- (1994 -Official Website -MAY- PT 6-2019 )--

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019        MAY-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 2-2019

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019      MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

*

 THE DOWNFALL

OF

A ONCE DECLARED

 IRON LADY

AND

HER ARDENT AND PASSIONATE PROMISE

 IN 2016

 

'BETTER A

NO DEAL

THAN A BAD DEAL'

*

'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT'

*

'TO LEAVE

THE EU

ON

MARCH 29,2019'

AS we had previously stated

COMPROMISE

should never be considered

when the return of our ancient freedoms given away by a so-called

 CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT

IN

 1972

to be reclaimed in

March 2019

in answer to a people's vote in a

REFERENDUM

 in

JUNE 2O16

 

when an overwhelming

17.4 MILLION PATRIOTS

VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE COUNTRY

FROM THE CRUMBLING CONFIDENCE TRICK

calling itself the

EUROPEAN UNION

soon to be a

SUPERSTATE

*

 

'Trust not him that has broken faith.'

SHAKESPEARE

*

*
Could the European elections herald the end of the EU - Eurosceptic parties all across the EU look like doing well!.... - Daily Express

https://www.express.co.uk/.../expresscomment/.../european-election-2019-vote-end-eu-comment-ross-clark

*
AGITATION

Agitation prevents rebellion, keeps the peace, and secures progress. Every step she gains is gained forever. Muskets are the weapons of animals. Agitation is the atmosphere of the brains.-
Wendell Phillips. Am.orator

*
Eurosceptics are fighting for the return of freedoms once secured by MAGNA CARTA and the PETITION of RIGHT.
 

 

Brought forward from 2003

TREASON

[The behaviour of our politicians over the past thirty-five years has confirmed the dangers of one-party rule which was warned of over two millennium ago . The greatest danger we face is from within BY THE TREASONABLE ACTIONS of many of our politicians and judges who should know better and those close to our sovereign Queen Elizabeth II the PRIVY COUNSELLORS of the REALM.
 
Before we proceed we will state the oaths taken by our Privy Counsellors to the Queen and also to the European Union. We are at a loss to understand how it is possible to take the oath to Queen and Country and yet still take the oath to the EU.
 
CONFLICT OF DUTIES AND LOYALTIES
 
THE UNITED KINGDOM
 
THE OATH OF A PRIVY COUNSELLOR
 
'You do swear by Almighty God to be true and faithful Servant unto the Queen's Majesty's Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person. Honour, Crown, or Dignity Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your Power, and either cause it to be revealed to her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will, in all things to be removed, treated, and debated in Council, faithly and truly declare your Mind and Opinion. According to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all Matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors, you will not reveal it unto him, but will keep the same until such time as, by the Consent of Her Majesty, or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will in your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminence's, and Authorities, granted to her Majesty, annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise,
against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty.

SO HELP ME GOD. '
 
THE EUROPEAN UNION
 
The OATH SWORN BY COMMISSIONERS - BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
 
'I solemnly undertake to perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the Communities in carrying out my duties neither to seek nor to take instructions from my government or body, to refrain from any action incompatible with my duties. I formally note the undertaking of each member state to respect this principle and not to seek to influence members of the Commission in the performance of their task. I further undertake to respect both during and after my term of office the obligations arising therefrom and in particular the duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance after I have ceased to hold office of certain appointments or benefits. '
 

Our Constitution was only safe so long as our Representatives were persons of INTEGRITY unfortunately it is clear that any person owning allegiance to Her Majesty could not in all honesty sign the oath to the European Union. We have therefore in our midst many TRAITORS to her Majesty and to the people of these Islands. We hope one day to have these Traitors tried by a SUPREME Constitutional Court when England one day will return to being a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of a Greater Britain. It is only a few decades ago when the last TRAITOR in England was" hanged by the neck until he was dead ". I t is our opinion that the actions of those who knowingly gave away the " Rights and Liberties " of the English People should suffer the maximum sentence prescribed by law, in memory of those millions of our people who gave their lives for their country, even in the last few weeks.
 
We will list every person that has had a hand in traitorously betraying this country in a TRAITORS GALLERY and see that these names are known by the people of this country. We ask anyone who is aware of anyone who has taken an Oath to let us know for inclusion in our list
 
OVER TWO THOUSAND YEARS AGO THE FOLLOWING WORDS WERE SPOKEN BY A GREAT SENATOR OF ROME .
 
" A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the TRAITOR moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the TRAITOR appears no TRAITOR; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A MURDERER IS LESS TO BE FEARED".
 
CICERO

 Brought forward from:

2003

 

ENGLAND

Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****    ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  **** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 
 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

May 27, 2019

 

H.F.1853/1

 

 

 

H.F.1849

 

*

H.F.1842

 *
 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: You stupid people. You got it wrong again.You were supposed to vote for candidates determined to STOP BREXIT, or at least STAY AT HOME and leave Britains future to the [shameless] experts... - Daily Mail

 

 THIS IS NOT

politics as usual, there

has been

an

ERUPTION.

 

 

... For what it's worth,I wouldn't vote for anyone who stayed in the Cabinet and supported May's

DISMAL, DEFEATEST'

DEAL

, former Brexiteer Gove included.

Can't we just cut to the chase and put them all on a ballot paper and THEN let the Tory faithful [if there are any still around]pick the bones out of it? Be honest how long does it take to run  a leadership election?

Saturday night TV talent shows manage to make votes happen in an instant, using the red button. Why not the

CONSERVATIVE PARTY?

Meanwhile, out here in the real world, there's something remarkable going on.

In the space of a few weeks, the

 BREXIT PARTY

 has gone from nowhere to a

THIRD OF THE VOTE

On Thursday, they fielded an impressive, eclectic slate of candidates from diverse backgrounds, and were rewarded with millions of votes -unlike the entitled, professional malcontents who make up

NO CHANGE UK

Can they kick on from here and became a proper, rounded, party, as opposed to a single issue pressure group? They've certainly got the talent and, er, momentum.

The upcoming Peterborough by.

ERUPTION-election might be the acid test.

 WE may be about to see a long-overdue realignment in

British Politics

 

As Bob Hoskins, aka Harold Shabnd remarks in the Long Good Friday: there's been an

 

ERUPTION

 

Not before time. So well done everyone who backed the

BREXIT PARTY

[On that most momentous DAY]

Thursday,25 May,2019

 TAKE A BOW,BRITAIN.

 

*

 

...Full article

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS]

Tuesday, May 28,2019

H.F.1854

 

 

 

*
LITTLEJOHN

 

Bring me sunshine...

BRING ME BREXIT

LAKESIDE Country Club in Surrey is probably best-known these days as the home of the World Darts Championship.

It was featured in that classic, knockabout episode of The Sweeney, starring Morecamb and Wise, and over the tyears has showcased everyone from Tommy Cooper to the Two Ronnies.

Lakeside is also said to be the model for Peter Kay's brilliant Northern variety club spoof Phoenix Nights. If there's a retro feel about the place, that's no bad thing. As Michael Parkinson once said:

'You meet a better class of person down Memory Lane,'

On Sunday night, Nigel Farage topped the bill at a sold-out Brexit Party rally at Lakeside.A  full house of 1600 people cheered Farage and his fellow candidates to the rafters. I only know about this because one of my friends, Robert Rowland, is standing for the Brexit Party alongside Farage in the South East, and was chosen to make the opening address.

.You won't have seen coverage of the rally on the BBC. Or anywhere else, for that matter. The main broadcast media spend most of their time belittling the

BREXIT PARTY

when they are not ignoring it altogether. So do the arrogant, professional politicians from the

TRADITIONAL PARTIES.

who kid themselves that once Thursday's protest vote' is out of the way, it will be back to business as usual

.But out in the country, something remarkable is happening. From the North-East of England to the South West, people who have never taken much interest in politics are flocking to Brexit Party rallies.

They've had enough of being patronised, of being dismissed as thick racists who are too stupid to know what they are voting for.

They are  throwing  their support behind sincere men and women from all walks of life and backgrounds who have put their careers and families on hold to take on the

POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT

My friend Robert Rowland is a 50-something father -of-four, ex-RAF who made a few bob in finance. He has never played an active role in politics before. But he subscribes to the philosophy of

EDMUND BURKE:

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.'

Robert decided it was time to stand up and be counted.

So have countless other good men and women, who put themselves forward as Brexit Party candidates-from former dyed-in -the-wool Tory businessmen to old school lefties such as Claire Fox

 THEY have an extensive range of real-life experience, utterly divorced from the narrowly drawn ranks of the careerist mediocrities who inhabit the Westminster bubble...
 
TO BE CONTINUED
 

 

 

 Both played pivotal roles in delivering the

LEAVE VOTE

in 2016

And both actually believe in

BREXIT.

(Well, I think Boris does, but

you never know, )

What's morethey share an optimistic view of Britain's  future, confident  we can thrive in the global economy once we have cast of the shackles of

BRUSSELS.)

What's At least, like Morecambe and Wise, they might bring us some

SUNSHINE

unlike the remorseless, defeatest drivel we have been force-fed by May and the resr of the political class for the past few years

But first, at the risk of sounding like Boris, we must cleanse the Augean stables. And that will only be achieved by casting

MILLION OF VOTES

FOR THE

BREXIT PARTY.

Sorry, but I don't buy the argument that voting Brexit will let in Corbyn.  Labour is thoroughly discredited, too, and has as much to lose at this election as the Tories.,

And anyway, ,what kind of a pitch is:

VOTE FOR US BECAUSE WE'RE NOT AS RUBBISH AS THE OTHER LOT?

As Mrs Thatcher said in 1979

people should vote Conservative because we are better than than Labour-not because they couldn't do any worse.

MAYBE A  BREXIT PARTY LANDSLIDE WILL LEAD TO A LONG OVERDUE POLITICAL REALIGNMENT AND USHER IN A NEW BREED,

 like my mate Robert Rowland who actually have confidence in Britain's future outside of the

SCLEROTIC, CORRUPT, CRUMLING

EU EDIFICE.

But it affords us a heaven-sent opportunity to tell the out-of-touch Westminster rabble and their hangers-on

WHERE TO GET OFF

 

DON'T WASTE IT.

 

 

VOTE BREXIT ON MAY25,  2019

Bring me sunshine, bring me BREXIT: RICHARD ... - Daily Mail

 

*

 

 

TUESDAY MAY 21,2019

 

 

H.F.1848

 

 

 
 

[NOTHING HAS CHANGED SINCE 2007. IN FACT IN MANY INSTANCES IT HAS BECOME EVEN WORSE IN 2019. THE SUFFERING PEOPLE ARE IGNORED BY THE GREATER MAJORITY OF THEIR SUPPOSED SERVANT IN WESTMINSTER.

AS CROMWELL HAD STATED IN HIS DAY

'YOU HAVE BEEN HERE TOO LONG

GO!

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FINANCE AS WE HAVE A BLOATED AND WASTED SO-CALLED

FOREIGN AID BUDGET OF OVER

£15 BILLION.]

[MAY-2019]

*  *  *

{

WE NEED ZERO TOLERANCE OF CRIME

 

- WE HAVE POLICE AND PROBATION OFFICERS PARALYSED BY POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WITH THE CRIMINAL AS THE VICTIM.

 

*

 

Gun violence: The real crime is the refusal to face the TRUTH

THE

Melanie Phillips

COLUMN

 [Daily Mail-February 19 -2007]

 

 

ANOTHER shooting in the early hours of yesterday in North London adds to the grisly toll of gangland gun violence over the past fortnight.

There has been particular revulsion at the youth of some of these murder victims - two of them -only 15, and one 16 years old, and the humdrum settings of their killings, with one gunned down at an ice rink, one at home and another in his bedroom.

This shocking situation has elicited the predictable signs of political panic. The Prime Minister says

SOMETHING MUST BE DONE

He Calls A Summit of Ministers and Community Leaders.

He floats the possibility of lowering the age limit from 21 to 17, and giving more powers to the police.

These are all knee-jerk reactions. The problem is

NOT TOO FEW LAWS or NOT ENOUGH POLICE POWERS

IT IS that the LAWS we already have ARE ACTIVELY UNDERMINED by a CULTURE that is sliding TOWARDS SOCIAL ANARCHY.

AT THE HEART of the PROBLEM is

FAMILY BREAKDOWN.

-and the widening epidemic of

FATHERLESSNESS

-condoned and promoted by political and legal circles hell-bent on

DESTROYING MARRIAGE

and promoting the MYTH that every KIND of FAMILY

 IS AS GOOD AS ANY OTHER.

 

*

 

Entrenched

At last week's devastating UNICEF REPORT observed Britain is at the very bottom of the

LEAGUE of WESTERN NATIONS

-when it comes to

CHILDREN'S WELL-BEING.

-and the root cause of that is nothing other than the

DISINTEGRATION OF THE FAMILY.

In such shattered family backgrounds the young person's peer group becomes his surrogate family and the

GANG LEADER

-becomes his surrogate family and the

GANG LEADER

-his replacement

FATHER

This is a particular problem for the

BLACK COMMUNITY

-where

FATHERLESSNESS IS ENDEMIC

and

DRUG CULTURE ENTRENCHED

This fundamental breakdown in social control is then compounded by just about every agency that deals with young people.

The schools deliver a broken education system, with the most vulnerable children left illiterate and innumerate; with the same

'child-centred' dogma

destroying all boundaries and discipline;

and with special schools catering for the most disturbed children shut down in the benighted cause of

SOCIAL INCLUSION.

The criminal justice system has become a

REVOLVING DOOR

-with those few young criminals who are actually arrested being given the equivalent of a slap on the wrist and sent home, from where they are sucked into a widening spiral of crime and more  fruitless court appearances.

Worst of all is the total shambles of the

DRUGS POLICY

which has led directly to the

EPIDEMIC OF DRUGS ON OUR STREETS.

-the rise in drug use and the ever younger age of both users and dealers.

This appalling situation the direct result of the grip of the drug legalisation lobby on the

Government - Police and Fashionable Society

-the downgrading of cannabis and the subsequent explosion of hard drugs as the bottom fell out of the flooded cannabis market.

When they look at the recent carnage on the streets of Moss Side and Longsight in Manchester, or Streatham, Peckham, Camberwell, Clapham and Hackney in London, all these people who promoted this chain of events

SHOULD HANG THEIR HEADS IN SHAME

THIS BLOOD IS ON THEIR HANDS. 

On top of all this is the profound racism of a society which, while demonising as 'racist' anyone who dares to discuss

BLACK CRIME

-actually ignores the growing mayhem within black communities - because of the shameful and unstated belief that while it's only black people who are committing violence against other black people, there's no reason for anyone else to bother about it.

Such an attitude is as short-sighted as it is terrible. It is terrible because the lives of black people are as vulnerable as those of anyone else.  It is terrible because this racism leads directly to the killing and abandonment of human beings under the camouflage of progressive attitudes.

 Gangs

It is terrible because it is mainly white drug users who are being supplied by these black gangs. And it is short-sighted because this mayhem is spreading well beyond the black population.

Across the Atlantic, they've already been there and done all that  -   denial of the impact of

MASS FATHERLESSNESS

HELPLESSNESS

-in the face of

DRUG CULTURE

ANTI-RACIST PARALYSIS

-and come out the other side.

Communities previously written off as shattered beyond repair

HAVE TURNED THEMSELVES ROUND.

 

THE KEY was when BLACK PEOPLE realised the MAIN VICTIMS of all this were THEIR

OWN YOUNG MEN.

-who were dying at the hands of other black men, and decided that this carnage had to stop.

So they started to take responsibility for their

OWN COMMUNITY.

 

In  [USA] Boston, the poorest areas of Dorchester and neighbouring Roxbury were, until 1992 a

WAR ZONE.

There were gun battles between school-children, knife fights on buses, drive by shootings.

NOW

THESE STREETS ARE SAFE TO WALK AND CRIME IS DOWN.

This was achieved by

BLACK PASTORS

-leaving their church pulpits to patrol the streets and pull in errant young for correction -drug treatment and other measures.

CRUCIALLY THEY DID NOT ACT ALONE.

-They went out on patrol with police officers pursuing a

ZERO TOLERANCE approach to CRIME

-and probation officers who abandoned both their desks and their

'FRIEND OF THE CRIMINAL'

APPROACH

-in order to pick up youths who were in breach of their

PROBATION ORDERS

-and threaten them with

PRISON

-if they didn't meet stringent conditions for

STAYING OUT OF TROUBLE.

*

IN BRITAIN, encouragingly, a growing number of pastors from black churches are trying to do the same. The problem is the absence of appropriate support for them.

Unlike America, we do not have

ZERO TOLERANCE

of

CRIME and DRUGS

-but policies which promote them.

Unlike America, our POLICE and PROBATION OFFICERS are still PARALYSED by POLITICAL CORRECTNESS -HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

-and the perception that the

CRIMINAL is the VICTIM of SOCIETY.

The belief that authority is a dirty word means there is no recognition of the crucial fact that the more shattered a child's background, the more urgent is his need for the

STRONGEST POSSIBLE BOUNDARIES AND CLEAR SANCTIONS IF THEY ARE TRANSGRESSED.

*

Discipline

Those who do grasp this achieve stunning results. In East London, the Eastside Young Leaders' Academy transforms black boys from jail fodder into model pupils. It does this through the tough love of uncompromising discipline - am essential antidote to schools where mistakes are never corrected and misdemeanours indulged, and families where the fathers who have fulfilled such a role are universally

ABSENT.

SO THIS PROBLEM IS NOT HOPELESS.

It can be turned around by a tough-minded, no-nonsense attitude to personal and social responsibility.  What is hopeless is the MORAL MUDDLE of a SOCIETY whose antipathy to authority has reached such a pitch that tough discipline is said to infringe a child's 'human rights'

A SOCIETY which believes that locking up large numbers of young criminals is worse than allowing them to continue to terrorise the streets.

A SOCIETY which places freedom of expression higher than stopping gangsta rap messages promoting violence, murder and bigotry as 'cool'

A SOCIETY whose rich, white cocaine habit is serviced by a sordid and violent drug culture, the truth of whose existence that same white society is at

pains to sanitise and censor.

SUCH A SOCIETY PRODUCES DEAD CHILDREN

 

IT NEED NOT BE SO

ALL THAT IS NEEDED IS THE WILL TO CHANGE

IT IS THE ABSENCE OF THAT WILL THAT IS TRULY

CRIMINAL

*          *          *

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used.-Comments in Brackets are ours.]

FEBRUARY/07

*

 

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 

 

H. F.1439

 

 

*
 

 A CALL TO ARMS.

The Leave camp need to be ready to

DEFEND

 their

VICTORY

to  live under

 

"The Rights and

Liberties"

of

ENGLISHMEN.

