1994 - EDP.ORG.UK. Official Website - JANUARY - PART1- 2021

 PART 1 -  PART 4 - PATRIOT FILE] - PART 5 -

 

 

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

[WE ARE MAKING CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF OUR BULLETINS OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS BY DELETING MANY BULLETINS THE SUBJECT OF THE EU TO CONCENTRATE ON HOME MATTERS AND THE THREAT TO OUR SECURITY WITHIN  AND WITHOUT OUR SHARED  ISLAND HOME, WITH THE RAPID RISE OF THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 OF  ALIEN NEWCOMERS  TO OUR SHORES - MANY OF OUR TOWNS AND CITIES ARE FOREIGN ENCLAVES . WITHIN A GENERATION  THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION WILL NO DOUBT BECOME A MINORITY IN THEIR OWN HOMELAND CALLED ENGLAND  THERE IS ALREADY A SHORTAGE OF WHITE TEACHERS IN OUR SCHOOLS AND WHITE CHILDREN ARE CLASSIFIED AS A DISADVANTAGED GROUP BECAUSE OF THE CURSE OF PC]

 

*  *  *

 

IN JANUARY 2021

WE ARE FREE OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU

BUT

WE ARE IN A WAR AGAINST NATURE'S CURSE ON MANKIND

A

PANDEMIC.

 

WE WISH OUR VIEWERS

A

SAFE NEW YEAR

IN A

FREE ENGLAND

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

IMPORTANT MESSAGE ON JANUARY 22,2021

 

 

 

PANDEMIC PROTECTION ALERT!

 

 

IN a DAILY MAIL article of today by Professor Herb Sewell there was a warning that a single dose vaccine without a follow-up  within a three week period might prove to be ineffective to protect  the individual and we have now learned the very same day that a pensioner couple in our village who have already had their first shot a few weeks ago have been told to go into isolation because of COVID 19 .

 

I fear ditching dose timetable could prove a costly ...

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

JOBS NOT UNEMPLOYMENT

 

 

A few decades ago GORDON BROWN urged everyone to

 

 

BUY BRITISH

 

 

WE ASK WHY THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT BRITISH INDUSTRY FINANCIALLY IN ORDER TO

 

MAKE

 

THE PRODUCTS COMPETITIVE AGAINST  CHEAP IMPORTS MUCH FROM A COUNTRY WITH SLAVE

 

LABOUR

 

AND  HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES.

 

THE GOVERNMENT COULD USE THE SAVED UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TO GIVE GRANTS TO

 

EMPLOYERS TO

 

ENSURE  THAT QUALITY GOODS ARE AVAILABLE FOR THE HOME MARKET AND FOR EXPORT.

 

 

FOR DECADES NOW MANY OF THE GOODS PRODUCED ABROAD ARE NOT OF THE SAME QUALITY AS

 

BRITISH GOODS OF YESTERYEAR  WHICH HAD A LONGER PERIOD OF USAGE WHICH MAKES THE

 

CHEAPER PRODUCT IN THE LONG RUN A MORE EARLY REPLACEMENT.

 

LET US ALL SUPPORT OUR OWN JOBS MARKET FOR OUR OWN JOB SECURITY AND QUALITY  OF

 

MANUFACTURER FOR WHICH WE WERE KNOWN FOR CENTURIES THROUGHOUT THE GLOBE

 

 

AS THE

 

 

 

INDUSTRIAL WORKSHOP OF THE WORLD.

 

 

 

JANUARY 25,2021

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

[A WORLD OF CHANGE

FOR THE BETTERMENT OF MANKIND IS IMMINENT AFTER THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF CONTROL BY DARK FORCES WHO ARE SOON TO BE ERADICATED AND IF NECESSARY EXTERMINATED  FOR  A BETTER AND MORE JUST AND PROSPEROUS FUTURE FOR ALL HUMANITY ON PLANET EARTH.]

 

 

John F. Kennedy Warned of the New World Order

 

 

 

H.F.1806/14-1 -2021

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

[THE EDP HAS BEEN DISPLAYING THE WORKS OF BENJAMIN FULFORD AND MANY OTHER PATRIOTS AT HOME AND ABROAD IN OUR MONTHLY BULLETINS FOR WELL OVER A DECADE CONVINCED OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER FOR GENERAL CIRCULATION']

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

The Timeline of The World’s Future Will Be Chosen This Week

Over the next week, one of several timelines will determine the future of humanity.  One is the fraudulent installment of Joe Biden as President followed by the U.S. surrender to Communist China.  The second is the re-election of Donald Trump as president of the bankrupt U.S. Corporation, which may happen following an interim military government, publicly viewed election fraud investigation, and eventually what Trump described as “a smooth transition” to the new Republic.  This could involve an escalating trade and cyberwar with China, to the detriment of Planet Earth.

The third is to choose neither of the above, followed by an interregnum to replace a corrupted and bankrupt U.S. Corporation with something that actually represents the aspirations of the American people and of humanity as a whole.  This third option would mean humanity would be free to decide its own future, instead of being herded by fear from one manufactured crisis to the next.

The future of the United States will be in the hands of 20,000+ National Guard troops who have been deployed in Washington DC to oversee the inauguration of the next president of the U.S. Corporation.  What these troops need to ask themselves is why are they guarding the so-called democratically elected government from the people.

Instead of facing out to protect a corrupt government from the wrath of the people they supposedly represent, they need to realize instead they have the criminals surrounded.  They have to round up the Deep State actors inside the beltway who were knowingly involved in the certification of a fraudulent election and committed treason.

That means the American people need to work the phones, call friends and friends of friends, to contact the people deployed in DC, and remind them they swore to protect the constitution of the Republic of the United States of America against ALL enemies FOREIGN and DOMESTIC.  On January 20th you will have them surrounded.  Go round them up while you can.

The troops stationed in DC may have been brainwashed into believing they are protecting a legitimately elected Joe Biden against “White Supremacist” Trump fanatics.  That is why these troops need to ask themselves why they did not have to protect Barack Obama from these same “White Supremacists” when he was elected.  The reason is that when Obama was elected they believed it was by a majority of the American people (and Dominion voting machine software).  That is not the case with China Joe where additional fake ballot dumps in the middle of the night were required.

The other thing the troops need to understand is that they are being lied to about why the presidential inauguration has to be held behind closed doors as a “virtual inauguration,” because of the “Covid-19” pandemic.  The U.S. military has been provided with decisive proof that the entire manufactured crisis is the result of a long-planned, elaborate fraud.  Additionally, there is also the possibility they may be aware that a transition is about to take place from the U.S. Corporation to the return of the Republic.

Below is the scan of a patent for a “Covid-19” test that was registered by Richard A Rothschild in 2016, three years before the so-called pandemic broke out.  Take a look at the third line from the bottom: “Last updated 22.06.2016.”

  Covid test patent

We made a hard copy of this patent registration because we are sure once this is exposed they will break into the database and try to alter the dates.

MI6 sent the following message to the Western-allied military command:

“The public health emergency is either false or a cover for something far worse all of which appears to stack up having established the single fact that in 2016 the patent was filed in the Netherlands for the PCR test…[therefore] we urge the international armed forces and military intelligence capabilities to…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

H.F.1806

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

*  *  *

 

*  *  *

 

 

A FINAL REMINDER TO ALL REMAINERS

 

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth to argue another Englishman into SLAVERY'

 

EDMUND BURKE.

 

 

One of our greatest poets JOHN MILTON in 1660 stated:-

 

'It was more just that a less number compel a greater to retain their liberty than a greater number for the pleasure of their baseless compel a less most injuriously to be fellow slaves.'

 

The following: On the importance of being a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

A MESSAGE FROM ALEXANDER von SCHOENBURG

 

EDITOR-AT-LARGE AT BILD GERMANY'S BIGGEST-SELLING NEWSPAPER

 

The following is an small excerpt from the article:

'Think Britain has vaccine problems? You should see the mess we've made of it in the EU'

dated Thursday, January 7,2021

 

...Pitiful...

 

Stumbled...

 

Mocked

 

Disgracefully, Belgium's deputy prime minister, Petra De Sutter, accused other countries of using sub-standard vaccines. 'The UK and Israel, as well as Russia and China are vaccinating people with vaccines that are not  of the same standard as the ones we use,' she said this week.

 

 

Yes, the U.S. and the UK gained a head start by invoking emergency powers that mean drug manufacturers are less exposed should problems with a vaccine later surface. But that is the kind of rapid, vital and timely decision  SOVEREIGN COUNTRY CAN MAKE IN A CRISIS..

 

It is impossible to make the same decision when you have 27 countries arguing with one another, all overseen by a

REMOTE AND  UNACCOUNTABLE BUREAUCRACY IN BRUSSELS

 

So what conclusions can we draw? First, nation states are far more effective in a crisis than unwieldy groupings of different countries.

 

But the most bitter irony for Europe is that the one foreign politician our liberal commentariat have most mocked for years - Boris Johnson -is also the one who acted swiftly and decisively when it came to securing the vaccines. The number of doses you have speaks for itself.

 

And it was the 'sensible' federalist Europeans who have failed so miserably.

 

Anyone who still doubts, the wisdom of Brexit needs only to look at the vaccine chaos unfolding across the channel  - and think again.

 

FOR FULL ARTICLE SEE BELOW

 

Think Britain has vaccine problems? You should see the EU ...

 

 

[CAPS AND HIGHLIGHTING ...ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

[The EDP has over many years made the important point that: A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE can make important decisions at once whereas groups of slave states  must all agree before important decisions can be made. As we see pointedly noted in the above detailed and informative and most excelent article.]

 

*  *  *

 

 

[WE ARE MAKING CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF OUR BULLETINS OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS BY DELETING MANY BULLETINS THE SUBJECT OF THE EU TO CONCENTRATE ON HOME MATTERS AND THE THREAT TO OUR SECURITY WITHIN  AND WITHOUT OUR SHARED  ISLAND HOME.]

 

 

 

 SAS hero launches full frontal ...

 

[AGAINST THE CURSE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS]

 

By SEBASTIAN SHAKESPEARE:

DAILY MAIL

JANUARY 8, 2021

General Sir Mike Rose was Commanding Officer of the SAS when it brought the Iranian Embassy siege to an explosive end and, two years later, when it achieved extraordinary success in the Falklands War.

But he has arguably saved his most devastating assault till now.

It comes, I can disclose, in the form of a blistering letter to Lieutenant General Ivan Jones, Commander UK Field Army, who has posted a video online in which he chats with BAME and LGBT members of the Army - and a single mother-all of whom are described as 'reverse mentors'.

Rose himself a former Commander UK Field Army warns that Jones imperils the Army's effectiveness by 'unquestioningly' focusing  on 'the modern definition of diversity'-'differences in racial. ethnic, socioeconomic, sexual orientation and cultural backgrounds'

THIS, he explains, is because the implication of Jones's cosy chat is that diverse ,make-up of the team' is as important, if not more so, 'than the performance and outcome of the team'.

[WHAT UTTER DANGEROUS DEFEATIST P C RUBBISH JONES TALKS.]

 

 Accusing Jones of being' in danger of sowing dissension and undermining cohesion', Rose asserts that a 'focus on outcome rather than team diversity should surely be the overriding approach of the British Army today' .

.Illustrating his point, Rose mentions how, while in Bosnia, he ensured New Zealand troops attached to a British battalion were 'good rugby players'. The 'British' battalion heavily defeated by a Bosnian side in a previous match by a corresponding amount' - by picking a side solely from 'Maoris and Islanders'. 'I had no interest in the massively slewed racial diversity of the make-up of the team-ONLY THAT WE SHOULD WIN.

He directs Jones to the performance of Brigadier Mike Culvert, who in Burma in World War II, 'started to turn the tide against the invading Japanese Army.' 'He had no interest in worrying about whether he was a homosexual (he was) or whether  he was truly 'being himself", reflects  Rose 'Nor did he feel the need to engage in "open honest conversations" with his junior soldiers. He was too busy giving orders, leading from the front and killing Japanese

Rose also suggests if Jones is really intent on securing a better reflection of the UK in the Army today, he recruits 'a Sikh battalion from the many Sikhs living in this country - a martial race whose forefathers fought gallantly for the British in

 TWO WORLD WARS

The  Ministry of Defence declined to comment]

*  *  *

 

[  COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

JANUARY  8, 2021

H.F.2103

 

 

 

 

 

15,000 DEATHS

over

NHS OVERDOSES'

DAILY MAIL,Tuesday, March16,2021

 

 

POLICE are studying 15,000 death certificates as part of a probe into whether hospital patients were given overdoses of painkillers.

pThe investigation will centre on the causes of deaths at

GOSPORT WAR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

in Gosport, Hampshire.

Officers are set to interview Dr Jane Barton,72,who worked at the hospital for 12 years and who was found guilty of serious professional misconduct in 2010.

Police will comb through millions of pages of documents, including 15,000 death certificates from between 1987 and 2001.

The Kent and Essex Serious Crime Directorate is managing the investigation - codenamed

OPERATION MAGENTA

-which began after an

INDEPENDENT INQUIRY PANEL

concluded that

456 PATIENTS DIED IN THE HOSPITAL

after being given

UNNECESSARY OPIOIDS

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Neil Jerome said there was no reason to suggest more patients would be identified. Dr Barton has previously said:

Throughout my career I have tried to do my best for all my patients.'

* ,TUESDAY, MARCH 16,2021 *  *

 

DAILY MAIL,Tuesday,March16,2021

H.F.2107

 

 

IN JANUARY 2021

WE ARE FREE OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU

BUT

WE ARE IN A WAR AGAINST NATURE'S CURSE ON MANKIND

A

PANDEMIC.

 

WE WISH OUR VIEWERS

A

SAFE NEW YEAR

IN A

FREE ENGLAND

 

 

 

 

 

DAILY TELEGRAPH

 

Don’t leave the vaccine roll-out to the

 

lumbering NHS

 

 

BUT TO

 

 

The enterprising spirit of the private

 

 

sector gave us the jabs, and should

 

 

help us to deploy them too

 

 

by MATTHEW LYNN

 

DECEMBER 31,2020

The crucial point  is surely this. PRIVATE ENTERPRISE HAS SHOWN IT HAS THE

SPIRIT

CREATIVITY

AND

ENERGY

 to deliver a vacine

It SHOULD BE TRUSTED TO DELIVER THE ROLL-OUT AS WELL

WITH HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE STILL DYING EVERY DAY, AND WITH BUSINESSES GOING BROKE AS RESTRICTIONS REMAIN IN PLACE WE CANNOT LEAVE THIS TO  A  NATIONALISED BUREAUCRACY.

WE NEED TO BE QUICKER THAN THAT.

FULL ARTICLE

 

 

DECEMBER 31,2020

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

H.F.2101

 

BREXIT

BRITAIN

will be Europe's biggest economy if

Boris plays his cards right

By LIAM HALLIGAN-DAILY TELEGRAPH

DECEMBER  31,2020

The UK has all of the freedoms it needs to race ahead of the failing EU once the pandemic is tamed.

'FOR YEARS, all supposedly sensible pundits have told us Brexit spells doom for Britain - now they must eat their words". This sentence was uttered not by Boris Johnson, nor by one of his loyal lieutenants. Nor did it come from the European Research Group of Tory Brexiteers,  who yesterday helped the Prime Minister's EU free trade  agreement sail through the House of Commons.

These are the sentiments of Alexander Von Schoenburg, editor of Bild, Germany's best-selling newspaper, "Just because someone has tangled hair, is prone to busting into Latin and somewhat chaotic private life doesn't mean they cannot be a statesman of historic importance," he wrote yesterday. "Europeans of all strips now know Johnson as the man who stood up to the behemoth that is the European bloc and, against all the odds, won the day for his country."

Having clinched an EU trade deal many said was impossible, the Prime Minster is entitled to feel vindicated. A few Remainer refuseniks will keep moaning. But most voters are relieved that, after four and a half years of squabbling, we have finally got

BREXIT DONE.

By "taking back control" from Brussels, while guaranteeing zero`-tariff trade with the EU, Johnson has confounded his critics. Amid endless no-deal catastrophism, he convinced the EU we were prepared to rely on World Trade  Organisation rules-which made a trade-deal more likely.

Having navigated the tricky withdrawal process, however, Johnson must now demonstrate Britain can use our new post-Brexit freedoms to thrive . We have come a long way since-mid-2016, when the Treasury insisted that merely voting to

LEAVE

 

would spark "an immediate and profound economic shock". The British economy stood firm, recording solid growth, high employment and strong public finances, exposing the

MASSED RANKS OF REMAINER MANDARINS TO RIDICULE.

Now, as mass vaccination gets going, Johnson can once again gainsay "all supposedly sensible pundits" by proving that BREXIT can boost the UK economy, after its battering during lockdown.

All ingredients are there. Outside the EU's single market, the UK is free of the highly politicised

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE-

which imposes huge restrictions on our economic freedom while requiring multibillion-pound annual EU payments. Within the SINGLE MARKET, all UK firms-including the 95 per cent that don't export to the EU-must comply with unnecessary and expensive rules.

NOW THEY DON'T

Also, the SINGLE MARKET IN SERVICES barely exists -so that's no loss either.

Since 1999, the share of UK exports to the EU has fallen from around 60 to 40 per cent. Our EU trade is shrinking, then, while generating a deficit, detracting from UK wealth-despite the the single market. Our non-EU trade, meanwhile, is rising fast, makes up the majority of Britain's international commerce and generates a surplus. We need to build on that - not least because, over the coming two decades, nine-tenths of global growth will happen

BEYOND THE EU.

That's also why the UK benefits from being outside the

EU'S CUSTOM UNION

-a tariff wall which has made imports from beyond  Europe more expensive for British shoppers. Such charges were sent to BRUSSELS, with the UK paying disproportionately given that most of OUR TRADE is ALREADY BEYOND EUROPE.

OUTSIDE OF THE  CUSTOMS UNION WE AVOID THESE CHARGES also being able to strike UK-specific trade deals-benefiting Britain's vibrant export sectors, in contrast to agreements by France and Germany.

Already, Liz Truss, the Trade Secretary has secured over

 60 UK TRADE DEALS

with more in the pipeline.

Some 85 per cent of the world economy is outside the EU, including the world's fastest growing and most populous economies. Britain should now seek lucrative agreements with the largest players, not least the US and China-deals that have long eluded Brussels, given intra-EU conflicts...

As the clouds of uncertainty lift - and once the pandemic is finally tamed-economists are concluding that post-Brexit Britain can boom. The highly respected Centre for Economic and Business Research now predicts that the UK will outperform the EU over the next 15 years, becoming almost 25 per cent larger than France by the middle of the next decade. As we continue to attract the lion's share of inward  investment into Europe, Britain is on course to outstrip the German economy by 2040.

 

The UK faces deep challenges-going beyond Covid. Low productivity, for instance, means resources must be poured into vocational education. But our full-deal Brexit presents huge economic advantages, which Johnson must now bring to bear.

"We are with Europe, but not of it," wrote Winston Churchill in 1930."

 We are linked but not compromised, interested and associated but not absorbed."

 

Thanks to Johnson's skill and cunning, Churchill's observation again rings true. But having secured political success with BREXIT the Prime Minister must secure economic prosperity, too, as he builds BRITAIN'S NEW JERUSALEM, leading us beyond the fraught uncertainties of 2020, into a

 

NEW YEAR AND BEYOND.

 

[OF

 

FREEDOM AND PROSPERITY]

 

 

[Comments in brackets and Change's of form... are ours!]

 

 

DECEMBER  31,2020

H.F.2100

JANUARY 4,2021

 

DOMINIC LAWSON: Brexit a threat to peace in Europe! Why can't the BBC Remoaners accept the war is over?

 

DOMINIC LAWSON: The day the UK became fully self-governing again, January 1, 2021, was for many millions of Britons a reason to celebrate. But you wouldn't have picked that up from our national broadcaster. The BBC's reports were unrelievedly apprehensive. ...read

 

And it provided a platform for Frankie Boyle - you know the comedian who likes to poke fun at people with Down's Syndrome -to declare on his own New Year special: 'Having Brexit at the end of the year like this is like finding cancer has spread to the walls of your house,' nice

But no broadcaster has been  as hysterically doom-laden as Dan Snow presenter of various history programmes. On January 1, he tweeted:

 '75 years ago after  history's bloodiest war, with its genocide and unimaginable brutality, a generation of survivors tried to prevent future war by building institutions to curb assertions of

NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY

The UK forged that. Now we help to dismantle it Brexit is a tragedy.'

[WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH YOU SPEAK MR SNOW]

*

Nonsense

Snow's Twitter handle is @thehistoryguy.  But he seems to have little grasp of the subject, in this matter.

The idea that peace in Europe4 has been guaranteed by the European Union-formerly theEEC European Economic Community - is a familiar nonsence. David Cameron was rightly ridiculed when during the 2016 referendum campaign, he warned that a vote to leave [Hitler's planned EU] would put at risk

PEACE ON OUR CONTINENT.

[The EDP  for the past two decades has shown in its thousands of bulletins that it has been NATO which has maintained the PEACE and has taken action on a number of occasions to ensure it is kept.].]

Yes, one reason for the founding of the European Coal  and Steel Community in 1951, (the forerunner of the Common Market) was to forge closer economic and political links between Germany and France, which had fought three wars against each other in the previous three quarters of a century. But does aqnyone seriously suggest that Britain's leaving the EU will tempt Germany to send tanks rolling across the French border?

In fact, the UK is increasing its financial and military commitment to keeping the peace in Europe through our

MEMBERSHIP OF NATO.

the organisation that protects European borders from being crossed by hostile powers.

Actually Dan Snow, like many fanatical proponents of European integration doesn't like those borders much. In an interview last year he said: 'In 200 years' time, do I think that there will be states called Belgium, and the Netherlands, and Luxembourg and Britain? I think I probably don't, really. That will cause a democratic deficit, but what's the alternative?

The alternative, Dan, is those countries still existing

Britons fought in Europe 75 years ago precisely to maintain nation's

RIGHT TO INDEPENDENCE

not least those countries that Snow lists. It was for

DEMOCRACY

not to create the 'democratic deficit about which Snow is so insouciant.

Perhaps he should travel to Estonia, a country seized by the Soviet Union when Stalin and Hitler carved up Europe into their respective spheres of interests. Following Vladimir Putin's annexation of predominantly Russian-speaking parts of the Ukraine, Estonia feared the Russian president would use the fact that there is a  large  Russian community within its territory to mount a similar operation.

Nato moved to protect the Estonian border - and the bulk of the battlegroup is provided by the

BRITISH ARMY...

 This has nothing whatsoever to do with the

EU

and our leaving the EU has not the slightest relevance to it

[MR SNOW]

There was one occasion since 1945 when Europe was faced with a full-scale war, and acts of genocide were carried out. That was during the break-up of the former Yugoslavia in 1991. The Luxembourg foreign minister Jacques Poos, declared that the EU would take the lead in sorting out the conflict: This is the hour of Europe, not the hour  of the Americans.

Boast.

It was a hollow boast. It was only Nato, with U.S. stealth bombers and fighters that prevented further massacres by the Serbian military and their leaders, who have since faced justice in the Hague...

Aside from Nato, the other organisation established in the 1940's to ensure a more peaceful world was the

UNITED NATIONS

which also supplies through its independent member nations, operations to keep formerly warring factions apart in various troble spots.

Despite what Dan Snow seems to imply Britain's membership of the UN's permanent security council is in no way linked to our erstwhile membership of the EU.

It was, in fact, absurd that the EU was in 2011 awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The committee judging the awards might well have given the EU the Nobel economics prize for launching the single European currency. And if the EU itself does break up, that ill-judged venture will be most likely cause: not our entirely peaceful departure.

*  *  *

JANUARY 4, 2021

 

 

 

H.F.2102

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM 2007

 

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

In our infrastructure in our politicians in our institutions in our communities

BUT STILL MANY WON'T FACE FACTS

*

Winston Churchill said over 50 years ago that:

"The Germans, after all had been belligerent for over 2000 years." "They never change."  How soon his words of wisdom and warning are forgotten.  Europe's leaders may not even fully understand what the GEU (German EU) is about. From 1999 to 2001 foreign companies took over 2,779 U.S. companies (worth $766 billion dollars) in an economic Blitzkrieg: mainly Germany , using France as junior aide, to ward off come-backs. How were such sales and so much money contrived?

 

[Before we answer this question and dozens of others we acknowledge the assistance of the following author whose record of being witness to the rise of Nazism in the 1930's and his close contact with those who were shaping the future of Germany. The following extracts are from his

'Germany's Four Reich's']

Harry Beckhough was born in Bristol in 1914. He is an Honours graduate of Bristol University in philology, specialising in German. Studying in Freiburg University in 1933 he witness Hitler's rise to power.

In WW II, he was commissioned in the Royal Artillery, served in India, until taken over by Bletchley Park, (Station x) as Codebreaker.  he served with the 8th Army, breaking Rommel's signals and messages for Montgomery. After Alamein victory, he was recalled to India to serve with 14th (Burma) Army, dealing with Japanese code signals.

On return home as Lt.Col.R.A./Int, he became S.O.I. (Senior Officer) with Foreign Office -with the remit to resuscitate the Rhineland Universities of Cologne and Bonn. There he met regularly, Dr Konrad Adenauer C.D.U., Chancellor of the first post- war German Government, members of his family and Ministers. Over 4 years, to end in  1950 he met many of the leading statesmen and prominent figures in Bonn, seat of the first post-war Government.

As an academic, in charge of the 2 Universities. they spoke freely to him of their plans the future. He has extensive knowledge of Germany, and has explored the development of its

AGGRESSIVE NATURE FROM ITS EARLIEST YEARS.

His book reveals that inherited desire for DOMINATION which has been GERMANY'S major characteristic through major wars and battles over centuries (2000 years), invariably ending in CHAOS, as exemplified by their German philosopher, NIETZSCHE.

Other books written by the author:

"Secret Communications"

"German Universities After WWII

" In the Beginning"

 

[We had the pleasure of meeting Mr Harry Beckhough at a recent meeting of many concerned about the drift of our country into a United States of Europe. After we had read his most comprehensive analysis of the German 's FIRST - SECOND - THIRD and at the present FOURTH REICH we felt its contents needed a greater coverage as we are soon so near to Germany accomplishing her aim unless the people in our once free country take to the streets to defend their legacy of Rights and Liberties of 1500 years in the making. Those many years ago the Germanic tribes that settled in their new home of ENGLAND became because of their island isolation a different people from those who stayed in their homeland so we the ENGLISH should more than any race have and should understand the threat they pose to our present future in 2007.

 

In order to get the complete message to you all we intend to place a short weekly up-date of the books contents on our FRONT PAGE the few paragraphs will be identified by their background of black with red print as we do at the moment to identify the

German Nazi agencies at work in Europe and around the world today in 2007.]

*

 

Unusually we will start with the  final paragraphs of the book under the heading:

Epilogue: On the German Character.

 

Previous attempts to summarise the multi-sided character of the Germans, have proved beyond the scope of previous authors, historians, philosophers and psychologists, especially of their own people.

The German remains a complex people of many -sided facts. Their major development period, circa 1500 to 1800, eventually produced a linguistic, literary and philosophic form of unification, developing from Mittel-Hoch-Deutsch, to an overdone Romanticism period, which produced some of the greatest writers (especially Goethe), musicians of outstanding quality, and philosophers, claiming Judaeo-Hellenic roots.

Followed by the hugely overdone industrialisation of the Bismarck period 1850 to 1914, from one extreme to another, suddenly changing from an agricultural country to extreme mechanical and industrial excess development. From a period of huge profits and great prosperity, flaunted to the world caricatures ,in final collapse and bankruptcy.

Finally the Hitler process of 'Gleichschaltung' (equalisation), seeking to create the impossible : a Nazi image of a one-type German Volk to become a national unit equivalent of Masters and slaves. But this unification only caused [pluralism - the fundamental split personality of the German -ever changing. The real German problem is unity in moderation and moderation in unity. He lacks reality, commonsense and good judgment. But invariably blames others for his troubles. But savagery always ready to burst forth at the slightest provocation.

 

He needs goals to be set by superiors, and is always ready to obey orders. Racism achieves domination and hegemony. he cannot clearly distinguish TRUE from FALSE, and confuses TRUTH with IDEOLOGY. Hence his love of intricate plots rarely reaching conclusion, getting lost or set astray with side issues.

 

He lives in a false world with distorted views conflicting TRUE and FALSE, GOOD and EVIL, PEACE and WAR. But seeks to TERRIFY and FRIGHTEN. He loves to organise, but loses his head if plans go awry, as happened with Hitler's rages, smashing order into chaos, and collapse of a scheme.

Above all he needs a strong leader, standing ready to obey, and follow. Without a Fuhrer, Germans become lost and confused. Generally hated for their arrogance, imperialism and brutal inhumanity, with outbursts of fury for little cause. But he enjoys his hatreds with a lethal intensity. "The ever-furious people" as [their] Nietzsche calls his 'Tauscher Volk'.

 

They are born wreckers -first of the Roman Empire, latterly of the League of Nations, now undermining both the United Nations and NATO. But their substitution, like their new Franco-German Constitution, may eventually collapse like a House of Cards, lacking a firm foundation, being constructed in hidden, mysteriously conceived, contrived and often confused plans, not properly finalised.

 

Pretending to act for the general good in a community of 'equals', their target is eventually revealed:

FIRST:-

an EU Super state,

- en route deviously to become a

German dominated Dictatorship.

We are coerced and invited to yield:

OUR SOVEREIGNTY

ANCIENT RIGHTS

and

HARD-WON

FREEDOM

-to become, for the first time in our history, a vassal state under the German jackboot. WWI and WWII should have taught us the brutal German reality.

 

I pray that our Leaders will remove their blinkers, to reveal German connivance in the reality of our appalling situation, in which we have been deceived and exploited since 1972. For this unhappy world once again is in sore need of our STRENGTH and GOOD LEADERSHIP, as a FREE BRITAIN, against the growing evil of TERRORISM, again endangering WORLD PEACE in the present century.

*

[As previously mentioned we shall be continuing with the remainder of Harry Beckhough's intensely researched book with further additions available on our FRONT PAGE.]

 

Key Features of German Deceit

In 1992 France became bound to Russia, as her agreed agent, to bring Russia into an extended European Federation -to promote collective security. In 1990 Professor Herzog denigrated the nation state, publicly identifying with Lenin's objective. The 1992 Maastricht Treaty then deprived EU nation states of key elements of their sovereignty; their currency, internal and external security, transferred, for the first time, to a European institution.

[Thanks a lot! Douglas Hurd our British Foreign Secretary at Maastricht  -WE don't of course - as that traitor to his country even was overheard after signing the Treaty to say:

'We'd better find out what we've just signed'

On that day in February 1992 after his committed Treachery to his country he was accompanied by the now  Conservative chairman Francis Maud another traitor to his true party's ideals and his country.]

Yet America's materialistic world seemed oblivious of the frightening reality, of the concealed intentions of this menacing, reborn German fast growing giant, with huge secret resources immediately available. Though the German Mark became worthless post-war, and the Black Market ruled a bargaining scene, until we created their new currency Mark in 1997/8, as I witnessed.

So whence came this sudden huge wealth?

Where was it stored in the Nazi era?

 

[YES! you have guessed right as you will have indicated on our Front Page]

Meanwhile, German military is rebuilding .fast and secretly as in 1920s/30s, using pseudo peace-keeping roles, as excuse to catch up with British military strength.

Playing a clever role in Kosovo, Croatia, being helpful in supplying peace-keeping troops, all undergoing strict home training. The old German trickery is still there, as deceitful and two-forked as ever. Adept at convincing lies, matching those of its Leninist? KGB trained ally, at the devil's trade of deceit, to which the West falls easy, trusting victim. Always with America especially ,in their sights (as also Britain), whilst proffering friendship. Now both the KGB-led Russian dictatorship and the

GEU (German European Union) Super state  

 

-are seeking global power and world domination by pseudo -peaceful means, using every trick [As our slippery Tony Blair and the other traitors] in their training.

These are aimed specifically at America and Britain, both economically and militarily.

 

Britain's so-called "New Labour" Government has recklessly thrown its lot in with German-led Europe.

[We would not be surprised if Tony Blair has his eyes on the new job of President of the New European Union should that monstrosity ever be brought into being. Of course we have already explained that we would NEVER agree to be part of such a collective Mammoth Police State and Evil conspiracy.]

America has fallen prey to every conceivable form of espionage in the 20/21st century from Russia, China, the East, Asia and the Arab world. But it is now learning fast not to put its trust in erstwhile 'Friends' in Europe, to the Arab world, from France to Arabia.  And to trade to its own well-protected and insured benefit, with trustworthy, proven allies, balancing gains and losses.

 

Thus America is now considering possible closure of well-established bases in Germany, and the danger of leaving these in the hands of a so-called friend.  Now known to be otherwise -preparing to bite the hand that restored it from its defeated collapse and misery, from a cruel, bloody War, started once again (as ever ) by Germany -never to be trusted, glorying in its success of LIES and DECEIT.

[It is to be remembered that the U.S. after WWII helped over 700 Nazi scientists and other callings to the United States and many used their influence and their successors also to foster the Nazi programme of future world domination  as clearly elaborated on by

 International Currency Review

Details on our Front Page

www.worldreports.org

cstory@worldreports.org

 *

Germany has been allowed, by its so readily trusting friend and hosts, to establish permanent military facility at Alamagordo, New Mexico, with (scarcely credible) an open -skies treaty for German planes flying over and surveying (and mapping) in totem. [As they did before the WWI and up to WWII when their people were everywhere in the Middle East and other areas mapping out future places of conflict] Something which needs 100% secrecy for complete safety. Even conducting training and joint military exercises - for German identification records.  Like Samson giving away the secret of his great strength - with resultant downfall, to his undoing. America should now look closely to her security.

Just as the Chinese were able to obtain all U.S. classified, most sensitive military, technical and nuclear information (painstakingly developed and built up over many years of highest quality operations, by most qualified American and British staff of highly trained experts - at tremendous cost and outstanding success) -simply by being able to tap into improperly guarded U.S. computer, technical system, without restriction and with minimum effort. Thus China, in quick time, learnt all U.S. secrets and was able to construct her own copies of U.S. nuclear warheads, with all technical know-how, and sell them on! Enough to make strong men weep!  But America has the resilience to ride its body-blows and restore terms with China.

Now German EU originally favoured, trusted and assisted by America [See Bilderbergers] , grows steadily stronger, militarily and economically-posing future menace, led by Germany, already seeking to undermine America in every way. Of course not openly, as is definitely not their nature, until ready for open combat -but through GEU.

Time we awoke [this was written  just a few years ago but in the closing months of 2006 there was a definite awakening as growing numbers are now joining the Anti-EU banner -see [http://eutruth.org.uk]]  to the dangers closing in on us, in this latest travesty of an all-embracing EU Constitution rending us [that means YOU!] in a vassal state [of the Fifth Reich].

 

ALL  20 of Germany's nuclear plants have unlimited licences.  200 American nuclear bombs are now in WMD storage vaults in EU states, with 55 in Germany.

 

The EU possesses 710 nuclear bombs. Germany has an advanced science and technology base, capable of supporting an advanced nuclear programme. This needs careful assessment for future consideration. Our British/American defence organisations seem to have no conception of this ongoing, tremendous build -up of power -with the sole aim of the creation of a

Super state Dictatorship

 

-with world control.

Whilst we continue to reduce our Armed Forces and equipment, Germany is quietly building hers (already more than equal to ours), with Europe providing the rest. They  have cleverly convinced first, Britain's P.M. Blair, and now America that they will not bypass NATO, when their intention is clearly to reduce NATO and then do away with it, leaving GEU German European Union in full power and able to argue with, if not threaten, America.

 

We learn in the Daily Mail of the 2nd February, 2007 that the NATO mission in Afghanistan is handing over leadership to an American commander - after all the trouble and fanfare to show NATO solidarity not so long ago. Obviously the Americans are learning a few lessons  of their own at this late state in the diplomacy game before they too find themselves with their defences completely useless after their long fraternisation programme in post-war Germany.]

Russia, in close co-operation with German since Bismarck, is seen both as partner and secretly, future target. The case of the Russian enclave, now cut off from Russia by the Independent Balkan states - Kaliningrad (formally Konigsberg, the centre of historic Prussia) presents a classic case of the German use of the EU, plus massive loans to Russia, to achieve expansion Eastward.

[Well we are all now aware that the German's have a very-very-very close relationship with Russia in many fields BUT particularly in the Energy field. It will be a weapon that our enemy of the 20th century will use with its superior military forces at its time of choosing and we should all remember what happens when a country allows it military forces to become a ridiculed second rate pantomime show.]

 

The huge loans arranged for Russia by Germany, cause weighty instability for the Russian economy and political dependence of German goodwill, with calculated benefit and lack of interference with German plans.

Chancellor Kohl calculated that these major bonds would serve as a foundation for reconstruction of the Russian economy, and close co-operation with Germany. However the arrival of Putin, trained by KGB, may produce firmer self-interest by Russia.

Discussions progress on conversion of this huge German debt into equity stakes in Russian companies, which now have greater freedom to develop, especially in oil and commodities.

Chris Patten, EU Commissioner responsible for external affairs, has made the first steps (quoted by the Times), in discussing the possible political status of Kaliningrad in the enlarged EU -to suit German EU, whom he seems to serve more than his own country.

 

The Euro and the projected European Army (of envisaged great strength), are important major steps in the creation of the planned corporatist, anti-democratic, anti-nation state power, based on German Europe ,as the EU Constitution of a Super state, to compete against American global strength and world authority. Always the great competitive target for global ambitious Germany.

*

Expanding by Ratchets

 

In 1970 the renewed German-Soviet Treaty for

"FRIENDSHIP and CO-OPERATION"

was signed, assuring their everlasting understanding -always included in Germany's secret plans for total reinstatement (already ipso facto regained)-and future control of greater Europe, both West and East -the same as ever target. It is truly amazing, on looking back, the ease with which Germany was able to deceive and convince America and Britain's leading Statesmen -but so did Gorbachev with his ready convincing stream of lies about his new Russia. Their joint ratchet found easy targets in the ever-trusting West.

 

East Germany overthrew their Communist regime in 1989, becoming one complete Germany again in 1990/91. The German democratic Republic became founder member of the Warsaw treaty Organisation, by the Warsaw Pact with Russia, then occupying the Russian Zone of Germany. The Berlin Wall built 1961, sealed off this Russian Zone from the West. In 1972 the Two Germany's signed a Pact of admittance to the United Nations. In 1991 came the overthrow of the Soviet government. Yeltsin and Gorbachev took power, expertly deceiving the West of their 'democratic' intentions.

In 1989 the Berlin Wall fell, bringing a neo-Nazi revival, cultivated strongly through the German Army (Bundeswehr). Nazi Germany came storming back as the communist stranglehold on East Germany was released. Violent racist incidents increased year on year to 1993.

In 1993 the Bundestag passed an asylum law, setting firm restrictions on immigrants seeking asylum. Still remaining anti-semitic, with disturbance of Jewish synagogues and cemeteries. Further reports of neo-Nazi revival in Germany.

In June 1991 the Bundestag voted to move their Capital back to Berlin  from Bonn (Adenauer's home town). May 1995 Manfred Roder -convicted Nazi terrorist- was invited to address the Bundeswehr [This has  memories of the Frederick Forsyth film the ODESSA-don't you think]

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall there are visible signs of return of the old spirit of independent arrogance, within the whole German nation. Now, again a bona fide word power, second only to the U.S. in arms exports,

with a standing army of circa 300,000, the largest in Europe

 

Already with France's help, leading the EU and soon to be recognised as a major nuclear power. Germany now back on top by usual clever manoeuving.

In 1990 a secret agreement between Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl accepted that the Bohemian and Moravian region belonged to the Germans.

ALSO

the final division of Czecho-slovakia and Yugoslavia by the end of 1992.

Germany planned to make a Customs Union of Europe, like Bismarck. Warnings by Roger Eatwell's: Fascism, Bernard Connolly's: THe Rotten Heart Of Europe and Margaret Thatcher's: The Downing Street years -

ALL GO UNHEEDED IN OUR SLEEPY APATHETIC NATION

Just as before WWII, with almost all Mainstream Press just as oblivious to the danger as they were before WWII.

[We have recently made a call to our at the moment FREE PRESS to open up the secret's of the EU but at a first glimmerings of activity it is obvious they only want to tinker out of harms way on the fringes of one of the GREATEST conspiracies in HISTORY. Possibly it is because after 50 years of backhanders and promises of special favours there are too many involved to bring the whole pack of cards to the ground. Who has the courage to start the ball rolling to collect up on its journey all the traitors and time-servers and to land on top of the Elite who have more to lose?

In 1995 Mrs Thatcher said in Parliament:

"You have not anchored Germany to Europe; you have anchored Europe to a newly dominant, unified Germany. In the end, my friends, you'll find it will not work."

Maybe not, but in the meantime they are expertly stirring the pot, causing ever more problems. [As no don't in February 2007].

Two years after the war-end, statistics now show that almost 50% of Bavarian civil servants belonged to the Nazi Party or its affiliates.

Of those dismissed by us, some 15,000 were reinstated. Almost all 11,000 teachers removed for political reasons were reinstated with 60% of the teaching staff employed by the German Ministry of Education and 81% of Judges, magistrates, prosecutors in the Ministry of Justice.

 Only in Universities were we able to keep good measure of control in the British Zone, by our direct command and control -with early denazification.

[It is obvious from the above that the Nazi Party continued in the main as it had always done but with for a time a lower profile awaiting their chance of future conquest which they have almost achieved in the early months of 2007.]

Inter-European unity has been long sought by the Hapsburg dynasty. Otto compared the similarities of the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages with his own views on a destined

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

Churchill favoured a U.S.E. (United States of Europe) led by Britain. He said:

"It should be built by the British "

[Of course it would have been built on British values]

"If the Russians built it, there would be communism and squalor.

If the Germans built it there would be TYRANNY and BRUTE FORCE"

( Martin Gilbert: Churchill War Papers Vol 3)

 

How far-seeing!-[As we see today in February 2007]

 

Now in German control, as yet in shape unrealised by the victims, caught in a net of German deceit and empty promises [As with their agent Tony Blair in 2007], inexorably leading to complete mastery.

As the USSR faded into history , overtaken by the new KGB dictatorship, Germany, under its EU cloak, was already on its panned path to overtake America, with the size and growth of its extended economic values.

In May 1997, Roman Herzog (former German president), on being presented with the International Charlemagne Prize  for his efforts to unite Europe said:

 

"Charlemagne, himself , sought the unification of Europe -the truth must be told, only by wading through a sea of blood, sweat and tears, did he reach it. Germany has been Europe's greatest perpetrator, instigating that bloodshed."

[Well we have at least

1,250,000

Sacrifices

 

-places of rest - many in foreign fields in our struggles to overcome that perpetrator on two occasions in the 20th century

 

One wonders how Tony Blair came to be chosen for this prize? Joschka Fischer (ex Communist, now leader of the Green Party) said:

" Germany needs NOT democracy, but a system of Statecraft, similar to that of the Soviet dictatorship, enabling the German political and military elite to organise Europe's industrial capacity, and the military qualities of German people or of the revival of the German race, Europe is just an extension of Germany.

THAT SAID IT ALL

-with Fischer omniscient.

Yugoslavia was deliberately undermined by German Intelligence Service (bundesnachrichtendienst) under Klaus Kinkel, throughout the 1980's  using German agents working with former Croatian Fascists, close allies of Hitler (providing needed outlet for the Adriatic). They now destroyed the multi-ethnic state of Yugoslavia, arranging the breakaway of Catholic Croatia and Slovenia.

Marshall Tito established a new Constitution for Yugoslavia, known as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The Serbs had initiated the first union of the 3 nations, following the collapse of the Habsburg ruled Austro-Hungarian Empire, end of WWI in 1918. Tito broke with the Soviets, creating a new federal Republic, which lasted 30 years. But the political iron -will of Germany took only 10 years to break it

 

Milosovic may have been unfairly charged in the Hague -but Germany now has arranged a more compliant leader under her control. Once again Anglo-Americans have been fooled by German trickery.

 

German machinations in the Balkans in WWI were repeated in WWII. Yugoslavia, historical all of Britain against German imperialism, has now been broken up into the same religious and racial statelets the Nazi established: Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia had their own Waffen SS divisions.

In 1991 Germany followed by the Vatican, recognised Croatia, which massacred

1,000,000

Serbs-gypsies and Jews at Jasennovac concentration camp

The wartime Archbishop Stepinac, whose own priests helped run the extermination camp, was beatified by the present Pope in 2002!?

Albania was favoured by NATO as an ally of Germany, whilst operating the biggest drug and gun-running corridor through Kosovo and Tiranen. Germany gained control by outright purchase of their main asset, their chromite mines.

Albanians, in the historical Serb province of Kosovo, who has conducted massive ethnic cleansing of Serbs over 100 years, (with the help of Nazi during the war and Tito thereafter, were armed by Germany as

FREEDOM FIGHTERS

[For whose Freedom?]

Provoked by repeated terrorist attacks by Kosovo Freedom Fighters, the anticipated Serb response gave GERMAN-controlled Europe the excuse to lead NATO into an ILLEGAL war against a SOVEREIGN STATE -by cunning German contrivance. This served Germany's historical aim of destroying Serbia, helping to reclaim so-called German territory in the East, thus helping construction of German Europe, now the EU.

 

[And who do they agree to be dictator of Kosovo -Yes! you are right -Our own Bilderberger Paddy Ashdown who has only recently stood down to enjoy his retirement?

Similarly, with Macedonia the EU cleverly had NATO do all the donkey work, transforming it into a vassal state of the EU. So, if things go wrong, NATO will be blamed.

THUS ANOTHER CLEVER(?) GERMAN STROKE.

 

[The EU is all about NUMBERS and TERRITORY-They need to have ALL Europe under their control -there can be no exceptions. They have a deal with Russia as we shall find out to our cost when our energy supplies are restricted to achieve their blackmail terms. Mark our words the English people will rue the day it failed to keep a tight control over THEIR GOVERNMENT]

During the Second World War about

1,000,000

were massacred by Croation fascists. In 1989/90 came the first ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, after Germany officially recognised [their own WWII ally] Croatia, who established a blatantly nationalistic constitution discriminating against the SERBS. There are now over one million displaced Serbs, because of Germany's aggressive interference and plotting. In 1991 Germany unilaterally recognised Croatia and Slovenia as separate sovereign state, completing her astutely conceived DOMINATION of the BALTIC AREA.

Exporting $320 million dollars of hardware to Croatia, 4000 German troops in Croatia, the FIRST deployment of German troops [they now have over 300,000 troops in their Army] since WWII, to help enforce the so-called

'PEACE AGREEMENT'

[Typical NAZIS they create the unstable conditions in  the area by their hurried recognition of Croatia which served their purpose to arrive at the situation today. Tony Blair certainly had  good training in the same philosophy as our situation in February 2007 with only weeks away from him signing the March 2007

'DECLARATION OF BERLIN.'

[Note each of the above underlined words has a different bulletin.]

All the meddling and interference in  Croatia -All part of Germany's deep plan for overall

CONTROL of ALL EUROPE

-Both West and EAST, At the same time, settling old scores of WWII.

In the rest of Eastern Europe the agricultural economy has collapsed, because the EU prevents their exports to the West.  Their media, business and agricultural land are being acquired by Western European Business, especially German. Just as the NAZI planned in the 1930s, the national states of Europe, for whose freedom Britain and America fought two bloody wars, sacrificing their heroic young men, effectively, no longer exist as self-governing entities.

 

THE AFTERMATH OF WWII, WITH GERMANY NOW ESTABLISHED AS THE STRONGEST FORCE IN EUROPE

[NOW DO YOU BELIEVE YOUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY IS IN GREAT DANGER?]

 

*

 

To the Serbs -an Independent Kosovo is anathema -Kosovo is their Jerusalem

Germany as the Strongman of Europe-A germanised Empire in the Making - PART 1

The New Beginning  - PART2

Germany's Third Reich -PART 3

Taskmasters of Europe -PART 4

A Warning Message To The Freedom Loving People Of England by Harry Beckhough

*

http://eutruth.org.uk

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

2007

A62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUST HOW

LOW CAN

CHINA GO?

News about Daily Mail-Just How Low Can China Go?

By IAN BIRRELL

DECEMBER 29, 2020

After its corona cover-up, its jailed a journalist for daring to

TELL THE TRUTH

and

 CHINA is now SEEKING to WIN PROFITS and POWER from the VIRUS it GAVE THE WORLD.

WHEN a new disease erupted one year ago in Wuhan, a group of journalists and activists rushed to the central Chinese city to document the extraordinary events, as hospitals were flooded with patients and authorities struggling to cope.

Among them was an idealistic lawyer from Shanghai called Zhang Zhan, who filmed the overflowing hospitals, deserted streets, empty rail station and even a top-security laboratory conducting secretive experiments on bat coronaviruses,

After Wuhan's Communist official suggested the city's traumatised citizens needed 'gratitude training' to thank the party for its efforts to control the pandemic, the fearless 37-year-old went on the streets to ask residents if they were really felt grateful.

'Is gratitude something you can teach? If you can, it must be a fake gratitude,' she responded caustically to her camera.

Like other citizens and professional journalists carrying out such risky work, Ms Zhang posted her impassioned reports on YouTube and Social Media to feed the appetite of a country desperate to learn about a deadly new virus.

Now this bold women-who was seized by police in May-has paid the price for

HONESTY.

in a dictatorship built on

LIES

PROPAGANDA

and

REPRESSION

Yesterday, she was jailed for four years on the spurious charge of 'picking quarrels and provoking trouble', despite being in poor health after going on hunger strike in protest over her detention and then brutally force-fed...

 

Silenced

*  *  *

Blood

*  *  *

 

Infection

 

...Professor Shi quickly identified the closest viral relative to this new disease in an academic paper - but failed to mention it was linked to the deaths of three miners with a similar respiratory disease eight years ago. Strangely, she said they died from fungal infection before being made to provided more information.

Now there are fears the World Health Organisation, so deferential to China from the start of this pandemic, is allowi9ng The Communist leadership in Beijing to dictate the terms of its belated pandemic inquiry.

The WHO's mission is to probe its origins is expected to travel to China next month. But there are concerns it is relying on Chinese data and has, according to its published terms of reference given Beijing the right to vet its experts.

China is a cruel society led by smart people who understand the meaning of that mantra from 1984 - Orwell's novel warning about totalitarism-that whoever controls the past also controls the future.

This is why they aim to create a false, self-aggrandising narrative on the pandemic. And this is

WHY

the jailed lawyer Zhang has been stuffed inside a prison hellhole after seeking

TO TELL THE TRUTH

about a virus that has infected the world.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

DECEMBER 29, 2020

H.F.2099

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE WAY AHEAD!

 

 

 

 

 

 [THE MORAL LAW

-THE PATH AHEAD TO FOLLOW.]

' ... May I ask you then to believe, as I do most devoutly believe, that the moral law was not written for men alone in their individual character, but that it was written as well for nations, and for nations great as this of which we are citizens. If nations reject and deride that moral law, there is a penalty which will inevitably follow. It may not in our lifetime; but, rely upon it, the great Italian is not a poet only, but a prophet, when he says,-
'
'''The sword of heaven is not in haste to smite
Nor yet doth linger.'

We have experience, We have beacons, we have landmarks enough. We know what the past has cost us, we know how much and how far we have wandered, but we are not left without a guide. It is true we have not, as an ancient people had, Urim and Thummin - those oraculous gems on Aaron's breast - from which to take counsel, but we have the unchangeable and eternal principles of the moral law to guide us, and only so far as we walk by that guidance can we be permanently a great nation, or our people a happy people.

JOHN BRIGHT MP
OCT.29,1858
Speech on Foreign Policy
BIRMINGHAM
Town Hall.
* * *
 

  • John Bright | British politician | Britannica

    https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Bright

    12/11/2020 · Author of Cobden and Bright and others. John Bright, (born Nov. 16, 1811, Rochdale, Lancashire, Eng.—died March 27, 1889, Rochdale), British reform politician and orator active in the early Victorian campaigns for free trade and lower grain prices (he was a co-founder of the Anti-Corn Law League), as well as campaigns for parliamentary reform. Bright was the eldest surviving son of Jacob Bright, …

  • John Bright - Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bright

    In 1857, Bright's unpopular opposition to the Crimean War led to his losing his seat as member for Manchester. Within a few months,

    he was elected unopposed as one of the two MPs for Birmingham in 1858. He would hold this position for over thirty years though he would later

    leave the Liberal Party on the issue of Irish Home Rule in 1886.
    On 27 October 1858, he launched his campaign for parliamentary reform at Birmingham Town Hall. In 1…

    John Bright - UK Parliament

    https://www.parliament.uk/.../great-reform-act1/john-bright1

    John Bright (1811-1889) is seen by many as one of the great reformist liberal politicians of the 19th Century. His Parliamentary career was played out in two Acts. The first Act, where he stood as a member for Manchester and became a champion of the free trade movement as one of the original founders of the Anti-Corn Law League. The second Act, saw Bright elected MP for Birmingham in July 1865 which …

  • John Bright, 1811-1889 · Liberal History

    https://liberalhistory.org.uk/history/bright-john

    20/05/2012 · John Bright was born on 16 November 1811, the son of a Quaker textile manufacturer. He worked for his father in his Rochdale mill after leaving school, and soon became involved in local political causes favoured by nonconformists, notably the opposition to compulsory church rates.

  • WE HAVE HAD THE LIKES OF THE BLM FACTION IN 2020 CASTIGATING THE INDIGENOUS

    ' POPULATION ON THE ISSUE OF SLAVERY WHICH WAS NOT OF THEIR MAKING. THE COMMON MAN IN BRITAIN WAS TREATED AS SUCH BY THEIR OVERSEERS THE LAND - OWNING POPULATION, UNTIL THE LIKES OF JOHN BRIGHT MP AND OTHERS RAISED THEM OUT OF ABJECT SLAVERY WITH THE REFORM ACT AND OTHER MEASURES WHICH FINALLY BROUGHT TRUE DEMOCRACY TO THE WORKING MAN IN 1906. THOUGH IT TOOK NEARLY A HUNDRED YEARS (1832-1928) BECAUSE OF THE OPPOSITION OF THE LARGE-LAND-OWNING POPULATION WHO RULED PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNTRY.



     

    IMPORTANT PUBLIC NOTICE

     

    “a secret deal between Switzerland and China that allowed Chinese security officials access to the country at Swiss taxpayers’ expense has been revealed.” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/secret-deal-reveals-chinese-spies-free-rein-switzerland.

     

    BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

    THE EDP.ORG.UK have been following the above website for over a decade. Its information may appear to new viewers to be fanciful but it is in fact a  true picture of the elite who for thousands of years have been responsible for war and countless crimes - who are now being hunted down - in order that those who wish to create a world of peace and plenty - instead of poverty and war - can guide us in the years ahead.

    WE are most surprised that it has taken so long for a member of our FREE PRESS to break ranks with the vital information of CHANGE which has been the message by Benjamin Fulford for many years.

     

    DECEMBER 15-2020

     

     

    Massive offensive against Octagon Group aims to finish off Nazi 4th Reich

     

    A massive offensive aimed at finishing off the Swiss-based Octagon group and putting an end to their Nazi fourth Reich has begun.  The executives of pharmaceutical companies, the heads of medical associations, and other people associated with the Covid-19 terror and vaccine campaign are high priority targets.  The Swiss will be asked to hand over all Octagon group leaders or face complete destruction of their country according to Gnostic Illuminati sources.

    “The Covid-19 Gladio operation is Swiss Octagon, Gladio is a compartment inside it,” MI6 sources confirm.  This means a global mass murder campaign is being orchestrated out of Switzerland, which is why such radical measures are being taken.

    Be warned though, the Octagon group is the de facto politburo of the about 1 million-person strong Khazarian Mafia and they do not intend to go quietly into the night.

    One NSA source says there is intel indicating KM actors are now plotting against Trump’s call for patriots to converge on Washington DC on January 6th.  The source warns it could become a deadly trap and if patriots want to help they should consider acting locally against politicians, doctors, etc. pushing lockdowns and “Covid-19” vaccinations.

    If you still believe in all the Covid fear propaganda being churned out all day long by the corporate propaganda media, here is some fact-checking you can do: The Chinese Bioweapons laboratory in Wuhan, China, where the so-called Covid virus originated is owned by the Soros Foundation as can be seen from foundation filings with the SEC.  This same foundation owns the vaccine makers.  The Soros Foundation is a front for the Khazarian Mafia.

    The other thing people need to be reminded of is that Western medicine is based on military medicine and has a military hierarchy.  If doctors do not obey orders, they lose their medical licenses.  The orders come from medical associations controlled by Khazarian Mafia.

    Russian FSB sources confirm some of the Covid-19 vaccines now being pushed contain microchips.  “We are now trying to decode them,” one source says.

    However, reacting to each new atrocity by the Khazarian Mafia is not enough, which is why major offensive operations continue.  Now, Russian, U.S., Israeli and other special forces are actively hunting down all the executives associated with this medical terrorism being carried out in the West, mostly the G7 group of Khazarian slave countries.

    Even propaganda news outlets like the Washington Post admit the largest National Guard mobilization since WWII is taking place.  Of course, they try to spin it as “fighting the pandemic,” but in reality, it is fighting the KM.  https://www.thehour.com/news/article/Pandemic-and-unrest-fuel-the-biggest-National-15826661.php

    In another sign, it is not business as usual land and sea borders have been sealed in Japan, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, the U.S., and other countries in order to…

    The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
    Please Log In or Register to create an account.
     

    December 28, 2020

     

    H.F.2101

     
     
     

     

    Here's why my fellow Germans

    DO want

     a

     Brexit deal

     

    DAILY MAIL Here's why my fellow Germans DO want a Brexit deal:  

    News for the DAILY MAIL-Here's why my fellow Germans do want a BREXIT DEAL

    by

     Alexander von Schoenburg

     

    EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

    GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

    DECEMBER14,2020

    What happened yesterday regarding the Brexit talks was reminiscent of the Battle of Waterloo -at least the version taught in my German school.

    The French had Britain on the brink of defeat, when Prussian troops stormed in and reprieved them.

    Chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier- a former foreign minister of France, don't forget -and his francophone troops were ready to declare all further negotiations futile and walk away when Germany's EU ambassador relayed a message from Berlin.

    Our foreign minister Heiko Maas insisted it was time to end the doctrinaire approach and 'start looking for a political solution'. If that meant talks had to go on beyond Sunday night, then so be it. As we have seen, his intervention proved decisive.

    AT around the same time, a press conference was taking place at Germany's Bundeskanzleramt, the Chancellery.

    It was designed to be solely devoted to explaining Germany's new Covid measures but one journalist asked whether the Chancellor Angela Merkel was in favour of the Brexit negotiations continuing.

    She replied: 'One should try everything that is possible to reach an agreement. '

    That word 'everything'highlights the difference between the German and the French positions .

    From the beginning of the Brexit talks, there have been two schools of thought prevailing on the continent.

    The German approach has always been to offer Britain a tailor-made deal that is more favourable than the one reached with Norway, or even Switzerland.

    The argument being that the size of Britain's economy justifies a more delicate approach. Contentious areas could be  side-stepped via extended transitional periods.

    The second school of thought favoured by those in the Franco-phone block, argued the outcome had to be so detrimental to Britain that no other member state would ever again dare to go down the road of secession.

    IN SHORT BRITAIN NEEDED TO BE PUNISHED.

    THE running gag in Brussels was that whenever the French anti-secessionist general Michel Barnier was away and non-French-speaking civil servants were running the show, negotiations were constructive. When he had to leave the negotiating table and self -isolate after a colleague contracted Covid , for example, there are said to have been a few minor breakthroughs.

     

     BUT when he returned to the negotiating table, the tone of the talks turned distinctly hostile, thanks to Barnier's insistence that the UK must abide by EU regulatory changes made after it leaves the bloc.

    Germany, of course, has much more to lose from a No Deal conclusion than France.

    Last year we [Germany) exported e80billion (£73 billion) of goods and services to the UK.

    -which is the world's biggest buyer of German cars, accounting for almost one in five of our

    motoring  exports. Volkswagen alone sold 200,000 cars in Britain last year. You are also big buyers of German pharmaceuticals, chemical and petroleum products.

     

    TO BE CONTINUED

     

    ...Once you  are out completely, even if it is on WTO-terms, you may well look back on 2020 as the year in which you managed to escape the dead hand of Brussels and regain your role as a global player with a distinctly more liberal, more entrepreneur-friendly and hence more attractive and innovative place to do business.

    A kind of Singapore on Thames is exactly what is feared most in Berlin and this is why Germany will do everything it takes to avoid a trade war and to get Monsieur Barnier and France off their high horse.

    Ursula von der Leyen might be slightly bossy-but the good thing from your point of view is that she is NOT French but GERMAN.

    In fact, she is from Lower Saxony a place which not only has particularly close ties to Britain but is a region where Volkswagen's headquarters is located.

    With the entreaties of Mrs Merkel and Germany's foreign minister Maas ringing in her ears, my prediction is that Mrs von der Leyen will go that extra mile the French seem incapable of going.

    *  *  *

     

    [This is a most important and excellent article from a valued and independent source so important and at this most critical moment in the negotiations as it goes to the heart of the matter in exposing the real blocking culprits the French and not as we had expected the Germans.

     

    BUT A TIMELY WARNING!

     

    From the  DAILY EXPRESS-December 15,2020

     

     

    Wary of EU mood Change

     

    Before Sunday, we were not expecting to have a further go at a Brexit deal.

    But as talks resumed yesterday, the EU suggested that a deal was close, with chief negotiator Michel Barnier proposing that we might be signing later on this week.

    Good news? Not so fast. The EU once again want the upper hand: this time to put restrictions on British firms in the event of UK blocking European fishing fleets from our coastal waters. The UK has a long said that our fishing rights are a non-negotiable fact of our hard-won sovereignty. We should not be punished for it, and must retain the right to make our own decisions.

    Thus we should beware conciliatory messages that carry unpalatable outcomes and remain

     

    STEADFAST IN OUR PRINCIPLES.

     

    *  *  *

     

    *  *  *

    [We were against entry to

    Hitler's plan for Europe

    in 1972 and again in 1975.]

    [WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

    THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

    [ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

    HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

     

    AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

     

    See also

    News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

    H.F.2097

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ENGLAND

     

     

     

     

     

     

    A

     

     

    FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

     

     

     

    OF A

     

     

     

     

    GREATER BRITAIN

     

     

     

     

    WITH OR WITHOUT SCOTLAND IF HER PEOPLE WISH SO!

    THE SCOTS ARE A CANNY PEOPLE AND MUST KNOW IT IS TO THEIR ADVANTAGE AND TO THAT OF THE OTHER NATION STATES OF BRITAIN IF ALL OUR PEOPLE'S WHO HAVE LONG SHARED HISTORIC PAST - THAT WE ARE STRONGER TOGETHER IN OUR   SACRED ISLAND HOME.

    The EDP ORG.UK. CONSTITUTION

     

     

     supports the establishment

     

     

    of the

     

     

    FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

     

     

    OF A

     

     

     

    GREATER BRITAIN

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     

    ALFRED THE GREAT.

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

    HOW IT ALL BEGAN.


     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Stephen  Glover
     

     

    WHEN WILL

    EUROPE

     GET IT?

    BRITAIN

    IS
    DETERMINED
    TO HAVE ITS

    SOVEREIGNTY

    BACK

    COME

    WHAT MAY.

     

    ' In trying to penalise us,they are hurting their own people.'

    DAILY MAIL-December 8,2020

     




    WHY don't they get it? Why can't European leaders understand that when Britain leaves the EU on December 31, it will be intent on being
    A SOVEREIGN INDEPENDENT NATION STATE?
    That Europe hasn't grasped the point can scarcely be doubted. France pushed for unchanged rights to fish in British waters, and has only recently backed down a little. Supported by other leaders, President Emmanuel Macron wants an independent Britain to obey future EU regulations-and be fined if it doesn't.
    Do they expect Boris Johnson to cave in during the next 24 hours? If so, they are tragically mistaken. Last night it was revealed that he will travel soon to Brussels to meet the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. A telephone conversation between them yesterday afternoon produced no breakthroughs.

    A deal will necessitate compromise on both sides - the Government yesterday offered to pull contentious clauses from the Internal Market Bill - but the Prime Minister will be a political carcass if he accepts the EU's vision of Britain as a satellite state. It was ever thus. Many European leaders, as well as the unelected bureaucrats of the Commission in Brussels, have constantly underestimated the strength of Euroscepticism in Britain.
    In the first place, they doubted that any government would give the British people the choice to withdraw from the EU. No other European country had ever given its voters the option to leave the organisation.
    After David Cameron promised a referendum if the Tories won the 2015 election, he was told he was stupid' by Donald Tusk, then President of the European Council .
    Mr Cameron did not, of course, want Britain to leave the EU. Before the 2016 referendum, he toured Europe's capitals, begging for concessions on unfettered EU migration to our shores, and was offered almost NOTHING.He duly lost the vote.
    In common with the British establishment, Brussels was shocked when an unprecedentedly large number of voters rejected European Union membership, albeit by a fairly narrow margin.
    European leaders were nonetheless reluctant to accept the result. Tusk frequently expressed his regret that Britain was deserting the organisation -and the hope that it would return to the fold. Jean-Claude Juncker , then President of the European Commission, spoke in similar terms..
    AS negotiations with the hapless Theresa May ground on-she allowed the EU to set the agenda and to pocket a down payment of
    £37 BILLION
    by Britain before the talks on a trade deal had even begun-Joseph Muscat, Prime Minister of Malta, suggested we hold a second referendum.
    Meanwhile Remainer MPs were forever popping over to conspire in Brussels, giving the likes of Tusk and Juncker reason to hope that, if the result of the referendum couldn't be overturned, at least it could be neutered.
    Then, almost exactly a year ago everything changed on the British side when Mr Johnson won a stonking majority. To the consternation of Brussels, he insisted that trade talks must finish by the end of this year. Britain is leaving in 23 days.

    But many of Europe's leaders and bureaucrats
    STILL DON'T GET IT.
    Hours before a deal must be signed, if there is to be one, they apparently think Britain should continue to be treated as a
     

     

    SECOND - CLASS NATION

    accepting diktats from Brussels after we depart.

    Would an independent France-if such an entity were to exist again-accept that neighbouring countries could fish in it's waters at will, or that it should be bound by future EU regulations or that it abide by the judgments of the European Court? I very much doubt it.

    Why then, can't the insufferably cocky President Macron and other European leaders comprehend the impossibility of Mr Johnson accepting their humiliating and unrealistic demands? The Irish foreign minister may be right in saying 98 per cent of a deal is agreed, but there are huge gulfs in the remaining two per cent.

    The old inability to appreciate the determination of the British Government to achieve

    TRUE INDEPENDENCE-

    unquestioningly enjoyed by countries such as Australia and Canada with much smaller populations than the UK's-persists at five minutes to midnight.

    And there is also an enduring desire to punish Britain for having the effrontery to leave an organisation that has an almost sacred status in the minds of the European political class.

    It seems not to matter to them that, in attempting to penalise and hobble us, they risk harming their own citizens. No Deal would have disastrous consequences for the German car industry and thousands of its employees. THE Irish economy might suffer even more than Britain's.

    But these are the costs which may have to be borne -by European workers, not well-padded European leaders - in defence of dogma. The most zealously held tenet is that a country which leaves the EU can't be allowed to prosper outside it.

    For what might be the consequence if post-Brexit Britain thrives? The peoples of several European nations which have suffered as a result of the hegemony of Brussels would cry for their

    INDEPENDENCE.

    The Italians, whose sclerotic economy has been crushed by its 20-year membership of the

    EURO

    could look to Britain's example.

    They might realise that life outside the EU is not only possible but preferable.

    That is the nightmare for European leaders, and it explains why in their view, burdens must be placed on Britain even if the upshot is

    NO DEAL

    which will hurt ordinary Frenchmen, Germans and Dutch.

     

    All one can say is that an organisation that truly confident of its superior arrangements wouldn't set out to handicap a former partner in this fashion. The punishment beatings which Brussels wants to inflict indicate the fragility of the EU project.

     

    [As we have explained over the past 20 years the EU is a BULLY which perfectly illustrates the identity of it's founder-ADOLF HITLER.]

     

    A secure club, sure of its innate attractions, would wish a departing  member well, and undertake to do everything in future that was conductive to mutual advantage.

     

     

     

    ...So in a ways I'm hearted by Brussel's churlish approach, epitomised by its rigid chief negotiator Michel Barnier. Remainers assert we are leaving a robust organisation, and will find life by ourselves hard going. I suggest the EU is weaker than it looks, and we are stronger than its elite believes.
    But I still hope for a last-minute leap of imagination on the part of the EU. This is partly because I don't doubt that a
    NO DEAL
     would be painful for Britain in the short term.

    It would be deeply undesirable for Europe to be at odds with its leading military power and natural ally, which in the lives of our parents and grandparents stood alone, and provided the springboard for the liberation of the continent.
     
    Gratitude may be too much to expect from the European political class 75 years after the end of that draining war, though perhaps not too much from European people with longer memories.
    Some recognition of reality is necessary, though. This country is embarking on a new path [We would say we are rejoining our accustomed path as once again a

     

    FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.]

     

     That can't be stopped. Only hours remain, but how much better if Europe and Britain can avoid poison and recrimination, and go on living together as friends.
    By travelling to Brussels Boris Johnson is going as far as he can. The question is whether the European Union truly grasps-at long last-that
    BRITAIN IS ABOUT TO BECOME A SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATE AGAIN.
     

    * * *
     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]
     

     

    [This is a most extensive article and we will be completing the article over the next few days.
    The EU is Hitler's wartime ,plan for the peace and it is no wonder that it is living up to it's founders objective for Germany to dominate Europe once again after
    TWO DEVASTATING WORLD WARS.
    AS a young child I saw from my bedroom window at night in Leamington Spa the sky light up over Coventry over two nights of the Nazi terror bombing of Coventry-shortly after which my twin brother and I were sent into the countryside as evacuees for the next few years so as to avoid Hitler's
     

     

     

     'HELL ON EARTH'
     

     

     

     

    [One only needs to remember that Britain and Germany were the main contributors to the EU BUDGET-year in and year out. Without the British contribution the corrupt EU will be forced to make changes as the other contributors will no doubt be unwilling to fill the gaping financial void left by the British departure?]

    IT needs to be remembered that many Nazis obtained positions in the original EC leading to the EEC-EU. WE have only recently learned that Angela Merkel is in fact Angela Hitler?]
     

     

    Germany's Four Reichs

    by Harry Beckhough

     

     


    Marlborough,April,2004.
     
    WW2 Lt.Col.R.A./Intelligence
     
    [The EDP ORG UK were fortunate to attend one of Mr Beckhough's meetings in Marlborough. If there is any other individual with such vast knowledge of GERMANY and it's long centuries of of belligerency we have yet to hear of it-It is stated that German roots go back to the bible and Noah's son Shem. Mr Beckhough in Germany after the war where he met regularly Dr.Konrad Adenauer C.D.U.., Chancellor of the first post-war Government.]





     

    H.F.2094

    DAILY MAIL-DECEMBER 12,2020

     SATURDAY

    ESSAY

    by Mark Almond

     

     

     

    LET us imagine that ,come the eleventh hour, a Brexit trade deal is announced tomorrow night.

    Leaving aside the feelings of diehard Remainers who will never accept our departure from the European Union, and diehard Brexiteers who will bemoan a 'sell-out', it's fair to say a mood of relief would sweep Britain.

    Wearied by the 'stop-start' negotiations, threats and counter-threats, the game-playing and brinkmanship, most of us want a resolution and businesses want certainty so that as a nation we can move forward and start to repair the economic damage of the pandemic.

    No 10 will present the deal as a triumph. As indeed will Brussels, with Eurocrats congratulating themselves on having pushed Boris Johnson to the limit.

     BGUT in my view - and whatever the details of the deal (if there is one) turn out to be-the celebrations of Macron, Merkel, von der Leyen & Co will be premature to say the least.

    For weeks now, the focus on both sides of the Channel has been on what a deal or no deal would mean for Britain.

    The assumption is that, whatever the outcome, the EU will maintain its progress and prosperity without us.

    According to this myopic narrative, we are the ones facing a storm as we strike out alone, while the EU, united and purposeful sails on serenely.

    IN FACT, NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH.

    With or without a deal, the EU faces monumental problems on every front, from economic scierosis and population decline to growing divisions between its 27 members.

    Papering over the tensions between the richer core states m-France, Germany and the Netherlands -and Greece and Italy , let alone those taking root among the poorer new members from the old Eastern bloc, is becoming ever harder.

    Since 2016, hostility toward Brexit has promoted a kind of shallow unity across the union. But once again Britain is no longer Brussels' scapegoat, the EU will be starkly confronted by its own chronic failings.

    The European project is in crisis - both broke and woke, if you like. Its entire model of governance is outdated and ill-suited to the challenges of the 21st century

    That is a fact too often ignored in Britain because of our navel-gazing tendencies around Brexit, currently reflected in panicky reports of a no deal scenario amid talk of looming food shortages, bottlenecks at ports and British passport holders being turned away at European border points...

     

    [TO BE CONTINUED]

     

     

     

     

    ...Fear of a revived, competitive Britain lies behind Brussels' constant attempts to lock us into its business - stifling regulations even after Brexit. But even if Britain succumbed to these demands-and as I write, Boris Johnson is insisting that is

    OUT OF THE QUESTION

    -the rest of the world won't.

    Canada, for example, hasn't had to agree to a 'level playing field', obeying the Brussels  rule - book at home.

    And can you imagine either of the world's superpowers the US or China, meekly accepting conditions such as those Europe has been trying to inflict on Britain?

    Nor are up-and-coming power houses such as India going to tie their economic hands behind their backs to keep Brussels happy.

    Margaret Thatcher loved the poem Waiting for the Barbarians by the Greek writer Constantine Cavafy. It caught the mood of a decadent empire which used the barbarian threat as a distraction from internal problems.

    For the EU, the end of Brexit will be the equivalent of the 'bewilderment' felt by the imperial elite in Cavafy's poem at the news that the barbarians have moved away.

    'What's going to happen to us without the barbarians? those people were a kind of solution.'

    Britain was Europe's great excuse for

    NOT GETTING THINGS DONE

    For decades we blocked 'progress' to a

    FEDERAL EUROPE.

    Then our protracted departure took Brussels' time and energy as the world moved on. Now,with Britain gone, what will hold Europe together in the face of self-inflicted wounds and hard realities.

    Brexit was a form of life support for Europe's moribund, log-jammed system.

    Even if a deal is reached before the end of the transition period, Europe will still be left without excuses for its problems once Britain goes.

    Can Brussels diagnose the EU's ills accurately? More importantly will it prescibe the right medicine?

    Given its unimpressive record, that seems unlikely. Rather than candidly addressing its deep-seated ailments, Brussels is more concerned to proscribe unwelcome advice from dissenters that have only worsened its poor health.

    THE EU HAS TRULY BECOME THE SICK MAN OF EUROPE.

    [This is a most extensive article .WE have only taken a small remnant-the last section of the article. WE will endeavour to complete the article over the coming days.]

    *  *  *

    DECEMBER 12,2020

     

     

     

     

    We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

     

    News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

    EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

    GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

    As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

    The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

    Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

     Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

     Regret

    The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

     Brexit

    was a

    BRITISH PROBLEM

    and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

    However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

    PARAMOUNT.

    Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

    YOUR PROUD NATION.

    It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

    Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

    After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

    But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

    For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

    [TREASON]

    This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

    Here!

     

    *  *  *

    [We were against entry to

    Hitler's plan for Europe

    in 1972 and again in 1975.]

    [WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

    THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

    [ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

     

    HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

     

    AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

     

    H.F.1784

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [A LESSON OF HISTORY]]

     

    SATURDAY

    ESSAY

    BY

    SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

    OCTOBER 20,2019

     

    ON AUGUST 6, 1806, a herald in full regalia rode across Vienna to the city's Jesuit church. He climbed the tower blew his silver trumpet and summoned the crowd to silence. he then announced that the Holy Roman Empire was dead.

    After a thousand years of existence, Europe's oldest union was being wound up-courtesy of Napoleon. The crowd wept.

    Might it happen again? History tells us that whenever Europe tries to act in unison, it screws up. The Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne left an empire that collapsed in ruins. Ferdinand of Bohemia tried to create a single Roman Catholic empire, and unleashed the Thirty Years War in the 17th century. Napoleon brought most of Europe under his rod, an millions died until Wellington did for him at Waterloo.

     The Allies punished Germany after the First World War, and so brought Hitler to power. Today's European Union mishandled Russia after 1989 and paved  the way for the reign of Vladimir Putin.

    Anyone who believes the EU is so modern, united and peace-loving that it will deftly handle Britain's departure should read history and shudder.

     Ever since somewhere called Europe came into being under the Ancient Greeks, two forces have driven this continent forward.

    One is the  inability of the descendents of its original migrant tribes to live in peace with their neighbours. The other is the attempt of one power

     [GERMANY TODAY]

    after another to seek to dominate and unite those disparate tribes.

     

    Rome  tried. So did successive popes, Holy Roman emperors, Louis XIV, Napoleon, Hitler and now, dare I add, the leaders of the European Union. Some of these attempts were well-intentioned; most were not so'

    There is no question they together forged a continent that is globally outstanding.

    Today, Europe is wealthy, stable, mostly liberal and a magnet to the world's migrants, rich and poor alike. Whether this was  because of or in spite of a history of ceaseless conflict is an open question, But so, too, is whether half a century of stability can survive any new breakdown in unity.

    WHEN I first studied Europe's history, I searched for themes that have glued together its various forces. First was the potency of ancient Mediterranean culture. Greece under Pericles was a kingdom of reason, fascinated by the human condition as expressed in art, literature and civic politics.

    Rome was a sort of opposite, a realm of law and order, the wielding of power over the entire Mediterranean basin. 'These be your arts, O Rome, 'said Virgil, to impose the ways of peace,' The operative word was impose.

    As Roman rule disintegrated, it mutated into that of the Christian Church.

    Christianity was ostensibly a doctrine of universal love and peace, but it soon became a cauldron of rivalry and disunity. It split Rome from Constantinople, and proved so quarrelsome that a third of Christendom-in the Levant and Africa-became Muslim and has remained so ever since.

     In 1216, the bid of Pope Innocent III to declare himself sovereign lord of Europe bred endless conflict with the Holy Roman Empire, based in Germany. So we can conclude that as a glue of union, religion was a failure. By the 16th century the Reformation had split Innocent's Roman church in two, between Protestant north and Catholic south.

    This in turn led to the Thirty Years War-the cruellest devastation of Europe before the 20th century. From the wreckage of that first great European War ever more potent nation states -notably France, Spain and Austria.

    The new cause of disruption was not religion but dynasty. Louis XIV sought perpetual war with his neighbours. Russia flexed its territorial muscles. Frederick the Great of Prussia declared that 'national enlargement is a fundamental law of life'. To him, Europe was synonymous with struggle.

    Nothing seemed able to bring peace to the continent: not the vitality of the Renaissance or wisdom of the Enlightenment, not great thinkers and writers like Petrarch, Shakespeare. Locke, Voltaire or Goethe.

    Napoleon's attempt to unite Europe under French rule led to

    5,000,000 DEATHS

    The victorious nations at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, a few months after Waterloo valiantly attempted a

    'Concert of Europe'.

    In future, they ordained, difference would be settled around a conference table not the battlefield.

    Peace lasted for a century, while Europe plunged into a different form of aggrandisement-that of overseas imperialism

     

     

     

    By the end of the 19th century, the British, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish and Germans ruled an astonishing half the world's population and 85 per cent of its trade

    Some might have hoped that such expansion might leave Europe itself in peace. Yet no sooner had it strutted the globe as a champion of progress then it fell victim to two of the world's most horrendous conflagrations.

    The idea that the 'Kaiser's war' and then 'Hitler's war were random Prussian monstrosities was absurd. They resulted from a failure of political imagination and leadership across all of Europe, whose turbulent nations seemed incurably belligerent.

     By 1945, Europe was in self-inflicted ruins. Its peoples were starving, its cities destroyed and a centuries-old edifice of cultural achievement was crippled. Though Fascism had been defeated, the price was half a continent enslaved to Communism, and the other half dependent on American protection.

    There is no doubt that the subsequent half-century saw  Europe at its best. It rebuilt itself, displaying a sincere desire for there never to be a war ever again

     A Common Market was formed in 1956 under the Treaty of Rome. This treaty grew and flourished, until a free trade area covered virtually all non-communist Europe. The continent seemed genuinely at peace, under the embrace of 'ever closer union'.

     But as this half of Europe prospered and cohered, it also slid into the morass of bureaucratic centralism. And here is where the lassons of history were ignored

     

    The ambition of the Brussels  elite was curiously reminiscent of the medieval church. It became a quest for ever-tighter control of its adherents, and a disregard for the political mood of member states

    The first moment of truth came with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. This ended the wartime division of Europe, to which the EU reacted like a conquering power. It enticed Russia's old Warsaw Pact allies into the EU and NATO, and left Moscow dangerously isolated.

    When Boris Yeltsin warned that advancing NATO deep into Eastern  Europe meant 'the flames of war could break out again across Europe, the EU laughed.

    The result was Vladimir Putin, vowing to 'make Russia great again' under  his kleptomaniac rule.  In the U.S., the balance of power between a central superstate and its various subordinate states was embedded in a constitution, written in blood. I Europe, that balance was left to evolve.

    The EU ignored the risks it was running, not just in mishandling Russia, but in readily opening its borders to the immature democracies of Eastern Europe.

    [And not forgetting the arrival in Germany of the once East German official Frau Merkel.]

    After Maastricht in 1992, which effectively pledged the continent to become one giant federal entity, majority voting in the EU council eroded the authority of NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS.

    Europe seemed the plaything of French bureaucrats and German bankers.

    [HITLER WOULD BE PROUD]

     

     

    Once more, the hard-learned lessons of the past were disregarded in the zealous pursuit of a new Nirvana. For example, the continent's longest confederation was the Holy Roman Empire. Voltaire may have called it not holy, nor Roman nor an empire-but its respect for the treasured autonomy of dozens of German princelings contrived to keep the German people's at peace with their neighbours for a millennium. Europe gained in the process, the wealth of the Rhine and the Baltic, the radicalism of Luther and the genius of Bach and Beethoven. That union collapsed only when Napoleon in France and then Bismarck in Germany could not tolerate what they saw as affront to their imperial ambitions.

    The collapse of a united Europe did neither tyrant any good, but it did turn Germany from a peaceful confederacy - a kind of giant Switzerland - into a belligerent power under the supremacy of warlike Prussia.

    The lessons must be obvious. Attempts at European union fail when they lose respect for the

    IDENTITY

    AND

    AUTONOMY

    of the continent's ancestral communities

    You cannot ram union, let alone

    GLOBALISATION

    down people's throats. Diversity lies at the core of Europe's collective experience, but it is jealously guarded diversity.

    Europe can never be subsumed under a single power structure. Union can only be a light-touch and consensual.

    The EU's greatest mistake was to move beyond ever-closer trade to an ill-defined' ever closer union'. Above all, it lay in demanding that member states accept open borders.

    That may have seemed a small matter to the globe-trotting cosmopolites of Brussels. But control over immigration meant control over the

    CHARACTER and RATE of CHANGE of LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

    To the member states of Europe this was a critical area-of sovereignty

    [sacrosanct]

    The character of one's society is not to be bartered merely for tariff-free trade.

    Unlike previous unions in Europe, the EU is a collection of self -determining democracies.

    Already by 2010, anti-European sentiment was growing and consent crumbling. Turnouts in EU elections plummeted from

    60 % to 40 per cent.

    Populist politicians-anti immigration and often anti EU-emerged in the UK. France, Italy, Germany and former communist states. The 2008 financial crisis saw the Eurozone's GERMAN MASTERS  inflict terrible damage on GREECE and SPAIN.

    Then in 2016, the UK shattered the equilibrium. Its people voted -narrowly- to withdraw. Europe's union face d a fissure, and a deep one.

    There was nothing new in Britain detaching itself from the rest of Europe. It had 'left' after the Hundred Years War that finally ended in the mid-15th century and after Henry V111's defection from Rome nearly a century later. It refused to join the Common Market in 1957, and only combined under NATO to benefit from America's nuclear shield.

    Now, once again, Britain has said

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

    We should have no doubt of the reason. Political Europe has not found an answer to the question that defied all earlier attempts at union. How can this fragmentary continent be united without lurching either towards debilitating central authority or towards disintegration

    Since the Lisbon Treaty of 2009, the EU has lurched towards the former. Now, with the rise of a reactionary populism, it is lurching towards the latter

    There is hardly a member state that would dare imitate Britain and hold a Referendum on EU membership. But that is insufficient consent for union.

    With or without Britain the EU must find a way of returning substantive sovereignty to its 

    MEMBER STATES

    not least over their borders. If it does that, who knows, Britain might rejoin.

    If it fails, Britain will not be the only defector. The EU will go the way of its many forerunners - to

    DISINTEGRATION and DANGER.

    *  *  *

     

    SIMON JENKINS: Dictators failed to unite Europe's ... - Daily Mail

    OCTOBER 20,2018

     

    A SHORT History of Europe:

    From Pericles to Putin by Simon Jenkins. Viking, £25 (20pc discount), visit www.mailshop.co.uk/books or call 0844 571 0640, p&p is free on orders over £15. Spend £30 on books and get FREE premium delivery. Offer valid to 27/11/2018

    shop

    H.F.1733

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     
     

    ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

    FREEDOM-UNITY.

     

    *

    FOR THE RETURN

    OF THE

    ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

    AT

    WESTMINSTER

    AND

     

     

     [A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT FROM WALES AND SCOTLAND]

     

    *

     

    SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

     

    *

     

    Home Rule for Scotland

    WHY NOT

    HOME RULE for ENGLAND

     

    *

    [All underlined capitals - words have a separate bulletin]

     
     

     

    LITTLEJOHN

     

     

    How long  are we going to suffer this fatuous

    'taking the knee' nonsense before every Premier football match?

    It's like wearing a Red Nose or poppy all year round. We all back efforts to rid sport and wider society of racism. I was presenting radio and TV shows promoting

    Kick it out

     more than 20 years ago.

     But even 'Sir' Les Ferdinand, one of our finest black former players, now director of football at

    Queens Park Rangers,

    says 'the knee' is little more than

    token  gesture

    AND SHOULD

     STOP.

     At the weekend, clubs marked

    REMEMBERANCE SUNDAY

    with a minutes silence. The players then ruined it

     taking the knee, a symbol of the militant

    BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT

    During the summer BLM supporters defaced

    CHURCHILL'S STATUE

    and tried to burn the Union flag

    AT THE CENOTAPH.

    Yet while the nation was honouring our

    WAR DEAD

    ,

    Premier League footballers were bending the knee to an

    anti British rabble

    that spat on the sacrifice of

    THOSE WHO FOUGHT AND DIED

    FOR OUR FREEDOMS.

    Sky Sports News is ten times worse.

    It's become the official broadcast partner of

    BLM

    even plastering its gormless slogans over golf leaderboards

    I CAN'T WATCH IT ANY MORE.

    And although I've had a season ticket at Spurs for four decades, I won't be renewing it while players continue

    TO KNEEL BEFORE GAMES

    I don't go to football to have political propaganda shoved in my face. And I'm convinced fans everywhere feel the same.

    ENOUGH ALREADY

    *   *   *

    [To us it is reminiscent of the

    FACIST MOVEMENT

    and the prewar

    NAZI PROPAGANDA.

    that led to the deaths of  millions of lives

    which were lost

    A CURSE OF  UPON MANKIND.]

      *  *  *

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    NOVEMBER 10,2020

    H.F.2091

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Who are the Zionists?

    Dear Benjamin,

    H.F.1806

     

    *  *  *

     

    Hidden history of the City of London & Washington D.C.

    Dear Mr. Benjamin Fulford,

    *  *  *

    *DID YOU KNOW?

    The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

    One example is
    the United States Federal
    Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

    "Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

    "The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati.
    (See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

    Government Conspiracies - World of Lies - Award Winning Documentary

    AUGUST - 2010

     

    H.F.1806

     

     

    *  *  *

    AS AN EXPERT WARNS POOR WHITE CHILDREN ARE IGNORED...
    The pernicious doctrine of 'white privilege' holds back children of

    ALL COLOURS

     

    by Calvin Robinson

    FORMER TEACHER AND NOW GOVERNOR OF A LONDON STATE SECONDARY SCHOOL

    DAILY MAIL-OCTOBER 15, 2020

     

     

    WHITE privilege...what an obscene phrase that is. It is also fundamentally racist in my view, encouraging bigotry and hatred it pretends to oppose.

    If you don't believe me, look at the immense damage it is doing in British schools.

    This week, Professor Matthew Goodwin, a politics lecturer at University of Kent, told the Commons Education Select Committee that the concept of

    'WHITE PRIVILEGE'- societal attitudes that benefit white people over non-white people-is brutally unfair to white working-class boys.

    It is nonsensical ,he said to teach white children-many from disadvantaged families-to apologise for

    THEIR SKIN COLOUR

    I couldn't put it better myself. For the uncomfortable reality is that, every day, the futures of white working-class children are being sacrificed on the

    ALTER OF DIVERSITY

    and

    POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

    *

    Misguided

    AS a governor and former teacher at a secondary state school in North London, I know unequivocally that racism is not built into Britain's education system-unless it is shoehorned in via misguided ideas such as

    'WHITE PRIVILEGE'.

    Fortunately my school has refused to bow to such divisive dogma. But many institutions put up little resistance and feel they cannot ignore it.

    Often themanifesto itself such as October's Black history month or Black Lives Matter protests that have spread from the US to Britain.

    I know many teachers who feel pressure to actively endorse them, down-loading educational resources from websites that are steeped in something called 'critical race theory' - a fashionable new ideology which, to put it simply, claims that every modern institution is racist.

    As a result, many schools now compete against one another in their quest to educate children about concepts such as 'white privilege' -the idea that white people can't bear to be told how lucky they are because they are white.

    Not only is this damaging to white pupils, who are told that they are racist all their lives and never realised it, it also has an equally pernicious impact on black children, who probably never considered that the colour of their skin was the most important thing in their lives Why are we telling children that, based on who their grandparents were, they will face barriers and hurdles that other classmates will not?

    It is a disgraceful state of affairs and only breeds enmity between young people and breaks up friendships.

    .Crucially, it also risks harming black lives -telling anyone that they are destined to fail is likely to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If they are told that the world is against them, black pupils who are doing well might ask themselves whether there is any point in hard work.

    And yet, like Professor Goodwin, I believe that the children who are worst affected by this divisive campaign are white pupils from low-income families, especially boys.

    Indeed, shocking data released by the Department for Education shows that white working -class boys from poor backgrounds are by far the most underprivileged youngsters in Britain.

     

    *

    Only 13 per cent of white boys who are eligible for free school meals, because their families are on benefits, go on to higher education -yet that figure rises to 51 per cent for black British boys. That's almost four times as many.

    In fact, the only groups that have a worse educational outcome that working-class white males are boys from the gypsy, Roma and Irish traveller communities-who often are not in school at all.

    All of which makes a failure of our politicians to speak up for this silent majority even more shameful. In particular the

    LABOUR PARTY

    which was established to speak for the working class, seems to have turned its back on white Brits even though it constantly professes to care about 'diversity and inclusion'.

    A few voices are now speaking out-not only Professor Goodwin, who himself came from a struggling single-parent family, but notably the Tory MP Ben Bradley, who earlier this year convened a

    COMMONS DEBATE

    on the plight

    of young working-class boys.

    Yet few dare to join them, and a deep-rooted taboo surrounds the whole topic.

    Today, saying anything in defence of white boys from lower-income backgrounds is seen as tantament to rewarding and fostering racism.

    This distorted world view can be traced back to the passing of the

    EQUALITY ACTof 2010

    which introduced the concept of

    PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS'-

    THAT IDEA THAT MINORITIES MERITED SUPPORT

    AND

    MAJORITIES

     DID NOT

    *

    Offensive

    But my skin is brown, and I find it deeply offensive that anyone should look at me and make patronising assumption that I need extra help or support. There's something inherently Victorian, not to say superior, in the very notion. It is, quite simply, racist.

    Nor am I aware of any research that says this approach results in any benefits for children from ethnic minorities. But there is clear evidence of the damage done by fabricating racial differences and assigning non-existent blame.

    Of course, privilege does exist. But it doesn't work in the way that 'critical race theory' claims it does. And so when my pupils ask me about it, I tell them that the concept of 'privilege' isn't straightforward.

     

    *

    Toxic

     

    Look at what happened when 96-year-old Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites last year tried to set up a £1.2 million bequest to benefit poor, white, working-class boys at his old schools Dulwich College and Winchester College. Unsurprisingly, he was turned down, with both schools rejecting the gifts. The very idea was treated as though it was somehow toxit.

    YEet when grime artist Stormzy set up scholarships for poor black children at Cambridge University two years ago, he was hailed as an inspiration. Of course, what he has done is truly inspiring. It's just wrong that his example cannot  be used to benefit the white children who need help, too.

    For the depressing truth is that this disparity continues into adulthood. Indeed ethnicity pay gap figures released this week showed that workers in their 20s from minority backgrounds were likely to earn more than their white counterparts, by an average of more than 5 per cent. So much for 'white privilege'.

    At my school, we like to tell the pupils: 'Make no mistake, you are privileged to be here. All of you have a great chance at success. We're all British and we're all in this together.'

    It's a message our politicians and teachers would do well to heed. And if they don't, its Britain's white children who will pay.

    *  *  *

     

    OCTOBER 15,2020

    [ For  some time our website has been under attack by those who wish to destroy-FREE SPEECH and

    ENGLAND

    HF2084

     

     

    *  *  *

     

    White male

    teachers fall by

    20%

    in a decade.

    By Sarah Harris

    DAILY MAIL

    OCTOBER 19,2020

     

    THE number of white male secondary school teachers has fallen by almost 20 per cent in a decade, sparking fears over a lack of role models for working -class boys.

    Education experts warn that disadvantaged white boys could fall further behind as a result of this worrying trend reports

    Research from the Education Policy Institute (EPI) shows that the teacher workforce is becoming 'increasingly female dominated' .

    The proportion of men teaching in secondary schools has fallen every year since 2010, hitting its lowest level in 2019, when 35.5 per cent of teachers were male. Numbers in primary schools remain low at 14.1 per cent.

    The EPI analysis reveals that the number of white male teachers in secondary schools has plummeted by more than 12,800 since 2010-a fall of 17per cent.

    The number of men from black and minority ethnic (BME0 backgrounds teaching in secondary schools has risen from 10,451 in n2010 to 13,967 last year -an increase of 34 per cent.

    Joshua Fullard, senior researcher at EPI, said yesterday: The decline in the number of white male teachers is concerning in areas where there is a prevalence of under-performing white working-class boys.'

    Professor Alan Smithers, of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at Buckingham University, said the drop in white male teachers was 'worrying'.

    He added: 'In striving for equality, the white working-class, particularly boys, are a neglected group.'

    [WE HAVE TO ASK THE OBVIOUS QUESTION WHICH SEEMS TO BE AVOIDED

     

    WHY?

    Amongst other reasons

     

    POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

     FITS THE BILL!

    If the subject of the article had been about any other racial group it would have been  a FULL NEWSPAGE.]

     

    Multiculturalism
     

    *  *  *

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    OCTOBER 19,2020

     

     

    HF2084/2

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     

     

    As Zionists are purged in Israel, the next target is Switzerland

    The autumn offensive begins.  The rogue nation of Israel was put under lockdown at the start of the Jewish New Year to facilitate a purge of Zionists, Pentagon sources say.   MI6 sources say their next target is a mysterious Swiss-based entity known as the Octagon Group.  In a counter-offensive, an estimated one-million Satanists in the U.S. are being mobilized to overthrow the government, multiple intelligence agency sources agree.

    The major anti-Zionist offensive was started with the announcement of the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.  Here is how Pentagon sources summed up the situation:

    “[U.S. President Donald] Trump announced a list of Supreme Court nominees on September 9th, so the Ruth Bader Ginsburg (RBG) death on Rosh Hashanah sends a New Year message to the Jewish mafia while Israel is forced into another lockdown to round up Zionists.”

    The Pentagon sources add they have jerked Trump’s chain to force him to act against the Zionists, and his son-in-law Jared Kushner will face a military tribunal on charges of treason and possible execution.

    We are also hearing from MI6 why they are going after the mysterious group in Switzerland known as the “Octagon,” whose members are descendants of Pharaonic bloodlines.

    Before we go any further into this issue, though, we need to take a deep dive into the secret government power structure that we are battling.  The organizational chart below was given to me by an envoy of David Rockefeller (via former Japanese finance minister Heizo Takenaka) ten years ago.

    This document (2 dozen pages in all) was handed to me after Asian secret societies mobilized to target people who were members of all three of the following groups: The Bilderbergers, The Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations.

    What this flowchart page allegedly shows is the Zionist power structure.  It has Switzerland at the top.  Underneath is the “Royal Bank.”  On the left is “Elizabeth E.C.” Below that is the City of London, followed by “properties,” then the “Chief Executive of Japan.” On the left you find France.  Below is the “Committee of 500” (i.e. the Fortune 500) and “ILIO 48.”

    At the bottom, you see enforcement units including North Korea, Military Police, and the CIA.  At the very bottom is a Chinese assassin designated by the U.S. occupation forces to control Japan.  In the middle you see they claim to control Japan, Mexico, Canada, the United States, Africa, Iran, Greece, England, Mongolia, and Russia.  What they do not control is Italy, Germany, India, and China among others.

    It was also at this time that Leo Zagami was sent by the P2 Freemasons to Japan to visit me.  When I reciprocated the visit and went to Italy, I was told the P2 (now P3) took orders from “aliens in Switzerland.”  They claimed to have started and run Communism.

    Now after 10 years of puzzling over this and other information given to me, we can start to connect some dots.  First of all, we have received reports that we are being ruled by descendants of the Egyptian Pharaohs, from many sources like the arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi (whose nephew Jamal Khashoggi was brutally murdered in Turkey).

    Japanese Royal Family members (real ones, not the fake Emperor Naruhito) also claim they are descended from the Pharaohs.  The boss of a large Japanese Ninkyo (Yakuza) group also said the world was ruled by a committee of 8 in Switzerland.  Now MI6 is telling us about the Pharaonic Octagon group in Switzerland.  This is what is portrayed in the James Bond movies as “Spectre.”  The P3 Freemasons say the Octagon group “are the masters of humans [sic] Earth Life.”

    Also, in the past, when I talked to mercenary soldiers involved in resource grabs in Africa, Al Qaeda/Daesh/Antifa, etc.  they said they were paid in Swiss Francs out of Switzerland.  We would also like to remind you about Glencore Commodities and Mark Rich based in Zug, Switzerland, paying off both Iranian and Israeli government officials to promote war between those countries while manipulating oil futures.

    Now let us talk about U.S. Offense Secretary Mark Esper.  If you watch the clip at the link below:  https://twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/1306232167769411584  you can see a man of limited intellect who has been completely pre-programmed.  He refers to fake enemies like Russia and China while promoting AI and the deadly 5G area denial weapons.  The real military brass do not take orders from him and nor should they.  However, they need to follow the trail to the financial controllers who pull his puppet strings.  It is a good bet it will lead to Switzerland.

    OK, with this background in mind, let us take a look at the news of the past week as the big autumn anti-Zionist offense goes into full swing.

    A necessary precondition to the defeat of the Zionists was taking away their control of the financial system, MI6, and Pentagon sources agree.  According to MI6 the new financial system “is designed with…

    The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
    Please Log In or Register to create an account.

     

    4.913 votes

    Article Rating

    Subscribe

    190 Comments

     

     

     

     

    JUST ONE OF

     189 Comments

     

     

    HF.2080

     

     

     

     

     

     

    September 21, 2020

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [A MATTER OF LIFE AND DEATH.]

     

     

    How CAN we spend more

    on maternity blunders than we pay doctors and nurses on maternity wards?

    By Jeremy Hunt

    FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH

    News about Daily Mail-How CAN We Spend More On Maternity Blunders

    SEPTEMBER 18,2020

     

     

     

    HAD SOMEONE TOLD ME LAST SUMMER THAT MORE THAN 50,000 COULD DIE THIS YEAR FROM A NEW KILLER VIRUS I WOULD HAVE BEEN SCEPTICAL TO SAY THE  LEAST.

    Understandably, much of the focus on the Government's handling of an unexpected pandemic has been on examining how many other deaths could have been avoided-especially in hospitals and care homes where we expect our loved ones to be safe.

    On top of which, as the Commons HEALTH SELECT COMMITTEE discussed with Health Secretary Matt Hancock last week, are nmany additional deaths caused by the interruption to vital services such as scanning and chemotherapy for cancer patients.

    Future inquires will debate where the responsibility lies for any mistakes-and rightly balance that against important achievements such as the fact that not a single coronavirus patient was denied an intensive care bed or ventilator, unlike in Northern Italy and New York .

     They will also recognise the

    HEROIC CONTRIBUTION MADE BY FRONT -LINE NHS AND CARE STAFF, WITHOUT WHICH MANY MORE LIVES WOULD BE LOST.  The Mail

    What is forgotten too quickly, I fear, is that in normal times too we have appalling high levels of

    AVOIDABLE HARM AND DEATH IN OUR HEALTH- CARE SYSTEM.

    >The Mail recently highlighted the terrible story surrounding the death of baby Harry Richford at East Kent Trust, but such tragedies are part of a pattern that

    HAS GONE ON TOO LONG

    and led the Select Committee to open an

    INQUIRY

    this summer into

    MATERNITY SAFETY

    across the

    NHS.

    But the issues don't just affect babies. As we start the new academic year, people will remember the recent spate of student suicides at Bristol and other universities, many of which might have been prevented with better

    MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORT.

    Things are no better when it comes to older patients. Neglect of dementia patients in particular can lead to more rapid decline and untimely deaths.

    So what is the scale of the problem? When I was Health Secretary I asked how many preventable deaths we had in our system.

    I was told about a highly respected study by Professor Nick VBlack and Helen Hogan of the London School of the Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

    They said around 4 per cent of hospital deaths were assessed by independent doctors as having a 50 per cent or more chance of being preventable.

    That worked out as about 150 deaths a week in the NHS in England alone. If a commercial airline were falling out of the sky every week it would be a

    MAJOR SCANDAL-BUT IN HEALTHCARE WE JUST ACCEPT IT AS INEVITABLE.

    WE urgently need to change the culture in healthcare. As Health Secretary I ordered all hospitals to publish their own estimates of levels of avoidable deaths. But data released today shows that three years on, only a quarter are complying. Much work remains to be done if we are to prevent so many trgedies being repeated...

    [This is a most extensive article-for the complete article see-.

    FULL ARTICLE

    *  *  *

     

    SEE ALSO

    The £1bn cost of maternity blunders: Jeremy Hunt exposes ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8745487

    1 day ago · By Sophie Borland Health Editor For The Daily Mail. Published: 17:15 EDT, 17 September 2020 | Updated: 18:02 EDT, 17 September 2020 . e-mail; 17 shares. 127. View comments. Blunders on maternity ...

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CHANGES OF FORM ARE OURS!]

    SEPTEMBER-18, 2020

     

    H.F.2066

     

    [ABOUT TIME TOO!]

