- (1994 - EDP Official Website - MARCH - PT1- 2020 )- PART 2- PART - 3 - PAR-T 4

NOVEMBER - HOME-

-   PART 1 -  PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

OCT H 1 2
3 4 5  6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019      MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019      

  MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

FOR THE RETURN

OF THE

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

AT

WESTMINSTER

 AND

 [A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT FROM WALES AND SCOTLAND]

 

*

 

 ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

 

H.F.1773

*

 

 

WE WONT DELAY

BREXIT

Even if EU asks us to.

No 10 hits back at IMF over trade deal negotiations.

By Daniel Martin - Daily Mail-Policy Editor

APRIL 15,2020

 

BRITAIN will not extend the negotiations period for a Brexit deal even if the EU wants to, Downing Street said yesterday

AS the two sides prepare for fresh talks, No 10 insisted nothing would change the UK leaving the single market and customs union on December 31,2020

The Prime Minister's spokesman said: 'We will not ask to extend the transition period, and if the EU asks we will say

NO

Extending the transition would simply ptrolong business uncertainty and delay the moment when we

CONTROL OUR OWN BORDERS

'UK business needs to know what the future trading arrangements will be. It comes after the International Monetary Fund called for the UK and EU not 'to add to uncertainty caused by coronavirus by insisting on keeping the current transition timetable

But No 10 said Britain needed to be able to put its own rules in place to deal with issues such as coronavirus, rather than being hidebound by EU regulations. Kristalina Georgieva managing director of the IMF, had told the BBC

[BRUSSELS BROADCASTING CONTRACTOR]

that because of the 'unprecedented uncertainty' arising from the virus pandemic, it would be 'wise not to add more on top of it'.

'I really hope all policymakers everywhere would be thinking about [reducing uncertainty.]

It is tough as it is, lets not make it any tougher,' she said, Asked if she would advise an extension to trade talks, Mrs Georgieva said: ,My advice would be to seek ways in which this element of uncertainty is reduced in the interests of everybody, the UK, the EU, and the whole world .

[Well!- going ahead with BREXIT after it has been delayed for almost five years is in our opinion removing any uncertainty -without a doubt. The IMF has a suspect past and should be replaced post haste under a coming new freedom loving and peace loving NEW WORLD.]

The UK and EU have announced a curtailed timetable to carry out three negotiation rounds by video conference on Monday.

But Britain's chief Brexit envoy David Frost, has already told his EU counterpart, Michel Barnier, that the UK has ruled out extending the talks into next year. Any extension would trigger demands ftrom Brussels for

 BILLIONS IN CASH

to help

Eurozone countries hard hit by the virus. If the UK and EU cannot agree a deal, we will trade on

WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION TERMS

from the beginning of

2021.

*  *  *

APRIL 15, 2020

 

*  *  *

DAILY MIRROR- UK will refuse to delay Brexit deadline in any way despite ...

*  *  *

 

WHY THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S DAUGHTER IN 2020-

See BELOW

 
 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

May 27, 2019

 

H.F.1853/1

 

 

APRIL 15,2020

H.F.2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

A MESSAGE TO BORRIS JOHNSON

 

A STATE OF EMERGENCY

 

RE: GUARDIANS OF THE COMMUNITY

 

SOME YEARS AGO WE SUGGESTED THAT THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT IN VILLAGE AND TOWN-THE TRUSTED AND RESPECTED LINK BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COMMUNITY WAS A MOST IMPORTANT REASON TO KEEP THE BOBBIE -ON -THE - BEAT IN EXISTENCE BECAUSE OF ITS IMPORTANT FUNCTION PARTICULARLY IN AN

EMERGENCY

 

As a 87 year old pensioner with a wife of 90 years of ago to know that such a link existed today in March 2020 would be a tremendour relief and comfort. to know that medical and food provisions were secure.  Such an arrangement should have been put in place immediately an EMERGENCY is DECLARED-OUR MILITARY COULD PERFORM THIS VITAL SERVICE IN VILLAGE AND TOWN TODAY IN MARCH 2020.

 

VILLAGE AND TOWN COUNCILS NEED TO MOVE FAST TO GET THIS VITAL  and NECESSARY SERVICE GOING AT ONCE WHICH WILL SAVE MANY LIVES

 

*  *  *

 

MARCH 14,2020

 

*  *  *

 

 

WHAT A FANTASTIC RESPONSE IN JUST A MATTER OF A FEW DAYS WITH HELP AT HAND FROM THE LOCAL COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY. FROM WHAT WE SEE IN OUR PRESS -TELEVISION... THIS HAS BEEN THE USUAL EXPECTATION EVERYWHERE IN OUR GREAT ISLAND HOME AND ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD

WHEN THE PRESENT SCOURGE FINALLY LEAVES OUR COUNTRY WE WILL ALL REMEMBER AS OTHER PEOPLES ON OUR PLANET EARTH  HOW THEIR  AND OUR GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES MET THE

 CALL

TO ARMS

AGAINST THE PESTILENCE.

 

WE WILL BE A BETTER COUNTRY-MORE UNITED AS NO DOUBT IN THE WORLD AT LARGE.

THERE IS A BETTER WORLD BEFORE US OF

 

 FREEDOM - PEACE AND PROSPERITY

 FOR ALL- 

 

AS THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN THE INSTIGATORS OF WAR AND FAMINE OVER CENTURIES ARE SOON TO MEET THEIR JUST PUNISHMENT.

 

GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY

AND THE PEOPLE IN THE WORLD AT LARGE

 

*  *  *

MARCH 17,2020

 

 

 
 

MY 999 CALL FOR ALL

 

EX- COPPERS

 

In our

 

time of greatest

 

need, why they could make all the difference.

 

By

 

LORD STEVEN

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8128185/

12 hours ago · My 999 call for all ex-coppers: In our time of greatest need, they could make all the difference, writes former Met Police chief LORD STEVENS

 

DAILY  MAIL- 19, MARCH, 2020

 

H.F.1773/1

 

*

 

DR MAX THE MIND DOCTOR: My mental toolkit to

help you through these tough coronavirus times

 

 

Well, what a week it has been for all of us as we come to terms with a world dominated by coronavirus and the restrictions on lives that, less than a week ago, seemed unimaginable.

Yes, it was happening in Italy, in France, in Spain, in New York and in California. But surely not here?

Today we are facing the reality of life in lockdown and it is grim, playing out against a backdrop of escalating cases of infection, rising death rates and an NHS under pressure as never before.

As a psychiatrist, I am of course very worried about the detrimental impact this will have on the mental health of my patients, my readers and the nation.

Dr Max writes that today we are facing the reality of life in lockdown combined with the backdrop of infections and a rising death rate

Whether it’s depression or anxiety, our emotional wellbeing is going to take a hit. And we must be prepared.

Most of us can cope for a week or so off work. But several weeks, possibly months, of isolation, of juggling family demands with working from home, of not seeing our loved ones beyond face-to- face, of worrying about grandparents and your job and cashflow...the list is endless.

The truth is, we are ALL going to be struggling.

There are some general principles that can help us through this awful period — not just to survive lockdown but actually to thrive in it. Yes, thrive! So here are my tips to help you through this tough time…

Routine: This is the most important thing. We are creatures of habit and find it reassuring to have order and structure in our lives. So break up your day into sensible sections or even write out a timetable.

However small your living space, take time to carve out areas —work, exercise, relaxation — for different activities and ‘commute’ between them.

Stick to mealtimes and bed times: Many people are working from home and will have a schedule. Even so, there may be a temptation not to get up, to stay in bed all morning working away on your laptop and phone. Don’t!

And for those not working, lounging about on the sofa watching Netflix while mindlessly snacking on comfort food and staying up late should be a no-no. Especially if alcohol plays a part. It’s bad for the mind and body at a time when safeguarding your health is a priority. Yes, watch TV to relax but make sure that you fit in some...

He suggests that one way to get through lockdown is To take advantage of Boris Johnson's offer of exercising once a day

...Exercise too! I can’t stress the importance of this, for both our physical and mental health. And the great thing is, you don’t even need to leave the house.

March on the spot, do an online aerobics or yoga class, vacuum the stairs — whatever you can do for at least 30 minutes to get you out of breath. It will help with appetite and sleep — and it will boost your immune system.

Read about the lives of others: Nothing helps us put our own struggles and difficulties into context better than learning about others who faced enormous challenges and overcame them. It helps us retain a sense of positivity and perspective.

After all, if Nelson Mandela could survive years of solitude on Robben Island, then emerge to lead South Africa, we can surely cope for a few months in our cosy homes.

Learn a skill: There is a huge range of courses available to us online. Keeping your mind stimulated with intellectual — or fun — tasks means you won’t be wallowing in the corona crisis.

It also means that when lockdown is over, you will emerge with something positive to show for it — fluent in French or a skilled juggler, for example!

Set yourself a goal: Have you always wanted to read every one of Dickens’s novels? Perhaps the attic needs a clearout? Or that flower bed could be redesigned? OK then, now’s your chance. Once some of those things are done, it will feel incredibly rewarding.

Plan for the down times: There will be times when you feel a bit lost, desperate, alone or angry. That’s OK and perfectly normal. Learn what helps you to feel better — call a friend, write about your worries in a diary (very helpful), listen to uplifting music or simple have a hot, fragrant bath. Be kind to yourself!

Finally, just remember that throughout all this, you are not alone. We will get through it and, with any luck, emerge from lockdown stronger than ever.

 

 

Why any old virus testing won't do

There’s no doubt that we need a reliable test to establish if NHS staff have or don’t have Covid-19. Right now, any staff member who shows symptoms that might be coronavirus has to go off for seven days. If one of their family members is symptomatic, it’s 14 days.

Hundreds of doctors, nurses and paramedics find themselves in this position, away from the front line — and the pandemic hasn’t even peaked here.

The Government has purchased antibody tests, but these will only be able to tell if someone has had the infection and is now immune, not whether they have the infection currently.

Some kits have given false-negative results (incorrectly saying someone doesn’t have the virus when in fact they do). Spain, for example, has withdrawn 9,000 Chinese-made tests after it emerged that they only had an accurate detection of between 20 and 30 per cent. That is a large margin of error and terribly risky.

The answer isn’t to demand that the Government simply introduces tests, but to wait for industry to produce ones that are accurate and detect who does have corona, so our NHS staff can get back on the front line where we need them.

Many people — including members of my own family — are hugely fearful of Covid-19. And of course they are right to be, but not if the anxiety is crippling them. This is what I tell my loved ones: just remember that a virus is a few strands of genetic material surrounded by a blob of lipid — fat — with a few proteins stuck on it. That’s it. It’s a blob of fat. Good old soap and hot water will vanquish it on your hands if you wash them properly. So don’t allow your mental health to suffer because of a microbe that a squirt of Fairy Liquid can kill!

 

 

Anyone who knows me will tell you I’m the kind of person who usually looks on the bright side. This week, however, I have struggled to keep chipper because I’m one of those NHS staff members struggling to cope with one of the biggest challenges this country has faced.

Then came a call to arms from the Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, and more than 700,000 of you have now signed up as volunteers with the NHS. This was followed by that fabulous display of support — Clap For Carers — on Thursday night.

I can’t thank you enough for boosting our morale. Can we keep this going once it’s all over?

 

 

How vulnerable kids can catch up

With schools closed, home-schooling is now the norm and for many children will be an enriching experience. They will also have more quality time with their parents — something that hardworking mums and dads are sometimes stretched to deliver.

I do worry about those children who don’t come from happy and stable families, though. For them, school is a form of escape, or the place where they can be sure of one hot meal a day. What must be happening to these victims of neglect, whose parents have no interest in their education?

Home-schooling has become the norm in lockdown Britain as schools are closed due to the coronavirus outbreak

Children’s brains develop at such a fast rate that even a few weeks, let alone a few months, away from the classroom without intellectual stimulation will have a lasting impact.

Perhaps there is a case to be made for scrapping this year’s summer holidays (if schools are allowed to open by then) so all children — but especially the vulnerable — can catch up.

 

 

Dr Max Prescribes... Switching off that news

If you find yourself overwhelmed by grim news, just step away. Turn off the TV and radio and log off from social media. 

Check in just once a day for updates on this pandemic and don’t believe all the rumours that swirl around. 

For up-to-date science on the coronavirus, you can’t do better than the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine — they have a dedicated Covid page that debunks fake news and is updated daily:

www.cebm.net/oxford-covid-19

DR MAX THE MIND DOCTOR: My mental toolkit to help you through these tough coronavirus times

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

H.F.1806/6

 

Deathbed confession rewrites British WW2 history

 

A former colonel in the United States Air Force, Leroy Fletcher Prouty served as Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President John F. Kennedy.

(This is a statement from Fletcher Prouty on his deathbed, written down as he dictated)

Lord Rothschild sent his five sons to the world’s capitals to instigate wars and then loan the money to carry them out.  Before a world war, the banks claw back every penny to then lend out at profit in the conflict.

The 1917 Russian revolution is sometimes called the Jewish revolution because the Jews used communism to seize the country and the Czar’s huge monetary assets in the London and Paris banks.  The remit of communism was to take the wealth of the people, rich and poor, and consolidate it in the hands of a very few called the elite, but done in such a way that the people thought it was being done for them.  Russia was robbed and thousands of churches were pillaged and burned, and millions of Christians murdered.

Rothschild then concentrated on Britain, clawing out the money where the Jarrow hunger marches were in protest over those dying of starvation.  Lord Rothschild told his homosexual apostles that a communist government was coming to Britain, and he predicted it by the year 2000.  He told them it may not be called that but that is what it would be.

Germany under Adolf Hitler broke free of the international bank scammers and declared its own currency and the amazing success of this made the bankers worry as other countries could follow suit, & many in England wanted to adopt the German economic system.  Charles Lindberg wanted to introduce it to the USA.  Lindberg was a hot favorite to run for political office, but the Jews took his baby son and in a Passover sacrifice of Rosh-Chodesh on March 1st ritually murdered the child.  Lindberg had to retire from the election race, and a halfwit German national was charged with the crime and executed.

So New York and London became the main areas of the Jewish rebellion against the Germans who dared to throw out the Jewish bankers.  Jewish led newspapers joined Hollywood and the BBC in issuing hate propaganda to initiate a war on Germany.  This despite Neville Chamberlain’s four-year secret study into the aims and directives of the Third Reich, showing Germany had no intentions toward Britain, only to stop the constant threat of the Soviet communists.

Lord Rothschild from around 1933, but in particular in 1936, had bulletins read out in every synagogue across the UK saying Jewish people prepare for war, get into any manufacturing concern that will accommodate this.  Herbert Morrison (Peter Mandelson’s grandfather) was posted by Winston Churchill as Home Office Procurement Minister who made sure all MOD contracts went to fellow Jews.
 Jews were told especially from 1936 to buy up any small manufacturing concerns like making boots helmets shell cases uniforms weaponry etc. as war was coming.

The Home Office would send out the order for what it wanted to these firms who would then say how much in materials it needed to complete the task.  They always ordered almost double the material needed and some of these Jewish firms found themselves very rich by the war’s end.  These Jews would bribe members of parliament to demand the government order more uniforms, more Hillman staff cars, more rifles or more army shirts or whatever the Jewish owner wanted to sell more of.

It was only after the war when huge stocks of army surplus took 25 years to sell off that the penny dropped that the Jews had robbed the British people again.
  I myself saw an East End button making firm’s wartime books, they made buttons for military tunics, and the profits were astronomical.  Some firms were using sheets of non-ferrous metal, from wartime orders into the early 1960s.  One firm had a contract to make so many million gas masks, and to complete that contract were still making them in 1968; they all lay rotting in a leaky warehouse.

This is why Jews were called ‘war profiteers’ and what they gained in this way, be it food for workers or whatever, was often sold for cash.  And this was why Jews were called the ‘black marketeers.’

Churchill’s bodyguard Walter Thompson said Marks and Spencers dealt with all MOD food supplies, and Burton tailoring made all the uniforms and demob suits.  Monetary kickbacks went to Herbert Morrison, Winston Churchill, and Lord Lendeman.

However, King George V was not happy with the Jews push for war, and began to speak openly that he had seen his country smashed in WW1 and would not allow it again.  So Winston Churchill and Lord Rothschild spoke to the King’s doctor Bertrand Dawson who gave the King a fatal dose of morphine.  However, the King realized what they had done and his last words were to Dawson ‘God damn you!‘
  This murder was a state secret, but once I had been told of it, the official statement was then released that the King was dying and they just sped his death up to meet the morning papers’ deadline.  Justice was later served, as Lord Dawson of Penn was himself silenced in March 1945.

King Edward VIII we are told had to abdicate to marry Wallace Simpson.  This is a lie.  He was forced out by Churchill because he kept trying to make peace with Germany.

Neville Chamberlain, listed as the most popular Prime Minister ever and one who wanted to keep Britain out of the war, died mysteriously in November 1940.  His death certificate said, ‘causes unspecified.’  It’s such nonsense for the most important man in the land to have this written on his death certificate, so it was later changed to ‘bowel cancer.’

Churchill’s bodyguard Walter Thompson claimed before his death that the deaths of Chamberlain, King George V, Mahatma Ghandi and the intelligence chief Vernon Kell, were among a batch of murders ordered by Lord Rothschild for Churchill to oversee.

The Churchill gang killed FDR according to Stalin, too!

 

 

 

*

 

FULL ARTICLE Benjamin Fulford 3-9-20… “US Presidential Election, Tokyo Olympics cancelled? Engineered pandemic ushers in World Government”

Full weekly report from Ben.

“The controlled demolition of the Khazarian mafia financial system is now visible for all to see. The 30% plunge in oil prices, the meltdown of stock and bond markets and a freeze in world travel and trade are all being orchestrated in tandem with a fake pandemic, multiple sources confirm. The pandemic, which is mostly a media event, and the financial collapse, which is real, are the cover being used to usher in a world republic, P3 Freemason, Illuminati and CIA sources all confirm.

“The aim of this controlled demolition is to remove Satan-worshipping, genocidal criminals from the apex of world power, Pentagon and other sources say. This will allow the release of forbidden technology and usher in a new age of wonder, they add. For example, old age will soon be a treatable condition…

“They elaborate: “U.S. troops sent to Europe for a NATO exercise may also engage in arrests of Zionist and deep state assets not just in Switzerland but Brussels, Antwerp, Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam, and London.”

“One CIA source summed up the [US election] situation in this way: “Trump is set to be the next president as he will declare martial law, to protect the people of course. It’s estimated that up to 70% of Americans will be affected. He will cancel the elections. May he be the last President standing? He has been aware of this maneuver for a long time. The dominos are starting to fall.”

“There has also been a record number of corporate bosses quitting or losing their jobs since January.

“An NSA source elaborated by saying, “The President has ordered a full-scale investigation of all communications across the Gates Foundation, Event 201, WHO, CDC, and the major companies in the U.S. and UK that have the most to gain from the fake pandemic. An investigation of insider trading and media authors “on the take” is also underway. CIA sources say this is intended to stop what has been detected in the past week: “New bio-war attacks in which the live virus is being spread by drones and other means in Italy and Iran, with selected drops taking place in other countries to keep the fear alive.”

“So a mild virus that mostly affects old people close to death is being used to spread global fear and will end up with most governments in all countries closing their borders, out of fear porn. “The world will be on lockdown. Then they will attempt to vaccinate everyone on the planet by mandate. The boys are in total panic mode,” a CIA source predicts.

“…a battle raging in the Vatican. “Pope Francis was deliberately given a mutation of the virus. He will die soon. The Vatican will try and cover it up until they have a clone/body double in place. This way they can control the narrative for the masses,” a gnostic Illuminati source says.

“…a senior MI6 source says the following people need to be arrested in order to end deep state control of the UK and Ireland: “Queen Elizabeth in the Court of St. James, Prime Ministers Cameron, May and Johnson, President Michael D. Higgins of Ireland, the joint directorate of MI5/MI6 Andrew Parker and Alex Younger, Irish civilian police commissioners Noireen O’Sullivan and Drew Harris, Baron Nathaniel Rothschild and UK and Irish cabinet secretaries Mark Sidwell and Martin Frazer both German double agents. These two men essentially run both countries irrespective of the Prime Minister of the Day.”

“A senior CIA source says: “Oil is out of date and most likely will drop to $10 per barrel before this is finished. The new energy technologies are ready to be released by Trump.” One example of this type of technology at the link below would make hydrogen much cheaper than oil.

“Pentagon sources add that: “ICC probes may expand to CIA drone strikes, Afghan drug trafficking and Israeli war crimes against Syria, Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon, as well as for using airliners as human shields.” The sources also note: “Third time is not the charm as war criminal Bibi [Benjamin Netanyahu] may finally be deposed as PM, and Trump may have outsourced arrests of Zionists to the ICC.” Netanyahu, like his puppet Abe, is trying to use the “pandemic” as an excuse for martial law.

“To summarize, here is what we are seeing: Airlines grounded worldwide. Almost all travel stopped. Hotels, restaurants, and resorts empty around the world, Oil price collapse, A global stock market rout of between 40-50 %, Global financial collapse. Wall Street will be closed,” the P3 Freemasons promise…

“…so: Game, Set, Match. Reset! The Phoenix Rises and a New Age dawns.”

As with all of Benjamin’s posts, feel free to “tune in” to that Higher Discernment while reading (particularly with regard to Trump and why he is doing / saying what he is doing / saying).

—————————————————————————

US Presidential Election, Tokyo Olympics cancelled? Engineered pandemic ushers in World Government
By Benjamin Fulford March 9, 2020
 


The controlled demolition of the Khazarian mafia financial system is now visible for all to see. The 30% plunge in oil prices, the meltdown of stock and bond markets and a freeze in world travel and trade are all being orchestrated in tandem with a fake pandemic, multiple sources confirm. The pandemic, which is mostly a media event, and the financial collapse, which is real, are the cover being used to usher in a world republic, P3 Freemason, Illuminati and CIA sources all confirm. The trigger event was the default on February 16th of the U.S. Corporate Government, they say.

The aim of this controlled demolition is to remove Satan-worshipping, genocidal criminals from the apex of world power, Pentagon and other sources say. This will allow the release of forbidden technology and usher in a new age of wonder, they add. For example, old age will soon be a treatable condition, the sources say.

To make this possible, a ruling class that has been trying to kill us with pandemics, carcinogens, war, etc. is being systematically hunted down and brought to justice, they add. They elaborate:

“U.S. troops sent to Europe for a NATO exercise may also engage in arrests of Zionist and deep state assets not just in Switzerland but Brussels, Antwerp, Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam, and London.”

Inside the U.S. meanwhile, the Presidential election process has already degenerated into a farce with the Democratic nomination being obviously stolen for a senile, corrupt Joe Biden. Here is an example of the nonsense Biden is spewing:

“If you want to nominate a Democrat, a lifelong Democrat, a proud Democrat, an Obiden-Bama Democrat, join us.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/stop-calling-it-stutter-here-are-dozens-examples-bidens-dementia-symptoms

One CIA source summed up the situation in this way:

“Trump is set to be the next president as he will declare martial law, to protect the people of course. It’s estimated that up to 70% of Americans will be affected. He will cancel the elections. May he be the last President standing? He has been aware of this maneuver for a long time. The dominos are starting to fall.”

The number of sealed indictments in the U.S. is now close to 160,000 and 1,613 indictments have actually been acted upon. So now it looks like many of these corporate crooks will finally end up in jail where they belong.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit#gid=1703320056

There has also been a record number of corporate bosses quitting or losing their jobs since January. An NSA source elaborated by saying, “The President has ordered a full-scale investigation of all communications across the…

…Gates Foundation, Event 201, WHO, CDC, and the major companies in the U.S. and UK that have the most to gain from the fake pandemic. An investigation of insider trading and media authors “on the take” is also underway. CIA sources say this is intended to stop what has been detected in the past week:

“New bio-war attacks in which the live virus is being spread by drones and other means in Italy and Iran, with selected drops taking place in other countries to keep the fear alive.”

In Hong Kong, health officials will start clinical trials with a still-unproven antiviral drug Remdesivir (Remdesivir is an Ebola drug) to treat the new coronavirus, according to a CIA doctor. “The cost as will be around $1,000 for a course and governments will pay the pharmaceutical company of course,” he notes.

The company behind this is the Gates Foundation owned Gilead Sciences. “Imagine just 10 million doses to start with globally. This is $10 billion alone. Plus look at what their stock prices will do.
https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/coronavirus-remdesivir-gilead-antiviral-drug-covid-19/573261/

At the top of this particular pyramid can be found, George P. Shultz,

Director Emeritus, Gilead Sciences. Deep stater Shultz was U.S. Secretary of State from 1982 to 1989 and has also been Secretary of the Treasury. He was also head of the Bechtel Group that many Japanese believe was involved in the Kobe Earthquake that killed 6,000 people in 1995.

One CIA source says:

“Gilead could be sitting on close to $20 billion in untapped stock market value, provided it has success with a potential new coronavirus vaccine. They will milk this for every penny their greed can steal. Imagine what else is in the vaccine, an RFID chip perhaps?”
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/coronavirus-vaccine-could-add-billions-in-value-to-gilead-161233464.html?guccounter=1

In any case, this doctor and other sources agree the Zionist Cabal is using a bio-weaponized coronavirus scam as a cover. The virus seems to be only killing elderly people with underlying health conditions, mostly pneumonia, they say. “Notice there are no children or teenagers affected so far,” the doctor notes.

So a mild virus that mostly affects old people close to death is being used to spread global fear and will end up with most governments in all countries closing their borders, out of fear porn. “The world will be on lockdown. Then they will attempt to vaccinate everyone on the planet by mandate. The boys are in total panic mode,” a CIA source predicts.

Here in Japan Zionist slave Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has been trying to use the fake, exaggerated pandemic to usher in martial law. Instead, Abe is going to be removed, CIA sources promise. They also say:

“Abe deserves everything he will be given. It will be interesting to see if he tries to make a deal and sing like a canary. For sure he will have a fatal accident or slip and fall on the soap in the shower and break his neck before he is able to spill the beans.”

There is also a battle raging in the Vatican. “Pope Francis was deliberately given a mutation of the virus. He will die soon. The Vatican will try and cover it up until they have a clone/body double in place. This way they can control the narrative for the masses,” a gnostic Illuminati source says. P3 Freemason sources, however, say Francis had only mild symptoms and is recovering.

In the UK as well, Brexit is leading to a purge of German double agents. MI6 and Pentagon sources say. Here is more on the fight from a Pentagon source:

“After the firing of UBS. Credit Suisse Ceo, Barclays CEO Jes Staley may be another casualty as it appears Jeffry Epstein may have groomed this former JP Morgan banker and blackmailed the UK parliament to get him the top job.”

A former Barclay’s banker accuses “the board and executive committee of Barclays bank PLC from 2011 to the present,” of stealing and hijacking the technology for the quantum financial system.

Meanwhile, a senior MI6 source says the following people need to be arrested in order to end deep state control of the UK and Ireland:

“Queen Elizabeth in the Court of St. James, Prime Ministers Cameron, May and Johnson, President Michael D. Higgins of Ireland, the joint directorate of MI5/MI6 Andrew Parker and Alex Younger, Irish civilian police commissioners Noireen O’Sullivan and Drew Harris, Baron Nathaniel Rothschild and UK and Irish cabinet secretaries Mark Sidwell and Martin Frazer both German double agents. These two men essentially run both countries irrespective of the Prime Minister of the Day.”

There has already been a purge in Saudi Arabia where a Zionist takeover attempt was thwarted. Three princes and dozens of military and ministry of the interior officials have been removed as a result. Immediately after the purge, a major oil war began. Both Russia and Saudi Arabia are flooding the world with oil even as the “pandemic” has radically cut demand. A senior CIA source says:

“Oil is out of date and most likely will drop to $10 per barrel before this is finished. The new energy technologies are ready to be released by Trump.”

One example of this type of technology at the link below would make hydrogen much cheaper than oil.
https://www.popularmechanics.co.za/science/hydrogen-made-using-rust/

This oil price collapse is putting an end to the oil for U.S. dollars scam the Zionists have been using to extort the U.S. and the world since the 1970’s. They are being brought down NOW, CIA sources say.

Pentagon sources agree noting Israeli Defense Forces personnel have been “banned from foreign travel as a resolutely stiffened International Criminal Court lowers the boom on not just war crimes of Israel but those committed by U.S. forces and the CIA in Afghanistan.”

Pentagon sources add that:

“ICC probes may expand to CIA drone strikes, Afghan drug trafficking and Israeli war crimes against Syria, Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon, as well as for using airliners as human shields.”

The sources also note:

“Third time is not the charm as war criminal Bibi [Benjamin Netanyahu] may finally be deposed as PM, and Trump may have outsourced arrests of Zionists to the ICC.”

Netanyahu, like his puppet Abe, is trying to use the “pandemic” as an excuse for martial law. But the Israeli armed forces are not going to fight their own people on behalf of this Satan worshipping pseudo-Jew, Mossad sources promise.

We are also getting mixed intelligence about the situation in China. CIA sources in South East Asia who interviewed Thai citizens recently evacuated from Wuhan say:

“The situation is far worse than what is being told in the media, people are bleeding out from the nose eyes, ears and lungs now. It is spreading much faster than anticipated. The actual deaths in Wuhan are close to 3 million. The city is the largest cemetery on the planet. It will remain on lockdown. This started near Wuhan where there was a massive electromagnetic radiation disaster, connected with 5G. The microwave blast cooked the citizens from the inside out. The release of the virus occurred at about the same time to adjust the narrative. The massive pollution there added to the catastrophe. There was no culling ordered by Xi Jinping. More fear porn. There is a massive cover-up. This accident may be China’s Chernobyl.”

A Chinese agent in Tokyo also says the situation is worse than the government admits. Asked about Taiwanese and Russian reports that President Xi Jinping had been replaced, the source only said: “there are several Xi Jinpings.” Japanese businessmen with extensive links to China, however, say production is returning to normal across much of the country.

To summarize, here is what we are seeing:

Airlines grounded worldwide.

Almost all travel stopped.

Hotels, restaurants, and resorts empty around the world

Oil price collapse

A global stock market rout of between 40-50 %

Global financial collapse

“Wall Street will be closed,” the P3 Freemasons promise so:

Game, Set, Match. Reset! The Phoenix Rises and a New Age dawns.

About Kauilapele

I am a Spirit of Light working with energies on this planet on the Big Island of Hawai'i (for 15 years). My spiritual missions have taken me from the Big Island of Hawai'i to neighbor islands (Oahu, Kauai), as well as to Turtle Island (N. America), Peru (Cusco), Bolivia (Lake Titicaca), and Egypt (Gizeh, Saqqara, the Pyramids) (see my YouTube page).
Gallery | This entry was posted in apocalypse, cabal, energies, new energies, partners in contrast and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

 

 

H

*

 

MARCH 12,2020

 

 

H.F.1997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM DECEMBER,2012

 

A Prime Minister in 1848

Over a Hundred and Sixty Four years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister - Foreign Secretary - Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) - beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:

 

“ Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)

 

We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

 

. It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”

 

[Of course the  MONARCHS  of ENGLAND since the 19th Century have been under the INFLUENCE of the ILLUMINATI.]

 

Winston Churchill warned the populace in the

1920's

 

 of the true facts of the ILLUMINATI who  have virtually ruled the world  since

 

WATERLOO

 

*

In the 1920's Winston Churchill mentioned the Jewish Bolsheviks the details

at

JEW WATCH

 

[As we have explained the social circles which Winston Churchill  was connected  with during his long life such as the Rothchilds and like-others were the Establishment existing at the time from the Disraeli era. It was an impossibility to ignore particularly as he wished to further his career.  Of course he was a strong and enthusiastic supporter of the BRITISH EMPIRE in its outer image and must have been aware of the true nature within.   Those that might criticize him should consider the circumstances of the time which have ameliorated somewhat over the past decades until the present day when there are at last changes afoot.]

 

[IN MARCH 2020 WE LEARN THAT WE UNDERESTIMATED THE POWERFUL INFLUENCE OF THE ILLUMINATI IN BRITISH AFFAIRS DURING WORLD WAR 2 AND NO DOUBT SINCE.]

*

 

A WARNING!

 FROM A PATRIOTIC PRIME MINISTER

 

 

BENJAMIN DISRAELI

 

IN

 

 1852

In the 19th Century, Benjamin Disraeli, [Beaconsfield] a baptised Jew,[Prime Minister of England-1868 ] proclaimed:

 

...the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes...The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property...The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.'
 

 

WE MUST NOT FORGET!

 

William Ewart Gladstone

 a great prime minister

 symbolised by his rolled  up sleeves-

 a man with the common touch.

*

 

BENJAMIN FREEDMAN -

 A JEW

UNCOVERED TO THE WORLD IN 1961 IN WASHINGTON D.C. THE

 ZIONIST CONSPIRACY.

-HE SPENT HIS LIFE WARNING THE PEOPLE OF THE GREAT DANGER TO THEIR LIVES AND LIBERTY

 

JEW WATCH

 

[As we have stated elsewhere many JEWS world-wide do NOT! agree with the  NEW WORLD ORDER - ZIONIST MESSAGE.]

 

JewsnotZionists

 

  1. John Milton Quotes About Truth | A-Z Quotes

    https://www.azquotes.com/author/10164-John_Milton/tag/truth

    John Milton (1859). “The prose works of John Milton”, p.183 But God himself is truth; in propagating which, as men display a greater integrity and zeal, they approach nearer to the similitude of God, and possess a greater portion of his love.

  2. Truth, free speech, and the legacy of John Milton's ...

    https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/truth-free-speech-and-the-legacy...

    The supreme value of truth that informs the commitment to free speech helps to explain how what begins as John Milton's tract against prior censorship, Areopagitica: A speech of Mr. John Milton for the liberty of unlicensed printing to the Parliament of England, turns into a tract on liberty and this, in turn, becomes an extended rumination on the process of discovering Truth.

    • Author: Regina M. Schwartz
    • Publish Year: 2012

       

      ADDED MARCH  19,2020

       

 

 

 

[THE FLAG ABOVE OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS THE TRUE FLAG OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE.

NOVEMBER-2012

 

'The sheer evil - arrogance and stupidity of members of the human race will be its final funeral epitaph.'

 

*

'Evil events come from evil causes; and what we suffer, springs, generally, from what we have done.'-

 

Arisophanes. 45O - 444? BC

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 
 

 

 

THE RETURN OF OUR

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

OF

 ENGLAND

 

 

 

 

[WE MUST NOT BE DETERRED BY THE COMING PANDEMIC SOON TO BE AMONGST US BUT REMAIN STEADFAST IN OUR RESOLVE TO LEAVE THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL IF NEED BE AT THE END OF JUNE 2020

THE PEOPLE IN THEIR MILLIONS HAVE SPOKEN AND WITH THE SPIRIT OF THE BLITZ STILL IN MANY MINDS WHEN THOUSANDS DIED IN ONE NIGHT BY THE AERIAL BOMBARDMENT BY HITLER'S LUFTWAFFE THE PEOPLE STOOD TOGETHER FOR 5 YEARS UNTIL VICTORY WAS WON.

 MANY OF THE SURVIVORS OF THOSE TIMES HAVE YET ANOTHER FIGHT ON THEIR HANDS AND THE KNOWLEDGE THAT VICTORY HAS FINALLY BEEN ACHIEVED AGAINST HITLER'S WARTIME PLAN TO DOMINATE OUR COUNTRY AGAIN IN THE PEACE WILL END  ON 30TH OF JUNE 2020 WILL BOLSTER THEIR  SPIRITS.

 

IF THE EU HAD TRULY WANTED A DEAL THEY WOULD HAVE DONE SO IN THE PREVIOUS 60 MONTHS- 5 YEARS. THEY REALISE THAT WITHOUT THE SUBSTANTIAL UK CONTRIBUTION TO THE EU YEARLY BUDGET THE FINAL COLLAPSE OF HITLER'S BRAINCHILD WOULD BECOME A REALITY WITHIN A MATTER OF A YEAR OR TWO.

 

 

IT MUST BE REMEMBERED THAT AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT OF JUNE 2015 -A BREXIT VICTORY - BORIS JOHNSON AND MICHAEL GOVE BY THEIR INTER-RIVALRY AT A CRUCIAL MOMENT IN ENGLISH HISTORY

 ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIVE YEAR DELAY IN LEAVING HITLER'S WAR-TIME PLAN TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE

 

THEY PUT SELF BEFORE COUNTRY

 

A PROMISE HAS BEEN MADE TO LEAVE THE EU AT THE END OF JUNE,2020

 

'IT MUST BE KEPT'

 

*

 

WE WOULD, HOWEVER, SUPPORT A LOOSE

 

DEMOCRATIC FEDERATION OF THE

 

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 

OF

 

EUROPE.

 

*  *  *

 

What did Israel hope to gain from Priti Patel's secret ...

 

[Certain events have occurred  over the past t few days 14th to 18th March  have led us to believe that our website of over 20 years could be  under threat. Should our website fail to appear in the coming months you will have had your confirmation.]

 

*

 

UK coronavirus cases: find out how many are in your area ...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/12/uk-coronavirus-cases-how-many-are-in...

12/03/2020 · UK coronavirus cases: find out how many are in your area Latest figures from public health authorities on the spread of Covid-19 in the United Kingdom. Find out how many cases

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

 

MARCH 16-2020

H.F.1424

*

 

 

Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday,November 19,2018 

 

Time to show some moral fibre

How many of those like me who participated in World War 11 would have chosen to capitulate in the way the Prime Minister has in her Brexit negotiations with the EU

I will be 96 this week and am housebound, but my life wasn't always like this . At 17, in early 1940, I joined the RAF ,serving in Bomber Command at RAF Brize Norton and also at Bletchley  Park. Posted to the Air Ministry in London. I was bombed out and 15 girls in my billet died. My husband was a wireless operator and rear gunner, who returned home from yhe two-year seige of Malta, weighing five stone. We had determination, pride and above all, moral fibre.

I feel that the once-proud UK has been asset stripped, ground down and told what to do by unelected bureaucrats in Europe. I knew exactly what I wanted from the referendum

TO LEAVE THE EU

I fear for the generations that follow me because the EU seems to want nothing more that to become a FEDERAL STATE.

WHY CAN'T THE GOVERNMENT SHOW SOME MORAL FIBRE?

I AM SO ASHAMED OF THEM ALL

 

Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday, November 19,2018

R M Wangford -SUFFOLK

[AS a pensioner couple of 87 and 89 we can understand the feelings of the above patriots and only a few days ago we watched the film the DARKEST HOUR. There was a sequence in the film when Winston Churchill was being driven in London after getting so much opposition to his plans from pro German-peace faction and suddenly when his vehicle stopped at a road junction near a tube station he suddenly without notice left the vehicle  in the vicinity of a underground railway station in London and entered it and went on to the platform where the many travellers recognised him. When a tube train arrived he entered the train and was soon in conversation with all the occupants of his carriage to the point that he conversed with everyone getting their names and there feelings about fighting the war and they without exception said the war must be fought vigorously and valiantly until VICTORY.  Later when he addressed members of the Cabinet he mentioned the names of those patriots and related their feelings of solidarity with their Prime Minister.  The climax of the film was as  with Winston's speech before the HOUSE which included towards the end with:

We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. we shall fight them in the hills; we shall never surrender.-Winston Churchill.

By this time the once quiet Opposition benches suddenly joined the Government benches and  broke into a stirring clamour of support with hundreds of order papers being thrown high into the air with gusto. The House was united for WAR and Churchill had won.

Today, the feelings of the above patriotic pensioners show how our country after 46 years within Hitler's so-called EU how millions of our once proud patriots are now fellow - travellers of the

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE - CORRUPT - COSTLY-EU

SOON TO BE A

SUPER-STATE

 

 

 

 

*

 

Brought forward from 2009

Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 
Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 
Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 
Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.'

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

Full ARTICLE


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich--EU.html#ixzz4oiNwdrtt
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

H.F.1270 -BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

 

*

 

 

[Of course the  MONARCHS  of ENGLAND since the 19th Century have been under the INFLUENCE of the ILLUMINATI.]

 

 

Winston Churchill warned the populace in the

1920's

 

 of the true facts of the ILLUMINATI who  have virtually ruled the world  since

 

WATERLOO

 

*

In the 1920's Winston Churchill mentioned the Jewish Bolsheviks the details a

JEW WATCH

 

[As we have explained the social circles which Winston Churchill  was connected  with during his long life such as the Rothchilds and like-others were the Establishment existing at the time from the Disraeli era. It was an impossibility to ignore particularly as he wished to further his career.  Of course he was a strong and enthusiastic supporter of the BRITISH EMPIRE in its outer image and must have been aware of the true nature within.   Those that might criticize him should consider the circumstances of the time which have ameliorated somewhat over the past decades until the present day when there are at last changes afoot.]

 December 2012 

 

 

 

 

A WARNING!

 FROM A PATRIOTIC PRIME MINISTER

 

 

BENJAMIN DISRAELI

 

IN

 

 1852

 

 

In the 19th Century, Benjamin Disraeli, [Beaconsfield] a baptised Jew,[Prime Minister of England-1868 ] proclaimed:

 

...the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes...The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property...The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.'
 

THE ABOVE FROPM OUR EDP FRONT PAGE OF 2012

 

IN MARCH 2020 [See ABOVE] It pains us considerably to  now find  that Winston Churchill was a prominent figure within the Rothchild ILLUMINATI before and during the SECOND WORLD WAR until his death

 

 

*

A REMINDER FROM 2004

 

 

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

 supports our

 Ancient Constitution

 

 The following letter was sent to This England by the late Viscount Tonypandy (Mr George Thomas) Speaker of the House of Commons

 

 Sir: Since I retired from the Speaker’s chair in the House of Commons in 1983, I have strictly adhered to our parliamentary tradition, which prevents former Speakers from being embroiled in party political controversies.

 

It is because I am convinced that the question of our national sovereignty towers above all that I feel free to submit this address to the electors of Britain.

 

Our Westminster Parliament is in danger of being denuded of its responsibilities, and of being supplanted by European assembly controlled by a hotchpotch of European politicians and bureaucrats, who have no love for this country. Our national destiny will be subject to foreign control.

 

In our British heritage a special place of honour is reserved for Pym and Hampden, who so courageously fought for the rights of our Parliament against the claims of absolutism by the Crown. Their portraits hang in pride in Speaker’s House, along with that of Speaker Lenthall who defended Parliament’s independence when it was challenged by Charles 1

 

Other parliamentary giants have followed in their wake. Names such as Palmerston and Pitt, Gladstone, Disraeli, Asquith, Lloyd George, Churchill, Attlee, and the like, shine in our history as fierce defenders of self-government by the British people.

 

They should be living in this hour, for we need support to protect our national interests from being subject to foreign control.

 

 No political party in Britain has a mandate from the electorate to surrender our national sovereignty to foreign hands.

 

The current slide towards a single European currency threatens both our economic and our political independence, and thus our sovereignty. Subterfuge and half-truths have been used to persuade the nation that neither our sovereignty nor our relationship with the Commonwealth is endangered.

 

There appears to be a conspiracy of silence about the fact that the United Kingdom’s trade and oversees investments are still much greater with countries outside the European Union than they are with those within the Union, which is itself increasingly a puppet of a French and German alliance.

 

It is not too late for us to save our sovereignty

 

For more than 600 years Speakers of the House of Commons have fiercely defended the supremacy of the Westminster Parliament. As one whose privilege it was to follow humbly in the steps of the mighty Speakers of the past, I call upon our nation to awake, and to demand that the voice of all our people shall be heard before the next inter-governmental conference takes irrevocable decisions affecting our sovereignty.

 

A national Referendum conducted before, and not after, further decisions are taken is our democratic right.

 

This is the only sure way to prevent our parliamentary sovereignty, our judicial system and our Commonwealth relationships from being grievously undermined.

 

*          *          *

 

We believe that Lord Tonypandy would support our cause at this momentous time for our nation when the people will at last have their say after they have been honestly given the true facts of the dangers to the Constitution, Freedom and Independence of our Country.

2004

 

 

*

 

 

 

AT LAST!

BREXIT

GETS THROUGH

COMMONS!

Bill passes with 99 majority-now it goes to the Lords.

By Jason Groves- Daily Mail-Political Editor

 

BORIS Johnson's Brexit deal passed its final hurdle in

the Commons last night despite a last-ditch effort by

Labour to block it.

 

MPs voted by 330 to 231 to pass the landmark

 

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT BILL

 

which will allow Britain to finally

 

 

LEAVE THE EU

 

on

 

JANUARY 31, 2020.

 

 

The 99-vote majority was in stark contrast with the repeated maulings handed out to Theresa May's deal last year. Downing Street welcomed last night's result, saying 'Securing the legislation's passage through the Commons is a significant step.'

 

Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay

 described the vote as

 

'an important moment in our national story'.

 

The legislation will move to the Lords next week. Peers waged a running battle against

 

BREXIT

 

in the last Parliament.

Mr Barclay warned them not to obstruct the Bill., saying the public had given a 'resounding message' at the election that they wanted the

2016 REFERENDUM RESULT

TO BE RESPECTED.

A total of 167 Labour MPs voted against the legislation.

All six candidates to succeed Jeremy Corbyn voted against the Bill, including frontrunners Sir Keir Starmer and Rebecca Long Bailey.

All 330 votes in favour were Conservative.

Shadow Brexit minister Thangam Debbonaire said Labour was opposed to many elements of Mr Johnson's deal. She said: 'WE are voting against the entire Bill, but that is not voting against Brexit.

The SNP's Westminster leader Ian Blackford predicted the vote would result in Scotland becoming 'an independent European country'.

Conservative MPs welcomed the vote. Sir Bernard Jenkin said: ' Now we can stop banging on about Europe.'

Sir Bill Cash described the event as a great moment in our democratic history.

Sir John Hayes said the legislation was the 'first step not on a trip to a different place but on a return journey a return journey for this United Kingdom to hope, to patriotism and to greatness.

It came as the EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier issued a warning over the Prime Minster's timetable to complete  talks on a trade deal by the end of the year[2022].The new legislation rules out any extension of the Brexit transition period, due to finish at the end of December.[2022]

He also warned that the EU would not strike a deal on trade unless the UK agreed to keep open its fishing grounds to European trawlers.

[THIS MUST NEVER EVER HAPPEN-PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH IN 1972 GAVE AWAY OUR FISHING GROUNDS FOR NOTHING! IT IS VITAL THAT WE REGAIN FULL SOVEREIGNTY OF OUR SEAS AS BEFITS A TRUE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JANUARY 10,2020

 

H.F.1952

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

[TREASON]

This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

 

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1784

 

 

 

*

 

 

[A WORLD OF CHANGE WILL SOON BE UPON US-WITH THE GOOD GUYS IN CHARGE.]

 

US Presidential Election, Tokyo Olympics cancelled? Engineered pandemic ushers in World Government

 

The controlled demolition of the Khazarian mafia financial system is now visible for all to see.  The 30% plunge in oil prices, the meltdown of stock and bond markets and a freeze in world travel and trade are all being orchestrated in tandem with a fake pandemic, multiple sources confirm.  The pandemic, which is mostly a media event, and the financial collapse, which is real, are the cover being used to usher in a world republic, P3 Freemason, Illuminati and CIA sources all confirm.  The trigger event was the default on February 16th of the U.S. Corporate Government, they say.

The aim of this controlled demolition is to remove Satan-worshipping, genocidal criminals from the apex of world power, Pentagon and other sources say.  This will allow the release of forbidden technology and usher in a new age of wonder, they add.  For example, old age will soon be a treatable condition, the sources say.

To make this possible, a ruling class that has been trying to kill us with pandemics, carcinogens, war, etc.  is being systematically hunted down and brought to justice, they add.  They elaborate:

“U.S. troops sent to Europe for a NATO exercise may also engage in arrests of Zionist and deep state assets not just in Switzerland but Brussels, Antwerp, Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam, and London.”

Inside the U.S. meanwhile, the Presidential election process has already degenerated into a farce with the Democratic nomination being obviously stolen for a senile, corrupt Joe Biden.  Here is an example of the nonsense Biden is spewing:

“If you want to nominate a Democrat, a lifelong Democrat, a proud Democrat, an Obiden-Bama Democrat, join us. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/stop-calling-it-stutter-here-are-dozens-examples-bidens-dementia-symptoms

One CIA source summed up the situation in this way:

“Trump is set to be the next president as he will declare martial law, to protect the people of course.  It’s estimated that up to 70% of Americans will be affected.  He will cancel the elections.  May he be the last President standing?  He has been aware of this maneuver for a long time.  The dominos are starting to fall.”

The number of sealed indictments in the U.S. is now close to 160,000 and 1,613 indictments have actually been acted upon.  So now it looks like many of these corporate crooks will finally end up in jail where they belong. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit#gid=1703320056

There has also been a record number of corporate bosses quitting or losing their jobs since January.  An NSA source elaborated by saying, “The President has ordered a full-scale investigation of all communications across the…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
March 9, 2020

[COMMENTS AT TOP IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1995

 

 

*

 

 

Boris Johnson warns Brussels over demands that we keep following European Union rules.

 

NO TRADE DEAL BY JUNE? WE WALK AWAY

 

By Jason Groves-Political Editor-DAILY MAIL

FEBRUARY 28,2020

 

 

BORIS JOHNSON yesterday vowed to walk away from

 

Brexit talks in the summer unless Brussels drops its demand

 

for Britain to continue following EU rules.

 

 

IN a hardline ultimatum, Downing Street said talks on a Brexit trade deal would be called off in June unless the 'broad outline' of a deal was in sight.

At that point ministers would switch their focus to

 

LEAVING WITHOUT A DEAL

 

at the end of the year. In a 30-page 'negotiating mandate' the Government confirmed it was pursuing a Canada-style

 

FREE TRADE DEAL

 

in which there are no tariffs or quotas.

 

But ministers also laid down a series of red lines which are likely to lead to an acrimonious start to the talks in Brussels on Monday.

These included ruling out any supervision by the

 

EUROPEAN COURTS

 

rejecting the EU's demands to retain the status quo on fishing and ruling out ant extension of the transition period beyond the end of this year.

[2020]

Brussels has said that the EU will open up its markets only if the UK agrees to comprehensive 'level playing field' obligations in which Britain continues to match Brussels regulations in areas such as competition law, workers rights and environmental standards.

The Prime Minister yesterday said that the EU needed to understand that

 

BRITAIN WAS GOING TO TAKE BACK

 

CONTROLS OF ITS LAWS.

 

'The whole objective [of Brexit]  is so the UK

can do things differently and better,' Mr

Johnson said.

 

' The crucial thing for our friends and partners to understand is that this is a great country with possible standards for the environment, for animal welfare, for workers' rights. WE are not going to engage in some race to the bottom.

'BUT we do not ask the EU to follow every change in UK legislation and so it doesn't make sense for them to make the same request of us.'

Ministers insisted that the new economic freedoms would benefit the UK, but there was no commitment to publish a detailed economic impact statement of the deal.

In the Commons, Michael Gove evoked Margaret Thatcher, declaring, No No, No, when Labour suggested a closer approach.

[In other words a surrender of the wishes of the 17.4 million British citizens who voted in December ,2019 to be

 FREE OF THE SMOTHERING and INTERFERING so-called EUROPEAN UNION in order to

 

REGAIN OUR FREEDOM

 

as a

 

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.]

 

He said Labour's plans would mean

 

'no control over our borders, and no way

 

of charting our own

 

INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC

 

 

DESTINY'.

 

Government sources said the tough new timetable for talks was designed to

 

focus minds and provide certainty for business.

The UK is demanding that the outline of a deal is in place by June[2020], with the agreement finalised by September[2020]. The new document states that if there is no deal in sight in June, 'the Government will need to decide whether the UK's attention should move away from negotiations and focus solely on continuing domestic preparations to exit the transition period in an orderly fashion'.

Sources yesterday confirmed that

 

LEAVING WITHOUT A DEAL

 

 would require new 'customs infrastructure' at ports and airports. But they said much of this would be needed even in the event of a

 

FREE TRADE DEAL

 

as the UK is leaving both the

 

CUSTOMS UNION

 

and the

 

SINGLE MARKET

 

at the end of the year.[2020]...

 

*  *  *

 H.F.1990

 

 

 

 
Deal or No Deal: Those dividing lines explained

ANALYSIS

by  Jason Groves

POLITICAL EDITOR OF THE DAILY MAIL

 

February 28,2020

 

TIME TABLE FOR NEGOTIATIONS

What the UK says:

No extension of the Brexit transition period beyond this year, Boris Johnson said he was ready to walk away from the talks as early as June. [2020] if no deal is in sight.

EU: What the EU says: Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier has said the December 31 deadline does not leave enough time to settle all issues and has urged the UK to consider extending the transition. The French claim the tight timetable amounts to 'blackmail'.

FLASHPOINT:3

[The EU have taken up almost four years of wasted time because of their arrogance so typical of its undemocratic and bullying nature. All they are interested in, is to show others within their captive nation bloc, that their growing feelings of FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE will never be granted.]

*

THE LEVEL PLAYING FIELD

*

FISHING

UK: 'Ready to consider' access for EU trawlers, but only as part of separate negotiations. Any quota for EU fishing fleets would be decided at annual negotiations run by the UK. Ministers previously said UK fishermen will get a bigger share of quota.

 [A SELL OUT!]

 

*

EU: Brussels wants access to for EU trawlers granted on the same basis as now. The issue is a 'redline' for the bloc-it says without a fish deal 'there won't be any agreement.

[A typical response from Hitler's wartime planned EU.]

EU: Brussels wants access to for EU trawlers granted on the same basis as now. The issue is a 'redline' for the bloc-it says without a fish deal 'there won't be any agreement.

[A typical response from Hitler's wartime planned EU.]

 

LEGAL OVERSIGHT

UK Rejects any role for EU laws and judges after Brexit, warning it 'will not negotiate any arrangement in which the UK does not have control of its own laws and political life'.

Says European Court of Justice will not have any jurisdiction in the UK'. Disputes should be settled by joint committee reflecting 'judicial autonomy of the UK'.

*

 

EU: UK to follow EU laws forever on state aid-regulations governing subsidies to industry. In other areas, It insists that the ECJ [The Criminals Friend] should be the 'sole arbiter'  in settling disputes over interpretations of EU law

Flashpoint rating 4

 

*

SECURITY

*

UK: WANTS close co-operation with EU on sharing DNA, fingerprints and criminal records.

However, it is not seeking to continue with the EU Arrest Warrant for reciprocal extraditions.

*

EU: wants 'reciprocal access' on DNA and fingerprints in fight against crime and terror.

Access could be limited by EU data laws, potentially blocking the release of vital intelligence.

FLASHPOINT:2

 

 

APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKED WITH HITLER'S NAZI GERMANY

AND IT WON'T WORK WITH HITLER'S NAZI PLAN IN 2020

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1991

 

 

 

 

 

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

[We shall be showing blockbuster extracts from the above publication of over 270pages which will confirm the suspicions of many that the  above title does not EXAGGERATE the DANGER to your FREEDOM and once FREE COUNTRY.]

*

A NAZI EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

[BERLIN-1942]

At the conclusion of the 'Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft' Dr Professor Hunke drew together the themes set out in the book by the following contributors:

+   Reichsswirtschatsminister und President dur Deutschen Reichsbank, Dr Walter Funk, who expostulated on

'The economic character of the New Europe

*

+    Dr Horst Jecht, from the Berlin School of Economics, who anticipated the development of the intended

'European Economic Community'.

*

+    Dr Emil Woermann. a professor from the University of Halle, who described the

'New European Agricultural Order'

which would rig farm prices [the forerunner of the EU's disastrous Marxist Common Agricultural Policy.

 [If you need some background possibly our Foreign Secretary David Miliband

 might be able to help.]

*

+    Dr Anton Reithinger, from I.G.Farben, Berlin, the manufactures of Zyklon-B extermination gas, who invoked the

'New European Industrial Economy'

*

+    Dr Philip Beisiegle, Director of the Reich Ministry of Labour, who gave details of the

'New Labour Order'

with emphasis on the rigging of labour markets, the movement of workers in accordance with inter-state agreements, and the de facto direction of labour (which the EU has so far not dared to emulate)

*

+    Gustav Koenigs, a State Secretary, whose paper discussed

'European traffic Questions'

-the forerunner of today's

 'Trans-European Networks';

*

+    Dr Bernard Benning, Director of the Reichs-Kredit-Gesellschaft A.G., Berlin, who elaborated upon

'European Currency Questions'.

including in particular:

 The harmonisation of European rates of exchange

'the future form of the European Currency System'

['Die Zukunft des europaisches Wahrungssystems'], and

'The European Currency Bloc'.,

*

+ Dr Carl Clodius, the Manager of the Foreign trade Centre in Berlin, who described

'European Trading and Economic Agreements'

touching inter alia upon: 

'Principles of European cooperation'

'The regional principle' [which was the precursor of the Maastricht Treaty's Common Regional policy]

and finally 'Methods of European cooperation' [the original thinking behind the oppressive system of extreme collectivist legalism and Treaty-based complexity].

