- (1994 - EDP.ORG.UK Official Website - FEBRUARY - PART 1 - 2022 ) -

policies-Elections- General Election 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links -

BULLETINS -NOVEMBER-2021 -HOME - PART  1  - PART 1-PAGE 2  - PART 2 - PART 3 - PART 4 - PART 5 - PART 6

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

 

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

 
 

 

Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail's recent articles

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: MI6 agents are being encouraged to confront their inherent 'white privilege'... but I bet they're not checking their spooks' pronouns in the Kremlin 

24/02/22 21:46

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: As Russian tanks roll into Ukraine, one of the most senior spooks charged with keeping us safe is more concerned with ensuring that his staff use the 'correct pronouns' at all times. Under no circumstances should they ever utter the deeply offensive term 'manpower', with all its implicit sexist connotations. Nor should they use problematic phallocentric terms such as 'strong' and 'grip' which can 'reinforce dominant cultural patterns'. Lovepants circulated this complete parcel of bolognese around Whitehall in the wake of the humiliating bottle job in Afghanistan. Rather than addressing what has gone horribly wrong with the Defence of the Realm in recent years, he chose to focus upon fashionable 'diversity' fantasies. As British troops were scuttling out of Kabul - sorry, Karble - and the drums of war were getting louder in the East, our risible 'national security adviser' was sounding the alert over 'misgendering'. Agents were warned against participating in 'all-male' panels, in the interests of 'inclusion'. (Pictured left, Stephen Lovegrove. Top right, Vladimir Putin. Bottom right, GCHQ) ...read more!

 

 

 

 
 

Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter explicitly states:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
this right includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

*  *  *

[ SO WHY? ARE THESE ENGLISH VALUES UNDER ATTACK IN THE LAND OF

MAGNA CARTA?

 

 

A TIMELY REMINDER!

 

IF ENOUGH PEOPLE REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL RESTRAINTS ON THEIR RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH AND EXPRESSION SUBJECT TO THOSE LAWS PREVIOUSLY IN PLACE - THEN THE LAW BECOMES EXTINCT!]

It is also clear that the state can only enforce obedience to law if the laws are such that most people do not want to break them.  Let the State, however powerful, pass a law which the mass of the people do not respect, or to which a considerable minority violently object, and the enforcement of the law will be difficult if not impossible. There is no need to insist on that at the present time.

Essentials of Democracy by A.D.Lindsay - LL.D.

Master of Balliol College, Oxford

July 1929.

*  *  *

 

 

 
LITTLEJOHN

 

DAILY MAIL

January 31-2022

Richard Littlejohn

 

 DO YOU THINK WE ARE IN A MESS

 

POST- BREXIT? - IMAGINE IF

 

REMAIN HAD WON...

 

TWO years after we officially left the EU,  Boris is promising us a Brusie Bonus. The PM says we will at last begin to reap the full benefits of breaking free from the suffocating embrace of Brussels.

Writing exclusively in the Mail yesterday he pledged to scrape unwanted EU laws still lingering like a bad smell on our statute books.

 We will move 'ever faster' to exploit our new found

INDEPENDENCE.

Not before time

It's been five and a half turbulent years since we voted

LEAVE

LET'S HOPE HE MEANS IT.

 Boris  like Brucie, always talks  a good game!   Now he has to deliver , provided he can survive the Downing Street partay  pile-on.

Those of us who hoped we were getting a

Tungston-tipped,

HARD BREXIT

 have been disappointed to say the least, with the sluggish progress so far. To be fairour outstanding vaccine roll out would not have been possible had we remained shackled to the

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY

 

And yes we have taken back control of our laws,our money and our borders -although that hasn't done vus much good in Northern Ireland, or when it comes to stopping illegal cross-Channel migration.

In  far too many areas, its almost as if we never left the EU. Blue passports, pint glasses and lower  VAT on tampons are scant consolation...

[TO BE CONTINUED SHORTLY]

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

[CHANGES OF FORM ... ARE OURS!]

,.

H.F.2159

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 
 

Page 66

SPEECHES OF JOHN BRIGHT MP

HOUSE OF COMMONS

MARCH 13 1865

[The above publication lists the  numerous unnecessary wars and the total colossal cost to the taxpayers at home and abroad in India...Millions died of STARVATION and NEGLECT - One would have thought our politicians would have learnt from the past ,but unfortunately the same situation has been with us on many occasions over the past 250 years.particulary in recent times with - 5 WARS-TONY BLAIR.

Top  Civil Servants are grossly overpaid - Quangos cost billions every year. Pensions are the lowest in Europe -even lower than in Portugal. There needs to be a levelling up for the multitude and a gradual drop in those highly paid in the PUBLIC SERVICE over the coming years until there is parity in the reward system.

Only today we heard of BARBADOS leaving the COMMONWEALTH - no doubt others will follow, particularly as CHINA obviously is looking to pick up many other small NATION STATES to advance their border across the WORLD.]

*  *  *

DECEMBER 1-2021

 

H F 2154/G/ 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT:

BORDER CONTROLS are a necessary part of any civilised state.

November 14 , 2021

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT FOR THE

DAILY MAIL

 

Tory MPs from the former Red Wall seats seized from Labour in 2019 have begun to revolt against the Government’s obsession with the COP26 conference on global warming.

They want Ministers to turn their minds instead to the alarming rise in illegal migration across the Channel.

They have a point. Many British people view this as one of the most urgent problems facing the country and they would like to know what Boris Johnson is going to do about it, especially since the French authorities seem to be incapable of decisive or effective action.

Criminal people traffickers, more confident by the day, are now smuggling so many men and women across the Strait of Dover that the known daily total recently reached 1,185.

Even the deteriorating weather has not reduced the flow, though an unknown number drown, a disgraceful side effect of this cynical industry. How is it that France, a modern state with huge technical resources, efficient armed services and large police forces, has so little control over its own coastline and territorial waters that it cannot prevent such tragedies? Others presumably make it to land without being observed or recorded by the UK border authorities.

Even allowing for days when the sea is too rough to cross, this means that each year about 300,000 illegal immigrants could soon be reaching this country by this route, a figure roughly the same as the populations of Newcastle upon Tyne, Brighton or the London suburb of Hillingdon.

The Mail on Sunday does not blame the migrants for trying to reach our country. We understand that our prosperous, peaceful and safe civilisation is a beacon to those in lands that are less fortunate.

Tory MPs from the former Red Wall seats seized from Labour in 2019 have begun to revolt against the Government’s obsession with the COP26 conference on global warming.

They want Ministers to turn their minds instead to the alarming rise in illegal migration across the Channel.

They have a point. Many British people view this as one of the most urgent problems facing the country and they would like to know what Boris Johnson is going to do about it, especially since the French authorities seem to be incapable of decisive or effective action.

Nor do we oppose immigration as such. Every country needs some migrants and benefits from them. And we believe it is the duty of civilised nations to give sanctuary to genuine refugees.

In 1972, the half-crazed Ugandan despot Idi Amin expelled large numbers of Asians in a blatant act of racial persecution. To the great benefit of this country, thousands of them settled in Britain – where they have contributed enormously to the nation they made their home.

At the time this was seen as a major political and social crisis, and a considerable strain on our resources.

Yet the total of those who came was just over 27,000 – a figure that could now be equalled by illegal cross-Channel migrants in a single month.

And in the case of the Ugandan Asians, they did not simply prefer Britain to France as a final destination. They held actual British passports, came here legally and were beyond doubt the victims of cruel persecution.

Criminal people traffickers, more confident by the day, are now smuggling so many men and women across the Strait of Dover that the known daily total recently reached 1,185. A group of thirteen migrants pictured off of the coast of Lydd, Kent on Saturday morning (Pictured)

So it is quite reasonable, and in fact desirable, for Tory MPs to be concerned about this present issue and to expect a reasoned and practical response from Downing Street.

Tom Tugendhat describes in this newspaper today the worrying developments in which migrants are being used as weapons against the West, on the border between Belarus and Poland. This ugly confrontation only makes the problem more urgent.

Uncontrolled migration is unfair on those who follow the rules, rewards criminal gangs, produces tension and bitterness and makes integration far harder.

The remarks made by the outgoing head of Border Force, which we report today, suggest a high-level unwillingness to grasp that proper frontier control is a necessary part of any civilised state.

It is time that the Prime Minister and Home Secretary Priti Patel together turned their minds to ending this intolerable scandal and human tragedy.

FULL ARTICLE

*  *  *

[As we have constantly stated as have many others, over the past 20 years ENGLAND is one of the most populated countries in the world, but successive governments have ignored the WARNINGS! WE recently mentioned that all who arrive from across the Channel should be taken to an island off our coast or taken to a country which will house them at a moderate cost to our NATION. Denmark's solution would be a good guideline to follow.

 We have a so-called FOREIGN AID BUDGET usually offered to dancing girls or whatever. It is about time it is put to it's correct  use without delay?]

H.F.2154/G/2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

GOOD HEALTH

 

 

IN MY VIEW... Part-time GPs should work in A&E.  by Dr MARTIN SCURR

 

DAILY MAIL

NOVEMBER 16,2021

THERE'S clearly a desperate shortage of GPs. The question is ,how do we resolve this ?

Recently the Health Secretary SaJid said  he was 'not going to pretend' that plans to recruit a further 6,000 GPs by 2025 are on track.It seems general  practice does not haqve the draw that it once did.

Talking  to a younger GP colleague recently I was surprised to learn of a general misapprehension that in the 1970s and 1980s. when      I started out, we had cit easy, with so many GPs to go around.

It's true back then there might be 50 applications for every partnership post in general practice, but the work itself was hard.

 For many years, my nose was on the grindstone of alternative nights and weekends on call, and I have my old diary recording 21 home visits during one on-call weekend' with red tape and a growing older population creating additional work - and recruiting new GPs is clearly challenging.

Perhaps the answer is to redeploy those we do have. Many now prefer to work part-time, opting for a three-day week. I suggest these GPs should be directed into staffing the GP units which form part of many A&E departments.

It could save the hospital emergency medical teams spending so much time engaged in general practice activity, rather than emergency medicine, as now happens due to low levels of GP involvement in out -of-hours cover.

Working within an A&E unit,  these doctors would not be burdened with admin or other non-clinical activities - which are just the kind of things that put so many off joining general practice.

 If I had my time again, this certainly would appeal to me !

NOVEMBER-16-2021

[There is no doubt that a number of GPs  by their general attitude find general Practice an absolute bore. The patient is made to feel that he is wasting the doctors time. What gave a majority of patients confidence in the past was to see a doctor with a stethoscope. Many illnesses must be overlooked because a casual look  at  a patient without looking into the throat may not tell the whole story. ,At one time a doctor of old would look into one's mouth to view the condition of the tongue which reveals in many cases the cause of many illnesses. A timely sounding of the chest could reveal infections and whatever -  preventing a more serious condition emerging in the future. Many patients decide to visit A&E rather than wait to see a doctor - who for many has become an elusive species over the past few years.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

NOVEMBER-16-2021

 

H.F.2154/5/3

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  * 
 

AS a Muslim, I'm Horrified the

BBC

gave a

 Platform to an apologist for the Taliban

by

Dr Taj Hargey

DAILY MAIL

August 24,2021

 EVERY Muslim in Britain is celebrating the return to power of the Taliban in Afghanistan. That's what Khola Hasan of the Islamic Shari  Council suggested on BBC Radio 4 at the weekend.

Even as she was speaking, thousands of Afghans were trying to escape the country. People were being trampled to death in the stampede for places on flights out of Kabal airport.

For Miss Hasan to proclaim that Muslims in the UK are united in welcoming this seizure of power by religious zealots, and the resulting chaos, is both obscene and an affront to the British  Muslim community. It is insulting, a travesty and a sign of just how pitifully ignorant she is.

But for the BBC to give her a platform to air her doctrinal falsehoods, without then demolishing them with real facts is unforgivable.

 

 

Tripe

The broadcaster has failed in its duty to address the news impartially. Instead, the BBC appeared terrified of contradicting Miss Hasan simply because she is a Muslim women and should therefore be allowed to assert any nonsense she likes without the fear of contradiction.

'Every single person that I know as a Muslim,' she said on the Sunday programme, presented by William Crawley, I don't know personally but I know them on social media or as friends, are celebrating and saying, "give them a chance".

I listenedf to that inarticulate tripe, wishing that the BBC still employed rigorous journalists instead of

'WOKELINGS'

who are afraid to question anything for fear of seeming sexist or racist.

The show did feature a courageous campaigner for Afghan women's rights, the filmmaker Diana Saqeb Jamal, who dismissed Hasan's claims as 'INSANE'

But Miss Hasan ignored her, and was permitted the last word. She was also allowed to assert that oppression of Women in France was worse than in Afghanistan, and that negative accounts of life under the Taliban were all lies:

.Western media loves misrepresenting Muslims. So let me spell this out, I have not met a single person in Britain who welcomes the return of the Taliban, not online, at the mosque or anywhere else.

British Muslims are sickened at the horrific news coming out of Kabul, and deeply distressed at the prospects for ordinary people in Afghanistan, especially women and girls.

The surrender

 of Kabul to the Taliban marks not only the effective end of Anglo-US occupation but also the restoration of theological tyranny.

The retributive campaign launched by Tony Blair and George Bush to avenge 9/11 hasw failed miserably after 20 years of nation-building.

The only beneficiaries are the new fanatical masters of Afghanistan and other militant jihadist groups throughout the Middle East, Africa and South-East Asia.

For the delusional Khola Hasan to applaud this is shameful. Virtually everything the Taliban stands for is in clear contravention of the Koran and is a betrayal of authentic Islam

Miss Hasaa and theIslamic Sharia Council (ISC)  operate in a theological bubble. The ISC is self-appointed, founded by her father Sheikh Suhaib Hasan in 1982 to promote Sharia Law in Britain.

 For readers who might not be Islamic scholars, a quick summary. Muslims follow the teaching of the Koran, Islam's Bible, teachings which were revealed by the angel Gabriel to the Prophet Muhammed between 610-632 CE.

But over the following centuries, hundreds of thousands of snippets and qutations attributed to the Prophet were collected in manufactured volumes known as the Hadith.

Many of these supposed sayings are apocryphal and were invented to support, tribal and sexist societies, strippping away the rights of women and religious minorities. These suspect reports  became a handbook for ideological intolerance and authoritarian governance.

All the abhorent aspects of populist Islam, from its insistence that women must be covered from head to foot, to violent jihad and brutal traditional punishments for gay sex, stems from the HADITH.

The HADITH is not the KORAN

.The two are like night and day: Completely opposite...

 

 

In addition, the ISC champions their narrow and bigoted interpretations of Sharia Law and risible fatwas.

Everyone remembers how Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini imposed a sentence of death on novelist Salman Rushdie knows what a fatwas means, but few people understand it represents only the personal opinion of an individual cleric. These are categorically not divine diktats.

AS a Muslim scholar myself, I regard the Hadith, Sharia law and fatwas as a toxic triad. But these are the cornerstones not only of Taliban theology and thinking but also of self-serving Islamic organisations that Miss Hasan is part of.

 

 

 

 

 

Wicked

 

Understand that, and you realise what an atrocious lie it is to say that 'all British Muslims celebrate the resurgence of the Taliban'. Only religious  militants and Sharia fanatics welcomed the Taliban's assumption of power.

It  is an outrageous libel on the whole British Muslim community, and one that grieves and insults me deeply.

I am aghast that the BBC should air Khola Hasan's words without explaining how erroneous and wicked they are, or have a local expert to balance and counter her tendentious assertions...

 

[In the EDP.Org.UK we have seen the same untruths and deliberate bias over the past twenty years in the country's fight to leave the EU. AS we stated during those years the BBC were in fact the BRUSSELS BROADCASTING CORPORATION On Channel 4 we were constantly faced by announcers dressed as battle ready with their Hijabs .

and other attire giving an provocative - an unappealing image of true Islam.]

 

 

 

 

Matured

 

'The problem is, we don't give them a chance.' Miss Hasan claimed on Radio 4.

'The kind of language that came out from Western media when the Taliban took over...civil war, monsters. they're going to slaughter people, it's going to be awful, poor  women, oh blah blah blah, we're going to cry our eyes out, poor women are going back into medieval times.

'It's been misrepresented for so long I've got used to it; I don't even blink an eyelid any more.'

Miss Hasan went on to complain that France is the real enemy of Muslims, because women are not allowed to wear Burka on the beach or the Hijab headscarf in public buildings.

:twenty years is a long time,' she added. 'we will see exactly how much the Taliban have grown up and matured.

The only change in two decades that I can see is the development of sophisticated Jekyll-and-Hyde double personality that will say one thing and do another.

The Taliban tyrants of Afghanistan might have learned to disguise the monster. But behind their flimsy facade, the cruel reality remains as horrifying as ever.

FULL ARTICLE

 

DR TAJ HARGEY is Provost of the Oxford Institute for British Islam.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*  *  *

 

 

BRITISH FORCES (OVERSEAS) BULLETINS

B F 1-BLAIR'SCRAPED THE BARREL' TO JUSTIFY INVASION OF IRAQ****B F 2-The Security Services and the Safety of YOUR REALM****B F 3-It's impossible to win a conflict without enough men on the ground.****B F 4-FIVE WARS BLAIR TO REDUCE OUR ILLUSTRIOUS FIGHTING REGIMENTS****B F5-The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at further RISK!**** B F 6-IRAQ NOT WORTH THE LIFE OF ANOTHER BRITISH SOLDIER****B F 7-Former Chief of Defence Intelligence supports Whistleblowers****B F 8-TONY BLAIR-THE MAN WHO NEVER DID-YET!****B F 9- The JUSTIFICATION for WAR offered by MR BLAIR may have been the  WRONG ONE, but it was a JUST WAR-says DAILY TELEGRAPH ****.  B F 10-A TROOPER and a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE****B F 11-House of Commons must REGAIN its RESPONSIBILITY****B F 12-Why wont Mr Ingram realise he CANNOT compare FUNDING of ARMY RECRUITMENT TRAINING with PRIVATE CORPORATIONS****B 490-TONY BLAIR WILL NOT ADMIT INVASION OF IRAQ MADE BRITAIN VULNERABLE TO TERRORIST ATTACK-ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS-IT DID!****B484-ABANDONED HEROES FIGHTING AND DYING ON £2 AN HOUR-IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN-AND OTHER CONFLICTS-WHY?****B492-TELL THE TRUTH!-MR BLAIR-OF HOW LONG OUR TROOPS WILL REMAIN IN AFGHANISTAN****B 499-Three more British deaths take Afghan toll to 19 in 6 days.****B 501-SADDAM HAD NO LINK TO AL QAEDA-says THE SENATE of the USA***B 504-BLAIR CONFESSES HIS FAULTS BUT STILL CONTINUES WITH HIS DISASTROUS POLICIES.****

[OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS  WE HAVE SHOWN A GREAT NUMBER OF BULLETINS WITH REGARD TO OUR ARMED SERVICES WHO WERE NOT ALWAYS GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS TO DO THE JOB-MR HOON-COMES TO MIND-SHORTAGE OF BODY ARMOUR AND SUITABLE AND SAFE TRANSPORT. THE ABOVE ARTICLES ARE BUT A FEW OF THE MANY BUT WE WILL ADD TO THE LIST OVER THE FOLLOWING WEEKS. A VISIT TO IRAQ FILE & BULLETIN FILE WILL REVEAL MUCH INFORMATION.]

FOR FURTHER INFO GO TO:

PT 2/ PT3/PT4/PT5/PT6

 

 

[We have great respect for the above author as our website will confirm over the past decades we have shown a number of his articles - but we must mention here as it is now known that 9/11 was in fact an inside job to enable the USA to obtain control of oil supplies in Iraq. Only a few nights ago on television it was again confirmed. This illegal and great wrong brought forward Iraq and the latter Afghanistan campaigns - the results of which we now see around us in November 2021. Tony Blair and other co-conspirators escaped impeachment - should have been brought before the International Court of Justice at the Hague to account for their CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.]

August 24,2021

H.F.2154/G/2

 

 *  *  *

 

 

 

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

November 8-2021

 

There were big moves last week at the top of the worlds’ secret power structure, Asian and Western secret society sources say. The moves were triggered when Queen Elizabeth II asked the White Dragon Society to “Please send our good wishes from the Venetian families to our friends and neighbors in the East.”

The Asians were asked to note the following speech by the Queen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXvfqUe4EFQ

https://www.itv.com/news/2021-11-01/cop26-read-the-queens-climate-speech-to-world-leaders-in-full

The speech reads in part as follows:

“For more than seventy years, I have been lucky to meet and to know many of the world’s great leaders…it has sometimes been observed that what leaders do for their people today is government and politics. But what they do for the people of tomorrow – that is statesmanship…the world has the chance to join in the shared objective of creating a safer, stabler future for our people and for the planet on which we depend…we are doing this not for ourselves but for our children and our children’s children, and those who will follow in their footsteps.”

The Asian secret societies answered (in part) as follows:

“We carry out our actions with the big picture of the world in mind…the planet is moving in a good direction. Please rest at ease.”

(我々は世の中の大局を見て、すべての事を進めています。。。世界は良き方向に向おうとしています。まずはご安心」)。

 This does not mean the Asians are buying into the lie that carbon is causing global warming or even that there is global warming.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2425775/Climate-scientists-told-cover-fact-Earths-temperature-risen-15-years.html

Instead, the Asians proposed “we keep it simple and launch a massive project to increase the amount and variety of life including human life.”

It is interesting to note in this context, that La Palma is calming down as are the problems with the three Gorges dam. It is probably just a coincidence.

https://www.laprensalatina.com/la-palma-volcano-enters-new-phase-expert-says-does-not-mean-eruption-ending/

In any case, after this exchange Mi6 sent the following message: “The deal has been done, the rest is housekeeping.”

This housekeeping, of course, begins with an intensified purge of the Khazarian mafia from their last holdouts. This is taking place both in the West and in Asia. What is being removed is “The cult that is controlling Antonio Guterres in the United Nations,” Western secret society sources say.

In Asia, the two big unfinished items of business are Korea and Taiwan. The Asian secret societies promise the peaceful reunifications of Taiwan with the mainland and of North Korea with South Korea are in the pipeline.

In the West, however, the following quote from a European royal makes it clear this will be no ordinary reckoning:

“The atrocity exacted upon the Russian Imperial family by the KM and many others around the world has not gone unnoticed. A very vast endeavor to expose this heinous hate crime is ongoing to root out and kill –we repeat kill- all concerned.”

The Rockefellers financed Trotsky and Lenin to overthrow the Czar because he refused to grant them oil concessions in Russia so; it is a pretty good guess that family is now being purged root and branch.

The removal of David Rockefeller’s grandson Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook and the renaming of that company as “Meta,” Hebrew for death, is a clear sign. The subsequent removal from Meta of face recognition data on a billion people shows the change in management.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/02/facebook-will-shut-down-program-that-automatically-recognizes-people-in-photos-and-videos-delete-data.html

The disappearance of Zuckerbergs’ “Jens Psaki” White House spokestrans persona is a clear sign the purge is well underway.

https://beckernews.com/2-jen-psaki-also-hasnt-been-seen-in-public-for-eleven-days-since-announcing-she-has-covid-despite-being-fully-vaccinated-42960/

The Rockefeller-owned pharmacidical companies behind the fake pandemic and the real mass vaccination campaign are also now being targeted. “They get a knock on the door and we say we know who you are we know what you are doing and you better knock it off,” explains MI6. “Later we will suck them all up with a giant vacuum cleaner,” they add.

The purge of the pharmacidical mafia is now undeniable. We can confirm for example that the CEO of Pfizer Albert Bourla

 

The remainder of this article or audio is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net holding the respective level of subscription
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 NOVEMBER-8-2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

November 1,2021

 

20 Slave “leaders” pose for photos while

their masters struggle to survive

By  Weekly Reports  1,146 Comments

A group of slaves known as the “leaders” of the G20 group of nations have been gathering in Rome and next Scotland to pose for pictures and pretend they run the planet. However, the so-called $150 trillion COP26 plan they have been gathering for is dead in the water. The masters who ordered them to follow this plan are being hunted down and will soon lose power, CIA, Mossad, MI6 and Asian secret society sources agree.

“The G-20 becomes the showpiece for a dysfunctional global order,” is even how the establishment mouthpiece, the Washington Post, describes the situation.

https://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/The-G-20-becomes-the-showpiece-for-a-16573910.php

The fact is the families that own the so-called “global” architecture such as the UN, the BIS, the World Bank, the IMF, the Chinese Communist Party, the United States Corporation etc. are bankrupt.

A group of Venetian nobility and Asian Royal Families have come to an agreement that these families need to be removed from power and control of so-called global institutions. Instead, the people of the planet will be given control, and so, as was long prophesied “the meek shall inherit the earth.”

A visible sign of this is that Queen Elizabeth, the head of the committee of 300 (often called the secret government of the West) is not attending COP26.

“The secret service, the police and the courts are saying enough is enough,” says an Ambassador for Venetian and Asian nobility. “Essentially the Queen is gone. She is under a two-week house arrest [OK palace arrest], and banned from Cop 26,” the Ambassador says. “The act of succession will remove Charles because of the murder of Diana,” he says. “Charles must never be king that is a widely accepted norm,” he adds. Furthermore, Prince William will not be King because he is “an obsequious little creep and we do not like him at all.” Instead, the source says, “The act of installation goes to King George VII or William’s son.”

https://www.royal.uk/prince-george

“We removed the king of Spain because he was essentially the worlds’ biggest drug dealer,” he added.

Another sign is that US Corporate Presidential Spoketrans Jens Psaki (almost certainly a cross-dressing David Rockefeller grandson Mark Zuckerberg) has “contracted Covid 19” despite being vaccinated and has been put under quarantine for 10 days and possibly forever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74FN8zsg9pY

CIA sources say Mark Rockefeller Zuckerberg has also been removed from control of Facebook, which is why it has been renamed Meta which, by no coincidence, means “dead” in Hebrew.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/facebooks-new-meta-handle-means-dead-in-hebrew/

The fact that Kamala Harris is “desperately trying to get out before she and her husband are outed and sink with the ship,” underlines the ongoing collapse of the fake Biden regime, CIA sources note.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/harris-shunning-public-events-with-the-big-guy-biden-after-receiving-no-fun-jobs-the-five

More Clinton (Rockefeller/Hanover) puppets are being rounded up slowly but surely, the CIA says. “They will all sing like canaries for a reduced sentence,” they add. 

https://resistthemainstream.org/former-clinton-operative-charged-arrest-warrant-issued/?utm_source=telegram

Another big event coming soon will be the public announcement of the death of

The remainder of this article or audio is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net holding the respective level of subscription
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

NOVEMBER  1, 2021

H.F.1806/G/3

*  *  *

PM' school report: he must try harder

DAILY MAIL

Wednesday, November 10, 2021

Here is a half-term report on the Government by a voter from the Red Wall.

BREXIT - CLOSE, but the EU is being difficult  [ Which we knew was the nature  of the BEAST!]

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS - pitiful : 0/10

WELFARE FOR THE OLD - we're due to have our pockets picked via National insurance - , but there is no concrete plan and all we know is that the black hole that is the NHS  will get some of the money : 3/10

WOKERY - the Government turns its back when it's mentioned and puts its fingers in its ears: 2/10.

DEALING WITH DEMONSTRATORS BLOCKING THE ROADS: WOEFUL: 1/10

THE POLICE, SCHOOLS  AND UNIVERSITIES seem to do as they please. Pupils are bombarded with WOKERY, INCLUSIVITY and CLIMATE CHANGE before they can use a knife and fork: 3/10

CLIMATE CHANGE was slipped into this year's curriculum behind everyone's backs. WIND and SOLAR POWER are seen as the answer to EVERYTHING, but WHATS THE BACKUP? Must try harder: 3/10

The COVID VACCINATION PROGRAMME is a SUCCESS but questions have been asked about decisions made at the beginning of the PANDEMIC: 7/10

LEVELLING UP, lots of rheteric, but LONDON is still seen as the centre of the UNIVERSE: 4/10

IF THIS GOVERNMENT WISHES TO RETAIN RED WALL VOTES, there is a lot of work to do to restore TRUST. The latest sleaze allegations WILL NOT HELP, but the BIGGEST QUESTION is WHO do we VOTE FOR if the TORIES don't manage to PULL THEMSELVES TOGETHER.

 [NOT WASTE 3 and a half years - as Boris Johnson did from JUNE 2016 until DECEMBER,2020 delaying BREXIT by failing to take the helm of STATE because of his disagreement with Michael Gove over who should be PM.]

 

T.COATES, BIRMINGHAM.

DAILY MAILednesday, November 10, 2021

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS & HIGHLIGHTING...ARE OURS!]

H.F.2154/F
 
 

Knifing Boris

was like a bomb

going off in my

hands, says Gove.

 

By Claire Ellicot

Political Correspondent

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 26,2021

MICHAEL Gove has  admitted he regrets 's  'torpedoing' Boris Johnson's first Tory leadership bid - -and says the move wound up like a bomb in his own hands Gi

The Housing Secretary admitted his decision to attack the now Prime Minister in 2016 and run for leader himself had ended his career.

Mr Gove stunned Westminster when he announced he could no longer back Mr Johnson for the leadership following Dasvid Cameron's resignation in the wake of the

BREXIT VOTE

The two men had worked side by side on the

VOTE LEAVE win the

 campaign

that helped win the

EU REFERENDUM

for

BREXITEERS

Speaking to MPs yesterday, Mr Gove admitted it had been'political suicide' to run against Mr Johnson after destroying his leadership campaign.

He made the remark in a Commons session about planning reforms, which are being reviewed amid criticism from Tory backbenchers.

Labour's planning spokesman Ruth Cadbury said she had not'seen (him) torpedo something so effectively since he sunk the Prime Minister's leadership in 2016'.

Responding, Mr Gove joked:'Well, I'm grateful to (her) for taking me back to the halcyon days of 2016. It wasn't so much a torpedo being launched as an exploded bomb going off in my own hands.

'But as the former member for Kensington and Chelsea Sir Malcolm Rifkind pointed out, one of the things about committing political suicide is that you always live to regret it.'

In June 2016 Mr Johnson's allies warned there was a deep pit in hell' for Mr Gove after he quit as his campaign manager saying he was not up to being a Prime Minister.

Mr Gove deliverede a brutal verdict on Mr Johnson's capabilities and questioned whether his 'heart and soul' were in taking the UK out of the EU.

He e3ffrectively ended Mr Johnson's hopes of succeeding Mr Cameron-a race eventually won by Theresa May. The two men ran against each other again in 2019 after Mrs May's resignation. Mr Johnson was victorious, but kept his rival in the Government, moving him from Environment Secretary to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.

Mr Gove replaced Robert Jenrick in the housing department at the last reshuffle, with additional powers to mastermind the levelling -up agenda and strengthen the UNION.

 

By Claire Ellicot

Political Correspondent

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 26,2021

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS... ARE OURS!]

H.F.2154/D
 

 

The Heritage of England is a Whole made up of Many Parts

 

  In 1929 the Right Hon. Stanley Baldwin, MP. wrote an Introductory to a work by John Bailey on our greatest poet Shakespeare.

 

 In another place we have been critical of Mr Baldwin during the years we all know as leading to the ‘Gathering Storm’ period, but when you have read his introduction you will be in no doubt that he was indeed a passionate and patriotic Englishman.

 

Introduction

 

" I have been asked to write an introduction to a series of volumes to be published under the general title of” The English Heritage.” I think the editors and publishers are to be warmly congratulated on their enterprise, and I find a peculiar pleasure in contributing a few words of welcome in a preface in which I may use the word English [This was in 1929 and how difficult it has been since then and particularly over the last seven years.] without the fear of interruption, and speak of England without hearing the acidulated suggestion that I should say Britain.

 

These books  [series of volumes published under the general title of” The English Heritage.”] are more needed because much of what they treat is changing under our eyes, [1929] and it may be of interest to our children to look to the rock whence they are hewed; and to others it may be a revealing of the Englishman and his heritage, for he is not apt to speak before strangers either of his land or of himself, and when he does the less Englishman he.

 

 The choice of subject appears to me to be singularly happy.  Think, for a moment, of the centuries packed into a little volume on “The Country Spirit.” That spirit, tranquil, unperceived, and apparently forgotten in our cities, leaped in a moment into the flame, which swept across the battlefields of the world.  Quickened, revivified, it is in our bones, as it has been since our counties were carved out of the dissipating fragments of the Heptarchy.

 

[As our pilgrims visited their fallen in Normandy this last June 6-2004]

Last Whitsuntide I was a pilgrim among our graveyards in Flanders and on the Somme.  In one of the most beautiful, where all are beautiful, I met three other pilgrims, large silent men.  Two carried baskets, and one rapidly scanning each headstone and occasionally stooped to the ground.  I approached them, and we spoke together.  They had brought out from home a quantity of small white-enamelled tablets with spikes affixed, the device thereon a red rose and the legend, "

 

“They win or die who wear the Red Rose of Lancaster,” and the stooping man had been placing one at the headstone of every grave, which held a Lancastrian soldier. So might their ancestors have murmured the same words over the bloody fields of Barnet and of Tewkesbury?

 

End of Part 1

 

*          *          *

“Shakespeare is, in fact, an Elizabethan Englishman: tolerant, kindly, indifferent to the niceties of dogma and the shibboleths of ecclesiastical parties, exhibiting a temper which began in England before Elizabeth reigned and did not die with her death.”

 

*          *          *

In Stanley Baldwin's publication  'ON ENGLAND-TRUTH and POLITICS' of 7th of April 1926 he quoted the work of a brilliant Cambridge scholar and theologian, and this is what I read on the first page:

"IN regard to truth, the more one reads of man's notions about the meaning and method of civil society, the more often is one inclined in despair to say that truth has as little to do with politics as it has with most politicians."

[AND HOW WELL THIS HAS BEEN SHOWN IN OUR ONCE VENERABLE AND PATRIOTIC HOUSE OF COMMONS PARTICULARLY SINCE THE END OF THE SECAND WORLD WAR.

TRAITORS]

WE NOW MOVE TO A SHORT SECTION FROMTHE SAME PUBLICATION OF STANLEY BALDWIN'S CHAPTER ON

PEACE IN INDUSTRY

... I dread that subtle poison of hatred which is being preached in some quarters[[As in November 2021-BMA?-Re FACE TO FACE APPOINTMENTS FOR PATIENTS.] which weakens the faith of men in their efficient service and sound workmanship-the very things which have built up the reputation of our great country [1926],on which we still live.  You may have have one of the finest fleets of liners in this world, you may have it owned by the State, and you may have it run by the State; but  if you have a crew bent on defying all that makes for co-operation and disipline you will bankrupt that fleet.

