admire Mr Clarke's lofty
scorn for his parliamentary
colleagues, the idea is
absurd. The issue of the
European Union pervades
almost every major area of
political choice.
It is ridiculous to imagine
that Mr Clarke's reasoned
support for the EU, which is
entirely consistent with his
generally Fabian Social
Democratic approach to the
world, will not bring him
swiftly into conflict with
those who are committed,
just as consistently, to
opposing the Union.
As for the other compromise
candidates being spoken of,
they all offer another
period of Majorism, neither
one damned thing nor the
other, yet encouraging
bitter divisions by
attempting to impose their
opaque blandness on all.
It would
also be helpful if people
would stop referring to 'big
beasts in the jungle'. The
metaphor is absurd.
What survives of the Tory
Party is more like a decayed
municipal park than a
jungle, and the little furry
creatures that roam about in
it may have sharp teeth and
ready claws but they are not
big. To be big, they would
at least have to have large
ideas. But there are none of
these.
The only
argument is, ultimately,
about tactics. There is a
total lack of original
thought, principle or even
instinct. Every debate is a
pathetic variation on one
parasitical theme: will the
Tory Party regain its
position by becoming more
like New Labour or less like
New Labour?
The answer is that it cannot
regain its lost position by
either means – because, for
good or ill, it has lost it
forever in many parts of the
country.
Many
cities no longer have any
Tory councillors. For good
reasons and bad, millions of
people in large swathes of
the country would rather eat
a raw hedgehog sandwich than
vote Conservative again. A
male under the age of 35 is
as likely to support the
Tories as he is to smoke a
pipe. A female under the age
of 35 is as likely to
support the Tories as she is
to wear a girdle.
The predictable Tory failure
in May ought to have been
worse, and would have been
had Labour had the sense and
nerve to get rid of Anthony
Blair nine months before.
The Tory result was, in
reality, a very poor one and
its wretchedness was
obscured only by Labour's
own demoralisation.
There is deep dislike of the
Government, as we would find
if there were a referendum
on the EU, and as we did
find when John Prescott
tried to persuade the people
of the North East to vote
for regional government.
But the
Tory Party cannot articulate
it and people will not vote
Tory to express it.
And here is the core of it.
The Tory Party does not know
what it is supposed to be
opposing. In fact, in
general, it has either
supported or failed to
oppose all the most
important actions of New
Labour. These are
constitutional, moral and
cultural and they are the
real issue.
The admirable Peter Oborne,
a brave and original
conservative critic of the
Government, insisted two
weeks ago in The Spectator
magazine that the Tory Party
had 'won all the great
intellectual and political
battles of the last quarter
century'.
Regrettably, this is not so.
Margaret Thatcher certainly
did not win the culture
wars. She did not even fight
them. On the great
battlefields of marriage and
the family, education and
culture, morality and law,
the Tories have been utterly
outmanoeuvred and bypassed.
Because
they did not fight, they
co-operated in the
destruction of their own
electorate. To this day,
they have no idea why it is
that they are so despised by
the young and their wretched
attempts to toady to fashion
– in such areas as civil
partnerships for homosexuals
– manage to offend or puzzle
their supporters while
utterly failing to convince
their opponents that they
are genuine.
It would be perfectly all
right to be the Nasty Party
if they knew why it was
necessary to be nasty and
meant it.
Millions long for a truly
Nasty government that will
be thoroughly horrid to the
wicked, the criminal, the
dishonest and to the
European Union. But to be
Nasty, without meaning to,
is worse than useless.
And to be Nice about these
things is to let down the
besieged, oppressed,
vandalised, burgled, mugged
people of Britain.
The Tories have failed in
all these things because
they have neither an
ideology nor an instinct.
They measure success by the
length of time they spend in
office, not by what they
have done while they were
there. Once, being a
disposition rather than a
movement might have
sufficed. But in these
revolutionary times, faced
with opponents wholly
committed to political
correctness (or Frankfurt
School Marxism, to give it
its more serious and
frightening name), it is not
enough.
You cannot properly defend,
say, constitutional monarchy
if you have no idea why you
believe in it and do not
understand why your
opponents hate it. You
cannot effectively oppose
the introduction of identity
cards unless your every
instinct revolts at the
imposition of these
oppressive breathing
licences on a free people. I
cannot imagine how a British
patriot could have moment's
doubt about this – yet
serious Tories of my
acquaintance have blown
around in the wind of
fashion, this month against,
last month for and who knows
what next week?
They cannot even understand
patriotism properly. It was
clearly never in British
interests to join the
American invasion of Iraq.
The bitterest opponents of
this adventure have been
traditional conservative
types. Yet, precisely
because it is not
instinctively patriotic, the
Tory Party grasped at the
war as an attempt to prove
that it still loves the
country it sold to Brussels
in 1972.
And so here we are. The Tory
Party was the only
opposition that could have
lost to Anthony Blair in May
and it is the only
opposition that can be
beaten by Gordon Brown in
2009.
If it does not collapse and
split soon, we are stuck
with another tedious
post-mortem, and another
wrangle over the bones, four
years hence.
Many intelligent and
effective people are still
trapped in its immobile
wreckage, who would be freed
to become serious opponents
of the Government if only
they could escape. Millions
of voters, who could never
be reasoned into change,
could be jolted by collapse,
split and renewal into
changing their habits.
Those who wish to hang on to
the failed Tory coalition
complain that a 'pure,
Rightwing' party would repel
what they call the centre
ground and become a small,
if unified sect.
They fail
to grasp that the lost
middle ground of politics
does not lie in the narrow,
churned-up, fought-over
stretches of mud that lie
between the Tory and New
Labour front-benches. There
is very little space here
anyway. Look instead at the
vast 39.5 per cent of the
electorate who do not vote,
and at many of the 13 per
cent who vote Liberal
Democrat, not because of
what Charles Kennedy is but
because of what he is not.
Remember, Labour won a
majority with 22 per cent of
electors and the Tories
gained an even more pathetic
20 per cent.
Look at the almost total
disappearance from
Parliament of Labour's old
patriotic, monarchist,
socially conservative Right
wing, leaving many
working-class people utterly
unrepresented. New Labour's
multicultural, metropolitan
social liberalism is
repulsive to many
traditional Labour voters,
many of whom stayed at home
in May mainly for that
reason.
It is surely possible to
find a majority out there
for a new party, neither
bigoted nor politically
correct, patriotic and
intelligent, committed to
national independence and
liberty and to the
re-establishment of justice.
I believe those
conservatives willing to
think, and to seek allies,
could swiftly develop a
programme and a coalition
far more honourable and
realistic than the present
Tory impasse.
We cannot go on avoiding
this decision forever. There
will not be many more
chances to wrest Britain
from the 'progressive
consensus'.
Tories are
dying and not being
replaced. The party is
becoming what marketing men
call a 'ghost brand', like
Capstan Full Strength
cigarettes: still worth
selling to a dwindling
market but with no hope of
regaining its lost position.
The Liberal Democrats
continue to grow and will
eventually be able to force
proportional representation
on Labour (the most likely
result of the next
Election).
This would end all hope of
real conservative change. I
understand that these
arguments are unwelcome to
many Conservative loyalists,
and I know why, but would it
not at least be worth
debating them while there is
still time?"
Again, I
think this stands up pretty
well two years after it was
written. Note that, at that
point, David Cameron was not
a serious contender for the
leadership. But my words "As
for the other compromise
candidates being spoken of,
they all offer another
period of Majorism, neither
one damned thing nor the
other, yet encouraging
bitter divisions by
attempting to impose their
opaque blandness on all."
seem to me to be pretty
close to a prophecy of Mr
Cameron's behaviour. The
current, temporary media
craze for Mr Cameron cannot
persuade the enormous
anti-Tory mass of
post-industrial Britain to
vote blue. Mr Cameron
presides over a party that
remains deeply divided and
maintains a sort of
discipline only because
David Davies prefers to bide
his time.
There, now
I have set it all out, as
clearly as I can. Those who
absurdly accuse me of
seeking to help New Labour
or of supporting Mr Brown
should know that I am
probably the most consistent
and dedicated foe of New
Labour, that my 1999 book
'The Abolition of Britain'
was described by Andrew Marr
(no less) as the "most
sustained, internally
logical and powerful attack
on Tony Blair and all his
works", that I refused to
toady to Anthony Blair when
many other conservative
commentators were doing so,
that I criticised Mr Brown's
bad stewardship of the
economy, when many
conservatives were praising
him, that I deliberately
embarrassed Mr Brown by
asking him to reveal if his
son had been given the MMR
injection he urges on other
parents (he never responded)
and that New Labour blame me
(exaggeratedly, but
flatteringly) for helping to
lose them the 1992 election
(the 'Jennifer's Ear'
affair) and regard me (
accurately) as a dedicated
enemy. At the press
conference launching the New
Labour 1997 manifesto, two
press officers, seeing me
approach the auditorium,
tried to close the door in
my face, claiming the room
was 'full'. During the
campaign I was generally not
allowed to ask Mr Blair any
questions (and was scolded
by Mr Brown for my
persistence in seeking to do
so). On the one occasion I
was allowed to ask a
question, Mr Blair dodged it
and - when I objected - told
me to sit down and stop
being bad. When I waited
outside a building in which
Mr Blair was skulking, in
the hope of asking him the
same question, the Labour
machine arranged an
elaborate trick to get me
out of the way (details
available on request). My
treatment during the 2001
and 2005 elections was
similar. So no accusations
of Labour sympathy, if you
please.
It is precisely because I
really do want to get rid of
New Labour that I am
convinced that the Tories
must go. They don't really
want to fight new Labour,
and they are not specially
angered or dismayed by the
way in which New labour runs
the country. Given the
opportunity, they would do
little that was different.
The polite term for my
advice to them is 'Fish, or
cut bait'. The less polite
one is to do something or
get off the pot. Well, in
ten years they have not
fished, nor done the other
thing, so it is time for
them to depart. I really do
want to free us from Labour
government. I think voting
is a political act designed
to have a practical effect,
not an emotional spasm to
make myself feel better.
Withdrawing your vote from
the Tories is the only
serious opportunity you have
to make the country better.
Anyone who responds to this
by saying "That's all very
well, but the important
thing is to get New Labour
out" will be showing that
they haven't read, or
understood, what I am saying
here.
Anyone who
says "But it's all so
negative" simply has to
recognise that we have got
precisely nowhere by being
'positive' since 1997. There
is no sentimental reason for
clinging to the Tories. It
may have been good to be ' a
disposition, not a dogma'
when Labour and the Liberals
were made up of undogmatic
British patriots with a few
silly or wrong ideas. But
that will not do when the
left-wing parties are now in
the grip of virulent
anti-British, anti-family,
anti-education dogmas which
threaten to dissolve the
country, and civil society,
altogether. A dispassionate
examination of the Tory
Party in power since the
1920s will show it becoming
an increasingly social
democratic, high-tax party,
and then, in the 1960s,
adopting left-liberal
positions on social and
cultural issues, or failing
to fight them. There was
never a golden age. the Tory
Party tends to forget that
its supposed hero, Winston
Churchill, was kept out in
the cold for much of his
life by the Tory
establishment, and was
threatened with deselection
by his local Tory
Association for (rightly and
prophetically) attacking the
Munich agreement. It also
tends to forget that its
supposed heroine, Margaret
Thatcher, failed badly in
the areas of family and
education, culture and
morals, and only grasped the
EU danger in her last months
in office.
Anyone who says "why don't
you found your new party?'
has likewise not been paying
attention. The new party can
only be founded once the
Tories have collapsed - and
you will have to found it
too. I have no millions
stashed away, nor could I by
myself hope to achieve
anything. Nobody will do
this for you. There is no
leader waiting upon our
northern shores to rescue
the beleaguered nation. If
you don't like the way the
country is being run, you
will have to do something
about it yourself. Those who
say "But what if you fail,
and no new party arises, and
Labour is still there?' have
the best point. It is a
grave danger that we may
fail. The collapse of the
Tories is the necessary
condition for a new party,
but not a sufficient one.
That will depend on us. But
even if that happens, we
will be no worse off then
than we are now, stuck as we
are with permanent Labour
rule till the crack of doom,
each year destroying more
and more of Britain. If I
wait long enough, I am sure
that my view on the Tory
Party will become
conventional wisdom, as most
of my other ‘outrageous’ and
'extremist' positions have
done in the last ten years.
But can we afford to wait
that long?
*
[But
should the Irish people in
October 2009 ratify the
Lisbon Treaty and all the
other remaining member
states also do likewise with
Germany having the privilege
of signing last which will
give them much relish and
satisfaction as the final
signature by Germany will be
looked on as their final
achievement with the
acceptance of the surrender
of all their old enemies but
particularly the BRITISH but
as they would would say THE
ENGLISH and the advancement
of their plans for a FOURTH
REICH if the BILDERBERGERS
have decided such in their
NEW WORLD ORDER. Have you
noticed that none of the
so-called FREE PRESS in our
once FREE COUNTRY have
brought before the PEOPLE
the terrible consequences
evident should THEIR FUTURE
DESTINY be in a
NEW WORLD ORDER.
We ask
ARE
FREE PRESS FREE?
We can understand that many
journalists wish to keep
their jobs and there is also
the possibility that ALL the
MAJOR PRESS BARONS are in
hock to the NEW WORLD ORDER
of about which we are now
introducing on our website.
The BATTLE FOR BRITAIN at
the years end may be LOST
but the BATTLE for WORLD
FREEDOM has now BEGUN as you
will notice recently. The
talk about which political
party who will win the next
European or General Election
is purely academic because
the EU RULES state that
REGIONS will replace
PARLIAMENT and existing
political parties unless
agreeable to BRUSSELS will
be abolished and under the
NEW WORLD ORDER the REGIONS
too will disappear. It is
TIME the once FREE PEOPLE in
our ISLAND HOME took a
closer interest as to WHAT
IS IN STORE FOR THEM because
soon
IT
COULD BE TOO LATE!
*
TREATY OF TREASON
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underling
Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
We don't need another
whitewash inquiry, this is a matter for the
police
by
Richard Littlejohn
Last updated at 11:25 AM on 24th March 2009
[THE
ROT MUST STOP NOW!]
No
Fixed Abode: McNulty is vague about where he
sleeps at night
As lame
excuses go, this one was positively paraplegic.
Caught stealing from taxpayers, employment
minister Tony McNulty cites the 'Nuremberg'
defence. Translation: I was only obeying orders.
This is disingenuous garbage
and he knows it. No one forced McNulty at
gunpoint to fiddle his parliamentary expenses.
Labour whips didn't put him up against a wall
and tell him that unless he fraudulently claimed
£60,000 in parliamentary expenses, his political
career was toast.
McNulty wasn't compelled to
pretend that his parents' house in his Harrow
constituency was his 'second home'. He hasn't
lived there since 2002, when he remarried and
moved in with his wife, six miles away.
As to how many nights a week
he sleeps there, he's evasive. 'I was spending
one or two nights a week there early on when I
was an MP. It is probably less now.'
Translation: none. McNulty
alleges he works at his parents' house when he's
on constituency business at the weekend. But why
would he? He's got an office round the corner.
Neighbours say he never, ever,
stays overnight. Of course he doesn't. His own
home is a short drive across West London, maybe
half an hour in traffic, or a few stops on the
Tube.
More to the point, his
constituency is only 11 miles from Westminster,
so there's no reason for him to claim
anything
- especially as his real home is only three
miles from the Commons.
To hell with what the rules
say. The regulations allowing outer London MPs
to claim second home allowances are bent as a
nine bob note, but that doesn't mean anyone
has to
take advantage of them.
Actually, even within the
flexible parliamentary rules McNulty's expenses
are arguably ineligible and probably criminal.
He's claiming money for a house he doesn't live
in.
We don't
need another whitewash inquiry. This should be a
matter for the police.
McNulty knows full well that
what he has been doing is crooked. That's why he
started back-pedalling furiously when he
realised the
Mail on Sunday had him bang to rights.
He now says that no MP living
within 60 miles of the Palace of Westminster
should be able to claim for a 'second home'. So
why is he telling us now?
If he thought trousering tens
of thousands of pounds for a house he doesn't
live in wasn't exactly kosher, he was at liberty
not to
do so.
For somebody who never seems
to be off television and cultivates a reputation
for straight talking, I can't ever remember
seeing him on Newsnight denouncing this
outrageous scam.
Instead, he would have us
believe, risibly, that he was under some kind of
moral obligation to rob the taxpayers of money
for expenses which he hadn't incurred - that
somehow it would be letting the side down if he
didn't.
Rude not to.
He even raised a loan against
the house to 'pay off some debts'.
Translation:
we paid
off his debts. When collared by reporters,
McNulty said he had already decided not to claim
the allowance in future. Who had he told of his
decision? Er, no one.
His
new-found revulsion at the exploitation of the
rules by hundreds of 'honourable' members
springs entirely from the fact that he's been
nabbed with his fingers in the taxpayers' till.
McNulty thinks he can brazen
it out. And who's to say he's wrong?
Jacqui Smith is still Home
Secretary, despite being exposed as a corrupt
liar, claiming her 'main' home is her sister's
spare bedroom and strolling away with £100,000
to which she should not be entitled.
The Balls-Coopers are still
raking in the cash and holding down lucrative
jobs in government, even though they pretend
their main home is in Yorkshire, not London -
where they spend most of their time and their
children go to school.
How can Gordon Brown sack
them, when his own much-flaunted 'moral compass'
doesn't run to preventing him claiming expenses
for light bulbs and his Sky Sports subscription?
It doesn't get much more two-bob than that.
Jacqui Smith claims for a spare room
in her sister's house
Yvette Cooper and husband Ed Balls'
expenses were investigated last year
The only hard and fast rule
when it comes to MPs' allowances is that
anything
is permissible if it allows them to claim up to
the max. The system is so cynically flexible it
allows them to be self- employed for taxation
purposes, yet count as employees when it comes
to pensions and other benefits.
Even then, they qualify for
allowances - which the Government has
systematically denied to the genuinely
self-employed. The Revenue doesn't allow mere
mortals to claim, for instance, for travel to
their place of work - one of the top
parliamentary perks, which has even seen some
MPs submit ludicrous annual mileage claims
sufficient to drive several times round the face
of the Earth - or to mix and match their
'main' and 'second' homes to evade Capital Gains
Tax.
The hidden agenda here is that
MPs need all this bunce to compensate for their
low wages. If only we were paid more, they
bleat, we wouldn't have to fiddle our exes.
As an employment minister paid
£104,000 a year, perhaps McNulty would like to
elaborate on that line of argument to the two
million plus people currently signing on the
dole, or the millions more struggling to pay the
mortgage and raise a family on the national
average wage of a quarter of his salary. Given
that his wife is on a couple of hundred grand as
a chief schools inspector, I should imagine the
McNultys might just about be able to scrape by,
without having to take in washing or moonlight
at McDonald's.
Even an MP's basic wage of
£63,000 is not to be sniffed at in these
straitened times. No one had to take the job if
they thought they could be more handsomely
rewarded elsewhere.
The truth is that most
politicians are otherwise unemployable,
especially on the Labour side. The best they
could hope for is a public sector gig as a
diversity manager or a five-a-day co-ordinator.
But this isn't a party
political point. The Tories won't do anything
about it, because most of them are just as bent
when it comes to expenses.
McNulty falls back on the
'Nuremberg' defence. But what he's actually
claiming is what those of us who follow football
would call the 'George Graham' defence. When the
former Arsenal manager was discovered taking a
large bung out of transfer payments, his main
grievance was not that he was innocent but that
everyone else was at it.
That's McNulty's mitigation, too. Translation:
we're all corrupt, so why pick on me?
It didn't stop Graham being
suspended from football,
pour encourager les autres. If this
scandalous abuse of public money is ever to be
stopped, someone has to be taken out and shot.
Where better to start then with
'straight-talking'
Tony McNulty?
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
A common sense copper... at last.
Well done Sir Paul for putting police back on the
beat
By
Peter Hitchens
Last updated at 9:14 PM on 21st March 2009
Yes, you can turn the clock back. The stupid mistakes of
the Sixties can be shown up for what they are, and
people in positions of power can begin to reverse
them.
I am greatly heartened by the
words of Sir Paul Stephenson, Metropolitan Police
Commissioner, who said last week that police
officers should return to patrolling the streets –
alone.
Sir Paul has also said that ‘we
have got to maximise the feeling that uniform is
governing the streets so people feel safe to walk
them’.
Right
direction: The reassuring face of policing in
1949
I am not sure how many years I
have been arguing, in this column and elsewhere,
that the whole point of the police force is to
prevent crime and misbehaviour by being visible and
accessible.
What I am sure of is that, when I
first started, the official response – from
government, from police chiefs, from ‘experts’ – was
always the same. Foot patrols were an antiquated
Victorian idea. They were futile, as they hardly
ever interrupted a crime in progress. And there
weren’t enough officers to do the job.
Sir Paul
Stephenson wants his officers to walk the beat
on their own rather than in pairs
Unconvinced, I and (after a while)
some others argued back. The manpower excuse was a
plain lie. We have never had so many police officers
at any time in our history.
The point of foot patrols wasn’t
to catch criminals after they’d broken the law, but
to stop people doing bad things in the first place.
They also put the police back in touch with the
public, curing them of their current delusion that
they are an elite corps and the public are
irritating ‘civilians’.
Their presence gives confidence to
the law-supporting, who are then more willing to
stand up against loutishness.
And Sir Paul grasps that it is
essential that his officers normally patrol alone.
Good for him. I’ve seen pairs of policemen so
absorbed in their own chat that they’ve failed to
notice offences being committed six feet away.
Anyway, it’s much harder to approach them when there
are two of them. You feel as if you’re interrupting
something.
Now, if this argument can be won,
can we also hope for some other triumphs of fact and
reason over thoughtless dogma?
Just as car-borne reactive
policing has been a proven failure, so has
comprehensive education and everything that came
with it, so has the abolition of truly local
government, so has ‘sex education’, so has the
abolition of the married family, so has unlimited
immigration, so has membership of the European
Union.
It is only inertia, and the
complete dominance of all three major political
parties by Left-wing liberals, that prevents these
idiocies from being reversed.
Just think how much we could do to
restore ourselves, if the Tories were sacked as the
official opposition – for incompetence, laziness and
collusion with the enemy (as they should be) – and a
political party emerged in their place which pledged
no more, and no less, than the undoing of the
Sixties and a fresh start. And it is within our
power to sack them.
[WHY NOT-A REAL
CONSERVATIVE PARTY FOR A CHANGE?]
At the next General Election, we
are being offered an insulting non-choice of more or
less identical parties, led by nobodies and
committed to carrying on as we are.
If you vote Tory you will be
voting for a change of personnel without any
alteration of policy. Worse, if David Cameron wins,
he will claim that he has triumphed precisely
because of his greenery, his hoodie-hugging
political correctness and his support for Labour
schools policy. Proper conservatives in the Tory
Party will be powerless and ignored for years to
come.
More from Peter Hitchens...
Why put up with it? The Tories are
already so sick and rotten and empty of real members
that they could not survive ten minutes without
state subsidies and the donations of dodgy
millionaires.
The only decent heavyweight among
them, David Davis, is in backbench exile. They are
held together by nothing except greed for office and
would fall apart if they failed for a fourth time.
Proper conservatives can achieve
this by the simple expedient of not voting for
Cameron’s party, anywhere or ever. The right
not to
vote is as precious as the right to vote, and
it’s
time we exercised it.
What an opportunity we have. Once
again, we could have a party that actually spoke for
us instead of for a dogmatic, anti-British elite. It
can be done. Change is possible. Common sense can
triumph. Sir Paul has proved it. But we – like Sir
Paul – have to be bold if we want to get our way.
Imagine if our children could imagine again
I am lucky enough to remember when
there were plenty of programmes for children on the
radio.
I was startled a few years ago
when someone said, ‘It’s a quarter to two,’ and the
words instantly summoned up cosy memories of Listen
With Mother. Incredible as it now seems, I was
introduced to John Bunyan’s immortal Pilgrim’s
Progress by ‘Uncle Mac’. The pictures were far
better than anything on TV, but they happened in my
imagination.
The imagination is the place where
we work out how our actions will affect others.
Without it, we’re lost, or at the mercy of the ideas
of strangers. It’s also a private place where we can
develop our own opinions and personality.
Radio stimulates imagination. TV
shrivels it, and substitutes its own conformist
picture of the world, making us all the same.
I understand why the BBC has
abandoned proper children’s broadcasting, but I
think it is a national tragedy – and an avoidable
error – that so many parents expose their children
to TV before their imaginations are formed.
*
Conventional wisdom says the Pope is stupid and
wrong to say fidelity and abstinence are better than
condoms at guarding Africans from AIDS.
Conventional wisdom, as usual, is talking out of its
backside. What the Pope says matters only if anyone
listens to him. If nobody does, his opposition to
condoms won’t stop anyone using them and will make
no difference. If lots of people listen to him, his
support for marital fidelity will persuade many
people to follow this path, and so save untold
lives.
The
experience of such countries as Uganda suggests very
strongly that he is right when he says this, and
that fidelity is a far better protection than a
rubber sheath. The only real hope is a change in
sexual habits.
I
am not a Roman Catholic, but I am weary of the
concerted smearing and misrepresentation which the
Pontiff constantly faces.
* Why does it take a newcomer to this
country to grasp that we are lost if we don’t all
speak the same language?
I think
it is because shopkeeper Deva Kumarasiri, who
insists that his customers speak English,
understands that it is both good manners and
practical sense to do so.
Yet dozens
of local councils actively encourage division and
separation by spending fortunes on multilingual
posters and leaflets.
Perhaps Mr Kumarasiri is influenced by the sad state
of his country of origin, Sri Lanka, where a
language barrier helps keep apart two increasingly
separate and hostile peoples.
*
*
*
[Good advice from
Peter Hitchins on the forthcoming elections in 2009]
'Proper conservatives can achieve
this by the simple expedient of not voting for
Cameron’s party, anywhere or ever. The right not to
vote is as precious as the right to vote, and it’s
time we exercised it.'
[We have been calling
on the electorate to ignore the Gang of Three in
Westminster who have sold your FREEDOM and COUNTRY
to a Foreign Power and while you still have a
Parliament ,which as you know will no longer exist
should the Lisbon Treaty be ratified by ALL member
states]
*
[TREATY OF
TREASON]
[Font Altered-Bolding
& Underlining Used-Comments in Square Brackets.]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
|
|
|
D-DAY
JUNE
6-1944
A DAILY
MAIL CAMPAIGN
To
support the Daily Mail's campaign to help
surviving NORMANDY veterans meet the cost of
attending events to mark the 65th
anniversary of D-DAY in June-2009,please
send cheques payable to
'Overlord', to: PO Box 5002, Department CHP,
Alton, Hants,GU34 9BZ
Alternatively, you can make donations at any
branch of HSBC bank or using telephone or
internet banking.
Simply make payments to the 'Overlord
campaign acount: number 91271628, sort code
40-14-21.
Montgomery's message
to the troops on D-Day 6th
June-1944.
*
'We
shall defend our island, whatever the cost
may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we
shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall
fight in the fields, and in the streets,
we shall never surrender . [4th June,
1940].
Winston Churchill.
*
D-DAY veterans thank Daily Mail Readers
for the magnificent contribution of
£183,000
Peter Hodge, secretary of the Normandy
Veterans association paid tribute to the
'amazing contribution and asked for no
more cheques to be sent. [March31,2009]
*
MARCH.2009
|
|
Terrifying,
chaotic and bloody... but
D-Day June6-1944
was one of the greatest
chapters in our history
By
Max
Hastings
[It was
in truth-'THE LONGEST DAY']
Anniversaries are mingled
festivals and wakes. In family life, we enjoy
celebrating children's birthdays, and learn
progressively to dislike our own.
As for national history,
nowadays we make little of events that once echoed
proudly through every schoolroom and church in the
land.
There was October 21, Trafalgar
Day in 1805, and June 18, the day of
Waterloo
in 1815. Today, such dates command blank looks from
almost every teenager.
In a picture that's
become a symbol of the Mail campaign, troops
land on the beaches in Normandy
Shakespeare was quite wrong
when he made Henry V tell his army on the morning of
Agincourt: 'Crispin Crispian shall ne'er
go by/ From this day to the ending of the world/ But
we in it shall be remembered.'
How many people today know
October 25 is St Crispin's Day?
But there is another St
Crispin's Day - or rather, another victory in
which British arms played a great and noble part,
much closer to hand.
It involved men who, though now
very old, still live among us. D-Day, the June 6,
1944, invasion of Normandy, was the greatest event of the Second
World War in the West.
Many other memories of the
conflict and, indeed, many other battles, were
darkened by defeat or at least shrouded in
controversy - Dunkirk, Tobruk, Crete, Singapore,
Arnhem.
But D-Day, the greatest
amphibious operation the world will ever know,
shines through as a triumph of imagination, planning
and, above all, human endeavour.
Here was something which the
British, Americans and Canadians did wonderfully
well, in one of the greatest causes the world has
ever known, 'the good war' against the supreme evil
of Nazism.
This June, the 65th anniversary
of D-Day, the French, led by President Sarkozy, will
mark the occasion with their usual fanfare on the
Normandy
beaches.
However little the French
sometimes like us, they recognise D-Day as the dawn
of their liberation.
Crowds
wave off the D-Day veterans as they leave
Portsmouth harbour bound for France for the
June
6th commemorations in 2004
The British
government, by contrast, has pleaded a previous
engagement. There is to be no glittering array of
royals, service brass, soldiers, sailors or airmen
at the June 6-2009 ceremonies.
There will be no
assistance for the few hundred members of
Britain's Normandy Veterans'
Association still fit to make the pilgrimage.
D-Day, say
ministers, received its last official send-off five
years ago, on the 60th anniversary. The date that
will next command
Whitehall's
attention is 35 years from now, the centenary, when,
in the nature of things, no veteran will be alive.
The Government
has a wretched record of burying Britain's legacy. The teaching of
history in schools has been deliberately strangled,
and in the new curriculum faces near extinction.
Since 1997, the erosion of our
identity has gathered pace rapidly. Unlike the
Americans, the French, the Irish and every other
nation not embarrassed by national pride, the
British under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have
embraced the false idol of multiculturalism.
In a modern
British comprehensive school, a child is more likely
to be taught about the slave trade, Poor Law or
Tolpuddle Martyrs than about our battlefield
triumphs at Crecy,
Poitiers,
Blenheim, Ramillies - and
D-Day.
I have a special
interest in the Second World War, because I have
been writing about it for 30 years.
Back in 1981,
researching a book about 'Operation Overlord', as
D-Day was codenamed, I spent many months sitting in
suburban bungalows, country cottages and city flats
in four countries, listening to men's tales of the
greatest day of their lives - June 6, 1944.
I still have my
yellowing notes of those deeply moving
conversations. Some veterans told stories of
heroism, some of pathos, frustration and sacrifice.
Surviving
members of the 47th Royal Marine Commandos
prepare for a remembrance service at Port-en-Bessin
Huppain, Normandy, on June 7, 2004
More than a few
told me how difficult they found it - at the age
of 18 or 19 - to grasp the magnitude of the vast
event in which they were summoned to participate.
A former U.S. infantryman evoked his bewilderment the
night before he landed on
Utah
Beach: 'Me, Lindley Higgins from
Riverdale in the Bronx, was about to invade France.
It was a problem that my mind in its then state of
maturity couldn't possibly cope with.'
What followed
was an epic, on land, at sea and in the air. Rommel,
the German commander, christened it in advance, when
he still had no inkling of the place or date.
Recognising that
the invasion would represent a decisive moment, he
told a staff officer before June 6-1944:
'For the Allies
as well as for ourselves, this will be
THE LONGEST DAY.'
More from Max Hastings...
So it was, for
men such as Corporal Charles Baldwin of the
Westminster Dragoons, shocked by the sight of
British engineers ahead of his 'flail' mine-sweeping
tank meeting savage resistance on Sword Beach.
'They were flung
about as German machine-gun fire hit them, clutching
various parts of their bodies, jolting like dolls,
then sinking out of sight into the water.'
A British gunner
named Charles Wilson described how he landed in a
vest, shorts and gym shoes, because his job was to
tow ashore a huge 'Roly Poly' mat across which his
battery could drive ashore from the landing craft.
They grounded on a sandbank off Gold Beach.
As the ramp went
down, the first man off, a commando sergeant
burdened with full kit, vanished into six feet of
water.
Wilson and
his mates heaved manfully at their unwieldy mat in
rough and icy water. It broke away and drifted
towards mines. The towing party scrambled ashore.
The gunner
recalled his first glimpse of France:
'The beach was strewn with wreckage. A blazing tank,
bundles of blankets and bits of bodies. A bloke near
me was blown in half by a shell. His lower half
collapsed in a bloody heap on the sand.'
That was one
man's typical D-Day morning: chaotic, terrifying and
frustrating in a fashion most of us - fortunately
- can scarcely comprehend.
Somehow, through
it all, just enough went right and just enough men
were brave to enable more than 100,000 Allied troops
to seize a beachhead by dusk.
They had breached Hitler's Atlantic Wall. They had
destroyed
Germany's last chance of averting
defeat in the West.
This is the
historic moment which today's British government
does not consider worthy of notice on its 65th
anniversary.
Ministers, as so
often, woefully misread the public mood. Most people
are still fascinated by the war. They take a just
pride in our achievement in it.
My old friend
Antony Beevor, historian of Stalingrad and the Battle of Berlin, has produced a
massive new book about D-Day for the anniversary
that is already attracting widespread attention,
weeks before its publication.
The enthusiasm
of TV and radio never flags. Every producer knows
there is a huge audience for an unforgettable story.
At the last
great June 6 commemoration in 2004, I spent all day
in the BBC's studio above the beach at Arromanches,
joining the live coverage. It was a profoundly
moving occasion.
And so it can be
again, if ministers bow to public sentiment and
enable Britain to play its part. We owe a
debt to the dwindling band of Normandy veterans to show that their
achievement and sacrifice are not forgotten.
We ourselves are
entering hard times. We deserve to be cheered by
recollection of the fashion in which our fathers and
grandfathers prevailed over much worse perils.
To commemorate
D-Day is not a surrender to nostalgia. It is a
celebration of a great moment in our heritage which
all those living in modern
Britain should be proud to share.
*
The
Spirit of England
by
Winston
Churchill
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
Daily Mail
COMMENT
March 19,
2009.
A MATTER
OF REAL JOBS-CRIMINAL NEGLECT AND HELP FOR THE REMAINING HEROES
*
Only
REAL
jobs can pull
us through.
As
unemployment surges above two million, these are desperate times
indeed for the wealth-creators of the PRIVATE SECTOR. But what a
different story it is in the la-la land of the PUBLIC PAYROLL.
To see
town hall bosses and quangocrats wantonly splashing taxpayers' money
around, you'd think there wasn't a cloud in the economic skies.
Isn't it
unbelievable that job numbers in the PUBLIC SECTOR actually
increased by 30,000 last year, while in private businesses
they shrank by
105,000
Let's be
clear: the Mail accepts many public employees do vital work, without
which our country couldn't function.
But while
engineers, stonemasons and shop assistants are being thrown on the
dole, what possible justification can there be for the NHS to go on
recruiting
'flexible resource team members'?
How can
Schools Secretary Ed Balls offer £65,000 a year of our money foe a
'themes coordinator'
to run
his fatuous
'Centre for Excellence and Outcomes'?
It's not
just economic madness to waste money like this, when PUBLIC FINANCES
are in their worst state since [the Second World ] War.
Its also
socially divisive -and deeply unfair - to insulate one section of
the workforce from economic reality, while leaving the rest to bear
ALL THE PAIN.
EVEN BEFORE the RECESSION, BRITAIN'S
PUBLIC SECTOR was BLOATED far beyond the NATION'S NEEDS, with PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES enjoying HIGHER WAGES-LOWER RETIREMENT AGES and HUGELY
MORE GENEROUS PENSIONS than those in PRIVATE BUSINESSES.
Today ,
there is no way the country can afford to go on financing this
reckless expansion of THE STATE. For the bigger it grows, the more
painful the CUTS will have TO BE when the inevitable MOMENT COMES.
If
ministers think
' themes co-ordinators and flexibile
resource team workers'
can
rebuild our ECONOMY ,they're in for a SHOCK.
ONLY
the
wealth-creators can dig us OUT of THIS MESS -and right now
THEY NEED ALL THE HELP THEY CAN GET.
*
[To Follow
-CRIMINAL NEGLECT
*
HELP FOR THE REMAINING HEROES.
In the
words of David Low's famous wartime cartoon: 'Very well, Alone!'
If penny
pinching ministers refuse to help the heroes of D-Day attend the
65th anniversary commemorations of the Normandy landings, then
ordinary Britons
WILL DO IT WITHOUT THEIR HELP
The Mail
knows money is tight. But we urge readers, renowned for their
generosity, to support our campaign to honour the veterans of one of
the greatest military triumphs.
For We Owe Them EVERYTHING.
*
*
D-DAY veterans thank Daily Mail Readers
for the magnificent contribution of
£183,000
Peter Hodge, secretary of the Normandy
Veterans association paid tribute to the
'amazing contribution and asked for no
more cheques to be sent. [March31,2009]
*
In a
further success for the Mail Campaign, National Lottery funding
chiefs have announced that they will pay for every British Second
World War veteran-or surviving next of kin-to make a pilgrimage of
remembrance any where in the world.
If you
are a Second World War veteran hoping to travel overseas to revisit
a battlefield, or the widow or close relative of a veteran who has
died, call the Big Lottery Fund hotline on 0845-00 00 121
. Lines are open 8am to 7pm Monday to
Friday. and 9am to 5pm Saturday and Sunday[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
used-Comments in Brackets]
*
March
-2009
|
|
Ten EU truths we must tell the public
1. The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties
have been taken over by pro-Europeans. These leaderships implement
the EU's policy, and ignore the wishes of their voters.
That's why your vote doesn't make a
difference.
2. The European Union has the
Constitution of a dictatorship, and the laws of a police state.
Dictatorships lead to oppression and poverty. The EU Constitution is
similar to the old Soviet Union's.
3. Once the Queen has signed the
sixth and final EU Treaty in June,2008 the very much alive EU
Constitution makes it clear the EU will abolish the nations of
Britain and England (and our Lib, Lab and Con
parties, Reform Treaty clause 8A-4).
4. The EU is illegal under British
law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have committed five acts of
Treason by signing five EU treaties which will abolish our nation
and replace it with the EU; they had to
secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape
prosecution.
5. The police state growing around
you, and reported on by some national newspapers, is the EU police
state. We've been in the EU for 34 years, we
are harmonising our laws with the EU, the emerging police state is
the result.
6. Political correctness, the
undermining of parents, the family and teachers, the teaching of sex
and homosexuality to under tens, the promotion of single parent
families etc. is subversion by the EU or its
Common Purpose organisation over the
last 34 years, using the plans of the German Frankfurt School.
7. The EU will be an economic
disaster. We now lose £30 billion a year trading with Europe; before
we joined we broke even. The EU's 111,000 regulations cost us £100
billion a year (Better Regulation Commission Annual Report 2005);
they will
bring us a soviet style command economy and poverty.
Our politicians lied to us.
8. If you have voted Conservative,
Labour or Lib Dem over the last 34 years you
have voted for the EU police state, and for the abolition of your
own party.
9. German Chancellor Angela Merkel
ensured our government signed the “Reform Treaty;” which will
abolish the British Constitution and enforce the EU’s from 1st
January 2009. The EU treaties don’t allow for a British General
Election, which isn't due until 5th May 2010, so it is unlikely
another will be permitted. You will by then be imprisoned inside the
EU police state, where you will be ruled by
unelected EU dictators, who will control the nuclear weapons of what
used to be Britain and
France.
10. Britain is the fifth largest
economy amongst the world's 200 nations. Forget elections and
parties, whose leaderships are controlled by the EU. Fight the
direct anti EU campaigns on eutruth to get Britain back before its
too late. Start by visiting
your MP in his local surgery and warn him he will lose his £240,000
salary and expenses when the EU closes Westminster on 5th May 2010.
David Noakes.
www.eutruth.org.uk
07974 437 097
|
|
What do
we expect if we treat our own nation with such
contempt?
Peter Hitchens
Last updated at 9:07 AM on 16th March 2009
The insulting anti-British
demonstration in Luton is a sign that we are
losing – and may already have lost – the most
important battle for survival in our modern
history.
Our political leaders like to
pretend they are defending us against all kinds
of perils – especially bogeymen such as Al
Qaeda.
I have always thought this was
humbug, partly designed to conceal their failure
to protect us from the real perils of the EU and
the destruction of our culture.
Now you can see, in those
Luton faces, exactly what I mean.
Shameful: The Muslim protestors in Luton
last week
For years these same leaders
have been the active allies of a real enemy
right here among us.
That enemy is the deliberate
destruction of Britain, the smearing of its
history, the mocking of decent patriotism, the
undermining of loyalty.
Those who were rightly angered
at the ill-mannered and contemptuous display in
Luton – the scowling menfolk and their sullen,
shrouded women – should aim their anger not at
these misguided individuals but at the liberal
Left which has brought us to this point.
It is the absolute right – and
in many ways the duty – of a free subject of the
Crown to protest against any war he or she feels
to be wrong. I have been against the Iraq War
since before it began and am likewise against
the ill-considered adventure in Afghanistan.
But such protests can only be
made if they are based upon a deep loyalty to
and love for this country and its people. To
anyone who has such feelings, the idea of
jeering at honest, courageous soldiers is
repulsive.
These are our
own people, who have rightly done their duty and
followed lawful orders, as they are supposed to
do.
If we wish to voice insults,
then we should direct them against the dim or
malevolent political figures who are really
responsible, and who have never risked so much
as a broken fingernail in the great causes they
claim to support and for which they send other
men’s sons to die and be maimed.
The cap badges
and flags of those soldiers are part of my
history.
And it is a history of which I
am endlessly proud, which has kept these islands
safe from foreign conquest and subjugation,
deportation, massacre, enslavement and plunder
for centuries.
They have preserved an almost
unique society of freedom under the law in a
world where both are in very short supply.
How is it possible for any
British person not to understand this? For, let
us be absolutely clear, the people on that Luton
protest are British by every legal measure.
We have rightly been told for
many years not to refer to such people as
‘immigrants’ for the simple reason that they
have been born and raised here.
Why then do they not feel as
we do? It is not because they are Muslims.
Muslims served the British Crown with loyalty
and distinction in the days of Empire, and would
not then have dreamed of insulting this
country’s flag or scorning its soldiers.
It is because we have
encouraged them to think like this by
ceaselessly attacking our own country.
We teach our children to be
ashamed of our past. We tell them our sailors at
Trafalgar had weevils in their biscuits but not
that by astonishing courage and endurance they
saved Europe from endless tyranny.
We act ashamed of the
Christian religion that formed our laws and
institutions. We encourage new arrivals to speak
their own languages, to stay in isolated
communities.
Heroes
welcome? Soldiers from Britain's 2nd
Battalion of the Royal Anglian Regiment
parade through the streets of Watford in
north London
We never say that there are
two sides to hospitality – a concept our Muslim
citizens understand very well – and that those
who are welcomed are expected to be loyal
members of the society they have voluntarily
joined. What do we expect these people and their
children to think if we treat our own nation
with contempt?
The reasons for this lie
buried in the lost teenage years of our elite.
Far more of them than are now ready to admit it
were revolutionary Marxists at the time.
They have not really changed
the views they held then, just become cleverer
at achieving their aims. Now we see the result.
Of course, if British
Christians living in an Islamic country turned
out to jeer at that country’s army, they would
be torn to pieces by the crowd or hurled into
prison.
I am rather proud of the
immense restraint shown by most of those who
went there to cheer – because such restraint is
very British. But how long will restraint be
British, and the British be restrained?
I cling to the idea that it is
not too late to stop the disintegration of our
society but, if so, then time is very short
indeed.
*
[We
agree with much of what Peter Hitchins states in
his excellent article but fear he too must face
the reality that whether Muslins have fought for
our country with honour has no bearing on
whether a Muslim decides that he does not wish
to INTEGRATE into our society but stand aloof
and work for the day when his new home will have
at its heart an ISLAMIC STATE. Independent Polls
around the country have been all too clear about
the true feelings of Muslims who have in a
greater majority stated that they do not intend
to INTEGRATE and by everyone not facing this
fact it will prevent an OPEN DEBATE on such an
IMPORTANT ISSUE on which the very existence of a
Christian nation state of 1500 years in the
making depends.
The history of the Muslim and
the Hindu since their INDEPENDENCE in 1947 in
the Indian -sub continent has not hidden the
bitter battles fought between these two peoples
of which the tension between India and Pakistan
which still occurs in our own time. Fortunately
,this does not appear to have occurred in
England but as to the future that is an unknown
factor. We still hold the view that immigration
from the Indian-sub continent should have been
rigorously restricted and only those who would
decide to integrate and accept our Rule of Law
and until that assurance had been received no
citizenship should have been conferred. We live
on a small island which is by the latest figures
makes our population the biggest in Europe.
England leads the table with 395 people per
sq/km- greater than Holland -Daily Mail March
12-2009. Many of the indigenous population
have commented that their country no longer
looks or feels like their own they feel
strangers in their own country which is exactly
what the politicians wanted to happen as to
destroy its UNITY-CUSTOM and LAW. The Government
supports its OPEN DOOR immigration policy on the
grounds that the more immigrants the richer our
country will be, but common sense has
established that the greater the number the
poorer many will be. We have proved throughout
our history that provided the greater core of
the indigenous population remains in place there
will be no threat to its existence by those from
other shores. Until fifty years ago this policy
was maintained and over the past decades and
particularly over the past decade this has been
ignored and our country now looks more like a
vast transit camp and as a result our country no
longer looks or feels like ENGLAND.
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!
WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND
STATES DECAY; BUT WE CAN AT ANY
RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE
JUSTICE, THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE
RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN
EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS
FALL. RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS
FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF
EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND
RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY. A
NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE
VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN
IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF
IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE
VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER, A NATION
MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID
CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS
TRADITION AND THE NATION WHICH
LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS
VERY SELF.
[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL
CHARACTER-1927] |
IS THIS
NOT THE CASE OF ENGLAND IN 2009
*
Tony Blair’s
legacy-the Ghettosization
of England
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining used -Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
The New Underworld Order
Curse of Criminalism: Dark Actors Playing Games
Author: Christopher Story FRSA Published by:
Edward Harle Limited
The New Underworld Order
addresses the greatest crisis the world has ever faced –
namely, the globalisation of criminalism. What this
means is that governments, and the revolutionary New
World Order cabal seeking global governance (or
control), are increasingly in the hands of criminal
gangs and corrupt power cliques that hide behind formal
government positions. Many of the the main Illuminati
figures on the world stage today are compromised or
vulnerable to blackmail and other ‘Black Ops’ forms of
control. During the giga-fund-raising operation, truly
unbelievable sums of money were stolen, misrouted or
‘misappropriated’. Indeed, the ransacking and pillaging
that took place was so colossal, and the impasse while
this was occurring so extended (in 1989-91), that the
international banking and financial systems nearly
collapsed. Other funding resources resulting from
creative Financial Warfare and scamming operations are
hidden in accounts held by offshore corporations
controlled by international intelligence, which is
extensively criminalised and thus increasingly engaged
in mafia-style global ‘gangland warfare’. A brilliant
light is focused by the Author into this contemporary
universe of darkness.
Christopher Story’s sensational new exposé provides
chapter and verse on the dark forces behind the New
Underworld Order, gives detailed financial audit trails
showing where and how colossal sums have vanished,
identifies the international institutions that have had
their trust abused by globalist criminalists or have
themselves been corrupted by them, shows how secret
Financial Warfare operations and scams conducted by the
Great Powers are driving the world to catastrophe, and
generally lifts the veil covering the global financial
intelligence war which the pressured ‘mainstream’ media
declines to monitor and report. In fact, when a
distinguished journalist advised a leading London
newspaper at the highest level about this Author’s
research, the publication’s management showed keen
interest – but reverted 24 hours later with the message
that they wouldn’t touch this subject ‘with a
thousand-foot bargepole’. So exposure of these matters
is obviously overdue:
The New Underworld Order performs this needed
forensic function, revealing dark actors playing games.
Please note that price breaks are NOT AVAILABLE for this
very large book.
- Price: $95.00
- UK [cheques only*]: £60.00*
- ISBN: 1-899798-05-6
- Published in: 2007
- Author: Christopher Story FRSA
Triumph of Criminalism: Dark Actors Playing Games:
The global hegemony of geomasonic intelligence and
Illuminati criminalism
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
U.S. COST OF IRAQ
WAR OVER 2 TRILLION DOLLARS AND RISING
*
THE REVOLUTION
A MANIFESTO
by
Congressman RON
PAUL-Republican.
[2008]
Few Americans
realize how costly their foreign policy is. Larry Lindsey, senior
economic adviser to the Bush administration, embarrassed the White
House when he warned in the Wall Street Journal that the Iraq war
cost £100 Billion to £200 Billion...
In early 2006, Harvard's Linda
Bilmes and Columbia's Joseph Stiglitz estimated the long term costs of
the Iraq War , including care for the maimed soldiers, at $2 trillion.
By the end of the year they were saying the $2 trillion figure was too
low. It isn't just the Iraq war that busts the BUDGET -it's our overseas
presence as a whole. We have reached a point at which it now costs $1
trillion per year to maintain. One trillion dollars. The proposed
Pentagon budget alone was $ 623 billion for 2008. " What's remarkable
about this year's military budget," writes one military analyst,
" is that it's the largest budget since WORLD WAR II."...
Our forces are
stretched much too thin, what with over 700 bases around the world and
all nation-building work that conservatives not so long ago critized
Bill Clinton for imposing on our military.
We have troops in
Korea for over five and a half decades. We have troops in Europe and
Japan for about as long. How many years is ENOUGH?...
Mean while , our
lack of debate has had terrible consequences for our republic. James
Bamford observes that the leadership of al Qaeda hoped to lure us into a
"desert Vietnam," an enormously expensive war that would deplete our
resources and help their own recruitment by stirring the locals against
us. AND THAT IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED. The war's ultimate cost is
being estimated in trillions. the dollar is collapsing. AND MORE
TERRORISTS ARE BEING CREATED. According to a study by the Global
research in International Affairs Centre in Herzliya, Israel, the vast
bulk of the foreign fighters in Iraq are people who have never been
involved in terrorist activity before but have been radicalized by the
U.S. presence in IRAQ - the SECOND HOLIEST PLACE IN ISLAM.
The
terrorists, in short, have played us like a fiddle. With the
unnecessary and unprovoked attack on IRAQ, our government gave them JUST
WHAT THEY WANTED [as Tony Blair did at home]
Americans have
the right to defend themselves against attack; that is not the issue.
But that is very different from launching a pre-emptive war against a
country that HAD NOT ATTACKED US AND COULD NOT ATTACK US, that lacked a
navy and an air force, and whose military budget was a fraction of our
own. A policy of overthrowing or destabilizing every regime our
government dislikes IS NO STRATEGY AT ALL. unless our goal is
INTERNATIONAL CHAOS and DOMESTIC IMPOVERISHMENT....
It is time for us
to consider a strategic reassessment of our policy of foreign
interventionism, occupation, and nation building. It is in our
national interest to do so and in the interest of WORLD PEACE.
This is the message that resonates not only with the American people at
large but also with U.S. military personnel: in the second quarter of
2007 our campaign raised more money from active duty and retired
military than did any other REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE in EITHER PARTY.
Then in the fourth quarter we received more money in military donations
than all other Republicans put together.
THIS MESSAGE IS POPULAR. and it
is based on AMERICAN SECURITY, FISCAL SANITY, and COMMON SENSE.
*
[Gordon Brown has still not apologised for his staunch support of
the Iraqi war and war monger Tony Blair and he himself has a great deal
to answer for in his crass handling of the ECONOMY since 1997 when the
larder was full to overflowing and instead went on a spending spree to
intoxicate the voters and at the same time depleted our GOLD RESERVES
with a gift to the German Treasury. Gold on the international markets is
being in 2009 deliberately undermined by the advocates of A NEW WORLD
ORDER.
*
THE
REVOLUTION
A
MANIFESTO
[2008]
by
RON PAUL
[From any good book stockist
or on line -AMAZON.UK
Price £7.31 + Shipping & packing £ 2.75]
*
Other websites:
Mises
Institute and
www.Mises.org
www.LewRockwell.com
*
Font Altered-Bolding &
Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT
MILLIONS OF CHRISTIANS WOULD BE BARRED FROM ISLAMIC STATES SO MUSLIMS
SHOULD HAVE BEEN DENIED ENTRY TO ENGLAND.
Because of the stupidity of New Labour who had an
OPEN DOOR for immigration from the Muslim world we now have within
our country what one can term an
ENEMY WITHIN.
For the few Muslims who endeavour to integrate
they still cannot because of their own more demanding culture
embrace 'the new way of life '-it is not their way of life. We are
constantly being told that some Muslims are tolerant and will in
time become 'one of us', But this is for a Muslim all nonsense.
Everything they HATE is all around them and in some instances many
Christians would agree with them of the sordid aspects of some of
the culture they are asked to tolerate or adhere. Nevertheless, it
is the duty of all Muslims to strive to obtain an Islamic State in
their new homeland. If from the beginning there had been Government
policy to only allow a small number of Muslims to settle in our
country there would possibly have been a chance that they would
endeavour to integrate into the island community but this was not
the case and instead we now have millions of Muslims in our small
island home who have NO INTENTION TO INTEGRATE and will lose no time
in promoting their own selective agenda as encouraged by Government
handouts which only strengthen their demands to be treated more
selectively than the indigenous population. And as a result we have
many
Ghettos in many counties of ENGLAND.
We have from the beginning stated that we need
clean hands to deal with the Islamic fundamentalist question and
that is why we have opposed the illegal war in Iraq from its
beginnings. We can understand their anger as demonstrated against
our brave soldiers of whom hundreds of their comrades have lost
their lives and many many thousands wounded many seriously and will
in many cases feel the affects for the remainder of their lives. We
mentioned some time ago that if we had illegally invaded any other
country with a large immigrant population in our country many of
those people would no doubt take to the streets.
THE
BLAME RESTS WITH THE NEW LABOUR GOVERNMENT
They encouraged millions of immigrants from the
Indian-sub continent with their Muslim Faith which any knowledgeable
diplomats from the area would have warned of the difficulties or
even the impossibility of integration. We are fortunate in having
over the past few years a diplomat of great experience in Sir
Andrew
Green of MigrationWatch with his experience of Islamic
countries at close hand and the dangers of an OPEN DOOR policy on
IMMIGRATION. In many cities and towns in England there is now a
preponderance of immigrants from Muslim countries and many
indigenous people no longer feel they live in the same country as
their birth. Of course the perpetrators of the pernicious policies
of New Labour have the where for all to live were ever they like on
the Planet having in the majority of cases robbed the taxpayer and
looking forward to a wonderful relaxed retirement on the people they
have swindled and traitorously deprived them of their Rights and
Liberties-Constitution and Country.
REMEMBER on JUNE4 the GANG
of THREE in WESTMINSTER are responsible for the state of your
country and they need your vote in order to allow them to continue
their destructive policies -IMMIGRATION-BURDENSOME PUBLIC SECTOR and
covering up the dirty tricks of the BANKERS and also for selling
YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER
VOTE
www.LIBERTAS.eu
Who intend to stand candidates in all EU member
states in order to obtain fundamental change which is of course will
be impossible but its intervention will inevitably lead to the fall
of the undemocratic and unaccountable and demonic United States of
Europe.
[We have noticed the case of Lord Ahmed who has
appeared to have received special treatment from the law fraternity
no doubt because of his usefulness to the Government in Muslim
matters. His straight talking about matters that the liberal brigade
has found to hot to handle is certainly a benefit to the ministers
who at the best of times have no stomach to speak the TRUTH.]
*
SOUL OF ENGLAND
*
MARCH-2008
|
|
BROWN AND OBAMA AT G20 TO ARGUE THEIR POLICY OF
BAIL-OUT BUT ARE THEY RIGHT IN THEIR OBJECTIVE?
*
So What Should be Done
by
Ron Paul
[THE REVOLUTION
A MANIFESTO]
FIRST of all, it's long past time to put the
monetary issue back on the table as a subject of genuine discussion,
and then to start asking forbidden questions. For over one hundred
years, the money issue has been absent from the political process.
No political campaign has focused on it or even said much of
anything about it. For most people, in fact, the Federal Reserve is
a COMPLETE MYSTERY.
It's operations incomprehensible.
That seems to be just the way the FED likes it.
We are supposed to be bored by it. We are supposed to treat it as a
given, like air we breathe. We are supposed to have confidence in
-surely the experts who run out our monetary system for us (and who
of course have a vested interest in perpetuating the system we now
have) couldn't be giving us BAD ADVICE! BUT point to it as the
source of our eroding standard of living, the ravages of the
BOOM-BUST business circle, and the financial bubbles that have
RUINED COUNTLESS AMERICANS? That is simply not to be found anywhere
along the spectrum of allowable opinion in America.
It's time for some fresh thing for a change - an
unbiased rational reappraisal of a monetary system that is presented
us as the best of all possible worlds, but whose dangers grow
clearer and more urgent with each passing day.
THE FIRST practical measure that should be taken
is to legalize competition. restore to Americans their right to use
PRECIOUS METALS as a MEDIUM of EXCHANGE - a simple and reasonable
initial step if we believe in FREEDOM. It is essential that
Americans be given the chance to escape from the present system and
protect themselves from possible FINANCIAL RUIN, by being able to
use GOLD and SILVER if they so desire. If anyone would rather
continue to transact in the DEPRECIATING DOLLAR, he would be FREE TO
DO SO. But anyone who prefers a currenc7 that holds its value and
won't become worthless before his eye just because HIS GOVERNMENT
ran a PRINTING PRESS one too many times would have REAL OPTIONS.
Right now, various disabilities make it difficult
for GOLD to be USED in market transactions. SALES and CAPITAL GAINS
TAX on PRECIOUS METALS should be PROMPTLY REPEALED, and the
enforceability of GOLD clauses in private contracts definitively
reaffirmed...
The GOLD STANDARD has
historically been a BULWARK AGAINST INFLATION. [The German Treasury
is well aware of this and has possible the highest GOLD RESERVES in
Europe with a little help from the most prolific high -spender
Gordon Brown who raised the total by selling our GOLD at a BARGAIN
PRICE.] It is politically manipulated money such as we have
had since the 1930's that CAUSES OUR INFLATION. That should not be
unexpected or difficult to understand, The supply of GOLD is
relatively fixed and grows modestly. But in a FREE ECONOMY, capital
investment leads to ever-greater productivity and the ability to
produce more and more goods over time. So the GOLD relatively
stable on the one hand and the supply of goods grow3ing by leaps and
bounds on the other, the GOLD will tend to be WORTH MORE and MORE,
and the prices of these goods will be lower and lower.
History bears this out. An
item that cost $100 in 1913 (when the Federal reserve Act was
passed) would cost £2014.81 in 2006. An item that cost $100 in 2006
would have cost $4.96 in 1913. As we can see, the dollar has lost
nearly ALL ITS VALUE since the FED WAS ESTABLISHED. NOW, if the GOLD
STANDARD had brought about such an outcome, we would never hear the
end of all the howls of OUTRAGE. BUT the FED DOES IT and...UTTER
SILENCE. the FED has managed to insulate itself from the kind of
criticism that is directed at ALL OTHER INSTITUTIONS THAT HARM
AMERICANS. And in FACT the GOLD STANDARD DID NO SUCH THING.
People's money INCREASED IN VALUE under the GOLD STANDARD. They were
LOOTED by INFLATION. An item that cost $100 in 1820 would have COST
ONLY $63.02 in 1913.
*
THE
REVOLUTION
A
MANIFESTO
[2008]
by
RON PAUL
[From any good book stockist
or on line -AMAZON.UK
Price £7.31 + Shipping & packing £ 2.75]
*
Other websites:
Mises
Institute and www.Mises.org
www.LewRockwell.com
*
Font Altered-Bolding &
Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
A NEW INTERNET POLITICAL
PARTY-OF THE PEOPLE -TO RECLAIM PARLIAMENT FOR THE PEOPLE.
