- (1994 - EDP Official Website - OCTOBER-NEW-HOME-2019-

Once more unto the breach,

dear friends,once more;...

/Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge/ Cry 'God for Harry!

ENGLAND and ST GEORGE!'

 

OPPORTUNITY

'There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound  in shallows and in miseries.'

Shakespeare

*

OCT H 1 2
3 4 5  6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019      MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019
ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

A MONTH TO REMEMBER

RECLAIMING

 AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION

 OUR

 ENGLISH FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION AND

COUNTRY.

 

MARCH 29, 2019

VICTORY

FOR

 ENGLISH FREEDOM DAY

 

 ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

H.F.1773

 

 

 

*

 

 
 OCTOBER 22,2019
 

  1. ANDREW PIERCE

     

     

     

     

     

    Ugly truth about

     

     

     

    WHY MPs DON'T WANT

     

     

     

    TO GIVE YOU A

     

 

 

 

SAY

 

 

ON

 

 BREXIT

 

OCTOBER 22,2019

 

Since the last General Election, 51 MPs have swapped parties and for reasons of

COWARDNESS

or

STUBBORN ARROGANCE

have refused

 to take the honourable path by resigning from the Commons and fighting a by-election under their new colours.

Indeed, we have witnessed the biggest number of Mps switch sides since the turmoil over Irish Home Rule in 1886. Some Mps, such as Chuka Umunna and Heidi Allen have changed parties more than once.

Perhaps it's not surprising, therefore, that with so many MPs thus dodging voters, the majority in the Commons won't accede to the Government's wishes of having a

GENERAL ELECTION.

For the truth is that if they were honest with themselves, MP's ought to have only one choice: Accept Borris Johnsons EU exit deal or face voters in a general election and account for

THEIR FAILURE TO DELIVER

BREXIT...

[TO BE CONTINUED.]

 

...The SNP has another reason for pressing for an early election. A

 

trial is scheduled in January 2020 of Alex Salmond the party's  former

 

leader.

 

 

He's accused of two counts of attempted rape, among other allegations.

 

Salmond has strenuously denied all the claims against him but the

 

.

party fears the effect of any

 

 

bad publicity

 

As for the Lib Dems, since Jo Swinson became leader, the party has

 

hardened its anti-Brexit stance from supporting a second referendum

 

to wanting to revoke Article 50-in other words,

 

 

cancelling

 

 

BREXIT.
 

Realistically, the only way this could happen is if the

Lib Dems

get a parliamentary majority -and the only way of possibly achieving

that pipe-dream is a general election.

True, the Lib Dems have been buoyed by the defection of six Mps from

Labour and the Tories taking a total to 18.

But, pollsters say the likelihood of a LIb Dem government  is just

5 per cent

This is is why, despite all their noisy rhetoric, Swinson

and her Lib Dems are pushing hard for a

SECOND REFERENDUM

as the best way to halt

BREXIT.

Also, rather than support Jeremy Corbyn as the head

, of a caretaker government, the Lib Dems would

prefer a vote of confidence in the Tories that

might lead directly to an election.

All in all, a politically motivated and cowardly coalition

of MPs are doing everything in their power to

HALT

BREXIT

-and 

prevent

  a

GENERAL ELECTION

 

*  *  *

FULL ARTICLE

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7602285/ANDREW-PIERCE-party...

 

22/10/2019 · Ugly truth about why MPs don’t want to give you a say: ANDREW PIERCE on party-switchers dodging voters to cling on to their seats By Andrew Pierce for the Daily Mail.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 22, 2019

H.F.1913

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

[FREEDOM AND UNITY]

 

I VOTED REMAIN

BUT NOW WE MUST BACK

 BORIS

Letters to the Daily Mail, Tuesday, October 8,2019 by a reader from Huddersfield, WEST YORKSHIRE.

THREE years ago my wife and I voted in the Referendum to

REMAIN

but we accepted that a majority of people voted to

LEAVE

If there was a General Election we would vote Conservative, as we and many others think that Parliament should honour the result of the 2016 referendum

In 2017, MPs voted to back the Article 50 Bill by 498 votes to 114 - a majority of 384. The SNP, Plaid Cymru, along with 47 Labour MPs and Ken Clarke.

Since then, it has become obvious the SNP wants to remain in the EU and hopefully have a second referendum on Scottish independence -which the Scots have already rejected.

The Lib Dems have decided the only way they think it possible to have more elected MPs is to remain in the EU, while Jeremy Corbyn's Labour is undecided over which way to turn. Corbyn is clearly afraid that even some of his most ardent  Labour supporters do not relish the thought of him ever becoming Prime Minister.

For the past three years, not one workable suggestion has been put forward by any of the Opposition parties to solve the problem of thr Irish backstop, because clearly they wish to remain in the EU against the people's wishes. The only way to get this country out of this mess is to back Boris Johnson's campaign to solve Brexit and get us out of the claws of the EU.

Another reader from Preston, Lancs.

WHEN will our MPs start using their common sense? Winston Churchill must be turning in his grave. During the war, we had a coalition government and politics was the last thing on our minds,

The only priority was our country, and pulling together to make sure there would still be one.

*  *  *

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

 

 

[A WAR

OF ENGLISH INDEPENDENCE ]

FROM

HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION

*

At another time when England was divided by religion with the threat of invasion-On that occasion all differences were AT A TIME OF Great danger, a notable majority  STOOD FIRM FOR THEIR FREE COUNTRY. TODAY IN OCTOBER 2019 THE LESSON OF HISTORY HAS BEEN FORGOTTEN BY THOSE WHO PUT A FOREIGN DICTATORSHIP BEFORE THEIR OWN FREEDOM OF PERSON AND COUNTRY.

THE WAR OF ENGLISH INDEPENDENCE

By

ESMA WINGFIELD STRATFORD

1940

The foundations of British patriotism.

'...IT came to this, that if England was to remain a

FREE COUNTRY

 the patriotism of her sons had got to be sufficient unto itself. The love of the reformed or any other religion was palpably insufficient to unite the whole country in that ardency of self-confidence and self-sacrifice which is the effective will to victory. The ideal, towards which she had only just began to feel her way, of an independent civilisation -was it so supremely worth her while, that it could inspire her to do and dare to the uttermost? such was the question that the last of the Tudors, that proud young goddess ( Queen Elizabeth) with the flaming hair, unhesitatingly elected to answer for herself and subjects in the affirmation. For she was one- and the words are her own-to stick at nothing.

Believers - if they still exist-in a special Providence watching over the destinies of ENGLAND, might find a relevant significance in the first words of hers, on hearing she was Queen:

" This is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes."

It may seem a far cry from

Alfred

 to Elizabeth from England's Darling to Gloriana, but they have this in  common, that each, at an hour of supreme national crisis, proved to be endowed with precisely those qualities thart the situation demanded, and to so unique a degree that it would be plausible to say, " No one else could have pulled the country through."

.. .. It was the essence of that task to foster an English patriotism of at least equivalent strength to the holy zeal of the Counter-Reformation. And to do this it was necessary that she should focus it upon herself, that she should identify the love of Elizabeth with the love of England. It was to this that she dedicated her life, and like so many other great women devotees-her virginity. Her own words, so often and greatly reiterated, show that she did so in full consciousness: To put it plainly, England, having disassociated herself from the ideal of a united Europe, had made it her business to prevent that ideal from ever materialising, even on the mainland, on any other basis than that of free and equal association. (As Winston Churchill declared centuries later in the 1960's onwards his strong opposition to England joining the EEC/EU. ...)

 

[We now hear on Thursday October 10,2019 that France-Italy and Spain are against any EU plan to move to a more autocratic Superstate. No doubt other captive once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in Europe will follow. ]

 

*

 

*AT A TIME WHEN ENGLAND WAS DIVIDED BY RELIGIOUS STRIFE WITH THE THREAT OF INVASION, THE COUNTRY BECAME AS ONE TO DEFEAT THE CONTINENTAL AGGRESSOR.

Elizabeth 1  reviewed her troops at Tilbury-(1588).

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

1588

...Shakespeare, the greatest of them all, expressed the feeling which taught Englishmen that their well-being lay in unity among themselves which sprang from their devotion to their queen, when he wrote:-

 

This England never did-nor never shall

Lie at the proud foot of a conqueror,

But when it first did help to wound itself.'

 

 

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History]

In June 2008

 Her Majesty The  Queen

[Each word  above has a separate bulletin]

rather than say

'NO'

or threaten to abdicate if asked to sign the

LISBON TREATY

without

HER PEOPLE

being given a

REFERENDUM -AS PROMISED

has

BETRAYED HER PEOPLE.

We await the decision of the

LAW LORDS

the Lions under the Throne

of

ENGLAND

[Each word has a separate bulletin]

To protect the accustomed

"Rights and Liberties"

of the

ENGLISH PEOPLE

as stated in our Great Charter

MAGNA  CARTA  

  of 1215

 

And the rallying call of the English people at times of peril from unaccustomed demands from their representatives in

PARLIAMENT

More!

In June 2008

AND LATER ADDITIONS

 H.F.1088

 

'Courage noble Englishmen

And never be dismayed

If that we be one in ten

WE will not be afraid

To fight with foreign enemies

And set our country free...'

 

Lord Morley

 

TO BE CONTINUED

 

OCTOBER 8,2019

 

H.F.1880

 

*

 

 

"'A nation cannot'

said

Abraham Lincoln,

'exist half-slave and 'half-free.'

The aphorism has a wider application."

AS we see in England at the present time in April,2019 when the country appears divided on the issue of the bedrock of our ENGLISH CONSTITUTION of a FREE ENGLAND as concluded at the

ENGLISH REVOLUTION  .

And our troubles have arisen since because the

"FUNDAMENTALS of THE REVOLUTION ."

were NOT then or later EMBEDDED into the

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.

IT IS WELL TO REALISE THAT IF THERE HAD BEEN IN EXISTENCE A ENGLISH PARLIAMENT as there is SCOTTISH and WELSH it would have been most unlikely that we would  have ever joined HITLER'S PLANNED so-called EUROPEAN UNION  in 1973 which was to ensure a

GREATER GERMANY IN THE PEACE.

THE BREXIT PARTY must lead to the return of an

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

to PROTECT our PRICELESS INHERITANCE

of the

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN."

STILL RESPECTED AND ENJOYED BY A GREATER PART OF THE FREE INDEPENDENT NATIONS OF THE WORLD.

Yet sometimes Nations will

decline so low.

From vertue, which is reason

that no wrong,

But Justice, and some fatal

curse annext

Deprives them of their outward

libertie.

Thir inward lost

MILTON (PARADISE LOST).

Milton said it was more just "that a less number compel a greater number to retain their liberty, than that  a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness compel a less   most injuriously to be their-fellow-slaves ".(1660)

*

'A few honest men are better than numbers.

 (Letter to Sir W. Spring, Sept . [1643]

OLIVER CROMWELL. 1599-1658

*

APRIL, 2019.

H.F.1835

 

 

 

*

 

 

A REMINDER TO REMAINERS - ON OUR WEBSITE IN 2005

 

WHY DeGaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP IN 1963

 

HE ARGUED THAT:" ENGLAND, IN EFFECT IS INSULAR. SHE IS MARITIME. SHE IS LINKED THROUGH HER EXCHANGES, HER MARKETS, HER SUPPLY LINES TO THE MOST DISTANT COUNTRIES. SHE PURSUES ESSENTIALLY INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AND ONLY SLIGHTLY AGRICULTURAL ONES. SHE HAS, IN ALL HER DOINGS, VERY MARKED AND VERY ORIGINAL HABITS AND TRADITIONS. IN SHORT, ENGLAND`S VERY SITUATION DIFFERS PROFOUNDLY FROM THOSE OF THE CONTINENTALS."
 
 What DeGaule argued was not too dissimilar from what Churchill, Eden and the British Conservatives had said originally in the 1950s, that the Continental Tradition and the British Tradition, both in politics and economics, are different and cannot be reconciled within the European Economic Community.
 
 It took a French politician to remind us of our past and our destiny for the future and it is as well for us to remind ourselves of the marked differences between ourselves and our neighbours across the narrow but now vulnerable moat which divides our nations in more ways than some of us are prepared to admit. A vigorous thinker has said :
 
 "The French notion of Liberty is political equality, and the English notion is personal independence. The Frenchman is content with a liberty which leaves him free to cast an equal vote with his contemporaries at a General Election and to live his life free from interference of political superiors. This is political liberty and it is good, but it does not go far enough. The highest conception of liberty is he who claims a spiritual liberty to live a life of personal independence. The Frenchman is content to be fitted as an equal into the political system; the Englishman will have nothing to do with political systems, and surrenders his personal independence only at moments of tremendous political crisis. He hates conscription. He hates interference. The policeman is not his master, but his servant.  The state is not his prison, but his doorkeeper. His life is his own, and he will live it as he chooses" How more different could we be - we are no more successful in changing our neighbours as they of us , and we should be greatful for that.'

 

MORE!

 

2005

 

H.F.1084/1

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1907

 

 

*

 

 
 

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Sing-song in the Commons sums

 

 

up how absurd our MPs have become Sing - song in the

 

 

Commons as Parliament was prorogued sums...

 

LAND

 OF

HOPELESS

TORIES

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7458221/amp/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Sing-song...

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Land of hopeless Tories! Sing-song in the Commons as Parliament was prorogued sums up how absurd our MPs have become Sing-song in the Commons as Parliament was prorogued sums ...

 

 

*

 

[The present political parties in Westminster cannot be trusted to protect our world respected

ENGLISH INHERITANCE

 OF A

FREE

INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

 

therefore there should be a patriotic lobby in Parliament to prevent the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN"

 being ever again

AT RISK

by

TRAITORS WITHIN.]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!].

 

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 13,2019

 

 

H.F.2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 		SEP 19

OCT-19

 

NOV-19

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE
 

*

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP Official Website -2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP Official Website -2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY

 BRIBERY AND TREASON

AND FRAUD WHICH UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

*
"'A nation cannot'

said

Abraham Lincoln,

'exist half-slave and 'half-free.'

The aphorism has a wider application."

AS we see in England at the present time in April,2019 when the country appears divided on the issue of the bedrock of our ENGLISH CONSTITUTION of a FREE ENGLAND as concluded at the

ENGLISH REVOLUTION  .

And our troubles have arisen since because the

"FUNDAMENTALS of THE REVOLUTION ."

were NOT then or later EMBEDDED into the

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.

IT IS WELL TO REALISE THAT IF THERE HAD BEEN IN EXISTENCE A ENGLISH PARLIAMENT as there is SCOTTISH and WELSH it would have been most unlikely that we would  have ever joined HITLER'S PLANNED so-called EUROPEAN UNION  in 1973 which was to ensure a

GREATER GERMANY IN THE PEACE.

THE BREXIT PARTY must lead to the return of an

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

to PROTECT our PRICELESS INHERITANCE

of the

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN."

STILL RESPECTED AND ENJOYED BY A GREATER PART OF THE FREE INDEPENDENT NATIONS OF THE WORLD.

Yet sometimes Nations will

decline so low.

From vertue, which is reason

that no wrong,

But Justice, and some fatal

curse annext

Deprives them of their outward

libertie.

Thir inward lost

MILTON (PARADISE LOST).

Milton said it was more just "that a less number compel a greater number to retain their liberty, than that  a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness compel a less   most injuriously to be their-fellow-slaves ".(1660)

*

'A few honest men are better than numbers.

 (Letter to Sir W. Spring, Sept . [1643]

OLIVER CROMWELL. 1599-1658

*

APRIL, 2019.

H.F.1835

*

A REMINDER FROM 1926

 

DEMOCRACY

 AND

REPRESENTATION

 

the principles of politics

INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE EVOLUTION

OF POLITICAL IDEAS

BY

A. R . LORD

 

1926

...Another method of democratizing  a representative government requires all important acts of the legislature  to be referred to a popular vote before they become law. Sometimes such a referendum applies to acts affecting the constitution alone; sometimes it is of more extended scope. But however it is arranged, the significance and meaning of a referendum is clearly that in the last resort the

PEOPLE ALONE ARE THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.

 

 

*

OXFORD

AT THE CLARENDON PRESS

1926

H.F.1424

*
 

[ON THURSDAY JULY 25,2019

 WE HAVE OUR ANSWER

BORIS JOHNSON

PATRIOT

PRIME MINISTER

OF THE

UNITED KINGDOM

OF

GREAT BRITAIN.
 

STIRRING

WORDS OF PM

 
 

'The doubters, the doomsters, the gloomsters, they are going to get it wrong again are not. The people who bet against Britain are going to lose their shirts because we are going to restore trust in our democracy and fulfil the repeated promises of Parliament to the people and come out of the EU on October 31,no ifs or buts.

*

I have every confidence that in 99 days time we will have cracked it-but you know what we are not going to wait 99 days because the British people have had enough of waiting.

The time has come to act, to take decisions, to give strong leadership and to change this country for the better.

*

Though I am today building a great team of men and women, I take personal responsibility for the change I want to see. Never mind the backstop-the buck stops here.

*

It is time we unleashed the productive power of every corner of England Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The awesome foursome that are incarnated in that red, white and blue flag; who together are more than the sum of their parts and whose brand and political personality is admired and loved around the world.

*

After three years of unfounded self-doubt, it is time to recover our natural role as an enterprising, outward-looking and global Britain. No one in the last few centuries has succeeded in betting against the pluck and nerve and ambition of this country. They will not succeed today.

*

 

    JACK DOYLE analyses what new PM

     Boris Johnson can ...

    - Daily Mail

     

    1 day ago ... JACK DOYLE analyses what our new Prime Minister can do for Britain ... 'Never mind the backstop, the buck stops here' ... towns' and 'answering the plea of the forgotten people' in areas outside London and the South East.
     

A great historian has observed,-

'That honesty is the best policy, is a maxim which we firmly believe to be generally correct, even with respect to the temporal interest of individuals; but with respect to societies, the rule is subject to still fewer exceptions, and that for this reason, that the life of societies is larger than individuals.  It is possible to mention men who have owed great worldly prosperity to breaches of private faith: but we doubt whether it is possible to mention a state which has, on the whole, been a gainer by a breach of public faith.,'

[We all know politicians since we have been in Hitler's so-called European Union who fit this bill. Many have gained abundant riches and have left the People to suffer the consequences of their wicked deeds of death and destruction... and the result is clearly demonstrated further by the actions of many Remainer MPs who have decided not to keep their promise to accept the result of the Peoples referendum of June, 2016, which they sanctioned; which is a derogation of their duty to their constituents-a clear breach of political accountability to those they serve.]

August 8,2019

H.F.1424

 

 

 

A MATTER OF TREASON

The behaviour of our politicians over the past thirty-five years-and in AUGUST 2019 -forty six years-has confirmed the dangers of one-party rule which was warned of over two millennium ago . The greatest danger we face is from within BY THE TREASONABLE ACTIONS of many of our politicians and judges who should know better and those close to our sovereign Queen Elizabeth II the PRIVY COUNSELLORS of the REALM.
 
Before we proceed we will state the oaths taken by our Privy Counsellors to the Queen and also to the European Union. We are at a loss to understand how it is possible to take the oath to Queen and Country and yet still take the oath to the EU.
 
 CONFLICT OF DUTIES AND LOYALTIES
 
THE UNITED KINGDOM
 
 THE OATH OF A PRIVY COUNSELLOR
 
 'You do swear by Almighty God to be true and faithful Servant unto the Queen's Majesty's Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person. Honour, Crown, or Dignity Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your Power, and either cause it to be revealed to her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will, in all things to be removed, treated, and debated in Council, faithly and truly declare your Mind and Opinion. According to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all Matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors, you will not reveal it unto him, but will keep the same until such time as, by the Consent of Her Majesty, or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will in your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminence's, and Authorities, granted to her Majesty, annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty. SO HELP ME GOD. '
  
 THE EUROPEAN UNION
 
 The OATH SWORN BY COMMISSIONERS - BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
 
 'I solemnly undertake to perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the Communities in carrying out my duties neither to seek nor to take instructions from my government or body, to refrain from any action incompatible with my duties. I formally note the undertaking of each member state to respect this principle and not to seek to influence members of the Commission in the performance of their task. I further undertake to respect both during and after my term of office the obligations arising therefrom and in particular the duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance after I have ceased to hold office of certain appointments or benefits. '
  
 Our Constitution was only safe so long as our Representatives were persons of INTEGRITY unfortunately it is clear that any person owning allegiance to Her Majesty could not in all honesty sign the oath to the European Union. We have therefore in our midst many TRAITORS to her Majesty and to the people of these Islands. We hope one day to have these Traitors tried by a SUPREME Constitutional Court when England one day will return to being a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of a Greater Britain. It is only a few decades ago when the last TRAITOR in England was" hanged by the neck until he was dead ". I t is our opinion that the actions of those who knowingly gave away the " Rights and Liberties " of the English People should suffer the maximum sentence prescribed by law, in memory of those millions of our people who gave their lives for their country, even in the last few weeks.
 
We will list every person that has had a hand in traitorously betraying this country in a TRAITORS GALLERY and see that these names are known by the people of this country. We ask anyone who is aware of anyone who has taken an Oath to let us know for inclusion in our list
 
OVER TWO THOUSAND YEARS AGO THE FOLLOWING WORDS WERE SPOKEN BY A GREAT SENATOR OF ROME .
 
 " A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the TRAITOR moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the TRAITOR appears no TRAITOR; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A MURDERER IS LESS TO BE FEARED".
 
 CICERO

See: A_pointofeu.html

 

‘A’.    Our democracy   betrayed    

 

“Sovereignty”, the “British Constitution”, our “democracy”, “self-government”; what threads run through these priceless things, and hold them  together?  At least two fundamental principles are common to all of them. 

 

The First: is the hard won right of the British people to elect and dismiss those who make their laws? 

 

The Second:  is that the British people have given Parliament the power to make all their laws for them, but they have not given Parliament permission to give that power away.

 

Both of these principles, for which, over the centuries, millions have willingly given up their lives, already stand deeply betrayed by our membership of the European Union.  I propose to justify this depressing statement under three heads.

 

First:  What is the present position under the Treaties of Rome; how much of our democracy have we already handed over to the corrupt octopus in Brussels and how were we deceived into doing it?

 

Second:   How much is this costing us in cash and is it worth it?

 

Third:   What does the proposed EU Constitution have in store for us?

 

It is essential to remember that the people’s pact is with Parliament; it is not with the Executive or Government of the day.

 

The People elect and dismiss Members of Parliament once every 4 or 5 years, and our Government is formed out of a majority of elected MP’s.  But only 60% of the electorate now bother to vote in General Elections, and modern Governments are supported by only some 40% of those who do vote, or 24% of the electorate.  The percentage of those who vote is declining; trust in our system of Parliamentary Democracy is eroding steadily.

 

I submit therefore that these temporary Governments, always empowered by a minority of the people, do not have the right to break great pacts upon which our Sovereignty rests.  Yet that is just what they have been doing for the last 32 years. [2005]

 

*

Numbers in brackets are Reference Numbers e.g.  (1) – (24) –shown on the last Page of this bulletin.

 

End of Page ‘A’

H.F.1424

 

JULY 25,2019

 

august 18,2019

 

H.F.1884

 

*

 
 

Daily Mail -November 27, 2006

 

LET THEM EAT PORRIDGE-WE'LL KEEP OUR CAKE

By

 

Max Hastings

 

Daily Mail -November 27, 2006

 

MONTHS before the 300th anniversary of the

ACT OF UNION

-Which brought together Scotland and England under a common Parliament, new opinion Polls suggest that the two peoples have had enough of each other.

 

More than half the respondents to a weekend ICM survey on both sides of the border claim to believe that the two nations should go it alone again. The figures reflect sentiments which anyone who travels the United Kingdom can endorse. In Scotland, ill-will and resentment towards the ENGLISH HAS BEEN MOUNTING FOR MANY YEARS.

 

A 1995 Nuffield Foundation study found that 75 per cent of Scots felt 'some antipathy towards the English, thinking them aggressive, arrogant and untrustworthy.

Today, hostility has grown. It was highlighted by ugly incidents during the World Cup, when some fans rash enough to wear English colours in Scotland were physically assaulted, and Scottish First Minister Jack McConnell defiantly asserted that he was more interested in the fates of the Trinidad and Angola teams than that of ENGLAND.

 

Meanwhile, south of the border, after decades in which the English seemed unmoved by Scottish animosity, suddenly passions are stirring.  There is growing awareness, and resentment of the bills we pay for the northern kingdom's fecklessness.

Per capita PUBLIC SPENDING in Scotland is much higher then in ENGLAND. Official figures this year put it at £8,265 per head in Scotland and £6,762 in ENGLAND.

 

The Scottish parliament has recently decreed that the elderly should receive free long-term health-care regardless of their wealth. In England it is a source of bitter grievance that no such provision is available - yet we are funding Edinburgh's largesse to its own.

 

Am astonishingly recent statistic suggests that of Scotland's  population of five million, just 163,000 people are taxpayers when all relief's and subsidies are discounted.  The remainder are takers from - and not contributors to - the NATION EXCHEQUER.

 

And yet this same nation of dependents possesses a vice-like grip on BRITAIN'S governance.

Scottish MPs vote on ENGLISH issues in the COMMONS, while ENGLISH  MPs are barred from voting on Scottish ones.

Many key OFFICES of GOVERNMENT are filled by SCOTS MPs, and we shall have a Scottish prime minister if Gordon Brown succeeds Tony Blair.

The English might swallow all this with good grace, if the SCOTS seemed grateful or even merely friendly.

BUT THEY ARE NOT

And as abuse grows, as English visitors perceive ever more hostility when they cross the border, southerners are GETTING ANGRY.

Now , their feelings are reflected in opinion polls, and building a head of steam.

'If the Scots don't like it, why don't they just b***** off and become INDEPENDENT? demand a host of voices in English bars and homes.

If the latest ICM poll is to be believed, 68 per cent of the southern public wants an

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

 to match the

 Scottish one.

 

THIS, it seems to me, would be the worst possible response to the tensions in the [so-called] UNION. It would create another vastly expensive layer of GOVERNMENT in a [so-called] United Kingdom which is already over-governed.

 

[England OUT -OF-EU which be an even richer country and a NEW UNION of Independent Nation States would add little to the wealth of an EU FREE zone.  There is the possibility that Scotland would prefer to remain in the EU but with English withdrawal any cost would have to be shared by the other contributors in the EU and  NOT ENGLAND.]

If we do not think much of most Commons MPs, imagine what the members of a subordinate English Parliament would be: rejects from Westminster scrambling to board a branch gravy train.

Take a look at the McPygmies' who squander our money in Edinburgh. They are most famous for promoting a measure to give women rights to breastfeed in public places, and venting their spleen on the English as the source of all Scotland's woes.

 

Do we really want the same sort of thing in an English Parliament HOUSE, to be established -

let us say in the forthcoming and soon-to-be-derelict Olympic stadium in East London?

[The historical home of the INDEPENDENT ENGLISH PARLIAMENT is at WESTMINSTER and there it will always remain]

The only rational debate must be about whether the UNION should continue at all. Economically from an English standpoint there is no case. Scotland brings nothing to the party except glorious scenery.

The northern kingdom has suffered a tragic decline since the 19th century when it was a thriving heartland of heavy industry, coal mining and shop building.

 

As engineers, architects, soldiers and traders. Scots were among the foremost builders of the British Empire.  In the 20th century, however, since the collapse of the old manufacturing base, Scotland has languished.

Nationalism began its resurgence some 30 years ago, when Scottish football fans started to sing

 Flower of Scotland

-at International matches in place of

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

The movement gathered pace dramatically during the years of Margaret Thatcher. Scots bitterly resisted her campaign to strip their decaying industries of public funding and make them stand on their own feet.

