The
Secret Government
[This will explain
why there has been
no disclosure to the
public of the
traitorous
activities of the
RING of TRAITORS
from BALLIOL
COLLEGE-OXFORD
-Edward Heath - Roy
Jenkins and Geoffrey
Ribbon whereas those
CAMBRIDGE COMMUNISTS
were EXPOSED.
*
EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED
AS ILLEGAL
by
A criminalized
organisation
Monday 10th
October, 2005- London.
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE
THIS ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING
DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’
TOMORROW
The European Union
Collective is
illegal and so
extensively criminalized
that it has become all
but indistinguishable
from
a criminal organization.
It is
illegal
because key EU treaties
were procured by means
of slush fund payments.
It is
criminal
because, being born
in corruption, its
procedures are designed
to mask the corrupt
activities of many of
its officials, while it
publishes false
accounts.
Britain is free to leave
immediately, as
explained below.
These findings are
published today the 10th
October, 2005 in the
latest issue of
International Currency
Review, the
London -based Journal of
the International
Financial Community.
·
The fraudulence of the
European Commission’s
accounts necessitates
urgent consideration of
its Triple-A Credit
Rating by the leading
Rating Agencies. Precise
evidence of the
fraudulence of the EC’s
accounts is presented in
the issue. (Normally
this scandalous state of
affairs is
‘successfully’ shoved
under the carpet).
·
International Currency
Review has advised the
agencies accordingly,
and anticipates that
they will carry out the
necessary overdue
reassessment of the EU’s
‘integrity’. In the
event that zero action
is taken, given the
extreme gravity of the
evidence of
institutionalised
accounting fraud
presented in the
journal,
the integrity of the
Credit Rating Agencies
themselves may be called
into question - not
least by
International Currency
Review.
This may have
repercussions for the
International Financial
Community generally.
*
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION
IS ILLEGAL AND
ILLEGITIMATE
But first things first.
The illegitimacy and
illegality of the
European Union-and thus
of
ALL its
constituent structures,
including the European
Central Bank - arises
from the following
facts:
The British Treaty of
Accession was signed by
two agents of the German
‘Black’ Nazi
intelligence continuum,
DVD
-This
is the ultra-secret
German Nazi continuing
‘Black Operations’
intelligence
organisation based,
appropriately enough, in
Dachau, near Munich.
Intelligence concerning
the existence was passed
to the
Editor of
International Currency
Review:
Christopher Story FRSA -
Veteran UK financial and
intelligence analyst
E-mail: cstory@
worldreports.org
Telephone +44-(0)
20-7222 3836
by
British intelligence
sources
The Editor then had its
contents checked out by
high -level US
intelligence contacts,
who confirmed the
entity’s existence and
importance.
There remains some
uncertainty about what
the initials
DVD stand for-
alternatively
Deutsche Versicherungs
Dienst [German
Insurance Agency] or
else
Deutsche Verteidigungs
Dienst [German
Defence Agency]
- the context here
being that DVD is the
intelligence [Abwehr]
continuum of the
NAZI INTERNATIONAL
Originally established
by the Nazi
Abwehr
as the German
Geopolitical Centre in
Madrid in 1942.
Therefore, in this
context, ‘insurance’
would mean ‘insurance’
would mean ‘insuring the
continuity of Nazi
global hegemony strategy
for the controlling
a
Thousand-Year Reich.’
While ‘defence’ in this
same context would mean
‘defending’ the
continuing covert Nazi
global hegemony
strategy.
DVD
is not funded by the
German Government and
Taxpayer, since it
operates its own covert
sources of giga-finance;
but its primary
operations and strategy
are routinely approved
by the
German Chancellery.
Any official denial of
this fact is a lie
To continue:
The signatories, both -
of
The British treaty of
Accession whom
received
substantial financial
rewards for
their ‘co-operation’,
were
Edward Heath and
Geoffrey Rippon.
Together with the late
Roy Jenkins, they
were recruited by the
German
Abwehr while
studying at
Balliol College, Oxford.
This intelligence has
emerged since the recent
death of
Sir Edward Heath [Another
Traitor amongst many who
have been honoured by
the Queen with a title]
*
THE E.U. TREATIES ARE
ROUTINELY PROCURED BY
FRAUDULENT MEANS:
That is to say, official
signatories and senior
policymakers/operatives
have received
substantial corrupt
payments, remitted to
their secret offshore
bank accounts, in
exchange for their
‘co-operation’ in
pushing through
successive E.U.
