The Tories failed to curb power of EU Court in 1996- No
better chance in 2005
We are only a few months from a General Election in May
2005 and it is almost a certainty that Michael Howard will promise
to claw back from the European Court of Justice their right of
jurisdiction in amendment of the 1972 European Communities Act or make
other promises which will prove to be fruitless as in the past.
In the Respected journal Freedom Today (www.tfa.net ) an article appeared in June
1996 which include an edited version of Iain Duncan Smith MPs recent
23rd April [All patriots know what that day means to a True
Englishman] - speech introducing his ten Minute Rule Bill to clip the wings
of the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. It attracted the support of
77 Tory MP’s.
[Knowing how easily Tony Blair was able to sign the New
European Constitution in Rome in 2005 it would be hard to believe that there
are such a number of Eurosceptic Conservative MP’s in existence but we call on
them to put Country before Party and join the UKIP before the election in May
2005, because some of them will certainly lose their seats.]
*
The Bill I present to the House today I believe a simple
one. It would amend the European
Communities Act 1972 for the purpose of disapplying rules and doctrines of the
European of Justice (ECJ) by the mechanism of an Order in Council which had
been approved by the House in draft form first.
I drafted the Bill over a month ago, and at the time I
raised it we were on the receiving end of a bizarre ECJ decision on Spanish
fishermen, but since then we have seen the European Court overthrow our
painstaking negotiated opt- out from the Social Chapter. The terrible European Union ban on British
beef, which is tearing an excellent industry apart, sadly will not be affected
by this Act.
A Political Court
Yet despite the way the European Court affects British
citizens, too few understand its ethos, for the European Court is a political
court which sees its role as the architect of full European integration. Its rulings have far reaching implications,
now enabling British courts to overturn Acts of Parliament on such issues as
part-time workers’ rights.
In
making its judgments, the European Court often interprets the intentions of
national governments, which signed the relevant European treaties
[Mainly by Conservative Governments and
many of their MPs in collusion with Labour when in office.]
This
gives the Court huge licence to make legislation, which national governments
must obey. In so doing, it has changed
general statements on sex equality or health and safety at work into very
powerful doctrines, and extended the power of the European Union’s
institutions.
We are therefore witnessing a process of judge-made law,
which goes far beyond the traditional scope of British courts, and cut
across the vital concept that law-makers should be fully accountable to their
electorate.
[Well!
Mr Duncan-Smith why don’t you ask your Tory grand traitor Edward Heath why he
got you in such a fine mess and which your present leader Michael Howard in
2005 has no comment?]
To continue- Furthermore, once it makes such a ruling, it has
been decreed by the Court *that the relevant power is forever lost to
national government - the insidious doctrine of the *-acquis
communautaire.
The European Court’s recent
fishing decision provides an excellent example of how my Bill will
operate. In this case the ECJ not only
overturned a British Act of Parliament, the Merchant Shipping Act, but has gone
further, because in a recent European case-Frankovitch-the Court created a new
doctrine that national governments could be liable for damages, and applied
this in the case involving the Spanish fishermen.
[Why Duncan -Smith appears so
surprised by events when Edward Heath could have put him the picture years ago
in fact in 1972 possibly earlier.]
Yet this is not something that had been agreed
between EU member governments or was written in the Treaty. The Court had simply decided it was
“inherent in the scheme of the Treaty” [Isn’t that right Mr Heath?] and as a result the British Government may have to £30 million of
taxpayers’ money in compensation.
[It is naïve of politicians to have expected that the ECJ
would not have introduced its own un-English brand of Equity-if you join the
Club then you must obey the rules-ask Edward Heath and Tony Blair and Kenneth
Clarke and Paddy Ashdown and all the other traitors to their country.]
This
adds an additional element to the Common Fisheries Policy, which now allows the
Spanish to take a huge proportion of our fish quota, resulting in the demise of
a once great British fishing industry
[Which Edward Heath a fellow Conservative threw away when
negotiating the entry into the supposed EEC those many years ago -Ask him Mr
Smith -he will tell you if you don’t already know?]
What is ironic is that many of
our European partners whose implementations of these ECJ judgments is way below
ours, have constitutional court mechanisms, whereas we in Britain have no such
mechanism. It is therefore high time
that this Parliament, which is meant to be the guardian of our Constitution,
was able to review European Court judgments and if necessary seek to get them
changed politically.
[Our Parliament the once guardian of our Constitution
gave away our Constitutional Rights when they passed the 1972 European
Communities ACT- the only way to get change is to leave the EU-there is no
other viable solution.]
The Government has determined to
get the ECJ’s fisheries decision changed (1996) at the Inter-Governmental
Conference, although I understand we have not yet tabled any proposals. However, I expect the Government will do so
very soon.
[Well
-there is a General Election in 1997 isn’t there-we know we where there because
we no longer trusted the Tories to get us out of Europe.]
Yet in the meantime, we cannot stop British courts settling
claims brought by quota-hopping Spanish fishermen
[Here again-the only person to blame is Edward Heath
-maybe he will make some recompense to the taxpayer.]