'With the precise and good intentions of a nurse,'

 historian Richard Weight has written,

 

'Mrs. Thatcher unpeeled the fiscal bandages which British government  since the 1930s had placed on Scotland and Wales in an effect to heal the wounds of industrial decline.

THATCHER WAS RIGHT, of course, but the Scots have never forgiven her or the ENGLISH. They cling to an implacable conviction that we had shafted them, above all by stealing 'THEIR' OIL.

IN TRUTH, if we had given them every penny from the North Sea bonanza but made them pat their own way for say, the past half century, SCOTLAND WOULD STILL BE IN DEEP DEFICIT.

While England has transformed itself into a post-industrial society the northern  kingdom has lagged helplessly. Scots make many excuses for their failure, but frequent studies have concluded that they simply lack the entrepreneurial energy and skills to complete.

Edinburgh has become a significant financial centre, but Scottish businesses start-ups have an appalling survival record. As ambitious young Scots migrate south, the population sustained  only by a steady inflow of ENGLISH retirement couples, who appreciate cheap housing and a low cost of living.

The country employs vastly more public-sector workers per head than ENGLAND

Its Parliament promotes a shamelessly Stalinist vision of STATE dominance and STATE provision.  Politically, socially, economically, SCOTLAND has become retirement home for 20th century lost causes and discredited ideals

 

 

The Scots tragedy is that they cannot make their own country work, and want somebody else to blame. They measure their history alongside that of the IRISH, and imagine an INDEPENDENT future as bright as that of modern Ireland. Both propositions are ill-founded.

[Ireland receives annually a Billion pounds from the EU partly paid for by the English taxpayers.]

 

FIRST, even admitting the 19th century Highland clearances, Scotland never suffered at English hands as Ireland did. Indeed, it has profited mightily from the UNION for most of its history, as economists acknowledge.

SECOND, Ireland's take- off was made possible by a tidal wave of U hand-outs [much from the English taxpayer] in the 1970s and 1980s. This will not be repeated if Scotland votes for INDEPENDENCE, because the cash isn't there.

 

THE WORST - and likeliest -

outcome of current surge of nationalist sentiment is that the Scots will go on whinging, but stop just short of going INDEPENDENT. They will be terrified of losing access to all that lovely

 

 ENGLISH MONEY

 

[WE HOPE THEY KEEP THEIR NERVE-some of the most successful countries in the world are SMALL NATION STATES. Mr Salmond needs to visit those countries and learn from their success.  He of course needs to get rid of the many nut- cases which give his historic country a bad image on the international scene.  Wealth is NOT the most important objective but the happiness of the PEOPLE and their commitment to each other to make a transition to the necessary changes to give their people a decent standard of living but more IMPORTANTLY a 'breath of fresh air' of Freedom and modest contentment.  Scottish Independence will pave the way for an

INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

OF

ENGLAND

AT

WESTMINSTER.  ]

 

 

 

If I were David Cameron, however, as the next General Election approaches I would play the English card ruthlessly. Whatever the Tories do, they will never again win significant seats in Scotland, so they have nothing to lose.

[We are not so sure as the possibility of England leaving the EU is almost assured if she becomes again an INDEPENDENT ENGLAND.  Many in the Tory party and particularly Mr Nice Guy Dave are committed to the EU and they will do anything to see that the name of England is never shown on the map of the British Isles again. There would also be a clamour for Proportional Representation as most of the voters are no longer pleased with Tweedledee and Dave's Tweedledumb.]

Cameron can ride a tide of mounting English anger, about how much the Scots cost us, and how wretchedly they behave in return.

 

Why should we accept governance by the [TARTAN CABAL] Labour ministers who sit for Scottish rotten boroughs? Why should we go on pretending to bear responsibility for Scotland's social and economic failure\?

 

I am an ENGLISHMAN  who has loved SCOTLAND

- all my life , but like many of us, I have had enough.

IF THE SCOTS CLAIM TO WANT INDEPENDENCE, LET THEM HAVE IT.

 

The break-up of the UNION will be a sorrow to those of us to whom its heritage means so much

But now that it has become a source of rancor and resentment among the Scottish people, let them see how they fare without it.

THEY CAN EAT SCOTS PORRIDGE INSTEAD OF ENGLISH CAKE< AND DISCOVER HOW THEY LIKE IT,

 

[As we have mentioned elsewhere a break-up of partners is not always a disaster it might lead to a more understanding and at a later stage a new partnership where they have learnt not to take their partner for granted. Scotland with Wales and England share the same Island and a

NEW UNION 

Of a Family of Independent Nation States

of

Greater Britain

would be a great force for FREEDOM and JUSTICE in the WORLD of the 21st century.]

*          *          *

NOVEMBER/06

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT

-WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 

 

H.F.1521

 

 

 

*

 
 
ONE THIRD OF BEAT BOBBIES AXED IN JUST THREE YEARS.

 

 

‘Plastic bobbies’ are used to investigate burglary and vandalism as cash-strapped forces ‘run out of fully-trained staff’

  • One in three beat bobbies
  • have been axed in only three
  • years, figures reveal
  • The Home Office findings come amid a
  • huge surge in violent crime 
  • They will raise fears in Whitehall that forces
  • are retreating from the front line

 

By Ian Drury Home Affairs Editor For The Daily Mail

 August 27,2018

203

View
comments

 

One in three beat bobbies have been axed in only three years amid a huge surge in violent crime.

Home Office figures reveal that more than 7,000 traditional neighbourhood police officers have been reassigned to other duties or quit since March 2015.

The findings will raise fears in Whitehall that forces are retreating from the front line, and that the days of Dixon Of Dock Green-style bobbies pounding our streets are gone for good.

 
 

One in three beat bobbies have been axed in only three years, figures reveal

The news will further harm public faith in the police at a time when officers have come under fire for failing to attend the scene of many crimes.

The fall comes amid spiralling violent crime in ‘Wild West Britain’, as highlighted by the Daily Mail.

Last month the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that police recorded 5.5million offences in the year to March, a rise of 45 per cent compared with 2015. Violent crime in England and Wales has almost doubled from 778,000 offences to 1.4million over the same period, while murders have increased from 539 to 736 and knife offences have soared from 26,065 to 40,147.

Senior officers have insisted that bobbies on the beat, who protect communities and gather intelligence, play a crucial role in solving crime. A more old-fashioned policing policy has seen Durham Constabulary become the best force in the country for achieving justice, with 18 per cent of crimes detected compared with 5 per cent in similar-sized forces.

Analysis of official figures by The Sunday Times found that the number of neighbourhood police officers fell from 23,928 in March 2015 to 16,557 this year, a drop of around a third.

Over the same period, the number of police community support officers, or PCSOs, has declined by around 18 per cent from 12,370 to 10,139.

Police officer numbers have dropped from around 143,700 in March 2010, a few weeks before the Tory-led coalition won power, to 122,400 this March.

Lord Stevens, the former Scotland Yard commissioner, said the figures were ‘incredibly alarming’, adding that public confidence in the police was linked to ‘officers on the street in uniform’.

Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Sir Ed Davey said: ‘This looks like the death of the traditional beat bobby by stealth.’

The Home Office insists that 92 per cent of officers are ‘front-line’ but they include more than 40,000 in ‘non-visible’ roles such as office-bound intelligence analysts, custody officers and operational support officers and nearly 9,000 in other support roles.

The Government says it has protected overall police budgets in real terms since the 2015 spending review. Despite this, Home Secretary Sajid Javid has acknowledged pressures and pledged to fight for more money.

A Home Office spokesman said: ‘Forces are changing how they deliver local policing so that they can respond better to the changing nature of crime. They recognise effective community engagement is more than just having a visible police presence.

‘Most have already set out plans to either protect or increase front-line policing this year.’

 
 

The forces using PCSOs to investigate burglaries

Police forces are using PCSOs to investigate crimes including burglary and vandalism as they ‘run out’ of fully trained staff.

Senior officers at more than a third of forces are directing the civilian officers to respond to calls for help from the public.

The police and community support officers, who do not have powers of arrest, are expected to pass inquiries on to detectives if they become more complex.

PCSOs, nicknamed ‘plastic policemen’ by their detractors, have been investigating burglaries in the West Midlands, Hertfordshire, Surrey, Northamptonshire, Lincolnshire and Cleveland.

One PCSO published CCTV footage of an intruder caught on camera at a social club in Aldenham, Hertfordshire.

 

Police forces are now using PCSOs to investigate crimes including burglary and vandalism

In Surrey, a PCSO urged residents to be vigilant after three break-ins at properties in Banstead and Hooley. In Lincolnshire a PCSO asked for help to solve a shed burglary and damage to a nearby fence.

Simon Kempton, of the Police Federation, which represents rank and file police officers, said: ‘This is policing on the cheap. Chief constables are simply running out of properly trained people to send to jobs.’

HM Inspectorate of Constabulary has criticised chief constables for failing to provide adequate training for PCSOs’ expanded responsibilities.

Hertfordshire Police said regular police officers, special constables, civilian investigators and PCSOs ‘all have a valuable role in offering a reassuring presence to the public [and] helping to fight crime and anti-social behaviour’.

 

Advertisement

‘Plastic bobbies’ are used to investigate burglary and vandalism

‘Plastic bobbies’ are used to investigate burglary and vandalism as cash-strapped forces ‘run out of fully-trained staff’

By Ian Drury Home Affairs Editor For The Daily Mail

 August 27,2018

 

H.F.1663

 

 

*

 
A CONSERVATIVE PARTY

PROMISES TO GET TOUGH ON LAW AND ORDER

IN

OCTOBER 2019

WHAT ARE ITS CHANCES

NILL

The DECADES LONG AWAITED CONSERVATIVE HARD-LINE POLICY

ON

LAW & ORDER

DEPENDS ON MORE PRISON SPACE

IN SIMPLE WORDS

MORE PRISONS

Because all the promises will avail

NOTHING

if there is no more prison space to hold the expected much increased number of

OFFENDERS

expected with the much increased number of offenders with their long belated no nonsense plan to increase the

Bobbies -on-the- Beat

and

the tougher sentencing for criminals who have played the system for too long to a stage that so called secure prisons are now in competition with Hilton and other majors hostellers with their good fare and comfort. The criminals have played the system for too long. Open Prisons should be secure prisons, and life in prison should not resemble a holiday camp, but time put to good affect to change the attitude of offenders for their good - but more importantly for the good of the law-abiding citizen in the community.

[See  the following article by Philip Davies MP.]

OCTOBER 6,2019

 

*

 

 

MAY-2015

  1. Beat Bobbies are dying out,

     

    warn police:

     

     

    Leaders say ...

     

    - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Police-leaders-say-officers-endangered-budget-cuts- hit.html

    By James Slack and Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail. Published: 18:03 EST, 19
    May 2015 | Updated: 18:04 EST, 19 May 2015. View comments. Bobbies on the ...
      

     

    [OVER THE PAST DECADE AND LONGER WE HAVE SHOWN MANY ARTICLES FROM THE DAILY MAIL ON THIS IMPORTANT AND VITAL SUBJECT OF THE LOSS OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT. AND ITS AFFECT ON THE GENERAL POPULATION BUT PARTICULARLY  ON THE GROWING OLDER POPULATION.  BUT WE HAVE ALSO STATED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY BEING FELLOW CITIZENS AND PART OF THE COMMUNITY WHICH SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE COMPLETELY  IGNORED.-MAY 2015 ]

H.F.1896

 

 

*

 

 
 

SUNDAY EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies MP
 

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually representing people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know many MPS think of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that those in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues.

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

 

THE PUBLIC

HEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERSW AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TODAY IN MARCH 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-at present 5 years. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES  from across our society, to do so.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

SUNDAY EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies  MP
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

 The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

 Diversity in the UK

 A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

 Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

 The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 

 

 

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

H.F.1828

 

*
Brought forward from February,2006

 

[HOW IT ALL BEGAN]

 

 

NO BRITISH GOVERNMENT

 IN MODERN TIMES HAS SO SYSTEMATICALLY SET ABOUT DESTROYING OUR LIBERTIES.

 

*

 

Persecution rather than prosecution is the real THREAT

*

Daily Mail

Friday, January 20- 2006

 

 

 

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

 

NO GOVERNMENT has ever come to power in this country prattling more about FREEDOM and HUMAN RIGHTS –assumed incoherently to be the same thing, though in practice opposites.

 

AND

 

NO BRITISH GOVERNMENT in MODERN TIMES has so systematically set about destroying our LIBERTIES.

 

We seem to be sleep walking into a Big Brother –POLICE STATE, where Orwellian rules apply.

 

REPRESSION is FREEDOM!

 

The new infinitely elastic weapon of our THOUGHT POLICE

Today is the investigation.

You need not have done ANYTHING which is exactly WRONG or would stand up in a COURT of LAW.

 

BUT

 

You may be ‘investigated’ for your remarks – including comments which, when Labour came to POWER could NEVER have aroused even the most nosey-parker of POLICEMEN.

 

WE HAVE obvious cases like that of Sir Iqbal Sacranie, leader of the Muslim Council of Britain, investigated for condemning homosexuality.

 

[WE HAVE] A Christian couple in Lancashire sent two police officers – obviously they had man-power to spare –for an 80-hour confrontation of a couple who complained about Wyre Council’s promotion of civil partnerships.

 

One view derived from the Koran the other the Bible or at least the

 Old Testament.

 

Can we now expect police raids on churches and mosques to remove these hate-inspiring books?

 

The THOUGHT POLICE have even reached into No 10, with Tony Blair being scrutinised by senior policemen from Wales for cursing the Welsh (in private).

In saner times the complainer would have been told to go home and lie down.

 

We have of course, the prize-winning award for imbecility of the Oxford undergraduate being arrested when he asked a policeman if he knew his horse was ‘gay’.

 

The Crown Prosecution Service offered no evidence in COURT, since there appeared no danger of ‘disorder’. Since the very conceivable chance of that would be the mounted police rioting - this was hardly surprising.

 

 

Note also that two police cars arrived to make the arrest, no doubt diverted from trivialities, such as householders complaining about burglaries or violence.

Truly we have a POLICE FORCE now which seems somewhere between the Keystone Cops and the KGB.

 

Nor is the FORCE itself immune. In Nottingham a detective, plus perhaps three colleagues, faces disciplinary action for referring to a career criminal as ‘pondlife’. They were caught, also note, after being covertly taped.

 

Nor are the prison warders SAFE.

 

Prisons Inspector Anne Owers – where on earth do they find these people?- has rebuked prison staff in Leeds for describing their charges as ‘coins’ and ‘bodies’.

 

Clearly such criticism could easily damage individual warders ‘ careers.

 

In Criminal Law we have the new plan of offences to be automatically levied in an appropriate reversal of the

 

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

 

The COURTS, in Tony Blair’s view, are obstructing JUSTICE.

 

And so it goes on and on.

Many are tempted merely to jeer, to assume that these events are affecting only a very few.

That is dangerously wrong.

 

FREEDOM may not only suffer the death of a thousand threats. There are few more depressing comments in everyday conversation than the addition to some comment:

 

BUT we are not allowed to say that any more are we?

 

-often in the wake of remarks which even today’s Keystone Cops could not act on.

 

Are we mice or men?

 

We could stand up to Hitler but are apparently cowed by our

 THOUGHT POLICE

 

 

These threats to FREEDOM of SPEECH are ironically based on ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ and the entitlement not to face ‘discrimination’-another much abused word-meaning that any lifestyle should be immune from criticism.

 

The Association of Chief Police Officers has issued a circular saying all complaints should be investigated, otherwise the complainant, however certifiable, might feel he is being ‘discriminated’ against.

THIS IS A LOONIES CHARTER.

 

Some of us can comfortably tell interfering policemen to buzz off and get back to the jobs they are supposed to be paid for. I can do that.  The POLICE are not likely to tangle with a powerful newspaper. But for many the fear of a visit from the POLICE is seriously intimidating.

 

Into all this Chancellor Gordon Brown steps with his call for flag poles and Union Jacks in every garden to celebrate

 

‘BRITISHNESS’

 

An idea once vulgar and unBritish’

 

The flag flying, he adds, would show our ‘commitment to

 

LIBERTY’

 

IS HE JOKING?

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

FEB/06

 

H.F.1861

 

*

 

    MERKEL'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Germany calls for .REFERENDUM.. - Daily Express

    https://www.express.co.uk/.../Germany-Eu-referendum-Dexit-Brexit-Angela-Merkel-european-union
    ‎
    3 Jul 2016 ... MERKEL'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Germany calls for Referendum as ... of Britain
    backed Brexit in the historic EU referendum on June 23

 

H.F.1832

NEXT YEAR the rising Anti-EU German political party the AfD will enter the German parliament and DEXIT will be top  on our programme.

REMAINERS have failed to realise that millions of once FREE PEOPLE  in captive Europe are now demanding THEIR FREEDOM. WE have mentioned often in the past that once the UK leaves the EU many other countries will follow and the above notice on GERMANY will be the first of many over the coming years.

'FREEDEOM IS INFECTIOUS!'

 

SLAVERY IS HELL!

 

*

Frederick-Forsyth

 
DEAL

OR

 NO DEAL,

IT'TS TIME

WE FINALLY STOOD UP TO THE

BULLY BOYS OF BRUSSELS

 

A Euro-fanatic enemy within is real danger, says Frederick Forsyth... - Daily Express

JUNE 7,2019
 

AS USUAL

, it was Sherlock Holmes who got it right, or at least his creator Arthur Conan Doyle. He said:

" If you eliminate all the solutions that are impossible, whatever you are left with, no matter how improbable, must be the

 TRUTH

Let's try it on

BREXIT.

Three times a clear majority in the Commons has voted that the shameful capitulation by  Theresa May after two years grovelling in

BRUSSELS

what she called her "settlement", was totally unacceptable. The EU team in Brussels has just made it very plain for the 50th time this British capitulation will not be changed by one dot or comma.

SOUNDS PRETTY PLAIN TO ME.

So what is left? There is only one recourse. Bite on the bullet. Prepare like fury, and go with

WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION

RULES.

Actually, there are three plusses here. One is that a lot of preparation has been very quietly accomplished already not by the saboteurs of the

CIVIL SERVICE

but by the real professionals-

THE CITY.

Another is that several huge economies out there are ready and eager to clinch

FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS (FTAs)

with us as soon as we are ready. The only hesitancy is with our damp-trousered establishment here in the UK.

Number Three is the biggest of all. Our trade with the EU generates for

EUROPE

an £80billion p. a .surplus which represents several million jobs,. The EU's unemployment levels are dizzying compared with ours. But our increase of imports fro th

REST OF THE WORLD

would cause a diminishment of

EU IMPORTS,

or several million jobs

OVER THERE.

The freeloaders of Brussels can ploy arrogant until they have drained the last chateau vintage but what about the

EUROPEAN TRADERS

and

WORKERS.

FACING JOB LOSSES?

They would bring whole governments down-when they are told, which has not happened yet

Our booming economy gives us several major aces to play. So why do our Cabinet-level lily-livers squeal with fright?

AS President Roosevelt said.

"We have nothing to fear but fear itself."

NO DEAL

is the

ONLY WAY

that we have left to go-unless Brussels renegotiates much better terms and that means for a start,

NO IRISH BACKSTOP.

WHICH IT ABSOLUTELY  WILL NOT.

*

Our friends and enemies around the world are watching us at this most important epic in our long history as a free independent nation state. They must see that there is still life in John Bull after 48 years of slavery in Hitler's brain-child. Other captive once free nation states  are looking for their freedom and our positive action will give them heart in their future battle for

 FREEDOM.

The die is cast-let the battle continue in earnest as

RIGHT

 IS ON OUR SIDE.]

[comments in brackets are ours.]

JUNE 7,2019

 

H.F.1862/2

*

 

 

Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!

 

Extract from

 

England our England

By

Vernon Coleman

 

Reason No 288 (out of 300 reasons)

 

Could England survive outside the EU? Yes. Very well, thank you.

 There has for years now been a cynical and ruthless propaganda campaign to persuade us that England has no future outside Europe. This is nonsense. For example, take Switzerland. They ignored the encouragement of their government and voted against joining the EU. But they had negotiated for themselves an excellent trade agreement – thereby putting a lie to the utterly false claim that no European country can possibly survive unless it becomes part of the EU.

 

The europhiles constantly argue that England would be ruined if she left Europe. 

 

Oh, what porkies these people do tell.

 

As the Economist said recently:’…the idea that leaving the (the EU) would be ‘economic suicide’ is nonsense.’

 

Examine what would happen if England pulled up the Tunnel and stopped paying subs to the big EU in Brussels:

 

1.  The EU would impose its external tariff on English exports to Europe. This would make little difference to English companies- most of whose exports go outside Europe anyway.

The world Trade Organisation restricts the EU to an external tariff of around six % so the effect would , in any case, be quite small. (England would almost certainly be able to negotiate for itself a smaller tariff- in the way that Switzerland has. This would drive down the cost of leaving the EU still further.)

 

2.   If outside the EU, England would, inevitably, be outside the euro. There would be an exchange rate between the pound and the euro. In the long run this could well be to England’s advantage.

 

3.  The external tariff on England’s imports from outside the EU would disappear. England would probably gain from this than it would lose from the imposition of a tariff on exports to Europe.

 

4.  An England outside the EU would be able to make special trading deals with other countries- such as those in the Commonwealth. This could be hugely advantageous.

 

5. Europhiles claim that if England left the EU then countries from outside Europe (such as Japan and America) would invest less. This is nonsense. England attracts more outside investment (known to economists as ‘Foreign Direct Investment’) than other European countries because its labour market is still relatively unregulated. If it was outside the EU, England could take advantage of its independence to reduce the number of regulations limiting foreign companies. EU regulations are already regarded as a minefield. Just ask some of the foreign companies who have had eurocrats leaping up and down all over them. Many would jump at the chance to invest in a less regulated Europe.

 

Finally, even if FDI did fall, England would not necessarily lose, since in an often irrational attempt to encourage foreign businesses( at the expense of English businesses) the English Government subsidises these investments. A subsidised  outside investment may well not make money for the country!

 

The bottom line is that the English stand to lose nothing by leaving the EU.  

 

If England left the EU it would leave behind an incompetent and power-hungry bureaucracy which has consistently failed. If we left the EU it would leave they would not be able to do anything in revenge. REMEMBER, we have a trade deficit with the EU. (For example, we have a trade deficit of over £3 billion a year with Germany alone.) The EU countries desperately need our trade

 

English politicians have supported the EU, lied and deceived the English voters and signed away

RIGHTS and FREEDOMS

 

 

They often did this claiming that they wanted England to have influence in Europe.

 

 

THIS IS NONSENSE.

 

England has far less influence in Europe than it had ten, twenty or thirty years ago. (written in 2002)

 

 

Politicians have sold out the voters to gain personal political influence.

 

 

England and the English,

have gained nothing from membership of the EU. But membership has cost a great deal.

 

ENGLAND WOULD SURVIVE AND SURVIVE WELL OUTSIDE OF THE EU.

 

 

The people of Norway and Switzerland have voted against joining the EU-and have thrived. Greenland once in the EU, escaped and has prospered since getting out. If they can do it so can ENGLAND.

England would survive well outside the EU. It would be richer and more powerful. And its citizens would regain their

LOST INDEPENDENCE.

 

England's trade is in surplus with every state in the world except the EU.  If England left the EU .If England left the EU it could regain power over its own legal system, armed forces, and agricultural polices. Hundreds of thousands of small businesses would be saved from suffocating

BUREAUCRACY.

 

English is the world's leading business language. English dominates the

INTERNET

Our language means we can trade with any other country in the world.

Tony Bliar won't tell you this but England would be richer if it left the EU. We would save a fortune. And be free of [at least] 30,000 RULES

 

The only people who would lose would be the

 POLITICIANS

 

for whom

 the

English stage is too small.

WE CAN STILL LEAVE THE EU.

289

 

'When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.'

 

 

THOMAS JEFFERSON (93rd President of the USA)1743-1826.

 

 

292

 

Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

 

 

Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

 

 

'The United States of Europe.

 

 

Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

 

He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

BERLIN.

 

[to be continued.]

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

 

(www.vernoncoleman.com)

 

*          *         *

More details to follow shortly.

*

Words of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:

 

‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)

More!

*

Brought forward from May 2007

 
 

LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/A1042/CON30/B404/B308

 

 

H.F.1752

 

*

 

TRUMP TRADE OFFER

 

Boosts

Brexiteers

Donald Trump promised US COMMERCE with Britain

Will increase 'very substantially' after a post-Brexit deal to preserve

£12 BILLION of trade

From TOM LEONARD in NEW York

Daily Mail - Trump trade offer boosts Brexiteers - Mail e-paper

 

FEBRUARY 16, 2019

Speaking at thE WHITE HOUSE, the president made clear he was happy with the deal and said the

'very good trading relationship' between the two countries had been 'strenghened further.'.

His comments will hearten pro-Brexit supporters who have argued that leaving the European Union will enable Britain to strike lucrative

FREE TRADE DEALS

Across the globe.

Mr Trump had previously critisised Theresa May's handling of

BREXIT

warning her moves to negotiate a softer deal with the EU acould 'kill' any new deal with the US.

The new mutual recognition agreement replicates the current deal between the EU and US on ntechnical standards for exported goods.

sMr Trump made the comments in passing as he rattled through his administration's foreign policy successes.

'With the UK, we're continuing our trade and we're actually going to be increasing it very substantially as time goes by,' he said.

International Trade Secretary Liam Fox leapt on the remarks, saying: President TRump's statement was clear-the UK and the USA share a

SPECIAL TRADE RELATIONSHIP

and there is real ambition on both sides of the Atlantic to enhance this after we

LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

[THOSE WHO TALK OF A SOFT OPTION ARE SUPPORTING ADOLF HITLER'S PLAN FOR A GERMAN DICTATORSHIP OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE.]

THROUGHOUT HISTORY OF MANKIND FREEDOM OF PERSON AND COUNTRY HAS OFTEN RESULTED IN THE OLD ADAGE!

'WITHOUT PAIN-THERE IS NO GAIN!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 *

FEBRUARY 16, 2019

 

H.F.1801

*

 

Daily Mail - WE MUST GRASP THIS CHANCE OF FREEDOM NOW

 
 WE MUST GRASP THIS CHANCE OF FREEDOM NOW. By Geoffrey Cox QC

ATTORNEY GENERAL Brexit On A Knife Edge WITHIN a few short days, the ...
 Within a few short days, the House of Commons majority will exert itself. It is likely it will once again vote to reject leaving the EU without a deal

 

 

 and place before the House a choice of options

and it will inevitably move to make binding, each of which will require a long extension of the Article 50 time limit for our departure.

 

*  *  *

 

Daily Mail - WE MUST GRASP THIS CHANCE OF FREEDOM NOW

by GEoffrey Cox QC ATTORNEY GENERAL

 

 

Tuesday March 26,2019

H.F.1850

 

*

 

Frederick-Forsyth

 
 

[HOW SELF-SERVING

OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY ARE THE  REMAINER MPS IN

PARLIAMENT]

*

Would these turkeys vote for Christmas

There are few absolute guarantees in life but here is one. Every MP in the House of Commons, all 650 of them, had an identical experience on

JUNE 8,2017.

Each stood on the platform of a hall in their constituency to hear the returning officer pronounce:

'I therefore declare ABC to be the elected member for constituency of XYZ.'

Supposing at that point someone from the back of the hall shouted,

"I disagree, and on that basis alone demand the whole election be re-run."

How many of those sitting as MPs would have agreed?

Guarantee?

The answer:

NONE.

So what do some of them mean by demanding a re-run of the

NATIONAL REFERENDUM

ON

BREXIT?

That was a

GENERAL ELECTION ,

save for a policy not a person.

Let me try a second guarantee. Supposing all those who clamour for a second referendum were told they must now stand down for an immediate by-election to confirm their constituents' choice of two years ago. How many would agree to that?

ANSWER: ZERO

All the EU-luvvies are happy to wreck our democratic system of government until it gets personel and dismissal to oblivion beckons. Then they try so hard to stay where they are.

[Well Done!

 Mr Forsyth]

[Brexiteer Constituents of Remainer MPs will no doubt ensure at the next GENERAL election that those QUISLINGS- FiFTH COLUMNISTS - IN PLAINER LANGUAGE

TRAITORS

are sent packing with mucH

 GUSTFUL APPLAUSE...]

A Euro-fanatic enemy within is real danger, says ... - Daily Express

 

June 7, 2019

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1879

*
 Threats of Armageddon.

3,500 troops on standby.

But I still believe there's no need for PANIC

if its a No Deal

By Alex Brummer

Friday,March 22,2019

ALEX BRUMMER: I still believe there is no need for panic if it's

NO DEAL ...

ON THE DAY after the EU referendum, the pound went into freefall on foreign exchange markets, credit became much scarcer and Britain looked to be without a functioning government as David Cameron threw in the towel.

Into the breach stepped the

BANK OF ENGLAND.

Governer to steady the nation's nerves

Outlining a contingency plan for tackling an economic and political vacuum, he endeavoured to calm investors, saying:

'WE ARE WELL PREPARED FOR THIS.'

The interest rate was slashed so that lending would continue and the Bank printed an extra

£60 BILLION

to underpin the economy.

This emergency package was hugely successful. Despite widespread fears about the ramifications of the

LEAVE VOTE

confidence in the nation's stability was restored.

Indeed, Britain has performed well since then, with employment a record levels, output chugging along nicely and public finances dramatically improving, despite months of political uncertainty...

Unpredictability...

Resources...

Spirit

Indeed, Mr Carney

told the Mail earlier this month that he 'has our back' and is ready to step in if there is disruption.

Of course, there are still doom-mongers.  Almost unusual joint letter from the general secretaries of business organisation, the CBI, and their trades union federation, the TUC, has warned 'our country is facing an emergency' and that firms and communities are unprepared for a

NO DEAL

However, this chilling warning is not shared  across the whole business community

Lord Wolfson, the Brexiteer boss of Next, says he's seen no evidence Brexit uncertainty is affecting consumer behaviour.

Grocery bosses are less sanguine and warn of dire consequences, not least the soaring cost of food basics from butter to oranges.

However, a chairman of two FTSE 100 companies told me yesterday that what he considers to be a 'confected panic' reminded him of fears that the Millennium Bug would cripple computers as the clock struck midnight on January 1,2000.

What can be said for sure is that no one knows what will happen if there is a

NO DEAL EXIT.

 but we can be sure that it would have a convulsive economic shock.

WE HAVE IN PLACE

the planning, fiscal and monetary resources and, above all, an immutable

NATIONAL SPIRIT

to deal with whatever is thrown at us.

Yet it could still be disorderly and painful, which is why I believe, even at this eleventh hour Mrs May's deal still offers the best opportunity to preserve jobs and prosperity...

 

 

[IT IS BECAUSE OF OUR [WE HOPE!] OUR IMMUTABLE SPIRIT THAT IN THE TRUE BRITISH SPIRIT WE PUT TWO FINGERS UP TO THE EU AND TAKE A NO DEAL OPTION TO RETAIN OUR DOGGED STAND FOR THE RETURN OF OUR WELL FOUGHT FOR INHERITANCE OF FREEDOM OF PERSON AND COUNTRY. MILLIONS OF OUR ISLAND PEOPLE'S REST IN GRAVES THROUGHOUT THE WORLD - FIGHTING FOR OUR

RIGHTS

 OF

FREEDOM.

To suffer or to be inconvenienced in fighting for this historic cause when so many have given their very lives in the past , should be an honour not a cause for regret.

Let us all brace ourselves with determination to protect  at this momentous moment in English history ,our  return to our well-trodden well-tested ancient path - our inheritance of freedom -constitution and country- that has over many centuries become an example and adoption throughout the

WORLD of FREE PEOPLES.

*

 

'Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide.

In the strife of Truth with Falsehood for the good or evil side.'

J. R. LOWELL. The Present Crisis

 

Freedom

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-This our fathers bought for us, long and long ago.

Rudyard Kipling. The Old Issue.

 

*

WE DIDN'T GIVE IN WHEN HITLER'S BOMBERS BOMBED OUR CITIES IN1940 SO WHY GIVE IN WHEN WE CAN EXIT HITLER'S PLAN  FOR A

GREATER GERMANY RUN EUROPE

 SOON TO BE A SUPER-STATE .  WE HAVE BEEN A  CAPTIVE PEOPLE FOR 46 YEARS BECAUSE OF THE COLLUSION BETWEEN NAZI-SPY PRIME MINISTER

 EDWARD HEATH

 ASSISTED BY

CIVIL SERVANTS

IN 1972.

 

 

THE CHOICE IS YOURS!]

*  *  *

ALEX BRUMMER: I still believe there is no need for panic if it's No Deal...

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

Friday, March 22, 2019

 

 

H.F.1829

*

 

SUNDAY  EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies
 

TORY MP

FOR SHIPLEY

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually representing people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS -  BREXITEER HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR

 THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know many MPS think of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that those in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues....

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

 

THE PUBLIC

 

THEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

 

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERS AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TODAY IN 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-of 5 years in total. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES , from across our society, to do so.]

*  *  *

SUNDAY  EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies
 

TORY  MP

FOR SHIPLEY

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

 

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilderberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

*  *  *
 

 

[A WORLD OF CHANGE!]

 

Battle to free humanity from cabal control reaching vital turning point
 By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, March 18, 2019

The battle to free humanity from a cult of human-sacrificing Satan worshipers (Ba’al, Molech, etc.) is reaching a key turning point as intense battles rage on multiple fronts. In essence, the battle is between the masses, allied with the military of most countries, against a deeply entrenched top-level elite.

People who are wondering why no mass arrests have taken place need to understand that we are dealing with a millennia-old control system that does not intend to go quietly into the night. To understand how deep the rabbit hole runs, please take a look at the diagram below.
 high tech freemasons.docx

This chart is not just about ancient history, but rather represents a system that still to this day controls most top world rulers.
 Read more…

March 18, 2019

 

H.F.1818

*

MARCH 10,2019

H.F.1828

 

*

AS WE ARE NEARING

 OUR

INDEPENDENCE DAY

 DO NOT RETREAT YOUR HOUR

 OF

LIBERTY

 IS

AT HAND!.

FEBRUARY 15,2019
 

A CALL TO ARMS.

The Leave camp need to be ready to

DEFEND

 their

VICTORY

to  live under

 

"The Rights and

Liberties"

of

ENGLISHMEN.

WE HAVE NO WISH TO SEE A REOCCURRENCE  OF THE BLOODY REVOLUTION  in 1642 IN EDGE HILL-WARWICKSHIRE

TO RETAIN

THE

Rights and Liberties of Englishmen'

 AND SUBSEQUENT  BATTLES AROUND THE COUNTRY.

THE REASON FOR A CALL TO ARMS IS BECAUSE MILLIONS OF THE FRIENDS OF FRAU MERKEL WILL NOT ACCEPT THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND

AND WILL USE ALMOST ANY MEANS TO ENSLAVE THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS FOR EVER IN THE NOW INTENDED TRI-NATION SUPER-STATE OF GERMANY-FRANCE AND ITALY.

THE SHEER ARROGANCE OF THE SPONSORS OF HITLER'S WAR-TIME PLANNED SUPER-STATE IS NOW A REALITY.

THE GREATER NUMBER STILL SUPPORTING THE  BEAST OF BRUSSELS

-BRAIN-WASHED-MIND-BENDING PROPAGANDA-BETRAYERS OF THEIR SACRED INHERITANCE OF

MAGNA CARTA

 FOUGHT FOR FOR OVER 800 YEARS -SO SOUGHT FOR  AND PROTECTED IN ALMOST HALF THE WORLD.

IF IT HAS TO BE THEN WE MUST FIGHT AS WE ARE IN THE RIGHT AND CANNOT ACCEPT ANY COMPROMISE TO THAT OF THE RETURN OF OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

TO SHOW THAT WE ARE READY THERE NEEDS TO BE RALLIES AROUND THE COUNTRY IN THOSE CROMWELLIAN BATTLE FIELDS OF THE

ENGLISH CIVIL WAR

IT IS AGAIN THE ROUNDHEADS AGAINST THE CAVALIERS

WILL YOU DO IT?

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

[BY A COINCIDENCE WE ONLY REALISED THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DAY AFTER WE HAD COMPLETED OUR WORK.

JULY 4-

AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE DAY

 

WHEN WILL WE CELIBRATE OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY?]

H. F. 824 FREEDOM NOW.

H.F.1800

 

*
 

ROTTEN DEAL MEANS WE'LL NEVER LEAVE.

Theresa May WARNED by Rees-Mogg: Rotten Brexit deal means we'll NEVER leave EU-Daily Express

 

EXCLUSIVE byDavid Maddox POLITICAL EDITOR

THERESA  MAY was warned last night that she is heading for a crushing defeat this week on

BREXIT

The leader of the Tory leavers group, Jacob Rees Mogg, branded her EU deal

"ROTTEN"

and warned that it would condemn Britain in

 "PERPETUAL PENAL SERVITUDE". 

 Writing for the Sunday Express, Mr Rees-Mogg offered Mrs May an 11th hour escape route-but only if Attorney General Cox can win a convincing time limit to the Northern Ireland

BACKSTOP

Cox in his talks with the EU.

Otherwise Brexiteer MPs will again vote against

HER WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

aWhen she last asked for the support of the Commons in January she lost be a crushing

230 VOTES.

Mr Rees-Mogg's warning came after a poll revealed voters believe most MPs in the predominently REMAIN COMMONS are now fighting for

EU INTERESTS

AHEAD OF

 BRITISH INTERESTS

The Prime Minister hopes to head to Brussels to sign off a revised deal tonight or tomorrow morning after talks continued yesterday. But a Downing Street source said:

"These are tough talks with the Commission which we are expecting to go right down the wire".

" The Prime Minister, ministers and her negotiating team are intensely focussed this weekend on making progress so that ultimately we can, in the country's best interests, leave the EU with a deal."

Last night senior Whitehall sources suggested that the changes agreed in Brussels will fall short of reopening the

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

and so will not go as far as

Brexiteers

 WANT.

Instead, it is understood that Downing Street is warning Brexiteers that if Mrs May's deal fails, the UK will end up with a so-called Norway option, favoured by Remainer Tories and many Labour MPs, of staying in the customs union and single market, suject to EU rules with no ability to change them.

It would mean the UK would be forced to accept uncontrolled immigration from the EU while being unable to strike free trade deals with the rest of the world.

A senior government source said " it is a Remainer Parliament" and suggested that an amendment by Labour MP Yvette Cooper and Tory MP Nick Boles allowing MPs to take control of the Brexit agenda would probably pass with Labour support.

A senior government source said this would lead to "the  softest of all Brexits, the Norway option". But members of Mr Rees-Mogg's Brexiteer European Research Group (ERG) were adamant that they will not be intimidated into backing a deal from Mrs May which they argue traps the UK under Brussels rule.

Tory Berwick MP Anne-Maria Trevelelyan said: "I am sure that the Prime Minister is preparing not only to vote to keep a

NO DEAL BREXIT

on the table next week but  to give a firm instruction to Conservative MPs to do the same.

" Anything less than this would fly in the face of every rule in nthe negotiating handbook, would signify the end to any semblance of governance and would give the EU a hammer with which to beat us into submitting to an even worse deal."

Leader of the House, Andrea Leadsom, one of the last Brexiteers in the Cabinet, has indicated that she does not believe the EU will have moved enough.

She said: "There is still hope, But I have to say I'm deeply disappointed with what we're hearing coming out of the EU. I do have to ask myself what game are they playing here." ...

a[ THE GAME THEY HAVE ALWAYS PLAYED SINCE IT'S INCEPTION-A GERMAN-HITLERITE CONSPIRACY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE.-AND THEY HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE OF THE NUMBER OF 'USEFUL IDIOTS' WHO HAVE DISTAIN FOR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES. BEING PART OF A SUPER-STATE MEANS MORE LUCRATIVE EARNINGS WITH NO LIMIT AND POWER SUPREME. THE ARROGANCE IS THERE TO SEE. AND THE PRESENT IMPASSE ON BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU IS TO ENSURE THAT OTHERS WISHING TO FOLLOW WILL BE AWARE THAT THEY ARE TRAPPED IN A  GODLESS - GREEDY- GROTESQUE-UNREPRESENTATIVE-UNDEMOCRATIC-UNYEILDING NAZI  GERMAN INVENTION.]

TO be Continued

...Meanwhile a BMG poll of 1,510 adults has revealed public disillusionment with MPs.

Of those polled 39 per cent believe that MPs put the EU interests above British interests.

The Government was also coming under pressure to delay a

£1billion contract for Royal Fleet Auxiliary Fleet Solid Support vessels. Under the EU defence directive the contract is expected to be awarded to Spain.

But if Britain leaves without a deal it can

GIVE THE WORK TO BRITISH SHIPYARDS

*  *  *

Theresa May WARNED by Rees-Mogg: Rotten Brexit deal means we'll NEVER leave EU-Daily Express

 

EXCLUSIVE byDavid Maddox POLITICAL EDITOR

TO BE CONTINUED

*

Brexit news: British public move towards a no deal ... - Daily Express

*

 47 YEARS IN TH

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 10-2019

 

H.F.1813

*

A CHANGE OF SIDE

TO

REMAIN

 BY

THE

 DAILY MAIL

AT A

 CRUCIAL MOMENT

 DID NOT HELP THE BREXIT CAUSE.

*  *  *

 

1,000  days of incompetence

betrayal and

now national

humiliation...how

 DID

VICTORY

turn to this?

Daily Mail COMMENT

[In one word

COMPROMISE]

Compromise

Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another.=too often ending in the loss of both.- Tryon Edwards

[TO A TRUE ENGLISHMAN

FREEDOM OF PERSON AND OF COUNTRY-

 AN INHERITED RIGHT-

CAN NEVER BE A MATTER OF COMPROMISE.]

 

    DAILY MAIL COMMENT: 1000 days of incompetence, betrayal and ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../The-Daily-Mail-reviews-1-000-days-incompetence-Brexit-referendum.html
    12 hours ago ... Exactly 1000 days ago today, the British electorate went to the ballot box for the
    EU referendum. How long ago it now seems! Today the dream ...
     

Wednesday, March 20,2019

EXACTLY 1,000 days ago today, the British electorate went in unprecedented numbers   to the ballot box for the eu referendum.

And when

 17.4 million

voted

LEAVE

on a  24-year -high turnout  of

72 per cent

they the Government the biggest democratic mandate in UK history.

With a sense of quiet jubilation, courage, determination and ambition, the people said precisely

WHAT THEY WANTED:

To cast off the scierotic bloc's chains and

STEP OUT INTO THE WORLD

Defiantly ignoring the unseemly bombardment of

 'PROJECT FEAR'

scare stories from biblical; prophets of doom, who warned  economic catastrophe would befall Britain, the indomitable public sent a clear message to the politicians

GET US OUT!

Despite being visibly stunned by the extraordinary -and unexpected-result, the party leaders agreed

TO IMPLEMENT THE ELECTORATES WILL.

Soon it was said, the country would finally become a

TRUE SOVEREIGN NATION

For the first time in

45 YEARS

WE would halt unpopular free movement, regain control of our borders, ditch the loathed

COMMON AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES POLICIES,

end the

 European Court's  jurisdiction

OVER

BRITISH LAW

and set sail on the high seas of

GLOBAL TRADE

with flourishing economies. And to boot, stop sending billions of pounds annually to the

 BRUSSELS SPENDTHRIFTS...

How long ago it now seems! Today the dream, if not dead, is gasping pitifully on life support.

The culprit? An out of touch, elitist Parliament which has shamefully failed to enact the explicit desire of the electorate.

[TO LEAVE THE EU-A CLEAN BREAK-not to be tied to the EU in any way that prevents the UK from assuming its long lost sovereignty over its affairs at home and abroad. Unfortunately Mrs May's supposed deal does not achieve that after 1000 days.]

A motley mixture of incompetent MPs, masochistically intransigent Eurosceptic zealots, treacherous Remainers and a supercilious, sabotaging Speaker have conspired to thwart

BREXIT.

As her deal floundered, no wonder Theresa May was forced to make the embarrassing admission that Britain was embroiled in a

NATIONAL CRISIS

[OF HER MAKING]

Let us be crystal clear; this is a humiliation for the United Kingdom. There are no two ways about: the failure to to pass a deal in the 1000 days since June23,2016, has made us

AN INTERNATIONAL LAUGHING STOCK.

Rubbing salt into the wound, EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier has suggested watering down the Prime Minister's

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

to a deal so soft it would make an aghast public wonder why they had bothered to

LEAVE IN THE FIRST PLACE.

For millions of moderate, pragmatic people across the nation, the unsavoury events unfolding at

WESTMINSTER.

MUST SEEM A

MONUMENTAL ACT OF BETRAYAL...

 

 

 [With a 1000 + days to March 29, Mrs May should have reported her progress after each 6months period to Parliament in order to ensure that there was never a cliff-hanger situation as we find ourselves with at this late stage in what many call a game! We know from Mr Barnier that the present so-called deal took a year and a half to negotiate. We ask what happened in the other 14 months?

THE BLAME FOR THE PRESENT IMPASSE FALLS ON  PRIME MINISTER MAY

AND

PARLIAMENT

AND A

BELLICOSE

EU-in reality the Pan-German instrument of

'Lebensraum'

They now control the space vacated by abolishing the sovereignty of all other regional nation states, with the exception of Germany, hiding behind the 'mask of federalism': THIS is the new 'Lebensraum'.]

More! More!  More!  More!  More!  More!

*

 

TO BE CONTINUED

 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: 1000 days of incompetence, betrayal and ...

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1830

 

*

 

 

PARLIAMENT

 

They vowed to deliver Brexit Britain

but instead were offered a EU compromise.

 

This was NO DOUBT the intention when Mrs MAY OUTSIDE OF NO 10 AFTER THE REFERENDUM SPOKE OF

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

THE FACT THAT AFTER 35 MONTHS OF NEGOTIATIONS MRS MAY'S CALL TO THE HOUSE TO ACCEPT THE TAINTED COMPROMISE PROVED BEYOND DOUBT THAT SHE HAD NEVER HAD ANY INTENTION OF KEEPING

HER PROMISE WHATSOEVER.

THE MAJORITY OF MPS WITHIN THE HOUSE HAVE BEEN SO BRAINWASHED OVER THE LAST 47 YEARS BY THE BBC THE BRUSSELS BROADCASTING CONTRACTOR AND THE LURE OF SO MANY LUCRATIVE OPPORTUNITIES IN HITLER'S PLANNED EU THAT AS SHOWN THEY PUT THEMSELVES FIRST! INSTEAD OF IMPLEMENTING THE DEMOCRATIC DECISION OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE ON JUNE 23,2016

AS OLIVER CROMWELL WOULD HAVE SAID:

YOU HAVE BEEN HERE TOO LONG!

GO!

THE MAJORITY WITHIN OUR ONCE HALLOWED PARLIAMENT HAVE BROUGHT THE  ONCE HONOURABLE HOUSE INTO DEEP DISGRACE. THE WORLD LOOKING ON MUST WONDER HOW A ONCE WORLD-UNIQUE  CONSTITUTION AND FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE COULD IGNORE THE WISHES OF CITIZENS TO CLAIM BACK THEIR INHERITANCE WHICH WAS TAKEN FROM THEM BY LIES AND DECEIT IN 1972 BY  PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH A NAZI SPY FROM HIS DAYS IN 1938 WHILE AT BALLIOL COLLEGE  OXFORD .BUT HE WAS PROTECTED BY THE NAZI SYMPATHISERS IN THE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES AND GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY.

THE DAILY MAIL SUPPORTED THE BREXIT CAUSE

BUT ABANDONED THE BATTLEFIELD WHEN THE NEWCOMER CAME ON THE SCENE AT A MOST IMPORTANT MOMENT AND CHANGED SIDES TO SUPPORT THE REMAIN CAUSE -BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HAD HAPPENED. WE HEAR IN HISTORY OF ACCOUNTS OF THE CHANGEOVER OF FORCES ON THE BATTLEFIELD- SOME FOR FREEDOM AND SOME NOT. BY ITS CHANGE ON THE BATTLEFIELD TO THE SIDE OF OUR ENEMY OF

ENGLISH FREEDOM

 IT IS ITSELF JUSTLY THE CAUSE OF FAILURE TO FULLY SUPPORT THE

DEMOCRATIC DECISION OF THE PEOPLE ON JUNE 23,2016

*  *  *

 

ThE spirits of those millions of patriots who over our long english history - buried in graves the world over- must wonder how their forbears could discard such a priceless inheritance which  was in trust for future generations. the troubles in our nation are mainly due to selfish interests and the breakdown of patriotism - of love of country and its freedom-loving past. for the majority of those who chose to ignore the past for wicked personal gain  will regret their misguided decision to put self

 before their hard won constitution and country.

 

LATEST!

WORLD CHANGE!

KNOWN ALREADY TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD THERE IS A GREAT CHANGE COMING TO BRING FREEDOM AND PROSPERITY TO THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD. THE OLD SATANIC HOLDERS OF POWER ARE BEING BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.-ILLUMINATI and THE 13 ROYAL FAMILIES WORLD-WIDE.  SO THOSE WHO LIKE ABOVE ARE ONLY FOR SELF WILL SOON SEE THAT THEY ARE MISTAKEN IF THEY WISH TO PARTICIPATE IN THE NEW WORLD OF FREE NATION STATES IN A DEMOCRATIC WORLD GOVERNMENT WHICH WILL SOON BE WITH US.

MARCH 13,2019

H.F.1810

*

 
THE EU IS A BULLY

AND IT HAS GROWN INTO A BEAST!

And it is incredible how many so-called political observers over many years are taken in by its propaganda to believe that it is a democratic entity in the true sense of the word.

Take the matter of encouraging its allies in each country to disregard the vote of their people until they say YES! to joining the EU.

At at this late stage we are now told that we must accept the terms of our leaving because it is the only alternative.

ABSOLUTE RUBBISH!

After 32 months the only deal on the table which would have been rejected years ago is now at this late stage praised by those same

'Useful Idiots'

which the EU has counted on from its beginning to further their collectivist-sovietised agenda.

One has only to remember how the EU Commission supported the invasion of their captive states, of millions of immigrants from the middle East, a threat to the culture of many of those countries or to be precise-regions of the EU.

With only a matter of days until we should be leaving Hitler's plan for a GREATER GERMANY,  we find that the majority of our members of parliament are so brainwashed, that they cannot even understand that they are guilty of

TREASON

But this doesn't bother them at all because they are loving their well paid jobs and pensions and the opportunities and lucrative earnings in the EU and in the main care nothing about loyalty to one's country and what that means to a

TRUE ENGLISHMAN.

The English have been to laid back about their unique constitution and have been amiss in not pushing harder for an ENGLISH PARLIAMENT in its ancient home of WESTMINSTER

It is this lack of identity that allowed the present situation to develop. England has given its neighbours their Parliament but has forgotten to address the wishes of millions of Englishmen who voted on

JUNE 23,2016

to recover their once

 FREE COUNTRY and CONSTITUTION.

*

AS the prime minister stated-BETTER A NO DEAL THAN A BAD DEAL-

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT

The world looking on must wonder how such a people as the English could be so laid-back to have had their country taken from them in 1972 and to be so duped by a REMAIN Prime Minister and that so many MPs representing English Shire Counties had failed to stand together to see that the democratic wish of the English in the referendum  on June 23,2016 is fully completed by

MARCH 29,2019

*

What we are experiencing before our very eyes is the degrading capitulation of a

 British Government

to

 Hitler's BRAINCHILD.

*

In the Daily Mail on Thursday March 14,2019 we  find the following quote by Mr Barnier

'If  the UK still wants to leave the EU and wants to do so in an orderly fashion, then the treaty we negotiated with the government of Theresa May for a year and a half will remain the only available treaty.'

We ask if the present treaty was concluded in a year and a half what was happening in the other 14 months since the referendum result?  It appears a deliberate delaying tactic which has resulted in the present impasse.   It is the crafty delaying procedure of Theresa May which is to blame and the late introduction of a faulty deal which the greater number of MPs detested as we have all found out ,which has caused the CHAOS at the eleventh hour.

The idea that that a referendum result can be ignored is an EU creation in order to ensure that they control the agenda -it is not democracy and to pursue such a dismissive system in the UK would undermine the very idea of that method of obtaining the 'voice of the people'  -   the feelings of the country, on a particular issue at one particular time, in the life of a nation state.

*

 

 

MARCH 13-2019

H.F.1815

 

*

 

We've suffered

47 years of

penal servitude

[IN HITLER'S PLANNED-EU]

 

COMMENTARY

By Jacob Rees-Mogg MP

GEOFFREY COX'S main task as he negotiates with the European Union is to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse or, as Rumpelstiltskin did the fairy tale, weave gold from straw.

It is not an easy task as the Government's negotiating hand has been undermined by those who never accepted the result of the referendum and think that they-with their preternatural powers -know best.

On the other hand, it is simple. The Attorney General needs to insert an end date into the treaty or something of equal legal force.

The Withdrawal Agreement is a rotten accord. It condemns the United Kingdom to at least 21 months of vassalage at a cost of £39billion,

Yet everything other than the backstop has an expiry date-after a certain point the nation's freedom and control would be restored.

After 47 years of penal servitude a final few months is tolerable. However, the backstop could last forever and would tie this country's hands in terms of

REGULATIONS

CUSTOMS

and the rulings of the

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 in areas without a formal ability to leave.

'Leaving without an agreement is nothing to be frightened about'.

Although fewer areas of British life would be affected than is currently the case, in these departments there would be even less control as there is now.

There would also be the absurdity of replacing a treaty that can be revoked with two years' notice with one that is perpetual.

The Lisbon Treaty, the de facto constitution of the EU allows a member state to depart after giving two years notice. THE WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT contains no such provision.

There would seem some logic in saying to the EU

 "LET US COPY ARTICLE 50 and paste it into this agreement"

as then the backstop could be cancelled with fair notice and the position would be no worse than today.

If Geoffrey Cox could achieve this then his return to westminster would be a heroic one.

If this cannot be achieved then the default position is that the UK

LEAVES WITHOUT A DEAL.

Some MPs say that they could never agree to this but many   of them voted for the Article 50 Act that sets out the timetable and then stood on a Conservative manifesto WHICH STATED.

"NO DEAL IS BETTER THAN A BAD DEAL."

If such people were to use Parliamentary prestidigitation to delay, in the hope of preventing BREXIT, the honour and trustworthiness of politicians would fall to a new low. if honour and truth prevail instead then on march 29 there would be an opportunity to use the gains of departure for

THE NATION'S BENEFIT.

Leaving without an agreement is nothing to be frightened about. it opens the door to prosperity. the Chancellor ought to welcome it and use the £39billion, which would otherwise be

WASTED IN EUROPE.

It could be spent on projects that would help the country and taxpayers keep more of their own money which they would, on the whole spend more wisely than the Government spends it for them.

EU taxes that hit the least well off most, such as the requirement to put Vat on domestic fuel, should go, as could tarriffs on goods not produced in this country. Perhaps taxpayers may even want some of their money spent on more police to help reduce knife crime .

The EU, asd its Eurozone economies stagnate again, is jealous of this potential success and obdurate in negotiations. It constantly offers TOO LITTLE and asks TOO MUCH and has shown over the last two years why it is so important to

LEAVE.

If the Attorney General succeeds it is the EU that would benefit, the UK will gain as long as it is out of this failed system.

DAILY EXPRESS-We've suffered 47 years of penal servitude-Commentary by Jacob Rees-Mogg MP

MARCH 10-2019

H.F.1816

 

*

 
 

DAILY TELEGRAPH

 

 

No self-respecting country would accept this deal-

MPs must vote it down

By DANIAL HANNAN

SUNDAY, MARCH 3,2019

 

The deal will come  before Parliament next week represents a devastating failure of

BRITISH STATECRAFT

It would keep most of the costs of EU membership while junking most of the benefits. It would require Britain to cede part of its territory to

FOREIGN JURISDICTION.

It would allow

 BRUSSELS

 to

CONTROL

OUR COMMERCE with NON-EU STATES

EVEN AFTER WE

LEAVE.

*

MPs

 who believe in parliamentary sovereignty

should

VOTE AGAINST IT.

*

MPs

 who believe in the

UNION

 should 

VOTE AGAINST IT .

*

MPs

WHO BELIEVE IN FREE TRADE

 should 

VOTE AGAINST IT .

*

MPs

who believe that there  is such a thing as

NATIONAL HONOUR

and who recognise that we are being treated in a calculatedly vindictive way should toss it out with especial force.

They should do so even if the alternative is a

DELAY

 IN

BREXIT.

They should do so, indeed, even though such a delay might allow the Mandelsons and Blairs to step up their campaign for a

SECOND  REFERENDUM.

A postponement, undesirable as it is, is less damaging than accepting permanently

DISADVANTAGEOUS TERMS.

As Lord King,

the former Bank of England Governor

 put it

:There are arguments for remaining in the EU

and arguments for leaving.

But there is no case whatsoever for giving up the benefits of remaining without  obtaining the benefits of

LEAVING.

WE keep being told that unreasonable

Eurosceptics

are their own worst enemies and that, if

 BREXIT

 is now thwarted, it will somehow be their fault.

 

But it is hard to think of a more unreasonable proposition than that all that matters is coming back with something that can techically  be termed

BREXIT.

Even after 30 months. Leavers are still being subtly patronised. It is assumed that the dim-witted oafs cannot possibly have weighed the costs and benefits before voting, and that all that the Government needs to do is to show them something that has BREXIT written on it in bright  , shiny letters.

In fact, Leave voters understand that some forms of Brexit are better than others. They understand too, that some are  so BAD that they would be worse than either

STAYING or LEAVING

The EU, of course, has understood this

 FROM THE START

[THE MERKEL-MAY CLOSE ASSOCIATION GOING BACK MANY DECADES.]

As Michel Barnier put it in 2016,

"I'll have done my job if, in the end, the exit terms are so bad that the British would rather stay in the EU."

Such an attitude on the part of Brussels was to be expected.

The readiness of our negotiators to go along with it was not.

Far from being uncompromising, the supposed hardliners in the ERG have accepted a series of CONCESSIONS, including a continuing role of the [MISCHIEVOUS]

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

AFTER WE LEAVE.

 

21 months of non-voting membership, an absurdly one-sided arbitration mechanism and a

30 BILLION

FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT.

THAT NO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATOR WOULD UPHOLD.

They have accepted all these things despite  the conspicuous absence of the trade deal that was supposed to be

quid pro quo.

Eurosceptic Tories have dug in on only one point, namely the

BACKSTOP, and with good reason. No self respecting country would allow the regulatory annexation of part of its territory in exchange for... well,

FOR NOTHING AT ALL,

really since the promised

TRADE DEAL

HASN'T MATERIALISED.

At least EU membership, unlike the

BACKSTOP

comes with an exit mechanism.

We are thus being asked to replace a temporary arrangement with a permanent one

THAT ALONE IS ENOUGH TO REFUSE...

[ This is a lengthy detailed and informative expose! of Hitler's brainchild the EU of which we warned many times over the past decades that only a firm stance would bring good results. Mrs May should remember Margaret Thatcher's way of handling the undemocratic and unreasonable -now  soon become a SUPER-STATE. She brought in a 'Bill' with her demands and the EU thought better not to decline. Our present difficulties were brought about by

not seeing the wood for the trees

 For many months now we have been unable to download articles from the Daily Mail-Daily Telegraph and some others ,which therefore means resorting to fingers and in that we follow the action of our brave archers at Crecy and raise  two fingers aloft in their image to our enemy within who wish to sell out their unique and world respected and adopted in parts by over a half of the countries in the world.

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE- 

The burial grounds at home and abroad of our brave patriotic service men and women are no doubt in spirit with those today in their just fight for that which no one has a right to give away-the historic

" Freedom and Liberties

of

ENGLAND' "

which is in our TRUST for future generations to come.]-

 ARTICLE TO BE CONTINUED.]

*

One thing, at any rate, ought to be beyond dispute, Britain should not sign a permanent treaty under duress.  The

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

 has been proposed in a

VENGEFUL SPIRIT

Eurocrats have understandably concluded that we have no bottom line, that the British are negotiating as Herman Van Rompuy, the former European Council president, reportedly put it last week,

"With their backs against a wall, the abyss in front of their eyes and a knife on their throat. WE are nearly there."

There was a time when that attitude would have been enough to convince us politely to decline the EU's TERMS and forge our own way.

are we still the nation we used to be?

[REGRETFULLY THE SIGNS ARE NEGATIVE!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

SUNDAY, MARCH 3,2019

 

H.F.1822

*
If

BREXIT

 is such a disaster, how come Europe's firms have doubled their stake in the UK?

By Alex Brummer-CITY EDITOR

 

March 5,2019

 

ALEX BRUMMER: If Brexit is such a disaster, how come ... - Daily Mail

A VISITOR from Mars tuning into events in Britain in recent months would rightly be shocked by the political paralysis in Westminster, the calamitous state of the motor industry, and the mortal damage to immediate business confidence caused by Brexit uncertainty.

Yet while there clearly are difficulties, the nation is selling itself short if it believes that this is the only story.

One doesn't have to be a swivel-eyed Brexiteer to recognise that if one looks over the horizon, beyond Brexit, there is much about Britain to inspire confidence in the future. Not least the fact that it is still the most favoured nation among the 28 states of the European Union for direct investment from overseas.

Boost

What makes this even more remarkable is that many of those keeping faith in Britain are state-directed sovereign wealth funds, run, owned and managed by foreign countries.

 The world's largest sovereign wealth fund, Norway -worth around £740bn as a result of the country's oil and gas revenues-recently announced it would continue to invest, and even increase investment, in Britain over the next three decades. If ever there was a moral boost in these uncertain times, THIS IS IT.

In addition, even as Brussels negotiators are playing hard-ball with the May government and warning of the calamity of

NO DEAL

It's clear that European investors do not believe Brexit will have a wholly negative impact on Britain. New data this week shows that in the past 12 months, EU businesses ploughed a staggering £23.9bn into the UK in the shape of property deals, corporate acquisitions and buying stakes in UK firms.

The data, collected by an offshoot of the credit rating agency Standard & Poor's shows there are 553 separate purchases of assets and that investment was up from £16bn on the previous 12 months and £10.5bn in the same period of 2016-17.Overall, European businesses have more than doubled the sums they have invested in Britain in the last three years-which is hardly a vote of no confidence.

Neither sovereign wealth funds, nor, for that matter, firms based in EU countries have any political reason to be part of a 'Project Cheer', boosting the UK simply to make the public feel better about our momentous decision to

LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

All of the bodies involved are hard-nosed investors -and they clearly have faith in the long-term stability of Britain's democracy, the tremendous value to be found from investment in prime UK real estate (especially in the City of London), the excellent long-term returns to be gained from shares in Britain's privatised utilities and the  pre-eminence of research and innovation in the UK.

How ironic that this message of confidence in a post-Brexit future is being voiced not by our squabbling and largely Remain-supporting political class but by overseas investors such as Norway's fund talking with their wallets.

Norway, like the UK, has been an enormous beneficiary of the munificence of the North Sea in yielding oil and natural gas, which is still the bedrock of our energy supplies, despite the drive to be more green.

But whereas the UK allowed the free market to decide where the North Sea went -higher shares prices and dividends from oil companies boosted private pension funds, and the HMRC took its share to help finance the NHS and other public services  - Norway directed the vast majority into the sovereign wealth fund which since 1990 has accumulated some £750bn of assets for future generations.

Britain has been a destination of choice for Norway's wealth fund ever since its inception and the country holds stakes worth an astonishing £62bn - around 8 per cent of its total investments - in some of Britain's biggest enterprises. These include HSBC, which is the nation's most profitable and global bank, the largest oil company, BP and UK debt.

There is no greater compliment any foreign state can pay than to invest in the bonds, known inn the UK as gilt edged stock, issued by another company.

Far from being deterred by the turbulence caused by

BREXIT

funds like Norway's believe it presents an opportunity because it has had an impact on asset prices in the UK.

Shares in Britain's key FTSE100 companies have lagged behind those of their overseas counterparts. This is despite the fact that firms ranging from Jonnie Walker spirits company Diageo to British Airways owner International Airlines Group are still punching hugely above their weight in world terms.

Vibrant

The continued success of the City makes its skyscrapers a source of constant attention for overseas investors, from the Gulf States to greater China. Indeed, Britain is now the number one favoured location for investment by Beijing, which has put money into projects ranging from Hinckley Point, the new nuclear plant in Somerset, to Heathrow Airport

Brexit or not, Britain remains a major target for corporate and sovereign investors. My own conversations with those in charge of investment funds have revealed that a bigger worry than Brexit is the possibility of a government led by Jeremy Corbyn and his anointed Chancellor John McDonnell rushing to take valuable privately held assets, such as water companies back into public ownership.

Certainly, Brexit may have affected domestic business investment but it has had little impact on how other countries view our nation.

Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics show that in 2017 the  value of direct foreign investment in the UK rose by £149bn. Our vibrant financial services sector, a pioneer in developing financial technology, pulled in an astonishing £385bn, up 19.5 per cent from 2016 - the year of the

REFERENDUM.

Among the sovereign wealth funds, along with Norway and China, those most attracted to the UK are the Gulf States of Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

The Qataris are in charge of the redevelopment of one of the most totemic buildings in central London, the former American Embassy in Grosvenor Square.

Magnet

They are also the biggest owner of shares in grocer J Sainsbury, with 22per cent of the stock, and in one of the pillars of the City, the London Stock Exchange, where it is the biggest shareholder with a 10.3per cent stake.

It is hardly surprising the Emir Sheikh Tamim has enjoyed accompanying the Queen in the parade down the racecourse at Royal Ascot.

There is little doubt sovereign investment funds from around the world, as well as some wealthy individual investors such as Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing, the owner of the nation's busiest port at Felixstowe, see Britain as the bargain basement of the world.

The 15 per cent devaluation of the pound since the referendum, together with the weakness of share prices, is a magnet for investors willing to look to the

 LONG TERM.

There is an obsession among UK and American investors about judging investments in shares and other assets by what is likely to happen over the next three months, let alone the next three or even 30 years.

How reassuring is it to know Britain has friends out there confident enough to ignore those who wail about impending disaster because of

BREXIT

-AND

INSTEAD SEE A LAND OF OPPORTUNITY.

*

By Alex Brummer-CITY EDITOR

 

March 5,2019

 

ALEX BRUMMER: If Brexit is such a disaster, how come ... - Daily Mail

*  *  *

 

H.F.1825

 

*
 

We've suffered

47 years of

penal servitude

[IN HITLER'S PLANNED-EU]

 

COMMENTARY

By Jacob Rees-Mogg MP

GEOFFREY COX'S main task as he negotiates with the European Union is to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse or, as Rumpelstiltskin did the fairy tale, weave gold from straw.

It is not an easy task as the Government's negotiating hand has been undermined by those who never accepted the result of the referendum and think that they-with their preternatural powers -know best.

On the other hand, it is simple. The Attorney General needs to insert an end date into the treaty or something of equal legal force.

The Withdrawal Agreement is a rotten accord. It condemns the United Kingdom to at least 21 months of vassalage at a cost of £39billion,

Yet everything other than the backstop has an expiry date-after a certain point the nation's freedom and control would be restored.

After 47 years of penal servitude a final few months is tolerable. However, the backstop could last forever and would tie this country's hands in terms of

REGULATIONS

CUSTOMS

and the rulings of the

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 in areas without a formal ability to leave.

'Leaving without an agreement is nothing to be frightened about'.

Although fewer areas of British life would be affected than is currently the case, in these departments there would be even less control as there is now.

There would also be the absurdity of replacing a treaty that can be revoked with two years' notice with one that is perpetual.

The Lisbon Treaty, the de facto constitution of the EU allows a member state to depart after giving two years notice. THE WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT contains no such provision.

There would seem some logic in saying to the EU

 "LET US COPY ARTICLE 50 and paste it into this agreement"

as then the backstop could be cancelled with fair notice and the position would be no worse than today.

If Geoffrey Cox could achieve this then his return to westminster would be a heroic one.

If this cannot be achieved then the default position is that the UK

LEAVES WITHOUT A DEAL.

Some MPs say that they could never agree to this but many   of them voted for the Article 50 Act that sets out the timetable and then stood on a Conservative manifesto WHICH STATED.

"NO DEAL IS BETTER THAN A BAD DEAL."

If such people were to use Parliamentary prestidigitation to delay, in the hope of preventing BREXIT, the honour and trustworthiness of politicians would fall to a new low. if honour and truth prevail instead then on march 29 there would be an opportunity to use the gains of departure for

THE NATION'S BENEFIT.

Leaving without an agreement is nothing to be frightened about. it opens the door to prosperity. the Chancellor ought to welcome it and use the £39billion, which would otherwise be

WASTED IN EUROPE.

It could be spent on projects that would help the country and taxpayers keep more of their own money which they would, on the whole spend more wisely than the Government spends it for them.

EU taxes that hit the least well off most, such as the requirement to put Vat on domestic fuel, should go, as could tarriffs on goods not produced in this country. Perhaps taxpayers may even want some of their money spent on more police to help reduce knife crime .

The EU, asd its Eurozone economies stagnate again, is jealous of this potential success and obdurate in negotiations. It constantly offers TOO LITTLE and asks TOO MUCH and has shown over the last two years why it is so important to

LEAVE.

If the Attorney General succeeds it is the EU that would benefit, the UK will gain as long as it is out of this failed system.

DAILY EXPRESS-We've suffered 47 years of penal servitude-Commentary by Jacob Rees MP

MARCH 10-2019

H.F.1816

 

*

 

 

May 'doesn't see upside from BREXIT

[AS WE SUSPECTED FROM THE BEGINNING. HOW COULD AN AVID SUPPORTER OF THE EU  HAVE ACTED OTHERWISE?]

DAILY MAIL

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

Nick Timothy-THERESA MAY'S FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF HAS CLAIMED SHE REGARDS BREXIT

AS

'DAMAGE LIMITATION'.

Nick Timothy, who lost his job over the Tories' disastrous election campaign of 2017, said she and mainly her ministers' struggle to see any economic upside to BREXIT.

He told the BBC:

They see it as a damage limitation exercise.

If you see it in nthat way inevitably you're not going to be prepared to take the steps that would enable you to fully realise the economic opportunities of

LEAVING.

In a separate interview with Channel 4 News, Mr Timothy said the UK had made4 mistakes in Brexit negotiations, including

 by

allowing the EU to determine the sequence of talks.

 

He said the Government should have spent money earlier on preparing for a

NO DEAL BREXIT

and should have been more 'robust' in pushing areas of UK advantage. 'Some of it is to do with negotiating style,' he said.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

*  *  *

[AND WHAT WE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION

IN APRIL 2018]

 
 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE
comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

H.F.1800

*

 

DELAYING BREXIT

WOULD BE TO BETRAY THE REFERENDUM

By

Leo McKinstry-Daily Express columnist

Monday, March 4,2019

 

Sir Ivan Rogers, the highly respected former British ambassador to the EU, said in an interview last week that, though he had always felt Brexit might be difficult, even he had been surprised

"by the extent of the mess"

Sir Ivan is absolutely right to be critical of the Establishment, which has reduced the process of withdrawal

 to a paralysing shambles.

What should have been an inspirational moment of

NATIONAL LIBERATION

has been transformed by our politicians into a longwinded

saga of of frustration and despair

In place of

DETERMINATION

PATRIOTISM

 and

VISION

There has been only

INERTIA

INCOMPETANCE

AND

COWARDNESS.

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that, with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away the process is still hopelessly bogged down in ptrocedural wrangling.

[IT IS MORE THAN POSSIBLE THAT THIS SENARIO WAS PLANNED SHORTLY AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT. AS WE HAVE SHOWN IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE THE TWO CHIEF NEGOTIATORS KNEW EACH OTHER AND THEY WERE BOTH COMMITTED TO THE EU- HITLER'S PLAN OF GERMAN DOMINATION OF MUCH OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE BELIEVING THAT A COMMITTED REMAINER COULD BE TRUE TO HER WORD

 OF

BREXIT

MEANS

BREXIT]

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away, the process is still hopelessly bogged down to proceedural wranging.

*

 

[OUR COMMENT]

[We have always advocated that MPs should only serve  one term in PARLIAMENT in order that no MP over time can only consider their own agenda and not of that of an accutomed

FREE PEOPLE and A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

The accumulated FREEDOM of PERSON and NATION  is in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS. The problem we have is that members of our hallowed HOUSE of WESTMINSTER are by custom the SERVANTS of the PEOPLE but as we have seen over the past 47 years they have become our MASTERS. They are so arrogant that they even now consider they OWN OUR BODIES. We should tell them to go to HELL!

*

All energy has been drained from our exit strategy, and there is a genuine risk that the vacillation could soon grow even worse. Within the next 10 days it is possible-even likely-that MPS could vote for an indefinite delay in BREXIT by an extension in Article 50, the legal instrument that ends our

 EU MEMBERSHIP...

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

Monday, March 4,2019

 

H.F.1824

*

FINAL COUNTDOWN

VICTORY

ON

FREEDOM DAY

[or V F- DAY]

ON

MARCH 29,2019

AT THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION  REMEMBER THAT THE GANG OF THREE HAVE TAKEN ALMOST THREE YEARS TO DELIVER YOUR FREEDOM FROM THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

TREATY OF TREASON 

  REMEMBER

THE

GANG OF THREE

GAVE AWAY YOUR FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION - COUNTRY

Find out what that means in the

TREATY OF TREASON 

So  in the next election vote for the small parties who LISTEN! to YOU!

 

FRIENDS of ENGLAND

who have been fighting for over 20 years for the  return of the accustomed

'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen'

which millions of our people have died for and are still dying for.

 

DAVID CAMERON FINALLY GAVE THE ENGLISH PEOPLE A REFERENDUM IN JUNE 2016.  NO DOUBT SHORE THAT HIS REMAINERS WOULD  CONFIRM OUR CAPTIVITY IN A CRUMBLING SATANIC CAPTIVE CREATION OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU DETAILS OF WHICH WERE OBTAINED BY BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AT THE END OF WORLD WAR II

WE ARE  NOW IN ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT EPOCHS IN ENGLISH HISTORY AFTER 46 YEARS IN CAPTIVITY WE WILL SOON BE ABLE TO RETURN TO BEING A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF

ENGLAND

AND RESUME OUR DESTINY AS A BEACON OF FREEDOM TO HELP THOSE UNFORTUNATE CAPTIVE STATES IN OCCUPIED EUROPE TO REGAIN THEIR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY IN THE YEARS AHEAD.

 'ENGLAND HAS SAVED HERSELF BY HER EXERTIONS; AND WILL, AS I TRUST, SAVE EUROPE BY HER EXAMPLE.''

(WilliamPitt-1759-1806 [9Nov.1805]

*

.

Previously October-2009

Amended-DECEMBER-2018

H F. 188

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE
MAR-

17

 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-

18

 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-

18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 
Why I WOULD be delighted to BACK

Theresa

 

(...and all it'll take is the tiniest of tweeks)

By

 Jacob Rees-Mogg

FEBRUARY 28,2019

 
 

ON TUESDAY evening at the London Palladium, I was surprised and flatered that so many people turned up to hear me talk about

BREXIT.

I fear I will never be as popular on its famous revolving stage as the great Sir Bruce Forsyth once was. But if only we can sort out one detail from the

EU WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

and ensure Brexit, then I could retire to sell ice creams at the theatre just as I did during the interval

And given that I took more than £480, it may, in fact, be my real vocation.

It was a joy to meet so many people and hear what they had to say about the issue that has dominated

 POLITICAL LIFE FOR MORE THAN TWO AND A HALF YEARS.

I got the strong sense from everyone I spoke to that they wanted Brexit delivered

AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

The Northern Ireland backstop has always been a sticking point in the negotiations - and for a very good reason. I an detewrmined as anyone that the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland should remain as

PEACEFUL AND PROBLEM FREE AS IT IS TODAY.

However, in its current form, the backstop-which would allow for an

OPEN BORDER

between the two countries, leaving Northern Ireland subject to certain rules of the EU's single market-would last indefinately.

The whole point of leaving the EU

 is

TO TAKE BACK CONTROL.

not to leave the eu with the potential for lasting effective power over trade and regulations in Northern Ireland, or any part of the UK.

If this issue can be resolved, then I would be content to support the Prime Minister's

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT.

Geoffrey Cox, the much-respected attorney general, is in Brussels trying to persuade the EU to agree to a legally binding date to the backstop.

It would be wrong to jump the gun, but if he can achieve this it would mark a fundamental change in the agreement and allow

BREXITEERS

such as me to accept it. Once we can secure a limit to the backstop, all the other imperfections in Mrs May's deal , such as continued meddling by the European Court of Justice and continuing to pay huge sums into EU coffers, become much less problematic.

The key difference is that these are all

TIME LIMITED

WHEREAS THE BACKSTOP, AS CURRENTLY OUTLINED, IS POTENTIALLY

EVERLASTING.

Once a final date is put on it, our objections to the

DEAL

like the effects of its provisions, fade away.

I really do not mind what form of words the Attorney General and the EU agree on regarding the

BACKSTOP

-as long as it expires before the next election and has the same legal status as the deal.

And has the same legal status as the DEAL. And I do not agree with those who say the

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

has to be reopened to solve the backstop problem. It is itself an appendix to the treaty, so I would be happy with a further appendix, as this would have

EQUAL LEGAL FORCE.

In my view, that would satisfy most of us who are worried, and may also help those who say the Withdrawal Agreement cannot be reopened to save face. I take a practical and not a theological attitude towards these matters.

THOSE WHO HAVE SUGGESTED THAT I AND MY COLLEAGUES IN THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH GROUP HAVE GONE OUT OF OUR WAY TO MAKE THINGS DIFFICULT FOR THE PRIME MINISTER COULD NOT BE MORE WRONG. OUR AIM HAS CONSISTENTLY BEEN TO FOLLOW THE COMMITMENTS MADE IN THE 2017 ELECTION MANIFESTO AND IMPLICIT IN THE 2016 REFERENDUM RESULT.

That some Cabinet ministers have undermined collective responsibility and tried to thwart Mrs May IS HARDLY OUR FAULT.

The Prime Minister says it is still her fervent hope that the UK leaves the EU on March 29-2019.

I SHARE HER SENTIMENTS.

If and I stress if-she can secure the necessary assurances on the

BACKSTOP I HAVE OUTLINED, I WOULD BE DELIGHTED TO SUPPORT HER DEAL AND HELP AVOID ANY DELAY TO BREXIT.

It is not my job to tell other Conservative MPs what to do, but I am sure may other passionate advocates of BREXIT would take the same pragmatic and patriotic view.

At long last, we would have delivered our

PROMISE

to the

17.4 MILLION

 who voted to

LEAVE THE EU in JUNE 2016

 

 

JACOB REES-MOGG: I WOULD be delighted to back ... - Daily Mail

 

*  *  *

FEBRUARY 28,2019

 

H.F.1812
BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

AS THE EDP HAS NOW BEEN  BLOCKED AFTER MANY YEARS  OF OBTAINING BEN'S MESSAGE WE HAVE FOUND A LINK WITH A MOST INTERESTING AGENDA.

Benjamin Fulford 2-11-19… “Secret treaties signal massive world changes as early as March”

FEBRUARY 12-2019
 
2018-12-31

 

If we all push, 2019 will see final victory against the Khazarian mafia

By  White Dragon Society  9 Comments
Many signs indicate that 2019 will be a breakthrough year in the battle against the satan-worshiping Khazarian mafia.  Not only have mass arrests begun, but the mass-murdering part of the pharmacidical/medical establishment is finally being taken out as well.  Another obvious sign it is no longer business as usual comes from the fact that the U.S. military is being withdrawn from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.  And this time the U.S. government shutdown may actually result in formal bankruptcy procedures against the illegal corporate government that has occupied Washington, D.C. since 1871.

Let’s start with the U.S. military withdrawals, since they mark one of the biggest changes seen since the end of World War II when the perpetual war economy of the U.S. military-industrial complex began.  Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald Trump’s Christmas Day visit to Iraq portends a pull-out from that country.  This follows withdrawal announcements from Afghanistan and Syria, as well as a ceasefire in Yemen.  We also note that almost all of the U.S. carrier groups are now at rest in their home ports.

Even more dramatically, the sources say, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan’s mission will be [to bring out in public view the] space force, bring troops home, release extraterrestrial and suppressed technology, close overseas bases, beat swords into plowshares and cut waste, while building a more lethal military.”  This means peace on earth and goodwill to all in a very real sense this holiday season.

The Pentagon sources also say the long U.S. government shutdown “makes it easy to arrest Deep-Staters embedded in the government.”  Furthermore, the first senior official to be publicly tried in “Nuremburg 2.0 will be ….
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-24

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

By  Weekly Reports  264 Comments
Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

018-12-17

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

By  Weekly Reports, White Dragon Society  337 Comments
Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
 https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
 https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.”

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-13

Previous JCS Chairman

By  Letters to the Editor  0 Comments
Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

 
2018-12-31

*  *  *

ADDED

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

IMPORTANT CHANGE  NOW WITH HUMANKIND

Benjamin Fulford Interview: Does Trump have what it takes? – Prepare For Change

*

 

 

H.F.1769

*

 

 

 

Don't Give In To The E U

 

WHY A UK COMPROMISE WITH BRUSSELS WILL CONFINE THEIR CAPTIVE NATION STATES EVEN TIGHTER TO ENSURE THERE CAN BE NO MORE DEFECTORS. WHILE A FIRM RESPONSE FOR A JUST SETTLEMENT FROM THE UK WILL GIVE HEART AND ASSISTANCE TO THOSE FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOTS PRISONERS OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU TO BAND TOGETHER TO FIGHT FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

WE SAY NO! TO COMPROMISE.

It is forgotten that an individual country which makes a decision affecting itself or others has the opportunity to remedy the situation. Whereas, in the EU this is not possible, unless ALL or the permitted number agree to the change and knowing the belligerence of Hitler's brainchild this could have serious and dangerous consequences.

Remember, the responsibility of the UK to assist those captive people's who wish to be

FREE

because it was the blood of British troops in the past that assisted the birth of many of the

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in EUROPE.

BY STANDING FIRM FOR AN ORDERLY AND JUST EXIT FROM HITLER'S EU WE WILL RECOVER THAT RESPECT THAT OUR BROTHER NATIONS WHO SAW BRITAIN IN 1973 NEGLECT THEIR KIN AROUND THE WORLD FOR AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE WITH A COUNTRY

GERMANY

WHICH IN

TWO WORLD WARS

WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS  AND INJURIES OF MILLIONS AND VAST DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY...FOR WHICH THE LIKE THE WORLD WOULD NOT HAVE  PREVIOUSLY SEEN.

A FREE INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN UNION OF FREE PEOPLE'S WITHIN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

YES!

THE PRESENT UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE-BULLYING EU.

NO!

The fault of our present situation is because of TREASON within the Tory Government of

Edward Heath

 A Nazi spy since 1938 reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master of Balliol College, Oxford.

 Who in the 70's  and with previous administrations secretly conspired to lead the British people blindfolded into the Nazi-planned EU . It is therefore incumbent on the present Tory Government of Mrs May to bring the situation back to what it was before January 1973. The evidence of Tory wrong-doing has been on our website since 2005.

*

Compromise.

Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,-too often ending in the loss of both,

- Tryon Edwards

*

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that human rights have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease. The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.-

Charles Sumner

*

A surrender to the Nazi-planned EU would not bring repose to the millions of patriots who wanted their country back. An unjust settlement instead of a Churchillian response will see the battle continue until victory is secured.

Victory

You ask, What is our aim?  I can answer in one word: Victory - victory at all costs, victory in spite of all the terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.

- Winston Churchill.

FOR THE MILLIONS WHO HAVE DIED IN THE PAST FOR THEIR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND THEIR CAN BE NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED UNDEMOCRATIC CAPTIVE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

 

 

 

 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

THIS COULD BE THE TIME FOR THOSE    MP'S in the SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  OR OTHERS TO FORM THEIR OWN PATRIOTIC PARTY OF THE CENTRE. TO ATTRACT ALL VOTERS WHO LOVE  THEIR COUNTRY AND UNIQUE -PRIZED CONSTITUTION. WHO WANT IT BACK AS IT STOOD BEFORE JANUARY,1973.

Rees-Mogg-Borris Johnson... TO LEAD THE WAY!

THE EDP WOULD OFFER ITS NAME AND WITHDRAW FROM THE POLITICAL SCENE TO SUCH PATRIOTIC INDIVIDUALS AND AT THE LEAST WOULD SUPPORT SUCH A PARTY.

IN PARLIAMENT WE FIND THERE ARE LOBBY GROUPS SUCH AS FRIENDS OF WHO EVER BUT THERE ARE NO FRIENDS OF ENGLAND .IT IS ABOUT TIME THERE IS A PATRIOTIC BLOCK TO STAND UP FOR ENGLAND AND ITS PAST AND FUTURE. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING TOO LONG FOR A RETURN OF OUR ENGLISH PARLIAMENT - IS LONG OVERDUE.

LETS DO IT!

*  *  *

'Destroy [her] fib or sophestry. in vain

The creature's at [her] dirty work again.'

Pope

*

A CALL TO ARMS!

 

'Awake, arise, or be for ever fallen,'

John Milton

[before the Beast of Europe.]

*

'Blest Isle, with matchless beauty crowned

And manly hearts to guard the fair:-

Rule Britannia! rule the waves!

Britons never will be slaves!'

J.THOMSON

[ With a Greater Remainer vote in Wales and Scotland the above verse is no more true,]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

H.F.1627

*

 

[A LESSON OF HISTORY]]

 

SATURDAY

ESSAY

BY

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20,2019

 

ON AUGUST 6, 1806, a herald in full regalia rode across Vienna to the city's Jesuit church. He climbed the tower blew his silver trumpet and summoned the crowd to silence. he then announced that the Holy Roman Empire was dead.

After a thousand years of existence, Europe's oldest union was being wound up-courtesy of Napoleon. The crowd wept.

Might it happen again? History tells us that whenever Europe tries to act in unison, it screws up. The Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne left an empire that collapsed in ruins. Ferdinand of Bohemia tried to create a single Roman Catholic empire, and unleashed the Thirty Years War in the 17th century. Napoleon brought most of Europe under his rod, an millions died until Wellington did for him at Waterloo.

 The Allies punished Germany after the First World War, and so brought Hitler to power. Today's European Union mishandled Russia after 1989 and paved  the way for the reign of Vladimir Putin.

Anyone who believes the EU is so modern, united and peace-loving that it will deftly handle Britain's departure should read history and shudder.

 Ever since somewhere called Europe came into being under the Ancient Greeks, two forces have driven this continent forward.

One is the  inability of the descendents of its original migrant tribes to live in peace with their neighbours. The other is the attempt of one power

 [GERMANY TODAY]

after another to seek to dominate and unite those disparate tribes.

 

Rome  tried. So did successive popes, Holy Roman emperors, Louis XIV, Napoleon, Hitler and now, dare I add, the leaders of the European Union. Some of these attempts were well-intentioned; most were not so'

There is no question they together forged a continent that is globally outstanding.

Today, Europe is wealthy, stable, mostly liberal and a magnet to the world's migrants, rich and poor alike. Whether this was  because of or in spite of a history of ceaseless conflict is an open question, But so, too, is whether half a century of stability can survive any new breakdown in unity.

WHEN I first studied Europe's history, I searched for themes that have glued together its various forces. First was the potency of ancient Mediterranean culture. Greece under Pericles was a kingdom of reason, fascinated by the human condition as expressed in art, literature and civic politics.

Rome was a sort of opposite, a realm of law and order, the wielding of power over the entire Mediterranean basin. 'These be your arts, O Rome, 'said Virgil, to impose the ways of peace,' The operative word was impose.

As Roman rule disintegrated, it mutated into that of the Christian Church.

Christianity was ostensibly a doctrine of universal love and peace, but it soon became a cauldron of rivalry and disunity. It split Rome from Constantinople, and proved so quarrelsome that a third of Christendom-in the Levant and Africa-became Muslim and has remained so ever since.

 In 1216, the bid of Pope Innocent III to declare himself sovereign lord of Europe bred endless conflict with the Holy Roman Empire, based in Germany. So we can conclude that as a glue of union, religion was a failure. By the 16th century the Reformation had split Innocent's Roman church in two, between Protestant north and Catholic south.

This in turn led to the Thirty Years War-the cruellest devastation of Europe before the 20th century. From the wreckage of that first great European War ever more potent nation states -notably France, Spain and Austria.

The new cause of disruption was not religion but dynasty. Louis XIV sought perpetual war with his neighbours. Russia flexed its territorial muscles. Frederick the Great of Prussia declared that 'national enlargement is a fundamental law of life'. To him, Europe was synonymous with struggle.

Nothing seemed able to bring peace to the continent: not the vitality of the Renaissance or wisdom of the Enlightenment, not great thinkers and writers like Petrarch, Shakespeare. Locke, Voltaire or Goethe.

Napoleon's attempt to unite Europe under French rule led to

5,000,000 DEATHS

The victorious nations at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, a few months after Waterloo valiantly attempted a

'Concert of Europe'.

In future, they ordained, difference would be settled around a conference table not the battlefield.

Peace lasted for a century, while Europe plunged into a different form of aggrandisement-that of overseas imperialism

 

 

 

By the end of the 19th century, the British, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish and Germans ruled an astonishing half the world's population and 85 per cent of its trade

Some might have hoped that such expansion might leave Europe itself in peace. Yet no sooner had it strutted the globe as a champion of progress then it fell victim to two of the world's most horrendous conflagrations.

The idea that the 'Kaiser's war' and then 'Hitler's war were random Prussian monstrosities was absurd. They resulted from a failure of political imagination and leadership across all of Europe, whose turbulent nations seemed incurably belligerent.

 By 1945, Europe was in self-inflicted ruins. Its peoples were starving, its cities destroyed and a centuries-old edifice of cultural achievement was crippled. Though Fascism had been defeated, the price was half a continent enslaved to Communism, and the other half dependent on American protection.

There is no doubt that the subsequent half-century saw  Europe at its best. It rebuilt itself, displaying a sincere desire for there never to be a war ever again

 A Common Market was formed in 1956 under the Treaty of Rome. This treaty grew and flourished, until a free trade area covered virtually all non-communist Europe. The continent seemed genuinely at peace, under the embrace of 'ever closer union'.

 But as this half of Europe prospered and cohered, it also slid into the morass of bureaucratic centralism. And here is where the lessons of history were ignored

 

The ambition of the Brussels  elite was curiously reminiscent of the medieval church. It became a quest for ever-tighter control of its adherents, and a disregard for the political mood of member states

The first moment of truth came with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. This ended the wartime division of Europe, to which the EU reacted like a conquering power. It enticed Russia's old Warsaw Pact allies into the EU and NATO, and left Moscow dangerously isolated.

When Boris Yeltsin warned that advancing NATO deep into Eastern  Europe meant 'the flames of war could break out again across Europe, the EU laughed.

The result was Vladimir Putin, vowing to 'make Russia great again' under  his kleptomaniac rule.  In the U.S., the balance of power between a central superstate and its various subordinate states was embedded in a constitution, written in blood. I Europe, that balance was left to evolve.

The EU ignored the risks it was running, not just in mishandling Russia, but in readily opening its borders to the immature democracies of Eastern Europe.

[And not forgetting the arrival in Germany of the once East German official Frau Merkel.]

After Maastricht in 1992, which effectively pledged the continent to become one giant federal entity, majority voting in the EU council eroded the authority of NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS.

Europe seemed the plaything of French bureaucrats and German bankers.

[HITLER WOULD BE PROUD]

 

 

Once more, the hard-learned lessons of the past were disregarded in the zealous pursuit of a new Nirvana. For example, the continent's longest confederation was the Holy Roman Empire. Voltaire may have called it not holy, nor Roman nor an empire-but its respect for the treasured autonomy of dozens of German princelings contrived to keep the German people's at peace with their neighbours for a millennium. Europe gained in the process, the wealth of the Rhine and the Baltic, the radicalism of Luther and the genius of Bach and Beethoven. That union collapsed only when Napoleon in France and then Bismarck in Germany could not tolerate what they saw as affront to their imperial ambitions.

The collapse of a united Europe did neither tyrant any good, but it did turn Germany from a peaceful confederacy - a kind of giant Switzerland - into a belligerent power under the supremacy of warlike Prussia.

The lessons must be obvious. Attempts at European union fail when they lose respect for the

IDENTITY

AND

AUTONOMY

of the continent's ancestral communities

You cannot ram union, let alone

GLOBALISATION

down people's throats. Diversity lies at the core of Europe's collective experience, but it is jealously guarded diversity.

Europe can never be subsumed under a single power structure. Union can only be a light-touch and consensual.

The EU's greatest mistake was to move beyond ever-closer trade to an ill-defined' ever closer union'. Above all, it lay in demanding that member states accept open borders.

That may have seemed a small matter to the globe-trotting cosmopolites of Brussels. But control over immigration meant control over the

CHARACTER and RATE of CHANGE of LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

To the member states of Europe this was a critical area-of sovereignty

[sacrosanct]

The character of one's society is not to be bartered merely for tariff-free trade.

Unlike previous unions in Europe, the EU is a collection of self -determining democracies.

Already by 2010, anti-European sentiment was growing and consent crumbling. Turnouts in EU elections plummeted from

60 % to 40 per cent.

Populist politicians-anti immigration and often anti EU-emerged in the UK. France, Italy, Germany and former communist states. The 2008 financial crisis saw the Eurozone's GERMAN MASTERS  inflict terrible damage on GREECE and SPAIN.

Then in 2016, the UK shattered the equilibrium. Its people voted -narrowly- to withdraw. Europe's union face d a fissure, and a deep one.

There was nothing new in Britain detaching itself from the rest of Europe. It had 'left' after the Hundred Years War that finally ended in the mid-15th century and after Henry V111's defection from Rome nearly a century later. It refused to join the Common Market in 1957, and only combined under NATO to benefit from America's nuclear shield.

Now, once again, Britain has said

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

We should have no doubt of the reason. Political Europe has not found an answer to the question that defied all earlier attempts at union. How can this fragmentary continent be united without lurching either towards debilitating central authority or towards disintegration

Since the Lisbon Treaty of 2009, the EU has lurched towards the former. Now, with the rise of a reactionary populism, it is lurching towards the latter

There is hardly a member state that would dare imitate Britain and hold a Referendum on EU membership. But that is insufficient consent for union.

With or without Britain the EU must find a way of returning substantive sovereignty to its 

MEMBER STATES

not least over their borders. If it does that, who knows, Britain might rejoin.

If it fails, Britain will not be the only defector. The EU will go the way of its many forerunners - to

DISINTEGRATION and DANGER.

*  *  *

 

SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

OCTOBER 20,2018

 

A SHORT History of Europe:

From Pericles to Putin by Simon Jenkins. Viking, £25 (20pc discount), visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640, p&p is free on orders over £15. Spend £30 on books and get FREE premium delivery. Offer valid to 27/11/2018

shop

H.F.1733

*
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 SEP 19

OCT-19

 

NOV-19

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

Via Benjamin Fulford, 3-10-19… “Top-level discussion between CIA and MI6 about the tip-top of Western power and what’s going on behind the scenes”

Posted on 2019/03/11 by
I

I was checking Benjamin’s website, and this showed up. I found it pretty fascinating, and felt drawn to post it. I believe the answers are from the MI6 person (British Intelligence) and the questions are from the CIA person. The parts about Bitcoin and blockchain may be related to the Quantum Financial System many have been talking about.

This is not the weekly report.

“[Q: explain the “World Future Planning Agency.”] A proposed new economic planning agency in peacetime as the Khazarian Mafia control matrix rapidly collapses. Similar to the Marshall Plan, but more like the Asian Economic Planning Agencies.

“[Q: Do you believe that you were recruited to solve the global currency and financial crisis whereabouts this financial reset is necessary?] Yes, I own the patents for the new quantum financial systems and single digital world currency unit which resolve the difficulties in the architecture of legacy systems.

“The new Quantum Financial System is designed in such a manner there could no repeat of the poor conduct by the international financial services industry. It is highly forensic in order to discourage bad behaviour… Blockchain is a brand name of a technology called Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). It is not a currency; it is the technology embedded inside electronic currencies.

“[Q: comment on this statement: “The distributed ledger technology ends the Rothschild fiat monetary system and the dreaded New World Order.”] It has ended both already.

“Karen Hudes is a very disruptive person who has caused a great deal of damage to international diplomatic relations. Much of her work is confusing, to be polite.

“[Q: comment on this statement: N. Keenan is the trustee for the gold in Indonesia.] We have reason to believe Neil Keenan was assassinated. This has been verified by British military counterintelligence.

“[Q: Do you really think this will work out peacefully, knowing what you know?] The prediction is a peaceful transition, but the opposition may require limited military intervention around the world to break up the remaining obstacles.”

————————————————————-

 

H.F.1814

*

 

 

 

 

*
 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 
 
2018-12-31

 

If we all push, 2019 will see final victory against the Khazarian mafia

By  White Dragon Society  9 Comments
Many signs indicate that 2019 will be a breakthrough year in the battle against the satan-worshiping Khazarian mafia.  Not only have mass arrests begun, but the mass-murdering part of the pharmacidical/medical establishment is finally being taken out as well.  Another obvious sign it is no longer business as usual comes from the fact that the U.S. military is being withdrawn from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.  And this time the U.S. government shutdown may actually result in formal bankruptcy procedures against the illegal corporate government that has occupied Washington, D.C. since 1871.

Let’s start with the U.S. military withdrawals, since they mark one of the biggest changes seen since the end of World War II when the perpetual war economy of the U.S. military-industrial complex began.  Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald Trump’s Christmas Day visit to Iraq portends a pull-out from that country.  This follows withdrawal announcements from Afghanistan and Syria, as well as a ceasefire in Yemen.  We also note that almost all of the U.S. carrier groups are now at rest in their home ports.

Even more dramatically, the sources say, “Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan’s mission will be [to bring out in public view the] space force, bring troops home, release extraterrestrial and suppressed technology, close overseas bases, beat swords into plowshares and cut waste, while building a more lethal military.”  This means peace on earth and goodwill to all in a very real sense this holiday season.

The Pentagon sources also say the long U.S. government shutdown “makes it easy to arrest Deep-Staters embedded in the government.”  Furthermore, the first senior official to be publicly tried in “Nuremburg 2.0 will be ….
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-24

Western civilization heading for a reboot over the holidays

By  Weekly Reports  264 Comments
Many signs and confirmations from highly placed sources indicate that a reboot of Western civilization is being planned for 2019.  The shutdown of the U.S. government over the holidays, for example, has nothing to do with building a wall, and everything to do with a financial reboot and upcoming military tribunals.

However, what is coming is about much more than just rounding up the criminals who hijacked and bankrupted the U.S. government—it is about fixing the problems besetting monotheism.

Since today is December 24th, Christmas Eve, it’s a good time to remind people of the historical truth behind this holiday.  The fact is that nobody knows when Jesus Christ was born, so the early Christian church hijacked the old solar New Year holiday and replaced the sun with Jesus.  Here’s the thing:  the sun sets at its most northern point on December 21st, the winter solstice.  For three days afterwards, it appears to set at the same place, and then on December 25th it starts setting further south, marking the birth of the solar New Year.  Thus, the Christian church needs to confess and tell people the truth about Christmas without in any way denying the wonderful teachings of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

The Jews, for their part, need to stop celebrating the xenophobic Hanukkah and realize that it is perfectly kosher to celebrate the solar New Year (unless they somehow think the Creator did not make the sun).  Anyway, Merry Christmas to the Christians and Muslims, and Merry Sunmas to everybody else.

These issues, together with discussions of updating the calendars to bring them back into line with the movements of the heavens on which they are based, are going to be part of a broad public discourse in the New Year.  That is because, at the highest levels of world power, a decision has been made to go ahead and rebuild the temple in Jerusalem and turn that city into an international free zone.  This is why 2019 is likely to be a year for the history books.

In preparation for these upcoming historical changes, U.S. troops are being withdrawn from various conflict zones in order to pave the way for world peace, CIA sources say.  Pentagon sources agree, adding that “U.S. President Donald Trump is pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Ukraine to terminate the Deep State and the Zionists, since the global currency reset requires peace and cessation of hostilities.”

European royal family sources concur that preparations are under way for a reboot of the global financial system.  The current U.S. dollar, Euro, and Japanese yen-based system is bankrupt and dysfunctional, these and other sources agree.  This is especially true of the United States, which has been bankrupt for quite some time now, the sources say.  That’s why this current U.S. government shutdown is going to lead to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-17

Secret head of world finance, Cardinal Pell, fired and big changes coming

By  Weekly Reports, White Dragon Society  337 Comments
Last week Cardinal George Pell was found guilty of sexually abusing children by an Australian court and was subsequently fired by Pope Francis because he was “elderly.”
 https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/12/12/cardinal-pell-top-advisor-pope-francis-found-guilty-historical-sexual-offenses

This is huge news in the secret world of finance, because Pell was the person in charge of financial matters at the Vatican and thus was a secret controller of most world government leaders, P2 Freemason and CIA sources say.  This is because when most world rulers take power, they get a visit from an official of the Vatican Bank who hands them a bank book with an astronomical number written in it (a billion dollars or more for big countries;  less for smaller countries).  They are then told, “Welcome to the world of the rich,” and are gently reminded that if they refuse to accept the money they will be “removed.”

This is the choice of silver or lead that has allowed the Vatican P2 Freemason Lodge, run by descendants of the Caesars, to secretly rule most world governments.  The 200 leaders who last week affirmed the fraudulent “carbon causes global warming” agreement are all slaves of this system, P2 Freemason and CIA sources agree.
 https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/14/18139402/cop24-climate-change-katowice-poland

Thus, the removal of the head of this secret control system will have huge repercussions for world finance and politics, depending on who is selected to replace him, and also depending on whether or not this secret system will be allowed to continue.

On that front, another huge news item (still not fully confirmed because it only comes from one royal family source) is that a new head of the Committee of 300, the secret government of the 13 ruling bloodline families, will take power next year.  This means Queen Elizabeth will be handing the committee reins to a younger person (hint:  not Charles and not William).

With this caveat in mind (i.e., only one source), here some excerpts from a statement by the soon-to-be-appointed new committee head:  “The 13 ruling bloodlines and I have had enough of this world and the minions charged with its curation.  All Sovereign Heads of State and all respective governments fired.  Ordo ab Chao.”

The source also said, “Sir Alexander Younger at MI6 is already briefed, along with the Queen in London and the Emperor in Tokyo,” about this development.

The statement further read that, “The Habsburg dynasty and spin-offs—most criminally psychopathic—have …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-12-13

Previous JCS Chairman

By  Letters to the Editor  0 Comments
Ben:  Enjoy your weekly newsletters and I put more credence in you than any other source.  I’m curious about your comment in last newsletter, “as the previous JCS Chairman was Army.”  I believe you’ll find that Gen. Joseph Dunford was a United States Marine.  Means a lot to us former active duty Marines!  Have a great day.
I was referring to his predecessor Mike Dempsey, since Dunford is still JCS Chairman for now.
–BF

 

 
2018-12-31

*  *  *

ADDED

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]
 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

March against

The

 Donald!

News for DAILY MAIL-March against THE DONALD! by Richard Littlejohn

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: March against The Donald (that's Tusk, not Trump)

 

(That's TUSK not Trump

LOOKING forward to the march against  The Donald? Me too! It's time we showed this tinpot dictator exactly what the British people think of him.

Frankly we're had our fill of this preening middle-aged sexist pig throwing his weight around. We're sick of his arrogant tweets and contempt for democracy.

Who the hell does this self-styled 'Mr President' think he is? So join me Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson at the

STOP TUSK rally.

I,ve already ordered the inflatable Baby Donald to be flown over the Houses of Parliament.

While  I'm at it, maybe I'll commision giant hot air balloons of a naked Jean-Claude Drunker, Michael Barnier and Angela Merkel.

Then we can invite ther Provisional Wing of the Country Alliance to bring along their shotguns and blast these grotesque puffed -up politicians out of the sky, like grouse on the Glorious  Twelfth.

I'm sure Farage would lend me one of his matched Purdeys. If not, I'd settle for a second-hand sawn-off, left over from a South London blagging. What a joy it would be giving both barrels to effigies of Donald Tusk and the rest of mthe European elite.

Sorry, what's that? You thought when I referrred to Donald', I was talking about

PRESIDENT TRUMP

I can see why you might have leapt to that conclusion. The usual suspects are already salivating at the prospect of their next demo against Trump, when he arrives in Britain for the Nato summit in December.

That's if a a rumoured state vist this summer does't go ahead. His official trip, last July was an excuse for a petulant display of protests, which cost taxpayers

£14 MIILLION TO POLICE.

Thousands of demonstrators, many in fancy dress, marched through London in a carnival atmosphere, wearing novelty headgear and waving placards plastered with obscener slogans. No one has yet explained to me why a red

'Make America Great Again'

baseball  cap

is an affront

to

decency

 yet  a  hat resembling giant female  genitalia

  is  perfectly acceptable.

In Trafalgar square, they gathered under a 'Baby Trump' blimp, given the thumps up by London's two-bob chancer of a mayor Saqiq Khaqn, and cheered a succession of Left-wing rabble rousers heaping vitriol on the leader of our most important ally. Now they're limbering up to do it all over again. The Lib Dems (11 MPs and the Green Party (one MP) are promising to be 'front and centre'.

No doubt O. J. (Oh, Jeremy) Corbyn will be there, too, blaming America for the humanitarian crisis in bankrupt, corrupt, socialist Venezuela. Try stopping him.

And when this orgy of condemnation and self-congratulation is over, and everyone has repaired to the pub until Glastonbury comes around again, will any of them stop to think why they're protesting- and what on earth it is they hope to achieve?

Trump may be pretty unsavoury for the delicate palates of snowflake types and the dwindling band of prigs who still buy the Guardian

OK so he offends their own set of 'principles' and sense of self righteousness. But given that the people define themselves by who they hate, if Trump didn't exist they'd have to invent him

He's not exactly my cup of meat either. But his greatest virtue is his ability to send all the right people into a deranged frensy.

What Trump does on the home front is entirely a matter for the American voters, who elected him once already and will have to decide whether to award him a second term.

 

So WHAT if he puts

 'AMERICA FIRST' ?

THAT'S HIS JOB,

If only we had a Prime Minister who put

BRITAIN FIRST.

Rather than bite his hand off, all the resentful Remainer camp could do was scaremonger about chlorinated American chicken, which was going to wipe out half the population. (Never mind the poisonous Romanian horsemeat the EU sent us.)

U.S. military might has ensured the PEACE in EUROPE since WORLD WAR II, which is why it is perfectly appropriate that the President is coming to Britain in December to mark the

70th ANNIVERSARY OF THE NATO ALLIANCE

 

Yes, Trump managed to upset European leaders by insisting that they keep their side of the bargain and commit two per cent of GDP to defence. But he was right to do so. And his uncompromising negotiating stance paid dividends securing an extra 100 billion for Nato from Europe

It's a pity MotherTheresa has learned nothing from Trump's success in playing hardball with our 'partners' .Instead, she let's them trample a

ll over her.

I was only half-joking when I said we should march against

THE OTHER DONALD.

As Tusk's latest outburst illustrates only too well, he treats our female Prime Minister-and the British people -with distain, patronising  her with snide comments and snarky Tweets

Had Trump done the same, we'd never hear the last of it

 

President Trump, I repeat, only wants

FRIENDSHIP and FREE TRADE

TUSK and the rest of the self-perpetuating conga line of unelected EU 'presidents' aim to humiliate, subjugate and punish us into a permanent prisoner of their

ROTTEN, ANTIDEMOCRATIC EMPIRE.

 

The 17.4 million who voted Leave -Chesterton's 'secret people'-are not the type to take to the streets. Nor, it should be said, are most of the decent folk who backed Remain. We leave the demos to the noisy show-offs determined to draw attention to themselves, whatever the convenient cause

BUT IF WE MUST HAVE ANOTHER TIRESOME MARCH AGAINST A

THE DONALD,

LET'S GIVE TRUMP A MISS FOR ONCE, AND PROTEST AGAINST OUR

REAL ENEMY

DONOLD TUSK

News for DAILY MAIL-March against THE DONALD! by Richard Littlejohn

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: March against The Donald (that's Tusk, not Trump)

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1788

 had our fill mof this preening middle-aged sexist pig throwing his weight atround. WE're

 

 

 

H.F.1769

*  *  *

 
 

ENGLAND CAN DO IT!

[The history of Europe in the modern era has shown that England and her once free independent neighbouring nation states have flourished the banner of freedom to assist the emerging future free nation states in europe and elsewhere to their rightful place under the protecion of the british empire as a commonwealth of free nations states. that banner was by

 deceit and treason

 ignomiously withheld  these past 46 years and must rise again to assist those captive states  in  EUROPE clammering for freedom from hitler's 1940's planned so-called european unionand those elsewhere to their rightful place as free independent nation states in a peaceful world of a family of free states.]

*  *  *

With hotels all over Europe, you might expect him to be a Remainer. BUT in this blistering DEMOLITION Sir ROCCO FORTE thunders...

 

 

WHY THE

PROPHETS

OF DOOM

HAVE GOT IT

WRONG.

 

With hotels all over Europe you might expect him to be a Remainer but SIR ROCCO FORTE thunders... why the prophets of doom have got it so wrong

By Sir Rocco Forte For The Daily Mail

July 6, 2018

517

View
comments

Two years ago the British people voted by a decisive margin for independence from EU rule. 

Yet instead of embracing the global opportunities offered by the referendum verdict, too many ministers and mandarins now appear desperate to emasculate Brexit, keeping Britain under the governance of Brussels.

Such a fudge would be highly damaging to both the British economy and our democracy. But it seems to be the direction in which the Government is now heading.

Today, Theresa May hosts her vital summit at Chequers, where she hopes the Cabinet will agree a strategy for the final negotiations with the EU on the withdrawal deal. 

By all accounts her plan, drawn up by her chief European adviser Olly Robbins, will involve the continuation of some kind of customs union, single market membership for goods, and the jurisdiction of the European Courts.

 

Sir Rocco Forte (pictured) says he believes the alarmism is not only unjustified but also unrepresentative of British business as a whole

That is hardly the outcome that the electorate backed in June 2016.

One of the key arguments used by the politicians to prop up this sort of compromise is that British businesses are terrified of so-called 'hard' Brexit and want as close a commercial alignment with the EU as possible. 

In recent days, major international firms such as Airbus, BMW and Jaguar have made just such a case.

Yet I believe that alarmism is not only unjustified but also unrepresentative of British business as a whole.

Many of the corporate lobbyists – used to decades of operating within the EU's bureaucracy – are only thinking of their narrow, short-term vested interests instead of the long-term future of the UK.

They certainly do not speak for me and many other entrepreneurs.

As an international hotelier with a chain of 11 establishments, including three in Germany, three in Italy and one in Belgium, I might have been expected to join the corporate chorus of anxiety about Brexit.

But I feel just the opposite.

For me, the brighter prospects for Britain lie in national freedom, whereas the retention of control by Brussels will mean the shackling of enterprise and global trade. It is precisely my long experience in business that has left me so disillusioned with the EU.

Working a great deal on the continent, I have seen at first hand that excessive regulations and bureaucratic intervention have created a hostile environment for enterprise.

 

As an international hotelier with a chain of 11 establishments, including three in Germany, three in Italy and one in Belgium (above, the Rocco Forte Hotel in Brussels), I might have been expected to join the corporate chorus of anxiety about Brexit

In many EU countries, the burden of state levies can add an additional 45 to 55 per cent to labour costs, compared to about 12 per cent in Britain. 

Moreover, trade unions are dominant, as are rigid demarcation rules about which employee is allowed to perform which task. 

At times, the workplace culture in parts of continental Europe reminds me of sclerotic Britain before Margaret Thatcher's revolution.

But that is why some global businesses like the EU.

Operating in favour of the corporate giants and trade unions, the heavy-handed Brussels regime can be a vehicle for shutting down competition and stifling innovation.

The same uncompetitive spirit would be forced on Britain if we had to remain in the customs union and single market.

Other concerns voiced by the big business lobby are little more than scaremongering, like the claim that any restriction on European freedom of movement will badly hurt recruitment by British firms. This is untrue. 

My family's hotel chain hired staff from all over the world, including Europe, long before the EU was even created. We will continue to do so after Brexit, especially because so many young people from Europe want to come here to learn English.

Contrary to the hollow warnings from the pro-EU campaigners, migration controls will not mean an end to European migration. Just look at the U.S., which has tough border controls and visa requirements, yet has the highest level of legal immigration in the developed world.

Big business representatives also frequently express their disquiet that Britain could 'crash out' of the EU without a deal, and therefore would be forced to operate on World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. But the dangers of such a scenario have been wildly exaggerated.

More than half of our total exports, made up of commerce outside the EU, are traded under WTO rules. There are no cries of anguish from those exporters, no long queues of lorries or great hold-ups at ports. The narrative of doom is misplaced.

 

By all accounts, Theresa May's (pictured) plan will involve the continuation of some kind of customs union, single market membership for goods, and the jurisdiction of the European Courts

WTO rules will work in Britain's favour post-Brexit, because they are based on legal requirements which ban arbitrary discrimination against a particular country's goods, and also insist on seamless customs procedures.

Is the EU or the UK seriously going to ignore the WTO system and act in defiance of international law? Ah, cry the anti-Brexiteers, but traders may have to pay tariffs on goods if Britain leaves the EU without an agreement. But at worst, average customs duties will amount to just 3 to 4 per cent. That's a figure dwarfed by the 15 per cent devaluation in sterling against the Euro since the referendum, a shift that's provided a massive boost for exports.

In any case, it is within the remit of the British Government not to levy any tariffs on EU goods coming into this country: we could even adopt unilateral free trade.

Big businesses should be making those arguments rather than seeking to undermine the democratic verdict of the electorate.

Britain's position is far stronger than the pro-EU lobby pretends. There is no reason for any defeatism.

We are the sixth largest economy in the world, a global cultural force and a major military power. Our huge financial contributions to Brussels, amounting to 11 per cent of the entire EU budget, should give us tremendous leverage in negotiations. So should the EU's £100 billion trade surplus with us.

It is not in the interests of any European exporters – from Italian fashion houses to German car makers – to lessen that trade. The business imperative on all sides is for a sensible deal.

The business lobbying groups, particularly the Confederation of British Industry, are wrong about Brexit, just as they have been hopelessly wrong on so many other policies in the past.

In the 1970s, they were in favour of state control of industrial strategy and appeasement of the unions. In the early 1980s, they were strongly opposed to Margaret Thatcher, a stance that angered me because I recognised that she was trying to free businesses.

In the same vein, they have been wrong about us joining the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, the single currency and Project Fear. Confounding their grim recent forecasts about a recession in the event of a Leave vote, the economy has boomed, manufacturing is at a record high, and unemployment at a record low.

They keep getting it wrong on European policy because they are not the authentic voice of British business.

Swayed too often by the global conglomerates, they ignore the small and medium-sized companies that are the backbone of the domestic economy.

For all the noise about the EU, it should be recognised that businesses representing 88 per cent of Britain's GDP are not involved in trade with Europe at all, even though they have to follow Brussels' rules and regulations.

One recent survey by the accountancy firm Grant Thornton showed that a large proportion of British businesses are totally unconcerned about the effects of Brexit and have made no special preparations to deal with them.

In their demand for continued alignment with the EU, what the Europhile lobbyists ignore is Brussels' obsession with achieving full political integration.

The whole purpose of the European Project is to create a federal entity through the abolition of national identities. The single market, free movement and the Euro are all political, not economic, instruments to achieve the goal of 'ever-closer union'.

That's why if Britain remains tied to Brussels, British sovereignty will continue to be dramatically eroded.

The pro-EU advocates like to speak of 'our national interest', but that is a delusion. In the long term, there will be no British nation at all if we remain in the EU's bureaucratic empire.

Alternatively, national freedom beckons if the Government seizes the moment and truly liberates us from the bureaucratic and undemocratic monster of the EU.

Theresa May is in a difficult position, with no Parliamentary majority and a divided Cabinet. But the one sure way she can rebuild her authority is by implementing the decision of the British people.

comment on this article

517

View
comments

Full Article

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

July 6, 2018

H.F.1601
LITTLEJOHN

 

The Living Dead

AND

The Joy of Brexit

DAILY MAIL- RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Joy of

Brexit

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

 

JUST when you thought the Brexit debacle couldn't get any worse, the crypt door creaks open and out crawls Gordon Brown to give us the benefit of his wisdom.

Looking like an extra from a George Romero zombie movie, Gordon Brown became the latest member of the Living Dead to demand a second referendum.

His two immediate predecessors, Tony Blair and Johnny Major are already doing their damnest to overturn the clearly expressed will of

17.4 MILLION PEOPLE

who voted unequivocally

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

I think we can safely ignore Gordon's view on

DEMOCRACY.

After losing the 2010 General Election, managing to harvest 29 per cent of votes cast, he tried to hang on by what remained of his fingernails and had to be dragged out of Downing Street four days later.

HE WAS THE MAN WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY IN SECRET,

sneaking in through the tradesmen's entrance to avoid photographers.

You may vaguely recall that Blair and Brown gave a solemn promise to hold a referendum on Lisbon and then cynically reneged on it. Major forced the Maastricht Treaty through the Commons, in the teeth of fierce opposition, and consigned the Conservative Party to

13 years in the wilderness.

Gordon's solution to heal the divisions which could only be exacerbated still further would be to establish a new Royal Commission to 'engage and listen' to voters views.

Brilliant.

That's exactly what millions of us had in mind when we voted in 2016.

What Do We Want?

Royal Commission!

When Do We Want It?

Now!

Anyway, what's wrong with simple accepting the outcome of the biggest single democratic exercise in

BRITISH HISTORY.

The only reason we have bitter divisions in some sections of society is that

well-funded fanatical Remainers refuse to acknowledge the result of the first

'PEOPLE'S VOTE'

and are determined

TO REVERSE IT.

Sadly this poisonous cohort contains three of our four former PM's.

To Call Me Dave's credit, he has maintained a dignified distance from the self-styled resistance to Brexit.

But what is it about certain ex-prime ministers that persuades them they immediately become sagacious statesman the moment they leave office, regardless of the mess they left behind?

Why do they think they can completely disregard the wishes of those who once voted for them and kept them in the manner to which they always  felt entitled?

Of course, all Prime Ministers eventually go mad. It just takes some a little longer than others.

IN the case of Theresa May, who is still there (for now), she has already managed to convince herself that she is the only person with the wit, imagination and ability to decide what comprises a successful

BREXIT

The sad fact is that she possesses precisely none of those qualities. As a direct result of her fatal combination of stubborness and stupidity, she has achieved the feat of joining the ranks of the

LIVING DEAD

while still in the job.

[The crisis on our streets has been brought about by Theresa May when Home Secretary when she upset the POLICE FEDERATION and she undoubtedly holds a grudge because it is lack of FINANCE that has seen the virtual disappearance of the Bobbie-on-the Beat and closure of POLICE STATIONS and the 'Wild West' anarchy on our streets.]

 

On the other hand, I suppose it takes a special kind of genius to alienate

EVERYBODY

-Leaver. Remainers, the EU Commission, the DUP-YOU NAME IT.

 

When you manage to upset both sides of the Johnson family, you're in big trouble. As I wrote back at the time of Chequers sell-out in July, she's hopelessly bungled the negotiations and is prepared to reduce Britain to

serf status

in her desperation to

SEAL A DEAL:

'Independent sovereign nations do not accept the jurisdiction of unelected foreign judges. Independent sovereign nations do not swallow wholesale rules made by unaccountable foreign bureaucrats. Independent sovereign nations are at liberty to conclude free trade deals with any country in the world.'

 

And for this she wants to bung Brussels

£39BILLION

OF OUR MONEY

Since Chequers, it's got even worse. No wonder even Remainers like Jo Johnson despair.

About the only sensible thing Gordon Brown said yesterday was that we can still go back to the EU and tell them the deal on the table won't wash - despite the fact that Brussels hasn't even agreed to that.

They think Mother Theresa is so feeble that they have been emboldened to demand continued access to Britain's fishing waters. That would be the ultimate humiliation among many. Grocer Heath gave up our traditional fishing waters to get us in to the EU. Now Mrs May could give them away again so we can 'LEAVE'.

 

YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP.

But Gordon's right. We can go back and renegotiate. Just not with the dismal, defeatist Theresa in charge

She should have the decency to resign in July, when it was clear the game was up

The only way forward is for her to fall off her kittren heels, sooner than later. After two wasted years of dissembling, betrayal, incompetance and downright surrender to Brussels, Mother Theresa deserves nothing less than an ignominious departure.

If the Conservative Party can rediscover some backbone and sense of self-preservation they can get rid of her tomorrow without having to trigger a protracted leadership contest, provided they agree on a single compromise candidate.

Who would replace her? Does it really matter? Years ago, when there was talk of a stalking horse candidate standing against Johnny Major, I reakoned a real horse could beat him.

So I invited readers to vote for either Major or Red Rum as Prime Minister. Red Rum romped home by a margin of

9-1

The talk in some quarters is that Home Secretary Sajid Javid might be the right fit. He is bright, has a compelling backstory and although he sided with Remain during the referendum, is not a committed EU federalist.

On the downside, when it comes to inspirational public speaking, he has all the charisma of Albert RN,

But beggars can't be choosers. And we can't go on as we are

Even diehard 'no deal'  Brexiteers like me have to accept, as Mick Jagger said, that you can't always get what you want.

The best we can probably hope for at this late stage is a

Norway For Now Deal;

which would get us out of the EU with no barriers to frictionless trade. It wouldn't be ideal but we could try to pick the bones out of it later.

 

Unless the Tories can pull a relatively cheap Brexit out of the fire, they will forfeit all trust and credibility and we will be staring down the barrel of a Corbyn government by default.

 

 

In a just universe, Labour shouldn't benefit from the Tory disarray. They're all over the place, too, and will vote down any deal put before Parliament because they want to force a General Election.

 

The Conservatives may be  what Terry-Thomas would have called a 'absolute shower', but do really want to live in a country with Corbyn in No 10, Mr McDonnell running the Treasury and Diane Abbott in charge of immigration and the Old Bill?

As FOR the Liberals, at least they managed to provide us with a little light relief.

Not only has 82-year old Lord Lester been suspended from the House for offering to make a women a baroness if she agreed to become his mistress - an allegation that he says is 'completely untrue'.

We also learn that 'one of their senior advisers has fallen foul of the #MeToo madness.

Apparently, he propositioned a female colleague after inviting her to dinner to discuss his party's 'Brexit position'.

Ding, dong!

I've heard of the missionary position but the Brexit position is a new one on me.

In case you're wondering exactly what her idea of the Brexit position, its like this:

Shackled together, facing both ways at once, with little prospect of an early withdrawal.

*  *  *

 

NOVEMBER 13,2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 
 

STATEMENT

[Mr Richard Littlejohn has drawn an impressive  and positive picture of the present political scene which will be looked on as one of the most important epochs in the history of our island home.

 How a once FREE DEMOCRACY was SOLD out to a FOREIGN POWER and hindered in its RETRIEVAL by its ELECTED CHAMBER shows how the PEOPLE failed to heed the message of HISTORY that unless VIGILANCE is KEPT then THEIR FREEDOM is at RISK..

Over the past DECADES many PATRIOTS have WARNED of the CONSEQUENCES of the NEGLECT of our WORLD-PRIZED ANCIENT PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY an INHERITANCE in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS.. THE FUTURE IS UNCERTAIN because TRAITORS within our ELECTED CHAMBER are in the ENEMIES CAMP of TWO BLOODY WORLD WARS  GERMANY because the EU was the BRAINCHILD of ADOLF HITLER.

 WHEN we are AGAIN a FREE NATION STATE our CONSTITUTION should be AMENDED to PREVENT ever AGAIN our NATION STATE of ENGLAND being a SUBJECT STATE of another POWER by the EMBEDEDMENT of OUR FREEDOM in the CONSTITUTION OF OUR COUNTRY. THe LAW of TREASON should be updated to ensure that any future individuals are punished ,who plot to undermine the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

of

ENGLISHMEN. "]

the very foundation of many constitutions the world over.

'...The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their own rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no  shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.  It may be very wrong to say that the forms of Government are of no importance and that the best system is the one best administered.  But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of FREE INSTITUTIONS is their enabling men to obtain a wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those who live under it to WATCH the CONDUCT of their RULERS, aiding them when RIGHT, checking them when they are WRONG; and above all, that no Constitution however excellent, can supersede the NECESSITY or DISPENCE with the DUTY of this CONSTANT VIGILANCE.' [Caps are Ours]

 by HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM FRS-LONDON-1844

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 13-2018

 

 

H.F.1759

 
 
 

 

How Britain is ruled by patronising

 

 

B*#*@:rds

 by QUENTIN LETTS

Quentin Letts for the Daily Mail's recent articles

How Britain is ruled by patronising b*#*@rds: QUENTIN LETTS names the worst offenders among the People Who Know Best who never tire of telling us what to do and think

06/10/17 22:24

The government machine was used remorselessly to help

REMAIN

We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised. His friend George Osborne (top left) was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election. From comedians to bishops (hard to say which of those two groups is funnier), fund managers to charity-sector tsars, Brexit was as pongy as a bad sardine. They did not just oppose it. They recoiled from it - including (also top to bottom, left to right): Amanda Abbington, Kwasi Kwarteng, Gary Lineker, Chris Martin, J, K, Rowling, James Corden and Keira Knightley

 

A rebellion has taken place in this country of ours, an uprising, a new Peasants’ Revolt. A real kick in the kidneys for Britain’s ruling elite.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people.

In the greatest citadel-storming since the French Revolution, they chose to leave the obtrusive European Union.

But it was not a result that happened by accident. It was born of a weary truculence — a yeoman impatience with those who make up our smug, self-perpetuating, invisible Brahmin caste.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised. His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election

For decades, Britons have been bossed about by a cadre of administrators and managers and pose-striking know-alls.

The old aristocracy having faded, in came a more furtive elite, driven by the desire to own minds, not acres, determined to control opinion and dictate our attitudes.

It was done on the sly, of course. They posed as liberals, and crouched behind ‘enlightened’ attitudes while imposing their views on a populace they claimed to esteem but more truthfully disdained.

 

Politicians, civil servants and lawyers used a language few could understand, while government was farmed out to agencies and quangos and privatised supply companies.

Cheap labour was imported, suppressing workers’ wages, because that was what globalised boss-cats at the international forums said was necessary.

Could we criticise immigration? Only if we wanted to be called racists and fruitcakes. The elite’s media munchkins had placed it on the top shelf, somewhere safe where it could not be touched.
 

At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed

Against our will, children were exposed to sex education by schools more interested in dogma than declension. Sex crimes rocketed.

Sociologists said murderers must be released into the community. Re-offending rates rose.

Smokers were made to feel like criminals. Criminals were encouraged to sue their victims.

From every side came instruction as to what we must think: about diet, gender, sexuality, race, even the weather, with the TV forecasters telling us to put on sun cream and giving silly names to every incoming squall.

The entire System was at it, badgering us, belittling us, patting us on the head, putting us in our place.

Think this. Don’t think that. Inappropriate! Hate-crime!

From the Chief Medical Officer and her strictures about alcohol limits to railway announcements saying ‘do not become a victim of crime’, they treat us like toddlers.

Even the most docile beach donkey, by nature placid and reliable, if repeatedly kicked, will eventually refuse to co-operate. It will bare its teeth and walk in the other direction, pulling its tethers out of the sand.

So it has proved with the British voters.

Get off our backs, they said. Stop goading us. Stop being such patronising bastards.

The morning we discovered we’d break free from Europe was that unforgettable Friday, June 24, 2016.

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated. Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof

I was in a pokey hotel bedroom in London’s Bloomsbury and awoke at daybreak as the television relayed the referendum results from around the country.

I’d expected the technocracy was going to win. It always did, didn’t it? The experts had said defeat for Remain was unthinkable. Treasury officials, opinion pollsters and almost the entire diplomatic corps idly presumed Remain would win.

But it hadn’t.

Our dominating elite of parliamentarians, lobbyists, bankers, artists, political theorists, clergy, academics and sterile aesthetes was about to take a massive custard pie smack in the face.

So many well-connected people had scoffed at Brexit. They had belittled anyone who suggested it could occur.

But there it was, happening before our eyes as the BBC’s presenter, David Dimbleby, announced: ‘The British people have spoken and the answer is “we’re out!”.’

The cold print of the referendum ballot papers had merely asked voters if they wanted to stay in the EU. This result was the crystallisation of something bigger.

It was the eruption of a long-building resentment at being bossed around by an opaque snootocracy, by affluent fixers and the People Who Know Best.
 

James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x’

In my hotel room on that Independence Dawn last year, I felt a giddying rush of patriotic pride. The apple-cart had been overturned.

This was not just a public rejection of the EU. It was an act of thrilling dissent. Our arrogant elite, after years of self-enriching condescension, had been whupped.

More than a year on, I still can’t get out of my head how unrelenting the campaign was for Remain to win the popular vote.

For months before the referendum, the System did its best to engineer things in favour of the EU.

Cabinet Brexiteers were silenced. Civil servants were told to hide sensitive EU material from Eurosceptic ministers.

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised.

His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election.

Carney, a Canadian but bound to the status quo here by instinct and career, predicted Brexit would cause sterling to collapse, growth to stall and unemployment to rise.

From comedians to bishops (hard to say which of those two groups is funnier), fund managers to charity-sector tsars, Brexit was as pongy as a bad sardine. They did not just oppose it. They recoiled from it.

The reaction was not simply intellectual or even political. It was rooted in taste, aesth- etics, manners.

Let your future son-in-law have tombstone teeth, the clothes sense of Ken Dodd and a string of shoplifting offences to his name, but pray God Almighty he be not a Brexiteer.

We no longer have widowed duchesses who clutch their dewlaps in horror when they hear the word ‘serviette’, but Brexit had the same effect on managerial and technocratic types.

My wife, a sweet and liberal-minded soul, casually mentioned to a princeling of the Church of England that she intended to vote Leave. He gasped: ‘How could you?’ He might have been less aghast had she admitted to witchcraft.
 

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more’

Fashionable ‘opinion leaders’ and pliable industrialists were pressed to the Remain cause to build the idea that superior people — good people — were of one accord. They crouched down beside the voters, looked them very gravely in the eye and told the boys and girls that Mummy and Daddy would be really, really sad if Remain did not win the referendum.

Opinion pollsters said Remain would win, and in the last week of the campaign the Cameroons started to strut.

Two days before the referendum, Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee, la-di-dah Leftist and one-time owner of the most perfect villa in Italy, opined that the result was in the bag. The headline over her article read: ‘On Friday I’ll get my country back. Britain will vote Remain’.

But the voters came to a different conclusion. They decided that those prominent Remain supporters were only in it for themselves, chasing either business contracts or honours.

The Leavers were the ones who reclaimed their country. On the morning after the referendum, I headed from my hotel to work in a taxi whose driver was cock-a-hoop at the Leave vote. At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed. He was right. General elections are elections for Parliament. TThe referendum was an election against Parliament, in spite of Parliament.

Abraham Lincoln once spoke of ‘government of the people, by the people, for the people’. We had drifted towards ‘government of the people, by the Parliament, for the Parliament and its fleas’.

The Establishment reacted with petulant disbelief.

Tony Blair called it ‘a foolish excursion into populism’. The then Lib Dem leader Tim Farron, 46, normally a sunny fellow, was ‘angry that today we wake to a deeply divided country’. Would he have said the same if the scores had gone the other way?

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated.

Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. 

Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof. James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x.’

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more.’ TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’

The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’. Damon Albarn wore a black armband.

Marianne Faithfull, famous because decades earlier she was supposed to have done something filthy with a Mars Bar and Mick Jagger, said: ‘We are back to where it used to be, the Right-wing racist Little England. Those dreadful people, they’ve always been there.’

TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’ The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’

Emma Thompson, mother, director, writer, actress, intellectual, citizen, was, naturally, appalled by Brexit. She said she felt more European than English and she regarded Ukip’s Nigel Farage as a ‘white nationalist’.

Where that left the many non-white Leave voters and non-white Ukip supporters, it was hard to say.

The Remain camp united atheists and the modern Church of England, with former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and arch-atheist Richard Dawkins deploring the result. Science bod Dawkins, who has made a study of natural selection, raged that the voters had been ‘ill-informed’ and ‘ignorant’. Personally, I blame evolution.

Another secularist, A. C. Grayling, wrote to MPs demanding that they reject the will of the people who, said Grayling, had voted on the basis of ‘demagoguery and sentiment’.

Too many voters were merely ‘System One’ thinkers, he argued — i.e. they acted chiefly on impulse and could be ‘captured by slogans’, unlike ‘System Two’ thinkers who made more considered, logical judgments.

Shades here, of the Greek philosopher Plato, who regarded democracy as rule by the rabble and proposed the creation of elite ‘Guardians’ or ‘Philosopher Kings’ who could be selected in youth and trained to rule.

Plato’s thinking is most clearly seen today in the French grandes écoles that train the cadre of Brussels Eurocrats who propose and draft EU treaties.

Tony Blair made a speech calling on people to ‘rise up against’ ... er, themselves, basically.

Time and again it was argued by anti-Brexiteers that Leave voters did not understand the vastness of their decision.

The elite was indignant and fearful — and that only made many Leave voters all the more certain they had made the right decision.

In their appalling condescension, what all these furious anti-Brexiteers ignored were people such as a Derbyshire factory worker called Stuart Carrington and the other 17,410,741 men and women who had voted to Leave.

Stuart had also been on my mind that anxious night as we waited for the referendum result. He was my brother-in-law. (Well, as good as. He and my wife’s sister Nicky were not formally married but they had been together years.)

Fifty-four-year-old Stuart’s health had become a worry in recent months. Out of character, he took time off work. Stuart’s machine, capable of the most intricate measurements, checked parts for aircraft jet engines.

He was proud of his work, just as he was proud of Nicky, her two sons and their flat. But he knew all that was coming to an end.

The doctors initially told him he had a low-threat cancer but they changed their prognosis. That week we were told he was dying.

Yet on referendum day morning, moving with difficulty, he had managed to get himself to his local polling station in the Spital district of Chesterfield, to vote for the last time.

A gaunt figure, he leaned heavily on the stubby pencil while casting his vote. Job done, he carefully dropped his ballot into the box, thanked the officials, winced a little and made slowly for the door.

A keen supporter of Leave — and normally a Labour man, his dad having been a miner — Stuart had been determined to vote and he had bloody well managed it.

I kept thinking of stoical, taciturn Stuart.

Those northern men don’t always say much but by God they make their mark. Stuart was not a showy person. He did not consider himself important, not in the way we normally use that term.

Not back then. Maybe things are a little different now. Maybe, with Brexit, the balance of power has shifted a little.

Maybe, but I wouldn’t bank on it.

As I will show in the rest of this series based on my new book, the patronising bastards are everywhere, lording it over the plebs, putting us in our place, waving their entitlement in our face, telling us what to think and what to do.

And not just over Brexit but on every issue under the sun.

And the biggest ‘bastard’ of them all, at the very top of my list of patricians treating the rest of us with contempt? I’ll reveal his identity on Monday.

Adapted from Patronising Bastards: How The Elites Betrayed Britain, by Quentin Letts, published by Constable on October 12 at £16.99. © Quentin Letts 2017. To order a copy for £13.59 (offer valid to October 14, 2017) visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640. P&P is free on orders over £15.


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4957180/Britain-s-ruled-patronising-b-rds-says-QUENTIN-LETTS.html#ixzz4uqBaZlGZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

6/10/17

 

 

H.F.1338 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT A SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU.

 
REMAINERS NEED TO REFLECT

ON A

STATEMENT

OF A

WORLDLY-WISE BUSINESSMAN

Sir Rocco Forte

CONFIRMS

REMAINERS MINDS REMAIN

CLOSED

TO

REALITY!

*

SIR ROCCO FORTE thunders... why the prophets of doom have got it so wrong...

 

* * *

[This must be one of the most instructive and powerful deliveries on the true purpose of the EU in it's march to an ever - closer union and to a bureaucratic empire'

In the words of the TRUTH-SEEKER and PATRIOT Christopher Story

the

EU

IS THE ENEMY OF NATION STATES.]

THE+EUROPEAN+UNION+COLLECTIVE-ENEMY+OF+ITS+MEMBER+STATES+BY+CHRISTOPHER+STORY

 

*  *  *

JULY 6,2018

H.F.1601/1

 
 

 

How Britain is ruled by patronising

 

 

B*#*@:rds

 by QUENTIN LETTS

 

A rebellion has taken place in this country of ours, an uprising, a new Peasants’ Revolt. A real kick in the kidneys for Britain’s ruling elite.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people.

In the greatest citadel-storming since the French Revolution, they chose to leave the obtrusive European Union.

But it was not a result that happened by accident. It was born of a weary truculence — a yeoman impatience with those who make up our smug, self-perpetuating, invisible Brahmin caste.

Before the EU referendum in 2016, the electorate was told firmly what to do. A vote for Remain would be safe and strong, and woe betide the country if you were stupid enough to back Brexit. You know your duty, little ones, said the elite. Sod that, said the people

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised. His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election

For decades, Britons have been bossed about by a cadre of administrators and managers and pose-striking know-alls.

The old aristocracy having faded, in came a more furtive elite, driven by the desire to own minds, not acres, determined to control opinion and dictate our attitudes.

It was done on the sly, of course. They posed as liberals, and crouched behind ‘enlightened’ attitudes while imposing their views on a populace they claimed to esteem but more truthfully disdained.

 

Politicians, civil servants and lawyers used a language few could understand, while government was farmed out to agencies and quangos and privatised supply companies.

Cheap labour was imported, suppressing workers’ wages, because that was what globalised boss-cats at the international forums said was necessary.

Could we criticise immigration? Only if we wanted to be called racists and fruitcakes. The elite’s media munchkins had placed it on the top shelf, somewhere safe where it could not be touched.
 

At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed

Against our will, children were exposed to sex education by schools more interested in dogma than declension. Sex crimes rocketed.

Sociologists said murderers must be released into the community. Re-offending rates rose.

Smokers were made to feel like criminals. Criminals were encouraged to sue their victims.

From every side came instruction as to what we must think: about diet, gender, sexuality, race, even the weather, with the TV forecasters telling us to put on sun cream and giving silly names to every incoming squall.

The entire System was at it, badgering us, belittling us, patting us on the head, putting us in our place.

Think this. Don’t think that. Inappropriate! Hate-crime!

From the Chief Medical Officer and her strictures about alcohol limits to railway announcements saying ‘do not become a victim of crime’, they treat us like toddlers.

Even the most docile beach donkey, by nature placid and reliable, if repeatedly kicked, will eventually refuse to co-operate. It will bare its teeth and walk in the other direction, pulling its tethers out of the sand.

So it has proved with the British voters.

Get off our backs, they said. Stop goading us. Stop being such patronising bastards.

The morning we discovered we’d break free from Europe was that unforgettable Friday, June 24, 2016.

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated. Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof

I was in a pokey hotel bedroom in London’s Bloomsbury and awoke at daybreak as the television relayed the referendum results from around the country.

I’d expected the technocracy was going to win. It always did, didn’t it? The experts had said defeat for Remain was unthinkable. Treasury officials, opinion pollsters and almost the entire diplomatic corps idly presumed Remain would win.

But it hadn’t.

Our dominating elite of parliamentarians, lobbyists, bankers, artists, political theorists, clergy, academics and sterile aesthetes was about to take a massive custard pie smack in the face.

So many well-connected people had scoffed at Brexit. They had belittled anyone who suggested it could occur.

But there it was, happening before our eyes as the BBC’s presenter, David Dimbleby, announced: ‘The British people have spoken and the answer is “we’re out!”.’

The cold print of the referendum ballot papers had merely asked voters if they wanted to stay in the EU. This result was the crystallisation of something bigger.

It was the eruption of a long-building resentment at being bossed around by an opaque snootocracy, by affluent fixers and the People Who Know Best.
 

James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x’

In my hotel room on that Independence Dawn last year, I felt a giddying rush of patriotic pride. The apple-cart had been overturned.

This was not just a public rejection of the EU. It was an act of thrilling dissent. Our arrogant elite, after years of self-enriching condescension, had been whupped.

More than a year on, I still can’t get out of my head how unrelenting the campaign was for Remain to win the popular vote.

For months before the referendum, the System did its best to engineer things in favour of the EU.

Cabinet Brexiteers were silenced. Civil servants were told to hide sensitive EU material from Eurosceptic ministers.

The government machine was used remorselessly to help Remain. We were muck-spreadered with warnings of hideous consequences from Brexit. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, was mobilised.

His friend George Osborne was Chancellor and, so far as the two of them could see, Remain was bound to win, and Clever George would become prime minister before the next general election.

Carney, a Canadian but bound to the status quo here by instinct and career, predicted Brexit would cause sterling to collapse, growth to stall and unemployment to rise.

From comedians to bishops (hard to say which of those two groups is funnier), fund managers to charity-sector tsars, Brexit was as pongy as a bad sardine. They did not just oppose it. They recoiled from it.

The reaction was not simply intellectual or even political. It was rooted in taste, aesth- etics, manners.

Let your future son-in-law have tombstone teeth, the clothes sense of Ken Dodd and a string of shoplifting offences to his name, but pray God Almighty he be not a Brexiteer.

We no longer have widowed duchesses who clutch their dewlaps in horror when they hear the word ‘serviette’, but Brexit had the same effect on managerial and technocratic types.

My wife, a sweet and liberal-minded soul, casually mentioned to a princeling of the Church of England that she intended to vote Leave. He gasped: ‘How could you?’ He might have been less aghast had she admitted to witchcraft.
 

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more’

Fashionable ‘opinion leaders’ and pliable industrialists were pressed to the Remain cause to build the idea that superior people — good people — were of one accord. They crouched down beside the voters, looked them very gravely in the eye and told the boys and girls that Mummy and Daddy would be really, really sad if Remain did not win the referendum.

Opinion pollsters said Remain would win, and in the last week of the campaign the Cameroons started to strut.

Two days before the referendum, Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee, la-di-dah Leftist and one-time owner of the most perfect villa in Italy, opined that the result was in the bag. The headline over her article read: ‘On Friday I’ll get my country back. Britain will vote Remain’.

But the voters came to a different conclusion. They decided that those prominent Remain supporters were only in it for themselves, chasing either business contracts or honours.

The Leavers were the ones who reclaimed their country. On the morning after the referendum, I headed from my hotel to work in a taxi whose driver was cock-a-hoop at the Leave vote. At the gates to the Palace of Westminster I bumped into pro-Leave Tory MP Kwasi Kwarteng, a great bear of a man. ‘This is bigger than any general election result,’ he boomed. He was right. General elections are elections for Parliament. TThe referendum was an election against Parliament, in spite of Parliament.

Abraham Lincoln once spoke of ‘government of the people, by the people, for the people’. We had drifted towards ‘government of the people, by the Parliament, for the Parliament and its fleas’.

The Establishment reacted with petulant disbelief.

Tony Blair called it ‘a foolish excursion into populism’. The then Lib Dem leader Tim Farron, 46, normally a sunny fellow, was ‘angry that today we wake to a deeply divided country’. Would he have said the same if the scores had gone the other way?

Everywhere, celebrity luvvies hyperventilated.

Actress Amanda Abbington (she was Dr Watson’s wife in Sherlock on the telly) messaged: ‘Watch the collapse begin. Dark days . . . Where can I move me and my children too (sic)? Where’s nice? Italy? Canada?’ They might have better grammar there, certainly. 

Keira Knightley was foul-mouthed. ‘Stop others f***ing with your future,’ she bleated in a message to yoof. James Corden, who left Britain to present a TV show in California, transmitted from across the water: ‘I’m so sorry to the youth of Britain. I feel you’ve been let down today. x.’

From J. K. Rowling came: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever wanted magic more.’ TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’

The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’. Damon Albarn wore a black armband.

Marianne Faithfull, famous because decades earlier she was supposed to have done something filthy with a Mars Bar and Mick Jagger, said: ‘We are back to where it used to be, the Right-wing racist Little England. Those dreadful people, they’ve always been there.’

TV presenter and sometime footballer Gary Lineker asked: ‘What have we gone and done?’ The mood at Glastonbury pop festival was funereal. Coldplay’s Chris Martin saw ‘the collapse of a country’

Emma Thompson, mother, director, writer, actress, intellectual, citizen, was, naturally, appalled by Brexit. She said she felt more European than English and she regarded Ukip’s Nigel Farage as a ‘white nationalist’.

Where that left the many non-white Leave voters and non-white Ukip supporters, it was hard to say.

The Remain camp united atheists and the modern Church of England, with former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and arch-atheist Richard Dawkins deploring the result. Science bod Dawkins, who has made a study of natural selection, raged that the voters had been ‘ill-informed’ and ‘ignorant’. Personally, I blame evolution.

Another secularist, A. C. Grayling, wrote to MPs demanding that they reject the will of the people who, said Grayling, had voted on the basis of ‘demagoguery and sentiment’.

Too many voters were merely ‘System One’ thinkers, he argued — i.e. they acted chiefly on impulse and could be ‘captured by slogans’, unlike ‘System Two’ thinkers who made more considered, logical judgments.

Shades here, of the Greek philosopher Plato, who regarded democracy as rule by the rabble and proposed the creation of elite ‘Guardians’ or ‘Philosopher Kings’ who could be selected in youth and trained to rule.

Plato’s thinking is most clearly seen today in the French grandes écoles that train the cadre of Brussels Eurocrats who propose and draft EU treaties.

Tony Blair made a speech calling on people to ‘rise up against’ ... er, themselves, basically.

Time and again it was argued by anti-Brexiteers that Leave voters did not understand the vastness of their decision.

The elite was indignant and fearful — and that only made many Leave voters all the more certain they had made the right decision.

In their appalling condescension, what all these furious anti-Brexiteers ignored were people such as a Derbyshire factory worker called Stuart Carrington and the other 17,410,741 men and women who had voted to Leave.

Stuart had also been on my mind that anxious night as we waited for the referendum result. He was my brother-in-law. (Well, as good as. He and my wife’s sister Nicky were not formally married but they had been together years.)

Fifty-four-year-old Stuart’s health had become a worry in recent months. Out of character, he took time off work. Stuart’s machine, capable of the most intricate measurements, checked parts for aircraft jet engines.

He was proud of his work, just as he was proud of Nicky, her two sons and their flat. But he knew all that was coming to an end.

The doctors initially told him he had a low-threat cancer but they changed their prognosis. That week we were told he was dying.

Yet on referendum day morning, moving with difficulty, he had managed to get himself to his local polling station in the Spital district of Chesterfield, to vote for the last time.

A gaunt figure, he leaned heavily on the stubby pencil while casting his vote. Job done, he carefully dropped his ballot into the box, thanked the officials, winced a little and made slowly for the door.

A keen supporter of Leave — and normally a Labour man, his dad having been a miner — Stuart had been determined to vote and he had bloody well managed it.

I kept thinking of stoical, taciturn Stuart.

Those northern men don’t always say much but by God they make their mark. Stuart was not a showy person. He did not consider himself important, not in the way we normally use that term.

Not back then. Maybe things are a little different now. Maybe, with Brexit, the balance of power has shifted a little.

Maybe, but I wouldn’t bank on it.

As I will show in the rest of this series based on my new book, the patronising bastards are everywhere, lording it over the plebs, putting us in our place, waving their entitlement in our face, telling us what to think and what to do.

And not just over Brexit but on every issue under the sun.

And the biggest ‘bastard’ of them all, at the very top of my list of patricians treating the rest of us with contempt? I’ll reveal his identity on Monday.

Adapted from Patronising Bastards: How The Elites Betrayed Britain, by Quentin Letts, published by Constable on October 12 at £16.99. © Quentin Letts 2017. To order a copy for £13.59 (offer valid to October 14, 2017) visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640. P&P is free on orders over £15.


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4957180/Britain-s-ruled-patronising-b-rds-says-QUENTIN-LETTS.html#ixzz4uqBaZlGZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

6/10/17

 

 

H.F.1338 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT A SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU.
 

David Cameron

 asked Daily Mail owner to sack

Paul Dacre over Brexit

 

 THE GUARDIAN

https://www.theguardian.com/...

 
David Cameron asked Lord Rothermere if Dacre could ‘cut him some slack’, a source told Newsnight. Photograph: Robin Jerstad/Rex/Shutterstock
David Cameron pressed the owner of the Daily Mail to sack his avowedly pro-Brexit editor, Paul Dacre, in the run-up to last year’s EU referendum.

A source indicated that Lord Rothermere, whose family owns the newspaper, told Dacre that the then-prime minister had suggested he sack him, in a story that was first reported by the BBC’s Newsnight programme.

The Mail was one of the most vociferous voices for Britain to leave the EU before the 23 June referendum.

Dacre and Cameron met at the PM’s Downing Street flat on 2 February 2016, the day after Cameron’s planned new deal with the EU to ward off Brexit was announced.

There Cameron asked Dacre to “cut him some slack”, but was rebuffed - although the account has been denied by a spokesman for Cameron.

Early the following month, Dacre was told by a “Westminster source” that Cameron had sought to persuade Rothermere – who inherited French nationality, along with the newspaper, from his father for tax reasons – to sack him, making the editor “incandescent” and all the more determined to push for Brexit.

It was only in July, after the referendum, that Rothermere personally told his editor of the pressure from Cameron.
 

A spokesman for Rothermere refused to deny the story. The spokesman said: “Over the years, Lord Rothermere has been leant on by more than one prime minister to remove Associated Newspapers’ editors but, as he told Lord Justice Leveson on oath, he does not interfere with the editorial policies of his papers.”

Dacre said in a statement: “For 25 years, I have been given the freedom to edit the Mail on behalf of its readers without interference from Jonathan Rothermere or his father. It has been a great joy and privilege.”

A spokesman for Cameron said: “It is wrong to suggest that David Cameron believed he could determine who edits the Daily Mail. It is a matter of public record that he made the case that it was wrong for newspapers to argue that we give up our membership of the EU.

“He made this argument privately to the editor of the Daily Mail, Paul Dacre, and its proprietor, Lord Rothermere.”

 
Topics

' Nothing , indeed, but the possession of power can with any certainty discover what at the bottom is the true character of any man.'-

EDMUND BURKE

 

 

H.F.1820

 

 
 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

    A maestro of hypocrisy, he's as shameless as a thief in

     

     

    a charity shop by Quentin Letts - Daily Mail

     

    That we-know-best minority aside, last night was a

    TRIUMPH FOR DEMOCRACY

    For once

    , even Jeremy Corbyn showed he understood the word, ordering his party to

     

    vote for triggering BREXIT (albeit at the cost of tearing Labour further apart.)

     

    But what a battle it has been to get to this stage. In the referendum campaign, David Cameron and George Osborne used every despicable weapon in their armoury to try to scare and dupe voters.

    More!

    *

     

    Daily Mail: 2017-02-02

     

    - WE HAVE LIFT-OFF!

    *

     

    [AS was in the case in the 1970's by  Macmillan and Edward Heath and many

    others to snare the unsuspecting British people into the  Hitler's plan in 1942

    for German domination of Europe even after they lost the war.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1101

STEPHEN GLOVER: Has the gulf between rulers and the ruled ever been more starkly shown than in the passport fiasco?

By Stephen Glover for the Daily Mail

April  5,2018

To those of us who believe that the new British passport should be printed in this country, there is a common rebuke delivered by Remainers and Brexiteers alike.

Don't you believe in free trade? Isn't preferring the more expensive bid of a British company to that of a European one an example of protectionism and insularity?

Surely — these critics go on — insisting that the new blue passports be manufactured even at a slightly greater cost in the United Kingdom runs counter to all the spirited talk about post-Brexit Global Britain.

I disagree. And I very much hope the Government will reconsider its choice of the Franco-Dutch company Gemalto in the light of a Mail-inspired petition with well over 300,000 signatures, being delivered to No 10 today.

Symbolism

Indeed, I am certain these doughty people speak for millions. 

A YouGov poll found that 49 per cent of respondents believe the blue passports should be produced by a UK company even if an overseas firm offered better prices or services. Some 29 per cent disagreed.

Will Theresa May and Home Secretary Amber Rudd listen? The answer to that question depends on the degree to which they have grasped that this, above all, is a matter of symbolism which towers above financial considerations.

As it happens, nearly all these considerations collapse under examination. I'll come to these later. 

But first let me explain why I think that where the passports are printed is of such totemic importance.

More than any other document in our lives, the blue passport represents the revival of British sovereignty and independence sparked by the referendum on June 23, 2016.
 

I very much hope the Government will reconsider its choice of the Franco-Dutch company Gemalto in the light of a Mail-inspired petition with well over 300,000 signatures, being delivered to No 10 today, writes Stephen Glover 

Some Remainers scoff, of course. They say sovereignty and independence are illusions in an interconnected world except for huge continental powers like the United States or China. 

The blue passport means nothing to such people. In fact, many would rather keep their burgundy one.

But for most of those who voted Brexit, the blue passport is the very essence of what was taken away from us and has now been restored.

That is why it must be truly British. The new passport should be what it purports to be — a document signifying that the 'bearer' (to use the term included in the document's preamble) is a citizen of an independent nation.

And this will categorically not be the case if a Franco-Dutch company manufactures it in its low-cost Polish plant, or even in a factory in the UK. For one thing, Gemalto is expected soon be a quarter owned by the French state.

What happens if its workers should strike, or if the firm in some other way should fail to fulfil all aspects of its contract with the British Government?

Well, the Government would be powerless in the short-term to do anything at all. 

The symbol of regained independence would turn out, in practice, to be subject to the vagaries of a foreign conglomerate beyond its control.

By contrast, the British-based company De La Rue — which makes our current EU passport, and was underbid by Gemalto for the blue one — has never missed a delivery in the decade of its current contract.

Nor has De La Rue's loyal (and predominantly Brexit-supporting) workforce in Gateshead in the North-East, where current passports are made, lost a single day to industrial action.

Meanwhile, it transpires that Gemalto's record of reliability is far from flawless. 
 

A YouGov poll found that 49 per cent of respondents believe the blue passports should be produced by a UK company even if an overseas firm offered better prices or services. Some 29 per cent disagreed

It is embroiled in a national security row with the Estonian government after hundreds of thousands of state ID cards made by the firm were judged vulnerable to cyber-attack. 

The Estonian government (and others) are reportedly considering legal action against Gemalto, which has not had its contract renewed. From 2019, the cards will be produced elsewhere.

One might add that Gemalto's commercial viability is also not beyond question. It has posted four profit warnings in 18 months. 

Can anyone be 100 per cent certain that the company will deliver everything it is contracted to?

The point is a simple one. A new UK passport, standing as it does for our recovered independence, should be printed in conditions over which a sovereign British Government has as much control as is possible.

Of course we can't — and here we must grapple with the financial considerations I mentioned — ignore the matter of money. Gemalto underbid De La Rue by £120 million over an 11-year period to win the £490 million contract.

Furore

Set aside for a moment whether it can deliver at that price. Ignore possibly well-founded insinuations that Gemalto's bid was below cost price, and that the company is in receipt of covert loans or subsidies from the French government.

No, let us proceed as though that £120 million over ten years — £12 million a year — were real. Consider, then, the cost to the state of the mooted 200 job losses at De La Rue's Gateshead plant.

In an area of higher-than- average unemployment, many of these people would be thrown on the dole. 

 

Will Theresa May (pictured) and Home Secretary Amber Rudd listen? The answer to that question depends on the degree to which they have grasped that this, above all, is a matter of symbolism which towers above financial considerations

They would no longer pay income tax or National Insurance. Significantly poorer, they would buy less, and so pay less VAT. And they would be in receipt of all sorts of welfare benefits.

It's impossible to predict what the cost would be to the Inland Revenue in lost tax, or the extra burden to the Department for Work and Pensions in new benefits, but we can be sure there would be considerable inroads into the annual 'saving' of £12 million.

And then, of course, there is the human side of the equation. The North-East is one of the poorest regions of the UK. 

Many of its inhabitants feel forgotten and forsaken by successive governments — which partly explains why such large numbers there voted Leave.

Betrayal

Are the Tories really going to betray these dutiful people when there are already so many strong arguments concerning sovereignty and independence, not to mention reasonable doubts about Gemalto's ability to deliver? It would be a wrong-headed and careless thing to do.

Don't forget that France, Germany, Italy and Spain all insist that their passports are produced on home soil, citing security concerns. 

But the British Government dumbly plays by EU rules (even though we are leaving) and gives the contract to the lowest European bidder.

When this furore blew up two weeks ago, the Government in general, and Amber Rudd in particular, looked shell-shocked. 

The Home Secretary could not understand why her decision was deemed by so many as unpatriotic — as well as pretty bone-headed.

Seldom has the gulf between our rulers and the ruled been so dramatically illuminated. 

It's one thing to hop along reluctantly to the mood music of Brexit, as Miss Rudd generally does. It's quite another thing to understand its heart.

It's not too late. Labour wants the blue passports to be made in this country to protect jobs. Tory free-traders can surely be induced to accept that giving the contract to De La Rue is not an affront to the idea of global trade.

The Government must grasp that this is an issue about sovereignty and independence and looking after our own people. In truth, it's really about the future of Britain.



 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5579921/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Gulf-rulers-ruled-highlighted-Brexit-passport-fiasco.html#ixzz5BpSECWOz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

APRIL 5,2018

 

H.F.1515
 
LITTLEJOHN

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: May should have solved this 'migrant crisis' in 2016'

 Government ignored the problem of illegals crossing the Channel when it
first surfaced more than two-and-a-half years ago.

 

May should

have solved this migrant crisis in 2016

 

 

READERS of a certain age will remember the famous Eighties TV commercial for an insurance company that promised:

'We wont make a drama out of a crisis.'

The advert was intended to reassure customers that no matter what calamity might befall them, their problems would be solved with  the minimum of fuss.

Sadly, it's a message that has been lost on our modern generation of politicians, who are guaranteed to turn any minor hiccup into a full-blown, multi-million dollar Hollywood production number.

Not that there's anything minor about the current cross-Channel traffic in illegal immigrants coming ashore on the Kent coast in increasing numbers. Since the story exploded on a slow news day over Christmas, the Government  has gone into full headless chicken mode.

With great fanfare, Home Secretary Sajid Javid cuts short his family holiday in Africa to fly home and 'take control' of the situation. Everything is going according to the script. Javid arrives back in the middle of the night and changes from jeans and zipper jacket into his

'I'm in Charge' blue suit.

Hours later, he leaves his London home through a scrum of telivision reporters shouting inane questions, which they know perfectly well he has no intention of answering.

He convenes emergency meetings in Whitehall , then announcing a plan of action despite admitting in a newspaper article that, actually, there's very little he can do to stop the influx of Iranians and other assorted foreign nationals making their way across the Channel.

Javid could order the Navy to turn back any dinghy bound for Kent and return any passengers to France.

But he's already rejected an offer of naval assistance from Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson because he doesn't want Williamson to gain any political advantage at his expense.

STILL he has to be seen to be doing something, anything, to justify his dash back from his safari holiday. How long before Javid is filmed heading out to sea on the prow of a coastguard boat, like George Washington leading his troops across  the Delaware River during the American Revolution-only in a hi-viz jacket, rather than a general's uniform and tricorn hat.

Mind you, given this Government's track record of dealing with illegal immigration, a better analogy would be  Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet on the Titanic. All that matters is that Javid creates an impression of frantic activity, with him at the centre of it.

None of this would be necessary, of course, had the Government not ignored the problem of illegals crossing the Channel when it first surfaced more than two-and-a-half years ago.

It's not as if they didn't know it was happening. Between March and May 2016, there were at least eight recorded incidents of Border Force officials intercepting attempts to enter Britain by boat, via beaches in Kent and Sussex.

On May 31 that year, after 18 Albanians were picked up in a  rubber dinghy off Kent I wrote a spoof Shipping Forecast, illustrated by a Gary cartoon, of a country under siege from foreign nationals on a variety of inflatables.

 

Here's the flavour of it.

'Forties, Dogger. High chance of Iraqis, pretending to be Syrians, seen clinging to lilos near North Sea oil rig, bound for Bridlington...'

You get the idea. And still they kept coming , unhindered, throughout the summer. In September 2016, the Mail's Sue Reid hired out a small inflatable boat in France and sailed across the Channel to Dover. She passed a French coastguard vessel, a naval patrol and landed safely without anyone challenging her or asking to see her passport

Six days earlier, a group of illegal immigrants  had jumped off a private boat near Felixstowe, in Suffolk, and simply vanished.

In November 2016, I returned to the subject, when a man who claimed to be Iranian, but probably wasn't, was found rowing towards Britain in an inflatable kayak.

I wrote at the time: 'Instead of towing him back to Calais, he was rescued and given a lift to Croydon , where his asylum claim was processed. If the authorities aren't going to deport them to France, it will only encourage even more desperate illegals to attempt the hazardous journey in everything from children's paddling pools to inflatable armbands...

'I don't know if anyone has yet landed in Margate clinging to one of Del Boy's blow-up sex dolls, but, at any rate, it can only be a

MATTER OF TIME...

 

[We are only half-way through this article but we are sure you get the full picture of the ease in which illegals can enter our country, and the total failure of successive governments to stop it. But it is no surprise when you list the many failures of policy on matters essential to  the DEFENCE of the REALM and LAW and ORDER...  over decades, which we have shown on our website, that one wonders what use many of our politicians are when the same shortcomings arise year after year and decade after decade. The dilatory way that BREXIT -the voice of 17.4 million  People - has been handled, has confirmed this unfortunate trend.]

 

TO BE CONTINUED SHORTLY

 

...WHAT he has inherited is merely the culmination of more than two-and-a-half years of incompetence, indifference and inaction.

So who was Home Secretary back then?

LET ME THINK

Oh yes. It was the same Home Secretary responsible for the Windrush scandal, for which her successor

HAD TO CARRY THE CAN.

The same Home Secretary who abandoned the

STOP AND SEARCH

leading to the explosion of knife crime in London

The same Home Secretary whose reputation as a 'safe pair of hands' propelled her into  10 Downing Street after Call Me Dave resigned, even though

SHE VOTED REMAIN

and spent the referendum campaign hiding behind the sofa.

The same Home Secretary who as Prime Minister ordered Javid to cut short his holiday to deal with something she should have nipped in the bud

TWO AND-A-HALF-YEARS AGO.

And still some people wonder how she managed to make such a

COMPLETE HORLICKS

 OF

BREXIT

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you

THERESA MAY,

Someone who can always be relied upon to make a

DRAMA OUT OF A CRISIS.

 

HAPPY NEW YEAR

*  *  *

 

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: May should have solved this 'migrant crisis' in 2016'

 

*  *  *

 

JANUARY 1,2019

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-CHANGES OF FORM- ARE OURS]

 

H.F.1772
 
 
 

 ENGLAND

 

JUST A FEW OF OUR THOUSANDS OF BULLETINS MANY ON

HITLER'S SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION
   
 

 SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL
 

DEATH OF A GIANT-A DAY TO REMEMBER
 

ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]
 

ST GEORGE`S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARES' BIRTHDAY  [23rd April]
 

SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 1.
 

Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 2
 

Our basic Liberties and Freedoms – to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part I
 

Our basic Liberties and Freedoms - to be surrendered to a Foreign Power? - Part II
 

TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANAYSIS By NORRIS McWHIRTER - Least We Forget.
 

Why can’t we have the right to be English? - Part 1
 

Why can’t we have the right to be English? - Part 2
 

DON'T LET THEM LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY.
 

10 Reasons of how to destroy - our Nation.
 

 Petition to the Queen
 

So You Thought You Were Free- By Vernon Coleman
 

Could England Survive Outside The EU? -YES!
 

Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution
 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’
 

DON'T LET THEM LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY.
 

A Voice from 1962 about the Common Market.
 

Democracy without Morality and respect for Individuality is Despotism..
 

 A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 1.

 

A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 2.
 

 A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time - Part 3.
 

Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.
 

 Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States - Part 1
 

Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States - Part 2
 

Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.
 

Why Members of Parliament must be restricted to one term of office to protect their Independence.
 

 Marriage is when two people become one. Cohabitation is when two people remain two.
 

 Canterbury Cathedral is not just a building, nor even just a cathedral. It is England in stone.
 

A STORY OF SACRIFICE-THE SPITFIRE -ITS DESIGNER R.J.MITCHELL-A SAVIOUR OF THE SKIES OVER ENGLAND.
 

THE BILL THAT COULD TURN THIS COUNTRY INTO A DICTATORSHIP
 

 'There'll always Be an ENGLAND' -NOT any MORE

 

You Can't Seperate Politics and Morals.
 

ENGLAND is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in BLAIR's  POLITICALLY -CORRECT ENGLAND
 

SAVE YOUR ENGLAND-SAY NO TO THE EU REGIONS 
 

WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT.
PT I
 

‘I say we must not join Europe’-
Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery.
 

OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?
 

THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING -A CONSPIRACY to prevent the TRUTH emerging about Corruption and Treason in our country TODAY.
 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING
 

MULTICULTURALISM HAS BETRAYED ENGLISH CULTURE SAYS ARCHBISHOP OF YORK
 

ENGLAND is ALREADY SECOND ONLY to HOLLAND as the MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE
 

Multicultural policies have effectively divided the population into ethnic and faith communities
 

ENGLISH FREEDOM - WHY IT IS YOURS?
SAY 'NO' TO THE EU

 

CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP
 

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.
 

GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT BY JOHN GOURIET
 

 WHY WE NEED A PASSPORT TO FREEDOM
 

A Champion of Individualism from the late 19th century exposes the fallacies in collectivism and central planning.
 

 

THE SLAVERY PROTESTORS FAIL TO LOOK WITHIN THEIR OWN CULTURE AND HISTORY

*

The slavery protests' guilty secret

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-March 30, 2007]

 

The other celebration this week has been confused. Were we proud that Parliament had backed William Wilberforce's Bill to abolish the shameful slave trade, or were we in a familiar

ON-OUR-KNEES

POSITION

-and apologising for ever being involved in it?

If the latter, then it would have been helpful to hear someone of African descent also apologising for the

FACT

-that SLAVERY continued throughout that continent for decades afterwards, except where colonial governments like Britain managed to suppress it -in face of fierce [African] local opposition.

It might have been helpful, too, if the protesters of African descent had vented some of their spleen on the

ARAB SLAVE TRADERS

-who carried on for so long with their particularly vicious form of

SLAVE TRADING

They systematically

and crudely castrated their victims, which killed the great majority of them

PERHAPS

-the slavery protesters have called on the

ARAB NATIONS

-for a few billions of their oil revenues in

COMPENSATION

BUT IF SO, I FAILED TO NOTICE IT.

*          *          *

A SUMMARY OF THE SLAVE TRADE

 

..From Britain, the largest slave trader and the greatest offender the movement sprang which successfully abolished slavery in the British Isles in 1772, then the slave trade in 1806, then slavery itself in the British Dominions in 1833, and finally so worked on the conscience of the world as to secure a large and nearly universal concurrence of action for the extirpation of the evil.

The credit for securing from Lord Mansfield the famous decision in the case of

JAMES SOMERSET (1772)

-that the status of slavery was unknown to the

COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND

was due to

GRANVILLE SHARP

-a civil servant, inconspicuous in wealth and station, but of a rare warmth of heart and persistence of character, who once fired by the cruel usage of a negro slave in the streets of London, never rested until he had obtained the verdict which for ever afterwards rid the British islands of the taint of slavery.

Thereafter comes a roll of English emancipators whose names even in a general history of Europe are worthy of

COMMEMORATION

-William Wilberforce, Thomas Clarkson, Zachary Macaulay and James Stephen, whose preparatory labours, sustained over a period of twenty years, enabled Charles Fox to carry the

ABOLITION OF THE SLAVE TRADE

Thomas Fowel Buxton, the parliamentary leader of the

ABOLITIONISTS

-who worked up the

HOUSE OF COMMONS

-to abolish slavery; and Lord Brougham, who carried the torch through the country; Lord Palmerston, who stopped the slave trade between

PORTUGAL and BRAZIL

-and the noble group of missionaries, soldiers, and statesmen, David Livingston, Charles Gordon, Sir John Kirk, and Lord Lugard, by whose efforts in large measure

AFRICA

-has been opened up and

RID OF THE CURSE

of the

ARAB SLAVE -RAIDER

Lecky does no more than

JUSTICE

when he states the

THE CRUSADE of ENGLAND

AGAINST SLAVERY

"may probably be regarded as among the three or four perfectly virtuous pages in the history of nations'

[A History of Europe by H.A.L.FISHER -1936]

 

*

 

[Today in March 2007 we have a Government which does not deserve a mention in history as it has had no virtuous events in the past ten years. It will be remembered as a Government not trusted by the people and which has brought a once proud and just nation to kneeling before the  politically correct diverse minority who have not lost any opportunity to degrade the nation which today should not be on its knees but standing with thankfulness that their descendents had showed Christian fellowship with all mankind remembering the words dedicated above to the many who saw an injustice and abolished a vile trade which at the time was responded too because of our standing and reputation in the corridors of power throughout the world.]

What is unforgivable that an opportunity to honour an 18th and 19th century of a

BAND of BROTHERS

-had been lost because a people who once had confidence and pride in their country and have lost their way and  have become the 'silent people' because they are afraid (they think) to offend.

Our minority cultures have all been taught that they can be a part of our country but not of it. They can demand their voice is heard but not that of the majority who are of this country. this pattern was launched by

MULTICULTURALISM

-which has now been discredited -as it has done immense harm to community relations in our country.

IT IS TIME FOR OUR MINORITIES TO FORGET THEIR ENCOURAGED DIFFERENCES AND IN FUTURE TO BE AS WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN THE PAST

ALL ONE

Whoever you are and from wherever you have come.

 

LET US ALL BE

A

 

BAND OF BROTHERS AND SISTERS

AND

NOT LOOK FOR OUR DIFFERENCES.

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

[Daily Mail-March 30, 2007]

 

*

H.F.1675
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 SEP 19

OCT-19

NOV-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

 THE DOWNFALL

OF

A ONCE DECLARED

 IRON LADY

AND

HER ARDENT AND PASSIONATE PROMISE

 IN 2016

 

'BETTER A

NO DEAL

THAN A BAD DEAL'

*

'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT'

*

'TO LEAVE

THE EU

ON

MARCH 29,2019'

AS we had previously stated

COMPROMISE

should never be considered

when the return of our ancient freedoms given away by a so-called

 CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT

IN

 1972

to be reclaimed in

March 2019

in answer to a people's vote in a

REFERENDUM

 in

JUNE 2O16

 

when an overwhelming

17.4 MILLION PATRIOTS

VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE COUNTRY

FROM THE CRUMBLING CONFIDENCE TRICK

calling itself the

EUROPEAN UNION

soon to be a

SUPERSTATE

*

A great historian has observed,-

'That honesty is the best policy, is a maxim which we firmly believe to be generally correct, even with respect to the temporal interest of individuals; but with respect to societies, the rule is subject to still fewer exceptions, and that for this reason, that the life of societies is larger than individuals.  It is possible to mention men who have owed great worldly prosperity to breaches of private faith: but we doubt whether it is possible to mention a state which has, on the whole, been a gainer by a breach of public faith.,'

[We all know politicians since we have been in Hitler's so-called European Union who fit this bill. Many have gained abundant riches and have left the People to suffer the consequences of their wicked deeds of death and destruction... and the result is clearly demonstrated further by the actions of many Remainer MPs who have decided not to keep their promise to accept the result of the Peoples referendum of June, 2016, which they sanctioned; which is a derogation of their duty to their constituents-a clear breach of political accountability to those they serve.]

August 8,2019

H.F.1424

'Trust not him that has broken faith.'

SHAKESPEARE

*
 Could the European elections herald the end of the EU - Eurosceptic parties all across the EU look like doing well!.... - Daily Express

https://www.express.co.uk/.../expresscomment/.../european-election-2019-vote-end-eu-comment-ross-clark
‎
 *
 AGITATION
Agitation prevents rebellion, keeps the peace, and secures progress. Every step she gains is gained forever. Muskets are the weapons of animals. Agitation is the atmosphere of the brains.-
Wendell Phillips. Am.orator

*
 Eurosceptics are fighting for the return of freedoms once secured by MAGNA CARTA and the PETITION of RIGHT.
 

 

 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

Posted on 2019/05/27 by

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
 By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

May 27, 2019

 

H.F.1853/1

 

 

H.F.1849

*

[A REMINDER OF A SOLEMN PROMISE!]

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 
 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

March against

The

 Donald!

News for DAILY MAIL-March against THE DONALD! by Richard Littlejohn

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: March against The Donald (that's Tusk, not Trump)

 

(That's TUSK not Trump

LOOKING forward to the march against  The Donald? Me too! It's time we showed this tinpot dictator exactly what the British people think of him.

Frankly we're had our fill of this preening middle-aged sexist pig throwing his weight around. We're sick of his arrogant tweets and contempt for democracy.

Who the hell does this self-styled 'Mr President' think he is? So join me Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson at the

STOP TUSK rally.

I,ve already ordered the inflatable Baby Donald to be flown over the Houses of Parliament.

While  I'm at it, maybe I'll commision giant hot air balloons of a naked Jean-Claude Drunker, Michael Barnier and Angela Merkel.

Then we can invite ther Provisional Wing of the Country Alliance to bring along their shotguns and blast these grotesque puffed -up politicians out of the sky, like grouse on the Glorious  Twelfth.

I'm sure Farage would lend me one of his matched Purdeys. If not, I'd settle for a second-hand sawn-off, left over from a South London blagging. What a joy it would be giving both barrels to effigies of Donald Tusk and the rest of mthe European elite.

Sorry, what's that? You thought when I referrred to Donald', I was talking about

PRESIDENT TRUMP

I can see why you might have leapt to that conclusion. The usual suspects are already salivating at the prospect of their next demo against Trump, when he arrives in Britain for the Nato summit in December.

That's if a a rumoured state vist this summer does't go ahead. His official trip, last July was an excuse for a petulant display of protests, which cost taxpayers

£14 MIILLION TO POLICE.

Thousands of demonstrators, many in fancy dress, marched through London in a carnival atmosphere, wearing novelty headgear and waving placards plastered with obscener slogans. No one has yet explained to me why a red

'Make America Great Again'

baseball  cap

is an affront

to

decency

 yet  a  hat resembling giant female  genitalia

  is  perfectly acceptable.

In Trafalgar square, they gathered under a 'Baby Trump' blimp, given the thumps up by London's two-bob chancer of a mayor Saqiq Khaqn, and cheered a succession of Left-wing rabble rousers heaping vitriol on the leader of our most important ally. Now they're limbering up to do it all over again. The Lib Dems (11 MPs and the Green Party (one MP) are promising to be 'front and centre'.

No doubt O. J. (Oh, Jeremy) Corbyn will be there, too, blaming America for the humanitarian crisis in bankrupt, corrupt, socialist Venezuela. Try stopping him.

And when this orgy of condemnation and self-congratulation is over, and everyone has repaired to the pub until Glastonbury comes around again, will any of them stop to think why they're protesting- and what on earth it is they hope to achieve?

Trump may be pretty unsavoury for the delicate palates of snowflake types and the dwindling band of prigs who still buy the Guardian

OK so he offends their own set of 'principles' and sense of self righteousness. But given that the people define themselves by who they hate, if Trump didn't exist they'd have to invent him

He's not exactly my cup of meat either. But his greatest virtue is his ability to send all the right people into a deranged frensy.

What Trump does on the home front is entirely a matter for the American voters, who elected him once already and will have to decide whether to award him a second term.

 

So WHAT if he puts

 'AMERICA FIRST' ?

THAT'S HIS JOB,

If only we had a Prime Minister who put

BRITAIN FIRST.

Rather than bite his hand off, all the resentful Remainer camp could do was scaremonger about chlorinated American chicken, which was going to wipe out half the population. (Never mind the poisonous Romanian horsemeat the EU sent us.)

U.S. military might has ensured the PEACE in EUROPE since WORLD WAR II, which is why it is perfectly appropriate that the President is coming to Britain in December to mark the

70th ANNIVERSARY OF THE NATO ALLIANCE

 

Yes, Trump managed to upset European leaders by insisting that they keep their side of the bargain and commit two per cent of GDP to defence. But he was right to do so. And his uncompromising negotiating stance paid dividends securing an extra 100 billion for Nato from Europe

It's a pity MotherTheresa has learned nothing from Trump's success in playing hardball with our 'partners' .Instead, she let's them trample a

ll over her.

I was only half-joking when I said we should march against

THE OTHER DONALD.

As Tusk's latest outburst illustrates only too well, he treats our female Prime Minister-and the British people -with distain, patronising  her with snide comments and snarky Tweets

Had Trump done the same, we'd never hear the last of it

 

President Trump, I repeat, only wants

FRIENDSHIP and FREE TRADE

TUSK and the rest of the self-perpetuating conga line of unelected EU 'presidents' aim to humiliate, subjugate and punish us into a permanent prisoner of their

ROTTEN, ANTIDEMOCRATIC EMPIRE.

 

The 17.4 million who voted Leave -Chesterton's 'secret people'-are not the type to take to the streets. Nor, it should be said, are most of the decent folk who backed Remain. We leave the demos to the noisy show-offs determined to draw attention to themselves, whatever the convenient cause

BUT IF WE MUST HAVE ANOTHER TIRESOME MARCH AGAINST A

THE DONALD,

LET'S GIVE TRUMP A MISS FOR ONCE, AND PROTEST AGAINST OUR

REAL ENEMY

DONOLD TUSK

News for DAILY MAIL-March against THE DONALD! by Richard Littlejohn

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: March against The Donald (that's Tusk, not Trump)

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1788

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 
A MATTER OF CONCERN!

 

 

Browse: Home / Updated – Bishop Williamson: On the New Religion of ‘Holocaustanity’

Essential Reading

Who Are The Illuminati?

By on April 24, 2004

Conspiracy theory is now an accepted turn of phrase but sometimes one hears the expression, sometimes whispered rather than spoken. “The Illuminati”.

Category: ,

The Marijuana Trick

By on November 17, 2005

Doug Yurchey looks at the history of Hemp and the real reason why it is now illegal. As with so many other things, we’ve been sold a lie to maximise the profits of a few

Category: ,

REPOST: US ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt’ – Report

By on April 8, 2017

This appeared early, 2013, but was removed from the Mail’s website. Fortunately some observers copied extracts, which we repost here

Category: ,

“Dark Forces”

By on January 23, 2008

There are few real accidents in history and the version we see in the history books, may have happened entirely differently in reality. A prime example being the murder of Rasputin nearly 100 years ago

Category: , ,

9/11 and Zion: What Was Israel’s Role?

By on August 31, 2012

When Netanyahu said the very next day, ‘This is very good for Israel”, he wasn’t just blurting out something indiscreet, he was publicly congratulating the various agents who had worked so hard

Category: , ,

Coming Clean

By on April 29, 2004

Chemtrails are not the product of some ‘Conspiracy Theory’. They are real. We get the low down from an aircraft mechanic who has done his own investigating

Category: ,

Untold Truths About the Planned War on Iran

By on April 9, 2013

Dynamite documentary: Press TV talks to former White House insider Gwenyth Todd about the push for war with Iran. She has subsequently escaped to Australia to avoid FBI prosecution. Essential viewing

Category: , , ,

General Ivashov: “International terrorism does not exist”

By on February 24, 2007

Gen. Leonid Ivashov was Chief of Staff of Russian armed forces when the 9/11 attacks took place, but he says, they weren’t carried out by Osama or al-Qaeeda. The most likely culprits, says the General, were transnational mafias and international oligarchs

Category: , ,

The Essene Gospel of Peace I

By on April 26, 2007

Based on texts found in the Vatican library and the Royal Library of the Hapsburg’s and dated to the first century AD, the following is considered by some to be the real words of Christ

Category: ,

The Essene Gospel of Peace II

By on April 26, 2007

Translated by Purcell Weaver and Edmond Szekely from its original Aramiac, a language that today few know but 2000 years ago was the language that Christ spoke and taught with

Category: ,

Updated – Bishop Williamson: On the New Religion of ‘Holocaustanity’

By on February 3, 2019

By Bishop Williamson – Darkmoon Feb 2, 2019

Patience, dear friends, the Truth can take its time
To refute a hollow cause, a real thought-crime.

williamson on holocaustainityMany Catholics seem to think that what is called the “Holocaust” has nothing to do with religion. They are very mistaken. Here are two (slightly edited) paragraphs from the handsome tribute paid to the late Professor Robert Faurisson by Jérôme Bourbon, brave editor of the excellent Paris weekly Rivarol:
Not only did Professor Faurisson by his research and famous phrase of 60 words threaten the ideological foundations of the world order issuing from World War II, but he also called in question the religion (or counter-religion) of “Holocaustianity.”
It is a veritable religion, demanding respect and submission. Its false god requires a homage of adoration, a constant burning of incense before it, a flame to be lit like at Yad Vashem, flowers to be offered, and wailing to go up to Heaven, like at the pilgrimages and processions to Auschwitz and elsewhere, while people must beat their breasts, crying out “Never again!”
“Holocaustianity,” taught from primary school to the end of one’s days, by television, cinema and every form of entertainment, does in fact ape all features of the Catholic religion.
It has its martyrs (the Six Million), its Saints (Elie Wiesel, Anne Frank), its miracles (“Holocaust” survivors), its stigmatists (tattooed camp-inmates), its pilgrimages (to Auschwitz, etc.), its temples and cathedrals (“Holocaust” museums and memorials), its alms-giving to obtain pardon (never-ending reparation payments to Israel and to “Holocaust” survivors), its relics (camp inmates’ teeth, hair, shoes, etc.), its lives of the Saints (books by Elie Wiesel, Anne Frank, etc.), its torture chambers (gas-chambers), its Gospel (the verdict of the post-war Nuremberg military tribunal), its High Priests and Pontiffs (Simon Wiesenthal), its Inquisition (anti-Revisionist civil law-courts), its laws against blasphemy (strictly forbidding any questioning of the “Holocaust”), its Holy City (modern Jerusalem), its preachers and guardians (all instructors and associations in politics, the media, religion, trade unions, sports and economics), its religious Congregations (World Jewish Congress, B’nai B’rith, AIPAC, etc., etc.), its Hell (for all nationalists – except Israelis! – all revisionists, all believers in the deicide and in the New Testament replacing the Old, etc.), and its faithful (almost all of mankind).
However, not only does “Holocaustianity” ape Christianity, it also turns it inside out:
instead of love, hate; instead of truth, lies; instead of forgiveness, Talmudic vengeance; instead of respect for elders, the hunting down of aged camp-guards; instead of the spirit of poverty, the pursuit of reparation payments; instead of humility, the drive to dominate; instead of sharing, the pursuit of personal gain; instead of charity, blackmail; instead of respect for others, lynching; instead of quiet and discretion, publicity and noisy accusations in the media; instead of the boundless justice of God, the brazen injustice of conquerors setting themselves up as judges of the conquered, and so on and so on.
faurissonzionthugs
Here is a sonnet to honour what Prof. Faurisson did to get this monkey off of mankind’s back:

In Honour of Robert Faurisson (1929-2018)

“The Truth is mighty, and will prevail,” they said.
“Oh no!” one race replied, “the Truth we make–
“We are the Master Race, of all men head,
Our truth is what inferiors have to take!”
And thus a whole mythology arose
From how this race remoulded two World Wars.
On weak minds horror chambers they impose
To fake a god that everyone adores.
Yet one frail Frenchman braved the racist lies:
“Picture us one such genuine chamber—one!”
But pictures there were none to show. With cries
Of rage, the racists knew that Truth had won.
In God, Professor, you did not believe;
But you He used, all races to relieve.
Kyrie eleison.

Source

Posted in , , | 2 Responses

2 responses to “Updated – Bishop Williamson: On the New Religion of ‘Holocaustanity’”

  1. Bishop Williamson: On the New Religion of 'Holocaustanity' – Darkmoon February 3, 2019 at 11:08 am |
    […] Published on The Truthseeker […]
  2. APPAF Newsletter 02-04-2019 | APPAF February 3, 2019 at 10:00 pm |
    […] Truth Seeker: Updated – Bishop Williamson: On the New Religion of ‘Holocaustanity’ By Bishop … […]

FEBRUARY 4,2019

 

H.F.1792
 

A MAN of VISION-A LEARNED PATRIOT for whom LONDON DOCKERS MARCHED on WESTMINSTER in his SUPPORT-HISTORY has VALIDATED his FEARS.

*

 

Words

Enoch would never have uttered

 

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail- Friday, November 9, 2007]

 

 

THERE is a long standing form of moral evasion popular among politicians - and some journalists too - which has always intrigued me , if only for its

IMPUDENCE

It involves Enoch Powell's so called 'river of blood' speech in 1968, whose recollection has forced the resignation of the Tory candidate for Halesowen and Rowley Regis. The speech itself, incidentally, was notable for understating the prospective immigrant population.

 

'Ah, yes, you see,' the cry of the political elite has long run (I read it again last week),

'It was that speech , that phrase, which made rational discussion of immigration impossible.'

Note the implication that these people had been indulging in a rational debate on immigration only to be thrown off course by Powell's hand-grenade.

Let me assure you with every fibre of my being that a rational discussion was just what leading politicians were avoiding.

THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

by both front benches

-which drove Powell to fury.

Far from making thoughtful debate impossible, his speech and reaction made it

VERY URGENT

As an admirer and friend of Powell I was myself dismayed by that sanguinary phrase. But the real shock lay in the public reaction.

Dockers from the East End marched on Westminster demanding  to protest at

TED HEATH

sacking Powell from the Shadow Cabinet.

Opinion polls showed massive backing for Powell, to say nothing of the largest politician's postbag on record, in which the overwhelming majority supported him.

THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

sprang from the fact that the problem had become so daunting. Effective action would have to be on a major scale , admit to previous failures and would risk, indeed ensure, denunciation from every pulpit in the land (lay and clerical)

It was easier for politicians and commentators, all secure in their leafy suburbs, to assure the public that the problem would be solved by

INTEGRATION

NOW, however, the genie was out of the bottle. So in the 1970 Tory manifesto Heath promised

'No further large scale permanent immigration'.

BUT

of course, there was.

 

The 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act

 

TOO LITTLE and TOO LATE

had allowed those already here or able to secure work vouchers to bring in their families and 'dependant relatives'.

THEY CAME IN SWARMS

 

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

UNCLES

and

SISTERS

and their

COUSINS

and their AUNTS.

They came from the sub-continent where birth certificates were far form common and anyone could claim a blood relationship. Money readily changed hands. So that Tories changed the law to say that only

Spouses

Fiances

and

Fiancees

would be allowed.

 

But by 1976, the level of intercontinental match-making had reached such a level the Foreign Office dispatched a senior official to the sub-continent to assess the

PROBLEM.

He observed that allowing in married and affianced partners would open up a whole new group of applicants -'subsequently entitling

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

and allegedly distressed

RELATIVES

to seek entry.

IT WOULD BE LIKE BAILING OUT THE OCEAN.

 

SO AN EFFORT was made to tighten up the rules but it was -how did you guess?

TOO LITTLE-TOO LATE

Since Heath's promise

TO CLOSE THE DOOR

more than

3,000,000

non-British immigrants have arrived

IN THIS COUNTRY

And traffic in spouses between such places such as

BRADFORD and BANGALORE

HAS CONTINUED APACE

 

Two other factors have long overhung any rational debate on

IMMIGRATION

Most obvious, in an echo of the Salem witchcraft trials, has been the tactic of pointing at someone and shrieking

'RACIST'

-the sin against the Holy Ghost - and even calling for

POLICE ACTION

Believe me , this accusation has long scared the wits out of

FLEET STREET EDITORS

-their legal departments

media commentators generally and politicians of every shade.

IT HAS BEEN CENSORSHIP BY ANOTHER NAME

-the public has been duly cowed.

A technical problem has added to this because the word

RACE

is SHORT -and EASY to FIT into a HEADLINE -while IMMIGRATION isn't. So arguments about IMMIGRATION were labelled in innumerable headlines as being about

'RACE'

The other problem which hindered meaningful debate was that immigrants had come to form a grouping of such

SIZE and IDENTITY

that politicians on all sides thought well worth wooing, indeed crawling to.

NOW

David Cameron has woken up, in intervals between sacking Tory front benchers and Tory candidates for 'racism' to the Government's vulnerability on

IMMIGRATION.

Ministers have trebled the number of work vouchers available to foreign workers over ten years to a level running at

150,000 a year

 

Cameron has no serious solution to

IMMIGRATION

but as the saying is, every bit helps.

 

The supreme irony of this week's fuss around Powell's 1968 speech is that recently had our supposedly internationalist Prime Minister promising

'BRITISH JOBS for BRITISH WORKERS.

Enoch would not have touched such a phrase with a bargepole.

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

[Under PR- Proportional Representation the Immigration levels would have been curtailed because the Government of the Day would feel obliged to take a stronger line in order to gather up the votes and back to power. But as we all know it has been this single-minded attitude of the tripartite in your

HOUSE OF COMMONS

to keep power within their grasp and to hell to any outsiders.

Most of the problems in our society over the past 40 years have occurred because of the determination of the party in power to take what they consider a more lenient line on policy whether it is

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

ABORTION

IMMIGRATION

and no doubt dozens of other matters which has resulted in absolute chaos in the above areas.

If they are able to claw in another small section of the community which will be ready voters they will change anything what ever the consequences to the people and the country.

We have been calling for the introduction of

PR in our PARLIAMENT

for many years as a number of bulletins on our website can testify but the very organisations that could achieve this necessary alteration -the numerous political organisations in our country appear not to be interested. And that is the PROBLEM

and until we change the system we shall see the constant over-regulation by the Government and the hair-brained schemes adopted by the so-called OPPOSITION which lays a path of problems in the future.

Of course if PR had been in place over the last four decades there would not have been the

WAR in IRAQ

or even

Mission Impossible in Afghanistan.

 

The Abortion Bill would only have passed if much greater safeguards had been put in place.

 

Immigration would have been freely discussed and sensible measures adopted to allow controlled entry ONLY and those who were prepared to INTEGRATE and NOT THREATEN the very existence of the COUNTRY that they were adopting.

 

Abolition of Capital Punishment Bill failed to honour the feelings in the country that if the Death Sentence was abolished that MURDER would mean a LIFE SENTENCE where the circumstances warrant it. Even before the abolition of the penalty over 50 per cent of murderers had their sentence commuted to life imprisonment and that didn't mean twelve or even three years or less today. The liberal establishment have much to answer for ,whether in believing that prisons should be five star hotels or that a fine that is never paid is the answer to the increased

MURDERS- GUN /KNIFE CRIME- BURGLARY- ROBBERY-THEFT-ASSAULT and whatever.

 

 

Our so-called Criminal Justice system would have been unable to treat prisoners as visitors and victims as criminals and there would have been Bobbies of the Beat- more prisons, and punishment to fit the crime.

Over the past 40 years the majority of your politicians in

YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS

 have been feathering their own nests to the point today in November 2007 there are many of them on a comfortable

£250,000 [at least] a year.

They fiddle their expenses-They lie about their expenditure-They lie about the true facts of the EU. In fact many of them lie about almost everything. They only work for a little over half a year .They have gold-plated pensions and they will be comfortable for the rest of their lives. As for what happens to their country as far as many of them are concerned our country had never existed.

Of course in such a bedlam there are a small group of men and women of

Honour and Integrity

who alas are ignored by their colleagues -some say they even detest them. Guilty secrets no doubt.

 

As for Europe the lies could not have been hidden if there had been eurosceptic parties at Westminster.  And the CONSPIRACY that has taken place since 1972 would not have been in place and our NATIONHOOD and COUNTRY threatened with extinction as will be the case in your Parliament in the early months of 2008.

*

THE ENEMY WITHIN IS YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT WHICH INTENDS TO SELL YOUR COUNTRY TO FOREIGN POWERS.

November-2007.

*

H.F.1594
 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

H.F.1449
 

 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/
Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

 YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

 HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

The Rothschilds.
 
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

 HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 
UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 
 
 
 
[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

*  *  *

ADDED DECEMBER,2018

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

SEP 19

OCT-19

 
OCT19 H 1 2
3 4 5  6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

-2019