Treaties.
The bribery funds are
derived from a colossal
secret ‘Black
Operations’ slush
fund account located in
Switzerland -the title
and size of which is
divulged in the REPORT.
For instance:
$5.0 billion was
allocated in 2004 from
the secret Swiss slush
fund to ‘procure’ the
European Constitution
Treaty,
divided into two
branches:
1)
$2.5 billion was
allocated (and paid out)
on completion of the
Inter Governmental
Conference [IGC],
in July/August of 2004,
with $100 million
allocated for each of
the
25 EU’Member States’.
The corrupt bribery
funds were remitted to
the National officials
concerned in
Euros.
2)
A further $2.5 billion
($100 million for each
‘Member State’) was
payable on ratification
of the Collective
Treaty.
Given the negative
referendum results
delivered by the French
and Dutch electorates,
payment of the second
branch has been a matter
of understandable
tension and contention
ever since, not least
since such ‘Black’
remittances, which are
common place at the
intergovernmental level
are illegal -and
therefore ‘never
happened’.
Intelligence sources
have provided
International Currency
Review with the NAME of
the secret Swiss bank
account, the vast amount
of ‘Black’ money it
holds, the amounts
allocated for each
corrupted EU ‘Member
State’, plus the names
of three of the most
prominent alleged
recipients of ‘Black’
payments, together with
details of the alleged
transactions concerned.
[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU
THINK BUT THIS REPORT
MUST PUT THE PRO-EUROPE
FACTION LITERALLY IN A
SPIN AND FEAR OF THE
OUTCOME WHEN THE
CONSPIRACY IS FULLY
REVEALED]
We have more to follow
*
EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY
THE DEATH OF
SIR EDWARD HEATH
These revelations have
become possible
following the death of
Sir Edward Heath,
who was a German agent
and asset for six
decades -
the longest known
foreign intelligence
penetration in modern
history.
It is significant
that the extensive
Obituary of Heath
published in the
Guardian
on 18th
July 2005, closed with
the cryptic sentence:
‘He [Heath]
remained determined that
he would be vindicated,
until close to the end.
This referred to the
fact
that when Heath visited
Salzburg in 2003,
ostensibly to attend the
Music Festival there,
the real reason for his
visit was that he had
been summoned to
Dachau, where
DVD officers warned
him that
British intelligence
were intending to
confront him with his
treachery.
It is reported that, on
hearing this, Heath
literally ‘blew a fuse’:
he suffered a pulmonary
embolism.
A similar fate
attended the demise of
the late
Roy (Lord) Jenkins
who suffered a severe
heart attack when
confronted by
intelligence officials
with the fact that he
was about to be exposed
for his long-term
treachery against the
United Kingdom.
Roy Jenkins was one
of the most lethal of
all long-term German
agents operating at the
highest levels of the
British Government.
And
-the present allegedly
deeply compromised Tony
Blair is the late Lord
Jenkins’ protégé.
Heath, Rippon
and
Jenkins were far
from being the only
long-term. High-level
foreign penetrations by
the
DVD-the successor
‘Black’ (continuing
Nazi) intelligence
organisation to the
Abwehr.
In the United States,
the
Dulles brothers were
German agents to this
day. Substantial
transfers of ‘Black’
Operations’ funds
originally controlled by
the United States
authorities are known to
have been transferred
into the hands of the
German ‘Black’ covert
intelligence community.
The CIA is belatedly
being to some extent
purged of operators with
ethnic and other
loyalties and ties to
Germany.
TENSIONS
EXIST WITHIN
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES
BECAUSE OF THIS
PENETRATION
*
THE 1969 VIENNA
CONVENTION ON TREATIES.
Given that
(a)
The United Kingdom’s
EEC Accession Treaty,
(b)
The
Maastricht Treaty of
1992 and
(c)
The (aborted)
European Constitution
Treaty were among
E.U. bilateral and
collective Treaties that
were procured by corrupt
and fraudulent means,
THE EUROPEAN UNION IS AN
ILLEGAL ORGANISATION.
This is because Article
49 of the 1969 Vienna
Convention on Treaties,
to which Britain and the
other EU ‘Member States’
are parties, provides as
follows:
‘If a State has been
induced to conclude a
Treaty by the fraudulent
conduct of another
negotiating State, that
State may invoke the
fraud as invalidating
its consent to be bound
by the Treaty.
