*

DON’T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY

THE DEADLY SILENCE?

Once again we are all made aware of our own thoughts which we are unable to express because of the scourge of Political Correctness by the timely article in Saturday’s Daily Mail by Max Hastings 12-8-2003 which exposes the dangers which have taken place because of the unlimited immigration policy of the present Government.

* *

‘ Millions of moderate Britons – deeply worried that limitless immigration is destroying their Nation’s Identity – are cowed into silence by the Left who argue that any discussion of this subject is racist. –What Nonsense!’

‘I think of myself as a one-nation Tory, a social liberal’, says Mr Max Hastings. ‘ I applauded Margaret Thatcher’s resurrection of the enterprise culture, deplored her indifference to the poor, favour Europe but not today the Euro, mistrust the police, loath capital punishment, want grammar schools restored and support university top-up fees’.

* * *

In Modern Britain, all these matters are contentious, but we can argue about them anywhere. There is one issue, however, about which all public exchanges are muted, stifled. The Left has driven debate on Immigration underground. It brandishes above the heads of every opponent of large-scale increases in the population of this Island that most terrible of charges – Racism. And that threat works.

Even the Conservative party, desperate to recover Power, holds back from assaulting the Government on its deplorable record, for fear of unleashing the wrath of the Liberal media. The worst legacy of Enoch Powell’s ravings in the Sixties is that they made it impossible ever since to hold a rational debate in Britain about Immigration.

Figures published this week show that the non-white population of London has topped two million, almost double the figure of a decade ago. Britain’s capital has become a Bable, as anyone who rides on a Tube or Bus perceives in a moment, among passengers drawn from dozens of Nationalities.

Enthusiasts such as London Mayor –Ken Livingston applaud the’ richness and diversity’ this creates. They speak of immigrants’ priceless contribution to the ‘London buzz’, rivalling the melting pot of New York. Livingston welcomes the inflow of immigrants, who account for almost a third of his city’s population.

‘ Our poll shows that nearly eight out of ten Londoners think that the city’s cultural diversity is one of its most attractive features’, he says. This may be true, but Mr Livingston fail to add that 80% of British poll respondents also wants more effective control of Immigration.

And the truth is that the real number of Immigrants in London is higher than the official figure, because so many illegal residents avoid censuses.

For instance, the latest survey records 45,000 people from the whole South American continent in London, yet the Columbian embassy believes Britain is hosting 150,000 of its citizens alone.

We know that more than 250,000 immigrants and asylum seekers are arriving here each year creating a net population increase of more than two million a decade.

The Home Secretary, ‘Billy’ Blunkett believes this does not matter. Last month, he said on TV that he perceives no particular upper limit at which the number of immigrants arriving in Britain would become un acceptable.

Some economists argue that immigration is not only essential to provide a 21^st century work force for Britain when its population is ageing and the birth rate falling.

We shall return to the economic issue later, let us address first the Social one.

Politics is an ongoing debate about what kind of Britain we all wish to live in. It is a wholly legitimate part of this debate to consider which outsiders should not be admitted to the privilege of joining our society.

The Left argues that anyone opposed to large –scale immigration is, ipso facto, a racist. This is nonsense.

No country in the modern world can close its doors to all comers, and few sensible people wish to do so.

But it is entirely reasonable for any citizen to believe, and to exercise a right to declare publicly, that he or she wishes to live in a community dominated by people who share our historic culture and values.

It is plainly racist to object to the presence in Britain of any given individual merely because of their colour or creed.

It is not racist to argue that we must set limits upon how many people of alien cultures or creeds can enter Britain within a given time span without imposing intolerable strains on our society.

At a time when housing the British people is a crisis issue for this overcrowded Island, Sir Andrew Green’s Migration watch (the independent organisation set up to monitor immigration policy) estimates that an additional 1.1 million new homes will be

needed simply to provide roofs for immigrants

The Government’s arguments about Britain’s urgent need for immigrant labour seem spurious.

It is indeed possible that, 20 years from now, we shall want workers. We do not need them now. Young workers arriving in 2003 will already be ageing by the time even the most pessimistic labour studies perceive a real need for their services.

Given the desire of many British people to keep working past retirement age, even if we shall no longer be capable of heaving bricks on building sites, the need for immigrant labour a generation hence remains highly speculative.

So why does the Government continue to admit legal immigrants in increasing numbers and to make no serious effort to exclude illegal immigrants and asylum seekers.

