Thus, from about 1895 until some
time, as from case to case,
between 1940 and 1941, the
British Empire had been the
chief authority behind the
intention to engage Germany and
the Soviet Union in a war of
mutual destruction, while,
during the same general lapse of
time, the Anglo-French and
related interests, such as
fascist Italy, sat out the
process of the mutual
destruction of the nations of
Central Europe. Japan was
nominally still an ally of Nazi
Germany and of the British at
that time, until the Wehrmacht
breached the “western line,” and
had overrun continental Europe
west of the Soviet border. This
British scheme known as “World
War I,” was made feasible
through, chiefly, the
assassination of U.S. President
William McKinley, thus bringing
to power the Vice-President
Theodore Roosevelt foisted upon
McKinley by the London-steered
Wall Street gang within the
Republican Party, all in much
that same fashion in which Wall
Street stooge Harry S Truman had
been foisted upon President
Franklin Roosevelt as his
Vice-President-elect of 1944.
Then, when France had fallen,
and the United States was
brought to the rescue of
Britain, Japan broke its
continued alliance with Britain,
that done in order to carry
forward Japan’s intention to
destroy both the United States
and the Anglo-Dutch empire in
Asia. This was done according to
Japan’s perceived greater
interest in the destruction of
the United States which had been
the joint intention of both the
British empire and Japan since
the earlier 1920s plan, by,
originally, both the British and
Japan, for the Japan attack on
Pearl Harbor.See
Japan’s conduct in actually
launching the long-prepared
attack on Pearl Harbor, acting
thus as a former British ally
against the United States, as
also against China and Russia,
was not that Japan wished that
war to occur under the
conditions of that immediate
time, but that the launching of
the attack on Pearl Harbor
without support from what had
been its anti-U.S.A. British
ally, was considered, as the
debates within Japan on that
actual attack showed, as being
virtually a possibly suicidal
act of desperation by the
calculations of Japan itself,
for reason of that specific set
of global circumstances. For, if
the U.S. were to succeed in
rescuing Britain from the Nazis,
the success of the U.S.A. would
put an end to Japan’s imperial
intentions since its 1890s
agreement with the British
Prince of Wales. Japan caught
between the great powers
respectively represented by the
English-speaking rivals, the
British Empire and the U.S.A.,
was thus placed in the position
that when it actually launched
the attack against Pearl Harbor,
Japan already knew full well,
that it had thus launched a war
against the U.S.A. which Japan’s
relevant leaders regarded as an
act of strategic desperation.
Such is the prevalent, if not
entirely infallible nature of
the shifting strategic arrays of
a world dominated by a set of
virtually kaleidoscopic effects
of British imperial strategy
since the Seven Years War and
that 1763 Peace of Paris which
established the British East
India Company as an imperial
power.
It is relevant, that Franklin
Roosevelt had a specific
strategic purpose for the United
States under the circumstances
of World War II and its
conclusion. Stalin’s intention
toward a United States under a
Presidency like that of
President Franklin Roosevelt,
was also clear and sincerely so.
It was only the deaths of,
first, Franklin Roosevelt, and,
later, Josef Stalin, that
allowed the conflict between
British puppet-President Harry S
Truman and a Soviet Union under
Josef Stalin to proceed toward a
threatened thermonuclear
conflict. The cases of the
policies of Dwight Eisenhower,
Douglas MacArthur, and “Wild
Bill” Donovan remained, that for
as long as they and their
co-thinkers lived as influential
representatives of the true
patriots of our United States,
they remained a powerful
influence in U.S. policy. This
continued until the effects of
British imperial success in
ruining the U.S.A. itself
through a decade of lunatic
warfare in Indo-China.
The continuing British imperial
interest through all of these
developments since the “Seven
Years War,” to the present day,
has been the included, and
featured intention of that new
Venetian interest of the
Venetian Party faction of Sarpi
et al., which has been the chief
agency behind the efforts to
prevent, and later to destroy
what would become the “unique
model” of our constitutional
United States. This British
intention has continued, with
the qualification that the
British empire itself must not
be destroyed by the risk for
Britain in making such
treacherous adjustments in its
current, temporary rosters of
“friend and foe.”
Presently, the successive U.S.
Presidencies of George W. Bush,
Jr. and Barack Obama, have
combined effects aimed at the
destruction of the United States
(on behalf of the British
Empire), but, this time, the
British Empire would not outlive
its efforts to destroy our
United States. History’s
patience with continued
existence of the British Empire
is now worn out.