 

It has not come to that in this country [1926], and in my belief it never will. The power of managing our own affairs in our own way is the greatest gift of Englishmen.  We have demonstrated that fact in the past, and we shall demonstrate it in the future. It has been ours in a growing degree for a dozen centuries.  And I cannot put that thought before you better than in the words of a distinguished Oxford man, the late Master of Balliol

A D.Lindsay,LL,D.

who wrote:

"Nowhere was the village community so real and so enduring a thing as in England for at least twelve centuries of its history.  In every parish men met almost daily in humble but very real self-government, to be judged by their fellows or fined by them, or punished as bad characters, to settle the ploughing times and harvest times, the fallowing and grassing rules for the whole village.  To these twelve centuries of discipline we owe the peculiar English capacity for self-government, the enormous English development of the voluntary principle in all manner of institutions (clubs, associations [AS with the EDP.ORG.UK-1994-2021] hospitals, joint stock) and the aptitude for colonisation. [In 2021 we hear much about the evils of Colonisation but it is conveniently forgotten that much good was implanted-such as DEMOCRACY and FAIR PLAY...and the eradication of evil and cruel practices.] Our politics, our commercial enterprise, our Colonial Empire, are due to the spirit of co-operation, the spirit of co-operation, the spirit of fair play, and 'give and take,' the habit of working to a common purpose which tempered the hard and grim individuality of the national character."

 

*  *  *

WE have experience, we have beacons, we have landmarks enough. We know what the past has cost us, we know how much the past has cost us, we know how far we have wandered, but we are not left without a guide.  It is true we have not, as an ancient people had, Urin and Thummim - those oraculous gems on Aaron's breast - from which to take counsel, but we have the unchangeable principles of the moral law to guide us, and only so far as we walk by that guidance can we be permanently a great nation, or our people a happy people.

SPEECHES OF JOHN BRIGHT MP

1858

FOREIGN POLICY

A TRUE MAN OF THE PEOPLE

 

 

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

 

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

NOVEMBER 2,2021

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 2154/E

 at least
REMEMBER!

EDWARD HEATH A NAZI TRAITOR  FROM 1938 UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2005 WHO GAVE AWAY OUR FISHING GROUNDS TO FRANCE FOR

FREE

 

IN 1973

AND WHY BORIS JOHNSON

MUST HOLD FIRM AGAINST THREATS

FROM THE PETTY SUBSTITUTE

NAPOLEON

OF

2021

A BRITISH GOVERNMENT FIRST RESPONSIBILITY IS TO PROTECT THE REALM AND SHOULD NEVER DEPEND ON FOREIGN SUPPLIES FOR ESSENTIAL FUEL SUPPLIES-OF WHICH ALMOST HALF IS NOW IMPORTED.

 SUCCESSIVE BRITISH GOVERNMENT  POLICY HAS ENDANGERED  NOT ONLY OUR OWN SECURITY  BUT ALSO THAT OF THE CHANNEL ISLANDS. THIS UNFORTUNATE INCIDENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN FORESEEN AT THE VERY OUTSET.

AS A ISLAND, THE UK SHOULD ALWAYS KEEP ESSENTIAL SERVICES IN HOUSE WHICH WOULD PREVENT BLACKMAIL THREATS FROM ENDANGERING OUR SECURITY , HEALTH AND SAFETY

*  *  *

 
 
 TIME

TO

REMEMBER

 THEM

 

 

 

 
 

IGNORANCE and ARROGANCE of OUR AFGHAN FOLLY  

 by

Andrew Alexander

[Daily Mail, Friday, August 17,2007]

 

AFGHANISTAN is all set to become Gordon Brown's IRAQ

 

It is liable to taint his reputation as surely as Iraq tainted Tony Blair's -unless he is prepared to grasp the nettle and pull out.

THE DEATH RATE FOR BRITISH SOLDIERS IS HIGHER THAN IRAQ AND CAN BE EXPECTED TO WORSEN.

 

AS some of us who have followed this doomed attempt to pacify Afghanistan warned months ago, this would not be easier than Iraq as certain ministers claimed.

At least in Iraq, the biggest problem  is the locals murdering each other. In Afghanistan, the locals may be all too ready each other - as they have for centuries in a traditional lawless land - but they can and do unite in the goal of driving out

FOREIGN INVADERS.

We should know, having fought three

AFGHAN WARS

and been bested in them when we ruled India and disposed of powerful forces.

There seems no comprehension in the Government about the grim prospects ahead. The full folly of our approach is summed up in a piece by

FOREIGN SECRETARY -DAVID MILIBAND

IN THE

SPECTATOR

His article: -

 

'WHY we are in AFGHANISTAN for the LONG HAUL'

is at once

IGNORANT-PATRONISING-SUPERFICIAL-COMPLACENT

AND DEVOID OF

UNDERSTANDING OF THE COUNTRY

ITS HISTORY

OR

ITS PEOPLES.

 

IT IS NONSENSE, OR PERHAPS WE SHOULD SAY

POPPYCOCK.

Mind you, he has visited the place and 'seen for himself' the problems. This is typical politician's FANTASY.

Of course he has not seen for himself. Do you imagine that he had trailed up and down the country's  dangerous roads, traversed its mountain passes, stopped off in villages for the night, inspected farms in the poppy growing areas or visited the competing warlords' territories?

HE DID NOT

 'SEE'

-He talked - with various officials, British and Afghan, under conditions of maximum security. He arrived on July 24 and left for Karachi on the 25th. Political tourism -it's Wednesday, this must be Pakistan.

In his article, he sees Afghanistan as a country needing rescue, a place of considerable poverty -when was it not? - and one which can only be a 'success' with help from outsiders to 'rebuild' its infrastructure (such as it is). According to HIM on his lightning tour,

'you can sense the quiet pride of the Afghans' in their determination to rebuild their country.

IN THAT CASE,

WHY NOT LET THEM

GET ON WITH IT

rather than our troops act like a magnet for militants all over the Middle East?

ARE THE AFGHANS SUPPOSED TO BE TOO STUPID IDLE OR INCOMPETENT TO BUILD SCHOOLS OR RESTORE ROADS OR INSTALL POWER PLANTS THEMSELVES?

YOU MIGHT THINK SO FROM THE TENOR OF HIS ARGUMENTS.

 We might also note that a

$1.2 billion contract

for rebuilding infrastructure was last year granted to

2 American Firms

- Well! -there's a surprise!

[Would one be the Halliburton company which supplies virtually everything needed in the Iraq/Afghanistan theatre of war - has close links with Bush and his cronies.]

Apparently the Afghans also need our guidance in establishing effective(Western-style) political institutions (Of the Tony Blair variety which shows the world how to destroy a  unique Nation-State of parliamentary democracy from within by undermining its foundations, institutions and constitution)

Miliband claims that under our guidance, progress has been made in establishing a constitution, elections and a GOVERNMENT.

But the writ of the government under President Karzai has scarcely run outside the capital, Kabul at all. Moreover, the crop of poppies this year , the basis for so many drugs, has risen to record levels.

[AS for all Mr Miliband's claptrap uttering will some kind soul let him down lightly and let him know that very little has changed in Afghanistan for centuries -except the name of the capital -once referred to Cabal when brave British/Indian regiments were cut to ribbons and when as in Iraq today when they had a victory the fruits of that victory were on many occasions later given up to the defenders. Not much has changed in over 150 years.]

However, we and the others from NATO

insist we will help with

LAW and ORDER

[Something we don't have in ENGLAND

at the present time.]

We will 'train' the Afghan police, which is as condescending as it is

SILLY.

Afghans know their own country-its faults and weaknesses.

[In ENGLAND they should be known but nothing has been done about it, possibly we should invite a hill tribe of Afghans to come here to frighten the life out of our millions of troublemakers.]

*

DO YOU THINK

-any senior British bobbies can teach them much of real use beyond how to install speed cameras and parking meters?

IF YOU SAY, 'but we can teach Afghan policemen how to fight', then that is

SILLY, TOO.

since half the problem with Afghans is that fighting

IS IN THEIR BLOOD.

 

And weapons are everywhere, as they have always been.

According to Miliband, we must keep the Taliban (among others) at bay to prevent Afghanistan becoming a training ground for guerrillas.

BUT THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT WE HAVE MADE IT.

Islamic militants, whose numbers we continuously boost, can go to Afghanistan and receive basic training (there are numerous sight-seeing tours from Britain to enable them to visit their relatives and gain on the holiday training in demolition and how to fire entrances to airports or what have you. ) in how to shoot ,make explosives, plant bombs and all the rest

WITH BRITISH TROOPS PROVIDING PERFECT TARGET

[ALL FOR FREE FROM THE BROWN- MILIBAND TOUR COMPANY OR SHOULD IT BE OIL COMPANY?]

All the while we are also feeding the militants' propaganda machine. Such has been the casualty rate among civilians from aircraft strikes that Nato says it must use smaller bombs in future.

According to military commanders and Nato politicians, the answer to the country's security problem, which President Karzai complains has now been deteriorating for two years, is more troops. The British Government seems to concur in this as it transfers men from Iraq to Afghanistan.

WE HAVE HEARD THAT BEFORE

-We have seen it fail in Iraq where the death toll sets new records.

We heard it all the time in Vietnam where a force of 16,000 American advisers eventually became a

DEFEATED ARMY

OF

450,000

It is hard to believe, alas, that we will have an effective

BRITISH ARMY

LEFT

IF ITS ROLL IS TO BE CONSIGNED TO HOPELESS CAUSES

 LIKE

IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN

 *          *          *

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

IRAQ WAR FILE

 

 

*

H.F.730

 
 

BLOODY BETRAYAL BY BLAIR

 

BLUNDERS BELIES BELEAGUERED BRAVE BRITONS BLOOD BATH BATTLE BECKONS BEYOND BABYLONIAN BORDERS.

 *

BLOODY BETRAYAL

BY

Max Hastings

*

Daily Mail

Saturday, July 8-2006

In this denunciation

Military historian

MAX HASTING

Argues that

MINISTERS

Have contemptuously

Lied about

Afghanistan

-Leaving our

Desperately

Undermanned army

To make good

Blair’s bad cheques in blood

 

JUST before leaving for my first trip to Vietnam in 1970, I telephoned a veteran correspondent for advice. ‘Just remember’, he said, ‘they lie, they lie, they lie.’

By ‘they’, of course, he meant American politicians, diplomats and commanders, and he was absolutely right.

 

The ‘credibility gap’ in Vietnam - the chasm between what Americans claimed was happening and WHAT actually DID- contributed mightily to the final DEBACLE.

 

Britain’s involvement in Afghanistan is miniscule compared with Vietnam were 600,000

-       American troops were committed in the worst days of 1968.

 

OUR deployment in Helmand province has scarcely begun. Yet already the British Government has opened a credibility gap as shameful as the Americans sponsored in Saigon. It lies, it lies, it lies.

 

After the killings of three British soldiers within days, Tony Blair this week pledged to give our troops whatever they need in Afghanistan.

 

HIS WORDS ARE A MOCKERY

The Army, already desperately over-stretched, has scarcely an extra unit to commit to Helmand. Even if it did, there are no helicopters to move them. The Prime Minister cannot magic Chinooks out of a hat, and well he knows it.

 

Helicopters are vital because there is no other effective way for troops to get around an area as big as Scotland.

Adding an extra battalion or two to the 3,300 British troops on the ground in Helmand is a token.

 

[As we have already been told ONLY approximately 600 of the 3,300 mentioned above are the cutting -edge -the spearhead -a battalion which could be lost in one of the thousands of valleys and ravines in that dangerous and desolate landscape.]

 

In Blair’s Britain we have had gesture [SPIN]

 

Education

 

Health Policy

 

Justice Policy

 

NOW in Afghanistan, the Prime Minister gives gesture military strategy. To explain we need to go back to the beginning.

 

In 2001, with modest British support the U.S. invaded Afghanistan to depose the Taliban Government, an exceptionally nasty tyranny which was providing bases and support for Al Qaeda.

 

Almost the entire Western world endorsed the action. It was thought a proper response to the terrorist destruction to 9/11. The Taliban swiftly collapsed. Its fights fled to the mountains or over the border into Pakistan.

 

WITH the job done - ‘mission accomplished’ as George Bush idiotically declared after Baghdad was taken two years later. - The Americans pulled out most of their forces. Those who remained were tasked merely to pursue Osama bin laden and Al Qaeda.

 

N the surge if international goodwill following 9/11 and the Taliban’s fall, NATO’s members agreed to take over from the Americans responsibility for helping the precarious new Afghan regime to secure the country, install democracy and build its own forces.

 

All manner of little contingents descended on Kabul:

 

750-Turks; 17-Czechs; 10- Estonians; 9-Latvians; 4-Swiss; larger bodies from bigger countries, to a total earlier this year of 9000.

 

The NATO force mustered what would be enough soldiers to stage a showy old-style Royal Tournament at Earls Court. YET this was only a tiny fraction of he army that would have been needed to do the business in Afghanistan.

Once the shock of 9/11 faded and the Bush administration embarked o it’s hugely mismanaged and unpopular invasion of Iraq, European enthusiasm fast receded for participating in American adventures in the MUSLIM WORLD.

 

When push came to shove, most of the NATO members produced fewer men and much less cash than had been promised. Of the European soldiers who got to Kabul, most were forbidden to leave the Capital because far-flung provinces seemed too dangerous.

 

Their government were willing to let them dig wells, train policemen or guard a clinic, but were determined not to have their nationals killed fighting guerrillas.

 

The Kabul region became relatively secure. Elections were held. U.S. troops and aircraft continued their ruthless campaign against Al Qaeda in the mountains, killing too many civilians to win popular support.

 

Across most of the country however, local warlords, who have dominated Afghanistan for most of its history, regained control.

 

The story gets worse. Although the Americans were notionally committed to supporting the government in Kabul, they decided there was no realistic hope of supplanting the warlords’ authority in distant provinces.

 

THUS Washington made a devil’s bargain and gave cash and arms to some uncommonly nasty people.

 

In the absence of any legitimate economy or effective government, opium production soared. Poppy production doubled between 2002 and 2004. In 1999, under the Taliban opium was grown in only 18 of Afghanistan’s provinces; to day flourishes in all 32.

 

The opium trade now accounts for 40 per cent of the country’s economic activity. Afghan poppies provide raw material for 87 per cent of global heroin production.

The principle achievement of Western intervention in Afghanistan, therefore, has been to create the world’s leading narcotic state.

 

It was often and rightly said that the Taliban ruled by medieval principles of Justice. Today there is NO justice at all.

 

It is impossible for a Westerner to travel safely outside Kabul, save in military convoy. Afghanistan ranks in the bottom 1 per cent of nations for the effectiveness of its rule of law.

 

Washington’s blunder of course, matched that in Iraq. The Bushites said:

 

‘We don’t do nation-building’ [only destroying sovereign nations]

 

They were uninterested in what happened to Afghanistan once the Taliban were deposed, except to maintain an open season for Bin Laden-hunting, with laser-guided munitions and U.S Special Forces who make do with slaughtering the odd wedding party when they are unable to find guerrillas.

 

The British Army today has 3,300 men in Helmand Province

-as partial replacements for the Americans who have left because they are so over stretched in Iraq.

 

We are supposed to be responsible for leading the entire NATO mission

-though because of the tangle of multi-national committees, we have less effective executive control than the average primary school teacher.

 

Tony Blair and his Ministers promised our soldiers would be committed to assisting Afghan reconstruction- training local soldiers, building clinics and such like.

YET, whether they like it or not, they have been deployed on the battlefield.

 

Americans are still carrying out search- and-rescue missions against Al Qaeda, a few miles down the road. The Taliban’s guerrillas are delighted to be presented with Western soldiers to shoot at. They could not care less if Mr Blair intended our boys merely to act as baby-sitters.

 

Any serious attempt to interfere with the opium trade would provoke heavy fighting, because it provides the livelihoods of most of the population.

 

Ask any British officer to explain on one side of a sheet our objectives or the chain of command and he will still be chewing his pencil an hour later.

 

The Government’s

 

Big lie

 

is to pretend our operations in Afghanistan

 

-are coherent.

 

The theory is that we are helping the Afghans to build up forces effective enough to look after themselves.

 

The reality is that the Kabul government controls about 80,000 troops and police, who periodically fight each other and are hopelessly under-strength.

 

If the mess does not make you angry, it should.

 

This is a predicament, which nobody [in the Government] foresaw. Everyone who knew anything about Afghanistan forecast it from the outlet.

 

The British, as usual are trying much harder than any of our European partners to make their mission work. But even our finest soldiers cannot push water uphill.

 

Every casualty is a tragedy, but no one would flinch from some losses, if these were incurred in an operation that might succeed.

 

As it is, I know no responsible senior officer, serving or retired, who believes this job is do-able with the forces we can deploy, even if Colchester and Catterick were stripped of every cook and bottle-washer to reinforce Helmand.

 

To be fair to Mr Blair - always a hard thing to do - Britain bears less responsibility than most for the mess we find ourselves in.

 

THE U.S. is the principal betrayer of Afghanistan. Colin Powell memorably explained the

 

‘china shop rules’

 

-to President Bush when he was Secretary of State:

 

‘You break it, you own it’

 

By invading Afghanistan, albeit for good reasons, the U.S. accepted responsibility for piecing together the wreckage - and has failed

because it never really tried.

 

European NATO nations claimed to be willing to help rebuild the country -and have betrayed their commitments.

 

They have sent only token forces. They have been parsimonious with mere money,

 

-never mind blood.

 

We shall all be the losers if, as seems likely the West is eventually forced to abandon Afghanistan to become, once again, the haven of terrorists and drug traffickers.