With the possible partial exception of the chapter on the common labour policy, given its emphasis on the direction of labour, the main subjects aired at the Berlin brainstorming sessions in 1941 presided over by Dr Funke, have formed the framework for the EU Collective's Maastricht Treaty and its derivatives, particularly striking are the Nazis' published blueprints for a

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

the harmonisation of European rates of exchange, a European Currency System and the reinvention of coercive legalism as the primary basis for 'methods of European cooperation', and such collectivist concepts as 'trans-European networks' and Common agricultural policy.  The primacy of the European Union's Common Agricultural policy today can be traced not to pressure from the French farming lobby, as is usually supposed, but to the proposals put forward by the leader of the powerful German agricultural community, R Walther Darre, whose seminar in January 1939 was entitled:

'Market organisation of national Socialist agricultural policy as a pacemaker for a new foreign trade organisation.'

On 3rd April 1992, in an address to a meeting of the globalist Bertelsmann Forum, Dr Helmut Kohl omitted to credit the Nazis for linking Germany's destiny with European unification -claiming the authorship of this scheme himself.

He explained: 'There is no alternative to a policy which aims at combination, unless we wish to challenge fate and follow the way back to the system of small countries and rivalries of yesterday... It has been my policy from the outset to combine indivisibly German unity and the political unification of Europe.  For myself, these are two sides of the same coin... We shall be able to create this greater Europe provided we irrevocably advance the European core'.

 

 

Chapter and Section headings of 'EuropaischeWirtscaftsgemeinschaft

 

The main Contents Pages of 'Europaische Wirtschaftsgesellschaft', published in 1942 by Haude & Spenersche Verlaagsbuchhandlung, Max Paschke on instructions of the Association of Berlin Business People and Industrialists and the Berlin School of Economics, containing the previous year's Berlin papers on proposals for a new

European Economic Community

were as follows [names of speakers first]:

 

 

 

 

[YES! They were planning it back in 1942-No surprise as the Germans are not so stupid even if they lost TWO WORLD WARS they have always been an aggressive GERMANIC nation

and the ENGLISH nation within its protective island home for over 1400 years has fought with the Germanic spirit of FREEDOM to protect its isolation and has since with its new arrivals from Europe and beyond remained a more settled people and should have known better than to fall prey to our accustomed enemy over the past 100 years into the trap in 1972 in a so-called EEC-European Economic Community even though the information was known by the Intelligence Services after the war but possibly even earlier.  We have the NAZI-TRAITOR of 60 years

Edward Heath

 who admitted before his death in 2005 that he had lied about the true implications of the Accession Treaty which

Lord Irwin

 had confirmed before the Treaty was signed.

 

 

Returning to:

 

* Professor Dr Heinrich Hunke, President of the Association of Berlin Business People and Industrialists and of the Institute of the German Economy.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

* Economic practice

* Problems facing the Continental European Economic Community.

 

 

 

TO BE CONTINUED.

 

 

 

 

 

[As many people realise the impetus for the EEC was from the top levels of the Nazis hierarchy. There was no place in their plans to create a fully democratic and therefore a fully accountable system but to consider how they must hold tight control from the top and only give the impression of their willingness to make changes which they knew could never take place as their NEW EUROPE would be ruled from the TOP for the benefit of those at the TOP and for those in the community that did their bidding. And so it has been proved over the past 35 years.    In a real democracy the impetus as shown in the case of the American Declaration of Independence had to have the backing of the people.  Of course there were loyalists who would not support the Revolution and many left their country for Canada or back to what they considered their country.  But the Revolution was successful because the majority felt the need for 'THEIR COUNTRY'.

Over the past three decades the English people have been lied to by their Governments of all colours.  The Nazi traitor Edward Heath who was part of a spy-ring in Balliol College Oxford in 1938 admitted a few years before his death in 2005 that he had lied to the people about the question of no loss of sovereignty and it was later revealed that the EU negotiators were astounded when Heath offered them our FISHING GROUNDS simply as a sweetener.  The fractional elements of eurosceptic opposition failed when they became aware of the true facts to take firm united action of civil disobedience and as a consequence their country has been sold to a Foreign POWER. Not relying on orderly queuing in the precincts of Parliament with their balloons and piece of paper in their hands - hadn't they remembered the so-called 'Peace in our Time'  lesson of 1938.  As you can observe above you have been ensnared in a Nazis horror story because you trusted YOUR REPRESENTATIVES to 'play the game' with honest answers and behaviour -you received neither and as a consequence you no longer for all intents and purposes have  a country.] 

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

 

[More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

for additional information on the EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE contact:

International Currency Review

www.worldreports.org

c/story@worldreports.org

*

 *THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

[ 26 bulletins above- EACH Capital Letter * .

 

DECEMBER-2008

HOME

 

H.F.1932

 

*

 

 

 

 

PLEASE NOTE! A NUMBER OF BULLETINS HAVE BEEN MOVED TO PART 2 IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE SPACE TO FACILITATE A FASTER RESPONSE FOR OUR VIEWERS"

FEBRUARY 27,2020

 

 

 

 

[A CHURCHILLIAN RESPONSE

 

to Hitler,s so-called European Union.]

 

PM: 'Taking back control on December 31,2020'

MORE IMPORTANT THAN A TRADE DEAL'

By Jason Groves-Political Editor-Daily Mail

Tuesday,February 25,2020.

 

 

BORIS Johnson last night warned Brussels his priority is to 'take back control' of Britain's borders and laws by the end of the year, even if that scuppers talks on post -Brexit trade deal.

 

In a tough new ultimatum, Downing Street said it would not extend the transition period beyond the end of the year, even if that means

 

LEAVING WITHOUT A DEAL

 

EU leaders have warned there is not enough time to complete the comprehensive agreement both sides have signed up to deliver by the end of the year-[2020]

 

 Paris yesterday accused the UK of 'blackmail', and said it would mot sacrifice French interests to meet the timetable.

 

BUT No 10 said ending the transition period, duriung which the UK has to abide by EU laws-including FREE MOVEMENT-was the Prime Minister's TOP PRIORITY.

 

A spokesman said: 'The UK's primary objective in the negotiations is to ensure that we :

 

RESTORE OUR ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL

 

INDEPENDENCE ON JANUARY 1, 2021.

 

A Whitehall source added: 'WE have to have back control by January 1.2021. We are being very clear about that so that there is no misunderstanding.' Brussels will publish its' 'negotiating mandate' for the Brexit talks today.

 

It will say a Canada-style free trade deal with the UK is now off the table because of the 'geographical proximity' of the two econo0mies. The EU is also demanding Brirain agree a 'level playing field and wants 'robust commitments'that the UK continues to follow EU RULES on STATE AID,COMPETITION LAW,SOCIAL and ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS and RELEVANT TAX MATTERS'.

 

No 10 yesterday rejected the idea that the UK should

follow Brussels diktats in return for a deal.

 

The PM's spokesman said there was 'no reason'why the proximity of the UK  and EU'should mean restrictions on trade, and pointed out that the US,Canada and Mexico have signed a FREE TRADE DEAL.

 

France yesterday insisted that it will not be 'blackmailed' into accepting a 'bad' post-Brexit trade deal becauser of thev December 31 deadline. In a sign that the EU is prepared to take a tough line,French Europe minister Amelie deMontchalin said that her countries fgarmers.fishermen and businesses would not make sacrifices in order for a trade deal to be in place by the end of the year.

She told TV station France 2: 'It must be understood by British businesses that we do not want a bad agreement-almost certainly, that we will sign up to no blackmail.'

 

Refusing to allow the UK to dictate the time-table, Miss de Montchalin said: 'It is because Boris Johnson wants a deal at all costs for December 31 that we will sign, under pressure, a bad deal.' In an indication that access to UK fishing grounds will be one of the main flashpoints in the talks, the French minister added: 'The fishermen have the right to be protected, they know very well that if we sign a bad deal they will lose enormously.'

The PM's Brexit inner circle will meet today to sign off on the UK's mandate before it is published on Thusrsday. Ministers are expected to confirm the want a Canada-style agreement with zero tariffs.

The PM's Europe adviser David Frost and his team will then head to Brussels for the first round of negotiations on March 2,2020.

 

*  *  *

 

 

Tuesday,February 25,2020.

H.F.1988

 
Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday,November 19,2018 

 

Time to show some moral fibre

How many of those like me who participated in World War 11 would have chosen to capitulate in the way the Prime Minister has in her Brexit negotiations with the EU

I will be 96 this week and am housebound, but my life wasn't always like this . At 17, in early 1940, I joined the RAF ,serving in Bomber Command at RAF Brize Norton and also at Bletchley  Park. Posted to the Air Ministry in London. I was bombed out and 15 girls in my billet died. My husband was a wireless operator and rear gunner, who returned home from the two-year siege of Malta, weighing five stone. We had determination, pride and above all, moral fibre.

I feel that the once-proud UK has been asset stripped, ground down and told what to do by unelected bureaucrats in Europe. I knew exactly what I wanted from the referendum

TO LEAVE THE EU

I fear for the generations that follow me because the EU seems to want nothing more that to become a FEDERAL STATE.

WHY CAN'T THE GOVERNMENT SHOW SOME MORAL FIBRE?

I AM SO ASHAMED OF THEM ALL

 

Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday, November 19,2018

R M Wangford -SUFFOLK

[AS a pensioner couple of 87 and 89 we can understand the feelings of the above patriots and only a few days ago we watched the film the DARKEST HOUR. There was a sequence in the film when Winston Churchill was being driven in London after getting so much opposition to his plans from pro German-peace faction and suddenly when his vehicle stopped at a road junction near a tube station he suddenly without notice left the vehicle  in the vicinity of a underground railway station in London and entered it and went on to the platform where the many travellers recognised him. When a tube train arrived he entered the train and was soon in conversation with all the occupants of his carriage to the point that he conversed with everyone getting their names and their feelings about fighting the war and they without exception said the war must be fought vigorously and valiantly until VICTORY.  Later when he addressed members of the Cabinet he mentioned the names of those patriots and related their feelings of solidarity with their Prime Minister.  The climax of the film was as the to the end with Winston's speech before the HOUSE which included towards the end with:

We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. we shall fight them in the hills; we shall never surrender.-Winston Churchill.

By this time the once quiet Opposition benches suddenly joined the Government benches and  broke into a stirring clammour of support with hundreds of order papers being thrown into the air with gusto. The House was united for WAR and Churchill had won.]

Today, the feelings of the above patriotic pensioners show how our country after 46 years within Hitler's so-called EU how millions of our once proud patriots are now fellow - travellers of the

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE - CORRUPT - COSTLY-EU

SOON TO BE A

SUPER-STATE

H.F.1424

 

 

 

 

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

 

 

 

Cod War II?

 Tell the EU

 to

sling it's hook

 

LETTER FROM A FORMER TRAWLER SKIPPER TO THE

 DAILY MAIL

-February27,2020

 

 

AS A FORMER trawler skipper heavily involved in the so-called Cod Wars during the Seventies, I am interested that political commentators are talking about the possibility of a new Cod War after December 2020.

This is in reaction  to the French having the brass neck to tell us that their fishing rights within our waters are non-negotiable. It's about time our politicians started to stand up to our continental friends.

The Cod Wars were fought over Iceland seeking to expand its territorial limits and prevent its fisheries being over-exploited. The UK's negotiations for joining the Common Market or EEC, as it was then, coincided with this. To understand the impact of the betrayal of our fishing industry, we need to go back to the Seventies when Conservative prime minister was manipulated by the French into allowing the best of our fishing grounds to be given away without any proper authority or consultation with Parliament or the British people.

During the negotiations, the French hijacked the fisheries meetings and were pushing for fishing to be treated as a common resource with equal access for all, which the British and Irish governments initially rejected.

The deep-sea trawler owners, then the most powerful players in the British fishing industry, were in favour because they thought Iceland and Norway would eventually join and they would have unbridled access to their rich waters, cancelling out the Cod Wars' losses.

BUT Iceland and Norway rejected the EEC because of the fishing rights and the rest is history.

It is worth considering just how much of that thinking was driving the lobbying to a gullible Government in not accepting any of the fair deals Iceland was offering. We never suspected these European fleets would eventually establish 'historic rights' to control our fishing  grounds, aided by massive EU grants, not only from their own governments but also from us.

Decommissioning schemes to reduce the British fleet were brought in and our fishermen were put out of work while other nations, with the help of European grants, increased and modernised their fleets. The Spanish fleet was bigger than the rest of Europe's combined, but when they joined the EEC they declared they would not decommission even one vessel. They not only got away with that, they also secured grants to scrap, rebuild and modernise 850 0f their fishing boats.

..The French, Belgians and Spanish seem able to fish with impunity, while our fishermen are persecuted because we've got to be seen to be fair.

WE  have not had one fisheries minister worth their salt. I was in Brussels for several December Councils when our minister never came out with the quota he went in with. It was always cut to benefit of the other states, resulting in us being a minority in our own waters. Can someone explain that?

 

[WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE JOINED HITLER'S EU PLAN-IT WAS EDWARD HEATH A GERMAN SPY SINCE 1938 UNTIL HIS

DEATH

 IN 2005 WHO JUST BEFORE, HAD ADMITTED HIS PART IN THE CONSPIRACY TO JOIN THE EU BECAUSE HE WANTED THE UK TO JOIN THE EU - WHATEVER IT TOOK,.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

FEBRUARY 27,2020

 
 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

H.F.1989

 

DAILY MAIL :

 

Man's 'transphobic' tweet was

 

 

LAWFUL,

 

 

High Court rules ...

 

 

 · A man's 'transphobic' tweets were lawful

 

 

and police breached his right to freedom of expression

 

 

 by behaving like 'the Stasi' when they turned up at …

Police 'Gestapo in transphobic tweet probe, blasts judge.

Businessman's landmark win in FREE SPEECH CASE

 

Businessman's landmark win in free speech case

 

By Sue Reid

 

A HIGH Court judge yesterday likened police to the Nazi Gestapo in the way they investigated a businessman accused of transphobic tweets

 

Mr Justice Julian Knowles said officers violated Harry Miller's

 

 

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

 

 

 by recording his comments as a hate incident and threatening

 

prosecution.

 

He also blasted the heavy-handed manner in which they turned

 

up to quiz him at his business last year.

 

The probe was sparked after Mr Miller was reported for 31 posts,

 

including a limerick about transgender issues.

 

In a landmark ruling for

 

 

FREE SPEECH

 

 

Mr Justice Knowles said he did not break

 

 

the law,,,

 

 

He added:   'The effect of the police turning up at his place of

 

work because of his political opinions must not be

 

underestimated.

 

 

'It would be to undervalue a cardinal democratic

 

 

freedom in this country.

 

WE have never had a Cheka, Gestapo or a Stasi'-a reference to

 

the secret police forces in Stalin's Soviet Union, Nazi Germany

 

and the former Communist East Germany.

 

 

[The so-called Human Rights legislation has much to

 

 

do with confounding English Justice. We need to exit

 

 

this gross interference in English Law by the end of

 

 

2020. Perhaps Prime Minister Boris Johnson has this

 

 

already in mind?]

 

 

'There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune,

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound in shallows and in miseries."

Shakespeare.

 

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 

 

  1. Judges make it even harder to

     

    kick out foreign criminals ...

     

     

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

    14/06/2017 & 15/02/20· Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

  2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able

     

    to deport EU criminals ...

     

     

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

    08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

H.F.1984/1

 

 

H.F1984 NEED WE SAY MORE?

 

 

IIMMIGRATION-

THE ENEMY WITHIN!

WHY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE IGNORED GRASS ROOTS CALL FOR A HALT TO IMMIGRATION SINCE ENOCH POWELL SPOKE FOR THE PEOPLE OF OUR SMALL ISLAND THOSE MANY DECADES AGO. THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T SUFFICIENT HOUSING AVAILABLE AS LOCAL PEOPLE WON'T A STOP TO CONCRETING ANY MORE OF THEIR BEAUTIFUL COUNTRYSIDE.

 We hear that millions of robots will soon be a part of our life. Hasn't anyone thought about the consequences of this on our everyday life. Our transport system already overloaded will have to accommodate those extra bottoms. Millions of people will lose their jobs and become the responsibility of the general taxpayer.

As a small island a quarter the size of Germany it was stated many decades ago that the population of between 20 to 30 million would be a comfortable number to match the energy and other resources necessary for a comfortable existence. We have been recently informed that by 2050 we will have an island population of 80 million. Germany which is four times our landmass had 82 million not so long in the past and has accepted over a million immigrants in the last year alone.

It is the political parties, particularly the GANG OF THREE who over the past decades have looked on increased immigration as their source of future voters and as has been demonstrated they decided to ignore local objections to more housing and put pressure on local councils to build to accommodate the millions of immigrants in their back yard.

We mentioned a number of years ago that governments should not put the cart before the horse by allowing millions of immigrants to settle in our once settled and comfortable island home. As we all know there isn't sufficient housing for those many elderly who wish to downside which has been ignored for decades.

It is time for the politicians of all parties to face reality and immediately embark on a programme of an immediate block on future immigration except for the need for particular needs of the moment and the encouragement of immigrants to return to their own back yard .

We have over 3 million of the Islamic faith of which we are told over 60 per cent have NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING INTO OUR SOCIETY-their own CLERICS who have integrated have criticized  successive governments for their failure in not bringing in strict measures-

EITHER INTEGRATE-OR GO!

Instead, with successive governments looking to  Saudi Arabian Government investment and ARMS CONTRACTS they have chosen to ignore the repeated calls for ACTION! and simply leave the matter for a future government which means

THAT NOTHING IS DONE!

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS ARE IN POWER TO CARRY OUT THE WISHES OF THE ELECTORATE

NOT

THE SELFISH WISH

OF

UNPATRIOTIC POLITICIANS.

This is a matter that UKIP should have been covering but their internal bickering and unpatriotic mischief's have proved that they have been a tool of successive governments since its formation decades ago. We in fact were invited to the House of Lords at its inauguration and have not been impressed by their usual lack lustre performance over the years.]

ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE

 by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 6-2017

H. F.1243 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

WHY IT'S

 GOT HARDER TO DEPORT CRIMINALS

Foreign convicts exploiting human rights loophole reaches a five year high.

By David Barrett-Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent-February 15,2020

 

THE number of of foreign criminals avoiding

 

deportation on human rights grounds has hit

 

the highest level in five years.

 

Cases have nearly tripled since political pressure over abuse of human rights helped force successful claims down to a record low.

 

It comes amid concern about legal challenges to block deportations after dozens of Jamaican criminals had to be removed from a Home Office charter flight earlier this week.

 

When Theresa May was home secretary, she told the 2011 Tory party conference that

 

LABOUR''S HUMAN RIGHTS Act

 

[To be precise-Tony Blair's.]

 

 

'needs to go'

 

and that the meaning of one

 crucial clause had been perverted' to prevent removals.

The Home Office redoubled its efforts to fight cases in the immigration courts.

By 2016 the European Convention on Human Rights and other humanitarian laws were used in only 60 successful applications by foreign criminals.

The following year they more than doubled to 144.

By 2018, the most recent figure whole year for which figures are available, the number reached a five-year-high of 172.-the most since 212 in 2013...

 

The Mail revealed on Thursday that among the criminals who had been due to be removed from this country were killer Fitzroy Daley and rapist Fabian Henry.

 

Government sources have said they fear the criminals remaining in Britain will win bail within days and be released from immigration detention centres.

 

The Home Office is due to defend against the Jamaica deportation legal challenge in the High Court on Monday.

A spokesman said. 'WE make no apology for seeking to remove dangerous foreign criminals. WE will continue to fight robustly in the courts to ensure foreign criminals are removed as quickly as possible.

 

February 15,2020

 

dailymail.co.uk

 

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

  1. Judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

    14/06/2017 · Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

  2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able to deport EU criminals ...

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

    08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

H.F.1984/1

H.F.1986

 

 

THE ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

 ORG. UK.

 

 

 

 

 

WISHES THE

 

SCOTTISH PEOPLE

WELL

IN THEIR DELIBERATIONS

ON THE MATTER

OF THEIR FUTURE

AS A

FREE

INDEPENDENT

NATION STATE

*

MATERIALISM

IS NOT THE ANSWER

FREEDOM

IS!

HISTORY SHOWS YOU THE WAY!

'We fight not for glory

Nor for wealth

Nor for Honour

But for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

( From the Arbroath Manifesto sent by the nobles and commons of SCOTLAND to the Pope in 1320)

 

 

 

'...In 1320 the Scots drew up one of the most stirring documents in history. Their Declaration called on the Pope to recognize Scotland's just claim to INDEPENDENCE which she would defend to her last hundred men, even against the king, if need be.

On page 130 of In Finlay's book SCOTLAND we found the following in the  last paragraph which we feel sums up the situation today in September 2014:

 

...'If the true outline and identity of SCOTLAND are taking shape through the haar, it must not be looked upon as a break-away from ENGLAND. Only through discovery of HER OWN IDENTITY will SCOTLAND ever contribute her full quota to the partnership [we would say FAMILY] to ENGLAND and to the commonwealth of nations. She is not an ancient nation as the romantics will have us believe, but merely a NATION with a long childhood and adelesence, which perhaps in the end are not bad things.'

 

 

The rebirth of the Scottish Nation State will lead to a revival in time out of the three centuries conspiracy to destroy the FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE in order to bring about a new elitist world government of which the EU and the North American Union and others will be cohersed to follow.  The Scottish people will only remain  truly FREE! if they do not pass their hard-won freedom back to the :

COLLECTIVIST-SOVIETISED-CORRUPT-COSTLY

EUROPEAN UNION

 

THOSE WHO FIGHT FOR THEIR FREEDOM HAVE A GREATER RIGHT THAN THOSE WHO SELL THEIR BIRTHRIGHT FOR MAMMON

 

'Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a weed that grows in every soil.'

 

 EDMUND BURKE

 

 WHAT THE LABOUR PEER LORD SHORE SAID ABOUT FREE NATION STATES OUT OF THE EU

 

 

THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

 

SEPTEMBER 16-2014

 

 

H F 328

 

*

 

 ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

 

H.F.1773

 

*

 

IN ORDER TO HONOUR OUR NORTHERN NEIGHBOURS AND OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR WISH FOR INDEPENDENCE SOMETHING THE MAJORITY OF THE ENGLISH UNDERSTAND WE STATE HERE

FROM THE

Arbroath Manifesto

sent by the

Nobles and Commons of Scotland

to the

Pope

in

1320

 

'We fight not for glory nor for wealth nor for honour but for the freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

*

NOVEMBER/06

 

 

'You can fool  all the people some of the time,

and some of the people all the time,

 but you cannot fool all the people all the time.'

 

ABRAHAM LINCOLN -Speech -Sept.8-1858

 

[The majority of the common people at the General Election of December 12/13-2019  by their actions confirmed the above statement.

 

How the common populace rose up to confront the never-ending audacity of pompous - self-centered  -  arrogant - undemocratic elected persons, and sent them on their way']

 

 

"You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing .

Depart I say, and let us have done with you!

In the name of God. go!"

 

 

Oliver Cromwell-1653

 

 

 

 

 
 

Bushfire  facts the

biased

 BBC ignores

 

PETER HITCHENS

 

 

MAIL ON SUNDAY

 

January 12,2020

 

Glad as I always am to get news about Australia, an interesting parallel civilisation very like Britain but also deeply different, I am sick almost to screaming of the BBC's incessant coverage of the forest fires there.

They do it only because it supports their fanatic.al preaching about man-made global warming.

 

ACTUALLY IT DOESN'T.

 

A little study reveals that Australia has been just as hot before, according to measurements as far back as

 

1889

 

Various excuses are now made for ignoring these inconvenient figures but there really isn't much doubt about it.

 

Huge forest fires are also common in Australia's brief history, some of the worst having been in the very hot summer of

 

1938-9

 

After lethal blazes in 2009, a Royal Commission in Victoria strongly recommended the 'prescribed burning' of brush to prevent future fires-

 

an old Aboriginal method.

 

It criticised the 'minimalist approach to prescribed burning despite recent official or independent reports and inquires, all of which recommended increasing the programme.

 

The State has allowed the forests to continue accumulating excessive fuel loads, adding to the likelihood of more intense bushfires and therefore placing fire-fighters and communities at greater risk.'

 

 

PETER HITCHENS

 

FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

[With the huge sums of the so-called FOREIGN AID being

 

WASTED and ending up in the economies of SPACE

 

PROGRAMMED NATIONS surely our own kin and folk DOWN

 

UNDER should be assisted in their URGENT time of NEED?]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

JANUARY 12, 2020

H.F.1953

 

 

[IN THE NICK OF TIME?-A LAST

 

CHANCE APPEAL!]

Despotism and the origins of the European Union

by Don Briggs

Don Briggs finds that Alexis de Tocqueville has much to teach us about freedom

Peter Mullen, concerned about our feebleness today [Winter-2008/9], expressed bafflement at how the British people coped with casualty levels such as the death toll of 2,614 in one night in 1941.

It was a mystery to A. L. Rowse. In his  'The use of History '(Hodder & Stoughton, 1946) Rowse attributed it to the fact that

 "Germany was a strong state with a weak people. Britain was a week state with a strong people."

As regards the origins of the European Union, which Philip Warren believes days back to the 1920's, they could be earlier.

In the wake of the French Revolution of 1789, which shook the world, Edmund Burke said to the French:  " You wish to correct the abuses of your government, but why not return to your old traditions? Why not confine yourself to ma resumption of your ancient liberties? Or, if not possible to recover the obliterated features of your original constitution why not  look towards England." There you would have found the ancient common law of Europe.

Burke was chided by a wise Frenchman for failing to understand the true meaning of the revolution.  In his L'ancien regime et la revolution, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote:

" Burke did not see that what was taking place before his eyes was a revolution whose aim was precisely to abolish the 'ancient common law of Europe' and that there could be no question of putting the clock back."

In a version published by Doubleday Anchor in 1955, written three years before his death in 1859. De Tocqueville lamented that his countrymen had abandoned the original ideal of the Revolution and turned their backs on freedom to " acquiesce in an equality of servitude under the master of all Europe" (sounds familiar).

In place of the old regime they had created and accepted an all-powerful government, stronger and more autocratic than the one they had destroyed, and which " suppressed our dearly-bought liberties and replaced them by a mere pretence of freedom.  France's tamed Assemblies were there now only to give meaningless assent in servility and silence." (familiar?)

"Thus was the nation deprived both of means of self-government and of the chief guarantee of its rights, that is the freedom of speech, thought and literature which ranked among the most valuable achievements of the revolution."

Despotic government had made France the sick man of Europe, wrote de Tocqueville because it had virtually extinguished all those virtues which were so vital to a nation: a spirit of healthy independence, high ambitions, faith in oneself and in a cause, he said. (familiar?) De Tocqueville stated three facts with certainty about the future.

1. All his contemporaries were driven by a force which might have checked or curbed but which they could not stop; the headlong destruction of the aristocracy.

"Freedom alone is capable of lifting men's minds above mammon worship."

2.  Those peoples whose constitutions make it most difficult to get rid of despotic government for any considerable period, were those where aristocracy had ceased to exist.

3. Nowhere was despotism calculated to produce such evil effects as in social groups as these where ties of family, of caste, of class and craft fraternities no longer exist, people became self-seekers, think only of their own interests, narrow individualists caring nothing for the public good.  despotism encourages these vices, and money becomes the sole criteria of a social status, changing hands incessantly, raising and lowering the status of individuals and families.  Feelings for others' welfare cools; despotic government freezes them.

" love of gain, a fondness for business careers, the desire to get rich al all costs, a craving for material comfort and easy living become ruling passions under a despotic government... and tend to lower the moral standards...(familiar?)

" Lowering as they do the national morale, they are despotism's safeguard since they divert men's attention from public affairs and make them shudder at the mere thought of a revolution.

" Despotism alone can provide that atmosphere of secrecy which favours crooked dealings and enables the freebooters of finance to make illicit fortunes."  Despotism gave these vices free rein.  " Freedom and freedom alone can extirpate these vices, for only freedom can deliver the members of a community from that isolation which is the lot of the individual left to his own devices..."

And " Freedom alone is capable of lifting men's minds above mere mammon worship."