First, on the issue of asylum seekers, ministers perceive themselves bowing to the inevitable. The physical difficulties of keeping them out are enormous because Britain has abandoned effective frontier controls.

The Government absolutely refuses to contemplate abrogating the half-century Human Rights Conventions as a preliminary to effective action. These are failures for which Ministers should be harshly judged if or when a major terrorist atrocity takes place in Britain.

Thanks to the reckless abdication of responsibility, the authorities no longer possess reliable knowledge of movements across our borders by terrorists, never mind immigrants.

Second, a deep-rooted instinct in favour of Immigration pervades the Labour benches of the House of Commons.

The liberal media almost daily highlight examples of asylum seekers who have allegedly been victimised by the Immigration authorities and threatened with expulsion to persecution in their home countries.

The traditional socialist view is that immigration is a good thing, which makes Britain a more diverse and vigorous society, and that better any number of illegal immigrants than for us to renounce our historic role as a sanctuary for the oppressed.

Unfortunately, the ranks of the allegedly oppressed around the world today include millions of economic migrants who simply want a better life.

The facility with which even the poorest people in the world can travel renders the old liberal open-door vision utterly unrealistic.

It is impossible for the rich democracies to accept all those who yearn to come and live in them. It was a reckless act by Tony Blair for which he deserves to face the political pillory to grant a right to work in Britain to 72 million citizens of the new European members of the EU.

I asked a Polish friend the other day about the mood in his country.

‘They are all just aching to leave,’ he answered laconically.

‘The moment they become EU members, the floodgates will open.’

It is not a reflection of paranoia to suggest a further reason for: Labour’s inertia about Mass Immigration: it promises a political windfall.

It plays a significant part in fulfilling Tony Blair’s long declared aspiration to change the face of Britain forever.

Very few newcomers to Britain are likely to vote Tory, to embrace the old middle –class values which those cafetiere new- agers Blair and Brown so despire.

For many years, immigrants will be instinctive Labour supporters, just as new arrivals in the US almost always become Democrats.

I do not suggest that Tony Blair welcomes immigrants to gain political advantage. I merely submit that his Government is not making any serious attempt to exclude them, partly because their coming is good news for his Party. A year or two ago, I was teasing an old friend, a former Cabinet Minister of famously liberal convictions. What would his attitude be today, I asked, if he had to address the issue of Immigration? His answer surprised me.

‘ I don’t feel comfortable about seeing large numbers of People coming to live in this country that not only do not share our values, but have not the slightest desire to do so.’ he said.

Here, in a nutshell, is the view of a great many of us. I was amazed to hear it articulated by a legendary liberal, even if he would have flinched from saying as much in public.

Here, I think is the heaviest charge against the Government and its acolytes.

Far from encouraging immigrants to espouse our Traditional Values, Labour has fostered the pernicious cause of multi- culturism.

It has encouraged the view that anybody who comes to Britain can bring with them and establish in Hounslow or Reading or Coventry or Newcastle their own bit of India or Pakistan, Africa or Caribbean. This is the bit that sticks in the throats of millions of British People. Nobody expects the new arrivals, straight off the boat, will tuck into bed with Jane Austen or be able to recite within weeks a list of Marlborough’s battlefield triumphs over the French.

Yet it seems a wholly proper indeed essential, message to give to immigrants who come to Britain that they are welcome here if they come to share our lives, but not if they want to make a corner of England forever Bombay or Dhaka

It is monstrous that some English children have to learn Urdu in schools.

It is repugnant that the Labour Party

Appears willing in the name of multi-culturalism, to extend a tolerance to forced arranged marriages and the ritual slaughter of animals, which it denies to foxhunting.

Multi-Culturism does a huge disservice to immigrants themselves. Norman Tebbit’s suggested ‘cricket test’ was much derided and indeed abused when he proposed it.

His choose of words was ugly. But he made a Fundamental point that cannot be dismissed: the way to make immigration acceptable to the huge majority of British people, whose country this is, is to encourage immigrants to assimilate. National and social identities are precious possessions, which need reinforcement, not suppression.

If immigrants don’t want to celebrate Guy Fawkes’ Day or read the Canterbury Tales in school, then they might care to think of living somewhere else.

Of course, schools, institutions and public services must recognise the cultural and language problems of new immigrants. They should, however, be pursuing policies directed towards social integration, not

Separation.

On current trends, within a few years, children from ethnic minorities will outnumber whites in London’s schools.