 

 

We shall have shown that we lack the will and skill to restore a failed state. This will be a shocking indictment of what we laughingly call

 

‘the International Community’

 

*

 

[The failure is down to BUSH and BLAIR as they should have shown example of good international relations BUT decided to embark on an illegal war and forget about the

 

RULE OF LAW

 

The way each dictator has manipulated its Foreign Policy to maintain Office and gain greater CONTROL is there for all to see.]

Great nations such as Germany and France make gestures, but in reality have turned their back on Afghanistan.

 

[Well Germany has for a century and possibly longer used its

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

CONNECTION

-to undermine British Foreign Policy.

 

Since the formation of the EU -France is hand in hand with Germany and they are now ONE in foreign nations eyes.

 

They must be congratulating themselves on their success in undermining

ENGLAND and AMERICA

which it has been their ambition for so long?

 

France and Germany will have obtained their reward from the Islamic connection and must be laughing all the way to the BANK]

To Continue:

 

 

GREAT nations such as Germany and France make gestures, but in reality have turned their backs on Afghanistan.

 

They hope that if they can avoid getting their soldiers killed and keep their distance from the U.S. adventures, they can save themselves from the murderous wrath of the

MUSLIM WORLD.

 

 

A tiny force of British soldiers however brave and able cannot compensate for poor European partners huge act of cynicism.

 

The British Army will go on trying in Afghanistan, of course, because that what it always does. Its ‘can-do’ spirit provides one of the reasons why we admire it so much.

 

*

 

[We ask WHY we should accept this situation when it is so obvious that the background to the matter shows that it is NOT our RESPONSIBILITY

A few nights ago we watched the gripping ‘BLITZ’ on LONDON’

-Programme and when one who like so many others in our country experienced the events in the Second World War

one was hoping that the terrifying onslaught on England by the Hitler’s air armada would when their resident reporters report back home to the USA would bring their country into the war to stand with

 

ENGLAND

 

in defence of the

 

FREE WORLD

- but as with the situation in the Great War our cousins the other side of the pool let our nation get fully blooded FIRST and their delay in the Second World War resulted in our Nation mortgaging its assets from the past and this has been so ever SINCE.

 

We are inescapable with the

 

TRUE !

 

USA

 

from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson to Abraham Lincoln to Theodore Roosevelt to Woodrow Wilson to Franklin D. Roosevelt to John F Kennedy… and what they passionately stood for -

JUSTICE and INTEGRITY

Of THEIR

GREAT FREE NATION STATE.]

 

 

To continue:

 

If Gordon Brown wants to do something useful for our Armed Forces, rather than play politics with Trident, he could start seeing that soldiers are paid properly.

 

A significant number of our men in Afghanistan as well as Iraq depend on Tax credits - state benefits - to support themselves and their families. This is a shameful reflection on SERVICE PAY.

 

 

I have written here before about the scandal of the Army’s dependence on armoured Land Rovers -entirely inadequate vehicles in landmine country.

 

MORE helicopters cannot be found in weeks or even months-but they must be at least ordered.

 

*

[As we have already outlined before that MoD have at least 67 -Apache helicopters, which it had mothballed because it had no trained pilots to fly them. The helicopters cost over

 

48,000,000 each

 

instead of ordering direct from the USA

at a price of:

 

28,000,000 each

 

So the bulk of our 67 helicopters are in storage while only 6 are in service in Afghanistan while troops in Iraq and in other fire fights in the world have to be content with lightly armed Land Rovers.

 

As outlined in D.Mail-Wednesday, July5-2006-The problem was that the Apache had: just entered service after years of delays , in heavy demand in the UK for training crews.]

 

*

To continue:

 

For years now, the Prime Minister has committed the British Army to conduct a global crusade in fulfilment of his political fantasies

*

[And YOUR MEMBERS of the HOUSE of COMMONS spend THEIR TIME counting THEIR not so small SALARY and BENEFITS of

 

£284,000 a year

 

-So WHY should they concern themselves with getting off their backsides and standing up in YOUR HOUSE to see their brave soldiers get the equipment THEY NEED to protect THEIR LIVES and bring them HOME within the next few months. As has been said:

-‘People get the Government they Deserve’

 

BUT we will add you ALSO

 

GET

 

THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

 

you deserve -after all most of YOU did vote for THEM- Did you Not?]

*

 

To continue:

 

The manpower shortage is deeply worrying: not only did the GOVERNMENT

-deliberately cut Army numbers, it has also presided over a slump in recruitment, because mothers and fathers do not want their sons to risk their lives in Mr Blair’s campaigns.

 

I do not think the British Army will suffer a disaster in Afghanistan. Its men are more than a match for Taliban guerrillas, and its commanders will ensure that heir men do not stick out their necks out too far. But soldiers will continue to DIE.

 

The Prime Minister lies when he says that Britain’s Afghan mission is capable of fulfilment. No one sensible ever thought it was.

 

We should have nothing but contempt for the GOVERNMENT

 

-which is presiding overran unholy mess, leaving

 

OUR ARMY

 

-To make good Tony Blair’s bad cheques in it’s BLOOD.

 

* * *

 

[In history of which Tony Blair has NO interest it has shown that even ONE misguided individual can cause such DISASTER

-as a certain Corporal from the

GREAT WAR

-so succinctly stated in

MEIN KAMPF.

 

The RISE of HITLER was an indictment of the GERMAN PEOPLE.

 

‘The great masses of the people…will more easily fall victims to a great lie than a small one.’

[Mein Kampf, Ch.10]

 

The RISE of BLAIR was an indictment of the BRITISH PEOPLE -not once-not twice but three chances where missed to remove a DICTATOR.

 

THE FAULT IS OURS?

 

* * *

[Font altered -bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

JULY/06

 

*

IN 2021,WE SEE THAT THE PAST ERRORS HAVE RESULTED IN THOUSANDS OF AFGHANS BEING GIVEN ASYLUM - WINNING THE LOTTERY OF A LIFETIME AND PUSHING THE ETHNIC POPULATION EVEN FURTHER ALONG THE ROAD TO THE DOMINANT POPULATION WITHIN THE NEXT 30/40 YEARS.  THE AFGHANS THEMSELVES IN THEIR HOMELAND MADE NO STAND AGAINST THE TALIBAN  EVEN AFTER THE GREAT SACRIFICE OF LIVES AND INJURED WE HAVE SUFFERED OVER THE YEARS, WHICH SHOWS THAT THE ILLEGAL WARS , HAVE THEIR  SEVERE CONSEQUENCIES IN THE YEARS AHEAD ,AS IT HAS PROVED BY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. BLAIR AND BROWN ESCAPED JUST PUNISHMENT AT THE HANDS OF THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT THE HAGUE.

THEY ARE LAUGHING AT YOU ALL.

 

*  *  *

 

IRAQ WAR FILE

 

 

 

H.F.2154/D
 
 

RUSSIA'S PRESIDENT PUTIN'S  VIEW OF THE WEST'S

WOKE! BRIGADE

 shared by many in britain and shunned by many -many cultures around the world.

youtube.com/watch?v=wHpt4gB0-Mw …

 

TOLERATION OF DIFFERENCES -YES!

LAW - NO!

ALWAYS IN A TRUE FREE DEMOCRACY  -  AS SUPPORTED BY A UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION

ON

FREE SPEECH AND EXPRESSION.

" GIVE ME THE LIBERTY TO KNOW, TO UTTER, AND TO ARGUE FREELY ACCORDING TO CONSCIENCE

ABOVE ALL LIBERTIES."

JOHN MILTON

SECRETARY TO OLIVER CROMWELL IN THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR or GREAT REBELLION

1642 -1646  - SECOND CIVIL WAR 1648 -1649

 

OCTOBER 27, 2021

H.F.2154/D
 
 
 
 
 
 

*  *  *

*  *  *

 
 

 

[THE ENGLISH PEOPLE IN THEIR ISLAND HOME  WILL SOON BECOME A MINORITY IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY-POSSIBLY IN A GENERATION OR SO.

 AND MILLIONS OF NEWCOMERS FROM OTHER CULTURES WHO HAVE NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING- AND WHY SHOULD THEY WHEN THEY NUMBER MANY MILLIONS - WITH A BIRTH-RATE OF 4:1. A NUMBER OF OUR CITIES ARE ALREADY POPULATED BY A MAJORITY FROM FOREIGN CULTURES.}

*

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES

DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH

NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE

RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE

GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND

MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY

NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO

NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE 

VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT

IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO

THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE

INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS

TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS

HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF............More

.........& More :more-empires-have-fallen-&I- More .. I hardly-believe-it.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927] *

*

H.F.2021
 

PART 1/9

Growth and Development of the English Parish.

by

 

Wray Hunt

 

 

In the words of the author in 1932 the following chapters:

 

“ To describe as far as possible the story of the English parish not only as regards the religious but also the social life…It is often forgotten that no man or boy can possibly understand the history of his country if he does not understand its life and ideas.”

 

[We have it in mind to endeavour to bring to you each chapter in the life of the parish of England covering the years 651 to 1890.]

 

As the author Wray Hunt further mentions the chapters of the periods of history of the parish “to be accepted, not as a history of England but as a companion … to be read together with the usual political histories, so that the reader of these latter may be able to imagine the sort of people among who those things happened that are” described in the following chapters. 

 

*          *

 [The following statement was made a few years ago but in 2007 with a Archbishop of York who has energised Christianity in our Christian land the future is more encouraging with a recent poll showing that a majority of the population considered themselves Christians even if they have not been to CHURCH for YEARS.]

 

[Our purpose in taking this journey through English history by accounting the life of the community around and within the Christian Church is to show those who like some Anglican clergyman today who say that England is no longer a Christian country whereas it would be impossible for our land of England to deny our Faith with so many reminders of our Christian heritage in our living landscape- its past supporters at rest within the precincts of our numerous places of worship since St Augustine came to our shores over 1400 years ago and Christian Monarchy in England.

 

We do not deny that those who attend Anglican Church services has been steadily declining for half a century though some Christian communities who have adhered more strictly to Christian doctrine have either held their flock or even in some cases have increased their congregation.

 

As is outlined elsewhere in our Bulletin ’A Defence of Christianity’ by C.E.M.Joad-philosopher- writer (1951) that so far from Christianity becoming a world-wide religion,

 Christ taught that it would be a religion of the few.

 

In other parts of the world –USA, Africa and many other countries there has been a revival taking place and it is beginning in our own homeland.  So the clergyman who told his flock in October 2004, that England is no longer a Christian country had better withdraw his judgement because there is and will be a return to Christian Values because the other possibility will not succeed when we see the Christian heritage which meets our eyes in Hamlet, Village, Town and City which are a constant reminder that we are never far from our roots and for many of us still when we reach our final resting place.

 

The escalating crime, drug and other destroyers of a community have been having their way for the past 40 years and only a dramatic realisation of the dangers now with us all will there be a return to the Christian Values which can only make our lives better and safer.

 

Within our country we have those of other Faiths who are not so negligent of their mission and it should be a reminder to us all that a Religious belief should be   accompanied by a moral accountability.

 

We have seen how the grievous free-for-all offered by the politicians in a secular society can take their toll unless there is a moral dimension. Don’t blame the government but ourselves in being enticed into bottomless black hole where no moral accountability seems necessary or possible.

 

Those responsible for protecting the community such as Chief Police Constables have been warning for decades of the problems which would follow the relaxation of the Drug, Drink and now the Betting laws apart from the lack of discipline in the home and in the school and community.]

 

*          *          *

 

Chapter 1/ X1X

 

 

The King’s Hall

(AD 651-670)

 

I have given this title to the first chapter because, strange as it may seem, it is to a king’s hall that we must go if we are to understand the beginning of the English parish.  The Romans, though some of them were Christians – and we know that there were churches in Roman Britain – knew nothing of the parish, and even the earliest missionaries to the pagan English knew nothing of it.

 

Yet it is certain that had the parish not developed English life today would be something very unlike the life that we know, as will be clear enough when, in the course of [the following Chapters] we consider what the parish did.

 

But first we must go to the king’s hall, northward, into the bleak moorlands of Yorkshire.  There, in a town that we can call Whitby, we shall find what we seek.

 

For a king’s dwelling the place is bare and uninviting.  Built of rough-hewn timber, the cold wind of the north howls about it, through the unglazed openings that serve as windows, and down the rough hole in the roof that is the sole-chimney.  Yet once inside we come into the midst of a very august assembly.

 

There is a rough board table running down the centre of the long smoke-blackened room.  At the head sits a man dressed in course garments, but they are set off by a collar of fur and a great rudely carved gold chain.  He wears on his head a rude gold circlet for a crown.  That is Oswy; King of the Northumbrians and at the moment the most powerful king in England.

 

On his left hand sits one clad in a long grey robe, a man whose gentle face is lined and seamed with years of hard toil, of travelling up and down the land when roads were mere tracks through unbroken forest or over desolate heath, and a traveller must face the perils of starvation and of wild beasts as soon as he leaves the shelter of the town or village and sets his face toward the next goal of his journey.  The man’s head is curiously shaven, bald from crown to the forehead, with a crescent of hair marking the edge of the shaven patch.  This is Colman, leader of the Irish Christian party.

 

Opposite sits a man similarly clad in a plain grey robe.  But this man’s face is stronger altogether.  The heavy line between his brows, the obstinate set of the thin lips, tell of stubborn vigour.  This man can be almost mulish in his obstinacy, and at best is a determined, pushing person, sincere enough perhaps in his religion, but utterly incapable of appreciating anyone else’s point of view.

 

This is Wilfrid, leader of the Roman Church party in Northumbria.  His head is shaved too, but not like Colman’s.  A little bald patch at the crown surrounded by a ring of hair is his fashion.  H despises Colman’s method of tonsuring, as this head-shaving is called.  He says that the man who tried to buy from the Apostles the gift of the Holy Ghost wore his hair like that, and from his name, Simon Magus, Wilfred and his party nickname the others Magians.  Indeed, Wilfred has just been arguing this point with his Irish opponent.

 

The King looks from one party to the other as if in doubt. At last he speaks.

“ We have heard Colman,” he says, “that our Lord spake to the Apostle Peter, saying, ‘Thou art Peter, and upon this rock will I build my Church.’ Also that our lord said to this same blessed Peter, ‘I will give unto thee the keys of he kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Tell me, Colman, has your St Columba any such promise?”

 

For a moment the Irish missionary is dumb; he sees the trap.  Then with a sigh, he shakes his head. 

 

“Then,” continues the King, “ it were best that I agreed with the followers of Peter, lest when my turn comes he lock me out of heaven.”

 

The conference is over.  Colman rises with a sigh.  His work in England is done.  There is nothing left now but to return to Iona, the Holy Island off the rugged Scottish coast, where his abbey lies.  Wilfred smiles triumphantly. His party in the Church have won over to their side the strongest king in England, in whose dominions, moreover, the Irish Church was most powerful.

 

But the subtle King has is own secret.  He reverences and respects St Peter, but it is what St Peter’s successors have done that really moves him to act.

 

For the Irish, or Celtic Church, good men as its clergy might be, could never have developed the parish system, and that the Irish Church might win over all England appeared at one time possible.

 

There was no head of the Irish Church.  Each abbot was lord of his own abbey, and arranged as he thought good for the religious needs of the surrounding districts.  Sometimes there would be a dispute with a neighbouring abbey, and then, since there was no common superior to whom the case might go – for the bishop, so important in the Roman Church, was beneath the abbot in the Celtic Church –quaint things sometimes happened. 

 

There are stories of pitched battles between monks of rival Irish abbeys when some long-standing dispute had grown more than usually bitter.

 

But Oswy wanted to unite England under his rule, and such a Church [Celtic] as this, a group of disunited abbeys owning no common head, would hinder rather than help him in this object.  On the other hand, the Roman Church, every member of which must submit to the Pope, with its bishops and archbishops to keep order and discipline each in his own sphere, acted according to known and definite rules, would be, he hoped, the means of uniting rather than dividing England.

 

That is why in telling the story of the parish we go first to the king’s hall, where at the Synod of Whitby AD 664 it was decided that Roman, not Celtic Christianity should be the religion of England.  For had the verdict gone the other way it is doubtful if the parish as we know it would ever have come into existence.

 

*          *          *

[Further Chapters of our journey through the Parish life of England will follow]

 

 

[Fonts altered-bolding used –comments in brackets are ours!]

 

PART 2

 

2005

H.F.2154/C

  

*  *  *

[ WHY! - ARE WE STILL WAITING AFTER ANOTHER 14 YEARS ?- IF THE WELSH AND SCOTS CAN DO -WHY CAN'T

THE ENGLISH?]

[The English need to associate NOW! to protect their priceless inheritance of CONSTITUTION -CUSTOM - LAW and CHRISTIAN FAITH which should be embedded into  the law of the land before everything we cherish is LOST!

THOSE WHO WILL ACTIVELY SUPPORT OUR AIM ,

PLEASE SEND A POST CARD OF SUPPORT

TO

EDP.ORG.UK.

6 FIELD BARN ROAD,
HAMPTON MAGNA, WARWICK

CV 35 8RT

AFTER 20 years in the POLITICAL ARENA  - THE LEVEL OF SUPPORT WE RECEIVE WILL DETERMINE WHETHER WE AGAIN ENTER THE LISTS AT THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION.]

 

 

 [Daily Telegraph-Wednesday May 2, 2007]

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

 HOME RULE for ENGLAND?

