We have
more to follow
*
EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY
THE DEATH OF
SIR EDWARD HEATH
These revelations have
become possible
following the death of
Sir Edward Heath,
who was a German agent
and asset for six
decades -
the longest known
foreign intelligence
penetration in modern
history.
It is significant
that the extensive
Obituary of Heath
published in the
Guardian
on 18th
July 2005, closed with
the cryptic sentence:
‘He [Heath]
remained determined that
he would be vindicated,
until close to the end.
This referred to the
fact
that when Heath visited
Salzburg in 2003,
ostensibly to attend the
Music Festival there,
the real reason for his
visit was that he had
been summoned to
Dachau, where
DVD officers warned
him that
British intelligence
were intending to
confront him with his
treachery.
It is reported that, on
hearing this, Heath
literally ‘blew a fuse’:
he suffered a pulmonary
embolism.
A similar fate
attended the demise of
the late
Roy (Lord) Jenkins
who suffered a severe
heart attack when
confronted by
intelligence officials
with the fact that he
was about to be exposed
for his long-term
treachery against the
United Kingdom.
Roy Jenkins was one
of the most lethal of
all long-term German
agents operating at the
highest levels of the
British Government.
-the present allegedly
deeply compromised Tony
Blair is the late Lord
Jenkins’ protégé.
Heath, Rippon
and
Jenkins were far
from being the only
long-term. High-level
foreign penetrations by
the
DVD-the successor
‘Black’ (continuing
Nazi) intelligence
organisation to the
Abwehr.
In the United States,
the
Dulles brothers(State
Department were German
agents to this day.
Substantial transfers of
‘Black’ Operations’
funds originally
controlled by the United
States authorities are
known to have been
transferred into the
hands of the German
‘Black’ covert
intelligence community.
The CIA is belatedly
being to some extent
purged of operators with
ethnic and other
loyalties and ties to
Germany.
TENSIONS
EXIST WITHIN
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES
BECAUSE OF THIS
PENETRATION
*
THE 1969 VIENNA
CONVENTION ON TREATIES.
Given that
(a)
The United Kingdom’s
EEC Accession Treaty,
(b)
The
Maastricht Treaty of
1992 and
(c)
The (aborted)
European Constitution
Treaty were among
E.U. bilateral and
collective Treaties that
were procured by corrupt
and fraudulent means,
THE
EUROPEAN UNION IS AN
ILLEGAL ORGANISATION.
This is because Article
49 of the 1969 Vienna
Convention on Treaties,
to which Britain and the
other EU ‘Member States’
are parties, provides as
follows:
‘If a State has been
induced to conclude a
Treaty by the fraudulent
conduct of another
negotiating State, that
State may invoke the
fraud as invalidating
its consent to be bound
by the Treaty.
[* The first tranche of
corrupt payments for the
European Constitution
Treaty was paid out, but
the fate of the second
tranche, given the
negative French and
Dutch referenda
outcomes, is uncertain -
as well as being the
subject of vicious
secret controversy]
According to
intelligence sources,
earlier EU Collective
treaties were likewise
procured by fraudulent
means.
In the British case,
UK Membership of the
European Union
Collective -an illegal
organisation which
exists to subsume, usurp
and collectivise
national sovereignty
under the enticing cover
of ‘co-operation’ (code
for collectivisation)-contravenes
the
1689 Bill of Rights
which remains the
LAW of the United
Kingdom to this day
and which incorporates
the following
Oath:
‘I do declare that no
foreign prince, person,
prelate, state or
potentate hath or ought
to have jurisdiction,
power, superiority,
pre-eminence or
authority with this
Realm’
*
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION
IS A CRIMINAL
ORGANISATION
In addition to exposing
the illegality and
illegitimacy of the
European Union as a
whole,
International Currency
Review
[Volume 30, Number 4]
demonstrates, with
extensive analysis and
documentation, that
the European Commission
is a criminal
organisation.