Societies must be democratic, and Christian too, but if they were not free, " I make bold to say, never shall we find under such conditions a great citizen, still less a great nation; indeed I would...maintain that where equality and tyranny co exist, a steady deterioration of the mental and moral standards of a nation is inevitable." wrote de Tocqueville.

In July 1971, Edward Heath, as Conservative Prime Minister, promised a government White paper, Britain and Europe:

" The British safeguards of habeas corpus and trial by jury will remain intact. So will the principle that a man is innocent until proved guilty."

" The common law will remain the basis of our legal system."

As we watch habeas corpus and the common law go out of the window today along with our other freedoms, it is worth recalling what Winston Churchill; once said about the alternatives if we abandoned our parliamentary democracy:

:" there is really only one, namely Dictatorship."  And of its many forms, " rule by a caucus of political secretaries driven by bigoted conviction" was one of them.

That too sounds familiar.

 

MAGNA CARTA

 

[We chanced on this article with others a few days ago and realised that they had to be included in the Christmas message because as our heading above we have little time left to make a stand in the true Winstonian spirit to reclaim what is ours by RIGHT! and was in trust for future generations. What was the point of our people fighting in the past TWO WORLD WARS with such huge casualties and cost to let what we had held in trust to be given away by our own representatives. This is your last chance to make amends and show the greater number of your supposed protectors of your accustomed

" RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMAN"

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS  AND HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

THE ABOVE ARTICLE BY DON BRIGGS-FREEDOM TODAY-Winter-2008/9

 

DECEMBER-2013

 

*  *  *

ON DECEMBER 12,2019 at the General Election those who wished to live again in a FREE NATION STATE voted to LEAVE THE EU. However though the People voted to do so in June 2016 they are now informed by

David Churchill the Daily Mail Brussels Correspondent on Saturday December 28,2019

 

EU 'Want us tied to single market for

 THREE YEARS

[Making a total of over 6 years since the overwhelming victory

to

LEAVE THE EU in June 2016.]

 

It is stated in the article of December 28,2019.

 

THE European  Union may ask Britain to remain locked inside its single market until 2023.

Ironically, the man of the hour Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, are greatly responsible for the delay, since their inter- rivalry after the June 23,2016 resulted in Theresa May a ardent REMAINER  becoming Prime Minister, and we all now know the result of that great fatal consequence, in delaying our delivery from

Hitler's planned so-called EU.

Because of this past history it is important that we

 

LEAVE THE EU

 

WITH A

 

NO DEAL]

 

DECEMBER 28-2019

 

]H.F.1805

 

E U ' want us

 tied to single market for THREE YEARS'.

BY

 David Churchill

Daily Mail-Brussels Correspondent

DECEMBER 28-2019

 

THE European Union may ask Britain to remain locked inside its single market and customs union until 2023 -

[over 7 years after the REFERENDUM RESULT in JUNE 2016]

EU Commission president Urania von der Leyen yesterday insisted it would be reasonable' to ask for an extension of the Brexit 'transition' period for up to two years.

It would mean the UK continuing to accept

 

FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT

 

and paying

 

MEMBERSHIP FEES.

 

Mrs von der Leyen, who took over from Jean-Claude Juncker this month, said she was 'very worried' about Boris Johnson's time frame of striking a trade deal by the end of 2020. Speaking to a French newspaper, she said: 'We should seriously ask ourselves if all these negotiations are possible in such a short time.

'I think it would be reasonable to take stock mid-year [2020] and, if necessary agree on an extension.'

 

[THE BLAME FOR THE DELAY IS DUE TO THE EU'S OWN INTRANSIDENCE  RATHER THAN TO FIND A SETTLEMENT IN THE YEAR OF THE UK REFERENDUM  -AND THE UK IN APPOINTING A STRIDENT REMAINER AS PRIME MINISTER.]

 

As it stands the UK will remain in the EU's single market until the end of next year, giving an 11-month window to strike a trade deal after Britain leaves the bloc's institutions on

 

JANUARY 31,2020

 

But according to the terms of the

 

 

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT,this window-

 

 

also known as the 'transition' or

 

 

'implementation' period-can be extended

 

 

until the end of 2022.

 

Either side can request an extension, but the UK and EU must finalise any agreement on whether to do so by July 1 next year

Mr Johnson has ruled out any more delays, which would be deeply unpopular with hardline

BREXITEERS,

and has even begun the process of enshrining this in law.

 

[WHILE BORIS JOHNSON IS DOING THIS HE ALSO NEEDS TO ENSURE THAT OUR ENGLISH CONSTITUTION --LAW AND INDEPENDENCE IS ALSO EMBEDDED IN LAW, AS RICHARD CROMWELL HAD WISHED AFTER THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR -(1642-1649).]

 

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

DECEMBER 28-2019

 

H.F.1950

 

POLITICS IN THE UK HAS STALLED - IN FACT IT HAS BEEN ON A STEADY DECLINE SINCE WE WERE MISLEAD AND LIED TO IN THE 70's by EDWARD HEATH AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF OUR COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

Fortunately the PEOPLE on December 12-2019 decided they had had enough and demanded that their so-called

 SERVANTS remember who

they worked

FOR.

.

 

 

 

In 2003 the EDP began it's BULLETIN SERVICE to INFORM the BRITISH

PUBLIC of the LIES and DECEIT of POLITICIANS. It is well documented that

successive GOVERNMENTS of all COLOURS have FAILED to keep their

MANIFESTO PROMISES. Whether it is the FAILURE of LAW and ORDER-

TO  CURB IMMIGRATION-YOU NAME IT! and you will find that they are STILL

MAKING THE SAME PROMISES in JANUARY 2020.

WE have advocated in

the past, that towards the end of a 5-year PARLIAMENTARY SESSION, each

GOVERNMENT should FACE a PUBLIC ENQUIRY to see if THEIR

MANIFESTO PROMISES HAVE BEEN carried out by PARLIAMENT. AND

if NOT-WHY NOT?

One is only to look at the thousands of bulletins on our website to realise that

 

POLITICIANS and

 

GOVERNMENTS

 

NOT CARRYING OUT THE

 

 

WISHES

 

 

OF THE

 

 

PEOPLE!

 

As we have been informed the MPs are to receive an increased SALARY and no doubt other benefits and as we have seen over the past few years many of their predecessors failed to keep their REFERENDUM PROMISE and what are we to expect from their replacements?

 

POLITICIANS SHOULD BE

 

 

 REMINDED THAT

 

 

THEY ARE

 

 

 

SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE

 

 

NOT

 

 

 

THEIR MASTERS.

 

We have advocated on many occasions that MP's should

 

SERVE THE PUBLIC

 

FOR ONE TERM ONLY.

 

 

IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB

 

 

FOR LIFE.

 

JANUARY 1-2020

H.F.1947

 

 

A REMINDER FROM 2006

 

 

 

 

HOW COULD A MULTICULTURAL BRITAIN WORK

 

By

Andrew Alexander

Column

[Daily Mail-December 15, 2006]

 

TONY BLAIR has admitted at last that MULTICULTURALISM has failed, but future historians will puzzle why anyone thought it would ever succeed

 

After all, history is one long tale of cultural clashes - religious, sectarian, racial and national. As they contemplate the remains of what was once one of the world's most stable societies, blessed with a common cultural heritage, they will marvel that vast waves of immigrants were admitted -

AND ARE STILL COMING.

Of course , there had always been immigration but the numbers had been small, the arrivals often talented; and many of them not just ready but eager to embrace the British

WAY-OF-LIFE

 

For an explanation, we need to go  back to the 1962 Commonwealth Immigration Act. When Harold Macmillan finally brought in that legislation, peppered with loopholes to pacify critics, the Left sternly opposed it.

The Far left was intelligent enough to see that mass immigration could overturn a society they hated. The opposition of more moderate Socialists was based on a firm if vaguely-defined belief in the

BROTHERHOOD OF MAN

- those from less prosperous countries should be automatically welcomed.

 

Besides, there was the delicious lure that nearly all immigrants would

VOTE LABOUR

-But that was not publicly aired.

 

MacMillan reluctantly introduced the legislation, whose outlines had been drafted in 1955.  As with others in his party, he was in thrall to the Multiracial Commonwealth fantasy, prolonging a belief that though the

BRITISH EMPIRE

-was dead, we could be-

or pretend to be -

a serious global power.

The biggest hindrance to clear  thinking about immigration and multiculturalism has always been the 'moderates' who dominate what is called the political class-party activists, information professionals, social scientists and opinion formers generally. these people are always proud of their 'moderation'.

 

MULTICULTURALISM was a natural attraction. It sounded, you see, so 'decent'

 

. These predominately middle-class moderates could also think of themselves as more enlightened than the working class (who bore the brunt of the tidal wave of immigrants).

 

You encountered these high-minded souls in the Press and TV and radio, insisting that immigration was by definition a good thing.

THEY STILL DO IT.

-but their postal codes always give then away.

If you lived in Hampstead or Kensington or Richmond you could enjoy the advantages of a moral smugness without the disadvantages of an alien wedge in your midst. When I point out to multicultural enthusiasts the tremendous property values in Brixton, they seem curiously uninterested.

 

Their cause was certainly helped by media self-censorship. Not since the British Press kept silent about Edward VIII's dalliance with Mrs. Simpson had the media exercised such nervous restraint. Anything that was alarming about IMMIGRATION was PLAYED DOWN.

[We have at the present day the same reluctance to thoroughly open discussion on the benefits or otherwise of the European Union -though there appears to be a slight fissure appearing in the 35 year-old dam of silence but no real momentum by the pro-Europeans to sell their wonderful dream in their utopian wonderland. We wonder WHY?]

The moderates who dominated the Press became terrified of the accusation of 'racism'. The U.S.,because of well-deserved bad conscience had declared that the ultimate sin; and with our habit of importing everything American good or bad, we adopted the same values.

 

Anything that might suggest their thinking was racist had newspapers in a flap. Disagreeable forecasts about immigration levels were ignored, reassuring figures emphasised. Anyway, ran the moderate view, even if the numbers did prove large, our oh-so-tolerant multicultural society would comfortably absorb them.

When facts became unavoidable, real issues would be evaded. if the number of blacks in prison was reported as disproportionately high, the required conclusion was that something was wrong with the judicial system.

If there were riots in Brixton or Tottenham , some extreme moderate like Lord Scarman would be sent to conclude that

WE WERE ALL GUILTY.

 

Blair's insistence that we must have integration is hopelessly late. he says, for example that immigrants must learn English. But there is no way to compel that on the inflow [flood] of immigrants from Eastern Europe.

They may unlike the Commonwealth immigrants, be less alien to British ways. But they will regularly form their own communities rather than integrate and the process of constant, ethnic fragmentation will be common place.  Poles are already setting up Polish branches of trade unions in Southampton - where they number up to 30,000-and in Glasgow.

 

AS for the insistence that immigration is economically advantageous

IT SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE.

it may produce good economic growth, but income per head rises little.

 

The strain upon public services ranging from HEALTH to TRANSPORT is also very costly. Moreover, IMMIGRATION has been a key factor in raising HOUSE PRICES-inevitably in one of the

WORLD'S MOST CROWDED NATIONS.

Further waves will be coming soon from Romania and Bulgaria but they will be 'managed'. claims the Home Office [You know! -the 'unfit for purpose 'establishment.] unconvincingly. One day, no doubt, from Turkey too (whose admission to the EU is supported by the Conservatives!)

 

THE FUTURE IS BLEAK

*          *          *

 

 

 

DECEMBER/06

 

 

 

POPULATION IN ENGLAND...

INDIANS OVERTAKE POLES AS OUR LARGEST MIGRANT POPULATION

BORN ABROAD LIVING IN UK

1)India-837,000

2)Poland-837,000

3)Pakistan-533,000

4)Ireland-358,000

Daily Mail-November 29,2019.

*   *   *

 

NOVEMBER 29,2019

 

 

 

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

*

 FOR RETURN TO

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

*

H.F.1927

 

 

 

mail doctor

MAX PEMBERTON

 

 

Dr MAX PEMBERTON: Sorry, we shouldn't be afraid to use the F-WORD...

 

march 5,2020

  1. Sorry, we shouldn't be

     

    afraid to use the

     

    F-word

When did the word ‘fat’ stop being a description of someone’s body and start to become their identity?

Being fat is now a choice that should be celebrated — a characteristic that deserves respect from others.

To suggest otherwise — that, for example, being overweight is a fundamentally unhealthy state and might be something that an individual tries to address for their own benefit — is considered ‘shaming’.

And now doctors and healthcare workers are being warned against calling patients fat in case it offends them!

In fact, a group of academics at King’s College London — and 100 organisations that support them — have gone one step further. In a statement worthily entitled ‘Pledge to Eradicate Weight Stigma’, they outline how calling people fat is akin to racism and sexism.

Escalating

 Have we all gone stark raving mad? Discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin or because of their gender is very different to stating a fact about someone’s physical state which is putting them at risk

And I worry this hyperbole and, quite frankly, nonsense from hand-wringing liberals falling over themselves not to upset people at every turn, helps nobody, least of all those battling with their weight.

Last year, a Freedom of Information request showed the NHS receives hundreds of complaints every year from patients who object to having health professionals suggest they lose weight. This ‘pledge’ will only encourage more complaints at a time when the consequences of obesity cost nearly half the entire NHS budget.

It’s not old people or dementia or cancer that will cripple the NHS, it’s fat people. Being overweight is linked to a host of conditions, from cancer and heart disease to strokes, joint and breathing problems, and diabetes, to name but a handful.

Managing type 2 diabetes alone costs us £10 billion a year, and the situation is escalating out of control.

Of course, being fat or obese is not something one should be mocked or bullied over. But equally, nor is it something that should be ignored.

And it’s certainly not something that we should pretend isn’t linked to a shortened life expectancy

To be blunt: people just aren’t bothering to lose weight any more.

In part, this may be because so many more people are now overweight, it is becoming viewed as ‘normal’. But I think increasingly people just refuse to take responsibility for their behaviour.

Have we all gone stark raving mad? Discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin or because of their gender is very different to stating a fact about someone’s physical state which is putting them at risk

And I worry this hyperbole and, quite frankly, nonsense from hand-wringing liberals falling over themselves not to upset people at every turn, helps nobody, least of all those battling with their weight.

Last year, a Freedom of Information request showed the NHS receives hundreds of complaints every year from patients who object to having health professionals suggest they lose weight. This ‘pledge’ will only encourage more complaints at a time when the consequences of obesity cost nearly half the entire NHS budget.

It’s not old people or dementia or cancer that will cripple the NHS, it’s fat people. Being overweight is linked to a host of conditions, from cancer and heart disease to strokes, joint and breathing problems, and diabetes, to name but a handful.

Managing type 2 diabetes alone costs us £10 billion a year, and the situation is escalating out of control.

Of course, being fat or obese is not something one should be mocked or bullied over. But equally, nor is it something that should be ignored.

And it’s certainly not something that we should pretend isn’t linked to a shortened life expectancy.

To me as a doctor, it seems bizarre that I'm now being urged to turn a blind eye to the waistline of my patients

Because this is not an issue that we need to debate, nor is it a matter of opinion. It’s a simple fact: being fat can kill you.

I’m sure this is upsetting for some overweight patients to hear, but it doesn’t make it any less true. I view it as my duty as a healthcare professional to warn them of it.

So how did we get to this point? Like so many trends, it started in America — a country which is decades ahead of us in the obesity epidemic.

There, people with weight issues have adopted the language of persecuted or marginalised minorities, such gay or black people, to justify their size and shape and deflect criticism. Now they are ‘proud’ of their fatness and ‘celebrate’ in what has become a ludicrous cult of ‘body positivity’.

But what is there to celebrate if you are so fat you can only wear tent-like clothes, can’t fit into airline or theatre seats, and you need a reinforced bed and reinforced ambulances to ferry you to hospital for treatment for the myriad health issues you suffer?

Where’s the pride in being unable to walk without a stick or having to sit on a mobility scooter?

All this ‘body positivity’ movement is doing is facilitating a delusion. It stops people from attempting to make the lifestyle changes that will save their lives.

Our attitudes towards weight are a major factor in the scale of the problem we face, as illustrated by a fascinating survey by the Department of Health, which compared data collected in 1967 with that from 2010.

 

Sedentary

Although the Sixties diet was high in fat and there was far less access to gyms, people were considerably slimmer than they are now, a fact attributed to greater daily activity.

For example, fewer people had cars, and there was more manual work compared with our relatively sedentary lives.

But the 1967 survey also found that nine out of ten people had attempted to lose weight in the past year compared with 57 per cent of adults questioned in 2010. Even more telling is the finding that, in the Sixties, of those who thought they were fat only 7 per cent failed to do anything about it. That figure compares with nearly 50 per cent now.

To be blunt: people just aren’t bothering to lose weight any more.

In part, this may be because so many more people are now overweight, it is becoming viewed as ‘normal’. But I think increasingly people just refuse to take responsibility for their behaviour

Insidious

Instead of acknowledging that they are fat because they stuff their faces on a regular basis, they prefer to blame the Government, the food manufacturers, their genes etc.

And if someone is confronted with the reality of being fat or obese, they fall back on the insidious language of identity politics and claim they are being victimised or picked on.

Some activists argue that being overweight is not a choice. Sorry, but it is. There may be complex reasons why someone is obese — poverty and poor education are factors — but this doesn’t absolve people of responsibility, of choosing to eat more food than their body needs.

There is undoubtedly a group of obese people who have deep-rooted underlying psychological problems — they may use food as an emotional crutch —and I meet many of them in my outpatient clinics. They need help and it pains me that we are so lacking in adequate services for them.

But I also know that the majority of overweight people simply don’t care. When their joints crumble because of their bulk, or they need surgery to clear out their blocked arteries, or they develop diabetes, they know the NHS — that is us taxpayers — will pick up the tab.

It is incumbent on all of us to change this attitude — to make being overweight socially unacceptable, just as smoking is because of the risk it poses to health, and to the rest of us.

We could sort out all the NHS’s funding problems in the bat of an eyelid if only people would take responsibility and lose pounds by eating less and moving more. What is at stake is the future of the NHS.

And as a doctor I will continue to make patients aware of that fact, whether or not it hurts their feelings.

 *  *  *

 

 

[freedom of expression-

 

 

SERIES!]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

march 5,2020

H.F.1993

 

 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 [A CAUSE WORTH FIGHTING FOR

THE RETURN OF THE FREE NATION STATE

OF

 ENGLAND

-instead of remaining within a threatening-toxic totalitarian so-called European Union- a monstrous- cunning - controlling - captive - calamitous

soon to be

SUPER-STATE.

*

BUT

TO REGAIN

OUR RIGHTFULL INHERITANCE.]

"WE must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of independence..."

 

Part
of an almost 1000 word speech by Winston Churchill at Fulton Missouri,USA in March,1946,

*  *  *
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

By

David Brown

 

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

2008

 

 

292

Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

'The United States of Europe.

Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

 

He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

BERLIN.

 

MORE!

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!}

DECEMBER  5,2018

H.F.1760

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

The Commonwealth Realms  V  The Constitution for Europe. - Part 1

2001

inasmuch as the Crown is the symbol of the free association of the members of the British Commonwealth of nations… united by the common allegiance to the Crown”

 

The Statute of Westminster 1931

 

 

A Paper delivered to a meeting held in the House of Lords London on the 21st April 2004.

 

[THE ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY ORG UK WERE IN ATTENDANCE ON THIS MOMENTOUS DAY  TO HEAR THE

 GRAVE APPEAL TO THE

 MOTHER COUNTRY.]

 

By

 

Philip Benwell MBE

 

 

 

The Commonwealth Realms

 

Antigua and Barbuda          New Zealand

Australia                                Papua New Guinea

Bahamas                                Saint Kitts

Barbados                                Saint Vincent

Belize                                      Solomon Islands

Canada                                   Tobago Tuvalu

Grenada                                  Tonga

Nevis Saint Lucia                    United Kingdom

 

 

*          *          *

 

My Lords, Ladies & Gentlemen,

 

My task tonight is not to take sides on whether we should be in or out of Europe, but rather to explore what I consider to be the real danger to the Commonwealth of Australia and the fourteen Commonwealth Realms.

 

The issues relating to individual sovereignties are indeed complex, particularly since the Statute of Westminster of 1931 which was enacted to provide for the maturing independence of those former colonies who remained ‘under The Crown of the United Kingdom’ which were termed ‘Dominions’, so named in 1907 as ‘the self-governing dominions beyond the seas’ to replace the term ‘Great Colonies’ and which today comprise the nations of Australia, Canada and New Zealand, each having unique constitutions with precedents and conventions developed to suit their individual environments and peoples.

 

For instance, Canada is still essentially a ‘Royalist’ nation whereas Australia is not; and this is probably due to the comparative physical closeness of Canada to the United Kingdom and its greater number of Royal Visits, a privilege Australia has little experience of, due to our distance and the length of travel time to reach us.

 

This may explain why Australia has a more constitutional – and lesser Royalist-approach to our Monarchy than Canada.  We tend to recognise The Crown as but an ingredient –albeit vital – within our system of Government.  It is this more sterile approach that has led Monarchists to explain that the Governor-General is effectively Australia’s Head of State with the Queen as Sovereign, whereas Canada still unashamedly recognises The Queen as their head of State.

 

In the years leading up to 1931, the former British Prime Minister, Arthur, later lord Balfour, formulated a treaty between the United Kingdom and the then Dominions to encompass the views expressed during the preceding Imperial Conferences, particularly that of 1926.  The Conferences had been held in London between the United Kingdom Government and representatives of the Governments of the Dominions who were calling for a relaxation of control, which continued to be exerted by the British Government following their independence, particularly with regard to the decision of who would nominate their respective Governors-General.

 

It was this Treaty, which was consolidated into an Act of the British Government called the Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the then Dominions, which included Australia, Canada, South Africa and New Zealand.

 

The independent sovereignty of the Realms was clearly shown at the time of the Constitutional Referendum in 1999, for if Australia was not in charge of its own affairs, how else could the people themselves decide whether or not to retain The Crown?

 

The concerns now facing Australia go far beyond the Republican / Monarchist divisions caused by the Referendum.  Whilst the British Parliament no longer has any right to legislate over the affairs of Australia, it is fettered from taking certain actions relating to the Crown of the United Kingdom and is specifically barred from legislating in matters of the Succession and the Royal Styles and Titles.

 

In Zurich in September 1946, Churchill, still in Opposition, explained his motivation in working for Union: “When the Nazi power was broken, I asked myself what was the best advice I could give my fellow citizens in our ravaged and exhausted continent.  My counsel to Europe can be given in a single word: Unite!

 

[Winston Churchill also stated in his Zurich speech his feelings of his own country when he said:

 

We are with Europe but not a part of it.

 

We are linked but not combined.

 

We’re interested but not absorbed”]

 *

 In Volume IV of his ‘The Second World War’ Churchill wrote: “Hard as it is to say now, I trust that the European Family may act united as one under a Council of Europe…I look forward to a United States of Europe in which the barriers between nations will be greatly minimised and unrestricted travel will be possible. I hope to see the economy of Europe studied as a whole.”

 

It was thus that Churchill founded the United Europe Movement in 1947 and it was Churchill who brought together persons of influence to create a bi –partisan committee and it was Churchill who persuaded France to allow a defeated Germany into the Alliance.  Indeed had not Churchill thrown his weight behind the early meetings the entire concept of a united Europe may have become a forgotten segment of history?

 

Churchill, of course, knew that Britain had to provide the leadership in bringing the war-torn nations of Europe together and that in ding so there would be some loss of sovereignty.  Britain has been entering into treaties for nigh on a thousand years or more, all of which have resulted in a loss of some sovereignty.

 

There is a statement attributed to Churchill:  “If the choice for Britain is Europe or the open sea, then Britain must choose the open sea.”

 

This, however, has been taken from a conversation Churchill had with de Gaulle in 1944 and is often quoted out of context to indicate his opposition to European Union.  It is not necessary to take Churchill’s comments out of context for it was never in his mind that Britain would ever become a State subservient to a United Europe.

 

And certainly not at the expense of the Empire and Commonwealth, but rather that Britain had to take the lead, jointly with the United States of America, in the reconstruction of Europe.  [Elsewhere in our Bulletins we have emphasised that the USA from the beginning of their support for a United Europe wished to include the UK in a Federal Union.]  

When in Government, Churchill seemed to lose interest in European Union.  This was possibly because the Marshall Plan was working, but more probably because he was then in full command of the facts and he vehemently disagreed with the more extensive plans of pro-Unionists and would never be convinced that the sacrifice of British Sovereignty would be worth anything Europe could offer Britain.  It was not until Harold Macmillan became Conservative Prime Minister that Union was pursued by Britain with full vigour at whatever cost.

 

Macmillan, of course, had been with Churchill as Churchill sought solutions to rebuild a war-torn Europe, but unlike Churchill, Macmillan never took into account the dangers of full integration.

 

Macmillan was not the British Bulldog that Churchill was.  He was a Conservative as such and in his younger days had flirted with many different ideologies, including Mosley’s National Socialism and Roman Catholicism.

 

For over fifty years, the British Parliament has been debating and legislating over matters pertaining to its entry into Union with Europe.  That there are economic benefits to Britain in a European Trading Bloc cannot be denied.  That there are disadvantages also cannot be denied.  Today (21st April 2004) however, we are not just talking about an economic Union, but a political one, one that denies, indeed saps, the natural right of member states to legislate and administer themselves without external interference or authority.  It is this, which is the greatest challenge to the independence of Britain’s sovereignty, and it is this, which provides a possible danger to the integrity of the Crown of the United Kingdom, without which the independent constitutions of the fifteen Commonwealth Realms cannot survive.  That is the question to be analysed tonight.

 

End of Part 1

 

 

 

 

WE WERE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS ON THAT DAY  -21ST APRIL-2004 TO HEAR MR BENWELL MBE SPEAK OF THE FAMILY OF COMMONWEALTH REALMS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING THOSE LINKS WHICH WERE IN 1970-72 TRAITOROUSLY GIVEN AWAY BY A PRIME MINISTER WHO WAS A NAZI SPY IN 1938 UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2005 WHEN HE ADMITTED HIS DECEIT IN ORDER TO JOIN THE EEC KNOWING THAT IT WOULD EVENTUALLY BECOME HITLER'S WARTIME PLAN FOR GERMANY TO RULE EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

 

 

 



Click Here for Part 2

 

 

H.F.1932

 

 

 

 

*

 

NOVEMBER 1-2019
 

 

Let me recommend to you the following quotation.

. When you have read it, try, before reading further, to think who might have said it.

"Historians have noticed, all down the centuries, one peculiarity of the English people which has cost them dear. We have always thrown away, after a victory, the greatest part of the advantages we gained in the struggle. The worst  difficulties from which we suffer do not come from without. They come from within. They do not come from the cottages of the wage earners. They come from a peculiar type of brainy people found in our country who, if they add something to its culture, take much from its strength,"

"Our difficulties come from the mood of unwarrantable self-abasement into which we have been cast by a powerful section of our own intellectuals. They come from the acceptance of defeatist doctrines by a large proportion of our politicians. But what have they to offer but a vague internationalism and promise of impossible utopia?"

How on earth could he have described with pinpoint accuracy the entire Remainer clique of today, down to a T? Well the speaker was

WINSTON CHURCHILL,

out of office, speaking in April 1933.

He was describing back then a mood in wide sections of the Establishment to trash this country in favour of

GERMANY

where a little Austrian with a postage -stamp moustache had just taken office as

CHANCELLOR OF GERMANY

It was later called

APPEASEMENT

and is still the

RELIGION of the REMAINERS

TALK ABOUT HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF...

NOVEMBER 1-2019

 

 

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

PATRIOT & TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill.

 

 

To the Serbs -an Independent Kosovo is anathema -Kosovo is their Jerusalem

Germany as the Strongman of Europe-A germanised Empire in the Making - PART 1

The New Beginning  - PART2

Germany's Third Reich -PART 3

Taskmasters of Europe -PART 4

A Warning Message To The Freedom Loving People Of England by Harry Beckhough

*

http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

 

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

 

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

BY

WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 1-2019

H.F.1915

 

 

*

 

 

[FREEDOM AND UNITY]

 

I VOTED REMAIN

BUT NOW WE MUST BACK

 BORIS

Letters to the Daily Mail, Tuesday, October 8,2019 by a reader from Huddersfield, WEST YORKSHIRE.

