YOUR ONCE COUNTRY OF IDENTITY
DROWNED UNDER FOREIGN INVADERS.
[THE title is ours and in the present
climate of the now open discussion on IMMIGRATION is now the reality of
the majority who understand that numerically and selective control is
best for ALL who live in our country.]
*
Let's stop this guff about British
resolve and stand up for the one family who can still
UNITE US ALL
by
TOM UTLEY
[Daily Mail, Friday, July 6,2007]
SOMETHING that's been bothering me all
week is Gordon Brown's solemn statement to the TV cameras after the
failed attack on Glasgow Airport:
'I know the British people will
stand together united, resolute and strong.'
I mean what a ridiculous thing to say.
If a man sidled up to you in a pub and came out with a that line like
that, you'd rightly think him bonkers and beat a hasty retreat to the
door. So why is it thought somehow all right for prime Ministers to
spout such a load of old tosh?.
It's the sort of thing you'd expect to
hear from a trainee spin doctor. Something big happens and he feels he's
got to say something portentous, but can't think quite what.
So he comes out with an utterly vacuous
formula, which he hopes has a sonorous ring to it, and prays that nobody
will notice:
'In the face of a terrorist
attack/hurricane/flue epidemic/economic downturn/Henman defeat [delete
as applicable], one thing is certain: the British people will stand
together, united, resolute and strong'
Poor Mr Brown was clearly determined to
say something Churchillian to mark the first proper drama of his sojourn
in No10. It's just a pity that his words didn't actually mean anything.
What does all this standing
together, unity, resolution and strength entail?
It strikes me that if a bomb goes off
in an airport terminal or outside a packed nightclub, no amount of
unity, resolution or strength is going to save the wretched victims from
being blown to shreds.
Sceptical
More to the point who are these
'British people' who are supposed to be standing together? Not so long
ago, of course, we all knew exactly what was meant by the phrase. We
were an instantly recognisable national entity, bound together by dozens
of invisible ties.
We may have been a nation of mongrels
(my own ancestors, include Englishmen, Irishmen, Scots, Dutchmen and
Poles - and that's only within three generations
BUT BY AND LARGE
WE SPOKE THE SAME LANGUAGE
WATCHED THE SAME PROGRAMMES ON
TV
LEARNED HISTORY FROM THE SAME
ANGLO-CENTRIC VIEWPOINT
ON
LIFE:
Anti-Authoritarian
Unsentimental
Humorous
Sceptical of all ideologies
Tolerant much of the time but capable
of blood-mindedness
ESPECIALLY
-when we came up against
PETTY OFFICIALDOM.
All right , this is a caricature - and
there are always plenty of Britons who didn't fit it. But enough of us
did to give some sort of corporate identity to the nation beyond the
mere coincidence that we were all entitled to carry
BRITISH PASSPORTS.
*
Her Britannic Majesty's
Secretary of State
Requests and requires in the
Name of Her Majesty
all those whom it may concern to
allow
the bearer to pass freely without
let or hindrance
and to afford the bearer such
assistance
and protection as may be necessary.
*
As I look around me on my daily
commute, listening to my fellow passengers jabbering into their mobiles
in a dozen different languages, I wonder if these are the British people
who Mr Brown thinks will stand together in the face of the
TERRORIST THREAT
If so, I'm afraid he'll be sadly
disappointed. certainly, we often stand together -but seldom any free
seats (which I don't think was quite what the new Prime Minister meant).
Otherwise, most of us have absolutely nothing discernible in common
apart from our membership of the human race and their presence on the
same train.
True , I live in London, where a
staggering
2,288,000
of my fellow residents were born
overseas.
-very nearly
1 in 3
-of the population up from
28%
-ten years ago.
[Now you know the reason for our
heading of this essay]
(THAT'S ACCORDING TO THE LATEST
OFFICIAL FIGURES FROM THE
OFFICE OF NATIONAL STATISTICS
- so you can add
at least a few tens of thousands to account for
ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
AND OTHERS
-who have escaped the statisticians'
NOTICE.
www.ukpopulation.org/england-population
Based
on our research,
England population will reach
55.93 million
by 1st July
of
2020.
