ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG UK.

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

Top Topics and Stats-ENGLAND FILE

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-23-1994-Official Website-June-23-2016-PART-8-9-10-11-12-13-14

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

VOTE LEAVE ON JUNE 23

AND SAVE

FREEDOM

FOR

EVERYONE

 

At another time in England's history when there is division within  we quote the words of Oliver Cromwell to his Second Parliament in 1658 when after 10 years of war  followed by 6 years of PEACE he made a plea of UNITY!.

'...Let us have one heart and soul; one mind to maintain the honest and just rights of this nation;-not to pretend to them, to the destruction of our Peace, to the destruction of our Nation...

[In 1658 for treason heads rolled but in 2016 after June 23 heads are to be crowned. This tells you much of the man pretending to govern the affairs of our once respected and   

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND]

*

Words of Lord Fauconberg:

The Genius of England no longer soars Sunward, world defiant, like an eagle through the storms, 'mewing her mighty youth,' as John Milton saw her do: the Genius of England, much liker a greedy Ostrich intent on provender and a whole skin mainly, stands with its other extremity Sunward; with its Ostrich-head stuck into the readiest bush, of old Church tippits, King-clocks, oe what other' sheltering Fallacy there may be , and so awaits the issue,. The issue has been slow; but it is now seen as inevitable. No Ostrich, intent on gross terrene provender, and sticking its heads into Fallacies, but will be awakened one day,- in a terrible a-posteriori manner. if not otherwise!-- AWAKE before it comes to that; gods and men bid us AWAKE! The Voices of our Fathers, with thousandfold stern monition to one and all ,

BID US AWAKE!

On the death of

 ENGLAND'S

TRUE LORD PROTECTOR

OLIVER CROMWELL

3rd September,1658 

Oliver Cromwell's LETTER and SPEECHES

by

THOMAS CARLYLE

May 1888

*

 

POLITICS

'If ever this free people-if this government itself is ever utterly demoralized, it will come from the this incessant human wriggle and struggle for office, which is but a way to live without work.'

ABRAHAM LINCOLN

*

 

JUNE 23-PT 9/14-2016

(Please note: that the above June 23 x 14 monthly bulletins are additional to the usual x 6 JUNE monthly bulletins to enable us to bring forward relevant information from over 13 years.)

WHY I WANT

OUT OF THE EU

 

I want out because I fear that our

NATIONAL IDENTITY

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and tradition of liberal democracy are under

THREAT

from the EU's rules on the

FREE MOVEMENT of PEOPLE

and its

INSANE

HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME

I WANT OUT

because I believe that

BRUSSEL'S

attempts to impose

UNIFORMITY

on hugely diverse peoples are holding economies back, destroying livelihoods and breeding dangerous ill-feelings between

NATIONS.

I WANT OUT

so that we can regain the right to elect those who make our laws-and to

DISMISS THEM IF THEY FAIL US

I'm sick of seeing my country infantilised by an

UNSACKABLE NANNY STATE.

IN A WORD

I WANT OUT BECAUSE I WANT

BRITAIN

[ENGLAND]

TO BE FREE

*

 

[We couldn't have put it better-Thank you!- Tom Utley.

TOM UTLEY: Oh dear. Is the fact my wife was a bus ... - Daily Mail-Friday, June 3,2016l

 

H.F.805

 
 

DAILY MAIL-COMMENT-

JUNE  22-2016

 

Lies, greedy elites and a divided, dying Europe-why Britain could have a great future outside a broken EU

 

EXTRACT

THROUGHOUT this long and often acrimonious referendum campaign the most striking fact about the

REMAINERS

is that they have failed to articulate a single positive reason for staying in the EU

Instead, they have subjected voters to a barrage of scaremongering, with the aid of a once proudly

INDEPENDENT CIVIL SERVICE

pinning all their hopes on persuading the British people that the dangers of withdrawing from

BRUSSELS

outweigh the many drawbacks of belonging to it.

In so doing, they have had to seek the support of the likes of

Jeremy Corbyn-Ed Miliband- Gordon Brown-Tony Blair

-from the very party voters rightly rejected at the last election on the grounds

THAT THEY COULDN'T BE TRUSTED

But the the EU is an edifice

BUILT ON LIES

-starting with the blatant untruth, peddled when we signed up to the Common Market in 1973, that we were joining nothing more threatening than a tariff-free trading zone, which would involve

NO SACRIFICE OF SOVEREIGNTY.

More than 40 years on, some 50 or 60 per cent of our LAWS

and

70 per cent of REGULATIONS

are dictated to us by

BRUSSELS

whose power is only matched by its

INCOMPETENCE

CORRUPTION

and

 HUNGER

to impose ever more statist regulations on 28 utterly diverse member nations.

And though we do less than 10 percent of total business with the EU-with80 per cent of our trade being within the UK-every firm in the country

MUST

SUBMIT TO IT'S THROTTLING RED TAPE.

Then there's the

GREAT LIE

that the EU is a guarantor of prosperity for its members. In truth, while the economies of other countries have forged ahead,

 the Continent's share of the global commerce has been shrinking for decades.

Meanwhile, the proportion of the UK's overseas trade that we conduct with our partner nations had actually declined since we joined,

 from about 55 to 45 per cent.

As for the 19 countries locked into the catastrophic, one-size fits all single currency- the very apotheosis of the

 European Dream

of ever closer

POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC UNION

- just ask the jobless young people of

GREECE, SPAIN and FRANCE

if the euro has underpinned their

PROSPERITY.

Indeed , in Greece, crushed in bankruptcy by

 ARROGANT GERMAN INTRANSIGENCE

daily living in a nightmare.

In other parts of Southern Europe, youth unemployment is a terrifying

50 PER CENT

and more, with half a generation's prospects of a decent life

SACRIFICED ON THE ALTER OF EU EMPIRE BUILDING.

Or take Italy, a country with an economy roughly comparable in size to our own. Its growth rate over the past eight years has been

 NEGLIGABLE...

*

[THIS ARTICLE IS EXTENSIVE IN SIZE COVERING THE SUBJECT IN GREAT DEPTH WHICH LEAVES NO DOUBT THAT THE CORRECT DECISION ON JUNE 23 IS TO :

VOTE LEAVE

to recover your freedom and country.]

 

Full article

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JUNE 22-2016

H.F. 900

 

 

 

 

FREEDOM!

 

...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

 

THE FOURTH ESTATE OF THE REALM OF ENGLAND AS THE ENGLISH BARONS OF MAGNA CARTA IN 1215 SUPPORT THE PEOPLE

AGAINST THEIR  ARBITRARY AND TYRANNICAL EXECUTIVE SERVANTS OF A FOREIGN POTENTATE

 IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE RETURN OF THEIR INHERITED RIGHT OF FREEDOM

* * *

    DAILY MAIL

    COMMENT:

    This deafening silence and the Cabinet cowards.

     

     

    ... What are they afraid of? Undermining Tory unity? If so The future of this natiojn is vastly more important than party-political advantage.

    Are they nervous, then, of jeopardising their careers by backing the losing side? If so, how contemptible

    How foolish, too, For win or lose, there is honour in standing up for principles. And with the sclerotic EU buckling under the crisis of the euro and the migrant tsunami, there is every chance history will vindicate the sceptics.

    NO!-the gags on the eurosceptic heavyweights MUST COME OFF-NOW!

    It will be a crime against DEMOCRACY if this ONCE-A-GENERATION opportunity for DEBATE, on perhaps the most important decision of our lives, is sacrificed to thee AMBITION AND VANITY OF CAREERIST POLITICIANS.

     

     

     

    ***

     

    QUENTIN LETTS says:

     

     

    SUCH

    a sickening

    BETRAYAL

     of

     BRITAIN[ENGLAND]

    [THE SEPARATE NATION STATES OF BRITAIN SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY DECIDE THEIR FUTURE OR NOT WITHIN THE COLLECTIVIST- CORRUPT-UNDEMOCRATIC-NAZI-PLANNED- EUROPEAN UNION]

     

     

      News for DAILY MAIL-QUENTIN LETTS

      -Such a sickening betrayal

       

       

       

     

     

     

     

     

    QUINTON LETTS  rejoiced when Cameron promised a

     

     

     

    referendum and a radically reformed relationship with the

     

     

     

    EU.

     

     

    The charade since and the gutlessness of careerist ministers

     

     

     

     

     

    MAKE HIS BLOOD BOIL.

     

     

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

  JANUARY 30-1-16

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS CHANGES TO TEXT AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JANUARY 30-2016

 

H. F.694

 

 

The Commonwealth Realms  V  The Constitution for Europe. - Part 1

 

“inasmuch as the Crown is the symbol of the free association of the members of the British Commonwealth of nations… united by the common allegiance to the Crown”

 

The Statute of Westminster 1931

 

A Paper delivered to a meeting held in the House of Lords – London on the 21st April 2004.

 [WE WERE THERE.]

By

 

Philip Benwell MBE

   

The Commonwealth Realms

 

Antigua and Barbuda          New Zealand

Australia                                Papua New Guinea

Bahamas                                Saint Kitts

Barbados                                Saint Vincent

Belize                                      Solomon Islands

Canada                                   Tobago Tuvalu

Grenada                                  Tonga

Nevis Saint Lucia                    United Kingdom

 

 

*          *          *

 

My Lords, Ladies & Gentlemen,

 

My task tonight is not to take sides on whether we should be in or out of Europe, but rather to explore what I consider to be the real danger to the Commonwealth of Australia and the fourteen Commonwealth Realms.

 

The issues relating to individual sovereignties are indeed complex, particularly since the Statute of Westminster of 1931 which was enacted to provide for the maturing independence of those former colonies who remained ‘under The Crown of the United Kingdom’ which were termed ‘Dominions’, so named in 1907 as ‘the self-governing dominions beyond the seas’ to replace the term ‘Great Colonies’ and which today comprise the nations of Australia, Canada and New Zealand, each having unique constitutions with precedents and conventions developed to suit their individual environments and peoples.

 

For instance, Canada is still essentially a ‘Royalist’ nation whereas Australia is not; and this is probably due to the comparative physical closeness of Canada to the United Kingdom and its greater number of Royal Visits, a privilege Australia has little experience of, due to our distance and the length of travel time to reach us.

 

This may explain why Australia has a more constitutional – and lesser Royalist-approach to our Monarchy than Canada.  We tend to recognise The Crown as but an ingredient –albeit vital – within our system of Government.  It is this more sterile approach that has led Monarchists to explain that the Governor-General is effectively Australia’s Head of State with the Queen as Sovereign, whereas Canada still unashamedly recognises The Queen as their head of State.

 

In the years leading up to 1931, the former British Prime Minister, Arthur, later lord Balfour, formulated a treaty between the United Kingdom and the then Dominions to encompass the views expressed during the preceding Imperial Conferences, particularly that of 1926.  The Conferences had been held in London between the United Kingdom Government and representatives of the Governments of the Dominions who were calling for a relaxation of control, which continued to be exerted by the British Government following their independence, particularly with regard to the decision of who would nominate their respective Governors-General.

 

It was this Treaty, which was consolidated into an Act of the British Government called the Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the then Dominions, which included Australia, Canada, South Africa and New Zealand.

 

The independent sovereignty of the Realms was clearly shown at the time of the Constitutional Referendum in 1999, for if Australia was not in charge of its own affairs, how else could the people themselves decide whether or not to retain The Crown?

 

The concerns now facing Australia go far beyond the Republican / Monarchist divisions caused by the Referendum.  Whilst the British Parliament no longer has any right to legislate over the affairs of Australia, it is fettered from taking certain actions relating to the Crown of the United Kingdom and is specifically barred from legislating in matters of the Succession and the Royal Styles and Titles.

 

In Zurich in September 1946, Churchill, still in Opposition, explained his motivation in working for Union: “When the Nazi power was broken, I asked myself what was the best advice I could give my fellow citizens in our ravaged and exhausted continent.  My counsel to Europe can be given in a single word: Unite!”

 

[Winston Churchill also stated in his Zurich speech his feelings of his own country when he said:

 

“We are with Europe but not a part of it.

 

We are linked but not combined.

 

We’re interested but not absorbed”]

 

*

  

In Volume IV of his ‘The Second World War’ Churchill wrote:

“Hard as it is to say now, I trust that the European Family may act united as one under a Council of Europe…I look forward to a United States of Europe in which the barriers between nations will be greatly minimised and unrestricted travel will be possible. I hope to see the economy of Europe studied as a whole.”

 

It was thus that Churchill founded the United Europe Movement in 1947 and it was Churchill who brought together persons of influence to create a bi –partisan committee and it was Churchill who persuaded France to allow a defeated Germany into the Alliance.  Indeed had not Churchill thrown his weight behind the early meetings the entire concept of a united Europe may have become a forgotten segment of history?

 

Churchill, of course, knew that Britain had to provide the leadership in bringing the war-torn nations of Europe together and that in ding so there would be some loss of sovereignty.  Britain has been entering into treaties for nigh on a thousand years or more, all of which have resulted in a loss of some sovereignty.

 

There is a statement attributed to Churchill: 

 “If the choice for Britain is Europe or the open sea, then Britain must choose the open sea.”

 

This, however, has been taken from a conversation Churchill had with de Gaulle in 1944 and is often quoted out of context to indicate his opposition to European Union.  It is not necessary to take Churchill’s comments out of context for it was never in his mind that Britain would ever become a State subservient to a United Europe.

 

And certainly not at the expense of the Empire and Commonwealth, but rather that Britain had to take the lead, jointly with the United States of America, in the reconstruction of Europe.  [Elsewhere in our Bulletins we have emphasised that the USA from the beginning of their support for a United Europe wished to include the UK in a Federal Union.]  

When in Government, Churchill seemed to lose interest in European Union.  This was possibly because the Marshall Plan was working, but more probably because he was then in full command of the facts and he vehemently disagreed with the more extensive plans of pro-Unionists and would never be convinced that the sacrifice of British Sovereignty would be worth anything Europe could offer Britain.  It was not until Harold Macmillan became Conservative Prime Minister that Union was pursued by Britain with full vigour at whatever cost.

 

Macmillan, of course, had been with Churchill as Churchill sought solutions to rebuild a war-torn Europe, but unlike Churchill, Macmillan never took into account the dangers of full integration.

 

Macmillan was not the British Bulldog that Churchill was.  He was a Conservative as such and in his younger days had flirted with many different ideologies, including Mosley’s National Socialism and Roman Catholicism.

 

For over fifty years, the British Parliament has been debating and legislating over matters pertaining to its entry into Union with Europe.  That there are economic benefits to Britain in a European Trading Bloc cannot be denied.  That there are disadvantages also cannot be denied.  Today (21st April 2004) however, we are not just talking about an economic Union, but a political one, one that denies, indeed saps, the natural right of member states to legislate and administer themselves without external interference or authority.  It is this, which is the greatest challenge to the independence of Britain’s sovereignty, and it is this, which provides a possible danger to the integrity of the Crown of the United Kingdom, without which the independent constitutions of the fifteen Commonwealth Realms cannot survive.  That is the question to be analysed tonight.

 

End of Part 1

Click Here for Part 2

 

*

 

FEBRUARY 5-2016

H.F.700/1

The Truth About A Federal Europe -

 

Part I

 

1)         Why is the issue of Britain’s role in Europe so important?                                                          

 

Because it presents you with a choice which will affect every aspect of your life and future. In a nutshell: do you want Britain to remain an independent self-governing country, or rather we become a province of a new European state?

 

Do you want to be ruled by your own national parliament at Westminster or do you want to be ruled from Brussels?

 

*

 

2)         Is it true that the European Union involves a sharing rather than a loss of sovereignty?

 

No!  ‘European Union’ implies the transfer of sovereignty and of the right of self – government from the individual nations of the European Community to a new European federal government and parliament.

 

‘Pooling’ sovereignty actually dissolves it, since, in a European State comprising [25 or more nations], Britain could easily be outvoted and overruled by her European partners.  We have already lost control over our agriculture and fishing grounds through the adoption of common European policies in these areas.

 

Do you want this process to be widened to include other parts of our national life [With a New European Constitution]?

 

*

 

3)         Wouldn’t our ability to govern ourselves be safeguarded within a Federal Europe by the European Parliament?

 

No!  However extensive the powers of a democratically elected European Parliament, it would still be the case that British MEPs would be in a minority within it, and therefore unable to prevent the passage of legislation or the introduction of regulations harmful to British interests.

Furthermore, a majority of British voters could elect Tory MEPs, and find themselves ruled by European Socialist Government, or vice versa. Is that what you want?

 

4)         Is movement towards a Federal Europe a real prospect or is the danger exaggerated?

 

Look at the facts. Although the word ‘federal does not appear in the recent (Dec. 1991) Maastricht Treaty, its federalist character is obvious [Today in May 2004 we all are now aware of the Government’s intention to sign the New European Constitution] 

 

The treaty on political, for instance, states that “ By this Treaty, the High Contracting Parties establish among themselves a European Union”.  Since the Concise Oxford Dictionary defines the word ‘unite’ as meaning:  “Join together, make or become one, combine, consolidate, amalgamate”, European Union clearly implies the eventual creation of a European State [ As evidenced today – May 2004 with the New European Constitution]

 

         

         It is, furthermore, particularly

         Significant that the treaty on political      

         Union declares that “ Citizenship of   

         Union is hereby established.  Every 

          Person holding the nationality of a

          Member State shall be a citizen of

         The Union…Union citizen’s resident

          In Member States of which they are

          not nationals will have the right to

          Vote and stand as a candidate at municipal and European elections”.

          Could anything be plainer? What else, other than federalism, is implied by the notion that German residents may vote in British elections, or their Italian equivalents in French elections?  Look, in addition, at what the Maastricht Treaty says about foreign policy:

          “The Union and its Member States shall define and implement a common foreign and security policy” whose objectives shall be “to safeguard the common values, fundamental interests and independence of the European

         Union”.

 

          The language of the Treaty, in other words, describes a new entity, which is clearly intended to be the sum of its parts.

 

*

 

5)         What is there to worry about given the [Conservative] Government’s [1994] opposition to European Federalism?

 

Plenty, Whatever our Government’s policy may be, most of Britain’s European partners are committed to the goal of European federalism and regard the Maastricht treaty as an important further step towards its eventual achievement.  The Maastricht Treaty not only introduces common European citizenship and seeks the development of a common European defence and foreign policy.

