Celebrate 700 years of Constitutional Development in 2007- from Edward I - the English Justinian

Celebrate in 2007 the beginnings of our parliamentary representation 700 years ago, which we owe to the English Justinian -Edward I of England –if King Tony will let you?

In this year of 2005 we have been witness to a late revival of the doggedness of many members of our Parliament in their contesting the actions of the present dictatorship in the Mother of Parliaments.

Over the last three decades many of us have seen the successive governments of both complexions tie their colours to Treaties which have virtually taken away from OUR Parliament the very rights and liberties which had their beginnings those seven centuries ago.

But for the rejection of the New European Constitution by France and Holland this year the rail-roading of the British people into the abomination of a United States of Europe would no doubt have been precipitated in order that the Elite can enjoy the rewards of

TREASON.

They have no fear themselves that the oppressive laws, which we will have to obey, will bother them because they will be exempted from such trauma because of their special status.

As with the USSR of the past select numbers enjoying the good-life at the expense of the majority – may well be a million or two because there will be many who would rather keep their job and perks than decide to fight for their country’s hard won rights and liberties from the past.

The latest revelations of October 10 –2005

from

International Currency Review

Is the only INDEPENDENT global journal specialising in international currency, financial and economic issues with a geopolitical and intelligence dimension?

Published since 1969 it specialises today in exposing corruption in governance structures, since corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is swamping all other considerations. The Journal is one of a series of intelligence sources published by World Reports limited, details of which will be found on:

www.worldreports.org

E-mail-cstory@worldreports.org

concerning the Corruption-Treachery and Skulduggery in the EU and the US which has been a common feature over the past thirty years with its beginnings in the UK with a ring of Traitors in Balliol College Oxford

Edward Heath

Geoffrey Rippon

Roy Jenkins

who were uncovered by the Master of Balliol - [Lindsay] and who reported them to M15 before the Second World War – being Nazi agents which were controlled later from the Nazi Geopolitical centre in Dachau the location of the Nazi concentration camp in Germany from 1943.

Until his death this year and his burial service in Salisbury Cathedral the past prime minister and parliamentarian Edward Heath had been a Nazi agent for 60 years the longest penetration in Intelligence history.

His co- conspirators were:

Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon.

[And no doubt others]

It is known that

Tony Blair

was a protege of

Roy Jenkins

We have disclosed the above facts which are a part of a much greater expose which we have detailed more fully on our bulletin board in order to show the dangers which have and still do threaten our Ancient parliamentary representation which our people fought for and obtained from one of the greatest kings of England –Edward I –The English Justinian and the constitutional contribution of the French born supporter of Parliament- the great Earl Simon de Montford.

Though the pressure for a decision on Europe has now receded there is no time for complacency as the EU bandwagon is still rolling along with more regulations-directives which the EU Commission say they have a right to do because of past treaties which we now learn were secured by FRAUD with the signatories to the Treaties paid to sign with the funds from a Nazi slush fund provided no doubt DVD and stored under the streets of Switzerland by the:

Nazi Geopolitical Centre in Dachau which we are told though not financially supported by the

Chancellery of Germany

-they have their support.

[See EDP bulletin board for more details –under International Currency Review]

We now hear that King Tony intends to do away with the Shire structure in England which as the Third Estate (Commons) so long ago its bedrock ‘of seventy-four knights of the shires which constituted the original strength of our representative system.’

This is a further move by King Tony to destroy any evidence of our past history and to enable him and his many cronies to put forward disastrous policies for consideration in order to destroy the cohesion of the opposition in order for him to claim success.

But then he has no intention of permitting any Englishness to exist in the desert he is planning for his greatest foe England whereas thousands of millions of pounds have been handed to Scotland and Wales in the evolution process in order for their history and separateness to be encouraged.

We have lately had the revelations of our previous Ambassador to Washington Sir Christopher Meyer who has given a

splendid picture of the antics of King Tony which explains why our brave troops are in Iraq with 98 killed and hundreds wounded of which we hear nothing of their numbers and suffering of the many distressed families in the land.

