101 REASONS FOR LEAVING THE EU - Part 2
We wish to express our indebtedness and gratitude to those
who in books and articles have sought to alert the Nation to its Danger, and
whose observations are reflected or summarised here: in particular,
Rodney Atkinson and Norris
McWhirter
for Treason at
Maastricht
Adrian Hilton for The
Principality and Power of Europe
Lindsay Jenkins for The
Last Days of Britain
And
For the late Lord Shore of Stepney’s
Separate Ways
Copies of this booklet can be obtained from the Publishers -Priced £1.20 incl p&p
St Mathew Publishing Ltd
24 Geldart St.
Cambridge
Tel: 01223 504871 Fax: 01223 512304
*
50
marching orders
In specifying that matters
affecting peace keeping are determined by majority vote, the Amsterdam Treaty
weakened Britain’s control over her armed forces, her veto lapsing once a
strategy for deployment is agreed, so that the possibility exists of her committed forces
becoming involved in conflicts contrary to her proper interests, or being
unable to contribute to her own defence.
51. critical tasks
A stated purpose of the
European Army in the ‘’Petersburg tasks’’, as being its use in
undefined’’critical situations’’, or, in the French Prime minister Lionel
Jospin’s more specific phase, ‘’to maintain internal security’’ (9th
May 2000), needs to be viewed in the light of the fact that the EU’s treaties
asserting the primacy of its law offer no mechanism for a member state’
withdrawal; of
the question how the EU would force its laws on a recalcitrant state; and,
particularly, of the history of nations liberating themselves, sometimes by
violent means, from artificial conglomerates.
52.
lost in pool
The most familiar example
of the verbal deception constantly used by the EU’s proponents has been the
notion of ‘’sharing’’ or ‘’pooling’’ of national sovereignty, despite the fact
that, amongst
the things incapable of being ‘’pooled’’ and kept, are an individual’s secret,
a husband’s wife, and a nation’s sovereignty, the pooling of sovereignty actually
dissolving it, since the nation concerned can thereafter be outvoted and overruled.
53.
treaties of subjugation
A recurring plea for the
EU is that Britain has never really been independent, but always depended on
the past on treaties of alliance with other countries, and so is merely doing
as before; but while former treaties have been agreements as to a line of
policy for a period, leaving untouched the sovereignty of the participants, the EU treaties involve
actual surrender to the EU of constitutional powers and of sovereignty itself,
and thus the loss for ever of Britain’s independence.
54.
sovereign provinces?
The commitment of the
signatories of the Treaty of Rome to the creation of an ultimate political
union in a European State, to which their electorates would not have consented, was disguised by
the treaty’s use of the unspecific and indefinite phrase’ ever closer union’’, which
can be variously interpreted, and seems to imply no more than good
neighbourliness and friendly co-operation between member states.
55.
double talk
The emerging European
State is constantly referred to by EU politicians ‘’as a union of sovereign
states’’; but the word sovereign, denoting absolute supremacy, dominion or
jurisdiction, cannot
apply to states which, having yielded up the powers constituting their
sovereignty, have thereby become provinces of the institution now possessing
their former sovereignty and exercising it over them.
56.
hold on….
The common assertion that ‘’three million
jobs depend on our being in the EU’’ is deceptive, in what these jobs depend on
is trade; that Britain being the EU’s biggest market, trading arrangements will
readily be forthcoming between the EU and an independent Britain; and that, in
order to trade with any state, one does not have to join it.
57.
metaphors assorted
Appeals that Britain must
not be left behind, miss the bus, or stand on the sidelines, but get on board,
jump in the driving seat, exercise leadership, fight our corner, and be at the
heart of Europe, belie
the truth that Britain will have greater influence on Europe and in the world
outside the European State as an independent nation, than inside it as a
province; instances of tail wagging dogs being somewhat rare.
58.
paper victory
The chief means of
securing the merging European State’s dominance has been the torrent of its
directives and mandatory regulations, affecting and gradually changing nearly
all aspects of Britain’s industrial, commercial and national life, which Parliament at
Westminster has been powerless to question, and almost as unable to scrutinise,
the number being over 30,000 since 1973.
59.
grace and favour
Although the EU and
British Government spokesmen have urged that ‘’subsidiarity’’ will remedy the
‘’democratic deficit’’ through the decentralization of power, powers once
apportioned to the EU, the so called ‘’acquis communautaire’’, belongs to it
for ever and cannot be touched; and any such minor freedoms as its lower structures may
be allowed will have been bestowed, not as of right, but as concession from the
governing authority.
60.
carve up
An important part of the process of
consolidating rule from Brussels is the setting up, by unofficial
self-appointed ‘’ constitutional conventions’’, and with government
encouragement, of artificial EU regions and ‘’parliaments’’ within Britain, to be
funded in some respects by grants from Brussels rather than Westminster, in
keeping with the Roman principle of ‘’divide and rule’’.
61.
take -over
An informal and highly
successful method of extending its authority has been Brussels’ creation of regulatory
agencies or ‘’networks’’, using the already existing Civil Service
organisations and staffs of member states, but requiring them by mandatory EU
regulations to report to the Commission, work according to its guidelines, and
constantly apply EU law: so including them in its own bureaucracy with minimum effort and
expense, and with no outward sign of their having been taken over.