We
use first day of July each year due to Office for National Statistics (ONS
normally publishes the estimated population data for the same period. The
calculation is based on the average growth rate of …
-
04/01/2020 ·
Official ONS figures
for 2018/19 that
were released in December show that there are 3,194,791
Muslims living in
England, with over a third aged under 16. English
Muslims make up …
JUNE-2020 |
But though other parts of the country
retain what would once have been called a distinctively
BRITISH IDENTITY
London is by no means unusual in having
a
HUGE
-and rapidly growing population of
settlers born elsewhere
WITH NO NATIVE LOYALTY TO BRITAIN
[Thank's a lot New Labour- we don't
think so! And neither does the millions of the indigenous
population who are now identified in many of our cities as
'White Flight']
This is one of the reasons. of course,
why Mr Brown keeps banging on about
BRITISHNESS
(the other is to try to make us forget
that he's
SCOTTISH
- though it has the opposite effect:
the more he repeats the word
'BRITISH'
the more we're reminded that the
speaker is the MP for
Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath.)
The fact is that Tony Blair's most
lasting legacy to
THIS COUNTRY
WAS HIS DESTRUCTION OF BRITAIN'S
NATIONHOOD
[How Members of Parliament
over the last ten years particularly have turned a blind eye to the
almost destruction of a country almost 1400 years in the making can only
be explained by their selfish regard to their political careers and
their Pro-EU conspiracy to destroy our nation state as a means they
hoped of reducing the possibility of mass demonstrations of the
people in protection of their NATIONHOOD]
ONLY NOW, TEN YEARS TOO LATE
-and with the NHS crawling with zealots
determined to blow up as many of us as possible - has Mr Brown woken up
TO HOW PRECIOUS THAT NATIONHOOD WAS
It gave us a community of identity,
purpose, interest and feeling that is further diluted with
EVERY
Coachload
of
Eastern Europeans
EVERY Planeload
of
Pakistanis and Middle Easterners
-WHO LAND ON OUR SHORES
IN
NUMBERS FAR TOO HUGE
-to be comfortably absorbed, like the
waves of immigrants who came before them.
I'm afraid that the new Prime Minister
was a
DECADE TOO LATE
when he told the COMMONS on
Tuesday July 3-2007
'We must give new life to the very
idea of CITIZENSHIP itself.'
[When one reminds one self that a
definition of citizenship -the
'Rights of a Citizen'
have been steadily been eroded over the
past ten years with a convenient illegal war in 2003 under cover of
which we are now living in a totalitarian state though we are now
informed by the new kid on the block that it is now -all change. The
appeasement over that period of the growing dangers to our
'Rights and Liberties'
are a legacy that our once passionate
protector of those rights
OUR
HOUSE OF COMMONS
BECAME
A
SLAVE
TO
EXECUTIVE TYRANNY]
*
DOES HE HONESTLY believe that by
'improving citizenship education' he will turn young Muslims away from
Al Qaeda and towards the Boy Scouts?
DOES HE REALLY think that by
flying the Union flag on public buildings every day of the year -instead
of 18 - he will make the congregations of every Bradford Mosque rejoice
in being British? [particularly as a great
majority of Muslims naturally look for the day when they will be living
in a country with an Islamic state religion and Sharia law the RULE
- instead as now carried out under the Nelson touch eyes of the
complicit authorities.]
That brings me to a funny thing about
Mr Brown:
He does like to go on about the flag. I
can't help feeling that's rather un-British of him.
Americans, of course, are crazy about
the
STARS and STRIPES
-and they're forever swearing
allegiance to it.
BUT IN BRITAIN
-our loyalty has never been so much to
a piece of cloth as to the
LIVING
BREATHING
SYMBOL
OF THE
UNION and the NATION
OUR
REIGNING MONARCH
*
Unifying
You'd think
that
Her Majesty's
Prime Minister
-of all people, would appreciate that.
You'd also think,
he might talk less about
British citizens
and more about
British subjects
*
How strange that in his Commons
statement on the
CONSTITUTION
[OURS!- What's left of IT - NOT the
European supposed UTOPIAN model on offer]
Mr Brown mentioned the very pinnacle of
that constitution only once - and that was when he promised to
'surrender of limit'
the powers exercised in the name of the
MONARCH.
I'm all for doing away with the
ROYAL PREROGATIVE
-which ceased centuries ago to be
exercised by the
CROWN
and has given
PRIME MINISTERS
FAR TOO MUCH POWER EVER SINCE
But I do wish that Mr Brown would
publicly recognise the value of the
MONARCHY
-as a focus of
NATIONAL FEELING
-and one of the strongest of those
invisible bonds that held us together FOR SO LONG...
Come along, Mr Brown. Less of this
rubbish about the Union flag. Let's hear it for
THE QUEEN
Speak up for her and I'll stand right
by you
UNITED
RESOLUTE
and
STRONG.
*
* *
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
JULY/07
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
SCOTLAND
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin]
ADDED JUNE 2020 |