The issue has been
prepared in close
collaboration with
Ashley Mote,
-Independent MEP for
Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk]
and Continental MEP
colleagues. In October
2004, Mr Mote and Marta
Andreason, the former
Chief Accountant of the
European Commission,
presented the UK Serious
Fraud Office with two
large lever-arch files
containing voluminous
damning information
about institutionalised
corruption in the EU
Commission and related
EU structures.
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN
[Does the stink of
corruption in high
places prevent the Rule
of Law from taking
place?]
Among the reasons for
concluding that the
European Union is a
criminal organisation,
are the following:
1)
Because
successive Presidents of
the European Union
preside over the
disbursement of the
corrupt ‘Black’
‘facilitation fees’
identified, each
successive (six-monthly)
President is and has
been aware of the
corrupt mechanism used
to procure the EU’s
successive collective
Treaties.
2)
The incidence of fraud
committed within the
EU’s structures is so
extensive and routine,
that the European
Commission has been
condemned as openly
condoning a
‘culture of corruption’,
and presiding over a
system of
‘institutional looting’.
Scandalised EC
whistle blowing
officials refer to the
European Commission as a
‘festering dustbin of
corruption’. In
2004, there were nearly
3,500 cases of EC fraud.
3)
When informed in 2004
that the EC Vice -
President-designate,
Jacques Barrot, had
been convicted for
embezzlement of funds,
and had withheld this
information from the
European Commission’s
President-designate,
Sr. Jose-Manuel Barroso,
the new President denied
any prior knowledge of
this fact, and left
Barrot in place.
4)
It is nothing unusual
for
European Commission
officials to be
associated with
lucrative corrupt
‘side businesses’-often
using offshore accounts-from
which they benefit
financially, consequent
upon contracts being
awarded to the
businesses
in which they themselves
have a secret pecuniary
interest.
For instance:
5)
The Sunday Telegraph
reported on 25th
September -2005 that two
EC employees own a
Brussels sex hotel,
Studio Europe, which
rents out rooms for 13
euros an hour. No doubt
this location is used
for blackmail purposes.
The EC officials in
question were named as
Carmela lo Guidance,
an assistant in the
EC Budget
Directorate-General
and
George Tizzies a
porter in the
Directorate-General
responsible for
employment. This is the
latest of innumerable EC
scandals to have erupted
into the public domain,
some of which are
examined in the Special
Issue [out
on Monday 10th
October 2005.]
6)
Unhealthy and evidently
pervasive masonic links
exist between European
Commission officials and
contractors, resulting
in corrupt and unhealthy
‘business
relationships’.
7)
The European
Commission’s accounting
is NOT only shambolic,
but also
fraudulent.
Evidence to this effect
is presented, inter alia,
by the well-known
British forensic
accountant
Christopher Arkell, FTCA,
and by former
Chief Accountant of
the European Commission,
Marta Andreason. She
was ‘suspended’ after
five months
en poste, and then
fired, after she
questioned the
legitimacy of payments
that
Directorates-General
required her to
authorise. She asked
awkward questions, and
was effectively told to
‘shut up and just sign’.
8)
The EC’s accounting
irregularities, which
are glaring, include the
following abuses:
When certain accounting
modifications were
implemented at the end
of 2004, the closing
balances in 2004 and the
opening balances in 2005
were
not reconciled-
thereby permanently
embedding false
accounting data for the
future.
This means that
henceforth no European
Commission accounts can
ever be accurate (not
that this has ever been
the case).
en though EU ‘Member
States’ have been making
payments to the
Commission for decades
to cover the costs of
pension liabilities for
approximately 39,000 EC
employees (as of 2005),
the EU ‘Member States’
have simultaneously been
charged with the
liability of
making/guaranteeing the
resulting pension
payments. Thus pension
liabilities appear on
both sides of the
balance sheet. Proper
accounting practice
would require a charge
to the Income and
Expenditure Account of
EUR 19.5 billion
And a consequent
reduction in reserves.
The European Commission
should have been
acquiring a liability
for pensions throughout
its existence instead of
fudging the accounts in
this fraudulent and
irregular manner.