62.
get them young
Since the plan is, by necessity, as much
concerned with the conquest of minds as with the acquisition of territory,
children and college students are receiving special attention through EU school
literature, and university professorships under the Commission’s ‘’Jean Monnet
Project’’ (102 by May, 2001) - funded
by Brussels, which also has the final say in who is appointed to these posts
(We now know the significance of the expression the ‘Enemy Within’. See further
details on bulletin- Constitutional No.12).
63.
hook or crook
The EU’s huge spending on propaganda and
‘’information services’’ (in 1996 amounting to £200 million) funds an extensive
range of projects, from ensuring the Swedish ‘’Yes’’ vote organisers had Twenty
times the finance of the ‘’No’’, to producing one-sided publications (contrary
to Section 407 of the 1996 Education Act) like ‘’Partners in Europe’’ for all
schools, or ‘’The Raspberry Ice Cream War’’ cartoon booklet, ‘’a comic for
young children on a peaceful Europe without frontiers’’, or for younger
children the colouring book ‘’Lets Draw Europe Together’’, with a slogan’’Europe,
our future’’ and picture of an infant carrying an EU banner and wearing a 12
starred nappy, to awarding grants through the secret Committee of the Soul of Europe organisation to British Churches’’
which explicitly promote the integration of Europe.’’ (This Nazi example of
conditioning the young is only the beginning of the ungodly and untrueful
message which the despotic and corrupt and parasitic members of the EU
Propaganda Ministry have in store for any misguided Soul who fails to see
through their Lies and Deceit.)
64.
muffled media
A disturbing feature in the sphere of
communication has been the consistently trivialised and EU-biased treatment of
the Europe issue itself in the TV and radio media especially, but also in much
of the Press, a situation confirmed with respect to the BBC by an (unreported) independent
survey commissioned by Lord Pearson of Rannoch, accounted for by T
Spectator (1st July 2000, p.24) as top-down institutional bias, and explicable
only in terms of official and media collusion.
65.
beached at nice
Provisions of the Nice Treaty, explained as
necessary for EU enlargement, but whose real purpose was to speed integration
through extension of qualified majority voting which had already minimised
Britain’s veto there to a mere 8.4%
66.
a game of forfeit
As a consequence of Nice, Brussels can,
amongst other things, sign international treaties binding on Britain without
her agreement, take over her seats on international bodies, appoint to
positions in the EU persons to whom she might object, make changes in the
operation of EU courts increasing their power over her own, and oblige her to
provide financial help for member states in economic difficulty; while Britain
surrenders the ability to subsidise its industries, to regulate the water
companies, and to decide its own policy on Immigration matters, leaving her
without effective control over which and how many people are let into the
country.
67. retractable
rights
Despite earlier denials by Blair administration,
the Charter of so called Fundamental Rights will both become part of EU law and
form the basis of a European State Constitution; but these ‘’rights’’, far from
being absolute and inalienable as under UK law, are held as being conferred
under the Charter, and capable of being withdrawn in the case of any person if
this is deemed in the interests of the European State.
68.
dangerous dissent
Much the same treatment extends to member
states, since, under the provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam (article F.1),
dissent expressed by a state’s political party, or by that state’s elected
government, and judged to be contrary to the ethos of the EU can lead to that
government’s being pilloried, and its electorate deprived of their rights under
the Treaty, including voting rights: a procedure which incidentally can render
any state’s veto inoperative, but which is in principle objectionable as
authoritarian and anti-democratic.
69.
but some are more equal
To these actual and potential encroachments
upon liberty must be added the EU’s assumption of powers to take action to
marginalize or otherwise suppress political parties, or what it terms religious
‘’sects’’ (the word on the Continent usually applied to Protestant churches),
which might be regarded as coming into conflict with concepts to be upheld
under the European State.
70.
absolutism
Arrangements for the victimisation or
suppression by any means of political parties or religious organisations are
unknown and alien to the Western democracies, being incompatible with
individual liberty and freedom of thought and speech which their constitutions
and parliaments exist t6o protect and promote.
71.
EuroArrest
The EU Arrest Warrant introduced upon the
plea of action against terrorism, covering a wide range of 32 offences most of
which have nothing to do with terrorism, and soon to apply to any alleged
criminal offence carrying a term of imprisonment of one year or more, is a
substantial instalment of Corpus Juris, imposed at the opportune moment following
the September 11th terrorist outrage in the United States.
72.
extradition on demand
The Warrant enables any state of the EU to
obtain the automatic extradition for trial under its own judicial system of
anyone from other member countries, without the production of evidence, and
without any court in that person’s country having power to intervene.
( This is
no Joke - but fact- which many of our citizens are unaware )
73.
criminality extended
Under the Arrest Warrant, offences previously
non-existent in British law now become crimes, under the categories of ‘’swindling’’ and
‘’xenophobia’’.
