- (1994 - EDP Official Website - NOVEMBER - HOME- 2021 )-

 BULLETIN FILES FOR AUGUST 2021: - HOME- PART 1 - PART 1-PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3 -  PART 4 - PART 5 - PART 6
 

BULLETIN FILE - OCTOBER-2021  HOME - PART 1  - PART 1 PAGE 1  - PART 2  - PART 3  - PART 4   - PART 5  - PART 6

 

BULLETIN FILE - SEPTEMBER-2021    HOME - PART 1  - PART 1 PAGE 1  - PART 2  - PART 3  - PART   - PART 5  - PART 6

 

 BULLETIN FILES FOR AUGUST 2021: - HOME- PART 1 - PART 1-PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3 -  PART 4 - PART 5 - PART 6
 Policies-Elections- General Election 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links -

IMMIGRATION FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter explicitly states:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
this right includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

*  *  *

 SO WHY? ARE THESE ENGLISH VALUES UNDER ATTACK IN THE LAND OF

MAGNA CARTA?

 

 

A TIMELY REMINDER!

 

IF ENOUGH PEOPLE REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL RESTRAINTS ON THEIR RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH AND EXPRESSION SUBJECT TO THOSE LAWS PREVIOUSLY IN PLACE - THEN THE LAW BECOMES EXTINCT!

 

 

 

 

[WE SHALL BE LOOKING BACK OVER 20 YEARS TO SHOW YOU THAT:  - IMMIGRATION HAS EXPLODED TO OVER 9 MILLION SINCE 1948 - ILLEGAL WARS -THE AFGHAN WAR COST THE HARD -PRESSED TAXPAYER-£22 BILLION AND THE IRAQI WAR COST £10 £BILLION -DAILY MAIL-AUGUST 5-2021

-THE RISE OF THE CURSE! OF MULTICULTURALISM - WOKEISM - POLITICAL CORRECTNESS - PENSIONS SMALLER THAN THOSE RECEIVED IN PORTUGAL - LACK OF BOBBIES-ON-THE BEAT- IN FACT IN OUR AREA THERE ARE NONE-POSSIBLY THE SAME EVERYWHERE.-   MORE PRISONS NEEDED- LOCAL POLICE STATIONS  CLOSED- BLOATED PUBLIC PAY IN QUANGOES AND TOP CIVIL SERVANTS...- THREAT FROM CHINA- -REGARDING OUR SECURITY AS A FREE NATION STATE...--ATTACKS AGAINST FREE EXPRESSION AND FREE SPEECH-INTERNAL ENEMIES...-ENGLAND'S SURVIVAL AS A CHRISTIAN - FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE  - IN A LAND CALLED ENGLAND...

POLITICIANS GIVE AWAY OUR  NATIONS SECURITY INTERESTS TO WORLD CORPORATIONS [EQUITY VULTURES] FOR THEM TO MAKE HUGE PROFIT AT THE EXPENCE OF THE TAXPAYER]

 

*  *  *

 

[A REMINDER FROM NOVEMBER-2006]

 

Both sides of the Border back Scots Independence.

By

Max Hastings

*

Daily Mail

    Monday, November 27,2006

 

FRUSTRATION over Scotland's addiction to English subsidies has boiled over with a poll showing a majority in favour of ending the UNION.

For the first time, voters on both sides  of the border back Scottish independence and an end to the political merger agreed nearly three centuries ago.

 

The findings are a serious blow to Gordon Brown. The Chancellor, a Scot, is expected to succeed Tony Blair as Prime Minister next year despite pressure from campaigners who resent Scotland's influence in English affairs.

He made an impassioned appeal for the UNION on Saturday as Labour tried to Fight off a serious challenge from the Scottish National Party.

Worryingly for Mr Brown, the survey found neatly two out of three people in England believe higher public spending in Scotland is unjustified.

A long standing Treasury spending formula gives Scotland 20 per cent more to spend per head pf population than is available in England.

Mr Brown has spent months talking up his belief in 'Britishness' after Tory claims that his Scottishness will prove a turn-off for Middle England.

THE ICM survey for the Sunday Telegraph also found more than two out of three voters in England would like to see a separate

English Parliament

 

The future of the UNION is coming into sharp focus as the Government prepares to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the

Act of Union

OF

1707

[Next May]

The commemoration falls on the eve of elections for the Scottish Parliament, which Labour fears will see a

SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY

  VICTORY

The anniversary and the elections are also likely to coincide with the handover of power from Mr Blair to Mr Brown.

According to ICM, support for Scottish independence has reached 52per cent among SCots and even higher -59 per cent-in England.

The poll also found more than two thirds -68 per cent-of English people want their

OWN

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

 

-an idea supported by 58 per cent of the Scots.

[WE THANK FOR IT!]

Mr Blair and Mr Brown used appearances at Labour's Scottish conference over the weekend to defend the Union, with the Prime Minister warning of a 'constitutional crisis, if the SNP won control of the Scottish executive.

Earlier this month a similar ICM  poll for The Scotsman  newspaper found 51 per cent of Scots wanted to break away from England, for the first time a majority has been recorded since 1998 when Scottish Parliament was established.

Mr Brown admitted 'there is a debate to be had about the future of the [Supposed] United Kingdom' but added the countries were 'stronger together and weaker apart'.

[NONSENSE!- An Independent Scotland which would lead to an Independent England would be a great advantage with both Independent Nation States able to negotiate a stronger Act of Union of the INDEPENDENT NATION STATES OF A GREATER BRITAIN

-the aim of the EDP for over 12 years.]

 

SNP leader Alex Salmond said Scots were tired of being ruled from London and added that the English voters were 'quite rightly' resentful of the Scottish MPs in THEIR AFFAIRS.

[As the sooner Scotland obtains its NATIONHOOD so the same will apply with England - we have suggested that a contribution to SNP  funds will bring that day sooner]

*          *         *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used -comments in brackets]

 

NOVEMBER/06

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 

HOME

*  *  *

 

 

 

[THE ENGLISH PEOPLE IN THEIR ISLAND HOME  WILL SOON BECOME A MINORITY IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY-POSSIBLY IN A GENERATION OR SO.

 AND MILLIONS OF NEWCOMERS FROM OTHER CULTURES WHO HAVE NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING- AND WHY SHOULD THEY WHEN THEY NUMBER MANY MILLIONS - WITH A BIRTH-RATE OF 4:1. A NUMBER OF OUR CITIES ARE ALREADY POPULATED BY A MAJORITY FROM FOREIGN CULTURES.}

*

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES

DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH

NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE

RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE

GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND

MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY

NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO

NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE 

VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT

IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO

THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE

INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS

TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS

HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF............More

.........& More :more-empires-have-fallen-&I- More .. I hardly-believe-it.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927] *

*

H.F.2021
 

PART 1/9

Growth and Development of the English Parish.

by

 

Wray Hunt

 

 

In the words of the author in 1932 the following chapters:

 

“ To describe as far as possible the story of the English parish not only as regards the religious but also the social life…It is often forgotten that no man or boy can possibly understand the history of his country if he does not understand its life and ideas.”

 

[We have it in mind to endeavour to bring to you each chapter in the life of the parish of England covering the years 651 to 1890.]

 

As the author Wray Hunt further mentions the chapters of the periods of history of the parish “to be accepted, not as a history of England but as a companion … to be read together with the usual political histories, so that the reader of these latter may be able to imagine the sort of people among who those things happened that are” described in the following chapters. 

 

*          *

 [The following statement was made a few years ago but in 2007 with a Archbishop of York who has energised Christianity in our Christian land the future is more encouraging with a recent poll showing that a majority of the population considered themselves Christians even if they have not been to CHURCH for YEARS.]

 

[Our purpose in taking this journey through English history by accounting the life of the community around and within the Christian Church is to show those who like some Anglican clergyman today who say that England is no longer a Christian country whereas it would be impossible for our land of England to deny our Faith with so many reminders of our Christian heritage in our living landscape- its past supporters at rest within the precincts of our numerous places of worship since St Augustine came to our shores over 1400 years ago and Christian Monarchy in England.

 

We do not deny that those who attend Anglican Church services has been steadily declining for half a century though some Christian communities who have adhered more strictly to Christian doctrine have either held their flock or even in some cases have increased their congregation.

 

As is outlined elsewhere in our Bulletin ’A Defence of Christianity’ by C.E.M.Joad-philosopher- writer (1951) that so far from Christianity becoming a world-wide religion,

 Christ taught that it would be a religion of the few.

 

In other parts of the world –USA, Africa and many other countries there has been a revival taking place and it is beginning in our own homeland.  So the clergyman who told his flock in October 2004, that England is no longer a Christian country had better withdraw his judgement because there is and will be a return to Christian Values because the other possibility will not succeed when we see the Christian heritage which meets our eyes in Hamlet, Village, Town and City which are a constant reminder that we are never far from our roots and for many of us still when we reach our final resting place.

 

The escalating crime, drug and other destroyers of a community have been having their way for the past 40 years and only a dramatic realisation of the dangers now with us all will there be a return to the Christian Values which can only make our lives better and safer.

 

Within our country we have those of other Faiths who are not so negligent of their mission and it should be a reminder to us all that a Religious belief should be   accompanied by a moral accountability.

 

We have seen how the grievous free-for-all offered by the politicians in a secular society can take their toll unless there is a moral dimension. Don’t blame the government but ourselves in being enticed into bottomless black hole where no moral accountability seems necessary or possible.

 

Those responsible for protecting the community such as Chief Police Constables have been warning for decades of the problems which would follow the relaxation of the Drug, Drink and now the Betting laws apart from the lack of discipline in the home and in the school and community.]

 

*          *          *

 

Chapter 1/ X1X

 

 

The King’s Hall

(AD 651-670)

 

I have given this title to the first chapter because, strange as it may seem, it is to a king’s hall that we must go if we are to understand the beginning of the English parish.  The Romans, though some of them were Christians – and we know that there were churches in Roman Britain – knew nothing of the parish, and even the earliest missionaries to the pagan English knew nothing of it.

 

Yet it is certain that had the parish not developed English life today would be something very unlike the life that we know, as will be clear enough when, in the course of [the following Chapters] we consider what the parish did.

 

But first we must go to the king’s hall, northward, into the bleak moorlands of Yorkshire.  There, in a town that we can call Whitby, we shall find what we seek.

 

For a king’s dwelling the place is bare and uninviting.  Built of rough-hewn timber, the cold wind of the north howls about it, through the unglazed openings that serve as windows, and down the rough hole in the roof that is the sole-chimney.  Yet once inside we come into the midst of a very august assembly.

 

There is a rough board table running down the centre of the long smoke-blackened room.  At the head sits a man dressed in course garments, but they are set off by a collar of fur and a great rudely carved gold chain.  He wears on his head a rude gold circlet for a crown.  That is Oswy; King of the Northumbrians and at the moment the most powerful king in England.

 

On his left hand sits one clad in a long grey robe, a man whose gentle face is lined and seamed with years of hard toil, of travelling up and down the land when roads were mere tracks through unbroken forest or over desolate heath, and a traveller must face the perils of starvation and of wild beasts as soon as he leaves the shelter of the town or village and sets his face toward the next goal of his journey.  The man’s head is curiously shaven, bald from crown to the forehead, with a crescent of hair marking the edge of the shaven patch.  This is Colman, leader of the Irish Christian party.

 

Opposite sits a man similarly clad in a plain grey robe.  But this man’s face is stronger altogether.  The heavy line between his brows, the obstinate set of the thin lips, tell of stubborn vigour.  This man can be almost mulish in his obstinacy, and at best is a determined, pushing person, sincere enough perhaps in his religion, but utterly incapable of appreciating anyone else’s point of view.

 

This is Wilfrid, leader of the Roman Church party in Northumbria.  His head is shaved too, but not like Colman’s.  A little bald patch at the crown surrounded by a ring of hair is his fashion.  H despises Colman’s method of tonsuring, as this head-shaving is called.  He says that the man who tried to buy from the Apostles the gift of the Holy Ghost wore his hair like that, and from his name, Simon Magus, Wilfred and his party nickname the others Magians.  Indeed, Wilfred has just been arguing this point with his Irish opponent.

 

The King looks from one party to the other as if in doubt. At last he speaks.

“ We have heard Colman,” he says, “that our Lord spake to the Apostle Peter, saying, ‘Thou art Peter, and upon this rock will I build my Church.’ Also that our lord said to this same blessed Peter, ‘I will give unto thee the keys of he kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Tell me, Colman, has your St Columba any such promise?”

 

For a moment the Irish missionary is dumb; he sees the trap.  Then with a sigh, he shakes his head. 

 

“Then,” continues the King, “ it were best that I agreed with the followers of Peter, lest when my turn comes he lock me out of heaven.”

 

The conference is over.  Colman rises with a sigh.  His work in England is done.  There is nothing left now but to return to Iona, the Holy Island off the rugged Scottish coast, where his abbey lies.  Wilfred smiles triumphantly. His party in the Church have won over to their side the strongest king in England, in whose dominions, moreover, the Irish Church was most powerful.

 

But the subtle King has is own secret.  He reverences and respects St Peter, but it is what St Peter’s successors have done that really moves him to act.

 

For the Irish, or Celtic Church, good men as its clergy might be, could never have developed the parish system, and that the Irish Church might win over all England appeared at one time possible.

 

There was no head of the Irish Church.  Each abbot was lord of his own abbey, and arranged as he thought good for the religious needs of the surrounding districts.  Sometimes there would be a dispute with a neighbouring abbey, and then, since there was no common superior to whom the case might go – for the bishop, so important in the Roman Church, was beneath the abbot in the Celtic Church –quaint things sometimes happened. 

 

There are stories of pitched battles between monks of rival Irish abbeys when some long-standing dispute had grown more than usually bitter.

 

But Oswy wanted to unite England under his rule, and such a Church [Celtic] as this, a group of disunited abbeys owning no common head, would hinder rather than help him in this object.  On the other hand, the Roman Church, every member of which must submit to the Pope, with its bishops and archbishops to keep order and discipline each in his own sphere, acted according to known and definite rules, would be, he hoped, the means of uniting rather than dividing England.

 

That is why in telling the story of the parish we go first to the king’s hall, where at the Synod of Whitby AD 664 it was decided that Roman, not Celtic Christianity should be the religion of England.  For had the verdict gone the other way it is doubtful if the parish as we know it would ever have come into existence.

 

*          *          *

[Further Chapters of our journey through the Parish life of England will follow]

 

 

[Fonts altered-bolding used –comments in brackets are ours!]

 

PART 2

 

2005

H.F.2154/C

  

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

[ACCORDING TO THE

DAILY MAIL

IN OCTOBER 2020

 

Most English people now think of themselves as BRITISH first, new study reveals

Most people in England now consider themselves British rather than English, a study by the influential …

Daily Mail · 15h

See more news about Daily Mail-Most English Now Think Of

Themselves As BRITISH First By Steve Doughty…

THE

 FEEL MORE BRITISH

*  *  *

 

[There couldn't be a more inappropriate time  with a pandemic taking up

 a great deal of our lives -to ask such a question.

If it should ever becomes so - then that would be a tragedy and a loss to all true

at home and scattered around the world.

It would also tell us what manner of people we have had and still have

handlings the care of our

English institutions and country for future generations. If it ever proves to be

true at a future date then a great deal of the blame

belongs to the

 BBC-the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation which has

 

been brain-washing our children since we entered the

 

EEC/EU in January,1973.

 

With the people in Scotland and wales becoming even more nationalistic it is hardly the time for the english to continue to consider themselves british - instead of english

 

When THE MATTER UNDER DISCUSSION IS ABOUT

ENGLAND

 

 - after all  - we live in a

land called

ENGLAND -

not a land

called

 britain.

 

WHICH IS A GEOGRAPHICAL TERM FOR OUR ISLAND.]

 

Well before the Second World War when a matter concerning England arose the press mentioned ENGLAND but shortly before, the  Press began to use the term-BRITAIN and it has continued to the practice to the present day.

 

 

*  *  *

 

I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country that I love. This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, (As with the pandemic amongst us today in 2020), have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an

ENGLISHMAN.

BY

ENGLAND-by William Ralf Inge-1860-1954.

 

 

 

H.F.2087

WE ARE MAKING CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF OUR BULLETINS OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS BY DELETING MANY BULLETINS THE SUBJECT

 

OF THE EU TO CONCENTRATE ON HOME MATTERS AND THE THREAT TO OUR SECURITY WITHIN  AND WITHOUT OUR SHARED  ISLAND HOME,

 

WITH THE RAPID RISE OF THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 OF  ALIEN NEWCOMERS  TO OUR SHORES AND MANY OF OUR TOWNS AND CITIES ARE

 

NOW FOREIGN ENCLAVES.  WITHIN A GENERATION  THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION WILL NO DOUBT BECOME A MINORITY IN THEIR OWN

 

HOMELAND CALLED ENGLAND  THERE IS ALREADY A SHORTAGE OF WHITE TEACHERS IN OUR SCHOOLS AND WHITE CHILDREN ARE CLASSIFIED

 

AS A DISADVANTAGED GROUP BECAUSE OF THE CURSE OF PC - POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

 

 AS WE HAVE STATED OVER THE PAST 20 YEARS-IT IS THE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE FROM OTHER CULTURES WHICH EVERY

 

GOVERNMENT HAS FAILED TO LIMIT IMMIGRATION.  WE ARE NOW TOLD THAT ONLY KEY INDIVIDUALS WILL BE INVITED IN THE

 

FUTURE. BUT CAN WE BELIEVE THEM AFTER OVER 40 YEARS OF LIES AND DECEITS. THE PANDEMIC HAS SHOWN THE VALUE OF

 

THE KEY WORKERS FROM COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD IN THE NHS AND IN OTHER OCCUPATIONS IN OUR COUNTRY. BUT WE

 

ARE A SMALL NATION ONE OF THE MOST CROWDED PLACES ON THE PLANET AND MANY OF ITS IDIGENOUS PEOPLE ARE FEARFULL

 

FOR THE FUTURE OF THEIR

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION -CUSTOM AND CHRISTIAN FAITH.

 

*  *  *


 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 


HOME
“The love of home, the sympathy with those who live at home, the work for those at home, can be carried on in ever-widening circles until you embrace the whole universe. The truest patriotism is that which is grounded in the love of home. There is a real danger, if you try neglecting that elementary duty, if you think it sounds grander and bigger to embrace the love of humanity first.”
 
Rt.Hon. Stanley Baldwin: This Torch of Freedom

ON

 ENGLAND

 

1923

 

 

 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

 

 

 

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

 

*

FOR THE RETURN

OF THE

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

AT

WESTMINSTER

AND

 [A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT FROM WALES AND SCOTLAND]

 

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[Each of the underlined words above - have a separate bulletin

 

the works of a

 

PATRIOT OF ENGLAND-SIMON HEFFER]

 

*  *  *

 

The EDP ORG.UK. CONSTITUTION

 

 supports the establishment

 

of a family of

 

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 

AND THE CREATION OF A  SUPREME ISLAND COUNCIL TO PROTECT THE SECURITY AND INTERESTS

 

OF A

 

GREATER BRITAIN.

 

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAKER - UNITED IN OUR ISLAND HOME -WE ARE STRONGER AGAINST ENEMIES WITHIN AND IN THE WORLD AT LARGE. BUT IF THE PEOPLE OF SCOTLAND DECIDE TO LEAVE THE UNION FOR SLAVERY UNDER HITLER'S BULLY EU THEN SO BE IT! THEY WILL BE MISSED-BUT THEY KNOW IN THEIR HEARTS WHO ARE THEIR FRIENDS AND CLOSE NEIGHBOURS - AND WILL REJOIN AS WE ENVISAGE - AS A TRUE PARTNER IN FREE NATION STATE-

 

 WITHIN A FAMILY OF NATION STATES -

 

OF A TRULY UNITED ISLAND HOME OF A

 

 

 

GREATER BRITAIN

 

*

 

FREEDOM

 

'All we have of freedom-all we use or know-

 

This our fathers bought for us, long and long ago'

 

Kipling. The Old Issue.

 

 

*

 

We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

 

That Shakespeare spake; the faith and morals hold

 

Which Milton held

 

 

Wordsworth.Sonnets

 

*

All our past proclaims our future; Shakespear's voice and Nelson's hand,

 

Milton's faith and Wordsworth trust in this our chosen and chainless land,

 

Bear us witness; come the world [or the EU] against her,

 

England yet shall stand.

 

SWINBURNE. England

 

[Comment in brackets is ours!

*
 

[A TIMELY REMINDER]
 

 

If it's good enough for the Scots -It's good enough for the English.

 

By

 

Simon Heffer

 

Daily Telegraph -November 29-2006

 

ONE of the more astonishing features of our politics is the way in which really quite clever and experienced people fail, from time to time, to see the blindingly obvious.

ONE example is the way in which some of those around Tony Blair -

and for all I know Mr Blair himself -

 have believed, on and off over the past few years, that it might be possible to stop Gordon Brown becoming PM.  Another was the even more foolish, and much more widely held fantasy that granting devolution to Scotland would not , sooner rather than later lead to a rampant rise of Scottish nationalism.

 

As the more astute among you will immediately realize, these two concerns are inextricably linked.

