- (1994 -Official Website - FOREIGN AID FILE-APRIL-2018-)-

FOREIGN AID FILE

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE       IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS
 
 

 

 

 
 
AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

 

*

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

IN MARCH 2018 WE HEAR THAT   ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IS GOING TO SELL OUT OUR FISHING RIGHTS AND  ISLAND FISHING FIELDS.

 THERE MUST BE NO SURRENDER OF ENGLISH

AND OTHER  ISLAND NATIONS SOVEREIGNTY OF THEIR HISTORIC WATERS.

This has been brought about because as we  suspected  to expect a

 REMAIN Prime Minister

 to put her country FIRST! was a an impossible dream.

ENGLAND IS NOT ENGLAND WITHOUT HER HISTORIC WATERS.

 

 

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962,

Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 

    Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said - Google Books Result
     

    Britain's attitude, Churchill explained, resembles that which we adopt about the
    European Army. We help, we dedicate, we play a part, but we are not merged
    with and do not forfeit our     insular or commonwealth character. Our first object is
    the unity and consolidation of the British Commonwealth. Our second, “the
    fraternal ...

 

Elizabeth reviewed her troops at Tilbury.

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History]

In June 2008

 Her Majesty The  Queen

[Each word has a separate bulletin]

rather than say

'NO'

or threaten to abdicate if asked to sign the

LISBON TREATY

without

HER PEOPLE

being given a

REFERENDUM -AS PROMISED

has

BETRAYED HER PEOPLE.

We await the decision of the

LAW LORDS

the Lions under the Throne

of

ENGLAND

[Each word has a separate bulletin]

To protect the accustomed

"Rights and Liberties"

of the

ENGLISH PEOPLE

as stated in our Great Charter

MAGNA  CARTA  

  of 1215

 

And the rallying call of the English people at times of peril from unaccustomed demands from their representatives in

PARLIAMENT

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

 

The Spirit of England - Churchill in London -

St George’s Day-1953.

*

An excerpt from Sir Winston Churchill’s broadcast speech to the Honourable Artillery Company, given in London 40 years ago-

on St. George’s Day,

*

THIS ENGLAND

Publication -Spring-1993.

 

 

‘It is twenty years since I had to speak on the toast of

 

ENGLAND

 

And

on

St. George’s Day.

 

Twenty years - it’s a long time and a lot has happened, but in those bygone days I did try to see what would have happened if St. George had lived twenty years ago, and really it does apply very much to what might happen if he lived today.

 

I said St. George would arrive in Cappadocia accompanied not by a horse but by Secretary of State. He would be armed not with a lance but with several flexible formulas.

 

He would, of course, be welcomed by the local branch of the League of Nations Union - or I ought to alter that to be correct and say the United Nations Union.

 

He would propose a conference with the dragon - a Round Table Conference - no doubt it would be so much more convenient for the dragon’s tail.

 

He would make a Trade Agreement with the Dragon. He would loan the dragon a lot of money. The maiden’s release would be referred to Geneva (it would now be to New York), the dragon observing all his rights meanwhile. Finally, the dragon would be photographed with St, George.

 

Now, I do not think there’s anything very wrong with this passage although twenty years have passed, but there are a few things I would like to mention about

 

ENGLAND

 

I’m not boasting but I would like to say that here no one questions the fairness of our

 

Courts of Law and Justice.

We have our own way of life that is so. Here no one thinks of persecuting a man on account of his religion or his race.

 

Here everyone, except the criminals, looks on the policeman as the friend and servant of the public.

 

Here we provide for poverty and misfortune with more compassion, in spite of all our burdens, than any other country.

Here we assert the rights of the citizen against the

 

STATE

 

-       criticize the

-        

-    GOVERNMENT of the DAY

 

-without failing in our duty to the

 

Crown

 

- or our LOYALTY to the

 

QUEEN.

 

If I’m not detaining you too long there are two points I would like to make.

 

One is our weakness.

 

Our weakness is that there are always a certain number of English people who wake up every morning -very brainy they are -they wake up and they look all round the fields and they think

 

‘NOW WHAT IS THERE THAT BELONGS TO OUR COUNTRY THAT WE CAN GIVE AWAY?’

 

[Reminds us of Tony Blair and his cronies and adherents around the country in local government and the business community in 2006. and the indecent haste of Gordon Brown to ratify the Lisbon Treaty in June 2008 in order to prove to the German/Franco bloc that he is a good european.]

or

 ‘WHAT IS THERE WE CAN FIND THAT HAS MADE OUR COUNTRY GREAT THAT WE CAN PULL DOWN?’

 

[Ditto -above -of course!]

 

Well, that is the question they ask themselves and THAT IS OUR WEAKNESS - they are very brainy and they have done us a great deal of harm.

 

[Ditto- as above - of course!]

 

On the other hand,

 

ENGLAND

 

-has a quality which no-one should overlook.

 

ENGLAND

 

-like Nature, never draws a line without smudging it.

 

We lack the sharp logic of some other countries whom in other ways we greatly admire - in our climate, the atmosphere is veiled, there are none of these sharp presentations, an although we have our differences they do not divide us as they do in nearly all the other countries of the WORLD.

 

There is a great underlying spirit of neighbourliness and there is without doubt a strong sense of

 

NATIONAL UNITY and LIFE

 

-       Which, though it doesn’t help us in the small matters with which we have to deal from day to day, may well be our Salvation in our troubles.

 

‘NOTHING CAN SAVE ENGLAND IF SHE WILL NOT SAVE HERSELF’

 

[That means each one of YOU in 2006 and in June 2008]

 

If we lose

FAITH in OURSELVES,

in our

 capacity to guide and govern,

if we lose

our will to live,

then indeed

our story is told.

 

If, while on all sides foreign nations are every day asserting a more aggressive and militant nationalism by arms and trade - if we remain paralysed by our own theoretical doctrines or plunged in the stupor of after-war exhaustion, all that the croakers predict will come true and

 

OUR RUIN WILL BE CERTAIN AND FINAL.

 

But why should we break up the solid structure of British power founded upon so much, kindliness, and FREEDOM?

 

Why should we break it up for dreams which may some day come true but now are only dreams, or it may be nightmares?

 

We ought as a nation and Empire -you won’t mind my mentioning that WORD? I didn’t get shouted down when I said it twenty years ago tonight -Empire, we might, we ought, to weather any storm that blows at least as well as any other existing system of human government.

 

We are at once more experienced and more truly united than any other people in the world.

 

It may well be, I say, that the most glorious chapters of our history are yet to be written. Indeed, the very problems and dangers that encompass us in our country ought to make English man and women of this generation glad to be here at such a time.

 

We ought to rejoice at the responsibilities with which destiny has honoured us and be proud that we the guardians of our country in an age when her life is a stake.

 

I have lived, since then, to see

 

OUR COUNTRY

 

-accomplish, achieve her

 

FINEST HOUR

 

-and I have no doubt that if the

 

SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

-continues, there is no reason at all why twenty years hence someone may not stand at the table of this ancient company and speak in the sense of pride and hope in which I have ventured to address you tonight.

 

* * *

 

[Sadly -the twenty years later in 1972 with the connivance of the many members of

YOUR PARLIAMENT

of ALL parties and many in the business community the 1972 Act of Accession to the EU -then falsely described as the EEC -European Economic Community came into being.

 

There are still politicians alive today in 2006 who betrayed their country and a distinguished few including Tony Benn who tried to get the people to see through the LIES and DECEIT which led eventually in 2005 to the almost absorption of ENGLAND and her sister nation-states into the

 

Despotic and Totalitarian Police State

 

calling itself

 

The United States of Europe.

 

It was the French and Dutch voters who saved ENGLAND in 2005 as our Prime Minister signed twenty fives times the Treaty in Rome which called for the Slavery of a People who had failed to remember the words of their greatest Prime Minister

Winston Churchill in 1953]

 

‘Nothing can save England if she WILL NOT save herself’.

 

* * *

 

THE TRUTH IN VERSE

 

of

 

Strasbourg and Brussels

(With apologies to Sweet Molly Malone)

by

 

John Culerwell

 

 

‘In Brussels’ fair city where the EU sits so pretty,

 

I first set my eyes on the European clone.

 

And she wielded some powers that used to be ours

 

Til we tossed them away with the Treaty of Rome.

 

She is a great sponger and sure to no wonder,

 

Her colleagues are all just the same.

 

They all wield those powers that used to be ours

 

Before we got timid and tame.

 

It’s hard to describe them without being rude,

 

Red tape is the product they freely extrude,

 

By the edicts they issue fair trade is afflicted

 

And poor nations’ prospects severely restricted.

 

On the fat of the land lives the Eurocrat Band

 

And the Gravy train runs at full steam.

 

Not for them the poor food of an African’s bread.

 

The Clones live on the honey and cream.

They can only be sacked for blowing the gaff

 

And telling the world the accounts are

naff.

 

But they regulate this then subsidise that

 

The handouts they hand out are financed by VAT.

 

Where Hitler has failed, the Clones have prevailed

 

With the help of our legislators

 

By these deeds of disgrace our MPs have lost face

 

And can only be thought of as TRAITORS

They seek to enslave us (ONLY UKIP CAN SAVE US)

 

It’s all a set part of the Eurocrats aim.

 

They are parasites ALL and they’ve got us in thrall

 

And don’t know the meaning of SHAME.

 

The Clones, we abhor them, we didn’t vote for them

 

If they think they are wanted the answer is NO!

 

But due to their muscles in Strasbourg and BRUSSELS

 

They thrive, they thrive-O.

 

*

obtained from:

 

Eurofacts

April 7-2006-04-07

Vol 11 No 13.

 

08456 120 175

info@junepress.com

 

*

 

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 

[FRIDAY, APRIL 7, 2006]

 

*

 

WHY Brussels won’t take NO for an answer

 

IN the very week that reveals more evidence of the cynicism and persistent illegality at the [ROTTEN] heart of the EU, Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson - who should concentrate on promoting FREE TRADE in a scandalously protectionist EU - pushes for a NEW CONSTITUTION that would hand BRUSSELS more power.

 

You thought Europe’s INPERIAL ambitions were DEAD?

 

THINK AGAIN.

 

Ever since French and Dutch voters threw out the CONSTITUTION, Eurocrats have been busily introducing key elements of the DOCUMENT by the BACK DOOR.

 

A European Public Prosecutor…

 

a DEFENCE AGENCY…

 

a CHARTER of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS…

 

a FOREIGN MINISTER…

 

all these and MORE ate being foisted on us anyway.

 

DEMOCRACY?

 

WHO CARES?

 

 

NOW Mr Mandelson [Meddlesome] wants to go the whole hog.

 

He says NATION STATES must SURRENDER even MORE SOVEREIGNTY for the sake of an expanding EU, and of course he speaks for BRUSSELS.

 

But examine the sorry reality behind his grandiose vision.

 

FRAUD is RAMPANT

 

THE MONSTROSITY of the COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

CONTINUES

 

And this week

 

EUROPE’S supposedly FREE MARKET is again exposed as a

SICK JOKE

 

Twenty years ago, this country passed the SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT, as part of a European -wide initiative to TEAR DOWN barriers to TRADE.

 

A GREAT IDEA

in

THEORY

 

[which could have been achieved by all Nation States out of a DESPOTIC and TOTALITARIAN EU -with Britain giving the LEAD?]

 

BUT in practice it is a FIASCO, with most of our ‘partners’ outrageously flouting the LAW (to the disadvantage of Britain, which generally abides by the rules).

 

NOT ONLY have Member States -notably FRANCE, GERMANY, SPAIN and ITALY -rigged their ENERGY MARKETS to frustrate FOREIGN COMPETITION, but also they and others have consistently

 

BROKEN THE RULES

 

on everything from

 

State Airlines to Telecoms.

 

NOW the [EU] COMMISSION reveals the SCALE of the LAW-BREAKING with a blizzard of actions against 17 members) including Britain, for a technical infringement [they HAD TO get us in the net with the true offenders]

BUT WILL ANYTHING CHANGE?

 

[

  General de Gaulle   knew of our DIFFERENCES and vetoed our ENTRY to the then EEC and since a number of ex-COMMISSIONERS of the EU have said the same about how we would be the right example of conduct in the EU. What a waste of 34 years and the BILLIONS of POUNDS we have spent on a Fool’s errand because of the

 

Nazi TRAITORS- Edward Heath  -Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon and countless others then and since and still today now within our midst.]

 

FRANCE isn’t suddenly going to abandon the protectionism it has got away with for years.

 

NEITHER WILL THE OTHERS.

 

The habit of cheating is ingrained in an EU that is institutionally dysfunctional, corrupt and remote.

AND AS ALWAYS THE OPINIONS OF ORDINARY VOTERS MATTER NOT A JOT.

 

* * *

[We believe that the ONLY WAY to get us out of the mess of the EU would be for a CAMPAIGN for every voter to wear conspicuously a EMBLEM of their love of FREEDOM out of the EU and the others to wear chains from their mobiles or wherever so everyone will know who is for FREEDOM and who for SLAVERY.

Until there is a positive identification of the opponents within our community the GOVERNMENT can always say that it is only a FRINGE element involved. It is time to put aside OUR NATURAL RESERVE and not be afraid to wear a

 

BADGE of FREEDOM

 

We realise that in history even in our own country over 700 years ago wearing of insignia of a people led to evacuation of the Jews from ENGLAND until their return under Cromwell.

 

Under the Nazi Regime we are all aware of the millions of Jews and many others who were murdered during the 2nd World War

 

THEIR INSIGNIA BROUGHT DEATH

 

BUT

 

OUR INSIGNIA WILL BRING FREEDOM

 

Unless we put the issue above a PARTY and make it ONE of each INDIVIDUAL making a CHOICE for either

 

SLAVERY

 

or

 

FREEDOM

 

This way it will be impossible for the likes of Nice-Guy Dave and his close buddy Tony and their ilk to denigrate those who wish to be

 FREE

 Who will make a stand with others -together of what ever political persuasion or none? If we lost a relative many of us would wear a black armband or sombre clothing. Surely the possible total lose of

 

ONE’S COUNTRY and FREEDOM

 

demands some identification by each who no longer wishes to stand by and see the

 

"Rights and Liberties"

 

of

OUR INHERITENCE

lost

FOREVER.

*

[Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

APRIL/06

[Amended version in 2008- to take account of events in June 2008]

HOME

H.F.1448
 

MRS MAY

THE

SOUL

OF

ENGLAND

IS NOT FOR

SALE
BILL OF SALE

FOR

ENGLAND

 

    Theresa May wants Saudi oil firm to choose

     

     

    London | Daily Mail Online

     

    5 Apr 2017 ... Theresa May holds talks with Saudi

    officials as she tries to get ... Aramco is set

     

    to be valued at £1.6 trillion when it sells five per

    cent of ... Saudi Arabia's state oil
     

    company Aramco is the most valuable firm in the

    world. ... New York's bid may be
     

    problematic because US Securities and ......

     

     Here

     

    comes trouble!
     

    Full article

     

[WITH THE WEALTH OF SAUDI OIL AT ITS DISPOSAL THE

 

GROWING POPULATION OF THOSE OF ISLAM FAITH

IN

 ENGLAND

WILL HAVE NOT ONLY THE NUMBERS BUT THE BACKING OF THE

 

RICHEST FIRM ON THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE.

 

[WE WOULD INDEED HAVE SOLD OUR COUNTRY FOR

MAMMON

AND CHANGED OUR COUNTRY FROM A

CHRISTIAN BASED COUNTRY

TO AN

ISLAMIC STATE]

 

 
 
 

'...No man  of equal sanctity had risen to take his place, when in 878.

King Alfred

[CHRISTIAN King of the English]

lay in his tent at Iley, on the eve of the battle of Ethendun. To the king appeared St Neot,

"like an angle of God; his hair white as snow, his rainment white, glistening and fragrant with the scents of heaven."

HE PROMISED ALFRED VICTORY

" THE LORD" HE SAID, "SHALL BE WITH YOU"; EVEN THE LORD STRONG AND MIGHTY IN BATTLE. WHO GIVETH V ICTORY UNDER KINGS"

(Psalm. xxiv., verse 8)

...AS MORNING BROKE, THE LITTLE BAND OF SAXONS FELL ON GUTHRUN AND THE SLEEPING DANES.   SO SUDDEN WAS THEIR  ONSET, THAT AT FIRST THEY CARRIED ALL BEFORE THEM .  BUT GRADUALLY THE TIDE OF BATTLE BEGAN TO SWAY.   IT WAS TURNED IN FAVOUR OF KING ALFRED, WHEN A MAJESTIC FIGURE WHOM THE SAXONS RECOGNISED AS ST NEOT HIMSELF, SEIZING THE ROYAL BANNER, MARSHALLED  HIS COUNTRYMEN TO RENEWED EFFORT ,VICTORY, AND PURSUIT, SO FOR A TIME PEACE CAME TO THE LAND AND GUTHRUN AND HIS FOLLOWERS BECAME CHRISTIANS...

 THE PSALMS IN HUMAN LIFE-PROTHERO-1903

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

*

Alfred is one of the great figures of history because his career ensured the future of England to the English stock. After his hard-won victories he recogonized the West Saxon state, built a fleet, and so became the founder of English maritime power. He then set to work to repair the cultural ravages of war; he called in a Welsh bishop, Asser, to aid him in educating himself and his people, translating books into English and becoming the founder of English prose literature. There is something infinitely appealing and simple in the personality of this man which reaches out to us across a thousand years; as with Bede, ' we feel him to be unlike the men of other nations, but like the best among ourselves.' Page 20

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLISH HISTORY

by

 A. L. ROWSE

FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE OXFORD-1945

 

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

EASTER SUNDAY-APRIL 16-2017

H. F. 1173
 
 
 

Brought forward from October 2007

Magna Carta

As a copy of the historic charter of rights goes on sale, PETER OBORNE says we need an updated version to protect us from an overweening State.