74.
a
doddle
‘’Swindling’’ is so vague a notion that
it would be easily possible for any litigant who wished to frame some sort of
charge against almost anyone on the basis of old figures or accounts. (Welcome to the world of
Corpus Juris from across our once impenetrable moat)
75.
opposite of conglomerophilia
Is the term’’xenophobia’’, meanng
fear of or aversion from foreigners, to be formally employed., as it already is
being colloquilly, for the purpose of vilifying those who, believing in their country’s
Independence, are against its integration into the European State, their
‘’crime’’ of patriotism constituting a new kind of heresy?
76. wait and see
An MP who inquired what
the thus-termed offence of zenophobia consisted of received the government reply that its definition would be a
matter for the presiding judge at the defendant’s trial; a statement which,
however absurd in itself, is evidence of a threatening development.
77.
terrorists galore
Of equal note is the
definition of ‘’terrorism’’ in the EU legislation as an act of intimidation
with the intention of’’seriously altering…political, economic or social
structures’’, and as the ‘’unlawful seizure or damage to state or government
facilities, means of public transport, infrastructure facilities, places of
public use and property’’: a category so broad that those engaged in public protests,
demonstrations and civil disobedience could now find themselves charged as
‘’terrorists’’.
78.
euro-and beyond
Though repeatedly asked, Mr Blair has refused
the reasonable request to publish a statement of the political and
constitutional consequences of Britain’s joining the euro; and in his
Birmingham speech of 23 rd November 2001, summarily dismissed all such
considerations with the words,’’if the economic tests are met, political or
constitutional barriers should not prevent us joining’’ : of course, without
clarifying what the political and constitutional barriers are.
79.
curtains
Simply stated, the
consequence of our joining the euro would be Britain’s inability to conduct
monetary policy, the passing of control over taxation and public spending, and
thus of our economy as a whole, to the government in Brussels, and since such
control underlies a nation’s existence, the end of Britain as an Independent
Nation State.
80. masters of our fate
Britain’s joining the euro
would involve up to 80% of her wealth reserves( some £22 billion ) being transferred,
together with control of her economic and fiscal affairs, irrevocably into the
hands of a number of unelected bankers in Bonn, who by the Amsterdam Treaty
(article 108 ), are not obliged to seek or to take instruction from any outside
body concerning their conduct of monetary policy or the establishment of
interest rates.
81.
a leverage for liberty
Words of a great prime
minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point: ‘’The finance of a
country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a
powerful leverage by which the English liberty has been gradually acquired. If
the House of Commons by any possibility loses power of the control of the
grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very
little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as
the power of the purse - the control of the House of Commons over public
expenditure’’ (1891)
82. prosperous city
Responding to claims that
the City of London would suffer if Britain stayed outside the euro, David
Llascelles, leading member of a City think-tank, pointed out that in the 3
years since the founder members of the EU locked their currencies together, the
City of London had not only flourished, but won the lion’s share of
international business denominated in the euro; and that its future
independence would be a major asset at a time when it is increasingly difficult
for financial centres to differentiate themselves, and would also protect its
link with the US and the rest of the world, which represent 2/3 of its total
activity, in comparison with the 1/3 of its dealing with Europe ( European
Journal, November 2001)
83. big deal
The visible economic
disadvantages of Britain’s EU
membership range from the loss of fishing waters (soon to become an EU
asset) and damage to fisheries and farming, to the £1,000 penalty upon family
budgets through protectionist taxes on food, and the £11 billion per year
payment to the EU; but the unseen cumulative effect of the restriction of
Britain’s advantageous trade with her natural world markets is far more
actually and potentially damaging.
84. gift-horse’s mouth
Although
just over half of membership costs are returned in Brussels’ grants to the
‘regions’’ of Britain, the EU dictates how the grants are to
be spent, so taking over the formal role of Parliament at Westminster, and
using the redistribution of what is British money as the means of its growing
dominance.
85. clouded horizon
The dangers of membership
were demonstrated by the failure of the ERM attempt to link Britain’s currency
rate with those of \Europe, estimated to have cost around a million jobs and
bankrupted 150,000 businesses; but symptoms like the riing unemployment in
France and recession in Germany, and the enormous European pensions debt of £10
trillion ( to remind you that just one trillion is £1000 billion ) , which British taxpayers
would have to help remedy, are indications of problems in the making
86. the euro zone
A recent issue of the European
Central Bank’s Monthly Bulletin which points to a continuous decline in
productive growth in Europe over the last 40 years, and forecasts little if any
future growth, promptred Professor Tim Congdon, managing director of Lombard
Street Research, to blame’’ the excessive regulation, high taxes and labour
market inflexibility found in the eurozone’s member’s, and warn that , if the
British people say ‘’Yes’’ to the euro, ‘’they will be burying their nation in
a region of policy failure and stagnating living standards, which will suffer
drastic relative economic decline in the 21st century’’ (European Journal, December 2001 )
87. a pointer
The fact
that the protectionism and costly social programmes favoured by its politicians
have significantly hindered economic growth in Europe, while in the same period
Britain’s avoidance for the most part of such restrictive policies has resulted
in what the
City terms ‘’eight years of uninterrupted economic growth’’, is a pointer to
the European State’s future, and to Britain’s true interests.
88. sale of birthright
Thomas Jefferson, third
President of the United States, once commented,’’ A nation which seeks to trade
its political independence for economic gain deserves to lose both’’. If she
stays within the emerging European State, and continues to submit to government
from Brussels, Britain will lose both her Prosperity and her Independence.
89. a question
The waste and in competence
displayed in its 10-year efforts for reconstruction in the Balkans despite the
huge sums spent, typified by such things as the non-materialisation through bad
management of projects for water supply and removal of chemical waste , and the
construction of motorways in Greece when the need is for a local network of
roads, must (according to Andreas Oldag, Sudeutsche Zeitung, January 2002)
raise the question of how efficient the EU will be in the administration of
public affairs.
90. a refusal
The EU Court of Auditors,
which for many years in succession has heavily criticised the way money is
spent, wasted and stolen from the EU budget, has again in 2001 refused to
accord its certificate of reliability to the European Commission in view of the
high level of mistakes in the budgets fior agriculture and the structural
funds, which make up some 50% of the total EU budget ( Handelsblatt, 13Novenber
2001.
[ As at December 2006 -The EU has still not had its accounts passed by
its accountants.]
91. a scandal
The cronic tendency to
corruption in the EU was highlighted by the revelation in 1998 by Paul van
Buitenen, a Commission auditor, of massive fraud in some of the biggest Commission projects, involving close
friends and family members of the Commissioners, but though van Buitenen’s
disclosure forced the resignation of the entire Commission, almost all had soon
reinstated themselves: and two years after Commissioner Neil Kinnock’s appointment to
eradicate corruption, Die Welt reported that ‘’little or nothing had been
changed…the new Commission is just like the old’’ (5th April 2000)
92.. independent Britain
There is more prospect of
prosperity and security for this country as a member of the North American Free
Trade Area (NAFTA ), in which Britain and her people would be able to trade
world -wide, retain all their historic rights, privileges, and suffer no loss
of national independence.
93. a kinship in liberty
Historically, culturally and
politically, Britain has far more in common with the English-speaking peoples of the North
Atlantic and the Commonwealth countries, who together have imparted to many
nations the lesson of liberty, developed the world’s oldest system of
representative government, been the first to recognise inviolable and
fundamental rights , and created judicial systems free from influence or
interference by the state.
94. separate ways
This profound kinship, and
the need to sustain it politically by
separateness from Europe, was uppermost in the mind of Winston Churchill
when, in his famous Zurich speech in September, 1946, envisioning a future
union of the Continental states, he described Great Britain, the British Commonwealth
of Nations and ‘mighty America’’ as its prospective ‘’friends and sponsors’’ offering
support and help; and observed, ‘’
‘’We are with Europe but not
part of it.
We are
linked, but not combined. We are interested and associated, but not absorbed ‘’
* * *
DESPOTISM IS:
[‘ Everything by the EU- but nothing by YOU
’]
(More Reasons to follow shortly.) Or
you may order a booklet (£1.20pinp&p) from:
St Mathew Publishing Ltd
24 Geldart St. Cambridge
CB1 2LX
Tel. 01223 504871. Fax. 01223
512304
For
further information about the EU.
*
FROM
A Prime Minister in 1848
to another
Gordon Brown in 2007
Over a Hundred and Fifty
Seven years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister -Foreign Secretary -Lord
Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) -beloved by his People defined the principle of
nationality as follows:
“ Providence meant
mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have
been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by
separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)
“…We have in the
first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that
course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to
attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that
which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life
attempts to please everyone,
invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more
successful in such an endeavour…
. It must at times be
an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit
England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty,
Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown
for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces
corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar
Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties
and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”
For a full statement of his Principles:
“I hold with respect to
alliances that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful to
steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the
policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England-apart
from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or
commercial-is to be the champions of justice and right, pursuing that course
with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving
the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice
is, and wherever she thinks wrong has been done…
It is a narrow policy to
suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the
perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal enemies. Our interests are
eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.”
[In 1848 Lord Palmerstone was Foreign Secretary at the age of sixty-three.
He entered Parliament in 1807- Secretary at War in 1809; 1811-28 (most years)
War Office; 1830- 1852 Foreign Office; 1852-55 -Home Office; 1855-65.
‘ Born 1784 in Park Street
Westminster. Family home ‘Broadlands’ Hampshire. Died on the morning of October
18, 1865. And the last candle [last of his contempories] of the Eighteenth
century was out.’
* *
[It is significant that
the word ‘England’
was not a word despised in our House of Commons during the time of this great
patriot of England and only closer to our own times has the word Britain taken
its place though we do detect a slight revival now in existence. ]
* *
Words
of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:
‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the
country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually
acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the
grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very
little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as
the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)
*
*
Let the people speak!
www.makeitanissue.org.uk
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY
WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH
IN IRAQ
*
67%
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
ALSO
JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST
Readers can add their support to the growing
clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing
Street 0n-line petition
(http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/)
The Petition reads as follows:
"We the undersigned petition the Prime
Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding
REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any
or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."
Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008
Eurofacts 27th July 2007.
*
'The Spirit of
England'
by
Winston Churchill
In London on St.George's Day -1953
*
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST
ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT
,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]
SCOTLAND -ITS
PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a separate
bulletin]
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin]
[Read above what other patriotic
Englishmen and women say about the subject which few as is our
nature wish to talk about.]