*
Tycoon's vision to smash party politics with
Independent MPs
[Daily Mail, Monday ,March
9, 2009]
A FORMER
Tory tycoon yesterday launched an X-Factor-style political party
which he claimed would restore the public's faith in Parliament.
Sir Paul
Judge said repeated sleaze scandals and the narrow,
career-mindedness of many politicians meant the existing system was
'broken'
He is
launching a MOVEMENT called JURY TEAM which aims to use the internet
to enable the public to select candidates from OUTSIDE the ranks of
PARTY POLITICS.
THE GROUP,
which hopes to be up and running in time to field 72 candidates in
the EUROPEAN ELECTIONS in JUNE 2009, will have NO MANIFESTO of
SPECIFIC POLICIES.
INSTEAD,
Sir Paul, who is funding the party from his estimated £30 million
fortune, said nominees would have to commit to behaving HONESTLY and
SELFLESSLY if ELECTED.
The
BUSINESSMAN, who was a director general of the CONSERVATIVE PARTY
under JOHN MAJOR and who launched his new party's website yesterday,
said any elected candidates would sit as INDEPENDENTS and would NOT
BE TOLD HOW TO VOTE by PARTY WHIPS.
www.sirpauljudge.org
*
www.juryteam.org
*
[With so many potential voters
sickened by the majority of so-called representatives in Parliament
it will now be possible for those who gave up voting years ago to
now have a voice in THEIR HOUSE OF COMMONS which by a majority sold
our unique parliamentary democracy and Constitution to a Foreign
Power without giving the opportunity of the PEOPLE to declare
their intention on such a major constitutional issue in a REFERENDUM
TREATY OF TREASON
*
THE
POLITICS OF TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM MUST NOW END WITH PR-PROPORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION.*
Why Members of Parliament must be restricted to one term
of office to protect their Independence.
*
[We believe the movement
will have wider appeal if MPs are restricted to ONE TERM for obvious
reasons but it would also allow many who wish to SERVE THEIR COUNTRY
to take leave of their occupation for up to FIVE YEARS.]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments
in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
THE REVOLUTION
A MANIFESTO
by
RON PAUL
*
EXTRACT
Money: the Forbidden issue in American Politics.
[the
arguments used here are as applicable to the present dire situation
in England with the recent decisions of the Bank of England.]
Americans are concerned about our financial
picture: the housing bubble, the collapsing dollar, the specter of
inflation. Most don't know what 's causing it, but they correctly
sense that something in our economic system is rotten.
Neither political party will speak to them frankly
and honestly. Instead, the people are told by the talking heads on
television that their rulers know just what is wrong and will
promptly put things right. A little more monetary manipulation by
the federal Reserve is all the economy needs, and there is nothing
fundamentally wrong with the system.
These contrived, self-serving answers satisfy few,
but they are all the answers the American [and English] people are
ever given.
Once again, the Americans are deprived of a full
and fruitful debate on a subject of utmost importance. the entire
range of debate is limited to minor tinkering: should the Fed[eral
Reserve] make this trivial adjustment or that one?
[As with the Bank of England].
read the major newspapers and watch the cable news channels: you
will not see any fundamental questions raised. the debate will be
resolutely confined to superficialities...
As John Adams 2nd president of the United States
wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 1787, "All the perplexities,
confusions, and distress in America, arise, not from defects in
their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honour or
virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin,
credit, and circulation."...
Throughout most of American
history the dollar has been defined as a specific weight in gold.
Until 1933, in fact, 20 dollars could be redeemed for one ounce of
gold. But that year , the U.S. government went off the gold
standard, and henceforth American currency would be redeemable into
NOTHING...
And even this tenuous link to gold was severed in
1971, when Richard Nixon declared that within a year, at the $35
exchange rate, we would not have an ounce of gold remaining.
[If that had been during
the early years of the 21st century then the German Government no
doubt would have sufficient gold reserves topped up by Gordon Brown
on the cheap-might help out.]
..At that
point Nixon officially closed the gold window, so that not even
foreign central banks could get gold for dollars. In so doing, he
cut the dollar's last lingering tie to gold...
Central
economic planning has been as discredited as any idea can possibly
be. But even though we point to our devotion to the FREE MARKET, at
the same time we centrally plan our monetary system, the very heart
of the economy. Americans must reject the notion that one man,
whether Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, or any other chairman of the
Federal reserve Board. can know what the proper money supply and
interest rates ought to be. ONLY THE MARKET can DETERMINE THAT.
Americans MUST LEARN THE LESSON if we want to avoid continuous and
DEEPER RECESSIONS and to get the economy GROWING in a HEALTHY and
SUSTAINABLE FASHION.
Few
Americans during his tenure knew that Greenspan had once been an
outspoken advocate of the GOLD-STANDARD as the ONLY monetary system
that a FREE SOCIETY should consider. Not long after my return to
CONGRESS in the ELECTION of 1996, I spoke with Greenspan at a
special event that took place just before he was to speak in front
of the House banking Committee. At that event congressmen had a
chance to meet and have their pictures taken with the FED chairman.
i decided to bring along my original copy of his 1966 article from
the Objectivist newsletter called
"GOLD and
ECONOMIC FREEDOM"
an
outstanding piece in which he laid out the economic and moral case
for a commodity-based
[gold]
monetary system as against a fiat paper system. he graciously agreed
to sign it for me. As he was doing so, i asked if he wanted to write
a disclaimer on the article. he replied good-naturedly that he had
recently reread the piece and that he would not change a word of it.
i found that fascinating: could it be that, in his heart of hearts
Greenspan STILL BELIEVED in the bullet proof logic of that classical
article?
Shortly
afterwards , i decided -perhaps a bit mischievously - to bring up
that article and the arguments raised by it during a subsequent
Greenspan appearance before the Committee. But the Federal reserve
Chairman was less sympathetic to those arguments when he raised the
subject in the open. he replied that his views had changed since the
article was written, and he even advanced preposterous assertion
that the Fed did not facilitate government expansion and deficit
spending.
Greenspan's real views, however interesting as a piece of trivia,
are ultimately unimportant.
IT IS THE SYSTEM ITSELF THAT
MATTERS
In the
same way, it is absurd for the Fed chairman to come to Congress and
complain that the real problems of the economy [as in England] stem
from DEFICIT SPENDING and that it is solely Congress and its
recklessness with the BUDGET that is at FAULT.
THAT IS
NOT SO
It is the
entire system that is to blame. Congress could not get away with
spending beyond its means year after year if it did not have the
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ready to finance it all by
purchasing BONDS
with
MONEY
IT CREATES OUT OF THIN AIR.
[Sounds very much the same
problem we have with our Bank of England don't you think?]
What the
issue boils down to is: do we want a monetary system that
politicians can manipulate to their advantage? Do we want them to
have the ability to pay for all their extravagance by printing
money they need, thereby imposing a hidden tax on all Americans by
eroding the value of the dollar?
GOLD
cannot be mined as cheaply as Federal reserve notes [or Bank of
England notes] can be printed. Nor can its supply be manipulated on
a daily basis. there is a great dispersion of power in the GOLD
STANDARD system. thqat is the strength of the system, for it allows
the people to CHECK any MONETARY EXCESS of THEIR RULERS and does NOT
ALLOW THE RULERS TO EXPLOIT THE PEOPLE BY DEBASING THE MONEY...
*
[We have
taken but a few pages from the enlightening and informative article.
The full disclosure will certainly be worth the modest price of the
book.]
*
THE
REVOLUTION
A
MANIFESTO
[2008]
by
RON PAUL
[From any good book stockist
or on line -AMAZON.UK
Price £7.31 + Shipping & packing £ 2.75]
*
Other websites:
Mises
Institute and www.Mises.org
www.LewRockwell.com
*
Font Altered-Bolding &
Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
THE REVOLUTION
A MANIFESTO
by
RON PAUL
*
Civil Liberties and personal Freedom
[EXTRACT]
TORTURE by rogue American troops or agents
puts ALL Americans AT RISK.
Judge
Andrew Napolitano recently asked, " Why should government agents
spy on us? They work for us . How about we spy on them?.
On cops when they arrest and interrogate people or contemplate
suspending freedom; on prosecutors when they decide whom to
prosecute and what evidence to use; on judges when they
rationalize away guaranteed rights; and on members of Congress
whenever they meet with a lobbyist, make up a piece of
legislation, or conspire to assault our liberties or our
pocketbooks."
For a
patriotic American, there is nothing radical about this attitude
at all. This is how the Founding fathers thought. If our
critics want to repudiate the Founding Fathers, let them go
ahead and do it. If they won't be honest enough to do so, they
should at least refrain from condemning those of us who still
believe in the wisdom they left for posterity.
Much
more is at stake here than privacy violations or
unconstitutional searches, important and dangerous as those
are. For example, the president has made clear, in one of his
signing statements, that he retains the power to engage in
torture regardless of congressional statutes to the contrary.
Defense Department memoranda say the same thing.
First
of all , legal issues aside, the American people and Government
should never abide the use of TORTURE by our military or
INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES. A decent society never accepts or
justifies TORTURE. It dehumanizes both torturer and victim, yet
seldom produces reliable intelligence. TORTURE by rogue American
troops or agents puts ALL Americans AT RISK especially our
rank-and- file soldiers stationed in dozens of dangerous places
around the globe. It is not difficult to imagine American
soldiers or travelers being taken hostage and tortured as some
kind of sick retaliation for Abu Ghraib.
Beyond
that is the threat posed by unchecked EXECUTIVE POWER.
Executive branch lawyers claim that the PRESIDENT'S
COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF powers override FEDERAL LAWS prohibiting
TORTURE, But the argument for extraordinary wartime executive
powers has been made time and again, always with bad results and
a LOSS of our LIBERTIES . War has been used by presidents to
excuse the imprisonment of American citizens of Japanese
descent, to SILENCE SPEECH, to suspend HABEAS CORPUS, and even
to CONTROL entire private industries. That's why it is
precisely during times of relative crisis that we should adhere
most closely to the CONSTITUTION, and NOT ABANDON IT. The
Founders were especially concerned about the consolidation of
power during times of WAR and NATIONAL EMERGENCES. WAR does NOT
JUSTIFY the SUSPENSION of MURDER LAWS, the SUSPENSION of DUE
PROCESS, or the SUSPENSION of the SECOND AMENDMENT.
The
hallowed right of habeas corpus has also been a casualty of WAR
ON TERROR. the Military Commissions Act of 2006 gives the
PRESIDENT the power to detain people indefinitely and to deny
the accused any real opportunity to answer the charges against
them. It is anti-American at its core. The name of the Act can
give the misleading impression that anyone targeted under it can
at least bring his case before a MILITARY COMMISSION. THAT IS
NOT SO. If the PRESIDENT wants to punish an accused "enemy
combatant," he may bring him before such a COMMISSION. BUT HE
NEED NOT, and if he'd rather that the person remain in prison
FOREVER, HE IS FREE TO ADOPT THAT COURSE INSTEAD....
'With necessity, the tyrant's plea, excused
his devilish deeds.'
John Milton
*
THE REVOLUTION-
A
MANIFESTO
[2008]
by
RON PAUL
[From any good book
stockist or on line -AMAZON.UK
Price £7.31 + Shipping & packing £ 2.75]
*
Other websites:
Mises Institute and Mises.org
LewRockwell.com
*
Font Altered-Bolding &
Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
DID YOU KNOW?
No 19
(Christopher Story of International
Currency Review)
PRAGUE?-LETS GIVE IT TO
GERMANY
Such
observations could only have been
made by a senior intelligence officer
who was aware of the fact that President
Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl, meeting
in Geneva in September 1990, had
included a secret Ribbentrop-Molotov-style
agreement to divide Czechoslavakia, the
details and proof of which are presented
[later]. Under the secret accord,
the Czech Republic was to be merged
with Germany within 15-years of the
agreement [2005]-although this was
intended to occur within the parallel
broader context of EUROPEAN FEDERALISM,
in accordance with the long-range
strategies of both the Comintern and of
the Pan-Germany elite which continues to
dominate and drive German policy today.
COMMUNISM COLLAPSE TWICE
When
explaining in 'Perestroika' : New
Thinking for our country and the
World' that the works of Lenin
and his ideals of socialism remained for
us an inexhaustible source of creative
thought, theoretical wealth and
political sagacity'...
If Communism had been
abandoned in August 1921, why did it
need abandoning again in 1991? Because
it had
NOT,
in fact been 'thrown overboard' in 1921
AT ALL .
That being the case, historians at
least should have asked, what confidence
could we have in the assertion that
Communism had been abandoned in 1991?
[Possibly
Edward Lucas with his article
on Prague and the Soviet-led
invasion of August 21, 1968 in the
Daily Mail on Saturday, August 23, 2008
could enlighten us because we obtained
the impression when he says: It is
astonishing that, after 50 years of
Soviet misrule, many in the Left still
look back on that political doctrine
with something like akin to nostalgia.
Maybe
it would be worthwhile for him to take
the opportunity offered below and find
the
TRUTH
which seems to have evaded
him that the ideology is still
today securely in place.]
*
[More
background information will be available
in the near future but why wait - order
your copy - contact the under-mentioned
website]
[This is a new series of
single statements from
THE
EUROPEAN UNION
COLLECTIVE
IS THE
Enemy
of its Member State
www.edwardharle.com
www.worldreports.org
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
[Each
word/words underlined has a separate bulletin]
*
AUGUST- 2008
|
|
|
WHAT
WE CAN LEARN AS WITH UNITED STATES OUR FOREIGN POLICY IS THREAT
TO LIBERTY AT HOME.
The
comparisons between our two countries are a mirror image at what
has happened to our society when foreign policy is decided by
the hawks and not the doves.
In the
173 pages of the 2008 edition of THE REVOLUTION-A MANIFESTO by
Ron Paul a best seller in the USA and as stated by the NEW YORK
TIMES -a BESTSELLER. And we know WHY?
....'My message is one of freedom and individual rights. I
believe individuals have a right to life and liberty and that
physical aggression should be used only defensively.
[We
acknowledge this statement but would identify the subtle meaning
as including civil disobedience when a people are about to be
deprived of their fundamental rights of citizenship and national
identity as is the case in the Island Home of the 'Rights and
Liberties of Englishmen ' which became the clarion call of the
new emerging citizens of the United States of America. In the
United States they have their Supreme Court which protects the
American citizen and the integrity of the Constitution of those
United States of America. In England we have not been so
fortunate as our unique Constitution was protected by the
Solemn Oath of the Queen and HER MINISTERS and a fat lot of good
were they in saving our unique parliamentary democracy and the
accustomed 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen']
We
should respect each other as rational beings by trying to
achieve our goals through reason and persuasion rather than
threats and coercion. That, and not a desire for "economic
efficiency," is the primary moral reason for opposing government
intrusions into our lives:
GOVERNMENT IS FORCE-NOT REASON.
People
seem to think I [Ron Paul] am speaking of principles foreign to
the Republican tradition. BUT listen to the words of Robert
A.Taft, who in the old days of the Republican Party was once its
standard bearer:
'When
I say liberty I do not simply mean what is referred to as
"FREE
ENTERPRISE"
I mean
liberty of the individual to think his thoughts and live his own
life as he desires to think and to live; the liberty of the to
decide how they wish to live, what they want for breakfast and
for dinner, and how they spend their time; liberty of a man to
develop his ideas and get other people to teach those ideas, if
he can convince them that they have some value to the world;
liberty of every local community to decide how its children
shall be educated, how its local services shall be run, and who
its local leaders shall be ; liberty of a man to choose his own
occupation; and liberty of a man to run his own business as he
thinks it ought to be run, as long as he dies not interfere with
the right of other people to do the same thing.'
As
George Washington the First President of the United States of
America added:
The
great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in
extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little
political connection as possible...Why quit our own to stand
on foreign ground? Why , by interweaving our destiny with
that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in
the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humour or
caprice?
[Millions of people in England have said the same thing in March
2009 and over the past 36 years about the totalitarian entity
calling itself now a UNITED STATES OF EUROPE. The above speech
is as true today as it was then as age is no barrier to TRUTH.
There
is an abundance of wise advice throughout the work of Ron Paul
on LIBERTY which as he continually states has been spoken by so
many others over the past centuries since the birth of the
United States of America.]
We
will conclude the present extract of the work with the words of
John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts (1825-9) 6th President of the
United States.
Mr
Paul first states the 'some Americans may be familiar with the
admonition of John Quincy Adams that America does not go abroad
in search of monsters to destroy. But his sentiments extended
well beyond this oft -cited maxim. FIRST, Adams considered what
could be said in America's defense if anyone were ever to wonder
what she had done for the world.
[I]f
the wise and learned philosophers of the elder world... should
find their hearts disposed to enquire what has America done for
the benefit of mankind? let our reply be this:
AMERICA, with the same voice which spoke herself into existence
as a nation, proclaimed to mankind the inextinguishable rights
of human nature, and the only lawful foundations of government.
AMERICA, in the assembly of nations, since her admission among
them, has invariably: though often fruitlessly, held forth to
them the hand of honest friendship, of equal freedom, of
generous reciprocity. SHE has uniformly spoken among them,
though often to heedless, and often to disdainful ears, the
language of
EQUAL
LIBERTY- of EQUAL JUSTICE and of EQUAL RIGHTS; she has in the
lapse of nearly half a century, without a single exception,
respected the independence of other nations while asserting and
maintaining her own; SHE has abstained from interference in the
concerns of others, even when the conflict has been for
principles to which she clings as to the
LAST VITAL DROP THAT
VISITS THE HEART.
Adams
then described the foreign policy of the American republic:
'WHENEVER the STANDARD of FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE has been or
shall be unfurled, there will be HER HEART, HER BENEDICTIONS and
HER PRAYERS be. But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to
destroy. SHE is the WELL WISHER to the FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE
of ALL. SHE is the CHAMPION and vindicator only of HER OWN.
SHE will COMMAND the GENERAL CAUSE by the countenance of HER
VOICE, and the benignant sympathy of HER EXAMPLE. SHE WELL
KNOWS that by once enlisting under OTHER BANNERS than HER OWN,
were they even BANNERS of FOREIGN INDEPENDENCE, SHE WOULD
involve HERSELF beyond the POWER of EXTRICATION, in all the WARS
of INTEREST and INTRIGUE, of INDIVIDUAL AVARICE, ENVY and
AMBITION, which assume the COLOURS and USURP the STANDARD of
FREEDOM. THE FUNDAMENTAL MAXIMS of HER POLICY would insensibly
CHANGE FROM LIBERTY to FORCE... SHE MIGHT become the DICTATRESS
of the WORLD. SHE WOULD NO LONGER THE RULER OF HER OWN
SPIRIT...'
Ron
Paul later comments: To those who say that the attackers are
motivated by a hatred of Western liberalism or the moral
degeneracy of American culture, Scheuer points out that Iran's
Ayatollah Khomeini tried in vain for a decade to instigate an
anti-Western jihad on exactly that basis. IT WENT NOWHERE. Bin
Laden's message, on the other hand, has been so attractive to so
many people because it is fundamentally defensive. Bin Laden,
says Scheuer, has " spurned the Ayatollah's wholesale
condemnation of Western society," focusing instead on "specific,
bread -and-butter issues on which there is widespread agreement
among MUSLIMS...
...
Scheuer told reporters: " About the only thing that can hold
together the loose coalition that Osama bin Laden has assembled
is a COMMON MUSLIM HATRED FOR THE IMPACT OF USA FOREIGN
POLICY...they all agree they have HATE USA FOREIGN POLICY. To the
degree we change that policy in the interests of the United
States , they become more and more focused on their local
problems." That's not what a lot of our talking heads tell you
on television every day, but few people are in a better position
to understand bin Laden's message than Scheuer, ONE OF OUR
COUNTRIES FOREMOST EXPERTS ON THE MAN...
[We
shall from time to time include other extracts from the work of
Senator Ron Paul but why not get this most informative and
knowledgeable book which will give you HOPE for the future of
DEMOCRACY and the LIBERTY of the INDIVIDUAL which is in the
HEART and FRAME of a modern CRUSADER.
Mr Paul has stated that:
'peaceful civil disobedience to unjust laws, which I support
with every fiber of my being, can sometimes be necessary at any
level of government. It falls upon people, in the last resort,
to stand against injustice no matter where it occurs.'
With such a momentous issue as
the very Constitution and Liberties of a People we feel that we
are justified to take our battle on to the streets but those who
have the responsibility for the Eurosceptic failure to mobilise
their members in a civil disobedience exercise to prevent the
passing of the LISBON TREATY by QUEEN and PARLIAMENT will be a
matter that future generations will be astonished to
comprehend.]
Finally Senator Ron Paul states:
Our Constitution was written to
restrain government, not the people. Government is always
tempted to turn the maxim upside down
[As in England over the past 36
years]
.Little wonder that George
Washington the father of our country, once said," GOVERNMENT IS
NOT REASON; IT IS NOT ELOQUENT; IT IS FORCE. LIKE FIRE, IT IS
A DANGEROUS SERVANT AND A FEARFUL MASTER" .
THE
REVOLUTION-A MANIFESTO
by
RON
PAUL
[From
any good book stockist or on line -AMAZON.UK
Price
£7.31 + Shipping & Handling £ 2.75]
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
DID YOU
KNOW?
No 20
(Christopher Story of International Currency
Review)
ALWAYS
BEAR IN MIND THAT YOU AND WE GERMANY AND THE
USSR CAN DICTATE OUR TERMS TO THE WHOLE WORLD IF
WE STAND TOGETHER.
And
indeed the Pan-German elite has never forgotten
that Soviet sentiment. It was summarised in a
document, intercepted by Western intelligence,
distributed by the
NAZI
INTERNATIONAL
in
1950
[Each
underlined word has a separate bulletin]
to its
various satellite centres, including Bonn,
Lisbon and Buenos Aires, since known as the
'Madrid Circular' Which asserted:
'We must not forget that Germany has always
considered orientation towards the West as a
policy of expedience, or one to be pursued
only under pressure of circumstances... All of
our great national leaders have constantly
counselled the long-range policy of close
cooperation with the East.... The so-called
American democracy does not deserve the
sacrifice of the bones of even a single German
....What Germany needs in the future is not
democracy but a system of statecraft similar
to that of the Soviet dictatorship which
would enable the political and military elite in
Germany to organise the industrial capacity of
Europe and the military qualities of the German
people for the survival of the German race and
the re-establishment of Europe as a power centre
in the world.'
This
'Madrid Circular' -prepared by 'former' Nazis
based in Madrid whose colleagues invaded the
Adenauer Governments structures to such an
extent that, when asked in the Bundestag how
many top Nazis were employed in the German
Foreign Office Dr Adenauer replied that there
were 134 of them-also contained statements such
as the following.'...
We will surely gain the undisputed leadership
in Europe, not excluding Britain. In such
a roundabout way we would be able to establish
the foundation for future world leadership....
And with
much of the media and press in Britain in 2008
ignoring the facts before their eyes it will be
left to the people in their so-called democracy
to find out for themselves.
*
[More background information will
be available in the near future but why wait -
order your copy - contact the under-mentioned
website]
[This is a new series of single
statements from
THE EUROPEAN UNION
COLLECTIVE
IS THE
Enemy of its
Member State
www.edwardharle.com
www.worldreports.org
*
THE
ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
[Each
word/words underlined has a separate bulletin]
AUGUST-
2008
|
|
|
UKIP LOST THE WAR TO FREE ENGLAND FROM
THE EU BUT THEY ARE STILL TALKING.
*
'TOO LITTLE!-TOO LATE!
Over the past few days
we have we have had Nigel Farage
MEP-UKIP leader and an 'active member of
the party' Sir George Earl Bt airing
their views about being 'the only
moderate nationwide party committed
to leaving. Well a little aggression
might have made this note unnecessary.
Have they both
forgotten that the WAR IS OVER as the
traitorous action of the Monarch and the
majority in Westminster have already
ratified in 2008 the EU Treaty-the
Lisbon Treaty the blueprint of the Nazi
Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1943.
Have any members of
UKIP been arrested in a active campaign
against the traitorous Tower of Babel
which has now replaced the once most
venerated spot in all of England?
Have they mobilised
their millions of membership with all
other eurosceptic parties and
organisations on an active gigantic mass
rally around the citadel of traitors to
ENGLISH FREEDOM?
Quite frankly one
would have expected the leadership of
the eurosceptic party would have by now
apologised to the 2,600,0000 voters from
the past who must be wondering how it
could be possible that they have lost
their unique parliamentary democracy and
the accustomed
"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
of ENGLISHMAN".
The Campaign failed
because of the fractional nature of the
eurosceptic policy in failing to
mobilise ALL eurosceptic opinion under
an umbrella organisation similar to the
Trades Union Congress.
Mr Farage cannot see
that the BATTLE for ENGLAND was LOST in
the COMMITTEE ROOM of UKIP and of ALL
other EUROSCEPTIC FACTIONS.
The reality is in
March 2009 that only
www.LIBERTAS.eu
ON
JUNE4-2009
can be the umbrella
vehicle to maximise ALL EUROSCEPTIC
voters because now the trap has been
sprung on us by the TRAITORS WITHIN and
our LIBERTIES-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY
sold to a FOREIGN POWER it will be by
the populations of the EU themselves in
DEMANDING CHANGE that this precise time
of ECONOMIC CRISIS will give the
EUROSCEPTIC CAUSE the momentum it so
desperately needs.
During the Second War
the allies landed ashore in Anzio in
[Italy]
in 1944 but the general was so timid and
cautious that he was relieved of his
command. Winston Churchill had stated
that he had expected that a ferocious
sea lion had
been put ashore and not a stranded whale
-or something of that nature. We have
the same feelings today of the leadership of
UKIP.
DON'T TAKE OUR WORD
ALONE BUT FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF
www.LIBERTAS.eu
*
WHAT A WAY TO WIN
A WAR
*
TREATY OF TREASON
*
WHAT WE
ADVISED UKIP TO DO
IN
OCTOBER -2004
[ 'Liberty is not a means to a higher
political end. It is itself the highest
political end. ' Lord Acton
ACT LIVELY: NEGLECT NO MEANS
It
is no longer disputing, but Out instantly all you can: hasten your horses. I beseech you spare not, but be expeditious
and industrious…. You must act lively: do it without distraction. Neglect no
means. ] Oliver Cromwell (1643)
*
BUT THEY FAILED
TO DO SO.
It has
been TALK-TALK-TALK
and pieces of paper and balloons-
cancelled marches and leadership
squabbles. How the EU must have
laughed at the Talking circus and
realised their despotic plans were
under no threat whatsoever.
What we
wanted was WAR! WAR! but all UKIP would
give us was JAW! JAW!
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING ENABLES GERMANY TO
BE LAST TO SIGN EU TREATIES.
We in England have no protection of an English
Constitutional Court to protect our Rights and Liberties. As we have
stated over the years and in our AIMS OF THE PARTY we have been in need
of a Supreme English Constitutional Court to protect a written Constitution
which would have made it impossible for our politicians from ALL parties
in Westminster by treachery to sell OUR FREEDOM-OUR MONARCHY- OUR CONSTITUTION-OUR
PARLIAMENT to a FOREIGN POWER.
In the USA each of the States have their Supreme Court as does
the Federal Government of the United States of America which ensures
that the treachery that has taken place in England by our Monarchy
[Head of State] and Parliament could not occur there.
At the present time the German Constitutional Court
has a number of legal actions taking place before it by concerned German
citizens as to the threat to the German Constitution in certain
important matters. But as we have already explained as a matter of
procedure the German Constitutional Court enables Germany to be the last
member state of the EU to ratify EU TREATIES. From a historical
perspective the EU treaties with Germany shown as the final signatory,
this is tantamount to Germany accepting the surrender of the member
states but particularly her victorious enemy ENGLAND with her sister
nation states of Wales and Scotland in TWO WORLD WARS.
It is on the ECONOMY that will prove the
ineffectiveness of a so-called UNITED EUROPE that the fault lines of the
undemocratic, unaccountable and demonic structure will be tested to
destruction. You can help this happen on
JUNE 4
VOTE
www.LIBERTAS.eu
For a looser arrangement of an EU of independent
nation states or the collapse of a discredited Nazi-inspired plan for a
NEW WORLD
ORDER.
TREATY OF
TREASON
*
MARCH-2009 |
|
|
EU
wipes England off the map - as Gordon
Brown flies the flag of St George over
Downing Street
Last updated at
16:23 23 April 2008
www.MailOnline.co.uk
The
Tories have issued a St George's Day
rallying cry against plans by Brussels
to "wipe England off the map" and create
a United Europe.
[What a cheek they have! It is
more than a little late for the
CONSERVATIVE
PARTY which has signed every EU TREATY
put before them and in particular the
MAASTRICHT TREATY the OPEN DOOR to the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE and the
destruction of our Monarchy-Parliament
and Country of 1500 years in the making
ENGLAND.
After the signing the Treaty in 1992,
Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd was
overheard saying to his fellow
conspirator in crime Francis Maud
'We'd better find what we have just
signed'
Conservative MEP's are obsessed with
changing the EU but have nothing
substantial to show for it. In the eyes
of the EU they are the '''
useful idiots
'
who year after year promise change
without any success.]
As
Gordon Brown hoisted the English
national flag over 10 Downing Street to
celebrate St George's Day, it was
revealed that EU officials had revised a
map wiping out the country and the
Channel.
The
change splits England into three and
lumps those parts together with chunks
of other countries to create
"transnational regions".
Flying the flag: The cross of St
George over No 10 Downing Street
today
It is claimed these zones - which have
been allocated their own budgets - are
intended to boost trade between EU
nations.
But the Tories yesterday accused the
Government of trying "to create a
European superstate via the back door".
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG,
counties along England's south coast
form the "Manche Region" along with
northern France.
Divide and rule: How the South-East
has been paired up with regions
across the Channel
The "Atlantic Region" takes in western
England, along with Ireland, Wales and
parts of Portugal, Spain, France and
Scotland.
Meanwhile eastern England is part of the
"North Sea Region", which covers areas
of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium,
Norway and the Netherlands.
Gordon Brown: Celebrating
Englishness
The UK Government is fully behind the
project, even though the words "England"
and "Britain" are left off official maps
of each area and the Manche Region
renames the English Channel "The Channel
Sea".
