IMMIGRATION-CONTROLLED IS NOT
RACISM BUT COMMON SENSE
In
the Daily Mail, Tuesday, March 22, 2005 a timely article by Max Hastings
has once again shown how the present Government have undermined the very culture
of our country by the flood of immigrants and refugees from across the world
with no thought of the future consequences.
*
IMMIGRATION
BY
Max Hastings.
It’s the social issue that dare not speak its name but the
truth is Mr Blair is presiding over an irrevocable shift in the character of the
country.
There is only one Tory election issue that seriously
scares New Labour, and of course it is immigration.
The
influx of hundreds of thousands of newcomers to Britain dismays a huge number of
[English] people, and the report published this week by MigrationWatch will fuel
their alarm.
The
study, based on data from the Government’s Office of National Statistics (ONS)
shows that nationally almost 20% of babies are born to immigrants, while in some
areas the figures are much higher.
In Inner London, for instance, 55% of children are born to
migrants. In Cambridge, Birmingham,
Bradford, Leicester, and some other cities, the figure is more than 30%.
According to the ONS, of the six million increase in national population
predicted for the next 25 years, five million will be immigrants and their
children. This represents an extraordinary change in
the make-up of the [English] people.
The Government’s own Cohesion Panel acknowledged last July that, in some areas,
the pace of the influx is simply too great for local communities to cope.
Yet
nothing effective is being done to stem the flow. Most Ministers assert defiantly that [England] will need
immigrants a generation hence to provide a young workforce to compensate for the
falling birthrate among native-born [English] people.
But
the truth is that Tony Blair is presiding over an irrevocable shift in the
character of the country. He seems perfectly content that this should be taking
place, irrespective of the clearly expressed wishes of the British people to the
contrary.
Pernicious
The implications for housing policy, and thus for the
destruction of countryside, as well as upon our national culture, are enormous.
Yet
in debating this - or rather, in not debating it nearly as much as we should -
we suffer the disastrous legacy of Enoch Powell. He made it politically disreputable to attack immigration,
which has become the great national issue, which scarcely dares to speak its
name.
Those who demand curbs on immigrant numbers are often denounced - not least from
Labour benches in the House of Commons - as racists.
This
is stupid, indeed pernicious. The
British people inhabit one of the most overcrowded spaces in Europe, so it is
reasonable to question whether we should welcome more people, even if each of
the five million new Britons we are promised over the next generation were
called Nicole Kidman or5 Russell Crowe.
As Gordon Brown seemed to recognise in some recent remarks, the UK faces a
serious issue,
if not a crisis of identity.
In
the mad pursuit of the folly of multi-culturalism more and more people of all
races are confused about who and what, exactly, the British - which means
themselves -are supposed to be.
If
it is important to control the influx of migrants to preserve the stability of
our society, it is even more important to ensure that those who come here learn
to share with us a common sense of values.
It
is the unwillingness of some Muslims, especially, to do so that causes dismay to
many thoughtful people.
There can surely be no place in any future vision of Britain for forced
marriages, the subjugation of women or-in a society which has banned foxhunting
because it is said to be cruel -for halal butchery.
The
argument here seems perfectly simple, even if it is unacceptable to many
Left-wing politicians: anyone who wishes to live in Britain must consent to do things our way.
That
does not mean sacrificing their religion, food and friendships. It does mean accepting a commitment to
liberal democracy and to the English language.
Yet we, the British, should recognise that our identity
problem goes deeper than anything to do with immigrants. For several generations now, our own
traditional bonds and loyalties have been weakening.
All the forces that held us together for so long - Empire,
the Monarchy, the Church, the memory of shared experience in two World Wars -
have been fading, as those to whom they meant so much die off.
George Orwell, a passionate Englishman, identified 70 years ago some of the
things he thought of as most English: bad teeth and gentle manners…the clatter
of clogs in the Lancashire mill towns, the to and fro of lorries on the Great
North Road.
“The queues outside the Labour exchange, the rattle of the pin tables in the
Soho pubs, the old maid biking to Holy Communion through the mists of early
morning…solid breakfasts and gloomy Sundays, smoky towns and winding roads,
green fields and red pillar boxes.’
Today, many of these sights have gone. Some cannot be lamented, for we are better
without them. There is no future in
nostalgia.
Challenge
We should acknowledge that in many respects, for a great
number of people Britain today is a brighter place than it was in Orwell’s time.
The
challenge is to create a credible British vision for the future. This is not easy when 66% of Scots, 43%
of the Welsh and 26% of English told researchers at Nuffield College, Oxford,
a few years ago that their sense of Britishness was ‘weak’ or non-existent’.
Most of us believe that, without wanting to go backwards,
pride in our own history is an indispensable foundation. The decline of history teaching in schools
and universities is a disaster - and I mean the fall in quality as well as
quantity.
How can any child be expected to feel much excitement about
the past when asked to interpret it through a study of the early 19th
century Poor Law rather than battles, kings and queens?
Led by the Prime Minister
we have become absurdly apologetic about our past. In truth, for all Britain’s past follies and
failures, anyone who comes to live here is joining a society, which has
been one of the foremost, most creative and inventive on Earth.
Some educationalists say
that it is absurd to try to make an immigrant child interested in the Battle of
Waterloo, when his own family’s past is in Pakistan, Afghanistan or the West
Indies seems vastly more real.
The answer, surely, is
that his family has chosen to break the link with his own historic legacy, and
to invest in that of Britain. How can he
or she expect to share this country’s future without its past.
Realistic
Norman Tebbit’s proposed
‘cricket test’, which caused such ire in liberal circles 15 years ago, was
flawed because cricket no longer stands at the heart of British life, for
reasons which have to do with changing lifestyles and enthusiasms.
Today, it seems much more
realistic to talk about a ‘football test’ a ‘pub test’ or a
‘countryside test’.
In an age when most of us
are middle-class, plenty of common strands of Britishness remain identifiable: a
love of green places, if this Government allows us to preserve any of them;
beer; PG Wodehouse and Agatha Christie, Jane Austin and Trollope; old buildings
and bridges; Coronation Street and the Archers.
These things, and maybe
also, somewhere in our hearts, a deep conviction that British is best.
The latter quality is
among the most important. It represents
not foolish vanity, but a whole-some pride in what we have been - and in the
fact that, for all our problems, today by any measure this is one of the
most successful societies on Earth.
Our job is to keep it
that way, by asserting our identity not in any jingoistic way, but with quiet determination.
[Regrettably this will not be sufficient if the New European Constitution should
be ratified by Parliament which would put the people into two camps as at the
time of the last Civil War over 350 years ago.
Those
loyal subjects of the Queen rather than Parliament this time will we expect do
more than quiet determination to fight for the return of their ‘inherited rights
and liberties’.]
To continue:
WE may welcome a tolerable
number of newcomers of all races who want to share our lives and our
Britishness, but are rightly suspicious when those numbers become so great that
our very national identity [whether English -Scottish or Welsh] is in danger of
being submerged.
It seems absolutely
right, however, to reject those who merely want to establish islands of their
culture and values in the midst of ours.
Britain can continue to be all that we know and value only
if the host of newcomers and their children accept the social terms of entry
that we are entitled to demand.
That is not racism, but common sense.
* * *
[Font altered-bolding used-comments in brackets]
MARCH/05
*
*
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
*
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the
absolute necessity of a
REFERENDUM
HEAR HIM ON
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
*
13th October,2007
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
DUAL CITIZENSHIP
-both
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
BRITISH DOCUMENTATION
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER
08]
*
|
|
|
|
CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!
A
BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.
*
TIME FOR DECISION
THE BRITISH
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.
*
The Act of Settlement of
1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!
*
The Common Law of ENGLAND
is the LAW of
THE COMMONWEALTH and
AMERICA
*
The Commonwealth Realms V
The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
*
THANK GOD WE ELECTED
A MONARCH
(by the Late -William Rees-Mogg-Independent
Peer)
*
WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND
WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
*
IF WE DESTROY OUR
RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?
(John Mortimer)
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS
QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE
LAST
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE
YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT
OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE
WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD
BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF
OUR PROTECTOR OF THE
'Rights
and Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep by HER SACRED OATH
or the MONARCHY be nothing more
than a THEME PARK in the future
THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS
THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.
We are told on
the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday
the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has
footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as far as many patriotic
subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns
the protection of our
FREEDOM and COUNTRY.
Change we have had and will continue
to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of
England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and
Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened
in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights
and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in
the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of
PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity exercise is to be used to
soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a
Monarch since James II who wished to sell our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and
RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT
PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?
THEY ARE
PRICELESS!
*
*
The Choice is Yours!-but time is
running out FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*
THE EU
WE-AND
THEM!
WE are
to join THEM
THEY are
not joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of
dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY
THEY have
been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our Queen and the EU
Constitution
*
The Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH
THE II
*
We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT
on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic
fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year
reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and
the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR
CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel
LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE
GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost
achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.
The reason for the marked drop in the
number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people
have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while
Rome burned'
Is
it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks
our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very
noses?
Of
course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and
Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to
be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the
MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.
We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who
is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this
late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE
some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and
LIBERTIES.
As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE
at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for
their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.
IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been
pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER
subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should
this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is
after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and
therefore nothing more than a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony Benn's comments about the
despotic and corrupt
EUROPEAN UNION
and the need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a politician with INTEGRITY and
love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the
monstrous creature soon to be a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
*
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
*
[All
words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]
|
|
|
|
|
A
CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
TO
ALL OUR VIEWERS.
WE WISH YOU ALL A
HAPPY
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR
IN
2008
[Since our Xmas message to you all last
year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added
emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors
in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN
POWER]
We Remember The Year 2006
The Spirit
of England-Winston Churchill-1953
[We were warned in 1953 to
beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken
Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds
they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor
Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final
signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000
year PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of
ENGLISHMEN
HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN
Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred
'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897
'We still leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state
which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has
already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final
signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE
It is within the power of Her
Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever
lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now
clear for ALL TO SEE.
In the Netherlands a number of years
ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put
before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over
1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS
which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the
Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE
DEPEND.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
*
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS
QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
*
A
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
by
Harry Beckhough
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
2004
*
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT
any MORE
*
THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL
PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD
'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '
"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions
taking place in the open air"
Guenter Burghardt, a former EU
ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic
service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should
not be discussed in public before the
UK PARLIAMENT
had ratified the NEW EU TREATY
and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next
summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007
The EU has
also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until the
English have ratified their TREATY.
Over the
next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of
the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in
a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what
has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they
are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you
will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for
YOU!
Referendum: how Labour could
still smell of roses.
and
'Money to
spare'
when we
leave the EU in 2008?
Open Europe
says:
-
Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13
or
- Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent
or
- Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p
or
Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent
or
Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in less
than a year
AND MUCH MORE
Commons debate on the European Communities
(Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.
REFERENDUM DAY
will be
RECOMPENCE DAY?
*
A TIME FOR
EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING
VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.
*
|
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
Home
Rule for
Scotland
WHY NOT
HOME
RULE
for ENGLAND
*
FOR RETURN TO
IMMIGRATION FILE
*