 

It also states that common European policies are to be increasingly pursued in a host of fields, including: education, regional development, industry, energy, transport, culture, the environment, research and technology, and overseas aid and development. There is also pressure to develop a common policy on immigration.  But most important of all, the Maastricht Treaty commits the European Community to the creation of a single currency by 1999 [Well we have seen the result –and were we not right to have declined to give up the POUND] 

 

That alone practically guarantees the development of a Federal State, since a single currency implies a single economic and monetary policy, and therefore a common European government.

 

Can Britain remain “ at the heart of Europe”- to use John major’s phrase – without being gradually pushed by these pressures down the road to political union? [Remember it was a Conservative party which put us into Europe in 1972 and who signed the Maastricht Treaty in 1992.]

 

*

 

6)         IIsn’t the idea of Britain’s sovereignty outdated since we are affected by international trends we can’t control?

 

It is true that we are affected by such trends and events, but this does not reduce the value of retaining our country’s capacity for independent decision –making. [E.g. Our decision to keep the POUND – which J Delores now applauds –sees our Bulletin Board for details.]

 

The important thing is to preserve our freedom as a nation, to adapt to change according to OUR choices and priorities, rather than being forced to accept the policies and decisions of others.

 

As the example of NATO demonstrates, Britain can pursue common policies in alliances with other countries, without us having to surrender our right to be governed from Westminster by our own Queen and Parliament.

Click Here to read Part II

H.F.693

ANOTHER FAILED TONY BLAIR STATISTIC!

*

24-HOUR DRINKING: THE TRUTH

 

DAILY MAIL

says:

 

A year on, Blair's media friends have been praising the relaxation of licensing laws. For the TRUTH read this article that appears in a left wing magazine...

 

SEVERAL liberal commentators have claimed over the last few days that the Government's introduction of the 24-hour drinking licenses have had a beneficial effect on British society, and that those who criticized the relaxation of the law have been proved wrong.

Here, the Daily Mail reprints an article from the left -wing New Statesman magazine which offers a very DIFFERENT VIEW.

 

COMMENTARY

by

Sam Alexandroni

 

At 3am on a Saturday night in Croydon High Street, the bars and clubs are kicking out. Hundreds of young people pack the street, shouting drunkenly and milling around, reluctant to go home.  There is aggressive edge to the crowd that makes the heavy police presence reassuring.

 

'There's always a meat wagon and an ambulance parked here,' says Dean Leahy, 24. 'You get lots of fights. It's a war zone; the bouncers don't care what happens on the street and you can't police it. There are just too many people.'

 

It is one year since the licensing laws were changed and it's hard to imagine a scene more at odds with the continental cafe culture that ministers had hoped would flourish once drinking hours were extended.

 

'Nothing has changed,'

[WORSE IN 2016]

says a barman working in Yate's, a busy night spot on the High Street, It's the same story -except now everyone gets booted out between two and three in the morning.'

 

The Home Office and the Department of Health say there is 'no indication' that the change in licensing laws has had a negative impact on alcohol-related crime or public health. But that is not the point; Britain is in the grip of an alcohol epidemic that the Licensing Act has proved completely unable to arrest. It was supposed , at the very least to spread the flow of frustrated drunks on to the streets and, by ending the race to get tanked up before last orders, reduce crime and curb binge drinking.

 

Every Friday and Saturday night , 70 per cent of all A&E admissions and 80 per cent of pedestrian road deaths are alcohol - related while the cost of alcohol abuse to the UK economy is estimated at £20 billion a year.

A REPORT from ALCOHOL CONCERN earlier this month put the number of alcohol-related deaths at more than 22,000 a year-nearly three times the official 8,000.

 

Most alarming is the discovery that those least able to handle drink have taken to the bottle as never before.  The number of under -18s admitted to hospital with alcohol related conditions is UP by MORE THAN 20 PER CENT in the PAST FIVE YEARS.

Dr Nick Sherin, a member of the Royal College of Physicians 'Alcohol Committee, said:

 

'Deaths from liver disease have doubled in the past ten years and the people I am seeing are getting younger.'

The implications for future public health are disastrous. Worse, the full health impact of excessive alcohol on the young is still unknown.

 'The adolescent brain is vulnerable and it remains a strong possibility that heavy drinking could cause lasting damage,' says Sherin

Carole Whittingham, the national secretary for the Campaign Against Drinking and Driving, is deeply worried.

'Young people go out with the deliberate intention of getting as drunk as possible.' she says.

'Seven years ago, I would have said that young people were responsible and that drink-driving was primary a problem of middle -aged men. That's no longer the case.  We are seeing more young people and more young women convicted of drink-driving.'

It is not just that young people are drinking more; there has been a huge shift in gender behaviour. Teenage girls in Britain are now drinking more than boys, according to a recent European survey.  Almost a third (29 per cent) of female students admit drinking to excess at least three times a month, compared with 26 per cent of boys, while consumption among women of all ages has doubled over the past decade.

 

[Well we have always referred to those children and youths who have been around over the last ten years as Blair's children because it has been under New Labour that the excesses in ALCOHOL-DRUGS-PREGNANCY -CRIME -ILLITERACY-GAMBLING and whatever in their anything goes culture.  As with the Tobacco Industry scandal of a cover-up for may years of the TRUTH about their product we will no doubt see an attempt by others who are destroying our young people to evade their responsibility when their time comes.]

 

The causes for heavy drinking are complex, but the Medical Association identifies two key factors: PRICE and AVAILABILITY.

ALCOHOL is getting CHEAPER

In the past 40 years alcohol consumption per person (aged 15 plus) has doubled and the price of alcohol relative to income has halved. A third of all 24-hour licenses granted were given to supermarkets, where alcohol is cheapest. It is not surprising, then that consumption outside licensed premises is on the rise.

 

Pressure group Action on Addiction (AOA) is one of a number of organisations campaigning for an increase in the price of alcohol. Research shows that the higher the price of alcohol relative to income, the less the nation as a whole drinks,' says Nicola Brian, of AOA.

'We believe that raising the price would have a significant impact on young people who are more likely to have lower disposable incomes..'

 

According to Dean Terry , manager of The Ship in Croydon:

'There's a lot of pressure to sell as much alcohol as you can. On the one hand you are told to encourage sensible drinking and not to serve drunk people, but on the other you are supposed to drive sales.

SO WHERE IS THE LINE?

 

The reality is that no bar is going to stay open longer, yet be content to sell the same amount of alcohol as before.

 

The only hope of combating a growing disaster is to change public attitudes. last month, the Government launched its first national alcohol awareness campaign. The slick £4 million

'Know Your Limits' campaign

 is designed to shock.

 

In one TV ad, a drunken man, fuelled by Dutch courage, attempts to impress a group of girls by rescuing balloons caught high in some scaffolding.

He plunges to his DEATH.

YET THE DRINKS INDUSTRY IS STILL DOING WHAT IT HAS ALWAYS DONE: TRYING TO MAXIMIZE ITS SALES

*

[New Labour handle their domestic programme as they do their foreign policy. First they get themselves in deep water by bringing in unsuitable or unnecessary legislation and embark on an illegal war and then later find that their policies have resulted in them having to spend millions on Awareness Workshops to remedy the disastrous effects of its actions.  WE hear that the Government is to supply a nanny squad to deal with difficult families whereas many people in the country feel that those more needful of  the corrective treatment are the members of Blair's Tartan clan .They have failed to understand the habits of the indigenous people they represent and have instead decided that they know better and we all know what that has meant for our People-our Constitution and our Country.]

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used -comments in brackets]

A longer version of this article appears in the current issue of the New Statesman.

NOVEMBER/06

 

 
 

 Daily Mail

Just who do they think they are? You pay their wages Just who do the think they are? You pay their wages

JUST WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?

 

 

 

You pay their wages .But the so-called public servants who run councils, the NHS and POLICE are uniting to keep you in the dark about their greed, incompetence and corruption.

by James Slack and Jack Doyle... -

 

EXTRACT

PUBLIC sector bureaucrats yesterday united in a 'sinister' attempt to crush the public's right to know about the scandals in the NHS, police., town halls and education

The bosses-paid billions by the taxpayer-made a series of extraordinary claims that elderly care and childen's services would suffer unless the Freedom of Information Act was curbed.

This is despite the vital role the legislation has played in exposing corruption, incompetence, ill-treatment and 'fat cat' pay and perks that drains vast sums from the Health Service, policing and council budgets.

As well as exposing the MPs expences scandal, it has laid bare how lives were put in danger by POOR TREATMENT and FOREIGN GP's with poor English were working in the NHS unchecked.

The law has also been used to uncover:

 

How hospitals were paid millions to hit targets for numbers of patients who died on the LIVERPOOL CARE PATHWAY-a controversial practice which has since been scrapped amid claims it was being misused to

HASTEN DEATH;

The truth about how ambulance delays were putting lives at RISK! and

How OUT-OF-HOURS CARE is SO BAD in some parts of the UK that just ONE FAMILY DOCTOR can be on DUTY for

500,000 PATIENTS....

AND MUCH MUCH

MORE!

 

 

Corruption.

Corrupt influence is itself the perennial spring of all prodigality, and of all disorder; it loads us more than millions 0f debt; takes away vigor from our arms. wisdom from our councils, and every shadow of authority and credit from the most venerable parts of our constitution.

EDMUND BURKE  

(1729-97) Member of Parliament)

[Nothing has changed and who would expect it to happen as it is a human failing   and it is to be expected and rigorously dealt with by all competent governments who place the welfare of ALL!  uppermost but particularly the greater number of the population who expect the government of the day to manage the

 PUBLIC PURSE for the BENEFIT of ALL!]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 9-2014

H F 644

[AN IGNORED WARNING FROM NOVEMBER 2006-AND IT IS EVEN WORSE IN 2016]

 

A BLUNDER FOR WHICH WE'LL ALL PAY THE PRICE

A

COMMENTARY

BY

Sir Andrew Green

MigrationWatch

 

BRITAIN is facing the largest wave of immigration for nearly 1,000 years.  The number of Huguenots in the 17th century and the Jews a century ago are trivial compared to the present flows. Recent GOVERNMENT figures put the net inflow at almost 500 every day

On part of this inflow comes from  the new East European members of the EU.  If these people wish to work, they must register, and today's figures show that the number who have registered since eight countries joined in May 2004 has hit 500,000 mark

THE HOME OFFICE - NEVER LET IT BE FORGOTTEN, PREDICTED THAT THIS FIGURE WOULD BE A MAXIMUM 26,000 OVER TWO YEARS.

[So much for their statistics]

What effect is all this having and how long can we expect it to continue?

For a start, the registration numbers are looking increasingly DUBIOUS. They have never included the self-employed or temporary workers -the Government themselves have added nearly 50% to take account of this. Even more worrying is the real number of East Europeans who have decided to stay in Britain compared with the number the GOVERNMENT claims have stayed.

Official; statistics suggests that three-quarters of them go home within a year. But these figures are based on a passenger survey which focuses almost entirely on Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester -while East Europeans arrive on budget airlines, mainly at Luton, Stansted and regional airports.

The Governor of the Bank of England has complained twice publicly that the numbers of immigrants are so unreliable that he cannot estimate how tight the labour market has become and, consequently whether or not there is a need to raise interest rates.

There is growing evidence of British workers being replaced by East Europeans. And since East Europeans accept lower wages, British workers -from construction workers to truck drivers to flower arrangers -are suffering pay cuts.

 

The East Europeans can afford a lower wage. They are mainly single. They can, and often do, live in very crowded conditions. And, of course they can earn four or five times what the would earn at home.  This is all good news for them and for their employers. East Europeans have established a solid reputation for hard work, turning up on time and making few demands.  Lower wages mean higher profits. They also mean lower inflation and somewhat lower interest rates [Provided the Bank of England can get the correct immigration figure for their calculation]

The Middle Classes are happy too. Cheap nannies, cheaper restaurants and a cheap hand-wash for the gas guzzler.

 

But there are snags. Not only do the low-paid suffer a reduction in wages. Worse, we risk building up an underclass of long-term unemployment.

 

There are a million young people who are neither in work or education. If you add those on incapacity benefit to the unemployed (now at a six year high), you have nearly

5,000,000

-young people who are NOT WORKING and , more importantly have little prospect of doing so for the foreseeable future.

 

Which employer is going to take a young British worker of incapacity benefit when he can take a bright young energetic and probably over-qualified Pole?

 

The Government frequently claims the East Europeans are filling gaps in the labour market. But we have to examine the facts, NOT THE SPIN.  It is five years since the Government first proclaimed that we need immigration to fill

600,000 vacancies in OUR LABOUR MARKET.

Since then, immigration has added about three-quarters of a million to our population. YET believe it or not, VACANCIES are still at

600,000

The REASON is that immigrants are not only filling jobs, but they are also adding to consumer demand, which in turn creates more jobs so that vacancies in the labour market remain the same. 

The Government argument is demonstrably FALSE

[As it is in 2016]

The main outcome is that we become an ever-more crowded island.

And that is where the shoe really pinches.  The strain on our public services and infrastructure grows by the day.  Children are turning up at school gates with NO ENGLISH and NO WARNING.  Rents are rising sharply as the buy-to-let market booms and house prices rise.  More young people find it impossible to get on the housing ladder as prices spiral.

I do not mean in any way to be critical of the new arrivals. They work hard and fit in. BUT the bottom line is that we are a small island and are already overcrowded-especially in the

SOUTH EAST

The Department of Transport has forecast that traffic on our roads will increase by 30 per cent in the next ten years and by 40 to 50 per cent on motorways. GRIDLOCK APPROACHES. It is time that serious thought was given to how many people we can sensibly accommodate on this island.

Is there any relief in sight? Not in the Third World, from where the majority of immigrants still come.  As for Europe, Romania and Bulgaria are no longer on the horizon but on our doorstep. From next January 2007 30 million people from those countries will be free to enter Britain.

 

In the longer term much depends on how much time it will take these countries, given substantial aid from Brussels, to reach our level of economic prosperity. Poland, the source of 60 per cent of East European immigration, will be a key factor. At present, its wealth per head is only just over a third of ours.

 

Even if its economy grows at five per cent a year (and we maintain our long-term growth of 2.5 per cent), it will be 34 years before they catch up.

Demographics will help. The two most populous countries -Poland and Romania -will both have a declining number of 18 year-olds in the years to come, down by about a third over the next 20 years.

Eventually too, the other EU countries will be obliged to open their labour markets to the new member states.

The biggest factor of all is how long our newcomers decide to stay.

Eventually, the flow of those going home will balance those arriving and we will be in the same situation as we are with say FRANCE.

 

This interchange of people is what the EU is all about. Eventually it will enrich our lives. The Government's mistake has been to rush into the free movement of labour with countries so much poorer than ourselves.

 

It now tries to SPIN this DECISION as a GREAT SUCCESS, hoping perhaps that we will overlook its massive miscalculations which originally forecast ONLY 13,000 East Europeans would come here a year.

 

THE REALITY IS IT IS PUTTING A BRAVE FACE ON A BLUNDER FOR WHICH THE LESS FORTUNATE IN OUR SOCIETY ARE NOW PAYING

*

 

[We have not commented about the usefulness or otherwise of belonging to the EU as we have hundreds of thousands of words already on our bulletin board asking for a quick exit]

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

Sir Andrew Green is chairman of MigrationWatch and former ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria.

NOVEMBER/06

*          *          *

IMMIGRATION

H.F.689

 

The History of the House of

 Rothschild - The French Connection

*

I AM THE WITNESS. COM.

*

Savage: “Obama appointees actually have almost the same exact policies as the Nazi Party did”

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
March 13, 2009

Michael “Savage” Weiner, corporate media talk show host and former beatnik, has told his audience that Obama’s appointees are following the policies of the Nazis. Savage, a former Bush supporter and notorious carnival barker for the false right-left paradigm (and neocon Muslim-hater), does not bother to call out a single Obama appointee by name. Instead, in the audio clip here, Weiner concentrates on Obama’s “green shirts,” an allusion to Hitler’s SA brown shirts.

Savage is correct about the fascistic character of Obama’s mass movement, but he has conveniently omitted an important part of the larger picture.

Hitler was a creation of Wall Street financiers and the international bankers, a historical fact documented by British economist, historian, and writer Antony C. Sutton. Sutton documents the roles played by J.P. Morgan, T. W. Lamont, the Rockefeller interests, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, and other elitists in the rise of Hitler and Nazism.

“Wall Street financed the German cartels in the mid-1920s which in turn proceeded to bring Hitler to power,” writes Sutton in the final chapter of his book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. “Hitler and his S.S. street thugs came in part from affiliates or subsidiaries of U.S. firms, including Henry Ford in 1922, payments by I.G. Farben and General Electric in 1933, followed by the Standard Oil of New Jersey and I.T.T. subsidiary payments to Heinrich Himmler up to 1944.” Hitler’s mass movement was a creation of bankers and industrialists.

In Adam Lebor’s Hitler’s Secret Bankers (see also Charles Higham’s Trading With the Enemy), we learn how the Basel-based Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and its American president, Thomas McKittrick, continued trading and money laundering on behalf of the Nazis throughout the Second World War.

BIS is an international organization of central banks established under the globalist Bretton-Woods International Financial scheme. BIS is closely associated with the Bilderberg Group, the elitist organization established by the Nazi collaborator Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (see Alden Hatch’s H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands for more on Bernhard’s SS connections).

Savage: “Obama appointees actually have almost the same exact policies as the Nazi Party did”  obamadecept 340x169

It should be noted that Timothy F. Geithner, Obama’s point man on the economy and former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, sits on the board of directors of BIS (Fed mob boss Ben Bernanke also sits on the board of this one-time Nazi front group that now controls the IMF and World Bank).

It is no mistake Bilderberg and Rockefeller stooge Henry Kissinger came out early in favor of Obama, as did Rockefeller minion and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Obama’s appointees are overwhelmingly of the globalist and bankster persuasion — a preponderant number are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission.

Financial support for the Obama campaign flowed in from Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and others.

Michael “Savage” Weiner would have us believe Obama is a “neo-marxist fascist dictator” and his hand-picked appointees “actually have almost the same exact policies as the Nazi Party did,” when in fact Obama’s policies are those of the bankers, not Hitler or Ernst Röhm, co-founder of the Sturmabteilung or SA. In fact, Obama is a puppet for the global elite and it is completely irrelevant if he subscribes to Marxism, Nazism, or anything else.

 

Savage and the neocons are fond of conflating Nazism with “progressive” Democrat liberalism — which is yet another artificially generated flavor of bankster dominated statism — a tactic they employed in the days following the false flag attacks of September 11, 2001, when neocons absurdly attempted to demonize Muslims as “Islamofascists.”

In a call to Savage’s radio show, activist Mark Dice was able to get the former beatnik turned talk show host to admit he believes any mention of the Bilderbergers is too “esoteric” for his largely neocon wannabe audience. It is not the Bilderbergers (and by way of extension the CFR and the Trilateralists) we need to worry about, but rather the “Democrat socialist group run by Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Ann Feinstein, and the others.”

Weiner further admits he has known about the Bilderberg Group since 1990, and yet he refuses to discuss the organization’s objectives and the indisputable fact members are at the highest levels of government, including the Obama administration. It is the Democrats we need to worry about, declares Savage, not the international banking elite.

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers,” wrote the historian of the elite, Carroll Quigley, in his book Tragedy and Hope. “Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”

Michael “Savage” Weiner understands this all too well. His role — along with Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and other corporate media “conservatives” — is to foment a carefully orchestrated and controlled opposition to the current regime so that in four or eight years, after Obama has accomplished the tasks assigned to him by the global elite, the American people “can throw the rascals out… without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.”

Related posts:
  1. “Nazi Youth” Crashes Santa Fe Tea Party
  2. Former Nazi Bank To Rule The Global Economy
  3. Telegraph: Bilderberg Group Founder ‘Was Member of Nazi Party’
  4. Savage: Obama Regime Will Stage Violence To Crush Dissent
  5. Asian economists warn Barack Obama policies could make downturn worse

This article was posted: Saturday, March 14, 2009 at 6:16 am

H.F.643

DID YOU KNOW?

MIND CONTROL

 PAID FOR BY YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO THE EU SINCE 1973

 FOR THE INDOCTRINATION OF OUR CHILDREN IN OUR SCHOOLS. AN EXCELLENT AND  IN DEPTH WARNING ESSAY FROM THE DAILY MAIL WRITER JAMES DELLINGPOLE EXPOSES THE GEORGE ORWELL 1984 SCENARIO IN HIS

DAILY MAIL-SATURDAY ESSAY ON DECEMBER 5,2015

Britain's schools [with financial help from the EU] are force-feeding pupils politically correct dogma about sexuality, climate change and British history. The result will be a nation LESS tolerant than before

Britain's schools are force-feeding pupils politically ... - Daily Mail

 

[THE QUESTION AS TO WHETHER 16 YEAR OLDS SHOULD BE GIVEN THE  VOTE NEEDS TO BE DECIDED WITH THE ABOVE WARNING IN MIND. AS WITH ALL MATTERS OF THE HUMAN KIND THERE ARE ALWAYS EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE. POSSIBLY A FREE YOUR MIND DOSSIER AVAILABLE TO THEM FROM THE OUT-OF-EU LOBBY EXPLAINING  THE DANGEROUS AND EVIL  INTENT OF THE MYTHS AND MISINFORMATION  CLOGGING THEIR SUPPLE AND SENSITIVE MINDS BY THE FOLLOWERS OF THE BIG BROTHER COLLECTIVIST ONE MIND EU-BUT IT NEEDS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE YESTERDAY?]

 

KGB DESTABILISING CHART

*

'The more accurately we search into the human mind, the stronger traces we everywhere find of the wisdom of HIM who made it.'-

EDMUND BURKE

*

'The mind is its own place, and in itself can make a heaven out of hell, and a hell of heaven.'

JOHN MILTON

*

'If we work marble, it will perish; if we work upon brass, time will efface it; if we rear temples, they will crumble into dust; but if we work upon immortal minds and instill into them just principles, we are then engraving that upon tablets which no time will efface, but will brighten and brighten to all eternity.-

DANIEL WEBSTER

*

'If you have control of a child's mind you have the man.'

Anon

[Comments in brackets are ours!]

DECEMBER 5-2015

H.F.640

 

 DAILY MAIL

Don't Bomb Syria-but don't forget the enemy within

by

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 

December 4 - 2015

 EXTRACT

...Cameron talks about the necessity of meeting our military commitments to our closest allies. Yet HE has presided over a suicidally short-sighted rundown of our Armed Forces, which began under George Brown.  Our presence in the Syrian campaign is more symbolic than critical. Symbolic is about all we can manage these days.

Anyway, it's all very well lobbing a few laser-guided Fire and Brimstone missiles at Raqqa, but what about the enemy within? While the RAF isn bombing Syria, we are told at least 450 home grown jihadis are now back in this country after training with Izal in the Middle East.

[We are most certainly poorly so-called governed by IDIOTS! WE need a patriotic Cromwellian DICTATOR for a year to clean up the stinking revolting MESS! before PARLIAMENT is allowed to resume what is called DEMOCRACY.]

many of them planning attacks here.

 IF WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE WHY HAVEN'T THEY BEEN DETAINED ALREADY?

Meanwhile, the authorities sit on their hands while increasing numbers of impressionable BRITISH MUSLIMS are 'radicalised' online and Islamist sympathisers

TAKE OVER OUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES, USING VIOLENT PROTEST AND SOCIAL MEDIA SAVAGERY.

Hard-line mosques and religious schools are allowed to flourish unmolested. We complain about Turkey being the gateway to Syria, but our borders are so porous that terrorists-both BRITISH and FOREIGN-are able to come and go as they please.

[This is one of the historic and  most dangerous shortcomings of a British society which in its endeavour to allow the liberties of a FREE SOCIETY it FAILS to take effective action against those who use our FREEDOM to further their own despotic ambitions at home and abroad. The classic example is the invasion of the Islamic Fundamentalists under the cover of a massive influx of over 3,000,000  Muslims of which a greater number have only the wish to in time establish an ISLAMIC STATE in ENGLAND-they already have 85 SHARIA COURTS in place. When one reflects on the matter one realises that it was the ignorance of the ruling elite here ignoring the once prudent native demographic principle which allowed the massive inflow of those of another RELIGION and CULTURE and in many instances as mentioned above the formation of an ENEMY WITHIN-one can hardly blame the staunchly religious Muslims from wanting to implant their

FAITH and CULTURE on THEIR  adopted NEW LAND.

THE FAULT WAS OURS!]

[Sorry We Got Carried Away]

To continue:  Now we learn that the computer system which is supposed to check on a watch list of known terrorists trying to sneak into Britain typically crashes three days a week.

Not only that, it also turns out that the Tory pledge [as so very often] to scrap the pernicious [so-called] Human Rights Act, aka the

TERRORISTS CHARTER

has been [typically]

DELAYED FOR AT LEAST ANOTHER YEAR.

If the Government hasn't got the stomach  to take on the yuman rites lobby, then at least it should bring back the laws of

SEDITION and TREASON

But it 's far easier to bomb a few oil depots and Izal' command and control' centres in the desert than it is to

CONFRONT the REAL MENACE  in our MIDST.

We're told the Syria debate was a shining example of British democracy in action. But from outside the Bubble looking in, it was little more than a demonstration of displacement activity. What if, on Wednesday night there had been a Paris-style attack in this country, rather than in America?

Where would 14 people gunned down in at a Christmas party in Sandbach, Cheshire-instead of San Bernardino, California-have left all those back-slapping, sabre-rattling politicians at Westminster , congratulating themselves on

GETTING TOUGH ON TERROR?

They'd have soon learned the

REAL MEANING

of a

PYRRHIC VICTORY.

 

continued:-

 

DECEMBER 4,2015

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.638

 
 [LET THE TRUTH PREVAIL!]

This is a huge development which needs to go viral so as to help awaken those duped into thinking the war on terror is a legitimate effort.
 

 

Russia Breaks Huge Story: ISIS is Supported by the U.S. and Nato Allies, Detailed Evidence Of ISIS-Turkey Oil Trade

It's well known in awakening circles that the terrorist group known as ISIS or ISIL is an American financed and led organization. This was conclusively demonstrated in a recent full length investigation by David Wilcock which you can read here

Recently, Russia held a ground breaking press conference presenting even more evidence ISIL is being funded by oil production in Turkey and else where. Further, that military forces in countries presently fighting ISIL have said that they could defeat the terrorist group if it were not for the support of the US and it's allies. In other words, the biggest hurdle to defeating ISIL is the US.
This is a damning indictment for the false war on terror propagandized in western media. It's even being reported covertly by some mainstream outlets such as News Week:
 

Russia’s defense ministry on Wednesday accused Turkish President Tayyip Recep Erdogan and his family of being involved in the Islamic State militant group’s (ISIS) illegal oil trade, as the war of words between Moscow and Ankara continues over Turkey’s downing of a Russian warplane near the Syrian border in November. 

“The main consumer of this oil stolen from its legitimate owners, Syria and Iraq, is Turkey,” Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov told journalists in Moscow, AFP news agency reported. “According to available information, the highest level of the political leadership of the country, President Erdogan and his family, are involved in this criminal business.” - News Week
This is a huge development which needs to go viral so as to help awaken those duped into thinking the war on terror is a legitimate effort.
 
Read more »

 

DECEMBER 4 - 2015

H.F.635

 

 

 Daily Mail--

 

This mad deal on migrants is a real

 

TURKEY

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

EXTRACT

THE EU's solution to the escalating migration is to give

75 MILLION TURKS

Visa-free access

 to

EUROPE.

WHO THOUGHT THAT A GOOD IDEA?

In addition, Brussels has also agreed to pay Turkey more than £2 billion to tighten border security. Britain's share of the bill will be in the region of

£280,000,000

even though we

ARE NOT PART OF THE OPEN BORDERS SCHENGEN TREATY.

Not that the opt-out from Schengen has done anything to curb net migration to this country, which hit a record

336,000

in the year to June.

That headline figure also masks the true scale of foreign nationals moving to Britain, since it is calculated by deducting the number of people who emigrate. the actual total of new arrivals over that period is north of

600,000

Our population is set to grow by

10,000,000

over the next 20 years, with most of it coming from

IMMIGRATION.

That's if you believe the estimates, which I don't. We have been constantly  lied to by politicians about the  overwhelming level of migration. REMEMBER when LABOUR told us there would be only 13,000 migrants from EASTERN EUROPE? The TRUTH is NEARER

2,000,000

In the last twelve months, more than 50,000 arrived from BULGARIA and ROMANIA alone.

Call Me Dave promised to cut immigration to the 'low tens of thousands'.

HOW'S THAT WORKING OUT, THEN?

SO TAKE with a lorry of salt the Government's contention that even if our European 'partners' give visa-free access to

75 MILLION TURKS,

 none of them will be allowed to settle here.

We have learned to our cost that while we remain members of the EU, once someone has set foot in EUROPE it is virtually IMPOSSIBLE to PREVENT THEM TRAVELLING to

BRITAIN.

For the record, the Turkish community in this country is one of the most successful and best INTEGRATED, having become established over the past four decades in 

NORTH LONDON...

The truth is that EU 'leaders' haven't  a clue what to do about the

MUSLIM INVASION OF EUROPE.

They're dancing in the dark, and this bonkers deal with TURKEY is a sign of their desperation.

The only good news is that when the impact sinks in, it will be another nail in the disastrous

EU MEMBERSHIP

IMMIGRATION was ALWAYS going to be the BIGGEST ISSUE in our upcoming REFERENDUM. And the day that BRUSSELS decided to give

73 MILLION TURKISH MUSLIMS

visa-free access may well prove to be

 THE DAY THAT FINALLY CONVINCED THE BRITISH PEOPLE

IT'S TIME TO GET OUT!

continued

 

 

 

[AS IS USUAL AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE AS WE EXPECT FROM RICHARD LITTLEJOHN.

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 1-2015

H F. 629

 
 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for Proportional Representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

&

 

WE ASK ON OCTOBER 30,2015

WHAT PROGRESS have the SMALL PARTIES MADE to COMBINE to FIGHT this

GROSS INJUSTICE?

 

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

 

*

 

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

*

 

[As we have stated over many years we have been suspicious of UKIP leadership particularly of Nigel Farage who though he has the necessary 'gift of the gab' and charisma for the job-he has admitted  he has a History of working for over 20 years in the City Mile of London -an independent state-a hotbed of

TREASON-INTRIGUE-GREED-MURDER-CONSPIRACY

 for over 300 years.]

&

How The Crown Rules the World

*

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is
the United States Federal
Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati.
(See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

Government Conspiracies - World of Lies - Award Winning Documentary

AUGUST - 2010 

H.F.741

REMEMBER!

 

[Comments in brackets are ours!]

 

OCTOBER 30-2015

*  *  *

 
 

Workers would be

BETTER OFF

 by £40 a week after Brexit, say Economists.

by Hugo Duncan- Daily Mail

Deputy Finance Editor

April 29,2016

 

 

THE European Union is an 'economic failure' and Britain would be richer if it left, a group of leading economists said yesterday.

They claimed EU membership was holding back growth and branded the euro an 'unmitigated disaster'.

Every worker in the UK would be £40 a week better off a decade after Brexit and the economy would be 4 percent bigger than if the UK stayed in the EU, the economists claimed.

The findings are a direct challenge to George Osborn's claims the the economy would be 6.2 percent smaller by 2030 if Britain votes

TO LEAVE

in the

REFERENDUM

ON JUNE 23 - 2016

Professor Patrick Minford, a former adviser to Margaret Thatcher and one of the authors of yesterday's report branded the Treasury's analysis

'as a totally misleading piece of

PROPAGANDA'

He said it was 'based on almost no proper economic thought and does not stand up to any kind of scrutiny,'

Rather than delivering a Brexit tax'-as claimed by the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) this week - the report argued leaving the EU

would result in a

 BREXIT DIVIDEND

The 'Economists for Brexit' report said output would be higher and wage growth stronger if Britain

LEFT THE EU.

It added that the 'City of London' would continue to THRIVE.

'A  lot of economic nonsense has been talked so far in the Brexit  debate,. 'Most of it has come from the PROJECT FEAR campaign launched by Downing Street.'

Professor Minford, who set up the self-funded eight-man group to challenge the 'consensus' view of the Treasury and international Monetary Fund, said the boost would come from reduced RED TAPE strangling British businesses and a move away from the  the

PROTECTIONIST TRADING UNION'

of the EU towards

FREE TRADE

'Brexit is a shock-a good shock,' he said.

*

Full article

April 29-2016

 

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

< IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE!  - LABOUR AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO LEAVE EU‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’            OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO DESTROY IT?         OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP              OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?              LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT-BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND.               COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU-YES!               ON THE EURO - MAX + HASTINGS - SORRY I WAS WRONG!             TORY MPS DEMAND REFERENDUM ON EUROPE -   IN MAY 2016- MAX HASTINGS-THIS IS WHY I'M NOT VOTING FOR BREXIT .

CLICK EACH ITEM TO VIEW

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ENGLAND

MUST RETRIEVE HER ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE AND UNIQUE DEMOCRATIC PARLIAMENTARY SUPREMACY OF OVER A MILLENIUM IN THE MAKING.

  TO BE A BEACON OF FREEDOM AND PEACE AND REMAIN LOYAL TO ITS CHRISTIAN ETHIC AND ENGLISH LAW IN BEING SINCE

 ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

OF

 OVER 1000 YEARS SINCE WITH STRONG DEFENCES  ON

LAND - SEA AND AIR.

 TO PROTECT  AND DEFEND THE REALM AND TO

AID THE WEAK AND JUST.

ENEMY OF THOSE WHO DECEIVE AND THREATEN PEACEFUL NATIONS

AND STAUNCH

DEFENDERS OF PEACE AND JUSTICE!

*

PEACE

'Peace has her victories, no less renowned than war.-

JOHN MILTON

*

'To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace.'

GEORGE WASHINGTON

*

Peace is rarely denied to the peaceful.

SCHILLER.

*

Five great enemies to peace inhibit with us: vis., AVARICE,AMBITION, ENVY,and PRIDE.  If those enemies were to be banished, we should infallibly enjoy perpetual peace.'

PETRARCH

*

 

COMPROMISE

'Compromise [ being in the EU] is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,- too often ending in the loss of both-.- Tryon Edwards.(1809-94)Am.theol. and editor

A lesson from the USA

Fro'In the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that HUMAN RIGHTS [ True Human Rights in England ] have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease.  The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.[English Common Law.]

Charles Sumner.(1811-74) Am.statesman.

*

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

AND MANY MANY MORE!

 

*

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

[THE ABOVE ARE BUT A FEW OF OUR 2000 BULLETINS-MANY ON ENGLAND'SLAVERY WITHIN THE EU .]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-TAKING A LIBERTY WITH QUOTES ETC-HIGHLIGHTED ITEMS ARE OURS]

DECEMBER 5-2015

H.F.636

Site Map

TERRORISM AND THE ILLUMINATI -- A THREE THOUSAND YEAR HISTORY

 

Chapter Nineteen:  The Muslim Brotherhood

The Nazis

Those secret societies that developed from the Asiatic Brethren, and preserving the doctrines and rituals of the Shabbeteans, divided in two directions. The first, was the Freemasonry in Egypt, resulting in the Salafi movement. The second was those principal occult societies of the Occult Revival of the late nineteenth century. However, these two divergent lines would continue to collaborate. Specifically, the European arm of this tradition would culminate in the creation of the Nazis, who would then collaborate, throughout the twentieth century, with their counterparts in the Middle East, the Salafi, to participate in the propagation of terrorism on behalf of the Illuminati.

Like the Salafi, the Nazis were also a principal component in the execution of Illuminati strategy, in their case, towards the creation of World War II. In accord with the plan worked out by Albert Pike, and summarized by William Guy Carr, the plan for WWII “was to be fomented by using the differences between Fascists and Political Zionists. This was to be fought so that Nazism would be destroyed and the power of Political Zionism increased so that the sovereign state of Israel could be established in Palestine.” [1] Therefore, the harsh terms imposed by the agents of the Illuminati at the Treaty of Versailles, that ruined Germany financially, were to set the stage for World War II.

These harsh economic conditions created the situation in which a leader like Hitler could arise, a leader promoted to power by Illuminati backers. It was Montagu Norman, as Chairman of the Bank of England, who, from 1933 through 1939, met repeatedly with Hjalmar Schacht, Reich Minister of Economics, and a member of the Rhodes Round Table, to plan the overall budget of the Nazi regime with British credit, and guided the strategies of Hitler’s primary supporters, the Rockefellers, Warburgs, and Harrimans.

While Hitler cynically denounced the company as an “international Jewish organization,” Schacht nevertheless awarded huge contracts to produce munitions and chemicals for the German military buildup to IG Farben, the giant chemical firm, that ultimately produced the Zyklon B gas used in Nazi extermination camps. And, IG Farben and Rockefeller’s Standard Oil of New Jersey were effectively a single firm, having been merged in hundreds of cartel arrangements. It was led, up until 1937 by Rockefeller’s partners, the Frankist Warburgs. [2] After WW II began, Standard Oil pledged to keep the merger with I.G. Farben, even if the U.S. entered the war.

In addition, the Nazi party was thoroughly an occult organization. The Nazis were the result of a merging of the O.T.O of Crowley and the Thule Gesselschaft of Germany. The chief architect of the Thule group was Baron Rudolf von Sebottendorff, who had contact with Dervish Orders, and knew much about Sufism. The doctrines of the Thule order were founded on The Coming Race by the Bulwer-Lytton, and the theory of the Atlantean origins of the Aryan race developed by Blavatsky. In 1919, the members of the Thule Society formed a political party named the “Germany Workers Party”. They were in turn later renamed the “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”, more popularly known as the Nazis, by Adolph Hitler in 1920, who became Chancellor of Germany in 1933 and dictator in 1934. Also a member of the Thule Society was black magician, Heinrich Himmler, leader of the SS, whose insignia was a Runic symbol, thought to represent the lost wisdom of their supposed Aryan forefathers.

The Muslim Brotherhood

The fruit of the shared occult knowledge of the two factions that developed out of Afghani’s influence, the Nazis and the Salafis, would work together to revive the ancient mind-control tactics of the Ismailis, to form a body of agent-provocateurs, more commonly known as terrorists. The name of the organization is the Muslim Brotherhood. Ultimately, following the example set by Afghani and Abduh, the upper leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood would profess Islam only to deceive. In truth, their true faith was the Gnostic cult of the Ismailis, through which they shared a common history with their occult brethren in the West. Thus, as Robert Dreyfuss described, in Hostage to Khomeini, a revealing look at the conspiracy to promote the Muslim Brotherhood:

The Muslim Brotherhood is a London creation, forged as the standard-bearer of an ancient, anti-religious (pagan) heresy that has plagued Islam since the establishment of the Islamic community (umma) by the Prophet Mohammed in the seventh century. Representing organized Islamic fundamentalism, the organization called the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan al-Muslimum in Arabic) was officially founded in Egypt, in 1929, by the British agent Hasan al-Banna, a Sufi mystic. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is the umbrella under which a host of fundamentalist Sufi, Sunni, and radical Shiite brotherhoods and societies flourish. [3]

The founder of the Muslim Brotherhood was a Freemason, named Hassan al Banna, born in 1906, who developed from the influence of the three Salafi reformers, Afghani, Abduh and Rida. Banna’s father was a student of Abduh, while Banna himself was greatly influenced by Rashid Rida. By age twenty-one, Banna was introduced to the leadership of Al- Manar, founded by Rida, and, beginning in the early 1920s, would often meet and discuss with Rida. Through Rida, Banna developed his opposition to Western influence in Egypt, in favor of “pure Islam”, meaning to the pernicious version of Wahhabism.

When Hitler came to power in the 1930’s, he and Nazi intelligence made contact with al Banna to see if they could work together. [4] Banna was also a devout admirer of Hitler. Banna’s letters to Hitler were so supportive that he and other members of the Brotherhood, were recruited by Nazi Military Intelligence to provide information on the British and work covertly to undermine British control in Egypt. Banna himself said that he had “considerable admiration for the Nazi Brownshirts” and organized his own forces along fascist lines. [5] Banna’s Brotherhood also collaborated with the overtly fascist “Young Egypt” movement, founded in October 1933, by lawyer Ahmed Hussein, and modeled directly on the Hitler party, complete with paramilitary Green Shirts, aping the Nazi Brown Shirts, Nazi salute and literal translations of Nazi slogans. Among its members, Young Egypt counted two later presidents, Gamal Nasser and Anwar Sadat.

The Islamo-Fascists

A key individual in the Islamo-fascist nexus, and go-between for the Nazis and Banna, became the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al Husseini, later the mentor of Yasser Arafat, from 1946 onward. Hajj Amin al Husseini was convicted in absentia after fleeing to Syria for his involvement in the 1920 attack on Jews at the Western Wall. However, despite his involvement and conviction, he was pardoned by the local British High Commissioner Herbert Samuel, and made the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in 1921.

Beginning in 1933, al Husseini regularly met with local Nazi representatives and openly expressed admiration for Hitler’s ideas. During these meetings, he served as a liaison for the Muslim Brotherhood to the Nazis. Between 1936-1939, Adolf Eichmann, oversaw funding from the SS to al Husseini and his associates, to aid their efforts in encouraging a revolt in the region. [6] However, in the late 1930’s, al Husseini openly called for direct aide from Germany to Arab forces, and had to flee to Syria. In April 1941, al Husseini assisted the pro-Nazi revolt in Iraq, and attempts by the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, or the Syrian Nazi Party, to support the revolt after the British moved to suppress it. Those involved included Saddam’s uncle Khairallah Tulfah, and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, who formed the Baath Parties of Syria and Iraq. [7]

Thus, the mufti was to flee once again, ultimately reaching Berlin, to a hero’s welcome. He remained in Germany as an honored guest and valuable intelligence asset throughout most of the war, met with Hitler on several occasions, and personally recruited leading members of the Bosnian-Muslim “Hanjar” division of the Waffen SS. One member was Alija Izetbegovic, who later lead Bosnia’s move for independence. [8]

In the summer of 1942, when German General Erwin Rommel’s Afrikakorps were poised to march into Cairo, Anwar Sadat, Gamal Nasser and their cronies were in touch with the attacking German force and, with help from the Muslim Brotherhood were preparing an anti-British uprising in Egypt’s capital. [9] A treaty with Germany had been drafted by Sadat, which included provisions for German recognition of an independent, but pro-Axis Egypt, and guarantying that “no British soldier would leave Cairo alive.” When Rommel’s push failed in the fall of 1942, Sadat and several of his co- conspirators were arrested by the British, and sat out much of the remainder of the war in jail.

After the defeat of Nazi Germany, al Husseini fled to Egypt. His arrival in 1946 was a precursor to a steady stream of Third Reich veterans. Cairo became a safe haven for several thousand Nazi fugitives, including former SS Captain Alois Brunner, Adolf Eichmann’s chief deputy. Convicted in absentia for war crimes, Brunner would later reside in Damascus, where he served as a security advisor for the Syrian government.

Several of the Germans, recognizing British puppet King Farouk’s political weakness, soon began conspiring with Nasser and his “Free Officers,” who, in turn, were working closely with the Muslim Brotherhood, to overthrow the king. When Banna was assassinated by Egyptian officials in 1949, the movement was destabilized, but not for long. On July 23, 1952, a coup d’etat was carried out by the Free Officers with Brotherhood assistance. Newsweek marveled that, “The most intriguing aspect [of] the revolt ... was the role played in the coup by the large group of German advisors serving with the Egyptian army... The young officers who did the actual planning consulted the German advisors as to ‘tactics’... This accounted for the smoothness of the operation.” [10]

The Odessa Network

Assisting the Egyptians in coordinating with the Nazis was the CIA, headed by Allen Dulles. A 33rd Degree Freemason and Knight Templar, Allen Dulles was also a founding member of the CFR, an in-law of the Rockefellers, Chairman of the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Board Chairman of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Prior to working for the CIA, Dulles was a director of the J. Henry Schroeder bank in London, a prime instrument employed by Montagu Norman in his support of Nazi of Germany. Allen’s brother John Foster Dulles can be credited for having created the Versailles Treaty’s harsh terms against Germany. And yet, it was the two of them who secretly went to Hitler to confirm that the Illuminati bankers would back his rise to power. As partners in the Sullivan and Cromwell firm, Allen and John Foster also represented I.G. Farben, the Rockefeller-Harriman-Warburg combination. [11]

Allen Dulles served with the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS), a Round Table creation that would eventually become the CIA, and of which he would become head. In 1938, US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, by agreeing to let the Special Operations Executive (SOE) control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General “Wild Bill” Donovan to London before setting up the OSS under the aegis of SOE-MI6. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA, have since worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute. [12]

Miles Copeland, a former CIA operative specializing in the Middle East, revealed in his autobiography, The Game Player, that in 1951 and 1952 the CIA became interested in Nasser through a project known secretly as “The Search for a Moslem Billy Graham.” According to Copeland, who activated the project in 1953, the CIA needed a charismatic leader in order to divert the growing anti-American hostility that was dominant at the time. Copeland describes the first secret meeting he had with three army officers, including Major Abdel Moneim Ra’ouf, of Gamal Abdun Nasser’s inner circle.

In March 1952, Kermit “Kim” Roosevelt, grandson of President Roosevelt, who headed the CIA Near East Operations, had begun a series of meetings with Nasser that led to the coup four months later. When Nasser wanted to overhaul Egypt’s secret service, he turned to the CIA. However, the U.S. government “found it highly impolitic to help [Nasser] directly,” Copeland recalled in his memoirs, so the CIA instead secretly bankrolled more than a hundred Nazi espionage and military experts to train Egyptian police and army units in the mid-1950s. [13]

Allen Dulles turned to Reinhard Gehlen, the most senior eastern front military intelligence officer, who, just before the end of WWII, had turned himself over to the U.S. In exchange for his extensive intelligence contacts in the USSR, Dulles and the OSS, reunited Gehlen with his Nazi associates, to establish “the Gehlen Organization”, which then functioned within the OSS, and later the CIA. [14]

Gehlen handpicked 350 former German army and SS officers who were released from internment camps. That number eventually grew into 4000 undercover agents, called V-men. The more notorious of these henchmen included Gestapo captain Klaus Barbie, otherwise known as the “Butcher of Lyon”, Alois Brunner, Adolf Eichmann’s right-hand man in orchestrating the Final Solution, and Emil Augsburg, who directed the Wannsee Institute, where the Final Solution was formulated, and who served in a unit that specialized in the extermination of Jews. Another was the former Gestapo chief Heinrich Muller, Adolf Eichmann’s immediate superior, whose signature appears on orders written in 1943 for the deportation of 45,000 Jews to Auschwitz for killing.

By the early 1950s, Reinhard Gehlen was in charge of developing the new German intelligence service. To build Egypt’s spy and security forces, Gehlen hired the best man he knew for the job, former SS colonel Otto Skorzeny, who was described by the OSS, as “the most dangerous man in Europe”. It was Skorzeny who, at the end of the war, organized the infamous ODESSA network, the purpose of which was to establish and facilitate secret escape routes, called ratlines, out of Germany to South America and the Middle East for hunted members. With ties to Argentina, Egypt, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and the Vatican, they operated out of Buenos Aires and helped Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengele, Erich Priebke, Aribert Heim and many other war criminals find refuge in Latin America and the Middle East.

According to Nazi-hunter Serge Klarsfeld of Paris, it was the banking contacts of Francois Genoud that set in motion the ODESSA networks, which transferred millions of marks from Germany into Swiss banks. [15] According to European press accounts, Genoud was managing the hidden Swiss treasure of the Third Reich, most of which had been stolen from Jews. [16] Genoud later employed these funds to pick up the tab for the legal defense of Adolf Eichmann, Klaus Barbie, and Carlos the Jackal.

Genoud had traveled to Palestine on behalf of the Nazis, when Adolf Eichmann was providing financial assistance from the SS to al-Husseini, with whom he developed a lifelong friendship. It is also likely that Genoud had some part in al- Husseini’s escape from Europe, as he was a representative of the Swiss Red Cross at the end of the war. [17]

Through the same ratlines, Dulles also orchestrated an operation in Italy, known as “Stay-Behind”, to build a Europe wide secret network of anticommunist terrorists, who would fight behind the lines in the event of a Soviet invasion. The plan was later codified under the umbrella of the Clandestine Co-ordinating Committee of the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), the military arm of NATO. US planners, worried over the growing influence of Italy’s large and popular communist party, organized the Stay-Behind network into what was called Operation “Gladio” in 1956. The name derived from the short sword used by Roman. In addition to the CIA, Gladio was also operated by the secret Masonic lodge “Propaganda Due”, also known as P2, headed by Licio Gelli, known as the “Puppet-master”. During the war, Gelli had been a member of Mussolini’s notorious “Black shirts”, and later acted as liaison officer to the Hermann Goering SS division. [18]

Also involved in the Nazi smuggling operations was George Herbert Walker, maternal grandfather of George H. W. Bush. Walker was president of Union Banking Corporation, a firm that traded with Germany, and helped German industrialists consolidate Hitler’s political power. Union Banking became a Nazi money-laundering machine. Walker helped take over North American operations of Hamburg-Amerika Line, a shipping line and cover for I. G. Farben’s Nazi espionage unit in the United States. Hamburg-Amerika smuggled in German agents, and brought in money for bribing American politicians to support Hitler. Also, a 1934 congressional investigation showed that Hamburg-Amerika was subsidizing Nazi propaganda efforts in the U.S. [19]

George H.W. Bush’s father, Prescott, was a board member of Union Banking, and a senior partner in a Union Banking affiliate, the investment firm Brown Brothers, Harriman. Both E.R. Harriman and Prescott Bush were members of Yale university’s Skull and Bones society, which was the dominant American chapter of the international Brotherhood of Death secret societies, that included Germany’s Thule Society, later the Nazis. The Bush family are descendants of several prominent English families, like the Pierces and the Groverners, who trace their descent to the Fisher King, Alain IV Duke of Brittany. [20]

However, the U.S. government investigated both Bert Walker and Prescott Bush, and under the Trading with the Enemy Act, seized all shares of Union Banking, including shares held by Prescott Bush, because “huge sections of Prescott Bush’s empire had been operated on behalf of Nazi Germany and had greatly assisted the German war effort.” [21]

The German chemical company I.G. Farben also directly financed Joseph Mengele’s experiments at Auschwitz. [22] In 1940-41, I.G. Farben built a gigantic factory at Auschwitz in Poland, to utilize the Standard Oil-IG Farben patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal. The SS, who were paid by Standard Oil funds, guarded the Jewish and other inmates and selected for killing those who were unfit for I.G. Farben slave labor. [23]

Mengele was among the hundreds of high-ranking Nazis which the US intelligence and military services extricated from Germany, during and after the final stages of World War II, known as Operation Paperclip. Of particular interest were scientists specialising in aerodynamics and rocketry, such as those involved in the V-1 and V-2 projects, chemical weapons, chemical reaction technology and medicine. However, Christopher Simpson shows how the CIA hired former Nazis “for their expertise in propaganda and psychological warfare,” and other purposes. [24]

According to the author of Mind Control The Ultimate Terror, it was through Mengele that the MK-Ultra and Monarch programs were developed. The project was begun in the 1950s, and coordinated by the British psychological warfare unit called the Tavistock Institute, with the Scottish Rite Freemasons, the CIA, and other British, American, Canadian, and UN agencies. [25] The Tavistock Institute, formed at Oxford University, London, by the RIIA in 1922, became the Psychiatric Division of the British Army during World War II. [26]

The plan was to employ the age-old indoctrination methods of the Ismaili Assassins, to continue to create mind-controlled agent-provocateurs, more commonly known as “terrorists”. In 1952, Dulles founded Banque Commerciale Arabe in Lausanne, Switzerland, representing a pact between the CIA and the Muslim Brotherhood, which is comprised of Saudi royal family members. [27] The bank was co-founded by a longtime British intelligence agent, Benoist Mechin, a protégé of Jack Philby. [28] Dean Henderson, author of Geopolitics: The Global Economy of Big Oil, Weapons and Drugs, summarizes the nature of this relationship:

Part of this Faustian bargain may have involved the House of Saud chieftains providing information to US intelligence on how to create mind-controlled assassins. The Muslim Brotherhood claims to have first perfected this technique during the 11th century Crusades when it launched a brutal parallel secret society known as the Assassins, who employed mind-controlled “lone gunmen” to carry out political assassinations of Muslim Saracen nationalists. The Assassins worked in concert with Knights Templar Christian invaders in their attacks on progressive Arabs, but were repelled. [29]

The ostensible reason for MK-Ultra, incepted by then director of the CIA, Dulles, in 1953, was to counteract the mind- control capabilities of the communists. This concern was largely based on the fact that U.S. prisoners captured during the Korean War were coerced into signing false confessions of crimes, and some had defected to North Korea, because of the effects of brainwashing. However, The Manchurian Candidate, a 1959 book, which was made into a movie in 1962, explains the true intended purpose. The film features a communist plot to use a U.S. soldier brainwashed in Manchuria to assassinate the leading U.S. presidential candidate. The CIA would employ the expertise of former Nazis in mind-control to program assassins for homegrown operations, but ultimately, members of Islamic fundamentalist groups to carry out acts of terrorism.

The Muslim World League

With Skorzeny now on the job of assisting Nasser, Egypt became a safe haven for Nazi war criminals. [30] Ultimately, the Free Officers coup was the work of many foreign intelligence agencies, though especially the British, French and American, in collusion with the Muslim Brotherhood. However, tensions eventually grew between the Free Officers and the Brotherhood. Nasser emerged in 1954, naming himself prime minister, and when his government moved towards a confrontation with the British, the Brotherhood was directed to wage war against him. To that effect, the Brotherhood received assistance from Israeli intelligence, for which reason, among others, it was accused by Al Ahram, and other Egyptian press, as being the tool of imperialists “and the Zionists”. [31]

So when Nasser threatened to nationalize the Suez Canal, so important as a conduit for oil cargo to Europe and elsewhere, the Rothschilds employed their assassins from the Muslim Brotherhood against him. The Rothschilds had maintained an interest in the canal, ever since Baron Lionel de Rothschild financed his friend’s Benjamin Disraeli’s purchase of the canal for the British government in 1875.

When Brotherhood members fired shots at Egyptian leader Gamal Abdun Nasser in 1954, the group was forcibly suppressed by the government, with thousands of members being imprisoned. Six of its leaders were tried and executed for treason, and many others were imprisoned. Interrogations revealed that the Muslim Brotherhood functioned virtually as a German Intelligence unit. As divulged by Copeland:

Nor was that all. Sound beatings of the Moslem Brotherhood organizers who had been arrested revealed that the organization had been thoroughly penetrated, at the top, by the British, American, French and Soviet intelligence services, any one of which could either make active use of it or blow it up, whichever best suited its purposes. Important lesson: fanaticism is no insurance against corruption; indeed, the two are highly compatible. [32]

The CIA also became concerned over his leanings towards the Soviet Union. Great Britain and the United States had originally agreed to help finance the first stage of the Nasser’s Aswan High Dam project. Although, in 1956, the U.S. secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, canceled the U.S. offer, and the next day Britain followed suit. Five days later, Nasser announced the nationalization of the Suez Canal, promising that the tolls Egypt collected would in five years pay for the dam.

In response to Nasser’s nationalization of the Canal, the United Kingdom and France, with the help of Israel, invaded the Sinai and much of Port Said, sending the Egyptian military into retreat. However, due to pressure from both the United States and the Soviet Union, the British and the French had to withdraw. Though Israel did achieve the cessation of Egyptian raids, Nasser was hailed as having achieved a victory for the Arab world.

Fleeing members of the Muslim Brotherhood were then shuttled to the CIA’s ally, Saudi Arabia. When John Loftus, a Justice Department official in the eighties, was permitted to peruse classified government documents, he discovered that the British Secret Service convinced American intelligence that the Arab Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood would be indispensable as “freedom fighters” in preparation for the next major war, which was anticipated against the Soviet Union. Kim Philby, the Soviet agent who infiltrated the British Secret Service, and the son of “Abdullah” Philby, helped the US acquire these Arab Nazis, then being expelled from Egypt, who were afterwards sent to Saudi Arabia. There, according to Loftus, “they were given jobs as religion education instructors.” [33]

Thus, beginning in the 1960s, the Salafi became more formally allied to the Wahhabis, who became the principal patrons of the Brotherhood, which set up branches in most Arab states. With the CIA’s tacit approval, the Saudis provided funds for Brotherhood members who joined the anti-Nasser insurgency in Yemen in 1962. “Like any other truly effective covert action, this one was strictly off the books,” wrote Robert Baer, a nineteen-year veteran of the CIA, in Sleeping with the Devil. “There was no CIA funding, no memorandum of notification to Congress. Not a penny came out of the Treasury to fund it. In other words, no record.” Describing the Brotherhood as a “silent ally” that provided a “cheap no- American casualties way” to do “our dirty work in Yemen, Afghanistan, and plenty of other places,” Baer explained, “All  the White House had to do was give a wink and a nod to countries harboring the Muslim Brothers.” [34]

In 1962, with CIA encouragement, the Saudis established an organization called the Muslim World League. [35] Underwritten initially by several donors, including Aramco, then a CIA collaborator, the League established a powerful international presence, with representatives in 120 countries. [36] It was headed by then chief Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed ibn Ibrahim Al al-Sheikh, a lineal descendant of Mohammed ibn Abdul Wahhab, and the presidency remains vested in the Saudi Mufti to this day.

Included among its eight members were important representatives of the Salafi Muslim Brotherhood: Said Ramadan, son- in-law of Hasan al Banna, Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, leader of Brotherhood offshoot, the Jamati Islami of Pakistan, and Maulana Abul Hasan Nadvi, of India. “Moreover”, as Abul El Fadl describes,

...the proponents of Wahhabism refused to be labeled or categorized as the followers of any particular figure including ‘Abd al-Wahhab himself. Its proponents insisted that they were simply abiding by the dictates of alsalaf al-salih (the rightly-guided predecessors, namely the Prophet and his companions), and in doing so, Wahhabis were able to appropriate the symbolism and categories of Salafism. [37]

Nevertheless, as El Fadl mentions, “even with the formation of the Saudi state, Wahhabism remained a creed of limited influence until the mid-1970’s when the sharp rise in oil prices, together with aggressive Saudi proselytizing, dramatically contributed to its wide dissemination in the Muslim world. [38] This opportunity presented itself in 1967, when Israeli forces routed a coalition of Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, in the Six Day War. Israel then seized control of Jerusalem, the West Bank of the Jordan River, the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, and the Golan Heights. In consequence, a summit of Arab leaders met, who resolved to employ their oil wealth to help confront Israel.

Go to Next Page

 

H.F.642

 

DAILY MAIL

News

 

 

by James Slack

 

Four-year of EU migrants coming here

'will fill a city the size of MANCHESTER'

 

The population of the UK was 59.3 million in 2003

 

  1. United Kingdom - Population 2014 | countryeconomy.com

    countryeconomy.com/demography/population/uk

    ‎ United Kingdom ended 2012 with a population of

    63,896071 ,

    which represents and INCREASE of 400768 compared with 2011.

    [No doubt by now we have possibly at least another MILLION  at least enjoying our hospitality from the world at large

    GET RID OF THE GANG OF THREE

    BY VOTING

    UKIP

     AT THE

    EU ELECTION

    IN

    MAY 2014

    The average % of those voting at the EU elections is approximately 32% which shows how much interest there truly is in the EUROPEAN UNION but it is vital that people vote in this instance in order to achieve an early REFERENDUM on the COLLECTIVIST-GODLESS-UNDEMOCRATIC EU.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

APRIL-2014

H.F.159

Friends, Britons, Conservatives-

Lend us your vote!

 

MICHAEL MCGOUGH argues that conservatives should vote

 UKIP

 

 in the Euro-elections.

[AFTER THE EXCELLENT RESULTS IN THE EURO ELECTION IN MAY 2014 IT IS VITAL THAT THIS LAST CHANCE TO OBTAIN OUR HISTORICAL FREEDOM MUST EXTEND TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN MAY-2015.]

I AM a conservative, [-ditto-] I vote for conservative policies but I have for so long been let down by the Conservative Party which has been compliant as we have been drawn into ever closer union with our fellow European Union member states, treaty by treaty.  we have only once been given our say on EU membership and that was by a Labour Government in 1975.[WITH GROSS LIES AND DECEIT.] is it right that the generations unable to vote then are constrained by that ancient vote, which only referred to an economic arrangement?

For some time now, in anticipation of the next General Election delivering change to a Conservative administration, the media ( Financial Times, Spectator and Andrew Marr for example)   have been sponsoring the idea that David Cameron is a hardened Eurosceptic[REMEMBER! this article was written in the  Winter of 2008/9]

BUT IS HE?

Past evidence would indicate a short period of tenure if that were so. 

WE MUST NOT FORGET

how Lady Thatcher was removed subsequent to her Bruges Speech, nor Iain Duncan Smith after his in Prague.  Discarding the previous robust party policy of repatriation of fishing rights, appointing a Europhile head of candidate selection and remaining in the federalist European People's party despite promising

NOT TO DO SO

does little to confirm him as

"one of us"

for I am certain that TFA Members of all parties are confirmed Eurosceptics.  Cameron says that he will definitely leave the EPP after the 2009 European Elections, finally delivering on his leadership election promise  However Miro Topolanek, the Czech prime Minister, Cameron's partner in forming his proposed post-EEP grouping in the European Parliament is"committed" to ratifying the

LISBON TREATY

hardly an ideal partner to roll back the EU. As soon as the Conservative MEPs had elected a new leader, the Europhile Timothy Kirkhope, Charles Tannock suggested on Conservative Home , that they should stay in the EPP, for reasons of status.

WHAT OF SHADOW FOREIGN SECRETARY WILLIAM HAGUE?

I recall his commitment to opposition to the Euro was limited to the life of one parliament.  With the Pound collapsing towards parity with the Euro and the current "beneficial" economic and financial crisis, demands for us to adopt the currency of the

EUROPEAN SUPERSTATE

will come again harder to oppose post ratification of the LISBON -Treaty which requires it.  We have an OPT-OUT, but nothing is forever.

Speaking at the Freedom in the City talk Professor Haseler of the Federal trust confirmed that the EUROPHILES would push for THIS and Roland Rudd , Chairman of Britain for a New Europe had an article calling for this on the Evening Standard website (15.11.08) followed by Will Hutton in the Observer (16.11.08)

A major plank of the Conservative's European manifesto will be apparent strident opposition to the LISBON TREATY and  a commitment to hold a further referendum , post a GENERAL ELECTION.

This played well until David Cameron made his "Harrow Declaration" diluting his initial commitment. Policy is now:

We will be sold the familiar, but sad old tale of unceasing efforts to renegotiate our position in the EU, so much easier from within.

[Balderdash!-Fiddle-Faddle!]

" So if the Lisbon Treaty is not yet in force at the time of the next General Election

 [No fear of that as the supposed reluctant Scot Gordon Brown signed the

TREATY OF TREASON

 and in the words of our greatest English poet

 

'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the ensuing age abhorred.' 

  William Shakespeare

 

and a Conservative Government is elected we would put the Treaty to a referendum of the British people, recommending a "no" vote

 [Well! in 2013 we are told by David Cameron that he would fight to remain in a reformed EU so there was never any truth in the above statement.  The man has been proved a serial liar and traitor to his country and not to be trusted under any circumstances.]

If the British people rejected the Treaty, we would withdraw Britain's ratification of it. But if the treaty is in force we will be in a different situation. In our view, then, political integration would have gone too far and the Treaty would lack democratic legitimacy in this country and we would not let matters rest  there."

What does " we would not let matter rest there " mean?  We will be sold the familiar, but sad old tale of unceasing efforts to negotiate our position in the EU, so mush easier from within.  Nigel Farage, at the Bruges Group meeting in Birmingham, recalled a cartoon of a fish within a fishing net telling another outside

" it is much easier to negotiate from within"

If Cameron was really opposed to LISBON he would kill it dead

NOW!

by offering a referendum, come what may, without qualification.

[A reminder this article was written in the Winter of 2008/9

If LISBON is no good before ratification it cannot be good after.  If, because of treaty law, a NO vote in such a referendum meant we would have to leave the EU then so be it.  We woul;d, as the Freedom Association's own campaign states, be

"BETTER OFF OUT OF THE EU"

anyway.

Where are the Conservatives crying out about yet another year of unsatisfactory

EU ACCOUNTS

[Not been passed for over 18 years]

With losses of 2p in the £1 being seemed  acceptable by the auditors with actual losses being greater such as 11p in the £1 for structural funds (6 billion Euros) one would expect a Shadow chancellor to be outraged, not pussyfooting around the margins of employment taxes.

There will be no referendum, but there will be an early opportunity for all those opposed to LISBON and everything else that is wrong with our membership of the EU clearly to highlighting this. Voting for the

UKIP

on 4 June -2009

[Certainly in May 2014]

and securing yet more UKIP MEPS will send a message to the EU, the Government, and most importantly, David Cameron, that we seek change.

LEND US YOUR VOTE AND CHANGE YOUR COUNTRY-PUT COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY.  

 am certain that David Cameron would then be forced to CHANGE and PROMISE us the POLICIES the MAJORITY DEMAND.

[HE DIDN'T IN 2009]

If he does that , I envisage that all conservatives shall once again be able to vote together at a general election.

Michael Mc Gough.

michael.mcgough@lineone.net

[An excellent article which we decided to give much prominence because of the importance of the subject particularly as it is a LAST WARNING to those who LOVE THEIR FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY to understand that this is not about PARTY but about COUNTRY and by now you must surely realise that the GANG OF THREE in WESTMINSTER are FELLOW TRAVELLERS of the COLLECTIVIST SOVIETISED GODLESS UNDEMOCRATIC EUROPEAN UNION.

 

VOTE!

 

UKIP

 

FOR THE RETURN OF YOUR ONCE
FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

TO

CONTROL IMMIGRATION

AND

HAVE THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD OUR TRADING PARTNERS

AND

SECURITY AND SPACE IN OUR ISLAND HOME

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER   -2013

H F 161

 DAILY MAIL

-PETER McKAY

 

-Slippery-Daves-right-European-Union-Our-real-enemy-Frau-Merkel.

 

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE:

 

We have taken the rare case to outline the above work by Peter MCKAY because it has touched on so many important matters with regard to the NAZI PLAN in 1943 for their domination of EUROPE under a EUROPEAN UNION which was to become in time a ONE-STATE EUROPE on the road to a ONE-WORLD  GOVERNMENT UNDER A SMALL ELITE who would oversee a SLAVE STATE of the MAJORITY reminiscent of

 H. G. WELLS

1984

 

[COMMENTS and many CAPS are OURS!]

JUNE-2014

 

 

 

Forget tipsy Jean-Claude Juncker. Our real EU ENEMY is the GERMAN CHANCELLOR ANGELA MERKEL.

 

Initially she agreed with David Cameron that Juncker was a useless candidate for presidency of the EU COMMISSION.  But then she supported the ill-regarded Luxembourger.

WHY?  Because she could easily manage him and he suited her purposes better than the main alternative candidate who is her Socialist rival in Germany.

Meanwhile, surprise is expressed about how several other national leaders who had agreed with Cameron privately that Juncker was unacceptable then voted otherwise.

 

This is to MISUNDERSTAND the NATURE of the EUROPEAN UNION.

 

In theory, the 28 [so-called] enjoy EQUAL RIGHTS, but in practice its run [on behalf of NAZI INTERNATIONAL] by [GERMAN CHANCELLOR] ANGELA MERKEL

 

 

There's fancy talk about EU community spirit and a vision  of what 'EUROPE' can be in the world, but the TRUTH is that MERKEL is QUEEN BEE and the 27 other NATIONAL LEADERS are HER DRONES

 

It's said by Cameron-haters that he is a secret EUROPHILE who only seeks changes in Britain's relationship with the EU so as to head off Eurosceptics in his own party,and UKIP.

 

If that was ever true it can't be the case now.

 

 

The dislike European citizens have expressed in elections for FEDERALISM - and the CONTEMPT for their voters which national leaders have now indicated by choosing arch-federalist Juncker-might even made Europhobes out of the EU's FOUNDING FATHERS.

 

 

SO WHERE DOES HER MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION STAND?

 

Labour's posture on Juncker is  surely beneath contempt.  They pretend to share Cameron's belief that the EU NEEDS REFORM-and POWER must be RETURNED to NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS - but claim that the PM went about it THE WRONG WAY.

 

 

So what would have been the right way? Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls didn't manage to explain that on ANDREW MARR'S TV SHOW yesterday.

 

He had simply mesmerised a sound bite which he repeated:

'We won't be influential in the world if we're not influential in Europe.'

 

 

Which I took to mean:

'AGREE WITH GERMANY AT ALL COSTS. IGNORE PUBLIC DISSENT ABOUT FEDERALISM AND THE EU's UNDEMOCRATIC PROCEDURES.

 

 

Keep our heads down and avoid argument.'

 

 

As for Cameron, he has played Mr Nice Guy too long. The reforms he sought were minimal until Jean Claude Juncker appeared. But the determination of MERKEL and HER DRONES to impose an ever-FEDERALIST EUROPE changes EVERYTHING.

 

 

SO, NO MORE MR NICE GUY, I HOPE

 

 

Meanwhile in Scotland, SNP leader and FIRST MINISTER ALEX SALMOND - always seeking new reasons for ditching the UNION-warns that Cameron's promised REFERENDUM in 2017

[WHY ARE WE WAITING MR CAMERON?]

on Britain's EU Membership might take us OUT OF THE EU, something HE'D OPPOSE.

 

 

Another reason for voting YES to SECESSION, Salmond suggests.

 

Is that true for a majority of Scots?

 

I wouldn't have thought so. Besides, if Scots vote to quit the UK, they will lose their membership of the EU and have to apply to rejoin.

 

IT'S A CURIOUS KIND OF COUNTRY WHICH DUMPS A 300-PLUS YEAR UNION WITH A CONTIGUOUS NEIGHBOUR FOR ONE LED BY GERMANY WHICH IT HAS TWICE FOUGHT AGAINST IN TWO WORLD WARS.

 

 

[But what we find even more curious is how IRELAND which has fought the ENGLISH for CENTURIES for  its INDEPENDENCE as a FREE NATION STATE has so readily given it away to be part of a Satanic-collectivist-undemocratic-FEDERALIST EUROPE.     Of course we all know that it is the POLITICIANS in the so-called MEMBER STATES out of touch with THE PEOPLE, who love to be IMPORTANT INDIVIDUALS in such a POWERFUL CLUB]

 

 

I  suppose I am like most voters: I see the advantage of a friendly trading relationship with other nations

BUT NOT

when I am affected by laws made elsewhere, over which I have no control.

 

 

And like most people I dislike the coercive arguments used by EUROFANS who say we'll lose millions of jobs if we quit the EU.  As if it were impossible to trade with EU members without belonging to the club.

 

 

Fans of Europe used to argue that membership of the EU would entail

NO LOSS OF

  SOVEREIGNTY

 

 

NOW THEY SAY IT DOESN'T MATTER

 

 

BUT IT DOES MATTER TO MANY PEOPLE

 

And if the public votes against federalism, that should be taken into account and not ignored.

 

 

The cynicism of powerful FRAU MERKEL, backing the useless JUNCKER is a WAKE-UP CALL: the EU is headed for a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

run by

GERMANY

 

 

Eurofans will say this is not so, just as they denied that we'd SUFFER any LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY.  They LIED then and they'll LIE NOW.  Or they will say NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY  DOESN'T MATTER in 2014.

DON'T BELIEVE A WORD OF IT.

 

 

The  PUBLIC DEMAND for the RESTORATION of NATIONAL POWERS frightens OUR EU RULERS.  They worry over where it can end.  the EU leaders solution: ignore it and speed up the federalism of Europe. Its for it's own good.

David Cameron isn't to every taste. And he's been slipery about Europe for years,

BUT

HE WAS RIGHT about JUNCKER, and HE'S RIGHT about EU REFORM.

 

Full article

*

 

 

[An excellent article at a crucial moment in the history of our country when the PEOPLE have it in THEIR HANDS to return THEIR COUNTRY to a FREE INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATIC ISLAND NATION STATE.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS]

JUNE 30-2014

H F 162

 
 
  • Popular Articles

    • Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis 20140630 Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke
    • Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke?
    • Big power plays by Rothschilds, Rockefellers leave Putin on the defensive and China in the middle
    • Are all of these emergency meetings of world leaders leading to some big announcement?
    • Correction
 
  • Recent Posts

    • Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis 20140630 Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke
    • Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke?
    • Big power plays by Rothschilds, Rockellers leave Putin on the defensive and China in the middle
    • Are all of these emergency meetings of world leaders leading to some big announcement?
    • Correction
    • Emergency meetings of Western elite fail to break financial deadlock, US implosion now looms
    • Pope Francis pushes for one world religion as Western elite hits the panic button
    • New energy technology moving ahead even as financial chaos deepens
    • Shouting matches every day in the White House as US corporate government implosion continues
    • Lots of chatter about arrests, take-down of Zionist/Nazi cabal
  • Category

    • Finance
    • Geo-politics
    • Organized Crime
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
  • Links

    • 9/11 Truth.org
    • 911 Conspiracy
    • BBC
    • Drudge report
    • Japan Today
    • Rense.com
    • Reuters
    • The New York Times
    • TheNew Yorker
 

Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis 20140630 Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke

Posted by benjamin
July 1, 2014
 
Uncategorized
 

Is ISIS a CRISIS or some kind of inside joke?

Posted by benjamin
July 1, 2014
 

Sometimes events in the news seem so surreal that it becomes a guess they are not real, or at least not in the sense we see it. That is certainly the case with the declaration of the Islamic Caliphate or ISIS last week.

The first thing to note, as pointed out by alert readers, is that there is a military contractor called ISIS that offers services in such areas as “role playing,” “exercise and evaluations,” “human intelligence,” “special operations” and “unmanned aircraft systems” among other things.

https://public.isishq.com/public/capabilities/default.aspx

Most of their offices are either in the Middle East or the United States and it is a pretty good guess they got the contract to carry out operation ISIS in the Middle East.

When you see news article full of demands by ISIS to “hand over your daughters for sex,” or crucifixions of Christians and threats that the “black flag of Jihad will fly over London”

http://rt.com/uk/166128-isis-jihadists-threaten-britain/

it is a pretty good guess you are dealing with a major psy-ops or role playing game.
Here is what and MI5 source had to say about it:

“This is a PR exercise to bring terrorism into a branded, packaged presence which is the normal purview of corporate marketing and PR. We are witnessing a global psy-op to shift the perception of “terror” groups away from being rogue psycho’s to being more like football teams playing for victory in sanitized arenas.”

As mentioned before, there has been an agreement between various secret power groups for the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate to replace the artificial borders created by the French and the British in the Middle East after World War I. That is what is happening now.

This is linked to the sudden influx of illegal immigrants pouring into the US. There has been a secret agreement, certainly not made in consultation with the majority of the people, to

 

[COMMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 2014

H F 163

AFTER A STIRRING AND MOMENTOUS

 VICTORY!

ON MAY 22-2014

WE NOW HEAR THE USUAL SIREN CALLS FOR DEALS WITH THE

CON PARTY

THIS MUST NOT HAPPEN

BECAUSE

1)   UKIP WILL LOSE MOMENTUM AND THE LONGER IT REMAINS CLEAR OF ANY CONNECTION WITH THE GANG OF THREE THE GREATER WILL BE THE INFLUX INTO THAT PEOPLE'S PARTY.

2) THE POSSIBILITY THAT DAVID CAMERON WILL ACHIEVE ANY WORTHEWHILE CHANGES WITH THE GERMAN IRON CHANCELLOR FRAU MERKLE ARE NIL AS SHE HAS STATED SO OFTEN IN THE PAST.

3)A FUTURE LABOUR GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE EXISTENCE OF UKIP OTHERWISE MORE REAL LABOUR SUPPORTERS WILL JOIN THEIR STANDARD.

4) IT IS UP TO THE VOTER  TO TURN OUT IN MAY 2015 AND ENSURE THAT UKIP WIN SUFFICIENT SEATS IN WESTMINSTER TO PUT THE FEAR OF GOD IN THE ARROGANT AND COMPLACENT ESTABLISHED POLITICAL PARTIES-

THE GANG OF THREE.

5) THERE IS NO EASY WAY IN OBTAINING THE RETURN OF OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.  ONLY UKIP SEATS IN WESTMINSTER WILL FRIGHTEN THE PRO-EU FACTION ENOUGH TO MAKE THEM REALISE THAT THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE HAS CHANGED

 FOR EVER!

AND THE RECENT ELECTION RESULTS HAVE NMADE CLEAR THAT THE

 PEOPLE WANT CHANGE!

NOT FUTURE PROMISES

WHICH THE PAST HAS SHOWN HAS BEEN

DAMN LIES!

*

[We like millions of others have been waiting over 50 years for REAL CHANGE! in the EU and it has never happened because it cannot because that is not the nature of the

BEAST!

   What we find intolerable is that so -called Conservative euroscetic MEPs and MPs still stay within THEIR COMFORT ZONE instead of putting their PRINCIPLES FIRST! and like so many millions of once CONSERVATIVE VOTERS desert the CHANGELING PARTY and join their REAL HOME in UKIP.  So long as the VOTER votes for the SUBSTITUTES the longer it will take to REGAIN YOUR FREEDOM AND INDEPENDENT COUNTRY

and

TRADE with the WORLD at LARGE.

MAY 26-2014

H F 164

DAILY MAIL

I'VE BEEN BANNED  BY THE BBC!

 Ex Chancellor LORD LAWSON a passionate climate change sceptic, accuses BBC bosses of silencing debate on global warning

by Nigel Lawson

 
 

EXTRACT

 

Outrageous

The truth is that the BBC's outrageous behaviour is nothing whatsoever to do with whether I am a climate scientist or not. Indeed, it is not about me at all.

Matt Ridley, for example, is arguably this country's-indeed, the English-speaking world's-leading science writer who has researched the CLIMATE CHANGE ISSUE and reached a conclusion which is very close to my own. (He is also among the unpaid members of the Academic Advisory Council of my think-tank.) Not once has he been invited to discuss any aspect of the issue on Radio 4's TODAY PROGRAMME

The fact is that, on this issue, the BBC has its own party line (indistinguishable from that of the GREEN PARTY) which it imposes with quasi-Stalinist thoroughness.

The one occasion last February, on which it permitted a balanced and civilised discussion is now seen by the CORPORATION as a COLOSSAL ERROR for which it must grovel and undertake NEVER TO REPEAT.

THIS AMOUNTS TO A POLICY OF OUTRIGHT POLITICAL CENSORSHIP

It is hard to imagine a more blatant BREACH of its CHARTER which commits it to POLITICAL BALANCE, or  a more blatant BETRAYAL of the PEOPLE'S TRUST on which  the continuation of its LICENCE FEE DEPENDS.

The BBC justifies its unique compulsory funding model-television tax-by claiming that it provides a fair and balanced public service. Its treatment of CLIMATE CHANGE shows this is SIMPLY NOT THE CASE.

It is little wonder that a recent poll found most people would like to see

THE LICENCE FEE SCRAPPED.

More!

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

MAY 17 -2014

H F 165

New figures reveal that in the past year alone, 1,079 of the country's most prolific offenders were spared jail

DAILY MAILA

1,000 criminals with 100 convictions get just a slap on the wrist: Burglar being sentenced for 65th offence among offenders given another chance

By James Slack - July 10th 2014, 11:32:07 pm

Extraordinary new figures reveal that in the past year alone, 1,079 of the country’s most prolific offenders were spared a jail term by courts.

 

[A CASE OF THE RULE OF LAW AND JUST PUNISHMENT BEING IGNORED ON FINANCIAL GROUNDS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT APART FROM DEFENDING THE REALM TO ENSURE THAT THE LAW OF THE LAND IS MAINTAINED WHATEVER THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

THIS DISGRACEFUL AND UNJUST SITUATION OF THE VICTIM BEING IGNORED HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS AS OUR PAST COMMENTS OVER THE PAST DECADE HAS REVEALED. IT IS ALL A MATTER OF MONEY FOR MORE PRISONS AND STAFF AND REHABILITATION BUT SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS WILL NOT FOOT THE BILL.  AS WE NOW HAVE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE FROM THE POORER NATIONS NOW HERE IN OUR ALREADY CROWDED LAND.  DAVID CAMERON SHOULD DIVERT A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE WASTED 12 BILLION FOREIGN AID BACK HERE WHERE IT IS URGENTLY NEEDEDBECAUSE WE SEEM INTENT TO HOUSE LARGE NUMBERS OF THE POOREST IN THE WORLD HERE IN OUR SMALL ONCE SPACIOUS AND FREE  ISLAND HOME. ]

PREFACE

 

A SECRET WORLD OF GREED AND INTRIGUE!

*

The figures showed crimes recorded by police have failed to fall year on year for the first time in a decade

DAILY MAIL  

Article

Police fail to find culprit in HALF of all crimes: Critics say criminals 'are getting away with it' and demand tougher punishments after figures are published

By Ian Drury - July 17th 2014, 9:21:31 pm

Police are failing to solve more than half of all crimes in a trend critics have called 'alarming' and 'not good enough'.

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

JULY 11-2014

HF166

 
 
     
 

  IN SEPTEMBER-2011 - IT HAS HAPPENED MANY TIMES BEFORE!  - LABOUR AND TORY MPS UNITE TO DEVISE PLOT FOR BRITAIN TO LEAVE EU              ‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’             OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP              OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?              LIBERTIES OF PARLIAMENT-BIRTHRIGHT OF SUBJECTS OF ENGLAND.               COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU-YES!               ON THE EURO-MAX+HASTINGS-SORRY I WAS WRONG!

 
     
 

A PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE PAST HAVE NO FUTURE

 

THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL

*

Death knell for the euro (and the crisis that could EVEN DESTROY the EU)

by

Christopher Booker

 

WOMEN GETS CRIMINAL RECORD FOR SELLING FRUIT AND VEG BY THE POUND

 

DEFENCE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

THEIR FREEDOMS & LIBERTIES

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND
Ten

EU truths we must tell the public
 

-NO MATTER THAT CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH HER MAJESTY

WASTED NO TIME IN SELLING THE

the accustomed

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN"

 

GERMAN CHANCELLOR PUTS GERMANY FIRST-

GORDON BROWN PUTS THE EU

FIRST.

 

SEVENTY YEARS AGO NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN SIGNED THE NOTORIOUS MUNICH AGREEMENT TO BETRAY CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND DELIVER

' PEACE IN OUR TIME'

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN
WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY- THEN READ ON

The remarkable views of Declan Ganley

The multi-millionaire founder of

www.Libertas.org

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

What a colossal con trick they have played on the people of the once INDEPENDENT NATION STATES of the Island of BRITAIN.

LATEST!

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

Hurrah for Libertas!

FOR IRISH EU

'NO' VOTE
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

STATEMENT!

IS THE FOUNDER OF LIBERTAS WHO LED OPPOSITION TO LISBON A FEDERALIST EUROPEAN NOT A EUROSCEPTIC?

eurofacts 19th September, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

EU FAILS TO SIGN-OFF ACCOUNTS FOR 14TH YEAR RUNNING

WHAT DOES GORDON BROWN DO?-NOTHING!
There are certain Principles of Civil Liberty, which at the end of the fifteenth century protected the Individual from the arbitrary action of the government.

DAVID CAMERON NOW GIVES FIRM PROMISE OF EU REFERENDUM -CAN WE TRUST HIM?

Regrettably the answer is NO!

But after much obfuscation and stating his decision to stand down at end of term he relented in 2016
SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

CIVIL WAR

[Extract taken from Mr David Brown's book above]

[ALSO see below for THE END OF THE ENGLISH.

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

DON'T TRUST THEM

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.[The Queen could have at the least privately insisted that HER MINISTERS give HER once FREE SUBJECTS a REFERENDUM or NO EU TREATY

SHE DID NOTHING!

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

 

 

1418/2

 

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

 is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 
 
     
    IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - WHAT IS A EUROSCEPTIC? DAVID CAMERON AS A BILDERBERGER-YOU KNOW THIOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE SERVANTS OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT CROWD WHO ARE DESTROYING NATION STATES AND HAVE AN AGENDA TO REDUCE THE WORLD POPULATION DOWN TO 500,000,000 -SO ANYTHING THAT DAVID CAMERON SAYS REGARDING EUROSCEPTICISM NEEDS TO BE TAKEN WITH A PINCH OF SALT OR PEPPER IF YOU WISH TO CLEAR YOUR TEARS AWAY.   IT IS A SUNNY SATURDAY MORNING AND HAVE OPENED THE DAILY MAIL TO SEE STEPHEN GLOVER'S ARTICLE 'Has Cameron now broken a second pledge on Europe' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1325008/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Has-David-Cameron-broken-SECOND-pledge-Europe.html

+ WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11,2010 IN CHRISTOPHER BOOKER'S ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL SHOWN BELOW 'The ultimate surrender of Britain's sovereignty' - THE PROBLEM AS WE SEE IT IS THAT THOSE WHO HAVE FOR YEARS FOUGHT THE EUROSCEPTIC CAUSE REFUSE TO GET TO THE BASICS REGARDING THE TRUE STATE OF GOVERNANCE IN ENGLAND - WE LET THOSE FROM OUR SISTER NATIONS TO FIGHT THEIR OWN CAUSE. - THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS WELL KNOWN SUCH AS WHO REALLY RUNS OUR COUNTRY AND FOR THAT MATTER THE OLD COMMONWEALTH NATIONS - IT IS THE CITY OF LONDON HEADED BY OUR ONCE TRUE SOVEREIGN LORD -QUEEN ELIZABETH II - ASSISTED BY GEORGE OSBORNE-CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER -A BILDERBERGER A SERVANT OF THE ILLUMINATI - ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND.- WHY? OH! WHY -WON'T THOSE MANY DEFENDER'S OF ENGLISH FREEDOM STATE OUTRIGHT THAT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE TRAITORS AND SHOULD STAND TRIAL FOR TREASON?- YES! -YES! - WE KNOW THAT IN 1998 TONY BLAIR SECRETLY INSERTED A CLAUSE IN A BILL TO PROTECT HIMSELF AND EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING THE ONCE QUEEN OF ENGLAND FROM A TREASON TRIAL. - WHAT WE ARE OBSERVING IS A LOT OF HOT AIR - A FIRM RESOLUTE DETERMINATION TO DO ANYTHING BUT STATE THE REAL OBVIOUS SITUATION WHICH FACES US - THE BILDERBERGERS ARE IN ALL THE POLITICAL PARTIES AT WESTMINSTER - THEY ARE SERVANTS OF ROTHCHILD'S BANK OF ENGLAND AND THE CITY OF LONDON - IT HAS BEEN THE SAME SINCE THE BANK WAS PRIVATISED AT THE END OF THE 17TH CENTURY - SEE 'CENTRAL BANKS!' - INTERNATIONAL BANKERS! IN OUR MULTI VIEW INDEX FILE BELOW. - STRONG TALK AND GRIPPING NEWS STORIES ARE USEFUL - BUT! IT WILL NOT REPLACE REALITY - TO FACE THE TRUE FACTS WHICH FACE EVERY FREEDOM LOVING PERSON IN ENGLAND AND IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. - NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNTIL WE ALL SING FROM THE SAME HYMN-SHEET. ACKNOWLEDGE THE REAL ENEMY WITHIN AND AT LEAST YOU WILL HAVE THE SATISFACTION OF KNOWING THE TRUE FACTS EVEN IF THEY SHOW A FORMIDABLE FOE - IF THERE WAS MORE OPEN DISCUSSION IT IS POSSIBLE THAT NOT ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI AGREE WITH THE EVIL AGENDA AND MIGHT IF THE PEOPLE SHOWED MORE OF THEIR ACCUSTOMED FIERY NATURE -AND FIGHT!!! - A CHANCE TO BRING GOOD OUT OF EVIL FOR THE BETTERMENT OF ALL MANKIND!- BUT IT IS UP TO EACH OF YOU TO BRAVELY MAKE A PLEDGE AND JOIN THE FIGHT! - NOTHING ELSE WILL SAVE YOUR FREEDOM - YOUR IDENTITY - YOUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE. -AND INDEED EVEN YOUR OWN LIFE!- AS UNLESS YOU ARE PART OF THE ELITE OR SMALL NUMBER OF SLAVES PERMITTED TO SERVE THE ILLUMINATI - YOUR CHANCES OF LIFE ARE NIL. - THIS IS AN OPEN SECRET BUT AS THE EFFECTS OF A BIG LIE - A BIG TRUTH IS ALSO HARD TO CONTEMPLATE - THE CHOICE IS YOURS!- MAKE IT SOON OR IT WILL BE AS OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL STATED TO A PACKED AND HUSHED HOUSE OF COMMONS SHORTLY BEFORE THE SECOND WORLD WAR WHEN FACTS WERE DESPERATELY NEEDED OF GERMANY'S GROWING STRENGTH FOR WAR AND THE NEED TO REARM BEFORE IT WAS - TOO!!! LATE!!! - THE SAME SITUATION APPLIES TODAY IN AUGUST, 2010 - WE ARE AT WAR! AGAINST A FORMIDABLE ENEMY - [THE BILDERBERGERS-ILLUMINATI] - THEIR INTEBNTIONS HIDDEN FROM SIGHT BUT ,NEVERTHELESS , IS A GREATER THREAT THAN THAT WHICH FACED THE COUNTRY THEN - BECAUSE THIS ENEMY HAS PLANS TO DESTROY THE GREATER PART OF THE POPULATION OF OUR PLANET EARTH - WE ASK WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? - + WE HAVE REMINDED YOU ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OF THE BILDERBERGER/ILLUMINATI TACTIC OF THE BAD-GUY AND GOOD-GUY SCENARIO WHICH IS TO UNDERMINE SOCIETY AND THE MEANS TO JUSTIFY THEIR TOTALITARIAN MEASURES - WE KNOW HOW SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR DID SUCH A WONDERFUL JOB IN THIS DIRECTION AND WE NOW HERE THAT THE SO-CALLED GOOD GUY DAVID CAMERON IS DOING HIS BEST TO FOLLOW THEIR EXAMPLE! - + A TRULY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF DISSINTERESTED PATRIOTS - NOT BILDERBERGERS WHO OWE ALLEGIANCE TO A FOREIGN MASONIC BODY - WOULD HAVE MORE SUPPORT FROM THE POPULACE - A ONE - TERM SERVICE IN PARLIAMENT TO AVOID PRESSURE ON AN MP TO GO AGAINST HIS CONSCIENCE. - POSSIBLY A RETURN MIGHT BE PERMITTED AFTER EACH TERM OF ABSENCE BUT THE IMPORTANTANCE OF THE MEASURE IS TO PERMIT MORE CITIZENS FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE WHO WISH TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY - IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB FOR LIFE - THE EARLY GREEKS HAVE MANY LESSONS WHICH WE COULD UTILISE FOR BETTER GOVERNANCE! - BUT THE BILDERBERGERS ARE ENJOYING THEIR SPOILS WHETHER IN GOVERNMENT OR SO-CALLED OPPOSITION. - THEY HAVE MADE FOOLS OF US FOR TOO! LONG! -AS WE STATED BEFORE THE MAY6 GENERAL ELECTION THEY SHOULD BE OUTLAWED FROM SERVICE IN OUR ONCE SACRED AND HALLOWED CHAMBER OF WESTMINSTER WHICH THROUGHOUT ITS LONG DISTINGUISHED HISTORY HAS HAD MANY HONORABLE MEMBERS -WE URGENTLY NEED OTHERS OF A TRULY DISINTERESTED NATURE OF WHICH THE HOUSE HAS FEW AND REPLACE THE GREATER MAJORITY WITHOUT DELAY.- IT IS IN YOUR HANDS -WILL YOU DO IT? + - ON THE EU CON! - DO YOU REMEMBER!! - WE TOLD YOU SO BEFORE THE GENERAL ELECTION ON MAY 6-2010 THAT DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISES ARE WORTHLESS!!!-THIS IS NOW CONFIRMED IN THE EXCELLENT ARTICLE IN THE DAILY MAIL IN THE MELONIE PHILLIPS COLUMN ON AUGUST 2010  -  " EURO POLICE KNOCKING ON YOUR DOOR. - SURGERY HALTED BY 48 HOUR WEEK - SO MUCH FOR TORY PROMISES ON THE EU. - AN EXTRACT OF THE ARTICLE FOLLOWS: " When the Tories fought the [MAY 6-2010] general election they promised they would yield NO MORE POWER to the EUROPEAN UNION, and that they will seek to regain from the EU some of the powers that Britain has already lost.  -These pledges were designed to take the sting out of the fact that they were not, after all, going to offer A REFERENDUM on the EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION. - Three month's on , it looks increasingly as if NONE of THEIR PROMISES to SAFEGUARD BRITISH POWER is going to BE KEPT.   Indeed the COALITION GOVERNMENT seems to be going in precisely THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.- Last week, Home Secretary Theresa May told the COMMONS that BRITAIN had decided to OPT INTO the controversal EUROPEAN INVESTIGATIVE ORDER [ IT SOUNDS EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANS -A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE UNDER THE NEW WORLD ORDER-DONT YOU THINK?] - According to critics, this will mean that PROSECUTORS from ANY EU COUNTRY will be granted unprecedented and intrusive powers over the people of Britain. - They would be able to BUG the PHONE CALLS of BRITISH CITIZENS, monitor THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS and gain access to THEIR DNA if they suspected them of committing a CRIME in THOSE COUNTRIES - however trivial the offence, and EVEN IF IT WERE NOT A CRIME IN THE UK. + [Caps and Comments in square brackets are OURS!-For our BULLETIN FILE click under previous work for complete article from the Daily Mail click the following:   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1299512/Euro-police-knocking-door-Surgery-halted-48-hour-week-So-Tory-promises-EU.html - + WE NOW HEAR ON WEDNESDAY THE 4TH AUGUST THAT THE IRISH GOVERNMENT HAS AGREED WITH BRUSSELS TO ALLOW HER TROOPS TO SERVE IN OTHER COUTRIES IN THE EU AS A POLICE FORCE AND ALLOW FOREIGN TROOPS TO BE ON THEIR STREETS TO KEEP ORDER -+ WHEN YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LONG FIGHT OF THE IRISH PEOPLE FOR THEIR RIGHT TO GOVERN THEMSELVES WITH MUCH BLOODSHED GOING BACK HUNDREDS OF YEARS IT MAKES ONE WONDER WHY THEY BOTHERED AT ALL TO DO SO WHEN THEY HAVE MADE THEMSELVES SLAVES TO EVERY COUNTRY IN THE EU? - WE OURSELVES HAVE CONSTANTLY WARNED AGAINST THIS VERY MEASURE BUT IT SEEMS IN THE CASE OF IRELAND WHERE WE EXPECTED MORE OPPOSITION WE HAVE HAD A MOUSE-LIKE SURRENDER!!!! -AS INSTEAD OF AN EXPECTED STOICAL FIGHT FOR THEIR LIBERTY THEY HAD TAKEN THE BAIT AND THE TRAP HAD BEEN SPRUNG.- AS WE HAVE ALSO STATED FOR SOME TIME THE ONCE ALLIES OF IRISH INDEPENDENCE AMERICA HAS 350,000 FOREIGN TROOPS AND A LARGE NUMBER OF FORIEGN POLICE ON ITS SACRED SOIL TO BE USED BY AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHEN A FALSE FLAG ATTACK ENABLES MARTIAL LAW TO BE IMPLEMENTED AND THEN THE LARGE NUMBER OF CONCENTRATION CAMPS BUILT BECAUSE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE AND EVIDENCE OF MEANS OF EXTERMINATION HAVE BEEN REVEALED - THEY HAVE MILLIONS OF PLASTIC COFFINS READY TO BE FILLED - AND IT ALL COMES UNDER FEMA - THESE CONCENTRATION CAMPS UNDER FEMA -WHICH CAME INTO BEING AFTER THE FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON 9/11 - WILL BE FILLED BY MILLIONS OF PATRIOTIC AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO CAN SEE THAT THEIR GOVERNMENT IS A SATANIC ENTITY RUN BY THE BANKSTERS AND TRAITORS AT THE HEAD OF THE MEXICAN - USA - CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS WHO ARE DESPERATE TO CONCLUDE THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION TO MATCH THE EUROPEAN UNION WHICH CHANNEL 4 IN IT'S DOCUMENTARY FAILED TO BRING MORE FACTS TO LIGHT? - FROM WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OF DAVID CAMERON'S PROMISE OF NO MORE POWERS TO THE EU HE WILL NO DOUBT FOLLOW THE TRAITOROUS LEAD OF THE IRISH GOVERNMENT. - AS WE HAVE SAID IF THERE WAS ONE COUNTRY IN THE EU THAT WE BELIEVED WOULD PROTECT ITS COUNTRY IT WOULD BE IRELAND.
 
     
 

 

 
     
     IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - NOVEMBER 11 IS A DAY TO REMEMBER OF THE SACRIFICE OF OVER 2,000,000 servicemen and women who gave their lives in DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY in TWO WORLD WARS and the countless INJURED many bearing the SCARS and TRAUMA for the REST OF THEIR LIVES - IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY STATED that the EU would PREVENT WAR in EUROPE but the REALITY is DIFFERENT as it was NATO which kept THE PEACE until GERMANY went to aid her SECOND WORLD WAR ALLY CROATIA and the BULKANS exploded with ALBANIA and SERBIA at each others throats as old scores were being settled.  + OVER THE PAST CENTURY  OVER 150,000,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED THE GREATER MAJORITY IN RUSSIA IN THE GULAGS It is stated that whereas the FASCISTS MURDERED at least 50,000,000 the COMMUNISTS MURDERED at least 100,000,000.  +In the DAILY MAIL on this UNFORGETTABLE DAY  we see an article 'THE END OF BRITAIN AS A NATION STATE?  NOT ON YOUR LIFE - MR RUMPY PUMPY. and we show the the following extract :- 'History teaches us that nation states  have always been the best guarantors of LIBERTTY-DEMOCRACY-PROSPERITY and THE RULE OF LAW.    ONLY STRONG NATION STATES HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LIBERTIES AGAINST SUCH AS NAPOLEON - HITLER OR STALIN - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

+[PREVIOUS STATEMENT]
   -WE NOW HAVE TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - WE HAVE ONLY IN THE PAST WEEK IN JULY 2010 COME ACROSS ANOTHER FEARLESS FREEDOM FIGHTER IN THE USA AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BORN A JEW BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER WHO MORE THAN MOST IS WELL AWARE OF THE THREAT FROM THE WORLD ZIONIST CONSPIRACY AS HIS MANY ARTICLES ON HIS WEBSITEa href="http://www.realzionist">http://www.realzionistnews.com

"REAL ZIONIST NEWS" CAN TESTIFY.- IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY -  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET.COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEPLE AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          WE WARNED YOU PRIOR TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 THAT IT COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - BUT WE NOW KNOW THAT DAVID CAMERERON HAS STOOD DOWN THE REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE WOULD NOT GET AWAY PROCEEDING WITH THEM AFTER HIS STANCE ABOUT NO MORE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY TO BRUSSELS-WELL!-NOT YET! AS WE STATED WHETHER YOU VOTED NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE' WE NOW HEAR THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY MACHINE IS BAFFLED AS TO WHY IT DID NOT DO BETTER AT THE POLLS.- BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED THOSE EUROSCEPTICS WHO HAD BELIEVED THEM OVER 38 YEARS THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THE EU BUT APART FROM BRUSSELS GIVING GROUND ON CERTAIN MATTERS AND ONLY FOR AS LONG AS THEY FIND IT NECESSARY - THE CLOSER UNION WILL STILL GO AHEAD AS PLANNED.- AS WE HAVE STATED ELSEWHERE IT IS ALL ABOUT GRADUALISM . THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT EVERY SO-CALLED COMPROMISE WORKS TO THE BENEFIT OF BRUSSELS -THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR ON THE 1 JANUARY 2010 WHEN ENGLAND NO LONGER EXISTED AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE BUT REGIONS SHARED BY OTHER EUROPEAN REGIONS.  ONLY GERMANY HAS ESCAPED SUCH INIHILATION AND IRONICALLY IT WILL BE GERMANY WHICH MIGHT WITH THE COLLAPSE OF THE EURO AND THE IMERGENCE OF GERMAN IDENTITY AT HOME THAT MIGHT BRING BACK THE FREE INDEPENDENDEBNT NATION STATES WORKING TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY-  BUT BEFORE THIS CAN TAKE PLACE THERE IS A HERCULEAN TASK BEFORE US TO REGAIN FROM THE ZIONIST BANKSTERS THE CONTROL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE WITHOUT DOING SO FREEDOM AND EVEN THE LIVES OF MOST OF MANKIND WILL DISAPEAR FOR EVER FROM OUR PLANET.ART OF                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                            THE LISBON TREATY HAS BEEN RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY IS BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! -  AS ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO A TRAITOROUS SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!
UNITY OF ENGLISH PARTIES?                MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!                Click Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the 1999 European Elections.               Click Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!
 
     
 

 

 
 

 

 
     
     IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!  -LATEST! - NOVEMBER 11 IS A DAY TO REMEMBER OF THE SACRIFICE OF OVER 2,000,000 servicemen and women who gave their lives in DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY in TWO WORLD WARS and the countless INJURED many bearing the SCARS and TRAUMA for the REST OF THEIR LIVES - IT HAS BEEN CONSTANTLY STATED that the EU would PREVENT WAR in EUROPE but the REALITY is DIFFERENT as it was NATO which kept THE PEACE until GERMANY went to aid her SECOND WORLD WAR ALLY CROATIA and the BULKANS exploded with ALBANIA and SERBIA at each others throats as old scores were being settled.  + OVER THE PAST CENTURY  OVER 150,000,000 PEOPLE HAVE DIED THE GREATER MAJORITY IN RUSSIA IN THE GULAGS It is stated that whereas the FASCISTS MURDERED at least 50,000,000 the COMMUNISTS MURDERED at least 100,000,000.  +In the DAILY MAIL on this UNFORGETTABLE DAY  we see an article 'THE END OF BRITAIN AS A NATION STATE?  NOT ON YOUR LIFE - MR RUMPY PUMPY. and we show the the following extract :- 'History teaches us that nation states  have always been the best guarantors of LIBERTTY-DEMOCRACY-PROSPERITY and THE RULE OF LAW.    ONLY STRONG NATION STATES HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LIBERTIES AGAINST SUCH AS NAPOLEON - HITLER OR STALIN - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1328568/Nation-states-dead-EU-chief-says-belief-countries-stand-lie.html

+[PREVIOUS STATEMENT]
   -WE NOW HAVE TO ALERT YOU! TO WATCH ALEX JONES OF PRISON PLANET.COM - -THE FREEDOM LOBBY IN THE USA. - WE HAVE ONLY IN THE PAST WEEK IN JULY 2010 COME ACROSS ANOTHER FEARLESS FREEDOM FIGHTER IN THE USA AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BORN A JEW BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER WHO MORE THAN MOST IS WELL AWARE OF THE THREAT FROM THE WORLD ZIONIST CONSPIRACY AS HIS MANY ARTICLES ON HIS WEBSITEa href="http://www.realzionist">http://www.realzionistnews.com

"REAL ZIONIST NEWS" CAN TESTIFY.- IT COULD SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -YOUR LIVELIHOOD AND EVEN YOUR LIFE! - JUST FOR ONCE MAKE TIME TO SEE POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO THAT YOU WILL EVER WATCH IN YOUR LIFE! - THE ISSUES ARE MOMENTOUS AND AFFECT EVERY ONE ON OUR PLANET. - MUCH YOU WILL LEARN WILL ASTOUND YOU AND SURPRISE YOU WHEN YOU HEAR HOW THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS WHO HAVE BEEN PLANNING THEIR FINANCIAL COUP FOR OVER TWO CENTURIES AND A HALF TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD WITH AN ELITE! OLIGARTHY IN A WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE WORLD'S WEALTHIEST ABD MOST POWERFUL AND LATER TO DISPOSE OF AT LEAST 85% OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION. - THESE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ARE PRAYING TO SATAN TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM YOU! - TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - IN FACT YOU HAVE JUST TWO YEARS TO RALLY YOUR NEIGHBOURS TO THE TRUTH AS AN INSIDER HAS STATED THAT THE ELITE HAVE THEIR OWN ETHICS WHICH IS TO USE THEIR HOLLYWOOD EMPIRE TO PUT OUT WAR FILMS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOWING HOW THEY INTEND THEIR PURPOSE -  SO YOU HAVE THAT LONG! TO SAVE YOURSELF! - YOUR FAMILY! -YOUR FRIENDS! AND ALL FELLOW BEINGS ON OUR PLANET FROM THE SATANIC OLIGARTHY WHO WISH TO RULE THE WORLD THEIR WAY!- THE VIDEO WILL DETAIL IN ITS 2 HOUR VIDEO PRESENTATION 'THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC'. - IF YOU TURN YOUR FACE AWAY NOW!.-.YOU WILL SUFFER FOR IT!.- WE ARE CONVINCED THAT MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT IS HAPPENNING TO THEIR COUNTRY - NATURALLY THEY ARE LOOKING TO SURVIVE IN ONE OF THE WORST RECESSIONS IN LIVING MEMORY OR HISTORY WNICH HAS BEEN ENGINEERED BY THE ILLUMINATI WHICH INCLUDES THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE - THE MAIN MONEY LENDERS IN THE WORLD SINCE THEIR 18TH CENTURY AND LATER INTRIGUES IN BAVARIA IN THE 19TH CENTURY AND HAVE SUPPORTED BOTH SIDES OF MAJOR WARS AND NO DOUBT SMALLER WARS IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR WEALTH AND POWER.- THEIR MAJOR TRIUMPH WAS TO GET THE UNITED NATIONS OFF THE GROUND AFTER WORLD WAR II BY ROCKEFELLER WHO OWNED THE LAND WHICH HE OFFERED IN ORDER THAT THE UN BUILDING COULD BE BUILT IN NEW YORK - SINCE THEN ALL UN ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN PART OF THE ILLUMINATI INCLUDING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION WHICH ENGINNERED A PANDEMIC WHEN THE PREVIOUS CRITERA HAD NOT BEEN REACHED AND WORLD MONETARY FUND AND THE ELITE WHICH IS MADE UP OF OVER 6000 OF THE RICHEST AND MOST POWERFUL IN THE WORLD WHO TO ASSIST THEM HAVE THEIR SERVANTS IN POLITICS - ACADEMICS -PRESS AND MEDIA AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE  - THE BILDERBERGERS IN ALL YOUR MAIN POLITIOCAL PARTIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING - SUCH AS GORDON BROWN - ED BALLS - PETER MANDELSON - DAVID MILIBAND AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED NEW LABOUR AND IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY -  KENNETH CLARKE - GEORGE OSBORNE - WILLIAM HAGUE -http://www.bilderberg.org/Bilderberg2009. WILLIAM HAGUE - DOUGLAS HURD - AND OTHERS IN THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND NOT FORGETTING THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WITH PADDY ASHDOWN AND OTHERS WHO BY THEIR COMPLICITY INTEND BY VARIOUS MEANS - WAR - TOXIC VACCINES [MERCURY}- POVERTY (DESTRUCTION OF INDUSTRY -CAP AND TRADE) - POLLUTED WATER SUPPLIES- {FLUORIDE A POISON AND OTHER POLLUTANTS - TOXIC AIR SPRAYING AND DETENTION AS IN AMERICA WHERE THERE ARE NOW DETENTION CENTRES OR TO BE MORE PRECISE CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN MANY STATES ACROSS AMERICA IT IS OBVIOUS THE MAN IN THE STREET IS UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE DISASTER AWAITING THEM!  - IN OUR SMALL WAY WE AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN FIGHTING FOR MANY YEARS AS ALEX JONES -PRISON PLANET.COM AND INFOWARS>COM AND MANY OTHER BRAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHEN THEY DISAPEAR FROM SIGHT - YOU WILL TRULY DOOMED TO SLAVERY OR DEATH.- IN OUR OWN ONE MAN CAMPAIGN 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' WE HAVE WITNESSED THE TOTAL IGORANCE OF THE PUBLIC TO WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THEM!  - AT LEAST WE WILL KNOW WHY! - BUT MILLIONS WILL BE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER AS SHEEPLE AND IT WILL ONLY DAWN ON SOME THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAKEN NOTICE WHEN THEY COULD AND MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE FREE PEOPLE'S OF OUR WORLD! WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED BY OUR PARLIAMENT AND MONARCH - YOU ARE ONLY MONTH'S AWAY FROM LOSING YOUR ANCIENT FREEDOMS - YOUR UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY OF OVER 1500 YEARS IN THE MAKING! - UNLESS YOU STIR YOURSELVES!          WE WARNED YOU PRIOR TO THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2010 THAT IT COULD BE THE LAST! - AS LISBON TREATY SAYS SO! - AS REGIONS/PROVINCES WILL BE THE ORDER OF THE DAY - BUT WE NOW KNOW THAT DAVID CAMERERON HAS STOOD DOWN THE REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE WOULD NOT GET AWAY PROCEEDING WITH THEM AFTER HIS STANCE ABOUT NO MORE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY TO BRUSSELS-WELL!-NOT YET! AS WE STATED WHETHER YOU VOTED NEW LABOUR - CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS YOU HAVE AGREED TO LOSE YOUR INHERITED SACRED 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN' - WHICH SHOULD BE PASSED ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS -  BECAUSE THEY WOULD RATHER 'SELLETH HIS BIRTHRIGHT FOR A MESS OF POTTAGE' WE NOW HEAR THAT THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY MACHINE IS BAFFLED AS TO WHY IT DID NOT DO BETTER AT THE POLLS.- BECAUSE THEY BETRAYED THOSE EUROSCEPTICS WHO HAD BELIEVED THEM OVER 38 YEARS THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THE EU BUT APART FROM BRUSSELS GIVING GROUND ON CERTAIN MATTERS AND ONLY FOR AS LONG AS THEY FIND IT NECESSARY - THE CLOSER UNION WILL STILL GO AHEAD AS PLANNED.- AS WE HAVE STATED ELSEWHERE IT IS ALL ABOUT GRADUALISM . THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO REALISE THAT EVERY SO-CALLED COMPROMISE WORKS TO THE BENEFIT OF BRUSSELS -THE EVIDENCE WAS CLEAR ON THE 1 JANUARY 2010 WHEN ENGLAND NO LONGER EXISTED AS A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE BUT REGIONS SHARED BY OTHER EUROPEAN REGIONS.  ONLY GERMANY HAS ESCAPED SUCH INIHILATION AND IRONICALLY IT WILL BE GERMANY WHICH MIGHT WITH THE COLLAPSE OF THE EURO AND THE IMERGENCE OF GERMAN IDENTITY AT HOME THAT MIGHT BRING BACK THE FREE INDEPENDENDEBNT NATION STATES WORKING TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY-  BUT BEFORE THIS CAN TAKE PLACE THERE IS A HERCULEAN TASK BEFORE US TO REGAIN FROM THE ZIONIST BANKSTERS THE CONTROL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE WITHOUT DOING SO FREEDOM AND EVEN THE LIVES OF MOST OF MANKIND WILL DISAPEAR FOR EVER FROM OUR PLANET.ART OF                           MAIN ISSUES BULLETIN-UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                           EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                            THE LISBON TREATY HAS BEEN RATIFIED BY ALL!     YOUR PENALTY IS BE SLAVERY! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU! -  AS ON DECEMBER 1-2009 THE TREATY CAME INTO BEING AND ENGLAND DISAPPEARED FROM HISTORY AND EVEN FROM THE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE AND LOST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL IN THE BAD BARGAIN! - THANKS TO A TRAITOROUS SCOTSMAN GORDON BROWN WHO WITH HIS TARTAN CLAN HAS CERTAINLY TAKEN REVENGE FOR PAST TIMES!               Click           Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the           1999 European Elections.               Click           Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                 LINKS FROM BULLETIN FILE TO OTHER FILES!    nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ONLY MILLIONS ON THE STREETS CAN NOW SAVE US NOW! - BUT THERE IS NO LEADER OF FREEDOM TO COMPARE WITH OUR GREAT WAR LEADER WINSTON CHURCHILL - TO RALLY THE PEOPLE! - AND THAT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!     OVER 1'600 BULLETIN'S! AVAILABLE HERE!
UNITY OF ENGLISH PARTIES?                MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN UPDATED!   CLICK HERE!                EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION?                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!                Click Here to see how we performed in the 1997 General Election & the 1999 European Elections.               Click Here to find out about the registration of our party name.                MAJOR ISSUES!     THIS CONCERNS YOU!
 
     
 
 
 
 
 

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to

 Edward Heath,

prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the “Treaty of Rome”

 

My dear Ted,

 

You wrote to me on 30th November, [1970] - about the constitutional implications of our [The UK] becoming a party to the “Treaty of Rome”. I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me I agree with you that there are IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVED.

 

I have no doubt that if we do sign the TREATY, we shall suffer some LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.

 

 At the end of the day, the ISSUE is

Whether or NOT to join the [So-called]

 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

 

- must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in

this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious that does mean that I consider them conclusive [final!]

 

I do however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly WHAT, from the CONSTITUTIONAL point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised.

 

Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would in my opinion, would AFFECT our SOVEREIGNTY in three ways:-

 

PARLIAMENT would be required to surrender some of its functions to the ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

The CROWN would be called ON to TRANSFER part of its TREATY-MAKING power to those ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

OUR COURTS OF LAW would sacrifice some degree of INDEPENDENCE by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

The POSITION of PARLIAMENT.

 

It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal advisers that the Council of Ministers could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and would in fact become for us part of the LAW of the LAND.

 

THERE ARE TWO WAYS IN WHICH THIS REQUIREMENT OF THE TREATY COULD IN PRACTICE BE IMPLEMENTED.

 

Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council make regulations requiring action by us. The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither bind itself nor its successors, we could only comply with the obligations under the TREATY if PARLIAMENT abandoned its RIGHT of passing independent judgment on the legislative proposals put before it.

 

A parallel is the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION whereby PARLIAMENT passes the British North American Bills without question at the request of the PARLIAMENT of CANADA; in this respect PARLIAMENT here has substance if not in form, abdicated its SOVEREIGN position, and it would have pro tanto [for so much] , to do the same for the [EUROPEAN] COMMUNITY.

 

 It would in theory be possible for parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future [EU] regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.  For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of -----

I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons. Which ever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts [Of the EU Treaty] but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the [EU] Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the Statute of Westminster. 

 

In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the [EU] Council, or other appropriate organ of the [EU] Community, its substantive powers of legislating over a whole of a very important field.

 

Treaty –Making POWERS.

 

The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly TRUE.  Some treaties such as GATT and O.E.E.C restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereign that, by signing the TREATY of ROME, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.

 

BUT to transfer to the Council or the [EU] Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf, and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.

 

There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.

 

To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully FEDERAL STATE.

 

I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.  Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved as you know, although the treaty-making power is vested in the CROWN.

 

 

Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.

 

Independence of the Courts.

 

There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another Court and as I assume to be the implication of “refer” to accept that Court’s decision.

 

You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the INDEPENDENCE and AUTHORITY of OUR COURTS.

 

 

Of these three objections, the first two are by far the more important.  I must emphasise that in my view the SURRENDERS of SOVEREIGNTY involved are SERIOUS ONES, and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade PARLIAMENT or the PUBLIC to accept them.

 [Details at foot of page of information released from the Public Record Office at Kew under the 30 year rule revealing the LIES and DECEIT used by the Foreign Office to trick the people in 1972 and yet again in 1975. ]

I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.  But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the [EU] Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.  Having said this, I would emphasis once again that, although these CONSTITUTIONAL considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.  In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make

SACRIFICES of SOVEREIGNTY:

My concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.

 

Yours ever,      David.

 

*          *

 

[There are many hundreds of essays on the subject of constitutional  matters on our bulletin board which give the background to the CONSPIRACY of the pro-European lobby at the time and since who felt no compunction in telling LIES-LIES and more LIES.  Some of those politicians who concealed and the TRUTH and fostered the DECEIT are still with us today in 2006. –Though some have now realised how wrong they were to turn a blind eye to the blatant half-truths and downright lies in order to get the Bill through Parliament by only 8 votes. – to remind you again that many more details by INDEPENDENT sources on our bulletin board].

 

*          *          *

 

 [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.]

SEPTEMBER/06

*

H.F.766
 
 
TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
 
By
 
NORRIS McWHIRTER

A patriot and truth seeker.

 

HE ARGUED THAT:
 
By its nature, the duty of allegiance is in law "unalienable and perpetual". This language, from Foster`s Crown Cases (1743-1761), was quoted with approval at the trial of Sir Roger Casement in 1917. Casement had been arrested near Tralee, County Kerry, in1916, having been landed from a German U-boat to foment Irish defection. Allegiance was similarly defined at the capital trial of the supercilious Nazi wartime broadcaster, William ' Lord Haw-Haw' Joyce (1906-1946)
 
For the purposes of allegiance, foreign states are deemed either to be "in actual hostility", as in the case of Argentina in 1982,or "in amity", as in the case at present of the other European Union states. However, the condition of hostility or amity in no way disposes of the essential exclusiveness of perpetual and unalienable allegiance. No man can serve two sovereigns. When, therefore the late Sir John Fiennes (1911-1996) cunningly drafted the European Communities Bill, in 1972, and when on 17 October 1972, his unamended Bill became an Act subordinating British law to European law, there was wrought nothing less than the greatest constitutional revolution in Parliament's seven and a half centuries of existence. It was furthermore done without even a schedule of consequential repeals.
 
The politicians of the day, many of them unwittingly, voted to launch the nation on a path of "ever closer[ European] union" which could only lead to the United Kingdom becoming a subordinate offshore province of the United States of Europe. Those who engineered Britain's adherence to the
 
Treaties of Rome and of Maastricht, probably never even had Section 3 of thee Treason Felony Act 1848 drawn to their attention. In it , condemnation is incurred:
"If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise or intend to deprive or dispose our most gracious Lady the Queen. . . from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom. . ."
 
Indicted and convicted offenders against this unrepealed law are subject to imprisonment "for the term of his or her natural life". Yet not a finger was lifted even when, on 7 February 1992, two Privy Counsellors, Douglas Hurd and Francis Maude, signed the Maastricht Treaty which , at a stroke, brought our Monarch under suzerainty of the European Union.
 
The Queen was thereby rendered subject to past and future judgments of the Court of the European Communities in Luxembourg, from which there is no appeal and which was thereby confirmed in authority over her Courts in which she was previously arraignable.
 
Article 8 of the Treaty of Maastricht which imposed all-embracing compulsory European citizenship on the Queen and all her United Kingdom subjects, without their express consent, did so " subject to the duties imposed thereby". These duties are undefined and are thus both unknown and unknowable. One of them is however perhaps discernable since the Maastricht Treaty left unamended Article 192 of the Treaty of Rome. This reads:
 
"Decisions of the Council or of the Commission which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than states shall be enforceable."
 
Since "pecuniary obligations" clearly includes taxation, and "perhaps other than states" must include the new recipients of compulsory European citizenship, we have here the legal authorization of a reserve power to levy new taxation from Brussels on each and every citizen of the 15 EU countries.
 
Of al the magical and mysterious processes involved in Britain's political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by Heath from 31 July 1961 to17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes - Magna Carta of Edward 1, the Petition of Right(1627), the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and the Act of Settlement (1700). Perhaps Sir John Fiennes relied upon the doctrine of implied repeal, but certainly the electorate would have regarded express repeal as offending against the principle that nothing but their own demerit can deprive natural born subjects of their peculiar privileges, called their birthright, as enshrined in these hitherto durable constitutional bulwarks.
 
In Vauxhall Estates v. Liverpool Corporation 1932, it was established in law that "no Parliament may bind its successors" However, Article Q of the timeless Maastricht Treaty said that the Treaty "is concluded for an unlimited period" and it conveyed no right or mechanism for secession. It is nonetheless arguable that what one Parliament has done , that same or some succeeding Parliament can undo. In Blackburn v.Attorney General 1983, Lord Justice Megarry, in his judgment declared:
 
"As a matter of law, the Courts of England recognize Parliament as being omnipotent in all save the power to destroy its omnipotence."
 
From the European Court of Luxembourg in 1972, the very year in which Parliament, at least temporarily, voted away its sovereignty in such large measure, came an unappealable judgment on the Treaty of Rome:
 
"The treaty entails a definitive limitation of the sovereign rights of member states against which no provisions of municipal law whatever their nature can be involved."
 
It was in reference to this Court that Sir Patrick Neill QC, former Warden of All Soul`s College, Oxford, coined the maxim; " A court with a mission is a menace; a supreme Court with a mission is a tyranny." The phrase was incorporated into the recent Euro-sceptic speech by the Home Secretary. (1996)
 
Those who see the erosion of British self -government (in defence of the 1,250,000 Britons died in the first half of this century) as emanating from the single Oxford college of Balliol, will be dubbed ' conspiracy theorists'. But the precise legal definition of a conspiracy is that it is an agreement between two or more people, unrelated in marriage, to behave in a manner that will automatically constitute an offence by at least one of them, though mens rea (guilty mind) is required by at least two co-conspirators. There is nothing theoretical about the way in which the Privy Counsellor's oath, which enjoined two Balliol educated Prime Ministers, Macmillan and Heath. And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels (Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, also a Balliol man!):
 
"To bear faith bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign . . . persons . . . or states."
 
has been breached by these men.
 
What is further demoralizing is that no less than six subsequent Privy Counsellor's, following the precedent of Lord Jenkins in 1975, have each made a solemn declaration before the Luxembourg Court as European Commissioners:
 
"To perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the communities; in carrying out my duties".
 
This conflict of solemn undertaking can only mildly be described as duplicitous.
 
Unconstitutionality in the headlong dash to create the new European Super state is hardly confined to Britain. The Dutch draftsmen of the Maastricht Treaty included a stipulation in Article R that each and every country must ratify it "according to its own constitution requirements". Having got it ` wrong' the first time, Denmark's second referendum raised several studiously unanswered constitutional questions . No case was , however, more stark than the case of Germany herself. She has a unique Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, with nine judges sitting in Karksruhe to guard their Constitution.
The creation of the European Union and Britain's continued self-governance was dependent on the verdict of this Court for , on 11 October 1993 , Germany's instrument of ratification was still undeposited in Rome. Without this twelfth and last document (the other 11 EU countries having ratified the Maastricht Treaty) the EU could not come into being. It transpired however that the terms approved by this supreme German national Court to permit ratification, were miles wide of the terms of the Treaty already signed by the German Government and the eleven other nations.
For instance, the Court declared:
 
"Article F does not empower the (European) Union to procure the financial means or other means it deems necessary to fulfill its purposes."
 
Yet that is precisely what Article F does say in the following words:
 
" The Union shall provide itself with the resources necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies."

 
Following a question in the House of Lords, Baroness Chalker, Minister of State in the Foreign Office, confirmed that indeed the European Union "can obtain financial resources to attain the Union's objectives."
 
In another area the Karksruhe Court calmly took for Germany an negotiated opt-out from the European Monetary Union (EMU) - something for which both Denmark and the United Kingdom had to negotiate by special protocol prior to signing. Both the Governors of the Bank of England and the Danish Central Bank have confirmed that there was and is no opt-out provision for Germany in the Treaty. The fact that the terms and conditions of the Maastricht Treaty, as approved by their Constitutional Court, simply do not exist. Hence Germany's rapid ratification was in clear breach of Article R of the Treaty itself. Since its ratification was invalid, the Maastricht Treaty itself has no proper legal standing.
 
Though earlier this year (1996) our Foreign Office made a legal assessment of the Treaty, it has not publicly disclosed the obvious and only conclusion. Perhaps we are waiting either until the going gets rougher or some wealthily corporation litigates to prove that some swingeing Brussels penalty is in fact unenforceable.
 
No sovereign state can survive without the concepts of allegiance and of breaches of allegiance being treasonable.
 
Can a European Super state survive without such internal defences? The answer must assuredly be that where solidarity is more, rather than less, fragile and tenuous, the as yet unfamiliar concept of Euro-treason will eventually be vigorously advanced. There does not appear to be any ready instrument for enforcement at the moment (1996) it is not however hard to predict that the draconian powers of the Luxembourg Court will soon bring the concept of Euro-treason into focus. We are told that the Europol is intended for apprehending cross-border criminals within the Union. But the beef crisis, the United Kingdom was about to acquiesce in its creation. Perhaps a fortuitous blow for freedom has been struck and magazine articles such as this will be safe from a Europol for a little longer.
Bully for beef!
 

 
From The Freedom Association
www.tfa.net
 *  *  *

 

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

 

H.F.730

IN OTHER WORDS THE SCIENCE OF GRADUALISATION-A STEP BY STEP TRANSFER OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OF ENGLAND'S

 MAGNA CARTA! AND PETITION OF RIGHT!

IN ORDER TO HIDE THE HEINESS BETRAYAL

OF THE PEOPLE

BY

QUEEN

-LORDS  AND COMMONS.

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

 

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence.

 

The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 

 

 

 

OLD HOME

Est. 1994-Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links -

IMMIGRATION

 Archive-Top Topics and Stats

     

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

FREEDOM CORNER

WORLD AFFAIRS

     

TREASON!

Part 1-Preface

 

Part 2-The Strange Case Of Werner Report

 

Part 3-Mr Macmillan and 1961

 

Part 4-Mr Heath and 1970

 

 NEWFEBPART 1-2-3-(Previous Month)NEWFEBPART 4-5-6 

 NEWJANPART 1-2-3-(PREVIOUS MONTH)NEWJANPART 4-5-6 

 

VOTE LEAVE

FOR

 FREEDOM

 WITH A

FIRM FUTURE FOR

 ENGLAND

 

 THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

 

 

 

TOP OF PAGE