[* The first tranche of
corrupt payments for the
European Constitution
Treaty was paid out, but
the fate of the second
tranche, given the
negative French and
Dutch referenda
outcomes, is uncertain -
as well as being the
subject of vicious
secret controversy]
According to
intelligence sources,
earlier EU Collective
treaties were likewise
procured by fraudulent
means.
In the British case,
UK Membership of the
European Union
Collective -an illegal
organisation which
exists to subsume, usurp
and collectivise
national sovereignty
under the enticing cover
of ‘co-operation’ (code
for collectivisation)-contravenes
the
1689 Bill of Rights
which remains the
LAW of the United
Kingdom to this day
and which incorporates
the following
Oath:
‘I do declare that no
foreign prince, person,
prelate, state or
potentate hath or ought
to have jurisdiction,
power, superiority,
pre-eminence or
authority with this
Realm’
*
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION
IS A CRIMINAL
ORGANISATION
In addition to exposing
the illegality and
illegitimacy of the
European Union as a
whole,
International Currency
Review
[Volume 30, Number 4]
demonstrates, with
extensive analysis and
documentation, that
the European Commission
is a criminal
organisation.
The issue has been
prepared in close
collaboration with
Ashley Mote,
-Independent MEP for
Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk]
and Continental MEP
colleagues. In October
2004, Mr Mote and Marta
Andreason, the former
Chief Accountant of the
European Commission,
presented the UK Serious
Fraud Office with two
large lever-arch files
containing voluminous
damning information
about institutionalised
corruption in the EU
Commission and related
EU structures.
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN
[Does the stink of
corruption in high
places prevent the Rule
of Law from taking
place?]
Among the reasons for
concluding that the
European Union is a
criminal organisation,
are the following:
1)
Because
successive Presidents of
the European Union
preside over the
disbursement of the
corrupt ‘Black’
‘facilitation fees’
identified, each
successive (six-monthly)
President is and has
been aware of the
corrupt mechanism used
to procure the EU’s
successive collective
Treaties.
2)
The incidence of fraud
committed within the
EU’s structures is so
extensive and routine,
that the European
Commission has been
condemned as openly
condoning a
‘culture of corruption’,
and presiding over a
system of
‘institutional looting’.
Scandalised EC
whistle blowing
officials refer to the
European Commission as a
‘festering dustbin of
corruption’. In
2004, there were nearly
3,500 cases of EC fraud.
3)
When informed in 2004
that the EC Vice -
President-designate,
Jacques Barrot, had
been convicted for
embezzlement of funds,
and had withheld this
information from the
European Commission’s
President-designate,
Sr. Jose-Manuel Barroso,
the new President denied
any prior knowledge of
this fact, and left
Barrot in place.
4)
It is nothing unusual
for
European Commission
officials to be
associated with
lucrative corrupt
‘side businesses’-often
using offshore accounts-from
which they benefit
financially, consequent
upon contracts being
awarded to the
businesses
in which they themselves
have a secret pecuniary
interest.
For instance:
5)
The Sunday Telegraph
reported on 25th
September -2005 that two
EC employees own a
Brussels sex hotel,
Studio Europe, which
rents out rooms for 13
euros an hour. No doubt
this location is used
for blackmail purposes.
The EC officials in
question were named as
Carmela lo Guidance,
an assistant in the
EC Budget
Directorate-General
and
George Tizzies a
porter in the
Directorate-General
responsible for
employment. This is the
latest of innumerable EC
scandals to have erupted
into the public domain,
some of which are
examined in the Special
Issue [out
on Monday 10th
October 2005.]
6)
Unhealthy and evidently
pervasive masonic links
exist between European
Commission officials and
contractors, resulting
in corrupt and unhealthy
‘business
relationships’.
7)
The European
Commission’s accounting
is NOT only shambolic,
but also
fraudulent.
Evidence to this effect
is presented, inter
alia, by the well-known
British forensic
accountant
Christopher Arkell,
FTCA, and by former
Chief Accountant of
the European Commission,
Marta Andreason. She
was ‘suspended’ after
five months
en poste, and then
fired, after she
questioned the
legitimacy of payments
that
Directorates-General
required her to
authorise. She asked
awkward questions, and
was effectively told to
‘shut up and just sign’.
