101 REASONS FOR LEAVING THE EU
PART 1
We wish to express our indebtedness and gratitude to those
who in books and articles have sought to alert the Nation to its Danger, and
whose observations are reflected or summarised here: in particular,
Rodney Atkinson and Norris
McWhirter
for Treason at
Maastricht
Adrian Hilton for The
Principality and Power of Europe
Lindsay Jenkins for The
Last Days of Britain
And
For the late Lord Shore of Stepney’s
Separate Ways
Copies of this booklet can be obtained from the Publishers -Priced £1.20 incl p&p
St Mathew Publishing Ltd
24 Geldart St.
Cambridge
Tel: 01223 504871 Fax: 01223 512304
*
1. hush up
Cabinet papers pre - 1970
show the Heath government to have had full knowledge of the EEC being a long
-term plan for the unitary European State with its own Currency;
but the facts were suppressed by this and succeeding governments with the Deliberate
intention of keeping the Nation in the dark
1.
‘surrenders
of sovereignty’’
On 14th December
1960 the Lord Chancellor, Lord
Kilmuir, Britain’s senior legal officer, warned Edward Heath of the
implications of signing the Treaty of Rome:
‘’ To satisfy the
requirements of the treaty, Parliament could enact legislation which would give
automatic force of Law to any existing or future regulations made by… the
Community…It is clear that the Council of Ministers could make regulations
which would be binding on us even against our wishes… It is the first step on
the road, which leads… to the federal state… I must emphasise that in my view
the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones…these objections ought
to be brought out into the open.
2.
‘end of Britain’’
That the
consequences of membership had been realised by some at Westminster about this
time is apparent from a speech in 1962 by Hugh Gaitskell, leader of the Labour
party, who rightly identifying ‘’ the desire of those, who created the European
Community, for a political federation. That is what they mean, that is what
they offer’’, added that this would bring about the end of Britain as an
independent [Nation State]…the end of a thousand years of history.
3.
the big lie
Edward
Heath’s 1971 White Paper on joining the EEC deceived Parliament and the
People with its false statements that’’ there is no
question of any erosion of essential sovereignty’’, and that Britain’s
Sovereignty would somehow be ‘’enlarged’’ by ‘sharing’’
4.
ministry of propaganda
Between 1970 and 1972 the
Heath Government directed a secret propaganda offensive, known as the Connaught
Breakfasts, in which Cabinet Ministers, Foreign Heads of Department, civil
servants, media managers and journalists, in conjunction with the
European Movement, carried on TV, radio and newspaper campaign to swing round
strongly opposed public opinion to acceptance of the EEC, public money being
used in the process.
5.
unconstitutional…1
The 1972 Act which took
Britain into the EEC was in breach of the Constitution, in that the Government allowed
no prior consultation of the electorate by special General
Election or Referendum, as is required under the Constitution for
Parliamentary measures involving Constitutional Change, the
precedents being those of 1831/2 and 1910.
7. unconstitutional…2
By passing the 1972 European
Communities Act, Parliament unconstitutionally attempted to renounce its legal
Sovereignty, so as to make the British People subject to
enactments of outside agencies, and ending its own ability to put into effect
the expressed wishes of the Electorate.
8. unconstitutional…3
In doing so, it deliberately
and wrongfully denied the, ultimate Sovereignty of the People, of
which Parliament is Constitutionally both Servant and Defender and
which at the end of each Parliament’s term is returned to its Possessors.
9.
unconstitutional…4
It is the Corner Stone
of the Constitution that no Parliament is or can be bound by enactments of
its predecessors; but the Act of 1972 unconstitutionally purported (Section 2.4)
to be mandatory upon all succeeding Parliaments.
10.
unconstitutional…5
The Act of 1972 is unconstitutional in the wider respect that falsehood
and deception was employed to secure its enactment, contrary not only to the
spirit of the Constitution but of all procedure whatsoever.
11. test case
The Metric
Martyrs’ appeal against their conviction is
based on the fact that the 1985 Imperial Weights &Measures Act, which
permits trading in pounds and ounces, constitutionally takes precedence over
the earlier Act of 1972 which made us members of the EU; and it is thus a test
case not only between British and EU law, but of whether the 1972 Act can have
abrogated the Constitution.