The European Commission
‘makes’ massive
surpluses out of the
‘Member States’
annually, which it
covers up
Surpluses are supposed
according to the EU’s
own regulations, to be
returned to the ‘Member
States’. What happens in
practice is that the EC
surpluses that have
arisen after all
accruals have been
accounted for, are
eliminated by the simple
manipulative expedient
of providing for
potential expenditures
not openly through the
Income and Expenditure
Account, but by
means of corrupt
adjustments to the
Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).
This method of
accounting is prohibited
by all recognised
accounting standards
around the world as
DISHONEST.
Its use by the European
Commission represents a
clear fraud perpetuated
upon ‘Member States’
and their troubled and
exploited peoples.
EC accounting records
can be changed two or
more years in arrears.
The amount and the
payee, but not the
unique identifying
number, can be altered,
and no record whatsoever
of such changes is/has
been maintained in the
records.
This represents an
open-ended invitation to
scam the system,
especially as it is
routine for the EC’s
Annual Accounts to be
adjusted
retrospectively.
The huge Eurocracy (or
self-interested EU
nomenklatura)
has perfected subtle
mechanisms for ensuring
that hardly anything is
ever done to stamp out
the corruption over
which it has presided
for decades. These
techniques include, but
are not confined to the
following:
The use of ‘candour’,
which is NOT to be
confused with the truth.
‘Candour’ is deployed in
order to disarm,
mislead, divert and
mollify critics,
so that any underlying
fraud goes undetected.
The ‘multiple
investigations’
technique
8.2) What happens is
that several
investigations are
‘opened’ separately.
Further internal ‘investigations’
may follow. Some are
then
‘closed’, or
‘suspended’,
ostensibly ‘pending’ the
‘results’ of other
investigations.
The resulting,
deliberately contrived,
confusion, with
successive reports
contradicting others,
ensures that the
corruption trail is
buried and lost.
Report-writing is used
to smother transparency,
clarity, and TRUTH, with
the sole objective of
obfuscating the
underlying looting and
corruption.
8.3) The EC and its
structures have at least
3,094 secret ‘working
groups’ or committees,
all of which are
answerable to no-one,
and the operations of
which are secret.
8.4)
The main objective of
any EC fraud
investigation is to
procure that the case is
‘exported’ as quickly as
possible to the ‘Member
States’ concerned, so
that any corruption at
the EC centre is
consequently hidden from
scrutiny.
8.5)
Wherever possible,
investigations are kept
unresolved until the
existing Commission is
duly replaced by its
successor-when
the ‘that was then, this
is now’ excuse kicks in.
8.6)
Innumerable other
deliberate obstruction
methods, identified by
International Currency
Review with the
guidance of Ashley Mote
MEP and his colleagues,
are routinely employed
by the EC and related
structures, to maximise
the obfuscation of
troubling problems.
For instance, one
external corporation,
based in
Luxembourg, in which
EC officials had an
interest, was ostensibly
established on
29th
February 1989-a
date
which never even
existed, which meant
that the entity was
‘invisible’.
When a
sanitised official
report on the entity’s
fraudulent activities
was presented to the
former
President of the
European Commission,
Signor Romano Prodi
- that allegedly corrupt
Italian ‘machine’
politician- the date was
altered to
22nd
February 1989.
This further illustrated
the devious standard
European Commission
technique of
promulgating conflicting
information in separate
contradictory reports.
By this means,
controversy is deflected
into sterile arguments
over the conflicting
information-diverting
attention from the
institutionalised
internal looting itself.
8.7)
The
European Court of
Auditors has given an
adverse opinion for many
years, on 95% of all
European Commission
Expenditure.
It has never, ever,
approved the EC’s
accounts.
[In
September 2013 the EU
ACCOUNTS have not been
passed for 18
years-[Still not passed
in 2016] Would any
business in the UK get
away with this for even
ONE YEAR?]
Furthermore evidence has
surfaced of fraud in the
Court’s own accounts
-one of several
indications that the
Court itself cannot be
trusted. Indeed, like
the Commission’s own
internal Audit Service,
its main task, by open
official admission, is
to minimise
embarrassment to the
Commission.
The damning evidence of
institutionalised
European Commission
looting and serial
corruption covered up by
the EC authorities
contained in the single
issue of
International Currency
Review
is sufficient to induce
a terminal crisis at the
European Commission.
*
WHY
BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE
EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.
Both
Ashley Mote MEP and
the journal’s Editor,
Christopher Story,
demand that the UK
Treasury sits up,
finally takes notice,
and withholds further
contributions to the EC
budget pending
elimination of
institutionalised
corruption and looting
in the European
Commission’s structures
-which
will never happen.
In a
letter to
Ashley Mote dated 22nd
October 2004,
Stephen Timms, the
Treasury Minister,
told the MEP that
withholding British
payments to the EC would
be illegal and would be
an
‘option’
we would not consider’
BUT
Continued squandering of
UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY)
represents a dereliction
by British Ministers and
their officials, of
their duty of care
towards UK taxpayer’s
funds.
Given the conspicuous
gravity of the
situation, Ministers are
believed to be
increasing the risk of
being sued for
negligence as exposures
of the European
Commission’s ‘culture of
corruption’ proliferate.
[At
this moment in Time in
the UK millions of
people on tax-credits
who were overpaid
because of technical
problems are being asked
to hand the money back.
They should
ALL insist that the
Treasury should try
the
European Commission
and ask their employees
to point the finger and
explain were the
billions of pounds of
OUR money is resting in
banks in Switzerland.
WE should
certainly have a great
deal of compound
interest to collect at
the same time]
Moreover
the former
Chancellor of the
Exchequer, Lord Lawson
of Blaby, has
advised the House of
Lords’ European
Committee that the
British Government
DOES possess the
legal scope to give
itself powers
to
withhold payments to the
European Commission.
He told
the Committee:
‘You have to remember
how hard it was to win
the (UK) rebate…It would
never have happened if
we had not made clear
that if we did not get
satisfaction, we would
withhold our
contributions.
It was
never published, but it
was printed. It was
discreetly known to
those who we negotiated
with, that this is what
would happen if we did
not get
satisfaction….Without
that threat to withhold
our contributions, to
the extent of having the
UK law officers produce
a bill, we would have
NOT got [the Rebate].’
[Source:
Future Financing of the
European Union,
House of Lords European
Committee, HL Paper
62, 9th
March 2005.]
But since Britain’s EU
membership is illegal,
because the UK Accession
Treaty and successive EU
Collective Treaties
(notably Maastricht)
were procured by fraud,
it is not even
technically necessary
for the Government to
extract that draft bill
from the official
pigeon-hole into which
it was shoved.
*
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE
EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW:
NO PROBLEM.
The Government can walk
away from the European
Union Tomorrow- and
use the 25% of gross
Domestic Product
represented by all
current and future costs
of the EU membership:
To rebuild the Public
Transportation system.
Build spanking new
‘Schools and Hospitals’
wherever demand exists.
And revitalise the
BRITISH economy
generally.
All without suffering
any losses since EU
membership has brought
Britain no clear
benefits at all, that
could not have been
procured domestically.
It has however, meant
that billions of UK
taxpayers’ funds that
the British Government
should have been
spending at home, have
been squandered on this
sterile, decaying
collectivist project,
led by corrupted and
blackmailed politicians
and operatives.
All EU ‘Member States’,
valuing the huge
British market for their
goods, would be
compelled to negotiate
arms’-length bilateral
trade and other
agreements with the
United Kingdom, or risk
losing access to UK
markets. Any prospective
interim disruptions
could be accommodated by
the British Government
directing the UK
taxpayers’ funds that it
normally squanders with
the EC’s
‘festering dustbin of
corruption’, into
temporarily vulnerable
sectors of the UK
economy.
(7-3-16)
As Gomer Pyle used to
say on that old TV show
Surprise! Surprise!