I begin to suspect that the likely timing of Mr Blair's departure from office in the late spring or early summer of has been set to cause the most difficulty for his probable successor. For on May 3, the third elections for the Scottish Parliament is now governed by a coalition of Labour and the Libdems.

However, the SNP was five points ahead of Labour in the poll published this week. That this is no flash in the pan can be judged from how the Scottish Labour conference in Oban last weekend was dominated by big beasts of the Cabinet, from the Prime Minister downwards, warning the assembled multitude that waste, devastation and quite probably complete apocalypse would follow for Scotland if it elected the SNP.

 

The SNP reported a further groundswell of interest as a result of these attacks, and a Labour internal poll revealed yesterday that the SNP's lead had extended to

8 per cent

 

So: imagine you are Mr Brown, and you have just become Prime Minister of the [so-called] United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

 

Imagine, too, that the people of Scotland have a few weeks earlier, elected an SNP government to rule them -

a minority government, no doubt, but a government none the less. You, as Prime Minister of a nation that is  about 85 per cent English, are yourself Scottish. You sit for a Scottish seat at Westminster.

Your fellow Scots have , however, put into power a party committed to calling a referendum on whether Scotland remains part of the [so-called ] United Kingdom.

 

More than two thirds of the 85 per cent of the foreigners over whom you rule want (according to a poll just published by The Sunday Telegraph ) an

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

And all concerned have the temerity to do these things despite the fact that you yourself, sensing trouble ahead, have spent much of the past two or three years making regular cynical and implausible speeches about "Britishness". Oh dear!

Please forgive a moment of self-regard, which I introduce purely (well, almost purely) because it is relevant. Eight years ago , I wrote a book entitled

 

'NOR SHALL MY SWORD: THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND'

It appeared a couple of months before the first Scottish elections and it made the following points.

FIRST, that devolution would lead inevitably to SEPARATISM

.       SECOND, that if the Scots wished to separate from England, there was nothing we could ,or should, do to stop them (oh!, if only Gladstone's Irish Home Rule Bill in 1886 had been passed, etc etc)

      THIRD, that this might actually be beneficial to the English taxpayer.

      FOURTH, that in any political system the rulers ignore  the rights of majorities at their peril: and that the inevitable consequence of denying the ENGLISH, the same rights as the SCOTS -a referendum on their own separateness, and allowing any wish for separateness to be expressed in an

 INDEPENDENT

 ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

-would lead to towering resentments.

The way in which this book was received speaks much of the flavour of those bless enlightened times. It had a rave review from Alex Salmond, the leader of the SNP.

Michael Portillo, then in the middle of reinventing himself as a proto-Cameronian, addressed the work in a tone that suggested the men in white coats would be coming for the author with a matter of hours.

When I read The Sunday Telegraph not just that 68 per cent of my fellow English now want their own

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

-but that 59 per cent would be happy for Scotland to be fully INDEPENDENT

 

-I know we will never be able to build the madhouses fast enough.

 

It is not hard to see why the English feel these things.

FIRST, they have had largely alien rule for the past ten years.

SERVE YOU RIGHT,

-the Scots would say, recalling the Thatcher years, when they, too, felt occupied.  But the Scots sought and received, a remedy for their alleged sufferings; all the English now want is equal treatment.

SECOND, the English have been treated to the most preposterous justifications of why Scottish MPs should still vote in the Westminster Parliament on matters that, in Scotland, are dealt with by the Parliament in Edinburgh.

Foundation hospitals and top-up fees are only on the statute book because of the help the Government received from Scottish MPs with no interest in the matter.

 

No Wonder, with a much smaller majority now than when those measures went through, Labour is desperate to retain this lobby-fodder.

Increasingly, though, in a era when we are all feeling grotesquely overtaxed, there is the question of money.

Sixty per cent of those questioned in THE SUNDAY TELEGRAPH poll resented the far higher per capita public spending in Scotland compared with England.

The revenue powers of the Scottish Parliament do not have to be used to fund handsome new capital projects in Scotland -

 not least their extravagant new Parliament building - [Just a reminder that we were first told that it would cost approx. £41,000,000 but ended up at

£400,000,000

-at least.

When our NICE (not really very nice!) refuses to agree for essential medicines  at a cost in one case of £2.50 a week and many other instances which are denying life saving treatment it is no wonder there is so much great anger at the increased subsidy in Scotland.]

 

-while the English taxpayer is standing by to have his pocket picked.

As an article on this subject in this month's Prospect points out, per capita spending is 30 per cent higher in Scotland, but the GDP per capita is five per cent lower.  Despite this Herculean level of bribery of the Scottish voter, growth rates simply do not improve.

 

It is a glowing, and ghastly , example of the evils of the

SUBSIDY CULTURE

 

And, quite clearly, not only is it not doing the

ENGLISH

 

-taxpayer any good, it is also not doing the

SCOTS

any long - term good either.

 

Scotland is on its way to sovietisation

 

The amount of GDP spent in the public sector, at 50 per cent, is 10 per cent higher than in the [so-called] United Kingdom as a whole.

£11 Billion

more is spent in Scotland than is raised in revenue there.

The SNP says this takes no account of the oil revenues. BUT, should Scotland ever become INDEPENDENT, there will have to be an interesting discussion about the nature of territorial waters, and the origins of the money used to develop the oilfields.

There might also be a DEBATE about whether Shetland, in the event of independence, would want to be part of [sovietised] Scotland, or would prefer to remain a dependency of England, or would like to revert to being a part of NORWAY.

So far, all the decision -making in these matters has been placed on the Scots.

THAT HAS TO STOP!

 

The English deserve their referendum, too, on whether they wish to remain in any sort of UNION with Scotland.  If they can have their

OWN

PARLIAMENT

WHY shouldn't ENGLAND

 

[WE all know about Lord Falconer's comment that he wouldn't like England to have her own PARLIAMENT as it would BULLY Scotland. The sooner he and his tartan hangers-on depart England on the high-road back to Scotland the better it will be for those who live on this side of the border.]

If [Scotland] wishes to separate, then why should the ENGLISH subsidise them?

 

Above all, why should the rights of the English majority be aggressively denied?

I know this is horrid for Gordon Brown, who , like Napoleon, or Stalin, or Hitler, aspires to come to a distant province or satellite STATE and take over the

MOTHER COUNTRY.

BUT he and his friends started this process: It is a shame, given how very brilliant we are always told he is, that he wasn't clever enough to realise how we might finish what he had started.

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

*

[The tragedy was that Gordon Brown put the his ardour for a united party above personal ambition whereas if he had moved earlier onto the backbenches in opposition to Iraq and fought to rectify the great injustices to the English people he would have succeeded as the leader of the ENGLISH PEOPLE

whatever his ancestry.

He held on to the vision of 'Britishness' when to support such an IDEAL was an affront to the English who could see clearly that they were being denied their just rights whereas he and  his  numerous countrymen around him were gathering up their emoluments and at the same time to enslave the English in an European State with the proud name of ENGLAND eradicated from their homeland.  If for once Mr Brown had put himself into to the mindset of an Englishman he would have realised the great wrong and as the man we all know he would have righted the wrong.]

 

IN ORDER TO HONOUR OUR NORTHERN NEIGHBOURS AND OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR WISH FOR INDEPENDENCE SOMETHING THE MAJORITY OF THE ENGLISH UNDERSTAND WE STATE HERE

FROM THE

Arbroath Manifesto

sent by the

Nobles and Commons of Scotland

to the

Pope

in

1320

 

'We fight not for glory nor for wealth nor for honour but for the freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

*

NOVEMBER/06

 

*

  

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 
A REMINDER!

[A MATTER OF

 IDENTITY]

*  *  *

THE TRUTH that BRUSSELS cannot BEAR:

PEOPLE CRAVE NATIONAL IDENTITY.

By Stephen Glover for the Daily Mail

 October 3- 2017

 

What happened in Catalonia on Sunday was shaming and shocking in a modern European state. Spanish police bludgeoned and assaulted defenceless civilians who were simply trying to exercise their democratic right.

First and foremost, this is a terrible crisis for the wrong-headed, bully-boy government in Madrid. After the unedifying spectacle of police attacking blameless voters, the chances must surely have increased of Catalonia – Spain’s most prosperous region with some 7.5million inhabitants – seceding.

But it is also an enormous crisis for the European Union, which in recent weeks has said almost nothing as the Spanish authorities arrested officials arranging an independence referendum on behalf of the devolved Catalan government.

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES


 

One reason he did not do so in the case of Spain is that it is one of the most obedient pro-EU countries in Europe, which seldom defies the will of Brussels, or causes trouble for Juncker and his ilk.

But there is an even deeper reason for the Commission’s silence. The events in Catalonia challenge at a deep level its project for ever closer union, about which both Juncker and President Emmanuel Macron of France have ventilated in recent weeks.

For how can there be an amicable union between the EU’s nation states if some of those nations are themselves deeply divided and fractious, as is plainly the case with Catalonia and Spain?

Here is a region of largely Catalan-speaking people who regard themselves as culturally distinct. A sizeable proportion of them yearn to break free from Spain, even though Catalonia has been part of the country for hundreds of years.

Sunday’s vote illuminates a truth which Brussels cannot bear. There are many people in Europe for whom the atavistic call of identity counts far more than any exhortation about forging a European superstate

That, after all, was one of the main messages of Brexit – that the majority of voters in our own ancient nation resent the undemocratic control of Brussels, and have no wish to be sucked into a united Europe.

For Brussels, the example of Britain was bad enough, and it has set about trying to punish us for having had the effrontery to want to leave. In a sense, the demonstration of Catalan nationalism is even more alarming to the federalists because this show of independence is happening inside one of the EU’s nation states.

How is it possible, they wonder, for the pan-European project to proceed if some EU countries are in danger of fracturing? The terror in Brussels is that if Catalonia were allowed to break away, regions in other member states could follow suit. Instead of coalescing into an amorphous whole, some EU nations might fall apart.

Belgium, whose capital, Brussels, is the seat of EU expansionism, is divided. The Flemish-speaking region of Flanders, which constitutes about 60 per cent of the country’s population, is at daggers drawn with the French-speaking minority.

Many people in northern Italy long to be rid of the impoverished south, which is relatively unproductive and, in the view of northerners, consumes more than its fair share of government spending. The Right-wing Northern League has campaigned with some success for independence for the north, and imagines a separate country called Padania.

France faces an independence movement in the island of Corsica. Meanwhile the cohesion of Spain is threatened not just by free-spirited Catalans but also by militant Basques, part of whose territory lies in France.

Romania and Slovakia both have unhappy Hungarian minorities. Even in Poland’s region of Silesia, much of which used to be ruled by Germany until 1945, there are stirrings of an independence movement.

All over Europe apparently unified countries are harried by breakaway groups which have a strong sense of separate identity. If Catalonia were allowed to go it alone, who knows what might come next?
 

The problem for Brussels is that it is used to dealing with individual nation states but is powerless to intervene in unruly regions. That is why the Commission has remained so quiet in the case of Catalonia apart from expressing a few words of solidarity with Spain.

By the way, the British response has been regrettably supine. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson stressed his support for the Spanish government in a tweet. As the leading Brexiteer he should surely have been more critical of Madrid’s use of violence.

The Spanish government, it must be said, has behaved rashly and brutishly. Arguably some Catalan separatist political parties have been unwise in deliberately engineering a confrontation.

But given that the Catalan government had made numerous requests to hold a referendum on independence – after Spain’s constitutional court had controversially declared in 2010 that Catalonia was not a nation – what was it to do having been rebuffed time and time again? If it had possessed a modicum of good sense, the Spanish government would have allowed the referendum to go ahead. Had the vote been in favour of independence, it could have then questioned its legal status.

But to arrest Catalan officials, to close a large number of polling stations, and then to clobber innocent voters were acts of unbelievable stupidity as well as nastiness.

It passes understanding how the prime minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, can say that democracy has prevailed. The opposite is true.

Imagine if two or three years hence the Scottish National Party’s Nicola Sturgeon were to hold a referendum without the approval of Westminster – by no means an unthinkable eventuality.

In fact, her case would be much weaker than that of the Catalan government since there has already been one legal referendum in Scotland in 2014, which was said by the SNP leader Alex Salmond at the time to be the last for a generation.

Even so, it is inconceivable that a new unofficial referendum in Scotland would be met by the authorities in Westminster with police wielding batons and firing rubber bullets. Such a wild over-reaction would inevitably give a boost to Scottish nationalism – as, I have no doubt, the cause of Catalan nationalism will have benefited from Sunday’s onslaught.

The truth is that the Spanish state has a very restricted conception of democracy. We should know that already from its desire to shoehorn Gibraltar into Spain despite 99 per cent of its citizens having voted in a 2002 referendum to remain British.

God alone knows what will happen now in Catalonia. Unless the Spanish government agrees to an official referendum – an unlikely prospect – there will probably be deadlock. I am afraid there is also the possibility of more violence on both sides.

Justifying and supporting the Madrid government is the European Commission in all its absurdity, dreaming dreams of a union which the people of Europe do not want. It will do its utmost to ensure that Catalonia doesn’t interfere with its grandiose scheme.

Will Remainers look at Catalonia and reflect that we have a quieter and more civilised way of dealing with our differences in this country? I don’t know. What I do know is that every day I am ever more relieved that we are leaving this misguided club.
Full article
 


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942684/STEPHEN-GLOVER-truth-national-identity.html#ixzz4uYWX4q7V
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

92

View
comments

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

H.F.1332 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 
 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week
  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

By Daniel Martin, Policy Editor For The Daily Mail

February 12, 2018

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.
 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.
 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

February 12, 2018

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

 Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

 Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

February 12, 2018

*

LATEST!

ON THE CONTINUING GROWTH OF THE GROTESQUE AND WASTEFUL VANITY PROJECT

FOREIGN AID BUDGET

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 30, 2018

Foreign Aid will top £14bn a year
 

Britain's foreign Aid budget will soar by £230million next year, taking it above£14billion for the first time

The UK is committed to spend 0.7per cent of its national income on aid.

Britain is one of only seven countries in the world to meet the target.

The foreign aid budget soared by £555million to a record £13.9billion last year. Our aid budget has more than doubled from the £6.4billion spent in 2008 and more than quadrupled from the £3.3billion doled out in 2002.

[Why with such vast sums to alleviate the distress around the world are we still seeing adverts on our television screens for such a basic-common and vital need as drinking water?]

 

With billions spread abroad like confetti why are UK state pensions not up with the best in Europe. With a strongly extreme Left Labour Party we would have expected them to have this at the top of their agenda-If it is-they are keeping it a SECRET!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 30, 2018

 

H.F.1716
 
 
 

Extra £11billion

Phil COULD have given US

That's the amount

experts say we overspend on foreign aid-the

 Budget so Bloated

the Government has had to

 LIE

about its

RESULTS

*

News for DAILY MAIL EXTRA £11 billion Phil COULD have given US by Ian Birrell

OCTOBER 31-2018

 

FRANKLY, it was one of the most patronising lines heard in a Budget speech for an the a long time.

Philip Hammond admitting classroom finances were stretched declared he was announcing a £400 million bonus 'to help our schools buy the little extras the need'.

In one glib Budget phrase, the Chancellor managed to infuriate an influential chunk of the electorate while underlining the hollowness of talk on ending austerity.

[While reading this account of the Chancellor's speach one should remember that the Prime Minister Theresa May would be aware of its content and therefore we would expect in agreeance with its message. The need for more police on the beat and prisons is being ignored with so many criminals unable to join their friends in the drug supplied holiday camp atmosphere now common place in our so-called corrective system.

When schools are begging parents to help fund computers and textbooks, this was barely enough to give pupils a new set of pencils-and less than Hammond gave councils to fill in a few pot holes.

Meanwhile, crime is rising, cities are becoming more violent, MPs are pressing for more cash to help protect

PUBLIC SAFETY.

yet hard-pressed police received received

NOTHING

beyond £160 million for those fighting terrorism.

Prisons are in terrible crisis-yet the justice department budget is being cut, Social care is crumbling-yet services were given about one-third the amount they need just to cope with existing demand in an ageing and rising population.

Surge

But one slab of spending grew substantially bigger as always- the sums frittered away on

FOREIGN AID

which continued their inexorable surge with an extra £230million set to be sprayed around the world next year.

So the total given away by Britain will top

£14 BILLION

-enough to fund

2,168 nurses

for every English  hospital trust

90 teachers

for for every secondary school or to build enough social housing for a new city the size of

LIVERPOOL...

TO BE CONTINUED

Absurd

Many MPs know the great British aid giveaway is crazy and that the arguments for aid contain more holes than a colander. They can see how most rival nations simply ignore the flawed United Nations-set 0.7 per cent GDP target

Even before Trump, the US was giving less athan0.2per cent. None of the other major economies in the G7-Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan-are hitting the UN target that prioritises spending over need. It is absurd that Britain doled out nearly £1 for every £6 spent on aid by these wealthiest nations.

One former foreign office minister told me the real level of British aid based on need and effective spending should be 'at most

'£3BILLION.

Just think how another £11BILLION could help the

POLICE

SCHOOLS

or the

SOCIAL CARE SYSTEM.

Instead the Government has decided British schools can struggle because they must keep on offering 'little extras' for

 CORRUPT DICTATORS.

CONFERENCE ORGANISERS

and

FAT-CAT CHARITY CHIEFS.

[REMEMBER! THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY IS JUDGED ON ITS ACTIONS AND WHEN ONE SEES HOW MATTERS LIKE THE BLOATED AND WASTEFUL FOREIGN AID AND THE NEED OF 'BOBBIES ON THE BEAT' AND MORE PRISONS-STOP CLOSING POLICE STATIONS AND POST OFFICES... ARE IGNORED THEN ONE CANNOT EXPECT SUCH AN EQUALLY IMPORTANT ISSUE SUCH AS BREXIT  TO BE HANDLED EFFECTIVELY AND EXPEDITIOUSLY -WHICH IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED AT THE PRESENT TIME.]

 

FULL ARTICLE

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

OCTOBER 31-2018

H.F.1741

 

WE ASK THE QUESTION : WHY HAVE SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS PERMITTED MASS IMMIGRATION KNOWING POSSIBLY FOR YEARS THAT THE ROBOT WILL EVENTUALLY BE REPLACING WORKERS ACROSS THE EMPLOYMENT SECTOR AND EVEN INVADING HOMES AND IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES REDUCING THE HUMAN PRESENCE IN THE HOME. 

*  *  *

 

 

 

    800 million workers will be replaced by robots by 2030 |

     

    Daily Mail ...

     

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../800-MILLION-workers-replaced-robots-2030.html

    29 Nov 2017 ... The report, by New York based firm, McKinsey, claims that as many as 800
    million workers could be replaced by machines in just 13 years ...
     

    Robots taking human jobs is causing a 'hellish

     

    dystopia' | Daily Mail ...

     

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Robots-taking-human-jobs-causing-hellish-dystopia.html

    15 Jan 2018 ... Humanity will live in a 'hellish dystopia' as robots takes over billions of jobs ... that
    800 million workers could be replaced by machines by 2030.
     

    Plumbers and nurses will be last to lose jobs to robots

     

    | Daily Mail ...

     

     

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article.../Plumbers-nurses-lose-jobs-robots.html

    15 Dec 2017 ... Plumbers and electricians are the workers who will be last to lose their ... All
    human jobs will be replaced by robots in the future, but plumbers, ...
     

    Robots 'could take 4m UK private sector jobs within 10

     

    years ...

     

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/.../robots-could-take-4m-private-sector-jobs-within-10-years

    19 Sep 2017 ... Four million jobs in the British private sector could be replaced by ... and “allow
    workers to concentrate on more human-centric roles that are beyond the reach of
    machines”. ... One in Lincoln plans to use one to help residents remember daily ...
    The prediction that millions of jobs will be lost to robots led the ...
     

    Robots threaten 15m UK jobs, says Bank of England's

     

    chief ...

     

     

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/.../robots-threaten-low-paid-jobs-says-bank-of-england-chief-economist

    ‎
    12 Nov 2015 ... The Bank of England has warned that up to 15m jobs in Britain are at ... you are
    to be replaced by a robot... pic.twitter.com/uHvutoe5wz ... on the UK labour
    market and its more than 30 million employees. ...... Would make the world less
    annoying though and get rid of most of the Daily Mail website's content.
     

    It's impossible for robots to steal your job - no matter

     

    what the Daily ...

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/.../its-impossible-for-robots-to-steal-your-job-no-matter-what-the-daily-mail-says

    ‎
    6 Dec 2016 ... The Daily Mail has reported that robots could 'steal' 15 million UK jobs. ... A co-
    worker unfairly takes credit for your efforts and gets a promotion ... to you, or
    someone in line to replace you spreads malicious rumours about you ...
     

    Millions of UK workers at risk of being replaced by

     

    robots, study says ...

     

     

     

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/.../millions-uk-workers-risk-replaced-robots-study-warns

    ‎
    24 Mar 2017 ... The PwC report said inequality would result from robots increasingly ... More than
    10 million UK workers are at high risk of being replaced by ...
     

    If 1 In 5 Jobs Is 'Displaced' Due To Automation, What

     

    Does That ...