Each region, which will be given
taxpayers' money to promote trade links,
cultural ties, transport policies and
tourism, is to be run by a "managing
authority" of unelected officials
overseen by a director.
None will be based in the UK, with
Manche ruled by the French, Atlantic by
the Portuguese and North Sea by the
Danes.
The regions have legal status and Manche
has a budget of £261million between 2007
and 2013, Atlantic £127million and North
Sea £219million.
Every project funded by a region must
have a publicity campaign which ensures
"there is provision for flying the EU
flag at least one week every year".
Eric Pickles, the Conservatives'
communities spokesman, said: "We already
knew that Gordon Brown had hoisted the
white flag of surrender to the European
Constitution.
[What nonsense the
Conservative
spokesman speaks when their party has
been flying the white flag of surrender
to the EU for over 36 years.
St
George, played by historical
interpreter Alan Larson, does his
best at dispatching the Dragon at
Scarborough Castle
"Now the Labour Government has been
caught red-handed conspiring with
European bureaucrats to create a
European superstate via the back door.
"Gordon Brown literally wants to wipe
England off the map."
But a spokesman for the Department for
Communities and Local Government
insisted: "It has nothing to do with
altering names on maps.
"It is about support for business,
helping boost employment and turning
around deprived areas... helping firms
in Kent do business with people in
Northern France or promoting joint
tourism initiatives between different
countries."
A
St George's Day flag flies next to a
statue of Sir Winston Churchill in
London's Parliament Square today
The
move came as Gordon Brown ordered that
all UK Government buildings with two
flag poles should fly the cross of St
George alongside the union banner.
It
follows a review of flag flying
practices. Number 10 will in future fly
the Scottish and Welsh flags on their
patron saints' days.
Northern Ireland does not have an
official national flag, and so the same
practice will not apply on St Patrick's
Day.
"The
Prime Minister's view is that of course
we should celebrate our Britishness, but
celebrating our Britishness does not
mean we cannot also celebrate our
Englishness, Scottishness, Welshness or
Northern Irishness," said the spokesman.
The
English flag last flew over Downing
Street during the 2006 World Cup.
*
[The
Conservatives have their eye on
the forthcoming
2009 European
Elections
and could even include
a General Election and their
pretence of being a patriotic
party was blown away over 36
years ago. Vote for the smaller
parties for a change and throw
the majority unpatriotic
expensive time wasters out on
the dole. A look at the Regions
/States of Germany will show
that the integrity of their
territory is intact. It is said
what the Pan-Germans mean when
they say other Europeans can
tame the naturally aggressive
and acquisitive tendency to
augment the German race -in
translation is that the
Lebensraum' they seek is the
space vacated by abolishing
the sovereignty of all the other
regional nation states,
with the exception of
Germany hiding behind a 'mask of
federalism':
THIS: is the new
'Lebensraum'. The Germans
have got clean away with their
dastardy plan because of the
stupidity over 36 years of
British politicians who still in
2009
in the forthcoming European
Election will continue to be
'useful idiots'
by claiming they can change the
EU for the better. They have no
chance whatsoever to do so and
they know so but they cannot
admit they have been fooled for
so long. We shall no doubt have
the same plea 'of change'
from the prospective
Conservative MEP for the West
Midlands Philip Bushill-Mathews.
He needs taken quietly to one
side and told that
Brussels rules Britannia as he
appears to have some doubt about
it.
The Germans
have yet to ratify the Lisbon
Treaty because their
Constitutional Court has matters
yet to be dealt with before that
can take place. They seem
intent to ratify their treaty
ONLY after every other country
has done so. What a wonderful
propaganda victory and their
revenge for losing TWO WORLD
WARS as to accept the surrender
of all their previous foes but
particularly a country called
England which they have longed
to cut up to destruction.]
*
[Each underlined word has a
different bulletin]
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
A LOST LIBERTY!
Why too much sensitivity to offence has taken away
our right of free expression.
We can see the result in the community at large in
everyone having to consider every spoken word least it be offensive
to someone. The fear is a barrier to harmless banter -raillery which
is necessary for those who love their right of free expression in
their contact with their fellow citizens. It is a means of bridging
the gap between those from different social and religious or
national backgrounds which a little humour can most effectively
bridge.
The law of the land and common sense was on the
whole successful in ensuring that those who overstepped the mark
outrageously were taken to task. Over the past decades before the
arrival of New Labour there were a number of hilarious comedy's on
television which illustrated the differences within our society
which we believe in their portrayal helped newcomers to our shores
to in time appreciate our great sense of humour. there can be few
who have not heard good-natured raillery even from those who have
settled here from across the world. In fact when the local accent
is added into that dimension the affect is a great deal funnier and
that added to a sense of belonging by the newcomer and the
acceptance to our country.
We hope that in our country the sense of FAIR PLAY
is not dead and this has the affect of keeping in check those who
may decide to cross the narrow line between innocent banter and
verbal brutality. We do have a law of breach of the peace which is
in most circumstances able to deal with those who are a persistent
nuisance and should the offender dare to raise a finger in further
aggravation they will find themselves on the way to Gaol. Of course
since New Labour arrived on the scene it is impossible to be sure
that the VICTIM will go to GAOL and the AGGRAVATED ASSAULT treated
with a CAUTION or possibly awarded a PRIZE to hope for better
behaviour in the future.
Recently we have the actor
and director Clint Eastwood-quoted in the Daily Mail-February
26,2009:
Eastwood goes gunning for those PC
killjoys
CLINT EASTWOOD believes the rise of political
correctness is no laughing matter. he says the world would be a
better place if we could still laugh at inoffensive jokes about
different races.
The Hollywood actor and director, 79, said we live
in constant fear of beiong labelled racist for simply laughing about
national sterotypes.
'People have lost their sense of humour,'he told
Germany's Der Spiegel magazine.
'In former times we constantly made jokes about
different races.
'You can only tell them today with one hand over
your outh otherwise you will be insulted as a racist.
I find that ridiculous. In those earlier days
every friendly clique had a "Sam and Jew" or "Jose the Mexican" -
but we didn't think anything of it or have a racist thought.
'It was normal that we made jokes based on our
nationality or ethnicity. That was never a problem.
" I don't want to be politically correct. We're
all spending too much time and energy trying to be politically
correct about EVERYTHING.'
His comments come in a week in which BT suspended
30 call centre staff after they had circulated an Irish joke by
email.
BT, however, insists other serious matters are
involved and that a joke was not the sole reason for the
suspensions.
*
*
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
ON JUNE 4 -2009 DON'T VOTE FOR
THE GANG OF THREE AT WESTMINSTER
THEY SOLD YOUR FREEDOMS
AND COUNTRY TO A FOREIGN POWER.
THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR AN
ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ
THEY GAVE YOU YUMAN
RIGHTS.
THEY GAVE YOU POLITICAL
CORRECTNESS.
THEY GAVE YOU AT LEAST
1,200,000 IMMIGRANTS FROM INDO/ASIA. MANY WHO HAVE NO DESIRE TO
INTEGRATE AND WHO WISH TO TURN OUR ONCE CHRISTIAN COUNTRY INTO A
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC. THEIR DEPENDENTS OF 50,000 A YEAR ARE ALLOWED
TO FOLLOW.
THEY ALLOWED UNLIMITED
WORKERS FROM THE EU WHEN OTHER EU MEMBER STATES HAD RESTRICTIONS
THEY ALLOWED THE BANKING
CRISIS TO OCCUR EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE WARNED.
THEY GAVE YOU GROWING
UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR BUT BALLOONING NON-JOBS IN
THE PUBLIC SECTOR
THEY GAVE YOU A TWO
-TIER RULE OF LAW- WITH SHARIA LAW AND
THEY ALLOWED POLYGAMY
WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW OF ENGLAND AT GREATER COST TO THE
TAXPAYER AND SPECIAL HOUSING.
THEY HAVE MADE THE ONCE COUNTRY
OF ENGLAND INTO REGIONS WITH HUNDREDS OF QUANGOS COSTING
BILLIONS.
THE LIST IS ALMOST
ENDLESS WE KNOW.
THEY HAVE MADE FOOLS OF
YOU ALL - DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT
ON
JUNE 4-2009
VOTE
www.LIBERTAS.eu
OR
THE SMALLER PARTIES WHO WILL
FIGHT FOR THE RECOVERY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES.
*
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
The
Programme
for
the
www.ConventiononModernLiberty.com
was published today. We will
be putting the entire pdf on the web. Meanwhile
there are two short pieces by the Convention’s
Co-Directors on what what next.
Anthony Barnett
It was one
of the great missed opportunities of recent time.
Twelve years ago we had our own ‘Obama moment’. A
young, untried leader was swept to power on a wave
of popular desire for the renewal of our political
system, all the more possible in benign economic
circumstances. Now, for all the good things it has
done, Labour’s legacy includes:
-
The
misuse and abuse of ‘the war on terror’ to
extend arbitrary police power
-
The
development of a surveillance society that
undermines privacy
-
The
creation of a database state that tracks and
controls the lives of its subjects
-
The
collapse of parliament as a check on the
executive power of government
Why? What is
the problem to which the billions being allocated to
the database state and the surveillance society is
the solution? I know of no coherent and persuasive
answer.
Is it
because, as a senior figure in Westminster suggested
while himself supporting ID cards, that a “deep
state” at work, especially in the Home Office? Is it
because surveillance and information sharing provide
juicy contracts ensuring years of cash flow for
mainly US corporations skilled at lobbying at the
highest levels of the bazaar (as Diane Abbott
described the House of Commons in an unchallenged
speech)? Is it because our media has been too
flattened to expose and sustain coverage that is not
fed by official press releases? Is it because the EU
seeks to create a ‘single market’ for commercial and
official information sharing? Is it because the
Westminster establishment, led by Blair, bought
George Bush’s ‘war on terror’? Is it because, since
it backed the Iraq war, the Whitehall elite knows
that it is no longer wiser than the people, and
seeks to sustain by electronic means the legitimacy
it has lost even in its own eyes? Is it because ID
cards will be British and thus provide a hi-tech
means of countering the threat to the UK as
governments gain popularity in Scotland, Wales and
Northern Ireland? Or is it because a governing
class hankering for the global reach of empire is
simply desperate to control the natives by any means
possible?
It makes it
harder to stop something if you do not understand
why it is happening. So investigating the reasons
for the assault on our liberties is important
ongoing work.
It needs to
be public, concerted, open-minded and enjoyable.
Henry Porter and I want the Convention to be a
convivial event. If it is, it will be thanks to the
energy and confidence of a generation under 35 and
in some cases under 20. Their talents and voluntary
dedication have created the website, the videos, the
research and briefing papers, the design, the local
meetings, and its spirit of constructive
resistance.
The original
idea was for an “alarm call”. When asked “What
next?” I feel like saying don’t look to the smoke
alarm to put out the fire. Look to yourself and what
you can do in concert with others. Remember that we
are powerful together - and if you don’t feel this
to be so, perhaps it is because this is how they
want you to feel. Many organisations are already
combating the four-fold undermining of liberty as we
can see. Please join and support them.
Any such
movement will include strange bedfellows and contain
differences. Some fear the right to privacy strikes
at the right to know. Some see human rights as an
infringement of democracy not its support. Party
antagonism run deep across those brought together by
the Convention. But as the financial crisis moves
in, and as the police seem to be preparing to act
‘pre-emptively’ to control everyone they deem
unruly, from football fans to music lovers, this is
all the more reason to act together where we can.
A profound
transformation of our government and political
culture is needed to defend the causes of liberty,
fundamental rights and freedom in our country.
People say this can only happen from below. It’s
true. Usually it is said in Britain in a tone of
voice that suggests such a movement is therefore
impossible and can never happen. I hope the
Convention shows that it can.
Henry Porter
Looking
through the thirty odd Acts of Parliament
responsible for so much of the erosion of British
liberty, you have a feeling of unreality: how could
this happen in our Parliament, under the gaze of the
press and the British public with its innate respect
for justice and freedom and addiction to privacy?
It seems
incredible to find that MI5 developed the torture
policy in Pakistan, that Britain is one of the two
liberal democracies in the world to be named by an
International panel of jurists as having actively
undermined international law, that the
Constitutional Committee of the House of Lords has
condemned the culture of surveillance and data
collection in the United Kingdom as “undermining the
long standing traditions of privacy an individual
freedom which are vital to democracy.”
This is
Britain, for heaven’s sake. These don’t happen here.
But they do
and perhaps the most remarkable part of the story is
that the Human Rights Act – a bill of rights by any
other name - came into law in 1998 at the exact
moment the government began to reveal its hostility
to constitutional rights and the Rule of Law. The
HRA may have brought justice to many individuals but
even its most ardent supporters cannot now argue
that it has protected the public as a true bill of
rights would from a government that received just a
third of the popular vote at the last General
Election, yet behaves as though our rights and
freedoms are privileges that maybe withdrawn at his
pleasure.
The presence
of the 1998 Human Rights Act on the statute book has
prevented us from seeing the wart on the end of our
nose: namely, that we are a substantially less free
society than we were a decade ago and that the
individual is on the point of being encircled by the
state’s apparatus of surveillance.
If the HRA
really worked as Bill of Rights we would not be here
today.
Perhaps the
most difficult aspect for many to face is that we
are as responsible as the government for what has
happened. Over the last decade a change came about
in Britain that allowed people to think that only
their liberty and comfort mattered and to forget
that a system of rights must be universally applied
and respected in order for it to work. The very
expression “human rights” became an object of scorn
in the popular press and led those in power to
believe that we did not care about rights and
liberty and we would not guard our privacy. It’s
difficult to know whether fear of terrorism, apathy
or exuberant consumerism caused this mood but it is
clear that this selfish mood was disastrous for
society - and for politics. For government can only
function properly and serve the public if people pay
attention to what’s happening and demand proper
coverage of politics from the media.
When people
ask me what next? I reply, well, reading the papers
would be a start. Find out who your MP is and pester
them; set up a local group to discuss the attack on
liberty and what you can do about it, which is
exactly how my co-director, Anthony Barnett, and I
began three years ago. Activated opinion can be a
great force for good and not just on this issue. We
need to re-engage with politicians and they with us,
not in the bogus consultations that always produce
the result the government wants but with meaningful
exchange in which we hold our politicians to
account
It’s no
exaggeration to say that unless we involve ourselves
in the political process ours will be the first
generation in centuries of British history to hand
on a less free society than the one we inherited.
That is a shocking thought, but we still have time
to act. What we need is a movement, especially among
young people, to make the public at large understand
that we have only a few years before the changes
wrought by this government become a permanent part
of life in the United Kingdom. A movement cannot be
born in a day of speeches and discussion, however
notable the speakers, but we can provide that spark
of inspiration and that is what we will do today.
*
[WE SUPPORT THEM!]
'All government, indeed every
human benefit and enjoyment, every virtue, and every
prudent act, is founded on compromise and barter'
*
Slavery they can have anywhere.
It is a weed that grows in every soil',
Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
*
'The poorest he that is in
England hath a life to live as the greatest he.'
[Army Debates on Liberty at
Putney, 29th October,1647]
Thomas Rainborowe.
*
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
MEPS treat themselves to a nine million
euro luxury sports and fitness centre.
www.LIBERTAS.eu
Wednesday,25th
February,2009
MEPS display just how out of
touch with current reality they are by moving ahead with
plans for a luxury swimming pool and gym. And you have
no way of knowing whether or not your MEP voted for
this.
The decision by
the European Parliament to go ahead with building a nine million euro
gym and pool in Brussels which only MEPs and Parliament staff can access
shows how out of touch current MEPs are, according to Libertas
“At a time of economic crisis and rising unemployment it is an outrage
that MEPs should vote to spend taxpayers’ money in this way. It shows
how out of touch and unaccountable current MEPs are” said Libertas
Chairman, Declan Ganley.
The estimated budget, which was voted in by MEPs as part of the European
Parliament budget, has increased by two million euro since the original
estimate.
The move to go ahead with it while families across the EU are facing
financial hardship shows a complete lack of respect for the people of
Europe.
This is another fine example of Brussels elites having absolutely no
regard for the citizens of Europe. Those who have worked hard and paid
their taxes over the years are facing uncertain futures. And MEPs in
Brussels are using that tax money to pamper themselves around a swimming
pool.
www.Libertas.eu
will contest next
June-2009 European Parliament elections across the
European Union with the aim of bringing democracy,
accountability and transparency to European Union
governance. Declan Ganley says “The serious lack of
transparency in the way the European Parliament conducts
its business means that MEPs can conveniently hide how
they voted. Libertas will fight hard to eradicate both
this lack of transparency and outrageous
spending behaviour. Voters have the chance to decide
in June if they want to keep these fat cats in their
jobs or if they want have a more democratic, accountable
and transparent Europe”.
[It is no wonder many MEPs are so enthralled by their
prestigious surroundings and lavish salaries and
expences as to believe that they must hold on to their
jobs whatever it takes and if that means telling their
constituents that they will change the EU one day in
order to keep them on side knowing very well that the
demonic 'Beast' cannot be changed in its fundamentals. It must die
in order for a looser arrangement of independent nation
states joining together for their people's mutual
benefit.]
*
www.Libertas.eu
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & underlining
used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
A LOST LIBERTY!
Why too much sensitivity to offence has taken away
our right of free expression.
We can see the result in the community at large in
everyone having to consider every spoken word least it be offensive
to someone. The fear is a barrier to harmless banter -raillery which
is necessary for those who love their right of free expression in
their contact with their fellow citizens. It is a means of bridging
the gap between those from different social and religious or
national backgrounds which a little humour can most effectively
bridge.
The law of the land and common sense was on the
whole successful in ensuring that those who overstepped the mark
outrageously were taken to task. Over the past decades before the
arrival of New Labour there were a number of hilarious comedy's on
television which illustrated the differences within our society
which we believe in their portrayal helped newcomers to our shores
to in time appreciate our great sense of humour. there can be few
who have not heard good-natured raillery even from those who have
settled here from across the world. In fact when the local accent
is added into that dimension the affect is a great deal funnier and
that added to a sense of belonging by the newcomer and the
acceptance to our country.
We hope that in our country the sense of FAIR PLAY
is not dead and this has the affect of keeping in check those who
may decide to cross the narrow line between innocent banter and
verbal brutality. We do have a law of breach of the peace which is
in most circumstances able to deal with those who are a persistent
nuisance and should the offender dare to raise a finger in further
aggravation they will find themselves on the way to Gaol. Of course
since New Labour arrived on the scene it is impossible to be sure
that the VICTIM will go to GAOL and the AGGRAVATED ASSAULT treated
with a CAUTION or possibly awarded a PRIZE to hope for better
behaviour in the future.
Recently we have the actor
and director Clint Eastwood-quoted in the Daily Mail-February
26,2009:
Eastwood goes gunning for those PC
killjoys
CLINT EASTWOOD believes the rise of political
correctness is no laughing matter. he says the world would be a
better place if we could still laugh at inoffensive jokes about
different races.
The Hollywood actor and director, 79, said we live
in constant fear of beiong labelled racist for simply laughing about
national sterotypes.
'People have lost their sense of humour,'he told
Germany's Der Spiegel magazine.
'In former times we constantly made jokes about
different races.
'You can only tell them today with one hand over
your outh otherwise you will be insulted as a racist.
I find that ridiculous. In those earlier days
every friendly clique had a "Sam and Jew" or "Jose the Mexican" -
but we didn't think anything of it or have a racist thought.
'It was normal that we made jokes based on our
nationality or ethnicity. That was never a problem.
" I don't want to be politically correct. We're
all spending too much time and energy trying to be politically
correct about EVERYTHING.'
His comments come in a week in which BT suspended
30 call centre staff after they had circulated an Irish joke by
email.
BT, however, insists other serious matters are
involved and that a joke was not the sole reason for the
suspensions.
*
*
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neo-Nazis plan to build Fourth
Reich on back of economic crisis
claims far-right defector
By
Allan Hall
www.Mailonline.co.uk
Last updated at 7:57 PM on 26th
February 2009
Neo-Nazis are on the rise in Germany
and are planning to exploit the
economic crisis to build a Fourth
Reich, a defector from their ranks
warned yesterday.
Uwe Luthardt painted a chilling
picture of the far-Right trying to
recruit the record number of young
Germans facing a bleak future as the
country's economy contracts and
unemployment mounts.
Experts fear that the worsening
conditions are worryingly similar to
those of the late 1920s and early
1930s which propelled Hitler's Nazi
regime - the Third Reich - to power.
German
neo-Nazis idolise Adolf Hitler, seen
here addressing supporters at
Nuremberg in 1933
Mr Luthardt was a senior member
of Germany's neo-Nazi National
Democratic Party - the NPD - but
resigned to inform on the group
which Germany tried unsuccessfully
to ban several years ago.
German unemployment has climbed
by 63,000 this month to 3,552,000,
or 8.5 per cent. Its economy - the
world's third largest - is predicted
to shrink by 5 per cent this year.
A sign of resurgent extreme Right
came earlier this month in Dresden
where nearly 7,000 neo-Nazis turned
up to 'honour German patriots' on
the anniversary of the Allied
bombing in 1945 which killed 25,000
residents.
A young
neo-Nazi in Leipzig, Germany:
Far-right groups continue to be a
huge problem for the authorities who
have tried to ban many of them
It was nearly double the turnout
of last year. Far-Right attacks on
immigrants, anti-Nazi activists and
Jewish sites are growing.
Youngsters have always been
recruiting fodder for the party, but
now German intelligence officials
worry that, as young people or their
parents lose their jobs, they will
drift into the politics of the
extreme Right with increasing
enthusiasm.
Mr Luthardt described an
organisation that preys on the
gullible and the weak who seek, as
he did, to restore some mythical
glory to Germany while finding
scapegoats for the economic misery.
Rampant
inflation meant Germans needed huge
amounts of money simply to buy a
loaf of bread during the Weimar
Republic: Parallels have been made
with today's economy
He told of weapons stores, how
members greet each other with Heil
Hitler! salutes, sing the banned
songs of the Third Reich, relish the
idea of a new Holocaust against the
Jews and plot to bring hard-core
Nazism back with a vengeance.
Luthardt was in the NPD for only
four months, but quickly rose to
become a member of the ruling board.
He told Der Spiegel magazine that
old Nazis living in South America
donate to the party via shell
companies. Other funds come from the
staging of skinhead-music concerts.
He went on: 'The simple aim is
the restoration of the Reich in
which a new stormtrooper
organisation takes revenge on anyone
who disagrees with them.
'In Jena in East Germany in the
NPD HQ there are a load of SS
pictures in the cellar. And there's
a room with weapons.
'The basic concept the NPD talks
about is, "Let's kick out all the
foreigners, then the Germans will
have jobs again".
'The dream is of the German
Reich. They're totally convinced
that they'll win an election one day
and that things will really get
going. Everyone can imagine what
would happen then.'
*
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 YEARS IN NEW LABOUR'S
HELL HOLE BIG BROTHER FANTASY ISLAND.
*
Daily Mail
COMMENT
Saturday, February 21,2009 |
How our liberties
have been destroyed.
Since Labour was elected 12
years ago, a massive and frightening array of powers have
been introduced which curtail Britain's long-fought-for
commitment to the
FREEDOM OF THE INDIVIDUAL
There are
56 such
freedom-destroying powers,
according to the
Convention on Modern
Liberty
They range from the
shameful decision to ban inconvenient but peaceful protests
in the vicinity of Parliament to the storage by the police
of DNA samples taken from entirely innocent people.
Town hall Stasi routinely
deploy anti -terrorist powers to snoop on dog foulers and
families suspected of cheating school catchment area rules.
Low-ranking officials have
access to the chilling Contact Point database containing the
sensitive personal details of every child in England. A
giant NHS database will allow confidential patient records
to be accessed by health workers across the land.
THE LIST IS TERRIFYING
But still ministers are not
satisfied they have sufficient powers to
PRY INTO EVERY ASPECT OF
OUR LIVES.
The Home Office will
shortly announce details of a new
Big Brother
' Intercept Modernisation
Programme'
which will store details
of every phone call and internet visit.
The Coroners and Justice
Bill
will allow the
STATE
to order inquests
involving matters of
NATIONAL SECURITY
to be held in secret if the
details prove embarrassing to ministers. This means it
will be possible to die in modern, 'civilised'Britain
WITHOUT ANYONE-NOT LEAST
RELATIVES-KNOWING HOW AND WHY.
And , as we reveal today,
there will soon be compulsory CCTV cameras tracking people
as they shop in supermarkets for a bottle of wine.
Without fanfare, ministers
have slipped powers into the
POLICING and CRIME BILL
for councils to force any
premises selling alcohol to install the cameras and hand
over the relevant footage to the police.
BUT IF PASSED
it will mean there is
virtually no aspect of public life
NOT UNDER SURVEILLANCE
Police already have 4.2
million cameras trained on the street, number plate
recognition systems watching our roads and are even , as we
revealed earlier this week, insisting drinkers should be
spied upon with CCTV
IN THEIR LOCAL PUB
Save for places of worship,
NOWHERE IS SACRED OR
PRIVATE.
Everyone is a potential
suspect
This Labour Government, in
ways that should shock its socialist forebears, is
systematically acquiring the tools of a
TOTALITARIAN STATE
in a way not even
George Orwell could have predicted.
The price we are paying
in the
LOSS OF INDIVIDUAL
FREEDOMS
IS
AWESOME.
But so is the
£34,000,000,000
COST to the TAXPAYER
of running the likes of
Contact Point
and the
ID CARDS DATABASE
over the next decade according to the
CONVENTION on MODERN LIBERTY.
Yet are the
WATCHERS
prepared to be
watched themselves to check they are not abusing the
pervasive powers which they have amassed?
OF COURSE NOT.
In a display of
dizzying hypocrisy, ministers this week introduced a law
which makes it a criminal offence, punishable by ten
years in prison, to take a picture of a police officer.
[Well the only way to get a bad law taken off the Statute
Book is to see that it is strictly observed. We all know
there are over 100,000 convicted criminals who should be in
prison but there has been no space for them. The only way to
stop this nonsense DEAD is for there to be a nation-wide
PHOTOGRAPH YOUR
FRIENDLY FELLOW CITIZEN AND POLICE OFFICER DAY
Of
course it will be necessary to have a
CAMPAIGN FUND
and LEGAL TEAM
in place to make
the impact and success of the project which we can call
FREEDOM DAY.
That should
shake the buggers up as Winston Churchill said to a
packed House of Commons in the Gathering Storm years
before the Second World War
WE
NEED TO SHAKE THEM UP AGAIN IN 2009
and let them know that we are the MASTERS and they are the
SERVANTS.
But regrettably over the past decades the politicians have
changed the ranking which the Glorious Revolution of 1688
issued in the TRUSTEE conception of government, expounded in
the pages of Locke which dominated political thought during
the eighteenth century. Since that time PARLIAMENT became
TRUSTEE by the PUBLIC of its Rights and Liberties [THAT
IS YOU!] So we have to ask WHY has the the House of
Commons betrayed that sacred MANDATE? The revolution
was fought against an absolute sovereign in the seventeenth
century and the PEOPLE need to fight against an absolute
PARLIAMENT in 2009. the majority of lackies in YOUR
PARLIAMENT have forgotten their place in the CONSTITUTION
and it is time we made a stand in a Cromwellian mode and
made them leave the Commons with all due haste.
The worm need to turn and
quickly because time is running out and soon no protest
will be permitted]
Continuing the Daily Mail
Comment:
The Press will be hampered in reporting
legitimate rallies at which police are present.
Peaceful demonstrators will be stopped from taking their own
record of events and tourists who dare to take a to take a
picture of the Pc guarding Big Ben could quickly find
themselves behind bars.
Of course, the Government defends this, and
the many other assaults on
LIBERTY
since 1997, by pointing to the increased
threat Britain faces from serious crime and terrorism.
[Well as we have said so many times over the
past ten years the New Labour strategy was to direct its
polices in order to undermine the security on the streets
and in the country at large. It took away the local
Bobbie -on -the -Beat - the fellow citizen respected by the
local community and a gatherer of local intelligence of crime
and replaced him with a CCTV camera. As for the terrorism
threat this was accomplished by an illegal war against a
sovereign nation state no threat to us but it gave the
Government the very weapon in order to suppress opinion and
forbid protest when ever they could. And where were the
so-called OPPOSITION parties while all this was going on?
Well good old Dave said he was happy to go along with New
Labour and we now see how well he did in protecting our
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen.'
NOTHING!
*
The Daily Mail concludes:
But with every
erosion of the values our enemies so despise[The
Enemy Within included]
we hand these terrorists a victory to savour.
ENOUGH! is ENOUGH!
*
A call to
arms
Today, in the Observer, I've
written about why the Convention on Modern
Liberty, of which I'm co-director, is so
critical
Today, in
the Observer, I've written about the
Convention on Modern Liberty, of which
I'm co-director. The gathering on 28
February, I write, "is not some academic
conference of liberal hysterics, but a call
to arms, to all parties, to resist the
government's attack on our liberties, rights
and privacy." You can
read the full article here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHjZyDKTjLQ
ACTION
Please join us in your own way
The aim of
the Convention on Modern Liberty is to bring
together a wide and growing range of
concerns about the state of fundamental
rights and freedoms in this country and
publicise the work of the many individuals,
groups and organisations deeply involved
with them from across the political
spectrum. We hope this will generate a wider
release of energy among the public that may
assist the growth of a movement to take back
what has been lost and to help shape a
Modern Liberty capable of securing
individual and collective freedom at a time
of profound uncertainty and change.
The
Convention will be a powerful public display
of concern. It will be taking place both in
London and in meetings in the regions and
nations of the UK. We are working out how to
let people and meetings feed in their
questions and compare their responses,
feedback and proposals for action.
We are an
ad hoc alliance not an organisation. The
Convention has been built up with little
resources and we are aware that others
should be included. We will be as inclusive
as possible in what we do. We are keen to
link up with all other relevant discussions
and publicise them. If you work for an
organisation that shares our aims and would
like to be added to our list of partners we
encourage you to get in contact with us to
discuss how we can work together. There are
opportunities to be involved in supporting
regional and local meetings, helping to run
sessions, producing Convention videos and in
many other different ways. We are very
interested to hear any ideas you may have on
the project and how you would like to see it
grow.
We hope
that everyone who wants to put their name to
an expression of our shared concern whether
they can make the day itself or not, will be
able to do so.
What you can do:
1.
Buy tickets for the
Convention in London
2.
Attend one of the parallel
conventions in your area
3.
Assess the blogs and websites
relevant to Modern Liberty
4.
Join or support an
organisation
5.
Publish your suggestion about
what should happen next
6.
Check out the Taking
Liberties exhibition at the British Library
7.
Donate to the Convention on
Modern Liberty or one of our partner
organisations
8.
Post a video in response to one of the
many
videos relating to Modern Liberty that
we have published.
9.
Promote the Convention by
distributing our flyers.
*
RABID DOGS ATTACK BYSTANDER
On the same day the Daily Mail had an article
by Nickolas Blincoe -crime novelist of Waking the Dead who
suffered a horrific attack by teenage misfits who knew they
had nothing to fear from the so-called Justice System.
Because there was no CCTV cameras -it appears it was all his
fault. His problem was fourfold.
1. The so -called punishment system strikes
no fear into the sneering teenage monsters. They can see
that the worst that will happen to them is that they may
have to take cover for a short while and ask mummy to
pretend that she has learned her lesson-for NOW!.
2. He was most unfortunate because he did not
have a known regular Bobbie-on -the-Beat who would have
known about the teenage misfits and would have if the above
lunatic Justice System had been FIT FOR PURPOSE would
have had them locked away and thrown away the key some time
ago.
3. Unless there is a Bobbie -on-the-Beat the
householder has no-one who they trust to protect their homes
and their lives. Only regular known local
intelligence kept up to date by an officer on his local
round can nip the trouble in the bud and make the lives of
his fellow citizens worth living.
4. The present
routine of dealing with the trouble makers is making a
mockery out of a so-called Justice System. The new
Lord Chief Justice who recently said that there needs to be
much sterner punishment for crime . What better place to
start than with the young thugs who under the present system
will be before the Lord Chief Justice in their hundreds over
the next few years if something is not done to change the
attitudes of the sneering thugs and
INSTILL
FEAR and RIGHT PUNISHMENT.
*
WHAT WENT WRONG?
At the turn of the 20th
century a brief
document,
of a single page -The Introduction to the Code of
Regulations for Public Elementary Schools -which admirably
explains the nature of the change. It was the work of the
parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education (Sir
William Anson, the Warden of All Souls College ,Oxford), and
the Secretary ,Sir Robert Morant -men who knew the best
elements in the public schools and the old universities, and
knew. too, the lofty conceptions of education to be found in
the Old Greek philosophers. It sets out that the purpose of
the Public Elementary School " is to form and strengthen the
character as well as to develope the intelligence" that "
teachers can do much to lay the FOUNDATIONS of CONDUCT";
that "the DISCIPLINE of the SCHOOL can IMPLANT habits of
INDUSTRY -SELF-CONTROL and perseverance"; that "the
corporate life of the
school,
especially in the playgound, should develope FAIR PLAY and
LOYALTY"; and that in all its work and all its efforts the
school should enlist the CO-OPERATION of PARENTS and the
HOME.
[ERNEST BARKER-1927]
In the late 19th century
historian G.M TREVELYAN stated:
Education... has
produced a vast population able to read but unable to
distinguish what is worth reading.[English Social
History,Ch.18]
Since 1997 New Labour has
destroyed the educational system and turned it into a STATE
propaganda machine and meddling where it had no business to
go. In the 19th century many personages such as Priestly,
Godwin, and Herbert Spenser, warned of the dangers. It is a
fine theme of a fine chapter entitled "Decay of the Family,"
in C.H.Pearson's book on National Life and Character. "Will
the family continue to be a responsible moral institution"
and continues about the dangers of a more intrusive STATE
and in February 2009 we all know what they meant and the
dangers on our streets from young thugs whose only thrill in
life is to attempt to kick a defenceless citizen to DEATH..
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE THIRD GREAT WONDER FROM THE
NEW WORLD AFTER-MAN OF ALL SEASONS -CROMWELL NOW YOUNG QUEEN
VICTORIA-WHEN WILL MIRACLES CEASE?
*
Hollywood learns a history lesson at
LAST!
by Andrew Roberts
[Daily Telegraph-Wednesday,
February 18, 2009]
A new film to be released in Britain next month
-March,2009, about young Queen Victoria is remarkable for its lack
of anti-British prejudice.
[With her illustrious Queen Bess as an outstanding
example of a Monarch who chose ENGLAND as her bride. The young Queen
Victoria knew well what a great responsibility SHE had to RULE HER
PEOPLE to the best of HER ability and PROTECT their RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
which placed the TRUST of the GLORIOUS REVOLUTION of 1689 into her
hands. The affairs of the NATION were SAFE in HER HANDS. There would be
no possibility that SHE would have permitted HER GOVERNMENT to SELL HER
PEOPLE and COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER. In years to come there will be a
film about the last QUEEN THAT NEVER REIGNED and who forgot HER SACRED
DUTY to HER PEOPLE and COUNTRY.
Andrew
Roberts states:
For decades Hollywood has treated its audiences like morons. Well have
not successive British Governments since 1972 with the help of the
so-called FREE PRESS and even some notable authors of history also
treated the British people as morons in keeping from them the TRUE FACTS
about the eventual enslavement of a once FREE PEOPLE which was completed
in 2008 by a traitorous PARLIAMENT and MONARCH who had taken a sacred
OATH to protect our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
He further informs us that 'it is probably too much to
hope that Hollywood has fundamentally altered its view of the ENGLISH.
Well after the culmination of 36 years of slow but secret
absorption of ENGLAND into the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE in 2008 with its
consequent lose of FREEDOM and IDENTITY we would hardly think that
Hollywood or even the AMERICAN PEOPLE at large would have any RESPECT
for a PEOPLE renowned in the BLITZ and stubborn resistance to HITLER on
HER OWN but with the BRITISH COMMONWEALTH for over two years could be
identified with a PEOPLE who have been led as the PIED PIPER into
SLAVERY to join the RATS in BRUSSELS without so much as a whimper.
Thomas
Jefferson the 3rd President of the United States of America uttered
the following words:
'Freedom of religion, freedom of
the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas
corpus these are principles that have guided our steps through an age of
revolution and reformation'
and where did this framework
come from
ENGLAND
The voices of the emerging new
nation had on its lips the CLAIM OF RIGHT to the' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
of ENGLISHMEN'.
In 2008
OUR
QUEEN-OUR LORDS-OUR COMMONS
SOLD
ENGLAND TO A FOREIGN POWER.
The American people must think
we have all gone bonkers!
*
TREASON AT LISBON
*
TO BE CONTINUED
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 YEARS IN NEW LABOUR'S
HELL HOLE BIG BROTHER FANTASY ISLAND.
*
Daily Mail
COMMENT
Saturday, February 21,2009 |
How our liberties
have been destroyed.
Since Labour was elected 12
years ago, a massive and frightening array of powers have
been introduced which curtail Britain's long-fought-for
commitment to the
FREEDOM OF THE INDIVIDUAL
There are
56 such
freedom-destroying powers,
according to the
Convention on Modern
Liberty
They range from the
shameful decision to ban inconvenient but peaceful protests
in the vicinity of Parliament to the storage by the police
of DNA samples taken from entirely innocent people.
Town hall Stasi routinely
deploy anti -terrorist powers to snoop on dog foulers and
families suspected of cheating school catchment area rules.
Low-ranking officials have
access to the chilling Contact Point database containing the
sensitive personal details of every child in England. A
giant NHS database will allow confidential patient records
to be accessed by health workers across the land.
THE LIST IS TERRIFYING
But still ministers are not
satisfied they have sufficient powers to
PRY INTO EVERY ASPECT OF
OUR LIVES.
The Home Office will
shortly announce details of a new
Big Brother
' Intercept Modernisation
Programme'
which will store details
of every phone call and internet visit.
The Coroners and Justice
Bill
will allow the
STATE
to order inquests
involving matters of
NATIONAL SECURITY
to be held in secret if the
details prove embarrassing to ministers. This means it
will be possible to die in modern, 'civilised'Britain
WITHOUT ANYONE-NOT LEAST
RELATIVES-KNOWING HOW AND WHY.
And , as we reveal today,
there will soon be compulsory CCTV cameras tracking people
as they shop in supermarkets for a bottle of wine.
Without fanfare, ministers
have slipped powers into the
POLICING and CRIME BILL
for councils to force any
premises selling alcohol to install the cameras and hand
over the relevant footage to the police.
BUT IF PASSED
it will mean there is
virtually no aspect of public life
NOT UNDER SURVEILLANCE
Police already have 4.2
million cameras trained on the street, number plate
recognition systems watching our roads and are even , as we
revealed earlier this week, insisting drinkers should be
spied upon with CCTV
IN THEIR LOCAL PUB
Save for places of worship,
NOWHERE IS SACRED OR
PRIVATE.
Everyone is a potential
suspect
This Labour Government, in
ways that should shock its socialist forebears, is
systematically acquiring the tools of a
TOTALITARIAN STATE
in a way not even
George Orwell could have predicted.
The price we are paying
in the
LOSS OF INDIVIDUAL
FREEDOMS
IS
AWESOME.
But so is the
£34,000,000,000
COST to the TAXPAYER
of running the likes of
Contact Point
and the
ID CARDS DATABASE
over the next decade according to the
CONVENTION on MODERN LIBERTY.
Yet are the
WATCHERS
prepared to be
watched themselves to check they are not abusing the
pervasive powers which they have amassed?
OF COURSE NOT.
In a display of
dizzying hypocrisy, ministers this week introduced a law
which makes it a criminal offence, punishable by ten
years in prison, to take a picture of a police officer.
[Well the only way to get a bad law taken off the Statute
Book is to see that it is strictly observed. We all know
there are over 100,000 convicted criminals who should be in
prison but there has been no space for them. The only way to
stop this nonsense DEAD is for there to be a nation-wide
PHOTOGRAPH YOUR
FRIENDLY FELLOW CITIZEN AND POLICE OFFICER DAY
Of
course it will be necessary to have a
CAMPAIGN FUND
and LEGAL TEAM
in place to make
the impact and success of the project which we can call
FREEDOM DAY.
That should
shake the buggers up as Winston Churchill said to a
packed House of Commons in the Gathering Storm years
before the Second World War
WE
NEED TO SHAKE THEM UP AGAIN IN 2009
and let them know that we are the MASTERS and they are the
SERVANTS.
But regrettably over the past decades the politicians have
changed the ranking which the Glorious Revolution of 1688
issued in the TRUSTEE conception of government, expounded in
the pages of Locke which dominated political thought during
the eighteenth century. Since that time PARLIAMENT became
TRUSTEE by the PUBLIC of its Rights and Liberties [THAT
IS YOU!] So we have to ask WHY has the the House of
Commons betrayed that sacred MANDATE? The revolution
was fought against an absolute sovereign in the seventeenth
century and the PEOPLE need to fight against an absolute
PARLIAMENT in 2009. the majority of lackies in YOUR
PARLIAMENT have forgotten their place in the CONSTITUTION
and it is time we made a stand in a Cromwellian mode and
made them leave the Commons with all due haste.
The worm need to turn and
quickly because time is running out and soon no protest
will be permitted]
Continuing the Daily Mail
Comment:
The Press will be hampered in reporting
legitimate rallies at which police are present.
Peaceful demonstrators will be stopped from taking their own
record of events and tourists who dare to take a to take a
picture of the Pc guarding Big Ben could quickly find
themselves behind bars.
Of course, the Government defends this, and
the many other assaults on
LIBERTY
since 1997, by pointing to the increased
threat Britain faces from serious crime and terrorism.
[Well as we have said so many times over the
past ten years the New Labour strategy was to direct its
polices in order to undermine the security on the streets
and in the country at large. It took away the local
Bobby-on -the -Beat -the fellow citizen respected by the
local community and a gather of local intelligence of crime
and replaced him with a CCTV camera. As for the terrorism
threat this was accomplished by an illegal war against a
sovereign nation state no threat to us but it gave the
Government the very weapon in order to suppress opinion and
forbid protest when ever they could. And where were the
so-called OPPOSITION parties while all this was going on?
Well good old Dave said he was happy to go along with New
Labour and we now see how well he did in protecting our
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen.'
NOTHING!
*
The Daily Mail concludes:
But with every
erosion of the values our enemies so despise[The
Enemy Within included]
we hand these terrorists a victory to savour.
ENOUGH! is ENOUGH!
*
ACTION
Please join us in
your own way
The aim of the Convention
on Modern Liberty is to bring together a wide and growing
range of concerns about the state of fundamental rights and
freedoms in this country and publicise the work of the many
individuals, groups and organisations deeply involved with
them from across the political spectrum. We hope this will
generate a wider release of energy among the public that may
assist the growth of a movement to take back what has been
lost and to help shape a Modern Liberty capable of securing
individual and collective freedom at a time of profound
uncertainty and change.
The Convention will be a
powerful public display of concern. It will be taking place
both in London and in meetings in the regions and nations of
the UK. We are working out how to let people and meetings
feed in their questions and compare their responses,
feedback and proposals for action.
We are an ad hoc alliance
not an organisation. The Convention has been built up with
little resources and we are aware that others should be
included. We will be as inclusive as possible in what we do.
We are keen to link up with all other relevant discussions
and publicise them. If you work for an organisation that
shares our aims and would like to be added to our list of
partners we encourage you to get in contact with us to
discuss how we can work together. There are opportunities to
be involved in supporting regional and local meetings,
helping to run sessions, producing Convention videos and in
many other different ways. We are very interested to hear
any ideas you may have on the project and how you would like
to see it grow.
We hope that everyone who
wants to put their name to an expression of our shared
concern whether they can make the day itself or not, will be
able to do so.
What you can do:
1.
Buy tickets for the
Convention in London
2 .
Attend one of the parallel conventions in
your area
3.
Assess the blogs and websites relevant to
Modern Liberty
4.
Join or support an organisation
5.
Publish your suggestion about what should
happen next
6.
Check out the Taking Liberties exhibition at
the British Library
7.
Donate to the Convention on Modern Liberty or
one of our partner organisations
8.
Post a video in response to one of the many
videos relating to Modern Liberty that we have
published.
9.
Promote the Convention by distributing our
flyers.
*
Comment:
[We notice that two of the
speakers at the London meeeting on 28th February are in
different camps over the EUROPIAN UNION COLLECTIVE. We have
Helena Kennedy QC who has first hand experience of the dirty
tricks within the EU and Nick Clegg MP who led his party to
adore the EU and of course supported the destruction of a
nation state of 1500 years in the making. What many fail to
realise is that the whole purpose of the LABOUR and LIBERAL
and majority in the Conservative PARTIES was to ensure that
the English people were made obedient in order that they
became accustomed to what was already in place in the UNITED
STATES of EUROPE. One cannot talk about LIBERTY at HOME
and have a blank mind when it concerns the EU. In February
2009 England no longer exists as a nation state and should
the LISBON TREATY be ratified by ALL member states by the
year's end it will truely be the END OF LIBERTY as an
ENGLISHMAN would consider it as the EU as every trueful
person will agree is NOT A DEMOCRACY and is indeed a
TOTALITARIAN STATE. Fighting for FREEDOM in ENGLAND at
this late stage will certainly make many pro-EU enthusiasts
to reconsider their opinion as what is the point of opening
such a DEBATE when in a matter of months the whole matter
will be smothered by the enthusiastic adherents of the New
World order within the EU COLLECTIVE. If anyone could make
sense of the whole matter it is Tony Benn who is very clear
WHAT THE EVIL EU IS ALL ABOUT!. FIGHT for LIBERTY! but
remember that many who now wish to protect THEIR LIBERTY
have over decades been responsible for losing that very
LIBERTY which they are now endeavouing to DEFEND.
We advocate that all who
love FREEDOM and LIBERTY should consider
www.LIBERTAS.eu
who will either bring change to the EU [which is impossible]
or lead to its eventual collapse with the emergence of FREE
NATION STATES in EUROPE which is the only foundation firm
enough to support LIBERTY!
House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence
of OUR Law & Constitution.
[The question that many would ask is why hasn't the
Government made known to the General Public the traitorous
activities going back 60 years of Edward Heath who admitted
before he died in 2005 that he had
misled
the people as to the true intention of the
EEC/EU/UNITED STATES OF EUROPE. Simple because it would have
brought the Government down and made any chances of passing
the the final EU treaty through the House of Commons
IMPOSSIBLE. There is a perfect example of a Government
covering up the identity of a traitor in order to turn to
their advantage the the film with Michael Cain
'WHISTLEBLOWER' which no doubt is true to fact as little is
hidden of what transpires within the depths of the SECURITY
SERVICES MI5 and MI6.]
TREATY OF TREASON
*
RABID DOGS ATTACK BYSTANDER
On the same day the Daily Mail had an article
by Nickolas Blincoe -crime novelist of Waking the Dead who
suffered a horrific attack by teenage misfits who knew they
had nothing to fear from the so-called Justice System.
Because there was no CCTV cameras -it appears it was all his
fault. His problem was fourfold.
1. The so -called punishment system strikes
no fear into the sneering teenage monsters. They can see
that the worst that will happen to them is that they may
have to take cover for a short while and ask mummy to
pretend that she has learned her lesson-for NOW!.
2. He was most unfortunate because he did not
have a known regular Bobbie-on -the-Beat who would have
known about the teenage misfits and would have if the above
lunatic Justice System had been FIT FOR PURPOSE would
have had them locked away and thrown away the key some time
ago.
3. Unless there is a Bobbie -on-the-Beat the
householder has no-one who they trust to protect their homes
and their lives. Only regular known local
intelligence kept up to date by an officer on his local
round can nip the trouble in the bud and make the lives of
his fellow citizens worth living.
4. The present
routine of dealing with the trouble makers is making a
mockery out of a so-called Justice System. The new
Lord Chief Justice who recently said that there needs to be
much sterner punishment for crime . What better place to
start than with the young thugs who under the present system
will be before the Lord Chief Justice in their hundreds over
the next few years if something is not done to change the
attitudes of the sneering thugs and
INSTILL
FEAR and RIGHT PUNISHMENT.
*
WHAT WENT WRONG?
At the turn of the 20th
century a brief document, of a single page -The Introduction
to the Code of Regulations for
Public Elementary Schools -which admirably explains
the nature of the change. It was the work of the
parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education (Sir
William Anson, the Warden of All Souls College ,Oxford), and
the Secretary ,Sir Robert Morant -men who knew the best
elements in the public schools and the old universities, and
knew. too, the lofty conceptions of education to be found in
the Old Greek philosophers. It sets out that the purpose of
the Public Elementary School " is to form and strengthen the
character as well as to develope the intelligence" that "
teachers can do much to lay the FOUNDATIONS of CONDUCT";
that "the DISCIPLINE of the SCHOOL can IMPLANT habits of
INDUSTRY -SELF-CONTROL and perseverance"; that "the
corporate life of the school, especially in the playgound,
should develope FAIR PLAY and LOYALTY"; and that in all its
work and all its efforts the school should enlist the
CO-OPERATION of PARENTS and the HOME.
[ERNEST BARKER-1927]
In the late 19th century
historian G.M TREVELYAN stated:
Education... has
produced a vast population able to read but unable to
distinguish what is worth reading.[English Social
History,Ch.18]
Since 1997 New Labour has
destroyed the educational system and turned it into a STATE
propaganda machine and meddling where it had no business to
go. In the 19th century many personages such as Priestly,
Godwin, and Herbert Spenser, warned of the dangers. It is a
fine theme of a fine chapter entitled "Decay of the Family,"
in C.H.Pearson's book on National Life and Character. "Will
the family continue to be a responsible moral institution"
and continues about the dangers of a more intrusive STATE
and in February 2009 we all know what they meant and the
dangers on our streets from young thugs whose only thrill in
life is to attempt to kick a defenceless citizen to DEATH..
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH
ABOUT THE EU FROM INDEPENDENT SOURCES
Publications
www.globalvision.net
Joint publications with the
TaxPayers' Alliance
Click here to visit the
The TaxPayers' Alliance website
'What next for Britain and
Europe'
-
A conference
sponsored by Global Vision and The Daily
Telegraph
Full details
EU
Reform Treaty Documents
Perspectives
- Professional insights into
specific EU issues.
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
|
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
www.globalvision.net
*
[We have included the above
information on the EU which will enable
everyone to look objectively at the question WHY
ARE WE IN THE EU the totalitarian police state
calling itself the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE? ]
*
EU QUANGOS
COSTING US ALL
£1,800.000.000
[Daily Mail,
Monday, February 23,2009]
DOZENS of
European Union QUANGOS costing taxpayers £1.8
billion a year are attacked today as 'not fit
for purpose'.
A report into
the growth of publicly funded EU AGENCIES said
many are duplicating work carried out at
NATIONAL LEVEL, and some were squeezing out
PRIVATE SECTOR rivals.
Until 1990,
there were only 2 EU QUANGOS. Then came 34 more
in 18 years, such as the COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY
OFFICE.
Most expensive
is the EUROPEAN RESEARCH AGENCY with an annual
budget of
£460,000,000
The Essential Guide to EU QUANGOS
2009, by the Economic research Council
think-tank and research group
www.globalvision.net
recommended
curbing their activities and even closing some.
It said the
QUANGOS were costing taxpayers £1.8billion a
year even though some-such as the EU's trademark
registration office-were self-financing. Ruth
Lee of GLOBAL VISION said the QUANGOS were
'symptomatic of an EU which fails to appreciate
that MEMBER STATES' economies can only RECOVER
and eventually PROSPER in a world which favours
INNOVATION over BUREAUCRACY and FLEXIBILITY over
CENTRALISED RIGIDITY'.
They are simply
not fit for purpose in the 21st century.'
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining used-Comments in
Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
DAILY TELEGRAPH LEADER
MISLEADS THE PEOPLE SUGGESTING REGIONS CAN BE DISSOLVED
WHEN THEY ARE TO REPLACE PARLIAMENT UNDER LISBON TREATY.
*
Voice of the people
[Daily
Telegraph-Wednesday, February 18, 2009]
EXTRACT
The Conservatives plan
to change this [centralisation ]. not only will they
sweep away the regional bodies that have cost us
billions., and delivered precious little in return, but
excessive rises in council tax will be subject, if
desired to public vote...
As you will observe
below the Lisbon Treaty clearly states the demise of the
GANG at WESTMINSTER and the replacement of PARLIAMENT by
the REGIONS
Ten EU truths we must
tell the public
1. The leaderships
of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem
parties have been taken over by
pro-Europeans. These leaderships implement
the EU's policy, and ignore the wishes of
their voters.
That's why your vote doesn't make a
difference.
2. The
European Union has the Constitution of a
dictatorship, and the laws of a police
state. Dictatorships lead to oppression and
poverty. The EU
Constitution is similar to the old Soviet
Union's.
3. Once the
Queen has signed the sixth and final EU
Treaty in June,2008 the very much alive EU
Constitution
makes it clear the EU
will abolish the nations of Britain and
England (and our Lib, Lab and Con parties,
Reform Treaty clause 8A-4).
4. The EU
is illegal under British law. Four Prime
Ministers and the Queen have committed five
acts of Treason by signing five EU treaties
which will abolish our nation and replace it
with the EU; they
had to secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act
(s36.3) to escape prosecution.
5. The
police state growing around you, and
reported on by some national newspapers, is
the EU police state. We've been in the EU
for 34 years, we
are harmonising our laws with the EU, the
emerging police state is the result.
6.
Political correctness, the undermining of
parents, the family and teachers, the
teaching of sex and homosexuality to under
tens, the promotion of single parent
families etc. is
subversion by the EU or its Common Purpose
organisation over the
last 34 years, using the plans of the German
Frankfurt School.
7. The EU
will be an economic disaster. We now lose
£30 billion a year trading with Europe;
before we joined we broke even.
The EU's 111,000
regulations cost us £100 billion a year
(Better Regulation Commission Annual Report
2005); they will
bring us a soviet style command economy and
poverty. Our politicians lied to us.
8. If you
have voted Conservative, Labour or Lib Dem
over the last 34 years you have voted for
the EU police state,
and for the abolition
of your own party.
9. German
Chancellor Angela Merkel ensured our
government signed the “Reform Treaty;” which
will abolish the British Constitution and
enforce the EU’s from 1st January 2009. The
EU treaties don’t allow for a British
General Election, which isn't due until 5th
May 2010, so it is unlikely another will be
permitted. You will
by then be imprisoned inside the EU police
state, where you will be ruled by unelected
EU dictators, who will control the nuclear
weapons of what used to be Britain and
France.
10. Britain
is the fifth largest economy amongst the
world's 200 nations. Forget elections and
parties, whose leaderships are controlled by
the EU. Fight the direct anti EU campaigns
on eutruth to get Britain back before its
too late. Start by visiting
your MP in his local surgery and warn him he
will lose his £240,000 salary and expenses
when the EU closes Westminster on 5th May
2010.
David
Noakes. http://eutruth.org.uk 07974 437 097
|
As to their remarks
that
CUTTING BANK BONUSES
WILL NOT SOLVE THIS CRISIS
No one in their right
mind would say that it would. But JUSTICE must be SEEN
to be DONE. We can only see the Telegraph's comments as
an spectacular own goal since it will be seen as a sop
to the GREEDY BANKERS. Possibly the Barclay Brothers
have mentioned to their Editor to give some relief from
the natural onslaught their banker friends RICHLY
DESERVE. We have a suggestion for those bankers who are
able to obtain their bonuses because of legal matters.
They can give ALL their undeserved bonuses into a fund
for those who have been made redundant because of the
GREEDY action of the BANKERS. Now this is a CAMPAIGN
that the DAILY TELEGRAPH will get much acclamation from
those who have SUFFERED because of the actions of the
GREEDY BANKERS.
NO ONE IN THE BANKING INDUSTRY SHOULD
RECEIVE A BONUS.
Even banking staff should be included
in this as they are so lucky to still have a job. Even
the £50 a month suggested is still millions in total and
are better directed to the almost 2,000,000 workers who
have LOST THEIR JOB.
*
THE QUEEN
AND THE EU CONSTITUTION
HOW
IT ALL BEGAN
THE
EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION-Q&A
100
REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU WHY
EU REGIONAL POLICY WILL DESTROY THE NATION STATE
BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION-CONSPIRITORS
NAMED
The TRUTH about a FEDERAL
EUROPE.
CONSTITUTION MILLIONS DIED FOR IS AT GREATER RISK THAN
ANY TIME.
NEW ELITE THREATEN EU PROJECT
ALMOST
EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS
COME FROM SMALL STATES
by
PETER SHAW
TREATY OF
TREASON
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
GORDON BROWN'S
TIME IN THE
WILDERNESS
*
Britain can be
fixed-but not by a PM who wants
to save the world.
by
Irwin Stelzer
[telegraph.co.uk/personal
view]
[Daily
Telegraph-Wednesday, February
18, 2009]
It is a pity that Gordon Brown
has decided to substitute
truculence for calm reason when
confronted by his critics. For
my guess is that when the
history of the Brown era is
written, he will realise that
his defensiveness; his
unwillingness to admit a single
error; his dishonest effort to
paint the Tories as a do-nothing
party, despite the fact that
some of their ideas were so
sound that he filched them,
detracted from his real
accomplishments.
After all,
this is the man who kept Britain
out of the euro, membership in
which is bringing Spain,
Ireland, Italy and other
countries to the brink of
financial disaster. This is the
man who presided over a rather
long period of economic growth:
had he not boasted that he had
eliminated the business cycle,
he could claim that the current
recession was inevitable in any
capitalist system. This is the
man who provided the protection
Tony Blair needed to consign
Clause Four to the dustbin of
history. And, yes, this is the
man who first sensed that one
aspect of any recovery programme
would be the recapitalisation of
the banks – somehow.
Why, then, is it that, absent
a miraculous recovery in the
economy and in his own
performance, Brown seems doomed
to go down to defeat when he
finally faces the electorate he
has avoided confronting for so
long? His experience in America
is instructive. Soon after
stepping into Tony Blair's
shoes, Brown travelled to
America to meet George W. Bush.
The Prime Minister managed to
insult the President by keeping
his distance, refusing to
reciprocate when praised, and
scorning the President's gift of
a bomber jacket. All to appease
his Left, which was anyhow
irritated with him for
consorting with the hated Texan
warmonger.
Brown then proceeded to try
to play it both ways in Iraq. A
quick visit to support the
gallant troops – during the Tory
party conference, by strange
coincidence – before ordering
them to barracks and leaving the
fighting to the Americans and
the Iraqis. The electorate knows
a stunt when it sees one, the
soldiers who were confined to
their barracks fumed at having
their mission aborted, and we
Americans learnt that the
Britain of Gordon Brown is not
the ally we would want at our
backs in a bar-room brawl.
Then there was the Lisbon
Treaty. Break an electoral
promise to hold a referendum,
and sign the unpopular document.
But not in the full glare of
television lights or within the
sound of popping champagne
corks; sneak down and sign
Britain on as if no one would
notice so long as the pomp and
ceremony were avoided. Result:
furious European allies, already
irked at Brown's habit of taking
off his headphones at meetings
when they were saying their
piece, and angry voters who had
been denied the promised
referendum. Brown's decision to
write books that admire the
courage of others only
highlighted his lack of it.
Which brings us to the
economy. This recession will
end: there is indeed boom and
bust, or with proper reforms,
ups and downs. That's why we
call it the business cycle.
Brown will be remembered for his
refusal to accept any
responsibility for the prior
period of excessive credit and
undetected excesses in the
financial sector, for his
insistence that his blameless
management of the economy had
been nullified by the Americans,
for some ineffectual
anti-recession measures such as
the cut in VAT, and for the
genuine accomplishment of
preventing a complete collapse
of the banking system.
The chapter still to be
written will cover the Britain
that will have emerged from the
recession. We already know
certain things. It will be a
country in which faith in the
political class is at its nadir.
Brown, with a well-deserved
reputation for personal probity,
and for being in public life in
order to accomplish goals we all
consider admirable, presides
over a cabinet that includes
fiddlers who claim payments for
expenses that meet the rules,
yet not what I believe to be the
Prime Minister's own sense of
what is right. But, as with the
aborted general election, he
bottles out of confronting those
in his party who do not meet the
standards he applies to himself,
leaving a sceptical public that
wishes a plague on all
politicians.
It will also be a country
suffering from the Blair-Brown
flirtation with a form of
multiculturalism that has
brought to Britain millions who
openly reject its values.
Properly managed, immigration
adds a healthy zestiness to
society, as well as productive
workers. But immigration that
requires natives to adapt to the
customs of the newcomers, rather
than the other way around,
fragments society and creates
social tensions that in their
extreme manifestation result in
the bombing of the Tube and an
attempt to blow up Glasgow
airport.
Brown's legacy will also
include a bloated public sector
that has reduced portions of the
country to complete dependence
on public-sector jobs, and that
will so burden the
wealth-creating private sector
that economic growth will be
stunted for decades to come.
Worse still, the nation will
have learnt to look to the
Government to provide child
credits, pay its fuel bills, see
to its health care and
education, protect it from
falling conkers, support it in
its old age, provide increasing
amounts of its housing, supply
millions of jobs – all paid for
with its own money, which passes
from earners through the
Government, which skims enough
to support its lawmakers in
style long after the voters have
retired them from public life.
But cheer up. The dependency
culture can be broken, but not
by a prime minister who believes
it is his destiny to save the
world, or who drives David
Freud, the man who devised
Labour's plan to privatise job
training, into the arms of the
opposition party. James Purnell
is on to something with his
welfare-to-work programme,
although the extent of the Prime
Minister's support is called
into question by Freud's
defection. The Tories have
finally decided that promising
to shrink the bloated public
sector is not an invitation to
another decade in opposition,
although they remain
sufficiently lacking in
self-confidence to feel the need
to call Ken Clarke back into
service as shadow chancellor.
Politicians such as Vince
Cable have proved that if you
talk sense to voters they will
respect you for it. The contours
of the needed reforms of the
financial services industries
are coming into view. The
deformed system of compensation
that has distorted economic
incentives, and not only in the
financial sector, is breathing
its last.
Most of all, there is the
possibility that the Prime
Minister will rise above his
redistributionist, class-war
predilections, and redirect his
formidable intellect to solving
the longer-term problems of the
country – perhaps after some
years spent in the wilderness,
from which he might emerge as an
elder statesman. Britain would
be the winner. As the world
might have been had the
then-chancellor accepted my
half-serious advice to take the
open jobs as head of the
International Monetary Fund or
the World Bank
*
[This as usual is
an excellent article from the
hand of Irwin Stelzer which has
covered the life and times and
rise and fall of Gordon Brown a
Scotsman who sold not ONLY his
COUNTRY but also that of
ENGLAND. This blot on the
landscape of Brown's future
career will be always with him
and when the EU finally falls
with much disaster to all member
states except of course Germany
with its massive gold reserves
which good old Gordon helped to
increase at a significant loss
of value to the taxpayer who
funded the acquisition in the
first place. The appellation of
TRAITOR he will always carry
with him for the rest of his
days. We hope one day he will
apologise to the English people
for his sneaky traitorous act of
TREASON in LISBON.
[telegraph.co.uk/personal
view]
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
APPEASEMENT IN 1938 TO NAZI PLAN
FOR EUROPE -WAR IN 1939.
APPEASEMENT TO NAZI PLAN FOR
EUROPE IN 2009 -SLAVERY IN
EUROPE IN 2010.
TIME IS RUNNING OUT!
*
EUROPEAN ELECTION BUT POSSIBLY
GENERAL AND LOCAL ELECTIONS ALSO
ON
JUNE 4-2009
-THE LAST CHANCE BATTLE OF A
UNITED EUROSCEPTIC
VOTE!
*
The VOTE must be for COUNTRY and
NOT for PARTY
There can be no excuse
whatsoever in the Eurosceptic
organisations in this last ditch
stand not to pool their resources
and manpower in a campaign to
fight on a UNITED FRONT to GET
THE VOTE OUT under a
umbrella organisation
www.LIBERTAS.eu
This is not the time for
sticking to your OWN PARTY-
whatever the COST. It is a
golden opportunity and possibly
the last occasion that
EUROSCEPTICS will be able to use
their VOTE against the EU
because after the LISBON TREATY
is ratified by ALL member states
there will be no
Conservative-Labour or LibDems
parties as they will be
abolished in accordance with the
EU TREATY.
Parliament will also be
abolished and its once hallowed
chambers occupied by a Regional
Assembly in its place.
It is time well overdue for the
main Eurosceptic
organisations-UKIP and the
DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT and English
Democrats with all eurosceptic
organisations to UNITE under a
umbrella organisation
www.LIBERTAS.eu
If we are united we can make
such fight with others in EUROPE
and at home in ENGLAND SCOTLAND
and WALES as to send such a
powerful message to the EU
COMMISSION that we intend to
topple their undemocratic,
unaccountable police state of a
UNITED STATE OF EUROPE from its
lofty pedestal.
OUR MESSAGE IS:
FOR OUR COUNTRY NOT FOR PARTY
*
For details of the abolition of
YOUR TRIPARTITE GANG OF THREE IN
WESTMINSTER AND YOUR PARLIAMENT
GO TO:
THE LISBON TREATY-THE TREATY OF
TREASON
Th
The
similarity between the
last decade and that preceding
the Second World War with
Germany in 1939 when many German
Jews and others who feared
Hitler's doctrines left the
country whereas others decided
that it might not be too bad
after all so remained -a mistake
many were to lose their lives
for. There are millions of
people in our Island Home who
are oblivious to the same
Nazi
Plans
which are the bedrock of
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
COLLECTIVE
[ 26 ] .
.
Slowly but surely ALL the aims
of the new Gestapo in Brussels
will be achieved as many of them
have been achieved already by
deceit and the apathy of a well
indulged population who believed
THEY NEVER HAD IT S0 GOOD.
They are in for such a shock as
those who complacently decided
to stay in Germany in the years
up to the war. Tens of thousands
of those undecided German
citizens who made the mistake of
staying were betrayed by their
own citizens and even family
some to round up old scores.
In 1944 alone 2,000 Germans
were beheaded by the Nazis and
many others met their deaths in
the concentration camps. As
recent articles in the press
have stated many Germans were
betrayed by their own people as
had happened with French people
in France. German women played a
major part in assisting the Nazi
cause working in the
administration and concentration
camps. In 2009 it must be
hard for many people in England
and in our neighbouring states
of Scotland and Wales to
understand the full impact of
the
LISBON TREATY on their lives
as the millions who in Germany
before the last war who mistook
a job as more important than
their accustomed FREEDOM as many
do today in our own country in
2009. If those who
recently went on unofficial
strike to save their jobs had
been on our streets in their
millions years ago to save OUR
FREEDOM- OUR CONSTITUTION -OUR
COUNTRY we would not be faced
with the nightmare scenario of
today and many will live to
regret it if the TREATY OF
TREASON should be ratified by
all member states of the EU
before the years' end.
What
we find so alarming is the
laid-back attitude at this most
dangerous time in our history
since the Second World War of
organisations such as the
respected FREEDOM ASSOCIATION
with its long list of notables
of significant rank and
experience ,many do sterling
service to the Cause of Freedom
as MPs-Historians-Authors and
even MEPs and many others. Their
founders include men of stature
and great courage such as
Ross McWhirter
(1925-1975-murdered by the IRA
and the late Norris
McWhirter (1925-2004) who gave
his life for the CAUSE of
FREEDOM. We lament that such men
were not here when we needed
them so urgently to take the
banner of FREEDOM onto the
STREETS. But not one of
the long list had decided to
take the lead in the overall
BATTLE of BRITAIN onto the
streets as the LEADER of the
EUROSCEPTIC CAUSE at such a time
of great danger to protect what
we hold most dear. Their present
message in January 2009 is that
they are forming more branches
and putting forward the vital
message of the dangers to our
freedom . But at this eleventh
hour when our traitorous CROWN
-LORDS and COMMONS has signed
the TREATY OF TREASON we had
expected a more positive and
energetic call for people to
take to the streets (which
should have happened over the
past few years to inform
the Government that there was
real opposition to the EU
TREATY) and they should have
some time ago rallied their
supporters onto the streets in
non-violent demonstrations to
save what they hold so dear.
But it appears still at this
late stage business as usual
-more branches -more members.
But they are in for such a shock
as their political
activities come under the
heading of
enemies of
the state
and as with
the abolition of political
parties and Parliament
are BANNED by the EU TREATY
enemies of
the state
We have
constantly stated over the years that ACTION not
WORDS should be the ORDER of the DAY and the failure
of not heeding this urgent message has resulted in a
once FREE COUNTRY a beacon of true parliamentary
democracy in the world has been destroyed by its own
sworn PROTECTORS-CROWN-LORDS and COMMONS. History
will judge why such a once proud stoic fearless
people were destroyed from WITHIN.
WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR
*
[PLEASE NOTE:
Each word underlined word /words has a separate
bulletin but where each LETTER of a word has a
bulletin it will be followed by the number of
bulletins within
SQUARE BRACKETS
as above and below
EU
COLLECTIVE [12]
.
OR
THE
EU
COLLECTIVE [15]
.
OR
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
COLLECTIVE
[ 26 ] .
*
[This we hope
will enable you to view matters
of a similar nature within a
shorter time scale]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
EU leaders hope
2009 will be the year that the Lisbon Treaty finally
comes into effect, after months of delay.
The treaty is aimed
at streamlining EU institutions to make the enlarged
bloc of 27 states function better. Opponents say it
is part of a federalist EU agenda that threatens
national sovereignty.
The treaty was
rejected by Irish voters in a referendum on 12 June
2008 and, under EU rules, it cannot enter into force
if any of the 27 member states fails to ratify it.
Signed in Lisbon in
December 2007, the treaty was drawn up to replace
the draft European constitution, which was thrown
out by voters in France and the Netherlands in 2005.
Opponents, and even some of the constitution's
architects, say Lisbon differs little from the
constitution.
Can the EU still
complete ratification?
Yes, but it is not
clear what will happen if Irish voters reject the
treaty again in a second referendum this year. That
could scupper the treaty, or at least further delay
its implementation.
At a December
summit EU leaders agreed on a "roadmap" to get round
the blockage caused by the Republic of Ireland's No
vote.
The Irish
government agreed to put the Lisbon Treaty to a
second referendum by November 2009, in return for a
set of EU "legal guarantees" aimed at addressing
various concerns raised by voters. The EU pledges
not to impose rules on Ireland concerning taxation,
"family" issues - such as abortion, euthanasia and
gay marriage - and the traditional Irish state
neutrality.
Announcing the new
Lisbon deal, French President Nicolas Sarkozy also
said that under Lisbon "every member state will have
a commissioner" - another concession to Ireland.
That promise might prove difficult to reconcile with
the original plan under Lisbon to have fewer
commissioners than member states, as from 2014.
LISBON TREATY
PROGRESS
Approved by
parliament: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus,
Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,
Malta, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, UK
Defeated by
referendum: Irish Republic
Challenges: Legal
objections delayed ratification in Czech Republic,
Polish president also delaying ratification.
The Irish
"protocol" will be bolted onto Croatia's treaty of
accession, which will have to be approved by all 27
member states. Mr Sarkozy said that would happen "in
2010 or 2011".
Mr Sarkozy again
ruled out any renegotiation of Lisbon. The only
countries that have not yet ratified it are the
Czech Republic, Ireland and Poland. [and *GERMANY]
Czech ratification
is complicated by the fact that Czech President
Vaclav Klaus, a Eurosceptic, does not like the
treaty. And the Czech Prime Minister, Mirek
Topolanek, says Lisbon ratification depends on
whether MPs vote for the government's plan to host a
US radar base. But as current holder of the EU
presidency the Czech Republic will not want to be
embarrassed over Lisbon.
In the UK, the
opposition Conservatives want a referendum on
Lisbon. If they were to win an early general
election they could conceivably delay ratification
further.
Hungary was the
first of 25 countries to approve the treaty in
parliament.
Poland's President
Lech Kaczynski has refused to sign the treaty for
the time being, calling it "pointless". He says he
is waiting for the Irish question to be resolved.
Was Ireland the
only country to hold a referendum?
Yes. Most EU
leaders argue that Lisbon is an amending treaty
which does not transform EU structures to the extent
that a referendum is necessary.
That position is
rejected by the Irish No camp and the British
Conservatives, as well as by many Eurosceptics
across the EU.
One of the Irish No
camp's leaders, Declan Ganley, says his party
www.Libertas.eu
will compete for
seats in all EU states in the June European
Parliament elections.
According to an
Irish Supreme Court ruling in 1987, any major
amendment to an EU treaty entails an amendment to
the Irish constitution - and that in turn requires a
referendum.
How similar is
Lisbon to the draft constitution?
It contains many of
the changes the constitution attempted to introduce,
for example:
-
A politician
chosen to be president of the European Council
for two-and-a-half years, replacing the current
system where countries take turns at being
president for six months.
-
A new post
combining the jobs of the existing foreign
affairs supremo, Javier Solana, and the external
affairs commissioner, Benita Ferrero-Waldner, to
give the EU more clout on the world stage.
-
A smaller
European Commission, with fewer commissioners
than there are member states, from 2014.
-
A
redistribution of voting weights between the
member states, phased in between 2014 and 2017 -
qualified majority voting based on a "double
majority" of 55% of member states, accounting
for 65% of the EU's population.
-
New powers for
the European Commission, European Parliament and
European Court of Justice, for example in the
field of justice and home affairs.
-
Removal of
national vetoes in a number of areas.
Most European
leaders acknowledge that the main substance of the
constitution would be preserved.
If it contains the same substance, why is the Lisbon
Treaty not a constitution?
The constitution
attempted to replace all earlier EU treaties and
start afresh, whereas the new treaty amends the
Treaty on the European Union (Maastricht) and the
Treaty Establishing the European Community (Rome).
It also drops all
reference to the symbols of the EU - the flag, the
anthem and the motto - though these will continue to
exist.
How long did it
take to agree the treaty?
The effort to draft
a constitution began in February 2002 and took
two-and-a-half years, but that text became obsolete
when it was rejected by French and Dutch voters in
2005.
Work began in
earnest on a replacement treaty during the German EU
presidency, in the first half of 2007, and agreement
on the main points of the new treaty was reached at
a summit in June that year.
Negotiations
continued behind the scenes over the following
months before a final draft was agreed by the
leaders of the 27 member states in October 2007.
Why was the
constitution dropped?
France and the
Netherlands said they would be unable to adopt the
constitutional treaty without significant changes,
following the 2005 referendums.
The UK also pressed
hard for a modest "amending treaty", which could be
ratified by means of a parliamentary vote, like
earlier EU treaties.
Does the Charter
of Fundamental Rights feature in the new treaty?
No. There is a
reference to it, making it legally binding, but the
full text does not appear, even in an annex.
The UK has secured
a written guarantee that the charter cannot be used
by the European Court to alter British labour law,
or other laws that deal with social rights. However,
experts are divided on how effective this will be.
[NO USE AT
ALL-AS THE PAST HAS SHOWN!]
Are any
countries seeking opt-outs?
Ireland and the UK
currently have an opt-out from European policies
concerning asylum, visas and immigration. Under the
new treaty they will have the right to opt in or out
of any policies in the entire field of justice and
home affairs.
[FOR HOW LONG?]
Poland is also due
to sign up to the guarantees on the Charter of
Fundamental Rights negotiated by the UK. During the
treaty negotiations, Polish leaders voiced concern
that the charter could contradict Polish law in
moral and family matters.
Denmark will
continue with its existing opt-out from justice and
home affairs, but will gain the right under the new
treaty to opt for the pick-and-choose system.
When will the
new treaty kick in?
The pre-referendum
plan is in disarray now. Originally, the treaty was
supposed to come into force in January 2009.
The schedule -
which may well change - currently looks like this:
• The High
Representative on foreign affairs will not start
work until the treaty has been ratified. The new
president of the European Council could also start
work at that point.
• The European
elections in June 2009 will be held under the
existing Nice Treaty. That means there will be 736
seats in the European Parliament - down from the
current 785. Under the Lisbon plan, the number will
be fixed at 751.
• Although a new
European Commission will be chosen in October 2009,
its size will not be slimmed down until 2014.
• Some extensions
of qualified majority voting in the European Council
are already in place, such as the appointment of the
new commission president and the High Representative
for Common Foreign and Security Policy - but
Poland's objections over voting weights mean the
redistribution of votes will not come in until after
2014.
It could be at
least 10 years before the process is complete.
|
|
LATEST!
eurofacts:-5th
September,2008
Hurrah for Libertas!
It was reported in the Sunday Telegraph
on 20th July 2008 that the Irish millionaire, Declan Ganley , has
disclosed far reaching plans to give voters THROUGHOUT THE EUROPEAN
UNION a REFERENDUM on the HANDOVER of POWER to BRUSSELS.
He is to field more than 400 candidates
in next June's [2009]
European Parliament elections in 26 countries including GREAT BRITAIN,
where voters have been side -tracked by governments that have happily
ratified the LISBON TREATY without any democratic input from their
voters.
Great Britain has 12 European
Parliament constituencies and will certainly be a novelty -and a huge
relief -if formerly non-democratic endorsement of the EU Treaties hits
the buffers! The vehicle for Mr Ganley's initiative will be his
pressure group-
www.LIBERTAS.eu
[SEE
LATEST PROGRESS IN FEBRUARY 2009]
-he claims to be well on his way
to raising the £75 million to FUND HIS PROJECT.
As the long standing critic of the way
that the EU has concentrated power in Brussels,
AT THE EXPENSE OF DEMOCRACY
I and very many others will say "GREAT,
bring it on".
If Mr Ganley would welcome financial contributions from
the voters in the 26 countries then he should place advertisements in
their
NATIONAL PAPERS.
His initiative will truly put the cat amongst the pigeons
for it has been all too easy for Europe's political elite to ride
roughshod over their peoples. His initiative will also present UKIP
with a conundrum for it no doubt expected to do well in Europe, next
June-2009, against the [TRAITOROUS TRIPARTITE CABAL] the three main
political parties in our country.
DAVID OWEN
Devon
[ENGLAND]
[Well! as our bulletins have shown over the past five
years we have supported the UKIP solely because they were the largest
eurosceptic organisation with an understood message of OUT OF THE EU.
We are now of the opinion that the UKIP have failed their supporters
with their TOO LITTLE! TOO LATE! approach failing to mobilise the entire
eurosceptic bodies under an INDEPENDENT LEADER of RENOWN, possibly a
military personage with the TRUE GRIT to GET THE JOB DONE. UKIP has
failed to do so and now all their resources should be handed over to a
MAN of DESTINY who CAN SAVE the FREEDOM loving PEOPLE OF EUROPE. POWER
MUST RETURN TO THE PEOPLE and support for Mr Ganley and HIS and OUR JUST
CAUSE - WILL DO JUST THAT.
Mr Ganley will have our FULL SUPPORT in his momentous
EPIC making decision to SAVE the PEOPLE of EUROPE and EUROPE ITSELF.
IT ONLY NEEDS FOR EVERY EUROSCEPTIC OF WHATEVER PARTY TO
PUT PARTY POLITICS ASIDE AND SUPPORT
www.LIBERTAS.eu
in JUNE, 2009
*
|
|
|
|
Daily Mail
CHRISTMAS-2008 CAMPAIGN
ACTION ON
ALZHEIMER'S
Make your cheque payable to 'Daily Mail' and send it ,
with this form, to Alzheimer's Appeal, PO BOX 5000,
Dept. ALZ, ALTON HANTS, ENGLAND . GU34 9BX
YOU CAN GIVE ONLINE AT
www.dailymail.
co.uk/promotion
|
A
MERRY
CHRISTMAS
in 2008
AND A
HAPPY
NEW YEAR
TO YOU ALL
|
TO LATE!
THEY
ARE
Closing the parliament door when the
constitution has bolted? They do protest
TOO MUCH!
|
CONVENTIONS OF
THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
We will use the word of a great
patriot historian Edward A. Freeman, D. C. L., LL. D-
Honorary Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford. (1876)
From his: -
OF
THE
ENGLISH
CONSTITUTION
|
SO YOU ALL THOUGHT
THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN
WALL-THINK AGAIN!
|
Snippets
of COMMENT [Daily Mail
COMMENT- Friday, December5, 2008] WHAT A
SHOWER! |
THE
ORIGINS OF THE EU
The origins of what
is now the EUROPEAN UNION |
A SINISTER
EROSION OF OUR ANCIENT LIBERTIES
|
DID YOU KNOW?
NO 6 -
CAP
trebles
COST of FOOD.
ABOLITION
WILL SAVE
£40
and
£60
a week,
HUGE SAVING
for every
FAMILY IN
THE LAND
|
ECHR
outlaws DNA DATABASE of INNOCENT PEOPLE
I HATE these
UNELECTED FOREIGN JUDGES.
BUT today I could kiss
them for BACKING the FREEDOMS we FOUGHT TWO-WORLD
WARS to PROTECT.
by
TOM UTLEY
|
DID YOU KNOW?
NO 5-
BEHIND
SCHEDULE
Buckets of
taxpayers money are currently being poured into the
EU'S Galileo Global Positioning System Programme.
This is
behind schedule, massively over-budget and entirely
unnecessary since we can use the American GPS
System
FREE OF CHARGE.
|
DID
YOU KNOW?
NO 4-
National
Interest
Always anxious to play its part
eurofacts is keen to point out to the
obvious truth that a genuinely
EUROSCEPTIC GOVERNMENT
will find it easier to find CUTS than
a
EUROPHILE ONE
for the simple reason that many EU
programmes are
HUGELY EXPENSIVE -UNNECESSARY
|
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE
THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH |
WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN
EVER RELIED ON |
67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU |
THE
SOUL OF ENGLAND |
THE SIGNS OF A
DICTATORSHIP IN A ONC E FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY
*
A monstrous
abuse of power by the same bunch of gangste rs who
hounded Dr David Kelly to his DEATH
by
LITTLEJOHN
|
SO YOU
ALL
THOUGHT
THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN
WALL-
THINK AGAIN!
|
THE
RIGHT
HONOURABLE
GENTLEMEN
- MANY ARE NEVER RIGHT OR HONOURABLE AND CERTAINLY NO GENTLEMEN.
|
LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS
UNITE TO DEFEND
PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS
ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED
IN A
TOTALITARIAN
STATE
|
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP
TO BLAIR & BROWN |
I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY |
WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL
GUILTY? |
LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN |
UK
SELLS MORE GOODS OUTSIDE EU |
CHRISTMAS GREETINGS
FROM THE PAST
2003-2007 |
THE SPEECH
THE QUEEN
SHOULD
HAVE MADE |
WE NEED A
REVOLUTION
NOW!
|
FED UP!
No one to listen
to your COMPLAINT
Daily Mail
-Money Mail-editor Tony Hazell-Web:
www.thisismoney.co.uk
|
DID YOU KNOW?
THE EURO
No 1-
WHY WE ARE
BETTER OUT
|
TO LATE!Closing the parliament door when the
constitution has bolted? They do protest
TOO MUCH!
|
THE SIGNS
OF A
DICTATORSHIP
IN
A ONCE FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY
|
FRONT PAGE INFORMATION WITHDRAWN ON THE 17TH
NOVEMBER, 2008
STILL AVAILABLE IN THE
ABOVE
PICK
& CHOOSE
FORMAT |
TREASURY TEAM CAN'T
ADD UP ON VAT REDUCTION.
*
Some retailers
will not pass on Vat cut
|
AT LONG LAST!
A LABOUR PARTY
now back to it's roots - but A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
would have brought JUSTICE to bear on the PUBLIC
PENSIONS SCANDAL.
|
THE ORIGINS
OF THE
EU
The origins of what
is now the
EUROPEAN
UNION
COLLECTIVE |
SOVIET ANALYST
A Review of continuing
Soviet global
revolutionary strategy
|
The
Lisbon Treaty is
DEAD
IRISH voters rejected the LISBON TREATY on
12th June 2008. In a debate in the House
of Lords on 18th June, Lord Neill of Bladen,
a former Warden and Vice-Chancellor of
Oxford University, a highly respected
lawyer, explained why
|
BBC Account of History obscured by the partial Truth –
Part 1
|
NATIONAL DESTABILISATION PLAN OF KGB/GRU
BASED ON SOVIET DEFECTOR INTELLIGENCE
*
[THE ENEMY WITHIN]
[ Note: 2 bulletins here] |
The Minister
of 'Justice' Mr Straw the 'Nonsense ' man,
says Iraq war was legal
|
A Silent Vigil in a village country
church graveyard on Remembrance
Day. |
DID YOU KNOW?
THE EURO
No 2- WHY WE ARE
BETTER OUT
|
GOVERNMENT should
be the SERVANT of the PEOPLE and INDIVIDUALITY or it
is a DEMONICAL DICTATORSHIP.
|
DO YOU KNOW?
THE
EUROPEAN UNION
COLLECTIVE
IS THE
Enemy of its
Member State
*
www.edwardharle.com
|
Don’t blame the
BNP.
It’s the main parties who have
betrayed the voters |
DAILY MAIL
COMMENT
Blair
the
law
breaker
|
How Two
Patriots died while in the service of their country.
CIVIL WAR
PARLIAMENT
AGAINST
THE KING
|
BRITAIN &
EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER |
GERMANY AS
STRONGMAN OF EUROPE |
50 YEARS of
SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER |
ALMOST
70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER
RELATIONSHIP |
RABID
BEHAVIOUR OF MANY LABOUR MPS IN SUPPRESSING FREE
SPEECH IN PARLIAMENT HAS NOW BEEN ACCOMPANIED WITH
AN INVASION OF THE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS.
|
UK
SELLS
MORE GOODS
OUTSIDE
EU |
WE
NEED
A
REVOLUTION
NOW!
|
LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS UNITE TO DEFEND
PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS
ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED IN A
TOTALITARIAN STATE |
Latest!
AUGUST-08
TOP TOPICS
PAST TOP TOPICS
[2003-2007]
BULLETIN FILE |
'ODESSA
FILE'
Author
supports
Mr Ganley
Irish
Millionaire's
'NO VOTE'
Letter to
eurofacts -17th October, 2008
|
THE END OF THE ENGLISH
INTRODUCTION
HOW IT ALL BEGAN
HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER
THE RESULTANT LUNACIES
HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED
WHERE
FREEDOM IS VANISHING |
ENGLAND
is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE
in POLITICALLY-CORRECT
BLAIRDOM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REMEMBER
ON
JUNE
4-2009
VOTE
www.LIBERTAS.eu
TO
REGAIN OUR FREEDOM FROM EU
YOUR
MAIN PARTIES IN PARLIAMENT HAVE SOLD YOUR
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY TO AS FOREIGN POWER.
A
GENERAL ELECTION AND LOCAL ELECTIONS COULD
TAKE PLACE ON THE SAME DAY SO IT IS A GOLDEN
OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW THE TRAITOROUS GANG OF
THREE IN WESTMINSTER THAT YOU HAVE A MIND OF
YOUR OWN AND DELETE THEM FROM YOUR VOTING
LIST. SUPPORT THE SMALLER PARTIES WHO
WILL LIOSTEN TO WHAT YOU SAY .YOU NEED
TO SHOW THE TRIPARTITE TRAITORS HOW
YOU FEEL BECAUSE IT COULD BE THE LAST
ELECTION IN WHICH THE PRESENT POLITICAL
PARTIES WILL PARTICIPATE BECAUSE THE TREATY
STATES THAT ALL PRESENT PARTIES WILL BE
DISBANDED AND ONLY EU AGREED POLITICAL
PARTIES FOR THE REGIONS WILL FOLLOW.