*
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its Second Reading on
Monday 21st January. This sixth and final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon
Treaty, formally replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January
2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of
Germany, Angela Merkel.
The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the
nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster
Parliament, and giving the EU the power to close it.
The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo executive in
Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU
parliament has no power and is a sham.
Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left. Gordon Brown was
lying: the Treaty is worse than the constitution.
This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has
drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is
growing, and they know speed is vital.
This Commons vote, one of the most important in our history, was
largely unreported by our controlled press and media.
The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this spring, 2008
Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty in February (not
much for its own abolition). They will probably have the final
ratification vote in March. The Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter,
plans to give her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and
the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the other five
treaties.
No referendum
German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of pushing it
through as a constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations.
She twice visited 10 Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel
both his promised referendum, and his General Election.
"Anti-EU" groups have
encouraged us to call for a
referendum precisely because
the EU has already
prohibited it. They know we
are wasting our efforts: our
four party leaderships take
their orders from the EU,
not from the voters.
How to fight
The real course of action is to change the minds of 70 MP's and get
a majority against. MP's have been selected on the Party list system
over the last 20 years to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs.
These MPs now need to understand the EU has the constitution (the six
treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws of a police state, and when
enforced, its 111,000 regulations will create a government command
economy, soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty.
They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put this
dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they are the greatest
threat to take it out of power. All dictatorships in the past have
eliminated that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even
worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and
held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these hated
traitors will suffer severely.)
Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this. (Instructions top
left)
The EU remains illegal
Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British
Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our
common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our
Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these
treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation.
The EU will always be
illegal in Britain; but once
the EU has complete power
and control here, we can no
more get rid of it than we
could Germany, had their
planned illegal occupation
of Britain in 1940 been
successful.
The Countdown to abolition
Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five
treaties and replaced them with a single document conferring absolute
power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing
them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with
appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony
Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s
back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC),
when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty.
Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at the resort
of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in Lisbon on the 18th
and 19th October, where they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown
signed it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most criminal
act on the statute book.
The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were already in force;
they are consolidating their power each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform
Treaty and the other five seize all remaining power from our Westminster
Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining
powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor
powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus
elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will
get in the future.
Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and a British
General Election is due. The six treaties make no provision for an
election to our Parliament. By that time the EU will have consolidated
its absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that
election and to close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule
what was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional capitals, by
passing Westminster, from which every function will be removed.
Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is
a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They tried twice
before in 1914 and 1939. Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU
to succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt School subversion
techniques on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of
Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.
You have 11 months left
Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just 11
months left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us
out of the EU dictatorship.
Around 45 million British
people are against the
abolition of our nation, and
with the little European
voting that has been
allowed, it seems clear over
200 million of its victims
don’t want the EU. But we
will never be given the
choice. YOU have to decide
to act yourself.
There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left.
Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal
MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time.
Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC.
Original 2009
article from German Parliament -.pdf for download
Then check it at the German Parliament
here
|
Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two pages each.
Your Campaigns
Ten EU truths
Reform Treaty one
page
50 reasons to leave
EUtruth flier
Common Purpose
Abolition of Councillors
Abolition of 48 Counties
Map: the 9 EU regions
Transnational regions
Reform Treaty full text
EU Constitution, one page pdf
EU Constitution: one page
html
Signs of EU police
state
The EU's degraded our lives
What will the EU be like?
List of British traitors
Beef up the British Constitution
Lib Lab Con: One Party State
The Queen
The EU's Hitler
The EU costs £200 billion pa
The dictatorship: Quotes
UK > EU handover of power.
EU subversion diagram.
Subversion: Common Purpose
Frankfurt subversion.
The terrorism deception
Abolition of our 48 counties
Abolition of Parliament.
Church flier
Some revolutionary lyrics
drjn.co.uk - copy of this site
The Westminster News
The Devonport Column
The Cornish Free Press
The British Free Press
Government disinformation
Mobilisation talk
Blueprint to get out
SS child snatching
Wood's rigged elections
Stood for the leadership
Where we are now:
1. Since 1972 The Queen has illegally signed five of the six
EU Treaties.
2. The five treaties define and build the EU as an unelected
dictatorship.
3. The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give it the powers
of a police state.
4. The sixth EU treaty will complete the abolition of Britain
as a nation
- the Queen is due to sign it this year.
A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and enforce the
laws of a police state.
Shouldn't we repeal the 1972 European Communities Act
now
before we are imprisoned permanently inside? We've only got till
July 2008.
Please fight the campaigns at the top of
the menu on the left.
The
leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties have
been controlled by the European Union for two decades. It is the
EU agenda they implement in Parliament, not your wishes, which
is why your vote doesn't count.
Our controlled press and media haven't reported it, but
Britain would have been abolished in November 2006 if the
French and Dutch hadn't voted down the EU Constitution.
Instead a sixth and final Treaty will now be signed; after
which EU Commissioners will have the power to impose the
Constitution (and the Euro) on us, and enforce the laws of a
police state.
5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have you noticed how
our democracy is being withdrawn?