8)
The EC’s accounting
irregularities, which
are glaring, include the
following abuses:
When certain accounting
modifications were
implemented at the end
of 2004, the closing
balances in 2004 and the
opening balances in 2005
were
not reconciled-
thereby permanently
embedding false
accounting data for the
future.
This means that
henceforth no European
Commission accounts can
ever be accurate (not
that this has ever been
the case).
en though EU ‘Member
States’ have been making
payments to the
Commission for decades
to cover the costs of
pension liabilities for
approximately 39,000 EC
employees (as of 2005),
the EU ‘Member States’
have simultaneously been
charged with the
liability of
making/guaranteeing the
resulting pension
payments. Thus pension
liabilities appear on
both sides of the
balance sheet. Proper
accounting practice
would require a charge
to the Income and
Expenditure Account of
EUR 19.5 billion
And a consequent
reduction in reserves.
The European Commission
should have been
acquiring a liability
for pensions throughout
its existence instead of
fudging the accounts in
this fraudulent and
irregular manner.
The European Commission
‘makes’ massive
surpluses out of the
‘Member States’
annually, which it
covers up
Surpluses are supposed
according to the EU’s
own regulations, to be
returned to the ‘Member
States’. What happens in
practice is that the EC
surpluses that have
arisen after all
accruals have been
accounted for, are
eliminated by the simple
manipulative expedient
of providing for
potential expenditures
not openly through the
Income and Expenditure
Account, but by
means of corrupt
adjustments to the
Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).
This method of
accounting is prohibited
by all recognised
accounting standards
around the world as
DISHONEST.
Its use by the European
Commission represents a
clear fraud perpetuated
upon ‘Member States’
and their troubled and
exploited peoples.
EC accounting records
can be changed two or
more years in arrears.
The amount and the
payee, but not the
unique identifying
number, can be altered,
and no record whatsoever
of such changes is/has
been maintained in the
records.
This represents an
open-ended invitation to
scam the system,
especially as it is
routine for the EC’s
Annual Accounts to be
adjusted
retrospectively.
The huge Eurocracy (or
self-interested EU
nomenklatura)
has perfected subtle
mechanisms for ensuring
that hardly anything is
ever done to stamp out
the corruption over
which it has presided
for decades. These
techniques include, but
are not confined to the
following:
The use of ‘candour’,
which is NOT to be
confused with the truth.
‘Candour’ is deployed in
order to disarm,
mislead, divert and
mollify critics,
so that any underlying
fraud goes undetected.
The ‘multiple
investigations’
technique
8.2) What happens is
that several
investigations are
‘opened’ separately.
Further internal ‘investigations’
may follow. Some are
then
‘closed’, or
‘suspended’,
ostensibly ‘pending’ the
‘results’ of other
investigations.
The resulting,
deliberately contrived,
confusion, with
successive reports
contradicting others,
ensures that the
corruption trail is
buried and lost.
Report-writing is used
to smother transparency,
clarity, and TRUTH, with
the sole objective of
obfuscating the
underlying looting and
corruption.
8.3) The EC and its
structures have at least
3,094 secret ‘working
groups’ or committees,
all of which are
answerable to no-one,
and the operations of
which are secret.
8.4)
The main objective of
any EC fraud
investigation is to
procure that the case is
‘exported’ as quickly as
possible to the ‘Member
States’ concerned, so
that any corruption at
the EC centre is
consequently hidden from
scrutiny.
8.5)
Wherever possible,
investigations are kept
unresolved until the
existing Commission is
duly replaced by its
successor-when
the ‘that was then, this
is now’ excuse kicks in.
8.6)
Innumerable other
deliberate obstruction
methods, identified by
International Currency
Review with the
guidance of Ashley Mote
MEP and his colleagues,
are routinely employed
by the EC and related
structures, to maximise
the obfuscation of
troubling problems.
For instance, one
external corporation,
based in
Luxembourg, in which
EC officials had an
interest, was ostensibly
established on
29th
February 1989-a
date
which never even
existed, which meant
that the entity was
‘invisible’.
When a sanitised
official report on the
entity’s fraudulent
activities was presented
to the former
President of the
European Commission,
Signor Romano Prodi
- that allegedly corrupt
Italian ‘machine’
politician- the date was
altered to
22nd
February 1989.
This further illustrated
the devious standard
European Commission
technique of
promulgating conflicting
information in separate
contradictory reports.
By this means,
controversy is deflected
into sterile arguments
over the conflicting
information-diverting
attention from the
institutionalised
internal looting itself.
8.7)
The European
Court of Auditors has
given an adverse opinion
for many years, on 95%
of all European
Commission Expenditure.
It has never, ever,
approved the EC’s
accounts.
[In
September 2013 the EU
ACCOUNTS have not been
passed for 18
years-Would any business
in the UK get away for
even ONE YEAR?]
Furthermore evidence has
surfaced of fraud in the
Court’s own accounts
-one of several
indications that the
Court itself cannot be
trusted. Indeed, like
the Commission’s own
internal Audit Service,
its main task, by open
official admission, is
to minimise
embarrassment to the
Commission.
The damning evidence of
institutionalised
European Commission
looting and serial
corruption covered up by
the EC authorities
contained in the single
issue of
International Currency
Review
is sufficient to induce
a terminal crisis at the
European Commission.
*
WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO
THE EC MUST CEASE
FORTHWITH.
Both
Ashley Mote MEP and
the journal’s Editor,
Christopher Story,
demand that the UK
Treasury sits up,
finally takes notice,
and withholds further
contributions to the EC
budget pending
elimination of
institutionalised
corruption and looting
in the European
Commission’s structures
-which
will never happen.
In a letter to
Ashley Mote dated 22nd
October 2004,
Stephen Timms, the
Treasury Minister,
told the MEP that
withholding British
payments to the EC would
be illegal and would be
an
‘option’
we would not consider’
BUT
Continued squandering of
UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY)
represents a dereliction
by British Ministers and
their officials, of
their duty of care
towards UK taxpayer’s
funds.
Given the conspicuous
gravity of the
situation, Ministers are
believed to be
increasing the risk of
being sued for
negligence as exposures
of the European
Commission’s ‘culture of
corruption’ proliferate.
[At this moment in
Time in the UK millions
of people on tax-credits
who were overpaid
because of technical
problems are being asked
to hand the money back.
They should
ALL insist that the
Treasury should try
the
European Commission
and ask their employees
to point the finger and
explain were the
billions of pounds of
OUR money is resting in
banks in Switzerland.
WE should certainly have
a great deal of compound
interest to collect at
the same time]
Moreover the former
Chancellor of the
Exchequer, Lord Lawson
of Blaby, has
advised the House of
Lords’ European
Committee that the
British Government
DOES possess the
legal scope to give
itself powers
to withhold payments to
the European Commission.
He told the Committee:
‘You have to remember
how hard it was to win
the (UK) rebate…It would
never have happened if
we had not made clear
that if we did not get
satisfaction, we would
withhold our
contributions.
It was never published,
but it was printed. It
was discreetly known to
those who we negotiated
with, that this is what
would happen if we did
not get
satisfaction….Without
that threat to withhold
our contributions, to
the extent of having the
UK law officers produce
a bill, we would have
NOT got [the Rebate].’
[Source:
Future Financing of the
European Union,
House of Lords European
Committee, HL Paper
62, 9th
March 2005.]
But since Britain’s EU
membership is illegal,
because the UK Accession
Treaty and successive EU
Collective Treaties
(notably Maastricht)
were procured by fraud,
it is not even
technically necessary
for the Government to
extract that draft bill
from the official
pigeon-hole into which
it was shoved.
*
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE
EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW:
NO PROBLEM.
The Government can walk
away from the European
Union Tomorrow- and
use the 25% of gross
Domestic Product
represented by all
current and future costs
of the EU membership:
To rebuild the Public
Transportation system.
Build spanking new
‘Schools and Hospitals’
wherever demand exists.
And revitalise the
BRITISH economy
generally.
All without suffering
any losses since EU
membership has brought
Britain no clear
benefits at all, that
could not have been
procured domestically.
It has however, meant
that billions of UK
taxpayers’ funds that
the British Government
should have been
spending at home, have
been squandered on this
sterile, decaying
collectivist project,
led by corrupted and
blackmailed politicians
and operatives.
All EU ‘Member States’,
valuing the huge
British market for their
goods, would be
compelled to negotiate
arms’-length bilateral
trade and other
agreements with the
United Kingdom, or risk
losing access to UK
markets. Any prospective
interim disruptions
could be accommodated by
the British Government
directing the UK
taxpayers’ funds that it
normally squanders with
the EC’s
‘festering dustbin of
corruption’, into
temporarily vulnerable
sectors of the UK
economy.