 

*

 

Here's a wheeze to help out the Tories;

HOME RULE

FOR THE

ENGLISH.

by

Simon Heffer

 

[Daily Telegraph-Wednesday May 2, 2007]

It is all too easy to play the dinner party game about Acts of Parliament one  would repeal were one to become Lord protector: a more sophisticated version concern which law should most have made the Statute Book, but never did.

For my part, I am in no doubt: it is the 1886 Irish Home Rule Bill, whose prescience seals for me, Gladstone's position as one of the great peacetime leaders of our country in its history, taking his rightful place - now there's another dinner party game - between Oliver Cromwell and Mrs Thatcher.

Older readers will recall that the Conservative Party, in one of those sporadic moments of profound obtuseness that visits it from time to time, felt it would be a better idea to coerce the Irish. They were assisted in this by Liberal Unionists, with the result that we have had murder, bloodshed, gangsterism, impoverishment and the likes of Gerry Adams and Martin McGuiness ever since.

I suspect I am right in saying that there is no bloody fool today who would think of coercing

SCOTLAND

-no armoured  cars will roll down Princes Street, desperadoes will not occupy Edinburgh's main post office, and no modern -day Black and tans will be picking off rebels in the hills of Fifeshire and the streets of Clackmannan.

If , as seems rather likely, the Scots choose a predominantly SNP government tomorrow in the Holywood elections, it will be a democratic statement of a sort that no sensible person could dream of ignoring. If he becomes

FIRST MINISTER

-Alex Salmond

has promised a referendum on

INDEPENDENCE

within three years.

However distasteful they might find the plebiscite, his coalition partners (mostly likely the Janus faced Liberal Democrats) would obstruct such a plan at their peril.

In three years' time the Scots may choose to say goodbye to the

UNION

-the putrefying remains of which celebrated their

300th Birthday

-yesterday, May 1-2007.

-or they may not, especially if economic reality has kicked in by then.

All that is wrong with this scenario, in which the sun of self-determination ceases to be eclipsed by the moons of gerrymandering and jobbery, is that we

ENGLISH

-don't seem to be getting much of a say in something that profoundly affects us -

STRATEGICALLY and ECONOMICALLY

It is rather like those horrible divorces one hears of in which one party unilaterally decides he or she is off, and goes to the bewilderment, impotence and unheard protests of the other.

There is a way through this that would restore to the

ENGLISH

-some democratic power and, in doing so, elevate the Tory party in the estimation of the

ENGLISH TAXPAYER

-whose burden

SCOTLAND

is: all of which is long overdue.

It is with trepidation that one offers a wheeze to the Tories

-for with such provenance there is a risk that it won't be taken entirely seriously. But Mr Cameron can forbear from sticking pins in his effigy of me for a few moments and read on, he might just learn something to his

ADVANTAGE.

I have my doubts whether the Tories can win an outright majority at the next election. This has, for the moment, nothing to do with

POLICY

-or with any unexpected wonder from Gordon Brown: it is purely about demographics.

Conservatives are strong in the south and east. And in Scotland, they have all but expired, in terms of Westminster MPs. They cannot secure the 324 seats they need for an overall majority -126 more than they hold at present - unless they win back parts of cities such as

BIRMINGHAM

LEEDS

BRISTOL

MANCHESTER

NOTTINGHAM.

In some of these seats they barely have organisations, let alone a chance of winning. It would be a help to pick up the 10 or 11 they used to win in Scotland too, but there isn't a prayer of that.

They might. though, win a majority of the 529 seats in

ENGLAND

This would mean that a Labour or Lib/Lab government could

ONLY PASS LAWS

that solely affected

ENGLAND

-by using votes from MPs whose parts of the Kingdom were not touched by them.

For the Tories to pledge to end this anti-democratic and unfair system ought to make them hugely popular than they are: they should not, in the first instance be afraid to say so.

Even if Labour forms a

GOVERNMENT

-either with or without help from elsewhere, if the Tories reach

265

ENGLISH SEATS

-they should prepare a campaign to ensure that

ENGLISH RIGHTS

-are secured, and

ENGLISH LAWS

-passed without interference from others

Just as Welsh and Scottish ones now are.

 English nationalism is rejected outright by many even quite sensible people: this is because nationalism has horrid connotations that evoke

HITLER and MUSSOLINI

-and because

"ENGLISH"

-suggests something white and therefore racist.

The Conservatives have avoided playing the English card for these reasons, redolent as they seem to be of the "nasty" party.

 

BUT

English nationalism has nothing to do with race.

"ENGLISH"

-at the moment is a geographical term

-and a badge of ethnicity.

If England became  a citizenship once more there would be:

BANGLADESHI ENGLISH

INDIAN ENGLISH

CHINESE ENGLISH

POLISH ENGLISH

-all sorts of ENGLISH.

So there is, or should be, nothing of the Ku Klux Klan about the Tories playing the English card: quite the reverse.

More to the point, the old nationalisms of the 20th century that gave the idea such a bad name were rooted in dictatorships: the Tories' definition of English nationalism would be supremely democratic.

Above all, no one has yet been able to explain satisfactorily to me

WHY

Scottish nationalism is acceptable to polite society

BUT

English nationalism isn't:

I suspect that is because there isn't a satisfactory explanation.

The Tories should say now that at the next election they will campaign on a

Gladstonian

-premise: that there should be a

HOME RULE BILL

for

ENGLAND

Why leave the Scots with the power to call the shots?

Why should it be solely up to them to decide whether the

UNION

-continues?

Why shouldn't their paymasters the English taxpayers have their say too?

If they vote -either by a simple Bill in Parliament

-or through

Referendum

-to sunder the link with Scotland, then that is that. If they vote to retain it, then it would send a strong signal to the Scots that perhaps after all, the family can stay together under one roof, though with a new understanding.

The Tories must see that the tide has turned, if not for good, then certainly for many years to come, against them in Scotland.

Their root to power is in

ENGLAND

-and lies in creating a distinct English polity. If the Tories, even in OPPOSITION, called a DEBATE, just on the principle, and 265 or more English MPs voted for the MOTION. it would then become a question of whether a Labour government, with or without some LibDem quislings, was bloody fool enough to seek to coerce the

ENGLISH

 

[Well this should have been in the minds of those who introduced DEVOLUTION into a disintegrating UNITED KINGDOM. To expect the English to sit idly by while their close neighbours were being encouraged in their Nationalism ambitions at the expense of the English people has been  typical of politicians for over 50 years at least as government publications of the time and since have emphasised the already separativeness of our Welsh and Scottish neighbours. But to consider the breadwinner and major player in the Union

ENGLAND

to have it's own IDENTITY was not allowed to show. It was because of this already favourite treatment of our neighbours at the expense of ENGLAND and it's ignored IDENTITY that the

English Democratic Party.Org UK was formed in 1994. 

*

To continue:

"All the English ask for is equity. We do not wish to keep anyone in our constitutional family against his will: but we also have a right to take some initiative in this matter, rather than always cowering at the whim of the small minority of British subjects who live in Scotland. Our Scottish friends can do the cause of English democracy one huge favour tomorrow, and that is by going out and voting SNP with all their heart.

[The Scottish people did just that on May 1-2007 and on May 14 Alex Salmond was appointed

 FIRST MINISTER.]

 

 

*          *          *

 

'Of the whole sum of human life no small part is that which consists of a man's relations  to his country, and his feelings concerning it.

-Gladstone

 

'I do love my country's good with a respect more tender, more holy and profound than my own life

Shakespeare

 

Stirred up with high hopes of living to be brave men and worthy patriots, dear to God, and famous to all ages.

Milton

 

*  *  *

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

MAY/2007

 

*

 

*  *  *

 

Greek island on front line of Europe's refugee

 

 

route ...

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10121891

 

 

 

· SUE REID: Ringed by a tall razor wire fence in a remote part of

 

 

the pretty Greek island of

 

 

 

Samos, this is a migrant camp with a difference. ... This week the Daily Mail was

 

 

the first British ..

 

 

A Nationality and Borders Bill is currently going through Parliament, with the same aim of helping real refugees and

weeding out the rest. It is understood that if it gets approval next year, the new camps will be high on the agenda soon

afterwards

It was then six weeks away from opening but Ms Patel looked at the floor plans, toured the site under construction and was told of the ultra-secure deportation wing, to be finished by Christmas, for incarcerating inmates rejected for asylum in Europe and with no right to stay.

 

 

According to Mr Axiotis, she heard how the Greek coastguard is also pushing back migrants at sea towards Turkey, a contentious policy about to be introduced by the British in the Channel using Border Force jet ski teams to nudge boats back towards northern France. The Home Office believes Samos-style camps on British soil will make the UK less alluring and reduce illegal Channel crossings.

For who would want to end up living in a camp like it? The story peddled by people-smuggling gangs to drum up their trade is that England is a soft touch, a land of milk and honey where migrants are instantly housed in four-star accommodation or a council house with no questions asked.

The prospect of being locked up in a prison-like fortress, with speedy deportations and rigorous vetting to root out those coming here to harm us, would be far less enticing for people falsely claiming asylum.

‘Camps like Samos would make Britain a safer place for everyone, including the genuine asylum seekers who deserve our help,’ Home Office sources have told us.

A Nationality and Borders Bill is currently going through Parliament, with the same aim of helping real refugees and weeding out the rest. It is understood that if it gets approval next year, the new camps will be high on the agenda soon afterwards.

In Samos, we talked to migrants about what they thought of camp life. Most were put there because they have repeatedly been refused asylum in Greece. They are mightily displeased that they have been stopped from journeying onwards to Germany, Scandinavia, the Netherlands or, favourite of all,

 England.

 

 

[WELL COMING TO ENGLAND IS TANTAMOUNT TO WINNING THE

 

LOTTERY OF LIFE!.]

In hut 126 in the Arab zone, we found an Iraqi Kurd family of four who, until it was pulled down in September, lived in the squalid Samos jungle camp for five years. Now they are in a two-bedroom hut with a kitchen, bathroom and never-ending hot water from the camp’s solar power system. But they are not happy with their lot.

 

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

 

[We advocated this manner of dealing with illegal immigrants some months ago and there can be no objection to ENGLAND following the actions of the EU. in this particular matter.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS... ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

*  *  *
 

HOW IT ALL BEGAN

 BROUGHT FORWARD FROM

NOVEMBER/06

*  *  *

A BLUNDER FOR WHICH WE'LL ALL PAY THE PRICE

A

COMMENTARY

BY

Sir Andrew Green

 

BRITAIN is facing the largest wave of immigration for nearly 1,000 years.  The number of Huguenots in the 17th century and the Jews a century ago are trivial compared to the present flows. Recent GOVERNMENT figures put the net inflow at almost 500 every day

On part of this inflow comes from  the new East European members of the EU.  If these people wish to work, they must register, and today's figures show that the number who have registered since eight countries joined in May 2004 has hit 500,000 mark

THE HOME OFFICE - NEVER LET IT BE FORGOTTEN, PREDICTED THAT THIS FIGURE WOULD BE A MAXIMUM 26,000 OVER TWO YEARS.

[So much for their statistics]

What effect is all this having and how long can we expect it to continue?

For a start, the registration numbers are looking increasingly DUBIOUS. They have never included the self-employed or temporary workers -the Government themselves have added nearly 50% to take account of this. Even more worrying is the real number of East Europeans who have decided to stay in Britain compared with the number the GOVERNMENT claims have stayed.

Official; statistics suggests that three-quarters of them go home within a year. But these figures are based on a passenger survey which focuses almost entirely on Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester -while East Europeans arrive on budget airlines, mainly at Luton, Stansted and regional airports.

The Governor of the Bank of England has complained twice publicly that the numbers of immigrants are so unreliable that he cannot estimate how tight the labour market has become and, consequently whether or not there is a need to raise interest rates.

There is growing evidence of British workers being replaced by East Europeans. And since East Europeans accept lower wages, British workers -from construction workers to truck drivers to flower arrangers -are suffering pay cuts.

 

The East Europeans can afford a lower wage. They are mainly single. They can, and often do, live in very crowded conditions. And, of course they can earn four or five times what the would earn at home.  This is all good news for them and for their employers. East Europeans have established a solid reputation for hard work, turning up on time and making few demands.  Lower wages mean higher profits. They also mean lower inflation and somewhat lower interest rates [Provided the Bank of England can get the correct immigration figure for their calculation]

The Middle Classes are happy too. Cheap nannies, cheaper restaurants and a cheap hand-wash for the gas guzzler.

 

But there are snags. Not only do the low-paid suffer a reduction in wages. Worse, we risk building up an underclass of long-term unemployment.

 

There are a million young people who are neither in work or education. If you add those on incapacity benefit to the unemployed (now at a six year high), you have nearly

5,000,000

-young people who are NOT WORKING and , more importantly have little prospect of doing so for the foreseeable future.

 

Which employer is going to take a young British worker of incapacity benefit when he can take a bright young energetic and probably over-qualified Pole?

 

The Government frequently claims the East Europeans are filling gaps in the labour market. But we have to examine the facts, NOT THE SPIN.  It is five years since the Government first proclaimed that we need immigration to fill

600,000 vacancies in OUR LABOUR MARKET.

Since then, immigration has added about three-quarters of a million to our population. YET believe it or not, VACANCIES are still at

600,000

The REASON is that immigrants are not only filling jobs, but they are also adding to consumer demand, which in turn creates more jobs so that vacancies in the labour market remain the same. 

The Government argument is demonstrably FALSE

The main outcome is that we become an ever-more crowded island. And that is where the shoe really pinches.  The strain on our public services and infrastructure grows by the day.  Children are turning up at school gates with NO ENGLISH and NO WARNING.  Rents are rising sharply as the buy-to-let market booms and house prices rise.  More young people find it impossible to get on the housing ladder as prices spiral.

I do not mean in any way to be critical of the new arrivals. They work hard and fit in. BUT the bottom line is that we are a small island and are already overcrowded-especially in the

SOUTH EAST

The Department of Transport has forecast that traffic on our roads will increase by 30 per cent in the next ten years and by 40 to 50 per cent on motorways. GRIDLOCK APPROACHES. It is time that serious thought was given to how many people we can sensibly accommodate on this island.

Is there any relief in sight? Not in the Third World, from where the majority of immigrants still come.  As for Europe, Romania and Bulgaria are no longer on the horizon but on our doorstep. From next January 2007 30 million people from those countries will be free to enter Britain.

 

In the longer term much depends on how much time it will take these countries, given substantial aid from Brussels, to reach our level of economic prosperity. Poland, the source of 60 per cent of East European immigration, will be a key factor. At present, its wealth per head is only just over a third of ours.

 

Even if its economy grows at five per cent a year (and we maintain our long-term growth of 2.5 per cent), it will be 34 years before they catch up.

Demographics will help. The two most populous countries -Poland and Romania -will both have a declining number of 18 year-olds in the years to come, down by about a third over the next 20 years.

Eventually too, the other EU countries will be obliged to open their labour markets to the new member states.

The biggest factor of all is how long our newcomers decide to stay.

Eventually, the flow of those going home will balance those arriving and we will be in the same situation as we are with say FRANCE.

 

This interchange of people is what the EU is all about. Eventually it will enrich our lives. The Government's mistake has been to rush into the free movement of labour with countries so much poorer than ourselves.

 

It now tries to SPIN this DECISION as a GREAT SUCCESS, hoping perhaps that we will overlook its massive miscalculations which originally forecast ONLY 13,000 East Europeans would come here a year.

 

THE REALITY IS IT IS PUTTING A BRAVE FACE ON A BLUNDER FOR WHICH THE LESS FORTUNATE IN OUR SOCIETY ARE NOW PAYING

*

 

[We have not commented about the usefulness or otherwise of belonging to the EU as we have hundreds of thousands of words already on our bulletin board asking for a quick exit]

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

Sir Andrew Green is chairman of MigrationWatch and former ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria.

NOVEMBER/06

*          *          *

13th October,2007

 

*  *  *

FIRMS 'ABUSE' VISA SCHEME to BRING FOREIGN WORKERS TO UK.

DAILY MAIL

by David Barrett

Home Affairs Correspondent

Thursday, October 14, 2021

 

 

MULTINATIONAL companies are abusing a scheme which allows them to bring foreign workers into Britain, an official report has found.

The Firms are sending lower-skilled employees to the UK under what is supposed to be a programme for highly-qualified, such as IT workers.

Officials said companies 'describe the positions inaccurately' to obtain visa for workers who are brought to the UK under HOME OFFICE'S Intra-Company Transfer scheme, or IVT.

Firms were also found to 'artificially inflate' the value of housing provided to employees, to bring their earnings up to the minimum threshold.

The offenders have become skilled at 'hiding abuses from the Home Office, the

REPORT BY THE MIGRATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MAC) went on.

But despite its concerns, the MAC recommended significant expansion of the scheme. It said foreign workers on an ICT should be able to eventually settle here, and ultimately become British citizens, as with other visa routes.

The ICT system enables international businesses to send employees to their UK branch on a temporary basis. Before the pandemic more than 40000 workers came here every year under the scheme.

In most cases, the staff must have already worked for their overseas for at least 12 months and are supposed to be paid a minimum of £41,500, or an equivalent including allowances such as accommodation. Unlike other similar migration routes, such as the Skilled Worker visa, employees on the ICT are not required to speak English. The report said: 'It was difficult to identify when abuses are occurring, as many of those carrying it out are large companies that are experienced at using the route and are able to hide it effectively.' The MACD recommended the Home Office steps up checks to 'determine whether there is widespred abuse of the rules' focusing on reported salaries and accommodation allowances.

 

DAILY MAIL

by David Barrett

Home Affairs Correspondent

Thursday, October 14,2021

 

*  *  *

H.F.2154/B

*  *  *

WE SHALL BE LOOKING BACK OVER 20 YEARS TO SHOW YOU THAT:  - IMMIGRATION HAS EXPLODED TO OVER 9 MILLION SINCE 1948 - ILLEGAL WARS -THE AFGHAN WAR COST THE HARD -PRESSED TAXPAYER-£22 BILLION AND THE IRAQI WAR COST £10 £BILLION -DAILY MAIL-AUGUST 5-2021 -THE RISE OF THE CURSE! OF MULTICULTURALISM - POLITICAL CORRECTNESS - PENSIONS SMALLER THAN THOSE RECEIVED IN PORTUGAL - LACK OF BOBBIES-ON-THE BEAT- IN FACT IN OUR AREA THERE ARE NONE-POSSIBLY THE SAME EVERYWHERE.-   MORE PRISONS NEEDED- LOCAL POLICE STATIONS  CLOSED- BLOATED PUBLIC PAY IN QUANGOES AND TOP CIVIL SERVANTS...- THREAT FROM CHINA- -REGARDING OUR SECURITY AS A FREE NATION STATE...--ATTACKS AGAINST FREE EXPRESSION AND FREE SPEECH-INTERNAL ENEMIES...-ENGLAND'S SURVIVAL AS A CHRISTIAN - FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE  - IN A LAND CALLED ENGLAND...

POLITICIANS GIVE AWAY OUR  NATIONS SECURITY INTERESTS TO WORLD CORPORATIONS [EQUITY VULTURES] FOR THEM TO MAKE HUGE PROFIT AT THE EXPENCE OF THE TAXPAYER

[WE ARE MAKING CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF OUR BULLETINS OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS BY DELETING MANY BULLETINS

THE SUBJECT OF THE EU TO CONCENTRATE ON HOME MATTERS AND THE THREAT TO OUR SECURITY WITHIN  AND WITHOUT

OUR

SHARED  ISLAND HOME.]

IN SEPTEMBER-2021 WE WILL SHOW OUR VISION OF ENGLAND WHICH WERE SENT TO OUR VIEWERS SINCE 2003

 

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

FOR THE RETURN

OF THE

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

AT

WESTMINSTER

AND

 [A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT FROM WALES AND SCOTLAND - YORK!]

 

*

 

 

 TIME

TO

REMEMBER

 THEM

 

 

 

 

 

[BROUGHT FORWARD from Daily Mail-Saturday ,October 19, 2007]

 

FORGOTTEN HEROES  

 

Their scars may make us flinch. But read the haunting stories of how we've abandoned the wounded soldiers from Blair's wars and weep for our so-called civilised nation...

SATURDAY DISPATCH

by Sarah Sands

[Daily Mail-Saturday ,October 19, 2007]

 

WHEN a British soldier is killed in Iraq or Afghanistan, he is publicly named so that proper tributes can be made. But no one knows about the horrors of the wounded. they are not identified. No official figures are released - indeed ,we have no idea how many there are.

[It appears the Freedom of Information Act is being side -stepped by the Government in order to cover-up the true number and nature of casualties. In the USA there is no attempt to hide the figures because their FOI is with teeth and gets results.

In a democracy the information should be available but as recent events in Lisbon has shown we lost most of our democracy decades ago. We can't blame just the Government but everyone of us who have not taken to the streets to reclaim our ancient freedoms so why should the Government worry about the matter and as we know they DON'T.]

 

The closest estimate is that , in the past six years there have been

5,500

emergency medical evacuations from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Shamed by two conflicts that have no end in sight, the Government does nor care to draw attention to these thousands who have returned home from the battlefields far away - many so horribly maimed and disfigured that even their own relatives have struggled to recognise them.

Nor does it afford them the level of

CARE

they might expect, Britain's last specialist military hospital - at Haslar , near Portsmouth -was closed at the beginning of the year. In its place is an ordinary NHS hospital, Selly Oak in Birmingham, where a single military ward is dedicated to the care of wounded soldiers.

It has 14 beds. Yet in one month alone last year, 145 personnel were flown back from Iraq or Afghanistan requiring medical treatment.

And what then? The lucky ones will get a place at Headly Court Army rehabilitation centre in Surrey - a facility that offers wounded servicemen the best hope of coming to terms with their injuries, yet which one British soldier's young girlfriend, Nicola Curtis, describes bitterly as

'AS THE PLACE NO ONE WANTS TO KNOW ABOUT'

She says: 'The first time you see it, you feel sick with shock seeing all these wheelchairs and amputees and bandaged-up heads...all these terrible injuries, just hidden from the public.'

Small wonder, then, that Forces charities and ex-officers have grown increasingly outraged about a breach of the

'MILITARY COVENANT.'

which states that soldiers and their families should be properly looked after by the STATE in return for their SACRIFICES in the line of DUTY.

 

*

 

 

[Before we continue with the article further we draw your attention to our

CAMPAIGN to raise funds for

 

*          *          *

 

DEDICATED MILITARY HOSPITAL

CAMPAIGN

AUGUST -2007

*

We are at a loss to understand that there are not hundreds of military personnel with distinguished records of service and many with time and money to spare to launch a campaign for

A DEDICATED MILITARY HOSPITAL.

up to now there has only been

SILENCE

possibly we could ask a number of those recently retired  distinguished members of our Armed Forces to give the proceeds of their books showing how they had hoped to raise many important issues with the Government but had to consider their careers and no doubt their pensions and  any PATRONAGE which would help to keep THEIR MOUTHS SHUT.

*

 

To continue:

TO DISCOVER the full scale of that BREACH, I have spoken to the families of some of the wounded in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Stories like theirs have remained hidden from the public, not least because injured soldiers who stay in the Army's employ are prohibited from speaking about their treatment.

But they deserve to be heard for in the face of public indifference and political denial, their courage is as inspiring as it is shaming.

Ilai Derenalagi and his wife Anna are originally from Fiji, but moved to Britain with their daughter in 1999 so that he could join the Army, 'It was a dream for me to move to the Motherland and see Buckingham Palace.' recalls Anna smiling.

Then in April this year, Ilai, 33, was posted to Afghanistan for his second tour of duty. He phoned his wife to say that it had become more dangerous since his previous tour.

HE WAS RIGHT.

Early one July morning, Ilai was accompanying his commanding officer to meet local leaders to Helmand when their Landrover reversed over a landmine. Ilai took the full force of the blast. He was hurled 20m into the air and landed on nearby rocks.

Ilai says:

'I remember looking down on my shattered legs, and feeling my mouth full of blood because shrapnel had gone through my chin.

My body was swollen up from the force of the blast. Then I could hear people shouting around me - they said

 "We are going to pull you away, we will save you"

but I saw the despair  in their faces and tears in their eyes. I said a prayer, confessed my sins and asked ,

"Lord give me life."

Ilai's friends say that although he was barely conscious he called out two things.

First he wanted to know his commanding officer was safe. Second he wanted his Bible, which he always carried with him. (It was subsequently retrieved unscathed, from the wreckage.'

After that, Ilai remembers being taken to the field hospital where surgeons amputated his leg. Attempts to save his other leg would subsequently fail.

His pulse stopped and the doctor reported his death to the commanding officer. Then, after the medical team pumped him with oxygen in a desperate attempt to save him, his breathing started again.

The next think Ilai remembers is waking at Selly Oak hospital and seeing his wife and 17 year -old daughter crying.

During World War II, between 30 to 50per cent of soldiers died from their injuries , In Iraq and Afghanistan it is nearer 10 per cent. That is good news for the wounded returning from the front line today. the bad news is that there are

NO

DEDICATED  MILITARY HOSPITALS

TO CARE FOR THEM

still less a hero's welcome to lift their spirits in their lowest hours.

Most are left to fall back on a relative or loved one, who will have to care for the wounded, with minimal assistance from the State.

Ilai has a wife, Anna.

*

 

 

Rory Mackenzie has a South African girlfriend, Storm. It was a medical miracle that Rory, 25, survived his injuries from a roadside bomb that ribbed through the belly of his tank in Iraq in January.

No one believed that Rory could have survived the blast that tore through him and into the chest of the soldier opposite killing him instantly.

BUT HE DID.

Rory says:

'I remember lifting my head, trying to focus - it was broad daylight, but I couldn't see.

'Then I remember someone saying "One dead, one traumatic amputation" - my leg had been severed in the blast. Then I remember holding the nurse's hand and not letting go. And I remember saying to the surgeon: "Are my balls going to be OK?"

Then I woke up in Selly oak hospital a week later.'

That's when the harsh reality of his new existence began to dawn. Rory had to endure seven separate  amputations on his leg as infections spread up it.

Afterwards he remained in isolation at Selly Oak, where the only people he was allowed to mix with were elderly patients suffering from dementia on a non-military ward, because they carried the least risk of infecting him.

When Storm came to see him, she didn't know what to expect.'I was very nervous,' she says. 'His face was all bruised, he looked like a yellow candle, he had had so many blood transfusions and there were tubes everywhere in his cheeks and his neck. But there were no tears. I was just so happy. I said:

'I am so glad you are alive and I am not going to leave your side."

Storm was in her first year of a fine arts degree, but she let her lecturer know that she would not be returning.

'I can do a degree anytime, Rory needs me now'

The reunion between the wounded soldier and his loved ones is unbearably poignant. The last time wives and girlfriends or mothers saw these men, they were strong and capable.

SUDDENLY THEY ARE HELPLESS

AS Anna Derenalagi recalls:

'When I first saw Ilai at Selly Oak I just broke down in tears, He looked so vulnerable as he lay unconscious.'

I sat there with my daughter reading the Book of Psalms to him and then the Book of Proverbs and then singing songs from church. After about six days he began to twitch and he woke up slowly.

'The doctors had told me what I had to repeat to him:

'You have been in an explosion and your legs have been amputated.'

'He looked at me and said he knew about the explosion and that his legs were injured. Then he said:

"Could you take of my shoes please my legs feel very hot."

'I told him again that he had lost his legs but he thought I was just joking. In the end I took a picture with my camera and showed him, and then he asked.

"Is it really me? Well if that is it then it must be God's purposes."

 

While he was being treated at Headly Court, his mother and girlfriend had nowhere to live. They were temporary housed in a small property available to relatives next to Headly Court which had:

NO HOT WATER

NO FRIDGE

NO WASHING MACHINE

 

TO BE CONTINUED

 

[Last paragraph]

Their wounds may make us flinch.Their wars may be unpopular. But when men like these are being ignored and abandoned, we have no right to call ourselves a civilised nation.

 

 

 

*

 

ARMY CHARITIES:

SSAFA -0845 1300 975

Army Benevolent Fund 0845 241 4828

The Not Forgotten Association 020 7730 2400

 

*

With Remembrance Day in 2007  less than a month away.

A

'Corner of France where it will be forever England'

More Union Jacks are flying along 25 miles of the Normandy coast than in the whole of London.

 

That's what you see between Vierville and Arromanches drenching the seashore, tens of flags laying down easy in the calm of midday, then snapping out in full pride when the evening breeze takes them.

 

This is the last great show of TRUE BRITAIN anywhere on EARTH. And it is in FRANCE, in sunshine and all through the seaside villages behind the monuments on all those famous D-Day beaches.

*

'Battle of the Somme-of 90 years ago'

*

We make no apology in using the above revered term 'Longest' in the way we have used it because we believe the 'Fallen' are with us in our Battle over the next twelve months to protect the

Constitution

and

Conventions

of

our Country

for which millions of our countrymen have died in two World Wars have been almost destroyed by a number of our citizens who have no respect for our

Past History, our Tradition, our Common Law and our Way-Of Life.
 

*

Brought forward from October,2007

[WHAT THE EDP.ORG.UK STATED AT THE TIME.]

 

The Security Services

 and the Safety of YOUR Realm

 

With the Butler Report out this week on the Intelligence Services, we are at the crossroads of whether we follow our Traditional path of Truth and Justice or enveloped into a system of deceit, which is alien to our Culture.

 The Security Services occupy a privileged position in our society as the Guardians with the safety of the Realm and its citizens its prime responsibility and we believe answerable to the People, through our Prime Minister who we sincerely regret has no respect for the Integrity and Honour of Ancient Kingdom or OUR Parliament.

 This is the same First Minister who has only a few weeks ago signed the New European Constitution even though millions of the citizens of this country who in an Election only days before showed that they were adamant that they wished to be governed by their own People.

 He has presided over Security Services, which have not upheld the Independence of their Service to serve our Nation instead of the Cabinet of the day, and has compounded the errors of judgment by appointing a successor as head of MI6, who has more than most betrayed his country.

 

 This same individual it is stated had conveniently sent a note before the Iraq war in order to question the very evidence, which he himself had submitted to No 10 to confirm the need for action. What hindsight he has?

 

With the resignation of the head of the CIA and the statement by a leading Democrat that he and others would not have endorsed the call for war on the evidence now brought to light by the Inquiry it is now necessary for heads to roll at the British end before there is a chance of another cover-up.  

 

The Importance of the holders of the Security of our Nation having the well-being and the trust of the Country is of the paramount importance in the affairs of our Constitution.  No other organisation has such power to intrude into the lives of the citizens of our country. As we have ourselves experienced.

 

Our Party [EDP.org.uk.] is no exception as we have been aware of the interception of our communications over many years –but we have no objection to make so long as we have not been singled out for special treatment because we wish to protect the Integrity of our Ancient Realm.

 

Those who are at present a threat to our Nation we understand either receive a text message requesting the recipient to leave the country or possibly some other means of communication in order to minimize the possible embarrassment to No 10 Downing Street.

 

The Heads of our Security Services must be scrutinised by an Independent All Party Committee to ensure that they are not Servants of the Government. To ensure that the Committee is not biased to the Government, as previously shown, there should be an individual of proved Integrity to override that Committee if need be.

 If this person had been in place prior to the Iraq War there is no doubt there would have been:

No- War.  No- death of 61 of OUR brave soldiers; No - grieving relatives.  No- suicide of a patriotic and loyal servant of the State; No- thousands of innocent Iraqis killed and thousands made homeless, and infrastructure destroyed.  No – extra 5 or more millions of £’s  spent each week for years to come, which are needed to save lives in our country.

 

No- respect for the damage to the Integrity and Honour of our Nation, which will take years to repair. What price the Honour of our Country?  Surely the resignation of all those responsible for the war.

 What has transpired over the Iraq war has brought home to the People that any government intent to undermine the Integrity our once Free Nation State should not have the use of OUR Security Services. 

 

Those responsible for the lies and deceit, at all levels, which led to the Iraq War, must be removed from office and never again allowed to be Members of Her Majesty’s Government.

 

*

13th October,2007

AS we are aware in 2021 - no action was taken regards IRAQ- as was the case of Afghanistan.

 

 

H.F.2154/b

*

 

'I'm sorry': Historic moment Tony Blair FINALLY apologises for Iraq War and admits in TV interview the conflict caused the rise of ISIS

  • Former PM makes the confession after 12 years of refusing to apologise

  • Blair says he is sorry for his conduct which has now led to 'hell' in Iraq

  • Says there is an element of truth that the war caused the rise of ISIS 

  • Comes after Lord Blunkett revealed he had challenged Blair about the war 

 

By Simon Walters and Glen Owen and Martin Beckford and Daniel Bates In New York For The

Mail On Sunday

 

Published: 22:03, 24 October 2015 | Updated: 01:22, 25 October 2015

Tony Blair has finally said sorry for the Iraq War – and admitted he could be partly to blame for the rise of Islamic State.

The extraordinary confession by the former Prime Minister comes after 12 years in which he refused to apologise for the conflict.

Blair makes his dramatic ‘mea culpa’ during a TV interview about the ‘hell’ caused by his and George Bush’s decision to oust Saddam Hussein.

Tony Blair, who has finally said sorry for the Iraq War during an interview on CNN, which is due to be broadcast today 

Tony Blair, who has finally said sorry for the Iraq War during an interview on CNN, which is due to be broadcast today 

In the exchange, Blair repeatedly says sorry for his conduct and even refers to claims that the invasion was a war ‘crime’ – while denying he committed one.

Blair is asked bluntly in the CNN interview, to be broadcast today: ‘Was the Iraq War a mistake?’

He replies: ‘I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong.

‘I also apologise for some of the mistakes in planning and, certainly, our mistake in our understanding of what would happen once you removed the regime.’

Challenged that the Iraq War was ‘the principal cause’ of the rise of Islamic State, he said: ‘I think there are elements of truth in that. 

As well as apologising for the Iraq War, the former Prime Minister also admitted he could be partly to blame for the rise of Islamic State

As well as apologising for the Iraq War, the former Prime Minister also admitted he could be partly to blame for the rise of Islamic State

The TV interview by respected US political broadcaster Fareed Zakaria, also sees Blair be accused of being George Bush's 'poodle' over the conflict 

The TV interview by respected US political broadcaster Fareed Zakaria, also sees Blair be accused of being George Bush's 'poodle' over the conflict 

'Of course you can’t say those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015.’

In the ‘trial by TV’, respected US political broadcaster Fareed Zakaria accuses him of being President Bush’s ‘poodle’ over the conflict. Blair’s confession comes a week after The Mail on Sunday published a bombshell White House memo revealing for the first time how Blair and Bush agreed a ‘deal in blood’ a year before the invasion.

A 2002 briefing note from US Secretary of State Colin Powell to the President showed Blair had secretly pledged to back the conflict – while telling MPs and British voters that he was seeking a diplomatic solution.