 ONE OF the very few surviving copies of the

MAGNA CARTA

the  famous document that is the foundation of ENGLISH and later British liberty  - has come up for sale in New York.

Experts say this copy of the charter will sell for as much as £6 million. BUT the protection written out in the

Magna Carta

back in 1215 are priceless and never in our  history have they come under such sustained and ruthless attack as during the ten years of this Labour Government.

In the 13th century , it was the

MONARCHY

, and in particular feared tyrant

King John,

that was the enemy of

FREEDOM and LIBERTY

 

In the 21st century, the power of the STATE

is the menace.

It poses an ever-growing threat to the

LIBERTY of THE BRITISH PEOPLE.

IN MANY CASES SEIZING ON NEW TECHNOLOGY TO

MENACE OUR FREEDOM.

 TODAY ,in SEPTEMBER ,2007, THE SITUATION IS SO BAD THAT WE ARE IN URGENT NEED OF A

NEW

MAGNA CARTA

-ONE THAT ENSHRINES THE

FREEDOM

of the

BRITISH CITIZEN

FROM

STATE OPPRESSION

*

Here the Mail's political columnist outlines the ten basic freedoms this new document should contain...

 

1.   FREEDOM OF SPEECH

 

2.   RIGHT TO PROPERTY

 

        3.   RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE

 

4.   MAKE THE HOME OF A BRITISH CITIZEN SACROSANCT

 

5.   PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

6.  RIGHT TO PRIVACY

 

7.   THE RIGHT TO PROTEST

 

8.  HABEAS CORPUS OR FREEDOM FROM UNLAWFUL DETENTION

 

9.   TRIAL BY JURY.

 

10.  FREEDOM FROM SUMMARY JUSTICE.

*          *          *

 

THESE ARE ALSO THE AIMS OF THE

friends of england

 

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY

 

 

1. FREEDOM OF SPEECH

THE ability to speak our mind is a key freedom that distinguishes British citizens from those in countries which are tyrannies. In modern Britain, this freedom is slowly being eaten away. Often the motive is virtuous -for example part of the anti-terror legislation or to prevent racism. nevertheless, free speech is under threat as it has not been for hundreds of years.

The reality is that political correctness, though well-intentioned, is turning into a totalitarian monster that can censor any debate and distort argument about burning issues such as mass immigration and multiculturalism.

*

OUR COMMENT

[We believe that the FREEDOM of SPEECH  should NOT have been tampered with under any circumstances.

It is as we have said so often one can always find a reason to curb free speech. It was the government which made illegal war on Iraq and interfered in Afghanistan. TO VOICE ONE'S ANGER AT GOVERNMENT MISDOINGS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. IT IS ONLY WHEN THAT FREE SPEECH ACTUALLY CALLS FOR VIOLENT ACTION AND NOT PASSIVE ACTION THAT THE LINE SHOULD BE DRAWN. THOUGH EVEN HERE IF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY BETRAYED THE PEOPLE THEN AS HAPPENED IN OUR SEVENTEENTH CENTURY CIVIL WAR BETWEEN PARLIAMENT AND THE KING VIOLENCE WAS THE ONLY SOLUTION IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE ANCIENT RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF THE PEOPLE.

The poet John Milton who was secretary to Oliver Cromwell during the seventeenth century civil war between Parliament and the King uttered the following words in his famous call for freedom of printing and speech in "Areopagagita"

'Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties'

 

*

2. RIGHT TO PROPERTY

AS ALMOST all political philosophers have recognised, the right to private property is a key protection against tyranny. One of the reasons why King John was hated in the 13th century England was the high taxation he levied on his subjects. THIS BURDEN on the ordinary citizen has risen to previously unheard of levels in the past 100 years.

While everyone accepts taxation is necessary to pay for

DEFENCE

[NOT ILLEGAL WARS]

PUBLIC SERVICES

[NOT WASTE OF RESOURCES]

and other amenities of the STATE, today it is close to punitive.

TO GIVE ONE EXAMPLE: People living in quite modest dwellings are caught with massive inheritance tax bills, which force them to sell their family homes.

*

OUR COMMENT

 

We have ALWAYS maintained that Governments should have a fixed budget at the commencement of their term of office which would make them hesitant to spend on projects which were unreliable or too costly as we have with VARIOUS databases and CCTV cameras and other surveillance activities. Major projects should be matters for an independent panel in the HOUSE.

A FAMILY HAVE TO BUDGET SO SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT.

 

*

 

 

3.  RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE

THIS basic principle of human freedom was not enshrined in

MAGNA  CARTA

Instead , it was fought for over centuries by minority religious groups.

TODAY, however, all religions are under threat from militant secularism.

FOR EXAMPLE: Charities for the Christian, Muslim and other FAITHS face discrimination and withdrawal of

STATE FUNDING

which is made lavishly available to secular organisations,

In another encroachment on RELIGIOUS BELIEF, CATHOLIC adoption agencies are forced to act against their consciences by placing children with HOMOSEXUALS.

*

OUR COMMENT

ONLY when religious groups are a danger and threat to the community and country should the government interfere. When our nation was the custodian of an EMPIRE we made illegal a number of practices which entailed loss of life and in other areas where it was prudent to do so. Because of our NON-INTERFERENCE in other matters the question of the CASTE SYSTEM in INDIA of which has been hidden from view by those from the Sub-continent who have tarred our nation as a racist nation and who's representatives no doubt led the Commission for Racial Equality but should have stayed behind to RIGHT THE WRONG in THEIR OWN BACK YARD .We mentioned this matter a number of years ago but was ignored by THE PRESS.

 

4.  MAKE THE HOME OF A BRITISH CITIZEN SACROSANCT.

UNTIL recent times, the POWER of the STATE to enter a subjects home has been very

LIMITED. But new legislation has awarded public bodies numerous powers to enter private homes WITHOUT CONSENT.

TODAY, there are no fewer than

266

Statutory provisions and ministerial orders that allow entry to private dwellings, often

WITH THE OPTION TO USE FORCE.

*

OUR COMMENT

It is our political system which needs change because to all intents and purposes we have in

OUR HOUSE OF COMMONS

ONE

 

POLITICAL PARTY

 

We have said for some time that TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM

[Each word underlined has a separate bulletin]

should have some

COMPETITION and ONLY

 PR-Proportional Representation

WILL REDRESS THE BALANCE.

[We looked with our Search facility to find out how many times we have mentioned PR-Proportional Representation over the past five years possibly longer - it runs into 100's.

BUT AT NO TIME HAVE OUR FREE PRESS PICKED IT UP TO HAVE A GO!

 

A further change should be that NO MP should serve more than ONE TERM of each PARLIAMENT to enable many subjects from across our society to SERVE THEIR COUNTRY. It is because many MPs have found it a cosy number and not intent on rocking the boat when misplaced legislation is raised in the HOUSE that has led to OUR TROUBLES. They would rather toe the line rather than risk their comfortable jobs, perks and gold-plated pensions at the next GENERAL ELECTION.

Those members of Parliament that show distinction and courage at the present time under difficult circumstances because of the anger of their colleagues should be offered the position of belonging to

AN INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE of PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY

 which will in future protect the future direction of

PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE.

*

 5.  PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

ALL British citizens are presumed

INNOCENT until proven GUILTY

But this Ancient Right is under

THREAT

from a

GOVERNMENT

promise to introduce

IDENTITY CARDS

forcing us to carry a document we can present to the authorities

ON DEMAND.

The ID card threatens to become a massive weapon in the hands of

AN INTRUSIVE STATE

Another flagrant attack on the

 

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

concerns

DNA

samples taken from suspects.

It used to be the case that the police would destroy the fingerprints of those who were either acquitted or never charged.

Under new proposals, they will be able to retain DNA profiles in all circumstances.

*

OUR COMMENT

How have we got into this mess?

EASY

The Government of the Day takes away the first protection of the householder

'THE BOBBIE ON THE BEAT'

So that all local intelligence over years in each neighbourhood by the local Bobbie is lost and the subject to subject relationship of cooperation and confidence is destroyed.

WHAT DOES THIS DO?

CRIME ESCALATES OUT OF CONTROL

Which gives the very reason for the Government's reaction of more control from the CENTRE.

 

HOW DO YOU MAKE IT WORSE?

You refuse to build more PRISONS and you go soft on the PUNISHMENT OF CRIME and make it very difficult for the

VICTIMS OF CRIME

by instead of arresting the criminals but arrest

THE VICTIMS

to discourage others from reporting

CRIME.

EASY DON'T YOU THINK?

*

 

6. RIGHT TO PRIVACY

The British STATE, and also large corporations, are constantly seeking to discover more information about our private lives and to monitor our actions.

For example, Britain has now become the

CCTV CAPITAL

OF THE WORLD

with approximately 20 per cent of all closed -circuit television cameras based

IN THIS COUNTRY

*

 

OUR COMMENT

 

As explained above the loss of the full-time 'Bobbie on the Beat' has meant that criminals now have the streets to themselves and therefore the Government has by its own negligence turned to CCTV to fight crime because police officers are now occupied for much of their time filling in forms. Added to this we have a cheaper version of our intrepid police force who are mindful of

WHAT THEY CANNOT DO

to make their inferior services not even worth the money they are paid.

 

*

 

7. THE RIGHT TO PROTEST

The traditional British citizen has enjoyed the ability to

PROTEST AGAINST GOVERNMENT

ACTION

One effect of the recent anti-terror legislation has been to curtail this

RIGHT

MASSIVELY.

Though nobody doubts that it is necessary to give government powers to combat terrorists often these powers have been used in  very heavy-handed ways.

One famous example came in 2005, when the anti-war protester Walter Wolfgang was held under anti-terror laws for heckling Jack Straw at the Labour Party conference.

Another case concerned Maya Evans, victim of a ban on unauthorised protests in

WESTMINSTER

when she was arrested for reading out the names of soldiers killed in Iraq, near the Cenotaph.

 

*

8.  HABEAS CORPUS, OR FREEDOM FROM UNLAWFUL DETENTION.

 

THIS was set out in the original Magna Carta, and survived intact for eight centuries, but is now under ferocious attack

Habeas Corpus is the single most fundamental freedom of the

BRITISH SUBJECT

one which distinguishes us from tyrannical countries such as

BURMA

 CHINA

NAZI GERMANY

or the former

SOVIET UNION

where citizens can be seized

at whim by the police and held without trial.

In rare times of national emergency, such as World War II and the most violent phase of Northern Ireland troubles, British governments have temporarily suspended

THIS VITAL PROTECTION.

Habeas Corpus translates literally as

 

'thou shalt have the body [in court]'

and enshrines the  right

TO A FAIR TRIAL.

 

However, Tony Blair tried to get rid of it altogether by introducing legislation which would enable the

STATE

to hold suspected terrorists for

90 days

without being required to give reasons.

This was fought off in the COMMONS, but Gordon Brown appears to be intent on mounting a fresh assault.

*

 

OUR COMMENT

This Ancient right of the English people does not fit in with the European Union's system as is the case for Trial by Jury and this is WHY pro-EU politicians here wish to do away with it as they have with many of our historic County regiments and others distinguished in battles of the

BRITISH EMPIRE.

As the aristocrat Francis Fulford has said:

England is f****d

*

9.  TRIAL BY JURY

THIS principle , like 

HABEAS CORPUS was, was enshrined in [English Law by Magna Carta and later its principles into British law]

                                It survived for eight centuries before coming under venomous attack by modern governments which dislike its inefficiency and expense.

 The right to jury trial means that British citizens, unlike those of foreign dictatorships, are entitled to demand to be tried by

'12 good men and true'

rather than convicted by an arbitrary tribunal.                         

 

A GOVERNMENT BILL in 2006 tried to take away this right for complex cases, but the proposal was blocked in the

HOUSE OF LORDS.

*

OUR COMMENT

 

As with Habeas Corpus, Trial by Jury, the pro EU BRITISH GOVERNMENTS  which have been all governments since the passing of the 1972 Accession Act to the then supposed EEC need to destroy these FREEDOMS in order that we fit the pattern in the European Union.

IT IS THAT SIMPLE

And this attitude applies to anything which reminds the EU of Britain's past whether it is our historic regiments or what ever.

If it had not been for our long troublesome

HOUSE OF LORDS

our freedoms would have been spirited away by NOW!

*

10. FREEDOM FROM SUMMARY JUSTICE

ALONGSIDE

 the attack on

JURY TRIAL

modern British government has sought to move away from formal justice to an improvised system of

EXECUTIVE JUSTICE

thus sidestepping the

DUE PROCESS OF LAW

which has been the defining feature of the

BRITISH SYSTEM.

This kind of casual justice has been introduced for a variety of offences, for example hooliganism and shoplifting. The resultant move to fixed penalty notices means the suspects can buy their way out of the formal process of

PUNISHMENT

by paying a FINE.

As a result, shoplifting and some other offences are subject to

TAXATION

rather than

 CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT.

 

*

 

IN a famous passage, the great 20th century historian AJP Taylor wrote that

'in August 1914, a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the

STATE

beyond the post office and the policeman. He could live were he liked and as he liked. He could travel abroad or leave his country for ever without a passport or any sort of official permission.'

ONLY 90 years have passed since he uttered those words and today the

OPPOSITE IS TRUE.

The growth of the

STATE

intrudes everywhere upon our lives and our

LIBERTIES

We must set boundaries

NOW!

or our

ANCIENT FREEDOMS

-the very things which define us as

 British

[ENGLISH]

-will be lost for ever.

 

*

 

OUR COMMENT

 

We need to take measures to dismantle the excessive interference of the

STATE

In other words reduce the numbers and the excuses for those millions to interfere in our lives.

Our HOUSE OF COMMONS should NOT BE FOR THE FEW it should be for the MANY. We advocate that MPs serve ONE TERM in PARLIAMENT thereby enabling thousands of people from ALL WALKS OF LIFE to SERVE THEIR COUNTRY.

 

The achievement of success should be judged on

LESS LAW

and

MORE COMMON SENSE.

Our parliamentary system  consists of  many members of parliament who look on the HOUSE as their bread basket and will do whatever they can to increase their share of the wealth and privileges of membership.

Of course there are a select few who are a credit to the hallowed chamber and they must NEVER be forgotten. But in the main our self-servers need to see some competition and many put out to grass.

ONLY

 

A change to a ONE TERM period of OFFICE will defuse the power grabbers and enable many to

SERVE THEIR COUNTRY

AND

 

PR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Will enable more subjects to serve their country not in their own interests but for their fellow subjects and

QUEEN and COUNTRY.

 

We in ENGLAND are at the crossroads of history in our nation's future as an INDEPENDENT NATION STATE we can either take account of our long illustrious history and remain FREE and have the ability to serve not only our own country but EUROPE and the WORLD.

or become just a PROVINCE of a supposed EUROPEAN UNION which is already showing signs of collapse after over 50 years.

For us and millions of subjects in our country the last option can NEVER be accepted. And if we must fight to protect that which is dear to us then

SO BE IT!

 

Our challenge will be the ancient call from

our northern neighbours who have their own historic moment in history when in

 1320

in their

Arbroath Manifesto

Sent by the nobles and Commons of Scotland

to the

Pope

stated:

 

'We fight not for glory, nor for wealth, nor for honour but for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

 

*

And over centuries and particularly over the past 100 years millions of our fellow subjects have laid down their lives rather than submit to

TYRANNY.

 

WE MUST NOT BRING SHAME ON THE SACRIFICES OF THE PAST.

 

*          *          *

 

A NEW REFORMATION

IN

EUROPE

 

Milton's Faith in England

 

No English writer in any age has ever expressed his faith in England with more impassioned ardour and greater eloquence than Milton...

Inspiring almost all that he wrote was his passionate concern for

LIBERTY

and second only to that love was his faith in the English people as having for many generations striven more valiantly to win

FREEDOM

and  valued it more highly than any other modern people. When a young man in Italy his Italian hosts professed to envy the

ENGLISHMEN'S FREEDOM

he "took it as a pledge of future happiness, that other nations were so persuaded of

ENGLAND'S LIBERTY" (B., II,82)

On his return to England in the summer of 1639 the great struggle for

CIVIL and RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

was already imminent, and he was soon engaged on controversial writings. His prose treatises have long lost much of their topical interest.

 [until the advent of Tony Blair and his cohorts of destroyers of everything English and his successor's refusal to keep a promise

TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE.]

... he bids the two nations English and Scots,

"never to be disunited" but to make common cause "settle the pure worship of God in his church, and justice in the state" (407)

..he asked his readers not to forget "what numbers of faithful and freeborn Englishmen" had gone overseas to find religious freedom which was denied them at home.

[In 2007 we can look back over ten years and see the flood of the English leaving their once free homeland for the freedom elsewhere in the world which the English and later the British had laid the foundations of liberty by their sacrifices in two World Wars in the 20th century and by their ancestors example in the years of the preceding centuries.]

The treatise ends with an eloquent prayer that God who did

"build up this Britannic empire to a glorious and enviable height, with all her daughter - islands about her," and had scattered the Spanish armada, may now, "stay us in this felicity" and

DELIVER ENGLAND FROM TYRANNY AT HOME.

[And that is our wish in October , 2007]

 

As a nation we have always turned our attention to tyranny abroad and have on many occasions in our long history either militarily or on many occasions used our respected diplomacy to achieve the good end and help those in need wherever they may be.

However , over the past decade the foreign policy of England has been poisoned by a man who few now wish to remember with his five wars and his illegal and disastrous invasion of Iraq.