‘White flight’ will accelerate this development, as the middle classes leave boroughs such as Southwark, Ealing, and Lambeth in search of lives for themselves and their children among what they perceive as ‘their own kind’ in other parts of the countryside.

Tony Blair’s Government is lying to the British People by suggesting that 250’000 immigrants a year is an acceptable or remotely desirable number if the stability and coherence of our society are to be maintained.

The only consequence of an influx on such a scale must be to increase popular resentment and hostility towards those who come.

Whatever Ken Livingston’s pollsters may tell him, millions of people remain determinedly English, children of the culture of Dickens and Trollope, Wellington at Waterloo and chocolate digestive biscuits.

Our London is – or was the City of Pepys and Pygmalion. The latest London Population survey is bad news not because many of the city’s new immigrants are bad people or unworthy citizens, but because their numbers have changed the character of the Capital without its Historic inhabitants being consulted about whether they wanted to live in an ‘exciting cultural melting pot’.

Immigration and its consequences should be at the forefront of political argument because they are matters of deep concern to millions of voters.

AS it is, however, when the LEFT is ready to attack even the excellent work of Sir Andrew Green’s Migrationwatch as a reflection of racism, many people feel obliged to vent their dismay and anger only behind closed doors.

The sooner the newly revived Conservative Party works out a policy on Immigration (and no more plans to invite mockery such as processing asylum seekers on off-shore islands, please Mr Howard) then the better for the health of the body politic.

We are not, thank goodness with ‘rivers of blood’ but we do face profound changes in our society, which this Government has no mandate to endorse. The British People care deeply about this, and are entitled to say so without embarrassment.’

(End)

* * *

WHAT Tony Blair is allowing to happen is the eventual destruction of a our Peoples Culture and way of life by permitting the influx of unlimited immigration of those of alien culture with the sole purpose of changing the character and culture of the indigenous People of our Island.

During the Second World War the Nazi’s almost destroyed an entire race whose origins where 3000 years in the past. The present means used by Mr Blair have a similar purpose- the vanquishing of the way of life and culture of Peoples who have existed in these Islands for over 1400 years by the flooding in of millions of immigrants of an Alien Culture many of whom have no desire to assimilate and who will in time wish to create many Foreign States within a State.

The Nazi’s were able to almost achieve their objective because other Nations failed to speak out and act to prevent such a Holocaust, and only the victory of the Allies in the Second World War, saved many who would have perished.

We hope our kin and friends throughout the world will voice their protest at the attempt to annihilate a People by our Government’s obsession with Political Correctness and Multi-Culturalism.

As already stated above there will always be a home for other Peoples of all nationalities and creeds but their numbers must be controlled for the benefit of ALL the People in our Island.

This will ensure the future cohesion of our Nation in the difficult and dangerous years ahead.

* * *

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets

FINALLY REMEMBER!!!

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is the United States Federal Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati. (See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM

-A struggle for the soul of the Jewish People by the Rt.Hon. Winston S. Churchill-written in 1920

AUGUST - 2010

TIME FOR DECISION-DECEMBER,2007

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*
The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
*
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE
'Rights and Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep by HER SACRED OATH
or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a THEME PARK in the future
THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.
We are told on the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of our
FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.
THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*

THE EU

WE-AND THEM!

WE are to join THEM
THEY are not joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY
THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
*
The Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
*
We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.
The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very noses?
Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.
We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.
IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION
and the need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
*

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

*

[All words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

OR

INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION. THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN. THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI. IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected

Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

A+MONARCH+THAT+BREAKS+A+CORONATION+OATH+
CANNOT+CLAIM+IMMUNITY+FROM+HIGH+TREASON+

BECAUSE+A+FIRST+MINISTER+SECRETLY

+CHANGED+THE+LAW

IN+1998.

THE+SACRET+OATH+IS+TO+THE+PEOPLE+

TO+PROTECT+THEIR+ACCUSTOMED+LIBERTIES+

AND+THOSE+OF+FUTURE+GENERATIONS+TO+COME

+IS +SACROSANCT.

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

BENJAMIN FULFORD

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

*

Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle

More!

More!

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

More!

+(More!

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

YOUR

PLANET!

AND

YOU!

NO NEED TO PANIC!

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

WHITTIER

MAY-2012

TOP OF PAGE

ADDED - MAY-2012



A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.
In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
*
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
*

A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

www.eutruth.org.uk

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

www.speakout.co.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM