The MINISTRY of TRUTH and MINISTRY of LOVE are NOT what YOU THINK in BLAIRLAND.

 

With the recent event in the Labour Conference Hall where an 82-year -old activist Walter Wolfgang was man-handled from his seat because he had the effrontery to dissent to the opinion of the speaker our own MAN of STRAW and the curse of political correctness which has grown in magnitude so that there is no place in society, which this corruption has not affected.

 

The following passages have been taken from The Meaning of Freedom by Philip Drew -Aberdeen University Press -1982 from the chapter dealing with Fictions of the Prison State.

 

…The Party’s apparatus for shaping opinion is described with careful detail: members of the general public are never allowed to learn the true facts, while members of the Party are required to develop the technique of doublethink. (a)

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-59)

 

‘A Party member is expected to have no private emotions and no respites from enthusiasm. He is supposed to live in a continuous frenzy of hatred of foreign enemies and internal traitors, triumph over victories, and self- abasement before the power and wisdom of the Party. . . .Oceanic society [Blairland] rests ultimately on the belief that Big Brother is omnipotent and the Party is infallible, but since in reality Big Brother is not omnipotent and the Party is not infallible, there is need for an unwearying, moment -to-moment flexibility in the treatment of facts.

 

The Party thus maintains its power partly by CONTROL over the minds of its members (b) and partly by physical coercion (as with the experience suffered by Mr Wolfgang and Mr Steve Forrest -Labour Conference -28^th September-2005)

 

‘This day-to-day falsification of the past, carried by the Ministry of Truth, is as necessary to the stability of the regime as the work of repression and espionage carried out by the Ministry of Love.’

 

When the Thought-Police or the telescreens discover disloyal thoughts or actions the offender is handed over to the Ministry of Love, whose operations are also described in detail.

 

ITS MEANS ARE VIOLENCE, TORTURE AND DEGRADATION.

 

The systematic distortion of fact, the corruption of language and logic, the propaganda against imaginary enemy states and internal traitors, and the ruthless torture and extermination are in combination sufficient to secure the Party almost total domination over the lives of the people of Oceania [Blairland]

 

An exception is the hero of the novel, Winston Smith,© who begins to question the ways of the regime, to understand them and ultimately to resist them. He reflects that

 

In the end the Party would announce that two and two make five [as we had shown to be the case in response to an article in the Daily Telegraph-on our bulletin board] and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresies of heresies was common sense.

 

In his private diary he writes,

 

‘Freedom is the Freedom to say that two and two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.’

 

He works for the Ministry of Truth, at ‘Reality Control’, rewriting history to accord with the Party’s current needs: Unlike the other citizens of Oceania he knows how consistently the facts are falsified.

 

He writes in his diary

 

‘I understand HOW; I do not understand WHY’

 

This is where 1984 goes beyond Orwell’s earlier book Animal Farm a bluntly satirical account of the processes by which a democratic revolution may be converted to a Tyranny, for the story of 1984 is largely the story of how Winston comes to learn the reasons for the actions of the leaders of the Party.

 

As well as keeping a diary, which is a crime , he falls in love with another Party member called Julia. They form a brotherhood; a secret organization dedicated to overthrowing the regime, but discover that everything that they have been doing is known to the Party.

 

Julia is dragged away and Winston is taken to the Ministry of Love, where his chief interrogator is a senior party member called O’Brien speaks candidly to Winston about the Party’s purpose. First he explains why the Party exacts total obedience:

 

‘Did I not tell you just now that we are different from the persecutors of the past? We are not content with negative obedience [As was shown at the Labour Conference] , nor with abject submission. When finally you surrender to us, it must be of your own free will.

 

We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us: so long as he resists us we never destroy him. We convert him, we capture his inner mind, we reshape him.

 

We burn all evil and all illusion out of him; we bring him over to our side, not in appearance, but genuinely, heart and soul.

 

We make him one of ourselves before we kill him. It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought should exist [In Blairland] anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be. Even in the instant of death we cannot permit any deviation.

 

He goes on

 

What happens to you here is forever. Understand that in advance. We shall crush you down to a point from which there is no coming back. Things will happen to you from which you could never recover, if you lived a thousand years. Never again will you be capable of ordinary human feeling. Everything will be dead inside you.

 

Never again will you be capable of love, or friendship, or joy of living, or laughter, or curiosity, or courage, or integrity. You will be hollow. We shall squeeze you empty, and then we shall fill you with ourselves.

 

The speech is set in the context of brutal and unremitting torture. The implication is plain that in the last analysis the source of sovereign authority is physical [as experienced by Mr Wolfgang and Mr Forrest in the Conference hall of the Labour Conference on 28^th September -2005]

 

O’Brien asks Winston, by this time emaciated and battered, if he can conjecture the reason why the Party should want power of this kind.

 

‘You are ruling over us for our own good,’

he said feebly. ‘ You believe that human beings are not fit to govern themselves and therefore -‘

 

He started and almost cried out. A pang of pain had shot through his body. O’Brien had pushed the lever of the dial up to thirty-five.

 

‘That was stupid, Winston, stupid! He said. ‘You should know better than to say a thing like that.’

 

‘Now I will tell you the answer to your question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in POWER, PURE POWER.

 

In the speeches which are crucial to the argument of the book O’Brien makes it plain that ‘POWER is not the means, it is the END,’ and then proceeds to define the nature of POWER.

 

‘The real POWER we have to fight for night and day, is not power over things but over MEN.’ He paused, and for a moment assumed again his air of a schoolmaster questioning a promising pupil: ‘How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?’

 

Winston thought. ‘By making him suffer,’ he said.

 

Exactly. By making him suffer,’ he said. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own?

 

POWER is in inflicting pain and humiliation.

 

POWER is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic UTOPIAS that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself.

 

PROGRESS in our world will be progress towards more pain…. All the competing pleasures will be destroyed. BUT always - do not forget this, Winston -always there will be the intoxication of POWER, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at any moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.

 

 

[Well we all know about the hounding to death of a patriot of our country Dr David Kelly while the POWER lobby are rewarded as John Scarlett in his promotion to MI6 with many other cronies in places of influence and POWER in our society.

 

The above account is fiction -OR IS IT? Only the constant vigilance to maintain the rights of the Individual will we be sure that we are not on the path to (d) Tyranny.

 

Notes

 

(a) Defined as the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.

The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered: he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated.

 

(b)            One of Orwell’s more telling inventions is that of Newspeak, the official language designed to make disloyal thoughts impossible to express - ‘every year fewer and fewer words and the range of consciousness a little smaller.’ [Sounds familiar]

(c)             Possibly so named in memory of Lancelot Smith, the hero of Kingsley’s social novel Yeast.

 

(d)          It is of course Alexis Charles Henry de Tocqueville (1805-59) a French statesman and writer -who most forcefully reminds us that the rights of the Individual, tenuous as they are, must be guarded not just against Hereditary power or the naked oppression of a dictator but even more carefully against the undifferentiated popular mass of democracy.

 

In particular, he perceives, like Edmund Burke, the possibility of a despotism, which will operate with unprecedented thoroughness precisely because it does so in the name of the people as a whole:

 

 

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-59)

 

‘It would seem that, if despotism were to be established amongst the democratic nations of our days, it might assume a different character; it would be more extensive and more mild; it would degrade men without tormenting them….

 

Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications, and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild.

It would be like the authority of a parent, if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual childhood:

[Hence the spread of benefits to almost everyone in society by New Labour]

It is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing.

 

For their happiness such a government willingly labours, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures

[24- hour drinking-drugs-gambling-no moral restraint- no prison for persistent offenders -but certainly prison for Pensioners who are asked to pay for inane politically correct schemes that put up their Council Tax by over 8 percent-which they cannot afford to pay…]

-manages their principle concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?

 

Thus, it every day renders the exercise of free agency of man less useful and less frequent: it circumscribes the will within a narrower range, and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things; it has predisposed men to endure them. And oftentimes to look on them as benefits.’

 

[WE MUST REMIND YOU THIS ESSAY WAS WRITTEN OVER 150 YEARS AGO BUT IT DOES SOUND FAMILIAR IN SEPTEMBER -2005]

 

To continue:

 

‘After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp, and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community.

 

It covers the surface of society with a network of small-complicated rules, minute and uniform [Family credit and whatever else] through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd.

 

The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting: such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the Government [Blairland] is the shepherd…

 

[The remarkable incident at the Labour Conference on 28^th September 2005 when an 82-year -old activist was man-handled out of the hall and not allowed re -entry because he had been detained under Section 44 of the Terrorism Bill -simply because the man had shouted ‘NONSENCE’ at our MAN of STRAW. WE hope this is a start to a fight-back to reclaim each of us our right to be the Master in our Constitution and remind Tony Blair of his comment in 1997 that he was a

 

‘SERVANT of the People.

 

To continue:

‘Our contemporaries are constantly excited by two conflicting passions; they want to be led, and they wish to remain free: as they cannot destroy either the one or the other of these contrary propensities they strive to satisfy them both at once.

They devise a sole, tutelary, and all-powerful form of government, but elected by the people. They combine the principle of centralisation and that of popular sovereignty; this gives them a respite; they console themselves for being in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians.

 

Every man allows himself to be put in leading-strings, because he sees that it is not a person or class of persons but the people at large, who hold the end of his chain.

 

By this system, the people shake off their state of dependence just long enough to select their master [WE in England only tolerate a SERVANT of the PEOPLE], and then relapse into it again. A great many persons at the present day are quite contented with this sort of compromise between administrative despotism and the sovereignty of the people; and think they have done enough for the protection of individual freedom when they have surrendered it to the power of the nation at large. This does not satisfy me: the nature of him I am to obey signifies less to me than the fact of extorted obedience.’