Which returning to the work of Milton in his Epic

"PARADISE REGAINED"

'..what do these Worthies

But rob and spoil, burn and slaughter, and enslave

Peaceful nations, neighbouring, or remote,

Made Captive, yet deserving freedom more

Than those their Conquerors, who leave behind

Nothing but ruin wheresoe're they rove

And all the flourishing works of peace destroy?'

(III,74.)

 

Today many of us have on our minds the tragedy of the Burmese people who have suffered the tyranny of Military Dictatorship for over four decades. Here again we call on John Milton to express in his own words on the barbaric happening to the protestant subjects of the Duke of Savoy in 1655.

 

'When they refused to quit their homes, the troops were sent to expel them, and the villages were laid waste and many of the inhabitants brutally murdered, while the survivors took to the snow-covered mountains.  The news of this cruelty stirred England profoundly.

The Protector [Oliver Cromwell], forgetful of the savageries practiced by his soldiers, five years before at Drogheda and Wexford, came forward as the champion of the Pietmontese.

...Partly as a result of Cromwell's representation and threats and partly French interposition the Duke restored the ancient rights by a treaty signed on 18th August, 1655.

Milton as poet [even though secretary to Cromwell] could vent his strong feelings in the most passionate of all his sonnets.

'Avenge, O Lord, thy Slaughtered Saints"

[We in England in October,2007 would not disagree with this statement. How much more we can do if we remain a FREE and INDEPENDENT NATION STATE than as a PROVINCE of EUROPE with our voice drowned by the multitude in BRUSSELS and BERLIN.]

 

Here, more than in the Latin letters Milton expressed the English mind, of his day and of posterity.

*

 

 

[Milton and the English Mind

by

F.E.Hutchinson

D.Litt., F.B.A.

HODDER  & STOUGHTON LTD

1946]

 

[The works of one of our greatest poets and prose writers John Milton are shown in countless places amongst our 1600 bulletins. We have many additions from Shakespeare; Wordsworth, and writers such as Samuel Johnson, John Wilks and many others who have played a great part in a

DEFENCE of ENGLAND.

*

Our last words are from John Milton and are prescient at this hour in a nation's story.

'Methinks I see in my mind a noble and puissant Nation rousing herself like a strong man after sleep, and shaking her , invincible locks: methinks I see her as an Eagle mewing her mighty youth, and kindling her undazzled eyes at the full midday beam; purging and unscaling her long-abused sight at the fountain itself of heavenly radiance; while the noise of timorous and flocking birds, with those that love the twilight, flutter about, amazed at what she [England] means, and in their envious gabble would prognosticate a year of sects and schisms. (94.)

 

In his treatise Of Reformation (1641) he had written:

 

'The best-founded commonwealths and least barbarous have aimed at a certain mixture and temperament, partaking the several virtues of each other state...There is no civil government that have been known, no not even the Spartan, nor the Roman...more divinely and harmoniously tuned, more equally balanced as it were by the hand and scale of justice than is the commonwealth of England; where under a free and untutored monarch

, the noblest, worthiest, and most prudent men, with full approbation and suffrage, have in their power the supreme and final determination of highest affairs. (B.,II,408).

 

*

In his day John Milton commented:

Liberty had been put " like a bridle into the hands of the Parliament and Assembly.

also

Faction and favour carried the day, justice was delayed and then denied, and though there were some "men of wisdom and integrity" in Parliament, "the greatest part" proved unworthy of the confidence placed in them.

[sounds familiar to us in 2007-don't you think?]

Milton held that there was "in number little virtue, but the weight and measure wisdom working all things"

 

FREEDOM is,

 as always Milton's unremitting concern, but his experiences , both personal and political, have taught him that the only

FREEDOM WORTH HAVING is in obedience to the VOICE of REASON

 

'yet know withall,

Since thy original lapse, true Libertie

Is lost, which always with right Reason dwells

Twinn'd and from her hath no individual being:

Reason in man obscure'd, or not obeyed,

Immediately, inordinate desires

And upstart Passions catch the Government

From Reason, and to servitude reduce

Man till then free

(XII,82.)

And as it is with individuals, so it is with nations.

Yet sometimes nations will decline so low

From vertue, which is reason, that no wrong,

But Justice, and some fatal curse annext

Deprives them of thir libertie

Thir inward lost.'

(XII,97.)

As we are aware the past decade has seen a continuing slide into the abyss of the general moral degeneracy of our people from Politicians to the Public broadcasting to Business and the People at large and to top it all outside observers have concluded we are the unhappiness peoples in Europe and possibly in much of the World. The recent Daily Mail  COMMENT on the matter was an apt reminder and a warning. Milton was against censorship but he did believe that GOOD should be given a fair hearing as his works particularly his Epic work testifies. Some might say it is no longer fun to SIN because everyone is doing it . History has on record the decline of many nations who ignored -the writing on the walls -or something of that nature.

 

He further stated:

It was more just "that a less number compel a greater to retain their liberty, than that a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness, compel the less, most injuriously to be their fellow slaves "

TIME WILL TELL IF WE WERE

as a people to ignore the warnings from our greatest war leader

 Winston Churchill

 

TOO LATE!

 

And in John Milton's words who like Samson in his "Samson Agonistes" , he had taken  impulsively a wife from the Philistines, he was afflicted with blindness, he had championed the deliverance of his people who in the end would rather have

"bondage with ease than strenuous liberty"

WE HOPE THIS IS NOT TRUE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE IN OUR DAY

 

*          *          *

WE ARE BACK TO THE BEGINNING-USA-1787-2009-ENGLAND

 

 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****     REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

*

[ADDED -SEPTEMBER-2009]

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

MAGNA CARTA/ ****A Constitution millions died for/**** Bill of Rights of 1688 - OUTLAWS EUROPEAN UNION/****Almost everything which is most precious in our civilisation has come from small states/****Why We Must Remain A Christian Country/****England or European Regions/Provinces-You Cannot have BOTH!/GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT/****English Constitution-By It They Lived-For it They Died./**** A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION -CONSPIRATORS NAMED/**** Our Loyalty to our institutions and country/****Liberties of Parliament -Birthright of subjects of England/****WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT-Part 1-3/ ****The Heritage of England is a Whole made up of Many Parts/**** The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at Greater RISK./****Our basic Liberties and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a FOREIGN POWER/****TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS by NORRIS  Mc WHIRTER - Lest we Forget/****The Truth About A Federal Europe-Parts1-4/****A TIME TO MAKE A STAND/****COULD ENGLAND SURVIVE OUTSIDE THE EU?-YES!/****The Rotten Heart of Europe-by Bernard Connolly-Parts 1-4/****SAY 'NO' TO EUROPE! SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON/****So You Thought You Were FREE/****Empires have gone and most people in the world now live in Nation States said Lord Shore/****Freedom of Speech-A Freedom which cannot be abused - is NOT WORTH HAVING/****MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION/****England's place in theUNION?/****ENGLISH FREEDOM -WHY IT IS YOURS/****Our Loyalty to our Institutions and Country/

 *

[ Click HERE:There are hundreds of bulletins on ENGLISH FREEDOM listed  within and at the end of the

MAIN BULLETIN FILE]

 

 

WORK IN PROGRESS - We need to add this information to each of the bulletins above in order to assist you to scan them without leaving the site-We hope to complete it shortly.

 

SEPTEMBER-2009

*

TOP

HOME

H.F.1447

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.
DAILY  MAIL
comment
 

a decade on, has the city learned

nothing?

 

 

TEN years ago tonight, the BBC's Robert Preston broke the news that the Bank of England had been forced to step in to rescue Northern Rock from collapse, prompting endless queues to withdraw savings over the following days.

Though the authorities were slow to realise it, this was the first outward sign of

GREED-FED CANCER

infecting the entire financial system.

Indeed, it marked the start of an epic crisis whose consequences we all suffer today.

With businesses driven to the wall and taxpayers stung for massive bailouts, the

PUBLIC FINANCES

were laid to waste.

Borrowing soared to terrifying heights- and

DEBT

is still rising in

2017

Towards an unimaginable

£2 TRILLION

£2TRILLION.

Meanwhile, household incomes have been painfully squeezed, while savers and pension funds have been hammered by a decade of historically low interest rates.

Yet ten years on, no banker has been jailed for the sharp practice that brought this contry to the brink of ruin.

Extraordinary, nor has there been a

FULL ENQUIRY.

to establish

the lessons of the

 CRISIS.

(though after the comparatively footling scandal of voicemail hacking by rogue redtops, the Coalition had no hesitation in ordering one into the conduct sand ethics of the newspaper industry.

What is  so deeply worrying is that, even now, none of those lessons appears to have been learned. Indeed, there are abundant signs that the cancer is back.

As greedily as ever , bankers are inflating a DEBT BUBBLE-handing out excessive mortgages, cheep car loans and credit cards with

ZERO INTEREST

rates fixed for months.

Meanwhile, the old racket of trading bundles of sub-prime debt continues as if nothing untoward happened in 2007.

Now , as then, the banks have far too little capital in reserve to weather a

 STORM .

The difference is that in 2017, with taxpayers milked dry, the Government will be unable to mount anything like a similar bailout

[We prefer the word RESCUE. It is obvious that the banksters know something that the rest of the population do not know. A history of the City of London goes some way in explaining their unpatriotic and selfish and arrogant behaviour. They are not ENGLAND they are a financial DESPOT installed over 300 years ago by a SECRET SOCIETY - the cause and curse of much suffering here and of people's the world over. It is THE GREED CAPITAL of the WORLD -It is ALL for ITSELF  and NOTHING else MATTERS. IT IS A MAJOR DESTABILIZING BLOT ON THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND.  THEY CONTRIBUTE TO OUR ECONOMY AND AT THE SAME TIME THEY UNDERMINE IT AT GREAT COST TO THE PEOPLE EVERYWHERE.  THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SHOULD AMEND THEIR CHARTER TO ENSURE THAT ONLY ETHICAL PRACTISES ARE PERMITTED.  IT IS A LOOSE CANNON WHICH MUST BE NEUTERED WITHOUT DELAY.]

]

The City must act now to shore up its defences. Otherwise, there can be no telling how the next crisis will end.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

SEPTEMBER 13-2017

H.F.1310
 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

By DOMINIC LAWSON

 

Finally, it’s sorted. Until yesterday, the anti-Brexiteers known as Remoaners had high hopes of Philip Hammond, the Chancellor.

But yesterday he appeared as joint author of a newspaper article with the most adamantine Brexiteer in the Cabinet, the International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes declared that in March 2019, Britain would not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will leave the Customs Union and be free to negotiate the best trade deals around the world as an independent, open, trading nation’.

Although the Cabinet Brexiteers were content with Hammond’s proposal that there should be a transition period after March 2019, pending a final settlement of the country’s arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had given the impression he was bending to the demands of the CBI that Britain remain within the Customs Union during that unspecified period.

Blunder

This they regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just because they suspected the CBI (which had campaigned for Britain to give up sterling for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in the EU ‘by the back door’.

As Shanker Singham, chairman of the special trade commission of the Legatum Institute (a group consulted regularly by the Government), warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to provide the clarity of being outside the Customs Union on Day 1 of Brexit.

If such clarity does not exist, then other countries will not think the UK is serious about executing an independent trade policy and they will quickly lose patience and move on.’...

...In any case, the nation has not changed its collective mind since the referendum in June 2016. If anything, views have hardened in the direction set by the result. A survey of 3,293 people published on Friday by the London School of Economics showed that even those who had voted ‘Remain’ would prefer the sort of Brexit deal the LSE’s team described as ‘hard’.

A total of 51.3 per cent of Remain voters backed a Brexit deal which delivered ‘full control’ over immigration and led to lower numbers of migrants from the EU. No fewer than 54.7 per cent of Remainers said that the UK should ‘pay nothing’ to the EU by means of a ‘divorce bill’.

And 52.2 per cent of Remainers told the LSE researchers that we should entirely free British law from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Unsurprisingly, a still higher proportion of self-identifying ‘Leave’ voters supported what the LSE termed

His statement on The Andrew Marr Show last month that failure to reach an amicable deal with the EU ‘would be a very, very bad outcome for Britain’ was seen as an attack on his Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and, indeed, on the Prime Minister).

‘hard Brexit’.

Monstrous

This clearly disappointed the most voluble critic of the Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of resignation among most people who voted Remain that we have to “man up” and make the most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[12 MONTHS

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

 

 

  H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.
 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
PETER OBORNE

ON POLITICS AND POWER
 

 

 

IT'S TIME MRS MAY TOOK A LEAF OUT OF TRUMP'S BOOK

 

 

 

 

By Peter Oborne For The Daily Mail

 March  10, 2018

 

Donald Trump and Theresa May could hardly be further apart in their character as national leaders.

Whereas Trump is seen to be decisive, Theresa May dithers. Trump is flamboyant and May is dull. While the British Prime Minister tends to seek out compromise, a headstrong U.S. President wants everything on his own terms.

And recently these huge differences in personality and style have been more evident than ever.

While Mrs May has inched forward very carefully with Britain’s negotiations to leave the EU, Mr Trump has ripped up the rulebook by arranging a meeting with North Korean despot Kim Jong-un.

The move is pure Trump — a bombastic, boastful and arrogant man who conducts high-stakes diplomacy by Twitter and is contemptuous of the advice of the Washington establishment, which despises him and is determined to destroy him.
 

Donald Trump and Theresa May could hardly be further apart in their character as national leaders, says PETER OBORNE

Yes, it’s very early days, but the dramatic news that Trump is to meet Kim brings hope of an end to the threat of nuclear war which has hovered in that part of the globe for years and defied the best efforts of the world’s best diplomats.

If a deal is struck, it will be an extraordinary vindication of The Donald’s way of doing politics. His bravado, aggression and brinkmanship will have paid off.

Remember that when Barack Obama was in the White House, the liberal media applauded his judicious approach to North Korea. But it did absolutely nothing to stop the Pyongyang regime building missiles with the reported capability to reach California.

I’m not suggesting in any way that Mrs May copies Trump, but there are lessons from his leadership style.

Generally, the consensus has been that the Prime Minister’s calm and self-effacing approach has been the right one for a Government with a wafer-thin majority to handle historic negotiations.

Nevertheless, it’s time to ask whether in her dealings over the EU, Mrs May ought to take a leaf or two out of The Trump Book Of International Diplomacy. To date, she’s behaved in the opposite way to Trump.

She’s played by the rules. She’s been careful not to cause offence to Brussels. She’s always ready to offer compromise. She habitually does what Whitehall civil servants tell her.

In the early days of her premiership, Mrs May was tougher, saying about Brexit that no deal is better than a bad deal. She was right.

However, she has backtracked and there has been none of that resolute language recently. Quite the reverse, in fact.

True, her measured speech at London’s Mansion House eight days ago was pragmatic and sensible — setting out her government’s position while also handing out olive branches to Brussels.

So what was the result of being reasonable? The Prime Minister was put down by contemptuous EU leaders. They made clear that they have no intention of striking a deal with Britain except on their own terms.

The European Parliament’s Brexit chief, Guy Verhofstadt, with leaden sarcasm, insultingly spoke of Mrs May’s goals as ‘vague aspirations’ and said he hoped that ‘serious proposals have been put in the post’.
 

Donald Trump, right, speaks to Theresa May during in a working dinner meeting at the NATO headquarters

The preening Donald Tusk, President of the European Council, sneeringly said it was not in the EU’s interests to give way to what he called her ‘pick-and-mix’ approach.

And with his own bucket of cold water was the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier, whose office lectured the British Government that it should not be allowed to ‘cherry-pick’ a bespoke Brexit deal. It’s easy to guess how Trump would respond to such pipsqueaks. This is the man, remember, who called the North Korean leader ‘Little Rocket Man’ and who tweets scathing ripostes to his critics at 5am.

Mrs May, of course, disdains Twitter — unlike her predecessor in No. 10, David Cameron, who was an oh-so trendy social media obsessive.

(Indeed, on the evening of the EU referendum he was foolishly busy tweeting: ‘Just 1 hour left to #VoteRemain — and keep Britain stronger, safer and better off in Europe.’)

Without resorting to such gimmicks, Mrs May could start tearing up the diplomatic textbook and making her own ultimatums.

For the truth is that Britain has aces to play. If the Brussels bully-boys try to pull up the drawbridge, we must retaliate.

A bankrupt Brussels is desperate for the billions we have offered as a divorce settlement. If they cut up rough, we should threaten to withdraw our offer.

These Eurocrats need to be forcefully reminded that German and French manufacturers would be severely damaged if there was no deal.

Certainly, an area where Mrs May ought to be more Trump-like is on UK fishing rights.

In recent days, two ministers — Philip Hammond and George Eustace — shamelessly signalled to EU negotiators that Britain might be happy to sell out this country’s fishermen and allow boats from the remaining 27 EU nations into our coastal waters if we can secure a better deal for some sectors of our economy such as the City.
 

It’s time for Theresa May to be bolder, put EU negotiators in their place — and win a really good deal for Britain

What a shabby betrayal of the democratic wishes of the 17 million who voted for Brexit (and, I wager, of many who voted Remain who also care for the protection of British fisheries).

Fishing rights are a deeply emotive issue, like immigration. Mrs May would be justified to do a Trump and threaten to walk away from the negotiating table if Brussels tries to con us on that issue.

She needs to make absolutely clear that any border arrangement between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic cannot be allowed to damage the constitutional integrity of the UK, and if she needs to use brinkmanship to secure this, so be it.

Let’s never forget that it was the unequivocal resolve of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan — another leader unconscionably sneered at by the liberal classes — who out-stared the Russian bear, resulting in the collapse of Communism.