We now learn

BUSH ‘double-crossed Blair over Iraq War

Tim Shipman-political Correspondent

Daily Mail

Friday 25^th November 2005

Tony Blair was ‘double-crossed’ by George Bush in the run-up to the Iraq war, according to a former American diplomat.

Joe Wilson, whose wife was ‘outed’ as a CIA agent after criticising the President’s case for war, claimed the Premier was duped into believing the White House wanted action against Saddam because of his supposed weapons of mass destruction.

In fact it just wanted rid of the Iraqi dictator, he said.

The view, from a man central to the efforts to find evidence of Saddam’s weapons programme, has the power to damage Mr Blair because it reinforces critics’ claims that he had little say in the drift to war.

Mr Wilson said:

‘I watched the way that the British built their case, and it was a disarmament case as best I could see it. Mr Blair came to the U.S when Bush was talking about regime change and when he left Mr Bush started talking about disarmament as the objective.

‘I think that Mr Blair really thought that he was getting involved in a disarmament campaign, which was all to the good-I fully supported that.

‘I think at the end of the day he was double-crossed by the regime change crowd in Washington. It looks like he was double-crossed and chose to go along with it.’

Mr Wilson also criticised ‘weak’ and ‘exaggerated’ intelligence provided by British spies (err! You don’t surely mean our own John Scarlett) that Saddam was trying to buy uranium in Niger.

To the embarrassment of MI6, he made clear the CIA no longer believes what Britain tells it.

Mr Wilson was sent to Niger to investigate the claim in 2002 and found it to be untrue. He attacked Mr Bush for using it in his State of the Union address in 2003.

Vice-president Dick Cheney’s chief of staff Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby has resigned to fight charges that he leaked the name of Mr Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, in retaliation.

Mr Wilson said George Tenet, who was then Mr Bush’s Director Of Central Intelligence told the White House on three occasions that ‘the evidence is weak and we believe the British exaggerated the case’.

[Is that not so Mr John Scarlett?]

Mr Wilson added:

‘I believe the President and this administration had come to a decision that it wanted to go to war with Iraq.

To return back to the late thirteenth and early years of the fourteenth centuries and the subject of the Commemoration of the life and times of Edward I of England who himself had troubles in wishing to fight a war abroad which his baron’s considered to be unconstitutional -but to return to the great Law-maker and his father’s major contribution to the Constitution.

During the minority of his father Henry III when England was run under a Regency - the doctrines of:

‘The King can do no wrong’

And

‘The responsibility of Ministers of the Crown’

was formed.

We hope the events of the past eight years will be sufficient reasons for the majority of the loyal subjects of

Her Majesty

The Queen Elizabeth the Second

England

To support our petition to recognise the work of her great ancestor the English Justinian who made possible the beginnings of our unique parliamentary democracy 700 years ago which has been under threat for over forty years particularly over the last eight years in order that it can be destroyed in order to conform with a Continental model which was rejected those many years ago by a great Lord Chief Justice of England- Sir John Fortescue, LORD CHANCELLOR who’s final resting place is in The Church Of St. Eadburgha –Ebrington -Gloucestershire.

which stands in a commanding position in one of the highest parts of the village.

‘The CHURCHYARD has many ancient

Yews and tall dark trees sheltering a collection of headstones hoary with lichen. Some date back to the 17^th century. There is a right-of-way through the churchyard leading to the road to Chipping Campden’.

It looks over a fertile vale to the hills of the Cotswold borderland. Its short sturdy tower is a landmark for miles around which depicts the England we all love-those who consider their constitutional history unrivalled anywhere in the world for its accumulated wisdom from the past in our Constitution and in the People who will not let its principles be destroyed as is now happening by the many disastrous encroachments whether houses or wind farms into our precious picturesque landscape in many parts of our country.

* *

DEC/05

[We understand that we are in for a cold Winter and we wonder how the much-praised value of wind power will perform when there is little or no wind about. Even at other seasons of the year the wind is not something, which will arrive because you have the structure in place. Power stations depend on fuel of whatever kind to work. Why should we ruin our countryside for a source of energy so spasmodic and unreliable with its intrusive and irritating side-affects?