WE HAVE NO WISH TO SEE A REOCCURRENCE  OF THE BLOODY REVOLUTION  in 1642 IN EDGE HILL-WARWICKSHIRE

TO RETAIN

THE

Rights and Liberties of Englishmen'

 AND SUBSEQUENT  BATTLES AROUND THE COUNTRY.

THE REASON FOR A CALL TO ARMS IS BECAUSE MILLIONS OF THE FRIENDS OF FRAU MERKEL WILL NOT ACCEPT THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND

AND WILL USE ALMOST ANY MEANS TO ENSLAVE THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS FOR EVER IN THE NOW INTENDED TRI-NATION SUPER-STATE OF GERMANY-FRANCE AND ITALY.

THE SHEER ARROGANCE OF THE SPONSORS OF HITLER'S WAR-TIME PLANNED SUPER-STATE IS NOW A REALITY.

THE GREATER NUMBER STILL SUPPORTING THE  BEAST OF BRUSSELS

-BRAIN-WASHED-MIND-BENDING PROPAGANDA-BETRAYERS OF THEIR SACRED INHERITANCE OF

MAGNA CARTA

 FOUGHT FOR FOR OVER 800 YEARS -SO SOUGHT FOR  AND PROTECTED IN ALMOST HALF THE WORLD.

IF IT HAS TO BE THEN WE MUST FIGHT AS WE ARE IN THE RIGHT AND CANNOT ACCEPT ANY COMPROMISE TO THAT OF THE RETURN OF OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STARE.

TO SHOW THAT WE ARE READY THERE NEEDS TO BE RALLIES AROUND THE COUNTRY IN THOSE CROMWELLIAN BATTLE FIELDS OF THE

ENGLISH CIVIL WAR

IT IS AGAIN THE ROUNDHEADS AGAINST THE CAVALIERS

WILL YOU DO IT?

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

[BY A COINCIDENCE WE ONLY REALISED THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DAY AFTER WE HAD COMPLETED OUR WORK.

JULY 4-

AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE DAY

 

WHEN WILL WE CELIBRATE OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY?]

H. F. 824 FREEDOM NOW.

H.F.1800

*
 

DAILY TELEGRAPH

 

 

No self-respecting country would accept this deal-

MPs must vote it down

By DANIAL HANNAN

SUNDAY, MARCH 3,2019

 

The deal will come  before Parliament next week represents a devastating failure of

BRITISH STATECRAFT

It would keep most of the costs of EU membership while junking most of the benefits. It would require Britain to cede part of its territory to

FOREIGN JURISDICTION.

It would allow

 BRUSSELS

 to

CONTROL

OUR COMMERCE with NON-EU STATES

EVEN AFTER WE

LEAVE.

MPs

 who believe in parliamentary sovereignty

should

VOTE AGAINST IT.

*

MPs

 who believe in the

UNION

 should 

VOTE AGAINST IT .

*

MPs

WHO BELIEVE IN FREE TRADE

 should 

VOTE AGAINST IT .

*

MPs

who believe that there  is such a thing as

NATIONAL HONOUR

and who recognise that we are being treated in a calculatedly vindictive way should toss it out with especial force.

They should do so even if the alternative is a

DELAY

 IN

BREXIT.

They should do so, indeed, even though such a delay might allow the Mandelsons and Blairs to step up their campaign for a

SECOND  REFERENDUM.

A postponement, undesirable as it is, is less damaging than accepting permanently

DISADVANTAGEOUS TERMS.

As Lord King,

the former Bank of England Governor

 put it

:There are arguments for remaining in the EU

and arguments for leaving.

But there is no case whatsoever for giving up the benefits of remaining without  obtaining the benefits of

LEAVING.

WE keep being told that unreasonable

Eurosceptics

are their own worst enemies and that, if

 BREXIT

 is now thwarted, it will somehow be their fault.

 

But it is hard to think of a more unreasonable proposition than that all that matters is coming back with something that can techically  be termed

BREXIT.

Even after 30 months. Leavers are still being subtly patronised. It is sassumed that the dim-witted oafs cannot possibly have weighed the costs and benefits before voting, and that all that the Government needs to do is to show them something that has BREXIT written on it in bright  , shiny letters.

In fact, Leave voters understand that some forms of Brexit are better than others. They understand too, that some are  so BAD that they would be worse than either

STAYING or LEAVING

The EU, of course, has understood this

 FROM THE START

[THE MERKEL-MAY CLOSE ASSOCIATION GOING BACK MANY DECADES.]

As Michel Barnier put it in 2016,

"I'll have done my job if, in the end, the exit terms are so bad that the British would rather stay in the EU."

Such an attitude on the part of Brussels was to be expected.

The readiness of our negotiators to go along with it was not.

Far from being uncompromising, the supposed hardliners in the ERG have accepted a series of CONCESSIONS, including a continuing role of the [MISCHIEVOUS]

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

AFTER WE LEAVE.

 

21 months of non-voting membership, an absurdly one-sided arbitration mechanism and a

30 BILLION

FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT.

THAT NO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATOR WOULD UPHOLD.

They have accepted all these things despite  the conspicuous absence of the trade deal that was supposed to be

quid pro quo.

Eurosceptic Tories have dug in on only one point, namely the

BACKSTOP, and with good reason. No self respecting country would allow the regulatory annexation of part of its territory in exchange for... well,

FOR NOTHING AT ALL,

really since the promised

TRADE DEAL

HASN'T MATERIALISED.

At least EU membership, unlike the

BACKSTOP

comes with an exit mechanism.

We are thus being asked to replace a temporary arrangement with a permanent one

THAT ALONE IS ENOUGH TO REFUSE...

[ This is a lengthy article of which we are barely half way through which we will continue shortly. For many months now we have been unable to download articles from the Daily Mail-Daily Telegraph and others ,which therefore means resorting to fingers and in that we follow the action of our brave archers at Crecy and raise  two fingers aloft in their image to our enemy within who wish to sell out their once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-the burial grounds at home and abroad of our brave patriotic service men and women are no doubt in spirit with those today in their just fight for that which no one has a right to give away-the historic

" Freedom and Liberties of ENGLAND' "

which is in our TRUST for future generations to come.]-

TO BE CONTINUED.]

*

One thing, at any rate, ought to be beyond dispute, Britain should not sign a permanent treaty under duress.  The

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

 has been proposed in a

VENGEFUL SPIRIT

Eurocrats have understandably concluded that we have no bottom line, that the British are negotiating as Herman Van Rompuy, the former European Council president, reportedly put it last week,

"With their backs against a wall, the abyss in front of their eyes and a knife on their throat. WE are nearly there."

There was a time when that attitude would have been enough to convince us politely to decline the EU's TERMS and forge our own way.

are we still the nation we used to be?

[REGRETFULLY THE SIGNS ARE NEGATIVE!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

SUNDAY, MARCH 3,2019

 

 

H.F.1822

*

SUNDAY EXPRESS

 

 

Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies MP
 

ISN'T the House of Commons there to represent the people of the United Kingdom? It might seem a strange question but are MPs actually rtepresenting people on key issues?

Many MPs now seem to advocate representing the public on a politically correct tick box. Not a day goes by without someone mentioning the need to

 "represent/reflect the communities we serve"

Back in the real world, in terms of truly representing the people (rather than obsessing about someone's gender or skin colour) how are you feeling?

 Absolutely abysmally I'd say.

The most head-grabbing current example is Parliament's continuing mission to try to

frustate

BREXIT

We know the House of Commons is out of touch on

[HITLER'S]

EU.

Around 75 per cent of MPs voted for or campaigned for

REMAINING IN THE EU.

[A REMAINER PARLIAMENT]

However the [June 23-2016] result was that people voted to

LEAVE

and yet still many MPs seem to think they can cast aside public opinion like an old sweet rapping and carry on as they were before the public [their masters] came up with an answer

THEY DID NOT LIKE.

['THE BASTARDS'

AS  DAILY MAIL'S QUENTIN LETTS HAS RIGHTLY CALLED THEM. ]

We knew the EU would try to do that but shouldn't we expect better from our own MPS?

After all, they were telling voters this was a once in a lifetime chance to record

THEIR OPINION .

This does not sit comfortably with many MPs spending every waking hour

since

TRYING TO DISHONOUR THE RESULT

especially when most MPs elected since the referendum stood on a manifesto

 with a clear commitment to implement

BREXIT

YOU do not have to look far for another example of the chasm between

PARLIAMENT  and PEOPLE

The public's view on law and order compared to the Government's are chalk and cheese more police and want them on the streets

They want tougher action on criminals and tougher sentences for most crimes.

In a poll a few years ago asking views on a sentencing escalator (repeat offenders given increasing harsh sentences for committing the same crime again)

90 per cent of the public were in favour.

So, are we doing that?

NO

Not only are we not, this government is now touting the idea that there should be a presumption against short sentences-possibly six months or fewer. You might have thought, "Great, we shall now get longer sentences-Alas, no, Short sentences will be replaced by

NO SENTENCES AT ALL

It is a ludicrous suggestion yet, with all eyes on

BREXIT

It is genuinely being pursued by the

[SO-CALLED]

Ministry of Justice.

Never mind the public, just ask police officers what they think, then brace yourself...

IT IS HARD TO GET SENT TO PRISON AS IT IS: YOU EITHER HAVE TO COMMIT A REALLY SERIOUS CRIME OR OFFEND SOMANY TIMES THAT THERE'S NO OTHER OPTION. SOMEONE MANAGED TO BE CONVICTED OF

62 SHOPLIFTING OFFENCES

BEFORE FINALLY BEING SENT TO

 JAIL.

OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS OR FEWER LAST YEAR HAD RACKED UP AN AVERAGE OF

55 previous offences each.

THEY HAD also received an average of five community orders, which clearly didn't work.

Around 2000 knife offenders received six months or fewer. In a knife crime epidemic, who in their right minds would not want to see these offenders in prison. At least, while they are serving their sentences

THEY ARE NOT CONTINUING OFFENDING.

THEN, there's overseas aid. We spend more on that than on policing and double what we spend on our

[SO-CALLED]

JUSTICE BUDGET

This money is fixeds, ring-fenced and

WILL ONLY INCREASE

People do not generally share politicians' desire to waste money as if it is going out of fashion to make themselves feel better.

To add insult to injury, people then hear of billions spent on ridiculous projects or syphoned off by corrupt officials. This happens in a department whose mission is to spend as much as possible so there can be a luvvie hug when we hit a random target. As with the overseas aid cult, there's the religion of

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which has a huge following in Parliament.

Many MPs are obsessed with tick boxes' so-called

POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION

They refuse to speak the truth for fear of upsetting minority groups and twist the facts to suit the agenda.

Heaven help anyone who challenges this cosy politically-correct concensus, I have tried.

Yet most people are fed up with political correctness. Hardly anyone identifies as a feminist. They just want men and women to be treated fairly and equally. But Parliament makes our laws and so politically correct tentacles spread.

These are key issues where Parliament is not representing our vies and I haven't even started on HS2. And we know manyMPS nthink of voters who do not share their Left-wing or Remain views.

Being out of sync with the

PUBLIC

should be of grave concern. For a democracy to work, people have to feel that thoswe in the Commons

SPEAK FOR THEM.

This isn't happening and MPs should fear the backlash that will come if this continues.

*  *  *

[Need we look elsewhere for the great problems we are experiencing at the present time to extract our once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

FROM

HITLER'S PLAN

FOR

GERMANY TO DOMINATE

EUROPE

IN THE

PEACE]

 

*

 

THE PUBLIC

HEY WANT MORE POLICE AND WANT THEM ON THE STREETS.

PREVIOUS PRIME MINISTERSW AND HOME SECRETARIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CARNAGE ON THE STREETS TODAY IN MARCH 2019.

 

[The EDP for decades has many bulletins showing how many important  public issues have and are still being ignored by successive governments. As the excellent article above has shown it is the dim-witted members of the House of Commons who have been there too long that has created this Mad Parliament feature. AS in Cromwell's Day the way to deal with the trash is to kick them out of Parliament. WE have advocated for decades that MPS should only SERVE THEIR COUNTRY for a TERM-at present 5 years. At present many MPs look on the job as for life which reflects in their arrogance and treasonable behaviour. The change will enable those who wish give up 5 years TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY instead of THEMSELVES  from across our society, to do so.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

SUNDAY EXPRESS

-Time we MPs started working for all of you

by Philip Davies  MP
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

MARCH 10,2019

*  *  *

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

H.F.1828

*

 

May 'doesn't see upside from BREXIT

[AS WE SUSPECTED FROM THE BEGINNING. HOW COULD AN AVID SUPPORTER OF THE EU  HAVE ACTED OTHERWISE?]

DAILY MAIL

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

Nick Timothy-THERESA MAY'S FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF HAS CLAIMED SHE REGARDS BREXIT

AS

'DAMAGE LIMITATION'.

Nick Timothy, who lost his job over the Tories' disastrous election campaign of 2017, said she and mainly her ministers' struggle to see any economic upside to BREXIT.

He told the BBC:

They see it as a damage limitation exercise.

If you see it in nthat way inevitably you're not going to be prepared to take the steps that would enable you to fully realise the economic opportunities of

LEAVING.

In a separate interview with Channel 4 News, Mr Timothy said the UK had made4 mistakes in Brexit negotiations, including

 by

allowing the EU to determine the sequence of talks.

 

He said the Government should have spent money earlier on preparing for a

NO DEAL BREXIT

and should have been more 'robust' in pushing areas of UK advantage. 'Some of it is to do with negotiating style,' he said.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

*  *  *

[AND WHAT WE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION

IN APRIL 2018]

 
 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

H.F.1823

*

 
 

DELAYING BREXIT

WOULD BE TO BETRAY THE REFERENDUM

By

Leo McKinstry-Daily Express columnist

Monday, March 4,2019

 

Sir Ivan Rogers, the highly respected former British ambassador to the EU, said in an interview last week that, though he had always felt Brexit might be difficult, even he had been surprised

"by the extent of the mess"

Sir Ivan is absolutely right to be critical of the Establishment, which has reduced the process of withdrawal

 to a paralysing shambles.

What should have been an inspirational moment of

NATIONAL LIBERATION

has been transformed by our politicians into a longwinded

saga of of frustration and despair

In place of

DETERMINATION

PATRIOTISM

 and

VISION

There has been only

INERTIA

INCOMPETENCE

AND

COWARDICE.

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that, with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away the process is still hopelessly bogged down in procedural wrangling.

[IT IS MORE THAN POSSIBLE THAT THIS SENARIO WAS PLANNED SHORTLY AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT. AS WE HAVE SHOWN IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE THE TWO CHIEF NEGOTIATORS KNEW EACH OTHER AND THEY WERE BOTH COMMITTED TO THE EU- HITLER'S PLAN OF GERMAN DOMINATION OF MUCH OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE BELIEVING THAT A COMMITTED REMAINER COULD BE TRUE TO HER WORD

 OF

BREXIT

MEANS

BREXIT]

It is an extraordinary indictment of the political class that with the official deadline for Britain's departure from the EU now less than a month away, the process is still hopelessly bogged down to procedural wrangling.

*

 

[OUR COMMENT]

[We have always advocated that MPs should only serve  one term in PARLIAMENT in order that no MP over time can only consider their own agenda and not of that of an accustomed

FREE PEOPLE

and

 A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

The accumulated FREEDOM of PERSON and NATION  is in TRUST for FUTURE GENERATIONS. The problem we have is that members of our hallowed HOUSE of WESTMINSTER are by custom the SERVANTS of the PEOPLE but as we have seen over the past 47 years they have become our MASTERS. They are so arrogant that they even now consider they OWN OUR BODIES. We should tell them to go to HELL!]

*

All energy has been drained from our exit strategy, and there is a genuine risk that the vacillation could soon grow even worse. Within the next 10 days it is possible-even likely-that MPS could vote for an indefinite delay in BREXIT by an extension in Article 50, the legal instrument that ends our

 EU MEMBERSHIP.

ANY substantial delay in

BREXIT

would be a clear

 BETRAYAL

of the

REFERENDUM RESULT.

 

It is now almost three years since

17.4 million voted for BRITAIN to LEAVE the EU,

by far the biggest expression of support through the ballot box for any cause  in the

HISTORY OF OUR DEMOCRACY

The people have waited long enough for this decision to be implemented. The people have waited long enough for this decisin to be implemented. The overwhelming mood of the public is for the politicians to

" GET ON WITH IT"

But Brexit is still trapped in a political quagmire and there is little sign of an imminent resolution in this chaos. On the contrary, impending votes in the Commons provide yet more scope for irresponsibility. By Tuesday, March 12, MPs must make a decision on whether or not to approve the Prime Minister's

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT.

Optimistic noises are emerging from Downing Street, but that could be wishful thinking.

After all, Mrs May's deal was thrown out last month by a margin of 230 votes, the

BIGGEST GOVERNMENT  DEFEAT IN HISTORY .

 SINCE then little progress has been made in talks with the typically intransigent EU over amending the Irish backstop, loathed by the Brexiteers because it could trap Britain under permanent Brussels control. Negotiations are proving

"extraordinary difficult",

 the Attorney General Geoffrey Cox, the minister charged with achieving compromise.

If Mrs May's Agreement is again defeated, then the Cabinet -having been subjected in ferocious pressure by Remainer ministers, including open blackmail through threats of resignation -has accepted that MPs will be able to hold votes on two further proposals:

One to reject a NO DEAL, the other to extend Article 50. Both are likely to pass, but suchy movres will be a

DISASTER

FOR OUR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 INDEED any delay in Brexit could destroy our chances of leaving the EU altogether, while the inability to leave without a deal gives the EU the upper hand.

Last week the Tory MP George Eustice resigned as Agricultural Minister in fury sat the Governments retreat, warning that these developments could culminate

 " in the EU dictating the terms of the extension requested  and the final humiliation of our country."

A Commons vote in favour of a delay would leave Britain in its weakest position since the negotiations began.  We would have to adopt the stance of a

DESPERATE SUPPLICANT .

Brussels has already indicated that any delay would have to be a minimum of

21 MONTHS.

Furthermore, without a clear objective, a delay would be an act of destructive procrastination.

Remainers continually bleat about the dangers of

"UNCERTAINTY"

over

BREXIT

but, by refusing to embrace the

REFERENDUM OUTCOME

they are fuelling the problem. In their cynical mindset, agitation for a

DELAY

will create a vast political vacuum, which  will be filled with demands for another vote or straightforward reversal of the

2016 RESULT.

In practice, a delay will be the beginning of the end for

BREXIT,

 which is precisely why the Remainers support this proposition.

All momentum would disappear from the

LEAVE CAUSE.

If Britain cannot break free now how could we do so in future?

THE

MOMENT OF FREEDOM

WILL HAVE PASSED.

 deadline of March 29 was meant to be one of the Government's red lines. Enough concessions have been made already. Any further prevarication would be intolerable.

FULL ARTICLE

 'Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.'

Lord Acton

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

Monday, March 4,2019

 

H.F.1824

*
 

ROTTEN DEAL MEANS WE'LL NEVER LEAVE.

Theresa May WARNED by Rees-Mogg: Rotten Brexit deal means we'll NEVER leave EU-Daily Express

EXCLUSIVE byDavid Maddox POLITICAL EDITOR

THERESA  MAY was warned last night that she is heading for a crushing defeat this week on

BREXIT

The leader of the Tory leavers group, Jacob Rees Mogg, branded her EU deal

"ROTTEN"

and warned that it would condemn Britain in

 "PERPETUAL PENAL SERVITUDE". 

 Writing for the Sunday Express, Mr Rees-Mogg offered Mrs May an 11th hour escape route-but only if Attorney General Cox can win a convincing time limit to the Northern Ireland

BACKSTOP

Cox in his talks with the EU.

Otherwise Brexiteer MPs will again vote against

HER WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

When she last asked for the support of the Commons in January she lost be a crushing

230 VOTES.

Mr Rees-Mogg's warning came after a poll revealed voters believe most MPs in the predominently REMAIN COMMONS are now fighting for

EU INTERESTS

AHEAD OF

 BRITISH INTERESTS

The Prime Minister hopes to head to Brussels to sign off a revised deal tonight or tomorrow morning after talks continued yesterday. But a Downing Street source said:

"These are tough talks with the Commission which we are expecting to go right down the wire".

" The Prime Minister, ministers and her negotiating team are intensely focussed this weekend on making progress so that ultimately we can, in the country's best interests, leave the EU with a deal."

Last night senior Whitehall sources suggested that the changes agreed in Brussels will fall short of reopening the

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

and so will not go as far as

Brexiteers

 WANT.

Instead, it is understood that Downing Street is warning Brexiteers that if Mrs May's deal fails, the UK will end up with a so-called Norway option, favoured by Remainer Tories and many Labour MPs, of staying in the customs union and single market, suject to EU rules with no ability to change them.

It would mean the UK would be forced to accept uncontrolled immigration from the EU while being unable to strike free trade deals with the rest of the world.

A senior government source said " it is a Remainer Parliament" and suggested that an amendment by Labour MP Yvette Cooper and Tory MP Nick Boles allowing MPs to take control of the Brexit agenda would probably pass with Labour support.

A senior government source said this would lead to "the  softest of all Brexits, the Norway option". But members of Mr Rees-Mogg's Brexiteer European Research Group (ERG) were adamant that they will not be intimidated into backing a deal from Mrs May which they argue traps the UK under Brussels rule.

Tory Berwick MP Anne-Maria Trevelyan said: "I am sure that the Prime Minister is preparing not only to vote to mkeep a

NO DEAL BREXIT

on the table next week but  to give a firm instruction to Conservative MPs to do the same.

" Anything less than this would fly in the face of every rule in nthe negotiating handbook, would signify the end to any semblance of governance and would give the EU a hammer with which to beat us into submitting to an even worse deal."

Leader of the House, Andrea Leadsom, one of the last Brexiteers in the Cabinet, has indicated that she does not believe the EU will have moved enough.

She said: "There is still hope, But I have to say I'm deeply disappointed with what we're hearing coming out of the EU. I do have to ask myself what game are they playing here." ...

a[ THE GAME THEY HAVE ALWAYS PLAYED SINCE IT'S INCEPTION-A GERMAN-HITLERITE CONSPIRACY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE.-AND THEY HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE OF THE NUMBER OF 'USEFUL IDIOTS' WHO HAVE DISTAIN FOR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES. BEING PART OF A SUPER-STATE MEANS MORE LUCRATIVE EARNINGS WITH NO LIMIT AND POWER SUPREME. THE ARROGANCE IS THERE TO SEE. AND THE PRESENT IMPASSE ON BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU IS TO ENSURE THAT OTHERS WISHING TO FOLLOW WILL BE AWARE THAT THEY ARE TRAPPED IN A  GODLESS - GREEDY- GROTESQUE-UNREPRESENTATIVE-UNDEMOCRATIC-UNYEILDING NAZI  GERMAN INVENTION.]

TO be Continued

, a ...Meanwhile a BMG poll of 1,510 adults has revealed public disillusionment with MPs.

Of those polled 39 per cent believe that MPs put the EU interests above  British interests.

The Government was also coming under pressure to delay a

£1billion contract for Royal Fleet Auxiliary Fleet Solid Support vessels. Under the EU defence directive the contract is expected to be awarded to Spain.

But if Britain leaves without a deal it can

GIVE THE WORK TO BRITISH SHIPYARDS

*  *  *

Theresa May WARNED by Rees-Mogg: Rotten Brexit deal means we'll NEVER leave EU-Daily Express

EXCLUSIVE byDavid Maddox POLITICAL EDITOR

*

TO BE CONTINUED

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 10-2019

 

H.F.1813

*

 

 

 

CAN COX

BE OUR

IRON DUKE

OF

BREXIT

*

Andrew Pierce reporting

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

 

 

News for DAILY MAIL-CAN COX BE OUR IRON DUKE OF BREXIT?

AS a provocative gesture it could hardly have been more mischievous. Geoffrey Cox, the key Cabinet figure trying to secure

 BREXIT

posted online an image of a portrait of the

DUKE of WELLINGTON

whose finest hour was his victory over Napoleon at the

BATTLE of WATERLOO

just 40 miles from

 BRUSSELS.

As he engages in combat in the same city with a modern-day Frenchman, the European Union's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier, the British Government's Attorney General clearly hopes that

HE TOO WILL PREVAIL.

Accompanying his Wellinton tweet, Mr Cox gave a simple caption: The Iron Duke, By invoking the

SPIRIT

of one of Britain's greatest heroes and taunting the 'enemy', Mr Cox threw down the gauntlet.

Until his appointment as Attorney General last summer, the lawyer was best known as the MP with the biggest earnings from outside Parliament.

His admirers cross the political spectrum. Phillip Sands QC, Professor of Law at University College, London, describes him as

 'thoroughly independent and fearless in the best traditions of the

ENGLISH BAR.'

Andrew Mitchell MP the former International Development Secretary is another fan:

'He looks and sounds like a proper, old fashioned Attorney General.

He has real presence and authority. Everyone knows he will give his advice without

FEAR or FAVOUR

unlike some of his predecessors who served up what the Prime Minister wanted to hear.

Yet before his surprise promotion to Cabinet, Cox divided his time between his job as a Devon MP and work as a QC. In 2014, he earned £821,000 at the Bar. Two years later he apologised to the Commons for claiming parliamentary expenses of 49p for a bottle of milk, £2 worth of tea bags and £4.99 for weedkiller for space in front of the constituency office'-all claims that were rejected.

A profile on the Conservative Home website revealed he often took his juniors to the Savoy for tea, 'where they could digest the day's play as well as the cakes'. He has done the same for MPs who want to explore the intricacies of

BREXIT.

His clients have included the Turkish government, journalists from THE SUN accused of paying public for stories, a Liverpool FC footballer, the controversal property tycoon Nicholas Van Hoogstraten and a British Olypian'in proceedings for drug abuse.'

He also had a spell working in Mauritius as pupil master to the country's prime minister.

Cox was annoyed when he was named among 229 investors in Phoenix Film in 2014 which offered tax breaks for investing in Hollywood movies. While the HMRC regarded it as a tax avoidance scheme, Cox insisted he had instructed his financial advisers that he did not wish to be involved in 'aggressive tax avoidance.'

His political break-through came when ultra-Brexiteers Boris Johnson and David Davis quit the Cabinet and he was appointed as part of the ministerial reshuffle. On his Commons debut, he captivated MPs. His voice was described as being'as deep as a tuba's lament' and also likened to Mufasa, the character in The Lion King.

And at last autumn's Tory party conference, he was chosen as Mrs May's warm up act. In a stirring conclusion, he said

Britain would come to new life after

BREXIT

and quoted the poet John Milton's

Areopagitica

'Methinks I see in my mind a noble and puissant nation rousing herself like a strong man from sleep, and shaking her invincible locks;

Methinks I see her as an eagle muing her mighty youth, and kindling her undazl'd eyes at the full midday beam'.

Looking older than his 58 years, this son of a soldier has such an impressive bearing that Commons Speaker John Bercow mistakenly once announced him as

'Sir' Geoffrey

Mr Cox replied:' I am extremely obliged to you for promoting me., Mr Speaker. Perhaps I can take that as a hint to the Prime Minister.'

A rotund figure, he claims his recreations include swimming and enjoying rural life

If his brickmanship succeeds over Brexit negotiations in Brussels, he will have earned all the credit due.

If he fails, the PM will have a convenient scapegoat.

Geoffrey Cox, who relishes the cut and thrust of Cabinet life was once asked what was his greatest achievement. He modestly replied: 'Thirty-five years of marriage - well, its really my wife's achievement, not mine.

If he helps get Mrs May's Brexit deal over the line it will certainly be his achievement-and one to match that of the Iron Duke on a Belgian battlefield 204 years ago.

*  *  *

[In the film Wimslow Boy  with actor ROBERT DONAT who gave an impressive legal performance before the HOUSE OF COMMONS defending a Naval cadet accused of theft BY THE ADMIRALTY and the main theme was:

'LET RIGHT BE DONE!'

[Mr Geoffrey COX will become a man of  English history if he can retrieve the honour of our nation state - given away by traitors in 1972 by lies and deceit ,and be able to show the English people, wherever they are, that they have rejoined their ancient historic path ,lost to them so many decades ago.]

 'Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.'

Lord Acton

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 5,2019

 

H.F.1827

*
 

ROTTEN DEAL MEANS WE'LL NEVER LEAVE.

Theresa May WARNED by Rees-Mogg: Rotten Brexit deal means we'll NEVER leave EU-Daily Express

EXCLUSIVE byDavid Maddox POLITICAL EDITOR

THERESA  MAY was warned last night that she is heading for a crushing defeat this week on

BREXIT

The leader of the Tory leavers group, Jacob Rees Mogg, branded her EU deal

"ROTTEN"

and warned that it would condemn Britain in

 "PERPETUAL PENAL SERVITUDE". 

 Writing for the Sunday Express, Mr Rees-Mogg offered Mrs May an 11th hour escape route-but only if Attorney General Cox can win a convincing time limit to the Northern Ireland

BACKSTOP

Cox in his talks with the EU.

Otherwise Brexiteer MPs will again vote against

HER WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

When she last asked for the support of the Commons in January she lost be a crushing

230 VOTES.

Mr Rees-Mogg's warning came after a poll revealed voters believe most MPs in the predominently REMAIN COMMONS are now fighting for

EU INTERESTS

AHEAD OF

 BRITISH INTERESTS

The Prime Minister hopes to head to Brussels to sign off a revised deal tonight or tomorrow morning after talks continued yesterday. But a Downing Street source said:

"These are tough talks with the Commission which we are expecting to go right down the wire".

" The Prime Minister, ministers and her negotiating team are intensely focussed this weekend on making progress so that ultimately we can, in the country's best interests, leave the EU with a deal."

Last night senior Whitehall sources suggested that the changes agreed in Brussels will fall short of reopening the

WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT

and so will not go as far as

Brexiteers

 WANT.

Instead, it is understood that Downing Street is warning Brexiteers that if Mrs May's deal fails, the UK will end up with a so-called Norway option, favoured by Remainer Tories and many Labour MPs, of staying in the customs union and single market, subject to EU rules with no ability to change them.

It would mean the UK would be forced to accept uncontrolled immigration from the EU while being unable to strike free trade deals with the rest of the world.

A senior government source said " it is a Remainer Parliament" and suggested that an amendment by Labour MP Yvette Cooper and Tory MP Nick Boles allowing MPs to take control of the Brexit agenda would probably pass with Labour support.

A senior government source said this would lead to "the  softest of all Brexits, the Norway option". But members of Mr Rees-Mogg's Brexiteer European Research Group (ERG) were adamant that they will not be intimidated into backing a deal from Mrs May which they argue traps the UK under Brussels rule.

Tory Berwick MP Anne-Maria Trevelelyan said: "I am sure that the Prime Minister is preparing not only to vote to keep a

NO DEAL BREXIT

on the table next week but  to give a firm instruction to Conservative MPs to do the same.

" Anything less than this would fly in the face of every rule in nthe negotiating handbook, would signify the end to any semblance of governance and would give the EU a hammer with which to beat us into submitting to an even worse deal."

Leader of the House, Andrea Leadsom, one of the last Brexiteers in the Cabinet, has indicated that she does not believe the EU will have moved enough.

She said: "There is still hope, But I have to say I'm deeply disappointed with what we're hearing coming out of the EU. I do have to ask myself what game are they playing here." ...

[ THE GAME THEY HAVE ALWAYS PLAYED SINCE IT'S INCEPTION-A GERMAN-HITLERITE CONSPIRACY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE.-AND THEY HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE OF THE NUMBER OF 'USEFUL IDIOTS' WHO HAVE DISTAIN FOR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES. BEING PART OF A SUPER-STATE MEANS MORE LUCRATIVE EARNINGS WITH NO LIMIT AND POWER SUPREME. THE ARROGANCE IS THERE TO SEE. AND THE PRESENT IMPASSE ON BRITAIN LEAVING THE EU IS TO ENSURE THAT OTHERS WISHING TO FOLLOW WILL BE AWARE THAT THEY ARE TRAPPED IN A  GODLESS - GREEDY- GROTESQUE-UNREPRESENTATIVE-UNDEMOCRATIC-UNYEILDING NAZI  GERMAN INVENTION.]

TO be Continued

...Meanwhile a BMG poll of 1,510 adults has revealed public disillusionment with MPs.

Of those polled 39 per cent believe that MPs put the EU interests above British interests.

The Government was also coming under pressure to delay a

£1billion contract for Royal Fleet Auxiliary Fleet Solid Support vessels. Under the EU defence directive the contract is expected to be awarded to Spain.

But if Britain leaves without a deal it can

GIVE THE WORK TO BRITISH SHIPYARDS

*  *  *

Theresa May WARNED by Rees-Mogg: Rotten Brexit deal means we'll NEVER leave EU-Daily Express

 

EXCLUSIVE byDavid Maddox POLITICAL EDITOR

TO BE CONTINUED

*

Brexit news: British public move towards a no deal ... - Daily Express

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

MARCH 10-2019

 

H.F.1813

*
 

We've suffered

47 years of

penal servitude

[IN HITLER'S PLANNED-EU]

 

COMMENTARY

By Jacob Rees-Mogg MP

GEOFFREY COX'S main task as he negotiates with the European Union is to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse or, as Rumpelstiltskin did the fairy tale, weave gold from straw.

It is not an easy task as the Government's negotiating hand has been undermined by those who never accepted the result of the referendum and think that they-with their preternatural powers -know best.

On the other hand, it is simple. The Attorney General needs to insert an end date into the treaty or something of equal legal force.

The Withdrawal Agreement is a rotten accord. It condemns the United Kingdom to at least 21 months of vassalage at a cost of £39billion,

Yet everything other than the backstop has an expiry date-after a certain point the nation's freedom and control would be restored.

After 47 years of penal servitude a final few months is tolerable. However, the backstop could last forever and would tie this country's hands in terms of

REGULATIONS

CUSTOMS

and the rulings of the

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 in areas without a formal ability to leave.

'Leaving without an agreement is nothing to be frightened about'.

Although fewer areas of British life would be affected than is currently the case, in these departments there would be even less control as there is now.

There would also be the absurdity of replacing a treaty that can be revoked with two years' notice with one that is perpetual.

The Lisbon Treaty, the de facto constitution of the EU allows a member state to depart after giving two years notice. THE WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT contains no such provision.

There would seem some logic in saying to the EU

 "LET US COPY ARTICLE 50 and paste it into this agreement"

as then the backstop could be cancelled with fair notice and the position would be no worse than today.

If Geoffrey Cox could achieve this then his return to westminster would be a heroic one.

If this cannot be achieved then the default position is that the UK

LEAVES WITHOUT A DEAL.

Some MPs say that they could never agree to this but many   of them voted for the Article 50 Act that sets out the timetable and then stood on a Conservative manifesto WHICH STATED.

"NO DEAL IS BETTER THAN A BAD DEAL."

If such people were to use Parliamentary prestidigitation to delay, in the hope of preventing BREXIT, the honour and trustworthiness of politicians would fall to a new low. if honour and truth prevail instead then on march 29 there would be an opportunity to use the gains of departure for

THE NATION'S BENEFIT.

Leaving without an agreement is nothing to be frightened about. it opens the door to prosperity. the Chancellor ought to welcome it and use the £39billion, which would otherwise be

WASTED IN EUROPE.

It could be spent on projects that would help the country and taxpayers keep more of their own money which they would, on the whole spend more wisely than the Government spends it for them.

EU taxes that hit the least well off most, such as the requirement to put Vat on domestic fuel, should go, as could tarriffs on goods not produced in this country. Perhaps taxpayers may even want some of their money spent on more police to help reduce knife crime .

The EU, asd its Eurozone economies stagnate again, is jealous of this potential success and obdurate in negotiations. It constantly offers TOO LITTLE and asks TOO MUCH and has shown over the last two years why it is so important to

LEAVE.

If the Attorney General succeeds it is the EU that would benefit, the UK will gain as long as it is out of this failed system.

DAILY EXPRESS-We've suffered 47 years of penal servitude-Commentary by Jacob Rees-Mogg MP

MARCH 10-2019

H.F.1816

*

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

[TREASON]

This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

 

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1784

*

 

 

5

View
comments

 

The first rule of negotiation is to open talks with what you believe to be your strongest position.

Good negotiators know there will be push back from the other side, so they must recognise the limits of what they are prepared to concede, and what ‘red lines’ they cannot cross.

So imagine my anxiety when the Cabinet emerged from the Chequers summit with a proposal that is more concerned with what the EU might want, rather than what UK voters wanted. I call it Demi-Brexit.

Let’s start with the ‘common rule book’ for goods and agriculture. There isn’t and won’t be any such thing. What it amounts to is the UK accepting the EU’s rule book for all existing regulations, without any chance of divergence to help our own industries. How many times have we heard our leading entrepreneurs complain about the restrictive level of regulations imposed by Brussels and the sclerotic nature of EU bureaucracy?

 

The Cabinet's Brexit plan is a betrayal of 17.5million voters, says Iain Duncan Smith (pictured)

For small and medium-sized enterprises the problems are greater. They are most heavily penalised by ill-conceived European directives which hold back businesses and undermine competition.

Trying to justify this policy, the Cabinet argues that Parliament will have the final say before any new EU regulations are implemented. But if our Government has accepted complete alignment in trade of goods, what use is that? In practice, Parliament will be impotent and EU governance will continue.

Even worse, under such a system, businesses fear Britain won’t be able to negotiate proper non-EU trade deals. Ninety per cent of future economic growth will be outside the EU and we are in real danger of being unable to exploit that commercial freedom. It is vital we do so because most of the UK’s exports go outside Europe and despite all the hype, exports to the EU amount to only 12 per cent of our GDP.

Britain runs a yearly trade deficit with the EU of just under £100 billion, whereas we have a trade surplus with the rest of the world.

Given that stark imbalance, it is in our national interest to maximise our trade with the rest of the world. Yet, it will be impossible to strike arrangements centred on mutual recognition of standards of goods with other countries — all because we’ll be hamstrung as ever by EU requirements.

Most experts believe no self-respecting countries would entertain any such deals, meaning an early agreement with the U.S. — taking our steel industry out of sanctions imposed against the EU, for example — would not now be possible.

 

Cabinet members gather at Chequers to discuss the Prime Minister's Brexit proposals 

A golden opportunity for new global trading arrangements will be lost. Which brings me to what was notably missing from the discussions: our migration policy. The Government says freedom of movement with the EU will end, but it is becoming clear there is a plan that, when pressed by Brussels, we’ll offer some preferential access to EU citizens through a ‘Mobility Framework’ — or ‘Freedom of Movement Lite’. I don’t recall anyone voting for that.

It is likely the Government proposals will be watered down further because the Chequers strategy is only our opening offer.

So, as bad as it is already is, it will only get worse as EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier ratchets up his demands. Sadly, after making so many concessions already, what chance is there the UK will ever defy the EU?

In its desperation to reach a compromise at Chequers, the Cabinet has ignored the reality that, in 2016, 17.5 million UK citizens voted to take back democratic control of their own laws, borders, money and regulations. What is on offer simply will not do.

IAIN DUNCAN SMITH is MP for Chingford and Woodford Green 

IAIN DUNCAN SMITH: Cabinet's Brexit proposal is a betrayal of 17.5 million voters

*  *  *

H.F.1596

*  *  *

LITTLEJOHN

We need a fearless leader to deliver

BREXIT

- Nigel Farage:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN believes the former Ukip leader should be an integral part of the process after campaigning for so long

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly

Enoch Powell said famously that all political careers end in failure. Nigel Farage should have proved him wrong.

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly.

Up to a point.

The magnificent Leave victory in 2016 was a vindication of Farage’s virtually single-handed campaign to get Britain out of the EU.

Yes, others can also take credit. But Farage was the figurehead, often a lone voice in the wilderness. 

No one had to endure the vilification and violence directed at Farage as he took his message around the country year after year, well before Call Me Dave finally buckled and gave the people a long-overdue referendum.

Fifteen years ago, when I was presenting a nightly show on Sky News, I was about the only broadcaster who would give him a regular platform. The mainstream media treated him as a pariah — at best a circus act, at worst a neo-Nazi. 

This was around the time that New Labour was almost unanimously agreed to have established a 1,000-year reich and opposition to our glorious future as a European statelet was considered futile.

Aside from a few principled players in the Conservative Party — former leader and one-time Maastricht rebel Iain Duncan Smith prominent among them — the political establishment wholeheartedly embraced the EU project. 

But Farage kept banging away, making mischief in Brussels, where he’d managed to get himself elected as an MEP and used his position to ridicule the pompous panjandrums running the show.

Who can forget his wonderful denunciation of the ridiculous Herman Van Rompuy, self-styled former European ‘president’?

‘You have the charisma of a damp rag, and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk . . . Who are you? I’d never heard of you. Nobody in Europe had ever heard of you.

‘I would like to ask you, President, who voted for you . . . oh, I know democracy’s not popular with you lot, and what mechanism do the people of Europe have to remove you?

‘Is this European democracy? You appear to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states — perhaps that’s because you come from Belgium, which of course is pretty much a non-country . . .

‘Sir, you have no legitimacy in this job at all, and I can say with confidence that I speak on behalf of the majority of British people in saying: We don’t know you, we don’t want you, and the sooner you’re put out to grass, the better.’

The Westminster bubble was horrified. How dare this upstart show such a lack of respect to our European masters? But out in the suburbs and the shires, and on the rundown council estates in the North of England, millions of decent British citizens gave a silent cheer.

Call Me Dave dismissed Farage’s Ukip as a collection of ‘fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’. It was a cruel caricature, but partly accurate. Ukip’s annual conference certainly resembles a roomful of Hyacinth Buckets and men who model themselves on the Major in Fawlty Towers.

But Ukip was on a roll — and by now Farage was a ubiquitous presence in radio and TV studios, even if he was often only there as an Aunt Sally, to be shouted at by self-righteous presenters and panellists alike.

Yet Farage stood up to the verbal slings and arrows, and to the nasty physical abuse he frequently had to endure. Cigarette in one hand, pint of best in the other, he kept on plugging away.

In the 2015 General Election, Ukip polled almost four million votes, a large chunk of them in former Labour strongholds in the North, which felt ignored and abandoned and had suffered the greatest impact from mass immigration.

Farage’s ‘fruitcakes’ didn’t make a parliamentary breakthrough but they delivered the Tories their first Commons majority since 1992, simply by denying Labour seats they had taken for granted.

Now, Cameron feared, they were coming for the Tories, so he panicked and promised a referendum on EU membership. 

Say what you like about Call Me Dave, but this was his greatest gift to the people of Britain, an opportunity we seized, asserting our sovereignty and overturning the decades-old project of submerging our country into an anti-democratic United States of Europe.

 

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be

Cameron’s gamble backfired. He resigned immediately and is now reduced to scraping a living on the international lecture circuit, essentially a political end-of-the-pier show.

Next week, he’s playing a small town theatre in Florida, but has sold fewer seats than its current production, Million Dollar Quartet, a jukebox musical featuring hits by Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis.

In the States, where they value national independence, Farage is a folk hero, a bigger draw than our former Prime Minister.

And yet.

OK, so the referendum wouldn’t have been won without Boris, Gove and the brave career politicians who dared to defy the Establishment stitch-up. But without Farage, there would have been no referendum, nor would there have been any Brexit.

What kind of Brexit, if any, remains to be seen. Which, presumably, is why Farage is now muttering about making a comeback as part of a Ukip Mark II.

The corpse of the old Ukip is still twitching, but without Farage it’s nothing. The party’s on its third post-Farage leader, no one you’ve ever heard of, and he’s on the way out over a few incendiary tweets sent by some dopey bird half his age he’s got himself hooked up with. I can’t be bothered to go into details, because it’s a waste of time.

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be.

One of the reasons Ukip imploded was because those four million voters returned to the two main parties, both of which made manifesto promises to implement Brexit in full, yet now seem hell-bent on either reneging or watering it down so far it becomes meaningless.

So I understand and share Farage’s concern. As I’ve said all along, the fix has been in since the result of the referendum was announced. The political class have stolen our biggest vote in history for anything and made it all about them — not the people they are paid to serve.

Frankly, I don’t trust any of them to deliver the Brexit we voted for. If the vast majority of MPs had their way, they’d stop the whole process in its tracks today. When Theresa May succeeded Call Me Dave, she should have established a grand cross-party coalition to negotiate our departure, including heroic Labour figures such as Gisela Stuart and Kate Hoey.

But the central player should have been Farage, a man who knows his way around Brussels and scares the EU to death.

He’d never have put up with the contemptuous treatment being meted out to Britain by Michel Barnier and his ‘damp-rag, low-grade bank clerk’ bureaucrats.

Instead, we’re stuck with Mother Theresa, who spent the referendum hiding behind the sofa and still won’t say whether she’d vote Leave if it was held today.

Her new de facto deputy, David Lidington, is a full-on federast, already speculating we could rejoin the EU at some stage. Rejoin? We haven’t even left yet — and never will, other than in name only, if the political establishment prevails.

Even David Davis seems to have gone native and Boris has been banished to the outer darkness, certainly when it comes to Brexit. In what kind of Fred Karno government is the Foreign Secretary excluded from the biggest foreign policy issue facing the country in modern history?

Never mind Boris, though. Mrs May should be making plans for Nigel, bringing him into the fold, allowing him to be an integral part of the very Brexit process for which he has campaigned so long, so hard and so selflessly.

He doesn’t need a knighthood, or a sinecure in the Lords — each of which would have been a traditional reward for his service to this country. Given the fuss over Mrs Thatcher’s memorial, I suppose a statue in Parliament Square is out of the question, too.

But what is beyond doubt is that, after Thatcher, Farage is the most influential, most significant British political figure since Churchill — much more so than the Westminster pygmies and time-servers who treat him with unwarranted disdain.

Ukip, the party he led, may be sleeping with the fishes, but if there is any justice, Farage’s career deserves to end in triumph.

Let’s hope Enoch was wrong.

 


Read more:   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5300489/We-need-fearless-leader-deliver-Brexit-Nigel-Farage.html#ixzz55RBjzeYS

 

H.F.1460

*  *  *

 

TRUMP TRADE OFFER

 

Boosts

Brexiteers

Donald Trump promised US COMMERCE with Britain

Will increase 'very substantially' after a post-Brexit deal to preserve

£12 BILLION of trade

From TOM LEONARD in NEW York

Daily Mail - Trump trade offer boosts Brexiteers - Mail e-paper

 

FEBRUARY 16, 2019

Speaking at thE WHITE HOUSE, the president made clear he was happy with the deal and said the

'very good trading relationship' between the two countries had been 'strenghened further.'.

His comments will hearten pro-Brexit supporters who have argued that leaving the European Union will enable Britain to strike lucrative

FREE TRADE DEALS

Across the globe.

Mr Trump had previously critisised Theresa May's handling of

BREXIT

warning her moves to negotiate a softer deal with the EU acould 'kill' any new deal with the US.

The new mutual recognition agreement replicates the current deal between the EU and US on ntechnical standards for exported goods.

sMr Trump made the comments in passing as he rattled through his administration's foreign policy successes.

'With the UK, we're continuing our trade and we're actually going to be increasing it very substantially as time goes by,' he said.

International Trade Secretary Liam Fox leapt on the remarks, saying: President TRump's statement was clear-the UK and the USA share a

SPECIAL TRADE RELATIONSHIP

and there is real ambition on both sides of the Atlantic to enhance this after we

LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.

[THOSE WHO TALK OF A SOFT OPTION ARE SUPPORTING ADOLF HITLER'S PLAN FOR A GERMAN DICTATORSHIP OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

THROUGHOUT HISTORY OF MANKIND FREEDOM OF PERSON AND COUNTRY HAS OFTEN RESULTED IN THE OLD ADAGE!

'WITHOUT PAIN-THERE IS NO GAIN!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

FEBRUARY 16, 2019

 

H.F.1801

*  *  *

 

 

['BULLY FOR THEM!']

 

[UKIP REVENGE]

 

*

 

Mail On Sunday | Daily Mail Online

by John Stevens Deputy Political Editor.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/mailonsunday/index.html
Tory Remainers warn of 'purple Momentum' infiltrating party [UKIP]

PRO-REMAIN Tory MPs said last night the party was being taken over by former UKIP members amid fresh infighting over

BREXIT

 

Former ministers Nick Boles and Anna Soubry said a 'purple Momentum' was gaining control of some local Conservative associations and leaving their sitting MPs facing the

THREAT OF DESELECTION.

It came as Theresa May was warned that a dozen ministers will resign by the end of the month unless she agrees to pospone Brexit to prevent a

NO DEAL scenario.

Miss Soubry yesterday said the Conservative Party was 'broken' as the Prime Minister struggles to reconcile the warring factions. The former business minister who has been campaigning for a second referendum said even MPs loyal to Mrs May were facing the prospect  of being unseated because of the  arrival of hundreds of ex-Ukip supporters in their constituency association

[BLOODY GOOD SHOW]

They are now in control of the associations. We have got a "purple Momentum", I'm not exaggerating,' she told the BBC

[Brussels Broadcasting Contractor]

'I spoke to a colleague of mine and he was telling me that he is now being threatened with deselection because he

VOTED FOR THE PRIME MINISTER'S DEAL...

[THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY HAVE FORGOTTEN THE MEANING OF THE PARTY NAME WHICH IS TO

CONSERVE

AND NOT DESTROY OUR FREEDOM AND UNIQUE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.]

TO BE CONTINUED.

FULL ARTICLE

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

FEBRUARY 16,2019

 

H.F.1802

*  *  *

 

WE HEAR THAT 80% OF CONSERVATIVE MPs ARE COMMITTED FRIENDS OF ISRAEL- DAILY MAIL THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 9,2017.

 WE HAVE ASKED ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OVER THE PAST WHY OUR GOVERNMENTS WERE NOT

FRIENDS OF ENGLAND

BECAUSE IT HAS TAKEN 45 YEARS SINCE WE VOTED NO! IN 1975 FOR THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHO LIED ABOUT OUR TRUE COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLAN DOMINANCE OF EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

TO HAVE A REFERENDUM AND ONLY WHEN THE ELITE TORIES THOUGHT IT WOULD GO THEIR WAY TO A DEEPER ENMESHMENT INTO THE EU SUPER-STATE. THEY MISJUDGED THE TRUE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND-AS IT WAS SHE WHO SAVED THE UNION.

WE CAN HOPE NO BETTER WITH THE LABOUR PARTY WITH THEIR FRIENDS OF ISRAEL BODY THOUGH DECRIED MUCH LATELY IS STILL IN ACTION . ALAS! THE TRUE LABOUR PARTY OF THE SHIRES DIED DECADES AGO AS WITNESSED BY THE HUGE BREXIT VOTE.

OUR SUPPOSED CLOSEST ALLY THE USA WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN OUR ENTERING THE EU TO GIVE GERMANY A HAND .IT IS COMPLETELY UNDER THE ISRAELI LOBBY-HAS BEEN FOR OVER A HUNDRED YEARS.

AS WE HAVE STATED OUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENDEAVOUR TO BE ON FRIENDLY RELATIONS WITH ALL GOVERNMENTS -AS

WINSTON CHURCHILL

HAD STATED MOST VOCIFEROUSLY IN THE PAST:

 JAW JAW NOT WAR WAR!

News for DAILY MAIL-OUT OF THE SHADOWS THE POWERFUL FIXER BEHIND HER DOWNFALL by Andrew Pierce


Daily Mail
Andrew Pierce profiles the influential Lord Polak
Daily Mail - 13 hours ago
Out of the shadows, the powerful fixer behind Priti Patel's downfall: ANDREW
PIERCE profiles ... By Andrew Pierce for the Daily Mail ... He was also with her in
the two further undisclosed meetings in New York and Parliament 
 

 

[As on many other occasions over the past decades when we have shown details of Israeli intelligence and the connection with F O I . we have received many visits from their obedient servants who do not hide their NATIONAL identity.

 But this is ENGLAND

and such individuals should know their place and do their work without waving their FLAG!-MI5 need to keep them in place or is there nothing they can do-or must it be as CS1 WHERE ISRAEL REIGNS?]

 

 

JEW WATCH

 

 

 

H.F.1373 FRIENDS TO ALL- BUT COMMITTED TO NONE!

*  *  *

This might rattle the teacups, but must we rule out executing terrorists? STEPHEN GLOVER wonders if Britain should be discussing the return of capital punishment for high treason

659

View
comments

 

Where should two former alleged terrorists who were once British citizens be put on trial for the most brutal and barbarous acts against innocent civilians, some of them British?

The right answer is surely the United Kingdom. Two young men brought up in this country, who are accused of unspeakable terrorist offences, should face justice in a British court.

And yet they won't. Alexanda Kotey and El Shafee Elsheikh are being packed off to the United States to stand trial for grievous crimes they are said to have committed while fighting on behalf of Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria

Their erstwhile collaborator 'Jihadi John' is thought to have beheaded at least two U.S. journalists.

 

Alexanda Kotey (pictured left) and El Shafee Elsheikh (right) are being packed off to the United States to stand trial for grievous crimes they are said to have committed while fighting on behalf of Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria

Let me summarise their alleged crimes. Elsheikh, 30, who was born in Sudan but raised in London, is accused of supervising the torture and killing of Western hostages by ISIS. 

Kotey, 34, London born-and-bred, is charged with being part of the same ISIS cell which beheaded 27 hostages and, according to reliable testimonies, displayed horrendous cruelty and unbelievable sadism.

They are believed to have been part of a four-man killing machine known as 'The Beatles'. 

Seldom was a nickname so fatuously bestowed. If the 'fab four' who made up the pop group were fetching and creative, the ISIS killers are repulsive and deadly.

So why can't they be tried in their own country? The fact that they have been deprived of their British citizenship by the Government is beside the point. 

They are citizens of no other country. And their historical relationship is with Britain.

 

Kotey, 34 (mugshot pictured) London born-and-bred, is charged with being part of the same ISIS cell which beheaded 27 hostages and, according to reliable testimonies, displayed horrendous cruelty and unbelievable sadism

I can think of three possible reasons for our handing the problem over to the Americans. 

The first is that under existing legislation our courts are unable to apply the very lengthy sentences that can be handed down by American judges. 

These two presumed monsters could be walking free in 20 or 25 years if convicted here.

Moreover, as a result of the Human Rights Act our courts are swarming with lawyers who might well argue that because Kotey and Elsheikh were captured and held by rough-hewn Kurdish militia, they have not been treated as they should have been. Shock horror!

And then there is the reluctance of our intelligence services to allow their practices to be revealed in open court out of fear that would-be terrorists might learn things about spooks which they shouldn't.

For all these reasons, the Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, has gratefully washed his hands of the case.

 

Elsheikh, 30 (pictured) who was born in Sudan but raised in London, is accused of supervising the torture and killing of Western hostages by ISIS

There was no attempt to secure an undertaking that the death penalty wouldn't be applied in the United States, presumably because there was no prospect Washington would give such an assurance.

Now, of course, the Labour Party is up in arms, principally because it is so opposed to the death penalty.

Diane Abbott, the Shadow Home Secretary, hyperventilated that the Government's position was 'abhorrent and shameful'. 

Meanwhile, Labour's Hilary Benn piously (and idiotically) opined that 'we have to show we are better than Islamic State in our morals, and should therefore have nothing to do with capital punishment'.

In my humble opinion, the prospect that these two alleged killers might be sentenced to death if found guilty of horrendous crimes by an American court is by far the least troubling aspect of this affair.

No, what worries me is that our courts are considered too unreliable, and our legalisation too weak, for these seemingly wicked men to be tried in the country in which they were brought up, and which they have more right to call their own than any other.

 

Pictured: Alexandra Kotey is seen fighting for ISIS abroad 

Isn't the Government being particularly supine in asking dependable old Uncle Sam to deal with a problem that we are too querulous to address ourselves? I can see no other plausible interpretation.

Which is why a report by the Policy Exchange think-tank advocating a new treason law should be welcomed.

Believe it or not, the Treason Act of 1351 is still on the statute book, shorn of a few provisions over the years. It has not been used since 1945.

As the report argues, treason — the crime of aiding and abetting one's country's declared enemies — is extremely serious. 

A new law is needed which envisages very severe jail sentences for those convicted of treason.

If there were such a law, there is little doubt that, as former UK citizens, Kotey and Elsheikh would stand trial in a British court instead of being dispatched to the United States. 

For as well as being accused of carrying out mass murder in the most ferocious fashion, they also stand charged with working for an organisation, namely Islamic State, which was and remains an enemy of the United Kingdom and is effectively at war with it. That's treason.

And that brings me to another thought, which may rattle a few teacups. 

Why do we assume that the abolition of the death penalty as it applies to criminal law should also cover acts of treason committed in the circumstances of war?

 

The Home Secretary, Sajid Javid (pictured outside Downing Street) has gratefully washed his hands of the case, writes Stephen Glover 

After all, no one objects very much when a terrorist in the throes of some atrocity is shot dead by the police or Army.

I'm not clear why we are so certain that a person convicted of such an abominable crime shouldn't receive the ultimate punishment.

Interestingly, although the death penalty for murder was abolished in 1965, it remained on the statute book until 1998 in respect of high treason, though was never used.

It was deemed incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, which was incorporated into the Human Rights Act by New Labour in the same year.

I'm not — quite — recommending the restoration of capital punishment for treason, and the Policy Exchange report certainly does not.

I have too much residual modern liberal sensibility to argue unequivocally in favour of that. But can't we have an intelligent discussion about the issue?

It is undeniable that Western democracies are threatened by merciless and ruthless combatants such as Kotey and Elsheikh appear to be.

 

Diane Abbott, the Shadow Home Secretary (pictured at PMQs) hyperventilated that the Government's position was 'abhorrent and shameful'

I don't for a moment think people like them will succeed. There aren't enough of them, for one thing.

But it is feeble, as well as potentially dangerous, to treat the mortal enemies of our society and way of life as though they were commonplace murderers.

Whatever new measures are adopted — and the Policy Exchange's proposals for a new treason law would be an excellent start — it is obvious we need a legislative armoury strong enough either to deter home-grown traitors, or deliver fitting punishments to those who commit outrages.

If Kotey and Elsheikh were to be tried in this country, we might understand how it was that two young men who enjoyed the benefits of living in a free society should seemingly have done their utmost to destroy it.

And such a trial, if it had led to a conviction, would have given the British people the satisfaction of seeing justice meted out to two British traitors who appear to hate, and wanted to damage, their country.

As it is, though, I don't doubt they will receive a fair trial in the United States, it will inevitably be conducted in the margins of our attention.

Why can't we hold our own monsters to account? British justice for British terrorists is the best approach.

 

STEPHEN GLOVER ON CAPITAL PUNISHMENT FOR UK TERRORISTS.

 

 

 

 

H.F.1641

 

 

*  *  *

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Happy New Year: Hundreds of top Khazarian mobsters, including the Bush family, renditioned to Gitmo

 

In a historic moment of poetic justice, most of the U.S.-based top perpetrators of the fake “war on terror” have now themselves been renditioned to the U.S. Navy camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Pentagon sources say.  “The Rothschild assets George Soros, Peter Munk, Peter Sutherland, the Bushes, the Podestas, and many others may have been airlifted to Gitmo for military tribunals, as the Department of Defense spends $500M to upgrade the prison and send more military police and Marines,” the sources say.

In one of many signs of just how historic the new American revolution is, “30 congressmen will not be returning in the new year,” the Pentagon sources say.  CIA sources also confirm that former U.S. President Bill Clinton, hoping for a plea bargain, is spilling the beans on people like former CIA head John Brennan, top U.S. Mossad agent Rahm Emmanuel, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and many others.

Furthemore, as U.S. President Donald Trump proclaims Janaury 2018 to be “Anti-Slavery Month,”
 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-january-2018-national-slavery-human-trafficking-prevention-month/

… human trafficking centers around the world are being raided and shut down.  In Saudi Arabia, 3,000 child sex slaves have been freed, according to Russian FSB sources.  In the U.S., “there was a power outage on December 27th at the “pedo heaven Disneyland,” as the place was raided by special forces fighting human slavers, the Pentagon sources say.  In apparently connected events, Washington Post heir Bill Graham and Jordan Feldstein, the brother of the actor Jonah Hill, died last week, the sources point out.

Another move was that Julian Assange “was extracted from the Ecuadorian Embassy to take down the cabal, and he may be pardoned along with Mike Flynn,” the sources add.

Also, “On Christmas day, Delta Force raided a mansion owned by former President Barack Obama in …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Merry Christmas:  The 13 “Illuminati” bloodline families sue for peace

Peace on earth and goodwill to all (and not just men, but all life forms) is looking like a realistic goal for 2018 now that the 13 “Illuminati” * bloodline families, seeing their ancient rule of planet Earth collapsing, are suing for peace.  Last week a representative of the G7 (Germany, the U.K., the corporate U.S., Japan, Italy, France, and Canada) met with a representative of the White Dragon Society (WDS) to discuss peace terms, according to a WDS member who was present at the meeting.  The G7, of course, is the political front for the 13 bloodline families.  There can be no doubt that this meeting was made possible by people inside the military-industrial complex acting in the spirit of Jesus Christ, and for this we wish them all “a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.”

The bloodline offer to negotiate peace is directly connected to the state of emergency that was declared last week by USA President Donald Trump.  If you have not seen it yet, please read the historic document in the link below.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/

“After Hanukkah, Trump declared a state of emergency and signed an executive order on December 20th freezing the assets of those accused of human rights abuses and corruption, a catch-all to bankrupt the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, Obama, the Cabal, and the global Jewish mafia,” was how a Pentagon source summed up the situation.

“The national emergency allows Trump to seize assets and unleash the military to carry out mass arrests and adjudicate via military tribunals, effectively imposing martial law,” the source continues.

The Pentagon source also sent a copy of this photograph with the explanation, “Trump wears purple when unveiling his national security strategy on December 18th in a victory lap over the Soros/Hillary purple revolution, and drinks water with both hands to simulate handcuffs.”

Clearly reacting to this situation, the representative of the bloodlines set the meeting for December 23rd, the birthday of the Japanese Emperor, and claimed to be a representative of the Imperial family as well as the G7.  The representative, who acted as if he was negotiating a surrender, said the bloodlines want to keep existing nation-states and institutions as they are, but…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – Experimental Quantum Anti-Gravity Successfully Replicated

 

I would like to let you know that my anti-gravity experiments have been successfully replicated by the Aerospace Engineering Department at the New Sciences & Technologies Faculty of the University of Tehran in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I have developed complete quantum anti-gravity hypothesis with direct testable predictions that are simple, clear, easy, and inexpensive.

As you know, present-day quantum gravity theories suffer from too many mathematical space dimensions, and from too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear, and subject to easy empirical verification.  I offer clear explanation of the principles of quantum gravity, and also precisely describe how to perform simple and inexpensive experiments to verify it.

In order to clearly understand quantum anti-gravity, please follow these 8 steps:

  1. Start from this brief overview — Quantum Gravity in a Nutshell
  2. The theoretical basis for quantum gravity are the Abraham’s equations of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, and their empirical counterpart — the Abraham force
  3. To understand how the Biefeld-Brown effect works, you need to be clear where B-B vectors point — “up” or “down”
  4. The Biefeld-Brown effect is an instance of the Abraham force.
  5. Study the section about gyroscope’s anomalous effect.
  6. Please, study all the material on THE BOYD BUSHMAN EFFECT page in order to appreciate the potential complex magnetic fields have for shaping quantum gravity interactions.
  7. Now, you are ready to read the short introduction to quantum gravity.
  8. Perform two simple experiments for empirical verification.

The following are the 10 “mysteries” that my hypothesis sheds new light upon:

  1. The main prediction of my hypothesis (2016) is that anti-hydrogen will anti-gravitate.
  2. Gravitational waves mystery.
  3. EmDrive mystery.
  4. Solar mystery.
  5. Mass mystery.
  6. Bicycle mystery.
  7. Propeller  mystery.
  8. Cloud mystery.
  9. Pioneer mystery.
  10. Missing mystery.

I have designed 4 progressively more complex experiments, and we have successfully performed one of them, the one of medium difficulty, which constitutes:

The empirical discovery of hitherto unknown physical interaction between angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

To perform this experiment, we need a gyroscope with a vertical support, and magnetic and electric shielding cages.

According to my hypothesis, there will be a measurable time difference between a freely spinning gyroscope inside, and outside the cages.  A gyroscope freely spinning inside both cages will come to rest in less time than when spinning outside them.

The experiment was performed successfully and was recorded in the following two videos:

To have a clear idea what is involved in the experiment, please take a closer look at the above two videos first.

For the experiment, we used the following small and light gyroscope at 10,000 rpm:

It would be much better to use a heavier gyro, because the heavier the gyro, the stronger the effect, at the same rate of rpm.

The value of angular velocity (rpm) is important only insofar as to generate sufficient angular momentum to allow the gyro to spin freely for a longer time before it comes to rest.

The objective of the experiment was to obtain two values of the gyro’s run time:

  • Outside the shielding;
  • Inside the shielding.

In my experiment, the two sample values are, respectively:

  • 55.54 seconds
  • 51.87 seconds

There was a 3.67 second difference, which amounts to 6.6%.  The time difference is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of electrostatic shielding of the Faraday cage. Applying the magnetic shielding in addition to the electric one would further increase the time difference.

As you can see in the video, it is important that the gyro is elevated by means of a vertical support.  Ideally, gyro should start spinning as close to a vertical position as possible, and also be able to pass lower, while still spinning, than its horizontal position.

The reason for this effect is that the gyroscope inside the cages will be spinning in reduced strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, which in turn reduces the strength of the Biefeld-Brown effect acting upon it.

The gyroscope outside the cages, spinning in the undiminished strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, is subject to the full influence of the Biefeld-Brown effect that causes the gyroscope to resist Earth’s gravity pull, which happens to be none other than pure natural antigravity effect.

OBJECTIONS

  • All conductors, like the brass gyro, exhibit an effective diamagnetism when they experience a changing magnetic field.  The Lorentz force on electrons causes them to circulate around forming eddy currents.  The eddy currents then produce an induced magnetic field that opposes the applied field and resist the conductor’s motion.

—  That is true for both, the gyro spinning inside and outside the Faraday cage in Earth’s magnetic field.  It does not make any difference.

  • But the gyro’s induced magnetic field will generate eddy currents in the Faraday cage and the resultant magnetic field will slow down gyro’s spin (magnetic breaking), and hence the whole effect.  It is like dropping a magnet down a copper pipe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dFFL8TDt2Q

—   The analogy in the video applies, but only in principle.  Spinning brass gyro is not a strong neodymium magnet, and if, in principle, it generates any magnetic field, it is so weak that it will not even affect a needle of a compass.  As opposed to the copper pipe in the video, the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage has much larger diameter (the inverse-square law), so it is enough to drop a strong neodymium magnet down the Faraday cage to see how much it would slow down, if at all.  As you can see in the above video, even few empty slits in the copper pipe greatly weaken the eddy currents, this being the reason for using enamel-coated copper mesh.  Diamagnetic materials, like brass, or copper, have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than or equal to 1, and therefore a magnetic susceptibility less than or equal to 0, since susceptibility is defined as χv=μv−1.  This means that diamagnetic materials, in principle, are repelled by magnetic fields.  However, since diamagnetism is such a weak property, its effects are not observable in everyday life.  Moreover, there is a big difference between Faraday cage made of solid copper, and one made of enamel-coated copper mesh.  The magnetic field induced in the gyro is weak, because Earth’s magnetic field is weak, so whatever little eddy currents could be induced by the gyro in solid copper Faraday cage will become irrelevant in the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage, as you can see in the following two videos:

Even though it is true that the experiment, in principle, is open to influences from various phenomena, including the Carnegie curve, the overall result is clearly well beyond being attributed exclusively to these other phenomena.

To completely eliminate above objections, magnetic shielding needs to be applied in addition to the Faraday cage, and the gyro should be custom-made from a material which does not allow for eddy currents to flow in it.

Naturally,  I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for me regarding the theoretical foundations as well as replication of the experiment.

With respect and much gratitude,  I am
Sincerely yours,

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down, while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1430

 

 

*  *  *

 

*  *  **  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

SEPTEMBER 28-2016

 

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

FEBRUARY-2016

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

ALAS A FALSE HOPE

AS WE FOUND ON MARCH 29,2019

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

 

 
 
 

 

 A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL

...even though Carillions collapse

 shames CAPITALISM

and puts the wind in Labour's sails says ALEX BRUMMER

 

News for DAILY MAIL-A GIANT PONZI SCHEME THAT DESERVED TO GO TO THE WALL by ALEX BRUMMER

 

ALEX BRUMMER: A giant Ponzi scheme that deserved to go to the wall... even though Carillion's collapse shames capitalism and puts the wind in Labour's sails



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5273135/ALEX-BRUMMER-Carillion-deserved-wall.html#ixzz54RK5sa9n
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The collapse of the Wolverhampton -based construction group Carillion is catastrophic for its 43,000 employees at home and overseas, for the Government and for members of the stricken pension fund.

It represents a nadir for the private sector outsourcing companies which, since the era of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have been relied upon to deliver all manner of public services, from building hospitals and schools to modernising the NHS and even providing school meals.

In the fierce scramble for business among these behemoths, Carillion was so desperate for contracts that it consistently overpromised on the work it could do for an agreed cost. When it failed to deliver on time and on price, as was the case with the new 646-bed Royal Liverpool hospital, the group went on a borrowing spree.

 

More than 20,000 jobs in the UK, and more overseas, are at risk after Carillion ran out of time to find a way to restructure its £1.5bn debt burden. Pictured: A staff member outside an office in London

Its debts grew to £900 million, an impossibly large sum to manage when its share price was going into freefall during the course of last year.

Plunge

In effect Carillion, chaired by former water company boss Philip Green, had become a mammoth Ponzi scheme in which the cash promised or received for newer contracts was effectively being used to cover up the black holes on the older contracts.

Why Carillion has careered into crisis 

The Wolverhampton-based firm, the backbone behind a raft of public infrastructure projects, is teetering over a precipice.

The company is the second largest construction firm in the UK but has debts of about £1.5billion and a pension fund shortfall of almost £600million. 

So how has it got into this mess? Most analysts agree that the answer is simple. It has over-reached itself.

Carillion they argue has its fingers in too many pies at homes and abroad from the Battersea Power station redevelopment in the UK to operations in Canada, the Middle East and the Caribbean.

The company's incessant desire to expand has resulted in it pursuing too many risky contracts - some accompanied by questionable accounting practices - that have become increasingly unprofitable. 

It has furthermore faced delays in payments in the Middle East.

The firm in recent months has found  it much harder to manage its mountainous debt pile and pension deficit.

In December Carillion managed to persuade lenders to give it more time to repay them. But the company's banks are now understood to be unwilling to lend it any more cash.

What is unconscionable in all this is that over the past two decades, before its troubles emerged, Carillion paid out vast sums in dividends to shareholders (seeking to keep them sweet) and bonuses to fat-cat directors — including former chief executive Richard Howson, dismissed last July — yet allowed the pension fund deficit to balloon to an officially estimated £900 million.

The burden of sorting this out will now fall squarely on bail-out body the Pension Protection Fund, which is financed by raising a levy on the functioning pension schemes into which millions of us contribute.

Among the more astonishing aspects of the scandal is that even as Carillion’s share price plunged in the second half of last year, Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, as well as other ministers and civil servants, still felt it was safe to gift the firm new contracts. City investors and hedge funders had already recognised that the company was struggling for survival and could no longer pay its thousands of suppliers in good time. If ever there was a case of the Government throwing good money after bad, this was it.

The business-friendly Tory Government, deliberately or naively, awarded Carillion three new contracts within days of the company admitting several major projects had gone wrong to the tune of £800 million — an announcement that provoked a 30 per cent plunge in the group’s shares last July.

A week after that first public warning that it was all going to hell in a handcart, Grayling’s department revealed that Carillion would partner another construction group on a £1.4 billion contract to work on the flagship £56 billion HS2 railway project.

Days later, Carillion was told by the Ministry of Defence it had been chosen to provide ‘catering, retail and leisure’ services for 233 military facilities. These contracts provided some temporary relief for the firm’s books.

But confidence in Carillon’s ability to manage the crisis, in spite of the new contracts, was fading fast, and in September it warned again that profits would fall short of expectations.

Yet the Government still gambled that it was a good bet, and awarded it a key infrastructure project to electrify the railway connecting Corby in Northamptonshire with London.

Ironically, the contracts for these large-scale, taxpayer-funded projects were given out at a time when Carillion’s chief executive and finance director were departing, and the share price was tanking. Yet Whitehall, in their naivety, sailed serenely on.

The collapse of Carillion comes hard on the heels of the decision by Virgin Trains and its partner Stagecoach to hand back the East Coast railway service to the Government, at a potential taxpayer cost of £2 billion. These two disasters have not only left the Government looking very silly, but also given a fillip to those supporters of Jeremy Corbyn on the Left who are convinced capitalism is wicked, and that only re-nationalisation of public services is the answer.

 

Carillion workers lined up outside a staff office to check on the status of their jobs in London yesterday morning

Sure enough, Shadow Cabinet Office minister Jon Trickett has been quick to exploit the misfortunes of Carillion’s workforce and pensioners, asking what ‘due diligence measures were undertaken before awarding contracts worth billions of taxpayer money’.

Failure

What he failed to acknowledge is that the most enthusiastic embrace of private outsourcing companies came during the last Labour government, which used firms such as Carillion to replace Britain’s Victorian hospitals, to build modern schools, expand universities and begin the process of updating the nation’s railways and roads.

Much went wrong at Carillion, including the failure of highly paid auditors KPMG to lay bare the company’s parlous financial state.

But then independent directors and major investors failed to question a record dividend payout to investors of nearly £80 million in 2016, even as the company headed for the rocks and the huge shortfall in the pension fund grew ever larger. (Labour MP Frank Field, who chairs the Pensions Select Committee, castigated Carillion for taking on ‘mega borrowings while its pension deficit ballooned’.)

None of these attacks can be very comfortable for Baroness (Sally) Morgan, former political secretary to Tony Blair, who joined the Carillion board as an independent director in June 2017, shortly before the fateful disclosure to the stock market that the company was in deep trouble.

The collapse of Carillion also shines a light on the wider outsourcing industry, and the ability of huge private firms to be responsible capitalists when they are given hundreds of millions in public money.

Other companies including Serco, Mitie, Balfour Beatty and G4S have all experienced difficulties with Government contracts: there has been a tendency for them to take on too much and become financially over-stretched.

Stupidity

With the help of experts in company turnarounds, some have managed to clean up the contracts under their management and bounce back.

But it’s too late for Carillion, which ran its affairs in a helter-skelter, irresponsible manner, yet still managed to keep the Government on side until the very end. Some have questioned why the Tories chose not to bail the firm out in the way it seems to have done with the train companies running the East Coast line.

But that surely would have sparked public fury — after all, if capitalism is to survive and thrive as Britain’s chosen economic model then weakness or stupidity must not be allowed to flourish.

Of course, Carillion’s collapse is a dreadful blow, and even now it will prove expensive for taxpayers, who will have to fund the company’s most vital operations until the insolvency practitioners can sell on the contracts.

But it would be a serious misjudgment if this debacle were used as an excuse for bringing an end to the role of private enterprise in building more efficient public services.

Enterprise and ambition in business have been the lifeblood of Britain for centuries. What a shame that it took the collapse of Carillion to remind us how it should not be done.

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1439

 

 MAIN ARTICLE BELOW BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MAY, 2006

THEY NEVER LEARN!

[As we have said many times over the past decades governments fail to learn lessons about key matters vital to the public at large such as LAW & ORDER-IMMIGRATION-and a host of other matters which should have been finally resolved to the satisfaction of the GENERAL PUBLIC many years ago. The reason there is this constant CHAOS is that MINISTERS tread softly because there is always a shortage of FINANCE. Well! we  know where there is a mountain of GOLD in the so-called FOREIGN AID BUDGET! to supply resources to SECURITY-NHS-PENSIONS-ROADS and other ESSENTIAL NEEDS of the PEOPLE. BUT there will be NO CHANGE until PR -PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION is introduced into our POLITICAL SYSTEM. REMEMBER-THE GANG OF THREE or is it now the GANG of TWO have no fears of not alternating as a future government so it is IMPORTANT that the PEOPLE have other chooses to keep our POLITICAL SYSTEM in GOOD HEALTH. Soon we will be FREE of the EU and the their JUSTICE SYSTEM and their other ABOMINATIONS but unfortunately we still have the CURSE of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS with us which destroying the very FREEDOM of SPEECH and PERSON which our ANCESTORS fought for those centuries AGO.  WE see the once VOICE of the PEOPLE the once PARTY of the COMMON MAN in TURMOIL because of its links to a FOREIGN POWER. We have raised the QUESTION where are the FRIENDS of ENGLAND in our WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT?  yet there is a LOBBY of FRIENDS of ISRAEL in BOTH MAIN PARTIES with at least 80% of CONSERVATIVE MP's members. WE ASK should such INFLUENCE be PERMITTED in our HOUSE OF COMMONS.  This is NOT a RACIAL ISSUE but one of FAIRNESS to ALL NATIONS on our PLANET EARTH. WE have also raised the question of UNDUE INFLUENCE in the AFFAIRS of our ISLAND HOME and the difficulty of being CANDID of the MATTERS of the MOMENT of that FOREIGN POWER.       We have to ask ourselves if there was no FOREIGN LOBBY GROUP in PARLIAMENT there would have been no CRIES of RACISM echoing in our HALLOWED HOUSE in WESTMINSTER and what a great RELIEF that would be TO ALL CONCERNED.]

*  *  *

What PLANET are JUDGES living ON?

 

*

Daily Mail

Wednesday, May 31-2006.

 

by

 

Melanie Phillips

 

ARE OUR senior judges simply living on a different planet from the rest of us lesser mortals? Our most senior judge, The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, has launched yet another judicial broadside against apparent evils of imprisonment.

In Lord Phillips’ UNIVERSE, it appears that PRISON is NOT the PLACE for CRIMINALS.

 

Instead, wherever possible judges should pass community sentences -which he admits will not be tolerated by the public unless they include ‘significant punishment’ -because ‘the sensible place for rehabilitation is the community.’

 

EXCUSE ME?

COMMUNITY SENTENCES FAIL TO REHABILITATE CRIMINALS. THEY RESULT IN AN EVEN HIGHER RATE OF RECIDIVISM THAN JAIL SENTENCES.

 

This is hardly surprising, since community sentences seem to be hardship-free zones.

According to a recent report by the

Chief Inspector of Probation

-burglars and robbers in London are being set to restore antique furniture or make costumes for the Notting Hill carnival.

[You couldn’t make it up if you tried]

 

And thousands of criminals sentenced to unpaid community service do nothing at all some days.

 

When they turn up, there are no probation staff to supervise them, so they are simply sent home. And those who don’t who don’t even bother to turn up are NOT taken back to COURT and re-sentenced.

 

It may amaze Lord Phillips to learn that ‘significant punishment’ means going

 

TO PRISON.

 

YES, overcrowding means prisons don’t function properly. But the remedy for that is

 

TO BUILD MORE PRISONS.

 

YET our senior judges harbour an obsessive animosity towards prison, doubtless because of the way Human Rights doctrine has so muddled the way we look at the very concepts of

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT.

 

Lord Phillips’ remarks, however were more bizarre still. One reason prison numbers are rising, he said, was that drug users were deliberately committing crimes to get into prison drug programmes. He had come across prisoners offered community sentences who preferred to go to prison so that they could get treatment.

 

Offenders

 

What on earth does the Lord Justice have under his wig? There is no proper evidence for this at all.

 

Indeed, an investigation by MPs said last year that fewer than half of all jails had drug treatment courses, that ONLY one in ten prisoners who use drugs got places on drug treatment programmes, and that half of those who did go on courses NEVER FINISHED THEM.

 

As for supposedly non-existent community drug treatment programmes, they do EXIST-

but are pretty useless in turning offenders away from crime.

 

In a recent report, the Commons Public Accounts Committee observed that drug treatment orders were ‘more like a

GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD’

than a rehabilitation programme.

 

 

Only 25 per cent of those who accepted them ever completed them.

 

It is deeply worrying not only that a senior judge should make such odd and ill-informed remarks, BUT that the JUDICIARY should assume it knows better what policies should be pursued.

 

Yesterday, the former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf [The burglars’ friend] expanded upon such arrogance.

Apparently making a coded attack on the Prime Minister for his criticisms of a judge over the immigration ruling, Lord Woolf condemned politicians for ‘knocking’ individual judges, because it was ‘very damaging’.

 

So lets get this right. Judges may make comments, which are not only wildly inappropriate because they are intensely political, but also reveal themselves to be woefully OUT OF TOUCH.

 

Yet then they loftily inform us that we should not criticise them for doing so, because they apparently reside on some celestial plane above public debate.

 

Of course, in principle politicians and judges should have a Chinese wall between them. And it was once clearly understood that politicians and judges stood on either side of the wall.

 

But the problem is that the judges have torn up that understanding and are now getting involved in matters of POLICY such as the role of imprisonment or drug treatment, which ARE properly the territory of POLITICIANS.

 

The judges have simply grown too big for their wigs.

 

One of the main reasons is the Human Rights law. Lord Woolf robustly defended this yesterday and said that any resulting tension between GOVERNMENT and JUDICIARY was healthy in a democracy.

 

Weakness

But the fact is that Human Rights law has given the judges a weapon to undermine democracy, by setting up themselves rather than politicians as the people who should decide how the country should be ruled.

 

This first surfaced back in the 1980s, when senior judges decided that the long years of Tory government and the weakness of the opposition posed such a threat to democracy that the judiciary should take upon itself the mantle of opposition instead.

 

In the days before the passage of the Human Rights Act [1998], this took the form of challenges to immigration law through judicial review. Such attempts to change the direction of government policy through court rulings became known as judicial activism.

 

When Tony Bair came to power, instead of putting the judges back behind the Chinese wall he attached a turbo-charge to their already burgeoning judicial activism by introducing the Human Rights Act.

 

This change in the behaviour of judges was by no means restricted to Britain. Judicial activism had become a phenomenon throughout the

WESTERN WORLD.

 

In America, Australia, the countries of the EU and elsewhere, the judges -

Acting as a kind of judicial fifth column around the world - are arrogating to themselves power, which belong to the world of politics.

 

Earlier this year, in a little noticed address in London to the Law Commission, a prominent Australian judge, Michael Kirby - a key proponent of judicial activism- spelt out the judge’s agenda with unabashed frankness.

 

The institutions of government in both Britain and Australia, he said, had become unbalanced. Governments had become too powerful, civil servants and MPs had lost influence to political advisers and ministerial accountability was a thing of the past.

 

Amen to that.

 

BUT he went on to say that as a result ‘the very notion of “sovereignty” of parliament has become a somewhat inapposite concept’

 

There should be instead a new type of government led by judges and based on HUMAN RIGHTS LAW - which was already developing in BRITAIN.

 

So the remedy for politicians who were abusing their powers was to replace them by JUDICIAL POWER.

 

This was nothing less than an all-out attack on parliamentary democracy.

 

[Whatever is left of it after nine years of Tony Blair]

 

Yet Justice Kirby was given a platform by our principle legal reform body -the Law Commission - and before an appreciative audience, which included Lord Phillips, Lord Woolf and the Lord Chancellor.

 

Despised

 

English judges express similar alarming distain for democracy. Last year Lord Bingham, the Senior Law Lord, said that the Human Rights Convention existed to protect vulnerable minorities. Which were sometimes disliked, resented or despised.

 

It should therefore come as no surprise, he went on, that decisions vindicating their rights ‘should provoke howls of criticism by politicians and the mass media. They generally reflect majority opinion.’

 

So majority opinion, on this account, was essentially illegitimate, and the role of the JUDICIARY was to use HUMAN RIGHTS LAW to do it down.

 

This unashamed justification of judicial supremacism is as anti m-democratic as it is arrogant. We are living through a kind of creeping judicial coup d’etat driven by a profound contempt for the

PUBLIC OPINION

-to which politicians are answerable.

 

It is parliamentary weakness that is to blame. Only if Parliament reasserts itself will the

 

RULE OF LAW

 

-     be rescued from

 

RULE OF LAWYERS

 

-who have so high-handedly hijacked it?

 

* * *

[Font altered -bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

*

 

[Well it must occur to many in this country that the present sorry predicament of

 

OUR PARLIAMENT

 

- only benefits those in the Judiciary and of course the growing army of lawyers many of whom have grown rich on their human rights harvest which Tony Blair and his flatmate Lord Falconer have no doubt been sowing with hindsight for years. What better way to destroy an immemorial institution of over 700 in the making than to undermine it from within while professing that their attempts to govern are undermined by the JUDICIARY?

 

WHO CAN WE POSSIBLY TRUST?

 

THERE MUST SURELY BE A SEQUAL TO FOLLOW?

 

 

* * *

MAY/06

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1665BROUGHT  FORWARD FROM MAY-06

 

[A REMINDER]

 

WHAT WE ARE ESCAPING FROM ON MARCH 29,2019

[Daily Mail-Monday, June 9,2008]

 

The Dirty Little Secret Is That Our MPs Hardly Matter Any More

 

by

 

THE

Melanie

Phillips

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-Monday, June 9,2008]

CUP YOUR ears, What is that sound we are suddenly picking up on the bush telegraph?

[PANIC]

It is the distant but unmistakable trumpeting of the elephant in the room. And the name of that most dangerous but lamentably unscrutinised animal is the

EUROPEAN UNION.

The EU is the issue that all politicians are ignoring in the hope we will forget about it.  Most immediately, they hope we have forgotten to be concerned about the

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION

which is masquerading as a bog-standard treaty over which we need lose no sleep.

 

This constitution, which would bring into being a

SUPER-STATE

and end once and for all what remains of the

INDEPENDENCE

OF

EU MEMBER STATES

was dumped after it was rejected by

FRENCH and DUTCH

voters

in

2005.

It was then resurrected in all but name as the

TREATY of LISBON

which

PARLIAMENT

is in the process of ratifying.

This week, that

CONSTITUTION

faces a triple test.

Today, businessman Stuart Wheeler's legal challenge to Labour's refusal to honour its

MANIFESTO PLEDGE

to put it to a

REFERENDUM

reaches the

HIGH COURT.

On Wednesday , the ratification Bill reaches the

HOUSE OF LORDS.

This Bill was ruthlessly shoe-horned through the

COMMONS

This week we will see whether their Lordships will also spinelessly roll over, or recall their historic role as the last-ditch defence of this country's interests against

SUCH ABUSE OF POWER.

 

PANIC

But something else is happening which our politicians didn't bargain for. As we know, the constitution has to be approved by every member state or else it falls. On

THURSDAY 12th JUNE,2008

IRELAND VOTES ON THE TREATY

-and it looks as if

IT MIGHT VOTE AGAINST IT.

[IT DID]

The Irish government is filled with panic and horror at the possibility that the Irish public might actually be thinking for themselves. For the EU has always relied on bamboozling the public about the joys of EUtopia and terrifying them that their whole world will collapse if it is thwarted.

More and more people, however, are realising that they have lied to, not only about the constitution but about the whole EU project.  In Britain we were told from the start that it was only an economic union which would entail no loss of sovereignty.

THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF THE TRUTH

The dirty little secret is that, even without the constitution, political power has simply drained away to Brussels.

 a little-noticed but quite devastating speech in the Commons last week, the Tory MP Peter Lilly recorded that last year the EU passed no fewer than

177 directives

-more or less equivalent to our

ACTS OF PARLIAMENT

and

2,033 regulations

enforceable in the UK, as well as making

1,045 decisions

WHICH AFFECT US.

Our own Trade Minister has admitted that around half of all UK legislation with an impact on business, charities and the voluntary sector stems from laws passed in

BRUSSELS.

Once these powers have been transferred to the EU, observed Mr Lilly, ministers engage 'in a charade of pretence that they retain those powers and often end up 'nobly accepting responsibility for laws which they actually opposed in

BRUSSELS.

Is it any wonder that so many are terminally disillusioned with the entire political process when

politicians make promises

which they are simply powerless to keep -a fact which

 they carefully conceal.

Now the former Tory policy adviser Lord Blackwell is arguing that Britain should renegotiate the

TERMS OF EU MEMBERSHIP

restricting it to

TRADE AGREEMENTS

COMMON SECURITY

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES

BUT REJECTING

EU CONTROL

OVER

MONETARY POLICY

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

DEFENCE

AND

JUSTICE.

 An opinion poll run by his group

GLOBAL VISION

suggests that more than a third of voters across all parties would back a prospective

CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT

pledge to negotiate such a change, and that people would support it in a

REFERENDUM

MORE than TWO to ONE.

 

CORRUPTING

The fact is that those opposed to the creation of a

EUROPEAN SUPER-STATE

are not

'xenophobes'

or

'Little Englanders'

of the overheated Eurofanatic imagination.

On the contrary many Eurosceptics like their European neighbours and find much to admire in their culture. They merely want to carry on governing themselves in their own country -because they have an enduring attachment to

DEMOCRACY

And the EU is fundamentally an anti-democratic project, based on the belief that the individual nation is the source of the ills of the world and that by contrast supra-national institutions offer the solution to all its problems.

It is that absence of democratic transparency which is now corrupting not just

EUROPEAN POLITICS

BUT

OUR OWN.

The fresh outbreak of

 'Tory  sleaze'

 over the

EXPENCES GRAVY TRAIN

is rooted in

BRUSSELS

where corruption is the accepted way of

EU life.

Yesterday the Irish government said that a 'NO' vote over the

EU CONSTITUTION

would be a crisis for

EUROPE.

WHAT RUBBISH!

The plain fact is that the EU has brought about a crisis for

DEMOCRACY within EUROPE

WHICH IS WHY WE SHOULD RE-NEGOTIATE OUR PLACE

WITHIN IT.

Politicians, however, run a mile from any such suggestion. The terror of acknowledging the

TRUE NATURE

of what has happened, in case he is required to address it, has propelled David Cameron into a cul-de sac.

[With regard to the political intentions of David Cameron we have always believed that he was an EU 'sleeper ' in the wings ready to take over if Tony Blair needed replacement. That is why it has been impossible to get any concrete assurances as regard renegotiating the

LISBON TREATY

We would like to be proved wrong about our suspicions but up to now we can see no reason to change our minds.]

His pledge to allow the British people a vote on the constitution is worthless since -as he has only now admitted explicity -once the treaty is ratified it will be almost impossible top do anything about it.

But since his party has warned that the

EU CONSTITUTION

will spell the end of

BRITISH SELF-GOVERNMENT

this turns Mr Cameron into the Hamlet of the European debate - an awesome talent for speeches denouncing

TYRANNY

but a complete inability to act against it.

Mr Cameron is paralysed by fear of reigniting the Tories' internal civil war over

EUROPE

But the Tory Europhiles are now moth-eaten has-beens who have lost the argument with the

BRITISH PEOPLE.

 

Opportunist

The fact is that Parliament is now so emasculated it is becoming the equivalent of Westminster regional council in the

REPUBLIC of EUROLAND.

Why , therefore, should we bother to vote for politicians who will have

NO POWER

except to do the bidding of the Brussels bureaucrats imposing their

UNDEMOCRATIC RULE

over the

BRITISH PEOPLE?

IT IS TIME TO END THIS CHARADE.

Whatever happens to the

CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY

in

IRELAND

or

ANYWHERE ELSE

BRITAIN MUST NOW RENEGOTIATE ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EU

The politician who does so will be a

HERO to the NATION

Which is why Mr Cameron should ignore the faint-hearts and sued -shod Eurofanatics in his ranks.

THIS COUNTRY MUST REDISCOVER ITS

IDENTITY

AND

SENSE OF PURPOSE

OR ELSE

IT IS FINISHED.

IT CAN ONLY DO SO IF IT REGAINS THE POWER

TO RULE ITSELF.

The issue is quite simply whether 

DEMOCRACY in BRITAIN

 has a future at all. It could not be more fundamental

If Mr Cameron were to say he would renegotiate Britain's place in Europe, he would silence all the mutterings that he is a blank page, an opportunist, a follower rather than

A LEADER.

He would immediately establish himself instead as a

STATESMAN of the FIRST RANK

Come on, Mr Cameron: the PEOPLE would not only be with you, but are simply desperate to hear a politician say that he will fight to preserve what so many of our fellow citizens down through the centuries have

DIED TO DEFEND.

*

[This essay was as usual no disappointment to us who have followed the work of Melanie Phillips for a number of years and never disappointed with her assessment on any subject under the sun. This article was timely and no doubt it would have had many dithers as to the future of Europe decide that a

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

is better for the world than the Undemocratic super -state which as history has shown are doomed to failure as we have who witnessed the Blitz in our childhood have observed since .

We thank again Melanie Phillips and the Daily Mail for  such a timely call - to - arms which was answered by the majority of voters in Ireland for a DEMOCRATIC EUROPE of a Family of Free Nation States for the betterment of EUROPE and the WORLD.]

 

[Font altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

THE TREATY OF TREASON

*

ALMOST EVERYTHING THAT IS MOST PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL STATES

*

Empires Have Gone And Most People Now Live In Nation States-said Lord Shore.

 

*

A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk than at any time in it's over a Thousand Years of History.

*

Nor Shall My Sword

*

Don't Let Them Destroy Our Identity

*

WHY can't we have the right to be English

*

Why Are We English Made To Feel Guilty

*

The Soul of England

*

 

The Spirit of England

*

The Queen and EU Constitution

*

Thoughts on St George's Day -Who are the English

Letter from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to Edward Heath, prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the "Treaty of Rome"1972.

*

What History Tells us About Our History with the CONTINENT.

*

I Say We Must Not Join Europe-Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery.

*

Could England Survive Outside Europe?-YES!

*

The Truth About A Federal Europe

*

Our Basic Liberties And Freedoms -To Be Surrendered To A Foreign Power.

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution For Europe.

*

The Rotten Heart Of Europe by Bernard Connolly.

*

[There Are Hundreds Of Bulletins Of A Similar Vein In Our

 Bulletin File

 

Thank You for Calling!

 

[Glad to be back! -Our Website has been down since the 18th May because our server had been victim to a hacker. For a time however some items from 2007 were shown for a short period. This attack supports our contention that some do not like our frank comments about the EU and  proves we are doing our duty to pass the information to the general public to decide.]

 

JUNE 15-2008

 

COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

*

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2008

 

H.F.1702

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 

NEW AGE

OF

 INTOLERANCE

 

A.N. WILSON on the new dark age of intolerance: You must believe in gay marriage, you can't question abortion and as for transgender rights...

The great French writer Voltaire famously said: 'I disapprove of what you say and would defend to the death your right to say it'. In this way, he encapsulated what it meant to be an enlightened human being — someone prepared to consider all points of view.

But in recent years the principle of freedom of speech, sacred since Voltaire's 18th century, has been lost, and this is surely one of the most sinister features of our times. It is as if we are entering a new Dark Age of Intolerance.

The irony is that this intolerance has come about as a result of what were initially good intentions. One of the things which makes me happy as I grow older is the thought that during my lifetime we have all tried to become a kinder society.

When I was a boy and a young man, for example, racist jokes were the norm on radio and TV. Now they would be unthinkable. Mockery of homosexuals, and the equation of being gay with being limp-wristed and camp, were absolute norms of comedy when I was growing up. Now no longer.

Such jokes have gone the way of boarding-houses which used to put 'NO BLACKS. NO DOGS. NO IRISH in the window'. Obviously, all civilised people feel pleased by this.

But somehow those initial good intentions — to be kinder to and more tolerant of others — have morphed into a political correctness that has had the very opposite effect.

Two notorious recent examples of this concerned the treatment of a Christian baker in Northern Ireland, and some Christian bed and breakfast owners in Berkshire. The baker had not wanted to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who were getting married. The B&B owners had refused to let a gay couple share the same room in their establishment. In each case they were successfully sued for unlawful discrimination.

Now, a gay activist would no doubt say this was a good thing, arguing that the baker and bed and breakfast owners' behaviour was comparable to the racism of the past. Yet this is surely getting things wholly out of proportion.

The baker was not persecuting homosexuals, as Hitler did. He was not saying they should be put in prison, as all Home Secretaries in Britain did until the Sixties. He was merely saying that, as a Christian, he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that two chaps tying the knot were doing something rather different, which is contrary to traditional Christian teaching.

Whatever you think about this matter, the Northern Irish baker and the B&B couple were merely holding on to Christian beliefs.

I don't happen to share their views myself, and think that if two people are rash enough to promise to live together for the rest of their lives, good luck to them, whether they are gay, straight, trans or anything else. But surely you can understand both sides of this dilemma, can't you?

Well, the answer, more and more in our intolerant society, is 'No'. My concern here is not about the rights and wrongs of gay marriage, transgender rights, our colonial history, or any of the other emotive issues that are subject to endless debate in the modern age.

It is about freedom of thought and speech; freedom to disagree in a liberal society; freedom to have thoughts which are different from the current orthodoxy.

What began as our very decent desire not to be nasty to those of a different ethnicity, or sexual proclivity, from ourselves, has turned into a world as intolerant as monkish Christianity in the days of the Dark Ages, when any freedom of thought is questioned.

Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems during the General Election, was asked repeatedly about his views on gay marriage. As a fairly old-fashioned Christian, he did not believe it was possible — marriage should be between a man and a woman.

As the leader of a modern political party, he knew that it would be political death to admit this. He was finally forced to resign.

This was a signal to the world that if you want to succeed in modern politics, it is simply not allowed to hold views which, until a very short time ago, were the consensus among the great majority of people in the Western world.

I use the words 'not allowed' advisedly. What is sinister about living in the new Dark Ages, however, is that it is by no means clear who is doing the allowing and not allowing. In Mao's China, it was obvious: thought crimes were ideas which contradicted the supreme leader.

In Britain today, however, it seems an army of self-appointed censors — from internet trolls to angry students, lobby groups, town hall officials, craven politicians and lawyers and Establishment figures, as well as a host of other sanctimonious and often bilious busy-bodies — have taken it upon themselves to police what we can and cannot think or say.

Not believing in abortion, like not believing in gay marriage, is now, unquestionably, a thought crime. It was hardly surprising that the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg recently said he did not believe in abortion, because he is a man of conviction as well as a Roman Catholic, and this is the teaching of his Church. Yet his view was treated with incredulity and disdain by everyone from trolls and women's groups to the higher echelons of the political Establishment.

As in the case of abortion, debate is no longer allowed on transgender issues. There was a BBC2 Horizon Programme last Tuesday night called Being Transgender. The close-up shots of transgender surgery in a Californian hospital will not easily leave the mind.

We met a number of nice people who had decided for one reason or another that they were not the gender which they had once supposed. They were all undergoing some form of transformative medical treatment, either taking hormones or having surgery.

What made the programme strange as a piece of journalism was the fact that it did not contain one dissenting voice. Not one psychiatrist or doctor who said they doubted the wisdom of some of these procedures, especially in the very young.

Still less was there anyone like the redoubtable feminist and academic Dr Germaine Greer who once expressed her view that a man did not become a woman just because he had undergone transgender surgery — and was, as a result, decried from the rooftops with everything from petitions launched to stop her from speaking at university campuses to death threats.

Dr Greer had also been bold enough to say 'a great many women' shared her view, which is obviously true — a great many women do not think that transgender people have really changed sex. What has changed is that it is no longer permitted to say so.

A friend of mine who likes bathing in the women's pond on Hampstead Heath in London says that at least one person now uses the female changing rooms who is obviously in a stage of transition from man to woman, and is simply a hairy man wearing lipstick.

However uncomfortable this makes the women feel, they know that they cannot say anything.

There was an ugly incident lately at Hyde Park's Speakers' Corner, which used to be the place where anyone could go and stand on a soap-box and hold any opinion they liked.

Speakers' Corner was a symbol of British Freedom of Speech. As a schoolboy, I had a Jewish friend whose grandfather used to take us there to listen to people proclaiming that the earth was flat, preachers praising Hitler, Stalin, and others saying whatever they liked. It was the freedom to do so, said the old man who had escaped Hitler's Germany, which made the very air of Britain so refreshing to him.

What would he have thought had he witnessed the scene earlier this month at Speakers' Corner when a 60-year-old woman called Maria was smacked in the face, allegedly by a transgender fanatic, while listening to a talk on planned reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. Reforms which would allow men to 'self-identify' as female, and enter women's changing rooms or refuges unchallenged.

For Maria, as for the intimidated women of Hampstead swimming pool, and for Germaine Greer, it is by no means clear that transgender people have changed their sex.

Transgender activists have labelled women like Maria TERFS — Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists. When news of the assault on her reached the internet — ie instantaneously — the trolls began baying, like the bloodthirsty mob during the guillotine-executions of the French Revolution. 'Burn in a fire, TERF'. 'I want to f*** some TERFS up, they are no better than fascists'.

The use of the word 'fascist' is commonplace in our new Dark Age for anyone with whom you happen to disagree. You hear it all the time in the Brexit arguments which rage all around us and which I dread. As it happens, I voted Remain. But I do not regard Brexiteers as 'fascists', and many of their arguments — wanting to reclaim the power to make our own laws and control our own borders — are evidently sensible.

Yet I have lost count of the number of times I have heard Remainers say that Brexiteers are fascists. As a matter of historical fact, many of the keenest supporters of a united European superstate were actual fascists.

The only British politician who campaigned on the ticket of Europe A Nation during the Fifties was Sir Oswald Mosley who was leader of the British Union of Fascists. But then, today's PC censors don't let facts get in their way of bigotry.

Branding anyone you disagree with a fascist; hitting people in the face; tweeting and blogging abuse behind the cowardly anonymity of the internet — these are the ugly weapons used to stifle any sort of debate. And it is often in the very places where ideas should be exchanged and examined that the bigotry is at its worst: our universities.

This week on the Radio 4's Today programme, we heard James Caspian, a quietly-spoken, kindly psychotherapist, describing what has become a cause celebre at Bath Spa University.

He has been working for some years with people who for one reason or another have begun the process of gender-transition, and then come to regret it.

Caspian is evidently not a judgmental man. He wanted to write a thesis on this subject from a sympathetic and dispassionate point of view.

What makes people feel so uncomfortable with their own apparent gender that they wish to undergo painful and invasive surgery to change it? What makes people then come to reassess their first idea? These are surely legitimate questions about a subject many of us can't quite comprehend.

I have two friends who started out as men, and decided in mid-life that they were really women, or wanted to become women, which is what they have done. I do not really understand what has happened to them, even though they have tried to explain it to me.

Surely a man like James Caspian, who has worked with transgender men and women, should be encouraged by a university to explain this area of medicine or psychology?

But no. The university, having initially approved of his idea for a thesis, then turned down his application. 'The fundamental reason given was that it might cause criticism of the research on social media, and criticism of the research would be criticism of the university,' he told Radio 4 listeners. 'They also added it's better not to offend people.'

This is all of a piece with students at Oxford wanting to pull down the statue of 19th century imperialist Cecil Rhodes from his old college, Oriel, on the grounds that he was racist.

Rather than having a reasoned debate weighing the evils of racist colonialism against Rhodes's benevolence, the student at the forefront of the movement — who had actually accepted a £40,000 Rhodes scholarship funded by the fortune the colonialist gave to Oxford — wanted to pull down the statue.

This is the same attitude of mind as that which led monks in the Dark Ages to destroy the statues of pagan gods and goddesses, or the Taliban to do the same to age-old Buddhist artefacts.

Reason, debate, seeing more than one side to an argument, surely these are the foundations of all that has fashioned the great values of the West since the Enlightenment started in the 18th century with an explosion of new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, and modern rational thought that ushered in the Age of Reason.

Realising that human actions and ideas are often mixtures of good and bad — isn't this what it means to have a grown-up mind? Surely we should be allowed to discuss matters without being accused of thought crime?

In universities, as at Speakers' Corner and in the public at large, there used to be the robust sense that sticks and stones may break our bones but words can never hurt us. Now, the 'hurt-feelings' card is regularly played to stifle any debate.

Little by little, we are allowing the Dark Ages of intolerance to come again. We should not be letting this happen.

We should be able to say: 'We disapprove of your views — on Europe, on Transgender Issues, on Islam, on absolutely anything, but we defend to the death your right to express them'.


 

Full article

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4935418/A-N-WILSON-new-dark-age-intolerance.html#ixzz4uAFieZ6T
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTING - ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 30-2017

H.F.1329

WE HAVE A GOVERNMENT WITH NO HEART AND NO SENSE OF RESPONSIBILITY

 

-WHY SHOULD IT BE OTHERWISE WHEN THE PEOPLE  GAVE UP THE PRETENCE OF SO-CALLED DEMOCRACY DECADES AGO. OUR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY IS A FARCE AND THE MAJORITY OF ITS INCUMBENTS GAVE US THE 'V' SIGN USED AT CRECY BY OUR OUTNUMBERED ARCHERS TO THE OVERWHELMING FRENCH FORCES ON 26 AUGUST 1346. 

 NOW OUR SO-CALLED REPRESENTATIVES HAVE GIVEN THE SIGN TO US AND  THEY ARE SMILING AT SUCH A LACK LUSTRE RESPONSE TO THEIR INTENT TO ENSLAVE  A ONCE PROUD PEOPLE WHO ARE BEING DEPRIVED  OF THEIR FREEDOMS AS SHEEP WHO ARE WAITING TO BE  SHORN BEFORE THEIR SLAUGHTER WITHIN A FEW MONTHS. THE WORLD MUST BE LOOKING ON WITH WONDER -  WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE ESPECIALLY ONE WHICH ONCE RULED A QUARTER OF THE WORLD'S SURFACE AND WHICH HAS SAVED EUROPE TWICE IN THE 20th CENTURY AT SUCH A GREAT COST TO ITSELF IN LIVES AND TREASURE COULD ALLOW THEIR NATIONHOOD TO BE TAKEN FROM THEM WITHOUT SO MUCH AS A  WHIMPER..

IF THAT WASN'T ENOUGH THEY TREAT OUR ARMED FORCES AND THEIR FAMILIES WITH CONTEMPT AND NEGLECT .   THEY TREAT MANY PENSIONERS IN POVERTY WITH GROSS INDIFFERENCE AND RATHER THAN CHANGE THE SYSTEM THEY ALLOW THOUSANDS OF PENSIONERS TO DIE.     WE ARE TOLD THAT THEY HAVE LOST COMPUTER DISCS WITH THE PRIVATE INFORMATION OF 25 MILLION FAMILIES AFTER HAVING NOT TIGHTENED THEIR SECURITY AFTER FIVE OTHER CASES HAD PREVIOUSLY COME TO LIGHT.   THEY CAN PAY THEMSELVES WHATEVER THEY NEED AND DRAIN THE PURSE STRINGS OF THE NATION FOR THEIR CRAZY SCHEMES WHETHER ID CARDS OR WHATEVER.    THEY TREAT THE TREASURY AS A LOTTERY WITH THEMSELVES AND THEIR HANGERS - ON IN QUANGOS AND OTHERS TOEING THE GOVERNMENT LINE AS THE ONLY WINNERS. 

  THE SO-CALLED OPPOSITION PARTIES ARE FULL OF INVECTIVE BUT THEY HAVE BEEN PROVED TO BE NOT MUCH BETTER THAN THE OTHER LOT BECAUSE THEY ALL WISH TO BE AMONG THE NEW ELITE IN THE EU SUPER-STATE. THE LOSERS WILL BE THE MASS OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN  SO BUSY WITH THEIR LIVES NOT TO REALISE  THAT THEY HAVE BEEN TAKEN FOR A LONG RIDE AND MANY ARE ONLY NOW AWARE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO THE CLEANERS IN MORE WAYS THAN THEY IMAGINE.    NEVER HAS A PEOPLE BEEN BLED OF ITS CASH IN SO MANY WAYS BY SO FEW AND STILL REMAINED SO CALM.     WE KNOW MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE ON STATINS BUT ONE WONDERS IF THERE IS SOMETHING IN THE FOOD THAT HAS TRANSFIXED THE POPULATION AT LARGE.   

WE LIVE IN ONE OF THE MOST OVERCROWDED POPULATIONS IN EUROPE WITH OVER 3,000,000 NEW ARRIVALS WITH POSSIBLY AT LEAST  2 MILLION WHO HAVE NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING AND MANY OPENLY STATING THAT THEY WISH THEIR FAITH TO BE THE STATE RELIGION.   WE NOW EVEN HAVE THE FORMER CHIEF OF THE RACE INDUSTRY STATE HIS CONCERN OVER THE MATTER.   

WE HAVE OUR POLICE FORCE REPLACING THE RACE /EQUALITY COMMISSION TO CURB FREE SPEECH AND PURSUE INNOCENT CITIZENS IN ORDER TO SHOW THEIR ZEAL WHILE AT THE SAME TIME TELL THE VICTIMS OF CRIME WE ARE BUSY AT THE MOMENT COULD YOU CALL BACK LATER.    IT IS SAID A PEOPLE  DESERVE THE GOVERNMENT THEY HAVE GOT AND AFTER THREE ELECTIONS AND THE MESS THEY HAVE MADE OF THE COUNTRY WHO COULD DOUBT IT.

WE NEED A REVOLUTION NOW!

WILL YOU JOIN US?

*

DECEMBER, 2007

 

 

*

NOTHING HAS CHANGED FOR THE BETTER IN FEBRUARY 2019.

*

H.F.1318

 

EXPOSING

 THE WORLD

REVOLUTION

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

 

WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS

 

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE AS 'THE NEW EUROPEAN SOVIET

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

EXPOSING THE WORLD REVOLUTION

 

HOW THE BERLIN WALL

'COLLAPSED' [?]

 

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

 

RAISING THE STAKES: TWO STUDIES IN GERMAN OBTUSENESS

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

THE NAZI INTERNATIONAL 'S PLAN IS BROUGHT INTO THE OPEN.

 

NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES

 
THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS –
WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

The Haushofer-Hitler and Kennon-pentagon blueprints for Germany are shown by this comparison.

 

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

 supports our Ancient Constitution

 

DID YOU KNOW?

EU

DISCLOSURES

No's

1-32

 

Confound their politics; Frustrate their knavish tricks.

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

PRESIDENT OBAMA NEEDS TO WATCH THE ACTIONS OF THE

 INSTITUTE OF POLICY STUDIES

HIS NEIGHBOURS ON CAPITAL HILL.

 
GORBACHEV'S INSISTENT CONFESSION OF

HIS COMMUNISM

Why

EU

Regional policy will destroy

the

Nation State

 

EUROPEAN BILATERAL TREATIES DRAFTED BY THE GRU -SOVIET INTELLIGENCE.

 
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

1418/1

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

 

A PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE PAST HAVE NO FUTURE

 

THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL

*

Death knell for the euro (and the crisis that could EVEN DESTROY the EU)

by

Christopher Booker

 

WOMEN GETS CRIMINAL RECORD FOR SELLING FRUIT AND VEG BY THE POUND

 

DEFENCE OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

THEIR FREEDOMS & LIBERTIES

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND
Ten

EU truths we must tell the public
 

-NO MATTER THAT CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH HER MAJESTY

WASTED NO TIME IN SELLING THE

the accustomed

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN"

 

GERMAN CHANCELLOR PUTS GERMANY FIRST-

GORDON BROWN PUTS THE EU

FIRST.

 

SEVENTY YEARS AGO NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN SIGNED THE NOTORIOUS MUNICH AGREEMENT TO BETRAY CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND DELIVER

' PEACE IN OUR TIME'

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN
WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY- THEN READ ON

The remarkable views of Declan Ganley

The multi-millionaire founder of

www.Libertas.org

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

What a colossal con trick they have played on the people of the once INDEPENDENT NATION STATES of the Island of BRITAIN.

LATEST!

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

Hurrah for Libertas!

FOR IRISH EU

'NO' VOTE
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

STATEMENT!

IS THE FOUNDER OF LIBERTAS WHO LED OPPOSITION TO LISBON A FEDERALIST EUROPEAN NOT A EUROSCEPTIC?

eurofacts 19th September, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE . 

EU FAILS TO SIGN-OFF ACCOUNTS FOR 14TH YEAR RUNNING

WHAT DOES GORDON BROWN DO?-NOTHING!
There are certain Principles of Civil Liberty, which at the end of the fifteenth century protected the Individual from the arbitrary action of the government.

DAVID CAMERON NOW GIVES FIRM PROMISE OF EU REFERENDUM -CAN WE TRUST HIM?

Regrettably the answer is NO!

But after much obfuscation and stating his decision to stand down at end of term he relented in 2016
SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

CIVIL WAR

[Extract taken from Mr David Brown's book above]

[ALSO see below for THE END OF THE ENGLISH.

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

DON'T TRUST THEM

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.[The Queen could have at the least privately insisted that HER MINISTERS give HER once FREE SUBJECTS a REFERENDUM or NO EU TREATY

SHE DID NOTHING!

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

 

 

1418/2

 

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

 is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

 

HOW A WORLD WAR RESULTED FROM A DRIVER TAKING A WRONG TURN?

*

Stumbling into conflict, third time unlucky

by

Andrew Alexander

 

THE IDEA OF A SINISTER GLOBAL ELITE CONTROLLING EVENTS HAS LONG BEEN THE STUFF OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES-[AND WITH MUCH JUSTIFICATION].

*

DEATH OF PATRIOTISM

by

Leo McKinstry

 

THE NAZI INTERNATIONAL  PLAN IS BROUGHT INTO THE OPEN.

No 3

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

www.worldreports.org

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member States

www.edwardharle.com

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

How many people work for the European Union?

The ANSWER is NOT as stated in the EU pamphlet and blazed about by the Government minister Denis MacShane and the Independent which SHOULD KNOW BETTER.]

 

Hurrah for Libertas!

 

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

DAVID OWEN

DEVON

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

eurofacts

No:89

5th September, 2008

Review by Ian Milne

of 'The Triumph of the Political Class'

by

Peter Oborne.

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

www.worldreports.org
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE

ESTABLISHED

IN MADRID IN 1943

By

HEINRICH HIMMLER

 

 

PETITIONS TO NO10

DEMANDING A REFERENDUM ON EU

It is time the EUROSCEPTIC factions created a WAR COMMITTEE united under one LEADER.

As we have stated on many occasions in the past the Eurosceptic organisations are without a War Committee led by a General such as Sir Michael Rose -ex SAS command who would be the pivot point of the entire Eurosceptic opinion in the country.

 

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.

PART of EXTRACT

from

WHO KILLED BRITAIN

by

A. N. Wilson

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

'I fear the Frenchman even  though he offer gifts'.

THEY never give up.  THEY they can't afford to because without Britain the cost to the German engine driver and French fireman of the EU Collective Express would topple the EU.

 
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

THE END OF TRUTH - HOW WE CAME TO LOSE OUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY

 
LISBON

TREATY

IS

DEAD

by

Lord Neill of Bladen

Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.

As one of many who attended the Collegiate Church of Saint Mary in Warwick for the Funeral Service of The Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell (1912-1998) it was a great honour to be present with many to hear of the life of one of our nations great Patriots.

 

THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?

*

Gordon Brown states before a packed Parliament that it has now signed six

EU TREATIES

so

A REFERENDUM is NOT NECESSARY

WELL!-HE IS WRONG! 

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

THE WAY WE ARE?

Over our long history we have rarely made a mistake of colossal magnitude such as our foreign affairs with the American colonies in the 18th century and the question of Ireland which is still not completely settled after over 400 years.

BUT IN JUNE 2008 THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

WERE BETRAYED BY QUEEN-COMMONS and LORDS.

TREACHERY BY A PRIME MINISTER WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREALITY BUT COULD HE NOW DITCH THE POUND

*

eurofacts 31st October -2008

Gordon begged to be let in, says Luxembourg Finance Minister.

 

The CORONATION OATH ACT of 1688

declares

OATH TAKEN for the PURPOSE of MAINTAINING our SPIRITUAL and CIVIL RIGHTS.

Can the QUEEN veto the New EU Treaty?

'YES!'

 

AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED

HOW a  supposed FREE PRESS failed to FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM.

But are they finally gradually moving towards greater disclosure of the iniquities of the EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE?

OUR VERDICT IS THEY HAVE AS YET ONLY PUT THE TIP OF THEIR TOE INTO THE REVOLTING CREATURE.

BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

 

 

 

 

1418/3

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

 is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK.

 

 

SARKOSY NOW REMEMBERS HIS COUNTRY'S TRILATERAL TREATY WITH GERMANY-FRANCE.

Sarkozy slams U.S. missile shield

 

EU PROPAGANDA MINISTRY NOW PERMITS THE SALE OF BENT BANANAS.

 

EU LEADERS LEAD WITH THEIR COMMON PURPOSE AGENDA OF CONTROL.


WE HAVE A QUESTION YOU MIGHT LIKE TO ASK MA'AM! -WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO OUR FREEDOM- CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY?

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

EU skulduggery includes political fraud by deceiving Finland into the EU Collective Membership.

A RATIFIED LISBON TREATY WILL TAKE AWAY YOUR ONCE FREE NATION STATE AND AT THE SIGNING CREATE A UNITED STATES OF EUROPE  -SUPER-STATE.

 

  IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATY on US, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY

by

Christopher Booker

 

TREACHERY BY A PRIME MINISTER WHO SIGNED THE LISBON TREATY BUT COULD HE NOW DITCH THE POUND?

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

EU PROPAGANDA ATTEMPT

TO INSIST UK CUSTOMERS BE TOLD MONEY FROM THE  EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK

 

 

THE ORIGINS OF THE EU

The origins of what is now the

EUROPEAN UNION

 
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

100 pages of matters you need to know NOW! 

METRIC MARTYRS SPLENDID VICTORY  - MILLIONS OF POUNDS RETURNED BY COUNCILS OVER ILLEGAL PARKING FIASCO.
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

[This is just a few one of many home truths from the above]

 

£4.4BILLION HAS GONE MISSING

EU ACCOUNTING HABITS HAVE COME TO ENGLAND.

 

HOW DID WE GET IN THIS MESS-HOW DID THE ABSENCE OF INFLUENCE BY THE MONARCH LEAD US ON THE ROAD TO THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY?

 

RIGHT OF RESISTANCE -THE CUSTOM OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

WAKE UP!ENGLAND

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

THE DEATH OF A NATION

*

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

by

The European Superstate

by

 David Brown

[info@junepress.com]

 

THE FREEDOM TAKING EU MONSTER MAY YET FALL

*

Death knell for the euro (and the crisis that could EVEN DESTROY the EU)

by

Christopher Booker

 

IF MONETARY UNION GOES-EUROPEAN PROJECT IS UNDERMINED

*

Here are the lessons of the credit crunch - but will we learn them?

by

Simon Heffer

 

WOMEN GETS CRIMINAL RECORD FOR SELLING FRUIT AND VEG BY THE POUND

BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

1418/4

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE .

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

 
 Empires have gone and most people in the world now live in Nation-States said Lord Shore 

Separate Ways   

by    

 [LORD} Peter Shore -

Why EU Regional policy will destroy the Nation State

*

 

The Breakdown of Europe -by Richard Body

 
WHY de Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP IN 1963

The Rotten Heart of Europe -

by

Bernard Connolly-Part 1

 
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS

RODNEY ATKINSON

 

A Constitution millions have died for is at greater risk now than any time in it’s over a Thousand years of history.

Almost everything, which is most precious in our Civilisation, has come from small States.

European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

Britain must leave the EU as UN show best area for expansion will be USA-Anglo/Saxon sphere.

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND

 

WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON IN 1996 -EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE

 

Ninety-nine countries will soon have Free Trade with EU -without paying a cent to Brussels.

 
THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to Edward Heath, prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the “Treaty of Rome

 

ALMOST 50 per cent of EU BUDGET spent on Common Agriculture Policy for Fat cats - as the poor LOOK ON.

 

An interview with former Soviet Dissident Vladimir Bukovksy who

WARNS of EU DICTATORSHIP.

 

 
TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
 
By
 
NORRIS McWHIRTER

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

The Act of Settlement 1701- why it should Concern you NOW?

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY - AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND -
WHY THEY MATTER?

 

101 REASONS FOR LEAVING THE EU

 

WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT.
 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

1418/5

So Why DON'T We LEAVE The EU?

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 
Daily Mail CHRISTMAS-2008 CAMPAIGN

ACTION ON ALZHEIMER'S

Make your cheque payable to 'Daily Mail' and send it , with this form, to Alzheimer's Appeal, PO BOX 5000, Dept. ALZ, ALTON HANTS, ENGLAND . GU34 9BX

YOU CAN GIVE ONLINE AT

www.dailymail.

co.uk/promotion

 

A

MERRY

 CHRISTMAS

in 2008

 AND A

 HAPPY NEW YEAR

 TO YOU ALL

 

TO LATE!

THEY

ARE

Closing the parliament door when the constitution has bolted? They do protest

TOO MUCH!

 

CONVENTIONS OF THE  HOUSE OF COMMONS

We will use the word of a great patriot historian Edward A. Freeman, D. C. L., LL.   D- Honorary Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford. (1876) From his: -

THE GROWTH

OF

THE

 

ENGLISH

CONSTITUTION

 

 

SO YOU ALL THOUGHT THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL-THINK AGAIN!

 

Snippets of COMMENT [Daily Mail COMMENT- Friday, December5, 2008]  WHAT A SHOWER!  THE ORIGINS OF THE EU   The origins of what is now the EUROPEAN UNION

A SINISTER EROSION OF OUR ANCIENT LIBERTIES

 

DID YOU KNOW?   

NO 6 -  

CAP

 trebles

COST of FOOD.

ABOLITION

WILL SAVE

£40

and £60 a week,

HUGE SAVING

for every

FAMILY IN THE  LAND

 

 

 

 

ECHR outlaws DNA DATABASE of INNOCENT PEOPLE

I HATE these UNELECTED FOREIGN JUDGES.

 BUT today I could kiss them for BACKING the FREEDOMS we FOUGHT TWO-WORLD WARS to PROTECT.  

by

TOM UTLEY

 

 

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

 NO 5-  

BEHIND SCHEDULE  Buckets of taxpayers money are currently being poured into the EU'S Galileo Global Positioning System Programme.

This is behind schedule, massively over-budget and entirely unnecessary since we can use the American GPS System FREE OF CHARGE.

 

 

 

DID YOU KNOW?

 NO 4-

 National Interest  Always anxious to play its part eurofacts is keen to point out to the obvious truth that a genuinely EUROSCEPTIC GOVERNMENT

will find it easier to find CUTS than a

EUROPHILE ONE

for the simple reason that many EU programmes are HUGELY EXPENSIVE -UNNECESSARY

 

 

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON 67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

THE SIGNS OF A DICTATORSHIP IN A ONCE FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

*

A monstrous abuse of power by the same bunch of gangsters who hounded Dr David Kelly to his DEATH

by

LITTLEJOHN

 

SO YOU

ALL

THOUGHT THAT COMMUNISM WAS DEAD WITH THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL-

THINK AGAIN!

 

THE

RIGHT

HONOURABLE

GENTLEMEN

- MANY ARE NEVER RIGHT OR HONOURABLE AND CERTAINLY NO GENTLEMEN.

 
LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS

UNITE TO DEFEND

PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED

IN A

TOTALITARIAN

STATE

 
WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY? LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN
UK SELLS MORE GOODS OUTSIDE EU

CHRISTMAS  GREETINGS FROM THE PAST

2003-2007
THE SPEECH THE QUEEN SHOULD HAVE MADE

WE NEED A REVOLUTION

NOW!

 

FED UP!  No one to listen to your COMPLAINT

Daily Mail -Money Mail-editor Tony Hazell-Web:

 

www.thisismoney.co.uk

 

DID YOU KNOW? 

THE EURO 

No 1- WHY WE ARE BETTER OUT

 

TO LATE!Closing the parliament door when the constitution has bolted? They do protest

TOO MUCH!

 

THE SIGNS

 OF A

 DICTATORSHIP

IN

A ONCE FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY

 
FRONT PAGE INFORMATION WITHDRAWN ON THE 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008

STILL AVAILABLE IN THE ABOVE

PICK & CHOOSE

 FORMAT 

TREASURY TEAM CAN'T ADD UP ON VAT REDUCTION.

*

Some retailers will not pass on Vat cut

 

AT LONG LAST!

A LABOUR PARTY  now back to it's roots - but A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT would have brought JUSTICE to bear on the PUBLIC PENSIONS SCANDAL.

 

THE ORIGINS

 OF THE EU

The origins of what is now the

EUROPEAN

UNION

COLLECTIVE
SOVIET ANALYST

A Review of continuing

Soviet global revolutionary strategy

 
The Lisbon Treaty is DEAD

IRISH voters rejected the LISBON TREATY on 12th June 2008.   In a debate in the House of Lords on 18th June, Lord Neill of Bladen, a former Warden and Vice-Chancellor of Oxford University, a highly respected lawyer, explained why

 

BBC Account of History obscured by the partial   Truth –

Part 1

 
NATIONAL DESTABILISATION PLAN OF KGB/GRU BASED ON SOVIET DEFECTOR INTELLIGENCE

*

[THE ENEMY WITHIN]

[ Note: 2 bulletins here]

The Minister of 'Justice' Mr Straw the 'Nonsense ' man, says Iraq war was legal

 

 A Silent Vigil in a village country church graveyard on Remembrance Day.

DID YOU KNOW?

THE EURO 

 No 2- WHY WE ARE BETTER OUT

 

GOVERNMENT should be the SERVANT of the PEOPLE and INDIVIDUALITY or it is a  DEMONICAL DICTATORSHIP.

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

*

www.edwardharle.com

 
Don’t blame the

BNP.

It’s the main parties who have betrayed the voters

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Blair

the

law

breaker

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country.

 

CIVIL WAR

PARLIAMENT

AGAINST

 

THE KING

 
BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE 50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

RABID BEHAVIOUR OF MANY LABOUR MPS IN SUPPRESSING FREE SPEECH IN PARLIAMENT HAS NOW BEEN ACCOMPANIED WITH AN INVASION OF THE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS.

 

UK

SELLS

MORE GOODS

OUTSIDE

 EU

WE

NEED

A REVOLUTION

NOW!

 

LABOUR-CONSERVATIVE -LIBDEMS MPS UNITE TO DEFEND PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE WHICH THEIR OWN TRAITOROUS ACTIONS OVER 40 YEARS HAVE CULMINATED IN A TOTALITARIAN STATE

 

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

1418/6

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

UNFORTUNATELY  AT THE ELECTION MR GANLEY REVERTED TO A PRO-EU STANCE AND HIS PARTY DISSAPEARED WITHOUT A TRACE

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

BROUGHT-FORWARD FROM JUNE 7,2006

 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

 

- TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

-NOT MULTICULTURAL.

*

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

Wednesday, June 7,2006

*

Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

by

Simon Heffer

 There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

MULTICULTURALISM

-had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

[‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about 2006, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

To Continue:

 I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

 It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

ENGLAND

 -somewhat precarious.

Not all the Left has, however twigged that

MULTICULTURLISM

 -is rather last century.

 Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

-made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

 Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

OUR CULTURE

OUR CONSTITUTION

OUR NATION

At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

 REFORMATION

 -that the

Monarch

is Supreme Governor

of the

Church of England.

-which is the Established Church of this Realm.

As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

 “the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

Realm of England.

 

Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

“Defender of Faiths”

Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

 More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

Defender of the Faith

 -and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

 Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

 Perhaps the needless vandalism of

OUR CONSTITUTION

-will have been completed by then.

Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

-embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

NEW SOVEREIGN.

Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

But he would be WRONG!

It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

HISTORY and TRADITION

-and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

OUR WAY OF LIFE

And

OUR VALUES.

It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

 AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

 * * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

*

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

1844

 GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

 [Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

 

To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

Nationality and Domicile

 In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

Of this parliament we must speak.

 Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

-are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

 When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

 Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

 -the one nationality, the other domicile.

 Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

 If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

 But there is no such thing as British domicile -

Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

We have included the above extracts from

The

 CONSTITUTIONAL

HISTORY

OF

ENGLAND

by

F. W .MAITLAND [1908]

 

-to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

 The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

 Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

English Parliament.

 

Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

To continue:

 

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY

LORD BROUGHAM

*

 CHAPTER VIII

THE National Resistance was not only, a point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

 Right of Resistance

[Even in 2006]

 -as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

 But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

 

[DO YOU UNDERSTAND

TONY BLAIR?]

 

The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

The thirty renewals of

 MAGNA CARTA

-the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

RIGHTS are INVADED.

 The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

RIGHT of RESISTANCE

-less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

 In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

 The great virtue of the

CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

-is the purity in which it recognizes and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

The ruling powers are three:

The Sovereign

The Lords

The Commons

 -of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

PEACE and WAR

-and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

NATIONAL DEFENCE.

 [In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

-without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

 REFERENDUM

 - on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

 So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

WHAT IS?

 The following extracts are from the

PREFACE

of the

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

 By

HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F. R. S.

[1844]

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

 Sovereign of ENGLAND

-never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

 CONSTITUTION

-however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

 *

[In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

 ARE YOU CONTESTING?

* * *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

 

H.F.1151FREEDOM NOW

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 - (1994 -Official Website -MAY- PT 6-2019 )--

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019        MAY-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 2-2019

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MAY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019      MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

MAY-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

 

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE