- (1994 - EDP Official Website - JULY - PART 1 - 2021)

[THERE WILL APPEAR ITEMS ON MANY SUBJECTS ALLIED TO THE SUBJECT IN QUESTION!]

ENGLAND - CHRISTIAN FAITH

THERE ARE MANY BULLETINS ON THE SUBJECT OF CHRISTIANITY ON OUR WEB-SITE OVER  20 YEARS

 - PART 1-PART 2 - PART 3
 

CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

 

This is the price of the Church prostrating itself on the alter of trendy obsessions.

 By Stephen Glover

15 hours ago — Like the Roman Catholic Church he is joining, he is robustly opposed ... Former Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali with his wife Valerie ...

 

OCTOBER 15-2021

 

 WHEN a man who once nearly became Archbishop of Canterbury defects to the Roman Catholic Church, it is time to sit up and notice.

Michael Nazir-Ali is in most respects as unlike as is possible to a typical modern Church of England bishop, which is doubtless why he wasn't appointed Anglian Primate in 2002.

He has stood out as an uncompromising social conservative in an Established Church which in recent years has become increasingly liberal, and has tended to swim with the tide of secular belief.

One doesn't have to agree with every aspect of Dr Nazir-Ali's opinions -and some Anglians, let alone people of other denominations and non-believers, wont. Like the Roman Catholic Church he is joining, he is robustly opposed to abortion.

Nor has he been supportive of celibate homosexual priests working in the Church of England, or of same-sex marriages taking place in the church. Though still not permitted, it seems likely they soon will be.

At the same time, he has celebrated the importance of the family and sanctity of marriage in a way that would have been familiar to Anglican worshippers half a century ago, but is now unusual.

Whatever one may think of his particular views, I find it impossible not to admire Dr Nazir-Ali for the rigour of his thought, and for his courage in speaking out in defiance of fashionable opinion.

His background  largely explains why he is so different from the run-of-the-mill Anglian prelates. Born in overwhelming Muslim Pakistan, he became a bishop there while still in his thirties, before leaving the country when his life was in danger.

For him Christianity was not a set of safe and comfortable beliefs which can be bent to accommodate progressive thought. It was a minority sect fighting for survival, and sometimes threatened  by radical Islam.

That explains why, since his retirement as Bishop of Rochester in 2009 after 15 years in the role, he has spent  a lot of time in communion with Anglicans in the Third World, who are sometimes persecuted. He is above all a serious man.

Not a few Anglicans will agree with him when he says he wants  to be in a Church 'where there is clear teaching for the faithful'. It does exist in parts of the Church of England, but many priests seem too frightened of offending worldly values to speak out with much clarity.

Dr Nazir-Ali's criticism of the C o E for jumping on to every faddish  bandwagon about identity politics, cultural  correctness  and mea culpa about Britain's imperial past ' will also strike a cord with many people.

Of course there are historical events of which we should be rightly ashamed . What is so wearisome is the preoccupation with supposed misdeeds in the distant past, and the constant self-flagellation, when there are so many challenges and problems in our own time.

Yet the Church of England's hierarchy  has instructed  cathedrals and churches  to review their monuments  for links to slavery and colonialism , and take action  if any are found . Some  12,500 parishes and 42 cathedrals have been scouring their grounds and buildings for shameful connections.

Meanwhile the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby , has declared in the tones of a trendy Labour MP : 'Some will have to come down, some names will have to change.' Aren't there more pressing things for the Church to be doing?

Equally, although the Church is right to be deeply concerned about despoiling  of God's world, it shouldn't  be involving  itself in the politics of climate change. There are scientists and politicians aplenty to do that.

And yet earlier this year the CoE appointed a Bishop of the Environment to spearhead the crusade against climate change, and tackle the looming 'chaos and destruction' of 'this precious planet'. At a  Christmas service not long ago, I heard preach about global warming.
 

What about spearheading the fight against the seemingly ineluctable decline of religious belief in this country? , Religious attendance continues to fall, and the response of the Church of England, when it is not fretting about secular matters, is to talk about closing churches?

Indeed, a recent C of E document called into question 'the sustainability of many local churches', and warned that most dioceses intend to 'prune' the number of clergy.

ADMITTEDLY , there are still, particularly on the evangelical wing of the Church, vibrant parishes that aren't prepared to roll over and accept the inevitability of decline. But much of the C of E has become defeatist and inward looking.

So one can understand why Dr Nazir-Ali yearns for the clarity and robustness of the Roman Catholic Church, though there is room for doubt whether he will find that. After al, it is itself divided between traditionalists and liberals over issues such as abortion, contraception, the celibacy of the clergy and same-sex marriage

All one can say with confidence is that if there are more devout and committed bishops like Michael Nazir Ali in our national Church, it would be sending out a stronger message tpo a country that is drifting even further from GOD

*  *  *

By Stephen Glover

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS ETC. ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 15,2021

H.F.2154 /B

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

THE DEAFENING  SILENCE OF OUR GUTLESS LEADERS

 

 

 

 
[THE COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 H.F.2151

 

MONTHLY BULLETINS- ALL SUBJECTS   -    PART 1 - PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3 -PART 4  - PART 5  - PART 6

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter explicitly states:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
this right includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

*  *  *

 

[WE ARE MAKING CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF OUR BULLETINS OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS BY DELETING MANY BULLETINS

THE SUBJECT OF THE EU TO CONCENTRATE ON HOME MATTERS AND THE THREAT TO OUR SECURITY WITHIN  AND WITHOUT

OUR SHARED  ISLAND HOME,

WITH THE RAPID RISE OF THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 OF  ALIEN NEWCOMERS  TO OUR SHORES AND MANY OF OUR TOWNS AND CITIES

 ARE NOW FOREIGN ENCLAVES.  WITHIN A GENERATION  THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION WILL NO DOUBT BECOME A MINORITY

 IN THEIR OWN HOMELAND CALLED

  ENGLAND  .

 

THERE IS ALREADY A SHORTAGE OF WHITE TEACHERS IN OUR SCHOOLS AND WHITE CHILDREN ARE

CLASSIFIED AS A DISADVANTAGED GROUP BECAUSE OF THE CURSE OF PC - POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

 AS WE HAVE STATED OVER THE PAST 20 YEARS-IT IS THE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE FROM OTHER CULTURES WHICH EVERY

GOVERNMENT HAS FAILED TO LIMIT IMMIGRATION.  WE ARE NOW TOLD THAT ONLY KEY INDIVIDUALS

 WILL BE INVITED IN THE FUTURE. BUT CAN WE BELIEVE THEM AFTER OVER 40 YEARS OF LIES AND DECEITS.

 THE PANDEMIC HAS SHOWN THE VALUE OF THE KEY WORKERS FROM COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD

IN THE NHS AND IN OTHER OCCUPATIONS IN OUR COUNTRY. BUT WE

ARE A SMALL NATION ONE OF THE MOST CROWDED PLACES ON THE PLANET AND MANY OF ITS  PEOPLE ARE FEARFULL

FOR THE FUTURE OF THEIR ENGLISH CONSTITUTION - LAW CUSTOM AND CHRISTIAN FAITH.

AROUND THE WORLD THROUGHOUT HISTORY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ROBBED OF THEIR HOMELAND

BY OTHERS- AS HAS HAPPENED OVER THE PAST CENTURIES AND ONLY CONSTANT VIGILANCE OF THE PEOPLE

WILL ENSURE THAT ENGLAND WILL CONTINUE INTO THE FUTURE WITH THE SANCTITY FOR ITS PRICELESS

INHERITANCE OF THE  ENGLISH CONSTITUTION -LAW AND CUSTOM

AND CHRISTIAN  FAITH OF OVER 1000 YEARS IN THE MAKING.

 A SMALL COUNTRY THAT IGNORES ITS  POPULATION GROWTH AND RACIAL MIX

 WILL NOT ONLY BEGET DAMAGE TO ITS  CONSTITUTIONAL INHERITANCE BUT ALSO TO ITS INVIGORATING

COUNTRYSIDE AND WILL  TURN  THE COUNTRY  INTO A WHIRLPOOL OF NONENTITY AND CONFUSTION AND FEAR ! .]

]


 

 

 

H.F.2151

 

 

 

 

HOME
“The love of home, the sympathy with those who live at home, the work for those at home, can be carried on in ever-widening circles until you embrace the whole universe. The truest patriotism is that which is grounded in the love of home. There is a real danger, if you try neglecting that elementary duty, if you think it sounds grander and bigger to embrace the love of humanity first.”
 
Rt.Hon. Stanley Baldwin: This Torch of Freedom

ON

 ENGLAND

 

1923

 

 

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

 

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

FOR THE RETURN

OF THE

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

AT

WESTMINSTER

AND

 [A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT FROM WALES AND SCOTLAND POSSIBLY THE OLD CAPITAL  - YORK?]

 

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[Each of the underlined words above - have a separate bulletin

 

the works of a

 

PATRIOT OF ENGLAND-SIMON HEFFER]

 

*  *  *

 

The EDP ORG.UK. CONSTITUTION

 

 supports the establishment

 

of a family of

 

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 

AND THE CREATION OF A  SUPREME ISLAND COUNCIL TO PROTECT THE SECURITY AND INTERESTS

 

OF A

 

GREATER BRITAIN.

 

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAKER - UNITED IN OUR ISLAND HOME -WE ARE STRONGER AGAINST ENEMIES WITHIN AND IN THE WORLD AT LARGE. BUT IF THE PEOPLE OF SCOTLAND DECIDE TO LEAVE THE UNION FOR SLAVERY UNDER HITLER'S BULLY EU THEN SO BE IT! THEY WILL BE MISSED-BUT THEY KNOW IN THEIR HEARTS WHO ARE THEIR FRIENDS AND CLOSE NEIGHBOURS - AND WILL REJOIN AS WE ENVISAGE - AS A TRUE PARTNER IN FREE NATION STATE-

 

 WITHIN A FAMILY OF NATION STATES -

 

OF A TRULY UNITED ISLAND HOME

 

OF A

 

GREATER BRITAIN

 

*

 

FREEDOM

 

'All we have of freedom-all we use or know-

 

This our fathers bought for us, long and long ago'

 

Kipling. The Old Issue.

 

 

*

 

We must be free or die, who speak the tongue

 

That Shakespeare spake; the faith and morals hold

 

Which Milton held

 

Wordsworth.Sonnets

 

*

All our past proclaims our future; Shakespear's voice and Nelson's hand,

 

Milton's faith and Wordsworth trust in this our chosen and chainless land,

 

Bear us witness; come the world [or the EU] against her,

 

England yet shall stand.

 

SWINBURNE. England

*  *  *

[Comment in brackets are ours!

*

 

WORK IN PROGRESS

[ITEMS OF INTEREST WILL BE ADDED OVER THE COMING MONTHS AND OTHERS DELETED.]

 

Why I as a Christian believe we Must-

banish evil British jihadis from these shores-

Says former-Archbishop-Canterbury.

1. Lord Carey wants those involved in terrorism to lose their passports

[2.WE have not included item 2 as it is strongly contradicted (*) below]

 3.Muslim communities are being pressured to discipline their young

by Lord Carey forMAIL ON SUNDAY

EXTRACT

(*)...By embracing multiculturalism and the idea that every culture and belief is of equal value

WE HAVE BETRAYED OUR OWN TRADITIONS

of welcoming strangers to

OUR SHORE..

The strangers we welcome were attracted to

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS.

They were escaping

TOTALITARIANISM

and

RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

and  wanted to come to a country where there was

FREEDOM OF RELIGION

and separation of the power of

CHURCH

STATE

and

JUDICIARY

They also came to one of the only countries in Europe where there was an

ESTABLISHED CHURCH.

The establishment of the Church didn't mean other

BELIEFS

were not welcome but it did offer hospitality for a range of diverse beliefs...

This year we are reminded by the commemoration of

TWO WORLD WARS

that the

VALUES

of our

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS

are

PRECIOUS

Our fathers and grandfathers-including many thousands of Muslims from around the

Commonwealth

Fought against

TOTALITARISM

for the survival of DEMOCRATIC VIRTUES.

The bloody advance of IS is a reminder that

TOTALITARISM

 Is far from

DEAD

OUR FIGHT CONTINUES.

 

More!

 

 

Multiculuralism is no longer right for Britain by CRE Head Trevor Phillips [IT NEVER WAS.]

Christianity is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force which makes us what we are.

immigration flood'fuelling more hostility

Muliticulturalism: not only a fraud-but also DANGEROUS!

OUR PAST is embedded in our NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS-It asks-WERE WE CAME FROM and WHO WE ARE.

.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 24 19-2014

H F 228

 
 

PART 1/9

Growth and Development of the English Parish.

by

 

Wray Hunt

 

 

In the words of the author in 1932 the following chapters:

 

To describe as far as possible the story of the English parish not only as regards the religious but also the social life…It is often forgotten that no man or boy can possibly understand the history of his country if he does not understand its life and ideas.”

 

[We have it in mind to endeavour to bring to you each chapter in the life of the parish of England covering the years 651 to 1890.]

 

As the author Wray Hunt further mentions the chapters of the periods of history of the parish “to be accepted, not as a history of England but as a companion … to be read together with the usual political histories, so that the reader of these latter may be able to imagine the sort of people among who those things happened that are” described in the following chapters. 

 

*          *

 [The following statement was made a few years ago but in 2007 with a Archbishop of York who has energised Christianity in our Christian land the future is more encouraging with a recent poll showing that a majority of the population considered themselves Christians even if they have not been to CHURCH for YEARS.]

 

[Our purpose in taking this journey through English history by accounting the life of the community around and within the Christian Church is to show those who like some Anglican clergyman today who say that England is no longer a Christian country whereas it would be impossible for our land of England to deny our Faith with so many reminders of our Christian heritage in our living landscape- its past supporters at rest within the precincts of our numerous places of worship since St Augustine came to our shores over 1400 years ago and Christian Monarchy in England.

 

We do not deny that those who attend Anglican Church services has been steadily declining for half a century though some Christian communities who have adhered more strictly to Christian doctrine have either held their flock or even in some cases have increased their congregation.

 

As is outlined elsewhere in our Bulletin ’A Defence of Christianity’ by C.E.M.Joad-philosopher- writer (1951) that so far from Christianity becoming a world-wide religion,

 Christ taught that it would be a religion of the few.

 

In other parts of the world –USA, Africa and many other countries there has been a revival taking place and it is beginning in our own homeland.  So the clergyman who told his flock in October 2004, that England is no longer a Christian country had better withdraw his judgement because there is and will be a return to Christian Values because the other possibility will not succeed when we see the Christian heritage which meets our eyes in Hamlet, Village, Town and City which are a constant reminder that we are never far from our roots and for many of us still when we reach our final resting place.

 

The escalating crime, drug and other destroyers of a community have been having their way for the past 40 years and only a dramatic realisation of the dangers now with us all will there be a return to the Christian Values which can only make our lives better and safer.

 

Within our country we have those of other Faiths who are not so negligent of their mission and it should be a reminder to us all that a Religious belief should be   accompanied by a moral accountability.

 

We have seen how the grievous free-for-all offered by the politicians in a secular society can take their toll unless there is a moral dimension. Don’t blame the government but ourselves in being enticed into bottomless black hole where no moral accountability seems necessary or possible.

 

Those responsible for protecting the community such as Chief Police Constables have been warning for decades of the problems which would follow the relaxation of the Drug, Drink and now the Betting laws apart from the lack of discipline in the home and in the school and community.]

 

*          *          *

 

Chapter 1/ X1X

 

 

The King’s Hall

(AD 651-670)

 

I have given this title to the first chapter because, strange as it may seem, it is to a king’s hall that we must go if we are to understand the beginning of the English parish.  The Romans, though some of them were Christians – and we know that there were churches in Roman Britain – knew nothing of the parish, and even the earliest missionaries to the pagan English knew nothing of it.

 

Yet it is certain that had the parish not developed English life today would be something very unlike the life that we know, as will be clear enough when, in the course of [the following Chapters] we consider what the parish did.

 

But first we must go to the king’s hall, northward, into the bleak moorlands of Yorkshire.  There, in a town that we can call Whitby, we shall find what we seek.

 

For a king’s dwelling the place is bare and uninviting.  Built of rough-hewn timber, the cold wind of the north howls about it, through the unglazed openings that serve as windows, and down the rough hole in the roof that is the sole-chimney.  Yet once inside we come into the midst of a very august assembly.

 

There is a rough board table running down the centre of the long smoke-blackened room.  At the head sits a man dressed in course garments, but they are set off by a collar of fur and a great rudely carved gold chain.  He wears on his head a rude gold circlet for a crown.  That is Oswy; King of the Northumbrians and at the moment the most powerful king in England.

 

On his left hand sits one clad in a long grey robe, a man whose gentle face is lined and seamed with years of hard toil, of travelling up and down the land when roads were mere tracks through unbroken forest or over desolate heath, and a traveller must face the perils of starvation and of wild beasts as soon as he leaves the shelter of the town or village and sets his face toward the next goal of his journey.  The man’s head is curiously shaven, bald from crown to the forehead, with a crescent of hair marking the edge of the shaven patch.  This is Colman, leader of the Irish Christian party.

 

Opposite sits a man similarly clad in a plain grey robe.  But this man’s face is stronger altogether.  The heavy line between his brows, the obstinate set of the thin lips, tell of stubborn vigour.  This man can be almost mulish in his obstinacy, and at best is a determined, pushing person, sincere enough perhaps in his religion, but utterly incapable of appreciating anyone else’s point of view.

 

This is Wilfrid, leader of the Roman Church party in Northumbria.  His head is shaved too, but not like Colman’s.  A little bald patch at the crown surrounded by a ring of hair is his fashion.  H despises Colman’s method of tonsuring, as this head-shaving is called.  He says that the man who tried to buy from the Apostles the gift of the Holy Ghost wore his hair like that, and from his name, Simon Magus, Wilfred and his party nickname the others Magians.  Indeed, Wilfred has just been arguing this point with his Irish opponent.

 

The King looks from one party to the other as if in doubt. At last he speaks.

We have heard Colman,” he says, “that our Lord spake to the Apostle Peter, saying, ‘Thou art Peter, and upon this rock will I build my Church.’ Also that our lord said to this same blessed Peter, I will give unto thee the keys of he kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Tell me, Colman, has your St Columba any such promise?”

 

For a moment the Irish missionary is dumb; he sees the trap.  Then with a sigh, he shakes his head. 

 

“Then,” continues the King, “ it were best that I agreed with the followers of Peter, lest when my turn comes he lock me out of heaven.”

 

The conference is over.  Colman rises with a sigh.  His work in England is done.  There is nothing left now but to return to Iona, the Holy Island off the rugged Scottish coast, where his abbey lies.  Wilfred smiles triumphantly. His party in the Church have won over to their side the strongest king in England, in whose dominions, moreover, the Irish Church was most powerful.

 

But the subtle King has is own secret.  He reverences and respects St Peter, but it is what St Peter’s successors have done that really moves him to act.

 

For the Irish, or Celtic Church, good men as its clergy might be, could never have developed the parish system, and that the Irish Church might win over all England appeared at one time possible.

 

There was no head of the Irish Church.  Each abbot was lord of his own abbey, and arranged as he thought good for the religious needs of the surrounding districts.  Sometimes there would be a dispute with a neighbouring abbey, and then, since there was no common superior to whom the case might go – for the bishop, so important in the Roman Church, was beneath the abbot in the Celtic Church –quaint things sometimes happened. 

 

There are stories of pitched battles between monks of rival Irish abbeys when some long-standing dispute had grown more than usually bitter.

 

But Oswy wanted to unite England under his rule, and such a Church [Celtic] as this, a group of disunited abbeys owning no common head, would hinder rather than help him in this object.  On the other hand, the Roman Church, every member of which must submit to the Pope, with its bishops and archbishops to keep order and discipline each in his own sphere, acted according to known and definite rules, would be, he hoped, the means of uniting rather than dividing England.

 

That is why in telling the story of the parish we go first to the king’s hall, where at the Synod of Whitby AD 664 it was decided that Roman, not Celtic Christianity should be the religion of England.  For had the verdict gone the other way it is doubtful if the parish as we know it would ever have come into existence.

 

*          *          *

[Further Chapters of our journey through the Parish life of England will follow]

 

 

[Fonts altered-bolding used –comments in brackets]

 

PART 2

 

2005

 

 

*  *  *

ON THE ROAD TO A

 MULTICULTURAL

 ENGLAND

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[ HISTORIAN -Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]



 

 ' ... May I ask you then to believe, as I do most devoutly believe, that the moral law was not written for men alone in their individual character, but that it was written as well for nations, and for nations great as this of which we are citizens. If nations reject and deride that moral law, there is a penalty which will inevitably follow. It may not in our lifetime; but, rely upon it, the great Italian is not a poet only, but a profit, when he says,-
'
'''The sword of heaven is not in haste to smite
Nor yet doth linger.'

We have experience, We have beacons, we have landmarks enough. We know what the past has cost us, we know how much and how far we have wandered, but we are not left without a guide. It is true we have not, as an ancient people had, Urim and Thummin - those oraculous gems on Aaron's breast - from which to take counsel, but we have the unchangeable and eternal principles of the moral law to guide us, and only so far as we walk by that guidance can we be permanently a great nation, or our people a happy people.

JOHN BRIGHT MP
OCT.29,1858
Speech on Foreign Policy
BIRMINGHAM
Town Hall.
 

*  *  *

 

[WITH AN ENGLAND WITH A POPULATION NOW AFTER MASSIVE IMMIGRATION OF SUCH A VARIED TRADITION  AND CHURCH IT IS IMPORTANT

THAT THE

ENGLISH PEOPLE DEFEND THEIR INHERITANCE OF CHURCH-LAW-CUSTOM-TRADITION BECAUSE POPULATION CHANGES OVER THE NEXT FEW DECADES COULD CHANGE OUR COUNTRY TO A FOREIGN ENCLAVE

IT IS NOT RACIST TO PROTECT YOUR PRICELESS INHERITANCE OF LAW-CUSTOM-PARLIAMENT-CHRISTIAN FAITH.]

 


 

*  *  *

 

 

THE VEIL –

THE CROSS A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

THE

Melanie

Phillips

COLUMN

 *

Daily Mail

Monday, October 16,2006

SUDDENLY, Britain seems to be developing into a cultural and religious battleground. Hard on the heels of Jack Straw’s criticism of the Muslim full-face veil, local government minister Phil Woolas has said that Aishah Azmi the Dewsbury teaching assistant who insists on wearing a veil in her primary school class-room, should be sacked.

Not to be outdone, the Shadow Home Secretary, David Davis, has accused Muslims of promoting a kind of ‘voluntary apartheid’

-by shutting themselves away in closed societies and demanding immunity from criticism, corroding the very foundations of

BRITISH [ENGLISH] CULTURE

Meanwhile, British Airways is being sued for religious discrimination after it required a Christian women employee to conceal her cross while permitting other faiths to wear turbans, hijabs or Hindu bangles.

*

[This is classic political-correctness, which identifies with any faith or mantra provided it is

NOT CHRISTIAN.

The home culture is to be suppressed to show how tolerant and noble we are in our diversity agenda even if it places in peril the very identification of a land and people of over 1400 years as the home of

CHRISTIANITY. ]

To return:

This echoed the controversy earlier this month when the BBC agonized over whether newsreader Fiona Bruce should wear a small cross on a chain in case it might cause offence.

[In a Christian country whose people in a recent poll  - with 70 per cent who acknowledged their faith whether practiced or not.]

How can Britain have arrived at a situation where it is seriously argued that a class of children who don’t speak English as their first language should be taught by a shrouded women whose expression they can’t see and whose voice they can’t hear properly – while the BBC thinks that wearing the symbol of Britain’s established religion might be offensive?

Extreme

The source of this confusion is a profound loss of:

NATIONAL

CULTURAL

AND

RELIGIOUS NERVE.

The Christian values that once defined

NATIONAL IDENTITY

have simply collapsed, creating a cultural vacuum which

ISLAM –

Britain’s fastest –growing and most assertive religion –

is busily filling.

Those who defend the Muslim veil are grossly misreading the situation.  It is not some picturesque religious garment equivalent to the often-curious attire  worn by members of other religions.  It is associated instead with the most extreme version of

ISLAM

-which holds that Islamic values must take precedence over the secular state. Only a small minority of British Muslim women chooses to wear this veil.

[There is no mention in the Koran of the necessity of Muslims wearing either the veil or other controversial clothing claim Muslim clerics in Oxford and elsewhere.-added October 21,2017]

BUT unlike other religious attire, it is thus inherently separatist and perceived by some as intimidatory.

 That is WHY it is UNACCEPTABLE.

 

, there seems to be a dawning recognition in Government of the extreme danger into which British [English] society has been placed by the doctrine of MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow illegitimate, and by the official policy of appeasing Islamic extremism.

[We have over the past few days seen a fight back by the

Roman Catholic Church

to maintain

CHRISTIANITY

In Britain by gathering their flock to protect their religion brought to the islands those many tens of hundreds of years ago. 

The Anglican Church has been too accommodating with politicians for many decades and with a few exceptions particularly the recent appointment Archbishop of York  - Dr John Sentamu there has been silence and collusion with the secular State supported by Prince Charles

 the man of many faiths and true supporter of none’

 

as he does not wish to offend anyone.

 

The CHRISTIAN religion is ENGLAND  and ENGLAND is the CHRISTIAN religion

and if Prince Charles cannot accept this covenant made over with the blood and soil and  stone of our land he should NEVER ascend the

CHRISTIAN THRONE OF ENGLAND.

The throne of England is not heredity it is for the Commons of England and the People to decide who they wish to defend their Christian Faith and Values.

 

To return:

Hence Mr. Woolas’s remarks, the show of ministerial support for Jack Straw, and the threat last week by Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly to withstand funding from Muslim institutions that do not combat extremism.

Although hundreds of thousands of British Muslims have no truck with extremism, opinion polls reveal that between 40 to 60 per cent of British Muslims want to live under

SHARIA LAW

-and parts of our inner cities are fast becoming unofficial Sharia enclaves.

This has led to desperate suggestions to combat such a threat to social cohesion. Lord Bruce-Lockhart, chairman of the Local Government Association, says schools should have racial quotas, while the Government is proposing to force faith schools to open a quarter of their intake to other faiths.

Both approaches are badly misguided. Faith schools would be forced to turn away children of their own religion in favour of others who would significantly dilute the cultural and religious identity of the school.

*

[This is typical New Labour they create the problem and then ask the innocent to pay the price

We now learn the Government has been forced on the back foot by the acquired lesson learnt by the Roman Catholic hierarchy that Blairites only react to strength as has been the case of the so-called minorities in our midst over the past nine years who have learnt that they only need to plead racial discrimination to obtain preferential treatment in disregard of the needs of the majority.]

*

And can anyone really see non-Muslim parents being forced to send their children to Muslim schools where-

 As one Muslim headmaster has already declared –non-Muslim girls would have to wear the hijab?

But the problem lies deeper still. It is not so much separation as a desire in some quarters to Islamise Britain.

 

[This difficulty of integration by followers of the Muslim faith has been known for decades but successive governments continually allowed uncontrolled immigration from Muslim countries instead of only allowing only a moderate number of immigrants into the country and placed higher quotas to those who have proved their willingness to integrate.

As we have said on a number of occasions it is successive British governments who are responsible for the hundreds of Ghettos and No-Go areas growing in our cities containing up to a million possibly higher numbers who have declared openly their desire not to integrate but to change the cultural Christian religious structure  to one of ISLAM and SHARIA LAW.]

*

To return:

Mohammed Abdul Bari, chairman of the Muslim Council of Britain has said explicitly that he wants to encourage Britain to adopt Islamic traditions, including arranged marriages, and can’t see any reason why anyone should object. Unsurprisingly the MCB is now accusing MINISTERS of being ISLAM PHOBIC.

[As we have already indicted above it is the successive governments who are to blame in allowing settlement in the first place knowing that millions of Muslims would naturally wish to make

ENGLAND

a

 MUSLIM COUNTRY.

 

ON THIS ISSUE

 

NOT ONE MUSLIM IS AT FAULT. 

 

 

OUR GOVERNMENT –OUR CHRISTIAN LEADERS AND THE PEOPLE WHO LET UNLIMITED IMMIGRATION HAPPEN WITHOUT PROTEST ARE THE GUILTY PARTIES.

 

We now have amongst us millions of new comers who have no loyalty to our country and who long for the day when their ISLAM is the official religion of their adopted country.  As each day of each week and each month of the coming years there will be no way to stop the takeover of OUR COUNTRY as many cities now show..  And all they need to do to keep their silent conquest proceeding smoothly is to continuingly condemn the racist population on every opportunity and Tony Blair has given them enough reason for HATE to last for decades to come.

Our ONLY HOPE is that there will be a number of Muslim leaders who realize that COMPROMISE is in ORDER a confrontation must not take place and encourage their followers to integrate and understand the tolerant cultural and religious heritage of

ENGLAND

So that the strengths of both communities will become one to each mutual benefit.

ANY OTHER WAY WILL LEAD TO TRAGEDY FOR ALL IN OUR SMALL ISLAND WHICH APART FROM AN INCIDENT OVER 700 YEARS AGO BUT RECTIFIED IN THE 19th CENTURY

WE HAVE NEVER REFUSED NEWCOMERS BUT ASKED FOR ALL TO BECOME ONE]

 

To return:

Certainly , it is vital to prevent the demonisation of all Muslims. But the fact is that the persistent failure to tackle extremism is providing fertile territory for white racists to exploit.

 *

[BUT it is a fact that had successive governments controlled immigration by quotas and only permitted the bulk of that immigration to those who were able to integrate.  By controlling immigration it would have allowed for more housing to be provided and sufficient support services for those who would integrate.

What ever the Far Right have been accused of - the means for their support was provided by the silence of governments of the day.]

*

The recent disturbances in Windsor sounded an urgent alarm. The Muslim owner of a dairy in the town applied for planning permission to turn it into a

MOSQUE and ISLAMIC CENTRE.

Although the Council turned down the application, locals say the owner ignored this and extremist worshippers regularly turned up in the dairy to pray.

*

[This incident is not unusual as after nine years of Tony Blair and his politically correct cronies and in the main the sheepish and defeatist attitude of Councils all over the country to any resentment by Muslims of rejections of planning consent for Mosques it would be most surprising if the Muslim did not dig in his heals knowing from what has happened in the past that the Council will give in rather than be accused of being racist.]

*

Trouble flared when a 15-year-old non-Muslim boy was attacked outside the ‘mosque’. When the boy’s mother and 18-year –old-sister arrived to remonstrate they were apparently set upon by people, allegedly, wielding iron bars and pitchforks.

They set in train four nights of disturbances when, according to the police, both white racists and Muslim extremists muscled in and the dairy was firebombed.

In a further unrelated but disturbing development in the town, four British soldiers returning from Afghanistan were forced to abandon a house they were planning to rent after threats and intimidation by Muslims. And all this in the heart of the Home Counties.

 

Such Islamic aggression is gaining ground because of the collapse of British majority values. In remarks in his controversial interviews that have been largely ignored, the head of the Army General Sir Richard Dannatt , observed that Britain’s Christian anchor had been pulled up, leaving the country’s ‘

moral compass spinning.’

As a result, its values were being threatened by a ‘considerable body of opinion that would like to challenge the nature of society.

*

[We have the reoccurring comment from Prince Charles

that he wishes to be

‘Defender of the Faiths’

NOT as before and since Alfred the Christian King of the English over a thousand years ago.

 

‘DEFENDER OF THE FAITH’

 

And to remind Prince Charles that the FAITH the majority of people in this country have in mind is

CHRISTIAN FAITH.

Fortunately, with King Alfred as an great  king who came to the throne by the wish of the witan and not as a hereditary king. We leave it to the

COMMONS of ENGLAND

And the PEOPLE

To decide who should be trusted with the protection of the Christian religion and values so ingrained over the centuries in the life and culture of our country.] 

Offensive

On this issue, the General was absolutely right.  Christianity is being written out of the national script.  Local councils have abolished Christmas as offensive.  Christian voluntary groups are denied funding on the grounds that they are not committed to ‘diversity’. And despite Ruth Kelly’s recent strictures, the Church of England is dismayed that her Commission for Cohesion and integration contains –

Astoundingly –

NO CHRISTIAN REPRESENTATIVE

[For the 70 per cent of people in a recent poll who professed the Christian faith –practiced or not.]

Within the Church itself, there are faint stirrings of a challenge to its hitherto supine surrender to cultural collapse. An unpublished paper written by the inter faith adviser to the Archbishop of Canterbury has been sidelined by’ preferential’ treatment afforded to the Muslim community, including using public funds to fly Muslim scholars to Britain, shelving legislation on forced marriage and encouraging national financial arrangements to comply with Islamic requirements.

The most grotesque example of all however, is surely the proposal to build the largest m0sque in Europe on the site of the Olympic village in East London.

 [No doubt to be opened by Prince Charles with his banner to all the faiths unfurled –he should hang his head in shame for his not so much an act of toleration but the rejection of the identity and cultural heritage of the ESTABLISHED CHRISTIAN FAITH in our island HOME.]

 *

To return:

 [The mosque to occupy] the most prominent landmark on the Olympic site, West Ham –London it is intended to symbolize

ISLAMIC POWER

In

[ENGLAND]

BRITAIN.

[As there will soon be no such country as Britain with the independence of Scotland in the very near future it is time that commentators no longer use a term, which has virtually no significance.  Politicians have done great damage by hiding their destructive policies under a British label for too long.  It will be

 ENGLAND

to which will be identified the home of the largest mosque outside Europe –

NOT BRITAIN. ]

Worse still, it is being funded by the Tablighi Jamaat

Said by French intelligence and the FBI to be the most significant recruiters for al Qaeda in Europe.

And to cap it all, within a mile of the site, the largest

CHRISTIAN CHURCH

-the Kingsway International Christian Centre –

 has been  compulsorily purchased  and is about to come down.

 

 What GREATER SYMBOL CAN THERE BE OF THE RETREAT OF CHRISTIANITY AND ITS REPLACEMENT MILITANT ISLAM?

THIS IS WHY THE ARGUMENT OVER THE PLACE OF THE VEIL AND THE CROSS IN PUBLIC LIFE IS SO SIGNIFICANT.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT PREJUDICE

OR

DISCRIMINATION

 IT IS ABOUT CULTURAL SURVIVAL

 

*          *          *

 

*

[OF OUR OWN HERITAGE]

 

[Font altered- bolding & underling used –comments in brackets]

 

*  *  *

 

[We now hear on Sunday 29th October 2006 that we have an Ambassador in the form of

Prince Charles

 on his way to a Muslim country.

 

Unfortunately ,we have the same apprehension when our Foreign secretary is out of our country that the FO seems to delight in apologising for some past event from our history and at the same time place at a disadvantage our citizens wherever they are in the world –some incarcerated.

 

We now have Prince Charles on another of his ‘All Faiths Crusade’ to right Justice and we know that there will be a penalty incurred for our Christian  people in his misjudged concessions have already shown themselves in the weakness of THE ANGLICAN Church –the Archbishop of York Dr John SEntamu excluded  -to defend the tenets of Christianity now for some years undermined by a Prince of the realm’s unconstitutional breach of the Coronation Oath which all past prince's of the realm have held sacrosanct.

 

ONLY a Prince of the realm –a firm defender of the Christian Faith  -will be respected by the World leaders of the World’s Faiths.

 As over 800 years ago King Richard the Lionheart of England

and Saladin fought each other

 nobly and held each other worthy antagonists.

THE GREATER THE RANK THE GREATER THE RESPONSIBILITY

IN OCTOBER 2006 we send to a

 muslim country

 a prince of the realm who deserted his wife on the eve of his wedding and betrayed his wife and family and has betrayed his faith and country and still holds his illustrious RANK, WHICH should have been removed on his remarriage TO A DEVORCED WOMAN and destroyer of the marriage.

 

He is no FIRM friend of the

Christian Faith

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND of the

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND OF

TRUE ENGLISH VALUES AND WAY-of-life.

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND OF

ENGLAND

 HIS COUNTRY.

 

HE IS A FIRM FRIEND OF ISLAM

BUT

WILL NOT DEFEND

HIS ONCE INHERITANCE

‘DEFENDER OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH’

 CO-JOINED WITH THE ANCIENT THRONE

 OF

 ENGLAND

 

*          *          *

[FoNT altered-bolding & underlining used –comments in brackets.]

OCTOBER/06

*

Alfred the Christian King of the English

H.F.1347-BROUGHT FORWARD FROM OCTOBER-2006-SOME CHANGE OF FONT ETC. ON OCTOBER 23-2017]

 
 

Women should not be able to hide their faces behind a veil in court as it prevents juries from reading their body language,

says UK's top judge

  • Supreme Court president Lady Hale said expressions and body language is vital
  • Revealed she learned importance of seeing witness face during child abuse trial
  • Equality guidance given to judges says women to remove religious face covers

 

Supreme Court president Lady Hale (pictured) said it is vital to see expressions and body language when judging whether someone is telling the trut

 

Women giving evidence in court should not be able to hide their faces behind religious veils, one of Britain’s most senior judges has suggested.

 

Supreme Court president Lady Hale said it is vital to see expressions and body language when judging whether someone is telling the truth – something she learned while presiding over a child abuse case.

 

The intervention from Lady Hale, head of the Supreme Court since last autumn, comes after more than two years since guidance was promised from the Lord Chief Justice on whether or not women in courts should be allowed to cover their faces for religious reasons.

 

She said in a speech to the Oxford Centre For Islamic Studies: ‘The ingredients of a fair trial should be the same for all, regardless of their religious or other beliefs. We do take it for granted in this country that observing a person’s facial expressions, body language and general demeanour are

an important part of assessing their credibility.

 

‘And our adversarial trial system depends crucially on testing a witness’s evidence through cross-examination. I suspect that most advocates would find it difficult to imagine how one would cross-examine a witness whose face one could not see.’

She revealed she had learned how important it is to see the face of a witness giving evidence during a High Court child abuse case in the 1990s.

In the hearing, the wife of a doctor suspected of violence towards a baby was persuaded to remove her face covering when giving evidence, because all the lawyers were women.

‘This mother’s love for her children was quite apparent,’ Lady Hale said. ‘So too was the fact that, from time to time, she was repeating a rehearsed script.’

But she put a question mark over whether the face of a woman needed to be visible all the time while she is on trial.

She said: ‘A rather more difficult question is whether the magistrates, judge or jury should be able to observe a defendant’s demeanour throughout the trial. I would much have preferred to be able to watch the doctor’s wife’s reactions to what was being said throughout the proceedings. But I think I could weigh up the evidence without doing so.’

Equality guidance supplied to judges last week suggested when women remove a religious face covering to give evidence, there should be screens so only the judge and jurors can see them.

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5470609/Top-UK-judge-Women-not-hide-faces-veils-court.html#ixzz599cVwFef
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1499

 

 

 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 
The pernicious doctrine of 'white privilege' holds back children of

ALL COLOURS

 

by Calvin Robinson

FORMER TEACHER AND NOW GOVERNOR OF A LONDON STATE SECONDARY SCHOOL

DAILY MAIL-OCTOBER 15, 2020

 

 

WHITE privilege...what an obscene phrase that is. It is also fundamentally racist in my view, encouraging bigotry and hatred it pretends to oppose.

If you don't believe me, look at the immense damage it is doing in British schools.

This week, Professor Matthew Goodwin, a politics lecturer at University of Kent, told the Commons Education Select Committee that the concept of

'WHITE PRIVILEGE'- societal attitudes that benefit white people over non-white people-is brutally unfair to white working-class boys.

It is nonsensical ,he said to teach white children-many from disadvantaged families-to apologise for

THEIR SKIN COLOUR

I couldn't put it better myself. For the uncomfortable reality is that, every day, the futures of white working-class children are being sacrificed on the

ALTER OF DIVERSITY

and

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

*

Misguided

AS a governor and former teacher at a secondary state school in North London, I know unequivocally that racism is not built into Britain's education system-unless it is shoehorned in via misguided ideas such as

'WHITE PRIVILEGE'.

Fortunately my school has refused to bow to such divisive dogma. But many institutions put up little resistance and feel they cannot ignore it.

Often themanifesto itself such as October's Black history month or Black Lives Matter protests that have spread from the US to Britain.

I know many teachers who feel pressure to actively endorse them, down-loading educational resources from websites that are steeped in something called 'critical race theory' - a fashionable new ideology which, to put it simply, claims that every modern institution is racist.

As a result, many schools now compete against one another in their quest to educate children about concepts such as 'white privilege' -the idea that white people can't bear to be told how lucky they are because they are white.

Not only is this damaging to white pupils, who are told that they are racist all their lives and never realised it, it also has an equally pernicious impact on black children, who probably never considered that the colour of their skin was the most important thing in their lives Why are we telling children that, based on who their grandparents were, they will face barriers and hurdles that other classmates will not?

It is a disgraceful state of affairs and only breeds enmity between young people and breaks up friendships.

.Crucially, it also risks harming black lives -telling anyone that they are destined to fail is likely to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If they are told that the world is against them, black pupils who are doing well might ask themselves whether there is any point in hard work.

And yet, like Professor Goodwin, I believe that the children who are worst affected by this divisive campaign are white pupils from low-income families, especially boys.

Indeed, shocking data released by the Department for Education shows that white working -class boys from poor backgrounds are by far the most underprivileged youngsters in Britain.

 

*

Only 13 per cent of white boys who are eligible for free school meals, because their families are on benefits, go on to higher education -yet that figure rises to 51 per cent for black British boys. That's almost four times as many.

In fact, the only groups that have a worse educational outcome that working-class white males are boys from the gypsy, Roma and Irish traveller communities-who often are not in school at all.

All of which makes a failure of our politicians to speak up for this silent majority even more shameful. In particular the

LABOUR PARTY

which was established to speak for the working class, seems to have turned its back on white Brits even though it constantly professes to care about 'diversity and inclusion'.

A few voices are now speaking out-not only Professor Goodwin, who himself came from a struggling single-parent family, but notably the Tory MP Ben Bradley, who earlier this year convened a

COMMONS DEBATE

on the plight

of young working-class boys.

Yet few dare to join them, and a deep-rooted taboo surrounds the whole topic.

Today, saying anything in defence of white boys from lower-income backgrounds is seen as tantament to rewarding and fostering racism.

This distorted world view can be traced back to the passing of the

EQUALITY ACTof 2010

which introduced the concept of

PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS'-

THAT IDEA THAT MINORITIES MERITED SUPPORT

AND

MAJORITIES

 DID NOT

*

Offensive

But my skin is brown, and I find it deeply offensive that anyone should look at me and make patronising assumption that I need extra help or support. There's something inherently Victorian, not to say superior, in the very notion. It is, quite simply, racist.

Nor am I aware of any research that says this approach results in any benefits for children from ethnic minorities. But there is clear evidence of the damage done by fabricating racial differences and assigning non-existent blame.

Of course, privilege does exist. But it doesn't work in the way that 'critical race theory' claims it does. And so when my pupils ask me about it, I tell them that the concept of 'privilege' isn't straightforward.

 

*

Toxic

Look at what happened when 96-year-old Professor Sir Bryan Thwaites last year tried to set up a £1.2 million bequest to benefit poor, white, working-class boys at his old schools Dulwich College and Winchester College. Unsurprisingly, he was turned down, with both schools rejecting the gifts. The very idea was treated as though it was somehow toxit.

Yet when grime artist Stormzy set up scholarships for poor black children at Cambridge University two years ago, he was hailed as an inspiration. Of course, what he has done is truly inspiring. It's just wrong that his example cannot  be used to benefit the white children who need help, too.

For the depressing truth is that this disparity continues into adulthood. Indeed ethnicity pay gap figures released this week showed that workers in their 20s from minority backgrounds were likely to earn more than their white counterparts, by an average of more than 5 per cent. So much for 'white privilege'.

At my school, we like to tell the pupils: 'Make no mistake, you are privileged to be here. All of you have a great chance at success. We're all British and we're all in this together.'

It's a message our politicians and teachers would do well to heed. And if they don't, its Britain's white children who will pay.

*  *  *

 

OCTOBER 15,2020

 

HF2084

 

THE VEIL –

THE CROSS A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

THE

Melanie

Phillips

COLUMN

 *

Daily Mail

Monday, October 16,2006

SUDDENLY, Britain seems to be developing into a cultural and religious battleground. Hard on the heels of Jack Straw’s criticism of the Muslim full-face veil, local government minister Phil Woolas has said that Aishah Azmi the Dewsbury teaching assistant who insists on wearing a veil in her primary school class-room, should be sacked.

Not to be outdone, the Shadow Home Secretary, David Davis, has accused Muslims of promoting a kind of ‘voluntary apartheid’

-by shutting themselves away in closed societies and demanding immunity from criticism, corroding the very foundations of

BRITISH [ENGLISH] CULTURE

Meanwhile, British Airways is being sued for religious discrimination after it required a Christian women employee to conceal her cross while permitting other faiths to wear turbans, hijabs or Hindu bangles.

*

[This is classic political-correctness, which identifies with any faith or mantra provided it is

NOT CHRISTIAN.

The home culture is to be suppressed to show how tolerant and noble we are in our diversity agenda even if it places in peril the very identification of a land and people of over 1400 years as the home of

CHRISTIANITY. ]

To return:

This echoed the controversy earlier this month when the BBC agonized over whether newsreader Fiona Bruce should wear a small cross on a chain in case it might cause offence.

[In a Christian country whose people in a recent poll  - with 70 per cent who acknowledged their faith whether practiced or not.]

How can Britain have arrived at a situation where it is seriously argued that a class of children who don’t speak English as their first language should be taught by a shrouded women whose expression they can’t see and whose voice they can’t hear properly – while the BBC thinks that wearing the symbol of Britain’s established religion might be offensive?

Extreme

The source of this confusion is a profound loss of:

NATIONAL

CULTURAL

AND

RELIGIOUS NERVE.

The Christian values that once defined

NATIONAL IDENTITY

have simply collapsed, creating a cultural vacuum which

ISLAM –

Britain’s fastest –growing and most assertive religion –

is busily filling.

Those who defend the Muslim veil are grossly misreading the situation.  It is not some picturesque religious garment equivalent to the often-curious attire  worn by members of other religions.  It is associated instead with the most extreme version of

ISLAM

-which holds that Islamic values must take precedence over the secular state. Only a small minority of British Muslim women chooses to wear this veil.

[There is no mention in the Koran of the necessity of Muslims wearing either the veil or other controversial clothing claim Muslim clerics in Oxford and elsewhere.-added October 21,2017]

BUT unlike other religious attire, it is thus inherently separatist and perceived by some as intimidatory.

 That is WHY it is UNACCEPTABLE.

 

, there seems to be a dawning recognition in Government of the extreme danger into which British [English] society has been placed by the doctrine of MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow illegitimate, and by the official policy of appeasing Islamic extremism.

[We have over the past few days seen a fight back by the

Roman Catholic Church

to maintain

CHRISTIANITY

In Britain by gathering their flock to protect their religion brought to the islands those many tens of hundreds of years ago. 

The Anglican Church has been too accommodating with politicians for many decades and with a few exceptions particularly the recent appointment Archbishop of York  - Dr John Sentamu there has been silence and collusion with the secular State supported by Prince Charles

 the man of many faiths and true supporter of none’

 

as he does not wish to offend anyone.

 

The CHRISTIAN religion is ENGLAND  and ENGLAND is the CHRISTIAN religion

and if Prince Charles cannot accept this covenant made over with the blood and soil and  stone of our land he should NEVER ascend the

CHRISTIAN THRONE OF ENGLAND.

The throne of England is not heredity it is for the Commons of England and the People to decide who they wish to defend their Christian Faith and Values.

 

To return:

Hence Mr. Woolas’s remarks, the show of ministerial support for Jack Straw, and the threat last week by Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly to withstand funding from Muslim institutions that do not combat extremism.

Although hundreds of thousands of British Muslims have no truck with extremism, opinion polls reveal that between 40 to 60 per cent of British Muslims want to live under

SHARIA LAW

-and parts of our inner cities are fast becoming unofficial Sharia enclaves.

This has led to desperate suggestions to combat such a threat to social cohesion. Lord Bruce-Lockhart, chairman of the Local Government Association, says schools should have racial quotas, while the Government is proposing to force faith schools to open a quarter of their intake to other faiths.

Both approaches are badly misguided. Faith schools would be forced to turn away children of their own religion in favour of others who would significantly dilute the cultural and religious identity of the school.

*

[This is typical New Labour they create the problem and then ask the innocent to pay the price

We now learn the Government has been forced on the back foot by the acquired lesson learnt by the Roman Catholic hierarchy that Blairites only react to strength as has been the case of the so-called minorities in our midst over the past nine years who have learnt that they only need to plead racial discrimination to obtain preferential treatment in disregard of the needs of the majority.]

*

And can anyone really see non-Muslim parents being forced to send their children to Muslim schools where-

 As one Muslim headmaster has already declared –non-Muslim girls would have to wear the hijab?

But the problem lies deeper still. It is not so much separation as a desire in some quarters to Islamise Britain.

 

[This difficulty of integration by followers of the Muslim faith has been known for decades but successive governments continually allowed uncontrolled immigration from Muslim countries instead of only allowing only a moderate number of immigrants into the country and placed higher quotas to those who have proved their willingness to integrate.

As we have said on a number of occasions it is successive British governments who are responsible for the hundreds of Ghettos and No-Go areas growing in our cities containing up to a million possibly higher numbers who have declared openly their desire not to integrate but to change the cultural Christian religious structure  to one of ISLAM and SHARIA LAW.]

*

To return:

Mohammed Abdul Bari, chairman of the Muslim Council of Britain has said explicitly that he wants to encourage Britain to adopt Islamic traditions, including arranged marriages, and can’t see any reason why anyone should object. Unsurprisingly the MCB is now accusing MINISTERS of being ISLAM PHOBIC.

[As we have already indicted above it is the successive governments who are to blame in allowing settlement in the first place knowing that millions of Muslims would naturally wish to make

ENGLAND

a

 MUSLIM COUNTRY.

 

ON THIS ISSUE

 

NOT ONE MUSLIM IS AT FAULT. 

 

 

OUR GOVERNMENT –OUR CHRISTIAN LEADERS AND THE PEOPLE WHO LET UNLIMITED IMMIGRATION HAPPEN WITHOUT PROTEST ARE THE GUILTY PARTIES.

 

We now have amongst us millions of new comers who have no loyalty to our country and who long for the day when their ISLAM is the official religion of their adopted country.  As each day of each week and each month of the coming years there will be no way to stop the takeover of OUR COUNTRY as many cities now show..  And all they need to do to keep their silent conquest proceeding smoothly is to continuingly condemn the racist population on every opportunity and Tony Blair has given them enough reason for HATE to last for decades to come.

Our ONLY HOPE is that there will be a number of Muslim leaders who realize that COMPROMISE is in ORDER a confrontation must not take place and encourage their followers to integrate and understand the tolerant cultural and religious heritage of

ENGLAND

So that the strengths of both communities will become one to each mutual benefit.

ANY OTHER WAY WILL LEAD TO TRAGEDY FOR ALL IN OUR SMALL ISLAND WHICH APART FROM AN INCIDENT OVER 700 YEARS AGO BUT RECTIFIED IN THE 19th CENTURY

WE HAVE NEVER REFUSED NEWCOMERS BUT ASKED FOR ALL TO BECOME ONE]

 

To return:

Certainly , it is vital to prevent the demonisation of all Muslims. But the fact is that the persistent failure to tackle extremism is providing fertile territory for white racists to exploit.

 *

[BUT it is a fact that had successive governments controlled immigration by quotas and only permitted the bulk of that immigration to those who were able to integrate.  By controlling immigration it would have allowed for more housing to be provided and sufficient support services for those who would integrate.

What ever the Far Right have been accused of - the means for their support was provided by the silence of governments of the day.]

*

The recent disturbances in Windsor sounded an urgent alarm. The Muslim owner of a dairy in the town applied for planning permission to turn it into a

MOSQUE and ISLAMIC CENTRE.

Although the Council turned down the application, locals say the owner ignored this and extremist worshippers regularly turned up in the dairy to pray.

*

[This incident is not unusual as after nine years of Tony Blair and his politically correct cronies and in the main the sheepish and defeatist attitude of Councils all over the country to any resentment by Muslims of rejections of planning consent for Mosques it would be most surprising if the Muslim did not dig in his heals knowing from what has happened in the past that the Council will give in rather than be accused of being racist.]

*

Trouble flared when a 15-year-old non-Muslim boy was attacked outside the ‘mosque’. When the boy’s mother and 18-year –old-sister arrived to remonstrate they were apparently set upon by people, allegedly, wielding iron bars and pitchforks.

They set in train four nights of disturbances when, according to the police, both white racists and Muslim extremists muscled in and the dairy was firebombed.

In a further unrelated but disturbing development in the town, four British soldiers returning from Afghanistan were forced to abandon a house they were planning to rent after threats and intimidation by Muslims. And all this in the heart of the Home Counties.

 

Such Islamic aggression is gaining ground because of the collapse of British majority values. In remarks in his controversial interviews that have been largely ignored, the head of the Army General Sir Richard Dannatt , observed that Britain’s Christian anchor had been pulled up, leaving the country’s ‘

moral compass spinning.’

As a result, its values were being threatened by a ‘considerable body of opinion that would like to challenge the nature of society.

*

[We have the reoccurring comment from Prince Charles

that he wishes to be

‘Defender of the Faiths’

NOT as before and since Alfred the Christian King of the English over a thousand years ago.

 

‘DEFENDER OF THE FAITH’

 

And to remind Prince Charles that the FAITH the majority of people in this country have in mind is

CHRISTIAN FAITH.

Fortunately, with King Alfred as an great  king who came to the throne by the wish of the witan and not as a hereditary king. We leave it to the

COMMONS of ENGLAND

And the PEOPLE

To decide who should be trusted with the protection of the Christian religion and values so ingrained over the centuries in the life and culture of our country.] 

Offensive

On this issue, the General was absolutely right.  Christianity is being written out of the national script.  Local councils have abolished Christmas as offensive.  Christian voluntary groups are denied funding on the grounds that they are not committed to ‘diversity’. And despite Ruth Kelly’s recent strictures, the Church of England is dismayed that her Commission for Cohesion and integration contains –

Astoundingly –

NO CHRISTIAN REPRESENTATIVE

[For the 70 per cent of people in a recent poll who professed the Christian faith –practiced or not.]

Within the Church itself, there are faint stirrings of a challenge to its hitherto supine surrender to cultural collapse. An unpublished paper written by the inter faith adviser to the Archbishop of Canterbury has been sidelined by’ preferential’ treatment afforded to the Muslim community, including using public funds to fly Muslim scholars to Britain, shelving legislation on forced marriage and encouraging national financial arrangements to comply with Islamic requirements.

The most grotesque example of all however, is surely the proposal to build the largest m0sque in Europe on the site of the Olympic village in East London.

 [No doubt to be opened by Prince Charles with his banner to all the faiths unfurled –he should hang his head in shame for his not so much an act of toleration but the rejection of the identity and cultural heritage of the ESTABLISHED CHRISTIAN FAITH in our island HOME.]

 *

To return:

 [The mosque to occupy] the most prominent landmark on the Olympic site, West Ham –London it is intended to symbolize

ISLAMIC POWER

In

[ENGLAND]

BRITAIN.

[As there will soon be no such country as Britain with the independence of Scotland in the very near future it is time that commentators no longer use a term, which has virtually no significance.  Politicians have done great damage by hiding their destructive policies under a British label for too long.  It will be

 ENGLAND

to which will be identified the home of the largest mosque outside Europe –

NOT BRITAIN. ]

Worse still, it is being funded by the Tablighi Jamaat

Said by French intelligence and the FBI to be the most significant recruiters for al Qaeda in Europe.

And to cap it all, within a mile of the site, the largest

CHRISTIAN CHURCH

-the Kingsway International Christian Centre –

 has been  compulsorily purchased  and is about to come down.

 

 What GREATER SYMBOL CAN THERE BE OF THE RETREAT OF CHRISTIANITY AND ITS REPLACEMENT MILITANT ISLAM?

THIS IS WHY THE ARGUMENT OVER THE PLACE OF THE VEIL AND THE CROSS IN PUBLIC LIFE IS SO SIGNIFICANT.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT PREJUDICE

OR

DISCRIMINATION

 IT IS ABOUT CULTURAL SURVIVAL

 

*          *          *

 

*

[OF OUR OWN HERITAGE]

 

[Font altered- bolding & underling used –comments in brackets]

 

*  *  *

 

[We now hear on Sunday 29th October 2006 that we have an Ambassador in the form of

Prince Charles

 on his way to a Muslim country.

 

Unfortunately ,we have the same apprehension when our Foreign secretary is out of our country that the FO seems to delight in apologising for some past event from our history and at the same time place at a disadvantage our citizens wherever they are in the world –some incarcerated.

 

We now have Prince Charles on another of his ‘All Faiths Crusade’ to right Justice and we know that there will be a penalty incurred for our Christian  people in his misjudged concessions have already shown themselves in the weakness of THE ANGLICAN Church –the Archbishop of York Dr John SEntamu excluded  -to defend the tenets of Christianity now for some years undermined by a Prince of the realm’s unconstitutional breach of the Coronation Oath which all past prince's of the realm have held sacrosanct.

 

ONLY a Prince of the realm –a firm defender of the Christian Faith  -will be respected by the World leaders of the World’s Faiths.

 As over 800 years ago King Richard the Lionheart of England

and Saladin fought each other

 nobly and held each other worthy antagonists.

THE GREATER THE RANK THE GREATER THE RESPONSIBILITY

IN OCTOBER 2006 we send to a

 muslim country

 a prince of the realm who deserted his wife on the eve of his wedding and betrayed his wife and family and has betrayed his faith and country and still holds his illustrious RANK, WHICH should have been removed on his remarriage TO A DEVOICED WOMAN and destroyer of the marriage.

 

He is no FIRM friend of the

Christian Faith

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND of the

 ENGLISH CONSTITUTION

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND OF

TRUE ENGLISH VALUES AND WAY-of-life.

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND OF

ENGLAND

 HIS COUNTRY.

 

HE IS A FIRM FRIEND OF ISLAM

BUT

WILL NOT DEFEND

HIS ONCE INHERITANCE

‘DEFENDER OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH’

 CO-JOINED WITH THE ANCIENT THRONE

 OF

 ENGLAND

 

*          *          *

[FoNT altered-bolding & underlining used –comments in brackets.]