There is however hope on the horizon with the latest developments with clean coal technology in the USA with huge coal stocks there and in the UK which at first sight appears to be an answer to less dependence on nuclear energy]

We now return to the 13^th century with the help of the great constitutional historian

Dr Stubbs

in his own words in his

Constitutional History of England

Vol II

As there were many types of town constitution existing at the same time, so too there were many degrees of completeness of functions.

Some were almost independent republics, some mere country townships that had reached the stage at which they compounded severally for their ferm, but were in all other respects under the influence of the sheriff and county court.

There were, however, some points in which- London with sheriff and a shire constitution and the county court still reviewed or incorporated the town constitution.

In matters of jurisdiction, the towns, however completely organised, could not exclude the itinerant justices, whose court being the shiremoot involved the recognition of the sheriff.

Hence in the general summons of the county court before those officers in the boroughs were ordered to send twelve burgers to represent the general body.

In the measures for the conservation of the peace, the sheriff had orders to enforce the observance of watch and ward, to forbid tournaments and other occasions of riot, and to examine into the observance of the Assize of Arms, not only in the geldable or open townships of the shires, but in the cities and boroughs as well. The details of the system were carried out by the local officers; the great towns elected their own coroners, majors, bailiffs and constables, but they were under the view of the sheriff.

The military contingents of the towns, composed of the men sworn under the Assize of Arms, were also led by the sheriffs; these contributions to the national force being, except in the case of a few large towns, too small to form a separate organised body.

In point of direct dealing with the crown, whether in the executive measures resulting from reform, in fiscal negotiations, or in transactions which took the form of fine or petition, every town, as indeed every individual, had a distinct and recognised right to act; and these points, which serve in regard to the counties to show the corporate unity of the community, and therefore require illustration in relation to that point, need no further treatment here.

Under these circumstances, we can imagine the Simon de Montford and Edward I, when they determined to call the town communities to their parliaments, may have hesitated whether to treat them as part of the shire communities or as independent bodies.

Earl Simon adopted the latter course. Which was perhaps necessary under the local divisions of the moment; as he summoned out of the body of the baronage only those on whom he could rely, so he selected the towns, which were to be represented, and addressed his summons directly to the magistrates of those towns.

And this plan was adopted by Edward I on the first occasions on which he called the borough representatives together.

But when the constitution took its final form, a form which was in thorough accordance with the growth of the national spirit and system, it was found more convenient to treat them as portions of the counties; the writ for the election was directed to the sheriff, and formal election of the borough members, as well as that of knights of the shire, was in many cases, if not generally, completed in the county court. Thus the inclusion of the boroughs in the national system was finally completed in and through the same process by which the general representation of the three estates was insured.

The towns of England, neither by themselves nor in conjunction with the shires, ever attempted before the seventeenth century to act alone in convention like the Scottish boroughs, or in confederation like the German leagues.

The commons had no separate assembly, answering to the convocation of the clergy or the great council of the baronage.

In 1296, however, Edward summoned representative burghers from the chief towns to meet first at Bury and afterwards at Berwick to advise on the new constitution of the latter town; and this plan may have been occasionally adopted for other purposes.

We have now to link together very succinctly the several cases in which in the year 1295, the representative principle entered into composition of the parliaments; the political causes and other phenomena of which have been treated in the last chapter [xiv].

From the year 1215 onwards, in the total deficiency of historical evidence, we can only conjecture that the national council, when it contained members over and above those who were summoned by special writ as barons, comprised such minor members of the body of tenants –in-chief as found it convenient or necessary to obey the general summons which was prescribed for the purpose of granting special aids, by the fourteenth article of the [Magna Carta] charter.

These would be more or less numerous on occasion, but would have no right or title to represent the commons; they attended simply by virtue of their tenure.

When Matthew Paris describes a parliament of 1246 as containing the ‘generalis universitas’ of the clergy and knighthood of the kingdom, his words, suggestive as they are, cannot be safely understood as implying representation.

The year 1254 then is the first date at which the royal writs direct the election and attendance in parliament of two knights from each shire: the occasion being the granting of an aid in money to be sent to the king in Gascony, and the parliament being called by the queen and the earl of Cornwall in the belief that, as the bishops had refused to grant money without consulting the beneficed clergy, the surest way to obtain it from the laity was to call an assembly on which the promise of a renewal of the charters would be likely to produce the effect desired.