[Democracy in America,tr. Henry Reeve, Pt.2, Bk. IV, ch.6]

 

 

We have the Tory leader hopefuls talking about being in close contact with the People a trait they and their successors have ignored for decades whether it was Europe -Immigration- Law &Order -Iraq and many other issues.

 

Every time a politician looks for means to please the voter it is ‘shall we pass this or that legislation’ when in reality it is LESS LEGISLATION needed there are enough laws on the Statute Book -in fact over the past eight years over 1000 new laws have been enacted many coming from the despotic EU.

 

In fact we need to repeal many laws, which should never have been placed on the Statute Book in the first place because many have created more problems, which has necessitated even more law.

 

Every new law means more interference with the individual and this is as shown in Blairland means CONTROL.

 

Children are told not to accept sweets from strangers. Well grown ups should not accept sweetened promises from politicians which as proved in the past will make one very sick indeed.

 

 

What we want

 

Is to be out of the EU

 

-Control Immigration-

 

Leave Iraq and Impeach Tony Blair and all other Ministers responsible for the illegal war.

 

And much more

 

 

*

There are two conceptions of human ethics, and they are at opposite poles.

 

One of them is Christian and humane, declares the Individual to be sacrosanct, and asserts the rules of arithmetic are not to be applied to human units.

 

The other starts from the basic principle that a collective aim justifies all means, and not only allows, but demands, that the Individual should in every way be subordinated and sacrificed to the community - which may dispose of it as an experimentation rabbit or a sacrificial lamb… [This sounds exactly like New Labour -does it not?]

 

Whoever is burdened with POWER and RESPONSIBILITY finds out on the first occasion that he has to choose; and he is fatally driven to the second alternative.

 

Arthur Koestler’s -Darkness at Noon

 

 

*

 

 

Late News from the Daily Mail -Friday 30^th September-2005

 

 

Andrew Alexander- Column

 

THE ABSURDLY strained epithet ‘nasty’ attached to the Conservative Party by some Tory grumblers, may now without the remotest hesitation be attach to [New] Labour.

 

I have seen many unpleasant things at conferences of all parties - lying, cheating and shameless stage management.

 

BUT

 

There has never been anything to match the brutal ejection of the 82-year-old and a local party chairman who was calling for restraint. It was vile, just vile. And the stewards, remember are party workers.

 

 

Just think about these moments. The stewards descended because Walter wolfgang had uttered a one-word heckle at the Foreign Secretary Jack Straw who was dealing - but oh so briefly! -with [the illegal invasion] of Iraq.

Did none of the stewards insist: ‘Oh come on, this is an old man, we can’t use force’?

 

Did not one of them say of the other protester:

 

‘He was only calling for restraint’ NO, they descended on the pair like nightclub bouncers.

 

Labour has apologised. Well it could hardly do anything less. But even then the apologies were qualified. Ian Mc Cartney, party chairman declared that the stewards did , however have a job to do [prevent FREE SPEECH]

 

Tony Blair himself qualified his apology by insisting that the stewards’ job was difficult [Well preventing Free Speech we hope will always be so].

 

No it isn’t. they are supposed to deal with serious disorder , not with hecklers.

 

 

He also claimed when asked why proper time had not been devoted to the big question that that , ‘we have debates on debates on Iraq all the time ‘. But not at the Labour conference apparently…(To be continued)

 

 

[Font altered-bolding and underlining used -comments in brackets]

 

* * *

SEP/05

 

*

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING? * Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION SAY VOTERS by Daniel Martin Political Reporter [Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008] MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's IRISH REFERENDUM' The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the HOUSE of LORDS today to delay the RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY. And 10,000 people have signed a PETITION on the DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE within the past few days JUNE16-2008 , calling on the GOVERNMENT NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL [WHY DON'T YOU?]   Downing Street website is http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/ * JUNE 18-2008

 

 

 

 

*

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008 Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.   * The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138 * Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a REFERENDUM HEAR HIM ON http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o *

*

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

 

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

Links to :- English Matters and EU

 

Elections in the British One Party State If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies. The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship. No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office. UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)  For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP  OR  INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE     THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.   Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.   WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR     BENJAMIN FULFORD   More! [WORKS] * SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM   * Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle   More!   More!   PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY +More!    More!   +(More!     THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS  YOUR PLANET! AND  YOU!     NO NEED TO PANIC!   'Others shall sing the song, Others shall right the wrong,- Finish what I begin, All all I fail of win. Hail to the coming singers! Hail to the brave light-bringers! Forward I reach and above All that they sing and dare.   The airs of heaven blow o'er me; A glory shines before me Of what mankind shall be'- Pure, generous, brave and free, I feel the earth move sunward, I join the great march onward, And  take, by faith, while living, My freehold of thanksgiving.-   WHITTIER   MAY-2012   TOP OF PAGE       MAY-2012