An edited extract of Tony Blair's interview with Fareed Zakaria of the Americn CNN TV news network 

An edited extract of Tony Blair's interview with Fareed Zakaria of the Americn CNN TV news network 

In his CNN interview, Blair candidly asks for forgiveness for his blunder in not realising ‘what would happen once you removed the regime’.

The admission makes a mockery of the statement in the Powell memo that Blair would ‘demonstrate [to Bush] that we have thought through “the day after” ’ – a reference to the consequences of invasion.

However, the bloody chaos in the region continues to this day. And in a separate development, former Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett has revealed that he challenged Blair before the war about avoiding chaos after Saddam’s downfall.

The former prime minister with British troops in Basra in Iraq in 2003, soon after Saddam Hussein was toppled 

The former prime minister with British troops in Basra in Iraq in 2003, soon after Saddam Hussein was toppled 

Blair’s confession comes a week after The Mail on Sunday published a bombshell White House memo revealing for the first time how Blair and George Bush, picture,  agreed a ‘deal in blood’ a year before the invasion

Blair’s confession comes a week after The Mail on Sunday published a bombshell White House memo revealing for the first time how Blair and George Bush, picture,  agreed a ‘deal in blood’ a year before the invasion

Lord Blunkett says Blair failed to give him such ‘reassurances’ – and instead placed blind faith in the two main ‘hawks’ in the US administration, Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Lord Blunkett also vented his fury that Sir John Chilcot, who is leading the long-delayed inquiry into the Iraq War, had failed to ask him to give evidence.

BLAIR'S 'MEA CULPA' COMES AFTER 12 YEARS OF NON-APOLOGIES  

'I will not apologise for the conflict. I believe it was right.' House of Commons 2004

‘I don’t think we should be apologising at all for what we are doing in Iraq. We should be immensely proud. I can’t take responsibility for people sending car bombs into a market place.’ TV interview , 2007 

I may have been wrong, but I did what I thought was right for our country.’ When he resigned as PM, 2007

[If he had known there were no WMDs] ‘I would still have thought it right to remove Saddam.’ TV interview, 2009

‘It was a headline question. It had to have a headline answer. Answer “Yes” and I knew the outcome: “Blair apologises for war”, “At last he says sorry”. I can’t say sorry in words; I can only hope to redeem something from the tragedy of death, in the actions of a life, my life, that continues still.’ Memoirs , 2010

‘When people say to me, “Do you regret removing him”, my answer is, “No – how can you regret removing somebody who was a monster?” ’ TV interview , 2013

‘Given my front-row seat at these events, I am mystified Chilcot has not asked me to provide either oral or written evidence,’ Lord Blunkett told The Mail on Sunday. 

‘I would have thought that over the six years the inquiry has been going on, Sir John would have found the time to ask the then-Home Secretary what he knew.’

Blair’s confession about the Iraq War and the rise of IS is in stark contrast to his repeated refusal to shoulder the blame for the conflict, or its long term consequences. In 2004, he told MPs: ‘I will not apologise for the conflict. I believe it was right.’

He stuck to his hard line in 2007, saying: ‘I don’t think we should be apologising at all for what we are doing in Iraq.’

DAVID BLUNKETT: ‘I WARNED BLAIR THAT TAKING MILITARY ACTION AGAINST SADDAM CARRIED RISKS'

Former Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett has revealed that he challenged Blair before the war

Former Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett has revealed that he challenged Blair before the war

During the Cabinet meetings we held in the run-up to the Iraq War, I warned Tony Blair that taking military action against Saddam carried risks.

As the US embassy memo obtained by the Mail on Sunday correctly indicates, I was worried about the impact on our social cohesion if British muslims wrongly interpreted it as an attack on their community.

But I was also extremely concerned about what would happen after we had removed Saddam.

Make no mistake - I was in favour of the war, based on the information we were presented with. But I would have been a stronger advocate if I could have received any reassurance that US Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had a plan for ‘the day after’.

I did not receive that reassurance.

Tony was not able to say what was going to happen when combat operations were over. I think he had just decided to trust Cheney and Rumsfeld.

For understandable diplomatic reasons, the Prime Minister wanted to stay alongside and influence US leadership. However, it is now clear that the Americans had no intention of listening to us.

With the benefit of hindsight, we now know that they had decided to embark on the complete de-Ba’athification of Saddam’s Iraq by dismantling the entire Governmemt infrastructure.

This led to the disintegration of any form of functioning government, creating a complete power vacuum. Terrorists infiltrated Iraq and stirred discontent.

I am not seeking to scapegoat Tony Blair; we were all collectively to blame for deluding ourselves into believing that we had much greater sway over Washington.

But given my front row seat at these events, I am mystified that Sir John Chilcot has not asked me to provide either oral or written evidence to his inquiry.

Indeed, it is not clear to me that the degree of post-conflict planning by Britain and the US - and whether there are lessons to be learned - even forms a focus of Chilcot.

I would have thought that over the six years since the £10 million inquiry was established, Sir John would have found the time to ask the then-Home Secretary what he knew.

Time is ticking on. Given that it looks as if we will have to wait until at least 2017 for his report, I think it would be useful if Sir John could set out now the basic parameters of what he has established - or risk his entire exercise being totally discredited.

Remarkably, Blair himself predicted how the apology U-turn he finally makes today would be reported.

In his 2010 memoirs, he explained why he had so far refused to say ‘yes’ when asked if he was sorry, because he knew it would prompt damaging headlines.

‘Answer “Yes” and I knew the outcome: “BLAIR APOLOGISES FOR WAR”, “AT LAST HE SAYS SORRY”. I can’t say sorry in words.’

His apology is bound to prompt claims that he is trying to head off the scathing criticism of his handling of the Iraq War expected to be included in Chilcot’s findings.

All the key figures, including Blair and other senior Labour politicians, are understood to have been given notice of the broad thrust of Chilcot’s verdict on them, expected to be made public next year.

As a master of public relations and media manipulation, Blair may have calculated that since Chilcot is likely to accuse him of major errors of judgment, it is better for him to volunteer an apology now, rather than be forced to do so if, as seems certain, Chilcot’s damning assessment gives him little choice. The former Prime Minister’s decision to make his apology in the US, as opposed to the UK, is also significant.

Far from presenting his apology in a harsh critical light, CNN interviewer Zakaria, a personal friend of Blair, showers praise on him for being the only interviewee in the programme who ‘took responsibility for Iraq’ on camera.

Most of the others involved in the show, senior US political and military figures, blamed each other.

The Colin Powell memo – which this newspaper found among declassified US State Department documents while searching through a cache of Hillary Clinton’s recently released emails – was written in March 2002, a week before Mr Blair met Mr Bush for a summit at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.

In our report, which made headlines around the world, we revealed that Powell had said Blair ‘will be with us’ should the US take military action in Iraq and that the ‘UK will follow our lead’.

Blair would handle ‘public affairs lines’ for persuading people that Saddam posed a real threat – in fact, after the war, it was discovered Blair’s claims following the Crawford summit about Iraq’s ‘weapons of mass destruction’ were false.

Lord Blunkett told The Mail on Sunday yesterday how he challenged Blair during Cabinet meetings prior to the war about the level of post-conflict planning for Iraq.

As one of Blair’s most loyal Ministers, Lord Blunkett said he repeatedly sought reassurances that the US had a coherent plan to govern Iraq after the fall of Saddam.

He added: ‘I did not receive that reassurance. Tony was not able to say what was going to happen when combat operations were over. He just decided to trust Cheney and Rumsfeld.

‘With the benefit of hindsight, we now know that they had decided to embark on the complete de-Ba’athification of Saddam’s Iraq by dismantling the entire Government infrastructure.

‘This led to the disintegration of any form of functioning government, creating a complete power vacuum. Terrorists infiltrated Iraq and stirred discontent.

‘I am not seeking to scapegoat Tony Blair; we were all collectively to blame for deluding ourselves into believing that we had much greater sway over Washington.’ Lord Blunkett echoed calls for Chilcot to release an interim copy of his findings immediately or ‘risk his entire exercise being entirely discredited’.

Significantly, in the CNN show, host Zakaria gives his own apology, telling viewers that he regrets his own initial support for the war.

He says he changed his mind after watching the post-war turmoil unfold and witnessing the bloody rise of IS. Viewers may draw the conclusion that Blair came to the same decision for the same reason.

  • Blair’s apology airs on Fareed Zakaria: GPS on CNN Europe at 11am and 7pm today, and features in the documentary Long Road To Hell: America In Iraq, which airs on CNN Europe at 1am on Tuesday.

END

By Simon Walters and Glen Owen and Martin Beckford and Daniel Bates In New York For The

Mail On Sunday

Published: 22:03, 24 October 2015 | Updated: 01:22, 25 October 2015

*

IRAQ WAR FILE

*

GUILT!

'The consequences of our crimes long survive their commission, and like the ghosts of the murdered, forever haunt the steps of the malefactor.'

WALTER SCOTT.

'Those who engage in iniquitous designs miserably deceive themselves when they think they will go so far and no further; one fault begets another; one crime renders another necessary; and thus they are propelled continually downward into a depth of guilt, which at the commencement of their career they would have died rather than have incurred.-

SOUTHEY.

The guilt being great, the fear doth still exceed.

- SHAKESPEARE

*

[HEADING & COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 
 
 

A [REMINDER OF SACRIFICE IN WAR AND WHY THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR ILLEGAL CONFLICTS-HAVE STILL YET TO BE PUNISHED - WHY THE DELAY?]

 

Brought forward from

Thursday, August 31, 2006.

 

 

ABANDONED HEROES

FIGHTING AND DYING ON £2 AN HOUR–IRAQ – AFGHANISTAN – AND OTHER CONFLICTS – WHY?

 

 

*

ABANDONED HEROES

 

HOW I SEE IT

 

by

Robert Hardman

 *

Daily Mail

Thursday, August 31, 2006.

  

JUST STANDING UP

causes Dave Corrigan MUCH PAIN.

Injured in Iraq, evacuated to Britain, this gallant Para was dumped at an RAF base in the middle of the night and left to hitchhike his way home.

Three years on, his leg is getting worse. And the worse part of it? Officialdom doesn’t want to know.

Like numerous ex-soldiers, his only ally these days is a charity, which has been quietly tending the unsung casualties of every Army deployment since World War II.  But it has never faced a crisis like this.

The problem is a simple one: our generosity appears to be drying up.

 Much as we salute the heroism of our forces when the bands strike up on the big anniversaries, we have become increasingly reluctant to help our service charities since the invasion of Iraq.

‘I am afraid that the sums speak for themselves,’ says Major General Sir Evelyn Webb-Carter, controller of the Army Benevolent Fund (ABF)

‘if a cause captures the public’s imagination, the money follows. After the Falklands conflict, the public donated £11 million for the three services.

 

‘After the first Gulf War, which lasted 100 hours, the British people donated £3.5 million. More than three years after the [illegal] invasion of Iraq, we have raised less than £400,000.  When it’s an unpopular cause the money does not follow.’

 Iraq has already claimed the lives of 116 British troops. More than 4,000 have been airlifted home on medical grounds, some with appalling injuries.

 Some will return to active duty or busy lives elsewhere.  Many, though, will have lasting problems. When these soldiers and their families need those things that make a real difference – the new wheelchair, the new plastic limb, the therapy sessions, the stair lift, the educational grant to help the difficult teenager whose Dad is never coming home – they won’t get them from the Government.  They will turn to organisations like the ARMY BENEVOLENT FUND.

 

The Fund needs to raise £5 million a year to cope with existing demands. It is  about to receive many more calls on its resources from those affected not just by Iraq but also events in Afghanistan (with the latest death –bringing the total to 14   and no doubt many casualties to be cared for). But if we are not prepared to top up the pot, then that £5,000,000 is going to have to be spread far wider.

 

Hence the urgent need for funding events such as next month’s

Music On Fire!,

 a spectacular concert of music and several tons of fireworks (sponsored by the Daily Mail), which will explode above Sandhurst over three nights.

September  23,23 and 24th.

Certainly, without charities like the ABF, life would be very much worse for Dave Corrigan, 46, a married father-of-one.  A former lance Corporal in the Parachute Regiment, he became an ambulance driver in civilian life but remained a devoted member of the Paras’ Territorial Army wing.

In 2003, the part-time soldier was ordered to war with 16 Air Assault Brigade as an ambulance field commander.

‘I was very proud to go out to Iraq and do my bit. That’s what we trained for,’ he tells me at his County Durham home.

In March 2003, he damaged his knee falling out of a speeding ambulance in a nasty battle near Adalya.  Medics diagnosed a serious trauma to the knee and ordered him back, the UK for treatment.

 But on arrival at RAF Halton in Buckinghamshire he was told to see a GP and sent on his way in the middle of the night without so much as a travel warrant. He hitched a lift all the way back to Darlington.

Eventually, he received two botched operations in a military hospital before being medically discharged in 2004.  The Army had washed its hands of Corporal Corrigan, even though he was anything but mended.

The pain in his leg was so severe he feared for his job as an ambulance driver. He had no joy with his local MP –

a certain Tony Blair – but his case was raised in the Commons by a Tory. Eventually, a junior Defence Minister apologised for the way he had been treated. But, by now, he could barely walk.

 With a six-month wait for an operation, Mr Corrigan had no alternative but to go private – except that his savings were not enough to cover the £4,000 cost of the operation.  In desperation, he turned to the ABF, who investigated his case and quickly agreed to foot the bill.

‘They were fantastic – both with their advice and their funding,’ he says. When you are this low, it means a lot to have an organisation like the ABF with you.

 Darren Swift, 40, is equally indebted. In 1991, an IRA bomb in Belfast cost him both legs and two fingers.  The tough Lance Corporal in the Royal Greenjackets suddenly faced life in a wheelchair.

‘The regiment were great, but I needed a new direction,’ he says.  He met Al Hodgson, another ex-soldier who had also last his legs to terrorists, and the pair wanted to

prove themselves with a daring canoe expedition down a treacherous Canadian river. An ABF grant helped it happen and it changed their lives.

With renewed confidence the two men took up skydiving and ended up as national champions. Mr Swift’s other achievements include wheeling himself across Ireland for charity and a side-line in film stunts – which got him a role in Band of Brothers.  ‘We formed a group called Amputees In Action. When producers want people blown to pieces on camera, they come to us.’ He chuckles.

 Married with a young daughter, he is irrepressible. We meet in a wind tunnel, of all places. It is called Airfix, a gravity-defying tube in Milton Keynes which replicates the sensation of falling out of a plane.  You stand in the doorway above a safety net, fall forwards and float around on a carpet of air blasting up.  With the help of another ABF grant, Mr Swift is here learning how to become a skydiving inspector. And he has also perfected the first snowboard for amputees.

This remarkable man is eternally grateful to the ABF, as is David Loftus. ‘They have seen it all before’ says the chaplain of the Royal Military School of Music as he speeds about its Twickenham HQ in his electric wheelchair.  His cheerful enthusiasm makes ‘the padre’ one of the most popular figures round here but he wasn’t always so upbeat.

 Back in 1980, Mr Swift was playing the tuba in the band of the Queen’s Own Hussars, stationed in Hong Kong. His duties extended well beyond music.  He was on border patrol in a remote corner of the New Territories when a typhoon struck. Sheltering beneath a ground-sheet a bolt of lightning struck his radio set and he felt a sharp tingling through his body.

 A quick check-up suggested that he was fine and he resumed his duties until a few weeks later when his legs gave way.

The military hospital checked him out and came back with a grim diagnosis. ‘They said: “Your knee joints are cooked.”  His days in the band were over. He left the Army for a job with a charity but, by 1996, he could barely walk with a stick.

A knee replacement failed and following a deep infection and a pulmonary embolism, there was no alternative to an amputation in 2000. ‘That brought a whole new set of problems. It wasn’t a life. It was an existence.

 But he didn’t give up He and his wife, Ros, a secretary, set out to raise the £68,000 needed to alter their Middlesex home.  When a council grant and their savings fell £10,000 short, he turned to the ABF. ‘We were in a very vulnerable position but they knew these problems instantly and their advice and funding sorted everything out.’

 As a result, Mr Loftus is now determined to ‘put something back’, working with a youth band and part-time as chaplain at the school. ‘The Army is like a family. You never really leave it and it never leaves you,’ he says.

Like all families, though, it has its breaking point. Right now, it needs the rest of us. But if we are going to send it off to fight our wars, charge it with war crimes when we don’t like the results and turn our backs on it when the injured stagger home, then we should not be surprised if ,one day, there is no one to protect us at all.

 

*          *         *

 

Please Help Us To Continue Our Vital Help –NOW!

 

Music On Fire!

(Music and Fireworks)

For Three Days

 

September 22, 23 and 24. For tickets, contact 0870 606 3473 or www.ticketmaster.co.uk

 

Donations  

to the

Army Benevolent Fund,

41 Queen’s Gate, London SW7 5HR

 

*          *          *

 [There can be no question that we should all do what we can to alleviate the pain and suffering of members of our Armed Forces whatever the foreign policy of the Government.

 

Many people rightly are very angry to put it mildly about the Government’s willingness to take our country to war in circumstances where the legality of that war is questioned particularly as the Attorney-General at the time on first finding the war unlawful later changes his opinion to fit the Government’s intentions.

 

We believe there is a case for the Prerogative  (‘such powers as are exercisable by the Executive Government without express authority from Parliament’) of the Prime Minister in declaring war should in future be a matter for a Select Committee of the House of Common s chaired by Ambassadors’ and others of integrity in  the Intelligence Services and Security Services.  We can no longer permit the question of War and Peace to be left the sole prerogative of an individual with power to override all opinion.