THREE years ago my wife and I voted in the Referendum to

REMAIN

but we accepted that a majority of people voted to

LEAVE

If there was a General Election we would vote Conservative, as we and many others think that Parliament should honour the result of the 2016 referendum

In 2017, MPs voted to back the Article 50 Bill by 498 votes to 114 - a majority of 384. The SNP, Plaid Cymru, along with 47 Labour MPs and Ken Clarke.

Since then, it has become obvious the SNP wants to remain in the EU and hopefully have a second referendum on Scottish independence -which the Scots have already rejected.

The Lib Dems have decided the only way they think it possible to have more elected MPs is to remain in the EU, while Jeremy Corbyn's Labour is undecided over which way to turn. Corbyn is clearly afraid that even some of his most ardent  Labour supporters do not relish the thought of him ever becoming Prime Minister.

For the past three years, not one workable suggestion has been put forward by any of the Opposition parties to solve the problem of thr Irish backstop, because clearly they wish to remain in the EU against the people's wishes. The only way to get this country out of this mess is to back Boris Johnson's campaign to solve Brexit and get us out of the claws of the EU.

Another reader from Preston, Lancs.

WHEN will our MPs start using their common sense? Winston Churchill must be turning in his grave. During the war, we had a coalition government and politics was the last thing on our minds,

The only priority was our country, and pulling together to make sure there would still be one.

*  *  *

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

 

 

[A WAR

OF ENGLISH INDEPENDENCE ]

FROM

HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION

*

At another time when England was divided by religion with the threat of invasion-On that occasion all differences were AT A TIME OF Great danger, a notable majority  STOOD FIRM FOR THEIR FREE COUNTRY. TODAY IN OCTOBER 2019 THE LESSON OF HISTORY HAS BEEN FORGOTTEN BY THOSE WHO PUT A FOREIGN DICTATORSHIP BEFORE THEIR OWN FREEDOM OF PERSON AND COUNTRY.

THE WAR OF ENGLISH INDEPENDENCE

By

ESMA WINGFIELD STRATFORD

1940

The foundations of British patriotism.

'...IT came to this, that if England was to remain a

FREE COUNTRY

 the patriotism of her sons had got to be sufficient unto itself. The love of the reformed or any other religion was palpably insufficient to unite the whole country in that ardency of self-confidence and self-sacrifice which is the effective will to victory. The ideal, towards which she had only just began to feel her way, of an independent civilisation -was it so supremely worth her while, that it could inspire her to do and dare to the uttermost? such was the question that the last of the Tudors, that proud young goddess ( Queen Elizabeth) with the flaming hair, unhesitatingly elected to answer for herself and subjects in the affirmation. For she was one- and the words are her own-to stick at nothing.

Believers - if they still exist-in a special Providence watching over the destinies of ENGLAND, might find a relevant significance in the first words of hers, on hearing she was Queen:

" This is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes."

It may seem a far cry from

Alfred

 to Elizabeth from England's Darling to Gloriana, but they have this in  common, that each, at an hour of supreme national crisis, proved to be endowed with precisely those qualities thart the situation demanded, and to so unique a degree that it would be plausible to say, " No one else could have pulled the country through."

.. .. It was the essence of that task to foster an English patriotism of at least equivalent strength to the holy zeal of the Counter-Reformation. And to do this it was necessary that she should focus it upon herself, that she should identify the love of Elizabeth with the love of England. It was to this that she dedicated her life, and like so many other great women devotees-her virginity. Her own words, so often and greatly reiterated, show that she did so in full consciousness: To put it plainly, England, having disassociated herself from the ideal of a united Europe, had made it her business to prevent that ideal from ever materialising, even on the mainland, on any other basis than that of free and equal association. (As Winston Churchill declared centuries later in the 1960's onwards his strong opposition to England joining the EEC/EU. ...)

 

[We now hear on Thursday October 10,2019 that France-Italy and Spain are against any EU plan to move to a more autocratic Superstate. No doubt other captive once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in Europe will follow. ]

 

*

 

*AT A TIME WHEN ENGLAND WAS DIVIDED BY RELIGIOUS STRIFE WITH THE THREAT OF INVASION, THE COUNTRY BECAME AS ONE TO DEFEAT THE CONTINENTAL AGGRESSOR.

Elizabeth 1  reviewed her troops at Tilbury-(1588).

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

1588

...Shakespeare, the greatest of them all, expressed the feeling which taught Englishmen that their well-being lay in unity among themselves which sprang from their devotion to their queen, when he wrote:-

 

This England never did-nor never shall

Lie at the proud foot of a conqueror,

But when it first did help to wound itself.'

 

 

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History]

In June 2008

 Her Majesty The  Queen

[Each word  above has a separate bulletin]

rather than say

'NO'

or threaten to abdicate if asked to sign the

LISBON TREATY

without

HER PEOPLE

being given a

REFERENDUM -AS PROMISED

has

BETRAYED HER PEOPLE.

We await the decision of the

LAW LORDS

the Lions under the Throne

of

ENGLAND

[Each word has a separate bulletin]

To protect the accustomed

"Rights and Liberties"

of the

ENGLISH PEOPLE

as stated in our Great Charter

MAGNA  CARTA  

  of 1215

 

And the rallying call of the English people at times of peril from unaccustomed demands from their representatives in

PARLIAMENT

More!

In June 2008

AND LATER ADDITIONS

 H.F.1088

 

'Courage noble Englishmen

And never be dismayed

If that we be one in ten

WE will not be afraid

To fight with foreign enemies

And set our country free...'

 

Lord Morley

 

TO BE CONTINUED

 

OCTOBER 8,2019

 

H.F.1880

 

*

 

 

A WARNING OF A DOUBLE - CROSS

 

 

 

NOVEMBER 1,2019
 

THE

BREXIT PARTY

SHOULD

BE SUPPORTED

AT THE

DECEMBER,2019 -GENERAL ELECTION.

 

Since the

 Referendum of June,2016

The Conservative Party has taken almost as many months as years since THEIR GOVERNMENT of the Nazi Spy Edward Heath(1938-2005) in 1972 passed a Bill to give away the independence of

ENGLAND

to Hitler's Planned so-called

EUROPEAN UNION

We all know what the Brexit Party stands for:

A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.

The ONLY WAY to secure

VICTORY

in the

DECEMBER,2019

GENERAL ELECTION

is to enable the

PATRIOTS

TO SECURE

THE LAND THEY LOVE

FROM FUTURE

FOREIGN DOMINATION.

We have for some time advocated that their should be a PATRIOTIC LOBBY in OUR OWN

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT.

In PARLIAMENT there is the Conservative Friends of Israel and that of the Labour Party. No doubt there are others we have yet to hear of. Events since January 1973 have shown that the English Constitution is not safe in the hands of the existing political parties in our once

HALLOWED and VENERABLE

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

The CONSERVATIVE PARTY in cooperation with the BREXIT PARTY can WIN the DECEMBER 2019

GENERAL ELECTION.

The BLATANT facts of the matter is that the sovereignty of our country is no longer SAFE in the hands of the political parties in the house of commons and only the strong presence of the BREXIT PARTY will ensure that the traitorous deed of January 1972 never again threatened

ENGLISH FREEDOM .

*  *  *

TREASON

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

*  *  *

 

IN 2018

 WE COULDN'T TRUST THE CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 1972 AND IT APPEARS WE ALSO CANNOT TRUST A CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 2018-BOTH WITHHELD VITAL LEGAL INFORMATION ON THE EU FROM MPs-WHICH AS IN THE PAST INDICATES A

COVER-UP.

*  *  *

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore [later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

JANUARY 6, 2019

A NO DEAL!

 

[A NO DEAL IS THE ONLY DEAL THAT HITLER'S SO-CALLED EU WILL RESPECT.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANY DEAL HAVE NO IDEA OF THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SATANIC BEAST THEY ARE DEALING WITH AFTER 46 YEARS.  IT'S DAYS ARE NUMBERED BECAUSE ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES CANNOT STEM THE NATURAL INSTINCT FOR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY FROM WITHIN.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANGELA MERKEL'S FRIEND THERESA MAY'S DEAL AT ANY PRICE ARE THE SAME PERSONS  WHO HAVE ALREADY SOLD THEIR SOULS TO A MONSTER STATE WHERE ONLY THE ELITE WILL PROSPER. THE MAN IN THE STREET IS IGNORED AND THAT IS WHY THERE ARE RIOTS ON THE STREETS OF MANY OF THE CAPTIVE PEOPLE'S WHO WERE DECEIVED BY THEIR NOW MASTERS. TRUE DEMOCRACY IS DEAD WITHIN HITLER'S BRAINCHILD AND IS REPLACED BY SUPPLE TOTALITARIANISM- ASK THOSE WHO ARE FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM IN CATALONIA AND NO DOUBT IN OTHER PARTS OF THE EU.]

*  *  *

 

DAILY EXPRESS

ANN WIDDECOMBE

OCTOBER 30,2019

BORIS'S PLAN WOULD CAUSE A GREAT DEAL OF DISAPOINTMENT

Slowly, very slowly commentators are waking up to the reality of Boris Johnson's "deal"

The more they read, the more they understand why the Brexit Party

, whose lawyers pored over each of several hundred pages, denounced it so vigorously. It is tempting to say simply

"Just do it"

but if that happens then two or three years from now, when people hear politicians telling that Britain cannot do something because EU law does not allow it, they will scatch their heads and say

"But I thought we had left".

But that awakening will come too late. Those of us who voted

LEAVE

BELIEVED THEY WERE VOTING TO  ESCAPE THE SUPREMACY of the EUROPEAN COURT of JUSTICE, to TRADE on WHATEVER TERMS WE LIKED AND TO CONTROL OUR BORDERS.

WE BELIEVED THAT FROM THE MOMENT OF LEAVING, PARLIAMENT WOULD RULE SUPREME-NOT THE

 

[HITLER'S]

 EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

 

BORIS'S DEAL FAILS ON EVERY SINGLE OF THESE COUNTS.

[WE WILL VOTE BREXIT ON ELECTION DAY]

*  *  *

 

'You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you can not fool all the people all the time.'

 

 

ABRAHAM LINCOLN (1809-1863)

 

 

 

 

H.F.1150

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1918

 

*

 

"'A nation cannot'

said

Abraham Lincoln,

'exist half-slave and 'half-free.'

The aphorism has a wider application."

AS we see in England at the present time in April,2019 when the country appears divided on the issue of the bedrock of our ENGLISH CONSTITUTION of a FREE ENGLAND as concluded at the

ENGLISH REVOLUTION  .

And our troubles have arisen since because the

"FUNDAMENTALS of THE REVOLUTION ."

were NOT then or later EMBEDDED into the

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.

IT IS WELL TO REALISE THAT IF THERE HAD BEEN IN EXISTENCE A ENGLISH PARLIAMENT as there is SCOTTISH and WELSH it would have been most unlikely that we would  have ever joined HITLER'S PLANNED so-called EUROPEAN UNION  in 1973 which was to ensure a

GREATER GERMANY IN THE PEACE.

THE BREXIT PARTY must lead to the return of an

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

to PROTECT our PRICELESS INHERITANCE

of the

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN."

STILL RESPECTED AND ENJOYED BY A GREATER PART OF THE FREE INDEPENDENT NATIONS OF THE WORLD.

Yet sometimes Nations will

decline so low.

From vertue, which is reason

that no wrong,

But Justice, and some fatal

curse annext

Deprives them of their outward

libertie.

Thir inward lost

MILTON (PARADISE LOST).

Milton said it was more just "that a less number compel a greater number to retain their liberty, than that  a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness compel a less   most injuriously to be their-fellow-slaves ".(1660)

*

'A few honest men are better than numbers.

 (Letter to Sir W. Spring, Sept . [1643]

OLIVER CROMWELL. 1599-1658

*

APRIL, 2019.

H.F.1835

 

 

 

*

 

A NEW WORLD CASE FOR PRESERVING THE 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN'

*

PART 2

 

 

If for a moment, we view the whole system of English Common Law as partly public and partly private law, even though English legal thought does not draw a sharp distinction between the two, we may the more easily grasp the early attitude of the colonists towards the law of the home-land.

Reinsch has expressed this attitude in these words:

"English colonists in their general ideas of justice and right, brought with them the fruits of the 'struggle for law' in England....

Most of the colonies made their earliest appeal to the [English] Common Law in its character as a monument of

ENGLISH LIBERTY

-that is considering more its public than its private law elements,"

Hallam, " Constitutional History of England," iii.1906, p.338:

"In quitting the soil of England to settle new colonies, Englishmen never renounced her freedom.  Such being the noble principle of English colonisation, circumstances favoured the early development of colonial liberties,"

On the claim of the colonists to the benefits of Magna Carta and other constitutional statutes of England, see Osgood "American Colonies in the seventeenth century," 1902,i.p.258.

Or, in Channing's [History of the United States,"i.1905,p.529]   phrase:

"So far as [the English Common law] protected them from the English government and the royal officials they looked upon it as their

"BIRTHRIGHT"

-so far as it interfered with their development it was to be disregarded"

If we bear this in mind , we shall see the more clearly that English constitutional statutes and cases were, as their "birthright"

-of fundamental importance to the English colonists of America in their struggles with colonial and imperial authorities.

 

[As in 2007 when we find that over the past 35 years our politicians have been undermining our fundamental liberties in order to enslave us into a corrupt totalitarian police state calling itself the United States of Europe.]

In the earlier Stuart reigns Magna Carta, as the greatest of all English

STATUTES OF LIBERTY

-was regarded by the colonists as a bulwark of their rights as Englishmen.

As the seventeenth century advanced, the great constitutional struggles in England were reflected in the colonies; and the

Petition of Right

the

Habeas Corpus Act

the

Bill of Rights

and the

Act of Settlement(1701)

-took their place beside

MAGNA CARTA

-in the minds of the colonists as

statutory guaranties

 of the

Rights of Englishmen

-both at home and away from home, in respect of

LIFE

LIBERTY

and

PROPERTY.

*

 

[In 2007 in England our guaranties have been stolen from us by those who had taken the constitutional oath to defend our accustomed rights and liberties and who in 1998 by legislation passed through the House of Commons in defiance of their Oaths an unannounced measure which took away any danger from the courts for their crimes of TREASON.

For confirmation:

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

http://eutruth.org.uk

 

It is for this reason that we must view Magna Carta in its history in the colonies as only part - though a most valuable part - of the whole body of English constitutional law, the Common law in its character of public rather than private law, the Common Law as it is found in constitutional cases and constitutional statutes.

As Englishmen owing allegiance to the Crown and settling upon land claimed by England as under its sovereignty, the colonists were, it would seem, entitled to the

'RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN'

-embodied in

MAGNA CARTA

and other sources of Common Law without further sanction of royal charter or colonial legislation. But , not only did royal charters to the colonists secure these constitutional rights, they were incorporated also in colonial legislation.

 

The history of Magna Carta in America has a meaning far deeper than the influence of a single constitutional document; for Magna Carta typifies those ideals of law and government which have spread to America and to many other political communities that lie beyond the four seas encircling the island realm [of England] itself.

The world diffusion of those ideals of liberty and justice deserve to be studied in its entirety, as a vast historical process which had its beginnings far back in the middle ages, and which has shaped and is still shaping in modern times the institutions of all the political commonwealths that owe their spiritual inheritance to

ENGLAND.

 

*

 

'In England the actual and practical security for English liberty against legislative tyranny was the power of

FREE PUBLIC OPINION

-represented by the

COMMONS of ENGLAND

In [America] written constitutions were deemed essential to protect the rights and liberties of the people against the encroachments of power delegated to their governments [States], and the provisions of Magna Carta, were incorporated into [States]

Bills of Rights

They were limitations upon all the powers of government, legislative as well as executive and judicial...'

Applied to England only as guards against executive usurpation and tyranny, here [America] they have become bulwarks also against arbitrary legislation; but ,in that application, as it would be incongruous to measure and restrict them to the ancient customary English law, they must be held a guarantee, not particular forms of procedure, but the very substance of individual rights of

LIFE LIBERTY and PROPERTY.

 

[AS we all know over the past 35 years our COMMONS of  ENGLAND the ancient protector of the English people has betrayed the People by its willingness to pass many TREATIES with the EUROPEAN UNION which has stealthily eroded the power of Parliament to a point today in 2007 when it will only require  the ratification of a FINAL TREATY to make Parliament into a Regional storehouse for the mountains of farm products which the EU with their allies in that historic building who have encouraged those policies and paid for.

In America this could NOT possibly happen because they have a Supreme Court to protect State rights and liberties as the States themselves their individual Bill of Rights.

ONLY people power using the INTERNET as its COMMONS of ENGLAND has any chance of putting our traitorous representatives ON TRIAL by the JURY of the PEOPLE where they cannot hide where ever they are from final retribution wherever they may be whether visiting the ice flows of the Antarctic or  enjoying their traitorous reward in the Elite body of the EU or on a lecture tour of the United States of America.

As during the last two World Wars when governments in Europe which had been overrun by the NAZIS  sent their Governments in Exile to England so we today in February 2007 have no need to leave OUR COUNTRY but as ALL loyal citizens of the TRUE CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND will form our own COMMONS of ENGLAND and conduct our deliberations through the INTERNET.

LET US SHOW THE PRESENT EXCUSES FOR REPRESENTATIVES THAT WHAT THEY SAY IN THEIR EU REGIONAL OFFICE AT WESTMINSTER IS OF NO INTEREST AS WE HAVE OUR OWN FORUM AND OUR OWN PARLIAMENT AT THE CLICK OF A BUTTON.

LET US SELECT OUR OWN GOVERNMENT IN EXILE without leaving our homes and use the only means now available to form an alternative government without the need of expensive buildings and rental etc. What a shock when Blair learns there is another Prime Minister of England out there who will have more support than he will expect at the next General Election which might never happen because by 2009 we will have no Government in England but an EU regional office for the Elite wasters owing their allegiance to Brussels.

 

One would love to see the look on the faces of those detestable traitors when they hear that there is a loyal Commons of England in England open to everyone and it has no connection with the traitorous brigands who will soon be turning that most ancient and hallowed corner of England into an EU Food Store.

*

 

The fragmentation of the eurosceptic opposition to the EU has been working in its favour - it is time for ALL organizations to be represented under an umbrella organisation that can speak for ALL eurosceptic opinion. In our communities today we have numerous such bodies to look after the interests of its members many representing new comers to our island home. We have been late to learn that ONLY IF THERE IS ONE BODY AND ONE VOICE and a UNITY which  we have lacked up to February 2007 will we ever be taken seriously by ANY GOVERNMENT.

The 50th anniversary of our entrapment into a supposed Common Market is an opportunity to after all be serious about our campaign and UNITE in a common cause and reap the benefits of that UNITY as we are ONLY *two years from the extinction of our own Parliament at Westminster.

*

 

 

*

 

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

http://eutruth://org.uk

 

*

 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS OF:

 THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND ITS HERITAGE AND IMPORTANCE TO PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY TODAY

*

WHY THE USA NEEDS A 21st CENTURY MONROE DOCTRINE.

*

WARNING AND A PROPHECY -TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS FROM AN ENGLISHMAN AND DEFENDER OF AMERICAN LIBERTY IN 1775.

 

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

FEBRUARY/07

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

H.F.1908

 

 

 

*

 

*

 

 

 

 

A REMINDER TO REMAINERS - ON OUR WEBSITE IN 2005

 

WHY DeGaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP IN 1963

 

HE ARGUED THAT:" ENGLAND, IN EFFECT IS INSULAR. SHE IS MARITIME. SHE IS LINKED THROUGH HER EXCHANGES, HER MARKETS, HER SUPPLY LINES TO THE MOST DISTANT COUNTRIES. SHE PURSUES ESSENTIALLY INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AND ONLY SLIGHTLY AGRICULTURAL ONES. SHE HAS, IN ALL HER DOINGS, VERY MARKED AND VERY ORIGINAL HABITS AND TRADITIONS. IN SHORT, ENGLAND`S VERY SITUATION DIFFERS PROFOUNDLY FROM THOSE OF THE CONTINENTALS."
 
What DeGaule argued was not too dissimilar from what Churchill, Eden and the British Conservatives had said originally in the 1950s, that the Continental Tradition and the British Tradition, both in politics and economics, are different and cannot be reconciled within the European Economic Community.
 
It took a French politician to remind us of our past and our destiny for the future and it is as well for us to remind ourselves of the marked differences between ourselves and our neighbours across the narrow but now vulnerable moat which divides our nations in more ways than some of us are prepared to admit. A vigorous thinker has said :
 
"The French notion of Liberty is political equality, and the English notion is personal independence. The Frenchman is content with a liberty which leaves him free to cast an equal vote with his contemporaries at a General Election and to live his life free from interference of political superiors. This is political liberty and it is good, but it does not go far enough. The highest conception of liberty is he who claims a spiritual liberty to live a life of personal independence. The Frenchman is content to be fitted as an equal into the political system; the
Englishman will have nothing to do with political systems, and surrenders his personal independence only at moments of tremendous political crisis. He hates conscription. He hates interference. The policeman is not his master, but his servant.  The state is not his prison, but his doorkeeper. His life is his own, and he will live it as he chooses" H
ow more different could we be - we are no more successful in changing our neighbours as they of us , and we should be greatful for that.'

 

MORE!

 

2005

 

H.F.1084/1

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1907

 

*

 

Germany's Four Reich's

by

Harry Beckhough

 

 

[Before we commence with the work of the above author we have given a biography of the learning and experience which has been obtained at close quarters over 75 years]

 

[Harry Beckhough was born in Bristol in 1914. he is an Honours graduate of Bristol University in philology, specialising in German. studying in Freiburg University in 1933-he witnessed Hitler's rise to power.

In WWII, he was commissioned in the Royal Artillery, served in India, until taken over by Bletchley Park, 9Station X) as Codebreaker. he served with the 8th Army, breaking Rommel's signals and messages for Montgomery. After Alemein victory, he was recalled to India to serve with the 14th (Burma) Army, dealing with Japanese code signals.

On return home as Lt. Col. R.A../Int, he became S.O.I. (Senior Officer) with the Foreign Office with the remit to resusitate the Rhineland Universities of Cologne and Bonn. There he met regularly Dr .Konrad Adenauer C.D.U., Chancellor of the first post-war German Chancellor, members of his family and Ministers.

Over 4 years, to end of 1950 he met many leading statesmen and prominent figures in Bonn, seat of the first post-war Government. As an academic, in charge of the 2 Universities they spoke freely to him of their plans for the future. he has extensive knowledge of Germany, and has explored the development of its aggressive nature from its earlier years.

This book reveals that inherited desire for

 DOMINATION

which has been Germany's major characteristic through major wars and battles over the centuries, invariably ending in

CHAOS

-as exemplified by their leading German philosopher Nietzsche.

*

 

PART 5

 

 

Adding the Finishing Touches

[World Power by Economic Means]

 

In fact the German-led EU is becoming an exact reproduction of the   obnoxious mixture of German aggressive imperialism and continental fascism, against which we are forced to fight. Thus the European Union, which some American business sees an opportunity, and some American politicians believe to be contributing to European peace and serenity, I see as of great danger to World Peace.

Germany, as strongman of Europe, has again seen to the split-up of Czechoslovak, annexed by Hitler, in Germany's War. Germany has established a 'Sudeten Fund' to allow Germans, dismissed post -war for collaboration with the NAZIS in WWII, in their brutal opposition of the Czech people, now to return to the shamefully carved - up Czech Republic -although such action

WAS FORBIDDEN BY THE ALLIES.

[This has echoes of the pre-WWII march of Hitler's troops into the Rhineland a direct violation of the WWI terms of surrender and Versailles Treaty]

Further proof that Germany refuses to accept the

 RULES of WAR

-even when totally defeated, under fully signed agreements, ever seeking her own cunning way round.

In other words, Germany is now intent on winning the Battle of the Peace (again of her own invention), which Germany failed to win by War, wholesale murder and brutal bloodshed, now by even more cunning, deceitful means.

 Instead of concentrating solely on rebuilding its empire by military strength.

GERMANY HAS A NEW MASTER PLAN

-through

ECONOMIC MEANS

 

FIRST .- by buying an EMPIRE, using the strength of its BUSINESS COMMUNITY.

German major industry which remained basically strong post war, by secret arrangements with Nazi leaders from 1943 (with defeat in sight), was now reinvigorated through AMERICAN DOLLARS

-by Dr. Adenauer's deceit, followed by the American super-generosity of the MARSHALL PLAN; basically anti-Communist, America's main fear in Europe. But thereby rebuilding German strength and aggression.

At amazing speed, German industry gathered strength with the addition of the business frame -work of those Nazi leaders who fled the Vatican 'rat-lines' and other means, with hoards of stolen wealth -used to purchase useful business overseas. Boasting the World's largest national economy, Germany now surpassed England in the economic area.

Thus the huge [German]  Deutsche Bank bought America's Banker's Trust in 1998, creating the world's largest financial services company. Germany's leading companies:

 

Allianz

Daimler

Hoechst

Krupp

Thyssen

Siemens

I.G Farben

-all still there.

No trouble to get around Europe's protective business culture, and manipulate any problems with Britain's Parliament procedure or America's State laws.

Germany was extremely clever and capable of deceiving both countries-especially America

-where a large German contingent was ready to hand

 

The Dresdner Bank bought U.S. Wassersteiin  Pirella & CO. for $1.6 billion dollars -gaining their extensive client list, including Phillip Morris and Time Warner.

Daimler Benz bought the Chrysler Corporation for over $37 billion dollars, becoming the biggest builder of truck engines, and the foremost manufacturer of commercial vehicles in the world and second largest exporter of military hardware

 

In 1998 Thyssen Krupp merged as Europe's largest, and the world's third steel producer.

German insurance giant Allianz paid $33 million dollars for Pimco Advisors Holdings, Europe's second largest insurer .

 

BMW and Daimler Benz has a major plant in Tuscolooza, Alabama.

 

In Septemver 2000 RWE bought British major water authority

THAMES WATER

-for $4.3 billion dollars.

 

Deutsche Bank failed to buy J.P Morgan brokers and the U.S nationwide wireless telephone company, Voice Stream.

RWE bought British American Waterways.

 

At long last in 2001 arose loud objections on the basis of

NATIONAL SECURITY

-not to give away America's telecommunications to German foreigners.

Somebody, finaaly, must have smelled

DANGER.

 

Where does Germany obtain all these extensive , huge piles of money, for such massive purchases, especially of KEY American and British Banks and POWER units?

Germany keeps raising her sights and bidding for:

 Major strategic Banks

Power Plants

Water

Electricity

Railway Controls

-in America especially, and also in Britain.

The Blair Government is seriously considering an offer from Germany's State -owned Bank, West L.B., for Railtrack's 2300 miles of track and 2500 stations, including the Channel Tunnel rail link. Railtrack owns Britain's railway infrastructure, including :

Station

Tracks

Signals

Tunnels

Bridges

Viaducts

etc...

WHAT A DANGEROUS WEAPON TO PUT IN THE HANDS OF OUR EVERLASTING ENEMY

GERMANY!

 

As an  ex WWII warrior and Intelligence officer, it makes my hackles rise.

As Winston Churchill said:

"Nothing but a change of the German heart can avert another catastrophe, unlikely to come from within, for the true German nature has never changed."

THe German after all , had been belligerent for 2000 years."

(William Manchester biography)

*          *          *

List of German Acquisitions of British Businesses

-to 2004

Boots Pharmaceuticals     -     BASF

Cornhill Insurance     -     Allianz

Grattan mail Order    -      Otto Versand

Kleinwort Benson     -     Dresdner Bank

Lansing     -     Linde

Lloyds Chemists     -     Gehe

Morgan Grenfell     -     Deutsche Bank

One2One    -      Deutche

Telecom Plessey    -      Siemens

Powergen     -     E.ON AG

Rolls Royce    -     Volkswagen

Thames Water   -      RWE

Thomas Cook     -     WestLB

Since 2004 - no doubt a significant number of companies have joined the above LIST.

A list of German Acquisitions of American companies will follow shortly.

*

[Font Altered -Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

FEBRUARY/07

 

 

 

SEE MORE: on Germany's Four Reich's

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

In our infrastructure in our politicians in our institutions in our communities

BUT STILL MANY WON'T FACE FACTS

*

Winston Churchill said over 50 years ago that:

"The Germans, after all had been belligerent for over 2000 years." "They never change."  How soon his words of wisdom and warning are forgotten.  Europe's leaders may not even fully understand what the GEU (German EU) is about. From 1999 to 2001 foreign companies took over 2,779 U.S. companies (worth $766 billion dollars) in an economic Blitzkrieg: mainly Germany , using France as junior aide, to ward off come-backs. How were such sales and so much money contrived?