Timidly and limply following the advice of diplomats never achieves much in the face of obdurate foes.

It’s time for Theresa May to be bolder, put EU negotiators in their place — and win a really good deal for Britain.
 
 

An over-ambitious liability 

As police continue to investigate the Salisbury poisonings, the Government is planning how to respond if it is proved that the Russian state was responsible.

In such circumstances, I wish I had more faith in our novice Defence Secretary, Gavin Williamson. Since his appointment four months ago, he has shown poor judgment.

First, he appalled senior military figures by revealing sensitive information about the Russian threat in what looked like a cack-handed attempt to distract attention from embarrassing revelations that he became close to a female office colleague during the early years of his marriage.

Then he self-aggrandisingly announced that he planned to challenge China by sending a British warship through the South China Sea — which must have had the Chinese quaking in their boots!

Most worryingly, I understand that Mr Williamson’s relations with his military chiefs of staff are poor.

I’m told he has taken to summoning them to his office and berating them in front of junior colleagues. Apparently, senior generals are so alarmed that they may raise their concerns with No. 10.

Mr Williamson makes little secret of his ambition to be prime minister one day. Let me tell him, if he continues alienating so many people, he’ll be lucky to stay in his present job, let alone make it to Downing Street.

As the storm clouds gather, Britain needs a wise head as Defence Secretary. Not an inexperienced lightweight who is consumed by his own vaulting ambitions.
 
 

Despite winning four of the five general elections he fought, Harold Wilson’s reputation was abysmally low when he died 23 years ago.

However, there are signs that it is being rehabilitated.

One reason, I believe, is because his skill in keeping Britain out of the Vietnam War contrasts with Tony Blair’s calamitous decision to take this country to war in Iraq.

The latter choice resulted in the wider region becoming a bloodbath that continues to this day.

An insight into Wilson’s mind was offered last week when his chief policy adviser, Bernard Donoughue, 83, delivered a speech in Westminster.

He said the Labour PM ‘never entered a room without first establishing the best exit’.

Donoughue added: ‘That was a metaphor for Wilson’s political tactics.’

Donoughue also said that Wilson warned his speechwriters: ‘Remember that I don’t want too many of these Guardianisms, Environmentalism, Genderism etc.

‘I want my speeches always to include what working people are concerned with: jobs, pay, prices, pensions.’

Sound advice for any prime minister. 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5484335/PETER-OBORNE-time-Mrs-took-leaf-Trumps-book.html#ixzz59Qv1fdRl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

MARCH 10,2018

 

*  *  *

PATRIOTISM

'Of the whole sum of human life no small part is that which consists of a man's relations to his country, and his feelings concerning it.'-   GLADSTONE

*

'Love of country is one of the loftiest virtues; and so treason against it has been considered among the most damning sins.'

E.A.Storrs

*

[A MESSAGE TO PRIME MINISTER MAY:

'Be just and fear not; let all the ends thou aimest at, be your country's thy God's, and TRUTH'S.

Shakespeare.

WE look to Mrs May to 'RIGHT THE WRONG' OF A CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT IN 1972 AND LET 'RIGHT BE DONE! ]

*

H.F.1500 -BREXIT MEANS BREXIT-PRIME MINISTER MAY-JUNE 23-2015.
 
 
 
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

Brought forward from October, 2005.

 

Revealed after his death that EDWARD HEATH: A agent of the Nazi International and Traitor to his Country

since 1938

 

[The following article is one of many in-depth studies in the Financial and Political Field which are available in a respected INDEPENDENT quarterly journal International Currency Review

established in 1965

World Reports Ltd –108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF Telephone:  +44(0) 20-7222 3836.

Website: www.worldreports.org

*

THE NAZI AGENT WHO BECAME BRITISH PRIME MINISTER.

 

GERMAN PENETRATION OF THE UK AND U.S. STRUCTURES

 

The death of Sir Edward Heath on 17th July 2005 has ‘enabled’ intelligence services to reveal to us what had previously been carefully withheld from the public domain – namely that Sir Edward was a long-term agent of the German Nazi intelligence organisation called *DVD (* Details on our Bulletin Board-A BLOCKBUSTER EXPOSE OF THE ILLEGAL- CORRUPT EU), Based, to this day in Dachau, the location of one of Nazi Germany’s most satanic extermination camps.

 

On the day following Heath’s death, the Editor received an unexpected briefing from a UK intelligence source, who informed him about Heath’s treacherous background.  A day later, another veteran, UK intelligence source conveyed ‘further and better particulars’, independently of the first source.  No doubt this service was selected for this exposure because of the expectation that the previously withheld intelligence would be used.  What these appalling revelations mean is that Britain’s entry into the EEC was fraudulent, which means that there is no problem leaving it.

 

FOLLOWING HEATH’S DEATH,

 THE NAZI STRATEGIC DECEPTION IS EXPOSED.

 

For many years, British opponents of the United Kingdom’s disastrous membership of the European Union Collective, have been aware that no amount of decisive rational argument is liable to prevail in the minds of the tight-knit, self-serving elite of geopoliticians who direct this flawed policy, led today by the Fabian Society, with its symbol of a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

 

Those engaged in the guerrilla war that we have been waging to recapture Britain’s total Independence from the EU Collective in the face of what is so conspicuously a CONSPIRACY, include some of the most intellectually talented people and ‘actives’ of their generation.

 

ONE of their number, Peter Jay, the former British Ambassador in Washington, contributed his warnings about the dangers of currency and monetary collectivism in a lecture that we published (International Currency Review) in this service, Peter Jay having been among the early contributors to this journal.  We publish a part of his analysis in this issue [See: ‘We told you so’, pages 145-152].

 

Having, as we and others see it, long since won the intellectual arguments against Britain’s continuing membership of this geopolitical collectivism experiment, we have been apt to question among ourselves the reasons for all our overwhelming decisive practical arguments being officially ignored, at least for public consumption purposes.  Many suggestions have been put forward, but none seems conclusive.

 

With the death in July 2005 of Sir Edward Heath, who negotiated Britain’s accession to the European Communities (now The European Union, which we always refer to as the European Union Collective, this being a more accurate description) all has suddenly become clear.  And the TRUTH is shocking, and will shock most of those who read this report, and the large number of those in sensitive quarters who also read this publication.

 

Within a few days of Heath’s death on 17th July 2005 at the age of 89, the Editor of this service received two separate comfirmations both from British Intelligence sources, that Edward Heath was a long-term agent of German (Nazi) intelligence.   In fact Edward Heath betrayed his country for 60 years-the longest penetration in history.

 

To remain undiscovered for 60 years is an achievement without parallel in the sordid history of geopolitical intelligence.

 

Edward Richard George Heath became a member of the Oxford ring, based at Balliol College, consisting of himself, Roy Jenkins, Geoffrey Rippon and Arthur (Madron) Seligman, who were together at Oxford University.

 

All were recruited through by a German intelligence agent working inside the College –Arnold Toynbee. Roy (‘WoY’) Jenkins, later, Ld Jenkins of Hillhead) later became the Chancellor of the exchequer in Wilson’s Labour Government and subsequently the President of the European Commission (EC) while Geoffrey Rippon was the co-signatory together with Edward Heath of the United Kingdom’s Treaty of Accession to the European Communities in January 1972, which led to Britain becoming a member of the EEC on 1st January 1973. Notwithstanding this, in February 1972, the Second Reading in the House of Commons was approved by a majority of only eight, ‘ in an atmosphere that degenerated into fisticuffs.’

 

MOST SUCCESSFUL NAZI PENETRATION

 

Arnold Toynbee’s recruitment became the most successful German intelligence penetration operation ever directed at the United Kingdom, with three members of the Oxford Ring playing central roles in forcing Britain predominately against its will, into the German-sponsored European political and economic collective, which, as is reviewed in the next section, is a hot bed of corruption.

 

Both Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon received secret payments in exchange for their signatures on the Accession document, setting the scene for the subsequent corrupt payments for similar services rendered by some of their successors.

 

For the odious intergovernmental system of secret intelligence-managed ‘Black Operations’ geopolitical ‘facility fees’ or special corrupt payments –which as we have deduced from our research, and have confirmed from special sources, is universally the norm today –was already well established at the beginning of the 1970’s.

 

It was partially for this purpose that the colossal cache of giga-funds initially worth $27.5 trillion, and now of the order of $55+ trillion, exposed in the preceding issue of this service, was raised under George H. W. Bush Sr. The primary reason was to bail out the Western banking system, by redistributing funds around the financial system so as to forestall systemic banking collapses.

 

A NAZI AGENT IN DOWNING STREET

Edward Heath was a German (Nazi) agent who became Prime Minister of Great Britain.

 

As soon as he was unexpectedly voted into power in 1970, he immediately set about to fulfil his secret instructions to bamboozle the British people and the House of Commons (which he did by perpetrating a number of gross lies that have since been exposed) into pleading for and accepting membership of the secretly German-sponsored political collective.  And the initiators and directors of this project were the superior brains at the Madrid-based Nazi International, a.k.a. the German geopolitical Centre, reviewed here.

 

Your correspondent remembers actually standing inside Downing Street, as it was possible to do in those days, and watching the newly elected Prime Minister entering Number 10 in triumph on the day of his election, 18th June 1970 after securing a narrow victory over the Labour Party led by Harold Wilson, having started at a clear disadvantage in the opinion polls.

 

The so-called ‘Conservatives’ won office with an overall majority of 30 seats.

 

HEATH’S OVERT-COVERT BACKGROUND

 

Heath first entered the Westminster Parliament with a tiny majority of 133 votes in the marginal seat of Bexley, which he held until he belatedly retired from the House of Commons in 2001.

 

According to the obituary published in The Daily Telegraph, ‘in his maiden speech, he attacked the Labour Government for its very negative response to the Schumann Plan to create a SINGLE European market in coal and steel’

 

When Harold Macmillan became Prime Minister some 13 years earlier in 1957, he celebrated his victory with Edward Heath over a dinner of oysters and champagne at the Turf Club; and in 1960,

 

Macmillan brought Heath into the Cabinet as Lord Privy Seal, responsible for negotiating the United Kingdom’s first application to join the European Economic Communities.  Harold Macmillan, like Edward Heath, has now been internally exposed by intelligence sources as a secret agent of the German Abwehr (Department of Defence, or military apparat)

 

Heath was an agent of the super-secret German DVD –or Deutsche Vericherungs Dienst – the continuing intelligence service of the ultra-covert Nazi international, which established itself as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1943, when leading German officials realised there was a 50% chance that Germany would lose the war.  The DVD organisation itself was set up by Admiral Canaris in 1944.

 

The DVD is so secret that its finances are hidden (that is, it is financed by ‘Black Operations’ resources) and there appear to be no traces at all of thus service being funded by the German taxpayer, precisely because it is funded clandestinely.

 

And what will cause very great astonishment outside intelligence services around the world is the location where the DVD is based: DACHAU, the town that gave its name to the notorious concentration and Holocaust extermination camp.

 

While visiting the Salzburg (music) festival in 2003, Sir Edward Heath was alerted by DVD that his live-long service to Germany’s covert nazi intelligence community had been uncovered by British investigators.  One of the intelligence sources reports that he literally blew a fuse when this warning was delivered –which is to say, he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 

Plans to interrogate Heath were blocked at Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) level by no 10 Downing Street.  One of our cynical special sources commented: ‘No surprises there’- given that M16 is headed by an operative allegedly considered to be an asset of French intelligence [Would it be our own John Scarlett?].

 

The super-secret covert ‘Black’ Nazi DVD acts with the approval of the German Government, and ‘owns’ the German Chancellorship, beginning with the postwar Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, who was an asset of the German Abwehr before its collapse.

It follows that the German Government is, at any point in time, actually the instrument of the secret Nazi international Establishment, the main blueprint of which was intercepted by the Allies in the early 1950’s.

 

MASTER OF BALLIOL’S SUSPICIONS

 

When the members of the Nazi oxford ring were recruited, the Master of Balliol College (Lindsay) entertained certain nagging suspicions.  It is understood he was initially tipped off by the College’s Head Porter; at all events, the master reported the members of the Ring to M15, which ‘then’ maintained a recruiter (for British intelligence) at  Oxford University, and had become well aware of the German intelligence activity in the Oxford area during the months prior to the Munich Conference, from which the Prime minister Mr Joseph Chamberlain, returned from his fatal meeting with Herr Hitler in premature triumph in 1938.

 

The future British prime Minister was by then already on the Nazi external intelligence payroll.  He is reported by one source to have complained about encountering problems in paying a loan from a Kent Education Committee, even though as indicated he was already on the German payroll and was initially paid more than £250 annually, which was a very large sum of for a pre-war university student, in those days. (Your own correspondent, who came down from Christ Church, Oxford in the spring of that year, before emigrating to Canada later in 1959)

 

After the war M15 arranged for Master Lindsay to travel to the British Occupation Zone in Germany, where he met the British counterintelligence officers working on the so-called De-Nazification Programme, which was aborted when the already penetrated OSS, parent of the American CIA, reversed its policy under intense pressure from the US State Department led by George Kennon, and commenced the process which led to the importation and resettlement of at least 770 prominent Nazi scientists who had all been working on Heinrich Himmler’s jet-black satanic experiments and operations-including the development of occult psychopolitical personal and mass psycho-manipulative and personality modification techniques, and on rocket science and space travel innovations.

 

One source believes that Lindsay met with Brigadier Lathbridge, a senior British intelligence officer working in the British Zone.  Lathbridge is reported to have been unaware of the continuing \Nazi International secret intelligence service DVD, although he also believed to have suspected the existence of a powerful Nazi organisation that was engaged in the protection of high-ranking Nazis and overseas Nazi intelligence assets who have been left in place in 1945.

 

One of these was Edward Heath Further enquires were reportedly blocked in London and by assets of the DVD within the Nazi-penetrated OSS, which controlled access to Munich, to which location Edward Heath’s Abwehr (German external intelligence) file had been transferred from the German Abwehr headquarters in Berlin.

 

Today, the London Station of the continuing Nazi International’s DVD is shared with the overt German intelligence service, BND (Bundes Nachrichten Dienst.

 

*

 

EDWARD HEATH DESPATCHED

 

The traitor’s funeral service was held at Salisbury Cathedral at 2.30pm on Monday 25th June 2005. Attending the event were representatives of British intelligence, and the DVD itself, in the guise of German diplomats (BND officers, whom M15 will have been particularly interested in, given the likelihood of their secret Nazi intelligence provenance beneath their diplomatic cover.

 

A counter-intelligence review of all attendees will doubtless have been undertaken, given the necessity to establish what other assets the DVD may have recruited within the British Establishment.

 

It is no coincidence that this service  International Currency Review was the first to be informed of Heath’s long-term Nazi intelligence connections,

as it appears that there are no other remaining independent financial and geopolitical publishers left.

 

An entirely separate, veteran, British intelligence source, with detailed knowledge of intelligence warfare following the ‘defeat’ of the Nazi regime in 1945, adds:

 

‘By 1945, Edward Heath had been assigned to the Ministry of Aircraft Production with the support of a high-ranking German asset inside the Ministry who had been promoted by Lord Beaverbrook during the war and who had successfully delayed production of the successful De Havilland DH 98 Mosquito, during the war years’. Established within the Ministry, Heath worked on the ‘successful’ Comet and Tudor sabotage programmes, although it is unclear whether he was involved in the assassination of Roy Chadwick, the designer of the Tudor aircraft and the lead designer on the early Vulcan bomber programme’.  By ‘successful’ in this context, the source meant, of course, that Heath was instrumental in procuring the failure of the military projects in question.

 

‘The Germans’ , our second source advises, ‘recruited a rigger at the Woodford, Essex plant, who reversed the elevator controls of a Tudor  (from reflection) aircraft which was then boarded by Chadwick, who had earlier designed the Manchester and the Lancaster bombers[?] –his assassination holding back development after the war of the Avro Vulcan’.

 

This implication is that the assassination of the brillant aircraft designer was in sequence with sabotaging of the two earlier aircraft programmes with which Mr Heath was directly associated.

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding and underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

 

 

[After what we have heard about our traitor Heath there should be a petition raised in order to have his body shipped to Germany for re-burial.

 

 Over the past ten years we have always looked on the smiling sailor who gave away our Country and the Fishing Fleets as already a traitor before hearing about his traitorous behaviour before the Second World War-during and since in betraying his country.

 

If there is sufficient proof of guilt on anyone alive today who is implicated with Heath in his despicable plans –then the Law of High Treason should prevail.

 

We are sickened as we are sure the majority of people in this country of the career of the Traitor Edward Heath and if there are others like him alive today which we are told there are then we expect an untainted Prime Minster in the future will see that Justice is Done.

 

WE can only hope that there are men of principle that love their country in our Intelligence Services who will root out the bad eggs as quickly as possible so that the people will not have to conclude that their supposed protectors are working for a foreign power.]

 [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

*         *          *

We shall be continuing with our extracts from the International Currency Review with further subjects to air which many of you will find hard to believe but after the revelations about a past Prime Minister nothing will surprise us about what will be uncovered in the future.

 

We hope you will be interested enough to get in touch with the Editor: Christopher Story for confirmation of the authenticity of the articles we have displayed which are just a few of the many which are available in book form from them –a quarterly journal which is not afraid to expose the trickery of politicians and others around the world with particular reference to the EU.