There is no reason to suppose that the counties were represented either in the first parliament of 1258 or in the Oxford parliament of the same year, or that the knights who brought up the complaints of the shires to the October parliament were elected as representatives of the shires to the Oxford parliament were elected as representatives to take part in that parliament, or that the ‘bacheleria,’ which in 1259 took Edward for its spokesman, was the collective representation of the shires.

The provisionary government, which lasted from 1258 to 1264, restricted rather than extended the limits of the taxing and deliberative council.

In the intervening struggle however both parties had recourse to the system of representation:

In 1261 the baronial leaders summoned three knights of each shire to a conference at S.Alban’s and the king retaliated by directing the same knights to attend his parliament at Windsor.

In 1264, immediately after the battle of Lewes, Simon summoned four knights of each shire to a parliament at London, and in the December of the same year he called together the famous assembly, to which not only knights of the shire were summoned by writs addressed to the sheriffs, but two discreet and lawful representatives from the cities and boroughs were summoned by writs addressed to the magistrates of the several communities.

It is not impossible that Henry III, or earl Simon, may have summoned representatives of the commons, when he summoned proctors for the cathedral chapters, to parliament at Winchester, which was to have been held in June 1265.

The preamble to the statute of Marlborough in 1267 states that the king had called to parliament the more discreet men of the realm,

‘tam de majoribus quam de minoribus,’

The discretion, which was the peculiar qualification of the knights of the shire, affording a presumption that they were present.

In 1269, at a great court held for the translation of S. Edward the Confessor

[To remind you all that in November 2005 the exact location of the tomb of this king has been believed to have been found in Westminster Abbey] -

attended by all the magnates, were present also the more powerful men of the cities and boroughs; but when the ceremony was over, the king proceeded to hold parliament with the barons, and the citizens and burghers can only be supposed to have been invited guests, such as attended, by nomination of the sheriffs, at the coronations and other great occasions.

[Further information on this particular matter can be obtained from Dr Stubbs-Constitutional History –details above.]

Other points of interest follow.

Edward I Inherited some sound institutions.

In an attempt to ascertain how far Edward really comprehended the constitutional material on which he was working, and formed his idea according to the capacity of that material, we can scarcely avoid crediting him with measures, which he may have inherited, or which may have been the work of his ministers.

Little as can be said for Henry III himself, there was much vitality and even administrative genius in the system of government during his reign.

Local institutions flourished, although the central government languished under him. Some of his bad ministers were among the best lawyers of the age.

Stephen Segrave, the successor of Hubert de Burgh, was regarded by Bracton as a judge of consummate authority; Robert Burnell and Walter de Merton, old servants of Henry, left names scarcely less remarkable in their line of work than those of Grosseteste and Cantilupe.

No doubt these men had much to do with Edward’s early reforms. We can trace the removal of Burnell’s influence in the more peremptory attitude of the king assumed after his death, and the statesmanship of the latter years of the reign is coloured by the faithful but less enlightened policy of Walter Langton.

But notwithstanding all this, the marks of Edward’s constitutional policy is so distinct as to be accounted for by his own continual intelligent supervision.

If his policy had been only Burnell’s, it must have changed when circumstances changed after Burnell’s death, as that of Henry VIII changed when Cromwell succeeded Wolsey; but the removal of the minister only sharpens the edge of the king’s zeal.

His policy, whoever were his advisers, is uniform and progressive. That he was both well acquainted with the machinery of administration and possessed of constructive ability is shown by the constitutions, which he drew up for Wales and Scotland:

Both bear the impress of his own hand.

The statute of Wales not only shows a determination closely to assimilate that country to England in its institutions, to extend with no grudging hand the benefits of good government to the conquered province, but also furnishes an admirable view of the local administration top, which it was intended to adapt it.