The EU has already denied us that most basic of human rights -
the right to vote against the EU and to keep our own nation. A
majority of us don't want to be in the EU. We are being forced
in against our will.
Do you feel you've become powerless, unable to influence
events, or your vote is worth less? The six treaties have been
gradually removing our democracy; for thirty years our laws have
been "harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the laws now passed by our
Parliament are EU laws, not ours. Isn't the real reason people
have lost interest in politics precisely because the EU has
taken away our ability to change things?
Common law, where the government was our servant, is now
largely replaced by the EU's Corpus Juris, which puts the
government above the law, and we don't participate. We have
already lost most of our rights (including habeas corpus). The
power of government grows unchecked, as does that of large
corporations. Politicians continuously lie about the EU,
pretending its not significant.
6. Massive EU corruption
The EU's auditors have found the fraud is so widespread they've
refused to sign off the EU's accounts for each of the last
ten years. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU
Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn't account for
95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply fired for
telling the truth.
7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU
Europe works by bribing politicians with huge salaries and
expenses to vote for Europe, against the best interests of their
own voters.
As a result all three parties are in favour of the EU -
Westminster acts like a one party state of politicians: the
Lib-Lab-Con. The parties are run top down and implement the
policy of their leaderships, not that of their members.
(unfortunately UKIP is run in the same way). If you have voted
for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since 1969, you have voted
for the EU dictatorship.
8. EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil
Service, our local government, and our 7,000 quangos.
A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy,
headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.)
It includes many parts of government including the RDA and the
Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation,
the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across
many government organisations including some city and county
councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is
destroying from within.
Common Purpose is the glue that enables fraud to be
committed across these government departments, most of it lining
the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats. It often involves
the sale of public assets such as land to friends of politicians
or their businesses. (The RDA -The EU Regional Development
Agency, is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the
handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and
expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the
theft of our money as taxpayers. The Chief Executive Officer of
Common Purpose is Julia Middleton of the ODPM.
9. Businesses closing under EU regulation
The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully enforced, will
transform Britain from a free market economy into a Soviet style
command economy, closing hundreds of thousands more businesses.
They will also control our personal lives far more closely than
were those of Soviet citizens. (In a Parliamentary answer to
Lord Stoddart in January 2003, the government admitted there
were 101,811 EU regulations, growing at 3,500 pa).
The cost of Britain's 8,500 quangoes is £124 billion a year,
and they raise an additional £40 billion from us in charges,
according to the Cabinet Office. The Public Bodies Directory
2006 describes only 882 of them. Most exist to enforce EU
regulations; nearly all should be closed.
10. The EU costs us £200 billion pa, 20% of our economy
According to the government's Better Regulation Task Force
Annual Report 2005 (Introduction written by Tony Blair,)
complying with EU regulations now costs our economy over £100
billion a year.
By far the largest treasury expense is now the £167 billion
spent on the EU's 8,500 quangos, (Cabinet Office figures) most
of which enforce EU regulation. This is patronage, bribery,
putting thousands of officials and influential businessment on
£100,000 - £300,000 a year salaries. That's why the Exchequer is
so desperate for cash and can't pay for the navy, nurses,
students etc.
Economists say we lose £80 billion pa by associating with the
EU's inferior economies. The EU took our fishing industry, which
costs us £5 billion pa. EU damage to other industries (like
forcing us to close the Rover Car Co) a further £20 billion. Our
EU contribution is a relatively minor £10 billion, the only bit
the Press discuss.
Before we joined the EU we had an even balance of trade with
them. Now EU regulations have fixed it so we lose £30 billion
year trading with the EU on our balance of payments. We'd be
enormously more wealthy if we left.
The main use of taxes is now to finance government and its
greedy whirlpool of waste; they've doubled in real terms in the
33 years we've been in the EU. There's less money in the economy
left for wages, creating a growing underclass who can't make
ends meet.
11. Our counties to be abolished
The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which adopts the EU
Regionalisation Plan. This will abolish England's 48 counties
and replace them with 9 European regions, each with their own
Regional Capital, which reports directly to Brussels, not to
Westminster. This effectively obliterates the country of
England. For example the County of Cornwall is replaced by the
South West Region, which stretches from Lands End and includes
Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its regional capital is Exeter.
As this move is unpopular it is being kept low-key and will not
be implemented until the sixth treaty is signed, when we lose
our right to object.
12. The deliberate destruction of our standards and way of
life,
From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work
Sundays for derisory pay - or they don't get a job, to the
deliberate undermining of the family and teachers, to sex
education for the under 13's, to children being given obscene
homework, its all traceable via our compliant government back to
the EU over the last 34 years, as it sucessfully implemented the
subversion of the Frankfurt School. While inside atheist Europe,
British Christianity has almost died out; safety on our streets
and a great chunk of civilised life has left with it.
13. The EU has controlled our immigration since 1997
In January 2007 on the front page of The Westminster News we
forecast 1.5 million immigrants for the year, and people laughed
at us. On January 24th 2008 the Daily Express published
government figures of 1.3 million Polish immigrants alone for
2007. With Romania and Hungary joining in that year the total
was probaly double that. The Amsterdam Treaty handed control of
our immigration to the EU. 30,000 a year used to arrive - the
EU's increased it by 60 times That's why house prices
have been screaming up, even though the population of original
British people is falling.
