VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

&

 AT THE REFERENDUM

WHICH MUST BE HELD IN THE FOUR NATION STATES

VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

EST.1994

-Elections 1997 - and EU election 1999-  POLICIES -Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-

CHRISTIAN HERITAGE

Top Topics and Stats

 

 

IMMIGRATION

 

 

 

FREEDOM CORNER

 

 

 

 

 

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

 

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED****HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

     
 

 

There are certain Principles of Civil Liberty, which at the end of the fifteenth century protected the Individual from the arbitrary action of the government.

 

They had been established in England in the Common Law, that is, in private rather than public law, but in America were made parts of the Constitution.  Hallam in his Constitutional History of England calls attention to them with the words:

 

‘‘No man could be committed to prison but by a legal warrant specifying his offence and by a usage nearly tantamount to Constitutional Right, he must be speedily brought to trial by means of regular session of goal delivery. The fact of guilt or innocence on a criminal charge was determined in a public court, and in the County where the offence was alleged to have occurred, by a jury of twelve men, from whose unanimous verdict no appeal could then be made’’.

 

Civil Rights, so far as they depended on the question of fact, were subject to the same decision. The officers and servants of the Crown, violating the personal Liberty or other Right of the Subject, might be such in an action for damages to be assessed by a jury, or in some cases, were liable to criminal process nor could they plead any warrant or command in their justification, nor even the direct order from the king.

 

The historian Bishop Stubbs commenting in the 19th century says:

 

‘’It is true that neither in the vague promises of Henry IV nor in the definite recommendations of Chief Justice Sir John Fortescue are to be found enunciations of the clear Principles or details of the practice of the English Constitution.

 

But the Constitution did not now require definitions. The discipline of the fourteenth century, culminating in the grand lesson of Revolution, had left the Nation in no ignorance of its Rights and Wrongs’’. 

 

The great Law of Custom written in the hearts and lives and memories of Englishmen, had been so far developed as to include everything material that had been won in the direction of popular Liberties and even of Parliamentary Freedom.

 

The Nation knew that the king was not an arbitrary despot, but a Sovereign bound by Oaths, Laws, Polices, and necessities, over which they had some control.

 

They knew that he could not break his Oath without God’s curse; he could not alter the Laws

or impose a Tax without their consent given through their Representatives chosen in the County Courts.

 

They knew how, when, and where these Courts were held, and that the mass of the Nation had the Right and Privilege of attending them; and they were jealously on the watch against royal interference in their elections. 

 

And so far there was nothing very complex about Constitutional practice: there was little danger of dispute between Lords and Commons: the privilege of members needed only to be asserted and to be admitted: there was no restriction on the declaration of gravamina, or on the Impeachment of Ministers or others who were suspected of exercising a malign influence on government.

 

When the king promised to observe their Liberties, men in general knew what he meant, and watched how he kept his promise….

 

Today the House of Lords may still legally try persons Impeached by the House of Commons for any crime or Political misdemeanor, but the last such trial was of Lord Melville in 1806.

 

The possibility of Impeachment proceeding being taken by the House of Commons of the countless Ministers of the Crown who over the last 40 years have ignored their Oath of office to HM the Queen will be the subject of intense interest of many historians in the future. All we can hope for today is a greater awareness of the People to the dangers to their Constitution and Freedom.

 

 

 

*          *          *

*

Words of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:

 

‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)

*

Brought forward from

 MAY/07

*

 
     
 

HOME