The constitution devised for Scotland is an original attempt at blending the Scottish national system as it then existed with the general administration of the empire, an attempt which was completed four centuries later [Under Henry the Eighth]

A similar conclusion may be drawn from Edward’s legislation: It is not the mere registration of unconnected amendments forced on by the improvement of local knowledge, nor the innovating design of a man who imagines himself to have a genius for law, but an intelligent development of well-ascertained and accepted principles, timed and formed by a policy of general government. So far, certainly Edward seems qualified to originate a policy of design…’

Simon de Montford

To Leicester [Simon] alone of the barons can any constructive genius be ascribed; and as we have seen, owing to the difficulty of determining where his uncontrolled action begins and ends, we cannot define his share in the successive schemes, which he helped to sustain.

That he possessed both constructive power and true zeal for justice cannot be denied.

That with all his popularity he understood the nation, or they him, is much more questionable: and hence his greatest work, the parliament of 1265, wants that direct relation to the national system, which the constitution of 1295 possesses.

In the aspect of a popular champion, the favourite of the people and the clergy, Simon loses sight of the balance of the constitution;

an alien, he is the foe of aliens;

owing his real importance to his English earldom, he all but banishes the baronage from his councils.

He is the genius, the hero of romance, saved by his good faith and righteous zeal…

Share of the clergy in the constitutional growth

It is in the ranks of the clergy that we should naturally look, considering the great men of the time, for a moderate constructive policy. The thirteenth century is the golden age of English churchmanship.

The age that produced one Simon among the earls, produced among the bishops Stephen Langton, S.Edmund, Grosseteste , and the Cantilupes. The Charter of Runnymede [Magna Carta] was drawn under Langton’s eye; Grosseteste was the friend and adviser of the constitutional opposition.

Berksted, the Episcopal member of the electoral triumvirate, was the pupil of S. Richard of Chichester: S.Edmund of Canterbury was the adviser who compelled the first banishment of aliens; S.Thomas of Cantilupe, the last canonised Englishman, was chancellor of the baronial regency…

Sympathy of the people with the reforms.

If we ask, lastly, what was the share of the people, of the commons, of their leading members in town and shire, our review of the history furnishes a distinct if not very circumstantial answer. The action of the people is to some extent traceable in the acts of the popular leader.

Simon de Montford possessed the confidence of the commons: the knightly body threw itself into the arms of Edward in 1259 when it was necessary to counteract the oligarchic policy of the barons: the Londoners, the men of the Cinque Ports, the citizens of the great towns, the Universities under the guidance of the friars were constantly on the side liberty.

But history has preserved no great names or programmes of great design proceeding from the third estate…

Conclusion

Let then the honour be given where it is due. If the result is a compromise, it is one made between parties which by honesty and patriotism are entitled to make with one another terms which do not give to each all that he might ask; and justly so, for the subjects on which the compromise turns, the relations of Church and State, land and commerce, tenure and citizenship, homage and alliance, social freedom and civil obligation, are matters on which different ages and different nations have differed in theory, and on which even statesman and philosophers have failed to come to a general conclusion alike applicable to all Ages and Nations

As the

IDEAL OF GOOD GOVERNMENT

* * *

[Unfortunately over the last eight years particularly under King Tony his idea of compromise is to destroy everything before him that has any link with the past.

It matters not to him if in the process of dismantling centuries of solid constitutional framework in his frantic fanaticism in his desire to be his kind of good European? That he has and is replacing the granite foundations of our great inheritance with chalk structures which will fall and he wonders why he is finding so much opposition to his unpatriotic and dishonest and traitorous ambitions.]

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments

in brackets]

DEC/05

FINALLY REMEMBER!!!

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is the United States Federal Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati. (See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

AUGUST - 2010

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008

Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

TIME FOR DECISION-DECEMBER,2007

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who wished to sell our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

THE EU

WE-AND THEM!

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTUTUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

[All words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]

13th October,2007

So You Want Out Of The EU

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

www.eutruth.org.uk

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

www.speakout.co.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

* July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

The Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

'The Spirit of England'

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

VOTE

-2007

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

OR

INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION. THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE . IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI. THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN. THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED FOR MANY YEARS THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI. IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN! As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE. However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

BENJAMIN FULFORD

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

*

Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle

More!

More!

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

More!

+(More!

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

YOUR

PLANET!

AND

YOU!

NO NEED TO PANIC!

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

WHITTIER

MAY-2012

TOP OF PAGE

The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill.

ADDED - MAY-2012

New World Order

1000's

of Video's