12.indestructible
Any supposition that the Act in some sense annulled
the Constitution is untenable, since (apart from the 1972 Act itself
being unconstitutional both in its content and process of enactment) the unique unwritten British Constitution is not
law, but essentially an honoured undertaking and consensus in those who have
created and live under it as to the proper conduct of Parliamentary affairs, and
thus incapable of being set aside by legal means.
13.
… twilight hour?
By subjecting the British people to decrees other than the laws enacted
by their own legislature, the Act contravened the undertaking in the Coronation
Oath ‘’ to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom according to their laws and
customs’’; the provisions of the treason Act 1795, against engaging in actions
‘’tending to the overthrow of the laws, government and happy constitution’’ of
the United Kingdom, and those of the Treason Felony Act of 1848 condemning ant
who attempt to ‘’ deprive or depose our most gracious Lady the Queen from the
style, honour or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom’’; and
the Privy Councillor's Oath ‘’ To bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and
defend its jurisdiction and power against all foreign…persons…or states.’’
14. royal commoner
Allegiance to H.M. the
Queen is in effect allegiance to Brussels, since through the Queen’s EU
citizenship and accountability in her own
courts to superior EU law, Her Majesty has vassal status, and an Oath of Allegiance to her now stands’
subject to the Commission’s tolerance’’ so long as she and her Nation do
not show themselves disloyal to the sovereignty of the European Union.
15. unconstitutionality
The chief reason for the Labour government’s calling a Referendum in
1975 was the unconstitutionality of the European Communities
16. bizarre
A retrospective Referendum upon an Act of Parliament was without precedent in British history,
and partook of the nature of inertia salesmanship, especially since accompanied
by the dispatching of government literature to every household with the
disinformation that the Act had been purely a free trade agreement, and urging
a ‘Yes’ vote; a species of official activity also without precedent, and just
as questionable.
17. the great divide
Britain’s becoming and remaining a member of the EU, and the methods
employed to his end, resulted from the emergence of what Lord Goodhart
memorably described as ‘’ a political establishment’’ with purposes
disturbingly opposed to the wish of the electorate; his book ‘Full-Hearted
Consent (1976) ironically gaining its title from Mr Heath’s assurance
during the 1970 General Election campaign that, if there were a future
possibility of entering the EEC, no government would take their nation into
it’’ without the full-hearted consent of Parliament and the People.
18. vote as EU please
The political establishment’s continuing activities have brought about
a new situation, new to British politics, in which the widespread public
hostility to the EU’s increasing encroachments is denied party political
expression, the policies of the major parties all being favourable to
membership.
19. polling days
In a nationwide MORI
opinion poll carried out on behalf of the British Democracy Campaign 15-21
March, 2001, in which 1805 adult respondents were questioned face to face in
their homes, 52% of these offered an opinion declared themselves in favour of
leaving the EU now, 71% wanted a Referendum on continued membership, and 75%
considered that the British people had not received sufficient information on
the implications of the EU.
20. mobile goalposts
Through the deeper
irregularity of its plan to proceed by stealth through a series of treaties
until the European State was a fait accompli before its populations had come to
realise what was going on, the EU has developed into a concept and institution
far other than what was voted on in 1975 Referendum, and so without democratic
validation in this as in other countries.
21. undemocratic
The European Union is an
unrepresentative and authoritarian institution, by
virtue of the fact that the members of the legislative (Council of Ministers)
and its executive (Commission) are not directly elected by and
responsible to the voters of a EU constituency.
22. non-accountable
The EU
Council of Ministers is composed of the non-dismissible nominees of the governments of member states, who are thus
removed from democratic accountability.
23. horse-trading
Britain’s voice in the Council is one amongst many;
and policy decisions, as the outcome of
conflict of interests and pressures resolved by bargaining, by no means
necessarily correspond to Britain’s needs and the wishes of its electorate.
24. cabal
The Council, more
strictly the legislative body, and the Commission, which with its executive
roll also issues legislative proposals, both meet in secret; and since the
fifty or so persons who compose the two have not been elected to European
government functions, and in carrying them out are accountable to
no-one, they constitutes, not a legislative, but a ruling oligarchy.
25. big brothers
Though the EU Commission
are unelected appointees without democratic mandate or accountability, they
have power to impose directives and regulations by by-passing the legislatures
of democratic states.
26. the parliament: authority
Whereas the
British Cabinet is constitutionally answerable to Parliament in Westminster,
where a government defeat on a motion of no confidence involves a Dissolution
and General Election, the European Union’s Parliament, so called, is
entirely without such control over the Commission, which is effectively the EU
Cabinet.
27. the parliament: finance
From its earlier
days to the present, what has been confirmed the Westminster Parliament’s power
has been its direction of finance; but the EU Parliament is without a corresponding
capacity?
28. the parliament: legislation
Unlike all the other parliaments in the Western
tradition, the EU Parliament is unable to legislate, its functions being merely
to review and agree measures drawn up by the Commission, and thereby to have
virtually no legislative role.
29 the parliament veto
Nor does the
Parliament have a final veto over Commission regulations and directives, since
through the procedure euphemistically named ‘’Conciliation’’, the Commission
can at its will override any negative vote.
30. façade
The word ‘’Parliament’’ is thus a misnomer for what is little more than a
rubber-stamp or puppet agency; but the democratic election of its members
creates the dangerous illusion of democracy being at work, in what is in
essence an authoritarian regime.
31. inferior
government
Through its
membership of the EU, Britain is being subjected to a species of non-representative,
non-democratic, authoritarian government far inferior to that which prevailed
at Westminster until 1973, and having features reminiscent of the
dictatorial systems which flourished on the continent of Europe in the not very
distant past.
32. 12-star
chamber?
The European Court
of Justice, whose members are appointed by the various governments, is the
supreme arbiter on EU law, with power to overrule the laws of member states;
but being charged under the Treaty of Rome with ensuring that provisions of all
the EU treaties, and the principle of ‘’ever closer union’’, are
observed, and in its own words devoted to ‘’overcoming the resistance of
national governments to European integration’’,
it is politically predisposed and active in a manner incompatible with judicial
impartiality.
33. moot
points
EU treaties and
regulations are generally cast in such obscure language that all wishing to be
sure where they stand will be forced to go to the European Court of Justice: so
that it will become an absolute source of political authority, and the European
State be unassailably dominant over the former nations now its provinces.
34. EU
rules OK
EU law, as
conveyed by the treaties, regulations and directives, and decrees and rulings
of the European Court, are accepted by British courts as taking precedence over
national law, the ECJ having declared that ‘’Every national court must
apply Community law in its entirety and must accordingly set aside any
provision of national law which may conflict with it, whether prior or
subsequent to this Community rule’’ (ECR 629
at 643,644).
35. ‘’tidal
wave’’
The result is that
the British Statute and Common law are being superseded, and law-making has
become primarily the prerogative of the European Union, which has been
described by a British judge as ‘’a bold new source of law’’, and whose
legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former Master of the
Rolls, is no longer’’ an incoming tide flowing up the estuaries of England’’,
but’’ now like a tidal wave bringing down sea walls and flowing inland over our
fields and houses, to the dismay of us all’’ (quoted in the Times, 1st
April 1996).
36.
corpus juris
In place of existing laws
in the member countries, there will have been instituted under the European State
the Corpus Juris, a
body of law largely in accordance with continental legal systems, deriving
from three main sources: the Corpus Juris Civilis of the Roman Emperor
Justinian, Inquisition
law, and the Code Napoleon
37. euro
state prosecutor
Corpus Juris is to be
administered by the European State Prosecutor, and operate through European
courts and trans-national police and the courts and police forces of member
states, so
combining police and prosecution into one entity
38. continental menu
Judicial
procedure is to be as already in practice on the Continent, the European State
Prosecutor having responsibility for investigation, arrest, committal to trial,
presentation of the prosecution case in court, judgment and imposition of
sentence, trial
taking place before an inquisitorial judge and two professional assessors: the
State, in effect, both judge and jury.
39. … innocent? Prove it!
Also as on the Continent, the concept of presumed
innocence will disappear, and it will become the responsibility of the
accused to prove his innocence to the court, contrary to the position under English law, where the
burden of proof rests with the prosecution, and the accused is innocent unless
and until proved guilty.
40.
goodbye, Habeas Corpus
Corpus Juris will quash
the right of Habeas Corpus, instituted in 1215 by Magna Carta (article 39), by
which it is granted in perpetuity to all subjects of the monarch that no-one
should suffer the loss of liberty without evidence warranting his further
detention being established in a court hearing, normally within 48 hours of his
arrest.
41. farewell, trial by jury
Corpus Juris will similarly abolish the right
of trial by jury, whose beginnings date from as early as 1166 in the reign of
Henry 11, through which the question of a person’s innocence or guilt is
determined by twelve of his peers, not by the judiciary, a practice which,
because of a jury’s freedom to acquit a person technically guilty under an
unjust decree, ensures that laws made by the state are always acceptable to the
people, and that government pressure upon, or corruption of, the judiciary
shall never be able to affect the impartial administration of justice.
42.
‘ the test of civilisation’’
In a Minute to the Home Secretary of 21st
November, 1943, Winston Churchill observed: ‘’The great principles of
Habeas Corpus and trial by jury… are the supreme protection invented by the
British people for ordinary individuals against the State… The power of the
executive to cast a man in prison without formulating any charge known to law
for an indefinite period, is in the highest decree odious, and is the
foundation for all totalitarian governments… Nothing can be more abhorrent to
democracy. This is really the test of civilisation.’’
* * *
43.
above the law
The European State’s judicial system involves
the introduction of forces of armed police, whether members of Europol
or of the paramilitary European border police in process of formation, enjoying
diplomatic immunity from arrest, and thus above the law; unlike British police,
who, while charged with enforcement of the, remain ordinary members of the
public, themselves subject to the laws they uphold
44. clear
enough
The reasons for the
European State police’s immunity from the law have never been explained, though
the parallel with the police forces of authoritarian regimes is manifest
45.
just the start
Eurojust, the provisional EU public
prosecution agency, which is closely linked to Europol, already has autonomous,
non-accountable power to initiate investigations in every state of the European
Union, Europol being able to order surveillance of any British person by
letters, E-mail or ‘phone tapping, and to acquire upon demand secret
intelligence from British security agencies M15 and M16.
46. affront
The concepts, provisions
and methods of the judicial system of the emerging European State are legally
and ethically inferior to the system of British justice admired throughout the
world for its humanity and impartiality: and if ever instituted in Britain,
would be a regressive and affronting imposition.
47. Euro
Army
The future of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organisation (NATO), founded upon the predominant military power of the United
States, which has for more than half a century secured and maintained Europe’s
peace, is now threatened by the European State’s establishing an Army of its
own, dubbed the Rapid Reaction Force, upon the pretext that it will facilitate
military operations in which NATO does not wish to take part.
48. pretext
Since arrangements already
exist within NATO for the EU to take military action without NATO’s
participation, but using its facilities, assets, transport and intelligence,
the reasons for setting up a European Army can only be to confirm the emerging
Statehood of the EU, and lessen the commitment of the United States to Europe’s security: so
jeopardising NATO’s continuing role, and thereby the peace of Europe.
49. escape
of cat
Helmut Kohl’s statement that ‘’ a united
Europe without a common defence is, in the long run, not feasible’’ (Independence,
CIB, January 2000,p1) would seem to apply regarding the first; and that of
Jacques Chirac, ‘’The object of a European defence identity is to contain the
United States’’ (cited by Michael Fabricant, MP, House of Commons, 29th
March 2000), with respect to the second.
* *
DESPOTISM is:
[‘ Everything by the EU- but nothing by YOU ’]
* * *
(50
- More
Reasons in Part 2.)
Or you may order a booklet from:
St Mathew Publishing Ltd
24 Geldart St. Cambridge
CB1 2lX
Tel: 01223 504871 or Fax: 01223
512304
www.eutruth.org.uk
Elections in the British
One Party State
If you vote Conservative, Labour,
Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship.
All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote
doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same
policies: the EU's policies.