Thus when the Government succeeds
-as succeed they must- in getting the judgment
overturned,
[They Didn’t] taxpayer’s money will have been paid out unnecessarily, not to mention the cost
of the Court’s time.
[What over confidence-once again underestimating the
Brussels machine]
Parliament should therefore act
now to stop the cases going through the British courts, by giving itself the
power to review not only the ECJ’s fishing judgment but also other judgments
and decide in each case on the course of action.
A Bill like the one I am
introducing (1998) should pass through swiftly without opposition, for if any
party opposed it they would have to explain to the great British public why
they preferred to have taxpayers money spent on ridiculous projects-to which
the British never agreed-rather than defend their interests.
Furthermore,
the Constitutional Court in Germany, for example, reviews European Court
Judgments. It has even confirmed the
German Bundestag’s authority to decide whether or not they abolish the
Deutschmark and whether they join a single currency at the turn of the
century. This would breach European law for Germany does not have a British
style opt-out on monetary union in the Maastricht Treaty. Yet there was not a murmur of comment when
they did this. And they are not alone,
because the French under article 55 of their Constitution, have similar powers,
as have other EU member countries. In
fact these Constitutional Courts almost universally have made it clear that in
any clashes between European law and their own Constitution, it is their
Constitution, which prevails.
The
British people have a right to ask why should we at least not choose to
exercise similar powers of revision.
Yet
there is one thing this Bill would do which seems to have created concern
amongst some, particularly the judiciary: It is that I am proposing to amend
the 1972 European Communities Act.
Although
they will not say it publicly, some would have us believe that we as a
Parliament cannot amend this Act at all and that we may only repeal the 1972 Act
[Great! -Do-it] unless it has
agreed this with other members of the European Community.
The
argument they use is that we sacrificed these sovereign powers when we signed
the Act confirmed in the referendum. Yet
our Rt. Hon Friend for Bexley and Sidcup, Sir Edward Heath made it clear at the
time there was no question of handing over Parliament’ sovereign powers, and I
prefer to be guided, as were the British people, by that statement. [Fool you!]
[What a silly -Billy he is after
there has been so much information in the public domain to remind everyone how
deceitful were and are Politicians in withholding vital TRUTHS from the People]
But
at the heart of this objection lies a serious misunderstanding of what it was
that we actually agreed to do back in 1972, for nothing in the Treaties we
signed defined the way in which Britain should deal with its relationship with
European law and court judgments. For
it is the European Court which has created new doctrines not primarily agreed
in any of the Treaties and it is by such a process that the power of the
central EU institutions has been enhanced.
For example:
The Doctrine
Those
individuals may invoke European Community ‘Directives’ before national courts-made in Van Duyn
case
Those
national courts cannot question the validity of Community instructions such as ‘Directives’- made during the Fotofrost case.
That
Community law had direct effect and created individual rights-made in
the Van Gend En Loos case.
And
most remarkably that the European Commission, when creating a ‘Directive’ must
always choose an article covered by qualified majority vote (QMV) because that
takes precedence over any other article-made in the Titanium Dioxide case.
This is not the Rule of law as
understood in Britain, where laws have been made and crafted by Parliament, scrutinised
line by line, opposed throughout by an official opposition and then handed to
the judiciary for application. At
stake, therefore, is the great question of whether Parliament should remain sovereign
because it has been entrusted by the British [people] with their rights and freedoms,
or whether we are content that they should be handed over to Brussels bit by
bit as the European Court rules.
This Bill is an opportunity for
us to restate our belief in the sovereign rights of the British people.
Freedom today, June 1996.
*
[Fonts
altered-bolding and underlining used-comment in brackets.]
[We
believe that it will be a long time -if ever -that the British people rely on
any promise of the Conservative Party in the years ahead. Their only way forward would be to change
their Party name, which has been dishonoured since Edward Heath signed the 1972
European Communities Act and the successive new Treaties passed by the Party or
supported by them since that time.
[The reason in showing to you
the
plan of Iain Duncan-Smith’s abortive
attempt in 1996 to curb the power of the European Court is so that when the
people hear the promises of Tony Blair or Michael Howard of their intention to
claw back power from the European Court of Justice you will have seen the
difficulties which lay in the way.
One can tell that the EU is getting nervous when the
new President Mr Barroso exclaims the virtues of the British system and some
changes he is hoping to get implemented in the future-less Directives- with
only a few months from our General Election in May 2005]
All we will say is that many voters were fooled in
1972 & 1975 and by successive governments since and there can be no mistake
in 2005.
Don’t Let Them Fool You Again?
[True Independent Facts about the EU can be obtained
from Independent and Government sources - don’t take our word -find the facts
this time round-many web-sites listed in a number of essays on our Bulletin
Board - but in the end you have to ask yourself do you wish to be governed by strangers
or by your own historic Parliament accountable to the People not to Brussels]
FEB/05
*
* *
*
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
*
Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
SAY VOTERS
by
Daniel Martin
Political Reporter
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the
controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last
week's
IRISH REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in
the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF THE
TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
|
*
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
*
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the
absolute necessity of a
REFERENDUM
HEAR HIM ON
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
*
*
13th October,2007
*
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
on
21st January, 2008
*
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
DUAL CITIZENSHIP
-both
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
BRITISH DOCUMENTATION
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER
08]
*
*
|
|
|
|
CHRISTMAS
SPECIAL!
A BLUNT REPLY TO THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th
DECEMBER ,2007.
*
TIME
FOR DECISION
THE BRITISH
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
MATTER.
*
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
-YOU!
*
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
THE COMMONWEALTH
and AMERICA
*
The
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
Europe- 4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
*
WHY WE MUST BE
ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS
MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
*
IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT
OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO
WINS?
(John Mortimer)
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE
LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
THIS
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
OF THE
'Rights and Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep
by HER SACRED OATH
or the
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
THEME
PARK in the future
THIS IS
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
DIRE PERIL.
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
FREEDOM
and COUNTRY.
Change we
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
THERE CAN
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which
will still survive in the English Speaking
World today in December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is
already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who wished to sell our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
LIBERTIES WORTH?
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
*
*
The
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*
THE EU
WE-AND THEM!
WE are to
join THEM
THEY are not
joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
THEY have
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
*
The Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
*
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
As for
the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has
been the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
POWER.
The reason
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
noses?
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
AWAY.
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's
responsibility it is to CARE for their
FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of
CHRISTMAS.
IF HER
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should this
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony
Benn's comments about the despotic and
corrupt
EUROPEAN
UNION
and the
need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
a
UNITED
STATES OF EUROPE.
*
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
*
[All words/word underlined have a
separate bulletin] |
|
|
|
|
A
CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
TO
ALL OUR
VIEWERS.
WE WISH YOU ALL A
HAPPY
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY
NEW YEAR
IN
2008
[Since our
Xmas message to you all last year we find
that our sentiments remain the same with the
added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR
COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR
HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR
COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]
We Remember The
Year 2006
The
Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953
[We
were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of
our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had
taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just
THAT while everyone had their minds they
thought on more important matters. Well! in
2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is
leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the
final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year
PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN
HER
MAJESTY-THE QUEEN
Of the House
of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd
and Darling of England' in the annals of 893
-897
'We still
leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
that
England was saved to become the first
individual nation -state which over 1100
years later a member of that same House of
Wessex has already signed away much of those
ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and
only awaits a final signature to enslave her
people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
UNITED STATES
OF EUROPE
It is
within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to
refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because
whatever lies her ministers have given her
over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear
for ALL TO SEE.
In the
Netherlands a number of years ago their
MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign
the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY
is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200
years in the making. It is the treasonable
actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed
THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection
of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS
as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
GOD SAVE
THE QUEEN
*
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
*
A
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
by
Harry Beckhough
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
2004
*
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT any MORE
|
|
|
|
|
THE EU
OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF
AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD
'Don't tell the voters-or you
will ruin everything '
"...we have to make sure
that there are no discussions taking place
in the open air"
Guenter
Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US,
warning that details of the new EU
diplomatic service (officially to be known
as the External Action Service) should not
be discussed in public before the
UK
PARLIAMENT
had
ratified the NEW EU TREATY
and Ireland has held
its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer
(source: EU Observer on 27th
November ,2007
The EU has also stated
that none of its institutions should rock
the boat until the English have ratified
their TREATY.
Over the next few months
you will hear more than ever the wonderful
benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global
warming or whatever they feel shows them in
a good light and when you have swallowed the
bait you will not know what has hit you.
They intend to show how reasonable they are
and that they are there to make you happy.
If you all fall for this con-trick then you
will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store
for
YOU!
Referendum: how Labour
could still smell of roses.
and
'Money to spare'
when we leave the EU in
2008?
Open Europe says:
-
Build 40 brand new
general hospitals each year 2007-13
or
- Cut council tax
by nearly 50 per cent
or
- Cut the
basic rate of income tax by 3p
or
Cut petrol
duty by 75 per cent
or
Pay the
total bill for the London Olympics
in less than a year
AND MUCH
MORE
Commons debate
on the European Communities
(Finance) Bill on Monday 19th
November,2007.
REFERENDUM
DAY
will be
RECOMPENCE
DAY?
*
A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN
FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING
VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND
COUNTRY.
|
|
*
Let the people speak!
www.makeitanissue.org.uk
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY
WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH
IN IRAQ
*
67%
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
ALSO
JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST
Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a
REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line
petition
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/
The Petition reads as follows:
"We
the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people
will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the
EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."
Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008
Eurofacts 27th July 2007.
*
'The Spirit of
England'
by
Winston Churchill
In London on St.George's Day -1953
*
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST
ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT
,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
SCOTLAND -ITS
PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a separate
bulletin]
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
VOTE
MAY -2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
Home Rule for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
MAY/07
[All underlined words have a separate
bulletin]