FULL
DETAILS:
TREASON AT LISBON
DON'T REWARD THEM FOR
THEIR TREACHERY
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09 / 05 |
|
1]. ‘BUT BY GOD I DESPAIR
OF POLITICIANS WHO ARE BETRAYING THOUSANDS LIKE HIM’ |
|
2]. How the CLOCKWORK MAN
with his implanted message to wind-up his Labour Conference audience. |
|
3]. How An Asian immigrant
became British because where she chose to live most of her friends
were white - so had to learn English. |
|
4]. Robocop or Dixon of Dock
Green -Millions of Pensioners will choose the latter. The true eyes
and ears and friend of the Community. |
|
5]. THE REAL STORY of the
HERO of the Bridge on the River Kwai. |
|
6]. The Project to create
a European State is doing far more damage to British identity than
Islamic fundamentalism. |
|
7]. Search and Destroy is
the tactic used in Iraq as an excuse for insufficient numbers on the
ground NOW Police forces in Britain use the same tactic. |
|
8]. How the liberal LEFT
after vilifying British values, nationalism and culture-performs another
U-TURN. |
|
9]. Are not the Grandees
of New Labour also culpable for appointing a ‘weak man’ as Prime Minister
of Britain? |
|
10]. THE DEATH OF POLITICS. |
|
11]. The MINISTRY of TRUTH
and MINISTRY of LOVE are NOT what YOU THINK in BLAIRLAND. |
|
|
|
|
|
09 / 05 |
|
1]. I am a soldier and the
citizens of the West are my targets. |
|
2]. LAWYERS GALORE-DO WE
NEED THEM? |
|
3]. PROOF that MORE Bobbies
on the Beat DO cut CRIME. |
|
4]. WE HAVE LOST BATTLE AGAINST
THE LOUTS-ADMITS BLAIR. |
|
5]. Ken Clarke’s great Euro
somersault. |
|
6]. God Save Our Anthem. |
|
7]. LOSS of TRUST in
NEW LABOUR. |
|
8]. Get British or Get
Out of the Country. |
|
9]. Muslims must follow
the Irish example-with Integration. |
|
10]. What about OUR Human
Rights? |
|
11]. IRAQ ON THE BRINK OVER
CHARTER. |
|
|
|
|
|
09 / 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
1]. Retired Vicar Thrown
into one of Britain’s toughest Prisons for not paying extra £63 of
his Council Tax. |
|
2]. THE GREAT ESCAPE. |
|
3]. The Project to create
a European State is doing far more damage to British identity than
Islamic fundamentalism. |
|
4]. SILENTLY-A DEADLY VIRUS
could kill millions of Britons. |
|
5]. BLAIR REFUSES TO KEEP
PROMISE OF BILL TO CLEAN UP HIS GOVERNMENT. |
|
6]. BLAIR-GOLDSMITH-SCARLETT
AND OTHERS - A CABAL OF TREASON. |
|
7]. LONDON TUBE CCTV: Was
there a Cover-Up? |
|
8]. THE POLITICS OF TWEEDLEDEE
AND TWEEDLEDUM MUST NOW END WITH PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION. |
|
9]. Most LOUTS are making
a MOCKERY of ASBOS. |
|
10]. OUR JUDGMENT OF MEN
-PARTIES AND SYSTEMS IS DETERMINED BY THE LOWEST POINT THEY TOUCH. |
|
11]. Popular TOP Town disappoints
businessman after twelve years. |
|
12]. IMMORALITY-ABSURDITY-WRONG-DOING. |
|
13]. 1.2million immigrants
let in by New Labour since 1998. |
|
|
|
07 / 05 |
|
|
1]. Mr
Blair is again using a Big Lie to cover his illegal war in
Iraq with as usual a half-truth |
|
|
2]. Will the Metropolitan
Police Chief let us know what he did with the information weeks ago
that our underground would be bombed? |
|
|
3]. WE NEED better answers
to the Pensioner Poverty that has been caused by Council Tax and poor
Pensions. |
|
|
4]. The British beat the
French at Trafalgar resulting in the creation of the greatest Royal
Navy-Where is it now? |
|
|
5]. Ninety-nine countries
will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels. |
|
|
6]. The EU big brother policy
reaches back over two millennium. |
" |
|
7]. 82 million Germans have
no say as MP’s back EU Constitution. |
|
|
8]. Britain must leave the
EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo.Saxon sphere. |
|
|
9]. Europe: It’s the modern
version of the white man’s burden. |
|
|
10]. The Time To Consider
Ourselves - In A Commonwealth Free Trade Area. |
|
|
11]. Childrens Patriotic
best-seller returning from 1905 and reprint in 1953 -A Gem. |
|
|
|
|
|
07 / 05 |
|
|
1]. THERE MUST BE ROOM ON
OUR PLANET FOR ALL SPHERES OF INFLUENCE. |
|
|
2]. What’s in a NAME-Can
the EU survive its utopian dream-NOW rejected by two founder members? |
|
|
3]. A Pilot Scheme, which
does not prove itself, should not be offered elsewhere. |
|
|
4]. Council tax-£300-no crime-four
policeman for over 3500 people -petrol cheap-a great life -WHERE IS
IT? |
|
|
5]. A Mockery of Justice
as 80,000 defendants fail to attend the Courts. |
|
|
6]. With the EU on the buffers
a proved Conservative Pro-Europe cheer-leader could never be trusted. |
|
|
|
|
|
06 / 05 |
|
|
1]. A MAN of ALL FAITHS but
insensitive to ONE. |
|
|
2]. Wave goodbye to the EU
- and make Europe a better place! |
|
|
3]. Yobs pounce on elderly
widower whose wounds result in death in hospital. |
|
|
4]. SEND FEWER CROOKS TO
JAIL-SAYS LORD WOOLF. |
|
|
5]. Why Parliamentary Reform
will give a voice to the people. |
|
|
6]. The Death of the EU might
have been exaggerated. |
|
|
7]. Our Man Of Straw -Professes
Too Much - You couldn't make it up. |
|
|
8]. Unworthy Patronage and
Disloyalty to their country is not what we expect from Government. |
|
|
9]. When No means Yes - the
French Way. |
|
|
10]. The English Parish -
CHAPTER IX - The Upheaval (1377-1399) |
|
|
11]. Why The British People
Must Have THEIR Referendum on EUROPE. |
|
|
|
|
|
05 / 05 |
|
|
1]. The European Constitution
- Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 1 |
|
|
2]. The European Constitution
- Questions and Answers - A Plain Man’s Guide - Part 2 |
|
|
3]. Europe and a conspiracy
of Silence. |
|
|
4]. Why the Tories must restore
Integrity of Government-Primacy of Parliament-Independence of Civil
Service. |
|
|
5]. Justice at last - for
Teacher jailed for firing air pistol at teenage vandals. |
|
|
6]. Head in the sand Election-or
how all Toda’s vital issues have been avoided. |
|
|
7]. Vote Reform: The PM answers
the nation- and why he misses the point. |
|
|
8]. Oui or non: the creation
of the European State will go on. |
|
|
9]. MP’s demand parliamentary
inquiry into voting reform. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05 / 05 |
|
|
1]. A Constitution millions
have died for is at greater risk now than any time in it’s over a
Thousand years of history - Part 1. |
|
|
2]. A Constitution millions
have died for is at greater risk now than any time in it’s over a
Thousand years of history - Part 2. |
|
|
3]. A Constitution millions
have died for is at greater risk now than any time in it’s over a
Thousand years of history - Part 3. |
|
|
4]. A MESSAGE TO THE VOTERS
OF SEDGEFIELD CONSTITUENCY |
|
|
5]. Why the voter must ensure
a stalemate on May 5-to force compromise and the return of true democratic
government. |
|
|
6]. UNLESS THERE IS AN AWAKING
- IN A FEW DAYS A DISCREDITED TONY BLAIR - WILL RETURN TO No 10. |
|
|
7]. BLAIR’S CHILDREN? |
|
|
8]. How President Blair corrupts
EVERYTHING he touches. |
|
|
9]. DEMOCRACY WILL WORK ONLY
IF ENOUGH PEOPLE WANT IT TO WORK. |
|
|
10]. WE CAN NO LONGER BELIEVE
A WORD HE SAYS. |
|
|
11]. Letting in migrants
to work is self-defeating - says Migrationwatch. |
|
|
12]. New Labour’s Political
Correctness says Christian Hostel must dispense with Bibles and after
meal Grace -or close. |
|
|
|
|
|
04 / 05 |
|
|
1]. BEFORE YOU VOTE ON MAY
5 2005 - READ HOW POLITICIANS ARE MANIPULATING YOU- THE VOTER. |
|
|
2]. Tony Blair at last admits
he authorised the naming of David Kelly-the tragic Government scientist. |
|
|
3]. LONG LIVE PATRIOTISM-WHY
PUBLISHERS TURNED DOWN A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY. |
|
|
4]. WHY ARE MOST BBC REPORTERS
STILL WITHOUT A SENSE OF FAIRNESS? |
|
|
5]. WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE
TO FEEL GUILTY ABOUT OUR IDENTITY? |
|
|
6]. Undercover schoolteacher
returned to witness the blackboard jungle savagery of the typical
school class of violence. |
|
|
7]. Canterbury Cathedral
is not just a building, nor even just a cathedral. It is England in
stone. |
|
|
8]. TEACHER PERSECUTED BY
YOBS-JAILED - WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO JUSTICE - Part 1. |
|
|
9]. TEACHER PERSECUTED BY
YOBS-JAILED - WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO JUSTICE - Part 2 |
|
|
10]. Lottery Quango gives
£360,000 to legalise brothels - but nothing for a Memorial to our
Fallen since 1946. |
|
|
11]. Download
the Escape to Freedom Latest - Poster Click Here. |
|
|
|
|
|
04 / 05 |
|
|
1]. End the EU gravy train-Vote
UKIP on May 5 - 2005 |
|
|
2]. Brussels scams can let
an MEP fiddle £60,000 a year. |
|
|
3]. Sunday school
can save children from delinquency, says Bishop. |
|
|
4]. MEPs act to stifle Media
Freedom. |
|
|
5]. Voting Fraud and New
Labour Lies. |
|
|
6]. SO IT IS OFFICIAL-THE
TORIES WILL STAY IN EU -BUT NO EU CONSTITUTION. |
|
|
7]. AN ANSWER TO THE PATRONS
of The British Declaration of Independence. |
|
|
8]. What is the difference
between a Yobbish thug and an unruly Dog? |
|
|
9]. OPEN LETTER TO WILLIAM
HAGUE REGARDING BILL TO AMEND THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT BY TORIES. |
|
|
10]. ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE
by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April] |
|
|
11]. ST GEORGE`S DAY - 23APRIL
- RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARES' BIRTHDAY [23rd
April] |
|
|
|
|
|
03 / 05 |
|
|
1]. Neil Kinnock sacked honest
Auditor because of refusal to sign off questionable EU Accounts. |
|
|
2]. VOTE UKIP ON MAY 5 -
TO OBTAIN YOUR COUNTRY’S FREEDOM . |
|
|
3]. Cost of Iraq War -2002
to 2005 equals-£3100 million OR two Aircraft carriers. |
|
|
4]. General De Gaulle acclaims
British national institutions back in 1960. |
|
|
5]. LibDem leader and his
17 MPs could have killed the Terror Bill and saved Habeas Corpus. |
|
|
6]. Refuting the biggest
Myth about leaving the EU. |
|
|
7]. Two loving parents are
more important than good teachers. |
|
|
8]. Thank God we elected
a Monarch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03 / 05 |
|
|
1]. Understanding Easter-
a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are. |
|
|
2]. Marriage is when two
people become one. Cohabitation is when two people remain two. |
|
|
3]. Blairland has almost
destroyed the Family Values in its quest for supposed Equality. |
|
|
4]. Referendum: How the Government
rigged the Question-Without being Noticed! |
|
|
5]. Legal immigration into
the UK has doubled in eight years of New Labour. |
|
|
6]. Britain takes over as
biggest contributor to the EU Budget |
|
|
7]. Why Members of Parliament
must be restricted to one term of office to protect their Independence. |
|
|
8]. IMMIGRATION-CONTROLLED
IS NOT RACISM BUT COMMON SENSE |
|
|
9]. Why our Foreign Office
needs a change of name to the British Office |
|
|
10]. TOUGH IRISH LAWS SEND
HUNDREDS OF TRAVELLERS TO ENGLAND. |
|
|
11]. Voters don’t trust you,
MPs warned. |
|
|
12]. Our Christian
Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none. |
|
|
|
|
|
03 / 05 |
|
|
1]. The New European Constitution
- Part 1 |
|
|
2]. 12-Point Summary of
EU Constitution continued - Part 2 |
|
|
3]. Michael Howard assists
his Party move to amend the 1701 Act of Settlement to take away Protestant
Succession to the Crown. |
|
|
4]. An Englishman’s checklist
to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution. |
|
|
5]. Our Past is embedded
in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we
are. |
|
|
6]. Thousands of householders
besieged by gipsies -awaiting Law Lords decision. |
|
|
7]. WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND
UP TO BLAIR. |
|
|
8]. Some say that one should
not use Prince Charles in order to knock the Monarchy. |
|
|
|
|
|
03 / 05 |
|
|
1]. A Fabian Europhile of
1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law. |
|
|
2]. If Britain votes No associate
membership will be offered of Free Market and not Political says Giscard
d’Estaing and others. |
|
|
3]. THE ENGLISH PARISH -
Chapter VIII - Changing Times |
|
|
4]. How the EU takes over
Nation-States. |
|
|
5]. TWO SHEEP IN WOLF’S CLOTHING. |
|
|
6]. Not ID cards-But Common
sense and sense of proportion will guard against fraud and Terrorism. |
|
|
7]. An astute political observer
in 2001 asked the question if we leave EU would others follow? |
|
|
8]. A FAILURE OF LAW & ORDER
LEADS 84 - OLD RAF VETERAN TO TAKE HIS LIFE IN BLAIR’S HUMAN RIGHT’S
BRITAIN. |
|
|
9]. Blair’s cronies in the
Lords back call to defend 800 year liberty of the individual. |
|
|
10]. Form-filling stops us
solving murders warns Police Chief. |
|
|
11]. Mr Nice Guy will save
Africa- but Habeas Corpus must be suspended for a year. |
|
|
12]. Download
the SUSPENSION OF OUR FREEDOMS POSTER.
"Right Click" on the image and select "Save As.."to
download the poster in word document. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03 / 05 |
|
|
1]. A DECLARATION by Members
of The House of Lords of Breaches Of OUR Fundamental Rights |
|
|
2]. Almost everything, which
is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States -
Part 1 |
|
|
Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has
come from small States - Part 2 |
|
|
3]. We want more migration,
more to study-to work -to find refuge - said Home Secretary. |
|
|
4]. Neil Kinnock in glover
- but failed to stop the Shadow of graft over EU’s £68bn spending. |
|
|
5]. Now the EU wants a single
Foreign Office to replace Nation-States Embassies. |
|
|
6]. Guilty! New Labour could
arrest self under new terror law. |
|
|
7]. Is it just another attempt
to browbeat Europe into giving Germany its supposed rightful place
as the Dominant Power? |
|
|
8]. THE GREATEST THREAT TO
OUR LIBERTY CAN ONLY COME FROM A NEW. |
|
|
9]. The New European Treaty
is no ordinary Treaty it will destroy your 1400 years unique Free
Nation-State. |
|
|
10]. Vote Lib-Dem-New labour
or Tory-You Will Lose Your Freedom and Country. |
|
|
11]. Blair’s Tyranny must
end by a 2005 Runnymede to protect our Freedom. |
|
|
12]. They say you can take
a horse to water but you can’t force it to drink-We hope not. |
|
|
|
|
|
03 / 05 |
|
|
1]. If we destroy our right
of Freedom to fight a war on terror -Who wins? |
|
|
2]. The passage of the Prevention
of Terrorism Bill confirms the House of Commons is no longer Protector
of our Constitution. |
|
|
3]. MI6 Chief in new sexing
-up row over dossier by Australian weapons inspector. |
|
|
4]. Electoral Commission
violates its own fair rules on referendum Question with faulty wording. |
|
|
5]. CAN THE 1972 ACCESSION
TREATY TO THE EU BE REPEALED? |
|
|
6]. Biased Referendum Question
needs a change of words as it will decide whether we will be FREE
or Slave. |
|
|
7]. President Putin -a Patriot,
Tony Blair a so-called Democrat - a Traitor-which would you prefer. |
|
|
8]. QC claims Lord Goldsmith
Attorney General-bullied to change mind on Iraq. |
|
|
9]. Innocent Planespotters-EU
Arrest Warrant-Greek Injustice-Why we don’t belong in Europe. |
|
|
10]. Freedom of Speech-A
Freedom, which cannot be abused - is not worth having. |
|
|
11]. They say Mr Howard will
at the General Election join the ‘No’ vote against the New European
Constitution. |
|
|
|
|
|
02 / 05 |
|
|
1]. A Distraction we can
do without so close to an Election to decide the fate of our Nation. |
|
|
2]. Royal Advisers provide
smokescreen for Blair’s May 2005 Election Fight. |
|
|
3]. Cost of EU to UK - £4,811
million in 2003= 40 District Hospitals equipped and staffed and funded. |
|
|
4]. MORI survey-When people
understand the EU & New Constitution - more they dislike it. |
|
|
5]. Six Big Whoppers From
A Man Of Straw. |
|
|
6]. How Blair spent £6.5billion
on 111 busybodies (Quangos) -none of us voted for. |
|
|
7]. THE COSTLIEST FIFTY QUANGOS
- MANY WASTE YOUR MONEY. |
|
|
8]. People in Britain are
more likely to become victims than anyone else in Europe. |
|
|
9]. Church and State make
their own the rules to dishonour our Constitution. |
|
|
10]. THE ENGLISH PARISH -
Chapter VII - New Ways (1215-) |
|
|
|
|
|
02 / 05 |
|
|
1]. WHY THE UKIP COULD HOLD
BALANCE OF POWER AFTER THE MAY 2005 ELECTION. |
|
|
2]. Immigration to be curbed-
Why should we believe them NOW? |
|
|
3]. HOW LABOUR MADE 1,000
new crimes since 1997. |
|
|
4]. WHY A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
IS NEEDED NOW IN 2005. |
|
|
5]. Why our English Self-Government
is unique in Europe and the World. |
|
|
6]. Senior Conservative Euro-Federalists
from 1998 are still with us in 2005. |
|
|
7]. The Tories failed to
curb power of EU Court in 1996- No better chance in 2005. |
|
|
8]. Human Rights Convention
leads to loss of our Liberty. |
|
|
9]. PENSIONS - UK less badly
off than Continent-perhaps. |
|
|
10]. YOUR MONEY-WASTED -No
1. |
|
|
11]. To Preserve The Free
Nation-States of Europe -Vote ‘NO’- To the NEW EU Constitution. |
|
|
12]. Prisons do not create
criminals or make them worse; prisons are bricks and mortar. |
|
|
13]. Little Englanders were
right to oppose the Crimean War and Boer War and now the Iraq War. |
|
|
|
|
|
02 / 05 |
|
|
1]. THE HONOUR OF OUR COUNTRY
MUST REJECT NEW HOUSE ARREST PROPOSALS. |
|
|
2]. Allegiance is Citizenship
the English way. |
|
|
5]. Let down by the leaders
of ALL of the political parties. |
|
|
6]. You Can Trust Tony Blair? |
|
|
7]. You Trust Michael Howard? |
|
|
8]. Man of the People and
saviour of our Nation at its greatest time of danger. |
|
|
9]. Multiculturalism: not
only a fraud- but also Dangerous. |
|
|
10]. Tory past ministers
in 1998 expound Gains from EU? in letter to The Independent. |
|
|
11]. A Champion of Individualism
from the late 19th century exposes the fallacies in collectivism and
central planning. |
|
|
|
|
|
01 / 05 |
|
|
1]. Intra-EU Trade and Services
shrinking with trade lower than a decade ago. |
|
|
2]. Can You -Spot The Odd
Man Out ? |
|
|
3]. Why the feely TONY should
leave the People to respond to the Tsunami Disaster. |
|
|
4]. Too many Laws; Too many
differences.
| |
|
5]. WHY THE LAW FOR PROTECTION
OF THE HOME MUST BE A REAL DETERENT TO THE INTRUDER. |
|
|
6]. How much does EU membership
cost us in cash? |
|
|
7]. WHY WE MUST ALL BE ALERT
AND MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY. |
|
|
8]. Chapter V - The English
Parish - Under the Normans - (1066-) |
|
|
9]. Chapter VI - The English
Parish - The Decay of the Manor |
|
|
|
|
|
01 / 05 |
|
|
1]. A NEW YEAR MESSAGE FOR
2005. |
|
|
2]. Labour –Lib-Dem and even
Tories will Spend-Spend-Spend to remain in the EU. |
|
|
3]. DEATH OF THE LAST GIANT-A
DAY TO REMEMBER. |
|
|
4]. A Constitution millions
have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 1.
| |
|
5]. A Constitution millions
have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 2. |
|
|
6]. A Constitution millions
have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 3. |
|
|
7]. New elite threatens EU
project, admits Lib-Dem Peer. |
|
|
8]. BBC EUROPHILE BIAS-UPDATE. |
|
|
9]. Want to Teach your Party
not to take YOU for granted and help Save Your Country? |
|
|
10]. Mr Howard-It is Not
fewer MP’s but a PR System of Representation to represent the ‘Gadflies’
in the HOUSE. |
|
|
11]. Harold Wilson in 1961-
To consider the Common Market in simple black and white terms. |
|
|
12]. Burglary law U-turn
after Blair says he is on the side of Victim not the Offender. |
|
|
|
|
|
12 / 04 |
|
|
1]. A MERRY CHRISTMAS AND
HAPPY NEW YEAR - A CALL TO ARMS. |
|
|
2]. A Christian Parliamentarian
speaks on a range of issues - Part 1. |
|
|
3]. A Christian
Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 2. |
|
|
4]. A Christian
Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 3. |
|
|
5]. A Christian
Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 4. |
|
|
6]. A Christian
Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 5. |
|
|
7]. A GULF EXISTS BETWEEN
THE WESTERN AND ISLAMIC WORLD WHICH ONLY SENSITIVITY – TOLERANCE
- AND TIME - CAN CROSS. |
|
|
8]. Democracy without
Morality and respect for Individuality is Despotism.. |
|
|
9]. Who CARES about
MORALITY? |
|
|
10]. Growth and Development
of the English Parish. by Wray Hunt |
|
|
11]. Minorities account
for 73 per cent of population growth- ‘Shut that Door’ |
|
|
12]. A Message to Members
of ALL Eurosceptic Parties- WE NEED YOU NOW! |
|
|
13]. British voting power
in the EU - Is almost non- existent? |
|
|
14]. IRAQ WAR LATEST –3,000
BRITONS sent home wounded and sick. |
|
|
15]. VOTE UKIP FOR A WAY
OUT OF THE EU -WHAT EVER THEIR INTERNAL DIFFICULTIES. |
|
|
16]. Ours might be a stronger
and happier Society if Christians were readier to defend their values. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 / 04 |
|
|
1]. NO TIME FOR TRADITION-NO
TIME FOR LAW –PLENTY OF TIME FOR ILLEGAL WAR. |
|
|
2]. BLOOD IS CHEAP- BILLIONS
ARE MADE. |
|
|
3]. Prospective Tory candidate
asks for ‘deal’ with the UKIP. |
|
|
4]. Butler accuses Blair-the
Control freak? |
|
|
5]. Blair’s chief Europhile
performs a somersault on currency. |
|
|
6]. BBC bias how Independent
is the Committee of Inquiry? |
|
|
7]. Electoral Commission
says Postal Voting more subject to Fraud. |
|
|
8]. 75 per cent of Poll
says too many immigrants are coming into our country. |
|
|
9]. DON’T LET THEM BRIBE
YOU -THERE IS A BIGGER PRIZE ELSEWHERE? |
|
|
10]. Immigration flood
‘fuelling more hostility’ |
|
|
11]. The World is
divided into Many Religious Circles of Influence? |
|
|
12]. DISHONEST, EVASIVE,
CONTEMPTIBLE GOVERNMENT’S LATEST PROPAGANDA ON EU. |
|
|
13]. American Impeachment
procedure as defined by Alexander Hamilton in 1788. |
|
|
14]. The Individual
is the backbone of Christianity. |
|
|
|
|
|
12 / 04 |
|
|
1]. IMPEACHMENT
OF TONY BLAIR – SIGN HERE. |
|
|
2]. MPs Launch their 330
Campaign-as way out of the EU-Are they too Late? |
|
|
3]. TORIES WILL GO ON LOSING
SUPPORT TO UKIP. |
|
|
4]. TO EUROSCEPTIC VOTERS
EVERYWHERE-UNITE AND VICTORY WILL BE YOURS. |
|
|
|
|
|
12 / 04 |
|
|
1]. A THANK YOU! TO OUR
MANY VIEWERS - IN 2004 |
|
|
2]. What happens if Britain
votes ‘No’? |
|
|
3]. Europhiles look to
Mandelson to obtain major concession from EU-or lose. |
|
|
4]. Blair placing at risk
our defence alliances with free English –speaking nations. |
|
|
5]. The Ukraine is a faraway
country.What has it to do with us? |
|
|
6]. Blair can spend Unlimited
cash on EU Constitution ‘YES’ Vote. |
|
|
7]. Why do the Media still
fail to grasp that the rejection of the EURO is Political |
|
|
8]. What most people wish
to hear must heal Discord at Home and Abroad-Not Spin! |
|
|
9]. Britain can be the Best
with extolling Britishness says Brown. |
|
|
10]. Who CARES about
MORALITY? |
|
|
11]. Italian PMs gloom
on Euro contradicts Mandelson optimism. |
|
|
|
|
|
12 / 04 |
|
|
1]. Why wont Mr Ingram
realise he cannot compare funding of Army Recruitment Training with
Private Corporations? |
|
|
2].The Government want
us to believe they have prevented a terrorist attack in our Island. |
|
|
3]. MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE
OF COMMONS. -‘IMPEACH BLAIR’. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL BULLETINS |
|
|
1]. Blairs European Obssesion
- Part 1 |
|
|
Blairs European Obssesion - Part 2. |
|
|
Blairs European Obssesion - Part 3. |
|
|
2]. A Voice from 1962 about
the Common Market. |
|
|
3]. Bush used it - Blair
needs it. |
|
|
4]. Blair asks Lord Goldsmith
to supress opposition to Iraq war.. |
|
|
5]. Dangers of a supreme
parliament. |
|
|
6]. Free Speech - Religious
Opinion. |
|
|
7]. Tony Blair Promises
Democracy (but only to the Palestinians). |
|
|
8]. BUSH SECURES PRESIDENCY
WITH HELP OF MORAL MAJORITY AND NOT FOR ILLEGAL WAR. |
|
|
9]. Christian Beliefs
under attack by EU ‘s Parliament is intellectual Nazism. |
|
|
10]. As the General Election
of January 1906 brought Labour into Parliament so can the UK Independence
Party in 2005. |
|
|
11]. The Fascists are back
in Europe-silencing EU Commissioner - Part 1. |
|
|
The Fascists are back in Europe-silencing EU Commissioner - Part 2. |
|
|
12]. Tony Blair has delayed
Referendum until 2006 in order to assure a place in history. |
|
|
13]. THE GREAT DECEIVER
SIGNS NEW CONSTITUTION 25 TIMES IN ROME. |
|
|
14]. A Defence of
Christianity by a once militant agnostic - Part 1. |
|
|
A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic - Part 2. |
|
|
15]. Growth and Development
of the English Parish. |
|
|
16]. The King’s Hall - Chapter
I/XIX (continued). |
|
|
17]. Chapter III The Parish. |
|
|
18]. House of Commons
must regain its Responsibility. |
|
|
19]. We in the UKIP are fortunate
says Roger Knapman. |
|
|
20]. Signing Away OUR Sovereignty-as
it tries to justify the surrender of yet more powers to Brussels. |
|
|
21]. Blair Bribes Brown
with keys to No10-But Mr Brown would not betray OUR Country. |
|
|
22]. Our UK Independence
Day is closer than you think. Our Plans afoot will tell all. |
|
|
23]. A TROOPER and a
TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. |
|
|
A TROOPER and a TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE - Part 2. |
|
|
24]. Europhiles say the Single
Market’s not working. |
|
|
25]. OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE
VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY. |
|
|
26]. Politicians enjoying
lavish and dubious expenses from public funds. |
|
|
27]. Yes Campaign Group
Moves Over to Join the No Campaign in North East. |
|
|
28]. If UK Independence
Party voters were to switch to the Conservative Party-who would fight
the ‘Gadflies’ battle for withdrawal from the EU. |
|
|
29]. The Justification
for War offered by Mr Blair may have been the wrong one, but it was
a Just War -says Daily Telegraph. |
|
|
30]. Why ratification of
the new European Constitution would lead to Civil War. |
|
|
31]. Christianity
is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force, which makes
us what we are. |
|
|
32]. Father savagely beaten
by teenage yobs in front of his children later commits suicide after
Police say no Evidence. |
|
|
33]. For it is the Family
that children learn how to find their way through the world - Part
1. |
|
|
For it is the Family that children learn how to find their way through
the world - Part 2. |
|
|
34]. A
chance for Humanity to triumph has been lost by the merciless death
of Ken Bigley. |
|
|
35]. So, you want good
schools, clean and efficient health service-So you should. But this
economic political smokescreen hides the truth on the EU. |
|
|
36]. Multiculturalism isn’t
working says Nobel Prize writer. |
|
|
37]. Most People In England
Still Think In Pounds And Ounces. |
|
|
38]. Private Members Clubs
are the future. New legal dilemma for authorities. |
|
|
39]. Peter Mandelson-New
EU Trade Commissioner assumes a No vote in Referendum would be simply
disregarded. |
|
|
40]. England has more CCTV
cameras than any nation on earth-but highest crime rate in the world
- Part 1. |
|
|
England has more CCTV cameras than any nation on earth-but highest
crime rate in the world - Part 2. |
|
|
41]. Why the EU is heading
for the scrap heap- The sovereignty of the Nation State the only tried
and tested system. |
|
|
42]. Has the “Woolf” lost
his Teeth? |
|
|
43]. Tony
Blair might save Ken Bigley by apologising for the illegal war on
Iraq. And an early withdrawal of troops. |
|
|
44]. Why we should leave
Iraq to its People. |
|
|
45]. Blair creates chaos
to justify oppressive and dictatorial legislation. |
|
|
46]. The Duty To Lay Down
Ones Life Must Be Accompanied By The Right To Truth. |
|
|
47]. Some MP’s Arrogance
and Toleration of Totalitarian Government has the beginnings of a
Civil War. |
|
|
48]. Blair to take vast
new Emergency Powers-Leading us into a Totalitarian State. |
|
|
49]. UKIP MEP for London
urges his party to contest all seats-no clear run for Tories. |
|
|
50]. Why won’t Tony Blair
Call it a Day-Are his Bilderberger chums insisting he complete our
enslavement in the EU before he goes? |
|
|
51]. Geoff. Hoon must
Resign-MP’s anger over kit shortages in Iraq War. |
|
|
52]. Now is Not the Time
to Prate About. - Join the Bandwagon. |
|
|
53]. Daily Telegraph Journalist
Coup exposes damaging pre-war FO documents- yet their leader writer
exclaims-Mr Blair proved himself a Statesman. |
|
|
54]. Why the Individual
is at the Heart of the American and British Democracy. |
|
|
55]. Why Free Trade with
the Single Market would continue if the UK left the EU. |
|
|
56]. TRAFALGAR CELEBRATION
ON A SHOESTRING - SAYS BLAIR. |
|
|
57]. DON'T LET THEM LET
THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY. |
|
|
58]. Our way forward
to Kinship in Liberty |
|
|
59]. ‘THE MAKING OF
THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’ |
|
|
60]. NAZI AWARD FOR TRAITORS
– BLAIR, HEATH & JENKINS. |
|
|
61]. THE COST OF ASYLUM
– EU – IRAQ = POOR PENSIONS, POOR SERVICES ETC |
|
|
62]. The Judiciary –
A Defence of English Freedom? |
|
|
63]. New European Constitution
– Concessions Fudge. |
|
|
64]. ‘Twelve Just Men’
seek the Truth? |
|
|
65]. Impeachment of
Ministers of the Crown – Why Now? |
|
|
66]. OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE
VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON - BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY |
|
|
67]. Bill of Rights
of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution |
|
|
68]. Christmas Message 2003 |
|
|
69]. Roll of Supporters -Battle
for Britain Campaign -Victory in Unity |
|
|
70]. JOIN OUR PENSIONERS REVOLT
- LONDON - 17.1.04 |
|
|
71]. Government Obsession
With Spending Itself out of Trouble |
|
|
72]. European Arrest
Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now? State of the Nation – Part 2 |
|
|
73]. COST OF DEVOLUTION
–N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS State of our Nation
– Part 3 |
|
|
74]. Could England Survive
Outside The EU? -YES! |
|
|
75]. NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE
OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP |
|
|
76]. THE MIND POLICE ARE WATCHING
YOU-DON’T MENTION CHRISTMAS |
|
|
77]. A DREAM TO REMEMBER-
NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004? |
|
|
78]. So You Thought
You Were Free- By Vernon Coleman |
|
|
79]. SHOULD GOVERNMENT
COLLECT TAXES IN ORDER TO WASTE MONEY |
|
|
80]. IMPORTANT NOTICE
TO ALL EUROFANATICS EVERYWHERE- see below 'UP-YOURS' Delors. |
|
|
81]. THEY BACK DOWN ON PENSIONERS
LONDON MARCH- 17-1-04 – PETITION TO DOWNING STREET |
|
|
82]. WHY you should
Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy |
|
|
83]. CRITICS OF THE EU ARE
OFTEN ACCUSED OF RACISM By Vernon Coleman |
|
|
84]. THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER
THAN THE HANDBAG |
|
|
85]. The Rotten Heart
of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1 |
|
|
86]. The Rotten Heart
of Europe by Bernard Connolly-Part2 |
|
|
87]. The Rotten Heart
of Europe by Bernard Connolly-Part3 |
|
|
88]. The Rotten Heart
of Europe by Bernard Connolly-Part4 |
|
|
89]. SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE!
– SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON |
|
|
90]. PENSIONER WILL GO TO
PRISON -THAN PAY RATES INCREASE |
|
|
91]. THE HUTTON REPORT - A
TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE- WHY? |
|
|
92]. CRIMEAN WAR TO IRAQ WAR
-WHY HAVE THEY NOT LEARNED THE LESSON |
|
|
93]. BBC Account of History
obscured by the partial Truth – Part 1 |
|
|
94]. House of Lords
legal Whistleblower. |
|
|
95]. Why EU Regional policy
will destroy the Nation State. PART 1 |
|
|
96]. Why EU Regional policy
will destroy the Nation State. PART 2 |
|
|
97]. Empires have gone and
most people in the world now live in Nation-States said Lord Shore.
- PART 1 |
|
|
98]. Empires have gone and
most people in the world now live in Nation-States said Lord Shore.
- PART 2 |
|
|
99]. Petition to the
Queen |
|
|
100]. Open Message -
Battle For Britain Campaign |
|
|
101]. THE FINAL BETRAYAL
- PART 1 |
|
|
102]. THE FINAL BETRAYAL
- PART 2 |
|
|
103]. Our Parliament
and Nationalism – Why it should concern us now! - PART
1 |
|
|
104]. Our Parliament
and Nationalism – Why it should concern us now! - PART
2 |
|
|
105]. Our Parliament
and Nationalism – Why it should concern us now! - PART
3 |
|
|
106]. M.Howard says
he will fight tax rises - But who will fight to protect OUR Constitution? |
|
|
107]. 10 Reasons of how to
destroy - our Nation. |
|
|
108]. It never troubles a
Wolf how many the Sheep be. |
|
|
109]. Multiculturalism is
no longer right for Britain - says CRE Head Trevor Phillips. PART
I |
|
|
Multiculturalism
is no longer right for Britain - says CRE Head Trevor Phillips. PART
II |
|
|
110]. Bin Laden on his Peace
Message for the World |
|
|
111]. The
Iron lady and the ‘Ides of March’ |
|
|
112]. FED-UP AND MORE
FED UP- WITH FREEDOM AND UNITY-so some say |
|
|
113]. The secretive Bilderberger
Group will destroy True Democracy Part 1 |
|
|
114]. The secretive Bilderberger
Group will destroy True Democracy Part 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
ASYLUM & IMMIGRATION BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. CITIZENS INTEGRATION BILL
- WHY IT IS NEEDED |
|
|
2]. DON'T LET THEM LET THEM
DESTROY OUR IDENTITY. |
|
|
3]. THE COST OF ASYLUM -
EU - IRAQ = POOR PENSIONS, POOR SERVICES ETC |
|
|
4]. ZEALOTS IN OUR MIDST
- PART I |
|
|
5]. ZEALOTS IN OUR MIDST
- PART II |
|
|
6]. LIES AND THE BETRAYAL
OF BRITAIN |
|
|
7]. IMMIGRATION WATCH UNCOVERS
CHAOS IN IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM POLICY |
|
|
8]. “The idea of multiculturalism
has served us well,” says spokesman for CRE. |
|
|
9]. Don’t support ID Cards-
Only tighter Border Controls? |
|
|
10]. A lunacy that corrodes
society |
|
|
11]. Why bother to come
if you don’t want to integrate says Sir Trevor McDonald |
|
|
|
|
|
ENGLISH CELEBRATION BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE
by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April] |
|
|
2]. ST GEORGE`S DAY - 23APRIL
- RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARES' BIRTHDAY [23rd
April] |
|
|
3]. TRAFALGAR CELEBRATION
ON A SHOESTRING - SAYS BLAIR. |
|
|
4]. Thoughts on St. George’s
Day –Who are the English? - Part 1. |
|
|
5]. Thoughts on St. George’s
Day –Who are the English? - Part 2 |
|
|
6]. THOUGHTS ON ST. GEORGES`S
DAY - FREEDOM |
|
|
7]. Confound their politics.
Frustrate their knavish tricks. |
|
|
8]. The Royal Society of St
George - London Branch. |
|
|
9]. A Nation In Prayer during
World War II |
|
|
10]. Make
St George’s Day a Public Holiday |
|
|
11]. Montgomery’s Message
to the troops on D.Day –June 6th 1944 |
|
|
12]. Why can’t we have the
right to be English? - Part 1 |
|
|
Why can’t we have the right to be English? - Part 2 |
|
|
13]. Alfred –Christian King
of the English - Part 1 |
|
|
Alfred -Christian King of the English - Part 2 |
|
|
14]. God Save Our Anthem. |
|
|
15]. THE REAL STORY of the
HERO of the Bridge on the River Kwai. |
|
|
|
|
|
CHRISTIAN POLITICS BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
1]. CHRISTIANITY
AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE. |
|
|
2]. GAMBLING AND
ETHICS - Part 1 |
|
|
GAMBLING AND ETHICS - Part 2 |
|
|
3]. Christianity,
The People, and Ethics - Part 1 |
|
|
Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 2 |
|
|
* *
*
|
|
|
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF
THE ENGLISH PARISH |
|
|
|
|
|
1]. Growth and Development
of the English Parish. |
|
|
2]. The King’s Hall - Chapter
I/XIX (continued). |
|
|
3]. Chapter III The Parish. |
|
|
4]. Chapter IV The English
Parish - Dane to Norman. |
|
|
5]. Chapter V The English
Parish - Under the Normans - (1066-) |
|
|
6]. Chapter VI The English
Parish - The Decay of the Manor - (1086-1199 ) |
|
|
7]. Chapter VII - THE ENGLISH
PARISH - New Ways - (1215-) |
|
|
8]. THE ENGLISH PARISH -
Chapter VIII - Changing Times |
|
|
|
|
|
* *
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATHOLICISM |
|
|
|
|
|
1]
WITH THE DEATH OF POPE JOHN PAUL II- THE WORLD HAS SUFFERED A GREAT
LOSS |
|
|
2]
AN APOSTLE OF OUR AGE - WHO WILL ALWAYS BE WITH US |
|
|
3]
A GREAT SERVANT OF GOD AND MAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRITISH FORCES (OVERSEAS) BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. WAR ON IRAQ. |
|
|
2]. IRAQ WAR – THE AFTERMATH
– WMD’S WHERE ARE THEY? |
|
|
3]. Iraq -Lions led by Asses
– But at What a Price? |
|
|
4]. CRIMEAN WAR TO IRAQ WAR
-WHY HAVE THEY NOT LEARNED THE LESSON. |
|
|
5]. Human Rights Act leads
to Legal Aid lawyer’s actions against our troops in Iraq? |
|
|
6]. Respect for Country and
for the Regiment must come from the Moral inheritance of a cohesive
society. |
|
|
7]. Why Her Majesty’s Opposition
should demand Justice for Sergeant Robert’s widow NOW! |
|
|
8]. Blair’ scraped the
barrel’ to justify Invasion of Iraq. |
|
|
9]. The Security Services
and the Safety of YOUR Realm |
|
|
10]. SO NO ONE IS TO BLAME
FOR IRAQ WAR? - PART 1 |
|
|
SO NO ONE IS TO BLAME FOR IRAQ WAR? - PART 2 |
|
|
11]. It’s impossible
to win a conflict without enough men on the ground |
|
|
12]. Five Wars Blair
to reduce our illustrious fighting Regiments. |
|
|
13]. The Lives and Reputation
of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk -
Part 1 |
|
|
The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom
now at greater Risk - Part 2 |
|
|
The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom
now at greater Risk - Part 3 |
|
|
14]. Tony Blair-The Man
Who Never Did-Yet? |
|
|
15]. Iraq –not worth
the life of another British soldier |
|
|
|
|
|
IRAQ WAR - BUTLER REPORT
/ ANALYSIS BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. NO ONE’S TO BLAME! –PART
1 |
|
|
NO ONE’S TO BLAME! –PART 2 |
|
|
2]. NO ONE TO BLAME – SAYS
DOUBLE DUTCH -LORD BUTLER |
|
|
3]. Lord Butler reveals
massaged case for war |
|
|
4]. NO ONE TO BLAME –THE
FINAL INSULT |
|
|
5]. Whistleblower John Morrison
-Former Deputy Chief of Intelligence-Sacked. |
|
|
6]. Former Chief of Defence
Intelligence supports Whistleblowers - Part 1 |
|
|
Former Chief of Defence Intelligence supports Whistleblowers - Part
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
EUROPEAN ELECTION BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. Michael
Howard say’s he will fight tax rises– But who will fight to protect
OUR Constitution? |
|
|
2]. Blair refuses to allow
Cabinet Members free speech on EU Constitution |
|
|
3]. Download
and print off the Escape to Freedom anti EU window poster. (Right
click here and select save as.) |
|
|
4]. European Elections –European
Issues? |
|
|
5]. A Thank You! - To the
thousands of viewers who have visited our web site. |
|
|
6]. Our Queen And The EU
Constitution. |
|
|
7]. Our basic Liberties
and Freedoms – to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part I |
|
|
8]. Our basic Liberties
and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part II |
|
|
9]. TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL
ANAYSIS By NORRIS McWHIRTER - Least We Forget. |
|
|
10]. The Truth About A Federal
Europe - Part I |
|
|
11]. The Truth About A
Federal Europe - Part II |
|
|
12]. The Truth About A
Federal Europe - Part III |
|
|
13]. The Truth About A
Federal Europe - Part IV |
|
|
14]. Mr Howard calls UKIP
voters –Gadflies? - Part I |
|
|
15]. Mr Howard calls UKIP
voters -Gadflies? - Part II |
|
|
16]. On June 10th don’t
let them destroy Your Nation State |
|
|
17]. BBC-EU ELECTION RESULTS
1999- AND THE UKIP |
|
|
18]. A Time to make a stand
is now here |
|
|
19]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part I |
|
|
20]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part II |
|
|
21]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part III |
|
|
22]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part IV |
|
|
23]. The
Longest Day. D-Day 6th June 1944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL ELECTION - MAY 2005
|
|
|
1]. Constitution: the referendum
bandwagon starts to roll. |
|
|
2]. How ‘a good European’
turned into a eurosceptic whistle-blower. |
|
|
3]. EU Constitution: Germany
piles on the pressure. |
|
|
4]. No giving up: Peers to
continue fight for Inquiry into EU. |
|
|
5]. The EU: are we approaching
a tipping-point?. |
|
|
6]. Why Britain’s security
is put at risk by the euro army. |
|
|
7]. Not worth the life of
a single British aircraftsman. |
|
|
8]. London can expect major
influx of EU immigrants. |
|
|
9] Why Britain will lose
control over policy on immigration and asylum seekers. |
|
|
10] £4000 million a year
- that’s our cost of EU membership. |
|
|
11] Lies, baloney and Peter
Hain. |
|
|
12] Just how ‘significant’
is Giscard’s draft Constitutional Treaty? - PART
1 |
|
|
12B] Just how ‘significant’
is Giscard’s draft Constitutional Treaty? - PART
2 |
|
|
13]. An Urgent Warning to
the Conservative Party-from a Conservative member. |
|
|
14]. Red lines multiply -
but Britain is losing the right to tax |
|
|
15]. EU membership ‘costs
Britain 100,000 million £’s a year. |
|
|
16]. Free trade agreements
are the future of world trade. |
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL ELECTION / REFERENDUM BULLETIN's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. 'The Longest Year' -
To D-Day -June 6 -2005 |
|
|
2]. As a great War Leader
Winston Churchill has said: |
|
|
3]. WHY UKIP’S 12 MEP’S SHOULD
TAKE SMALLER SALARIES. |
|
|
4]. An Urgent Warning to
the Conservative Party-from a Conservative member. |
|
|
5]. Red lines multiply -
but Britain is losing the right to tax |
|
|
6]. Download
and print off the Escape to Freedom anti EU window poster. (Right
click here and select save as.) |
|
|
7]. Download
and print off the ITS YOUR COUNTRY anti EU window poster. (Right click
here and select save as.) |
|
|
8]. What is Our Aim in the
forthcoming battle for our Freedom? |
|
|
9]. Guidance to a prospective
Member of Parliament. |
|
|
10]. NEW EU CONSTITUTION
LAID BARE AT LAST |
|
|
11]. NOT ONE MORE DAY OF
SLAVERY-NO NEED OF A REFERENDUM |
|
|
12]. The Heritage of England
is a Whole made up of Many Parts |
|
|
13]. Legislation of Primary
Importance must be referred to the People. |
|
|
14]. NO CAMPAIGN BANDWAGON
STARTS TO ROLL |
|
|
15]. BBC-EU ELECTION RESULTS-JUNE
10 –2004 |
|
|
16]. Twelve Mighty Reasons
why you must say No to the EU |
|
|
17]. DO VENTRILOQUIST DUMMIES
DEFEND NO 10 POLICIES? |
|
|
18]. How much does it cost
the UK in the EU |
|
|
19]. Don't Let Europe
Rule Britannia - Download and print off the
Rule Britannia anti EU window poster. (Right click here and select
save as.) |
|
|
20]. Save Our Country
- Download and print off the Save Our Country
anti EU window poster. (Right click here and select save as.) |
|
|
21]. Free trade agreements
are the future of world trade. |
|
|
22]. Why the UKIP should
contest all seats at the General Election. |
|
|
23]. Why the Pro-EU lobby
use smears -with their Guardian readers they prejudice their case. |
|
|
24]. Will the mainstream
parties now compromise on the EU to prevent a Four- Party parliamentary
system? |
|
|
25]. WHAT HISTORY TELLS
US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT - Part 1 |
|
|
WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT -
Part 2 |
|
|
WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT -
Part 3 |
|
|
26]. UKIP will have six
per cent of vote at General Election –say’s Anthony King |
|
|
27]. THE UKIP THE ONLY
SURE EXIT FROM THE EU |
|
|
28]. Tory Party battle
for Hartlepool scuppered |
|
|
|
|
|
BLAIR'S IMPEACHMENT BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
1]. A NATION’S HONOUR
SHOULD NOT BE BLEMISHED |
|
|
2]. Why Tony Blair
must face Impeachment |
|
|
3]. Why Impeachment
of Tony Blair is vital for the Integrity of Parliament and the Ethics
of our Society. |
|
|
4]. Crimes against
the Authority and Integrity of Parliament are punishable by Impeachment. |
|
|
5]. How Two Patriots
died while in the service of their country - Part 1 |
|
|
How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part
2 |
|
|
How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part
3 |
|
|
How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part
4 |
|
|
How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
EUROPEAN TRADE NOT
EUROPEAN UNION - BULLETIN'S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. Previous
Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83supports our Ancient Constitution. |
|
|
2]. Why we cannot trust Mr
Blair with our Future. |
|
|
3]. So Tony Blair has conceded
a Referendum on the EU Constitution? |
|
|
4]. Why there is still a need
to Petition the Queen-after Blair U-turn on Referendum.. |
|
|
5]. Thoughts on St. George’s
Day –Who are the English? - Part 1. |
|
|
6]. Thoughts on St. George’s
Day –Who are the English? - Part 2 |
|
|
7]. The Last Days Of Britain? |
|
|
8]. THOUSANDS OF BRITISH CITIZENS
REJECTING EU CITIZENSHIP- WHY DON'T YOU? |
|
|
9]. ‘I
say we must not join Europe’- Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery. |
|
|
10]. Be warned-‘The Lies of
1975 that still Haunt Us’. |
|
|
11]. Make no mistake! – Only
Full withdrawal will DO from the EU? |
|
|
|
|
|
CONSTITUTIONAL BULLETINS - ( AUSTRALIA ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. THE BRITISH LEGACY - AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW
ZEALAND - WHY THEY MATTER? |
|
|
2]. The Act of Settlement
1701- why it should Concern you now? |
|
|
3]. MESSAGE
FROM AUSTRALIA - SUPPORT THE CROWN. |
|
|
4]. The Common Law of England
is the Law of the Commonwealth and America. |
|
|
5]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part I |
|
|
6]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part II |
|
|
7]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part III |
|
|
8]. The
Commmonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe. - Part IV |
|
|
|
|
|
CONSTITUTIONAL BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1]. OUR CONSTITUTION
OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY |
|
|
2]. New European Constitution
– A ‘Bridge’ Too Far? |
|
|
3]. FORMER PRIME MINISTER
SUPPORTS TRADITIONAL VALUES |
|
|
4]. OPEN MESSAGE TO TRUE
'CONSERVATIVE' MEMBERS |
|
|
5]. PRESS BLACKOUT ON
LAUCH OF PETITIONS TO THE QUEEN |
|
|
6]. LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT
- BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND |
|
|
7]. OUR LOYALTY TO OUR
INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY? |
|
|
8]. WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS
OF MASS DESTRUCTION OF OUR FREE CONSTITUTION? |
|
|
9]. OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY
OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP |
|
|
10]. The True Church
Survived- The False EU Will Die |
|
|
11]. A EURO UTOPIAN
DREAM - BY ANY MEANS? |
|
|
12]. A BETRAYAL OF OUR
NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED - Part A
-
Part B
-
Part C |
|
|
A
BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONTINUED - Part D
-
Part E |
|
|
13]. THE SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP
WITH THE USA |
|
|
14]. AN APOLOGY TO PRESIDENT
BUSH AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE |
|
|
15]. Misuse of Prerogative
Powers by Tony Blair |
|
|
16]. Scottish Independence
– Have No need of Union flag and Anthem |
|
|
17]. OUR HISTORIC HOUSE
OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY |
|
|
18]. 10 Downing Street
-Our Once Secure Citadel Of Our Freedom |
|
|
19]. CABINET GOVERNMENT
IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP |
|
|
20]. English Constitution,
by it they lived, for it they died |
|
|
21]. The House of Commons
has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters. |
|
|
22]. New England’s Tears
for Old England’s fears? |
|
|
|
|
|
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETINS |
|
|
|
|
|
1]. WAR ON IRAQ. |
|
|
2]. HER MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION.
DOES IT EXIST? |
|
|
3]. English Judges --- ' Lions
or Sheep ?' |
|
|
4]. ENGLISH FREEDOM - WHY IT
IS YOURS? |
|
|
5]. ENGLAND - WHY SHE MATTERS |
|
|
6]. THE BLITZ on PENSIONERS |
|
|
7]. CITIZENS INTEGRATION BILL
- WHY IT IS NEEDED |
|
|
8]. WHY DO THEY WISH TO DESTROY
US OUR CONSTITUTION? |
|
|
9]. ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE
by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April] |
|
|
10]. ST GEORGE`S DAY - 23APRIL
- RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARES' BIRTHDAY [23rd
April] |
|
|
11]. SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! -
SAY NO! TO REGIONS |
|
|
12]. An English Revolution
- Why Now? |
|
|
13]. Traitors or Constitutional
Reform? |
|
|
14]. WHY DeGaulle VETOED OUR
EEC MEMBERSHIP IN 1963 |
|
|
15]. TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL
ANALYSIS |
|
|
16]. THOUGHTS ON ST. GEORGES`S
DAY - FREEDOM |
|
|
17]. A FURTHER 200 REASONS
WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU |
|
|
18]. WHY WON`T HE COME CLEAN
ON THE EURO? |
|
|
19]. BRITAIN AND EUROPE -
THE TRUTH - JUNE1975 |
|
|
20]. WORLD GOVERNMENT- WHY
IT WONT WORK MR BLAIR |
|
|
21]. DEFENCE OF THE ENGLISH
PEOPLE |
|
|
22]. SECOND DEFENCE OF THE
ENGLISH PEOPLE |
|
|
23]. OUR ROAD TO A TOTALITARIAN
STATE- WE MUST STOP IT NOW! |
|
|
24]. GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE
- FOR THE PEOPLE? |
|
|
25]. WHY DID THEY WANT BRITAIN
IN EUROPE - IN 1963 |
|
|
26]. Constitutional Issues
- at Elections |
|
|
27]. England Needs To Find
Herself - An Appeal to the New World from the Old |
|
|
28]. Why Debate Needed on
New European Constitution -Part 1 |
|
|
29]. A Nation in Crisis where
are those Statesmen to Protect our Freedom |
|
|
30]. AN ENGLISHMAN’S HOME
IS HIS CASTLE |
|
|
31]. Message to Mr George
Brown English Values in Europe |
|
|
32]. IRAQ WAR THE AFTERMATH
WMD’S WHERE ARE THEY? |
|
|
33]. LIBERTY IS YOURS - IF
YOU WILL FIGHT FOR IT! |
|
|
34]. WHY WE MUST REMAIN A
CHRISTIAN COUNTRY |
|
|
35]. Are the Lord Lords speaking
for England or Europe? |
|
|
36]. THE HOUSE! - SITS TOO
LONG - BETRAYS OUR FREEDOM |
|
|
37]. WHY DO SOME POLITICIANS
NEED A SMOKESCREEN - TO AVOID DEBATE |
|
|
38]. Valery Giscard d` Estaing
- Why is he "X" ? |
|
|
39]. A Nation Betrayed - An
Honour To Be Bestowed -Why? |
|
|
40]. MR BLAIR - A PREROGATIVE
TOO FAR? |
|
|
41]. Iraq -Lions led by Asses
– But at What a Price? |
|
|
42]. The Tyranny of Cabinet
Government has arrived – Safeguards needed now! |
|
|
43]. MORE LAW AND MORE DISORDER? |
|
|
44]. THE BRITISH LEGACY -
AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND - WHY THEY MATTER? |
|
|
45]. The Act of Settlement
1701- why it should Concern you now? |
|
|
46]. Parliamentary Scrutiny
is it Objective - Does It Speak For The People? |
|
|
47]. Terrorists or Freedom
Fighters - You Must Decide? |
|
|
48]. 101 REASONS TO LEAVE
THE EU - PART 2 |
|
|
49]. 101 REASONS TO LEAVE
THE EU - PART 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART 2
FOR ALL LISTED BULLETINS FROM
2003-JAN-2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click Here to view the Eurofacts File. |
|
|
|
|
|
Click Here to return to view the Iraq War file. |
|
|
|
August 1st, 2009 at 5:38 am
All you need to do is read the interview Bin Laden gave to UMMAT on Sept 28, 2001:
UMMAT: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?
USAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) for our guidance. I am thankful to the Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti-Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.
The U.S. has no friends, nor does it want to keep any because the prerequisite of friendship is to come to the level of the friend or consider him at par with you. America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates. However, our case is different. We have pledged slavery to God Almighty alone and after this pledge there is no possibility to become the slave of someone else. If we do that it will be disregardful to both our Sustainer and his fellow beings. Most of the world nations upholding their freedom are the religious ones, which are the enemies of the United States, or the U.S. itself considers them as its enemies.
The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American-Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.
Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.
UMMAT: A number of world countries have joined the call of the United States for launching attacks on Afghanistan. These also include a number of Muslim countries. Will Al-Qa’idah declare a jihad against these Islamic countries as well?
USAMA BIN LADEN: I must say that my duty is just to awaken the Muslims; to tell them as to what is good for them and what is not. What does Islam say and what do the enemies of Islam want. Al-Qa’idah was set up to wage a jihad against infidelity, particularly to counter the onslaught of the infidel countries against the Islamic states. Jihad is the sixth undeclared pillar of Islam. [The first five being the basic holy words of Islam ("There is no god but God and Muhammad is the messenger of God"), prayers, fasting (in Ramadan), pilgrimage to Mecca and giving alms (zakat).] Every anti-Islamic person is afraid of jihad. Al-Qa’idah wants to keep jihad alive and active and make it a part of the daily life of the Muslims. It wants to give it the status of worship. We are not against any Islamic country. We do not consider a war against an Islamic country as jihad. We are in favour of armed jihad only against those infidel governments, which are killing innocent Muslim men, women and children just because they are Muslims. Supporting the U.S. act is the need of some Muslim countries and the compulsion of others. However, they should think as to what will remain of their religious and moral position if they support the attack of the Christians and the Jews on a Muslim country like Afghanistan. The orders of Islamic Shariah [jurisprudence] for such individuals, organizations and countries are clear and all the scholars of the Muslim brotherhood are unanimous on them. We will do the same, which is being ordered by the Ameer-ul-Momeneen [the commander of the faithful] Muhammad Omar [leader of the Taleban] and the Islamic scholars. The hearts of the people of Muslim countries are beating with the call of jihad. We are grateful to them.
UMMAT: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the U.S. is not too difficult. U.S. experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is Al-Qa’idah not targeting their economic pillars?
USAMA BIN LADEN: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in the control of the American Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid down by them. So the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.
UMMAT: Why is harm not caused to the enemies of Islam through other means, apart from the armed struggle? For instance, urging the Muslims to boycott Western products, banks, shipping lines and TV channels.
USAMA BIN LADEN: The first thing is that Western products could only be boycotted when the Muslim fraternity is fully awakened and organized. Secondly, the Muslim companies should become self-sufficient in producing goods equal to the products of Western companies. Economic boycott of the West is not possible unless economic self-sufficiency is attained and substitute products are brought out. You see that wealth is scattered all across the Muslim World but not a single TV channel has been acquired which can preach Islamic injunctions according to modern requirements and attain an international influence. Muslim traders and philanthropists should make it a point that if the weapon of public opinion is to be used, it is to be kept in the hand. Today’s world is of public opinion and the fates of nations are determined through its pressure. Once the tools for building public opinion are obtained, everything that you asked for can be done.
UMMAT: The entire propaganda about your struggle has so far been made by the Western media. But no information is being received from your sources about the network of Al-Qa’idah and its jihadi successes. Would you comment?
USAMA BIN LADEN: In fact, the Western media is left with nothing else. It has no other theme to survive for a long time. Then we have many other things to do. The struggle for jihad and the successes are for the sake of Allah and not to annoy His bondsmen. Our silence is our real propaganda. Rejections, explanations, or corrigendum only waste your time and through them, the enemy wants you to engage in things which are not of use to you. These things are pulling you away from your cause. The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness.
UMMAT: What will be the impact of the freeze of Al-Qa’idah accounts by the U.S.?
USAMA BIN LADEN: God opens up ways for those who work for Him. Freezing of accounts will not make any difference for Al-Qa’idah or other jihad groups. With the grace of Allah, Al-Qa’idah has more than three alternative financial systems, which are all separate and totally independent from each other. This system is operating under the patronage of those who love jihad. What to say of the United States, even the combined world cannot budge these people from their path. These people are not in hundreds but in thousands and millions. Al-Qa’idah comprises of such modern educated youths who are aware of the cracks inside the Western financial system as they are aware of the lines in their hands. These are the very flaws of the Western fiscal system, which are becoming a noose for it and this system could not recuperate in spite of the passage of so many days.
UMMAT: Are there other safe areas other than Afghanistan, where you can continue jihad?
USAMA BIN LADEN: There are areas in all parts of the world where strong jihadi forces are present, from Indonesia to Algeria, from Kabul to Chechnya, from Bosnia to Sudan, and from Burma to Kashmir. Then it is not the problem of my person. I am a helpless fellowman of God, constantly in the fear of my accountability before God. It is not the question of Usama but of Islam and, in Islam too, of jihad. Thanks to God, those waging a jihad can walk today with their heads raised. Jihad was still present when there was no Usama and it will remain as such even when Usama is no longer there. Allah opens up ways and creates loves in the hearts of people for those who walk on the path of Allah with their lives, property and children. Believe it, through jihad, a man gets everything he desires. And the biggest desire of a Muslim is the life after death. Martyrdom is the shortest way of attaining an eternal life.
UMMAT: What do you say about the Pakistan Government policy on Afghanistan attack?
USAMA BIN LADEN: We are thankful to the Momin and valiant people of Pakistan who erected a blockade in front of the evil forces and stood in the first file of battle. Pakistan is a great hope for the Islamic brotherhood. Its people are awakened, organized and rich in the spirit of faith. They backed Afghanistan in its war against the Soviet Union and extended every help to the mojahedeen (freedom fighters) and the Afghan people. Then these are very Pakistanis who are standing shoulder by shoulder with the Taleban. If such people emerge in just two countries, the domination of the West will diminish in a matter of days. Our hearts beat with Pakistan and, God forbid, if a difficult time comes we will protect it with our blood. Pakistan is sacred for us like a place of worship. We are the people of jihad and fighting for the defense of Pakistan is the best of all jihads to us. It does not matter for us as to who reforms Pakistan. The important thing is that the spirit of jihad is alive and stronger in the hearts of the Pakistani people.
Source: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan -
Friday, 28 September 2001 – pages 1, 7.
Source: BBC Monitoring Service.
Source: http://www.khilafah.com/
Reply
Sui Juris Reply:
August 1st, 2009 at 5:39 am
Here is the most important part of that interview:
In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.
-Bin Laden Sept 28, 2001