 

[Before we answer this question and dozens of others we acknowledge the assistance of the following author whose record of being witness to the rise of Nazism in the 1930's and his close contact with those who were shaping the future of Germany. The following extracts are from his

'Germany's Four Reich's']

 

 

Harry Beckhough was born in Bristol in 1914. He is an Honours graduate of Bristol University in philology, specialising in German. Studying in Freiburg University in 1933 he witness Hitler's rise to power.

In WW II, he was commissioned in the Royal Artillery, served in India, until taken over by Bletchley Park, (Station x) as Codebreaker.  he served with the 8th Army, breaking Rommel's signals and messages for Montgomery. After Alamein victory, he was recalled to India to serve with 14th (Burma) Army, dealing with Japanese code signals.

On return home as Lt.Col.R.A./Int, he became S.O.I. (Senior Officer) with Foreign Office -with the remit to resuscitate the Rhineland Universities of Cologne and Bonn. There he met regularly, Dr Konrad Adenauer C.D.U., Chancellor of the first post- war German Government, members of his family and Ministers. Over 4 years, to end in  1950 he met many of the leading statesmen and prominent figures in Bonn, seat of the first post-war Government.

As an academic, in charge of the 2 Universities. they spoke freely to him of their plans the future. He has extensive knowledge of Germany, and has explored the development of its

AGGRESSIVE NATURE FROM ITS EARLIEST YEARS.

His book reveals that inherited desire for DOMINATION which has been GERMANY'S major characteristic through major wars and battles over centuries (2000 years), invariably ending in CHAOS, as exemplified by their German philosopher, NIETZSCHE.

Other books written by the author:

"Secret Communications"

"German Universities After WWII

" In the Beginning"

 

[We had the pleasure of meeting Mr Harry Beckhough at a recent meeting of many concerned about the drift of our country into a United States of Europe. After we had read his most comprehensive analysis of the German 's FIRST - SECOND - THIRD and at the present FOURTH REICH we felt its contents needed a greater coverage as we are soon so near to Germany accomplishing her aim unless the people in our once free country take to the streets to defend their legacy of Rights and Liberties of 1500 years in the making. Those many years ago the Germanic tribes that settled in their new home of ENGLAND became because of their island isolation a different people from those who stayed in their homeland so we the ENGLISH should more than any race have and should understand the threat they pose to our present future in 2007.

 

In order to get the complete message to you all we intend to place a short weekly up-date of the books contents on our FRONT PAGE the few paragraphs will be identified by their background of black with red print as we do at the moment to identify the

German Nazi agencies at work in Europe and around the world today in 2007.]

*

 

Unusually we will start with the  final paragraphs of the book under the heading:

Epilogue: On the German Character.

 

Previous attempts to summarise the multi-sided character of the Germans, have proved beyond the scope of previous authors, historians, philosophers and psychologists, especially of their own people.

The German remains a complex people of many -sided facts. Their major development period, circa 1500 to 1800, eventually produced a linguistic, literary and philosophic form of unification, developing from Mittel-Hoch-Deutsch, to an overdone Romanticism period, which produced some of the greatest writers (especially Goethe), musicians of outstanding quality, and philosophers, claiming Judaeo-Hellenic roots.

Followed by the hugely overdone industrialisation of the Bismarck period 1850 to 1914, from one extreme to another, suddenly changing from an agricultural country to extreme mechanical and industrial excess development. From a period of huge profits and great prosperity, flaunted to the world caricatures ,in final collapse and bankruptcy.

Finally the Hitler process of 'Gleichschaltung' (equalisation), seeking to create the impossible : a Nazi image of a one-type German Volk to become a national unit equivalent of Masters and slaves. But this unification only caused [pluralism - the fundamental split personality of the German -ever changing. The real German problem is unity in moderation and moderation in unity. He lacks reality, commonsense and good judgment. But invariably blames others for his troubles. But savagery always ready to burst forth at the slightest provocation.

 

He needs goals to be set by superiors, and is always ready to obey orders. Racism achieves domination and hegemony. he cannot clearly distinguish TRUE from FALSE, and confuses TRUTH with IDEOLOGY. Hence his love of intricate plots rarely reaching conclusion, getting lost or set astray with side issues.

 

He lives in a false world with distorted views conflicting TRUE and FALSE, GOOD and EVIL, PEACE and WAR. But seeks to TERRIFY and FRIGHTEN. He loves to organise, but loses his head if plans go awry, as happened with Hitler's rages, smashing order into chaos, and collapse of a scheme.

Above all he needs a strong leader, standing ready to obey, and follow. Without a Fuhrer, Germans become lost and confused. Generally hated for their arrogance, imperialism and brutal inhumanity, with outbursts of fury for little cause. But he enjoys his hatreds with a lethal intensity. "The ever-furious people" as [their] Nietzsche calls his 'Tauscher Volk'.

 

They are born wreckers -first of the Roman Empire, latterly of the League of Nations, now undermining both the United Nations and NATO. But their substitution, like their new Franco-German Constitution, may eventually collapse like a House of Cards, lacking a firm foundation, being constructed in hidden, mysteriously conceived, contrived and often confused plans, not properly finalised.

 

Pretending to act for the general good in a community of 'equals', their target is eventually revealed:

FIRST:-

an EU Super state,

- en route deviously to become a

German dominated Dictatorship.

We are coerced and invited to yield:

OUR SOVEREIGNTY

ANCIENT RIGHTS

and

HARD-WON

FREEDOM

-to become, for the first time in our history, a vassal state under the German jackboot. WWI and WWII should have taught us the brutal German reality.

 

I pray that our Leaders will remove their blinkers, to reveal German connivance in the reality of our appalling situation, in which we have been deceived and exploited since 1972. For this unhappy world once again is in sore need of our STRENGTH and GOOD LEADERSHIP, as a FREE BRITAIN, against the growing evil of TERRORISM, again endangering WORLD PEACE in the present century.

*

[As previously mentioned we shall be continuing with the remainder of Harry Beckhough's intensely researched book with further additions available on our FRONT PAGE.]

 

Key Features of German Deceit

In 1992 France became bound to Russia, as her agreed agent, to bring Russia into an extended European Federation -to promote collective security. In 1990 Professor Herzog denigrated the nation state, publicly identifying with Lenin's objective. The 1992 Maastricht Treaty then deprived EU nation states of key elements of their sovereignty; their currency, internal and external security, transferred, for the first time, to a European institution.

[Thanks a lot! Douglas Hurd our British Foreign Secretary at Maastricht  -WE don't of course - as that traitor to his country even was overheard after signing the Treaty to say:

'We'd better find out what we've just signed'

On that day in February 1992 after his committed Treachery to his country he was accompanied by the now  Conservative chairman Francis Maud another traitor to his true party's ideals and his country.]

Yet America's materialistic world seemed oblivious of the frightening reality, of the concealed intentions of this menacing, reborn German fast growing giant, with huge secret resources immediately available. Though the German Mark became worthless post-war, and the Black Market ruled a bargaining scene, until we created their new currency Mark in 1997/8, as I witnessed.

So whence came this sudden huge wealth?

Where was it stored in the Nazi era?

 

[YES! you have guessed right as you will have indicated on our Front Page]

Meanwhile, German military is rebuilding .fast and secretly as in 1920s/30s, using pseudo peace-keeping roles, as excuse to catch up with British military strength.

Playing a clever role in Kosovo, Croatia, being helpful in supplying peace-keeping troops, all undergoing strict home training. The old German trickery is still there, as deceitful and two-forked as ever. Adept at convincing lies, matching those of its Leninist? KGB trained ally, at the devil's trade of deceit, to which the West falls easy, trusting victim. Always with America especially ,in their sights (as also Britain), whilst proffering friendship. Now both the KGB-led Russian dictatorship and the

GEU (German European Union) Super state  

 

-are seeking global power and world domination by pseudo -peaceful means, using every trick [As our slippery Tony Blair and the other traitors] in their training.

These are aimed specifically at America and Britain, both economically and militarily.

 

Britain's so-called "New Labour" Government has recklessly thrown its lot in with German-led Europe.

[We would not be surprised if Tony Blair has his eyes on the new job of President of the New European Union should that monstrosity ever be brought into being. Of course we have already explained that we would NEVER agree to be part of such a collective Mammoth Police State and Evil conspiracy.]

America has fallen prey to every conceivable form of espionage in the 20/21st century from Russia, China, the East, Asia and the Arab world. But it is now learning fast not to put its trust in erstwhile 'Friends' in Europe, to the Arab world, from France to Arabia.  And to trade to its own well-protected and insured benefit, with trustworthy, proven allies, balancing gains and losses.

 

Thus America is now considering possible closure of well-established bases in Germany, and the danger of leaving these in the hands of a so-called friend.  Now known to be otherwise -preparing to bite the hand that restored it from its defeated collapse and misery, from a cruel, bloody War, started once again (as ever ) by Germany -never to be trusted, glorying in its success of LIES and DECEIT.

[It is to be remembered that the U.S. after WWII helped over 700 Nazi scientists and other callings to the United States and many used their influence and their successors also to foster the Nazi programme of future world domination  as clearly elaborated on by

 International Currency Review

Details on our Front Page

www.worldreports.org

cstory@worldreports.org

 *

Germany has been allowed, by its so readily trusting friend and hosts, to establish permanent military facility at Alamagordo, New Mexico, with (scarcely credible) an open -skies treaty for German planes flying over and surveying (and mapping) in totem. [As they did before the WWI and up to WWII when their people were everywhere in the Middle East and other areas mapping out future places of conflict] Something which needs 100% secrecy for complete safety. Even conducting training and joint military exercises - for German identification records.  Like Samson giving away the secret of his great strength - with resultant downfall, to his undoing. America should now look closely to her security.

Just as the Chinese were able to obtain all U.S. classified, most sensitive military, technical and nuclear information (painstakingly developed and built up over many years of highest quality operations, by most qualified American and British staff of highly trained experts - at tremendous cost and outstanding success) -simply by being able to tap into improperly guarded U.S. computer, technical system, without restriction and with minimum effort. Thus China, in quick time, learnt all U.S. secrets and was able to construct her own copies of U.S. nuclear warheads, with all technical know-how, and sell them on! Enough to make strong men weep!  But America has the resilience to ride its body-blows and restore terms with China.

Now German EU originally favoured, trusted and assisted by America [See Bilderbergers] , grows steadily stronger, militarily and economically-posing future menace, led by Germany, already seeking to undermine America in every way. Of course not openly, as is definitely not their nature, until ready for open combat -but through GEU.

Time we awoke [this was written  just a few years ago but in the closing months of 2006 there was a definite awakening as growing numbers are now joining the Anti-EU banner -see [http://eutruth.org.uk]]  to the dangers closing in on us, in this latest travesty of an all-embracing EU Constitution rending us [that means YOU!] in a vassal state. [of the Fourth Reich].

 

ALL  20 of Germany's nuclear plants have unlimited licences.  200 American nuclear bombs are now in WMD storage vaults in EU states, with 55 in Germany.

 

The EU possesses 710 nuclear bombs. Germany has an advanced science and technology base, capable of supporting an advanced nuclear programme. This needs careful assessment for future consideration. Our British/American defence organisations seem to have no conception of this ongoing, tremendous build -up of power -with the sole aim of the creation of a

Super state Dictatorship

 

-with world control.

Whilst we continue to reduce our Armed Forces and equipment, Germany is quietly building hers (already more than equal to ours), with Europe providing the rest. They  have cleverly convinced first, Britain's P.M. Blair, and now America that they will not bypass NATO, when their intention is clearly to reduce NATO and then do away with it, leaving GEU German European Union in full power and able to argue with, if not threaten, America.

 

We learn in the Daily Mail of the 2nd February, 2007 that the NATO mission in Afghanistan is handing over leadership to an American commander - after all the trouble and fanfare to show NATO solidarity not so long ago. Obviously the Americans are learning a few lessons  of their own at this late state in the diplomacy game before they too find themselves with their defences completely useless after their long fraternisation programme in post-war Germany.]

Russia, in close co-operation with German since Bismarck, is seen both as partner and secretly, future target. The case of the Russian enclave, now cut off from Russia by the Independent Balkan states - Kaliningrad (formally Konigsberg, the centre of historic Prussia) presents a classic case of the German use of the EU, plus massive loans to Russia, to achieve expansion Eastward.

[Well we are all now aware that the German's have a very-very-very close relationship with Russia in many fields BUT particularly in the Energy field. It will be a weapon that our enemy of the 20th century will use with its superior military forces at its time of choosing and we should all remember what happens when a country allows it military forces to become a ridiculed second rate pantomime show.]

 

The huge loans arranged for Russia by Germany, cause weighty instability for the Russian economy and political dependence of German goodwill, with calculated benefit and lack of interference with German plans.

Chancellor Kohl calculated that these major bonds would serve as a foundation for reconstruction of the Russian economy, and close co-operation with Germany. However the arrival of Putin, trained by KGB, may produce firmer self-interest by Russia.

Discussions progress on conversion of this huge German debt into equity stakes in Russian companies, which now have greater freedom to develop, especially in oil and commodities.

Chris Patten, EU Commissioner responsible for external affairs, has made the first steps (quoted by the Times), in discussing the possible political status of Kaliningrad in the enlarged EU -to suit German EU, whom he seems to serve more than his own country.

 

The Euro and the projected European Army (of envisaged great strength), are important major steps in the creation of the planned corporatist, anti-democratic, anti-nation state power, based on German Europe ,as the EU Constitution of a Super state, to compete against American global strength and world authority. Always the great competitive target for global ambitious Germany.

*

Expanding by Ratchets

 

In 1970 the renewed German-Soviet Treaty for

"FRIENDSHIP and CO-OPERATION"

was signed, assuring their everlasting understanding -always included in Germany's secret plans for total reinstatement (already ipso facto regained)-and future control of greater Europe, both West and East -the same as ever target. It is truly amazing, on looking back, the ease with which Germany was able to deceive and convince America and Britain's leading Statesmen -but so did Gorbachev with his ready convincing stream of lies about his new Russia. Their joint ratchet found easy targets in the ever-trusting West.

 

East Germany overthrew their Communist regime in 1989, becoming one complete Germany again in 1990/91. The German democratic Republic became founder member of the Warsaw treaty Organisation, by the Warsaw Pact with Russia, then occupying the Russian Zone of Germany. The Berlin Wall built 1961, sealed off this Russian Zone from the West. In 1972 the Two Germany's signed a Pact of admittance to the United Nations. In 1991 came the overthrow of the Soviet government. Yeltsin and Gorbachev took power, expertly deceiving the West of their 'democratic' intentions.

In 1989 the Berlin Wall fell, bringing a neo-Nazi revival, cultivated strongly through the German Army (Bundeswehr). Nazi Germany came storming back as the communist stranglehold on East Germany was released. Violent racist incidents increased year on year to 1993.

In 1993 the Bundestag passed an asylum law, setting firm restrictions on immigrants seeking asylum. Still remaining anti-semitic, with disturbance of Jewish synagogues and cemeteries. Further reports of neo-Nazi revival in Germany.

In June 1991 the Bundestag voted to move their Capital back to Berlin  from Bonn (Adenauer's home town). May 1995 Manfred Roder -convicted Nazi terrorist- was invited to address the Bundeswehr [This has  memories of the Frederick Forsyth film the ODESSA-don't you think]

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall there are visible signs of return of the old spirit of independent arrogance, within the whole German nation. Now, again a bona fide word power, second only to the U.S. in arms exports,

with a standing army of circa 300,000, the largest in Europe

 

Already with France's help, leading the EU and soon to be recognised as a major nuclear power. Germany now back on top by usual clever manoeuving.

In 1990 a secret agreement between Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl accepted that the Bohemian and Moravian region belonged to the Germans.

ALSO

the final division of Czecho-slovakia and Yugoslavia by the end of 1992.

Germany planned to make a Customs Union of Europe, like Bismarck. Warnings by Roger Eatwell's: Fascism, Bernard Connolly's: THe Rotten Heart Of Europe and Margaret Thatcher's: The Downing Street years -

ALL GO UNHEEDED IN OUR SLEEPY APATHETIC NATION

Just as before WWII, with almost all Mainstream Press just as oblivious to the danger as they were before WWII.

[We have recently made a call to our at the moment FREE PRESS to open up the secret's of the EU but at a first glimmerings of activity it is obvious they only want to tinker out of harms way on the fringes of one of the GREATEST conspiracies in HISTORY. Possibly it is because after 50 years of backhanders and promises of special favours there are too many involved to bring the whole pack of cards to the ground. Who has the courage to start the ball rolling to collect up on its journey all the traitors and time-servers and to land on top of the Elite who have more to lose?

In 1995 Mrs Thatcher said in Parliament:

"You have not anchored Germany to Europe; you have anchored Europe to a newly dominant, unified Germany. In the end, my friends, you'll find it will not work."

Maybe not, but in the meantime they are expertly stirring the pot, causing ever more problems. [As no don't in February 2007].

Two years after the war-end, statistics now show that almost 50% of Bavarian civil servants belonged to the Nazi Party or its affiliates.

Of those dismissed by us, some 15,000 were reinstated. Almost all 11,000 teachers removed for political reasons were reinstated with 60% of the teaching staff employed by the German Ministry of Education and 81% of Judges, magistrates, prosecutors in the Ministry of Justice.

 Only in Universities were we able to keep good measure of control in the British Zone, by our direct command and control -with early denazification.

[It is obvious from the above that the Nazi Party continued in the main as it had always done but with for a time a lower profile awaiting their chance of future conquest which they have almost achieved in the early months of 2007.]

Inter-European unity has been long sought by the Hapsburg dynasty. Otto compared the similarities of the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages with his own views on a destined

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

Churchill favoured a U.S.E. (United States of Europe) led by Britain. He said:

"It should be built by the British "

[Of course it would have been built on British values]

"If the Russians built it, there would be communism and squalor.

If the Germans built it there would be TYRANNY and BRUTE FORCE"

( Martin Gilbert: Churchill War Papers Vol 3)

 

How far-seeing!-[As we see today in February 2007]

 

Now in German control, as yet in shape unrealised by the victims, caught in a net of German deceit and empty promises [As with their agent Tony Blair in 2007], inexorably leading to complete mastery.

As the USSR faded into history , overtaken by the new KGB dictatorship, Germany, under its EU cloak, was already on its panned path to overtake America, with the size and growth of its extended economic values.

In May 1997, Roman Herzog (former German president), on being presented with the International Charlemagne Prize  for his efforts to unite Europe said:

 

"Charlemagne, himself , sought the unification of Europe -the truth must be told, only by wading through a sea of blood, sweat and tears, did he reach it. Germany has been Europe's greatest perpetrator, instigating that bloodshed."

[Well we have at least

1,250,000

Sacrifices

 

-places of rest - many in foreign fields in our struggles to overcome that perpetrator on two occasions in the 20th century

 

One wonders how Tony Blair came to be chosen for this prize? Joschka Fischer (ex Communist, now leader of the Green Party) said:

" Germany needs NOT democracy, but a system of Statecraft, similar to that of the Soviet dictatorship, enabling the German political and military elite to organise Europe's industrial capacity, and the military qualities of German people or of the revival of the German race, Europe is just an extension of Germany.

THAT SAID IT ALL

-with Fischer omniscient.

Yugoslavia was deliberately undermined by German Intelligence Service (bundesnachrichtendienst) under Klaus Kinkel, throughout the 1980's  using German agents working with former Croatian Fascists, close allies of Hitler (providing needed outlet for the Adriatic). They now destroyed the multi-ethnic state of Yugoslavia, arranging the breakaway of Catholic Croatia and Slovenia.

Marshall Tito established a new Constitution for Yugoslavia, known as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The Serbs had initiated the first union of the 3 nations, following the collapse of the Habsburg ruled Austro-Hungarian Empire, end of WWI in 1918. Tito broke with the Soviets, creating a new federal Republic, which lasted 30 years. But the political iron -will of Germany took only 10 years to break it

 

Milosovic may have been unfairly charged in the Hague -but Germany now has arranged a more compliant leader under her control. Once again Anglo-Americans have been fooled by German trickery.

 

German machinations in the Balkans in WWI were repeated in WWII. Yugoslavia, historical all of Britain against German imperialism, has now been broken up into the same religious and racial statelets the Nazi established: Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia had their own Waffen SS divisions.

In 1991 Germany followed by the Vatican, recognised Croatia, which massacred

1,000,000

Serbs-gypsies and Jews at Jasennovac concentration camp

The wartime Archbishop Stepinac, whose own priests helped run the extermination camp, was beatified by the present Pope in 2002!?

Albania was favoured by NATO as an ally of Germany, whilst operating the biggest drug and gun-running corridor through Kosovo and Tiranen. Germany gained control by outright purchase of their main asset, their chromite mines.

Albanians, in the historical Serb province of Kosovo, who has conducted massive ethnic cleansing of Serbs over 100 years, (with the help of Nazi during the war and Tito thereafter, were armed by Germany as

FREEDOM FIGHTERS

[For whose Freedom?]

Provoked by repeated terrorist attacks by Kosovo Freedom Fighters, the anticipated Serb response gave GERMAN-controlled Europe the excuse to lead NATO into an ILLEGAL war against a SOVEREIGN STATE -by cunning German contrivance. This served Germany's historical aim of destroying Serbia, helping to reclaim so-called German territory in the East, thus helping construction of German Europe, now the EU.

 

[And who do they agree to be dictator of Kosovo -Yes! you are right -Our own Bilderberger Paddy Ashdown who has only recently stood down to enjoy his retirement?

Similarly, with Macedonia the EU cleverly had NATO do all the donkey work, transforming it into a vassal state of the EU. So, if things go wrong, NATO will be blamed.

THUS ANOTHER CLEVER(?) GERMAN STROKE.

 

[The EU is all about NUMBERS and TERRITORY-They need to have ALL Europe under their control -there can be no exceptions. They have a deal with Russia as we shall find out to our cost when our energy supplies are restricted to achieve their blackmail terms. Mark our words the English people will rue the day it failed to keep a tight control over THEIR GOVERNMENT]

During the Second World War about

1,000,000

were massacred by Croation fascists. In 1989/90 came the first ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, after Germany officially recognised [their own WWII ally] Croatia, who established a blatantly nationalistic constitution discriminating against the SERBS. There are now over one million displaced Serbs, because of Germany's aggressive interference and plotting. In 1991 Germany unilaterally recognised Croatia and Slovenia as separate sovereign state, completing her astutely conceived DOMINATION of the BALTIC AREA.

Exporting $320 million dollars of hardware to Croatia, 4000 German troops in Croatia, the FIRST deployment of German troops [they now have over 300,000 troops in their Army] since WWII, to help enforce the so-called

'PEACE AGREEMENT'

[Typical NAZIS they create the unstable conditions in  the area by their hurried recognition of Croatia which served their purpose to arrive at the situation today. Tony Blair certainly had  good training in the same philosophy as our situation in February 2007 with only weeks away from him signing the March 2007

'DECLARATION OF BERLIN.'

[Note each of the above underlined words has a different bulletin.]

All the meddling and interference in  Croatia -All part of Germany's deep plan for overall

CONTROL of ALL EUROPE

-Both West and EAST, At the same time, settling old scores of WWII.

In the rest of Eastern Europe the agricultural economy has collapsed, because the EU prevents their exports to the West.  Their media, business and agricultural land are being acquired by Western European Business, especially German. Just as the NAZI planned in the 1930s, the national states of Europe, for whose freedom Britain and America fought two bloody wars, sacrificing their heroic young men, effectively, no longer exist as self-governing entities.

 

THE AFTERMATH OF WWII, WITH GERMANY NOW ESTABLISHED AS THE STRONGEST FORCE IN EUROPE

[NOW DO YOU BELIEVE YOUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY IS IN GREAT DANGER?]

 

*

 

To the Serbs -an Independent Kosovo is anathema -Kosovo is their Jerusalem

Germany as the Strongman of Europe-A germanised Empire in the Making - PART 1

The New Beginning  - PART2

Germany's Third Reich -PART 3

Taskmasters of Europe -PART 4

A Warning Message To The Freedom Loving People Of England by Harry Beckhough

*

http://eutruth.org.uk

 

*

 

21st January, 2008

 

*          *          *

LATEST PUBLICATION FROM THE AUTHOR

December 13-2007

Thinker Tailor Soldier Spy

by Harry Beckhough    Price £18.99

A remarkable book about a soldier-code breaker-intelligence officer-teacher and political activist.

Send payment to THE JUNE PRESS LTD

PO BOX 119

TOTNES, DEVON TQ9 7WA

Tel: 08456 120 175

Email:info@junepress.com

WEB SALES www.junepress.com

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding &Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

JANUARY/07

*

 

 

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

H.F.784

 

 

 

*

A CONSERVATIVE PARTY

PROMISES TO GET TOUGH ON LAW AND ORDER

IN

OCTOBER 2019

WHAT ARE ITS CHANCES

NILL

The DECADES LONG AWAITED CONSERVATIVE HARD-LINE POLICY

ON

LAW & ORDER

DEPENDS ON MORE PRISON SPACE

IN SIMPLE WORDS

MORE PRISONS

Because all the promises will avail

NOTHING

if there is no more prison space to hold the expected much increased number of

OFFENDERS

expected with the much increased number of offenders with their long belated no nonsense plan to increase the

Bobbies -on-the- Beat

and

the tougher sentencing for criminals who have played the system for too long to a stage that so called secure prisons are now in competition with Hilton and other majors hostellers with their good fare and comfort. The criminals have played the system for too long .Open Prisons should be secure prisons, and life in prison should not resemble a holiday camp, but time put to good affect to change the attitude of offenders for their good - but more importantly for the good of the law-abiding citizen in the community.

OCTOBER 6,2019

 

*

 

 

MAY-2015

  1. Beat Bobbies are dying out,

     

    warn police:

     

     

    Leaders say ...

     

    - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Police-leaders-say-officers-endangered-budget-cuts- hit.html

    By James Slack and Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail. Published: 18:03 EST, 19
    May 2015 | Updated: 18:04 EST, 19 May 2015. View comments. Bobbies on the ...

     

     

    [OVER THE PAST DECADE AND LONGER WE HAVE SHOWN MANY- MANY ARTICLES FROM THE DAILY MAIL ON THIS IMPORTANT AND VITAL SUBJECT OF THE LOSS OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT. AND ITS AFFECT ON THE GENERAL POPULATION BUT PARTICULARLY  ON THE GROWING OLDER POPULATION.  BUT WE HAVE ALSO STATED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY BEING FELLOW CITIZENS AND PART OF THE COMMUNITY WHICH SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE COMPLETELY  IGNORED.-MAY 2015 ]

H.F.1896

*

SUNDAY EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies
 

TORY MP

FOR SHIPLEY

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually rtepresenting people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know manyMPS nthink of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that thoswe in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues.

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

[THE PUBLIC

THEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERS AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TO DAY IN 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-at present 5 years. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES  from across our society, to do so.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

SUNDAY EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies
 

TORY MP

FOR SHIPLEY

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

H.F.1828

*

 

May 'doesn't see upside from BREXIT

[AS WE SUSPECTED FROM THE BEGINNING. HOW COULD AN AVID SUPPORTER OF THE EU  HAVE ACTED OTHERWISE?]

DAILY MAIL

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

Nick Timothy-THERESA MAY'S FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF HAS CLAIMED SHE REGARDS BREXIT

AS

'DAMAGE LIMITATION'.

Nick Timothy, who lost his job over the Tories' disastrous election campaign of 2017, said she and mainly her ministers' struggle to see any economic upside to BREXIT.

He told the BBC:

They see it as a damage limitation exercise.

If you see it in nthat way inevitably you're not going to be prepared to take the steps that would enable you to fully realise the economic opportunities of

LEAVING.

In a separate interview with Channel 4 News, Mr Timothy said the UK had made4 mistakes in Brexit negotiations, including

 by

allowing the EU to determine the sequence of talks.

 

He said the Government should have spent money earlier on preparing for a

NO DEAL BREXIT

and should have been more 'robust' in pushing areas of UK advantage. 'Some of it is to do with negotiating style,' he said.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

*  *  *

[AND WHAT WE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION

IN APRIL 2018]

 
 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

H.F.1800

 

*

 

DELAYING BREXIT

WOULD BE TO BETRAY THE REFERENDUM

By

Leo McKinstry-Daily Express columnist

Monday, March 4,2019

 

Sir Ivan Rogers, the highly respected former British ambassador to the EU, said in an interview last week that, though he had always felt Brexit might be difficult, even he had been surprised

"by the extent of the mess"

Sir Ivan is absolutely right to be critical of the Establishment, which has reduced the process of withdrawal

 to a paralysing shambles.

What should have been an inspirational moment of

NATIONAL LIBERATION

has been transformed by our politicians into a longwinded

saga of of frustration and despair

In place of

DETERMINATION

PATRIOTISM

 and

VISION

There has been only

INERTIA

INCOMPETENCE

AND

COWARDICE.

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that, with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away the process is still hopelessly bogged down in procedural wrangling.

[IT IS MORE THAN POSSIBLE THAT THIS SENARIO WAS PLANNED SHORTLY AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT. AS WE HAVE SHOWN IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE THE TWO CHIEF NEGOTIATORS KNEW EACH OTHER AND THEY WERE BOTH COMMITTED TO THE EU- HITLER'S PLAN OF GERMAN DOMINATION OF MUCH OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE BELIEVING THAT A COMMITTED REMAINER COULD BE TRUE TO HER WORD

 OF

BREXIT

MEANS

BREXIT]

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away, the process is still hopelessly bogged down to procedural wrangling.

*

 

[OUR COMMENT]

[We have always advocated that MPs should only serve  one term in PARLIAMENT in order that no MP over time can only consider their own agenda and not of that of an accustomed

FREE PEOPLE

and

 A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

The accumulated FREEDOM of PERSON and NATION  is in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS. The problem we have is that members of our hallowed HOUSE of WESTMINSTER are by custom the SERVANTS of the PEOPLE but as we have seen over the past 47 years they have become our MASTERS. They are so arrogant that they even now consider they OWN OUR BODIES. We should tell them to go to HELL!]

*

All energy has been drained from our exit strategy, and there is a genuine risk that the vacillation could soon grow even worse. Within the next 10 days it is possible-even likely-that MPS could vote for an indefinite delay in BREXIT by an extension in Article 50, the legal instrument that ends our

 EU MEMBERSHIP.

ANY substantial delay in

BREXIT

would be a clear

 BETRAYAL

of the

REFERENDUM RESULT.

 

It is now almost three years since

17.4 million voted for BRITAIN to LEAVE the EU,

by far the biggest expression of support through the ballot box for any cause  in the

HISTORY OF OUR DEMOCRACY

The people have waited long enough for this decision to be implemented. The people have waited long enough for this decisin to be implemented. The overwhelming mood of the public is for the politicians to

" GET ON WITH IT"

But Brexit is still trapped in a political quagmire and there is little sign of an imminent resolution in this chaos. On the contrary, impending votes in the Commons provide yet more scope for irresponsibility. By Tuesday, March 12, MPs must make a decision on whether or not to approve the Prime Minister's

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT.

Optimistic noises are emerging from Downing Street, but that could be wishful thinking.

After all, Mrs May's deal was thrown out last month by a margin of 230 votes, the

BIGGEST GOVERNMENT  DEFEAT IN HISTORY .

 SINCE then little progress has been made in talks with the typically intransigent EU over amending the Irish backstop, loathed by the Brexiteers because it could trap Britain under permanent Brussels control. Negotiations are proving

"extraordinary difficult",

 the Attorney General Geoffrey Cox, the minister charged with achieving compromise.

If Mrs May's Agreement is again defeated, then the Cabinet -having been subjected in ferocious pressure by Remainer ministers, including open blackmail through threats of resignation -has accepted that MPs will be able to hold votes on two further proposals:

One to reject a NO DEAL, the other to extend Article 50. Both are likely to pass, but such moves will be a

DISASTER

FOR OUR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 INDEED any delay in Brexit could destroy our chances of leaving the EU altogether, while the inability to leave without a deal gives the EU the upper hand.

Last week the Tory MP George Eustice resigned as Agricultural Minister in fury sat the Governments retreat, warning that these developments could culminate

 " in the EU dictating the terms of the extension requested  and the final humiliation of our country."

A Commons vote in favour of a delay would leave Britain in its weakest position since the negotiations began.  We would have to adopt the stance of a

DESPERATE SUPPLICANT .

Brussels has already indicated that any delay would have to be a minimum of

21 MONTHS.

Furthermore, without a clear objective, a delay would be an act of destructive procrastination.

Remainers continually bleat about the dangers of

"UNCERTAINTY"

over

BREXIT

but, by refusing to embrace the

REFERENDUM OUTCOME

they are fuelling the problem. In their cynical mindset, agitation for a

DELAY

will create a vast political vacuum, which  will be filled with demands for another vote or straightforward reversal of the

2016 RESULT.

In practice, a delay will be the beginning of the end for

BREXIT,

 which is precisely why the Remainers support this proposition.

All momentum would disappear from the

LEAVE CAUSE.

If Britain cannot break free now how could we do so in future?

THE

MOMENT OF FREEDOM

WILL HAVE PASSED.

 deadline of March 29 was meant to be one of the Government's red lines. Enough concessions have been made already. Any further prevarication would be intolerable.

FULL ARTICLE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

Monday, March 4,2019

 

H.F.1824

*

AS WE ARE NEARING

 OUR

INDEPENDENCE DAY

 DO NOT RETREAT YOUR HOUR OF

LIBERTY

 IS

AT HAND!.

FEBRUARY 15,2019

 

A CALL TO ARMS.

The Leave camp need to be ready to

DEFEND

 their

VICTORY

to  live under

 

"The Rights and

Liberties"

of

ENGLISHMEN.

WE HAVE NO WISH TO SEE A REOCCURRENCE  OF THE BLOODY REVOLUTION  in 1642 IN EDGE HILL-WARWICKSHIRE

TO RETAIN

THE

Rights and Liberties of Englishmen'

 AND SUBSEQUENT  BATTLES AROUND THE COUNTRY.

THE REASON FOR A CALL TO ARMS IS BECAUSE MILLIONS OF THE FRIENDS OF FRAU MERKEL WILL NOT ACCEPT THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND

AND WILL USE ALMOST ANY MEANS TO ENSLAVE THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS FOR EVER IN THE NOW INTENDED TRI-NATION SUPER-STATE OF GERMANY-FRANCE AND ITALY.

THE SHEER ARROGANCE OF THE SPONSORS OF HITLER'S WAR-TIME PLANNED SUPER-STATE IS NOW A REALITY.

THE GREATER NUMBER STILL SUPPORTING THE  BEAST OF BRUSSELS

-BRAIN-WASHED-MIND-BENDING PROPAGANDA-BETRAYERS OF THEIR SACRED INHERITANCE OF

MAGNA CARTA

 FOUGHT FOR FOR OVER 800 YEARS -SO SOUGHT FOR  AND PROTECTED IN ALMOST HALF THE WORLD.

IF IT HAS TO BE THEN WE MUST FIGHT AS WE ARE IN THE RIGHT AND CANNOT ACCEPT ANY COMPROMISE TO THAT OF THE RETURN OF OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

TO SHOW THAT WE ARE READY THERE NEEDS TO BE RALLIES AROUND THE COUNTRY IN THOSE CROMWELLIAN BATTLE FIELDS OF THE

ENGLISH CIVIL WAR

IT IS AGAIN THE ROUNDHEADS AGAINST THE CAVALIERS

WILL YOU DO IT?

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

[BY A COINCIDENCE WE ONLY REALISED THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DAY AFTER WE HAD COMPLETED OUR WORK.

JULY 4-

AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE DAY

 

WHEN WILL WE CELIBRATE OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY?]

H. F. 824 FREEDOM NOW.

H.F.1800

*

*

st.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

*

*

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM AROUND THE WORLD
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM: MARCH 16 -2012

A LESSON OF HISTORY

 

 ENGLAND

 

'

'It is because England is so great, and our love for our country is so deep and so just, that we can not only afford to dwell upon the darker spots of our history, but we absolutely require them, lest our love and admiration should become idolatrous;  it is because we are too apt to compare foreign nations with ourselves unfavourably that it is absolutely good for us to contemplate what they have suffered unjustly or done unworthily'  [P174]

 

Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 

 

 

 ENGLAND

 

OUR ISLAND HOME

 

 PART 2

 

...In our own island we see this most clearly: our history clearly begins with the coming over of the Saxons, the Britons and Romans had lived in our country, but they are not our fathers; we are connected with them as men indeed, but nationally speaking, the history of  Caesar's  invasion has no more to do with us, than the natural history of the animals which then inhabited our forests.   We ,this great English nation, whose race and language are now overrunning the earth [1843] from one end to the other,- we were born when the white horse of the Saxons had established his dominion from the Tweed to the Tamar.   So far we can trace our blood, our language, the name and actual divisions of our country, the beginnings of some of their institutions.   So far our national identity extends, so far history is modern, for it treats of a life which was then, and is not yet extinguished.

... By the great elements of nationality, I mean, race, language, institutions, and religion: and it will be seen that throughout Europe all these four may be traced up, if not actually in every case to the fall of the western empire, yet to the dark period which followed the fall, while in no case are all the four to be found united before it.   Otherwise, if we allow the two first of these [race and language] elements without the third and fourth [institutions and religion] to constitute national identity, especially when combined with sameness of places, we must say the the northern countries of Europe have no ancient history, inasmuch as they have been inhabited from the earliest times by the same race speaking what is radically the same language [GERMAN].   But it is better not to admit national identity, till the two elements of institutions and religion, or at any rate one of them, be added to those of blood and language .   At all events it cannot be doubted, that as soon as the four  are united, the national personality becomes complete...'

 

Is the government to impose its laws upon the people?   We speak of the government as distinct from the people, without thereby implying that it is in opposition to the people.   In a corrupt state the government and people are wholly at variance; in a perfect state they would be wholly one; in ordinary states they are one more or less imperfectly.    We need not be afraid to say, that in a perfect state the law of the government would be the law of the people, the law of their choice, the expression of  their mind.   In less perfect states the law of the government ids more or less the law of the people, suiting them in the main if not entirely.   If it be wholly or in great part unwelcome to them, something in the state is greatly wrong [ as has been the case since 1997 with so-called NEW LABOUR and the latter MIXED BUNCH of which we have no idea what they really stand for -THEY are ALL the SAME!.]   ;and although I believe that there are cases where a dictatorship is a good, and where good laws may rightfully be  imposed on a barbarian and unwilling people; yet, as  as the rule, there can be no doubt that such a state of things is tyranny.   When I speak therefore of the government, I am speaking of it as expressing the mind and will of the nation; and though a government may not impose its own law, whether human or divine, upon an adverse people; yet a nation, acting through its government, may certainly choose for itself such a law as it deems most for the good.

 

 

And therefore when it has been said that " these islands do not belong to the king and parliament in the same manner as the house or land of any individual belongs to the owner," and that therefore a government may not settle the religious law of a  country as the master of a family may settle the religious practices of his household; this is true only if we consider the king and parliament as not speaking the voice of the nation, but their own opposed to that of the nation.   For the right of a nation over its territory must be at least as absolute as that of any individual over his own house and land; and it surely is not an absurdity to suppose that the voice of government can ever be the voice of the nation:  although they unhappily too often differ, yet surely they may conceivably, and very often do in practice, completely agree...

 

... Wherever there is centralization, there is a danger of the parts of the body being too much crippled in their individual action; and yet centralization is essential to their healthy activity no less than to the perfection of the body.  But if men run away with the mistaken notion that liberty of conscience is threatened only by a state religion, and not at all by a church religion, the danger is that they will abandon religion altogether to what they call the church, that is, to the power of society far worse governed than most states, and likely to lay far heavier burdens on individual conscience, because the spirit dominant init is narrower and more intolerant.

 

[P46]  No doubt all societies, whether they are called states or churches, are bound to avoid tempting the conscience of individuals by overstating the terms of citizenship or communion.    And it is desirable, as I said before, to require a profession of obedience rather than belief, because obedience can and will often be readily rendered where belief would be withheld.    But as states require declarations of allegiance to the sovereign, so they may require declarations of submission to the authority of a particular law.   If a man believes himself bound to refuse obedience to the law of Christianity, or will not pledge himself to regard it as paramount in authority to any human legislation, he cannot properly be a member of a society which conceives itself bound to regulate all its proceedings by this law, and cannot allow any of its provisions to be regarded as revocable or alterable.   But no human power can presume to enquire into the degree of a man's positive belief: the heretic was not properly he who did not believe what the church taught, but he who wilfully withdrew himself from its society, refusing to conform to its system, and setting up another system of his own.

 

I know that it will be objected to this, that it is no other than the system of the old philosophers, who upheld paganism as expedient, while they laughed at it in their hearts as false.    But he who makes such an objection must surly forget the essential difference between paganism and Christianity,   Paganism, in the days of the philosophers scarcely pretended to rest on a foundation of historical truth; no thinking man believed in it , except as allegorically true.    But Christianity commends itself to the minds of a vast majority of thinking men, as being true in fact no less the doctrine; they believe in it as literally true no less spiritually.   When I speak then of a state requiring obedience to the Christian law, it means that the state, being the perfect church, should do the church's work; that is that it should provide for the Christian education of the young, and the Christian instruction of the old; that it should, by public worship and by a Christian discipline, endeavour, as much as may be, to realise Christianity to all its people.    Under such a system, the teachers would speak because they believed, for Christian teachers as a general rule do so, and their hearers would, in like manner, learn to believe also.   Farther, the evidence of the Christian religion, in itself so unanswerable would be confirmed by the manifest witness of the Christian church, when possessing a real living constitution, and purified by an efficient discipline; SO THAT THE TEMPTATIONS TO UNBELIEF WOULD BE CONTINUALLY LESSENED, AND UNBELIEF, IN ALL HUMAN PROBABILITY, WOULD BECOME CONTINUALLY OF MORE RARE OCCURRENCE.   And possibly the time might come when a rejection of Christianity would be so clearly a moral offence, that profane writings would be as great a shock to all men's notions of right and wrong as obscene writings are now, and the one might be punished with no greater injury to liberty of conscience than the other.

 

But this general hearty belief in Christianity is to be regarded by the Christian society, whether it be called church or state, not as its starting point, but as its highest perfection.    To begin with a strict creed and no efficient Christian institutions, is the sure way to hypocrisy and unbelief; to begin with the most general confession of faith, imposed, that is, as a test of membership, but with rigorous Christian institutions, is the way most likely to lead, not only to a real and general belief, but also in a lively perception of the highest points of Christian faith.   In other words, intellectual objections to Christianity should be tolerated, where they are combined with moral obedience; tolerated because in a way they are most surely removed; whereas a corrupt or disorganised church with a minute creed, encourages intellectual objections; and if it proceeds to put them down by force, it does often violate the right of conscience, punishing an unbelief which its own evil has provoked, and , so far as human judgment can see, has in great measure justified. [Page 49]

DEBT-HUMAN PASSION-HUMAN ERROR.

[We must bear in mind the colossal debt  acquired - the immense loss of life and injury to persons and destruction of property over the past 100 years because of WAR  of which ONLY the INTERNATIONAL BANKSTERS {ROTHCHILDS...with their increasing boundless WEALTH are the VICTORS.]

 

 

 THE BANK OF ENGLAND FORMED IN 1694 THROUGH AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT-

A PRIVATE BANK OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONEY LENDERS

 
 

After such disorientation was spread, Charles Montagu, treasurer, key leader of the Venetian Junto, and part of the welcoming committee of the foreign invaders, established the Bank of England in 1694 through an act of Parliament, which was founded by William Paterson, an imported student of the Bank of Amsterdam. Montagu then organized large loans through the private Bank, controlled not by the King, but parliament, and while supposedly helping the war torn economy, created a giant monetary debt out of thin air, a quantity for speculation and impoverishment of England, proceeding to push through dictatorial financial decisions for the economy, while never once issuing anything for development. For the job, Montagu selected the alchemist and calculating machine Isaac Newton, appointing him Warden of the Mint to carry out the enormous data processing job involved in the lying and faking on behalf of the numerous transitions in the economy for the sake of the Empire, such as a gruesome recoinage which cut the people’s wealth in half.20Newton immediately proffered his niece for sexual favors to Montagu in payment for the appointment, and for extra credit, as Warden of the Mint Newton personally advocated the death penalty and torture for petty thieves of coin wherever possible.

 

More!

 
     

Economical questions arise obviously out of the history of all WARS,

although careless readers are apt to neglect them.   They arise out of that simple law of our nature which makes it necessary for every man to eat and drink and be clothed.   Common readers, and I am afraid I may add, many historians also, appear to write and read about military matters without recollecting this.   We hear of armies marching, advancing and retreating ,besieging towns , fighting battles, being engaged actively for some weeks or months, and are apt  to think of them solely as moving or fighting machines, whose success depends on the skill with which their general plays them, as if they were really so many chess-men.   Yet one would think it was sufficiently obvious that these armies are made up of men who must eat and drink every day, and who wear clothing.       Of the expence and difficulty of maintaining them it is not easy.  I grant, for private persons in peace to form an adequate idea.   Yet here we may gain something more of a notion of it than can be obtained readily in a private family.      A college will contain perhaps seventy or eighty members; let him go into the kitchen and see the number of pounds of meat required for the daily consumption of the college, and see what the cost will amount to.  Then he may think what it is to provide for the food not of eighty or ninety persons, but of twenty, or of forty, or of sixty, or even of a hundred thousand.       All this multitude doing nothing to raise food or make clothing for themselves, must be fed and clothed out of the wealth of the community.     Again this community many have to maintain not one of these armies but several, and large fleets besides, and this for many years together;  while it may often happen that its means of doing so are at the same time crippled;  ITS FOREIGN TRADE MAY BE CUT OFF, OR LARGE PORTIONS OF ITS TERRITORY MAY BE LAID WASTE; while the event of the contest being uncertain, and hope and confidence are checked, and with them credit perishes also.      It is then a light matter first to provide the necessary resources for such a contest, and next to see that they ARE NOT SPENT WASTEFULLY? [P144]

 

With regard to providing them, there is first the great question between DIRECT TAXATION and LOANS.   Shall we lay the whole burden of the contest upon the PRESENT GENERATION, or DIVIDE it between OURSELVES and POSTERITY?     Conceive now the DIFFICULTIES, the exceeding temptations, which beset the decisions of this QUESTION.   In a FREE GOVERNMENT it may be doubtful whether the people will consent to raise the money or no.  But suppose that legally they have no voice in the matter, that the government may lay on what taxes it will; still extreme discontent at home is not likely to be risked in the midst of a FOREIGN WAR; or if the people are willing to bear the burden still  the power may be wanting.   A tax may easily DESTROY ITSELF: that is, suppose that a man's trade just  yields him a profit which he can live upon, and a tax is laid upon him to the amount of a fourth part of his profit.   If he raises the price of his commodity to the consumer, the consumer will either purchase so much less of it, or will endeavour to procure it from other countries where the dealer being less heavily taxed can afford to sell on cheaper terms.  Then the government interposes to protect the taxed native dealer by prohibiting the importation of the commodity of the untaxed foreigner.   But such a prohibition running counter to the plain rule of common sense, which makes every man desire to buy a cheaper article rather than a dearer, when both  are of equal goodness, it can only be maintained by FORCE.   Thence arise the necessity of a large constabulary or preventative force to put down smuggling, and to say nothing of the moral evils produced by such a state of things, it is clear that the expense of the additional preventative force which the new tax rendered necessary, is all to be deducted from the profits of that tax; and this deduction, added to the falling off in its productiveness occasioned by the greater poverty of the tax payer, may reduce its return almost to NOTHING.

[Comments within brackets and headings-highlighting and Caps are Ours]

TO BE CONTINUED

The above extract taken from the works of Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 

[We shall be showing extracts from his work not necessarily in the order  of its publication because for our purpose we wish to confine ourselves to matters relevant to the present day on much that is now in jeopardy because of the intent of many of our politicians to DESTROY the very heart of a once great and ancient NATION STATE

 

'Christianity is the basis of republican government, its bond of cohesion, and life-giving law.- more than the Magna Carta itself the Gospels are the roots of English liberty -That Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, with our completing Declaration, was possible only because the Gospels had been before them.'-

R. S. Storrs

*

'The distinction between Christianity and all other systems of religion consists largely in this, that in these others men are found seeking God, while Christianity is God seeking men.-'

Thomas Arnold, D. D.(1795-1842) Head Master of Rugby School.

CHURCH AND STATE IN A CHRISTIAN COMMONWEALTH

 

" An alliance between church and state in a Christian  commonwealth, is ,in my opinion, an idle and a fanciful speculation.  An alliance is between two things that are in their nature distinct and independent, such as between two sovereign states.   But in a Christian commonwealth, the church and the state are one and the same thing , being different integral parts of the same whole.... Religion is so far, in my opinion, from being out of the province or duty of a Christian magistrate, that it is, and it ought to be, not only his care, but the principle thing in his care; because it is one of the great bonds of human society, and its object the supreme good, the ultimate end and object of man himself."

 

Speech on the Unitarian Petition, 1792.   Burke's Works,Vol. X. p.43 Ed. 1818.

 

*

 

THE BEGINNING!

 

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

  

 

HOW THE SATANISTS ARE GRADUALLY ACHIEVING THEIR AIM  IN DESTROYING AN ANCIENT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

 

CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE

 

 

LORD RANDOLPH CHURCHILL

"Trust the People."

''But I own that my chief reason for supporting the Church of England I find in the fact that, when compared with other creeds and other sects, it is essentially the Church of religious liberty.   Whether in none direction or another, it is continually possessed by the ambition, not of excluding, but of including, all shades of religious thought, all sorts and conditions of men...I cannot, and will not, allow myself to believe that the English people, who are not only naturally religious, but also eminently practical... will ever consent to deprive themselves of so abundant a fountain of aid and consolation, or acquiesce in the demolition of an institution which elevates the life of the nation and consecratews the acts of the State...

 

Delivered by Lord Randolph Churchill at Birmingham on April 16th, 1884

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM

MARCH 16 -2012

 

H.F.1584

*

A REMINDER TO THOSE WHO STILL KOW-TOW TO

 BRUSSELS AND BERLIN

 

'...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you.'

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 EDMUND BURKE

 Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 *

1+2

 

 

 The

 I was accused of being racist, I knew political correctness had gone MAD

 

 

Political correctness had gone mad, writes TREVOR ... - Daily Mail

 
 

EXTRACT

A FEW weeks ago I observed that Barack Obama's iconic status as the first African-American US President should not obscure his mixed political record

For that, I was accused by one Radio 4 commentator of peddling a 'racist narrative

As a black man and former chairman of the

EQUALITY and HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

you might think I would be surprised to face a charge of

RACISM

but I was not.

For at a time when this country is crying out for frank discussion on issues such as race and sexuality, debate is being closed down because those who find offence in everything cry

RACIST or SEXIST.

The result - as I argue tonight in a TV programe -is that our

POLITICAL and CULTURAL ELITE

 seem unable to speak plainly about things that concern many citizens .

While our rulers seem to have all the time in the world to debate who should use the lavatory (in deference to the transgender lobby), they dismiss anxieties about

OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS

 DOCTORS SURGERIES

as merely a bigoted dislike of migrants.

HOW HAS THIS COME ABOUT?

[To follow]

Hounded...

Tyranny...

Hapless...

 

 

 

 

Full article

 

Multiculturalism is no longer right for Britain

[Mr Phillips has known for many years that MULTICULTURALISM WAS NEVER RIGHT FOR BRITAIN and in fact NOT  RIGHT

ANYWHERE.]

 

 

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

('the creation of a common mind') is a Soviet concept: 'Political correctness' means the exact reverse of what it says: It means that lies, or an 'imposed truth', supplant the objective truth' the exact reverse of what it says: it means that lies, or an 'imposed truth' supplant the objective truth. 'Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism' states, in an essay entitled 'Marxism-Leninism as a Philosophy and a WorldOutlook', that'...in deciding other affairs [sic], methods of public influence, the influence of public opinion will be utilised'. In a collectivised society, 'the Communist man...[is] distinguished by conscious collectivism and deep concern for the common good'; but the issues which preoccupy him are those imposed upon his controlled and easily manipulated mind by 'political correctness'.  In his closing remarks to the 28th CPSU Congress on 13th July 1990, Mikhail Gorbachev said that the restructured' CPSU would become a truly vanguard party whose power lies not in giving orders but in influencing people's minds'.

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

BY

CHRISTOPHER STORY

[WE HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF BULLETINS ON OUR WEBSITE SINCE 2005 DETAILING THE WORK OF THE ABOVE

A

TRUTH SEEKER AND PATRIOT

*

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

ENEMY OF ITS MEMBER STATES BY CHRISTOPHER STORY -

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 23, 2017

H F 1130 FREEDOM NOW

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

*  *  *

 

The Balfour Declaration [1916] : Time to say sorry. Time we made amends.

by Stuart Littlewood

 

In a letter to a local newspaper about Brexit and the way prime minister Theresa May is handling it, I happened to mention in passing the Balfour Declaration, criticising her plans to celebrate the centenary “with pride” and invite Israel’s PM Netanyahu to the fun. This drew a sharp response from someone spouting the usual Israeli propaganda ‘facts’ and saying my attitude harmed the Jewish community worldwide.

The Balfour Declaration is a deadly serious subject. It is a cause of great horror and grief, of justifiable international anger, and a matter for profound regret. This is a right time and proper time for debate. Let’s focus on it for the next few months because justice groups are urging the British Government to mark the Balfour Declaration centenary by saying sorry.

Mrs May could do some real good here. She could, at a stroke, help quell the destructive turmoil in the Middle East and begin repair to Britain’s tattered prestige. She could even open new trade routes into Islamic markets, vitally important as we leave the EU.

By eating a little humble pie and apologising on our behalf for 100 years of agony inflicted on lovely people in a lovely part of the world Mrs May could take a giant step for mankind on the world stage. She has between now and November to do it. Will she?

No, she’ll be celebrating Balfour in style with the Israeli prime minister and not giving a toss about the people Britain wronged.

Which is shocking when a UN report recently branded Israel an apartheid regime. It’s even more regrettable considering the desperate cry for help from the National Coalition of Christian Organizations in Palestine in an open letter to the World Council of Churches and the ecumenical movement, signed by over 30 organisations in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Here’s an extract: “We are still suffering from 100 years of injustice and oppression that were inflicted on the Palestinian people beginning with the unlawful Balfour declaration… followed by the Israeli occupation of the West Bank including East Jerusalem and Gaza and the fragmentation of our people and our land through policies of isolation and confiscation, and the building of Jewish-only settlements and the Apartheid Wall…”

Mrs May needs a jolt.

When I enquired whether the Balfour Declaration is taught in our schools I was told ‘no’. So what exactly is it?

Arthur Balfour, British foreign secretary in 1917, penned a letter to the most senior Jew in England, Lord Rothschild – pledging the Government’s “best endeavours” to facilitate the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. Balfour also wrote: “We do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country.”

It amounted to a betrayal of our Arab allies in WW1. Many in Parliament objected, including Lord Sydenham who remarked: “What we have done, by concessions not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section, is to start a running sore in the East, and no-one can tell how far that sore will extend.”

At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 when the Great Powers carved up the territorial spoils of war a Zionist delegation produced Balfour’s promissory note. It planted a powder-keg in the Middle East and the fuse was now lit. Britain accepted the mandate responsibility for Palestine and eventually in 1947 the Great Powers pushed the United Nations into partitioning the territory, again without consulting those who lived there.

So what made Balfour do it? The more you delve, the more incredible the answers to those unaware of the growing influence of worldwide Zionism. Support for the movement and its ambition to create a New Israel was quite fashionable in the corridors of power around the time of WW1. The story I find compelling is that, while Britain struggled desperately against German U-boat successes and ammunition shortages, the Zionist power-brokers of Germany and Eastern Europe consulted with their opposite numbers in America and decided, given their grip on money and media, they could bring the US into the war against Germany and its Ottoman ally if Britain were to promise them Palestine for a Jewish homeland afterwards.

Balfour was a Zionist convert (as were many others including prime minister David Lloyd-George) and in the right position. The proposition was put to Britain in 1916. The Zionists delivered. The US entered the war. In the meantime immigrant Polish-Zionist chemist Chaim Weizmann offered a solution to the production of enough acetone, a critical ingredient in cordite for artillery shells, to satisfy the war effort. He demanded the same promise. Balfour handed them their ‘receipt’ in November 1917 even though Palestine was not, and never could be, Britain’s to give away.