OCTOBER/06

*

 Alfred the Christian King of the English

H.F.1347-BROUGHT FORWARD FROM OCTOBER-2006-SOME CHANGE OF FONT ETC. ON OCTOBER 23-2017]

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

H.F.1424/2

 

 

 

 

 
 

A NATION STATE

 

 OF

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 

 

 

NOT A

 

 

 

NATION STATE OF CONFRONTATION

 

[The purpose of this information is to place in the forefront that the common people where not responsible for the cruel and wasteful wars or matters concerning slavery within the Empire. It was the Elite and Money Changers -Iluminati-that decided the path to follow. In the meantime the common people died in their millions of destitution and war. The ENGLISH PEOPLE-the Common Man is now branded a slaver and war-monger. Even in our own times we have seen illegal wars and waste of the public purse-nepotism and shifty behaviour at  the highest level. Some of those newcomers from other cultures are intent in destroying our culture and country and with the assistance of that supreme destroying devil of political correctness they have divided a once united country into a caldron of fiery disorder and hatred. The Christian Faith has a message of LOVE and FORGIVENESS but what we see around us in our once united land is

 

 HATRED and UNFORGIVNESS.

 

 

Nation States came into being as peoples of different cultures required their own homeland which ensured a stable and secure home. We can see from history and in  our time countless occasions where an influx of differing cultures leads to internal strife bloodshed and war. Europe suffered from this catastrophe for much of its history. The USA until around 1935 had a policy of only admitting Europeans and we can see the result today of their later OPEN POLICY which has made parts of the

USA a COUNTRY of CONFRONTATION and HATE within.

One has to consider that if those voices of warning of internal strife had been  listened to shortly after the Second World War we would not be faced by the foreign accusers given permission to live within our land as we experience in 2020.

A land called ENGLAND with only a small number of peoples from foreign lands who received a home amongst us. would not be today be taken to task for its past history, the sole responsibility of the ELITE! and MONEY LENDERS  -not of the PEOPLE . What it has demonstrated is that we are today in 2020 suffering from internal strife because  those warnings from the post-war years of the dangers of MASS IMMIGRATION from FOREIGN CULTURES have been IGNORED by SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS.

 

 

Unless the English People ignore POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and REGAIN CONTROL of their DIVIDED COUNTRY within a generation or so the NATION STATE OF ENGLAND will no longer exist.

 

 

THE ENGLISH PEOPLE NEED TO BAND TOGETHER AS ONE AGAINST THE ENEMY WITHIN AND TELL THE WITCH HUNTERS FROM FOREIGN LANDS TO GO TO HELL!]

AUGUST 9,2020

 

 

 

THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/       THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/ DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/    NOR SHALL MY SWORD/   WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/   WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/    ALFRED-CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1-    ALFRED-CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./      ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE-SPEECH BY ENOCH POWELL/     CONFOUND THEIR POLITICS FRUSTRATE THEIR KNAVISH TRICKS/ THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY-WHO ARE THE ENGLISH ?-PT 1/     THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY-WHO ARE THE ENGLISH? - PT2 /     THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND  BY WINSTON CHURCHILL

 

 

“War is essentially an evil thing.  Its consequences are not confined to the belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world.  To initiate a war of aggression therefore, is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

 

                                   Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal 1946

 

 

 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

[THE TWO MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES PLAY MUSICAL CHAIRS AND HAVE FAILED OVER DECADES TO CUT CRIME - IMPROVE STATE PENSIONS-EVEN PORTUGAL PAYS MORE. STILL NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT AND CROWDED PRISONS AND THE  OBVIOUS ANSWER NEW PRISONS IGNORED AND DECIDE TO FIT PHONE IN EVERY PRISON CELL  AND THE LATEST! ALLOW SEX AND DRINK IN THEIR 5 STAR ACCOMMODATION-CRIMINALS COMING UP BEFORE THE BENCH WILL BE PLEADING TO BE LOCKED UP  FOR SUCH WONDERFUL OFFERINGS.   WE HAVE HEARD OF OPEN PRISONS BUT THIS MUST BE A NEW DIMENSION IN THE WORD PUNISHMENT AND REHABILITATION.]

*

WE ARE CONTINUALLY HEARING OF THE WASTE OF FOREIGN AID-

THE LATEST!

DAILY MAIL, Saturday, January 5,2019

UK handing £1.5 bn aid to the world's corrupt countries

by

JASON GROVES-Political Editor

*

[After the TORY  BETRAYAL of 1972 there is an urgent need for an ENGLISH Patriotic political party to

PROTECT the INDEPENDENCE of our COUNTRY and the RETURN after over 300 years

OUR

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT IN HER ANCIENT HOME of WESTMINSTER.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1388

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM: MARCH 16 -2012

A LESSON OF HISTORY

 

 ENGLAND

 

'

'It is because England is so great, and our love for our country is so deep and so just, that we can not only afford to dwell upon the darker spots of our history, but we absolutely require them, lest our love and admiration should become idolatrous;  it is because we are too apt to compare foreign nations with ourselves unfavourably that it is absolutely good for us to contemplate what they have suffered unjustly or done unworthily'  [P174]

 

Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 

 

 

 ENGLAND

 

OUR ISLAND HOME

 

 PART 2

 

...In our own island we see this most clearly: our history clearly begins with the coming over of the Saxons, the Britons and Romans had lived in our country, but they are not our fathers; we are connected with them as men indeed, but nationally speaking, the history of  Caesar's  invasion has no more to do with us, than the natural history of the animals which then inhabited our forests.   We ,this great English nation, whose race and language are now overrunning the earth [1843] from one end to the other,- we were born when the white horse of the Saxons had established his dominion from the Tweed to the Tamar.   So far we can trace our blood, our language, the name and actual divisions of our country, the beginnings of some of their institutions.   So far our national identity extends, so far history is modern, for it treats of a life which was then, and is not yet extinguished.

... By the great elements of nationality, I mean, race, language, institutions, and religion: and it will be seen that throughout Europe all these four may be traced up, if not actually in every case to the fall of the western empire, yet to the dark period which followed the fall, while in no case are all the four to be found united before it.   Otherwise, if we allow the two first of these [race and language] elements without the third and fourth [institutions and religion] to constitute national identity, especially when combined with sameness of places, we must say the the northern countries of Europe have no ancient history, inasmuch as they have been inhabited from the earliest times by the same race speaking what is radically the same language [GERMAN].   But it is better not to admit national identity, till the two elements of institutions and religion, or at any rate one of them, be added to those of blood and language .   At all events it cannot be doubted, that as soon as the four  are united, the national personality becomes complete...'

 

Is the government to impose its laws upon the people?   We speak of the government as distinct from the people, without thereby implying that it is in opposition to the people.   In a corrupt state the government and people are wholly at variance; in a perfect state they would be wholly one; in ordinary states they are one more or less imperfectly.    We need not be afraid to say, that in a perfect state the law of the government would be the law of the people, the law of their choice, the expression of  their mind.   In less perfect states the law of the government ids more or less the law of the people, suiting them in the main if not entirely.   If it be wholly or in great part unwelcome to them, something in the state is greatly wrong [ as has been the case since 1997 with so-called NEW LABOUR and the latter MIXED BUNCH of which we have no idea what they really stand for -THEY are ALL the SAME!.]   ;and although I believe that there are cases where a dictatorship is a good, and where good laws may rightfully be  imposed on a barbarian and unwilling people; yet, as  as the rule, there can be no doubt that such a state of things is tyranny.   When I speak therefore of the government, I am speaking of it as expressing the mind and will of the nation; and though a government may not impose its own law, whether human or divine, upon an adverse people; yet a nation, acting through its government, may certainly choose for itself such a law as it deems most for the good.

 

 

And therefore when it has been said that " these islands do not belong to the king and parliament in the same manner as the house or land of any individual belongs to the owner," and that therefore a government may not settle the religious law of a  country as the master of a family may settle the religious practices of his household; this is true only if we consider the king and parliament as not speaking the voice of the nation, but their own opposed to that of the nation.   For the right of a nation over its territory must be at least as absolute as that of any individual over his own house and land; and it surely is not an absurdity to suppose that the voice of government can ever be the voice of the nation:  although they unhappily too often differ, yet surely they may conceivably, and very often do in practice, completely agree...

 

... Wherever there is centralization, there is a danger of the parts of the body being too much crippled in their individual action; and yet centralization is essential to their healthy activity no less than to the perfection of the body.  But if men run away with the mistaken notion that liberty of conscience is threatened only by a state religion, and not at all by a church religion, the danger is that they will abandon religion altogether to what they call the church, that is, to the power of society far worse governed than most states, and likely to lay far heavier burdens on individual conscience, because the spirit dominant init is narrower and more intolerant.

 

[P46]  No doubt all societies, whether they are called states or churches, are bound to avoid tempting the conscience of individuals by overstating the terms of citizenship or communion.    And it is desirable, as I said before, to require a profession of obedience rather than belief, because obedience can and will often be readily rendered where belief would be withheld.    But as states require declarations of allegiance to the sovereign, so they may require declarations of submission to the authority of a particular law.   If a man believes himself bound to refuse obedience to the law of Christianity, or will not pledge himself to regard it as paramount in authority to any human legislation, he cannot properly be a member of a society which conceives itself bound to regulate all its proceedings by this law, and cannot allow any of its provisions to be regarded as revocable or alterable.   But no human power can presume to enquire into the degree of a man's positive belief: the heretic was not properly he who did not believe what the church taught, but he who wilfully withdrew himself from its society, refusing to conform to its system, and setting up another system of his own.

 

I know that it will be objected to this, that it is no other than the system of the old philosophers, who upheld paganism as expedient, while they laughed at it in their hearts as false.    But he who makes such an objection must surly forget the essential difference between paganism and Christianity,   Paganism, in the days of the philosophers scarcely pretended to rest on a foundation of historical truth; no thinking man believed in it , except as allegorically true.    But Christianity commends itself to the minds of a vast majority of thinking men, as being true in fact no less the doctrine; they believe in it as literally true no less spiritually.   When I speak then of a state requiring obedience to the Christian law, it means that the state, being the perfect church, should do the church's work; that is that it should provide for the Christian education of the young, and the Christian instruction of the old; that it should, by public worship and by a Christian discipline, endeavour, as much as may be, to realise Christianity to all its people.    Under such a system, the teachers would speak because they believed, for Christian teachers as a general rule do so, and their hearers would, in like manner, learn to believe also.   Farther, the evidence of the Christian religion, in itself so unanswerable would be confirmed by the manifest witness of the Christian church, when possessing a real living constitution, and purified by an efficient discipline; SO THAT THE TEMPTATIONS TO UNBELIEF WOULD BE CONTINUALLY LESSENED, AND UNBELIEF, IN ALL HUMAN PROBABILITY, WOULD BECOME CONTINUALLY OF MORE RARE OCCURRENCE.   And possibly the time might come when a rejection of Christianity would be so clearly a moral offence, that profane writings would be as great a shock to all men's notions of right and wrong as obscene writings are now, and the one might be punished with no greater injury to liberty of conscience than the other.

 

But this general hearty belief in Christianity is to be regarded by the Christian society, whether it be called church or state, not as its starting point, but as its highest perfection.    To begin with a strict creed and no efficient Christian institutions, is the sure way to hypocrisy and unbelief; to begin with the most general confession of faith, imposed, that is, as a test of membership, but with rigorous Christian institutions, is the way most likely to lead, not only to a real and general belief, but also in a lively perception of the highest points of Christian faith.   In other words, intellectual objections to Christianity should be tolerated, where they are combined with moral obedience; tolerated because in a way they are most surely removed; whereas a corrupt or disorganised church with a minute creed, encourages intellectual objections; and if it proceeds to put them down by force, it does often violate the right of conscience, punishing an unbelief which its own evil has provoked, and , so far as human judgment can see, has in great measure justified. [Page 49]

DEBT-HUMAN PASSION-HUMAN ERROR.

[We must bear in mind the colossal debt  acquired - the immense loss of life and injury to persons and destruction of property over the past 100 years because of WAR  of which ONLY the INTERNATIONAL BANKSTERS {ROTHCHILDS...with their increasing boundless WEALTH are the VICTORS.]

 

 

 THE BANK OF ENGLAND FORMED IN 1694 THROUGH AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT-

A PRIVATE BANK OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONEY LENDERS

 
 

After such disorientation was spread, Charles Montagu, treasurer, key leader of the Venetian Junto, and part of the welcoming committee of the foreign invaders, established the Bank of England in 1694 through an act of Parliament, which was founded by William Paterson, an imported student of the Bank of Amsterdam. Montagu then organized large loans through the private Bank, controlled not by the King, but parliament, and while supposedly helping the war torn economy, created a giant monetary debt out of thin air, a quantity for speculation and impoverishment of England, proceeding to push through dictatorial financial decisions for the economy, while never once issuing anything for development. For the job, Montagu selected the alchemist and calculating machine Isaac Newton, appointing him Warden of the Mint to carry out the enormous data processing job involved in the lying and faking on behalf of the numerous transitions in the economy for the sake of the Empire, such as a gruesome recoinage which cut the people’s wealth in half.20Newton immediately proffered his niece for sexual favors to Montagu in payment for the appointment, and for extra credit, as Warden of the Mint Newton personally advocated the death penalty and torture for petty thieves of coin wherever possible.

 

More!

 
     

Economical questions arise obviously out of the history of all WARS,

although careless readers are apt to neglect them.   They arise out of that simple law of our nature which makes it necessary for every man to eat and drink and be clothed.   Common readers, and I am afraid I may add, many historians also, appear to write and read about military matters without recollecting this.   We hear of armies marching, advancing and retreating ,besieging towns , fighting battles, being engaged actively for some weeks or months, and are apt  to think of them solely as moving or fighting machines, whose success depends on the skill with which their general plays them, as if they were really so many chess-men.   Yet one would think it was sufficiently obvious that these armies are made up of men who must eat and drink every day, and who wear clothing.       Of the expence and difficulty of maintaining them it is not easy.  I grant, for private persons in peace to form an adequate idea.   Yet here we may gain something more of a notion of it than can be obtained readily in a private family.      A college will contain perhaps seventy or eighty members; let him go into the kitchen and see the number of pounds of meat required for the daily consumption of the college, and see what the cost will amount to.  Then he may think what it is to provide for the food not of eighty or ninety persons, but of twenty, or of forty, or of sixty, or even of a hundred thousand.       All this multitude doing nothing to raise food or make clothing for themselves, must be fed and clothed out of the wealth of the community.     Again this community many have to maintain not one of these armies but several, and large fleets besides, and this for many years together;  while it may often happen that its means of doing so are at the same time crippled;  ITS FOREIGN TRADE MAY BE CUT OFF, OR LARGE PORTIONS OF ITS TERRITORY MAY BE LAID WASTE; while the event of the contest being uncertain, and hope and confidence are checked, and with them credit perishes also.      It is then a light matter first to provide the necessary resources for such a contest, and next to see that they ARE NOT SPENT WASTEFULLY? [P144]

 

With regard to providing them, there is first the great question between DIRECT TAXATION and LOANS.   Shall we lay the whole burden of the contest upon the PRESENT GENERATION, or DIVIDE it between OURSELVES and POSTERITY?     Conceive now the DIFFICULTIES, the exceeding temptations, which beset the decisions of this QUESTION.   In a FREE GOVERNMENT it may be doubtful whether the people will consent to raise the money or no.  But suppose that legally they have no voice in the matter, that the government may lay on what taxes it will; still extreme discontent at home is not likely to be risked in the midst of a FOREIGN WAR; or if the people are willing to bear the burden still  the power may be wanting.   A tax may easily DESTROY ITSELF: that is, suppose that a man's trade just  yields him a profit which he can live upon, and a tax is laid upon him to the amount of a fourth part of his profit.   If he raises the price of his commodity to the consumer, the consumer will either purchase so much less of it, or will endeavour to procure it from other countries where the dealer being less heavily taxed can afford to sell on cheaper terms.  Then the government interposes to protect the taxed native dealer by prohibiting the importation of the commodity of the untaxed foreigner.   But such a prohibition running counter to the plain rule of common sense, which makes every man desire to buy a cheaper article rather than a dearer, when both  are of equal goodness, it can only be maintained by FORCE.   Thence arise the necessity of a large constabulary or preventative force to put down smuggling, and to say nothing of the moral evils produced by such a state of things, it is clear that the expense of the additional preventative force which the new tax rendered necessary, is all to be deducted from the profits of that tax; and this deduction, added to the falling off in its productiveness occasioned by the greater poverty of the tax payer, may reduce its return almost to NOTHING.

[Comments within brackets and headings-highlighting and Caps are Ours]

TO BE CONTINUED

The above extract taken from the works of Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 

[We shall be showing extracts from his work not necessarily in the order  of its publication because for our purpose we wish to confine ourselves to matters relevant to the present day on much that is now in jeopardy because of the intent of many of our politicians to DESTROY the very heart of a once great and ancient NATION STATE

 

'Christianity is the basis of republican government, its bond of cohesion, and life-giving law.- more than the Magna Carta itself the Gospels are the roots of English liberty -That Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, with our completing Declaration, was possible only because the Gospels had been before them.'-

R. S. Storrs

*

'The distinction between Christianity and all other systems of religion consists largely in this, that in these others men are found seeking God, while Christianity is God seeking men.-'

Thomas Arnold, D. D.(1795-1842) Head Master of Rugby School.

CHURCH AND STATE IN A CHRISTIAN COMMONWEALTH

 

" An alliance between church and state in a Christian  commonwealth, is ,in my opinion, an idle and a fanciful speculation.  An alliance is between two things that are in their nature distinct and independent, such as between two sovereign states.   But in a Christian commonwealth, the church and the state are one and the same thing , being different integral parts of the same whole.... Religion is so far, in my opinion, from being out of the province or duty of a Christian magistrate, that it is, and it ought to be, not only his care, but the principle thing in his care; because it is one of the great bonds of human society, and its object the supreme good, the ultimate end and object of man himself."

 

Speech on the Unitarian Petition, 1792.   Burke's Works,Vol. X. p.43 Ed. 1818.

 

*

 

THE BEGINNING!

 

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

  

 

HOW THE SATANISTS ARE GRADUALLY ACHIEVING THEIR AIM  IN DESTROYING AN ANCIENT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY AND ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

 

CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE

 

 

LORD RANDOLPH CHURCHILL

"Trust the People."

''But I own that my chief reason for supporting the Church of England I find in the fact that, when compared with other creeds and other sects, it is essentially the Church of religious liberty.   Whether in none direction or another, it is continually possessed by the ambition, not of excluding, but of including, all shades of religious thought, all sorts and conditions of men...I cannot, and will not, allow myself to believe that the English people, who are not only naturally religious, but also eminently practical... will ever consent to deprive themselves of so abundant a fountain of aid and consolation, or acquiesce in the demolition of an institution which elevates the life of the nation and consecrates the acts of the State...

 

Delivered by Lord Randolph Churchill at Birmingham on April 16th, 1884

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM

MARCH 16 -2012

 

H.F.1584

 

 ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

 

H.F.1773

 

 

 

 

'For England and St George'

 

 

 

Thoughts on St. George’s Day –Who are the English? - Part 1

 With the offer this week by the Government of a Referendum on the New European Constitution within the next twelve months, agreed only days from the celebration of our patron saint of England it is timely to illustrate below an article by the author Linda Proud which appeared over ten years ago in This England and which with its patriotic and potent reminder of what it means to be English.

 

*

 

Who are the English?

 

Although St. George’s Day is one that the English respect, it is hardly comparable to the national day celebrations as celebrated in most other countries.  April 23rd is marked with much fervour by the English abroad than by those at home, for it is still far from being regarded as a national holiday here.

 

We English do not like parading our nationality. We do not plaster our cars with stickers saying, “I love England”. Being English constitutes many things, and one of them is a rather shy identification with the land of our birth.

 

Apart from anything else, we have been confused by various historical Acts of Union, which have created the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.  For instance, do we consider ourselves to be foremost British, or English?

 

Britishness is, at the moment, a largely artificial construction.  It is something we aspire to. If we ever find full cultural union with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, but nothing is happening at the moment [Winter-2001] to promote such unity. British is what we will be when we have a British football or cricket team.  For now, what we need to understand is that we are English:

 

“Despite of all temptations to belong to other nations, he is an Englishman”.

 

So said Gilbert and Sullivan in one of their many moments of great perceptiveness. Despite, or perhaps because of the British Empire, we English appear to be ashamed of ourselves.  We go abroad, we revel in the cultural differences to be found in other countries, we adopt exotic foods, plants and words. We envy national uniqueness of other nations, and then come home to continue taking our own for granted!  We assume that our English life is the standard, a kind of mean line, compared to which all other nations seem either more colourful and romantic, or more dreary and oppressed.

 

To see ourselves for what we are, we need either to spend a long time abroad or, failing that, to turn an objective eye upon ourselves. This is difficult to do but, once achieved, the opening view is one of wonder.

 

To know ourselves, we can use the landscape as a mirror.  Even a short tour of the country will reveal several special qualities. The overriding one is gentleness.  A climate without extremes has created a land a people, similarly moderate.  There are no deserts in England. Mountains are few, the wilderness small. What we have instead is a rolling land of gentle changes complemented by weather, which often alters with the hour and, though it can be harsh, is rarely fatal.

 

The villages and towns have their roots in modesty rather than flamboyance.  They are the result of a practical people, a people who want to work and who require practical accommodation.  The Anglo-Saxons were farmers and they eschewed the cities already founded in Britain by the Romans.

 

City –life arrived late in England. It came with the industrial revolution – and even today most people live in a city out of necessity rather than desire. To be in a place such as London where there are no horizons and the passage of one season into another is blurred, can seem like enforced captivity out of necessity rather than desire.

 

To be in a place such as London where there are no horizons and the passage of one season into another is blurred, can seem like enforced captivity.  It comes as little surprise, then to learn that the first inhabitants of the first towns, which were established by King Alfred the Great, had to be persuaded to live in them as a matter of duty.

 

The quality, which the English prize most, is freedom.  It has taken a thousand years to achieve those freedoms for which the rest of the world envies us. 

 

Freedom is the product of good law, and the Common Law of England is founded on three assumptions: that man is essentially good, that all men are equal under the law, and that he who does not transgress the law is free.

 

This has led to such legal requirements, or idiosyncrasies, as the weight of evidence having to be supplied by the prosecution rather than the defence.

 

Throughout our history, a line of courageous judges have braved great danger by re-stating a fundamental principle of English Law, which is that God and the law are above the king.

 

Having our rulers answerable to the same law as the ruled has kept England free from oppression.

 

Under English law, and as subjects of the Queen, everyone in England is considered equal.  Obviously there are serious in equalities in the matters of wealth and property, but in terms of the freedom of the individual, all are the same.

 

This is not true in other countries, notably republics that have a concept of citizenship and, as a natural corollary, the concept of the “non-citizen”.

 

England has always loved justice, even when it has seemed most absent in our history.

 

 For justice to reign,

 

1) We need good judges,

 

2) We need juries,

 

3) We need a judiciary independent of the government of the day

 

These things are now under threat.

 

Firstly,

 

 Parliament is not keen on the independence of judges and too often puts itself above the law.

 

Secondly,

 

 By joining the European Union we have put our law below that of the Roman system, a system which the wise advisers of Henry 11  rejected in the 12th century!

 

While there may be perverse judgements in our own courts, and a semblance of justice on offer from European courts, we are in danger of being seduced into this other system.

 

In fact we should be pulling back hard, for the Roman system is vulnerable to tyranny, whilst our own acts as bulwark against it.

 

In all the multitude of statute, legislation and directives pouring out of Brussels reason seems hardly to figure. This is the law of bureaucrats and committees, not of principle.

 

End of Part 1

Click Here to read Part 2

 

H.F.2025

 

 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE
 

by
 

ENOCH POWELL
---

(BIRMINGHAM BRANCH)



" England is the country of the English, he said.
England is a stage on which the drama of English history
was played and the setting within which the
English became conscious of themselves as people . . . .

when politicians and preachers attempt to frighten
and cajole the English into pretending away
the distinction between themselves and other nations and
other origins, they are engaged in undermining the
foundation upon which democratic government
by consent and peaceable civilized society in this
country are supplied"
 - 
Enoch Powell

 

Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty

 

Is with the English- speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth, and our answer to those who prefer loss of Identity in an unaccountable, corrupt and godless European Police-State.

 

Thomas Jefferson, third President of the United States, once commented,’ A nation which seeks to trade its political independence for economic gain deserves to lose both’’. If she stays within the emerging European State, and continues to submit to government from Brussels, Britain will lose both her Prosperity and her Independence.

 

There is more prospect of prosperity and security for this country as a member of the North Atlantic Free Trade Area (NAFTA), in which Britain and her People would be able to trade world-wide, retain all ‘’Historic Rights’’, Principles and Privileges, and suffer no loss of National Independence.

 

Historically, Culturally and Politically, Britain has far more in common with the English-speaking Peoples of the North Atlantic and Commonwealth countries, who together have imparted to many nations the lesson of Liberty (which many of our European neighbours later in their history claimed but seem now to have forgotten the hard lesson that one must fight constantly to guard the Treasure of Liberty)   developed  the world’s oldest system of representative government, been the first to recognise inviolable and Fundamental Rights, and created judicial systems free from influence or interference by the State.

 

This profound Kinship, and the need to sustain it politically by separateness from Europe, was uppermost in the mind of Winston Churchill when , in his famous Zurich speech in September ,1946, envisioning a future union of the Continental states, he described Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations and ‘’mighty America ‘’as its prospective ’’friends and sponsors’’ offering support and help; and observed,

 

’’We are with Europe but not of it .

 We are linked, but not combined.

We are interested and associated, but not absorbed’’.

 

Because of Britain’s Unique global position , achievement as a Nation, and contribution to world history, the statement of William Pitt the Younger in 1805 (almost two-hundred years ago)  that England has saved herself by her exertions and Europe by her example’’ is an indication of her timeless role, so long as she is not decadent; and if she has become so, the present may be thought the time for the revival of her Beneficent Nationhood, rather than for it to be extinguished. (  see 101- Reasons )

 

‘’The Choose is yours!’’

 

– make it soon, before it is

too late!

 

2003

H.F.2025

 

 

A REMINDER FROM 2006

 

 

 

 

HOW COULD A MULTICULTURAL BRITAIN WORK

 

By

Andrew Alexander

Column

[Daily Mail-December 15, 2006]

 

TONY BLAIR has admitted at last that MULTICULTURALISM has failed, but future historians will puzzle why anyone thought it would ever succeed

 

After all, history is one long tale of cultural clashes - religious, sectarian, racial and national. As they contemplate the remains of what was once one of the world's most stable societies, blessed with a common cultural heritage, they will marvel that vast waves of immigrants were admitted -

AND ARE STILL COMING.

Of course , there had always been immigration but the numbers had been small, the arrivals often talented; and many of them not just ready but eager to embrace the British

WAY-OF-LIFE

 

For an explanation, we need to go  back to the 1962 Commonwealth Immigration Act. When Harold Macmillan finally brought in that legislation, peppered with loopholes to pacify critics, the Left sternly opposed it.

The Far left was intelligent enough to see that mass immigration could overturn a society they hated. The opposition of more moderate Socialists was based on a firm if vaguely-defined belief in the

BROTHERHOOD OF MAN

- those from less prosperous countries should be automatically welcomed.

 

Besides, there was the delicious lure that nearly all immigrants would

VOTE LABOUR

-But that was not publicly aired.

 

MacMillan reluctantly introduced the legislation, whose outlines had been drafted in 1955.  As with others in his party, he was in thrall to the Multiracial Commonwealth fantasy, prolonging a belief that though the

BRITISH EMPIRE

-was dead, we could be-

or pretend to be -

a serious global power.

The biggest hindrance to clear  thinking about immigration and multiculturalism has always been the 'moderates' who dominate what is called the political class-party activists, information professionals, social scientists and opinion formers generally. these people are always proud of their 'moderation'.

 

MULTICULTURALISM was a natural attraction. It sounded, you see, so 'decent'

 

. These predominately middle-class moderates could also think of themselves as more enlightened than the working class (who bore the brunt of the tidal wave of immigrants).

 

You encountered these high-minded souls in the Press and TV and radio, insisting that immigration was by definition a good thing.

THEY STILL DO IT.

-but their postal codes always give then away.

If you lived in Hampstead or Kensington or Richmond you could enjoy the advantages of a moral smugness without the disadvantages of an alien wedge in your midst. When I point out to multicultural enthusiasts the tremendous property values in Brixton, they seem curiously uninterested.

 

Their cause was certainly helped by media self-censorship. Not since the British Press kept silent about Edward VIII's dalliance with Mrs. Simpson had the media exercised such nervous restraint. Anything that was alarming about IMMIGRATION was PLAYED DOWN.

[We have at the present day the same reluctance to thoroughly open discussion on the benefits or otherwise of the European Union -though there appears to be a slight fissure appearing in the 35 year-old dam of silence but no real momentum by the pro-Europeans to sell their wonderful dream in their utopian wonderland. We wonder WHY?]

The moderates who dominated the Press became terrified of the accusation of 'racism'. The U.S.,because of well-deserved bad conscience had declared that the ultimate sin; and with our habit of importing everything American good or bad, we adopted the same values.

 

Anything that might suggest their thinking was racist had newspapers in a flap. Disagreeable forecasts about immigration levels were ignored, reassuring figures emphasised. Anyway, ran the moderate view, even if the numbers did prove large, our oh-so-tolerant multicultural society would comfortably absorb them.

When facts became unavoidable, real issues would be evaded. if the number of blacks in prison was reported as disproportionately high, the required conclusion was that something was wrong with the judicial system.

If there were riots in Brixton or Tottenham , some extreme moderate like Lord Scarman would be sent to conclude that

WE WERE ALL GUILTY.

 

Blair's insistence that we must have integration is hopelessly late. he says, for example that immigrants must learn English. But there is no way to compel that on the inflow [flood] of immigrants from Eastern Europe.

They may unlike the Commonwealth immigrants, be less alien to British ways. But they will regularly form their own communities rather than integrate and the process of constant, ethnic fragmentation will be common place.  Poles are already setting up Polish branches of trade unions in Southampton - where they number up to 30,000-and in Glasgow.

 

AS for the insistence that immigration is economically advantageous

IT SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE.

it may produce good economic growth, but income per head rises little.

 

The strain upon public services ranging from HEALTH to TRANSPORT is also very costly. Moreover, IMMIGRATION has been a key factor in raising HOUSE PRICES-inevitably in one of the

WORLD'S MOST CROWDED NATIONS.

Further waves will be coming soon from Romania and Bulgaria but they will be 'managed'. claims the Home Office [You know! -the 'unfit for purpose 'establishment.] unconvincingly. One day, no doubt, from Turkey too (whose admission to the EU is supported by the Conservatives!)

 

THE FUTURE IS BLEAK

*          *          *

 

 

 

DECEMBER/06

 

 

 

POPULATION IN ENGLAND...

INDIANS OVERTAKE POLES AS OUR LARGEST MIGRANT POPULATION

BORN ABROAD LIVING IN UK

1)India-837,000

2)Poland-837,000

3)Pakistan-533,000

4)Ireland-358,000

Daily Mail-November 29,2019.

*   *   *

 

NOVEMBER 29,2019

 

 

 

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

*

 FOR RETURN TO

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

*

H.F.1927

 

 

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

 

Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

what is the soul made of

afflict your souls in the bible

what is a person's soul

what is the soul of man

afflict your soul means

what is the soul according to the bible

afflict your soul kjv

what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

H.F.1424/2

 

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp known as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

H.F.1449

 

 

 
 
 
 
POLITICS IN THE UK HAS STALLED - IN FACT IT HAS BEEN ON A STEADY DECLINE SINCE WE WERE MISLEAD AND LIED TO IN THE 70's by EDWARD HEATH AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF OUR COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

Fortunately the PEOPLE on December 12-2019 decided they had had enough and demanded that their so-called

 SERVANTS remember who

they worked

FOR.

.

 

 

 

In 2003 the EDP began it's BULLETIN SERVICE to INFORM the BRITISH

PUBLIC of the LIES and DECEIT of POLITICIANS. It is well documented that

successive GOVERNMENTS of all COLOURS have FAILED to keep their

MANIFESTO PROMISES. Whether it is the FAILURE of LAW and ORDER-

TO  CURB IMMIGRATION-YOU NAME IT! and you will find that they are STILL

MAKING THE SAME PROMISES in JANUARY 2020.

WE have advocated in

the past, that towards the end of a 5-year PARLIAMENTARY SESSION, each

GOVERNMENT should FACE a PUBLIC ENQUIRY to see if THEIR

MANIFESTO PROMISES HAVE BEEN carried out by PARLIAMENT. AND

if NOT-WHY NOT?

One is only to look at the thousands of bulletins on our website to realise that

 

POLITICIANS and

 

GOVERNMENTS

 

NOT CARRYING OUT THE

 

 

WISHES

 

 

OF THE

 

 

PEOPLE!

 

As we have been informed the MPs are to receive an increased SALARY and no doubt other benefits and as we have seen over the past few years many of their predecessors failed to keep their REFERENDUM PROMISE and what are we to expect from their replacements?

 

POLITICIANS SHOULD BE

 

 

 REMINDED THAT

 

 

THEY ARE

 

 

 

SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE

 

 

NOT

 

 

 

THEIR MASTERS.

 

We have advocated on many occasions that MP's should

 

SERVE THE PUBLIC

 

FOR ONE TERM ONLY.

 

 

IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB

 

 

FOR LIFE.

 

JANUARY 1-2020

H.F.1947

 
 

PLEASE NOTE! A NUMBER OF BULLETINS HAVE BEEN MOVED TO PART 2 IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE SPACE TO FACILITATE A FASTER RESPONSE FOR OUR VIEWERS"

FEBRUARY 27,2020

 

 

 

 
 

.F.1442

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

 

H.F.1289

 
 
 

 

 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

H.F.1388

 

 

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

 
 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

 

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 

 

 
 

 

 

MAY-16 victory

JUN-16

REFERENDUM

JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

SEP 19 OCT-19 NOV-19 DEC-19 JAN-20

FEB-20

MAR-20

APRIL-20

MAY-20 JUNE-20
JULY-20 AUG-20 SEPT-20 OCT-20 NOV-20  FREE OF THE EU

DEC-20

AFTER  48 YEARS

JAN-21

A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

THE

WORLD OUR OYSTER

INDEX FILES

APRIL-2021

MAY-2021

 

 

 

 

 
 NEW SERIES- JULY-2021

 

CHRISTIAN FAITH*

*

ENGLISH HISTORY -

 LAW - CUSTOM - CONSTITUTION

- PARLIAMENT-

*  *  *

 BULLETINS- PART 1 - PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3 -PART 4  - PART 5  - PART 6

 

JANUARY -  PART 1 - PART 1-PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3-PART 4 -PART 5 -PART 6-

      

NOVEMBER- HOME-

PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

- (1994 -Official Website - MARCH-PT 5- 2019 )-

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

*

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 

 

 

 

 

THE DEAFENING  SILENCE OF O

 

UR GUTLESS LEADERS