     

    Hundreds of NHS 'one stop shop'

     

    diagnostic hubs are to be set to be carried

     

    out in hundreds of NHS

     

    'ONE STOP SHOPS' on HIGH STREETS

     

    across the UNITED KINGDOM...

     

     

     By Ben Spencer

     

    Daily Mail Medical Correspondent

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti, article-8796667/amp/Hundreds-NHS-one...

    Cancer checks, heart scans and blood tests are set to be carried out in hundreds of NHS 'one stop shopson high streets across the United Kingdom.

    CANCER checks, heart scans and blood tests are set to be carried out in hundreds of NHS 'one stop shops' on high streets across the country.

    The diagnostic hubs will allow patients to have vital checks close to their home-while ensuring    hospitals are left clear for serious care...

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

    H.F.2023

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    *  *  * 
     

    84 per cent of all English Channel cod is caught by

     

    French boats (yes, really). So as we wrangle over fishing rights in latest talks, DANIEL HANNON argues...

    We've got

     EU

     on the

    HOOK.

     

     

     

    By Daniel Hannan

     

    SEPTEMBER 2, 2020

     

    EVEN after all this time, they still don't understand us. The European Union expects Britain, once again, to SURRENDER it's FISHING GROUNDS and BETRAY it's COASTAL COMMUNITIES for the sake of a wider post-BREXIT free trade with BRUSSELS.

    Why else would the EUs lead negotiator, Michal Barnier display such intransigence as a NO-DEAL scenario looms closer.

    .Rather than banking the uncontroversial parts of a UK-EU FREE TRADE DEAL, Barnier , who arrived in LONDON yesterday for last-ditch talks, insists that UK 'cave in' on FISHERIES is a precondition for AGREEMENT on ,well ANYTHING ELSE.

    After all, as Eurocrats keep assuring one another, fishing accounts for barely 0.1 per cent of the UK economy

    Ruinous.

    Is it really conceivable, they ask, that Boris Johnson will jeopardise the interests of Britain's banking, insurance and investment industries for the sake of what has become almost a heritage industry?

    They choose to ignore the reality that no British government could contemplate surrendering the

     PRINCIPLE that, as a SOVEREIGN NATION we CONTROL our OWN TERRITORIAL WATERS.

    There is plenty of room within the principle for generosity. After half a century in the ruinous COMMON FISHERIES POLICY (CFP), we don't have the capacity to land all our own stocks. It makes sense to reach agreements with neighbouring states., This can be negotiated.

    What cannot be negotiated is the basic premise that Britain is entitled, under maritime law, to dispose of stocks within  its own sovereign waters, out to 200 nautical miles ( or the medium line between us and closer countries) - just as Norway and Iceland do.

    The vast majority of fish stocks in the North Sea are in British waters. But the EU's quota system reserves more two-thirds of these stocks for vessels from the other states. Even this figure underestimates the problem, because many British skippers unable to make ends meet under CFP had to sell their licences to Continental fishing companies. Thus, much of what on paper is the British quota is in fact landed abroad.

    Indeed, a fifth of the entire quota for ENGLAND is caught by one DUTCH MEGA-TRAWLER.

    So how did we end up in this disastrous position? How did we come to SURRENDER AN ENTIRE INDUSTRY, so that there is now not one major fishing port between PLYMOUTH and PETERHEAD?

    It goes back to a cynical BETRAYAL by EDWARD HEATH. Although previous British leaders had wanted to join the EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY (EEC), as it was then, none of them was as desperate to do so as the grumpy Bachelor.

    Heath was prepared to pay any price for admission -betrayal of the COMMONWEALTH, acceptance of the COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY, an external tariff THAT hammered our OVERSEAS TRADE.

     

    It so happened that, just as Britain was joining, maritime law was changing so that countries gained fishing rights over a much larger area around their coasts. The issue that was to lead, in 1975, to the 'COD WAR'  and the exclusion of BRITISH VESSELS FROM ALL WATERS WITHIN 200 MILES OF ICELAND.

    The loss of our historic fishing rights off ICELAND should have been more than offset by our stocks in the NORTH SEA and the CHANNEL. But Brussels sensing HEATH'S desperation, forestalled that move by imposing the CFP with its shrivelled British share.

    This established the principle that stocks in the waters of any state constituted a 'common resource' to which all members had 'equal access'. In practice it was a one-way street.French and Dutch and, later, Spanish and Portuguese vessels fished extensively in British waters, but the reverse was rare...

     

    Eclude...

    Friction...

    [This is an extensive article-for the full account press

     HEAR.

    DANIEL HANNAN is a former MEP and the president of the Initiative for Free Trade

     

     
     

    SEPTEMBER 2, 2020

     

     

    H.F.2072

    *  *  *

     

     

    A REMINDER

     

    TREASON

    Conservative skulduggery

    BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

    SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

    The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

    Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

    Edward Heath

     got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

    309 to 301'.

    *  *  *

     

    IN 2018

     WE COULDN'T TRUST THE CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 1972 AND IT APPEARS WE ALSO CANNOT TRUST A CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 2018-BOTH WITHHELD VITAL LEGAL INFORMATION ON THE EU FROM MPs-WHICH AS IN THE PAST INDICATES A

    COVER-UP.

    *  *  *

     

    Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

     ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

     

    Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

     both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

     ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

     ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

     which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore [later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

     What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

     International Currency Review

     October 10-2005

     Notes and References:

     ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

    1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

    This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

    ‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

     

    2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

     

    Christopher Booker (Column),

     

    International Currency Review

     

     

    JANUARY 6, 2019

    A NO DEAL!

     

    [A NO DEAL IS THE ONLY DEAL THAT HITLER'S SO-CALLED EU WILL RESPECT.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANY DEAL HAVE NO IDEA OF THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SATANIC BEAST THEY ARE DEALING WITH AFTER 46 YEARS.  IT'S DAYS ARE NUMBERED BECAUSE ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES CANNOT STEM THE NATURAL INSTINCT FOR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY FROM WITHIN.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANGELA MERKEL'S FRIEND THERESA MAY'S DEAL AT ANY PRICE ARE THE SAME PERSONS  WHO HAVE ALREADY SOLD THEIR SOULS TO A MONSTER STATE WHERE ONLY THE ELITE WILL PROSPER. THE MAN IN THE STREET IS IGNORED AND THAT IS WHY THERE ARE RIOTS ON THE STREETS OF MANY OF THE CAPTIVE PEOPLE'S WHO WERE DECEIVED BY THEIR NOW MASTERS. TRUE DEMOCRACY IS DEAD WITHIN HITLER'S BRAINCHILD AND IS REPLACED BY SUPPLE TOTALITARIANISM- ASK THOSE WHO ARE FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM IN CATALONIA AND NO DOUBT IN OTHER PARTS OF THE EU.]

    *  *  *

     

     

    OCTOBER-2005

    H.F.1150

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     
    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN

     

    WHO do you think you are kidding, Mr Johnson ?

    Just after 4pm on Wednesday, Boris's carefully cultivated reputation as a Churchill ion champion of British liberty crumbled like stale cheese

    'We will boost the local enforcement capacity of local authorities by introducing Coved-secure marshals to help ensure social  distancing in town and city centres, and by setting op a register of environmental health officers that local authorities can draw upon for support,' he announced.

    It didn't even sound like the jolly old Boris we voted back into Downing Street with an apparently unassailable 80-seat majority. Where was the rhetorical flourish, the optimism, the Tiggerish bounce? Where were the trademark classical quotations? Where was the defiance that had delivered

    Brexit against the odds?

    He resembled a ventriloquist's dummy, mouthing words written for him by the 'science'

    Gottle of geer

    It was as if he had been carried into the press conference by his two sidekicks like Albert R.N. The great orator had been reduced to spouting bureaucratic gobblegook, as he unleashed a Dads Army of Warden Hodges wannabes to enforce his draconian new restrictions on individual freedom.

    Recently retired council jobsworth are being recruited to patrol parks, shopping centres and railway stations, ready to pounce on anyone flouting Boris's Lockdown Lite. Under the latest anti - Covid rules people meeting in groups of more than six can be reported to the police, fined £100 and even arrested.

    You can't say I didn't warn you. Back at the beginning of June, I predicted that the New Normal would be ten times worse than the lockdown.

    'It's going to be hi-viz heaven, a jobsworth paradise. More road closures, wider pavement, extensive pedestrianisation , street marshals to enforce social distancing, exclusion zones.

    That column was illustrated by one of Gary's fabulous cartoons featuring Warden Hodges haranguing pedestrians through a loudhailer. Needles to say, the clampdown has been welcomed enthusiastically by the Local Government Association.

    The chairman of the association's 'Safer and Stronger Communities Board' said: We are pleased the Government has acted on the LGA'S CALLS FOR COUNCILS TO HAVE POWERS TO TAKE  ACTION WHEN RULES ARE FLOUTED.'

     I bet they are....

    Laws are made by ministerial degree. Most of us went to bed on Tuesday night oblivious to the fact that we were soon to be banned from meeting up with more than five other people - even in our own homes.

     This outrageous infringement of individual freedom was smuggled out under the cover of darkness by schoolboy authoritarian Matt Hancock, our self-styled 'worldbeating' Health Secretary.

    Thank goodness Commons Speaker Lindsay  Hoyle gave Hancock six of the best. Mr Speaker should now order all MPs back to the green benches, pronto, and restore our democracy.

    It's time Parliament set the country an example and took back control, to use  a well-known phrase or saying. Who would have thought a Conservative Government would exploit a manageable health crisis to introduce the most sustained peacetime assault on

    CIVIL LIBERTIES?

    Unemployment is about to go through the stratosphere when furlough ends next month. Yet even though deaths are at a record low, ministers are stroking fear and scaring people into staying at home. Meanwhile, the Prime Minster remains in thrall to unaccountable, unelected scientists and 'experts' who are relying on flawed computer models to unleash months more misery, through  Christmas and into the Spring.

    Boris seems a husk of his former self, shorn of all confidence, terrified of doing the wrong thing. He must raise his game, face down the doomsters and start showing some bold, fearless leadership.

    If he doesn't, he wont be remembered as the Heir to Churchill, or even the

    Lion of Brexit.

    He'll be destined to go down as the second Coming of

    Warden Hodges.

    This is a most extensive article - for further details click

    HERE!

     

    H.F.2074

     

     

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     
    CANCELLING

     

     

     OUR PAST

     

     

     DOES NOT

     

     

    HELP OUR FUTURE.

     

     

  • INAYA FOLARIN IMAN argues that moves to ban Last Night of the Proms ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8656475/INAYA-FOLARIN-IMAN...

    19 hours ago · Cancelling our past does not help our future: INAYA FOLARIN IMAN argues that move to axe Proms favourites Rule Britannia and Land of Hope and Glory serves no purpose . By Inaya Folarin Iman …

  • These intimidating protests will only inflame division

     

    AUGUST 24,2020

     

     

    HOW grimly ironic THAT

     

     

     

     

    HOPE and FREEDOM

     

    should be among the potential

     

    latest victims of

     

    CANCEL CULTURE'

     

     

     

    The drive to eradicate anything and anyone that sins against the

     

     

     

     

     

     

    IDEOLOGY

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     of

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

     

     

     

     

     

    For decades, music-loving crowds at the Last Night of the Proms have

     

    lifted up their voices in an Elgar sing-along roaring out

     

     

     

    'Land of Hope and Glory,

     

     

     

     

    Mother of the Free'

     

     

     

     

     

     

    But according to reports, the BBC is considering dropping the anthem-

     

     

     

    along with Rule ,Britannia!-with concerns over both the ability for

     

     

    musicians to rehearse it in time with Covid-19 restrictions and, more

     

     

     

    alarmingly, a perceived link to

     

     

     

     

     

     

    COLONIALISM and SLAVERY.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Finish conductor Dalia Stasevska, who will wield the baton at this

     

     

     

    year's Last Night on September 12 is said to be one of those who

     

    disapprove of the song's sentiments.

     

    A BBC source said at the weekend 'Dalia is a big supporter of

     

     

    Black Lives Matter

     

     

     

    and thinks a ceremony without an audience is the perfect moment to bring change.'

    In other words, the suspicion is that elements at our

     

     

     

    NATIONAL BROADCASTER

     

     

     

    have seized on the fact that coronavirus restrictions will keep the crowds away, and are intent on taking the

     

     

     

    ANTI-DEMOCRATIC OPPORTUNITY

     

     

     

    to ban the song, simply for the

     

     

     

     

    CRIME

     

     

     

     

    of being

     

     

     

     

     

    PATRIOTIC

     

     

     

     

     

    If so, what a travesty for one of

     

     

     

    Britain's best -loved anthems.

     

     

     

     

    The tune is from Elgar's Pomp And Circumstance March No 1 and the words were written by the poet Arthur Benson in 1902

    It's first verse salutes

     

     

     

     

    BRITISH DEMOCRACY

     

     

     

     

    the 'equal laws and 'truth maintained'.

     

     

    But it also contains a line  vowing that Britain's 'Empire shall be strong'-

     

    a sentiment guaranteed to provoke outrage today...

     

     

     

     

    [TO BE CONTINUED]

     

     

     

     

    ...THE idea that the past alienates ethnic minorities and that people

     

     

     

    should feel guilty about

     

     

     

     

    THEIR NATIONAL HISTORY

     

     

     

     

    and shamed by it, is constantly drummed into us-but it is both

     

     

     

    UNTRUE

     

     

     

     

    and solves

     

     

     

     

     

    NOTHING.

     

     

     

     

    cancelloing the past is not helpful to our

     

     

     

     

    SHARED FUTURE.

     

     

     

     

    We need to understand the the good and bad in our history,

     

     

     

     

    not seek to rewrite it.

     

     

     

     

     

    There are many other ways to honour our differences by building  on TRADITION and using it to

     

     

     

     

    CREATE A BETTER FUTURE

     

     

     

     

    By undermining

     

     

     

     

    OUR NATIONAL STORY

     

     

     

     

    we lose the one thing that can

     

     

     

    UNIFY

     

     

     

    US ALL

     

     

    as

     

     

     

    BRITISH PEOPLE.

     

     

     

     

     

    FULL ARTICLE.

     

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     

     

    [WE SUGGEST THAT SHOULD AN AUDIENCE BE IN PLACE AT THE LAST NIGHT THAT THEY TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SING THE FORBIDDEN ANTHEM JUST BEFORE THE END OF THE PROMS- WITH CONCEALED INSTRUMENTS OF SORTS TO BRING DOWN THE HOUSE.]

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

     

     

     

     

    Inaya Folarin Iman – Writer – Commentator – Campaigner

    https://inayafolarin.com

    Inaya Folarin Iman. Writer – Commentator – Campaigner. Menu. Home; About; Articles; In The Media; YouTube; Donate; Contact; Home. Inaya uses her work to explore subjects in politics and philosophy – with a particular interest in freedom of speech and expression, democracy, liberty and human potential. RECENT ARTICLES . We Can’t Just Oppose Racism: We Must Transcend Race. Why ...

     

     

    AUGUST 24,2020

    H.F.2067

  • S

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     

    [A COMMON SENSE POINT OF

     

     

    VIEW - WORTHY OF TREVOR

     

     

    McDONALD!]

     

     

     

     

    Jobs should be given on merit

     

     

     

    and not

     

     

     

    as part of hitting diversity-quotas...

     

     

    DAILY MAIL

     

     

    By Paul Revoir Media Editor

     

     

    SEPTEMBER 1,2020

     

     

    Sir Trevor McDonald has said that he favours people

     

     

    being

     

     

     

     given jobs on merit 

     

     

     

    rather than as part of hitting diversity quotas, The journalist, 81, who became the

     

    presenter of ITV's News at Ten in 1992, said: 'I understand why people do it, and why

     

    people think about quotas.. but there is a philosophical downside about that.

     

     

    'It's awful if you walk into a place and they say" Oh I know why she got that job because

     

    they are looking for women". I think that it is so unfair on the people. Maybe you were the

     

    best person for the job and so I am more interested in meritocracy...where someone is

     

    employed because they can do the job.

     

    During a talk on the Fane production company website, Sir Trevor also admitted he

     

    struggled with the fame of being a prominent black journalist in the UK, saying he

     

    handled it with 'difficulty'. He said when he joined ITN he had not wanted to be labelled

     

    as the black reporter' and was not going to be 'relegated' to ding stories about Bradford

     

    or Brixton or the 'problems of immigration'. He said he wanted to focus on international

     

    politics.

     

    Sir Trevor revealed he had always found reading the news to be 'terrifying' and he

     

    added:

     

    I don't think you ever lose the terror of doing it.' He said anyone who said it was easy'

     

    was not being very truthful'.

     

     

    The veteran broadcaster, who presented his last ITV News show in 2005, said:

     

    'I was overawed by the responsibility. I have a strong almost philosophical sense of

     

    news.'  he also recalled going to interview Saddam Hussein and being made to stay in a

     

    guest house where the phone lines had been disconnected. He said: 'In fact it was quite

     

    frightening as I suspect deep down I am a coward.'

     

     

     

    SEPTEMBER 1,2020

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    H.F.2069

     

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    H.F.1424

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

    A

     NATION STATE

    OF
     

     ENGLAND

    NOT A

    NATION STATE

    OF

    CONFRONTATION

     

    [The purpose of this information is to place in the forefront that the common people where not responsible for the cruel and wasteful wars or matters concerning slavery within the Empire. It was the Elite and Money Changers -Iluminati-that decided the path to follow. In the meantime the common people died in their millions of destitution and war. The ENGLISH PEOPLE-the Common Man is now branded a slaver and war-monger. Even in our own times we have seen illegal wars and waste of the public purse-nepotism at  the highest level. Some of those newcomers from other cultures are intent in destroying our culture and country and with the assistance of that supreme destroying devil of political correctness they have divided a once united country into a caldron of fiery disorder and hatred. The Christian Faith has a message of LOVE and FORGIVENESS but what we see around us in our once united land is

     HATRED and UNFORGIVNESS.

    Nation States came into being as peoples of different cultures required their own homeland which ensured a stable and secure home. We can see from history and in  our time countless occasions where an influx of differing cultures leads to internal strife bloodshed and war. Europe suffered from this catastrophe for much of its history. The USA until around 1935 had a policy of only admitting Europeans and we can see the result today of their later OPEN POLICY which has made parts of the

    USA a COUNTRY of CONFRONTATION and HATE WITHIN.

    One has to consider that if those voices of warning of internal strife if IMMIGRATION was not curtailed had been  listened to shortly after the Second World War we would not be faced by the newcomers who have become foreign accusers within our land in 2020.

    A land called ENGLAND with only a small number of peoples from foreign lands who received a home amongst us. would not be today be taken to task for its past history, the sole responsibility of the ELITE! and MONEY LENDERS  -not of the PEOPLE . What it has demonstrated is that we are today in 2020 suffering from internal strife because  those warnings from the post-war years of the dangers of MASS IMMIGRATION from FOREIGN CULTURES have been IGNORED by SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS.

    Unless the English People ignore POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and REGAIN CONTROL of their DIVIDED COUNTRY within a generation or so the NATION STATE OF ENGLAND will no longer exist.

    THE ENGLISH PEOPLE NEED TO BAND TOGETHER AS ONE AGAINST THE ENEMY WITHIN AND TELL THE NATION DESTROYERS FROM FOREIGN LANDS TO GO TO HELL!]

    AUGUST 9,2020

     

     

    LIFE IN THE MIX 2

    H.F.2061

     

     

    *

     

     

    DR MAX PEMBERTON
    WE clapped the NHS but IGNORE the BITTER TRUTH: OBESITY THREATENS IT MORE than COVED...

    and never mind yet more government initiatives, says

    DR MAX PEMBERTON. the cure is up to us

    [Each individual!-A MATTER of MIND over BODY.]

  • DR MAX PEMBERTON : Obesity threatens the NHS more than COVID ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8566103/DR-MAX-PEMBERTON...

    27/07/2020 · We clapped the NHS but ignore the bitter truth: obesity threatens it more than Covid... and never mind yet more government initiatives, says DR MAX PEMBERTON By Dr Max Pemberton For The Daily …

  • DR MAX PEMBERTON: It's the forgotten ... - Daily Mail

  •  

     

     

    ...Admirable...

     

    Responsibility...

     

    Tackle

     

     

    Why has pointing this out become taboo?

     

     

     

    There is evidence that part of the problem is down to current

     

     

    attitudes towards obesity. A

     

     

    Department of Health study comparing obesity rates from 1967

     

    with 2010 found that while less

     

     

    than 10 per cent of those who were obese in the 1960's failed to do

     

     

    anything about it, by 2010 that

     

     

    number had risen to more than half.

     

     

    People simply don't bother trying to lose weight any more. They see being

     

    fat as normal because

     

    there sare so many more people just like them.

     

    They have been brought up on a diet not just of junk food but on  something

     

    more damaging - a

     

    belief that nothing is their fault .

     

     

    [POLITICAL CORRECTNESS HAS A LOT TO ANSWER

     

     

    FOR.]

     

     

    that there is always  someone else to blame, that they should be able to

     

     

    have and do whatever they want and not have to deal with the

     

     

    consequences.

     

     

    Until we tackle that way of thinking and make a healthy weight a

     

     

    personal responsibility,

     

     

    no war on obesity or initiative stands a chance.

     

     

     

     

    I leave the last word to the newest convert to the

     

     

    CAUSE, Boris Johnson:

     

     

     

    LOSE WEIGHT, SAVE THE NHS.

     

     

     

    If we don't, then it won't be

     

     

    COVID.

     

     

     

     

    that eventually brings the

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    HEALTH SERVICE

     

     

     

     

     

    TO ITS KNEES

     

     

     

    BUT

     

     

     

    FAT.

     

     

     

     

    *

     

    FULL ARTICLE

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS & CHANGE'S of FORM ARE OURS!]

     

     

    JULY 28,2020

     

    H.F.2058

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

    LITTLEJOHN
     

     

    As MPs go off on their

    summer holidays...

    BASKET CASE

    BRITAIN

    IS GOING

     

     

    BANKRUPT

     

     

    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: As MPs go off on

     

     

    their

     

     

    summer holidays ...

     

    JULY24,2020

     BORIS JOHNSON wants to clear Backing Britain by the end of September. Good luck with that.

    He hasn't a hope in hell's chance of persuading feather-bedded civil servants back to their desks any time soon.

    Why would they

    , when M P's  have just knocked off for six weeks' summer holiday? If the Government was serious about getting the country up to speed again. Parliament would have scrapped the summer recess.

    It's not as if MPs have been rushed off their feet lately, Most of them have been content to stay at home, working out how to spend the extra

    £10,OOO

    they awarded themselves to cope with the

    CORONA CRISIS.

    THEY SHOULD BE AT WESTMINSTER SUBJECTING THE GOVERNMENT'S INCREASINGLY BAFFLING AND INCONSISTENT COVID RESPONSE TO PROPER SCRUTINY, BUT WHILE MPS ARE MISSING IN ACTION, THE UNIONS WOULD SCREAM BLUE MURDER IF CIVIL SERVANTS WERE ORDERED BACK TO WORK.

    Given the way ministers caved in to the teachers, there's not the remotest possibility that the Civil Service will be back to normal by September. The backlog of

    PASSPORT APPLICATIONS

    DRIVING LICECENCES

    BIRTH CERTIFICATES

    Will only get worse.

    Of course, the Government could have set up a simple system which would have allowed people to download the documents online. They could have issued six-month or one -year extensions, complete  with readablle bar codes, to be attached to licences and passports.

    It shouldn't be any more complicated than Amazon's system for returning  unwanted or faulty goods. passports.

    But that would have called for innovation, flexibility and political courage. And the unions would never agree to it, so it ain't gonna happen. My best guess is that it will be in the middle of next year before the backlog is cleared. If ever, the way things are going...

    *  *  *

    ...It can't go on. Parliament should be recalled and the Civil Service ordered back immediately.

    Instead of continuing to chuck money we haven't got at everything from the extended furlough scheme to half-price hamburgers, the Chancellor should be offering generous tax breaks, whatever it takes to get factories and offices back up running again.

    Frankly, I fear few people-including half the Cabinet - have any idea of the scale of the carnage coming down the pipe.

    NEVER MIND BACKING BRITAIN, ITS BANKRUPT BRITAIN WE SHOULD BE WORRYING ABOUT NOW.

    [IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY A GOVERNMENT CAN DO WHAT IT WANTS TO KEEP THE PEOPLE SAFE AND KEEP EVERYONE AT THEIR POSTS!].

    This is an extensive article and full details are available in

    FULL ARTICLE

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    JULY24,2020

     

    H.F.2056

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

    PETER HITCHENS: Face masks turn us

     

     

     

    into

     

    voiceless ...

     

     Daily Mail

    JULY 21,2020

    in the name of Covid, the State has already thrust itself into every corner of our existence.

    It has come between husbands and wives at the ends of their lives. It has forbidden the old to embrace their grandchildren.

    It has denied us funerals and weddings, locked the churches, silenced the ancient monastic music of cathedral choirs and prevented the free worship of God for the first time in 800 years, and banned us (unless we are Left-wing) from holding or attending public meetings.

    It has ordered us to stay at home, scolded or fined us for sunbathing, going on country rambles or even entering our front gardens.

    It has forced millions of us to stop working, sabotaged the educations – at school and university – of untold numbers of young people and has become our boss and paymaster in the biggest state takeover of life and work ever attempted by non-Communists.

    The Case Against

     

    Masks...Heckenlively, KentBuy New $12.99

    Soon we will discover that it has also wrecked an already wobbly economy and separated untold numbers of us from jobs and businesses we thought were safe. Soon, too, it will also separate us from our savings, through punishing tax and savage inflation, to pay for the disaster it has caused.

    Now it presumes to tell us what to wear. And what it wants us to wear is a soggy cloth muzzle, a face-nappy that turns its wearer from a normal human into a mumbling, mouthless submissive.

    And this, it seems, is popular. Is there nothing the modern British people will not put up with? Britain’s muzzle consumption is now so high that six months from now there will be reports of dolphins and whales floundering about in an ocean made sticky by millions of gallons of hand-sanitiser, as they choke on congealed clumps of used muzzles. These items are set to become the new plastic bags.

    Why is this frenzy taking place?

    Here is a clue. On July 12, Deborah Cohen, the medical correspondent of BBC2’s Newsnight, revealed an astonishing thing. The World Health Organisation (WHO) had reversed its advice on face masks, from ‘don’t wear them’ to ‘do wear them’.

    But the key fact was that it had not done so because of scientific information – the evidence had not backed the wearing of face coverings – but because of political lobbying.

    She revealed on Twitter that: ‘We had been told by various sources [that the] WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying.’ She said the BBC had then put this to the WHO, which did not deny it.

    In March, the WHO had said: ‘There is currently no evidence that wearing a mask (whether medical or other types) by healthy persons in the wider community setting, including universal community masking, can protect them from infection with respiratory viruses, including Covid-19.’

    The American TV news channel CNN reported on March 31 that Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO health emergencies programme, had said at a briefing in Geneva: ‘There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population

    has any potential benefit.

    Technocracy: The Hard ...W

    ‘In fact, there’s some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly.’

    A few weeks ago, the WHO changed its advice to say it ‘advises that governments should encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult, such as on public transport, in shops or in other confined or crowded environments.’

    Earlier that same month, England’s chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, had said that wearing face masks would do little to combat the outbreak.

    While noting that if someone was infected, they might reduce the danger of spreading the disease by covering their faces, Prof Whitty said wearing a face mask had almost no effect on reducing the risk of contracting the illness.

    He stated: ‘In terms of wearing a mask, our advice is clear: that wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all. So we do not advise that.’

    Read the Whole Article

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    'A law which supports a lie we must all defy-Freedom can be lost unless truth leads the way.'

     

     

    JULY 21,2020

    H.F.2053

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     

    FREE SPEECH

     

     

     

    DEMONISED!

     

    IT IS TIME TO TELL THE 'WOKE' BRIGADE

     TO GO TO

    HELL!

     

     

    ['WOKE' IS AN INSIDIOUS DISEASE OF THE MIND WHICH MUST BE BROKEN! FOR JOHN MILTON WARNED DURING THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR THAT ONLY FREE SPEECH WILL SEEK OUT THE TRUTH]

     

     

     

     

    IN 1945 THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT-FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT (1882-1945)

     

     

    STATED:

     

    'A world founded upon four essential freedoms

     

     

    The first is freedom of speech and expression - everywhere in the world

     

     

    The second is freedom of every person to worship god in his own way-everywhere in the world.

     

     

    The third is freedom from want...everywhere in the world.

     

     

    The fourth is freedom from fear...anywhere in the world

     

     

    ( Speech,6 January,1941)

     

     

    *

     

    [Since that time  the scourge of political correctness has embedded its insidious doctrine into the LAW of once FREE SPEECH DEMOCRACIES the  FIGHT BACK must BEGIN-NOW!- TO RECOVER OUR INHERITED RIGHT BELONGING TO  A FREE DEMOCRATIC NATION STATE.

     

     

    It has been long stated that a BAD LAW which is IGNORED by a large  part of the nation is NO LONGER A LAW.]

     

     

    THE BATTLE FOR FREE SPEECH

    MUST NOW

    BEGIN!]

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

    Broadcaster John Humphrys lifts the lid on 'institutional ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7487661/amp/Broadcaster-John...

    John Humphrys today lifts the lid ... ‘Management’ has become a dark art and its practitioners too often leave common sense at the door of the board room. They use language mere humans ...

     Britain's in the grip of a sinister new censorship: 'cancellation' of celebrities deemed to have transgressed the moral code of a self-appointed, self-righteous mob.

    BUT IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIGHT BACK...

    H.F.2047

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     

     

    TREASON OF THE INTELLECTUALS

    [WHY THERE IS SO MUCH STRIFE IN THE WORLD SINCE  THE 1920s]

    "From the savage flowering of ethnic and religious hatreds in the Middle East and throughout Europe today to the mendacious demand for POLITICAL CORRECTNESS on college campuses everywhere in the WEST, the treason of the intellectuals continue to play out its unedifying drama..."

    -Roger Kimball.

     

    Arrives: July 18 - 20 Details
     

    Fastest delivery: Wednesday, July 15 Details

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    Brought forward from February-2005

    FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

     

    [In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the

     

    TRUTH.

     

    Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

    *          *        *

    We all have a Right

    to

    Freedom of Speech

     

    Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

    What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

     The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

    Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

    Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

    How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

    The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

    The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

    This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

    The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

    Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

    It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

    The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

     

    No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

    A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

    The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

    To Irritate

     

    Annoy

     

    Dismay

     

    And Shock

     

    Anyone who Listens.

    The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

    I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

     As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

     

    The verse concludes:

     

    ‘In England today we can do what we like

    So long as we do what we’re told’

     

    How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

    ‘And that is why we can talk as we like

    So long as we talk as we’re told.’

    A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

     

    But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

     

    It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

     

    Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                              

     

    THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

    R I P

     

    PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

     

    ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

    A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

     ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

    Let her and Falsehood grapple!

    Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

    Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

     

     MAGNA CARTA

     

    FEBRUARY 2005

    *          *          *

    [Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

     

    H.F. 1325.

     

     

     

    *

    If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

    E Pluribus Unum?

     

    This is banned but separation is not

    Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

     

     

    Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

    Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

    Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

    Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

    The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

    The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

    Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

    Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

    If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

    The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

    See also:

    The Roots of New Labour

    Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

    Diversity in the UK

    A ranking of social evils 

    Multiculturalism and truth

    Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

    The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

    Against racism

    The aims of Localism

     

     

     

     

     H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

     

    H.F.2043

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MARCH,2007

    THE SLAVERY PROTESTORS FAIL TO LOOK WITHIN THEIR OWN CULTURE AND HISTORY

    *

    The slavery protests' guilty secret

    by

    Andrew Alexander

    COLUMN

    [Daily Mail-March 30, 2007]

     

    The other celebration this week has been confused. Were we proud that Parliament had backed William Wilberforce's Bill to abolish the shameful slave trade, or were we in a familiar

    ON-OUR-KNEES

    POSITION

    -and apologising for ever being involved in it?

    If the latter, then it would have been helpful to hear someone of African descent also apologising for the

    FACT

    -that SLAVERY continued throughout that continent for decades afterwards, except where colonial governments like Britain managed to suppress it -in face of fierce [African] local opposition.

    It might have been helpful, too, if the protesters of African descent had vented some of their spleen on the

    ARAB SLAVE TRADERS

    -who carried on for so long with their particularly vicious form of

    SLAVE TRADING

    They systematically

    and crudely castrated their victims, which killed the great majority of them

    PERHAPS

    -the slavery protesters have called on the

    ARAB NATIONS

    -for a few billions of their oil revenues in

    COMPENSATION

    BUT IF SO, I FAILED TO NOTICE IT.

    *          *          *

    A SUMMARY OF THE SLAVE TRADE

     

    ..From Britain, the largest slave trader and the greatest offender the movement sprang which successfully abolished slavery in the British Isles in 1772, then the slave trade in 1806, then slavery itself in the British Dominions in 1833, and finally so worked on the conscience of the world as to secure a large and nearly universal concurrence of action for the extirpation of the evil.

    The credit for securing from Lord Mansfield the famous decision in the case of

    JAMES SOMERSET (1772)

    -that the status of slavery was unknown to the

    COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND

    was due to

    GRANVILLE SHARP

    -a civil servant, inconspicuous in wealth and station, but of a rare warmth of heart and persistence of character, who once fired by the cruel usage of a negro slave in the streets of London, never rested until he had obtained the verdict which for ever afterwards rid the British islands of the taint of slavery.

    Thereafter comes a roll of English emancipators whose names even in a general history of Europe are worthy of

    COMMEMORATION

    -William Wilberforce, Thomas Clarkson, Zachary Macaulay and James Stephen, whose preparatory labours, sustained over a period of twenty years, enabled Charles Fox to carry the

    ABOLITION OF THE SLAVE TRADE

    Thomas Fowel Buxton, the parliamentary leader of the

    ABOLITIONISTS

    -who worked up the

    HOUSE OF COMMONS

    -to abolish slavery; and Lord Brougham, who carried the torch through the country; Lord Palmerston, who stopped the slave trade between

    PORTUGAL and BRAZIL

    -and the noble group of missionaries, soldiers, and statesmen, David Livingston, Charles Gordon, Sir John Kirk, and Lord Lugard, by whose efforts in large measure

    AFRICA

    -has been opened up and

    RID OF THE CURSE

    of the

    ARAB SLAVE -RAIDER

    Lecky does no more than

    JUSTICE

    when he states the

    THE CRUSADE of ENGLAND

    AGAINST SLAVERY

    "may probably be regarded as among the three or four perfectly virtuous pages in the history of nations'

    [A History of Europe by H.A.L.FISHER -1936]

     

    *

     

    [Today in March 2007 we have a Government which does not deserve a mention in history as it has had no virtuous events in the past ten years. It will be remembered as a Government not trusted by the people and which has brought a once proud and just nation to kneeling before the  politically correct diverse minority who have not lost any opportunity to degrade the nation which today should not be on its knees but standing with thankfulness that their descendents had showed Christian fellowship with all mankind remembering the words dedicated above to the many who saw an injustice and abolished a vile trade which at the time was responded too because of our standing and reputation in the corridors of power throughout the world.]

    What is unforgivable that an opportunity to honour an 18th and 19th century of a

    BAND of BROTHERS

    -had been lost because a people who once had confidence and pride in their country and have lost their way and  have become the 'silent people' because they are afraid (they think) to offend.

    Our minority cultures have all been taught that they can be a part of our country but not of it. They can demand their voice is heard but not that of the majority who are of this country. this pattern was launched by

    MULTICULTURALISM

    -which has now been discredited -as it has done immense harm to community relations in our country.

    IT IS TIME FOR OUR MINORITIES TO FORGET THEIR ENCOURAGED DIFFERENCES AND IN FUTURE TO BE AS WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN THE PAST

    ALL ONE

    Whoever you are and from wherever you have come.

     

    LET US ALL BE

    A

     

    BAND OF BROTHERS AND SISTERS

    AND

    NOT LOOK FOR OUR DIFFERENCES.

    [Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

     

    *

    13th October,2007

     

    [All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

     

    H.F.2044

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

    You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2016/04/slavery--guilt-as-a-jewish-weapon.html
    Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at henry@henrymakow.com

    [+] Show Comments for " Slavery -- "Guilt" as a Jewish Weapon "

    Dan said (April 24, 2016):
     

    I've never heard any say that any incarnation of the KKK was "philo-Semitic, and welcomed Jews as members". Read the case of Leo Max Frank - the president of the Atlanta chapter of the B'nai B'rith who was convicted of the rape/murder of 13 year old Mary Phagen one Saturday at his pencil factory in 1913.

    This is the historic event as a matter of fact the prompted the founding of the ADL. Such pressure was brought to bear that Georgia Governor John M. Slaton commuted Frank's sentence in 1915, when his conviction was upheld to the US Supreme Court. This was the incident that prompted the resurrection of the Ku Klux Klan.
    The "Knights of Mary Phagan" kidnapped Frank from prison in Marietta Georgia and lynched him.

    I haven't read The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, but any claim that the KKK was 'philo-Semitic' is just plain wrong. The Klan didn't even accept Irish Catholics.

    The 'philo-Semitic' enemies of black Americans I know of are "white liberals", Planned Parenthood, ACORN, Black LIves Matter, the Boule, the music industry, and most of ALL the DEMOCRAT PARTY.
     


    Robert K said (April 24, 2016):
     

    People raised in and educated by a system tend to conceive of it as being normal. Probably many black slaves in the USA didn't conceive of a life very different from the one they grew up in. Nothing is different today. The vast majority of people are wage slaves in a system that is not inherent in the nature of things but, rather, designed and imposed.

    This explains how the transformation of productivity through the application of automation and robotics can result in increased stress and insecurity for people, instead of an increasingly free and prosperous lifestyle. The control is exercised through the money system: money is required in order to live, and in order to get money people must kowtow to others in hierarchies, both private and public. Instead of the financial system releasing individuals, which is its proper function and could easily be done (and at an accelerating pace concomitant with the progress of technology), the power-mongers who operate it have fashioned it to be a means of control. Sadly, most of the slaves swallow the propaganda constantly streaming from government mouthpieces, media sheets and screens, and academic prostitutes to the effect that the "authorities" are really "doing the best they can in difficult circumstances".
     


    JG said (April 24, 2016):
     

    The WASP power base in America was the biggest threat to NWO Communism in the entire world until it was systematically dismantled beginning with the cultural Marxist Revolution of America in the late 1960's.

    The prosperity of the White American population made them easy prey for the "guilt psy-op" of slavery which 99% of the whites had no direct role in.

    They guilt they carried, if any, was for succeeding in life and building a strong family unit that resided in it's once crime free communities. Somehow they were successfully convinced to carry the guilt for the failure of others. This was the beginning of the doctrine of 'political correctness' that was intended to destroy them.

    The Jews may have been broker's in the American slave trade but the blacks were sold into slavery by their own nation first.

    It really doesn't matter much anymore because the WASPS have little left to give as we all watch America collapse a little more each day. America, as a nation, has lost the good fight.


    Alfred said (April 24, 2016):
     

    Some of the earliest Marxist propaganda specifically states using the Negro as a wedge against the United States https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/black.htm This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.
     


     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

    [AS WE HAVE ALREADY STATED: THE EU ONLY LOOKS TO ITS OWN INTEREST NOT TO THOSE WHO HAVE DECIDED THEY HAVE

    HAD ENOUGH

    THEY KNOW THAT A

     FREE ENGLAND

    IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THEIR VERY EXISTENCE.]

    *  *  *

     

    BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Britain and the European Union (EU) failed to make progress in talks on post-Brexit relations this week due to major differences and called off a one-on-one meeting between their chief negotiators, officials said on Thursday.

    By John Chalmers

    JULY 2-2020

     

    © Reuters/Yves Herman FILE PHOTO: EU's Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier gives a news conference

    after Brexit negotiations, in Brussels

    After the teams' first face-to-face talks in Brussels since the coronavirus pandemic consigned them to video-conferencing, UK chief negotiator David Frost and EU counterpart Michel Barnier had intended to meet alone on Friday.

    But officials said that plan had been ditched.

    "The negotiations have been comprehensive and useful," Frost said in a statement. "But they have also underlined the significant differences that still remain between us on a number of important issues."

    Barnier said the bloc continued to believe an agreement was possible and in everyone's interest, but its major demands for an economic partnership were unchanged.

    "After four days of discussions, serious divergences remain," he said in a statement.

    "The EU expects, in turn, its positions to be better understood and respected in order to reach an agreement. We need an equivalent engagement by the United Kingdom."

    Britain left the world’s largest trading bloc on Jan. 31, but there has been little progress on designing a new relationship with a year-end deadline looming. Both sides had hoped this week's negotiations would reboot the process.

    The EU says Britain cannot retain all the economic and trading benefits it had as an EU member, while London says Brussels is not showing enough flexibility.

    It insists that Britain must commit to maintaining EU standards on everything from state aid to labour to environment regulations to prevent it undercutting EU products in the future.

    Barnier said the EU's position remained that there could be no economic partnership without "robust guarantees for a level playing field – including on state aid – to ensure open and fair competition among our businesses".

    (Reporting by John Chalmers, Guy Faulconbridge and Kate Holton; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne)

    *  *  *

    [WE WERE PROMISED A NO DEAL IF THE EU FAILED TO COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS BY END OF JUNE 2020- NOT A DAY LONGER AFTER 4 YEARS OF WASTED TIME.]

    'Fortune befriends the bold.'

    -Dryden

    'It is wonderful what strength of purpose and boldness and energy of will are roused by the assurance that we are doing our duty.'-

    Scott.

    *  *  *

     

    [OUR  OLD FRIENDS IN THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH WHO WE BETRAYED IN 1973 AWAIT OUR NATIONAL FREEDOM FROM HITLER'S EU PLAN OF1943  IN ORDER TO REBUILD  A BOND OF PROSPERITY AND PEACE.]

     

     

    The Commonwealth Realms v The Constitution for Europe.

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    JULY 2-2020

    H.F.2041

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

    [A REMINDER

    TO OUR NEGOTIATOR

    IN JULY 2020.]

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

    WHY I LOATHE  BRUSSELS

     

     
     

     

    They steal our fish, squander our cash and treat our views with contempt. For decades Labour's Grimsby

     MP Austin Mitchell passionately campaigned against the

    E U.

    On the second anniversary of the referendum, his cri de coeur will cheer the

    HEART OF EVERY BREXITEER.

     

    Why I loathe Brussels: They steal our fish, squander our cash and treat our views with contempt, writes AUSTIN MITCHELL

     

    513

    View
    comments

     

    Austin Mitchell was a backbench Labour MP for 40 years before stepping down in 2015. 

    A self-confessed maverick who refused to toe the party line, he has always been fiercely opposed to Britain remaining in the EU. 

    Here, on the second anniversary of the EU referendum, he delivers a powerful and timely reminder of why Brexit must be seen through.

     

    My long-held and passionate attitude to the European Union is summed up in four words — three of which are ‘the European Union’, preceded by a commonly used four- letter verb of exhortation that the Oxford English Dictionary describes as ‘vulgar’.

    I’ve always been a Eurosceptic, ever since I first stumbled across the Common Market, as the EU then called itself, in 1962. I was 28, Yorkshire born and bred, and, with my doctorate from Oxford, was teaching history at a university in New Zealand. A colleague gave a lecture on the Common Market — and, to my horror, he endorsed it as ‘a good thing’.

    Incredible. Almost blasphemy. Britain led the Commonwealth. New Zealand, rich in dairy products, was its antipodean farm. Europe was there for us to defeat in war. How could an Englishman be so daft?

     

    Austin Mitchell campaigning for fishermen in 1978. He was a backbench Labour MP for 40 years before stepping down in 2015

    Fortunately General De Gaulle, the French president, agreed with me and dismissed British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan’s efforts to join a club he should never have applied for in the first place.

    I was further comforted when a succession of British politicians came out to New Zealand to assure us that if Britain did join this alien institution then, scout’s honour, New Zealand’s access to the British market would be protected. The old relationship would carry on.

    They lied. Albion can be perfidious and was particularly so when it betrayed New Zealand by joining in 1973 — egged on by Tory prime minister Ted Heath, who was so eager to get us into Europe that he did so on less than favourable terms. We were asking to be clobbered and duly were.

    I was back in Britain and had switched jobs to become a journalist and a presenter on regional television when two years later Harold Wilson, the new Labour PM, called for a referendum to endorse or reject that decision. 

    I voted ‘No’. But two-thirds of the country said ‘Yes’. We were staying in.

    I was far from convinced this was the right decision, and my hostility increased when in 1977 I was elected Labour MP for Grimsby.

    The town’s fishing industry had been ruined when the Europeans cunningly declared the seas around Britain common waters and gave other members, even landlocked Luxembourg, equal access. 

    As a result, we got only a small proportion of our own fish.

    I formed a Save Britain’s Fish campaign, which attracted support from all over the country.

    Tory MP Edwina Currie pointed out that: ‘You don’t want to save Britain’s fish. You just want to eat them.’ Which was true, but far better for us to eat them than have them gobbled by undeserving Europeans who took our jobs and the processing industry with them.

     

    Tory MP Edwina Currie pointed out that: ‘You don’t want to save Britain’s fish. You just want to eat them’

    There was more to my scepticism about Europe than a lingering desire to catch our own fish, however. 

    I believed then, and still do now, that the nation state is not only the best but the only way of advancing the cause of the people while maintaining their democratic control of the process.

    There is nothing the EU can do for us that we can’t do better for ourselves. Europe is too big, amorphous, divided and powerless. 

    It’s not a democracy but a plutocracy with a rootless bureaucracy, always pursuing an ever-closer union the people don’t want, yet never able to reach it.

    As a concept it is a piece of sublime mysticism and nonsense, a mirage.

    The trouble was that the EU couldn’t break away from its original purpose of protecting French agriculture and boosting German industry. 

    With these two states dominating, Europe embarked on a journey where few wanted to go, to an ever-closer union only the Brussels bureaucrats sought, imposing policies without democratic consent and ever prepared to overrule the people for their own good.

    My basic reason for opposing membership was economic. The European Union drained Britain of jobs, money, demand and growth. 

    It became a brake on our economy, not an accelerator. 

    Being a deal between the interests of Germany, which needed a bigger market for its manufacturing, and France, which wanted agricultural protection for its food, the EU didn’t suit Britain, a net agricultural importer with a less modern and less well-invested industry.

    The basis of British trade had been buying cheap food, particularly from Commonwealth countries, and sending them our manufactured goods in return.

    That stopped after we joined. The Common Agricultural Policy required us to buy France’s more expensive food. Costs went up and every family of four lost £20 a week.

    Meanwhile, Labour’s policy to boost jobs in the regions had to be scrapped because it was against the rules. What had been a surplus in our trade with Europe before we went in became a steadily growing deficit.

    Our membership contributions — in effect, our payments for being damaged — went up year by year, siphoning off money to Europe, particularly to the powerful German economy, which generated ever-bigger surpluses at the expense of everyone else and particularly us.

    To cap all this, Europe’s fast growth, which enthusiasts had claimed Britain would hitch up to, slowed substantially.

    That’s why in my successful campaign in the 1979 General Election, I stood on a soapbox outside the Bird’s Eye frozen fish factory in Grimsby to denounce Brussels. And I’ve been doing so as vigorously as I can ever since.

    But I’ve increasingly found myself out on a limb in a political class inexorably drawn to Brussels.

    Europe is very attractive for those who don’t like Britain. 

    For the liberal intellectuals and many of our elite, who saw themselves as cosmopolitan rather than nationalist, Europe was nicer than their brutal, xenophobic compatriots. 

    Those suffering in Britain — the unions, local government and the Labour Party — came to love the beguiling hopes Europe held out for them.

    They didn’t see that it had no ability to help lame dogs over stiles and that its handouts were really the nation’s own money coming back, but with the EU’s heavy costs deducted.

    My views remained unchanged as the Common Market marched on, grandiosing into the European Community, then the European Union.

    Major Labour figures from Roy Jenkins to Peter Mandelson went off to Brussels and found a bigger and better stage to strut on.

     

    Brussels came up with the Exchange Rate Mechanism, to set in stone rates of exchange between the various European currencies. Tory Prime Minister John Major took us in briefly. It was a disaster

    There, people actually listened to them rather than dismissing them out of hand. They came back to proclaim Europe’s benefits. 

    Then Brussels came up with the Exchange Rate Mechanism, to set in stone rates of exchange between the various European currencies.

    Tory Prime Minister John Major took us in briefly. It was a disaster. The whole system collapsed and Britain was humiliatingly forced out.

    We sceptics heaved a sigh of relief, forgetting the propensity of dogs to return to their own vomit.

    Instead of backing off, the EU went for an even stronger monetary union by creating the common currency, the euro.

    Unable to get electoral support for ever-closer union, the EU bureaucracy tried to smuggle it in through the back door. 

    A common currency, they hoped, would lead to convergence and develop the central institutions necessary to manage it.

    By now Tony Blair was in Downing Street with his New Labour re-make. It wasn’t a respray job on the old jalopy but a total re-engineering.

    Daft as a Liberal when it came to anything that would demonstrate his Euro-enthusiasm, he was passionately in favour of a single European currency.

    Not understanding economics, he didn’t realise that Britain would be shackled by a fixed, and inevitably overvalued, exchange rate, with consequences ruinous for our weaker economy.

    Fortunately, Gordon Brown, his Chancellor, saw the dangers and managed to think up five tests, failure in any of which would deny entry until the time was ripe. Which in my view it never would be.

    Britain stayed out of the euro, thank heaven, leaving us peripheral to the Eurozone, the EU’s great adventure into the clouds. 

    The Eurocrats persisted with monetary union, even though it forces deflation on weaker and less competitive partners. 

    Britain would have been one of these if we had been foolish enough to join in.

    Brussels showered money on the weaker European economies, then crippled them with unsustainable and unrepayable debt, as the Germans refused to underwrite it. Any grudging help went to save the banks, not the individual nation.

    Increasingly the EU was losing its shine. Unemployment was high, with a quarter of its young people out of work.

    Germany built up huge economic surpluses, which it didn’t spend or recycle to the less successful economies. 

    To manage the euro, the EU needed the economic institutions of the nation state, but the Germans couldn’t accept that.

    The EU could only move forward by greater federalism to create ‘ever-closer union’ but the members didn’t want this straitjacket. It was hit by the refugee crisis and couldn’t agree on what to do about it.

     

    By now Tony Blair was in Downing Street with his New Labour re-make. It wasn’t a respray job on the old jalopy but a total re-engineering

    It could possibly have conciliated British public opinion by delivering benefits to Britain, whose EU membership costs were spiralling all the time. 

    But it wouldn’t and didn’t. It was deadlocked: rudderless and dominated by Mrs Merkel, the most cautious politician in Europe.

    Yet still Britain clung to the edge of this rickety raft.

    The public were told to be happy with this developing disaster, and a Euro-enthusiastic Tory-led coalition government did nothing about it.

    That is, until an overconfident David Cameron buckled to pressure in his own party and announced that he would solve his party problems by renegotiating improved terms for our membership, to be endorsed by a referendum.

     

    He asked Brussels for changes to make the EU more acceptable in Britain. He got nothing worth having but still embarked on what he confidently assumed would be an easy victory.

    The battle of Brexit was a thrill for me. I had stood down from Parliament by the time of the referendum. I was into my 70s and had been an MP for nigh on 40 years.

    Suddenly I was in demand again. 

    As one of the few survivors of that rare breed, the Labour Eurosceptic, I was hauled into debates to provide a balance to overconfident Euro-enthusiasts who couldn’t believe anyone would be insane enough to want to leave the Franco-German condominium.

    It was the best fun I’d had for years. It was marvellous to harangue large audiences who were with me, for a change, rather than sitting there in stony-faced silence as Labour audiences had.

    Even more wonderfully, the campaign ended in triumph. To the amazement of Cameron and the rest of Britain’s elite, he lost. The British electorate, two-thirds of whom had voted to stay in 1975, had changed its mind.

    Victory was a strange new phenomenon. It had never happened to me before. I was as euphoric as any politician is ever allowed to be.

    What happened, though, was in fact a peasants’ revolt rather than a triumph for my arguments.

     

    The people, angered by cuts, stagnant living standards, de-industrialisation and austerity, used this unaccustomed power to express their unhappiness not just at Europe but at three decades of neo-liberal politics and globalisation which had done little or nothing for them.

    The educated and the liberal middle classes had come to identify with Europe as part of their privileged way of life, and supported a union that they saw as the symbol of enlightened internationalism and civilised (ie their own) values. 

    The less well-off, the less educated and the people who’d been left behind felt differently.

    Britain’s elite were shocked by the nation’s rejection of their wisdom and advice. George Orwell once remarked that ‘England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality’. 

    That remained true of the liberal intellectuals, who’d given up on Britain and saw Europe as the future.

    For the people to reject the EU just showed how irredeemable the British were.

    It was, as they saw it, a surrender to racism, xenophobia, insularity and everything liberal intellectuals dislike in their own people.

    On the other hand, Eurosceptics like me saw the vote as the result of a 40-year learning experience.

    For me, the referendum result was the turning point I’d hoped for since 1979. The people had achieved what the politicians had failed to do. 

    It’s a shame it took so long and that so much damage was done before it came. Winning is rare in the political game. But it’s nice.

    It has not, though, led to any belated acclaim coming my way. After the referendum, invitations to speak dried up as if I’d been a personal friend of Jimmy Savile. 

    The Guardian lost every article I sent them (as it had before, but now without explanation or reply).

    The BBC, which had used me as a tame Brexiteer throughout the campaign, once it was over immediately replaced me with a Muslim to keep up their other diversity targets.

    As for what lies ahead of us, the EU’s intransigence and the weakness of an insecure Government in negotiating are making withdrawal messy and difficult. 

    The Remainers don’t help. 

    They denounce the vote as the result of fear, ignorance, even Russian deceit, and have unleashed another, even bigger tide of fear about the consequences.

    They do everything they can to discredit the British case for withdrawal, to shackle, soften and weaken the Government’s negotiating position and to collude with the EU to resist it, in the hope that eventually the people will give up their foolishness and stay, unhappily or not, in the promised land.

    The Brexiteers, in contrast, can only wait and see, hoping for a good outcome which can’t emerge until negotiations end.

    The British Government has been weakened by its second election and Remain’s long rearguard action.

    The EU Commission, struggling to keep its rickety show on the road and facing unmanageable difficulties in Eastern Europe and Italy, wants to punish Britain pour décourager les autres.

    These are the symptoms of an impossible negotiation. I fear that the account by the former Greek minister of finance, Yanis Varoufakis, of the way the EU crushed his country’s aspirations may well be an omen of what’s to come.

    Intransigence, delay and simple bloody-mindedness were their weapons — and clearly still are.

    Those who believe they have a divine right to rule don’t give up easily. Nor must we.

    • Extracted from Confessions Of A Political Maverick by Austin Mitchell, to be published by Biteback on July 3 at £20. © Austin Mitchell 2018. To order a copy for £15 (25% discount), call 0844 571 0640 or go tomailshop.co.uk/books. P&P is free on orders over £15. Offer available until July 9, 2018.

     

    *  *  *

     

    H.F.1583

    *

     

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     Why DO our judges put terror

     

     

    suspects ?

     

     

     

     

     

    [FIRST!

     

     

     

     

     

    before the security

     

     

     

     of the

     

     

     

    Realm OF ENGLAND.

     

     

     

     THE SIMPLE ANSWER

     

     

     IS

     

     

     

    BECAUSE

     

     

     

     

    WE DO NOT HAVE A

     

     

     

     

     HOME GROWN

     

     

     

     

    HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

     

     

     

      

     

    TO PROTECT

     

     

     

    OUR

     

     

     

    DEMOCRACY AND SECURITY?

     

     

    We have been out of the EU over six

     

     

    months yet we are still tied to an EU

     

     

    so-called

     

     

     HUMAN RIGHTS LAW-

     

     

     

    WHY?

     

     

     

    ...

     

    *

    [ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    *

    JULY 18,2020

    H.F.2051

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [AT  LONG LAST PATRIOTS

     

    OUTNUMBER

     

    TRAITORS]

     

    *

     

    EDWARD LUCAS: At last! The

     

     

     

    end of the age of appeasing

     

     

     

     Beijing bullies...

     

     

    by Edward Lucas

     

    EDWARD LUCAS: At last! The end of the age of

    appeasing ...

    CHINA'S plan for world domination faces a hitch. That is the upshot of our Government's impending decision to curb Chinese technology giant Huawei's role in our next-generation 5G mobile data network...to BE CONTINUED

    Tortured...

    *

    Unsafe...

    *

    Struggle

    Our spies use this information too, for example to expose Russian hitmen who tried to murder ex-spy Sergi Skripal in Salisbury two years ago. But our agencies operate under the strictest legal framework, Chinese espionage faces no restraints.

    For this reason, banning Huawei from the 5G network, costly and risky though it will be, is a necessary first step, but far from a sufficient one. We face a long and arduous battle to extricate ourselves from the technological tenacies of

    CHINESE POWER

    China has already gained an alarming edge in vital fields such as artificial intelligence and quantum computers.

    Some of that comes from the brilliance of Chiese scientists. But much comes from countries such as Britain.

    Self-interest and misplaced idealism has led us to allow China to rampage through our universities and industries, hoovering up

    HUMAN TALENT and TECHNICAL SECRETS

    The Chinese presence in Cambridge is of particular concern. Last month the local authority there ignored security concerns to give approval to a £1 billion Huawei research centre in the university city.

    SWE are in a existential struggle with a

    DICTATORSHIP

    that regards us with

    VENGEFUL CONTEMPT

    We have seen, with chilling clarity, the brutal treatment Chinese leaders mete out to their own people. Given the chance

    WHY WOULD THEY TREAT US ANY BETTER.

    [AFTER THEY HAVE EXTRACTED ALL OUR SECRETS TO MAKE US FEAR FOR OUR SAFETY AND OUR VERY EXISTENCE?]

    FULL ARTICLE

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

     

    *  *  *

     

    READ MORE!

    Daily Mail - JULY 8-2020

    By Richard Pendlebury and Larisa Brown

    Former MI6 spy's dossier sparks Huawei storm over

     'useful idiots'

    claims

    HOW LEVIATHANS OF THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT -WITH ACCESS TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF POLITICS, INDUSTRY AND EVEN THE MONARCHY-ARE LABELLED CHINA'S 'USEFUL IDIOTS' FOR BEING ON THE PHONE GIANTS PAYROLL. SO THE QUESTION:

    WHAT DOES HUAWEI GET FOR ITS MONEY?

    HUAWEI'S VERY

    BRITISH COUP.

    [IN OUR MIND THEIR ACTIONS ARE TREASONABLE.]

    *

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    H.F.2042

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     

    CHINESE

     

     

     

     

    FIXER

     

     

     

     

    TARGETS

     

     

     

     

     

     PRIME

     

     

     

     

    MINISTERS

     

     

     

    [USEFUL IDIOTS]

     

     

     

    TONY BLAIR

     

     

    GORDON BROWN

     

     

    DAVID CAMERON

     

     

    THERESA  MAY

     

     

    BORIS JOHNSON

     

    [BUT AT LEAST BORIS JOHNSON HAS AT THE ELEVENTH HOUR  TAKEN TO HEART THE WARNINGS FROM HIS BACKBENCHERS JUST IN TIME BEFORE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A GREATER TASK  OR EVEN IMPOSSIBLE TO EXTRICATE OUR SECURITY FROM THE TOTALITARIAN COMMUNIST CHINESE SECURITY NET! TO ENCOMPASS THE WORLD. ]

     

     

    EXCLUSIVE: New evidence

     

     

    of Beijing's infiltration of

     

    [THOSE 'USEFUL IDIOTS 'WITHIN]

     

    the

     

    BRITISH

     

    ESTABLISHMENT

     

    By   Glen Keogh- Daily Mail

     

     

    JULY 13,2020

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    Cyber alert

     

     

     

    as Huawei faces

     

     

     

    5G ban

     

     

    By Jason Groves -DAILY MAIL

     

    JULY 13,2020

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    [THE CHINESE SECURITY NETWORK WILL NOW GO ON OVERDRIVE TO DISRUPT OUR COMMUNICATIONS AND THE CHAOS WHICH WILL FOLLOW SHOULD BE LAID ON THOSE PRIME MINISTERS MENTIONED ABOVE AND OTHERS INVOLVED AND LEAD TO CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR PUTTING THE SECURITY OF THE REALM IN DANGER.]

     

    [LINKS UNOBTAINABLE AT THE PRESENT TIME]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

    H.F.2042

     

     

     

    *

     

     

    SEDUCED BY CHINA'S HONEY TRAP

    SPIES

    IT's the book that's laid bare how deeply the Chinese have infiltrated Britain. Now, inthis devastating  extract, we reveal how they steal intelligence using blackmail, money...and sex

    by CliveHamilton and Mareike Ohlberg.

    JULY 14,2020

     

    EXTRACT

    ... THE HARSH and undeniable reality we in the West have to face up to  is that Beijing wields its economic power like a great  weapon.

    its economic blackmail has proved highly effective, distorting decisions made by elected governments, frightening bureacrats, silencing critics, and  making countless companies beholden to it.

    [Just two words surfice to describe them as Lenin and Stalin stated many decade ago.

    'USEFUL IDIOTS.'

    When it was mentioned a few years ago with much gusto that China had invested in the CITY OF LONDON we knew they would rue the day they opened the door into the heart of our financial system]

    That power is only amplified when Chinese companies, answerable to Beijing, own critical infastructure in other countries

    The West needs to inoculate itself against these pressures where it can, but where it can't, it needs to make some hard choices and

    WALK AWAY.

    All industries, including the education and tourism sectors must understand the

    POLITICAL RISKS

    of becoming heavily reliant on revenue flows from China.

    SHORT -TERM PROFIT-MAKING

    exposes them

    TO LONG-TERM DAMAGE.

    When considering partnerships with Chianese organisations much better due diligence is required by people who understand how the

    CCP SYSTEM WORKS

    Companies should not expect their government to compromise

    HUMAN RIGHTS

    and

    CIVIL LIBERTIES

    to appease

    Beijing.

    As long as the current CCP regime rules China, prudent corporate management requires diversification of markets.

    Above all, the

    WEST

     needs to

    WAKE UP

    to the

    FACT

    that a

    CCP-LED CHINAH.

    IS NOT

    AND NEVER WILL BE

    IT'S

    FRIEND.

    * ADAPTED from Hidden Hand Exposing How The Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping The World by Clive Hamilton and Mareike Ohlberg, to be published by Oneworld on July 16 at £20 *2020 Clive Hamilton and Mareika Ohlberg.c

    JULY 16,2020

     

    H.F2049

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

    GENERATION

    OF

    WOMEN BETRAYED

    IN THE

    NHS

    Thousands harmed by THREE health scandals amid culture of arrogance and intimidation,reveals damning report.

    By Kate Pickles- Daily Mail Health Correspondent

    JULY 8,2020

    TENS of thousands of women and children were 'catastrophically ' harmed by three avoidable health scandals, a damning report concludes today.

    It says crippling symptoms were dismissed as 'women's problems' by intimidating or arrogant doctors and surgeons. Patients who complained faced an'unresponsive and defensive' healthcare system.

    The inquiry said lives were catastrophically affected' by mistakes made with three different products: pelvic mesh implants, a pregnancy test drug and an epilepsy treatment

     

    heIt criticised the NHS, private health firms and regulators for failing to listen to patients or spot the signs when things went drastically wrong.

    The scandle unfolded over many decades. Baroness Cumberiege, the former health minister who led the review called for sweeping reforms, including an overhaul of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, which polices the

    SAFETY OF DRUGS AND MEDICAL DEVICES

    She also urged the Government to appoint an

    INDEPENDENT PATIENT SAFETY COMMISSIONER.

     An official response to her recommendations is expected in Parliament today July 8, 2020.

    dThe inquiry gathered evidence from hundreds of families affected by t6he

    PUBLIC HEALTH DISASTERS

    some dating back 60 yeasrs

    It examined the use of pelvic mesh, the hormone pregnancy test drug Primodos and epilepsy drug sodium valproate.

    In a letter to Health Secretary Matt Hancock, Baroness Cumberiege said patients had been let down by the

    ENTIRE HEALTH SYSTEM

    -from the NHS to manufactures of medical equipment.

    'I have conducted many reviews and inquires over the years, but I have never encountered anything like this- the intensity of suffering experienced by so many families and the fact that they have endured it for decades,' she said.

    'Much of this suffering was entirely avoidable, caused and compounded by failings in the health system itself.'

    'The first duty of any health system is to do no harm to those in its care, but I am sorry to say that in too many cases concerning Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh, our system failed

    We met with people, more often than not-women, whose worlds have been turned upside down, their whole lives, and often their children's livesz, shaped by the

    PAIN, ANGUISH and GUILT they feel as the RESULT of PRIMODOS, SODIUM VALPROATE or PELVIC MESH...
  • A generation of women betrayed: Thousands were harmed by ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8499945/A-generation-women...

    generation of women betrayed: Thousands were harmed by THREE health scandals – mesh implantspregnancy test drug and epilepsy treatment - which saw agonising symptoms dismissed as 'women's...

  • A generation of women betrayed: Thousands were harmed by ...

    https://distincttoday.net/2020/07/07/a-generation-of-women-betrayed...

    07/07/2020 · By Kate PicklesHealth Correspondent for the Daily Mail . Hundreds of babies are being born each year to mothers who were unaware their medication could harm them in the womb. It is thought that as many as 20,000 infants were badly affected by the anti-epilepsy drug sodium valproate.

  • Damning NHS failures that led to a ... - Daily Mail Online

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6697733/Damning-NHS-failures...

    By Kate PicklesHealth Correspondent for the Daily Mail Women are being put off cervical screening over fears the results could suggest they or their partners have been cheating, a survey has found.

  • Women who miss their cancer screening ... - Daily Mail Online

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6832435/Women-miss-cancer...

    20/03/2019 · Women across the UK will be offered DIY smear tests in a bid to cut cervical cancer deaths. ... By Kate PicklesHealth Correspondent For The Daily Mail. Published: 18:00 EDT, ... Part of the ...

  •  

    H.F.2046/1

     

    [NHS

    IS A LAW

    UNTO ITSELF. ]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    JULY 10-2020

    H.F.2045

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

     

     

     

    [THE BATTLE FOR THE SURVIVAL OF THE GREATER MAJORITY OF MANKIND IS NOW AT ITS MOST CRITICAL STAGE - AS YOU WILL READ BELOW.]

    Chaos Increasing in U.S. and Worldwide as Khazarian Mafia Desperately Struggles to Survive

    This week we would like to inform readers that our newsletter is under unprecedented attack and that your support is needed now more than ever.  One of our main intelligence sources in South Asia is being held indefinitely in prison under life-threatening conditions based on planted evidence and trumped-up charges.  Another has vanished.  Yet another was poisoned with ricin.  Your correspondent has also been targeted over the past two months by no less than three poisoning attempts and survived with assistance from both NSA and Asian secret society sources.  This work carries risks that we all understand, but there is no alternative except to fight on as the fate of humanity is at stake.

    Also, this writer was physically stopped from attending a press conference at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan to prevent me from asking Japanese Defense Minister Kono Taro about the Fukushima mass murder event.  Of course, similar harassment is being reported by multiple truth reporting media outlets.

    This is all part of an incredibly hysterical propaganda war based around the so-called COVID-19 coronavirus.  We are seeing fake news portals like the New York Times, Reddit, and the Drudge report filling over half their output with fake stories.  If you see the words COVID, Russia, Trump, or Hong Kong in any of these, or related outlets, you are almost certainly reading fiction.  As far as COVID is concerned, any reader can visit local hospitals and see what’s happening with their own eyes.

    It is true that old people are dying from pneumonia and other causes, as always. But now, hospitals are being ordered to bypass typical treatment protocols and put patients with any sort of breathing difficulty on ventilators that result in fatalities with insurance bribes as incentives to label unrelated deaths as COVID.  The whole thing is a well-organized, coordinated fraud.  And yet it is resulting in incredible economic damage and personal harm to millions of people.

    The source of the COVID fake news infection has been forensically traced to the Knights of Malta and the P3 Freemason lodge.

    322 new Covid cases in Mississippi!
    322 new Covid cases in Ohio! 
    322 new Covid cases in Oman!
    322 new Covid cases in Kentucky!
    322 new Covid cases in Mississippi! 
    322 new Covid cases in Armenia!
    322 new Covid cases in Iraq!
    322 Covid cases in Bangkok!
    322 new Covid cases in Juarez!
    322 new Covid cases in El Paso!
    322 new Covid cases in Mexico City!
    322 new Covid cases in Oaxaca!
    322 new Covid cases in WISCONSIN!
    322 new Covid cases in IOWA
    322 new Covid deaths in DELAWARE
    322 new Covid cases in Italy
    322 new Covid cases in Massachussetts

    (thanks to Jim Stone for spotting this)

    Where have we seen this number before?

    The original skull and bones can be found in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, a church built by the mother of Emperor Constantine, founder of Roman Christianity.

    To quote from Wikipedia:

    “The number “322” appears in Skull and Bones’ insignia and is widely reported to be significant as the year of Greek orator Demosthenesdeath.[19][26][5] A letter between early society members in Yale’s archives[27] suggests that 322 is a reference to the year 322 BC and that members measure dates from this year instead of from the common era.  In 322 BC, the Lamian War ended with the death of Demosthenes and Athenians were made to dissolve their government and establish a plutocratic system in its stead, whereby only those possessing 2,000 drachmas or more could remain citizens.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones

    The fact that this number celebrates the triumph of plutocracy over democracy tells us exactly who we are dealing with in this COVID conspiracy: the families who own the fortune 500 companies.

    They are pulling out all the stops because their control grid is threatened by secret negotiations now taking place concerning the Bretton Woods financial architecture set up after World War II, according to members of the Rothschild family.  This includes the World Bank, the Global Debt Facility, the International Bank for…

    The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
    Please Log In or Register to create an account.
     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS IN HEADING ARE OURS!]

     

    June 29, 2020

     

    H.F.2040

     

     

    [WHY THE EU  IS DELIBERATELY AVOIDING A DEAL WITH THE UK-AND WHY BORIS JOHNSON SHOULD KEEP HIS PROMISE TO LEAVE THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL AT THE END OF JUNE-2020.]

    ZURICH (Reuters) - Switzerland and the European Union are unlikely to agree a deal on a new treaty regulating their relations until next year, when the outcome of Brexit talks is known, former EU Commissioner Guenther Oettinger said in an interview published on Monday.

    Switzerland, which is not part of the EU, has a patchwork of 120 sectoral accords with the bloc, and the two sides have spent years negotiating a framework agreement.

    But officials have said a Swiss-EU accord is unlikely to emerge until the terms of Britain's future relationship with the bloc have been settled, because Brussels has been loath to give the Swiss concessions that Britain might seize on.

    Britain, which quit the EU at the end of January, has until the end of this year to reach an agreement with the EU on their future relationship but the talks are at an impasse.

    "I don't think that an (EU-Swiss) agreement will be reached in the second half of the year before the exact course of Brexit is clear," Oettinger, the former point person in Swiss-EU ties, told the Neue Zuercher Zeitung newspaper.

    "The willingness to agree is likely to be low," said Oettinger, a German who was an EU commissioner from 2010 to 2019.

    Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis has said a new agreement is not his country's top priority as it tackles the COVID-19 pandemic. Bern wants to keep the treaty issue under wraps before a September referendum on ending a Swiss-EU pact on the free movement of citizens.

    Brussels wants the Swiss to endorse terms under which Bern would routinely adopt single market rules and create a more effective platform for resolving disputes. The Swiss want to forge domestic consensus on how to proceed.

    The talks between the two sides should be a priority for 2021, Oettinger said.

    (Reporting by John Revill, Editing by Timothy Heritage)

    [GERMANY HAS NEVER HAD ANY INTENTION WHATSOEVER OF AGREEING A DEAL  WITH THE UK UNLESS IT WAS ON THEIR OWN DICTATORIAL TERMS.-AS IT HAS SHOWN FOR ALL TO SEE OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS. OBVIOUSLY FRAU MERKEL-SORRY! I MEAN FRAU HITLER WAS CONFIDENT THAT YET AGAIN A UK PM PROMISE TO LEAVE WITH A NO DEAL AT THE END OF JUNE NEEDED TO BE TAKEN WITH A PINCH OF SALT!]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    JUNE 20,2020

    H.F.2039

     

     

    *

     

    The world is also about to find out that Angela Merkel is Adolf Hitler’s daughter.  The Italians, who have just broken free of German (EU) control sent us a copy of the only known picture of Hitler with his daughter Angela. The message reads, “and when you grow up Angela, destroy all of Europe.”

    .” https://news.yahoo.com/merkel-isolating-pressure-mounts-her-040052387.html

     

    APRIL 6,2020

    H.F.1806

     

    *

     

     

     

    ENGLISH IDENTITY IN A LAND CALLED ENGLAND

     

    We have to thank the membership of the BLACK LIVES MATTER

    for their campaign which has illustrated their attitude of intolerance and lack of respect for British history.  When they came to our shores to be citizens we did not expect they would tear down anything they feel  alien to their feelings rather than respect the right of their hosts to protect their past history, rather than bury the past as if it had never happened.

    What these newcomers to our country have illustrated is their gross arrogance in wishing to obliterate our past to suit their pandering guilt complex instead of integrating into the culture of their tolerant hosts. This has been brought about because of government inaction to curb immigration over the past decades - the patriotic population have had enough.

    What we have seen is that newcomers from other cultures do not appear to have joined the 'mad mobs' which shows that that the BLACK LIVES MATTER role in the UK was ill conceived and the repercussions of that decision will reinforce the anger of the host nation to further demands that those who are seeking a home in ENGLAND should sign a declaration of good citizenship to respect the LAWS-CUSTOMS-HISTORY... of their NEW HOME in ENGLAND

     

    *  *  *

    OUR PAST

     

     

    'Methinks I see in my mind a noble and puissant nation

     rousing herself like a strong man after sleep,

     and  shaking her invincible locks. Methinks I see her as an eagle

    mewing her mighty youth, and kindling her undazzled eyes

    at the full midday beam.'

     

     

    *

     

    'Yet sometimes Nations will decline so low

    From virtue, which is reason, that no wrong,

    But Justice, and some fatal curse annext

    Deprives them of their outward libertie

    Their inward lost.'

    MILTON (Paradise Lost)

     

     

    *

     

    'All our past proclaims our future; Shakespeare's voice and  Nelson's hand.

    Milton's faith and Wordsworth's trust in this

    our chosen and chainless land

    Bear us  witness; come the world  against her,

    England  yet shall stand.'

     

    SWINBURNE

     

    *

    [TO EACH THEIR OWN]

     

    'The social price that a successfully aggressive civilisation has to pay is a seepage of its alien victims culture into its own life-stream. The effect on the victims of assault is  of the same order, but more complex. The introduction of Western ideals and institutions into non-Western societies often produces disconcerting results, for

     'one man's meat is another man's poison'

    The attempt to introduce one element of an alien culture, while excluding the rest is doomed to failure. '

     

    Page 388-2a

     

    A study of History-Toynbee.

     

    JUNE 13-2020

     

    H.F.2028

     

     

    *

    **

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [A WARNING FROM THE PAST

    WHICH THE ENGLISH PEOPLE IGNORE AT THEIR PERIL.]

     

    THOUGHT OF THE DAY

    We do not know why Empires Fall and States decline; but we can at any rate conjecture, with no little justice that a disturbance of the racial composition of the Roman Empire was one great cause of its fall. Right laws, Sound morals for the strongest safeguard of every national state; but a sound [English] racial basis is also necessary. A nation may be enriched by a [small] varied contribution of foreign immigration.

    BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION [AS WE FIND IN 2020] GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER, A NATION MAY [WILL] LOSE ITS INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID [ENGLISH]  CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS [ENGLAND] HAS LOST ITS VERY

    SELF.

    Ernest Barker-NATIONAL CHARCHER-1927

    *  *  *

    [THE CURSE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS  NOW WELL EMBEDDED INTO OUR GOVERNMENT IN 2020 - POLITICIANS -POLICE... HAS TAKEN ITS TOLL AND WITH A GREAT NUMBER OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE TAKEN IN BY THIS NATION DESTROYING CURSE -THEIR COUNTRY WILL SOON BE NO LONGER  BE THEIRS AND THEIR NEW MASTERS WILL APPLAUD THEIR SUCCESSFUL CRUSADE TO DESTROY ENGLAND FROM WITHIN.

    JUNE 23,2020

     

    WE thank RICHARD LITTLEJOHN of the Daily Mail of June 23,20

    for his timely article

     

    JUST STOP THESE STUPID RIOTES - IT'S GETTING SILLY

     

    * * * Black Lives Matter may have managed to get 150,000 people out onto the streets but there are another

    63 MILLION

    of us sitting at home utterly bewildered at the way in which the

    POLITICAL

    BROADCAST

    COMMERCIALt

    INSTITUTIONAL

    and

    CRIMINAL JUSTICE ESTABLISHMENT

    has simply caved in to these

    REVOLUTIONARY VANDALS

     

    Those behind BLM may be hell - bent  on toppling statues of long-dead white men, but their real aim is tearing down tearing down the PRESENT and CONTROLLING THE FUTURE.

     

    They have tapped in to genuine feelings of remorse and anger and anger at an unlawful killing 4,500 milesw away to advance their SINISTER AGENDA of SMASHING OUR TOLERANT, CIVILISED SOCIETY and replacing it with their own, rigidly enforced,

    LEFT WING, REVISIONIST, HISTORICALLY ILLITERATE BIGOTED TOTALITARIANISM.

     

    And they're getting away with it.

     

    WHO WILL SPEAK FOR US,THE [ENGLISH]LARGELY SILENT,UNDEMONSTRATIVE,LAW-ABIDING MAJORITY??

    WHO WILL DEFEND THE TRADITIONAL VALUES WE HOLD DEAR?

     

    Certainly not the spineless  [politically-correct]political class, or the ghastly, cringing broadcasters [CH 4]and definitely not  SCOTLAND YARDor any of the other brainwashed COMMON PURPOSE careerists running what used to be a   POLICE FORCE

     envied the world over

     

     now an international laughing stock

     

    Hears a plan. With OurAmasing NHS currently running at just 40 per cent capacity because of COVID, why don't they all elect to have one of their lega amputated as a gesture of solidarity with BLM? Then they can spend the rest of their lives on one knee, to demonstrate their woke piety.

    Until this happens, maybe we can  take a lead from the farmers who housed down a field in Derbyshire with manure to stop an illegal rave. Locals dubbed it Poo Corner. How about enlisting them to do the same in Trafalgar Square, to discourage demonstrators?

     

    If the usual suspects still insist on showing off every weekend, we could call it The Slurry With The Lunatic Fringe On Top .

     

    The Black Lives Matters sketch has run its course.

     

    JOKE'S OVER, CUE COLONEL CHAPMAN

     

     

    STOP THIS, IT'S GETTING SILLY

     

    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Just stop these stupid protests - it's ...

     

    FULL ARTICLE

     

    *  *  *

     

    [ HIGHLIGHTING - COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

     

    http://FreedomKeys.com
    Freedom Keys

     

    Professor R. J. Rummel, who keeps track of such things, now estimates that in the 20th century

    262,000,000

    people were murdered by their own governments.  And all these horrors were perpetrated by collectivist governments for the alleged sake of "the proletariat," the "master race," and especially, "the greater good."

    None were done by countries based

    on

    individualism

     

    See:  http://tinyurl.com/RJRummel 

     

     

    JUNE 23,2020

     

     

    H. F .1424

     

    [A MATTER OF BALANCE!

    WHAT BLM FAILED TO MENTION WHEN THEY BROUGHT THEIR CAMPAIGN TO THE UK.]

     

    Black Lives Matter: Racism

     in the

    Middle East and North Africa -

     and how to combat it

     
     
    nyanesh Kamat | Political analyst
    Updated Jun 29, 2020 | 17:15 IST

     

     

    From Basra to Beirut and from Tunis to Tel Aviv, anti-Black racism exists in various forms across the region.

     
    Racims in middle east
    Representative image  |  Photo Credit: iStock Images

    While much of the Western world remains convulsed with Black Lives Matter protests, the Mena (Middle East and North Africa) region should use this moment to address its own anti-Black racism problem. From Basra to Beirut and from Tunis to Tel Aviv, anti-Black racism exists in various forms across the region.

    In the Mena region, it is mostly the consequence of centuries of slavery, with Black Africans enslaved and sold in slave markets across the Indian Ocean and Arabian Gulf. Indeed, in some parts of the Gulf, slavery was abolished only as recently as the 1970s. This is also why racial insults hurled at Black people in these countries often refer to them as “slaves” or “servants.”

    This racist mindset also leads to widespread systemic discrimination against Black people throughout the region. Basra in southern Iraq is home to the majority of the country’s estimated 1.2 million Black population. Black Iraqis have long complained of systemic racism, with limited access to housing, education, healthcare and all but the most menial jobs.

    While Black communities in some Mena countries grapple with the legacy of slavery, others still face modern-day slavery or conditions akin to it. Mauritania is one of the last countries on the planet where slavery continues to this day. The Global Slavery Index of 2018 estimates there are approximately 90,000 Black Mauritanians, or roughly 2.4 per cent of the population, bound to a caste system that is a form of modern-day slavery, with their enslavement inherited from ancestors and passed down to their children. Slavery was abolished in 1981 but it was not until 2007 that it was made a crime, and that too in response to international pressure, with successive governments failing to eradicate the scourge.

    A similar caste-like Black community exists at the margins of society in Yemen. They call themselves the Muhamasheen (“the marginalized”), but other Yemenis refer to them pejoratively as the Akhdam (“the servants”). Many survive by begging. Needless to say, this community has borne the brunt of Yemen’s ongoing civil war.

    While countries like Mauritania and Yemen grapple with centuries-old practices, others have seen slavery rear its ugly head in modern times. Black Africans have long used Libya’s long Mediterranean coast as a staging post from which to attempt to reach Europe. Several migrants have been enslaved and tortured by Libyan militias, and subsequently sold in open-air slave markets.

    Popular culture in the Mena region is also rife with anti-Black racism, from caricatures of Black people used for comedy to erasing them completely from depictions of national culture. The national media in countries like Tunisia portray the country’s citizens as light-skinned. It might come as a shock that 15 per cent of Tunisians are black.

    Iran has a sizeable Black population living along the country’s southern coast. Their contribution to the culture of that region – whether in terms of cuisine, spirituality or to the unique bandari music – is immense. But Iranian popular culture would have us believe the country is populated only by fair-skinned Persians. This comes largely from the “Aryan myth” of Iranian nationalism. Depictions of Black people are limited to stereotypes or pale-skinned people in “blackface” – theatrical make-up used to portray racist caricatures of Black people. Indeed, early Iranian theatre often featured a type of comedy performance known as Siah Baazi, a term meaning “playing black.”

    In the Arab world, more recently, several Arabic-language networks have come in for criticism for their racist depiction of Black people in hidden camera-practical joke reality television shows.

    Almost a year ago, protesters marched through cities in Israel calling for an end to anti-Black police brutality and discrimination in housing, healthcare and education. One of the most horrifying examples of anti-Black racism in Israel occurred in 2016 when the government admitted to having given Ethiopian-Israeli women long-term contraceptives without their consent. The community’s birth rate has halved over the past decade.

    Perhaps the most egregious form of institutionalized racism in the Mena region is the kafala system of hiring migrant workers in Lebanon and parts of the Gulf, which has been described as a modern-day form of slavery. The kafala system, which is not covered by regular labour laws in Lebanon, gives employers total control over the legal residency of “their” workers. Every so often, horrific kafala-related stories emerge of migrant workers, most of them African, being made to work long hours without pay, tortured, sexually abused and even murdered, with little or no recourse to the law for help. Racism also pervades the tourism and hospitality sector in Lebanon and parts of the Gulf, with African and South Asian tourists complaining of being denied entry to trendy bars and clubs.

    If there is to be any impetus for change in the Mena region, it is likely to come from civil society. For example, recent protests against Lebanon’s corrupt political class were led by the youth of the country and included calls to abolish kafala. In 2018, Tunisia became the first Mena country to pass a wide-ranging anti-racism law.

    But much more needs to be done. Mena countries need to rethink their concept of nationalism, redefine the meaning of citizenship and re-negotiate the social contract between citizen and state. If there is to be any hope of dismantling racism and every vestige of slavery in the region, those are fundamental imperatives. Let the Black Lives Matter movement be the catalyst.

    In arrangement with Syndication Bureau

    Dnyanesh Kamat is a guest contributor. Views expressed are personal.

     
     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

     

    JULY 1, 2020

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.2037

     

    If we only ever sanctify the NHS, its harrowing failures will never be cured

     

    By Ian Birrell-Daily Mail

    JULY 9,2020
     

    GENERATION OF WOMEN BETRAYED

    Daily Mail -JULY 8,2020

     

     

    DANIEL MASON was born a half century ago without hands, with missing toes, a malformed mouth and impaired vision.

    From an early age, he - and his family-had to deal with people asking about his disabilities. The impact on his life has been considerable.

    His car, clothes and his eating implements must be tailored to his needs. He has not been able to form intimate relationships. Not surprisingly, he has suffered bouts of depression.

    leDanil's mother Daphne long suspected the cause of his problems was a powerful hormone tablet called

    Primodos

    that was given to women to determine whether they were pregnant. But when she raised her concerns with doctors they were dismissed.

    Now at last, Daphne, has been vindicated with official confirmation this week that her fears were RIGHT!, in a 277-page landmark review by Baroness Cumberlege into THREE separate HEALTH SCANDALS that has EXPOSED a litany of SHAMEFUL FAILINGS by the NHS , regulatory authorities and private hospitals

    DAMNING...

     

    Disdain...

     

    Suffer...

    Some critics point to the rising costs of compensation paid out by the NHS with an estimated bill of

    £9 BILLION

     a year.

    , as one reason for the refusal of managers and clinicians to face up to the problems. But these costs would plummet if the NHS was more open about its

    MISTAKES

    stopped trying to silence those raising concerns and was more prepared to

    APOLOGISE..

    We must accept that everyone even doctors and nurses , can make errors. And it would be kinder to distressed families not to drag out hostile legal battles for years, driving up the

    BILLS and PAIN.

    Now there is a proposal for a

    Patient Safety Commissioner.

    This  has potential but only if they are empowered as a strong, independent voice for  harmed patients and families.

    Those who suffer  are often the most vulnerable in society:

    THE ELDERLY

    NEW BORN BABIES

    and

    PEOPLE WITH LEARNING DIFFICULTIES.

    Three of whom die each day on average because of the avoidable failings of the  NHS

    Clapping dedicated carers in this crisis has united this nation. But we should NOT ignore how the same precious health service routinely inflicts

    GRIEF

    PAIN

    and

    SUFFERING

    on those it is meant to

    HELP,

    such as

     Daniel and Daphne Mason.

    If we really love the NHS, then, as with any marriage, we must cherish it both for

    BETTER AND FOR WORSE

    *  *  *

     

    If we only ever sanctify the NHS, its

     

    failures will NEVER ...

    www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8504295/If-sanctify-NHS...

    08/07/2020 · If we only ever sanctify the NHSits harrowing failures will NEVER be cured, says IAN BIRRELL as a damning report exposes three health scandals . By Ian …

     

     

    Daily Mail -JULY 8,2020

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

     

     

    H.F.2048

     

     

     

     

     

     

    A REMINDER

     

     

     

     

     

    HOW WE TOOK A WRONG TURN ON JANUARY 1-1973

    *

    THE WAY WE WERE

    THE BRITISH POLITICAL TRADITION

    The Concept of Empire

    BURKE TO ATTLEE

    1774-1947

    Edited by

    George Bennett

    *

    LONDON

    ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK

    79

    J.A.FROUDE. Oceana-1886

    [Below an excerpt which we feel appropriate to mention with

    BREXIT

    in mind.]

    Page 297- Concept of Empire. -1947

     ' IMPOSSIBILITY ' is a word of politicians who are without the wish or without the capacity to comprehend new conditions. An 'empire' of Oceana there cannot be. The English race do not like to be parts of an empire [or a European Union in our day] But a 'commonwealth' of Oceana held together by

    COMMON BLOOD

    COMMON INTEREST

    and a common pride in the great position which

    UNITY can secure-such a commonwealth as this may grow of itself if politicians

    CAN BE INDUCED TO LEAVE IT ALONE.

    ...It has become doubtful even to the political economist whether England [1886] can trust entirely to free trade and competition to keep the place which she has hitherto held.  Other nations press us with their rivalries. Expenses increase, manufactures languish or cease to profit. Revenue, once so expansive, becomes stationary. 'Business' may probably will, blaze up again, but the growth of it can no longer [1886] be regarded as constant, while population increase and hungry stomachs multiply, requiring the three meals a day whatever the condition of the markets. Hence those among us who have disbelieved all along that a great nation can venture its whole fortunes safely on the power of underselling its neighbours in calicoes and ironwork no longer address a public opinion entirely cold.  It  begins to be admitted that were Canada and South Africa and Australia and New Zealand members of one body with us, with a free flow of our population into them , We might sit secure against shifts and changes.  In the multiplying number of our own fellow citizens animated by a common spirit, we should have purchasers for our goods from whom we fear no rivalry; we should turn in upon them the tide of our emigrants[1886] which now flows away, while the emigrants themselves  would thrive under their own fig tree, and  rear children with stout limbs and colour in their cheeks, and a chance before them of a human existence.  Oceana would then rest on sure foundations; and her navy - the hand of strength and the symbol of her unity- would ride securely in self-supporting stations in the four quarters of the globe [1886].

    *

    WILLIAM HUSKISSON . Speech on moving for a Select Committee on the Civil Government of Canada

    House of Commons,3 May, 1828.

    Sir, England is the parent of many flourishing colonies-one of them is become an empire among the most powerful in the world. In  every quarter of the globe we have planted the seeds of freedom, civilisation, and Christianity.  To every  quarter of the globe we have carried the language, the free institutions, the system of laws, which prevail in this country; - in every quarter they are fructifying and making progress; and if it be said by some selfish calculator, that we have done all this at the expense of sacrifices which we ought not to have made, my answer is,- in spite of these sacrifices, we are still the first and happiest people in the old world; and, whilst this is our lot, let us rejoice rather in that rich harvest of glory, which must belong to a nation that has laid the foundation of similar happiness and prosperity in other nations, kindred in blood, in habits, and in feelings to ourselves. [1828]

    Ibid., Vol iii.pp286-7

    *

    126: CLEMENT R. ATTLEE. Speech in the House of Commons

    15 March 1946

     

    ...We should be conscious that the British have done a great work in India. We have united India and given her that sense of nationality which she so very largely lacked over the previous centuries,. She had learned from us principles of democracy and justice. When Indians attack our rule, they base their attack, not on Indian principles, but on the basis of standards derived from Britain. I was struck the other day in the United States, at a dinner where I met a number of distinguished Americans, including a very distinguished Indian, where the talk was turning on the way in which principles worked out here have been applied on the Continent of America.  It was pointed out that America had a great heritage from Britain.  My Indian friend said to me, " You know, the Americans sometimes forget there is another great nation that has also inherited these principles and traditions, and that is India.  We feel that we have a duty, a right and a privilege because we also bring to the world and work those very principles that you evolved in Britain."

    Hansard, Fifth Series, Vol. 420, cs.1421-2.

    *

    [That is why by joining the EU  on January 1-1973 England renounced her historic PAST to become a tool of its planned mischief maker, our enemy of

    TWO WORLD WARS

    -Adolf Hitler

     H.F.1211-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

     

     

     

    THAT IS WHY WE NEED TO RECOVER OUR  ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

    IN

    WESTMINSTER

     

    'I wish, sir, an English Parliament to speak the free unbiased sense of the body of the

    ENGLISH PEOPLE

    and of every man among us,  of each individual who may be justly supposed to be a fair majority...and we ought always to remember the important truth, acknowledged by every free state-that all government is instituted for the good of the mass of the people to be governed that they are the original fountain of power, and even of reverence and in all events the last response...I mention them now to show the necessity of a new regulation

    [To introduce PR-Proportional Representation in 2020.]

      of the representation of the Kingdom of ENGLAND...the monstrous injustice and glaring partiality of the present representation of the Commons of England

     [In fact there is no Commons of England  since 1707 at Westminster since 1707]

    has been fully stated, and is, I believe almost universally acknowledged, as well as as the necessity of our recurring to the great leading principle of our free [English] constitution which declares the House of Parliament [English Parliament] to be only a delegated power for the people at large. Policy, no less than justice, calls our intention to the momentous point; and reason, not custom, ought to be our guide in a business of this consequence [PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION in 2020 in an ENGLISH PARLIAMENT] where the right of a free people are materially interested.

    [In Germany which has PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION those who wish for the return of their NATIONHOOD are protected in their democratic decision by the LAW of the LAND as we have seen only recently.]

    Without a true representation [Introduction of PR in 2020] of the commons our constitution is essentially defective ,our Parliament is delusive name, a mere phantom, and all other remedies to recover the pristine purity of the form of government established by our ancestors would be ineffectual, even the shortening of the period of Parliament and a place and pension bill, which iI highly approve, and think absolutely necessary. [As we the EDP in 2020 fight for the return of the ENGLISH PARLIAMENT at WESTMINSTER.]  I therefore flatter myself sir, that I have the concurrence of the House with the notion which I have the honour of making, That leave be given to bring in a bill for a just and equal representation of the

    PEOPLE of ENGLAND in PARLIAMENT.

    BORIS JOHNSON HAS A STRIKING MAJORITY IN WESTMINSTER TO ENABLE HIM TO BE A MAN OF HISTORY TO RIGHT THE WRONG AND RETURN WESTMINSTER TO ITS HISTORIC PLACE AS THE HOME OF THE

     ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

    JUNE 14-2020

     

    The above extract of an article

    JOHN WILKS

    A warning and a Prophecy

    The Commons and its Rights

    1727-1797

     

    taken from

     

    International University Reading Course

    Copyright by

    International University Society.

    JUNE 14-2020

    H.F.2031

     

     

    A REMINDER FROM-2006

    *

    Daily Mail -November 27, 2006

     

    LET THEM EAT PORRIDGE-WE'LL KEEP OUR CAKE

    By

     

    Max Hastings

     

    Daily Mail -November 27, 2006

     

    MONTHS before the 300th anniversary of the

    ACT OF UNION

    -Which brought together Scotland and England under a common Parliament, new opinion Polls suggest that the two peoples have had enough of each other.

     

    More than half the respondents to a weekend ICM survey on both sides of the border claim to believe that the two nations should go it alone again. The figures reflect sentiments which anyone who travels the United Kingdom can endorse. In Scotland, ill-will and resentment towards the ENGLISH HAS BEEN MOUNTING FOR MANY YEARS.

     

    A 1995 Nuffield Foundation study found that 75 per cent of Scots felt 'some antipathy towards the English, thinking them aggressive, arrogant and untrustworthy.

    Today, hostility has grown. It was highlighted by ugly incidents during the World Cup, when some fans rash enough to wear English colours in Scotland were physically assaulted, and Scottish First Minister Jack McConnell defiantly asserted that he was more interested in the fates of the Trinidad and Angola teams than that of ENGLAND.

     

    Meanwhile, south of the border, after decades in which the English seemed unmoved by Scottish animosity, suddenly passions are stirring.  There is growing awareness, and resentment of the bills we pay for the northern kingdom's fecklessness.

    Per capita PUBLIC SPENDING in Scotland is much higher then in ENGLAND. Official figures this year put it at £8,265 per head in Scotland and £6,762 in ENGLAND.

     

    The Scottish parliament has recently decreed that the elderly should receive free long-term health-care regardless of their wealth. In England it is a source of bitter grievance that no such provision is available - yet we are funding Edinburgh's largesse to its own.

     

    Am astonishingly recent statistic suggests that of Scotland's  population of five million, just 163,000 people are taxpayers when all relief's and subsidies are discounted.  The remainder are takers from - and not contributors to - the NATION EXCHEQUER.

     

    And yet this same nation of dependents possesses a vice-like grip on BRITAIN'S governance.

    Scottish MPs vote on ENGLISH issues in the COMMONS, while ENGLISH  MPs are barred from voting on Scottish ones.

    Many key OFFICES of GOVERNMENT are filled by SCOTS MPs, and we shall have a Scottish prime minister if Gordon Brown succeeds Tony Blair.

    The English might swallow all this with good grace, if the SCOTS seemed grateful or even merely friendly.

    BUT THEY ARE NOT

    And as abuse grows, as English visitors perceive ever more hostility when they cross the border, southerners are GETTING ANGRY.

    Now , their feelings are reflected in opinion polls, and building a head of steam.

    'If the Scots don't like it, why don't they just b***** off and become INDEPENDENT? demand a host of voices in English bars and homes.

    If the latest ICM poll is to be believed, 68 per cent of the southern public wants an

    ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

     to match the

     Scottish one.

     

    THIS, it seems to me, would be the worst possible response to the tensions in the [so-called] UNION. It would create another vastly expensive layer of GOVERNMENT in a [so-called] United Kingdom which is already over-governed.

     

    [England OUT -OF-EU which be an even richer country and a NEW UNION of Independent Nation States would add little to the wealth of an EU FREE zone.  There is the possibility that Scotland would prefer to remain in the EU but with English withdrawal any cost would have to be shared by the other contributors in the EU and  NOT ENGLAND.]

    If we do not think much of most Commons MPs, imagine what the members of a subordinate English Parliament would be: rejects from Westminster scrambling to board a branch gravy train.

    Take a look at the McPygmies' who squander our money in Edinburgh. They are most famous for promoting a measure to give women rights to breastfeed in public places, and venting their spleen on the English as the source of all Scotland's woes.

     

    Do we really want the same sort of thing in an English Parliament HOUSE, to be established -

    let us say in the forthcoming and soon-to-be-derelict Olympic stadium in East London?

    [The historical home of the INDEPENDENT ENGLISH PARLIAMENT is at WESTMINSTER and there it will always remain]

    The only rational debate must be about whether the UNION should continue at all. Economically from an English standpoint there is no case. Scotland brings nothing to the party except glorious scenery.

    The northern kingdom has suffered a tragic decline since the 19th century when it was a thriving heartland of heavy industry, coal mining and shop building.

     

    As engineers, architects, soldiers and traders. Scots were among the foremost builders of the British Empire.  In the 20th century, however, since the collapse of the old manufacturing base, Scotland has languished.

    Nationalism began its resurgence some 30 years ago, when Scottish football fans started to sing

     Flower of Scotland

    -at International matches in place of

    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

    The movement gathered pace dramatically during the years of Margaret Thatcher. Scots bitterly resisted her campaign to strip their decaying industries of public funding and make them stand on their own feet.

    'With the precise and good intentions of a nurse,'

     historian Richard Weight has written,

     

    'Mrs. Thatcher unpeeled the fiscal bandages which British government  since the 1930s had placed on Scotland and Wales in an effect to heal the wounds of industrial decline.

    THATCHER WAS RIGHT, of course, but the Scots have never forgiven her or the ENGLISH. They cling to an implacable conviction that we had shafted them, above all by stealing 'THEIR' OIL.

    IN TRUTH, if we had given them every penny from the North Sea bonanza but made them pat their own way for say, the past half century, SCOTLAND WOULD STILL BE IN DEEP DEFICIT.

    While England has transformed itself into a post-industrial society the northern  kingdom has lagged helplessly. Scots make many excuses for their failure, but frequent studies have concluded that they simply lack the entrepreneurial energy and skills to complete.

    Edinburgh has become a significant financial centre, but Scottish businesses start-ups have an appalling survival record. As ambitious young Scots migrate south, the population sustained  only by a steady inflow of ENGLISH retirement couples, who appreciate cheap housing and a low cost of living.

    The country employs vastly more public-sector workers per head than ENGLAND

    Its Parliament promotes a shamelessly Stalinist vision of STATE dominance and STATE provision.  Politically, socially, economically, SCOTLAND has become retirement home for 20th century lost causes and discredited ideals

     

     

    The Scots tragedy is that they cannot make their own country work, and want somebody else to blame. They measure their history alongside that of the IRISH, and imagine an INDEPENDENT future as bright as that of modern Ireland. Both propositions are ill-founded.

    [Ireland receives annually a Billion pounds from the EU partly paid for by the English taxpayers.]

     

    FIRST, even admitting the 19th century Highland clearances, Scotland never suffered at English hands as Ireland did. Indeed, it has profited mightily from the UNION for most of its history, as economists acknowledge.

    SECOND, Ireland's take- off was made possible by a tidal wave of U hand-outs [much from the English taxpayer] in the 1970s and 1980s. This will not be repeated if Scotland votes for INDEPENDENCE, because the cash isn't there.

     

    THE WORST - and likeliest -

    outcome of current surge of nationalist sentiment is that the Scots will go on whinging, but stop just short of going INDEPENDENT. They will be terrified of losing access to all that lovely

     

     ENGLISH MONEY

     

    [WE HOPE THEY KEEP THEIR NERVE-some of the most successful countries in the world are SMALL NATION STATES. Mr Salmond needs to visit those countries and learn from their success.  He of course needs to get rid of the many nut- cases which give his historic country a bad image on the international scene.  Wealth is NOT the most important objective but the happiness of the PEOPLE and their commitment to each other to make a transition to the necessary changes to give their people a decent standard of living but more IMPORTANTLY a 'breath of fresh air' of Freedom and modest contentment.  Scottish Independence will pave the way for an

    INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

    OF

    ENGLAND

    AT

    WESTMINSTER.  ]

     

     

     

    If I were David Cameron, however, as the next General Election approaches I would play the English card ruthlessly. Whatever the Tories do, they will never again win significant seats in Scotland, so they have nothing to lose.

    [We are not so sure as the possibility of England leaving the EU is almost assured if she becomes again an INDEPENDENT ENGLAND.  Many in the Tory party and particularly Mr Nice Guy Dave are committed to the EU and they will do anything to see that the name of England is never shown on the map of the British Isles again. There would also be a clamour for Proportional Representation as most of the voters are no longer pleased with Tweedledee and Dave's Tweedledumb.]

    Cameron can ride a tide of mounting English anger, about how much the Scots cost us, and how wretchedly they behave in return.

     

    Why should we accept governance by the [TARTAN CABAL] Labour ministers who sit for Scottish rotten boroughs? Why should we go on pretending to bear responsibility for Scotland's social and economic failure\?

     

    I am an ENGLISHMAN  who has loved SCOTLAND

    - all my life , but like many of us, I have had enough.

    IF THE SCOTS CLAIM TO WANT INDEPENDENCE, LET THEM HAVE IT.

     

    The break-up of the UNION will be a sorrow to those of us to whom its heritage means so much

    But now that it has become a source of rancor and resentment among the Scottish people, let them see how they fare without it.

    THEY CAN EAT SCOTS PORRIDGE INSTEAD OF ENGLISH CAKE< AND DISCOVER HOW THEY LIKE IT,

     

    [As we have mentioned elsewhere a break-up of partners is not always a disaster it might lead to a more understanding and at a later stage a new partnership where they have learnt not to take their partner for granted. Scotland with Wales and England share the same Island and a

    NEW UNION 

    Of a Family of Independent Nation States

    of

    Greater Britain

    would be a great force for FREEDOM and JUSTICE in the WORLD of the 21st century.]

    *          *          *

    NOVEMBER/06

    SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT

    -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

     

    *

     

    Home Rule for Scotland

    WHY NOT

    HOME RULE for ENGLAND

     

    *

     

     

     

     

    [All underlined words above have a separate bulletin]

     

     

    ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

     

     

    *

     

     

    H.F.1521

     

     

    RDS- Open Letter to the President – Leverage NSA, Clean Up Wall Street, Engage Authentic Black Leaders

    11 June 2020

    Mr. President,

    It is my good fortune to be a former spy and also good friends with Bill Binney and known to Mike Flynn.  It has taken me months to arrange for Bill Binney to speak on the record, in a sixteen-minute video at https://tinyurl.com/NSA-10-30-100. With ten people in thirty days, Bill can deliver all the data you need to confiscate, through civil and criminal forfeiture, $100 trillion (or more) in assets acquired by varied Wall Street financial criminals among whom Goldman Sachs is by far the largest, using naked short selling and money laundering to steal from all.

    On the next page are four cartoons from Ben Garrison that I commissioned to help explain to the American people – and to remind you – that the greatest criminals in America are the banks, not the bank robbers. Wall Street has destroyed over 10,000 companies, thousands of innovations, and millions of jobs through its criminal financial practices, all condoned and enabled by the Senate Banking Committee, the Department of Justice (notably the Holder Memorandum taking jail off the table), the FBI, and the SEC.

    By combining data from NSA, from a forced audit of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) that has spit on our laws since its inception, and data from ShareIntel, a company ripe for acquisition by DoJ, you can completely by-pass all Wall Street lawyers and the decades of delay that come with lawyers, and begin confiscating stocks of gold and silver, art, waterfront mansions, condos all over the world, superyachts, private airplanes, private islands, and more. You were deceived when you were told that $17 trillion was all you could get. Bill Binney and I can find you another $100 to $200 trillion to help Make America Great Again.

    Furthermore, once you finish eradicating financial crime on Wall Street, all my experts tell me that the stock market will explode as everyone smart enough to stay away now comes back to the capital markets. America will experience a BOOM of innovation and entrepreneurship. There is legislation you could sponsor that would receive bipartisan support: we need to restore the $25 million IPO and break up the too big to hold accountable funds. We need to end flash trading, enforce good laws on the settlement, and put integrity back into banking.

    I believe NSA has been rolling you and the Attorney General. By now, had Bill Binney been there, you would have every traitor, every elite pedophile, every #RESIST and Antifa terrorist funder and organizer, and most crooked judges and prosecutors lined up for justice.

    Separately I have arranged for the top authentic Black leaders of America – not to be confused with celebrities or those who have been “made” by the white system – to reach out to you.  They all condemn the protests, which they have not organized; they are all ready to support you contingent on your hearing them out and being responsive to their suggestions.

    My varied memoranda in the past do not appear to have reached you. You will find my best and latest memorandum at https://tinyurl.com/POTUS-5.

    I have done all one man can do. Be assured of my vote in November 2020, but also be assured that it causes me great distress to see you betrayed every day by people who are in service to foreign powers, who are not loyal to you nor to America the Beautiful, and who continue to prevent you from being the greatest President ever.  I am local (Oakton, Virginia).  I would like to help you build an Open Source Agency that includes Web 3.0, a Trump Studio, and Truth Channel, and “the President’s Own” Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) service.

    Semper Fidelis,

     

    June 15, 2020

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.1806

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    IMMIGRATION

     

     

     

     

    THE REAL PROBLEM

     

     

     

    IS

     

     

     

    NUMBERS

     

     

     

    NOT

     

     

     

    RACE

     

     

     

     

    Because with smaller

     NUMBERS

     of

     NEWCOMERS

    years ago

     and

    REAL ACTION OF GOVERNMENT

     

     

     

    The matter would have SOLVED YEARS AGO.

     

     

    The only realistic

    answer

     is for the government

    to introduce a   REPATRIATION SCHEME WITH RESETTLEMENT ALLOWANCE TO THOSE WISHING TO RETURN TO THEIR

    HOMELAND.

     

     

    TRY AS WE MIGHT THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION

    BECAUSE THE PRESENT POPULATION LEVEL IN ENGLAND IS

    IS MUCH TOO HIGH

    WITH AT LEAST

    16MILLION WORKERS

    LOSING THEIR JOBS TO ROBOTS

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Far better for IMMIGRANTS

    TO RETURN TO THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN TO HELP

    RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING THERE

    AMONGST THEIR OWN KIN

     

     

     

    [The Coronavirus factor to also consider which will no doubt result in a large number of jobs which will never return.]

     

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

    Governments since Enoch Powell

     have ignored calls for a halt to immigration

    except for to fill important and essentional job vacancies.

     

     

     

     

    The present situation we face in England

     in June 2020 is due to successive governments ignoring the wishes of the English People for a stop to immigration except for essential job vacancies  has led to tens of thousands possibly millions of newcomers which local councils have had great difficulty in housing-the greater number in tower blocks 'caged' hence the anger and frustration of their occupants

     

    As we have already stated our land mass -50,300 square milesis less than a third the size of Germany with137,800 square miles which has a population of approximately 83 million yet we have over 55 million in England whereas a reduction of at least 20 million would have been an ideal number with an anticipated job loss in the near future of at least 16 million jobs due to the mass introduction of robots.

     

    For the past twenty years the EDP has brought this matter to the English People yet they still voted for governments of the LEFT and RIGHT who have brought this country to one of the most crowded in the world.

    We can only suggest the the English People in the main have been 'too laid-back' in their attitude about the takeover of their country by millions of newcomers who hold them in contempt -hence the riots of the past weeks.

    ONLY PR -  PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION WILL RETURN POWER TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

     

     UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

    by

    Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

     

    BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

    [MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

    SEE HERE!   ]

     

    JUNE 2-2015

    [THE TWO MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES PLAY MUSICAL CHAIRS AND HAVE FAILED OVER DECADES TO CUT CRIME - IMPROVE STATE PENSIONS-EVEN PORTUGAL PAYS MORE. STILL NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT AND CROWDED PRISONS AND THE  OBVIOUS ANSWER NEW PRISONS IGNORED AND DECIDE TO FIT PHONE IN EVERY PRISON CELL  AND THE LATEST! ALLOW SEX AND DRINK IN THEIR 5 STAR ACCOMMODATION-CRIMINALS COMING UP BEFORE BEFORE THE BENCH WILL BE PLEADING TO BE LOCKED UP  FOR SUCH WONDERFUL OFFERINGS.   WE HAVE HEARD OF OPEN PRISONS BUT THIS MUST BE A NEW DIMENSION IN THE WORD PUNISHMENT AND REHABILITATION.]

    *

    WE ARE CONTINUALLY HEARING OF THE WASTE OF FOREIGN AID-

    THE LATEST!

    DAILY MAIL, Saturday, January 5,2019

    UK handing £1.5 bn aid to the world's corrupt countries

    by

    JASON GROVES-Political Editor

    *

    [After the TORY  BETRAYAL of 1972 there is an urgent need for an ENGLISH Patriotic political party to

    PROTECT the INDEPENDENCE of our COUNTRY and the RETURN after over 300 years

    OUR

    ENGLISH PARLIAMENT IN HER ANCIENT HOME of WESTMINSTER.]

    *

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    H.F.1388

    H.F.2032

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
    BLACK
    LIVES
    MATTER

     

     

    An

     

    anarchist Manifesto

     

    Abolish the police

    Smash capitalism

    close all prisons

    -the avowed aims of the British arm of

    BLACK LIVES MATTER

    which would dismantle society as we know it.

    SO THE QUESTION FOR ITS

    33.000 DONORS:

     

    Do they really know the

    TRUTH

    of the

     

    Anarchist Manifesto

    Guy Adams

    INVESTIGATES

    DAILY MAIL-SATURDAY-JUNE 20-2020

    H.F.2035

     

     

     
     

     

    JUNE-2020

    H.F.2037

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a

     valuable tool for the elites.

     

     THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

    AS the year passes we are witnessing that England is becoming like the USA a country divided by

    RELIGION-CUSTOM and RACE

    Since the first arrivals many decades ago our country has the appearance of a global mishmash of peoples of different colour-creed and custom.

    ENGLAND IS NOW A DIVIDED NATION.

    Millions of newcomers have only contempt for our

    RULE OF LAW

    CUSTOM and HISTORY

    and seek to destroy our

    NATION STATE

    to

    DESTROY OUR DEMOCRATIC HERITAGE

    forgetting that many countries in our once

    BRITISH EMPIRE

    were bestowed a immense benefit of

    DEMOCRACY

    which later led to their

    INDEPENDENCE.

     

    Events of the last few months has shown that a malignant core of traitors of politically correct RABID idiots from within and of resentful newcomers are determined to

    DESTROY THE ENGLISH NATION

    It is now clearly obvious that many newcomers have no intention of protecting our

    ENGLISH HERITAGE

    which they were aware of when they decided to join the

     PEOPLE

    of

     ENGLAND

    They have proved their unfitness to being

     citizens of ENGLAND

    A proud nation state

     known the world over with a once

     ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

    known as the

    MOTHER OF PARLIAMENTS

    .

    Unless the true

    ENGLISH PEOPLE fight back and legislate to remove trouble-makers that came to our English shore who wish to

    DESTROY OUR HISTORY- LAW- CUSTOM-RELIGION

     

    and unless the true English People stand firm to protect their

    CUSTOM -LAW and RELIGION

     

    THEIR PRICELESS INHERITANCE

     

    Then the island which has housed the English people for over 1400 years will be obliterated from within and the words of our true feelings will be consigned to history.

     

    ENGLAND

     

    This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle

     

     This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars.

     

    *  *  *

     

    This precious stone, set in the silver sea,

     

    Which serves it in the office of a wall,

     

    Or as a moat defensive to a house,

     

    Against the envy of less happier lands;

     

    This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this

     

     ENGLAND

    *  *  *

     

    THE FAULT WE FACE IS BECAUSE THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

     

    HAVE BEEN RULED BY THE

     

    GANG OF THREE

     

    Who have ignored the constant call for a stop to immigration OVER THE DECADES except to fill urgent vacancies

     

    ONLY

    PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

     

    WILL ENSURE THAT ENGLAND TO ITSELF WILL BE TRUE.

     

    *  *  *

     

    JUNE 15,2020

     

    H.F.2017

     

    A REMINDER FROM 2006

     

     

     

     

    HOW COULD A MULTICULTURAL BRITAIN WORK

     

    By

    Andrew Alexander

    Column

    [Daily Mail-December 15, 2006]

     

    TONY BLAIR has admitted at last that MULTICULTURALISM has failed, but future historians will puzzle why anyone thought it would ever succeed

     

    After all, history is one long tale of cultural clashes - religious, sectarian, racial and national. As they contemplate the remains of what was once one of the world's most stable societies, blessed with a common cultural heritage, they will marvel that vast waves of immigrants were admitted -

    AND ARE STILL COMING.

    Of course , there had always been immigration but the numbers had been small, the arrivals often talented; and many of them not just ready but eager to embrace the British

    WAY-OF-LIFE

     

    For an explanation, we need to go  back to the 1962 Commonwealth Immigration Act. When Harold Macmillan finally brought in that legislation, peppered with loopholes to pacify critics, the Left sternly opposed it.

    The Far left was intelligent enough to see that mass immigration could overturn a society they hated. The opposition of more moderate Socialists was based on a firm if vaguely-defined belief in the

    BROTHERHOOD OF MAN

    - those from less prosperous countries should be automatically welcomed.

     

    Besides, there was the delicious lure that nearly all immigrants would

    VOTE LABOUR

    -But that was not publicly aired.

     

    MacMillan reluctantly introduced the legislation, whose outlines had been drafted in 1955.  As with others in his party, he was in thrall to the Multiracial Commonwealth fantasy, prolonging a belief that though the

    BRITISH EMPIRE

    -was dead, we could be-

    or pretend to be -

    a serious global power.

    The biggest hindrance to clear  thinking about immigration and multiculturalism has always been the 'moderates' who dominate what is called the political class-party activists, information professionals, social scientists and opinion formers generally. these people are always proud of their 'moderation'.

     

    MULTICULTURALISM was a natural attraction. It sounded, you see, so 'decent'

     

    . These predominately middle-class moderates could also think of themselves as more enlightened than the working class (who bore the brunt of the tidal wave of immigrants).

     

    You encountered these high-minded souls in the Press and TV and radio, insisting that immigration was by definition a good thing.

    THEY STILL DO IT.

    -but their postal codes always give then away.

    If you lived in Hampstead or Kensington or Richmond you could enjoy the advantages of a moral smugness without the disadvantages of an alien wedge in your midst. When I point out to multicultural enthusiasts the tremendous property values in Brixton, they seem curiously uninterested.

     

    Their cause was certainly helped by media self-censorship. Not since the British Press kept silent about Edward VIII's dalliance with Mrs. Simpson had the media exercised such nervous restraint. Anything that was alarming about IMMIGRATION was PLAYED DOWN.

    [We have at the present day the same reluctance to thoroughly open discussion on the benefits or otherwise of the European Union -though there appears to be a slight fissure appearing in the 35 year-old dam of silence but no real momentum by the pro-Europeans to sell their wonderful dream in their utopian wonderland. We wonder WHY?]

    The moderates who dominated the Press became terrified of the accusation of 'racism'. The U.S.,because of well-deserved bad conscience had declared that the ultimate sin; and with our habit of importing everything American good or bad, we adopted the same values.

     

    Anything that might suggest their thinking was racist had newspapers in a flap. Disagreeable forecasts about immigration levels were ignored, reassuring figures emphasised. Anyway, ran the moderate view, even if the numbers did prove large, our oh-so-tolerant multicultural society would comfortably absorb them.

    When facts became unavoidable, real issues would be evaded. if the number of blacks in prison was reported as disproportionately high, the required conclusion was that something was wrong with the judicial system.

    If there were riots in Brixton or Tottenham , some extreme moderate like Lord Scarman would be sent to conclude that

    WE WERE ALL GUILTY.

     

    Blair's insistence that we must have integration is hopelessly late. he says, for example that immigrants must learn English. But there is no way to compel that on the inflow [flood] of immigrants from Eastern Europe.

    They may unlike the Commonwealth immigrants, be less alien to British ways. But they will regularly form their own communities rather than integrate and the process of constant, ethnic fragmentation will be common place.  Poles are already setting up Polish branches of trade unions in Southampton - where they number up to 30,000-and in Glasgow.

     

    AS for the insistence that immigration is economically advantageous

    IT SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE.

    it may produce good economic growth, but income per head rises little.

     

    The strain upon public services ranging from HEALTH to TRANSPORT is also very costly. Moreover, IMMIGRATION has been a key factor in raising HOUSE PRICES-inevitably in one of the

    WORLD'S MOST CROWDED NATIONS.

    Further waves will be coming soon from Romania and Bulgaria but they will be 'managed'. claims the Home Office [You know! -the 'unfit for purpose 'establishment.] unconvincingly. One day, no doubt, from Turkey too (whose admission to the EU is supported by the Conservatives!)

     

    THE FUTURE IS BLEAK

    *          *          *

     

     

     

    DECEMBER/06

     

     

     

    POPULATION IN ENGLAND...

    INDIANS OVERTAKE POLES AS OUR LARGEST MIGRANT POPULATION

    BORN ABROAD LIVING IN UK

    1)India-837,000

    2)Poland-837,000

    3)Pakistan-533,000

    4)Ireland-358,000

    Daily Mail-November 29,2019.

    *   *   *

     https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

    NOVEMBER 29,2019

     

     

     

    *

     

    ONLY

    PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

    WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

    *

     

    SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

     

    *

     

    Home Rule for Scotland

    WHY NOT

    HOME RULE for ENGLAND

     

    *

    [All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

    *

     FOR RETURN TO

    IMMIGRATION FILE

     

    *

    H.F.1927

     

     

     

     

     

    BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER/06

     

     

     

    A BLUNDER FOR WHICH WE'LL ALL PAY THE PRICE

    A

    COMMENTARY

    BY

    Sir Andrew Green

     

    BRITAIN is facing the largest wave of immigration for nearly 1,000 years.  The number of Huguenots in the 17th century and the Jews a century ago are trivial compared to the present flows. Recent GOVERNMENT figures put the net inflow at almost 500 every day

    On part of this inflow comes from  the new East European members of the EU.  If these people wish to work, they must register, and today's figures show that the number who have registered since eight countries joined in May 2004 has hit 500,000 mark

    THE HOME OFFICE - NEVER LET IT BE FORGOTTEN, PREDICTED THAT THIS FIGURE WOULD BE A MAXIMUM 26,000 OVER TWO YEARS.

    [So much for their statistics]

    What effect is all this having and how long can we expect it to continue?

    For a start, the registration numbers are looking increasingly DUBIOUS. They have never included the self-employed or temporary workers -the Government themselves have added nearly 50% to take account of this. Even more worrying is the real number of East Europeans who have decided to stay in Britain compared with the number the GOVERNMENT claims have stayed.

    Official; statistics suggests that three-quarters of them go home within a year. But these figures are based on a passenger survey which focuses almost entirely on Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester -while East Europeans arrive on budget airlines, mainly at Luton, Stansted and regional airports.

    The Governor of the Bank of England has complained twice publicly that the numbers of immigrants are so unreliable that he cannot estimate how tight the labour market has become and, consequently whether or not there is a need to raise interest rates.

    There is growing evidence of British workers being replaced by East Europeans. And since East Europeans accept lower wages, British workers -from construction workers to truck drivers to flower arrangers -are suffering pay cuts.

     

    The East Europeans can afford a lower wage. They are mainly single. They can, and often do, live in very crowded conditions. And, of course they can earn four or five times what the would earn at home.  This is all good news for them and for their employers. East Europeans have established a solid reputation for hard work, turning up on time and making few demands.  Lower wages mean higher profits. They also mean lower inflation and somewhat lower interest rates [Provided the Bank of England can get the correct immigration figure for their calculation]

    The Middle Classes are happy too. Cheap nannies, cheaper restaurants and a cheap hand-wash for the gas guzzler.

     

    But there are snags. Not only do the low-paid suffer a reduction in wages. Worse, we risk building up an underclass of long-term unemployment.

     

    There are a million young people who are neither in work or education. If you add those on incapacity benefit to the unemployed (now at a six year high), you have nearly

    5,000,000

    -young people who are NOT WORKING and , more importantly have little prospect of doing so for the foreseeable future.

     

    Which employer is going to take a young British worker of incapacity benefit when he can take a bright young energetic and probably over-qualified Pole?

     

    The Government frequently claims the East Europeans are filling gaps in the labour market. But we have to examine the facts, NOT THE SPIN.  It is five years since the Government first proclaimed that we need immigration to fill

    600,000 vacancies in OUR LABOUR MARKET.

    Since then, immigration has added about three-quarters of a million to our population. YET believe it or not, VACANCIES are still at

    600,000

    The REASON is that immigrants are not only filling jobs, but they are also adding to consumer demand, which in turn creates more jobs so that vacancies in the labour market remain the same. 

    The Government argument is demonstrably FALSE

    The main outcome is that we become an ever-more crowded island. And that is where the shoe really pinches.  The strain on our public services and infrastructure grows by the day.  Children are turning up at school gates with NO ENGLISH and NO WARNING.  Rents are rising sharply as the buy-to-let market booms and house prices rise.  More young people find it impossible to get on the housing ladder as prices spiral.

    I do not mean in any way to be critical of the new arrivals. They work hard and fit in. BUT the bottom line is that we are a small island and are already overcrowded-especially in the

    SOUTH EAST

    The Department of Transport has forecast that traffic on our roads will increase by 30 per cent in the next ten years and by 40 to 50 per cent on motorways. GRIDLOCK APPROACHES. It is time that serious thought was given to how many people we can sensibly accommodate on this island.

    Is there any relief in sight? Not in the Third World, from where the majority of immigrants still come.  As for Europe, Romania and Bulgaria are no longer on the horizon but on our doorstep. From next January 2007 30 million people from those countries will be free to enter Britain.

     

    In the longer term much depends on how much time it will take these countries, given substantial aid from Brussels, to reach our level of economic prosperity. Poland, the source of 60 per cent of East European immigration, will be a key factor. At present, its wealth per head is only just over a third of ours.

     

    Even if its economy grows at five per cent a year (and we maintain our long-term growth of 2.5 per cent), it will be 34 years before they catch up.

    Demographics will help. The two most populous countries -Poland and Romania -will both have a declining number of 18 year-olds in the years to come, down by about a third over the next 20 years.

    Eventually too, the other EU countries will be obliged to open their labour markets to the new member states.

    The biggest factor of all is how long our newcomers decide to stay.

    Eventually, the flow of those going home will balance those arriving and we will be in the same situation as we are with say FRANCE.

     

    This interchange of people is what the EU is all about. Eventually it will enrich our lives. The Government's mistake has been to rush into the free movement of labour with countries so much poorer than ourselves.

     

    It now tries to SPIN this DECISION as a GREAT SUCCESS, hoping perhaps that we will overlook its massive miscalculations which originally forecast ONLY 13,000 East Europeans would come here a year.

     

    THE REALITY IS IT IS PUTTING A BRAVE FACE ON A BLUNDER FOR WHICH THE LESS FORTUNATE IN OUR SOCIETY ARE NOW PAYING

    *

     

    [We have not commented about the usefulness or otherwise of belonging to the EU as we have hundreds of thousands of words already on our bulletin board asking for a quick exit]

     

    [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

    Sir Andrew Green is chairman of MigrationWatch and former ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria.

    NOVEMBER/06

    *          *          *

     

    ONLY

    PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

    WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

    *

     

    SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

     

    *

     

    Home Rule for Scotland

    WHY NOT

    HOME RULE for ENGLAND

     

    *

    [All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

    *

     FOR RETURN TO

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    *

     

     

     

    IIMMIGRATION-

    THE ENEMY WITHIN!

    WHY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE IGNORED GRASS ROOTS CALL FOR A HALT TO IMMIGRATION SINCE ENOCH POWELL SPOKE FOR THE PEOPLE OF OUR SMALL ISLAND THOSE MANY DECADES AGO. THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T SUFFICIENT HOUSING AVAILABLE AS LOCAL PEOPLE

    WON'T A STOP

    TO CONCRETING ANY MORE OF THEIR

    BEAUTIFUL COUNTRYSIDE.

     We hear that millions of robots will soon be a part of our life. Hasn't anyone thought about the consequences of this on our everyday life. Our transport system already overloaded will have to accommodate those extra bottoms. Millions of people will lose their jobs and become the responsibility of the general taxpayer.

    As a small island a quarter the size of Germany it was stated many decades ago that the population of between 20 to 30 million would be a comfortable number to match the energy and other resources necessary for a comfortable existence. We have been recently informed that by 2050 we will have an island population of 80 million. Germany which is four times our landmass had 82 million not so long in the past and has accepted over a million immigrants in the last year alone.

    It is the political parties, particularly the GANG OF THREE who over the past decades have looked on increased immigration as their source of future voters and as has been demonstrated they decided to ignore local objections to more housing and put pressure on local councils to build to accommodate the millions of immigrants in their back yard.

    We mentioned a number of years ago that governments should not put the cart before the horse by allowing millions of immigrants to settle in our once settled and comfortable island home. As we all know there isn't sufficient housing for those many elderly who wish to downside which has been ignored for decades.

    It is time for the politicians of all parties to face reality and immediately embark on a programme of an immediate block on future immigration except for the need for particular needs of the moment and the encouragement of immigrants to return to their own back yard .

    We have over 3 million of the Islamic faith of which we are told over 60 per cent have NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING INTO OUR SOCIETY-their own CLERICS who have integrated have criticized  successive governments for their failure in not bringing in strict measures-

    EITHER INTEGRATE-OR GO!

    Instead, with successive governments looking to  Saudi Arabian Government investment and ARMS CONTRACTS they have chosen to ignore the repeated calls for ACTION! and simply leave the matter for a future government which means

    THAT NOTHING IS DONE!

    DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS ARE IN POWER TO CARRY OUT THE WISHES OF THE ELECTORATE

    NOT

    THE SELFISH WISH

    OF

    UNPATRIOTIC POLITICIANS.

    This is a matter that UKIP should have been covering but their internal bickering and unpatriotic mischief's have proved that they have been a tool of successive governments since its formation decades ago. We in fact were invited to the House of Lords at its inauguration and have not been impressed by their usual lack lustre performance over the years.]

    ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE

     by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]

    *

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

     

    JULY 6-2017

    H. F.1243 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

     

     

     

    LITTLEJOHN

     

    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: When I saw

     

    police officers 'taking the Knee' I knew it

     

    must end in tears...

     
     When I saw cops

     

    'taking the knee'

     

    I knew it must end in tears.

     

     

    THIS IS HOW IT ENDS.

    This is how it always ends. Badly. What did they think was going to happen?

    By the time the 'largely peaceful' Black Lives Matter protest had called it a day,48 coppers had been injured and one female officer was lying in hospital with cracked ribs, a broken collarbone and a collapsed lung

    It was yet another humiliation for the forces of law and order, a spectacular own goal.

    Pity the poor policeman and women who were filmed running away from a masked mob along Whitehall after they had the audacity to arrest a single demonstrator.

    In the view of a watching BBC reporter the arrest was clearly a mistake since it was 'bound to raise the temperature'.

    Far better, surely, to stand back and allowed the crowd to carry on baying for blood and lobbing missiles,

    IMAGES of the GREAT BRITISH BOBBY in FULL RETREAT were soon being BOUNCED around the WORLD on SOCIAL  MEDIA . Still the brass at SCOTLAND YARD will have calculated, rather BLOD ON THE RUN than an embarrassing VIDEO of RIOT POLICE clobbering a BLACK LIVES MATTER demonstrator.

    From the moment I saw pictures of those coppers

    'taking the knee'

    in solidarity with the protesters

    I KNEW IT WOULD END IN TEARS.

    The mob can smell weakness, fear and moral cowardness. Once the more violent elements worked out that the police were froightened to confront them, there was never any doubt about the outcome.

    I don't blame the young officers on the

    FRONT LINE

    They were only doing what has been drummed into their heads since their first day at Hendon.

    Playing politics is far more important than proper policing. The tone for the fiasco was set by an OFFICIAL STATEMENT MOST OF YOU MAY HAVE MISSED.

    It was issued last Thursday by all Britain's Chief Constables, the chair of the National Police Chiefs Council, the chief executive of the College of Policing and the President of the Police Superintendents Association, The statement read.

    'We stand alongside all those across the globe who are appaled and horrified by the way George Floyd lost his life. Justice and accountability should follow.

    Officers are trained to use proportionately, lawfully and only when absolutely necessary.We strive to continually learn and improve, we will tackle bias, racism or discrimination whereever we find it...,'

    WHAT WAS THAT ALL ABOUT?

    Why did the most senior police officers in Britain feel it necessary to pass coment on an incident which happened

    4000 miles away?

    WHAT THE HELL HAS IT GOT TO DO WITH THEM?

    [This is a long and most instructive article-for further details click

    HERE!

    *  * *

    [REGRETTABLY-The curse of political correctness is still with us.

     

    The beneficiaries of this BETRAYAL OF LAW AND ORDER  ARE THE CRIMINALS.]

     

    [ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND Alteration of style and form are ours!]

     

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

    *  *  *

     

    JUNE 9,2020

    H.F.2024

    *

    *

     

     

     

     

    England Population 2020 | Population UK

    www.ukpopulation.org/england-population

    Based on our research,

     

    England population will reach 55.93 million by 1st July of

     

    2020.

     

    We use first day of July each year due to Office for National Statistics (ONS normally publishes the estimated population data for the same period. The calculation is based on the average growth rate of …

     JUNE-2020

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

    A MATTER OF PATRIOTISM

     

     

    [GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO

     'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

    LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT

     LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

    GERMANY.

    ADDED JULY 28,2018

    AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    OCTOBER 21,2017

     

    H.F.741

     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

     

     

     

     

    The English People's

    VoicE

    WELCOME!

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

    IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

    A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

    FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

    LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

    OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

     

    H.F.1773

     

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [WHITE LIVES MATTER]

     

     

    [A MATTER OF FACT!]

    [A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

     

    Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
     

    The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
     

    White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
    Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

    The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

    The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

    All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
     

    Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

     If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
    http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

    Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

    what is the soul made of

    afflict your souls in the bible

    what is a person's soul

    what is the soul of man

    afflict your soul means

    what is the soul according to the bible

    afflict your soul kjv

    what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

    H.F.1424/2

     

     

    *  *  *

     

    ADDED JULY 2020

     

     

     

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/

    1959/

    black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since

    the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a

    valuable tool for the elites.

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

     

     
    POLITICS IN THE UK

    HAS STALLED -

    IN FACT IT HAS BEEN

    ON A STEADY DECLINE SINCE WE WERE MISLEAD AND LIED TO

    IN THE 70's by

    EDWARD HEATH

     AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF OUR COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

    Fortunately the PEOPLE on December 12-2019 decided they had had enough and demanded that their so-called

     SERVANTS remember who

    they worked

    FOR.

    .

     

     

     

    In 2003 the EDP began it's BULLETIN SERVICE to INFORM the BRITISH

    PUBLIC of the LIES and DECEIT of POLITICIANS. It is well documented that

    successive GOVERNMENTS of all COLOURS have FAILED to keep their

    MANIFESTO PROMISES. Whether it is the FAILURE of LAW and ORDER-

    TO  CURB IMMIGRATION-YOU NAME IT! and you will find that they are STILL

    MAKING THE SAME PROMISES in JANUARY 2020.

    WE have advocated in

    the past, that towards the end of a 5-year PARLIAMENTARY SESSION, each

    GOVERNMENT should FACE a PUBLIC ENQUIRY to see if THEIR

    MANIFESTO PROMISES HAVE BEEN carried out by PARLIAMENT. AND

    if NOT-WHY NOT?

    One is only to look at the thousands of bulletins on our website to realise that

     

    POLITICIANS and

     

    GOVERNMENTS

     

    NOT CARRYING OUT THE

     

     

    WISHES

     

     

    OF THE

     

     

    PEOPLE!

     

    As we have been informed the MPs are to receive an increased SALARY and no doubt other benefits and as we have seen over the past few years many of their predecessors failed to keep their REFERENDUM PROMISE and what are we to expect from their replacements?

     

    POLITICIANS SHOULD BE

     

     

     REMINDED THAT

     

     

    THEY ARE

     

     

     

    SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE

     

     

    NOT

     

     

     

    THEIR MASTERS.

     

    We have advocated on many occasions that MP's should

     

    SERVE THE PUBLIC

     

    FOR ONE TERM ONLY.

     

     

    IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB

     

     

    FOR LIFE.

     

    JANUARY 1-2020

    H.F.1947

     
     

    PLEASE NOTE! A NUMBER OF BULLETINS HAVE BEEN MOVED TO PART 2 IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE SPACE TO FACILITATE A FASTER RESPONSE FOR OUR VIEWERS"

    FEBRUARY 27,2020

     

    AGAIN ON AUGUST 1- 2020

    WE ARE MOVING BULLETINS FROM PART 1

    TO THE NEW

    PART 1-PAGE 2

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Cod War II?

     Tell the EU

     to

    sling it's hook

     

    LETTER FROM A FORMER TRAWLER SKIPPER TO THE

     DAILY MAIL

    -February27,2020

     

     

    AS A FORMER trawler skipper heavily involved in the so-called Cod Wars during the Seventies, I am interested that political commentators are talking about the possibility of a new Cod War after December 2020.

     

    This is in reaction  to the French having the brass neck to tell us that their fishing rights within our waters are non-negotiable. It's about time our politicians started to stand up to our continental friends.

     

    The Cod Wars were fought over Iceland seeking to expand its territorial limits and prevent its fisheries being over-exploited. The UK's negotiations for joining the Common Market or EEC, as it was then, coincided with this. To understand the impact of the betrayal of our fishing industry, we need to go back to the Seventies when Conservative prime minister was manipulated by the French into allowing the best of our fishing grounds to be given away without any proper authority or consultation with Parliament or the British people.

    During the negotiations, the French hijacked the fisheries meetings and were pushing for fishing to be treated as a common resource with equal access for all, which the British and Irish governments initially rejected.

    The deep-sea trawler owners, then the most powerful players in the British fishing industry, were in favour because they thought Iceland and Norway would eventually join and they would have unbridled access to their rich waters, cancelling out the Cod Wars' losses.

    BUT Iceland and Norway rejected the EEC because of the fishing rights and the rest is history.

    It is worth considering just how much of that thinking was driving the lobbying to a gullible Government in not accepting any of the fair deals Iceland was offering. We never suspected these European fleets would eventually establish 'historic rights' to control our fishing  grounds, aided by massive EU grants, not only from their own governments but also from us.

    Decommissioning schemes to reduce the British fleet were brought in and our fishermen were put out of work while other nations, with the help of European grants, increased and modernised their fleets. The Spanish fleet was bigger than the rest of Europe's combined, but when they joined the EEC they declared they would not decommission even one vessel. They not only got away with that, they also secured grants to scrap, rebuild and modernise 850 0f their fishing boats.

    ..The French, Belgians and Spanish seem able to fish with impunity, while our fishermen are persecuted because we've got to be seen to be fair.

    WE  have not had one fisheries minister worth their salt. I was in Brussels for several December Councils when our minister never came out with the quota he went in with. It was always cut to benefit of the other states, resulting in us being a minority in our own waters.

     

    Can someone explain that?

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    [WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE JOINED HITLER'S EU PLAN-IT

     

    WAS

     

    EDWARD HEATH

     

    A GERMAN SPY SINCE 1938 UNTIL HIS

     

    DEATH

     

     IN 2005 WHO JUST BEFORE, HAD ADMITTED HIS PART IN THE CONSPIRACY TO JOIN THE EU BECAUSE HE WANTED THE UK TO JOIN THE EU - WHATEVER IT TOOK,.]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    FEBRUARY 27,2020

     
     

    ENGLAND

     

     Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

    H.F.1989

     
     

     

    We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

     

    News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

    EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

    GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

    As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

    The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

    Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

     Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

     Regret

    The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

     Brexit

    was a

    BRITISH PROBLEM

    and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

    However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

    PARAMOUNT.

    Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

    YOUR PROUD NATION.

    It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

    Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

    After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

    But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

    For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

    [TREASON]

    This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

    Here!

     

    *  *  *

    [We were against entry to

    Hitler's plan for Europe

    in 1972 and again in 1975.]

    [WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

    THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

    [ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

     

    HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

     

    AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

     

    H.F.1784

     

     

     

    DAILY MAIL :

     

    Man's 'transphobic' tweet was

     

     

    LAWFUL,

     

     

    High Court rules ...

     

     

     · A man's 'transphobic' tweets were lawful

     

     

    and police breached his right to freedom of expression

     

     

     by behaving like 'the Stasi' when they turned up at …

    Police 'Gestapo in transphobic tweet probe, blasts judge.

    Businessman's landmark win in FREE SPEECH CASE

     

    Businessman's landmark win in free speech case

     

    By Sue Reid

     

    A HIGH Court judge yesterday likened police to the Nazi Gestapo in the way they investigated a businessman accused of transphobic tweets

     

    Mr Justice Julian Knowles said officers violated Harry Miller's

     

     

    FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

     

     

     by recording his comments as a hate incident and threatening

     

    prosecution.

     

    He also blasted the heavy-handed manner in which they turned

     

    up to quiz him at his business last year.

     

    The probe was sparked after Mr Miller was reported for 31 posts,

     

    including a limerick about transgender issues.

     

    In a landmark ruling for

     

     

    FREE SPEECH

     

     

    Mr Justice Knowles said he did not break

     

     

    the law,,,

     

     

    He added:   'The effect of the police turning up at his place of

     

    work because of his political opinions must not be

     

    underestimated.

     

     

    'It would be to undervalue a cardinal democratic

     

     

    freedom in this country.

     

    WE have never had a Cheka, Gestapo or a Stasi'-a reference to

     

    the secret police forces in Stalin's Soviet Union, Nazi Germany

     

    and the former Communist East Germany.

     

     

    [The so-called Human Rights legislation has much to

     

     

    do with confounding English Justice. We need to exit

     

     

    this gross interference in English Law by the end of

     

     

    2020. Perhaps Prime Minister Boris Johnson has this

     

     

    already in mind?]

     

     

    'There is a tide in the affairs of men

    Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune,

    Omitted, all the voyage of their life

    Is bound in shallows and in miseries."

    Shakespeare.

     

     

    FULL ARTICLE

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

    Brought forward from February-2005

    FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

     

    [In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

     

    Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

    *          *        *

    We all have a Right

    to

    Freedom of Speech

     

    Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

    What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

     The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

    Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

    Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

    How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

    The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

    The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

    This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

    The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

    Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

    It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

    The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

     

    No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

    A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

    The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

    To Irritate

     

    Annoy

     

    Dismay

     

    And Shock

     

    Anyone who Listens.

    The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

    I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

     As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

     

    The verse concludes:

     

    ‘In England today we can do what we like

    So long as we do what we’re told’

     

    How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

    ‘And that is why we can talk as we like

    So long as we talk as we’re told.’

    A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

     

    But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

     

    It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

     

    Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                              

     

    THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

    R I P

     

    PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

     

    ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

    A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

     ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

    Let her and Falsehood grapple!

    Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

    Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

     

     MAGNA CARTA

     

    FEBRUARY 2005

    *          *          *

    [Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

     

    H.F. 1325.

     

     

    1. Judges make it even harder to

       

      kick out foreign criminals ...

       

       

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

      14/06/2017 & 15/02/20· Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

    2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able

       

      to deport EU criminals ...

       

       

      https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

      08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

    H.F.1984/1

     

     

    H.F1984 NEED WE SAY MORE?

     
    ("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

     

    BANNED

     

     AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

    by

    Dr Taj Hargey-

    Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

    Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

     

    ...

    Tuesday, August 29,2017

    An

    An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

    The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

    Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

    But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

    Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

    One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

    ‘they don’t speak English’.

    A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

    When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

    Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

    In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

    (In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

    It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

    Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

    If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

    To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

    And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

    This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

    Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

    Alienation...

    *

    Poisonous...

    *

    Tolerance...

    *

    Full article

     

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
    Follow us:
    @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    *

     

     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    *

    ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

    *

    THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

    *

    THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

    *

    WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

    *

    TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

    WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

     

    H.F.1289

     

    VIGILANCE IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY!

    *

     QUOTE 684 of 900

    ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS

    Jewish objectives as outlined in Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

    1) Banish God from the heavens and Christianity from the earth.

    2) Allow no private ownership of property or business.

    3) Abolish marriage, family and home. Encourage sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, adultery, and fornication.

    4) Completely destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism.

    5) Establish a one-world government through which the Luciferian Illuminati elite can rule the world. All other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose.

    6) Take the education of children completely away from the parents. Cunningly and subtly lead the people thinking that compulsory school attendance laws are absolutely necessary to prevent illiteracy and to prepare children for better positions and life's responsibilities. Then after the children are forced to attend the schools get control of normal schools and teacher's colleges and also the writing and selection of all text books.

    7) Take all prayer and Bible instruction out of the schools and introduce pornography, vulgarity, and courses in sex. If we can make one generation of any nation immoral and sexy, we can take that nation.

    8) Completely destroy every thought of patriotism, national sovereignty, individualism, and a private competitive enterprise system.

    9) Circulate vulgar, pornographic literature and pictures and encourage the unrestricted sale and general use of alcoholic beverage and drugs to weaken and corrupt the youth.

    10) Foment, precipitate and finance large scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt the nations and thereby force them into a one-world government.

    11) Secretly infiltrate and control colleges, universities, labor unions, political parties, churches, patriotic organizations, and governments. These are direct quotes from their own writings (The Conflict of the Ages, by Clemens Gaebelein pp. 100-102).

    12) The creation of a World Government.

    KGB CHART NOW TO DESTROY A PEOPLE AND NATION

    More!

     

     

    H.F.741

     

    NOVEMBER 1-2019
     

     

    Let me recommend to you the following quotation.

    . When you have read it, try, before reading further, to think who might have said it.

    "Historians have noticed, all down the centuries, one peculiarity of the English people which has cost them dear. We have always thrown away, after a victory, the greatest part of the advantages we gained in the struggle. The worst  difficulties from which we suffer do not come from without. They come from within. They do not come from the cottages of the wage earners. They come from a peculiar type of brainy people found in our country who, if they add something to its culture, take much from its strength,"

    "Our difficulties come from the mood of unwarrantable self-abasement into which we have been cast by a powerful section of our own intellectuals. They come from the acceptance of defeatist doctrines by a large proportion of our politicians. But what have they to offer but a vague internationalism and promise of impossible utopia?"

    How on earth could he have described with pinpoint accuracy the entire Remainer clique of today, down to a T? Well the speaker was

    WINSTON CHURCHILL,

    out of office, speaking in April 1933.

    He was describing back then a mood in wide sections of the Establishment to trash this country in favour of

    GERMANY

    where a little Austrian with a postage -stamp moustache had just taken office as

    CHANCELLOR OF GERMANY

    It was later called

    APPEASEMENT

    and is still the

    RELIGION of the REMAINERS

    TALK ABOUT HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF...

    NOVEMBER 1-2019

     

     

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

     

    HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

     

     

     

     LIFE AND TIMES

    OF

    Christopher Story

    PATRIOT & TRUTHSEEKER

    2010

     

    The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill.

     

     

    To the Serbs -an Independent Kosovo is anathema -Kosovo is their Jerusalem

    Germany as the Strongman of Europe-A germanised Empire in the Making - PART 1

    The New Beginning  - PART2

    Germany's Third Reich -PART 3

    Taskmasters of Europe -PART 4

    A Warning Message To The Freedom Loving People Of England by Harry Beckhough

    *

    http://eutruth.org.uk

     

     

     

    AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

     

     

    FREEDOM-UNITY.

    *

    Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

     

    THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

    BY

    WINSTON CHURCHILL.

     

    *  *  *

    NOVEMBER 1-2019

    H.F.1915

     

    Conservative Friends of Israel

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
    Conservative Friends of Israel, abbreviated to CFI, is a British parliamentary group affiliated to the Conservative Party, which is dedicated to strengthening business, cultural and political ties between the United Kingdom and Israel. CFI is an unincorporated association. It also seeks to strengthen ties between the British Conservative Party and the Israeli Likud party.

    It was founded in 1974 by Conservative MP for Bury and Radcliffe, Michael Fidler. It is currently chaired by Stuart Polak. The Parliamentary Chairman is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary President is Baroness Shephard of Northwold. The Vice Chairmen are John Butterfill and James Clappison, the Secretary is David Amess, the Officers are Alistair Burt, Lee Scott, and Theresa Villiers, and the Chairman of CFI Europe is Timothy Kirkhope.

    In 1995 Conservative politician Robert Rhodes James called it "the largest organisation in Western Europe dedicated to the cause of the people of Israel".[1]

    By 2009, according to the Channel 4 documentary Dispatches – Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, around 80% of Conservative MPs were members of the CFI.[2] In 2013, Peter Oborne, the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator called CFI “by far Britain’s most powerful pro-Israel lobbying group”. The same is true of AIPAC in the US.”[3]

     

     

    Activities[edit]

    The group's 2005 strategy identified the following areas of activity: supporting Israel, promoting the British Conservative Party, fighting terrorism, combating anti-semitism, and promoting peace in the Middle East.[4] According to their website, "over two thirds" of Conservative MPs were members of Conservative Friends of Israel in 2006.[5] In 2007 the Political Director stated it had over 2000 members and registered supporters.[6] In 2009, at least half of the shadow cabinet were members of the group according to a Dispatches documentary.[7]

    Their website states the opinion that it is one of the fastest growing political lobby groups in the UK.[8] According to the Dispatches documentary, between 2006 and 2009 the CFI funded more than 30 Conservative parliamentary candidates to visit Israel.[7]

    In 2012 CFI reconstituted itself as a private company limited by guarantee.[9]

    CFI annual business lunch[edit]

    David Cameron, then newly elected leader of the Conservative Party, addressed the CFI annual business lunch on 30 January 2006, whose audience included half of the Conservative Parliamentary Party. As part of his speech, he stated "I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party. Israel is a democracy, a strong and proud democracy, in a region that is, we hope, making its first steps in that direction."[10]

    Former Conservative party leaders Iain Duncan Smith[11] and Michael Howard[12] have addressed the CFI lunch.

    The British Pakistani MP Sajid Javid has also made business lunch speeches which have been positively received by the CFI, the Jewish Chronicle even reporting Javid as a future Prime Minister.[13]

    Donations[edit]

    The Dispatches documentary claimed members of the group and their companies have donated over £10 million to the Conservative party between 2001 and 2009. The group called this figure "deeply flawed" saying that they have only donated £30,000 between 2004 and 2009 but that members of the group have undoubtedly made their own donations to the party. Dispatches described the CFI as "beyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groups".[2][7]

    Members of CFI[edit]

    According to the CFI website 80% of Tory MPs are members of Conservative Friends of Israel.[14]

    In alphabetical order, members of Conservative Friends of Israel include:

    See also[edit]

    References[edit]

    1. ^ Peter Oborne (12 December 2012). "The cowardice at the heart of our relationship with Israel". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
    2. ^ a b Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, Channel 4, Monday 16 November 2009
    3. ^ Peter Oborne, Iran nuclear deal: ill-informed friends of Israel are refusing to face facts, Daily Telegraph, 27 November 2013, accessed 10 August 2015
    4. ^ CFI INFORMED Magazine, Second Edition (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, February 2007, p. 3, retrieved 29 May 2008 [dead link]
    5. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel – About Us
    6. ^ Robert Halfon (27 September 2007). "Introducing the CFI". ConservativeHome. Retrieved 20 August 2012. 
    7. ^ a b c Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 November 2009. 
    8. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel web site
    9. ^ "Companies House WebCHeck - CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL LIMITED". Companies House. Company No. 08114952. Archived from the original on 29 December 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
    10. ^ CFI INFORMED Weekly Briefing (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, 3 February 2006, retrieved 25 May 2006 [dead link]
    11. ^ Duncan Smith: Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorists, Conservatives.com, 10 December 2001
    12. ^ "Howard Speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel, at the Savoy Hotel, London". Conservatives.com. 6 December 2004. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004. 
    13. ^ http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/94117/muslim-tory-mp-after-britain-israel-best
    14. ^ a b "About CFI". Conservative Friends of Israel. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
    15. ^ "Ministers "will change" war crimes arrest law". Jewish Chronicle. 8 July 2010. 
    16. ^ "Altrincham and Sale West: Election 2010". Jewish Chronicle. 29 April 2010. 
    17. ^ "UK: Evangelical Christian appointed new UK Middle East Minister". The Muslim News. 15 May 2010. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
    18. ^ "British MPs furious after Israel President Shimon Peres accuses the English of being anti-semitic". Daily Mail. UK. 1 August 2010. 
    19. ^ a b "Cameron's Cabinet: Who are they?". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
    20. ^ "Mike's Biography". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
    21. ^ "William Hague's Schmooze With The Jewish News". Totally Jewish. 25 March 2010. 
    22. ^ a b "Ministers lose seats in the East". East Anglia Daily Times. 7 May 2010. 
    23. ^ Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. 
    24. ^ "About Conservative Friends of Israel". cfoi.co.uk. Retrieved 22 September 2011. 
    25. ^ "Eric Pickles to lead MPs’ delegation to Israel". Jewish Chronicle. July 24, 2015. 
    26. ^ "Rifkind elected as Kensington MP". Jewish Chronicle. 7 May 2010. 
    27. ^ Sloan, Alaistair. "Ed Miliband will back Israel". Middle East Monitor. Retrieved 13 April 2015. 

    External links[edit]

     

    [GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-GERMANY.

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    ADDED JULY 28,2018

    AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2019.]

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    OCTOBER 21,2017

    H.F.1355

     

    [There is a well-known phrase:

    'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

    We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

    Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

    JewsnotZionists

    *

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

    David-Cameron-doesn't-understand-Conservative-party.

    [Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

    'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

    -A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

    [As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

    CLICKStartpage

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/

    real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

    -an-attack-on-iran.

    *

    [GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

    LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

    GERMANY.

    ADDED JULY 28,2018

    AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2019.]

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    OCTOBER 21,2017

    H.F.1355

     

     

     

    Dr MAX PEMBERTON: Sorry, we shouldn't be afraid to use the F-WORD...

     

    march 5,2020

    1. Sorry, we shouldn't be

       

      afraid to use the

       

      F-word

    When did the word ‘fat’ stop being a description of someone’s body and start to become their identity?

    Being fat is now a choice that should be celebrated — a characteristic that deserves respect from others.

    To suggest otherwise — that, for example, being overweight is a fundamentally unhealthy state and might be something that an individual tries to address for their own benefit — is considered ‘shaming’.

    And now doctors and healthcare workers are being warned against calling patients fat in case it offends them!

    In fact, a group of academics at King’s College London — and 100 organisations that support them — have gone one step further. In a statement worthily entitled ‘Pledge to Eradicate Weight Stigma’, they outline how calling people fat is akin to racism and sexism.

    Escalating

     Have we all gone stark raving mad? Discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin or because of their gender is very different to stating a fact about someone’s physical state which is putting them at risk

    And I worry this hyperbole and, quite frankly, nonsense from hand-wringing liberals falling over themselves not to upset people at every turn, helps nobody, least of all those battling with their weight.

    Last year, a Freedom of Information request showed the NHS receives hundreds of complaints every year from patients who object to having health professionals suggest they lose weight. This ‘pledge’ will only encourage more complaints at a time when the consequences of obesity cost nearly half the entire NHS budget.

    It’s not old people or dementia or cancer that will cripple the NHS, it’s fat people. Being overweight is linked to a host of conditions, from cancer and heart disease to strokes, joint and breathing problems, and diabetes, to name but a handful.

    Managing type 2 diabetes alone costs us £10 billion a year, and the situation is escalating out of control.

    Of course, being fat or obese is not something one should be mocked or bullied over. But equally, nor is it something that should be ignored.

    And it’s certainly not something that we should pretend isn’t linked to a shortened life expectancy

    To be blunt: people just aren’t bothering to lose weight any more.

    In part, this may be because so many more people are now overweight, it is becoming viewed as ‘normal’. But I think increasingly people just refuse to take responsibility for their behaviour.

    Have we all gone stark raving mad? Discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin or because of their gender is very different to stating a fact about someone’s physical state which is putting them at risk

    And I worry this hyperbole and, quite frankly, nonsense from hand-wringing liberals falling over themselves not to upset people at every turn, helps nobody, least of all those battling with their weight.

    Last year, a Freedom of Information request showed the NHS receives hundreds of complaints every year from patients who object to having health professionals suggest they lose weight. This ‘pledge’ will only encourage more complaints at a time when the consequences of obesity cost nearly half the entire NHS budget.

    It’s not old people or dementia or cancer that will cripple the NHS, it’s fat people. Being overweight is linked to a host of conditions, from cancer and heart disease to strokes, joint and breathing problems, and diabetes, to name but a handful.

    Managing type 2 diabetes alone costs us £10 billion a year, and the situation is escalating out of control.

    Of course, being fat or obese is not something one should be mocked or bullied over. But equally, nor is it something that should be ignored.

    And it’s certainly not something that we should pretend isn’t linked to a shortened life expectancy.

    To me as a doctor, it seems bizarre that I'm now being urged to turn a blind eye to the waistline of my patients

    Because this is not an issue that we need to debate, nor is it a matter of opinion. It’s a simple fact: being fat can kill you.

    I’m sure this is upsetting for some overweight patients to hear, but it doesn’t make it any less true. I view it as my duty as a healthcare professional to warn them of it.

    So how did we get to this point? Like so many trends, it started in America — a country which is decades ahead of us in the obesity epidemic.

    There, people with weight issues have adopted the language of persecuted or marginalised minorities, such gay or black people, to justify their size and shape and deflect criticism. Now they are ‘proud’ of their fatness and ‘celebrate’ in what has become a ludicrous cult of ‘body positivity’.

    But what is there to celebrate if you are so fat you can only wear tent-like clothes, can’t fit into airline or theatre seats, and you need a reinforced bed and reinforced ambulances to ferry you to hospital for treatment for the myriad health issues you suffer?

    Where’s the pride in being unable to walk without a stick or having to sit on a mobility scooter?

    All this ‘body positivity’ movement is doing is facilitating a delusion. It stops people from attempting to make the lifestyle changes that will save their lives.

    Our attitudes towards weight are a major factor in the scale of the problem we face, as illustrated by a fascinating survey by the Department of Health, which compared data collected in 1967 with that from 2010.

     

    Sedentary

    Although the Sixties diet was high in fat and there was far less access to gyms, people were considerably slimmer than they are now, a fact attributed to greater daily activity.

    For example, fewer people had cars, and there was more manual work compared with our relatively sedentary lives.

    But the 1967 survey also found that nine out of ten people had attempted to lose weight in the past year compared with 57 per cent of adults questioned in 2010. Even more telling is the finding that, in the Sixties, of those who thought they were fat only 7 per cent failed to do anything about it. That figure compares with nearly 50 per cent now.

    To be blunt: people just aren’t bothering to lose weight any more.

    In part, this may be because so many more people are now overweight, it is becoming viewed as ‘normal’. But I think increasingly people just refuse to take responsibility for their behaviour

    Insidious

    Instead of acknowledging that they are fat because they stuff their faces on a regular basis, they prefer to blame the Government, the food manufacturers, their genes etc.

    And if someone is confronted with the reality of being fat or obese, they fall back on the insidious language of identity politics and claim they are being victimised or picked on.

    Some activists argue that being overweight is not a choice. Sorry, but it is. There may be complex reasons why someone is obese — poverty and poor education are factors — but this doesn’t absolve people of responsibility, of choosing to eat more food than their body needs.

    There is undoubtedly a group of obese people who have deep-rooted underlying psychological problems — they may use food as an emotional crutch —and I meet many of them in my outpatient clinics. They need help and it pains me that we are so lacking in adequate services for them.

    But I also know that the majority of overweight people simply don’t care. When their joints crumble because of their bulk, or they need surgery to clear out their blocked arteries, or they develop diabetes, they know the NHS — that is us taxpayers — will pick up the tab.

    It is incumbent on all of us to change this attitude — to make being overweight socially unacceptable, just as smoking is because of the risk it poses to health, and to the rest of us.

    We could sort out all the NHS’s funding problems in the bat of an eyelid if only people would take responsibility and lose pounds by eating less and moving more. What is at stake is the future of the NHS.

    And as a doctor I will continue to make patients aware of that fact, whether or not it hurts their feelings.

     *  *  *

     

     

    [freedom of expression-

     

     

    SERIES!]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    march 5,2020

    H.F.1993

     
     [A CAUSE WORTH FIGHTING FOR

    THE RETURN OF THE FREE NATION STATE

    OF

     ENGLAND

    -instead of remaining within a threatening-toxic totalitarian so-called European Union- a monstrous- cunning - controlling - captive - calamitous

    soon to be

    SUPER-STATE.

    *

    BUT

    TO REGAIN

    OUR RIGHTFULL INHERITANCE.]

    "WE must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of independence..."

     

    Part
    of an almost 1000 word speech by Winston Churchill at Fulton Missouri,USA in March,1946,

    *  *  *
    THE END OF THE ENGLISH

    By

    David Brown

     

    INTRODUCTION

    HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

     HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

    THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

    HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

     WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

    *

    [THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

    NOTHING!]

    2008

     

     

    292

    Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

    Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

    'The United States of Europe.

    Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

    DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

     

    He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

    BERLIN.

     

    MORE!

    LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

    (www.vernoncoleman.com)

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!}

    DECEMBER  5,2018

    H.F.1760

     

     
    WHY IT'S

     GOT HARDER TO DEPORT CRIMINALS

    Foreign convicts exploiting human rights loophole reaches a five year high.

    By David Barrett-Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent-February 15,2020

     

    THE number of of foreign criminals avoiding

     

    deportation on human rights grounds has hit

     

    the highest level in five years.

     

    Cases have nearly tripled since political pressure over abuse of human rights helped force successful claims down to a record low.

     

    It comes amid concern about legal challenges to block deportations after dozens of Jamaican criminals had to be removed from a Home Office charter flight earlier this week.

     

    When Theresa May was home secretary, she told the 2011 Tory party conference that

     

    LABOUR''S HUMAN RIGHTS Act

     

    [To be precise-Tony Blair's.]

     

     

    'needs to go'

     

    and that the meaning of one

     crucial clause had been perverted' to prevent removals.

    The Home Office redoubled its efforts to fight cases in the immigration courts.

    By 2016 the European Convention on Human Rights and other humanitarian laws were used in only 60 successful applications by foreign criminals.

    The following year they more than doubled to 144.

    By 2018, the most recent figure whole year for which figures are available, the number reached a five-year-high of 172.-the most since 212 in 2013...

     

    The Mail revealed on Thursday that among the criminals who had been due to be removed from this country were killer Fitzroy Daley and rapist Fabian Henry.

     

    Government sources have said they fear the criminals remaining in Britain will win bail within days and be released from immigration detention centres.

     

    The Home Office is due to defend against the Jamaica deportation legal challenge in the High Court on Monday.

    A spokesman said. 'WE make no apology for seeking to remove dangerous foreign criminals. WE will continue to fight robustly in the courts to ensure foreign criminals are removed as quickly as possible.

     

    February 15,2020

     

    dailymail.co.uk

     

    *  *  *

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    1. Judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals ...

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

      14/06/2017 · Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

    2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able to deport EU criminals ...

      https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

      08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

    H.F.1984/1

    H.F.1986

     
     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

     
     

     

    ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

    - TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

    -NOT MULTICULTURAL.

    *

    THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

    Wednesday, June 7,2006

    *

     Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

    by

    Simon Heffer

     There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

     We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

    MULTICULTURLISM

     -had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

     

    [‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

    We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

     

    [The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

      

    To Continue:

     I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

    It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

     It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

    ENGLAND

    -somewhat precarious.

    Not all the Left has, however twigged that

    MULTICULTURLISM

    -is rather last century.

    Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

    Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

    -made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

     

    He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

     

    Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

     

    Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

    OUR CULTURE

    OUR CONSTITUTION

    OUR NATION

     

    At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

     

    REFORMATION

      -that the

    Monarch

     

    is Supreme Governor

    of the

    Church of England.

    -which is the Established Church of this Realm.

     

    As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

     

    “the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

    Realm of England.

     

    Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

     

    However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

     

    He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

     

    “Defender of Faiths”

     

    Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

     

    More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

     

    Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

     

    Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

     

    Defender of the Faith

     

    -and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

     

    THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

     

    Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

     

    Perhaps the needless vandalism of

     

    OUR CONSTITUTION

     

    -will have been completed by then.

     

    Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

     

    For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

     

    When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

     

    For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

     

    For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

    -embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

    NEW SOVEREIGN.

     

    Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

     

    But he would be WRONG!

     

    It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

     

    It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

    HISTORY and TRADITION

    -and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

     

    That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

     

    Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

     

    The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

    OUR WAY OF LIFE

    And

    OUR VALUES.

     

    It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

     

    WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

     

    WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

     

    AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

     

    WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

     

    AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABILITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

     

    * * *

    [Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS

    *

    BRITISH CONSTITUTION

    BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

    MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

    MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

    1844

     

    GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

     

    CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

     

    Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

     

    To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

    *

     

    Nationality and Domicile

     

    In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

     

    Of this parliament we must speak.

     

    Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

     

    It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

    HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

    -are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

     

    When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

     

    Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

     

    -the one nationality, the other domicile.

     

    Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

    The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

     

    If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

     

    But there is no such thing as British domicile -

    Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

     

    If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

     

    We have included the above extracts from

    The

     

    CONSTITUTIONAL

    HISTORY

    OF

    ENGLAND

     

    by

     

    F.W MAITLAND [1908]

     

    -to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

     

    The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

     

    Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

    To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

    English Parliament.

    Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

    To continue:

    BRITISH CONSTITUTION

    BY

    LORD BROUGHAM

    *

    CHAPTER VIII

     THE National Resistance was not only, n point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

    Right of Resistance

    [Even in 2006]

    -as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

    But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

     

    [DO YOU UNDERSTAND

    TONY BLAIR?]

     

    The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

    The thirty renewals of

    MAGNA CARTA

    -the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

    RIGHTS are INVADED.

    The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

    RIGHT of RESISTANCE

     

    -less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

     

    In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

     

    This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

     

    The great virtue of the

     

    CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

     

    -is the purity in which it recognises and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

     

    The ruling powers are three:

     

    The Sovereign

     

    The Lords

     

    The Commons

     

    -of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

    If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

     

    PEACE and WAR

     

    -and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

     

    The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

    NATIONAL DEFENCE.

     

    [In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

    UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

    -without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

     

    REFERENDUM

     

    - on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

     

    So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

    IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

     

    WHAT IS?

     

    The following extracts are from the

     

    PREFACE

     

    of the

    BRITISH CONSTITUION

     

    By

     

    HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

    [1844]

     

    GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

     

    It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

     

    It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

     

    Sovereign of ENGLAND

     

    -never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

    can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

     

    The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

     

    It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

     

    But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

     

    CONSTITUTION

     

    -however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

     *

    [In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

     

    It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

    WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

    ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

    ARE YOU CONTESTING?

     

    * * *

     

    MULTICULTURLISM

     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

    JUNE/06

    H.F.1472--BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2006

     
     
     
     

    Illuminati

    The story starts about 45,000 years ago. There was a planet in an orbit closer to the sun than Jupiter. Many call this planet Maldek, Mars was it’s largest moon. The Reptilian people that lived there were very violent and negative. They went to war with the people that lived on Mars. They were greater in number, but the Martians had better technology. These people refused to quit attacking the peaceful Martians. So the Martians devised a plan to seriously damage Maldek, making it impossible for these people to stay there and get the war over. The weapon they used, turned out to be to strong and blew up Maldek, scattering pieces all over our solar system, making the asteroid belt, new moons for some of the outer planets and comets in the far reaches of our solar system.

    About 8,000 of these Reptilian people were in large space ships and survived. So they decided to go live in our moon and kick out the few Draconians that lived there. The Reptilians (Draconians) soon returned in force. So they had to leave in a hurry, while their ships were being blasted and crash landed in Antarctica, which at that time was in a tropical area. Now they soon no longer had space flight, because of the Draconian continued attacks. They had trouble living on Earth as their bodies didn’t agree with Earth’s elements. Humanity had just came out of cataclysms caused by Maldek blowing up, so they were few in number and lost their technology and now were sort of primitive.

    These people captured some Humans and using genetics made hybrids of themselves, so they could live on Earth. They made 2 kinds of hybrids, one kind was very similar to and could mate with Humanity. The other kind was different and had elongated heads and became the ruling class and could not mate with Humanity. There are still some of these left, although they stay secret. Within 2,000 years the brown dwarf star, came through our solar system as it does every 3,557 years. Earth was hit hard and had a devastating pole shift, making the south pole in about the center of Antarctica as it is today.

    Most all of the people on Earth died as there was a flash freeze in the new polar areas, killing a lot of animals too. So the Reptilian-Mammal hybrid people that were similar to Humanity lived with and bred with Humanity. When one of their females had children, the children would get one of their souls, regardless of who the father is. These people, the Illuminati today can tell each other apart from Humanity, but Humanity can’t seem to tell that they have different souls. They arranged to put each other into positions of power, like kings and queens and still hold these positions today. Although with the invention of the internet and spreading of knowledge, they are starting to lose control.

    With them in power, we have war, central banks, shortages and other forms of suffering. Because of them we live in a negative world. In 2021 our 3rd cycle will finish and positive soul groups get to move up to the 2nd realm, 5th dimension (4th density). We are in the 1st realm, 4th dimension (3rd density) now. So we must get the Illuminati out of power and turn positive, to move up to 4th density. A soul can either go through 1 cycle of 3rd or 4th density (or some of both) and make ascension to 5th density (12th dimension on Earth). If we get in 4th density life improves, our bodies will be a little better and matter a little different, the biggest change is another component of time. Many of us will gain some telepathy and see a wider range of the spectrum and other improvements.

    Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

    what is the soul made of

    afflict your souls in the bible

    what is a person's soul

    what is the soul of man

    afflict your soul means

    what is the soul according to the bible

    afflict your soul kjv

    what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

     

    FEBRUARY 5-2016

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

    ADDED JULY-2020

     

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/

    1959/black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.1424/2S

     

     
     

     UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

    by

    Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

     

    BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

    [MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

    SEE HERE!   ]

     

    JUNE 2-2015

    H.F.1388

     

     

     

    PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

    PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

    BREXIT

    BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

    UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

    NULL AND VOID.

    JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

    JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

    JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

    *

    AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

    SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

    OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

    NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

    DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

    *

    H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

     

     

    PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

    MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

    2014

     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    E U FILE

    IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

         9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

    MAGNA CARTA

    LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

    NAZI DVD

    ENGLAND FILE

    CRIMINAL EU

    THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

    SAY NO TO EU

    UNDERSTANDING EASTER

    EURO MUST FAIL

    ROTTEN HEART OF EU

    SOUL OF ENGLAND

    100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

    TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

    ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

    THE END OF THE ENGLISH

    ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

    MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

     by LORD PETER SHORE.

     

     
    Brought-forward from August 2003

    [THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

    Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

    J. Bingley

    Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

    The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

    The whole constitution originates its authority from

    COMMON LAW

    Supremacy resides in the

    LAW and PEOPLE

    NOT THE

    CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

    It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

    THE LAW IS SUPREME

    The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

    HANDS of the PEOPLE.

    This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

    The English Constitution's function is to

    PROTECT the

    "RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

     of ENGLISHMEN".

    These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

    [In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

    The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

    " Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

    It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

    This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

    All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

    The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

    A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

    Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

     It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

    There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

    The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

    Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

    The MAGNA CARTA

    made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

    [THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

    THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

    That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

    'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

    [Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

    'Right to be Done!']

    Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

    There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

     There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

     There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

     We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

     Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

    The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

    Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

    The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

    A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

    WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

    John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

    *

    [We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

     KEW-LONDON

     which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

    1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

    ". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

    Edward Heath.

    . It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

    [Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

    FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

    *

    [THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

    AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

     

    More!

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

    MAY 30-2016

    H.F.800

     

     
    A FREE PRESS!

    It's finest expression had already been given in

    MILTON'S

    AREOPAGITICA.

    Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

    One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

    *

    THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

    More!

     

     

     

     

     
    THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

    WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

    [Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

    *

    A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

     (1959-2016)

     

     

     

    THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

    THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

    THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

     

    THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

     

     

     

     

     

     
     

     

    A REMINDER!

     

     

     

    [ A MATTER OF FACT!]

    On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

    'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

    STATEMENT!

    [We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

     What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

      NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

    FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

    *

     

    Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

     Added OCTOBER 11-2017

    IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

    OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

    IS

    'GO TO HELL'

    BUT

    MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

    "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

    The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

    CHRISTOPHER STORY

     WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

    FOR

    TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

     

    FROM

    INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

    SEPTEMBER-2005

    *

     

    EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

     

    THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

     

    An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

    The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

    On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

    For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

    Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

    Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

    Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

     

    WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

     

    This means that the European Union’s Treaties

     are null and void,

    as they have been obtained by fraud. 

     

    That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

     

    It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

     

    John Major

     

    Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

     

    THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

    ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

     

    The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

     

    *          *

    International Currency Review

     

    (Vol 30- No 4)

    *

     

     

    www.worldreports.org

     

    *          *          *

     

    [Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

    in brackets]

     

    OCT/05

     

    THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

    Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

    Law of Treaties

    there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

    WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

    TREATY

    in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

    AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

    2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

     

    A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

    FOREIGN POWER.

    which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

    As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

    ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

    This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

    ACT of WAR

    against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

    It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

    Muslim Brotherhood,

    is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

    The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

    near Munich

    For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

    E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

    Website:

    www.worldreports.org

    *

    The European Union Collective:
    Enemy of Its Member States

    OCTOBER-2005

     

     

     LIFE AND TIMES

    OF

    Christopher Story

     PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

    2010

     

    *  *  *

    ADDED DECEMBER,2018

    [FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

    YOU.]

     

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

     

     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

     

     

     
     

     

     

    MAY-16 victory

    JUN-16

    REFERENDUM

    JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
    MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
    JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

    APL-18

    MAY-18

    JUN-18

    JUL-18

    AUG-18

    SEP-18

    OCT-18

    NOV-18

    DEC-18

    JAN-19

    FEB-19

    MAR-19

    APR-19

    MAY-19

    JUN-19

    JUL-19

    AUG-19

    SEP 19 OCT-19 NOV-19 DEC-19 JAN-20

    FEB-20

    MAR-20

    APRIL-20

    MAY-20 JUNE-20
    JULY-20 AUG-20 SEPT-20 OCT-20 NOV-20  FREE OF THE EU

    DEC-20

    AFTER  48 YEARS

    JAN-21

    A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

    THE

    WORLD OUR OYSTER

     

     

     

     

     
     
       - JANUARY 2021 -  PART 1 -     

     

     PART 1 -  PART 4 - PATRIOT FILE] - PART 5 -

     

          

    NOVEMBER- HOME-

    PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

    - (1994 -Official Website - MARCH-PT 5- 2019 )-

    MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

    MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

    MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

           MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

     

    *

    THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

     

    TOP OF PAGE

     

    CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012