     

     

    https://www.forbes.com/.../if-1-in-5-jobs-is-displaced-due-to-automation-what-does-that-mean-for-hr/

    ‎
    20 Apr 2018 ... And according to the Daily Mail, 'Robots taking human jobs is causing ... in 5, or
    3.6 million, British jobs will probably be 'displaced' by 2030 due to ... Therefore,
    new jobs, job we can't even imagine yet, will arise to replace those that ... vital
    need for employees who don't have easy access to HR colleagues.
     

    Will you be replaced by a robot? Jobs study reveals ... -

     

    This is Money

     

     

    www.thisismoney.co.uk/.../Table-700-jobs-reveals-professions-likely-replaced-robots.html

    ‎
    31 May 2014 ... Millions of workers in the UK are in danger of being replaced by ... for post-
    graduation occupations – which could lead to streamlining of human ...
     

    Robot automation will 'take 800 million jobs by 2030'

     

     

     

     - report - BBC ...

     

     

     

     

     

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42170100

    ‎
    29 Nov 2017 ... Up to 800 million global workers will lose their jobs by 2030 and be replaced by
    robotic automation, a new report from a consultancy has found.
     

[WE ASK THOSE WHO HAVE SUPPORTED MASS IMMIGRATION  FOR DECADES ARE YOU STUPID OR JUST MAD?-YOU WILL SOON BE MADE AWARE OF YOUR ERROR WHEN YOU AND FAMILY AND FRIENDS ARE UNEMPLOYED-POSSIBLY THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT ANYWAY -WHO KNOWS?]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1643

 
"'A nation cannot'

said

Abraham Lincoln,

'exist half-slave and 'half-free.'

The aphorism has a wider application."

AS we see in England at the present time in April,2019 when the country appears divided on the issue of the bedrock of our ENGLISH CONSTITUTION of a FREE ENGLAND as concluded at the

ENGLISH REVOLUTION  .

And our troubles have arisen since because the

"FUNDAMENTALS of THE REVOLUTION ."

were NOT then or later EMBEDDED into the

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.

IT IS WELL TO REALISE THAT IF THERE HAD BEEN IN EXISTENCE A ENGLISH PARLIAMENT as there is SCOTTISH and WELSH it would have been most unlikely that we would  have ever joined HITLER'S PLANNED so-called EUROPEAN UNION  in 1973 which was to ensure a

GREATER GERMANY IN THE PEACE.

THE

 BREXIT PARTY

must lead to the return of an

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

to PROTECT our PRICELESS INHERITANCE

of the

"RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN."

STILL RESPECTED AND ENJOYED BY A GREATER PART OF THE FREE INDEPENDENT NATIONS OF THE WORLD.

Yet sometimes Nations will

decline so low.

From vertue, which is reason

that no wrong,

But Justice, and some fatal

curse annext

Deprives them of their outward

libertie.

Thir inward lost

MILTON (PARADISE LOST).

Milton said it was more just "that a less number compel a greater number to retain their liberty, than that  a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness compel a less   most injuriously to be their-fellow-slaves ".(1660)

*

'A few honest men are better than numbers.

 (Letter to Sir W. Spring, Sept . [1643]

OLIVER CROMWELL. 1599-1658

*

APRIL, 2019.

H.F.1835
 
BREXIT

BRITAIN

will be Europe's biggest economy if Boris plays his cards right

By LIAM HALLIGAN-DAILY TELEGRAPH

DECEMBER  31,2020

The UK has all of the freedoms it needs to race ahead of the failing EU once the pandemic is tamed.

'FOR YEARS, all supposedly sensible pundits have told us Brexit spells doom for Britain - now they must eat their words". This sentence was uttered not by Boris Johnson, nor by one of his loyal lieutenants. Nor did it come from the European Research Group of Tory Brexiteers,  who yesterday helped the Prime Minister's EU free trade  agreement sail through the House of Commons.

These are the sentiments of Alexander Von Schoenburg, editor of Bild, Germany's best-selling newspaper, "Just because someone has tangled hair, is prone to busting into Latin and somewhat chaotic private life doesn't mean they cannot be a statesman of historic importance," he wrote yesterday. "Europeans of all strips now know Johnson as the man who stood up to the behemoth that is the European bloc and, against all the odds, won the day for his country."

Having clinched an EU trade deal many said was impossible, the Prime Minster is entitled to feel vindicated. A few Remainer refuseniks will keep moaning. But most voters are relieved that, after four and a half years of squabbling, we have finally got

BREXIT DONE.

By "taking back control" from Brussels, while guaranteeing zero`-tariff trade with the EU, Johnson has confounded his critics. Amid endless no-deal catastrophism, he convinced the EU we were prepared to rely on World Trade  Organisation rules-which made a trade-deal more likely.

Having navigated the tricky withdrawal process, however, Johnson must now demonstrate Britain can use our new post-Brexit freedoms to thrive . We have come a long way since-mid-2016, when the Treasury insisted that merely voting to

LEAVE

 

would spark "an immediate and profound economic shock". The British economy stood firm, recording solid growth, high employment and strong public finances, exposing the

MASSED RANKS OF REMAINER MANDARINS TO RIDICULE.

Now, as mass vaccination gets going, Johnson can once again gainsay "all supposedly sensible pundits" by proving that BREXIT can boost the UK economy, after its battering during lockdown.

All ingredients are there. Outside the EU's single market, the UK is free of the highly politicised

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE-

which imposes huge restrictions on our economic freedom while requiring multibillion-pound annual EU payments. Within the SINGLE MARKET, all UK firms-including the 95 per cent that don't export to the EU-must comply with unnecessary and expensive rules.

NOW THEY DON'T

Also, the SINGLE MARKET IN SERVICES barely exists -so that's no loss either.

Since 1999, the share of UK exports to the EU has fallen from around 60 to 40 per cent. Our EU trade is shrinking, then, while generating a deficit, detracting from UK wealth-despite the the single market. Our non-EU trade, meanwhile, is rising fast, makes up the majority of Britain's international commerce and generates a surplus. We need to build on that - not least because, over the coming two decades, nine-tenths of global growth will happen

BEYOND THE EU.

That's also why the UK benefits from being outside the

EU'S CUSTOM UNION

-a tariff wall which has made imports from beyond  Europe more expensive for British shoppers. Such charges were sent to BRUSSELS, with the UK paying disproportionately given that most of OUR TRADE is ALREADY BEYOND EUROPE.

OUTSIDE OF THE  CUSTOMS UNION WE AVOID THESE CHARGES also being able to strike UK-specific trade deals-benefiting Britain's vibrant export sectors, in contrast to agreements by France and Germany.

Already, Liz Truss, the Trade Secretary has secured over

 60 UK TRADE DEALS

with more in the pipeline.

Some 85 per cent of the world economy is outside the EU, including the world's fastest growing and most populous economies. Britain should now seek lucrative agreements with the largest players, not least the US and China-deals that have long eluded Brussels, given intra-EU conflicts...

 

As the clouds of uncertainty lift - and once the p[andemic is finally tamed-economists are concluding that post-Brexit Britain can boom. The highly respected Centre for Economic and Business Research now predicts that the UK will outperform the EU over the next 15 years, becoming almost 25 per cent larger than France by the middle of the next decade. As we continue to attract the lion's share of inward  investment into Europe, Britain is on course to outstrip the German economy by 2040.

 

 

The UK faces deep challenges-going beyond Covid. Low productivity, for instance, means resources must be poured into vocational education. But our full-deal Brexit presents huge economic advantages, which Johnson must now bring to bear.

"We are with Europe, but not of it," wrote Winston Churchill in 1930."

 We are linked but not compromised, interested and associated but not absorbed."

 

Thanks to Johnson's skill and cunning, Churchill's observation again rings true. But having secured political success with BREXIT the Prime Minister must secure economic prosperity, too, as he builds BRITAIN'S NEW JERUSALEM, leading us beyond the fraught uncertainties of 2020, into a

 

NEW YEAR AND BEYOND.

 

[OF

 

 

FREEDOM AND PROSPERITY]

 

 

[Comments in brackets and Change's of form... are ours!]

 

 

DECEMBER  31,2020

H.F.2100
 

 

 

A REMINDER !

 

Brought forward from April,2006

 

A MESSAGE

FROM

A PATRIOTIC PRIME MINISTER

 in 1848

to another

Gordon Brown in June 2007

'Over a Hundred and Fifty Seven years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister -Foreign Secretary -Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) -beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:

 

“ Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)

 

“…We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

. It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”

 

For a full statement of his Principles:

 

“I hold with respect to alliances that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful to steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England-apart from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or commercial-is to be the champions of justice and right, pursuing that course with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice is, and wherever she thinks wrong has been done…

 

It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.” [In 1848 Lord Palmerstone was Foreign Secretary at the age of sixty-three. He entered Parliament in 1807- Secretary at War in 1809; 1811-28 (most years) War Office; 1830- 1852 Foreign Office; 1852-55 -Home Office; 1855-65.

 

‘ Born 1784 in Park Street Westminster. Family home ‘Broadlands’ Hampshire. Died on the morning of October 18, 1865. And the last candle [last of his contempories] of the Eighteenth century was out.’

 

* *

 

[It is significant that the word ‘England’ was not a word despised in our House of Commons during the time of this great patriot of England and only closer to our own times has the word Britain taken its place though we do detect a slight revival now in existence. ]

 

 

APRIL 2006

*

 

 

SEPTEMBER,2019

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

[A REMINDER OF THE LACK OF VIGILANCE IN THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND TO ALLOW THE TRAGIC LOSS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION IN A NATION KNOWN AS THE HOME OF  FREEDOM AND MAGNA CARTA.]

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
The pernicious doctrine of 'white privilege' holds back children of

ALL COLOURS

 

by Calvin Robinson

FORMER TEACHER AND NOW GOVERNOR OF A LONDON STATE SECONDARY SCHOOL

DAILY MAIL-OCTOBER 15, 2020

 

 

WHITE privilege...what an obscene phrase that is. It is also fundamentally racist in my view, encouraging bigotry and hatred it pretends to oppose.

If you don't believe me, look at the immense damage it is doing in British schools.

This week, Professor Matthew Goodwin, a politics lecturer at University of Kent, told the Commons Education Select Committee that the concept of

'WHITE PRIVILEGE'- societal attitudes that benefit white people over non-white people-is brutally unfair to white working-class boys.

It is nonsensical ,he said to teach white children-many from disadvantaged families-to apologise for

THEIR SKIN COLOUR

I couldn't put it better myself. For the uncomfortable reality is that, every day, the futures of white working-class children are being sacrificed on the

ALTER OF DIVERSITY

and

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

*

Misguided

AS a governor and former teacher at a secondary state school in North London, I know unequivocally that racism is not built into Britain's education system-unless it is shoehorned in via misguided ideas such as

'WHITE PRIVILEGE'.

Fortunately my school has refused to bow to such divisive dogma. But many institutions put up little resistance and feel they cannot ignore it.

Often themanifesto itself such as October's Black history month or Black Lives Matter protests that have spread from the US to Britain.

I know many teachers who feel pressure to actively endorse them, down-loading educational resources from websites that are steeped in something called 'critical race theory' - a fashionable new ideology which, to put it simply, claims that every modern institution is racist.

As a result, many schools now compete against one another in their quest to educate children about concepts such as 'white privilege' -the idea that white people can't bear to be told how lucky they are because they are white.

Not only is this damaging to white pupils, who are told that they are racist all their lives and never realised it, it also has an equally pernicious impact on black children, who probably never considered that the colour of their skin was the most important thing in their lives Why are we telling children that, based on who their grandparents were, they will face barriers and hurdles that other classmates will not?

It is a disgraceful state of affairs and only breeds enmity between young people and breaks up friendships.

.Crucially, it also risks harming black lives -telling anyone that they are destined to fail is likely to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If they are told that the world is against them, black pupils who are doing well might ask themselves whether there is any point in hard work.

And yet, like Professor Goodwin, I believe that the children who are worst affected by this divisive campaign are white pupils from low-income families, especially boys.

Indeed, shocking data released by the Department for Education shows that white working -class boys from poor backgrounds are by far the most underprivileged youngsters in Britain.

 

*

Only 13 per cent of white boys who are eligible for free school meals, because their families are on benefits, go on to higher education -yet that figure rises to 51 per cent for black British boys. That's almost four times as many.

In fact, the only groups that have a worse educational outcome that working-class white males are boys from the gypsy, Roma and Irish traveller communities-who often are not in school at all.

All of which makes a failure of our politicians to speak up for this silent majority even more shameful. In particular the

LABOUR PARTY

which was established to speak for the working class, seems to have turned its back on white Brits even though it constantly professes to care about 'diversity and inclusion'.

A few voices are now speaking out-not only Professor Goodwin, who himself came from a struggling single-parent family, but notably the Tory MP Ben Bradley, who earlier this year convened a

COMMONS DEBATE

on the plight

of young working-class boys.

Yet few dare to join them, and a deep-rooted taboo surrounds the whole topic.

Today, saying anything in defence of white boys from lower-income backgrounds is seen as tantament to rewarding and fostering racism.

This distorted world view can be traced back to the passing of the

EQUALITY ACTof 2010

which introduced the concept of

PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS'-

THAT IDEA THAT MINORITIES MERITED SUPPORT

AND

MAJORITIES

 DID NOT

*

Offensive

But my skin is brown, and I find it deeply offensive that anyone should look at me and make patronising assumption that I need extra help or support. There's something inherently Victorian, not to say superior, in the very notion. It is, quite simply, racist.

Nor am I aware of any research that says this approach results in any benefits for children from ethnic minorities. But there is clear evidence of the damage done by fabricating racial differences and assigning non-existent blame.

Of course, privilege does exist. But it doesn't work in the way that 'critical race theory' claims it does. And so when my pupils ask me about it, I tell them that the concept of 'privilege' isn't straightforward.

 

*

Toxic

Look at what happened when 96-year-old Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites last year tried to set up a £1.2 million bequest to benefit poor, white, working-class boys at his old schools Dulwich College and Winchester College. Unsurprisingly, he was turned down, with both schools rejecting the gifts. The very idea was treated as though it was somehow toxit.

Yet when grime artist Stormzy set up scholarships for poor black children at Cambridge University two years ago, he was hailed as an inspiration. Of course, what he has done is truly inspiring. It's just wrong that his example cannot  be used to benefit the white children who need help, too.

For the depressing truth is that this disparity continues into adulthood. Indeed ethnicity pay gap figures released this week showed that workers in their 20s from minority backgrounds were likely to earn more than their white counterparts, by an average of more than 5 per cent. So much for 'white privilege'.

At my school, we like to tell the pupils: 'Make no mistake, you are privileged to be here. All of you have a great chance at success. We're all British and we're all in this together.'

It's a message our politicians and teachers would do well to heed. And if they don't, its Britain's white children who will pay.

*  *  *

 

OCTOBER 15,2020

 

HF2084
 
 
 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]
Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
 http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

H.F.1424/2

  

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

AN URGENT APPEAL

TO

THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

 

 

 

AT HOME AND ABROAD

 

 

 

 

THE EDP WISHES TO CONTEST THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS AN ENGLISH LOBBY IN OUR ONCE FREE ENGLISH PARLIAMENT AT WESTMINSTER WHICH WE HAVE SUGGESTED SHOULD BE RETURNED TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE AND A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT BETWEEN WALES AND SCOTLAND.

 

 

MEMBERSHIP WILL BE OPEN TO ALL WHO SUPPORT OUR AIMS TO PROTECT OUR ENGLISH INHERITANCE OF LAW-CUSTOM-CHURCH-STATE-RELIGION.-TRADITION.

 

OTHERS WHO HAVE JOINED US IN OUR ISLAND HOME FROM AROUND THE WORLD HAVE THEIR OWN CHURCHES-CUSTOMS-RELIGION-EVEN LAWS...

 

 

PLEASE WRITE TO: 6,FIELD BARN ROAD

HAMPTON MAGNA

WARWICK,CV 35 8RT

 

 

My name is Michael Gibbs the Chairman of the EDP and the only member for the past 20 years.  I  am 89 years of age on September 15 .(BATTLE OF BRITAIN DAY) 2021  and I look forward to handing over the task to other hands as the intense workload of decades has taken its toll.

 

 

 

 IF YOU WISH TO BE A MEMBER:PLEASE WRITE TO

 6,FIELD BARN ROAD,HAMPTON MAGNA WARWICK,CV 35 8RT-PLEASE ENCLOSE A STAMPED ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.

 

 

 

WITH AN ENGLAND WITH A POPULATION NOW AFTER MASSIVE IMMIGRATION OF SUCH A VARIED TRADITION  AND CHURCH IT IS IMPORTANT

THAT THE

ENGLISH PEOPLE DEFEND THEIR INHERITANCE OF CHURCH-LAW-CUSTOM-TRADITION BECAUSE POPULATION CHANGES OVER THE NEXT FEW DECADES COULD CHANGE OUR COUNTRY TO A FOREIGN ENCLAVE

 

 

IT IS NOT RACIST TO PROTECT YOUR PRICELESS INHERITANCE

 

 

 

 

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET(T

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHEN YOU ARE ACCEPTED AS A MEMBER OF A FAMILY THEN YOU SHOULD RESPECT THEIR PAST EVEN IF YOU DISAGREE WITH IT- TO SEEK TO DESTROY RELICS OF THE PAST DOES NOT CHANGE THE PAST - ONE NEEDS TO LEARN FROM IT - FOR GUIDANCE IN THE FUTURE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSTITUTION OF THE EDP

 

There will be no need to MARCH OR WAVE THE FLAG BUT TO VOTE TO EMBED OUR ENGLISH CONSTITUTION INTO LAW SO FUTURE GENERATIONS WILL NEVER AGAIN BECOME SUBJECTS OF A FOREIGN POWER WITHIN OR BEYOND THE REALM OF ENGLAND. TO PROTECT THE ANCIENT RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE WITHIN THEIR ISLAND HOME-AN IMMEDIATE STOP TO IMMIGRATION EXCEPT FOR ESSENTIAL JOB VACANCIES. WE HAVE BEEN INFORMED  D.M THAT 16 MILLION JOBS WILL BE LOST TO ROBOTS OVER THE COMING DECADE. A COMFORTABLE POPULATION FOR ENGLAND WITH LESS THAN A QUARTER OF THE LAND MASS OF GERMANY IS 40 MILLION,

 

 

THE ABOVE ARE THE PURPOSE AND TASK OF THE PARTY AT THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION.

THE EDP LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT  WILL BE KNOWN AS THE

 FRIENDS OF ENGLAND.

 

 

'The poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he '

 

 

[Debates at Putney,29 Oct.1647-Cromwell's Army

 

There is an inbalance of reward within our society which needs urgent adjustment.

 

 

Policy of the EDP TO PROTECT THE COMMON MAN AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

A REMINDER IN 2020

 

 

'The Spirit of  England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

[Each underlined word/words has a separate bulletin]

'This England never did

Lie at the foot of a conqueror.

But when it first did help to wound itself:

Now these her princes are come home again.

Come the three corners of the world in arms,

And we shall shock them,

Naught shall make us rue

If England to itself do rest but true.'

( King John - V.vii.112)

*

A 19th century respected and honourable and disinterested and staunch Christian parliamentarian John Bright gave a world ringing acclaim in the memorable and potent words for the historic Commons of England which many are now fighting to protect:

"England is the mother of Parliaments"

and in essence is the war-cry in defence of liberty at home and everywhere where the unique parliamentary democracy took root in its variety throughout the world and which we are defending as all who love their country, as we do today against the very House of Commons whose duty was to protect our inheritance but which instead is intent in destroying that which it held in TRUST for future generations.

It is said that the English as a people did not see the danger at once-as today in February,2008- as again their history notably with the German aggression of the twentieth century.

It is also said that we are peacefully inclined, a too kindly and easy going people, like the Anglo-Saxons of the tenth and eleventh centuries, they

WOULD NOT SEE THE DANGER

It is said also that certain things distinguished Britain from the Continent:  parliamentary control, freedom of speech, free press and person, the very freedoms which will not exist in the European Union if THE QUEEN should sign the New EU Treaty in June, 2008.

*

From a year ago-Has anything changed in a year?

Our Parliament has ratified the New EU Treaty and the signs do not look too good in our House of Lords and of course the Monarch in defiance of her Coronation Oath will no doubt complete the treachery on a People who appear to be too ashamed to fly their national flag and the result is with us today with the betrayal by their representatives who decided a People who in the main had no stomach for a fight for their IDENTITY and COUNTRY were an easy PEOPLE to FOOL into a

 UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

Laurence Fox

 

 

 launching political party

 

hailed the ‘UKIP ...

 

https://metro.co.uk/2020/09/27/laurence-fox-new-political-party-hailed-ukip-for...

 

27/09/2020 · Laurence Fox is attempting to enter politics with his new party Reclaim

 

(Picture: ITV/REX)

 

Laurence Fox has announced his plans to launch a new political party which has been

 

described as

 

 

the ‘UKIP...

 
 

FULL ARTICLE

*

  1. Laurence Fox: Controversial actor launches political party ...

    https://www.mkfm.com/news/showbiz/laurence-fox-controversial-actor...

    28/09/2020 · Laurence Fox: Controversial actor launches political party to 'fight the culture wars' - MKFM 106.3FM - Radio Made in Milton Keynes. Actor Laurence Fox has launched a new political party he says is aimed at the reclamation of British values. Actor Laurence Fox has launched a new political party he says is aimed at the reclamation of British values.

  2. Global web icon
    New

    Laurence Fox launching political party to 'reclaim ...

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/sep/27/laurence-fox...

    27/09/2020 · The actor Laurence Fox has announced he is launching a political party to “reclaim” British values from politicians, who he says have “lost touch with the people”.

  3. Global web icon
    New

    Laurence Fox: why the actor is launching his own political ...

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/laurence-fox-why-actor...

    2 days ago · Actor Laurence Fox has announced that he is launching a new political party. The divisive figure, best known for his role in Inspector Lewis, said that he intends to put forward candidates at the ...

  4. Global web icon

    The radicalisation of Laurence Fox shows the worrying ...

    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2020/01/radicalisation...

    Laurence Fox is not a fan of the BBC. Last week, on the very same day that Fox appeared on Question Time, a YouTube video was uploaded featuring the actor in conversation with fellow right-winger James Delingpole. The two men agreed that the BBC was telling people how to think. “I don’t want my own children being shovelled with rubbish,” said Fox about the broadcaster, on which he would ...

  5. Global web icon

    Actor Laurence Fox slams stars who ... - Daily Mail Online

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7694537/Actor-Laurence-Fox...

    17/11/2019 · Laurence Fox, 41, admits in an interview that his new album criticises 'woke culture', while he even reveals that he wanted to call one of the songs MeToo, but was banned by his record label.

  6. ...WE FULLY SUPPORT MR FOX IN HIS TIMELY ENDEAVOR  TO RECLAIM OUR PAST CULTURE OF FREE SPEACH AND CENTURIES OF INHERITED EXPERIENCE OF PLAIN COMMON SENSE AND AS THE GREAT POET WORDSWORTH STATED:

     

     

     

    'We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

     

     

     

     

    That Shakespeare spake; the faith and morals hold

     

     

     

     

    Which Milton held.'

 

 

WORDSWORTH

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

SEPTEMBER 27,2020

HF.2082

 

 

 
 

A NATION STATE

 

 OF

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 

 

 

NOT A

 

 

 

NATION STATE OF CONFRONTATION

 

[The purpose of this information is to place in the forefront that the common people where not responsible for the cruel and wasteful wars or matters concerning slavery within the Empire. It was the Elite and Money Changers -Iluminati-that decided the path to follow. In the meantime the common people died in their millions of destitution and war. The ENGLISH PEOPLE-the Common Man is now branded a slaver and war-monger. Even in our own times we have seen illegal wars and waste of the public purse-nepotism and shifty behaviour at  the highest level. Some of those newcomers from other cultures are intent in destroying our culture and country and with the assistance of that supreme destroying devil of political correctness they have divided a once united country into a caldron of fiery disorder and hatred. The Christian Faith has a message of LOVE and FORGIVENESS but what we see around us in our once united land is

 

 HATRED and UNFORGIVNESS.

 

 

Nation States came into being as peoples of different cultures required their own homeland which ensured a stable and secure home. We can see from history and in  our time countless occasions where an influx of differing cultures leads to internal strife bloodshed and war. Europe suffered from this catastrophe for much of its history. The USA until around 1935 had a policy of only admitting Europeans and we can see the result today of their later OPEN POLICY which has made parts of the

USA a COUNTRY of CONFRONTATION and HATE within.

One has to consider that if those voices of warning of internal strife had been  listened to shortly after the Second World War we would not be faced by the foreign accusers given permission to live within our land as we experience in 2020.

A land called ENGLAND with only a small number of peoples from foreign lands who received a home amongst us. would not be today be taken to task for its past history, the sole responsibility of the ELITE! and MONEY LENDERS  -not of the PEOPLE . What it has demonstrated is that we are today in 2020 suffering from internal strife because  those warnings from the post-war years of the dangers of MASS IMMIGRATION from FOREIGN CULTURES have been IGNORED by SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS.

 

 

Unless the English People ignore POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and REGAIN CONTROL of their DIVIDED COUNTRY within a generation or so the NATION STATE OF ENGLAND will no longer exist.

 

 

THE ENGLISH PEOPLE NEED TO BAND TOGETHER AS ONE AGAINST THE ENEMY WITHIN AND TELL THE WITCH HUNTERS FROM FOREIGN LANDS TO GO TO HELL!]

AUGUST 9,2020

 

 

 

THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/       THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/ DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/    NOR SHALL MY SWORD/   WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/   WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/    ALFRED-CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1-    ALFRED-CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./      ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE-SPEECH BY ENOCH POWELL/     CONFOUND THEIR POLITICS FRUSTRATE THEIR KNAVISH TRICKS/ THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY-WHO ARE THE ENGLISH ?-PT 1/     THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY-WHO ARE THE ENGLISH? - PT2 /     THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND  BY WINSTON CHURCHILL

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

The Collapse of Christianity has wrecked British society

by

Steve Doughty

[Daily Mail-Thursday,29th May-2008]

THE collapse of Christianity has wreaked British society a leading Church of England bishop declared yesterday.

It has destroyed family life and left the country defenceless against the rise of radical Islam in a

moral and spiritual vacuum.

In a lacerating attack on liberal values, the Right Reverend Michael Nazir-Ali the

Bishop of Rochester

said the country was mired in a doctrine of

'endless self-indulgence'

that had brought an explosion in public violence and binge drinking.

*

JUNE-2008

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

“War is essentially an evil thing.  Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world.  To initiate a war of aggression therefore, is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

 

 

                                   Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal 1946

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.2061

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We repeat some of the words of a speech by JOHN BRIGHT MP-a true man of the people-

 

 in

GLASGOW, on the 21st, DECEMBER 1858 on

 

 

 

 REFORM

 

 

...'I have no craving for popularity. I think I have little of that which may be called the lust for fame. ,I am a citizen of a free country. I love my country, I love its freedom; but I believe that freedom can only be extended and retained by a fair and honest representation of the people; and it is because I believe this, that I am here tonight to ask you, through the power of your intelligence and your numbers, to step into the position which now opens up before you in 1858.']

 

In JUNE 2020 we ask the very same question as to our present electoral system in JUNE 2020 BELOW YOU WILL SEE THE GROSS INJUSTICE OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM WHICH CAN HARDLY BE CONSIDERED DEMOCRATIC. WE ARE NO LOVER OF THE EU WHICH WE HAVE FOUGHT AGAINST FOR OVER 20 YEARS IN THE POLITICAL ARENA AND SINCE THOSE TRAITORS UNDER THE GERMAN SPY EDWARD HEATH BETRAYED THE NATION AND ITS PEOPLE in 1970-73

 

 

AS WE HAVE CONSTANTLY STATED OVER

20 YEARS

PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

IS A TRUER ELECTORAL SYSTEM

FOR A

DEMOCRACY

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

[THE TWO MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES PLAY MUSICAL CHAIRS AND HAVE FAILED OVER DECADES TO CUT CRIME - IMPROVE STATE PENSIONS-EVEN PORTUGAL PAYS MORE. STILL NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT AND CROWDED PRISONS AND THE  OBVIOUS ANSWER NEW PRISONS IGNORED AND DECIDE TO FIT PHONE IN EVERY PRISON CELL  AND THE LATEST! ALLOW SEX AND DRINK IN THEIR 5 STAR ACCOMMODATION-CRIMINALS COMING UP BEFORE THE BENCH WILL BE PLEADING TO BE LOCKED UP  FOR SUCH WONDERFUL OFFERINGS.   WE HAVE HEARD OF OPEN PRISONS BUT THIS MUST BE A NEW DIMENSION IN THE WORD PUNISHMENT AND REHABILITATION.]

*

WE ARE CONTINUALLY HEARING OF THE WASTE OF FOREIGN AID-

THE LATEST!

DAILY MAIL, Saturday, January 5,2019

UK handing £1.5 bn aid to the world's corrupt countries

by

JASON GROVES-Political Editor

*

[After the TORY  BETRAYAL of 1972 there is an urgent need for an ENGLISH Patriotic political party to

PROTECT the INDEPENDENCE of our COUNTRY and the RETURN after over 300 years

OUR

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT IN HER ANCIENT HOME of WESTMINSTER.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1388

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

[ABOUT TIME TOO!]

 

Hundreds of NHS 'one stop shop'

 

diagnostic hubs are to be set to be carried

 

out in hundreds of NHS

 

'ONE STOP SHOPS' on HIGH STREETS

 

across the UNITED KINGDOM...

 

 

 By Ben Spencer

 

Daily Mail Medical Correspondent

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti, article-8796667/amp/Hundreds-NHS-one...

Cancer checks, heart scans and blood tests are set to be carried out in hundreds of NHS 'one stop shops' on high streets across the United Kingdom.

CANCER checks, heart scans and blood tests are set to be carried out in hundreds of NHS 'one stop shops' on high streets across the country.

The diagnostic hubs will allow patients to have vital checks close to their home-while ensuring    hospitals are left clear for serious care...

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

H.F.2023

 

  

(

75 per cent of Poll says too many immigrants are coming into our country.

 

It is said the British people are not concerned of the racial mix. There cannot be a more tolerant people on this earth.  What is the issue is that certain racial groups have no interest in becoming British but wish instead to create a State within a State.

 

It has been the policy of Tony Blair and New Labour policy to encourage as much immigration as they can in order to destroy the identity of our nation to be able to create a compliant multicultural State, which would enable him to lead the people into a European Super State.

 

Whenever an immigrant joins a host country any where in the world the immigrant should respect  the host nations culture and laws. This is not to say that they should not VALUE THEIR OWN ROOTS but “when in Rome do as the Romans do”

This message applies wherever people wish to join the citizens of another country.  It is not the place of the host country to evaluate and proclaim the different cultures but to protect the culture of the host country.

 

The cause of more wars than history can remember is that different peoples need room on the planet for their own national development and beliefs, and where there are conflicts today this prognosis will reveal this truth.

 

AS we defend the individual so we must defend the right of the individual nation-state.  It has been the interference of others with a political correctness agenda that poisons this natural development that has caused so much conflict in the world.

 

It is said that certain racial groups are not welcome in our country because of their reluctance to integrate though significant numbers of these peoples are already in our midst.  We ask them to think again and embrace our way of life.

 

Over our long history we have given refuge to many people from every quarter of the world and our ability to continue to do so will depend on those who seek our assistance to understand that our ability to do so depends on those who seek safety of our shores to give some understanding and contribution to the ‘spirit that nourishes Freedom, and in return is nourished by it’ the ancient legacy of the People of our Island.

 

On the continent there is much disquiet of the dangers of conflict within their societies because the nation-states have been so anxious to please the political lobby that they have now before their eyes the inevitable picture of discord in their society because they were too lax to lay down firm rules of integration in the naturalisation of their new citizens.

 

Everyone wishes to belong- to country-to community-to town-to village but this is only achieved if the individual will embrace the people they wish to live amongst. It is this identity which leads to loyalty and respect for one’s country and as outlined elsewhere gives to each of us our vision from the past which confirms the basis of our Loyalty which rests on our common inheritance in the fields and lanes of rural England, in the spirit which shook off the Armada, in the expansion of our Commonwealth of Nations, in the profundity of Shakespeare, the austerity of Milton, the fervour of Shelly, the humanity of Browning.

 

That is our inheritance- that is our past - and that spirit must be our future for all our citizens who join us from across the world.

  

DECEMBER/04

*          *          *

 

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

 
 
 

A MATTER OF PATRIOTISM

 

 

[GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO

 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT

 LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY.

ADDED JULY 28,2018

AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 21,2017

 

 

Conservative Friends of Israel - Wikipedia

 

 

 

80% of Conservative MPs are members

 

 

 

 

 

  

H.F.741

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

 

'You can fool  all the people some of the time,

and some of the people all the time,

 but you cannot fool all the people all the time.'

 

ABRAHAM LINCOLN -Speech -Sept.8-1858

 

[The majority of the common people at the General Election of December 12/13-2019  by their actions confirmed the above statement.

 

How the common populace rose up to confront the never-ending audacity of pompous - self-centered  -  arrogant - undemocratic elected persons, and sent them on their way']

 

 

"You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing .

Depart I say, and let us have done with you!

In the name of God. go!"

 

Oliver Cromwell-1653

 

 
 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

JUNE 6 -2020

is

ENGLAND'S DECISION DAY

 

 

WE DON'T NEED TO FIGHT ON THE BEACHES

 

BUT WE DO NEED TO FIGHT ON OUR ENGLISH SOIL

 

FOR OUR

 

ENGLISH INHERITANCE

 

BEFORE IT IS DESTROYED BY FOREIGN ELEMENTS WITHIN

 

OUR

 

ENGLISH LAND.

 

JUNE 6 -2020

 

 

Courage

 

"I see the damage done by foreign attacks;

but I also see, side by side with the devastation

and amid the ruins, bright and smiling eyes, beaming with a  consciousness of being

associated with a cause far higher and wider

than any human personal issue. I see the

spirit of  an unconquerable people."

 

 

Winston Churchill. (April 1941)

 

*
 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM: MARCH 16 -2012

A LESSON OF HISTORY

 

 ENGLAND

 

'

'It is because England is so great, and our love for our country is so deep and so just, that we can not only afford to dwell upon the darker spots of our history, but we absolutely require them, lest our love and admiration should become idolatrous;  it is because we are too apt to compare foreign nations with ourselves unfavourably that it is absolutely good for us to contemplate what they have suffered unjustly or done unworthily'  [P174]

 

Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 
 

 

 ENGLAND

 

OUR ISLAND HOME

 

 PART 2

 

...In our own island we see this most clearly: our history clearly begins with the coming over of the Saxons, the Britons and Romans had lived in our country, but they are not our fathers; we are connected with them as men indeed, but nationally speaking, the history of  Caesar's  invasion has no more to do with us, than the natural history of the animals which then inhabited our forests.   We ,this great English nation, whose race and language are now overrunning the earth [1843] from one end to the other,- we were born when the white horse of the Saxons had established his dominion from the Tweed to the Tamar.   So far we can trace our blood, our language, the name and actual divisions of our country, the beginnings of some of their institutions.   So far our national identity extends, so far history is modern, for it treats of a life which was then, and is not yet extinguished.

... By the great elements of nationality, I mean, race, language, institutions, and religion: and it will be seen that throughout Europe all these four may be traced up, if not actually in every case to the fall of the western empire, yet to the dark period which followed the fall, while in no case are all the four to be found united before it.   Otherwise, if we allow the two first of these [race and language] elements without the third and fourth [institutions and religion] to constitute national identity, especially when combined with sameness of places, we must say the the northern countries of Europe have no ancient history, inasmuch as they have been inhabited from the earliest times by the same race speaking what is radically the same language [GERMAN].   But it is better not to admit national identity, till the two elements of institutions and religion, or at any rate one of them, be added to those of blood and language .   At all events it cannot be doubted, that as soon as the four  are united, the national personality becomes complete...'

 

Is the government to impose its laws upon the people?   We speak of the government as distinct from the people, without thereby implying that it is in opposition to the people.   In a corrupt state the government and people are wholly at variance; in a perfect state they would be wholly one; in ordinary states they are one more or less imperfectly.    We need not be afraid to say, that in a perfect state the law of the government would be the law of the people, the law of their choice, the expression of  their mind.   In less perfect states the law of the government ids more or less the law of the people, suiting them in the main if not entirely.   If it be wholly or in great part unwelcome to them, something in the state is greatly wrong [ as has been the case since 1997 with so-called NEW LABOUR and the latter MIXED BUNCH of which we have no idea what they really stand for -THEY are ALL the SAME!.]   ;and although I believe that there are cases where a dictatorship is a good, and where good laws may rightfully be  imposed on a barbarian and unwilling people; yet, as  as the rule, there can be no doubt that such a state of things is tyranny.   When I speak therefore of the government, I am speaking of it as expressing the mind and will of the nation; and though a government may not impose its own law, whether human or divine, upon an adverse people; yet a nation, acting through its government, may certainly choose for itself such a law as it deems most for the good.

 

 

And therefore when it has been said that " these islands do not belong to the king and parliament in the same manner as the house or land of any individual belongs to the owner," and that therefore a government may not settle the religious law of a  country as the master of a family may settle the religious practices of his household; this is true only if we consider the king and parliament as not speaking the voice of the nation, but their own opposed to that of the nation.   For the right of a nation over its territory must be at least as absolute as that of any individual over his own house and land; and it surely is not an absurdity to suppose that the voice of government can ever be the voice of the nation:  although they unhappily too often differ, yet surely they may conceivably, and very often do in practice, completely agree...

 

... Wherever there is centralization, there is a danger of the parts of the body being too much crippled in their individual action; and yet centralization is essential to their healthy activity no less than to the perfection of the body.  But if men run away with the mistaken notion that liberty of conscience is threatened only by a state religion, and not at all by a church religion, the danger is that they will abandon religion altogether to what they call the church, that is, to the power of society far worse governed than most states, and likely to lay far heavier burdens on individual conscience, because the spirit dominant init is narrower and more intolerant.

 

[P46]  No doubt all societies, whether they are called states or churches, are bound to avoid tempting the conscience of individuals by overstating the terms of citizenship or communion.    And it is desirable, as I said before, to require a profession of obedience rather than belief, because obedience can and will often be readily rendered where belief would be withheld.    But as states require declarations of allegiance to the sovereign, so they may require declarations of submission to the authority of a particular law.   If a man believes himself bound to refuse obedience to the law of Christianity, or will not pledge himself to regard it as paramount in authority to any human legislation, he cannot properly be a member of a society which conceives itself bound to regulate all its proceedings by this law, and cannot allow any of its provisions to be regarded as revocable or alterable.   But no human power can presume to enquire into the degree of a man's positive belief: the heretic was not properly he who did not believe what the church taught, but he who wilfully withdrew himself from its society, refusing to conform to its system, and setting up another system of his own.

 

I know that it will be objected to this, that it is no other than the system of the old philosophers, who upheld paganism as expedient, while they laughed at it in their hearts as false.    But he who makes such an objection must surly forget the essential difference between paganism and Christianity,   Paganism, in the days of the philosophers scarcely pretended to rest on a foundation of historical truth; no thinking man believed in it , except as allegorically true.    But Christianity commends itself to the minds of a vast majority of thinking men, as being true in fact no less the doctrine; they believe in it as literally true no less spiritually.   When I speak then of a state requiring obedience to the Christian law, it means that the state, being the perfect church, should do the church's work; that is that it should provide for the Christian education of the young, and the Christian instruction of the old; that it should, by public worship and by a Christian discipline, endeavour, as much as may be, to realise Christianity to all its people.    Under such a system, the teachers would speak because they believed, for Christian teachers as a general rule do so, and their hearers would, in like manner, learn to believe also.   Farther, the evidence of the Christian religion, in itself so unanswerable would be confirmed by the manifest witness of the Christian church, when possessing a real living constitution, and purified by an efficient discipline; SO THAT THE TEMPTATIONS TO UNBELIEF WOULD BE CONTINUALLY LESSENED, AND UNBELIEF, IN ALL HUMAN PROBABILITY, WOULD BECOME CONTINUALLY OF MORE RARE OCCURRENCE.   And possibly the time might come when a rejection of Christianity would be so clearly a moral offence, that profane writings would be as great a shock to all men's notions of right and wrong as obscene writings are now, and the one might be punished with no greater injury to liberty of conscience than the other.

 

But this general hearty belief in Christianity is to be regarded by the Christian society, whether it be called church or state, not as its starting point, but as its highest perfection.    To begin with a strict creed and no efficient Christian institutions, is the sure way to hypocrisy and unbelief; to begin with the most general confession of faith, imposed, that is, as a test of membership, but with rigorous Christian institutions, is the way most likely to lead, not only to a real and general belief, but also in a lively perception of the highest points of Christian faith.   In other words, intellectual objections to Christianity should be tolerated, where they are combined with moral obedience; tolerated because in a way they are most surely removed; whereas a corrupt or disorganised church with a minute creed, encourages intellectual objections; and if it proceeds to put them down by force, it does often violate the right of conscience, punishing an unbelief which its own evil has provoked, and , so far as human judgment can see, has in great measure justified. [Page 49]

DEBT-HUMAN PASSION-HUMAN ERROR.

[We must bear in mind the colossal debt  acquired - the immense loss of life and injury to persons and destruction of property over the past 100 years because of WAR  of which ONLY the INTERNATIONAL BANKSTERS {ROTHCHILDS...with their increasing boundless WEALTH are the VICTORS.]

 

 

 THE BANK OF ENGLAND FORMED IN 1694 THROUGH AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT-

A PRIVATE BANK OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONEY LENDERS

  
 

After such disorientation was spread, Charles Montagu, treasurer, key leader of the Venetian Junto, and part of the welcoming committee of the foreign invaders, established the Bank of England in 1694 through an act of Parliament, which was founded by William Paterson, an imported student of the Bank of Amsterdam. Montagu then organized large loans through the private Bank, controlled not by the King, but parliament, and while supposedly helping the war torn economy, created a giant monetary debt out of thin air, a quantity for speculation and impoverishment of England, proceeding to push through dictatorial financial decisions for the economy, while never once issuing anything for development. For the job, Montagu selected the alchemist and calculating machine Isaac Newton, appointing him Warden of the Mint to carry out the enormous data processing job involved in the lying and faking on behalf of the numerous transitions in the economy for the sake of the Empire, such as a gruesome recoinage which cut the people’s wealth in half.20Newton immediately proffered his niece for sexual favors to Montagu in payment for the appointment, and for extra credit, as Warden of the Mint Newton personally advocated the death penalty and torture for petty thieves of coin wherever possible.

 

More!

  
     

Economical questions arise obviously out of the history of all WARS,

although careless readers are apt to neglect them.   They arise out of that simple law of our nature which makes it necessary for every man to eat and drink and be clothed.   Common readers, and I am afraid I may add, many historians also, appear to write and read about military matters without recollecting this.   We hear of armies marching, advancing and retreating ,besieging towns , fighting battles, being engaged actively for some weeks or months, and are apt  to think of them solely as moving or fighting machines, whose success depends on the skill with which their general plays them, as if they were really so many chess-men.   Yet one would think it was sufficiently obvious that these armies are made up of men who must eat and drink every day, and who wear clothing.       Of the expence and difficulty of maintaining them it is not easy.  I grant, for private persons in peace to form an adequate idea.   Yet here we may gain something more of a notion of it than can be obtained readily in a private family.      A college will contain perhaps seventy or eighty members; let him go into the kitchen and see the number of pounds of meat required for the daily consumption of the college, and see what the cost will amount to.  Then he may think what it is to provide for the food not of eighty or ninety persons, but of twenty, or of forty, or of sixty, or even of a hundred thousand.       All this multitude doing nothing to raise food or make clothing for themselves, must be fed and clothed out of the wealth of the community.     Again this community many have to maintain not one of these armies but several, and large fleets besides, and this for many years together;  while it may often happen that its means of doing so are at the same time crippled;  ITS FOREIGN TRADE MAY BE CUT OFF, OR LARGE PORTIONS OF ITS TERRITORY MAY BE LAID WASTE; while the event of the contest being uncertain, and hope and confidence are checked, and with them credit perishes also.      It is then a light matter first to provide the necessary resources for such a contest, and next to see that they ARE NOT SPENT WASTEFULLY? [P144]

 

With regard to providing them, there is first the great question between DIRECT TAXATION and LOANS.   Shall we lay the whole burden of the contest upon the PRESENT GENERATION, or DIVIDE it between OURSELVES and POSTERITY?     Conceive now the DIFFICULTIES, the exceeding temptations, which beset the decisions of this QUESTION.   In a FREE GOVERNMENT it may be doubtful whether the people will consent to raise the money or no.  But suppose that legally they have no voice in the matter, that the government may lay on what taxes it will; still extreme discontent at home is not likely to be risked in the midst of a FOREIGN WAR; or if the people are willing to bear the burden still  the power may be wanting.   A tax may easily DESTROY ITSELF: that is, suppose that a man's trade just  yields him a profit which he can live upon, and a tax is laid upon him to the amount of a fourth part of his profit.   If he raises the price of his commodity to the consumer, the consumer will either purchase so much less of it, or will endeavour to procure it from other countries where the dealer being less heavily taxed can afford to sell on cheaper terms.  Then the government interposes to protect the taxed native dealer by prohibiting the importation of the commodity of the untaxed foreigner.   But such a prohibition running counter to the plain rule of common sense, which makes every man desire to buy a cheaper article rather than a dearer, when both  are of equal goodness, it can only be maintained by FORCE.   Thence arise the necessity of a large constabulary or preventative force to put down smuggling, and to say nothing of the moral evils produced by such a state of things, it is clear that the expense of the additional preventative force which the new tax rendered necessary, is all to be deducted from the profits of that tax; and this deduction, added to the falling off in its productiveness occasioned by the greater poverty of the tax payer, may reduce its return almost to NOTHING.

[Comments within brackets and headings-highlighting and Caps are Ours]

TO BE CONTINUED

The above extract taken from the works of Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 

[We shall be showing extracts from his work not necessarily in the order  of its publication because for our purpose we wish to confine ourselves to matters relevant to the present day on much that is now in jeopardy because of the intent of many of our politicians to DESTROY the very heart of a once great and ancient NATION STATE

 

'Christianity is the basis of republican government, its bond of cohesion, and life-giving law.- more than the Magna Carta itself the Gospels are the roots of English liberty -That Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, with our completing Declaration, was possible only because the Gospels had been before them.'-

R. S. Storrs

*

'The distinction between Christianity and all other systems of religion consists largely in this, that in these others men are found seeking God, while Christianity is God seeking men.-'

Thomas Arnold, D. D.(1795-1842) Head Master of Rugby School.

CHURCH AND STATE IN A CHRISTIAN COMMONWEALTH

 

" An alliance between church and state in a Christian  commonwealth, is ,in my opinion, an idle and a fanciful speculation.  An alliance is between two things that are in their nature distinct and independent, such as between two sovereign states.   But in a Christian commonwealth, the church and the state are one and the same thing , being different integral parts of the same whole.... Religion is so far, in my opinion, from being out of the province or duty of a Christian magistrate, that it is, and it ought to be, not only his care, but the principle thing in his care; because it is one of the great bonds of human society, and its object the supreme good, the ultimate end and object of man himself."

 

Speech on the Unitarian Petition, 1792.   Burke's Works,Vol. X. p.43 Ed. 1818.

 

*

 

THE BEGINNING!

 

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

  

 

HOW THE SATANISTS ARE GRADUALLY ACHIEVING THEIR AIM  IN DESTROYING AN ANCIENT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

 

CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE

 

 

LORD RANDOLPH CHURCHILL

"Trust the People."

''But I own that my chief reason for supporting the Church of England I find in the fact that, when compared with other creeds and other sects, it is essentially the Church of religious liberty.   Whether in none direction or another, it is continually possessed by the ambition, not of excluding, but of including, all shades of religious thought, all sorts and conditions of men...I cannot, and will not, allow myself to believe that the English people, who are not only naturally religious, but also eminently practical... will ever consent to deprive themselves of so abundant a fountain of aid and consolation, or acquiesce in the demolition of an institution which elevates the life of the nation and consecrates the acts of the State...

 

Delivered by Lord Randolph Churchill at Birmingham on April 16th, 1884

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM

MARCH 16 -2012

 

H.F.1584

 

 ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

 

H.F.1773

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 16

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC AMBITION

In his 1934 book 'Sex and Culture the anthropologist J.D.Unwin studied 86 different cultures from a period of 5,000 years and concluded that chastity and fidelity in "strict marital monogamy" were central to any strong, healthy society. Indeed, no society flourished for more than three generations without it. Britain is now nearing the end of the second generation. Once the third generation was out, the society died, usually by being taken over by another, monogamous people. "I know of no exceptions to this rule.

Could the fiercely monogamous Islam be the culture that takes over from the secular humanist culture of the Western world? Will we see  the establishment of an Islamic State in Britain and the imposition of Sha'ria. This author believes the British Establishment would not  allow such a thing to happen, jealous  as its leaders are of their grip on power.  However, events have a habit  of taking politicians by surprise, and there is no lack  of ambition amongst Muslims.  It is only necessary to look at tower hamlets  to see what happens when 'ordinary Muslims' take power.

Tower Hamlets [in 2005] is 36% Muslim, and yet Muslims are in a majority in the ruling Labour group and on the Council as a whole, and the Mayor is Muslim.  Presumably the Muslim councillors can be regarded as 'ordinary Muslims.' Once in power, they attempted to have  wards renamed to eliminate references to Christianity (Trinity ward disappeared ), and a proposal to twin the London Borough with Jenin, a Palestinian hot-bed of terrorism, was narrowly averted.

The Borough is able to use the funding it allocates to advance Islamic programmes and cultural societies, force the closure of Christian schools and ensure that Muslims control everything for which the local authority has responsibility.

There are 14 Muslim community organisations in partnership with Tower Hamlets Borough Council. In addition to the 2 mosques, the Ahmadiya Muslim Association has as its purpose:

Practising Islamic knowledge... to upkeep a moral society', the junior Muslim Circle provided' religious education' to 8-14 year olds, a Madrassah has 'mother tongue [Arabic?] and study support classes', and the Shahjalal Centre is there  to 'meet the needs of the Muslim community' with 'prayer space' and 'education for children'

Couple Islamic ambition for a Khilafah with a decadent British society whose leaders dare not speak out against Islam or oppose 'multiculturalism', and Islamic advances can be made.  Mosques can be built and expanded, Islamic schools established, cultural centres set up, and large amounts of public money can fund studies which do not benefit the United Kingdom..

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

 
About 903,000 results
 

    Muslim Population Growth in Europe - Pew Forum on Religion and ...

    www.pewforum.org/2017/11/.../europes-growing-muslim-population/
    ‎
    29 Nov 2017 ... To see how the size of Europe's Muslim population may change in the coming
    decades, Pew Research Center has modeled three scenarios ...
     
    ‎Germany is top destination ... - ‎How Europe's Muslim ...

    Europe's Muslim population will continue to grow - Pew Research ...

    www.pewresearch.org/.../europes-muslim-population-will-continue-to-grow-but-how-much-depends-on-migration/
    ‎
    4 Dec 2017 ... While Muslims are still a relatively small share of Europe's population (roughly 5
    %), they are set to continue rising as a percentage of Europe's ...
     

    5 facts about the Muslim population in Europe - Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/.../5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/
    ‎
    29 Nov 2017 ... In the coming decades, the Muslim share of Europe's population is expected to
    grow – and could more than double.
     

    Muslims and Islam - Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/.../muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
    ‎
    9 Aug 2017 ... Indonesia is currently the country with the world's largest Muslim population, but
    Pew Research Center projects that India will have that ...
     

    The size of the European Muslim population in 2050 depends ...

    www.pewresearch.org/...muslim-population.../ft_17-12-04_muslimpopulation_thesize_1/
    ‎
    1 Dec 2017 ... Europe's Muslim population will continue to grow – but how much depends on
    migration. The size of the European Muslim population in 2050 ...
     

    A new estimate of U.S. Muslim population - Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/.../new-estimates-show-u-s-muslim-population-continues-to-grow/
    ‎
    3 Jan 2018 ... An estimated 3.45 million Muslims of all ages were living in the United States in
    2017, accounting for about 1.1% of the country's total ...
     

    Why Muslims are the world's fastest-growing religious group

    www.pewresearch.org/.../why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/
    ‎
    6 Apr 2017 ... Pew Research Center ... In 2015, Muslims made up 24.1% of the global
    population. ... of the seven other major religious groups analyzed in the study. ...
    The growth of the Muslim population also is helped by the fact that ...
     

    Muslims and Islam | Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/topics/muslims-and-islam/
    ‎
    Most Western Europeans favor at least some restrictions on Muslim women's ...
    live in India, there also are substantial populations of Muslims, Christians, Sikhs,
     ...
     

    Muslim population in some EU countries could triple, says report ...

    https://www.theguardian.com/.../muslim-population-in-europe-could-more-than-double
    29 Nov 2017 ... The report, Europe's Growing Muslim Population, shows a stark west-east divide.
    ... 9.3. 16.2. Guardian graphic | Source: Pew Research Center ...
     

    Muslim population growth - Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_population_growth
    ‎
    Muslim population growth refers to the topic of population growth of Muslims
    worldwide. .... Pew Research Center projects a slowing down of Muslim
    population growth in China than in previous years, with Muslim women in China
    having a 1.7 ...
     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1711/16

 

 

'For England and St George'

 

 

 

 Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 1

 With the offer this week by the Government of a Referendum on the New European Constitution within the next twelve months, agreed only days from the celebration of our patron saint of England it is timely to illustrate below an article by the author Linda Proud which appeared over ten years ago in This England and which with its patriotic and potent reminder of what it means to be English.

 

*

 

Who are the English?

 

Although St. George’s Day is one that the English respect, it is hardly comparable to the national day celebrations as celebrated in most other countries.  April 23rd is marked with much fervour by the English abroad than by those at home, for it is still far from being regarded as a national holiday here.

 

We English do not like parading our nationality. We do not plaster our cars with stickers saying, “I love England”. Being English constitutes many things, and one of them is a rather shy identification with the land of our birth.

 

Apart from anything else, we have been confused by various historical Acts of Union, which have created the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.  For instance, do we consider ourselves to be foremost British, or English?

 

Britishness is, at the moment, a largely artificial construction.  It is something we aspire to. If we ever find full cultural union with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, but nothing is happening at the moment [Winter-2001] to promote such unity. British is what we will be when we have a British football or cricket team.  For now, what we need to understand is that we are English:

 

“Despite of all temptations to belong to other nations, he is an Englishman”.

 

So said Gilbert and Sullivan in one of their many moments of great perceptiveness. Despite, or perhaps because of the British Empire, we English appear to be ashamed of ourselves.  We go abroad, we revel in the cultural differences to be found in other countries, we adopt exotic foods, plants and words. We envy national uniqueness of other nations, and then come home to continue taking our own for granted!  We assume that our English life is the standard, a kind of mean line, compared to which all other nations seem either more colourful and romantic, or more dreary and oppressed.

 

To see ourselves for what we are, we need either to spend a long time abroad or, failing that, to turn an objective eye upon ourselves. This is difficult to do but, once achieved, the opening view is one of wonder.

 

To know ourselves, we can use the landscape as a mirror.  Even a short tour of the country will reveal several special qualities. The overriding one is gentleness.  A climate without extremes has created a land a people, similarly moderate.  There are no deserts in England. Mountains are few, the wilderness small. What we have instead is a rolling land of gentle changes complemented by weather, which often alters with the hour and, though it can be harsh, is rarely fatal.

 

The villages and towns have their roots in modesty rather than flamboyance.  They are the result of a practical people, a people who want to work and who require practical accommodation.  The Anglo-Saxons were farmers and they eschewed the cities already founded in Britain by the Romans.

 

City –life arrived late in England. It came with the industrial revolution – and even today most people live in a city out of necessity rather than desire. To be in a place such as London where there are no horizons and the passage of one season into another is blurred, can seem like enforced captivity out of necessity rather than desire.

 

To be in a place such as London where there are no horizons and the passage of one season into another is blurred, can seem like enforced captivity.  It comes as little surprise, then to learn that the first inhabitants of the first towns, which were established by King Alfred the Great, had to be persuaded to live in them as a matter of duty.

 

The quality, which the English prize most, is freedom.  It has taken a thousand years to achieve those freedoms for which the rest of the world envies us. 

 

Freedom is the product of good law, and the Common Law of England is founded on three assumptions: that man is essentially good, that all men are equal under the law, and that he who does not transgress the law is free.

 

This has led to such legal requirements, or idiosyncrasies, as the weight of evidence having to be supplied by the prosecution rather than the defence.

 

Throughout our history, a line of courageous judges have braved great danger by re-stating a fundamental principle of English Law, which is that God and the law are above the king.

 

Having our rulers answerable to the same law as the ruled has kept England free from oppression.

 

Under English law, and as subjects of the Queen, everyone in England is considered equal.  Obviously there are serious in equalities in the matters of wealth and property, but in terms of the freedom of the individual, all are the same.

 

This is not true in other countries, notably republics that have a concept of citizenship and, as a natural corollary, the concept of the “non-citizen”.

 

England has always loved justice, even when it has seemed most absent in our history.

 

 For justice to reign,

 

1) We need good judges,

 

2) We need juries,

 

3) We need a judiciary independent of the government of the day

 

These things are now under threat.

 

Firstly,

 

 Parliament is not keen on the independence of judges and too often puts itself above the law.

 

Secondly,

 

 By joining the European Union we have put our law below that of the Roman system, a system which the wise advisers of Henry 11  rejected in the 12th century!

 

While there may be perverse judgements in our own courts, and a semblance of justice on offer from European courts, we are in danger of being seduced into this other system.

 

In fact we should be pulling back hard, for the Roman system is vulnerable to tyranny, whilst our own acts as bulwark against it.

 

In all the multitude of statute, legislation and directives pouring out of Brussels reason seems hardly to figure. This is the law of bureaucrats and committees, not of principle.

 

End of Part 1

 Click Here to read Part 2

 

H.F.2025

 
 

ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE
 

by
 

ENOCH POWELL
---

(BIRMINGHAM BRANCH)


" England is the country of the English, he said.
England is a stage on which the drama of English history
was played and the setting within which the
English became conscious of themselves as people . . . .

when politicians and preachers attempt to frighten
and cajole the English into pretending away
the distinction between themselves and other nations and
other origins, they are engaged in undermining the
foundation upon which democratic government
by consent and peaceable civilized society in this
country are supplied"
  - 
 Enoch Powell

 

Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty

 

Is with the English- speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth, and our answer to those who prefer loss of Identity in an unaccountable, corrupt and godless European Police-State.

 

Thomas Jefferson, third President of the United States, once commented,’ A nation which seeks to trade its political independence for economic gain deserves to lose both’’. If she stays within the emerging European State, and continues to submit to government from Brussels, Britain will lose both her Prosperity and her Independence.

 

There is more prospect of prosperity and security for this country as a member of the North Atlantic Free Trade Area (NAFTA), in which Britain and her People would be able to trade world-wide, retain all ‘’Historic Rights’’, Principles and Privileges, and suffer no loss of National Independence.

 

Historically, Culturally and Politically, Britain has far more in common with the English-speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth countries, who together have imparted to many nations the lesson of Liberty (which many of our European neighbours later in their history claimed but seem now to have forgotten the hard lesson that one must fight constantly to guard the Treasure of Liberty)   developed  the world’s oldest system of representative government, been the first to recognise inviolable and Fundamental Rights, and created judicial systems free from influence or interference by the State.

 

This profound Kinship, and the need to sustain it politically by separateness from Europe, was uppermost in the mind of Winston Churchill when , in his famous Zurich speech in September ,1946, envisioning a future union of the Continental states, he described Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations and ‘’mighty America ‘’as its prospective ’’friends and sponsors’’ offering support and help; and observed,

 

’’We are with Europe but not of it .

 We are linked, but not combined.

We are interested and associated, but not absorbed’’.

 

Because of Britain’s Unique global position , achievement as a Nation, and contribution to world history, the statement of William Pitt the Younger in 1805 (almost two-hundred years ago)  that England has saved herself by her exertions and Europe by her example’’ is an indication of her timeless role, so long as she is not decadent; and if she has become so, the present may be thought the time for the revival of her Beneficent Nationhood, rather than for it to be extinguished. (  see 101- Reasons )

 

‘’The Choose is yours!’’

 

– make it soon, before it is

too late!

 

2003

H.F.2025

 
LITTLEJOHN

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: When I saw

 

police officers 'taking the Knee' I knew it

 

must end in tears...

 
 When I saw cops

 

'taking the knee'

 

I knew it must end in tears.

 

 

THIS IS HOW IT ENDS.

This is how it always ends. Badly. What did they think was going to happen?

By the time the 'largely peaceful' Black Lives Matter protest had called it a day,48 coppers had been injured and one female officer was lying in hospital with cracked ribs, a broken collarbone and a collapsed lung

It was yet another humiliation for the forces of law and order, a spectacular own goal.

Pity the poor policeman and women who were filmed running away from a masked mob along Whitehall after they had the audacity to arrest a single demonstrator.

In the view of a watching BBC reporter the arrest was clearly a mistake since it was 'bound to raise the temperature'.

Far better, surely, to stand back and allowed the crowd to carry on baying for blood and lobbing missiles,

IMAGES of the GREAT BRITISH BOBBY in FULL RETREAT were soon being BOUNCED around the WORLD on SOCIAL  MEDIA . Still the brass at SCOTLAND YARD will have calculated, rather BLOD ON THE RUN than an embarrassing VIDEO of RIOT POLICE clobbering a BLACK LIVES MATTER demonstrator.

From the moment I saw pictures of those coppers

'taking the knee'

in solidarity with the protesters

I KNEW IT WOULD END IN TEARS.

The mob can smell weakness, fear and moral cowardness. Once the more violent elements worked out that the police were froightened to confront them, there was never any doubt about the outcome.

I don't blame the young officers on the

FRONT LINE

They were only doing what has been drummed into their heads since their first day at Hendon.

Playing politics is far more important than proper policing. The tone for the fiasco was set by an OFFICIAL STATEMENT MOST OF YOU MAY HAVE MISSED.

It was issued last Thursday by all Britain's Chief Constables, the chair of the National Police Chiefs Council, the chief executive of the College of Policing and the President of the Police Superintendents Association, The statement read.

'We stand alongside all those across the globe who are appaled and horrified by the way George Floyd lost his life. Justice and accountability should follow.

Officers are trained to use proportionately, lawfully and only when absolutely necessary.We strive to continually learn and improve, we will tackle bias, racism or discrimination whereever we find it...,'

WHAT WAS THAT ALL ABOUT?

Why did the most senior police officers in Britain feel it necessary to pass coment on an incident which happened

4000 miles away?

WHAT THE HELL HAS IT GOT TO DO WITH THEM?

[This is a long and most instructive article-for further details click

HERE!

*  * *

[REGRETTABLY-The curse of political correctness is still with us.]

The beneficiaries of this BETRAYAL OF LAW AND ORDER  ARE THE CRIMINALS.]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS  AND Alteration of style and form are ours!]

 

JUNE 9,2020

H.F.2024

 

*

 

 

 

Mystery 'militia' on the march in

[ENGLAND]

 

[IN AUGUST,2020]

 

BRITAIN

 

The uniformed group claims it is 'transparent'...

...SO WHAT IS IT?

 

By David Barret-Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent

August 3,2020

 

WEARING all black parimilitary style uniforms and standing with their fists raised, they seemed far from the traditional idea of a peaceful demonstration...

The event marked Afrikan Emancipation Day and the 186th anniversary  of the Abolition of Slavery Act. Campaigners argue that while slave owners were compensated under the Act, slaves were not which has perpetuated racial injustice. They are calling for an All-Party Parliamentary Commission for Truth and Reparatory Justice.

The Met Police said three people were arrested during the demonstration. It is unknown whether those arrested were affiliated to any groups in the march.

*  *  *

 

The Common People of England in past centuries were and are today innocent of the heiness crimes committed by the ELITE!-the wealthy friends of the ILLUMINATI who are today finally getting their comeuppance for their heinous crimes against HUMANITY.

 

COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 3,2020

 

H.F.2060

*

 

 

A REMINDER FROM 2006

 

 

 

 

HOW COULD A MULTICULTURAL BRITAIN WORK

 

By

Andrew Alexander

Column

[Daily Mail-December 15, 2006]

 

TONY BLAIR has admitted at last that MULTICULTURALISM has failed, but future historians will puzzle why anyone thought it would ever succeed

 

After all, history is one long tale of cultural clashes - religious, sectarian, racial and national. As they contemplate the remains of what was once one of the world's most stable societies, blessed with a common cultural heritage, they will marvel that vast waves of immigrants were admitted -

AND ARE STILL COMING.

Of course , there had always been immigration but the numbers had been small, the arrivals often talented; and many of them not just ready but eager to embrace the British

WAY-OF-LIFE

 

For an explanation, we need to go  back to the 1962 Commonwealth Immigration Act. When Harold Macmillan finally brought in that legislation, peppered with loopholes to pacify critics, the Left sternly opposed it.

The Far left was intelligent enough to see that mass immigration could overturn a society they hated. The opposition of more moderate Socialists was based on a firm if vaguely-defined belief in the

BROTHERHOOD OF MAN

- those from less prosperous countries should be automatically welcomed.

 

Besides, there was the delicious lure that nearly all immigrants would

VOTE LABOUR

-But that was not publicly aired.

 

MacMillan reluctantly introduced the legislation, whose outlines had been drafted in 1955.  As with others in his party, he was in thrall to the Multiracial Commonwealth fantasy, prolonging a belief that though the

BRITISH EMPIRE

-was dead, we could be-

or pretend to be -

a serious global power.

The biggest hindrance to clear  thinking about immigration and multiculturalism has always been the 'moderates' who dominate what is called the political class-party activists, information professionals, social scientists and opinion formers generally. these people are always proud of their 'moderation'.

 

MULTICULTURALISM was a natural attraction. It sounded, you see, so 'decent'

 

. These predominately middle-class moderates could also think of themselves as more enlightened than the working class (who bore the brunt of the tidal wave of immigrants).

 

You encountered these high-minded souls in the Press and TV and radio, insisting that immigration was by definition a good thing.

THEY STILL DO IT.

-but their postal codes always give then away.

If you lived in Hampstead or Kensington or Richmond you could enjoy the advantages of a moral smugness without the disadvantages of an alien wedge in your midst. When I point out to multicultural enthusiasts the tremendous property values in Brixton, they seem curiously uninterested.

 

Their cause was certainly helped by media self-censorship. Not since the British Press kept silent about Edward VIII's dalliance with Mrs. Simpson had the media exercised such nervous restraint. Anything that was alarming about IMMIGRATION was PLAYED DOWN.

[We have at the present day the same reluctance to thoroughly open discussion on the benefits or otherwise of the European Union -though there appears to be a slight fissure appearing in the 35 year-old dam of silence but no real momentum by the pro-Europeans to sell their wonderful dream in their utopian wonderland. We wonder WHY?]

The moderates who dominated the Press became terrified of the accusation of 'racism'. The U.S.,because of well-deserved bad conscience had declared that the ultimate sin; and with our habit of importing everything American good or bad, we adopted the same values.

 

Anything that might suggest their thinking was racist had newspapers in a flap. Disagreeable forecasts about immigration levels were ignored, reassuring figures emphasised. Anyway, ran the moderate view, even if the numbers did prove large, our oh-so-tolerant multicultural society would comfortably absorb them.

When facts became unavoidable, real issues would be evaded. if the number of blacks in prison was reported as disproportionately high, the required conclusion was that something was wrong with the judicial system.

If there were riots in Brixton or Tottenham , some extreme moderate like Lord Scarman would be sent to conclude that

WE WERE ALL GUILTY.

 

Blair's insistence that we must have integration is hopelessly late. he says, for example that immigrants must learn English. But there is no way to compel that on the inflow [flood] of immigrants from Eastern Europe.

They may unlike the Commonwealth immigrants, be less alien to British ways. But they will regularly form their own communities rather than integrate and the process of constant, ethnic fragmentation will be common place.  Poles are already setting up Polish branches of trade unions in Southampton - where they number up to 30,000-and in Glasgow.

 

AS for the insistence that immigration is economically advantageous

IT SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE.

it may produce good economic growth, but income per head rises little.

 

The strain upon public services ranging from HEALTH to TRANSPORT is also very costly. Moreover, IMMIGRATION has been a key factor in raising HOUSE PRICES-inevitably in one of the

WORLD'S MOST CROWDED NATIONS.

Further waves will be coming soon from Romania and Bulgaria but they will be 'managed'. claims the Home Office [You know! -the 'unfit for purpose 'establishment.] unconvincingly. One day, no doubt, from Turkey too (whose admission to the EU is supported by the Conservatives!)

 

THE FUTURE IS BLEAK

*          *          *

 

 

 

DECEMBER/06

 

 

 
POPULATION IN ENGLAND...

INDIANS OVERTAKE POLES AS OUR LARGEST MIGRANT POPULATION

BORN ABROAD LIVING IN UK

1)India-837,000

2)Poland-837,000

3)Pakistan-533,000

4)Ireland-358,000

Daily Mail-November 29,2019.

*   *   *

 

NOVEMBER 29,2019

 

 

 

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

*

 FOR RETURN TO

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

*

H.F.1927

 

 

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

 
Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

H.F.1424/2

  

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp known as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

H.F.1449
 

 
 
 
 

 

 

THE RETURN

OF OUR

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

OF

 ENGLAND

 

 

 

 

[WE MUST NOT BE DETERRED BY THE COMING PANDEMIC SOON TO BE AMONGST US BUT REMAIN STEADFAST IN OUR RESOLVE TO LEAVE THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL IF NEED BE AT THE END OF JUNE 2020

THE PEOPLE IN THEIR MILLIONS HAVE SPOKEN AND WITH THE SPIRIT OF THE BLITZ STILL IN MANY MINDS WHEN THOUSANDS DIED IN ONE NIGHT BY THE AERIAL BOMBARDMENT BY HITLER'S LUFTWAFFE THE PEOPLE STOOD TOGETHER FOR 5 YEARS UNTIL VICTORY WAS WON.

 MANY OF THE SURVIVORS OF THOSE TIMES HAVE YET ANOTHER FIGHT ON THEIR HANDS AND THE KNOWLEDGE THAT VICTORY HAS FINALLY BEEN ACHIEVED AGAINST HITLER'S WARTIME PLAN TO DOMINATE OUR COUNTRY AGAIN IN THE PEACE WILL END  ON 30TH OF JUNE 2020 WILL BOLSTER THEIR  SPIRITS.

 

IF THE EU HAD TRULY WANTED A DEAL THEY WOULD HAVE DONE SO IN THE PREVIOUS 60 MONTHS- 5 YEARS. THEY REALISE THAT WITHOUT THE SUBSTANTIAL UK CONTRIBUTION TO THE EU YEARLY BUDGET THE FINAL COLLAPSE OF HITLER'S BRAINCHILD WOULD BECOME A REALITY WITHIN A MATTER OF A YEAR OR TWO.

 

 

IT MUST BE REMEMBERED THAT AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT OF JUNE 2015 -A BREXIT VICTORY - BORIS JOHNSON AND MICHAEL GOVE BY THEIR INTER-RIVALRY AT A CRUCIAL MOMENT IN ENGLISH HISTORY

 ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIVE YEAR DELAY IN LEAVING HITLER'S WAR-TIME PLAN TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE

 

THEY PUT SELF BEFORE COUNTRY

 

A PROMISE HAS BEEN MADE TO LEAVE THE EU AT THE END OF JUNE,2020

 

'IT MUST BE KEPT'

 

*

 

WE WOULD, HOWEVER, SUPPORT A LOOSE

 

DEMOCRATIC FEDERATION OF THE

 

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 

OF

 

EUROPE.

 

*  *  *

 

What did Israel hope to gain from Priti Patel's secret ...

 

[Certain events have occurred  over the past t few days 14th to 18th March  have led us to believe that our website of over 20 years could be  under threat. Should our website fail to appear in the coming months you will have had your confirmation.]

 

*

 

UK coronavirus cases: find out how many are in your area ...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/12/uk-coronavirus-cases-how-many-are-in...

12/03/2020 · UK coronavirus cases: find out how many are in your area Latest figures from public health authorities on the spread of Covid-19 in the United Kingdom. Find out how many cases …

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

 

MARCH 16-2020

H.F.1424
 
 
 

[IN THE NICK OF TIME?-A LAST

 

CHANCE APPEAL!]

Despotism and the origins of the European Union

by Don Briggs

Don Briggs finds that Alexis de Tocqueville has much to teach us about freedom

Peter Mullen, concerned about our feebleness today [Winter-2008/9], expressed bafflement at how the British people coped with casualty levels such as the death toll of 2,614 in one night in 1941.

It was a mystery to A. L. Rowse. In his  'The use of History '(Hodder & Stoughton, 1946) Rowse attributed it to the fact that

 "Germany was a strong state with a weak people. Britain was a week state with a strong people."

As regards the origins of the European Union, which Philip Warren believes days back to the 1920's, they could be earlier.

In the wake of the French Revolution of 1789, which shook the world, Edmund Burke said to the French:  " You wish to correct the abuses of your government, but why not return to your old traditions? Why not confine yourself to ma resumption of your ancient liberties? Or, if not possible to recover the obliterated features of your original constitution why not  look towards England." There you would have found the ancient common law of Europe.

Burke was chided by a wise Frenchman for failing to understand the true meaning of the revolution.  In his L'ancien regime et la revolution, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote:

" Burke did not see that what was taking place before his eyes was a revolution whose aim was precisely to abolish the 'ancient common law of Europe' and that there could be no question of putting the clock back."

In a version published by Doubleday Anchor in 1955, written three years before his death in 1859. De Tocqueville lamented that his countrymen had abandoned the original ideal of the Revolution and turned their backs on freedom to " acquiesce in an equality of servitude under the master of all Europe" (sounds familiar).

In place of the old regime they had created and accepted an all-powerful government, stronger and more autocratic than the one they had destroyed, and which " suppressed our dearly-bought liberties and replaced them by a mere pretence of freedom.  France's tamed Assemblies were there now only to give meaningless assent in servility and silence." (familiar?)

"Thus was the nation deprived both of means of self-government and of the chief guarantee of its rights, that is the freedom of speech, thought and literature which ranked among the most valuable achievements of the revolution."

Despotic government had made France the sick man of Europe, wrote de Tocqueville because it had virtually extinguished all those virtues which were so vital to a nation: a spirit of healthy independence, high ambitions, faith in oneself and in a cause, he said. (familiar?) De Tocqueville stated three facts with certainty about the future.

1. All his contemporaries were driven by a force which might have checked or curbed but which they could not stop; the headlong destruction of the aristocracy.

"Freedom alone is capable of lifting men's minds above mammon worship."

2.  Those peoples whose constitutions make it most difficult to get rid of despotic government for any considerable period, were those where aristocracy had ceased to exist.

3. Nowhere was despotism calculated to produce such evil effects as in social groups as these where ties of family, of caste, of class and craft fraternities no longer exist, people became self-seekers, think only of their own interests, narrow individualists caring nothing for the public good.  despotism encourages these vices, and money becomes the sole criteria of a social status, changing hands incessantly, raising and lowering the status of individuals and families.  Feelings for others' welfare cools; despotic government freezes them.

" love of gain, a fondness for business careers, the desire to get rich al all costs, a craving for material comfort and easy living become ruling passions under a despotic government... and tend to lower the moral standards...(familiar?)

" Lowering as they do the national morale, they are despotism's safeguard since they divert men's attention from public affairs and make them shudder at the mere thought of a revolution.

" Despotism alone can provide that atmosphere of secrecy which favours crooked dealings and enables the freebooters of finance to make illicit fortunes."  Despotism gave these vices free rein.  " Freedom and freedom alone can extirpate these vices, for only freedom can deliver the members of a community from that isolation which is the lot of the individual left to his own devices..."

And " Freedom alone is capable of lifting men's minds above mere mammon worship."

Societies must be democratic, and Christian too, but if they were not free, " I make bold to say, never shall we find under such conditions a great citizen, still less a great nation; indeed I would...maintain that where equality and tyranny co exist, a steady deterioration of the mental and moral standards of a nation is inevitable." wrote de Tocqueville.

In July 1971, Edward Heath, as Conservative Prime Minister, promised a government White paper, Britain and Europe:

" The British safeguards of habeas corpus and trial by jury will remain intact. So will the principle that a man is innocent until proved guilty."

" The common law will remain the basis of our legal system."

As we watch habeas corpus and the common law go out of the window today along with our other freedoms, it is worth recalling what Winston Churchill; once said about the alternatives if we abandoned our parliamentary democracy:

:" there is really only one, namely Dictatorship."  And of its many forms, " rule by a caucus of political secretaries driven by bigoted conviction" was one of them.

That too sounds familiar.

 

MAGNA CARTA

 

[We chanced on this article with others a few days ago and realised that they had to be included in the Christmas message because as our heading above we have little time left to make a stand in the true Winstonian spirit to reclaim what is ours by RIGHT! and was in trust for future generations. What was the point of our people fighting in the past TWO WORLD WARS with such huge casualties and cost to let what we had held in trust to be given away by our own representatives. This is your last chance to make amends and show the greater number of your supposed protectors of your accustomed

" RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMAN"

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS  AND HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

THE ABOVE ARTICLE BY DON BRIGGS-FREEDOM TODAY-Winter-2008/9

 

DECEMBER-2013

 

*  *  *

ON DECEMBER 12,2019 at the General Election those who wished to live again in a FREE NATION STATE voted to LEAVE THE EU. However though the People voted to do so in June 2016 they are now informed by

David Churchill the Daily Mail Brussels Correspondent on Saturday December 28,2019

 

EU 'Want us tied to single market for

 THREE YEARS

[Making a total of over 6 years since the overwhelming

 victory

to

LEAVE THE EU in June 2016.]

 

It is stated in the article of December 28,2019.

 

THE European  Union may ask Britain to remain locked inside its single market until 2023.

Ironically, the man of the hour Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, are greatly responsible for the delay, since their inter- rivalry after the June 23,2016 resulted in Theresa May a ardent REMAINER  becoming Prime Minister, and we all now know the result of that great fatal consequence, in delaying our delivery from

Hitler's planned so-called EU.

Because of this past history it is important that we

 

LEAVE THE EU

 

WITH A

 

NO DEAL]

 

DECEMBER 28-2019

 

]H.F.1805
 
POLITICS IN THE UK HAS STALLED - IN FACT IT HAS BEEN ON A STEADY DECLINE SINCE WE WERE MISLEAD AND LIED TO IN THE 70's by EDWARD HEATH AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF OUR COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

Fortunately the PEOPLE on December 12-2019 decided they had had enough and demanded that their so-called

 SERVANTS remember who

they worked

FOR.

.

 

 

 

In 2003 the EDP began it's BULLETIN SERVICE to INFORM the BRITISH

PUBLIC of the LIES and DECEIT of POLITICIANS. It is well documented that

successive GOVERNMENTS of all COLOURS have FAILED to keep their

MANIFESTO PROMISES. Whether it is the FAILURE of LAW and ORDER-

TO  CURB IMMIGRATION-YOU NAME IT! and you will find that they are STILL

MAKING THE SAME PROMISES in JANUARY 2020.

WE have advocated in

the past, that towards the end of a 5-year PARLIAMENTARY SESSION, each

GOVERNMENT should FACE a PUBLIC ENQUIRY to see if THEIR

MANIFESTO PROMISES HAVE BEEN carried out by PARLIAMENT. AND

if NOT-WHY NOT?

One is only to look at the thousands of bulletins on our website to realise that

 

POLITICIANS and

 

GOVERNMENTS

 

NOT CARRYING OUT THE

 

 

WISHES

 

 

OF THE

 

 

PEOPLE!

 

As we have been informed the MPs are to receive an increased SALARY and no doubt other benefits and as we have seen over the past few years many of their predecessors failed to keep their REFERENDUM PROMISE and what are we to expect from their replacements?

 

POLITICIANS SHOULD BE

 

 

 REMINDED THAT

 

 

THEY ARE

 

 

 

SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE

 

 

NOT

 

 

 

THEIR MASTERS.

 

We have advocated on many occasions that MP's should

 

SERVE THE PUBLIC

 

FOR ONE TERM ONLY.

 

 

IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB

 

 

FOR LIFE.

 

JANUARY 1-2020

H.F.1947
 

 
 
A TRIBUTE TO A PATRIOT WHO WORKED TIRELESSLY FOR THE FISHING INDUSTRY UNTIL HIS RECENT DEATH-IN 2021

 

Cod War II?

 Tell the EU

 to

sling it's hook

 

LETTER FROM A FORMER TRAWLER SKIPPER TO THE

 DAILY MAIL

-February27,2020

 

 

AS A FORMER trawler skipper heavily involved in the so-called Cod Wars during the Seventies, I am interested that political commentators are talking about the possibility of a new Cod War after December 2020.

 

This is in reaction  to the French having the brass neck to tell us that their fishing rights within our waters are non-negotiable. It's about time our politicians started to stand up to our continental friends.

 

The Cod Wars were fought over Iceland seeking to expand its territorial limits and prevent its fisheries being over-exploited. The UK's negotiations for joining the Common Market or EEC, as it was then, coincided with this. To understand the impact of the betrayal of our fishing industry, we need to go back to the Seventies when Conservative prime minister was manipulated by the French into allowing the best of our fishing grounds to be given away without any proper authority or consultation with Parliament or the British people.

 

During the negotiations, the French hijacked the fisheries meetings and were pushing for fishing to be treated as a common resource with equal access for all, which the British and Irish governments initially rejected.

 

The deep-sea trawler owners, then the most powerful players in the British fishing industry, were in favour because they thought Iceland and Norway would eventually join and they would have unbridled access to their rich waters, cancelling out the Cod Wars' losses.

 

BUT Iceland and Norway rejected the EEC because of the fishing rights and the rest is history.

It is worth considering just how much of that thinking was driving the lobbying to a gullible Government in not accepting any of the fair deals Iceland was offering. We never suspected these European fleets would eventually establish 'historic rights' to control our fishing  grounds, aided by massive EU grants, not only from their own governments but also from us.

 

Decommissioning schemes to reduce the British fleet were brought in and our fishermen were put out of work while other nations, with the help of European grants, increased and modernised their fleets. The Spanish fleet was bigger than the rest of Europe's combined, but when they joined the EEC they declared they would not decommission even one vessel. They not only got away with that, they also secured grants to scrap, rebuild and modernise 850 0f their fishing boats.

.

.The French, Belgians and Spanish seem able to fish with impunity, while our fishermen are persecuted because we've got to be seen to be fair.

 

WE  have not had one fisheries minister worth their salt. I was in Brussels for several December Councils when our minister never came out with the quota he went in with. It was always cut to benefit of the other states, resulting in us being a minority in our own waters. Can someone explain that?

 

[WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE JOINED HITLER'S EU PLAN-IT WAS

 

EDWARD HEATH

 

A GERMAN SPY SINCE 1938 UNTIL HIS

 

DEATH

 

 IN 2005 WHO JUST BEFORE, HAD ADMITTED HIS PART IN THE CONSPIRACY TO JOIN THE EU BECAUSE HE WANTED THE UK TO JOIN THE EU - WHATEVER IT TOOK,.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

FEBRUARY 27,2020

 
 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

H.F.1989
 
 
 

[A CHURCHILLIAN RESPONSE

 

to Hitler,s so-called European Union.]

 

PM: 'Taking back control on December 31,2020'

MORE IMPORTANT THAN A TRADE DEAL'

By Jason Groves-Political Editor-Daily Mail

Tuesday,February 25,2020.

 

 

BORIS Johnson last night warned Brussels his priority is to 'take back control' of Britain's borders and laws by the end of the year, even if that scuppers talks on post -Brexit trade deal.

 

In a tough new ultimatum, Downing Street said it would not extend the transition period beyond the end of the year, even if that means

 

LEAVING WITHOUT A DEAL

 

EU leaders have warned there is not enough time to complete the comprehensive agreement both sides have signed up to deliver by the end of the year-[2020]

 

 Paris yesterday accused the UK of 'blackmail', and said it would mot sacrifice French interests to meet the timetable.

 

BUT No 10 said ending the transition period, duriung which the UK has to abide by EU laws-including FREE MOVEMENT-was the Prime Minister's TOP PRIORITY.

 

A spokesman said: 'The UK's primary objective in the negotiations is to ensure that we :

 

RESTORE OUR ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL

 

INDEPENDENCE ON JANUARY 1, 2021.

 

A Whitehall source added: 'WE have to have back control by January 1.2021. We are being very clear about that so that there is no misunderstanding.' Brussels will publish its' 'negotiating mandate' for the Brexit talks today.

 

It will say a Canada-style free trade deal with the UK is now off the table because of the 'geographical proximity' of the two econo0mies. The EU is also demanding Brirain agree a 'level playing field and wants 'robust commitments'that the UK continues to follow EU RULES on STATE AID,COMPETITION LAW,SOCIAL and ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS and RELEVANT TAX MATTERS'.

 

No 10 yesterday rejected the idea that the UK should

follow Brussels diktats in return for a deal.

 

The PM's spokesman said there was 'no reason'why the proximity of the UK  and EU'should mean restrictions on trade, and pointed out that the US,Canada and Mexico have signed a FREE TRADE DEAL.

 

France yesterday insisted that it will not be 'blackmailed' into accepting a 'bad' post-Brexit trade deal becauser of thev December 31 deadline. In a sign that the EU is prepared to take a tough line,French Europe minister Amelie deMontchalin said that her countries fgarmers.fishermen and businesses would not make sacrifices in order for a trade deal to be in place by the end of the year.

She told TV station France 2: 'It must be understood by British businesses that we do not want a bad agreement-almost certainly, that we will sign up to no blackmail.'

 

Refusing to allow the UK to dictate the time-table, Miss de Montchalin said: 'It is because Boris Johnson wants a deal at all costs for December 31 that we will sign, under pressure, a bad deal.' In an indication that access to UK fishing grounds will be one of the main flashpoints in the talks, the French minister added: 'The fishermen have the right to be protected, they know very well that if we sign a bad deal they will lose enormously.'

The PM's Brexit inner circle will meet today to sign off on the UK's mandate before it is published on Thusrsday. Ministers are expected to confirm the want a Canada-style agreement with zero tariffs.

The PM's Europe adviser David Frost and his team will then head to Brussels for the first round of negotiations on March 2,2020.

 

*  *  *

 

 

Tuesday,February 25,2020.

H.F.1988

 

 

 

 

[A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST TO BE ALWAYS VIGILANT IN THE CAUSE OF YOUR INHERITED FREEDOM]

OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

The EU’s control structure in Britain

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

Britain is the target

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

   For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

    That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

EDWARD HEATH

 

Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

, and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

The Conservative Party

The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

    The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

Labour and the Lib Dems

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

The Freemasons:

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

 to find out.

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

The Legal Profession:

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

Common Purpose:

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

   Common Purpose

 

 

have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

 

Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

David Noakes.

http://eutruth,org.uk.

 

 
 
 

A REMINDER FROM A TRUE PATRIOT IN 2004

 

 

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

 supports our

 Ancient Constitution

 

 The following letter was sent to This England by the late Viscount Tonypandy (Mr George Thomas) Speaker of the House of Commons

 

 Sir: Since I retired from the Speaker’s chair in the House of Commons in 1983, I have strictly adhered to our parliamentary tradition, which prevents former Speakers from being embroiled in party political controversies.

 

It is because I am convinced that the question of our national sovereignty towers above all that I feel free to submit this address to the electors of Britain.

 

Our Westminster Parliament is in danger of being denuded of its responsibilities, and of being supplanted by European assembly controlled by a hotchpotch of European politicians and bureaucrats, who have no love for this country. Our national destiny will be subject to foreign control.

 

In our British heritage a special place of honour is reserved for Pym and Hampden, who so courageously fought for the rights of our Parliament against the claims of absolutism by the Crown. Their portraits hang in pride in Speaker’s House, along with that of Speaker Lenthall who defended Parliament’s independence when it was challenged by Charles 1

 

Other parliamentary giants have followed in their wake. Names such as Palmerston and Pitt, Gladstone, Disraeli, Asquith, Lloyd George, Churchill, Attlee, and the like, shine in our history as fierce defenders of self-government by the British people.

 

They should be living in this hour, for we need support to protect our national interests from being subject to foreign control.

 

 No political party in Britain has a mandate from the electorate to surrender our national sovereignty to foreign hands.

 

The current slide towards a single European currency threatens both our economic and our political independence, and thus our sovereignty. Subterfuge and half-truths have been used to persuade the nation that neither our sovereignty nor our relationship with the Commonwealth is endangered.

 

There appears to be a conspiracy of silence about the fact that the United Kingdom’s trade and oversees investments are still much greater with countries outside the European Union than they are with those within the Union, which is itself increasingly a puppet of a French and German alliance.

 

It is not too late for us to save our sovereignty

 

For more than 600 years Speakers of the House of Commons have fiercely defended the supremacy of the Westminster Parliament. As one whose privilege it was to follow humbly in the steps of the mighty Speakers of the past, I call upon our nation to awake, and to demand that the voice of all our people shall be heard before the next inter-governmental conference takes irrevocable decisions affecting our sovereignty.

 

A national Referendum conducted before, and not after, further decisions are taken is our democratic right.

 

This is the only sure way to prevent our parliamentary sovereignty, our judicial system and our Commonwealth relationships from being grievously undermined.

 

*          *          *

 

We believe that Lord Tonypandy would support our cause at this momentous time for our nation when the people will at last have their say after they have been honestly given the true facts of the dangers to the Constitution, Freedom and Independence of our Country.

2004

 
 

 
 

 

We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

[TREASON]

This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

 

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1784

 
 

 

DAILY MAIL :

 

Man's 'transphobic' tweet was

 

 

LAWFUL,

 

 

High Court rules ...

 

 

 · A man's 'transphobic' tweets were lawful

 

 

and police breached his right to freedom of expression

 

 

 by behaving like 'the Stasi' when they turned up at …

Police 'Gestapo in transphobic tweet probe, blasts judge.

Businessman's landmark win in FREE SPEECH CASE

 

Businessman's landmark win in free speech case

 

By Sue Reid

 

A HIGH Court judge yesterday likened police to the Nazi Gestapo in the way they investigated a businessman accused of transphobic tweets

 

Mr Justice Julian Knowles said officers violated Harry Miller's

 

 

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

 

 

 by recording his comments as a hate incident and threatening

 

prosecution.

 

He also blasted the heavy-handed manner in which they turned

 

up to quiz him at his business last year.

 

The probe was sparked after Mr Miller was reported for 31 posts,

 

including a limerick about transgender issues.

 

In a landmark ruling for

 

 

FREE SPEECH

 

 

Mr Justice Knowles said he did not break

 

 

the law,,,

 

 

He added:   'The effect of the police turning up at his place of

 

work because of his political opinions must not be

 

underestimated.

 

 

'It would be to undervalue a cardinal democratic

 

 

freedom in this country.

 

WE have never had a Cheka, Gestapo or a Stasi'-a reference to

 

the secret police forces in Stalin's Soviet Union, Nazi Germany

 

and the former Communist East Germany.

 

 

[The so-called Human Rights legislation has much to

 

 

do with confounding English Justice. We need to exit

 

 

this gross interference in English Law by the end of

 

 

2020. Perhaps Prime Minister Boris Johnson has this

 

 

already in mind?]

 

 

'There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune,

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound in shallows and in miseries."

Shakespeare.

 

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 

 

  1. Judges make it even harder to

     

    kick out foreign criminals ...

     

     

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

    14/06/2017 & 15/02/20· Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

  2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able

     

    to deport EU criminals ...

     

     

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

    08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

H.F.1984/1

 

 

H.F1984 NEED WE SAY MORE?
 
 
("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

 

H.F.1289
 

VIGILANCE IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY!

*

 QUOTE 684 of 900

ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS

Jewish objectives as outlined in Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

1) Banish God from the heavens and Christianity from the earth.

2) Allow no private ownership of property or business.

3) Abolish marriage, family and home. Encourage sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, adultery, and fornication.

4) Completely destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism.

5) Establish a one-world government through which the Luciferian Illuminati elite can rule the world. All other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose.

6) Take the education of children completely away from the parents. Cunningly and subtly lead the people thinking that compulsory school attendance laws are absolutely necessary to prevent illiteracy and to prepare children for better positions and life's responsibilities. Then after the children are forced to attend the schools get control of normal schools and teacher's colleges and also the writing and selection of all text books.

7) Take all prayer and Bible instruction out of the schools and introduce pornography, vulgarity, and courses in sex. If we can make one generation of any nation immoral and sexy, we can take that nation.

8) Completely destroy every thought of patriotism, national sovereignty, individualism, and a private competitive enterprise system.

9) Circulate vulgar, pornographic literature and pictures and encourage the unrestricted sale and general use of alcoholic beverage and drugs to weaken and corrupt the youth.

10) Foment, precipitate and finance large scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt the nations and thereby force them into a one-world government.

11) Secretly infiltrate and control colleges, universities, labor unions, political parties, churches, patriotic organizations, and governments. These are direct quotes from their own writings (The Conflict of the Ages, by Clemens Gaebelein pp. 100-102).

12) The creation of a World Government.

KGB CHART NOW TO DESTROY A PEOPLE AND NATION

More!

  

 

H.F.741

 
 

Conservative Friends of Israel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Conservative Friends of Israel, abbreviated to CFI, is a British parliamentary group affiliated to the Conservative Party, which is dedicated to strengthening business, cultural and political ties between the United Kingdom and Israel. CFI is an unincorporated association. It also seeks to strengthen ties between the British Conservative Party and the Israeli Likud party.

It was founded in 1974 by Conservative MP for Bury and Radcliffe, Michael Fidler. It is currently chaired by Stuart Polak. The Parliamentary Chairman is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary President is Baroness Shephard of Northwold. The Vice Chairmen are John Butterfill and James Clappison, the Secretary is David Amess, the Officers are Alistair Burt, Lee Scott, and Theresa Villiers, and the Chairman of CFI Europe is Timothy Kirkhope.

In 1995 Conservative politician Robert Rhodes James called it "the largest organisation in Western Europe dedicated to the cause of the people of Israel".[1]

By 2009, according to the Channel 4 documentary Dispatches – Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, around 80% of Conservative MPs were members of the CFI.[2] In 2013, Peter Oborne, the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator called CFI “by far Britain’s most powerful pro-Israel lobbying group”. The same is true of AIPAC in the US.”[3]

 

 

Activities[edit]

The group's 2005 strategy identified the following areas of activity: supporting Israel, promoting the British Conservative Party, fighting terrorism, combating anti-semitism, and promoting peace in the Middle East.[4] According to their website, "over two thirds" of Conservative MPs were members of Conservative Friends of Israel in 2006.[5] In 2007 the Political Director stated it had over 2000 members and registered supporters.[6] In 2009, at least half of the shadow cabinet were members of the group according to a Dispatches documentary.[7]

Their website states the opinion that it is one of the fastest growing political lobby groups in the UK.[8] According to the Dispatches documentary, between 2006 and 2009 the CFI funded more than 30 Conservative parliamentary candidates to visit Israel.[7]

In 2012 CFI reconstituted itself as a private company limited by guarantee.[9]

CFI annual business lunch[edit]

David Cameron, then newly elected leader of the Conservative Party, addressed the CFI annual business lunch on 30 January 2006, whose audience included half of the Conservative Parliamentary Party. As part of his speech, he stated "I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party. Israel is a democracy, a strong and proud democracy, in a region that is, we hope, making its first steps in that direction."[10]

Former Conservative party leaders Iain Duncan Smith[11] and Michael Howard[12] have addressed the CFI lunch.

The British Pakistani MP Sajid Javid has also made business lunch speeches which have been positively received by the CFI, the Jewish Chronicle even reporting Javid as a future Prime Minister.[13]

Donations[edit]

The Dispatches documentary claimed members of the group and their companies have donated over £10 million to the Conservative party between 2001 and 2009. The group called this figure "deeply flawed" saying that they have only donated £30,000 between 2004 and 2009 but that members of the group have undoubtedly made their own donations to the party. Dispatches described the CFI as "beyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groups".[2][7]

Members of CFI[edit]

According to the CFI website 80% of Tory MPs are members of Conservative Friends of Israel.[14]

In alphabetical order, members of Conservative Friends of Israel include:

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Peter Oborne (12 December 2012). "The cowardice at the heart of our relationship with Israel". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  2. ^ a b Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, Channel 4, Monday 16 November 2009
  3. ^ Peter Oborne, Iran nuclear deal: ill-informed friends of Israel are refusing to face facts, Daily Telegraph, 27 November 2013, accessed 10 August 2015
  4. ^ CFI INFORMED Magazine, Second Edition (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, February 2007, p. 3, retrieved 29 May 2008 [dead link]
  5. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel – About Us
  6. ^ Robert Halfon (27 September 2007). "Introducing the CFI". ConservativeHome. Retrieved 20 August 2012. 
  7. ^ a b c Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 November 2009. 
  8. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel web site
  9. ^ "Companies House WebCHeck - CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL LIMITED". Companies House. Company No. 08114952. Archived from the original on 29 December 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
  10. ^ CFI INFORMED Weekly Briefing (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, 3 February 2006, retrieved 25 May 2006 [dead link]
  11. ^ Duncan Smith: Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorists, Conservatives.com, 10 December 2001
  12. ^ "Howard Speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel, at the Savoy Hotel, London". Conservatives.com. 6 December 2004. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004. 
  13. ^ http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/94117/muslim-tory-mp-after-britain-israel-best
  14. ^ a b "About CFI". Conservative Friends of Israel. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  15. ^ "Ministers "will change" war crimes arrest law". Jewish Chronicle. 8 July 2010. 
  16. ^ "Altrincham and Sale West: Election 2010". Jewish Chronicle. 29 April 2010. 
  17. ^ "UK: Evangelical Christian appointed new UK Middle East Minister". The Muslim News. 15 May 2010. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  18. ^ "British MPs furious after Israel President Shimon Peres accuses the English of being anti-semitic". Daily Mail. UK. 1 August 2010. 
  19. ^ a b "Cameron's Cabinet: Who are they?". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  20. ^ "Mike's Biography". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
  21. ^ "William Hague's Schmooze With The Jewish News". Totally Jewish. 25 March 2010. 
  22. ^ a b "Ministers lose seats in the East". East Anglia Daily Times. 7 May 2010. 
  23. ^ Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. 
  24. ^ "About Conservative Friends of Israel". cfoi.co.uk. Retrieved 22 September 2011. 
  25. ^ "Eric Pickles to lead MPs’ delegation to Israel". Jewish Chronicle. July 24, 2015. 
  26. ^ "Rifkind elected as Kensington MP". Jewish Chronicle. 7 May 2010. 
  27. ^ Sloan, Alaistair. "Ed Miliband will back Israel". Middle East Monitor. Retrieved 13 April 2015. 

External links[edit]

 

[GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-GERMANY.

ADDED JULY 28,2018

AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 21,2017

H.F.1355
 

[There is a well-known phrase:

'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

JewsnotZionists

*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

David-Cameron-doesn't-understand-Conservative-party.

[Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

-A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

[As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

CLICKStartpage

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

-an-attack-on-iran.

*

[GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

GERMANY.

ADDED JULY 28,2018

AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2019.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 21,2017

H.F.1355

 
 
 

IIMMIGRATION-

THE ENEMY WITHIN!

WHY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE IGNORED GRASS ROOTS CALL FOR A HALT TO IMMIGRATION SINCE ENOCH POWELL SPOKE FOR THE PEOPLE OF OUR SMALL ISLAND THOSE MANY DECADES AGO. THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T SUFFICIENT HOUSING AVAILABLE AS LOCAL PEOPLE

WON'T A STOP

TO CONCRETING ANY MORE OF THEIR

BEAUTIFUL COUNTRYSIDE.

 We hear that millions of robots will soon be a part of our life. Hasn't anyone thought about the consequences of this on our everyday life. Our transport system already overloaded will have to accommodate those extra bottoms. Millions of people will lose their jobs and become the responsibility of the general taxpayer.

As a small island a quarter the size of Germany it was stated many decades ago that the population of between 20 to 30 million would be a comfortable number to match the energy and other resources necessary for a comfortable existence. We have been recently informed that by 2050 we will have an island population of 80 million. Germany which is four times our landmass had 82 million not so long in the past and has accepted over a million immigrants in the last year alone.

It is the political parties, particularly the GANG OF THREE who over the past decades have looked on increased immigration as their source of future voters and as has been demonstrated they decided to ignore local objections to more housing and put pressure on local councils to build to accommodate the millions of immigrants in their back yard.

We mentioned a number of years ago that governments should not put the cart before the horse by allowing millions of immigrants to settle in our once settled and comfortable island home. As we all know there isn't sufficient housing for those many elderly who wish to downside which has been ignored for decades.

It is time for the politicians of all parties to face reality and immediately embark on a programme of an immediate block on future immigration except for the need for particular needs of the moment and the encouragement of immigrants to return to their own back yard .

We have over 3 million of the Islamic faith of which we are told over 60 per cent have NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING INTO OUR SOCIETY-their own CLERICS who have integrated have criticized  successive governments for their failure in not bringing in strict measures-

EITHER INTEGRATE-OR GO!

Instead, with successive governments looking to  Saudi Arabian Government investment and ARMS CONTRACTS they have chosen to ignore the repeated calls for ACTION! and simply leave the matter for a future government which means

THAT NOTHING IS DONE!

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS ARE IN POWER TO CARRY OUT THE WISHES OF THE ELECTORATE

NOT

THE SELFISH WISH

OF

UNPATRIOTIC POLITICIANS.

This is a matter that UKIP should have been covering but their internal bickering and unpatriotic mischief's have proved that they have been a tool of successive governments since its formation decades ago. We in fact were invited to the House of Lords at its inauguration and have not been impressed by their usual lack lustre performance over the years.]

ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE

 by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 6-2017

H. F.1243 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
WHY IT'S

 GOT HARDER TO DEPORT CRIMINALS

Foreign convicts exploiting human rights loophole reaches a five year high.

By David Barrett-Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent-February 15,2020

 

THE number of of foreign criminals avoiding

 

deportation on human rights grounds has hit

 

the highest level in five years.

 

Cases have nearly tripled since political pressure over abuse of human rights helped force successful claims down to a record low.

 

It comes amid concern about legal challenges to block deportations after dozens of Jamaican criminals had to be removed from a Home Office charter flight earlier this week.

 

When Theresa May was home secretary, she told the 2011 Tory party conference that

 

LABOUR''S HUMAN RIGHTS Act

 

[To be precise-Tony Blair's.]

 

 

'needs to go'

 

and that the meaning of one

 crucial clause had been perverted' to prevent removals.

The Home Office redoubled its efforts to fight cases in the immigration courts.

By 2016 the European Convention on Human Rights and other humanitarian laws were used in only 60 successful applications by foreign criminals.

The following year they more than doubled to 144.

By 2018, the most recent figure whole year for which figures are available, the number reached a five-year-high of 172.-the most since 212 in 2013...

 

The Mail revealed on Thursday that among the criminals who had been due to be removed from this country were killer Fitzroy Daley and rapist Fabian Henry.

 

Government sources have said they fear the criminals remaining in Britain will win bail within days and be released from immigration detention centres.

 

The Home Office is due to defend against the Jamaica deportation legal challenge in the High Court on Monday.

A spokesman said. 'WE make no apology for seeking to remove dangerous foreign criminals. WE will continue to fight robustly in the courts to ensure foreign criminals are removed as quickly as possible.

 

February 15,2020

 

David Barrett, Arthur Martin, Ian Drury

dailymail.co.uk

 

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

  1. Judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

    14/06/2017 · Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

  2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able to deport EU criminals ...

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

    08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

H.F.1984/1

H.F.1986
 
 

 

THE ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

 ORG. UK.

 

 

 

 

 

WISHES THE

 

SCOTTISH PEOPLE

WELL

IN THEIR DELIBERATIONS

ON THE MATTER

OF THEIR FUTURE

AS A

FREE

INDEPENDENT

NATION STATE

*

MATERIALISM

IS NOT THE ANSWER

FREEDOM

IS!

HISTORY SHOWS YOU THE WAY!

'We fight not for glory

Nor for wealth

Nor for Honour

But for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

( From the Arbroath Manifesto sent by the nobles and commons of SCOTLAND to the Pope in 1320)

 

 

 

'...In 1320 the Scots drew up one of the most stirring documents in history. Their Declaration called on the Pope to recognize Scotland's just claim to INDEPENDENCE which she would defend to her last hundred men, even against the king, if need be.

On page 130 of In Finlay's book SCOTLAND we found the following in the  last paragraph which we feel sums up the situation today in September 2014:

 

...'If the true outline and identity of SCOTLAND are taking shape through the haar, it must not be looked upon as a break-away from ENGLAND. Only through discovery of HER OWN IDENTITY will SCOTLAND ever contribute her full quota to the partnership [we would say FAMILY] to ENGLAND and to the commonwealth of nations. She is not an ancient nation as the romantics will have us believe, but merely a NATION with a long childhood and adelesence, which perhaps in the end are not bad things.'

 

 

The rebirth of the Scottish Nation State will lead to a revival in time out of the three centuries conspiracy to destroy the FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE in order to bring about a new elitist world government of which the EU and the North American Union and others will be cohersed to follow.  The Scottish people will only remain  truly FREE! if they do not pass their hard-won freedom back to the :

COLLECTIVIST-SOVIETISED-CORRUPT-COSTLY

EUROPEAN UNION

 

THOSE WHO FIGHT FOR THEIR FREEDOM HAVE A GREATER RIGHT THAN THOSE WHO SELL THEIR BIRTHRIGHT FOR MAMMON

 

'Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a weed that grows in every soil.'

 

 EDMUND BURKE

 

 WHAT THE LABOUR PEER LORD SHORE SAID ABOUT FREE NATION STATES OUT OF THE EU

 

 

THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

 

SEPTEMBER 16-2014

 

 

H F 328
 
 
 
 

 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

- TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

-NOT MULTICULTURAL.

*

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

Wednesday, June 7,2006

*

 Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

by

Simon Heffer

 There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

 We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

MULTICULTURLISM

 -had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

 

[‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

 

[The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

  

To Continue:

 I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

 It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

ENGLAND

-somewhat precarious.

Not all the Left has, however twigged that

MULTICULTURLISM

-is rather last century.

Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

-made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

 

He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

 

Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

 

Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

OUR CULTURE

OUR CONSTITUTION

OUR NATION

 

At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

 

REFORMATION

  -that the

Monarch

 

is Supreme Governor

of the

Church of England.

-which is the Established Church of this Realm.

 

As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

 

“the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

Realm of England.

 

Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

 

However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

 

He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

 

“Defender of Faiths”

 

Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

 

More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

 

Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

 

Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

 

Defender of the Faith

 

-and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

 

THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

 

Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

 

Perhaps the needless vandalism of

 

OUR CONSTITUTION

 

-will have been completed by then.

 

Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

 

For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

 

When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

 

For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

 

For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

-embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

NEW SOVEREIGN.

 

Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

 

But he would be WRONG!

 

It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

 

It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

HISTORY and TRADITION

-and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

 

That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

 

Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

 

The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

OUR WAY OF LIFE

And

OUR VALUES.

 

It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

 

WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

 

WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

 

AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

 

WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

 

AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABILITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS

*

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

1844

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

 

Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

 

To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

*

 

Nationality and Domicile

 

In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

 

Of this parliament we must speak.

 

Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

 

It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

-are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

 

When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

 

Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

 

-the one nationality, the other domicile.

 

Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

 

If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

 

But there is no such thing as British domicile -

Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

 

If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

 

We have included the above extracts from

The

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

HISTORY

OF

ENGLAND

 

by

 

F.W MAITLAND [1908]

 

-to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

 

The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

 

Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

English Parliament.

Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

To continue:

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY

LORD BROUGHAM

*

CHAPTER VIII

 THE National Resistance was not only, n point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

Right of Resistance

[Even in 2006]

-as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

 

[DO YOU UNDERSTAND

TONY BLAIR?]

 

The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

The thirty renewals of

MAGNA CARTA

-the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

RIGHTS are INVADED.

The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

RIGHT of RESISTANCE

 

-less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

 

In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

 

This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

 

The great virtue of the

 

CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

 

-is the purity in which it recognises and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

 

The ruling powers are three:

 

The Sovereign

 

The Lords

 

The Commons

 

-of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

 

PEACE and WAR

 

-and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

 

The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

NATIONAL DEFENCE.

 

[In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

-without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

 

REFERENDUM

 

- on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

 

So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

 

WHAT IS?

 

The following extracts are from the

 

PREFACE

 

of the

BRITISH CONSTITUION

 

By

 

HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

[1844]

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

…It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

 

It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

 

Sovereign of ENGLAND

 

-never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

 

The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

 

It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

 

But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

 

CONSTITUTION

 

-however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

 *

[In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

 

It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

ARE YOU CONTESTING?]

 

* * *

 

MULTICULTURLISM

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

H.F.1472--BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2006
 
 
 
 

Illuminati

The story starts about 45,000 years ago. There was a planet in an orbit closer to the sun than Jupiter. Many call this planet Maldek, Mars was it’s largest moon. The Reptilian people that lived there were very violent and negative. They went to war with the people that lived on Mars. They were greater in number, but the Martians had better technology. These people refused to quit attacking the peaceful Martians. So the Martians devised a plan to seriously damage Maldek, making it impossible for these people to stay there and get the war over. The weapon they used, turned out to be to strong and blew up Maldek, scattering pieces all over our solar system, making the asteroid belt, new moons for some of the outer planets and comets in the far reaches of our solar system.

About 8,000 of these Reptilian people were in large space ships and survived. So they decided to go live in our moon and kick out the few Draconians that lived there. The Reptilians (Draconians) soon returned in force. So they had to leave in a hurry, while their ships were being blasted and crash landed in Antarctica, which at that time was in a tropical area. Now they soon no longer had space flight, because of the Draconian continued attacks. They had trouble living on Earth as their bodies didn’t agree with Earth’s elements. Humanity had just came out of cataclysms caused by Maldek blowing up, so they were few in number and lost their technology and now were sort of primitive.

These people captured some Humans and using genetics made hybrids of themselves, so they could live on Earth. They made 2 kinds of hybrids, one kind was very similar to and could mate with Humanity. The other kind was different and had elongated heads and became the ruling class and could not mate with Humanity. There are still some of these left, although they stay secret. Within 2,000 years the brown dwarf star, came through our solar system as it does every 3,557 years. Earth was hit hard and had a devastating pole shift, making the south pole in about the center of Antarctica as it is today.

Most all of the people on Earth died as there was a flash freeze in the new polar areas, killing a lot of animals too. So the Reptilian-Mammal hybrid people that were similar to Humanity lived with and bred with Humanity. When one of their females had children, the children would get one of their souls, regardless of who the father is. These people, the Illuminati today can tell each other apart from Humanity, but Humanity can’t seem to tell that they have different souls. They arranged to put each other into positions of power, like kings and queens and still hold these positions today. Although with the invention of the internet and spreading of knowledge, they are starting to lose control.

With them in power, we have war, central banks, shortages and other forms of suffering. Because of them we live in a negative world. In 2021 our 3rd cycle will finish and positive soul groups get to move up to the 2nd realm, 5th dimension (4th density). We are in the 1st realm, 4th dimension (3rd density) now. So we must get the Illuminati out of power and turn positive, to move up to 4th density. A soul can either go through 1 cycle of 3rd or 4th density (or some of both) and make ascension to 5th density (12th dimension on Earth). If we get in 4th density life improves, our bodies will be a little better and matter a little different, the biggest change is another component of time. Many of us will gain some telepathy and see a wider range of the spectrum and other improvements.

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

 

FEBRUARY 5-2016

H.F.1424/2S

 
 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

H.F.1388
 

 MAIN ARTICLE BELOW BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MAY, 2006

THEY NEVER LEARN!

[As we have said many times over the past decades governments fail to learn lessons about key matters vital to the public at large such as LAW & ORDER-IMMIGRATION-and a host of other matters which should have been finally resolved to the satisfaction of the GENERAL PUBLIC many years ago. The reason there is this constant CHAOS is that MINISTERS tread softly because there is always a shortage of FINANCE. Well! we  know where there is a mountain of GOLD in the so-called FOREIGN AID BUDGET! to supply resources to SECURITY-NHS-PENSIONS-ROADS and other ESSENTIAL NEEDS of the PEOPLE. BUT there will be NO CHANGE until PR -PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION is introduced into our POLITICAL SYSTEM. REMEMBER-THE GANG OF THREE or is it now the GANG of TWO have no fears of not alternating as a future government so it is IMPORTANT that the PEOPLE have other chooses to keep our POLITICAL SYSTEM in GOOD HEALTH. Soon we will be FREE of the EU and the their JUSTICE SYSTEM and their other ABOMINATIONS but unfortunately we still have the CURSE of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS with us which destroying the very FREEDOM of SPEECH and PERSON which our ANCESTORS fought for those centuries AGO.  WE see the once VOICE of the PEOPLE the once PARTY of the COMMON MAN in TURMOIL because of its links to a FOREIGN POWER. We have raised the QUESTION where are the FRIENDS of ENGLAND in our WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT?  yet there is a LOBBY of FRIENDS of ISRAEL in BOTH MAIN PARTIES with at least 80% of CONSERVATIVE MP's members. WE ASK should such INFLUENCE be PERMITTED in our HOUSE OF COMMONS.  This is NOT a RACIAL ISSUE but one of FAIRNESS to ALL NATIONS on our PLANET EARTH. WE have also raised the question of UNDUE INFLUENCE in the AFFAIRS of our ISLAND HOME and the difficulty of being CANDID of the MATTERS of the MOMENT of that FOREIGN POWER.       We have to ask ourselves if there was no FOREIGN LOBBY GROUP in PARLIAMENT there would have been no CRIES of RACISM echoing in our HALLOWED HOUSE in WESTMINSTER and what a great RELIEF that would be TO ALL CONCERNED.]

*  *  *

What PLANET are JUDGES living ON?

 

*

Daily Mail

Wednesday, May 31-2006.

 

by

 

Melanie Phillips

 

ARE OUR senior judges simply living on a different planet from the rest of us lesser mortals? Our most senior judge, The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, has launched yet another judicial broadside against apparent evils of imprisonment.

In Lord Phillips’ UNIVERSE, it appears that PRISON is NOT the PLACE for CRIMINALS.

 

Instead, wherever possible judges should pass community sentences -which he admits will not be tolerated by the public unless they include ‘significant punishment’ -because ‘the sensible place for rehabilitation is the community.’

 

EXCUSE ME?

COMMUNITY SENTENCES FAIL TO REHABILITATE CRIMINALS. THEY RESULT IN AN EVEN HIGHER RATE OF RECIDIVISM THAN JAIL SENTENCES.

 

This is hardly surprising, since community sentences seem to be hardship-free zones.

According to a recent report by the

Chief Inspector of Probation

-burglars and robbers in London are being set to restore antique furniture or make costumes for the Notting Hill carnival.

[You couldn’t make it up if you tried]

 

And thousands of criminals sentenced to unpaid community service do nothing at all some days.

 

When they turn up, there are no probation staff to supervise them, so they are simply sent home. And those who don’t who don’t even bother to turn up are NOT taken back to COURT and re-sentenced.

 

It may amaze Lord Phillips to learn that ‘significant punishment’ means going

 

TO PRISON.

 

YES, overcrowding means prisons don’t function properly. But the remedy for that is

 

TO BUILD MORE PRISONS.

 

YET our senior judges harbour an obsessive animosity towards prison, doubtless because of the way Human Rights doctrine has so muddled the way we look at the very concepts of

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT.

 

Lord Phillips’ remarks, however were more bizarre still. One reason prison numbers are rising, he said, was that drug users were deliberately committing crimes to get into prison drug programmes. He had come across prisoners offered community sentences who preferred to go to prison so that they could get treatment.

 

Offenders

 

What on earth does the Lord Justice have under his wig? There is no proper evidence for this at all.

 

Indeed, an investigation by MPs said last year that fewer than half of all jails had drug treatment courses, that ONLY one in ten prisoners who use drugs got places on drug treatment programmes, and that half of those who did go on courses NEVER FINISHED THEM.

 

As for supposedly non-existent community drug treatment programmes, they do EXIST-

but are pretty useless in turning offenders away from crime.

 

In a recent report, the Commons Public Accounts Committee observed that drug treatment orders were ‘more like a

GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD’

than a rehabilitation programme.

 

 

Only 25 per cent of those who accepted them ever completed them.

 

It is deeply worrying not only that a senior judge should make such odd and ill-informed remarks, BUT that the JUDICIARY should assume it knows better what policies should be pursued.

 

Yesterday, the former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf [The burglars’ friend] expanded upon such arrogance.

Apparently making a coded attack on the Prime Minister for his criticisms of a judge over the immigration ruling, Lord Woolf condemned politicians for ‘knocking’ individual judges, because it was ‘very damaging’.

 

So lets get this right. Judges may make comments, which are not only wildly inappropriate because they are intensely political, but also reveal themselves to be woefully OUT OF TOUCH.

 

Yet then they loftily inform us that we should not criticise them for doing so, because they apparently reside on some celestial plane above public debate.

 

Of course, in principle politicians and judges should have a Chinese wall between them. And it was once clearly understood that politicians and judges stood on either side of the wall.

 

But the problem is that the judges have torn up that understanding and are now getting involved in matters of POLICY such as the role of imprisonment or drug treatment, which ARE properly the territory of POLITICIANS.

 

The judges have simply grown too big for their wigs.

 

One of the main reasons is the Human Rights law. Lord Woolf robustly defended this yesterday and said that any resulting tension between GOVERNMENT and JUDICIARY was healthy in a democracy.

 

Weakness

But the fact is that Human Rights law has given the judges a weapon to undermine democracy, by setting up themselves rather than politicians as the people who should decide how the country should be ruled.

 

This first surfaced back in the 1980s, when senior judges decided that the long years of Tory government and the weakness of the opposition posed such a threat to democracy that the judiciary should take upon itself the mantle of opposition instead.

 

In the days before the passage of the Human Rights Act [1998], this took the form of challenges to immigration law through judicial review. Such attempts to change the direction of government policy through court rulings became known as judicial activism.

 

When Tony Bair came to power, instead of putting the judges back behind the Chinese wall he attached a turbo-charge to their already burgeoning judicial activism by introducing the Human Rights Act.

 

This change in the behaviour of judges was by no means restricted to Britain. Judicial activism had become a phenomenon throughout the

WESTERN WORLD.

 

In America, Australia, the countries of the EU and elsewhere, the judges -

Acting as a kind of judicial fifth column around the world - are arrogating to themselves power, which belong to the world of politics.

 

Earlier this year, in a little noticed address in London to the Law Commission, a prominent Australian judge, Michael Kirby - a key proponent of judicial activism- spelt out the judge’s agenda with unabashed frankness.

 

The institutions of government in both Britain and Australia, he said, had become unbalanced. Governments had become too powerful, civil servants and MPs had lost influence to political advisers and ministerial accountability was a thing of the past.

 

Amen to that.

 

BUT he went on to say that as a result ‘the very notion of “sovereignty” of parliament has become a somewhat inapposite concept’

 

There should be instead a new type of government led by judges and based on HUMAN RIGHTS LAW - which was already developing in BRITAIN.

 

So the remedy for politicians who were abusing their powers was to replace them by JUDICIAL POWER.

 

This was nothing less than an all-out attack on parliamentary democracy.

 

[Whatever is left of it after nine years of Tony Blair]

 

Yet Justice Kirby was given a platform by our principle legal reform body -the Law Commission - and before an appreciative audience, which included Lord Phillips, Lord Woolf and the Lord Chancellor.

 

Despised

 

English judges express similar alarming distain for democracy. Last year Lord Bingham, the Senior Law Lord, said that the Human Rights Convention existed to protect vulnerable minorities. Which were sometimes disliked, resented or despised.

 

It should therefore come as no surprise, he went on, that decisions vindicating their rights ‘should provoke howls of criticism by politicians and the mass media. They generally reflect majority opinion.’

 

So majority opinion, on this account, was essentially illegitimate, and the role of the JUDICIARY was to use HUMAN RIGHTS LAW to do it down.

 

This unashamed justification of judicial supremacism is as anti m-democratic as it is arrogant. We are living through a kind of creeping judicial coup d’etat driven by a profound contempt for the

PUBLIC OPINION

-to which politicians are answerable.

 

It is parliamentary weakness that is to blame. Only if Parliament reasserts itself will the

 

RULE OF LAW

 

-     be rescued from

 

RULE OF LAWYERS

 

-who have so high-handedly hijacked it?

 

* * *

[Font altered -bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

*

 

[Well it must occur to many in this country that the present sorry predicament of

 

OUR PARLIAMENT

 

- only benefits those in the Judiciary and of course the growing army of lawyers many of whom have grown rich on their human rights harvest which Tony Blair and his flatmate Lord Falconer have no doubt been sowing with hindsight for years. What better way to destroy an immemorial institution of over 700 in the making than to undermine it from within while professing that their attempts to govern are undermined by the JUDICIARY?

 

WHO CAN WE POSSIBLY TRUST?

 

THERE MUST SURELY BE A SEQUAL TO FOLLOW?

 

 

* * *

MAY/06

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1665BROUGHT  FORWARD FROM MAY-06

 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 
 
 
 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 
 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

 

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

 

- TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

-NOT

MULTICULTURAL.

*

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

Wednesday, June 7,2006

*

 Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

by

Simon Heffer

 There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

 We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

MULTICULTURLISM

 -had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

 

[‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

 

[The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

  

To Continue:

 I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

 It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

ENGLAND

-somewhat precarious.

Not all the Left has, however twigged that

MULTICULTURLISM

-is rather last century.

Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

-made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

 

He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

 

Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

 

Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

OUR CULTURE

OUR CONSTITUTION

OUR NATION

 

At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

 

REFORMATION

  -that the

Monarch

 

is Supreme Governor

of the

Church of England.

-which is the Established Church of this Realm.

 

As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

 

“the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

Realm of England.

 

Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

 

However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

 

He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

 

“Defender of Faiths”

 

Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

 

More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

 

Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

 

Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

 

Defender of the Faith

 

-and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

 

THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

 

Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

 

Perhaps the needless vandalism of

 

OUR CONSTITUTION

 

-will have been completed by then.

 

Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

 

For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

 

When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

 

For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

 

For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

-embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

NEW SOVEREIGN.

 

Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

 

But he would be WRONG!

 

It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

 

It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

HISTORY and TRADITION

-and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

 

That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

 

Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

 

The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

OUR WAY OF LIFE

And

OUR VALUES.

 

It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

 

WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

 

WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

 

AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

 

WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

 

AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABILITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS

*

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

1844

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

 

Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

 

To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

*

 

Nationality and Domicile

 

In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

 

Of this parliament we must speak.

 

Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

 

It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

-are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

 

When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

 

Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

 

-the one nationality, the other domicile.

 

Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

 

If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

 

But there is no such thing as British domicile -

Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

 

If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

 

We have included the above extracts from

The

 

CONSTITUTIONAL

HISTORY

OF

ENGLAND

 

by

 

F.W MAITLAND [1908]

 

-to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

 

The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

 

Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

English Parliament.

Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

To continue:

BRITISH CONSTITUTION

BY

LORD BROUGHAM

*

CHAPTER VIII

 THE National Resistance was not only, n point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

Right of Resistance

[Even in 2006]

-as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

 

[DO YOU UNDERSTAND

TONY BLAIR?]

 

The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

The thirty renewals of

MAGNA CARTA

-the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

RIGHTS are INVADED.

The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

RIGHT of RESISTANCE

 

-less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

 

In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

 

This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

 

The great virtue of the

 

CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

 

-is the purity in which it recognises and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

 

The ruling powers are three:

 

The Sovereign

 

The Lords

 

The Commons

 

-of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

 

PEACE and WAR

 

-and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

 

The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

NATIONAL DEFENCE.

 

[In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

-without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

 

REFERENDUM

 

- on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

 

So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

 

WHAT IS?

 

The following extracts are from the

 

PREFACE

 

of the

BRITISH CONSTITUION

 

By

 

HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

[1844]

 

GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

 

…It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

 

It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

 

Sovereign of ENGLAND

 

-never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

 

The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

 

It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

 

But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

 

CONSTITUTION

 

-however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

 *

[In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

 

It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

ARE YOU CONTESTING?]

 

* * *

 

MULTICULTURLISM

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

H.F.1472--BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2006

 

 
 
 

 

 

MAY-16 victory

JUN-16

REFERENDUM

 JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19
SEP 19 OCT-19 NOV-19 DEC-19 JAN-20

FEB-20

MAR-20

APRIL-20

 MAY-20 JUNE-20
JULY-20 AUG-20 SEPT-20 OCT-20 NOV-20  FREE OF THE EU

DEC-20

 AFTER  48 YEARS

JAN-21

A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

 THE

WORLD OUR OYSTER

JAN-21

FEB-21

MAR-21

APRIL - 21

MAY - 21

JUNE - 21

 

 

  

 

 
 
   - NOVEMBER  -  HOME- 2021 -     -

 BULLETIN FILES FOR AUGUST 2021: - HOME- PART 1 - PART 1-PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3 -  PART 4 - PART 5 - PART 6
 

BULLETIN FILE - OCTOBER-2021  HOME - PART 1  - PART 1 PAGE 1  - PART 2  - PART 3  - PART 4   - PART 5  - PART 6

 

BULLETIN FILE - SEPTEMBER-2021    HOME - PART 1  - PART 1 PAGE 1  - PART 2  - PART 3  - PART   - PART 5  - PART 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUNE. 2021 :PART 1 - PART 1 - PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3 -PART 4  - PART 5  - PART 6

 

JANUARY. 2020 -  PART 1 - PART 1-PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3-PART 4 -PART 5 -PART 6-

 

 

      

NOVEMBER- HOME-

-  PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

- (1994 -Official Website - MARCH-PT 5- 2019 )-

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

*

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012