Politicians and huge corporations like immigration - with
thousands of immigrants available on low pay, they can impose
the minimum wage on millions. Politicians then lie that they
can't get British workers to do dirty jobs. The truth is they
won't offer a decent wage, and cynically use immigrants to drive
wages down, adding to the huge underclass.
The Government pretends there are a maximum of 145,000
immigants annually, and 1.5 million new houses will be needed to
house them. But then Jack Straw admits that 2.6 million
immigrants applied to stay here last year.
Our infrastructure and services can't stand such huge numbers
and is breaking down in some cities, where English people are
becoming a 10% minority. But the EU controls it, not the Foreign
secretary, and he has no power, no options but to do as EU
policy dictates, and accept it.
Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January 2005 when he
said he'd fix immigration - as Prime Minister, he'd have had no
control over it whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing
immigrants first - new immigrants move into their areas,
decreasing the wages and increasing the pressure on housing.
If the sixth Treaty is signed, we lose our right to
withdraw and Britain ceases to be a nation. Like the other six,
it only requires two signatures: the Prime Ministers, and the
Queen's |
|
Examples of how our lives
have degraded since we've been in the EU:
In the EU, (which means in Britain) government is
above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now pervades right through our
legal system. A policeman was let off by magistrates
this year (2005) for driving his private car at 159 mph
in Ludlow, Shrops. Under Corpus Juris the government are
above the law and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled
correctly under EU law. 45,000 police officers got off
speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their
speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail
27.12.05.)
EU "monitoring Officers" have the right to dismiss
our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of
the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to
spy on every council. If an elected councillor disagrees
with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards
Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years.
An example is in Cambridgeshire, where the ODPM has
threatened cllr Alex Riley with suspension if he attends
any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new
town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe on his ward. The
ODPM has the conflict of interest here; but its powers
are becoming absolute.
We have lost the right to freedom
The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th
November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge
and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor,
make a phone call, or even a right to a trial. You can
simply disappear.
Under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act
(SOCPA) 2005, we can now be arrested and held in the
cells by any police officer for any petty offence, like
dropping litter. Before it had to be an offense that
carried a 5 year jail term. This also applies to all of
the EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know them all?
The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to
confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no
right to object. This includes your house. It also gives
government the right to forceably move its population
around to different locations; you can be left with no
place to call your own and live like a refugee. The only
check and balance here is a Minister just needs to utter
the words "This is a national emergency." If a
demonstration or strike government doesn't like is being
organised, they can cut off all communications in a town
- phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all
access to that town including closing roads and
railways. It has all the powers and more of Hitler's
Enabling Act of 1933.
We have lost the right to free speech
At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82
year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to
the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist"
legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense"
at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq. Terrified
the true nature of the laws they have passed on behalf
of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party
stopped the police and begged the man to return to
conference.
On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested
under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005,
for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the
names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war.
She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and
found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th
December 2005.
Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a
foreign power, with oppressive laws like these, ? That's
what's happening.
We have lost the right to protest
These laws make protest very difficult; if we did hold a
General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now
require some bravery: the powers the EU has demanded
from our government enable it to respond in a way
similar to the Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square
should it so wish.
It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's
offices in Westminster are guarded by police with
machine guns, inside and out.
The Governments "terrorism" deception
All these new EU laws, including massive "anti
terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed
with the pretence they were only directed at
terrorists, or in the case of Asbos, ruffians who
terrorise the streets. In each case they are used far
more often against ordinary law abiding people,
particularly to suppress dissent. (91% of those detained
under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been
improperly arrested. Most of the remainder are charged
with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism,
but cover up over zealous arrests).
We have lost the right to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need
democratic authorisation. Just two senior police
officers authorised the police to kill British people. A
democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even
that would not have legalised the killing under British
common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian,
Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground
station, even though he was being held down by police
officers at the time of the execution. The police used
dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention
because they blow a man to pieces inside.
The police can no longer be convicted for killing
innocent people - Philip Prout shot at Lewannick in East
Cornwall is just one of 30 people shot dead by police
since 1992 when corpus juris crept in. At least one was
shot in the back; most were no threat to anyone. Not
once since 1992 has a policeman been convicted of any
crime for these murders.
Have you noticed this growing police state?
In addition to many more laws than those above, add the
107,000 regulations, and whole bureaucracies such as
VOSA building up networks of cameras and databases to
record our movements and criminalise us when we can't
comply. Persecution is no longer confined to motorists;
under EU Corpus Juris our courts have become extensions
of government power instead of independent arbiters of
justice.
Westminster had passed sufficient of the EU's
oppressive laws (the "harmonisation" in the Treaties) by
the end of 2004 that we have been living in what is
legally a police state since then. But at the moment,
its only one per cent enforced. After the Queen signs
the sixth Treaty, the EU has the absolute power to
enforce 100% of its regulations and laws.
|
|
|
On the basis of the laws and treaties
already signed by our Queen and Prime Ministers,
What will
life be like in the EU after
the 6th Treaty is signed?
Our Westminster Parliament immediately becomes pointess
as its remaining powers are transferred to Europe.
It is the formal end of Britain and England as
nations.
Britain's 153 embassies around the world will be
closed as the ink from the Queen's signature dries. (As
Tony Blair refused to admit this has been agreed to,
Jose Zapatero, the Prime Minister of Spain, confirmed it
in a February 2005 radio broadcast.)
After the EU abolishes our 48 counties your address
will change from 4 High St, Taunton, Somerset, Great
Britain, to 4 High St, Taunton, Area K, European Union.
(The glorious EU county "The South West Region" has had
the postal address "Area K" assigned for over a decade.)
The Official National Anthem of the EU, which you
should have known since 1971 is based on the melody "Ode
to Joy" by Beethoven, formally replaces God save the
Queen. The EU flag replaces the Union Jack, the red,
blue and white nautical ensigns etc. (The EU Commission
has already ordered (24.11.2005) our Merchant Navy to
fly the EU flag in place of the red Ensign.)
The EU takes ownership and command of our Police,
Army, Royal Navy, RAF, nuclear weapons, currency
reserves, North Sea Oil. (See the EU Constitution below)
Serving officers in our police, army, navy and air
force already know they will have to take an oath to the
EU instead of to the Queen. If they don't many have been
told they will be dismissed. The EU will have complete
military control of the UK.
The UK Independence Party will be banned under the
1999 ruling of the European court of Justice case
c274/99, where it was held that it is illegal to
criticise the EU.
The Conservative, Labour and Lib-dem parties will be
abolished (only pan EU parties like the EPP or PES are
allowed -see clause I.46.4 of the EU Constitution). It
will then be blindingly obvious to even the dumbest
politician there is no reason to keep Westmister open,
and that the EU has the legal right to close it.
Many people will be excluded from the jobs they know
best, as the EU's demand that you must pay to be
re-taught the job, and pay for a certificate before you
can be employed, becomes universal.
Hundreds of thousands more small businesses will
close on the enforcement of the remaining 100,000 EU
regulations our government has already passed. Several
million will be permanently unemployed as a result.
We will all be criminalised by the 107,000
regulations. Its impossible to know or understand
107,000 regulations, and the poor can't possibly afford
to comply. We will all be subject to frequent fines and
arrest as a result. Here are just 4 examples:
Under EU regulations it is now illegal for you to
repair your plumbing, electrics or your car (from 1st
January 2006). If you buy a boat over six feet long,
built after the EU Recreational Craft Directive of 1999,
and don't pay the EU £4,000 to "measure" the boat, you
get 6 months imprisonment. We will live under permanent
threat of arrest and fear of the knock at the door that
takes us away.
Massive corporations will do well, but with huge
immigration allowed from the EU, they'll be able to pay
minimum wage everywhere, not just in the provinces as
they do now. If you don't accept the minimum they'll
employ a Pole or a Czekoslovakian.
Big corporations will also have a near monopoly (with
the government) on employment and will be able to
dictate unfavourable terms to staff without fear of
contradiction.
Plum government jobs and corruption will ensure the
wealth of politicians, bureaucrats, their businesses and
associates at all levels of government, including local
government and amongst our 7000+ quangos.
Society will divide into two: the remaining 60% of us
will be either unemployed or treated abysmally on
minimum wage.
Taxes will rise more steeply to pay for the even
larger explosion in government growth and corruption
There will be no redress through local democracy
because there won't be any. The nine UK regional
governments, which replace our 48 counties and
councillors, will be unelected (see the European
Regionisation plan). Our only vote is to the powerless
EU parliament. We will be ruled by the 25 unelected
Commisssioners, and have have no redress at any level;
we will be as poor but have less freedom than Soviet
Citizens.
If we demonstrate or protest we can be be seized and
relocated to another region. The EU Arrest Warrant and
Civil Contingencies Act 2004, with 20 other oppressive
Acts the Queen has signed between 1972 and 2005, give
the government absolute power over us. They can shoot us
if they wish with no legal comeback - the shootings of
innocents Philip Prout and Jean de Menezes were entirely
legal under EU law.
The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as Germany used to
pick on Jews, has already begun. Europe will be a very
nasty place.
How long will the EU last?
Eventually, perhaps 15 years down the track, Europe will
collapse under the weight of its own corruption,
bureaucracy, and regulations. There will be so few
productive businesses that even at 100% tax rates we
will not be able to support the massive, corrupt and
wasteful government. Many of us will be starving in the
lead up to the collapse. After the collapse we may be
able to leave the EU, if a dictator has not taken
advantage of the complete absence of democratic checks
and balances by seizing power. The Constitution of the
EU is similar to the Soviet Union's. That dictator is
free to choose between a Soviet or Nazi style
government. Then it could take 70 years to break free.
|
|
|
Fifty years
ago our greatest threat might have been violence or
mugging. Now the greatest threat to our economic well
being, our way of life, our freedom and the very
existence of our nation, is our own government.
|
.
|
|
*
Let the people speak!
www.makeitanissue.org.uk
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY
WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH
IN IRAQ
*
67%
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST
ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT
,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
SCOTLAND -ITS
PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a separate
bulletin]