A Free Trade Agreement
linking Britain, the
United States and Canada
has bee readied, for
implementation when
Britain leaves the
European Community.
For, contrary to what is
in the public domain,
contingency plans do
exist in the United
Kingdom to leave the
European Union.
These were recently
reviewed and ‘dusted
down’, in the context of
key connections made by
certain intelligence
circles following the
7/7 attacks, which have
shown that EU Member
States’ that profess to
be allies of the United
Kingdom
are
anything but.
Exposure information for
this special issue of
International Currency
Review
[Vol.30, No4] has
been developed with the
generous practical
assistance of Ashley
Mote MEP. Paul van
Buitenen MEP, Marta
Andreason, Christopher
Arkle FTCA and the US
and UK intelligence
sources special to the
Editor, Christopher
Story.
For further details, see
Ashley Mote’s
website:
www.ashleymote.co.uk.
International Currency
Review, VOL. 30 NO 4
[extracts from 153 pages
-shown above], available
by subscription from
www.worldreports.org.
was mailed to paying
subscribers worldwide on
10th
October 2005
Banks, Corporations and
other entities that use
subscription agencies
may subscribe to World
Reports Ltd serials
(complete) through their
usual channels, or else
direct from our website,
or from the London or
New York addresses shown
in the lower red panel
on the
www.worldreports.org
Home Page. The website
has a secure and
reliable subscription
ordering system.
ABOUT
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY
REVIEW
International Currency
Review
is the only INDEPENDENT
global journal
specialising in
international currency,
financial and economic
issues with a
geopolitical and
intelligence dimension.
Published since 1969, it
specialises today in
exposing corruption in
governance structures,
since the corruption of
governance and of the
capitalist system is
swamping all other
considerations.
The Journal is one of a
series of intelligence
sources published by
World Reports, details
of which will be found
on our website:
www.worldreports.org
International Currency
Review
has recently exposed the
basis of the ‘Upper
Echelon’global
financial structure,
which sustains the
‘Lower Echelon’
structure with which we
are all familiar.
The
‘Upper Echelon’ is a
‘closed’
intergovernmental and
intelligence financial
environment
characterised by high
-yield investment
programmes, scamming
operations and colossal
stored fiat wealth
running into trillions
of dollars
[Font altered-bolding &
underlining
used-comments in
brackets]
* * *
OCTOBER 10-2005
Also
AVAILABLE SOON
THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER
*Published
by: EDWARD HARLE LTD
(Source of
‘politically
incorrect’
intelligence books.
108 Horseferry Road,
Westminster, LONDON SW1P
2EF
Orders@edwardharle.com
. Tel-Orderline +44
[0207-222-2635
*
PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE
ARE A NUMBER OF
BULLETINS AT THE END OF
THIS ARTICLE FURTHER TO
THE ABOVE SUBJECT
*
FINALLY REMEMBER!!!
* DID
YOU KNOW?
The City of
London is
governed by
the
Illuminati-Freemasons
and they are
governed by
their god
Lucifer/Satan.
The Bank of
England owns
the Central
Banks
established
around the
world, and
this is the
real power
of the
modern
British
Empire.
One example
is
the
United
States
Federal
Reserve Bank
,
which is
wholly owned
by the Bank
of England
and her
subsidiaries.
Thus the
world has
been
enslaved by
the
Illuminati-Free-Mason
conspiracy
which exacts
her tribute
through
interest on
their
various
currencies.
"Historically
all British
military
colonies
with white
populations
such as
Australia,
New Zealand,
Canada and
South Africa
were under
the
authority of
the Queen
and her
Government.
Whereas all
other brown
'slave'
colonies
such as
India,
Egypt,
Bermuda,
Malta,
Singapore,
Hong Kong,
Gibraltar
and the
African
nations were
the private
property of
the Crown,
which is the
separate
board of the
City of
London.
These
colonies
were
exploited
for slave
labor and
trade, to
make the
cartels
richer and
more
powerful."
"The Crown"
has nothing
to do with
the Queen.
It is a
private
corporation
led by the
Illuminati.
(See:
+(1)+(1)+(1)
AUGUST -
2010 |
|