The 17 most senior
politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties,
including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George
Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter
Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior
Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.
No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever
be allowed to hold public office.
UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is
riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the
BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick
Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong
Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers
of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to
clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU
leadership.)
For more
details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk
IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF
UKIP
OR
INTEND TO JOIN THEM
TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE
ABOVE
THE EDP HAS BEEN
CRITICAL OF THE
MANAGEMENT AND
LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP
FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS
SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF
BULLETINS OVER THE
PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE
HAVE CRITICISED THEIR
LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE
AS THEY FAILED TO
MOTIVATE THEIR
MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE
DETERMINED CIVIL
DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN
WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE
THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE
BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY
BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR
OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT
THE TOP OF THE
ORGANISATION. THIS
FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN
LACKING AND WE CAN
CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES
BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN
OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN
A MARCH WAS CANCELLED -
AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN
CANDLES WERE HELD AND
THOUSANDS OF LETTERS
SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW
WHERE TO DISPOSES OF
THEM -AND ALL TO NO
AVAIL. IF YOU ARE
A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU
HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY
YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME
APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES
SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN
UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT
RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE
TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY
FIRM DETAILS ON OUR
WEBSITE .
IRONICALLY IT WAS A
CHANCE LOOK ON THE
INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO
TO COME UPON THAT SITE
WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO
THE ILLUMINATI.
THOUGH WE HAVE SOME
DETAILS OF THE
BILDERBERGERS ON OUR
SITE A NUMBER OF
YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO
DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL
HAVE TO LEARN. THE
FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE
SUSPECTED FOR MANY
YEARS THAT
MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR
ORGANISATION MIGHT BE
UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF
THE ILLUMINATI. IT
IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF
THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY
PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT
THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS
POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM
TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE
IN TO CONTROL ITS
POLICES AS THEY BEHIND
THE SCENES SUPPLY THE
VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.
Our intention is not to
benefit from this
disaster as since the
1999 European Election
we have NOT! accepted a
DONATION! from ANYONE!
and we closed membership
also because we did not
wish to split the vote
for UKIP but have stated
in the past that we
would contest another
election if it was ever
necessary to enter into
the affray again and
with the reputation of
UKIP under scrutiny we
will keep our options
OPEN! As we
mentioned some time ago
we have been almost two
decades on the campaign
trail to free our once
FREE INDEPENDENT NATION
STATE of ENGLAND from
the SATANIC EU and those
who have for centuries
have planned for an EVIL
ONE-WORLD
CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT
and EXTERMINATE! at
least 5 BILLION of the
WORLD'S POPULATION and
therefore if we are
right about those
mentioned above they are
not only TRAITORS to
their COUNTRY but also a
THREAT to WORLD PEACE.
However, of late,
matters have NOT! been
going well for the
ILLUMINATI as you will
observe BELOW.
The
Queen,
Treason
and the
Coronation
oath
Together
with
Churchill,
King
George
VI saved
our
nation;
he was a
Monarch
to be
proud
of. But
his
daughter
the
Queen is
the only
monarch
to have
broken
all her
coronation
oaths,
by
signing
these
six
treaties
that
abolish
our
common
law, the
British
Constitution,
the
British
and
English
nations,
and our
sovereignty.
She has
also
committed
treason,
together
with
co-signatories
Ted
Heath,
Margaret
Thatcher,
John
Major,
Tony
Blair
and
Gordon
Brown.
Realising
that
under
the five
Treason
Acts
they
should
already
be
hanging
by the
neck
until
dead,
Tony
Blair
and the
Queen
signed
the
Crime
and
Disorder
Act,
1998,
which
secretly
abolished
much of
the
crime of
treason
(s36.3)
and
reduced
the
penalty
to life
imprisonment
- they
didn't
tell the
MP's
what
they had
just
voted
for.
1.4
million
British
Servicemen
gave
their
lives
for our
independence.
The
Queen
has
thrown
their
sacrifices
away and
made
them
worthless.
At
no
physical
risk to
herself,
she
could
have
fulfilled
her oath
and duty
as a
constitutional
check
and
balance,
by
refusing
to sign
the six
treaties
until an
in/out
referendum
had been
held. In
the
unlikely
event
the vote
went
against
her, she
was even
more
unlikely
to lose
her
crown
(not her
life or
a limb),
and
would
keep her
£9
billion
plus
palaces
either
way.
Those
servicemen's
lives
would
still
have
meant
something.
But she
was
always
keen to
sign;
and said
in
advance
she
would
sign the
last
treaty.
Princes
Charles,
William
or Harry
can now
never be
King.
You
can't
have a
King
without
a
Kingdom:
they can
only be
princes
of a
region
(principality)
within
Europe.
King
Edward
8th was
forced
to
abdicate
because
he was
too
overt as
a German
Nazi
supporter.
Mrs
Simpson's
divorce
was
merely
the
excuse.
The
Royal
Family
is a
German
Family -
real
surname
Saxe-Coburg Gotha.
Windsor
is an
adopted
surname.
All four
of
Prince
Phillip's
sisters
married
high
ranking
German
Nazis.
After
they
lost the
war the
EU was
switched
from a
Nazi
basis to
a
communist
basis.
Between
the ages
of 12
and 22
Queen
Elisabeth's
political
and
constitutional
tutor
was Sir
Henry
Martin,
a Fabian
Communist.
It seems
clear
she was
well
trained
for her
subversion
and
treason.
Because
she
waves
and
smiles
at us
most are
fooled
into
thinking
she's
lovely;
in fact
the
Queen is
a member
of the
Illuminati,
a
Bilderberger,
head of
Freemasonry,
is
wholly
pro the
(German)
EU, and
has
abolished
this
nation
with
ruthless
determination.
It is so
obvious
she
cares
nothing
for
Britain
or the
British.
The
Queen's
aspirations
are not
ours;
she
clearly
serves a
much
darker
master;
the
faith
she
defends
cannot
be the
one we
think it
is. King
George
VI, the
one
recent
monarch
not
indoctrinated
with
Nazi or
Communist
philosophy,
must be
turning
over in
his
grave.
I
ask that
the law
be
enforced,
and the
Queen be
tried
for
treason
before
12
honest
people,
and not
by our
corrupt
judges.
And that
the
illegal
section
36.3
Crime
and
Disorder
Act be
declared
null and
void, so
that she
can hang
by the
neck
till
dead.
The new
EU
Hitler
doesn't
have to
get
elected
Its
worth
noting
that
Adolf
Hitler
first
had to
get
elected,
if on a
35%
minority
vote,
and then
get his
Enabling
Act
passed.
An EU
dictator
has no
such
problems.
Our EU
rulers
do not
submit
themselves
for
election
now. And
the
Queen
has
already
signed
the
Enabling
Act
(Civil
Contingencies
Act
2004).
The EU's
Hitler
will
have a
much
easier
rise to
power,
and will
have the
formerly
British
and
French
nuclear
weapons
from day
one.
Adolf
Hitler
killed
54
million
people.
The EU's
dictator
could
kill a
billion
at the
touch of
a
button,
with no
democratic
checks
and
balances
to
answer
to. How
could
any
aspiring
dictator
resist
the EU
opportunity?
For more
details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk
www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.
|
|
|
WHAT
A WAY TO WIN A WAR
BENJAMIN
FULFORD
More!
[WORKS]
*
SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM
*
More!
More!
PATRIOT or
TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY
+More!
More!
+(More!
THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS
YOUR
PLANET!
AND
YOU!
NO NEED TO
PANIC!
'Others
shall sing the song,
Others
shall right the wrong,-
Finish what
I begin,
All all I
fail of win.
Hail to the
coming singers!
Hail to the
brave light-bringers!
Forward I
reach and above
All that
they sing and dare.
The airs of
heaven blow o'er me;
A glory
shines before me
Of what
mankind shall be'-
Pure,
generous, brave and free,
I feel the
earth move sunward,
I join the
great march onward,
And
take, by faith, while living,
My freehold
of thanksgiving.-
WHITTIER
MAY-2012
|
TOP
OF
PAGE
|
|
|
|
ADDED - MAY-2012 |
CLICK FOR
PART 2
50
more reasons to leave the EU