‘Name of the game: erasing Palestine’

Balfour had inserted into his ‘declaration’ that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing and non-Jewish communities….” on the insistence of the only Jew in the British Cabinet, Lord Montague, who was anti-Zionist and opposed the deal. But this safeguard was jettisoned as soon as Britain lost control of events.

Not content with the territory allocated to them under the UN Partition Plan the Israelis declared statehood ignoring all boundaries. Their ‘Plan Dalet’ offensive, begun beforehand, had seized much Arab-designated land at gunpoint.  Jewish militia – the Irgun, Haganah, Palmach and Lehi – raided towns and villages forcing inhabitants to flee. Numerous attrocities were committed including the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem (headquarters of the British administration) in 1946 murdering 91, and the massacres at Deir Yassin and Lydda in 1948.

Today Israel illegally occupies the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including the Old City, and has Gaza in a stranglehold so pitiless as to have caused a long-term humanitarian crisis and irreparable environmental damage. For nearly 70 years millions of dispossessed Palestinians and their families have languished in refugee camps, and those who remain in their homeland – Christian and Muslim alike – live a miserable life under brutal military occupation.

The situation stands as a monumental stain on the flag of the United Nations, which hasn’t the backbone to take action. And the continuing repercussions throughout the Holy Land should concern all true Christians and Muslims especially regular churchgoers like Mrs May.

Miko Peled, the son of an Israeli general and a former soldier in the Israeli army – and now an important figure in the struggle for justice – confirms what many have been saying for years: “The name of the game: erasing Palestine, getting rid of the people and de-Arabizing the country… By 1993 the Israelis had achieved their mission to make the conquest of the West Bank irreversible…. That is when Israel said, OK, we’ll begin negotiations…”

My critic in the local newspaper called Hamas terrorists. Peled describes the Israeli army, in which he served, as “one of the best trained and best equipped and best fed terrorist organisations in the world.” Take your pick. But Hamas’ political wing is not proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK.

The accusation that criticising the Israeli regime harms Jewish communities is unacceptable. There are many admirable Jewish groups vehemently campaigning against Israel’s crimes. One-time Israeli Military Intelligence chief Yehoshafat Harkabi warned that Jews throughout the world would pay the price of Israel’s misconduct. So the problem appears to be ‘family’ matter between Jews everywhere.

Related Posts:



 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on July 22, 2017, With 1416 Reads Filed under Government & Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 22-2017

FaceBook Comments

H.F.1261.-JULY 22,2017

*  *  *

[There is a well-known phrase:

'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

JewsnotZionists

*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

David-Cameron-doesn't-understand-Conservative-party.

[Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

-A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

[As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

CLICKStartpage

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

-an-attack-on-iran.

*

[GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY.

ADDED JULY 28,2018

AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 21,2017

H.F.1355

*  *  *

 

Conservative Friends of Israel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Conservative Friends of Israel, abbreviated to CFI, is a British parliamentary group affiliated to the Conservative Party, which is dedicated to strengthening business, cultural and political ties between the United Kingdom and Israel. CFI is an unincorporated association. It also seeks to strengthen ties between the British Conservative Party and the Israeli Likud party.

It was founded in 1974 by Conservative MP for Bury and Radcliffe, Michael Fidler. It is currently chaired by Stuart Polak. The Parliamentary Chairman is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary President is Baroness Shephard of Northwold. The Vice Chairmen are John Butterfill and James Clappison, the Secretary is David Amess, the Officers are Alistair Burt, Lee Scott, and Theresa Villiers, and the Chairman of CFI Europe is Timothy Kirkhope.

In 1995 Conservative politician Robert Rhodes James called it "the largest organisation in Western Europe dedicated to the cause of the people of Israel".[1]

By 2009, according to the Channel 4 documentary Dispatches – Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, around 80% of Conservative MPs were members of the CFI.[2] In 2013, Peter Oborne, the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator called CFI “by far Britain’s most powerful pro-Israel lobbying group”. The same is true of AIPAC in the US.”[3]

 

 

Activities[edit]

The group's 2005 strategy identified the following areas of activity: supporting Israel, promoting the British Conservative Party, fighting terrorism, combating anti-semitism, and promoting peace in the Middle East.[4] According to their website, "over two thirds" of Conservative MPs were members of Conservative Friends of Israel in 2006.[5] In 2007 the Political Director stated it had over 2000 members and registered supporters.[6] In 2009, at least half of the shadow cabinet were members of the group according to a Dispatches documentary.[7]

Their website states the opinion that it is one of the fastest growing political lobby groups in the UK.[8] According to the Dispatches documentary, between 2006 and 2009 the CFI funded more than 30 Conservative parliamentary candidates to visit Israel.[7]

In 2012 CFI reconstituted itself as a private company limited by guarantee.[9]

CFI annual business lunch[edit]

David Cameron, then newly elected leader of the Conservative Party, addressed the CFI annual business lunch on 30 January 2006, whose audience included half of the Conservative Parliamentary Party. As part of his speech, he stated "I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party. Israel is a democracy, a strong and proud democracy, in a region that is, we hope, making its first steps in that direction."[10]

Former Conservative party leaders Iain Duncan Smith[11] and Michael Howard[12] have addressed the CFI lunch.

The British Pakistani MP Sajid Javid has also made business lunch speeches which have been positively received by the CFI, the Jewish Chronicle even reporting Javid as a future Prime Minister.[13]

Donations[edit]

The Dispatches documentary claimed members of the group and their companies have donated over £10 million to the Conservative party between 2001 and 2009. The group called this figure "deeply flawed" saying that they have only donated £30,000 between 2004 and 2009 but that members of the group have undoubtedly made their own donations to the party. Dispatches described the CFI as "beyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groups".[2][7]

Members of CFI[edit]

According to the CFI website 80% of Tory MPs are members of Conservative Friends of Israel.[14]

In alphabetical order, members of Conservative Friends of Israel include:

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Peter Oborne (12 December 2012). "The cowardice at the heart of our relationship with Israel". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  2. ^ a b Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, Channel 4, Monday 16 November 2009
  3. ^ Peter Oborne, Iran nuclear deal: ill-informed friends of Israel are refusing to face facts, Daily Telegraph, 27 November 2013, accessed 10 August 2015
  4. ^ CFI INFORMED Magazine, Second Edition (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, February 2007, p. 3, retrieved 29 May 2008 [dead link]
  5. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel – About Us
  6. ^ Robert Halfon (27 September 2007). "Introducing the CFI". ConservativeHome. Retrieved 20 August 2012. 
  7. ^ a b c Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 November 2009. 
  8. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel web site
  9. ^ "Companies House WebCHeck - CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL LIMITED". Companies House. Company No. 08114952. Archived from the original on 29 December 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  10. ^ CFI INFORMED Weekly Briefing (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, 3 February 2006, retrieved 25 May 2006 [dead link]
  11. ^ Duncan Smith: Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorists, Conservatives.com, 10 December 2001
  12. ^ "Howard Speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel, at the Savoy Hotel, London". Conservatives.com. 6 December 2004. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004. 
  13. ^ http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/94117/muslim-tory-mp-after-britain-israel-best
  14. ^ a b "About CFI". Conservative Friends of Israel. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  15. ^ "Ministers "will change" war crimes arrest law". Jewish Chronicle. 8 July 2010. 
  16. ^ "Altrincham and Sale West: Election 2010". Jewish Chronicle. 29 April 2010. 
  17. ^ "UK: Evangelical Christian appointed new UK Middle East Minister". The Muslim News. 15 May 2010. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  18. ^ "British MPs furious after Israel President Shimon Peres accuses the English of being anti-semitic". Daily Mail. UK. 1 August 2010. 
  19. ^ a b "Cameron's Cabinet: Who are they?". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  20. ^ "Mike's Biography". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  21. ^ "William Hague's Schmooze With The Jewish News". Totally Jewish. 25 March 2010. 
  22. ^ a b "Ministers lose seats in the East". East Anglia Daily Times. 7 May 2010. 
  23. ^ Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. 
  24. ^ "About Conservative Friends of Israel". cfoi.co.uk. Retrieved 22 September 2011. 
  25. ^ "Eric Pickles to lead MPs’ delegation to Israel". Jewish Chronicle. July 24, 2015. 
  26. ^ "Rifkind elected as Kensington MP". Jewish Chronicle. 7 May 2010. 
  27. ^ Sloan, Alaistair. "Ed Miliband will back Israel". Middle East Monitor. Retrieved 13 April 2015. 

External links[edit]

 

[GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-GERMANY.

ADDED JULY 28,2018

AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 21,2017

H.F.1355

*  *  *

VIGILANCE IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY!

*

 QUOTE 684 of 900

ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS

Jewish objectives as outlined in Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

1) Banish God from the heavens and Christianity from the earth.

2) Allow no private ownership of property or business.

3) Abolish marriage, family and home. Encourage sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, adultery, and fornication.

4) Completely destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism.

5) Establish a one-world government through which the Luciferian Illuminati elite can rule the world. All other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose.

6) Take the education of children completely away from the parents. Cunningly and subtly lead the people thinking that compulsory school attendance laws are absolutely necessary to prevent illiteracy and to prepare children for better positions and life's responsibilities. Then after the children are forced to attend the schools get control of normal schools and teacher's colleges and also the writing and selection of all text books.

7) Take all prayer and Bible instruction out of the schools and introduce pornography, vulgarity, and courses in sex. If we can make one generation of any nation immoral and sexy, we can take that nation.

8) Completely destroy every thought of patriotism, national sovereignty, individualism, and a private competitive enterprise system.

9) Circulate vulgar, pornographic literature and pictures and encourage the unrestricted sale and general use of alcoholic beverage and drugs to weaken and corrupt the youth.

10) Foment, precipitate and finance large scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt the nations and thereby force them into a one-world government.

11) Secretly infiltrate and control colleges, universities, labor unions, political parties, churches, patriotic organizations, and governments. These are direct quotes from their own writings (The Conflict of the Ages, by Clemens Gaebelein pp. 100-102).

12) The creation of a World Government.

KGB CHART NOW TO DESTROY A PEOPLE AND NATION

More!

 

 

H.F.741

*  *  *

("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

 

H.F.1289

*  *  *

 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

- TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

-NOT MULTICULTURAL.

*

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

Wednesday, June 7,2006

*

 Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

by

Simon Heffer

 There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

 We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

MULTICULTURLISM

 -had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

 

[‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

 

[The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

  

To Continue:

 I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

 It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

ENGLAND

-somewhat precarious.

Not all the Left has, however twigged that

MULTICULTURLISM

-is rather last century.

Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

-made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

 

He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

 

Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

 

Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

OUR CULTURE

OUR CONSTITUTION

OUR NATION

 

At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

 

REFORMATION

  -that the

Monarch

 

is Supreme Governor

of the

Church of England.

-which is the Established Church of this Realm.

 

As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

 

“the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

Realm of England.

 

Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

 

However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

 

He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

 

“Defender of Faiths”

 

Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

 

More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

 

Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

 

Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

 

Defender of the Faith

 

-and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

 

THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

 

Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

 

Perhaps the needless vandalism of

 

OUR CONSTITUTION

 

-will have been completed by then.

 

Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

 

For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

 

When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

 

For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

 

For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

-embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

NEW SOVEREIGN.

 

Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

 

But he would be WRONG!

 

It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

 

It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

HISTORY and TRADITION

-and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

 

That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

 

Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

 

The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

OUR WAY OF LIFE

And

OUR VALUES.

 

It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

 

WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

 

WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

 

AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

 

WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

 

AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABILITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS

*

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

1844

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

 

Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

 

To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

*

 

Nationality and Domicile

 

In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

 

Of this parliament we must speak.

 

Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

 

It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

-are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

 

When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

 

Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

 

-the one nationality, the other domicile.

 

Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

 

If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

 

But there is no such thing as British domicile -

Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

 

If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

 

We have included the above extracts from

The

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

HISTORY

OF

ENGLAND

 

by

 

F.W MAITLAND [1908]

 

-to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

 

The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

 

Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

English Parliament.

Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

To continue:

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY

LORD BROUGHAM

*

CHAPTER VIII

 THE National Resistance was not only, n point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

Right of Resistance

[Even in 2006]

-as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

 

[DO YOU UNDERSTAND

TONY BLAIR?]

 

The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

The thirty renewals of

MAGNA CARTA

-the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

RIGHTS are INVADED.

The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

RIGHT of RESISTANCE

 

-less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

 

In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

 

This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

 

The great virtue of the

 

CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

 

-is the purity in which it recognises and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

 

The ruling powers are three:

 

The Sovereign

 

The Lords

 

The Commons

 

-of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

 

PEACE and WAR

 

-and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

 

The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

NATIONAL DEFENCE.

 

[In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

-without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

 

REFERENDUM

 

- on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

 

So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

 

WHAT IS?

 

The following extracts are from the

 

PREFACE

 

of the

BRITISH CONSTITUION

 

By

 

HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

[1844]

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

 

It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

 

Sovereign of ENGLAND

 

-never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

 

The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

 

It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

 

But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

 

CONSTITUTION

 

-however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

 *

[In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

 

It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

ARE YOU CONTESTING?

 

* * *

 

MULTICULTURLISM

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

H.F.1472--BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2006

*  *  *

 

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

H.F.1424/2

 
 
 

Illuminati

The story starts about 45,000 years ago. There was a planet in an orbit closer to the sun than Jupiter. Many call this planet Maldek, Mars was it’s largest moon. The Reptilian people that lived there were very violent and negative. They went to war with the people that lived on Mars. They were greater in number, but the Martians had better technology. These people refused to quit attacking the peaceful Martians. So the Martians devised a plan to seriously damage Maldek, making it impossible for these people to stay there and get the war over. The weapon they used, turned out to be to strong and blew up Maldek, scattering pieces all over our solar system, making the asteroid belt, new moons for some of the outer planets and comets in the far reaches of our solar system.

About 8,000 of these Reptilian people were in large space ships and survived. So they decided to go live in our moon and kick out the few Draconians that lived there. The Reptilians (Draconians) soon returned in force. So they had to leave in a hurry, while their ships were being blasted and crash landed in Antarctica, which at that time was in a tropical area. Now they soon no longer had space flight, because of the Draconian continued attacks. They had trouble living on Earth as their bodies didn’t agree with Earth’s elements. Humanity had just came out of cataclysms caused by Maldek blowing up, so they were few in number and lost their technology and now were sort of primitive.

These people captured some Humans and using genetics made hybrids of themselves, so they could live on Earth. They made 2 kinds of hybrids, one kind was very similar to and could mate with Humanity. The other kind was different and had elongated heads and became the ruling class and could not mate with Humanity. There are still some of these left, although they stay secret. Within 2,000 years the brown dwarf star, came through our solar system as it does every 3,557 years. Earth was hit hard and had a devastating pole shift, making the south pole in about the center of Antarctica as it is today.

Most all of the people on Earth died as there was a flash freeze in the new polar areas, killing a lot of animals too. So the Reptilian-Mammal hybrid people that were similar to Humanity lived with and bred with Humanity. When one of their females had children, the children would get one of their souls, regardless of who the father is. These people, the Illuminati today can tell each other apart from Humanity, but Humanity can’t seem to tell that they have different souls. They arranged to put each other into positions of power, like kings and queens and still hold these positions today. Although with the invention of the internet and spreading of knowledge, they are starting to lose control.

With them in power, we have war, central banks, shortages and other forms of suffering. Because of them we live in a negative world. In 2021 our 3rd cycle will finish and positive soul groups get to move up to the 2nd realm, 5th dimension (4th density). We are in the 1st realm, 4th dimension (3rd density) now. So we must get the Illuminati out of power and turn positive, to move up to 4th density. A soul can either go through 1 cycle of 3rd or 4th density (or some of both) and make ascension to 5th density (12th dimension on Earth). If we get in 4th density life improves, our bodies will be a little better and matter a little different, the biggest change is another component of time. Many of us will gain some telepathy and see a wider range of the spectrum and other improvements.

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

 

FEBRUARY 5-2016

H.F.1424/2S

 

 
 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

H.F.1388

 

 MAIN ARTICLE BELOW BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MAY, 2006

THEY NEVER LEARN!

[As we have said many times over the past decades governments fail to learn lessons about key matters vital to the public at large such as LAW & ORDER-IMMIGRATION-and a host of other matters which should have been finally resolved to the satisfaction of the GENERAL PUBLIC many years ago. The reason there is this constant CHAOS is that MINISTERS tread softly because there is always a shortage of FINANCE. Well! we  know where there is a mountain of GOLD in the so-called FOREIGN AID BUDGET! to supply resources to SECURITY-NHS-PENSIONS-ROADS and other ESSENTIAL NEEDS of the PEOPLE. BUT there will be NO CHANGE until PR -PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION is introduced into our POLITICAL SYSTEM. REMEMBER-THE GANG OF THREE or is it now the GANG of TWO have no fears of not alternating as a future government so it is IMPORTANT that the PEOPLE have other chooses to keep our POLITICAL SYSTEM in GOOD HEALTH. Soon we will be FREE of the EU and the their JUSTICE SYSTEM and their other ABOMINATIONS but unfortunately we still have the CURSE of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS with us which destroying the very FREEDOM of SPEECH and PERSON which our ANCESTORS fought for those centuries AGO.  WE see the once VOICE of the PEOPLE the once PARTY of the COMMON MAN in TURMOIL because of its links to a FOREIGN POWER. We have raised the QUESTION where are the FRIENDS of ENGLAND in our WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT?  yet there is a LOBBY of FRIENDS of ISRAEL in BOTH MAIN PARTIES with at least 80% of CONSERVATIVE MP's members. WE ASK should such INFLUENCE be PERMITTED in our HOUSE OF COMMONS.  This is NOT a RACIAL ISSUE but one of FAIRNESS to ALL NATIONS on our PLANET EARTH. WE have also raised the question of UNDUE INFLUENCE in the AFFAIRS of our ISLAND HOME and the difficulty of being CANDID of the MATTERS of the MOMENT of that FOREIGN POWER.       We have to ask ourselves if there was no FOREIGN LOBBY GROUP in PARLIAMENT there would have been no CRIES of RACISM echoing in our HALLOWED HOUSE in WESTMINSTER and what a great RELIEF that would be TO ALL CONCERNED.]

*  *  *

What PLANET are JUDGES living ON?

 

*

Daily Mail

Wednesday, May 31-2006.

 

by

 

Melanie Phillips

 

ARE OUR senior judges simply living on a different planet from the rest of us lesser mortals? Our most senior judge, The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, has launched yet another judicial broadside against apparent evils of imprisonment.

In Lord Phillips’ UNIVERSE, it appears that PRISON is NOT the PLACE for CRIMINALS.

 

Instead, wherever possible judges should pass community sentences -which he admits will not be tolerated by the public unless they include ‘significant punishment’ -because ‘the sensible place for rehabilitation is the community.’

 

EXCUSE ME?

COMMUNITY SENTENCES FAIL TO REHABILITATE CRIMINALS. THEY RESULT IN AN EVEN HIGHER RATE OF RECIDIVISM THAN JAIL SENTENCES.

 

This is hardly surprising, since community sentences seem to be hardship-free zones.

According to a recent report by the

Chief Inspector of Probation

-burglars and robbers in London are being set to restore antique furniture or make costumes for the Notting Hill carnival.

[You couldn’t make it up if you tried]

 

And thousands of criminals sentenced to unpaid community service do nothing at all some days.

 

When they turn up, there are no probation staff to supervise them, so they are simply sent home. And those who don’t who don’t even bother to turn up are NOT taken back to COURT and re-sentenced.

 

It may amaze Lord Phillips to learn that ‘significant punishment’ means going

 

TO PRISON.

 

YES, overcrowding means prisons don’t function properly. But the remedy for that is

 

TO BUILD MORE PRISONS.

 

YET our senior judges harbour an obsessive animosity towards prison, doubtless because of the way Human Rights doctrine has so muddled the way we look at the very concepts of

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT.

 

Lord Phillips’ remarks, however were more bizarre still. One reason prison numbers are rising, he said, was that drug users were deliberately committing crimes to get into prison drug programmes. He had come across prisoners offered community sentences who preferred to go to prison so that they could get treatment.

 

Offenders

 

What on earth does the Lord Justice have under his wig? There is no proper evidence for this at all.

 

Indeed, an investigation by MPs said last year that fewer than half of all jails had drug treatment courses, that ONLY one in ten prisoners who use drugs got places on drug treatment programmes, and that half of those who did go on courses NEVER FINISHED THEM.

 

As for supposedly non-existent community drug treatment programmes, they do EXIST-

but are pretty useless in turning offenders away from crime.

 

In a recent report, the Commons Public Accounts Committee observed that drug treatment orders were ‘more like a

GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD’

than a rehabilitation programme.

 

 

Only 25 per cent of those who accepted them ever completed them.

 

It is deeply worrying not only that a senior judge should make such odd and ill-informed remarks, BUT that the JUDICIARY should assume it knows better what policies should be pursued.

 

Yesterday, the former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf [The burglars’ friend] expanded upon such arrogance.

Apparently making a coded attack on the Prime Minister for his criticisms of a judge over the immigration ruling, Lord Woolf condemned politicians for ‘knocking’ individual judges, because it was ‘very damaging’.

 

So lets get this right. Judges may make comments, which are not only wildly inappropriate because they are intensely political, but also reveal themselves to be woefully OUT OF TOUCH.

 

Yet then they loftily inform us that we should not criticise them for doing so, because they apparently reside on some celestial plane above public debate.

 

Of course, in principle politicians and judges should have a Chinese wall between them. And it was once clearly understood that politicians and judges stood on either side of the wall.

 

But the problem is that the judges have torn up that understanding and are now getting involved in matters of POLICY such as the role of imprisonment or drug treatment, which ARE properly the territory of POLITICIANS.

 

The judges have simply grown too big for their wigs.

 

One of the main reasons is the Human Rights law. Lord Woolf robustly defended this yesterday and said that any resulting tension between GOVERNMENT and JUDICIARY was healthy in a democracy.

 

Weakness

But the fact is that Human Rights law has given the judges a weapon to undermine democracy, by setting up themselves rather than politicians as the people who should decide how the country should be ruled.

 

This first surfaced back in the 1980s, when senior judges decided that the long years of Tory government and the weakness of the opposition posed such a threat to democracy that the judiciary should take upon itself the mantle of opposition instead.

 

In the days before the passage of the Human Rights Act [1998], this took the form of challenges to immigration law through judicial review. Such attempts to change the direction of government policy through court rulings became known as judicial activism.

 

When Tony Bair came to power, instead of putting the judges back behind the Chinese wall he attached a turbo-charge to their already burgeoning judicial activism by introducing the Human Rights Act.

 

This change in the behaviour of judges was by no means restricted to Britain. Judicial activism had become a phenomenon throughout the

WESTERN WORLD.

 

In America, Australia, the countries of the EU and elsewhere, the judges -

Acting as a kind of judicial fifth column around the world - are arrogating to themselves power, which belong to the world of politics.

 

Earlier this year, in a little noticed address in London to the Law Commission, a prominent Australian judge, Michael Kirby - a key proponent of judicial activism- spelt out the judge’s agenda with unabashed frankness.

 

The institutions of government in both Britain and Australia, he said, had become unbalanced. Governments had become too powerful, civil servants and MPs had lost influence to political advisers and ministerial accountability was a thing of the past.

 

Amen to that.

 

BUT he went on to say that as a result ‘the very notion of “sovereignty” of parliament has become a somewhat inapposite concept’

 

There should be instead a new type of government led by judges and based on HUMAN RIGHTS LAW - which was already developing in BRITAIN.

 

So the remedy for politicians who were abusing their powers was to replace them by JUDICIAL POWER.

 

This was nothing less than an all-out attack on parliamentary democracy.

 

[Whatever is left of it after nine years of Tony Blair]

 

Yet Justice Kirby was given a platform by our principle legal reform body -the Law Commission - and before an appreciative audience, which included Lord Phillips, Lord Woolf and the Lord Chancellor.

 

Despised

 

English judges express similar alarming distain for democracy. Last year Lord Bingham, the Senior Law Lord, said that the Human Rights Convention existed to protect vulnerable minorities. Which were sometimes disliked, resented or despised.

 

It should therefore come as no surprise, he went on, that decisions vindicating their rights ‘should provoke howls of criticism by politicians and the mass media. They generally reflect majority opinion.’

 

So majority opinion, on this account, was essentially illegitimate, and the role of the JUDICIARY was to use HUMAN RIGHTS LAW to do it down.

 

This unashamed justification of judicial supremacism is as anti m-democratic as it is arrogant. We are living through a kind of creeping judicial coup d’etat driven by a profound contempt for the

PUBLIC OPINION

-to which politicians are answerable.

 

It is parliamentary weakness that is to blame. Only if Parliament reasserts itself will the

 

RULE OF LAW

 

-     be rescued from

 

RULE OF LAWYERS

 

-who have so high-handedly hijacked it?

 

* * *

[Font altered -bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

*

 

[Well it must occur to many in this country that the present sorry predicament of

 

OUR PARLIAMENT

 

- only benefits those in the Judiciary and of course the growing army of lawyers many of whom have grown rich on their human rights harvest which Tony Blair and his flatmate Lord Falconer have no doubt been sowing with hindsight for years. What better way to destroy an immemorial institution of over 700 in the making than to undermine it from within while professing that their attempts to govern are undermined by the JUDICIARY?

 

WHO CAN WE POSSIBLY TRUST?

 

THERE MUST SURELY BE A SEQUAL TO FOLLOW?

 

 

* * *

MAY/06

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1665BROUGHT  FORWARD FROM MAY-06

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

A REMINDER!

 

 

 

[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

*  *  *

ADDED DECEMBER,2018

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

  

 

 
MAY-16 victory

JUN-16

REFERENDUM

JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

SEP 19 OCT-19 NOV-19 DEC-19 JAN-20

FEB-20

MAR-20

APRIL-20

MAY-20 JUNE-20
JULY-20 AUG-20 SEPT-20 OCT-20 NOV-20  FREE OF THE EU

DEC-20

AFTER  48 YEARS

JAN-21

A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

THE

WORLD OUR OYSTER

 

 

 
   -  MARCH -  PART 1- 2020 -      PART 2-PART3-PART 4

      

 

NOVEMBER

HOME-

PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

- (1994 -Official Website - MARCH-PT 5- 2019 )-

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

*

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 

 

 

 
 

 

A MESSAGE TO BORRIS JOHNSON

 

A STATE OF EMERGENCY

 

RE: GUARDIANS OF THE COMMUNITY

 

SOME YEARS AGO WE SUGGESTED THAT THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT IN VILLAGE AND TOWN-THE TRUSTED AND RESPECTED LINK BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COMMUNITY WAS A MOST IMPORTANT REASON TO KEEP THE BOBBIE_ON_THE_BEAT IN EXISTENCE BECAUSE OF ITS IMPORTANT FUNCTION PARTICULARLY IN AN EMERGENCY

 

As a 87 year old prensioner with a wife of 90 years of ago to know that such a link existed today in March 2020 would be a tremendour relief and comfort. Such an arrangement should have been put in place immediately an EMERGENCY is DECLARED-OUR MILITARY COULD PERFORM WITH VITAL SERVICE IN VILLAGE AND TOWN TODAY IN MARCH 2020.

 

VILLAGE AND TOWN COUNCILS NEED TO MOVE FAST TO GET THIS VIOTAL SERVICE GOING AT ONCE WHICH WILL SAVE MANY LIVES

 

*  *  *

 

MARCH 14,2020

 

H.F.1773/1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHAT A FANTASTIC RESPONSE IN JUST A MATTER OF A FEW DAYS WITH HELP AT HAND FROM THE LOCAL COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY. FROM WHAT WE SEE IN OUR PRESS -TELEVISION... THIS HAS BEEN THE USUAL EXPECTATION EVERYWHERE IN OUR GREAT ISLAND HOME AND ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD

WHEN THE PRESENT SCURGE FINALLY LEAVES OUR COUNTRY WE WILL ALL REMEMBER AS OTHER PEOPLES IN OUR PLANET EARTH  HOW THEIR OUR GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES MET THE

 CALL

TO ARMS

AGAINST THE PESTULENCE

 

WE WILL BE A BETTER COUNTRY-MORE UNITED AS NO DOUBT IN THE WORLD AT LARGE

THERE IS A BETTER WORLD BEFORE US OF FREEDOM AND PROSPERTY FOR ALL-  AS THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN THE INSTIGATORS OF WAR AND FAMINE OVER CENTURIS ARE SOON TO MEET THEIR JUST PUNISHMENT

GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY

AND THE PEOPLE IN THE WORLD AT LARGE