 

[Font altered=bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

OCTOBER 10-2005

 

*         

For further details contact:

  

International Currency Review

 

World Reports limited

108 Horseferry Road

Westminster

London SWIP 2EF

Telephone +44 (0)20-7222 3836

www.worldreports.org

Editor: Christopher Story FRSA

Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst

E-mail: cstory@worldreports.org

 

Website:www.worldreports.org

 [MUCH OF THE WORK SHOWN BELOW WAS THAT OF CHRISTOPHER STORY WHO DIED IN 2010.  WE WERE SENT INFORMATION IN 2005 AND IN 2001 WHICH WE IMMEDIATELY PUT ON OUR WEBSITE AS SHOWN BY THE MONTH AT THE FOOT OF THIS PAGE.   THERE HAS BEEN A SILENCE FROM OUR FREE PRESS ABOUT THE TREASON OF THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH  AND HIS ASSOCIATES WHEREAS THE COMMUNISTS ARE ALWAYS IN THE NEWS TO THE PRESENT DAY. ]

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

 

Christopher Story -

Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Story
‎

Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA (8 March 1938 – 14 July 2010) was an
English writer, publisher and government adviser specialising in intelligence and
economic affairs, who is perhaps best known for his collaboration with KGB
defector Anatoliy Golitsyn on the 1995 book The Perestroika Deception.
Christopher Story
 A PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

Benjamin Fulford : Christopher Story murdered,  as were other journalists ...

 

 

 

*          *          *

H.F.1497    -Brought forward from October, 2005

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 
 

2018-02-26

Knights Templar admitted back to inner sanctum of monotheism after 711-year hiatus

By  Weekly Reports  61 Comments
 

For the first time since Friday, October 13th, 1307, the Knights Templar have been invited back into the inner sanctum of monotheism, according to Templar and P2 Freemason lodge sources.  So, a 711-year-old injustice, one that gave rise to the superstition of Friday the 13th being unlucky, is finally being addressed.  This is just another sign that we are experiencing events that can only be described as biblical.  Remember that in February of 2016, the Roman and Russian churches ended their thousand-year schism.  Will the Muslim, Jewish, and Christian schisms be next to end?  Maybe we will find out soon.

Anyway, now the Templars will be merging with the Knights of Malta, and this will “provide access for the Templars to the Vatican itself,” according to Andrew Heim, of the Sovereign Military Order of the Temple of Jerusalem, aka the Templars.  Furthermore, the Templars will be given “access to the inner sanctum of the Abrahamic religions, seen with the access afforded to the Vatican and to the Holy Land.  In addition, this inner sanctum will include access to the controversial Prieure de Sion made popular by Dan Brown’s novel The Da Vinci Code…” says Heim.
 http://www.chevaliersfideles.com/international-news-2018

This event is just the latest sign of a fundamental change of direction for Western civilization away from war and toward peace and development, according to these sources.  If all goes well, trillions of dollars will soon be made available to both pay off debt of the U.S. government and the private sector, as well as finance a massive campaign to end poverty, stop environmental destruction, and turn the planet earth into the paradise it is meant to be, the sources say.  This is now being talked about in public by Western leaders and reported on in the corporate media.  Remember, you read it here first.
 https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/18/us-japan-india-australia-mull-alternative-to-chinas-belt-and-road.html

The earth alliance fighting to free humanity from Babylonian debt slavery is also winning on multiple fronts, with senior satanic cabalists dying, disappearing, or losing power at an accelerating pace.  CIA sources are now confirming, for example, that Jacob Rothschild …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

2018-02-21

Any intel on Jared Rand?

By  Letters to the Editor  9 Comments
 

Ben:

Would you have any intel on Jared Rand?

He says there is a “bad RV” and a “good RV,” and that the bad RV is the cryptocurrency, which is the cabal’s new fiat currency.  They will assure everyone it is gold-backed and “rescue” us from all the others.  (The recent warnings from the BIS against cryptocurrency feel like a cabal deception.)

The good RV is the gold-backed new currency.

Jared Rand is new on the scene and has all the positive off-world helpers’ projections well organized, as well as the spiritual themes put out by the likes of Wilcock and Goode.

Any thoughts on this?

Thanks,
–DS

DS,
All I can say is that we are tired of waiting for things to happen, so we are working on starting a gold-backed cryptocurrency.  And we like to think we are the good guys.
–BF

 
2018-02-21

Bad Guys into Good Guys?

 

By  Letters to the Editor  7 Comments

 

Dear Ben:

I heard in your talk with Robert David Steele that you think we should pay the bad guys off and change things to turn the bad guys (NWO mafia) into good guys.

I guess you don’t realize these bad guys are not Human–they have Human bodies and a Reptilian soul.  I’m sure of this although I can’t prove it, but my work is at http://www.icheckyoursoul.com.

I have a God-given ability to read souls by the use of a pendulum, and almost everyone that has used my services agrees with my findings.

These Bad Guys are polarized evil and their souls come from the Draconian Reptilians, so they almost can’t change!  If we were to pay them off and take them out of power, so to speak, what’s to stop them from continuing funding their evil corporations and keep up chemtrails, GMOs, vaccines, Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030, wars, and many other evil activities.

These Reptilian-soul people will not stop, and they intend to have just them in the ruling class and everyone else be a worker/slave.  We must take these evil people out of our society while we still can.  What say you?

A Long Time Subscriber

My view is that the true criminals will face justice, but the ones who went along because it was a choice of “either go along or die” should be allowed truth and reconciliation.
–BF

 

 

How and Why Was WWI Planned and Prolonged

Mujahid Kamran

August 1, 2017

The history of the First World War is a deliberately concocted lie. Not the sacrifice, the heroism, the horrendous waste of life or the misery that followed. No, these were very real but the truth of how it all began and how it was unnecessarily and deliberately prolonged beyond 1915 has been successfully covered up for a century. A carefully falsified history was created to conceal the fact that Britain, not Germany, was responsible for the war. Had the truth become known after 1918, the consequences for the British Establishment would have been cataclysmic.”

Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor

The Planners and the Plan

The First World War did not just happen. There is undeniable evidence that the war was planned by the international-banker controlled British oligarchy almost two decades before it broke out (see e.g. [1-3]). In their outstanding book Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor have established beyond reasonable doubt that indeed the First World War was planned by a tiny group of members of the British oligarchy including Nathaniel Rothschild [1].

King Edward VII

While building upon what was first revealed by the late Professor Carrol Quigley, they have not only provided detailed evidence in favor of this thesis, but have also revealed the astonishing role of the British monarch, King Edward VII, in secretly building alliances against Germany. They have provided ample evidence that the playboy King, much disliked by his mother Queen Victoria, went along with the secret group that had, in the first place, planned this horrific war.

The secret group of people, whose existence was first revealed by Professor Carrol Quigley, thus putting his own life in danger, decided to work behind the scenes with the utmost secrecy. The revelations of Professor Quigley were based on documents provided by the Secret Elite, as they are referred to sometimes. The documents were provided for the purpose of writing a sanitized history.

The goal of the Secret Elite was the expansion of the British empire to the total exclusion of other powers.

This cabal was extremely wealthy. Cecil Rhodes, who, with Rothschild help, had amassed a huge fortune in South Africa, first discussed his plans with Nathaniel Rothschild in February 1890 in the presence of a few members of the British oligarchy.

In 1891 a five-member secret group comprising Cecil Rhodes, Nathaniel Rothschild, William Stead, Lord Esher and Alfred Milner became, unknown to anyone else, the core group that decided to steer the world towards a war aimed at the destruction of Germany. They called themselves the Society of the Elect. Around themselves they built, as if in a concentric circle, The Association of Helpers, eminent men, who did not know of the Society of the Elect. Other men were gradually involved in the plan but they were not aware of the separate existence of the five-member core. Together, these men steered and controlled the course of British foreign policy, unknown to the Parliament, the people, the Cabinet, and others who were constitutionally relevant.

These men represented a new phenomenon on the world stage – the money kings, who held no office and yet had real power to decide the fate of nations. When Rhodes died at age 48, he left all his money to these men for the sole purpose of extending the British empire over the entire globe. Secrecy was of utmost importance to this group.

The destruction of Germany, the Secret Elite knew, would entail enormous bloodshed. They also knew that Britain could not do it alone. It needed the strength of the Russian and French armies to achieve that end.

Russian soldiers WW1

And maybe the Secret Elite wanted Russia and France to shed their own and German blood for them. But France had been a traditional enemy of the British and vice versa whereas Russia and Britain had vied for the control of the Black Sea and the annexation of Constantinople i.e. Istanbul. There was rivalry between Russia and Britain regarding the Russian urge southwards and eastwards to warm waters, seaports that could function round the year. In the south lay the “jewel” of the British empire – India.

Despite these rivalries the Secret Elite was determined to befriend and woo both France and Russia because it considered Germany the most potent threat to the existence of the British empire. Germany was not fully aware of this heinous plan aimed at its utter destruction. And Russia and France, both were trapped by the Secret Elite. In fact, the Secret Elite succeeded not only in destroying Germany, they also destroyed Russia, and by prolonging the war, destroyed the Ottoman as well as the Austro-Hungarian empires. Britain, in the end, did not really benefit. The Zionists did – the Illuminati Zionist bankers emerged as the real force on the world stage. The Milners and the Eshers and Balfours, and all others became powerless eventually and faded away.

The Rothschilds have continued into the 21st century enhancing their power and wealth with every major bloodshed. They and their illuminati banking brethren were the real beneficiaries. The Christian West was the real loser. And so were the Muslims.

It is well known among historians that Queen Victoria disapproved of her son’s womanizing and kept his royal stipend at a minimum while she was in power. The expenses of the womanizing of King Edward VII, when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were borne by the Rothschilds and by Sir Ernest Cassel, both bankers of German-Jewish extraction. When he came to power Edward VII was keen to oblige his patrons who, apparently, wanted to destroy the emerging German nation. And, in any case he was under the impression that the destruction of Germany would pave the way for a global British Empire – it was to be his empire.

The Zionist/Illuminati international bankers had other plans. King Edward VII was the architect of the Entente Cordiale of 1904. His image as a playboy concealed the fact that he was traveling all over Europe to build alliances against Germany, while Germany never suspected that traditional enemies like England and France could or would become friends.

Docherty and Macgregor also describe the infiltration of the Foreign Office and the Colonial Office of Great Britain by agents of the group that had planned the First World War. They were able to control the officers of both government departments. They also controlled the War Office as well as the highly important and secret Committee of Imperial Defense. The Group had influence in both parties. Their policy of destroying Germany not only transcended party politics, it also went beyond which party was in power – it transcended governments.

The Parliaments and the prime ministers came and went without knowing that a tiny cabal was planning and relentlessly driving Britain to total war with Germany.

*

Cover up and Fabricated History

Docherty and Macgregor have further revealed that (p 5, ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite dictated the writing and teaching of history, from the ivory towers of the academia down to the smallest of schools. They carefully controlled the publication of official government papers, the selection of documents for inclusion in the official version of the history of the First World War, and refused access to any evidence that might betray their covert existence. Incriminating documents were burned, removed from official records, shredded, falsified, or deliberately rewritten, so that what remained for historians was carefully selected material.”

Docherty and Macgregor point out (their book was published in 2013) that even “To this day researchers are denied access to certain First World War documents because the Secret Elite had much to fear from the truth, as do those who have succeeded them.” Why such a vehement cover up that even a century later the British authorities do not grant access to certain documents pertaining to the first World War? They want to maintain the myth of German culpability and their innocence, whereas the reality is the reverse of what establishment history portrays. The truth will shift the onus of responsibility to the shoulders of the Secret Elite and of every other consequence that followed: the Second World War, Bank of International Settlements, IMF, World Bank, the U.N., Israel, the Korean and Vietnam wars, continuing wars in the Middle East, right up to the dangerous situation today. They have lied to generations and rather than let the truth be known they have chosen and attempted to perpetuate the lie worldwide and for all times.

They can do so because the international illuminati-Zionist bankers are all powerful and control the American and British governments. Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom, a source of perpetual war and a possible eventual Armageddon. The academia is, by and large, part of this cover up and that is very sad, to say the least. Any historian in a university who challenges the establishment version will be ostracized, if not thrown out of his job. Nick Kollerstrom had to lose his job despite the fact that he is an outstanding academic. One of his colleagues, whom he had known for years, was so angry that he told Kollerstrom that he wanted to hit him with his racket!

Guido Preparata was ostracized for his outstanding book Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Built the Third Reich, and had to quit his job, leave the U.S., and even give up his research career for some time. It is therefore significant that Docherty and Macgregor, though British (both are Scottish) do not work for any British university. They, therefore, cannot be thrown out of their jobs.

On the surface of it, the strategic aim behind the instigated and covertly planned World War I was to destroy both Germany and Russia and thereby kill the possibility of emergence of a dominant Eurasian power, or a powerful coalition of Eurasian countries, that could threaten the British Empire. The initial group, the Circle of the Elect, appeared to have, as its aim, the establishment of a worldwide British Empire. It only included one banker, Nathaniel Rothschild. With hindsight, the evolution of global affairs indicates without any doubt that the Zionists (Communism and Zionism sprouted from the same Illuminati “tribe” and had a common origin) were the real beneficiaries and the deeper instigators of this war.

The world today is headed towards a global slave state controlled by the Illuminati cum Zionist international bankers. The Bolshevik Revolution was led and controlled by “atheistic Jews” (to use Churchill’s phrase) most of whom came from outside Russia and both Lloyd David George and President Wilson were stooges of the Zionists. Today both, the U.S. and the U.K., are completely controlled by the Zionist cum Illuminati international bankers.

However, other deeper aims of the international bankers were to weaken Christianity through widespread death and destruction of Christian life and property, to weaken European governments by exhaustively bleeding them and bringing them under deep debt bondage, to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution, to facilitate the creation of Israel and the establishment of a supra-national organization through which to set up a One World Government under their ruthless and absolute control (The New World Order). The international bankers were simultaneously Zionists and Freemasons/Illuminati.

A photo of the 1914 Christmas Truce illustrates how the British and Germans had no antipathy until it was created by propaganda and the war itself

*

Building Japan, Bruising and then Wooing Russia after Sabotaging a Russo German Treaty

It was the Secret Elite that was behind the strategy to build Japan’s navy that was then used to destroy the Russian fleet that traveled around the world to confront the Japanese navy. The Russian fleet was utterly destroyed in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905 and the small island nation managed to inflict a humiliating defeat on a giant. This was part of the strategy of the Secret Elite to curtail Russia’s ambitions in the Far East and to bruise and weaken her. Ships for the Japanese navy were quietly built in the shipyards of Britain. On the one hand, the Rothschilds in London secretly provided loans to Japan, while on the other the Rothschilds in France provided loans worth 400 million francs to the Russian government to build the 6365 miles long trans-Siberian railway (p 86, ref. [1]). The Russians had expressed their gratitude to the Rothschilds when the czar decorated Alfonso de Rothschild of Paris with Grand Cross. The London Rothschilds made double profits because the armament industry which manufactured battleships for the Japanese navy were partly owned by the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds had the greatest shares in Vickers armament. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 92, 93 ref [1]):

Manipulators at the heart of the Secret Elite, like Esher, facilitated meetings held on Rothschild premises to help the Japanese financial envoy, Takahashi Korekiyo, raise their war chest. While banks with strong links to the Rothschilds were prepared to raise funds for Japan quite openly, the Rothschilds had to tread carefully because of their immense Russian investments, not least in the Baku oilfields. They were also very aware of the political repercussions that might ensue for Russian Jews who bore the harsh brunt of czarist anti-Semitism. That changed once the war was over. The London and Paris Rothschilds negotiated a further £48 million issue to help Japanese recovery. At every turn the war profits flowed back to the Secret Elite.”

It was Japan that attacked the Russian fleet in Port Arthur, a Chinese port that was functional all year round and had been leased to Russia. Although Japan issued a declaration of war on Feb 8, 1904, its navy attacked the Russian fleet three hours before the ultimatum was delivered to the Russian government.

In order to go to war with Germany the Secret Elite took four decisions. These are summarized by Docherty and Macgregor in the following words (pp 73,74, ref. [1]):

“Foreign policy had to be sustained no matter what political party was in office; the British Army needed a complete overhaul to make it fit for the purpose; the Royal Navy had to maintain all its historic advantages; the general public had to be turned against Germany.”

The British public did not want to go to war with Germany and therefore a secretly driven but powerful propaganda campaign against Germany was launched in order to poison the minds of the public. The Belgian ambassador apparently noticed by 1903 that jingoism was on the rise in Britain and people were turning against Germany. He wrote to his government that this was merely because of jealousy. Docherty and Macgregor point out that the ambassador did not know that secret manipulation behind the scenes had resulted in this attitude.

The Secret Elite worked relentlessly using the vast Rhodes fortune at its disposal to buy politicians and men of influence in all countries that were relevant. One of the men in their pocket was Alexander Islovsky, who served them loyally to the immense detriment of Russia, Europe and the Christian West. Kaiser Wilhelm had made a brilliant move in 1905 – he wanted to have an agreement between Russia and Germany that would have averted the war by forming a defensive alliance.

The Kaiser and the Czar secretly met and signed an agreement on July 24, 1905 at Bjorko Finland, whereby if any one of the countries was attacked by a European power the other shall come to its aid. However, when the czar returned to Russia the agents of the Secret Elite as well as a bribed press opposed the ratification of the treaty. Actually no one knew of the contents of the treaty until the Czar confided in is his foreign minister Count Lansdorff who betrayed the secret to King Edward VII.

The Czar was in need of money after the Russo-Japanese war in which Russia suffered heavy material and human losses. He therefore needed loans and the Rothschilds in Paris were far richer than any Berlin banks. The Secret Elite threatened to block the much needed loans. This was crucial and the Czar backed off despite having signed the proposed treaty. This treaty, had it gone through, would have averted the planned world war. This caused the Kaiser immense pain and he wrote to the Czar (p 95 ref. [1]): “We joined hands and signed before God who heard our vows.” This mistake by the Czar was to cost Russia and Germany dearly during World War I.

Having sabotaged the Russo-German alliance the Secret Elite then used King Edward VII to woo Russia. The King invited the Russian navy to Britain and the British public was softened towards Russia through a media campaign. The Secret Elite managed to lure and trap Russia by a false promise of allowing Russia to control Constantinople (Istanbul) and the Black Sea Straits. A Russia that had been mauled militarily, that was in dire financial straits, and that was presented with a dangling Constantinople carrot succumbed and fell in the trap. An Anglo-Russian Convention was signed on 31 August 1907. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 95,96 ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite was prepared to use any nation as cat’s-paw and Russia became the victim of British trickery, manipulated into a different treaty that was designed not to protect her or the peace of Europe but to enable the Secret Elite to destroy Germany. . . It was yet another secret deal hidden from Parliament and the people. . .”

By such deceptions, lies, bribery and manipulations, the brutal and absolutely ruthless and utterly shameless Secret Elite proceeded to steer and goad nations to a path of unprecedented bloodshed in which Christian, and to a lesser extent Muslim blood was shed. The beneficiaries were the satanic illuminati international bankers and their brethren. Their determination to destroy Germany masked a deep and malevolent desire for a conflagration that would burn Christian Europe to ashes with tens of millions of casualties. That was their goal and they drew the deepest delight and satisfaction by turning men into savage animals.

The Myth of Belgian Neutrality

When World War I began the British public had been exposed to false propaganda for a long time. Two issues on which their mind had been falsely influenced were Belgian neutrality and German militarism. Facts were the opposite of what people were led to believe. As for Belgian neutrality, it was utterly untrue. Belgium was not only not neutral it had had close military links with Britain since 1905 when Britain offered to send “4 cavalry brigades, 2 armored corps, and a division of mounted infantry” to Belgium (p 106, ref. [1]). At that time nobody outside the close knit Secret Elite know of, or suspected, possible war with Germany.

Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 106, 107ref. [1]): “Britain’s military link with Belgium was one of the closes guarded secrets, even within privileged circles.” General Grierson, who was director of military operations was present at a secret 1905 meeting along with Lord Roberts, PM Balfour, Admiral Fisher and the head of naval intelligence, where a decision to take forward joint military planning with France and Belgium was taken. This was so secret that it was agreed that “the minutes would not be printed or circulated without special permission from the prime minister.” Docherty and MacGregor write further (p 107, ref. [1]):

Documents found in the Belgian secret archives by the Germans after they had occupied Brussels disclosed that the chief of the Belgian general staff, Major General Ducarne, held a series of meetings with the British military attache’ over action to be taken by British, French and Belgian armies against Germany in event of war. A fully elaborated plan detailed the landing and transportation of British forces, which were actually called ‘allied armies’, and in a series of meetings they discussed the allocation of Belgian officers and interpreters to the British Army and crucial details on the care and ‘accommodation of the wounded of the allied armies.’”

The British allowed Belgium to annex Congo Free State in return for a “secret agreement that was in everything but name an alliance. King Leopold II sold Belgian neutrality for African rubber and minerals.” Thus Belgium bargained away her neutral status and in return entered into a deep and hidden relationship with Britain against Germany. Docherty and Macgregor point out that here too King Edward VII played a hidden but important role because the King of Belgium was a cousin of Queen Victoria and was very fond of her. So much for Belgian neutrality that became a rallying cry to war for the misled and deliberately misinformed British public. The technique of using the media to control the public mindset continues to date and entails an incredible cost in terms of loss of human life and property.

The Myth of German Militarism

As for German militarism, Docherty and Macgregor have provided irrefutable data that clearly establishes that Britain was spending far more secretly on arming itself compared to Germany. In reality it was British militarism but the cunning and, in a sense, deep characterlessness of the Secret Elite, which hoodwinked everyone and which worked outside and in contradiction with the constitution, and which lied to and shamelessly deceived everyone, created the opposite impression. When the Liberal leader Campbell-Bannerman won a landslide victory in 1906, the Liberals were committed to peace.

Edward Grey and Haldane were committed to war and along with other members of the Secret Elite, steering the country towards war. Cabinet was never informed of this, nor was the prime minister. The crafted biographies of men like Haldane contain lies and are unreliable. And if one reads Docherty and Macgregor they have exposed the lies in Haldane’s biography and private notes. In fact, there is evidence that Campbell-Bannerman was kept in the dark about the military contacts with other countries. His untimely death in 1908 relieved the Secret Elite of the pressure for a peaceful world! In fact, the Secret Elite were very worried soon afterwards, because in 1910, their key patron King Edward VII died at age 68, while the Liberals were still in power.

False propaganda about German military preparations was carried out at the behest of the Secret Elite in the British media. As Docherty and Macgregor put it (pp 134, 135, ref. [1])

From the beginning of the twentieth century, the Secret Elite indulged in a frenzy of rumor and half-truths, of raw propaganda and lies, to create the myth of a great naval race. The story widely accepted, even by many anti-war Liberals, was that Germany was preparing a massive fleet of warships to attack and destroy the British navy before unleashing a military invasion on the east coast of England or the Firth of Forth in Scotland. It was the stuff of conspiracy novels. But it worked. The British people swallowed the lie that militarism had run amok in Germany and the ‘fact’ that it was seeking world domination through military superiority. Militarism in the United Kingdom was of God, but in Germany of the Devil, and had to be crushed before it crushed them.”

These authors are quick to point out that when Germany was defeated and all their prewar records became available to the Allies, not a shred of evidence in favor of such secret plans to invade Britain were discovered. They point out that the statistics were thoroughly abused by an “almighty alliance of armaments manufacturers, political rhetoric, and newspaper propaganda” that conjured a frightening image of a German naval armada and the German will to dominate the world.

Rothschild and Ernest Cassel, who paid for the lechery of King Edward VII when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were major owners of the largest armament factory Vickers. They point out that in the decade prior to war the British naval expenditure was £351.9 million whereas the German naval expenditure was £185.2 million, i.e. almost half of the British expenditure. Similarly, the Allies, i.e., the Triple Entente spent £675.88 million on warships in that same decade whereas Germany and Austro-Hungary spent £235.9 million, almost a third of what the Entente had spent, on their navies in the same period.

Generals Hindenburg and Ludendorff (R) lead Germany as virtual military dictators from mid-1916 to the end of the war

The German army was 7,61000 strong, the French and Russian armies had, respectively, 794,000 and 1.845 million personnel. So, where is the evidence of German militarism running amok? Who was running amok? Who was spending far more than the Germans? This lie of German military buildup has been perpetuated by establishment historians when the numbers speak out for themselves. The establishment historians should be ashamed at propagating lies and holding the so-called nonexistent German militarism responsible for the war. They have lied to, and continue to lie to their own people as well as the whole world. What a shame! The Germans should stand up with their heads high. They did not lie or deceive.

The sanitized history taught worldwide seems to hold Germany as the aggressor. This is utterly untrue as established by Docherty and Macgregor. Preparata also states in his fascinating book (published 2005) (p 14 of ref [3]):

“From the beginning Britain was the aggressor, not Germany.”

The Russian ambassador to France Isvolsky, who was an agent of the Secret Elite, sent a telegram to Moscow on August 1, 1914 (p 320, ref. [1]):

“The French War Minister informed me, in hearty high spirits, that the Government have firmly decided on war, and begged me to endorse the hope of the French General Staff that all efforts will be directed against Germany…”

Germany did not order mobilization until 24 hours later! The Kaiser had sent a message to the Russian czar asking that Russia stop her military movements on her borders. The Kaiser waited for 24 hours without any reply before ordering mobilization. Docherty and Macgregor correctly observe that Germany was the last of the European powers to order mobilization. Does that indicate that Germany wanted war? It only indicates that Germany did her best to avoid war.

A detailed study of the interactions between the British leaders and the Germans and others during July and the first days of August reveals clearly that the British leaders were shamelessly lying to the Germans and deceiving them. Their conduct had descended to the level of common criminals and crooks.

The Germans conducted themselves with integrity and a degree of innocence. The Secret Elite had also advised the Russians and the French to mobilize to attack, but not actually attack Germany, because the British public would never support the aggressor in a European war. They wanted Germany, as Docherty and Macgregor put it, to “swallow the bait.” Britain had trapped Germany into a war, in collusion with Russia and France. Docherty and Macgregor write (p 321, ref. [1]):

“What else could Germany have done? She was provoked into a struggle for life and death. It was a stark choice: await certain destruction or strike out to defend herself. Kaiser Wilhelm had exposed his country to grave danger and almost lost one precious advantage Germany had by delaying countermeasures to Russian mobilization in the forlorn hope of peace.”

When Germany declared war against France on August 3, 1914, the French Under-Secretary of State, Abel Ferry, noted in his diary (ref. [3], p 24):

The web was spun and Germany entered it like a great buzzing fly.”

The Illuminati international bankers and other secret society members of the British oligarchy had colluded together for a destruction of Christian Europe. Only the Zionist international bankers and their fellow “tribesmen” saw this outcome clearly – they had planned for it and the non-banking oligarchy was used. The lie parroted in standard history books that Germany bore the responsibility of the war is an utter and shameful lie. The responsibility of the war rested with the Secret Elite controlled British leadership.

Western Front WW1 British soldier

Zionism and the American Involvement

Almost two months before war broke out, on May 29, 1914, the Rothschild agent Col. House, who handled and controlled President Wilson, had written to him:

“Whenever England consents, France and Russia will close in on Germany.”

It is well known that Col. Edward Mandel House was a Rothschild agent as was his father. Col. House played a diabolical role in prolonging World War I, and in dragging the U.S. into the World War. It is important to understand how influential he was with President Wilson. President Wilson had once referred to him as his alter ego. In his seminal book, that has sold over five million copies since it was first published, Gary Allen states [4]:

“Colonel” House was front man for the international banking fraternity. He manipulated President Wilson like a puppet. Wilson called him “my alter ego.” House played a major role in creating the Federal Reserve System, passing the graduated income tax and getting America into WWI. House’s influence over Wilson is an example that in the world of super-politics the real rulers are not always the ones the public sees.

Col. House represents a new phenomenon – the emergence of “advisors” to the U.S. President who do not hold any formal office, are unelected, and are intimately tied to the international banking families, apart from being members of secret societies. These advisors hold the president of the United States “captive.” In his profound book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed, a Times (London) correspondent in Central Europe right up to the beginning of WW II, mentions that four men held President Wilson captive – Col. House, Rabi Stephen Wise, Justice Brandeis and Bernard Baruch. Reed states [5]:

Thus three out of the four men around President Wilson were Jews and all three, at one time or the other, played leading parts in the re-segregation of the Jews through Zionism and its Palestinian ambition ….

Such was the grouping around a captive president as the American Republic moved towards involvement in the First World War, and such was the cause which was to be pursued through him and his country’s involvement. After his election Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.

In order to understand how and why the preplanned WWI was prolonged it is important to know who influenced or controlled the elected leadership of the U.K. and the U.S. and what were the aims of these controllers. It is also important to know that Justice Louis Brandeis had founded a secret society by the name Parushim, for promoting Zionism in U.S.A. The initiate was asked to accept the following oath at a secret initiation ceremony [6] :

You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life. You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be impelled to heed at any time, in any place, and at any cost. And ever after, until our purpose shall be accomplished, you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life – dearer than that of family, of school, of nation. By entering this brotherhood, you become a self-dedicated soldier in the army of Zion. Your obligation to Zion becomes your paramount obligation… It is the wish of your heart and of your own free will to join our fellowship, to share its duties, its tasks, and its necessary sacrifices.

Rabi Stephen Wise was on board regarding Parushim and, almost certainly, Bernard Baruch was also on board. Bernard Baruch’s connection with the international bankers is well known. It is also important to point out that the international bankers had planned World War I to, among other things, promote the Zionist cause. As Douglas Reed, using information provided in Chaim Weizmann’s book Trial and Error, stated in his book Far and Wide [7]:

The First World War began in 1914; long-memoried readers may recall that it appeared to be concerned with such matters as the rape of Belgium, ending Prussian militarism, and making the world safe for democracy. At its start Baron Edmond de Rothschild told Dr. Weizmann that it would spread to the Middle East, where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur.

How did Edmond de Rothschild know right at the beginning of the war that the war would spread to the Middle East where things will work out to the great advantage of Political Zionism? He could only know this if it was planned that way and if he was one of the planners. And, as we will see, this was one of the reasons why World War I was deliberately prolonged.

Prolonging the War

The war was prolonged through several tactics. Firstly, all overtures of peace from the side of the Germans, and later the Ottomans, were defeated by agents of the international bankers. Secondly when Germans ran short of food, the deception named Belgian Relief Commission was set up by the international bankers through their front men, by which food was supplied to Germany and the German army, under guise of food supplies to Belgium, so that the German army could keep on fighting. Thirdly Germans were supplied with vital chemicals, metals, and other war materials by Allied Big Business, to enable them to keep fighting. Finally, wherever the Allied rulers seemed to resist the expansion of the war into the Middle East, they were eliminated politically, and if need be physically. They were then replaced by agents of the international banking cabal.

Sabotage of German Peace Offers of February 1915 and December 1916

A lone French soldier in a wet trench

Early in the war, on November 3, 1914, Britain declared the North Sea a theater of war. It blockaded ports of neutral countries illegally. On February 3, 1915, i.e. three months later, the Germans announced a counter blockade. They announced that with effect from February 18, 1915, the entire English channel along with territorial waters of Britain and Ireland would be considered a war zone. One must appreciate the fact that the Germans waited for three months before announcing a counter blockade. They were within their rights to do so.

However simultaneously, in February 1915, the Germans approached James W. Gerard, the U.S. ambassador in Germany, and expressed their desire to end the war. The German authorities wanted the ambassador to convey their desire for peace to President Wilson. They were however utterly unaware that President Wilson was a captive of the “advisors” installed around him by the international bankers. This German overture for peace is not something that is mentioned in textbooks but it has been mentioned by James W. Gerard in autobiography My First Eighty Three Years in America.

The response from Washington was most astonishing. Instead of commenting on the German proposal for peace, the White House directed the ambassador to communicate with Col. House instead of the President of U.S.A.! Dr. Stanley Montieth quotes from ambassador Gerard’s biography [8]:

In addition to the cable which I had already received informing me that Colonel House was “fully commissioned to act” he himself reminded me of my duty in his February 16 postscript. In his own handwriting these were the words from House. “The President has just repeated to me your cablegram to him and says he has asked you to communicate directly with me in future . . .” All authority, therefore had been vested in Colonel House direct, the President ceased to be even a conduit of communications. . . . He, who had never been appointed to any position, and who had never been passed by the Senate, was “fully instructed and commissioned” to act in the most grave situation. I have never ceased to wonder how he had managed to attain such power and influence.

One may notice that the German counter blockade was to begin on February 18, and the Germans communicated their desire for peace before that date as Colonel House’s handwritten postscript was dated February 16th. So it appears that the Germans expected that since the counter blockade represented an increased and new level of hostility, the Americans would be concerned to defuse the situation. They had no idea that Wilson was a stooge, a puppet in the hands of those who had planned a long war.

And one may recall that although the Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated as late as June 28, 1914, Col. House had, a month earlier, on May 29th, communicated to Wilson the arrangement that as soon as England indicated, France and Russia would pounce on Germany. So Colonel House wanted a long war, and destruction of both Germany and Russia, in accordance with the desire of the Zionist international bankers. Therefore, the ambassador never heard anything from Col. House about the peace proposal of February 1915. The peace proposal was sabotaged by Col. House.

Realizing that Col. House was in control of Wilson the Germans made another overture of peace in December 1916. This has been revealed by historian Leon Degrelle [9]. He mentions that on December 12, 1916, German officials expressed a desire for peace and talks with their adversaries. He also writes that Germans expressed the hope that Col. House would persuade the Allies. The freemason Col. House ruled out peace and thus helped sabotage the second peace initiative within the same year. The Germans did not know that Col. House had played an important role in precipitating the First World War by secretly entering into a secret agreement with Britain, well before Wilson’s re-election, that the U.S. would join the war, on the side of the Allies. Degrelle further writes [9]:

“On December 18, 1916, U.S. ambassador to Britain, Walter H. Page, relayed a peace offer to the Allies from Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. On January 9, 1917, Prime Minister Lloyd George quickly repudiated the offering and declared that Britain would fight to the victory, which possibly prompted the Germans to re-initiate submarine warfare. Ambassador Page, in touch with President Wilson and Secretary of State Robert Lansing, defended British policies. This was William Jenning Bryan’s resignation, after he described Britain’s collapsing financial situation and the need for America’s neutrality.”

If the war had ended in 1916 million of lives could have been saved and destruction and devastation of numerous cities avoided. But the international bankers had planned a long war. It is important to note that, according to writer Juri Lina, who had access to records of numerous important Masonic lodges, Lloyd George was a Freemason, a Masonic Grand Master, and a Jew, whose real name was David Levi-Lowitt [10]. His connections with international bankers are very well known and he was installed in power as a result of an intrigue with the object of promoting the Zionist cause, as will be described later.

The picture of dead men among trees is a censored photo that was banned from publication by the French government. Those are dead Frenchmen mowed down by German guns during the Battle of the Frontiers in August/September 1914.

*

“Belgian Relief”

The next betrayal perpetrated by the international bankers took place in the form of the deception called Belgian Relief Commission. One finds many eulogized discussions about the work of this Commission. On the face of it this Commission was set up to supply food to the Belgian population. We quote below the typical version of the Belgian Relief Commission. It has been taken from an article by Elena S. Danielson that appeared in The United States in the First World War: An Encyclopedia, (edited by Anne Cipriano Venzon) [11]:

Herbert Hoover founded the Commission for Relief in Belgium (CRB) in London in October 1914 as a private organization to provide food for German-occupied Belgium. Belgium’s attempts at resistance to German military demands at the outbreak of the Great War had aroused much popular sympathy in England and the United States. A densely populated, industrialized country, Belgium depended on imports for three-quarters of its normal food supply. When the German Army began to requisition local foodstuffs and the British blockade cut off imported sources, 7 million Belgians faced severe hunger as the winter of 1914-1915 approached. When the American ambassador in London, Walter Hines Page, met with Belgian representatives, they concluded that Herbert Hoover was the best choice to administer some emergency relief action. The comprehensiveness of the program, however, was the result of Hoover’s personal determination to feed the entire nation.

But the real function, to which the Belgian Relief Commission was diverted, was hideous. Once Britain blockaded Germany, and the Germans were starved for food, the Belgian Relief Commission became a cover for sending food supplies to the German Army so that the German Army could keep on fighting. It may be useful to remember that Walter Hines Page was in the pay of Rothschilds. In his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve Eustace Mullins writes [12]:

The U.S. Ambassador to Britain, Walter Hines Page, complained that he could not afford the position, and was given twenty-five thousand dollars a year spending money by Cleveland H. Dodge, president of the National City Bank. H.L. Mencken openly accused Page in 1916 of being a British agent, which was unfair. Page was merely a bankers’ agent.

The “City” banks were always owned by the Rothschilds. Mullins writes [13]:

The Belgian Relief Commission was organized by Emile Francqui, director of a large Belgian bank, Societe Generale, and a London mining promoter, an American named Herbert Hoover, who had been associated with Francqui in a number of scandals which had become celebrated court cases, notably the Kaiping Coal Company scandal in China, said to have set off the Boxer Rebellion, which had as its goal the expulsion of all foreign businessmen from China. Hoover had been barred from dealing on the London Stock Exchange because of one judgment against him, and his associate, Stanley Rowe, had been sent to prison for ten years. With this background, Hoover was called an ideal choice for a career in humanitarian work.

Further the truth about Hoover is given in the following words [14]:

Hoover had also carried out a number of mining operations in various parts of the world as a secret agent for the Rothschilds, and had been rewarded with a directorship on one of the principal Rothschild enterprises, the Rio Tinto Mines in Spain and Bolivia.

It may also be useful to remember that [15]:

Wilson’s academic career was financed by gifts from Cleveland H. Dodge, director of National City bank and Moses Taylor Payne, grandson and heir of the founder of the National City Bank. Wilson then signed an agreement not to go to any other college.

Please note that the same Cleveland Dodge was the financier of both, Ambassador Walter Hines Page, and President Wilson. Dodge was working for the Rothschilds. The first person to expose the hideous reality about the Belgian Relief Commission was a British nurse named Edith Cavell who was running a hospital in Belgium at the time. In his book Secrets of the Federal Reserve, first published in 1951, Eustace Mullins wrote about this [16]:

Franqui and Hoover threw themselves into the seemingly impossible task of provisioning Germany during World War I. Their success was noted in Nordeutsche Allegmeine Zeitung, March 13, 1915, which noted that large quantities of food were now arriving from Belgium by rail. Schmoller’s Yearbook for Legislation, Administration and Political Economy for 1916 shows that one billion pounds of meat, one and a half billion pounds of bread, and one hundred and twenty one million pounds of butter had been shipped from Belgium to Germany in that year.

Mullins then narrates the story of Edith Cavell (Ibid pp 72, 73):

A patriotic British woman who had operated a small hospital in Belgium for several years, Edith Cavell, wrote to Nursing Mirror in London, April 15, 1915, complaining that “Belgian Relief” supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed the German army. The Germans considered Miss Cavell to be of no importance, and paid no attention to her, but the British intelligence service in London was appalled by Miss Cavell’s discovery, and demanded that the Germans arrest her as a spy. Sir William Wiseman, head of British Intelligence, and partner of Kuhn Loeb Company, feared that the continuance of war was at stake, and secretly notified the Germans that Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to escape. The usual penalty for this offence was three months imprisonment, but the Germans bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s demands, and shot Edith Cavell, thus creating one of the principal martyrs of the First World War.

It is to be noted that after the war Sir William Wiseman settled in the United States and became one of the directors of the Kuhn Loeb & Co. This was his reward for having helped prolong the war. It may be noted that the head of the German secret service was Max Warburg, another international banker, whose brother Paul Warburg had emigrated to the U.S. in 1902 and was instrumental, in 1913, in having the Federal Reserve Act passed. Paul Warburg was a partner in Kuhn Loeb & Co. The deeply hidden international banking connections are fairly obvious to anyone who cares to find out.

Thus the “Belgian Relief” was used to prolong the war. Had the war ended in February 1915 there would have been no Bolshevik Revolution (instigated and bankrolled by the international bankers) and the war would not have been extended to the Middle East. But the plan of the bankers who instigated the war was to prolong the war as long as possible and to fulfill, as far as possible, their targets (as revealed at the outset of the war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann).

Zionists Sabotage a Separate Peace Possibility with the Ottomans

The Zionists defeated another opportunity of securing peace with the Ottoman Empire in May 1917. It was in May 1917 that the U.S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing received a report that the Ottomans were tired of war and a separate peace with Britain could be secured thereby isolating Germany. But the Zionists did not want to keep the Ottoman Empire intact – they wanted its complete destruction so that they could secure a Jewish homeland in Palestine from the rubble of the Ottoman Empire. The Zionists got wind of the plan when President Wilson assigned Henry J. Morgenthau the duty of contacting the Ottomans. Henry J. Morgenthau had once been the U.S. ambassador in Turkey. Morgenthau was himself Jewish and he therefore decided to take Felix Frankfurter with him.

As Alison Weir writes in her book [17], Felix Frankfurter was a “paid political lobbyist and lieutenant” of Justice Louis Brandeis. Now Justice Brandeis was a highly unscrupulous individual when it came to his political purposes – he could go to any length to achieve these. It is the same Justice Brandeis who had set up the secret society Parushim for promoting Zionism in U.S. clandestinely, as mentioned previously. He was also one of the four men who held President Wilson captive.

If the Ottomans had made a separate peace with Britain, the Ottoman Empire would have survived intact and there would be no room for Israel. Alison Weir states [18]:

“Felix Frankfurter became part of the delegation and ultimately persuaded the delegation’s leader, former Ambassador Henry J. Morgenthau, to abandon the effort. U.S. State Department officials considered that Zionists had worked to scuttle this potentially peace-making mission and were unhappy about it. Zionists often construed such displeasure at their actions as evidence of American diplomats’ ‘anti-Semitism’.”

Thus the Zionists, controlled by the international bankers, “killed” still another opportunity for peace which could have saved millions of lives.

Two Russian soldiers stand in front of a ruined building in NE Turkey and look at the remains of Armenians killed by the Turks, part of the 1.5 million Armenians killed during WW1 by the Turks.

*

Intrigue in Britain to Open Up a Front in Palestine

In his deep book, Douglas Reed, narrates [19]:

Opposition to Zionism developed from another source. In the highest places still stood men who thought only of national duty and winning the war. They would not condone “hatred” of a military ally or espouse a wasteful “sideshow” in Palestine. These men were Mr. Herbert Asquith (Prime Minister), Lord Kitchener (Secretary for War), Sir Douglas Haig (who became Commander-in-Chief in France), and Sir William Robertson (Chief-of-Staff in France, later of Chief of the Imperial Staff).

How did the Zionists get rid of this highest level opposition to opening up a front in Palestine? They decided to get rid of the Prime Minister and Lord Kitchener. It is almost unknown to the world that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually a Zionist coup in which the funding and support came from international bankers. The Zionist international bankers were mortal enemies of Russia because of the allegiance of the royal family to Christianity. Researchers have dug out this little known aspect of World War I. This aspect reveals the profound, utterly ruthless and absolutely single-minded pursuit of the goal of world domination by the international bankers. Reed describes how the Zionists were able to eliminate Lord Kitchener. He writes [20]:

“Lord Kitchener was sent to Russia by Mr. Asquith in June 1916. The cruiser Hampshire, and Lord Kitchener in it, vanished. Good authorities concur that he was one man who might have sustained Russia. A formidable obstacle, both to the world-revolution there and to the Zionist enterprise, disappeared. Probably Zionism could not have been foisted upon the West, had he lived.”

The silent and sinister physical elimination of Lord Kitchener has also been consigned to oblivion through controlled history writing. Had Kitchener managed to salvage Russia the Zionist enterprise would have been almost permanently thwarted. That is why he had to be eliminated. In an overall view of things the elimination of Lord Kitchener was vital for the survival of the Zionist enterprise and fits a pattern of intrigue in which assassinations and installation of puppet politicians was crucial. World War I was triggered by an assassination and prolonged by various tactics including the elimination of Lord Kitchener.

The elimination of Prime Minister Asquith has been looked into by Cornelius. He writes [21]:

“Herbert Asquith, who had been prime minister since 1908, had begun, reluctantly, to consider a negotiated peace, but negotiations with the Zionists, through Weizmann and Balfour, provided another option for Britain, although not for Asquith. That option was the possibility of a formal, but secret, alliance between the Zionists and the Monarchy, whereby the British Monarchy would undertake to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine and the Zionists would undertake to help bring America into the war on the side of the Allies, this assuring an Allied victory. An agreement with a British government would certainly be necessary, but British governments come and go, and a commitment from something less ephemeral than a British government would have been required by the Zionists. It is proposed that such an agreement took place. There seems to be no way to date it accurately but it seems likely to have occurred sometime around in October 1916.”

Cornelius writes further:

In early December 1916, a political crisis, probably engineered, occurred in Britain, and Herbert Asquith, was forced to resign. The denouement came on Dec. 6, 1916. That afternoon King George V summoned several prominent political figures, including Balfour and Lloyd David, to a conference at Buckingham Palace. Later that same evening, Balfour received a small political delegation, which proposed that the difficult situation could be resolved with Lloyd George as prime minister, provided Balfour would agree to accept the position of foreign minister, which he did.”

The Zionists thus eliminated Asquith, who did not wish to open a front in the Middle East for furtherance of the Zionist ambitions there. In his place they installed Lloyd David George, a Zionist, a Freemason and a man who worked for the international bankers. This was an odd situation – Balfour, who had been a Prime Minister from 1902 – 1905, had agreed to work as Foreign Minister of a far junior politician.

What concerns were so pressing that made Lord Balfour accept a junior position? Lord Balfour had long been inducted in the larger Secret Elite circle and was simply carrying out what the Secret Elite wanted him to do as part of their plans. It could only be the pressure of the Zionist international bankers with reference to the opening up of a military front in the Middle East and establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Lest anyone has any doubts about who steered the policy when Lloyd David George became Prime Minister, it would be sufficient to look at the following statement in A.N. Field’s 1936 book, All These Things, in which he quotes a passage from the French book La Mystification des Peuples Allies authored by Andre Cheradame [22]:

For some years a group of financiers whose families, for the most part, are of German-Jewish origin, has assumed control of political power and exerts a predominant influence over Mr. Lloyd George. The Monds, the Sassoons, Rufus Isaacs those known as the representatives of the international banking interests, dominate Old England, own its newspapers, and control its elections. The close solidarity existing between Mr. Lloyd George and Jewish high finance is easily shown by the brief biographical sketches of some of the influential personages by whom he is surrounded . . . Each of the names represents not only an individual, but also a veritable tribe and head of immense financial interests.”

So the international bankers assumed control of the British government at the highest level by eliminating Prime Minister Asquith and Lord Kitchener, the former politically and the latter physically. Docherty and Macgregor have pointed out that the Secret Elite “identified and nurtured malleable politicians” across Europe and at home. They write (p 170, ref. [1]):

“Lloyd George’s love of good life and his insatiable sexual appetite rendered him vulnerable. His career could have ended several times over had the Secret Elite chosen to destroy him. Instead, they protected his reputation, defending him against damaging allegations and saved his career.”

Since 1910 Lloyd George had been in the “pocket of the Secret Elite.” What happened when Lloyd George became Prime Minister? This is best described by Douglas Reed who has rendered an invaluable service to mankind by writing his last book. He writes [23]:

The simultaneous triumph of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in London in the same week of 1917 were only in appearance distinct events. The identity of the original source has been shown in an earlier chapter, and the hidden men who promoted Zionism through the Western governments also supported the world-revolution. The two forces fulfilled correlative tenets of the ancient Law: “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”; the one destroyed in the East and the other secretly ruled in the West.”

Reed further narrates that after the assumption of power by Lloyd David George the cabinet began pressing the army for opening up a front in the Middle East. The armed forces resisted this strategically senseless pressure. But the change of government had been wrought by the international bankers, the Rothschilds, only for one purpose, the purpose of promoting the cause of political Zionism, as revealed at the outset of war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann. John Reed quotes Sir William Robertson (emphasis in original) [24]:

“Up to December 1916, operations beyond the Suez Canal were purely defensive in principle, the government and General Staff alike . . . recognizing the paramount importance of the struggle in Europe in need of give the armies there the utmost support. This unanimity between ministers and the soldiers did not obtain after the premiership changed hands . . . The fundamental difference of opinion was particularly obtrusive in the case of Palestine . . . The General Staff put the requirements at three additional divisions and these could only be obtained from the armies on the Western Front . . . The General Staff said the project would prove a great source of embarrassment and injure our prospects of success in France . . . These conclusions were disappointing to Ministers, who wished to see Palestine occupied at once, but they could not be refuted . . .”

This clearly shows that there was a difference of opinion between the government and the General Staff regarding the issue of sending British troops to occupy Palestine. Sir William Robertson was one of the four men, mentioned previously by Reed, who held British interests supreme and stood in the way of the expansion of war into Palestine.

Shipment of War- and Food-materials to Germany Despite Blockade

The international bankers, who also controlled Big Business, were able to prolong the war by supplying much needed materials, such as chemicals, copper, zinc, etc., as well as food to Germany through neutral countries, thereby helping Germany to fight longer. The major neutral countries were Denmark, Norway Sweden, and Netherlands. Finland was also part of the chain of nations supplying materials to the Germans. This is another little known aspect of World War I (and also World War II). This policy of trading with the enemy to make profits and to prolong the war was also utilized in the Second World War.

It is not that sentient and patriotic journalists and analysts were unable to fathom the international-bankers’ intrigue at that time – rather it was the overall control of media, and of book publishing, that has made it possible for the international bankers to deceive generations with controlled information and sanitized history which omits their hideous role. The story was brought out by journalists and analysts in England during the course of World War I, and subsequently by Admiral M.W.W.P. Consett, who was posted as naval attaché in Denmark during the war. Scandinavia was, of course, a traditional “listening post for warring nations.” In the year 1923 Consett wrote a book with a very interesting title, The Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918). Consett writes [25]:

“Our trade with Scandinavia was conducted and justified on the accepted security of guarantees that Germany should not benefit by it: here it is sufficient to say that the security was worthless.”

As he writes in a previous paragraph (p x):

“But from the very beginning goods poured into Germany from Scandinavia, and for over two years Scandinavia received from the British Empire and the Allied countries, stocks which, together with those from neutral countries, exceeded all previous quantities and literally saved Germany from starvation.”

Consett has given several tables that indicate that the amount of various items that were imported into Germany during the period 1913-1917. Please note that war broke out in August 1914. The total food imported into Germany from Sweden in the years 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917 was, respectively (in metric tons): 252 128, 262376, 561,234, 620,756, and 315,205 (Appendix VI, p 298). Please note that food imports from Sweden in 1917 were more than food imports from that country in 1913. The food items covered in these figures are “meat of all sorts, fish, dairy produce, eggs, lard, margarine.” The food items do not include “vegetable oils, beer, fish, oil, bone fat, coffee, tea, cocoa, horses, syrup and glucose, fruit, vegetables.” This was despite the naval blockade imposed by Britain. The corresponding figures for Denmark follow a similar pattern. No wonder a Danish naval officer wrote (p 295 of Consett’s book) to his British counterparts:

“I cannot help saying to you how much we Danish naval officers sympathize with you in having to live as you do amongst these people who are making fortunes in supplying your enemies with food when the officers and men of the Navy to which you belong are risking their lives in trying to blockade your enemies.”

The story of Germany acquiring other items – much needed coal, vital lubricants, metals such as zinc, copper, nickel, etc. arrived at German ports through Scandinavian countries. The details have been provided by Consett in various chapters of his book. For instance on p 180 of his book, Consett quotes the U.S. ambassador James W. Gerard as having recorded the following his diary [26]:

“Probably the greatest need of Germany is lubricating oil for machines.”

And yet lubricating oil did reach Germany from Scandinavian countries, as described by Consett. In fact Consett mentions that Ludendorff admitted:

“Lubricants provided us with some of our greatest problems . . .”

Similarly, other materials needed for explosives also arrived in Germany from Denmark and Holland despite the blockade. That the laxity in the blockade was intentional will become evident shortly. Consett states [27]:

“These oils and fats, both vegetable and animal, are used in normal times principally for food, soap, candles, lubricants and fuel; but in war time their importance is much enhanced on account of the glycerin which they contain.”

Glycerin is used in explosives and in 1915 Germany had discovered a process for extracting glycerin from sugar. This secret process was revealed only after the war. So important is glycerin that during the war the British Army collected all scraps of meat carefully in the British war zone, so that the fat could be used for extraction of glycerin.

That the British government was complicit in allowing vital materials to be shipped to Germany is evident from the following, which was revealed by Arnold White, a British journalist. In a packed meeting held at the Queen’s Hall London on March 4, 1917, Arnold White was speaker. According to A.N. Field, Arnold White [28]:

“. . . referred at length to the mysterious way in which Britain had allowed an extension of Norwegian territorial waters from the customary three miles accepted internationally to a four-mile limit. This extra mile allowed great American ships to slip through immune Norwegian waters with 10,000-ton cargoes of ore to Germany. He had enquired into this matter and he found that the political heads understood nothing of significance of the extension of Norwegian territorial waters to which Britain had consented. Those who instigated it, in Mr. White’s opinion, knew exactly what it meant. But for that extension he added, “it would have been impossible for the great American ships to have carried 100,000 tons of ores last year into Germany.”

What is difficult to understand about such matters that the politicians could not understand? One is reminded of the famous line by Upton Sinclair:

It is difficult to make a man understand when his salary depends upon not understanding it.”

It is quite clear that the British government allowed the extension of Norwegian territorial waters deliberately. The politicians were working for the international bankers, led by the Rothschilds. The government of David Lloyd George had been installed in power by them through intrigue, and possibly murder of Lord Kitchener that may have been made to look like drowning or disappearance of the cruiser Hampshire, to further their own Zionist interests. According to A.N. Field:

. . . Mr. Lloyd George had been among other things solicitor to the Zionist organization in England. In December 1916, Mr. Lloyd George succeeded Mr. Asquith as Prime Minister, holding office until October 1922. Throughout the greater part of his career Mr. Lloyd George had close Jewish associations, and the pronounced Jewish complexion of the Lloyd George Ministries was more than once subject of Press comment in Britain.”

Nine days later, on March 13, 1917, questions were asked in the House of Commons regarding the extension of territorial waters of Norway. The answer was that the government would do nothing about it.

The March 4, 1917 meeting had been organized by Dr. Ellis Powell, editor of the London Financial News. In this meeting Dr. Powell pointed out to the mysterious continuation of the activities of international bankers in Britain. This meeting was one of a series of meetings addressed by Dr. Powell and others, who had been agitating for exposing the “Hidden Hand” that was in control of Britain, and was betraying British interests. In fact, in 1917, Arnold White had written a book with title The Hidden Hand. The “Hidden Hand” was none other than the international bankers. The banks being run by bankers of German-Jewish origin in Britain were involved in activities that needed investigation. A resolution was passed at the March 4, 1917 meeting by all those present, numbering several thousand. They unanimously demanded closure of German banks in London. Field writes further [29]:

In seconding the resolution Dr. Ellis Powell, while seconding the resolution declared that German banks in the city were part of a vast organization of betrayal. The great outstanding fact of the war-time Hidden Hand agitation is that whenever it came to mention names and specific instances the names were mainly Jewish.”

The Russian revolution is relevant to WW1 – this 1919 poster was printed by the White Russians and depicts Trotsky as an evil Jew. Bottom right are Asiatic soldiers of the Red army executing a European Russian

In his speeches Dr. Powell had attacked Jacob Schiff by name as being behind activities that went against British interests. Schiff was the owner of the Kuhn Loeb & Co, who had also bankrolled the Bolshevik movement. Jacob Schiff was born in the same house where the founder of the Rothschild family was born. Dr. Powell also mentioned Schroder, a naturalized British citizen, a banker of German-Jewish extraction, as well as others.

It is therefore quite clear that the international bankers were behind all major attempts at prolonging the war. They not only surrounded the British Prime Minister and the U.S. President, but all surrounded the German Chancellor. They were all Zionists and Freemasons.

It is important to keep track of the dates because this enables a better overall comprehension of what was going on. The German peace proposals of February 1915 and December 1916 were sabotaged.

It was in December 1916 that Asquith was toppled, it was in February 1917 that the Russian Czar abdicated, it was in April 1917 that the U.S.A. entered the war, it was during, and soon after May 1917, that the Ottoman peace possibility was destroyed by the Zionists, it was in October 1917, that the agents of the international bankers, the Bolsheviks, took over Russia and it was in November 1917, that the Balfour Declaration, addressed to Baron Rothschild, was formally issued.

All these events were manipulated by Zionist international bankers and their Illuminati controlled freemasonic brethren who had planned and intrigued on a global scale for a very long time. These epochal victories of the Illuminati Zionist international bankers have since dictated the course of history right up to today.

The global turmoil is a continuation of the Zionist thrust for seizing world power and they have come very close to their target with the destruction of U.S.S.R., Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and the ongoing destruction of Syria, and with clouds over Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Pakistan. “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”! The United States of America and the United Kingdom are the biggest tools in the hands of international bankers. Despite their profound strengths these two countries have, on account of their control by Zionist and Illuminati international bankers, become the greatest threat to the very survival of the human species at this point in time.

Henry Makow Ph.D., himself Jewish, and full of anger at the anti-mankind policies of the Zionist international bankers, sums up World War I [30]:

“As mysteriously as it began, the war ended. In Dec. 1918, the German Empire suddenly “collapsed.” You can guess what happened. The banksters had achieved their aims and shut off the spigot. (Hence, the natural sense of betrayal felt in Germany, exacerbated by the onerous reparations dictated by the banksters at Versailles.)

What were the banksters’ aims? The Old Order was destroyed. Four empires (Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman) lay in ruins.

The banksters had set up their Bolshevik go-fers in Russia. (They sponsor many “revolutionary” movements as a way to eventually control all property themselves.) They ensured that Palestine would become a “Jewish” state under their control. Israel would be a perennial source of new conflict.

But more important, thanks to bloodbaths such as Verdun (800,000 dead), the optimistic spirit of Christian Western Civilization, Faith in Man and God, were dealt a mortal blow. The flower of the new generation was slaughtered. (See “The Testament of Youth” by Vera Brittain for a moving first-hand account.)”

Almost forty million humans died in World War I [31].

REFERENCES and NOTES

[1] Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor: Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War; Mainstream Publishers, 2013

[2] Carol White: The New Dark Ages Conspiracy: Britain’s Plot to Destroy Civilization; The New Benjamin Franklin House Publishing Co, 1980

[3] Guido G. Preparata: Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich, Pluto Press 2005, p 24.

[4] Gary Allen: None Dare Call It Conspiracy, first published 1971; 2013 edition published by Dauphin Publications Inc., p 52.

[5] Douglas Reed: The Controversy of Zion, Bridger House Publishers Inc. 2012, p 242; emphasis added.

The story of Douglas Reed illustrates how the international bankers and their agents suppress truth and promote a sanitized history. In a book Far and Wide, Douglas Reed had dared to put the American History in its true European context. Ivor Benson writes in the Preface to The Controversy of Zion:

“In Europe during the war years immediately before and after World War II the name of Douglas Reed was on everyone’s lips; his books were being sold by scores of thousand, and he was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world by a vast army of readers and admirers. Former London Times correspondent in Central Europe, he won great fame with books like Insanity Fair, Disgrace Abounding, Lest We Regret, Somewhere South of Suez, Far and Wide, and several others, each amplifying a hundredfold the scope available to him as one of the world’s leading foreign correspondents.

The disappearance into almost total oblivion of Douglas Reed and all his works was a change that could not have been wrought by time alone; indeed the correctness of his interpretation of the unfolding history of the times found some confirmation after what happened to him at the height of his powers.

After 1951, with the publication of Far and Wide, in which he set the history of the United States of America into the context of all he had learned in Europe of the politics of the world, Reed found himself banished from the bookstands, all publishers’ doors closed to him, and those books already published liable to be withdrawn from library shelves and “lost”, never to be replaced.”

This is how knowledge of history is controlled, distorted and even fabricated by the One World cabal of international bankers.

[6] Sarah Schmidt: The Parushim: A Secret Episode in American Zionist History;

American Jewish Historical Quarterly, Sep 1975-Jun 1976; 65. l – 4; AJHS Journal pg. 121.

[7] Douglas Reed: Far and Wide; first printed 1951; Angriff Pr June 1, 1981; part 2, chapter 2.

[8] Dr. Stanley Montieth: Brotherhood of Darkness, Bible Belt Publishing, Oklahoma City, U.S.A., 2000, p 65.

[9] Leon Degrelle: Hitler: Born at Versailles, Vol I, Institute for Historical Review, Torrance, California, 1992, p 255 – 259; cited by Deanna Spingola: The Ruling Elite: The Zionist Seizure of World Power, Trafford Publishing 2012, pp 622, 923

[10] Juri Lina: Architects of Deception, Referent Publishing 2004, chapter 7.

[11] See http://socialarchive.iath.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=commission-for-relief-in-belgium-1914-1930-cr.xml

[12] Eustace Mullins: The Secrets of the Federal Reserve: The London Connection; first published 1951; the 1991 edition by Bridger House publishing, p 83.

[13] Ibid, pp 69, 70.

[14] Ibid p 72.

[15] Eustace Mullins: The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, published by Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization, 1985

[16] Ref 11, p 72

[17] Alison Weir: Against Our Better Judgment: the hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel; 2014, p 9.

[18] Ibid p 22.

[19] Ref. 5, p 247.

[20] Ibid p 248.

[21] John Cornelius: The Hidden History of the Balfour Declaration; Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;

http://www.wrmea.org/2005-november/special-report-the-hidden-history-of-the-balfour-declaration.html

[22] A.N. Field: All These Things, 1936, p 82.

[23] Ref 5, p 272

[24] Ref 5, p 252

[25] M.W.W.P. Consett: Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918), Williams and Norgate, London, 1923; p xi.

[26] Ibid p 180.

[27] Ibid p 167.

[28] Ref. 22, p 42.

[29] Ref. 22, p 42.

[30] Henry Makow : Bankers Extended WWI By Three Years; revised and reposted December 1, 2007, http://www.henrymakow.com/001583.html

[31] Ref. 15.

*

Related Posts:



 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on August 1, 2017, With 1863 Reads Filed under Of Interest, World War I (1914-1918). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 
 

aceBook Comments

8 Responses to "How and Why WWI Was Planned and Prolonged

AUGUST 1-2017

H.F.1269
PETER OBORNE

 

 

PETER OBORNE: Our complacent and complicit foreign aid civil servants should hang their heads in shame over the Oxfam charity scandal which will take years to recover from

By Peter Oborne For The Daily Mail

As well as Oxfam and other charities exposed for misdemeanours in Haiti, the
UK's Department for International Development is also in the dock, writes PETER
OBORNE

 

February 17, 2018

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti, but the UK Department for International Development is also in the dock. Former Secretary of State Priti Patel (pictured) is believed to have known about it all and stayed quiet

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti. Other charities, too, whose staff have been exposed for awful misdemeanours have seen their reputations badly damaged.

However, the Department for International Development (DfID), which has given hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money to these charities, is also in the dock.

We now know its officials were aware of the shocking culture of sexual abuse, exploitation and paedophilia that exists in Oxfam and in much of the rest of the aid sector that DfID oversees.

Former DfID secretary Priti Patel said government officials 'at the highest levels' knew about aid workers' sex abuse (with some victims being children) but tried to keep it hushed up.

She said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it.

This means the taxpayer-funded DfID — whose mission statement is to 'tackle the global challenges of our time, including poverty and disease, mass migration, insecurity and conflict' and to 'build a safer, healthier, more prosperous world' — must bear responsibility for what went on. Indeed, it's very possible that, without the newspaper investigation that exposed the Haiti scandal, DfID officials would still be condoning such appalling behaviour.

There is clearly something very rotten at the heart of DfID. Yet the department seems blissfully unaware of this.

As recently as January, DfID's permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft boasted that he was in charge of a 'well run and well organised department'.

Such complacency beggars belief. For the truth is that its complicity in the Oxfam scandal is just the latest example of DfID's tolerance of corruption and worse. 

As has been well documented, it shovels billions of pounds a year into countries run by some of the most brutal regimes in the world.

Very few dictators are too bloodthirsty or barbaric for DfID not to do business with.

Cynically, they abuse the generosity of people in the West by using their donations in order to spend less themselves on welfare programmes for their own people.

Instead, DfID's largesse allows them to invest huge sums in excessive arms budgets — or, worse, line their own pockets and amass personal fortunes in Swiss bank accounts.
 

Patel said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it, writes Peter Oborne 

No wonder it is said — not in jest — that the definition of overseas aid is 'the transfer of cash from the pockets of poor people in rich countries to the bank accounts of rich people in poor countries'.

Lest it be forgotten, Britain's foreign aid budget last year alone totalled £13.3 billion. The cases of this money being abused are too numerous to list in full.

In Ethiopia, for example, DfID spent hundreds of millions with a Marxist government that puts communist propaganda into school textbooks. 
 

Mikelange Gabo (pictured) claims sacked Oxfam boss Roland Van Hauwermeiren started a sexual relationship with her when she was just 17 

In Syria, our taxes fund armed groups which my sources in the country say may be linked to Al-Qaeda.

In Pakistan, Imran Khan, the former national cricket captain and a leading opposition leader, called for foreign aid to be halted because he believes it corrupts and weakens his country.

He says: 'Why should the Pakistani rich bother to pay taxes when foreign loans and aid money are always there to cover up their incompetence and corruption and pay for their lavish lifestyle?'

Also, he asks: 'Why should politicians bother to fix the economy when they can artificially maintain it' with foreign donations?
 

Scandal-hit Van Hauwermeiren (pictured) is alleged to have spotted her in the street while she was eight months pregnant and told her: 'I find you very sexy, how can I help you?'

Many respected economic studies show the best way to lift people out of poverty is not through handing out aid but through trade, encouraged by free market capitalism. 

But this is frowned upon by many DfID civil servants and charity activists, a large proportion of whom hold Left-wing views and spend their lives going from one well-paid job in the bloated public sector to another.

Equally, I am convinced overseas aid has increasingly less to do with helping the poor in foreign countries and more to do with self-preening government ministers trying to flaunt their compassion.
 

Pictured: A mountainous region outside Haitian capital Port-au-Prince 

These virtue-signallers are more interested in boasting about the size of their budgets and posing for photocalls during short visits abroad rather than ensuring taxpayers' money is well spent.

And I'm afraid the truth is that DfID has not been well served in the choice of its ministers over recent years.

Under Tory-led governments there has been Andrew Mitchell who went native and was widely rebuked after claiming, at a time of austerity at home, that he wanted the UK to be seen around the world as a foreign aid superpower.

Tactlessly, he criticised his successor, Justine Greening, saying she never wanted the job and that she had failed to rebut claims that huge sums of foreign aid had been lost in corruption and waste.

Greening didn't last long. Her replacement was Priti Patel, who was only in the job 15 months before being sacked for breaking the ministerial code by holding undeclared meetings in Israel, in a clumsy bid, it seemed, to promote her own political ambitions.

Patel's position was all the more disingenuous because, before her appointment, she had argued that

DfID ought to be abolished. 

She quickly reversed this once in charge. And during her tenure, nothing changed.

Patel's replacement, Penny Mordaunt, now has an opportunity to restore discipline and standards.
 

The Oxfam Haiti scandal shocked the nation after it emerged earlier this month 

Above all, she should order a root-and-branch overhaul of her entire department.

Britain has spent about £70 billion of taxpayers' money on international aid since the Conservatives came to power in 2010. This is an incredible £2,500 from every British family.

Only a forensic audit can determine how much has been squandered and how much actually needs to be spent at all.

As a foreign reporter, I've visited many trouble spots around the world where DfID money is spent, and wouldn't deny for a moment that there are places where it has done a great deal of good.

Yet I've also witnessed evidence of a huge waste of money, not least in Pakistan, where hundreds of millions have been frittered away in a largely fruitless attempt to reform the education system.

I believe the Government's commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product on foreign aid a year is utterly misguided.

In a country where NHS beds are scarce and a care system is collapsing, we simply can't afford that largesse.

I dearly hope Penny Mordaunt, the latest minister in charge of what has become a gold mine for corrupt foreign dictators and child abusers, has the courage and will to restore discipline to her out-of-control department.

Otherwise, public belief in international aid, and respect for the noble principle of charity-giving, may never recover.
 

Too soft on Myanmar

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses. 

He should have gone further and accused the Myanmar government — led by Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi — of carrying out genocide. 

I'm convinced he held back because it would have necessitated the British government stepping in to try to stop the killing — something it hasn't the stomach for. 

Why won't the Foreign Office do anything to halt the rape and murder in our former colony? 
 

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson (pictured) challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses

 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton.

He has become a figure of public ridicule — defying colleagues' calls for him to resign after he walked out on his wife and children for an affair with a far younger woman who has been exposed for appalling racist views.

Yesterday, Nigel Farage — who has acted like the most irritating back-seat driver since standing down as leader after the EU referendum — gave his backing to Bolton.

He's right. Useless though Bolton undoubtedly is, Ukip will become even more of a laughing stock if it has its ninth change of leader since 2009.
 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton (pictured)



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5402335/

PETER-OBORNE-foreign-aid-civil-servants-ashamed.html#ixzz57O0ZUQl3
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 *  *  *

Peter Osborne: Boris Johnson's

Brexit

views are persuasive

 

February 17, 2018

 

H.F.1479
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
 
 
 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week
  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

By Daniel Martin, Policy Editor For The Daily Mail

February 12, 2018

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.
 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.
 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

February 12, 2018

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

 Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

 Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

February 12, 2018

 

H.F.1478
 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 
 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

APRIL FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018   APRIL FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018 

 APRILFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          APRILFREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018         

 APRIL-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

APRIL-FREEDOM NOW-NEW- HOME PAGE-201

 

THIS IS:

 - (1994 -Official Website - FOREIGN AID FILE-APRIL  - NEW -2018 -) -