 

With regard to the Care of our Armed Forces during and in the aftermath of a war there should be the subject of a Bill passed through Parliament for the sole purpose of insuring that no member of our Fighting Services should have to rely on CHARITY for the vital necessities which each of us would wish to obtain if we were in the plight of the individuals as detailed in the above narrative who are no doubt a few of many thousands of ex-servicemen and women who have NOT received the Care and Attention from a Government with an annual budget of £9000,000,000,000

-the 4th richest country in the world.

 

Our soldiers are fighting and dying for £2 an hour-D.Mail-11/9/06.

 

The truth is that MONEY appears to be the criteria on which the Ministry of Defence decides many important decisions with regard the LIFE and DEATH of our brave servicemen and women.

Of course there will always be a place for charitable giving which would provide further help for those in need after their just needs have been met by the department that sent them to war.

 

 

Our purpose is to insure that in future it should be a right for our Armed Forces in the event of injury to expect exemplary treatment from the MoD and NOT as at present a question of cost. If a Government decides to go to war and ONLY if our country or our friends abroad are in danger then the question of COST must be put aside for the duration of the conflict and in the aftercare how ever long it may be required.

 

WE believe that a new Bill under the title :

 

Care and Treatment of our Armed Forces Bill

-should be introduced in Parliament.

 

s with the Terrance Rattigan play of the cadet who was falsely accused and punished for cashing a cheque in

 

‘The Winslow Boy’

 

We expect that a member of the House of Commons should take it on his or her shoulders to contest with the MoD the injustice to the members of our Armed Forces by the actions and inactions of that department.

 

As in the ‘Winslow Boy’ we and we are sure millions of people are with us for a Fiat

A

‘PETITION OF RIGHT’

 

TO

‘LET RIGHT BE DONE’

 

The Attorney-General whose place it is to agree the Fiat will after all be able to redress for the future the damage done by the illegal war in Iraq and enable charges to be brought against the MoD for their mishandling of their priority of the Care and Treatment of our Fighting Services.

 

The Bill should be named:

 

The Care and Treatment of our Armed Forces Bill

*          *          *

[Font altered –bolding & underlining used –comments in brackets.]

AUGUST/06

 

ADDED NOV 1-2015

 

 

BRITISH FORCES (OVERSEAS) BULLETINS

 

 

B F 1-BLAIR'SCRAPED THE BARREL' TO JUSTIFY INVASION OF IRAQ****B F 2-The Security Services and the Safety of YOUR REALM****B F 3-It's impossible to win a conflict without enough men on the ground.****B F 4-FIVE WARS BLAIR TO REDUCE OUR ILLUSTRIOUS FIGHTING REGIMENTS****B F5-The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at further RISK!**** B F 6-IRAQ NOT WORTH THE LIFE OF ANOTHER BRITISH SOLDIER****B F 7-Former Chief of Defence Intelligence supports Whistleblowers****B F 8-TONY BLAIR-THE MAN WHO NEVER DID-YET!****B F 9- The JUSTIFICATION for WAR offered by MR BLAIR may have been the  WRONG ONE, but it was a JUST WAR-says DAILY TELEGRAPH ****.  B F 10-A TROOPER and a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE****B F 11-House of Commons must REGAIN its RESPONSIBILITY****B F 12-Why wont Mr Ingram realise he CANNOT compare FUNDING of ARMY RECRUITMENT TRAINING with PRIVATE CORPORATIONS****B 490-TONY BLAIR WILL NOT ADMIT INVASION OF IRAQ MADE BRITAIN VULNERABLE TO TERRORIST ATTACK-ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS-IT DID!****B484-ABANDONED HEROES FIGHTING AND DYING ON £2 AN HOUR-IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN-AND OTHER CONFLICTS-WHY?****B492-TELL THE TRUTH!-MR BLAIR-OF HOW LONG OUR TROOPS WILL REMAIN IN AFGHANISTAN****B 499-Three more British deaths take Afghan toll to 19 in 6 days.****B 501-SADDAM HAD NO LINK TO AL QAEDA-says THE SENATE of the USA***B 504-BLAIR CONFESSES HIS FAULTS BUT STILL CONTINUES WITH HIS DISASTROUS POLICIES.****

 

 

[OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS  WE HAVE SHOWN A GREAT NUMBER OF BULLETINS WITH REGARD TO OUR ARMED SERVICES WHO WERE NOT ALWAYS GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS TO DO THE JOB- MR HOON-COMES TO MIND-SHORTAGE OF BODY ARMOUR AND SUITABLE AND SAFE TRANSPORT. THE ABOVE ARTICLES ARE BUT A FEW OF THE MANY BUT WE WILL ADD TO THE LIST OVER THE FOLLOWING WEEKS. A VISIT TO IRAQ FILE & BULLETIN FILE WILL REVEAL MUCH INFORMATION.]

 

 

FOR FURTHER INFO GO TO:

PT 2/ PT3/PT4/PT5/PT6

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

Blair’ scraped the barrel’ to justify Invasion of Iraq.

 

An article on Monday the 12th July 2004 by

James Chapman –Political Correspondent of the

Daily Mail

 

Tony Blair’s claim before the Iraq invasion that Saddam Hussein posed a ‘current and serious’ threat to Britain came under devastating fire last night.

 

John Morrison former deputy chief of Intelligence at the Ministry of Defence, accused Downing Street of ‘scraping the barrel’ in an attempt to justify war.

 

He also alleged that intelligence officials were pressurised to lie about the effectiveness of earlier military action against Saddam.

 

The explosive claim centres on Operation Desert Fox, when America and Britain bombed Baghdad in 1988 to inflict damage on Saddam’s military capability.

 

Mr Morrison said spy chiefs were asked to declare the operation a success-though they thought the opposite was true.

 

‘We concluded it really hadn’t done much harm at all,’ he said.

 

‘We were being pressured to say something had been effective when in the long run we decided that it hadn’t been particularly effective.

 

‘That had never happened in my career before, and I didn’t like it very much. [Well this despicable action by Downing Street then and later will  be known as the ‘Deceitful Years’ to future historians.]

 

‘I’m sure Number Ten wanted it to be a success and I’m sure the MoD wanted it to be a success.

 

‘But wanting it does not make it so. I actually sent a note round to all the analysts congratulating  them on standing firm in the face, in some cases, of individual pressure to say things that they knew weren’t true.’

 

The Prime Minister’s chief of staff Jonathan Powell and John Scarlett, [We may have been privileged to see this man in his mop head disguise some month’s ago?], chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee- which oversaw the drawing up of the infamous Iraq arms dossier-are among those expected to face censure.

 

In another blow to Mr Blair’s case for war, there were claims yesterday that M16 has taken the rare step of retracting crucial evidence about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.

 

The claims came from a senior intelligence source interviewed by the BBC’s Panorama programme.

 

The source said spy chiefs have withdrawn the intelligence assessment that suggested Saddam was continuing to build a stock-pile of lethal chemical and biological weapons.

 

Their unusual move will be seen as an admission that the evidence was fundamentally unreliable.

 

Though Mr Blair admitted last week there may be no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, pressure is now building on him to apologise for leading Britain to war on false pretences.

 

Dame Pauline Neville-Jones, former head of the Joint Intelligence Committee, insisted responsibility for intelligence failings lay firmly with Mr Blair.

 

She said the ‘buck must stop’ with the Prime Minister.

[ We can accept that with the proviso that those who belong to the Intelligence Services also have their part to play as shown in the above remarks of Mr Morrison but the fact remains that if the members of the Service had put their jobs at stake there is every possibility there would have been no Iraq war.

 

We have to remember the courageous action of Dr David Kelly  in speaking out when others remained silent and who will always be remembered for his sacrifice by those who love their country]             

[Please note all comments in brackets are those of the EDP]

*

13th October,2007

H F 2154/B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REISSUED  - OCTOBER 5,2021

B484/2154/B

 
 
 
 

 

THESE THREATS

FROM MACRON' SHAME OUR

 COUNTRY.

 By Nabila Ramdani with Britain

 

is a French Algerian journalist, broadcaster and academic specialising in Anglo-French issues

DAILY MAIL

 

OCTOBER 7-2021

 

ANGRY French workers often burn barricades and launch savage attacks on the police during demonstrations. The Republic was built by citizens who would stop at NOTHING -including liberal use of the guillotine - TO GET WHAT THEY WANTED.

 The latest target is the British Christmas. Yesterday the Daily Mail revealed how French fishermen, angry at the delay in receiving licences to tap into British waters, have threatened to BLOCKADE food from France, creating more headaches for families already under pressure to stock up on turkeys and chocolate.

This outrageous action comes hot on the heels of threats to CUT POWER to JERSEY - potentially affecting schools and hospitals in the coldest months of the year - and the news that France allegehameddly 'stole' five million Covid vaccines destined for Britain at the beginning of this year.

'Unless Boris backs down, the Brits will not have so msany nice things to eat this Christmas'. Oliver Lepretre, head of the northern France fisheries committee, said earlier this week. I hope it doesn't come to that.'

AS a French woman, I can only feel ashamed. This sense of rowdy entitlement is not just about angry workers; it extends from bottom to top. as the British all too well.

 Emmanuel Macron's highhanded attitude to the BREXIT negotiations made every step more difficult. Even the French media are now comparing our head of state to Napoleon Bonaparte, suggesting that 'Napo-Macron' wants to use sea blockade to 'starve the English' into compliance.

The EU Commission should pull France into line and stop this bickering before it gets out of hand. THE alternat6ive is calling on the Royal Navy, which could have serious consequences.

.Responsible politicians should be outraged by such guerrilla tactics, but not in France, where there has been no attempt to condemn the fishermen's UNLAWFUL REPRISALS whatsoever.

unisOn the contrary, senior Macron lieutenants have made it clear they want to add to the SABOTAGE by preventing British fishermen delivering fish to France.

a

They would also li9ke to toughen up customs and veterinary checks on all vehicles arriving from the UK, causing INCREASED DELAYS.

Most shameful, however, is the THREAT TO CUT POWER of the fishing  to BRITISH SOVEREIGN TERRITORY as part of the fishing row. Clement Beaune, Mr Macron's Europe minister , has implied that ELECTRICITY SUPPLIES to the CHANNEL ISLANDS of JERSEY and GUERNSEY, which are provided by two undersea cables from France could be interrupted within days.

'WE DEFEND OUR INTERESTS' Mr Beaune fumed. 'WE do it nicely and diplomatically, but when that doesn't work, we take measures. The Channel Islands, the UK, are dependent on us for their energy supply. They think they can live on their own and badmouth Europe as well. And because it doesn't work, they indulge in one-upmanship, and in an aggressive way.'

If all this suggests that the Macron government is still extremely bitter about Britain's historic decision to leave the EU, then it's because it still is.

Indeed, it woiuld be fair to say the latest salvo in the so-called 'Scallop War' is simply another battle in France's

NEVER ENDING HOSTILITY TOWARDS

 BREXIT.

The influential Paris investigative weekly Le Canard Enchaine (The Chained Duck) summed up the situation in nits latest edition, saying

'FRANCE HAS CALLED FOR A COMMON FRONT AGAINST THE UK.'

 This means 'Admiral Macron' - as he is dubbed-using sea blockades, in the style of the Napoleonic Wars. 'So he wants to starve the English?' the magazine asks, as it compares him to Napoleon, the dictator who was constantly at war with the British . 'Napo Macron will establish a new continental blockade like his illustrious predecessor.

The Napeonic parrallels were clear last May when two Royal Naval gunships steamed to Jersey after dozens of French boats blockaded the islands harbour.

Mr Macron originally described BREXIT as a 'crime' and has done all he can to undermine Anglo-French relations since.

Last year he caused outrage by suggesting the UK's Oxford-Astra-Zeneca waS QUAsi-ineffective among the over-65s, and that the over-60s should not be encouraged' by its results.

Now it has emerged that Mr Macron allegedly plotted with EU bigwigs to halt exports of the jabs, in what has been described by one British Government source as 'AN ACT OF WAR'. President Macron has also been accused of stirring up violence by insisting that the post-BREXIT UK must stick  to the NORTHERN ISLAND PROTOCAL, despite the threat this poses to PEACE and STABILITY in the REGION.

 His ministers have also taken up hard-line positions in the never-ending dispute over thousands of unregistered migrants travelling from northern France to the coast of France enabling desperate migrants to enter the UK with ease, while BLOCKADING GOODS.

Mr Macron is also angry with Britain over it's alliance with AUSTRALIA and the US, which  has resulted in a £50 billion-plus French contract to build submarines for Australia being scrapped.

Mr Beaune said dismissively that far from becoming GLOBAL BRITAIN, the Aukus alliance was' a return into the American lap and a form of accepted vassalisation '.

A common thread in these face-offs is the fact that Mr Macron and his cronies are preparing for a presidential election in April [2022].  Mr Macron is determined to win a second five-year term and establish himself as the defacto EU leader after the retirement of German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

As France moves further to the Right, Mr Macron knows he has to attract extreme nationalistic voters to defeat rivals such as Marin Le Pen of the National Rally  party.

An obvious way of doing this is for 'Napo-Macron to take on his country's historic enemy at every opportunity, so prepare for Britain to be blamed for every French ill in the coming months. He  might not win every battle, but if Mr Macron finds himself back inside the Elysee Palace, his aggression  will have served him well -whatever it does for Britain's relations with one of its closest neighbours.

*  *  *

 Nabila Ramdani is a French-Algerian journalist, broadcaster and academic specialising in Anglo-French issues.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS ETC. ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 7,2021

H.F.2154 /B
 

  A REMINDER OF PAST PROMISES OVER 20 YEARS STILL TO BE COMPLETED BY IN THE MAIN-THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY.

WE SHALL BE LOOKING BACK OVER 20 YEARS TO SHOW YOU THAT  - IMMIGRATION HAS EXPLODED TO OVER

9 MILLION SINCE 1948 - ILLEGAL WARS - THE RISE OF THE CURSE! OF MULTICULTURALISM - POLITICAL

CORRECTNESS- PENSIONS SMALLER THAN THOSE RECEIVED IN PORTUGAL - LACK OF BOBBIES-ON-THE

BEAT-  PRISONS -  POLICE STATIONS CLOSED...-BLOATED PUBLIC PAY IN QUANGOES AND TOP CIVIL

SERVANTS...-  CHINA -REGARDING OUR SECURITY AS A FREE DEMOCRATIC NATION STATE...-POLITICAL

CORRECTNESS-ATTACKS AGAINST FREE EXPRESSION AND FREE SPEECH-INTERNAL ENEMIES...-ENGLAND'S

SURVIVAL AS A FREE INDEPENDENT - CHRISTIAN NATION STATE - IN A LAND CALLED ENGLAND...

 *  *  *

WE NOW HEAR  ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 18-Daily Mail -THAT THE HOME SECRETARY PRIT PATEL IS TO SPEND MILLIONS ON A £2m RECEPTION HALL FOR THE THOUSANDS OF UNWELCOME VISITORS FROM FRANCE . AS WE HAVE STATED BEFORE ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO AN ISLAND DESTINATION  OFF THE MAINLAND AND NOT ALLOWED TO RETURN TO THE MAINLAND  UNTIL THEIR RIGHT TO REMAIN IS ESTABLISHED -_THIS WAY THOSE CROSSING FROM FRANCE WILL ONLY SPEND A SHORT TIME ON MAINLAND ENGLAND - AND THIS MAY HAVE THE DESIRED AFFECT OF REDUCING IMMIGRATION BY THOUSANDS. AS IT WAS IN THE INTERESTS OF ISRAEL TO HAVE BRITAIN AND USA TO FIGHT THEIR CLOSE ENEMIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST... - CAN WE TRUST THE HOME SECRETARY WHO WAS CENSORED FOR HER SECRET VISIT TO ISRAEL- TO PUT THE INTERESTS OF ENGLAND

 FIRST?

LATEST! in  OCTOBER 2021-A THREAT TO OUR FUEL SUPPLIES FROM RUSSIA. WHY WE ASK IS THE UK STILL DEPENDENT ON FOREIGN SUPPLIES-WHEN WE KNOW THE ANSWER BUT STILL IGNORE THE DANGER OF FAILURE IN SUPPLYING OUR OWN STOCKS FROM OUR OWN KNOW-HOW AND RESOURCES?

*  *  *

UK PRODUCTION = 48%

TANKERS = 5%

EUROPEAN PIPELINE = 47%

Daily Mail, Friday, October 8,2021
 
 

 

This is the price of the Church prostrating itself on the alter of trendy obsessions.

 By Stephen Glover

DAILY MAIL

STEPHEN GLOVER: This is price of the Church prostrating ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk › article-10093843 › amp
15 hours ago — Like the Roman Catholic Church he is joining, he is robustly opposed ... Former Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali with his wife Valerie ...

 

OCTOBER 15-2021

 

 WHEN a man who once nearly became Archbishop of Canterbury defects to the Roman Catholic Church, it is time to sit up and notice.

Michael Nazir-Ali is in most respects as unlike as is possible to a typical modern Church of England bishop, which is doubtless why he wasn't appointed Anglian Primate in 2002.

He has stood out as an uncompromising social conservative in an Established Church which in recent years has become increasingly liberal, and has tended to swim with the tide of secular belief.

One doesn't have to agree with every aspect of Dr Nazir-Ali's opinions -and some Anglians, let alone people of other denominations and non-believers, wont. Like the Roman Catholic Church he is joining, he is robustly opposed to abortion.

Nor has he been supportive of celibate homosexual priests working in the Church of England, or of same-sex marriages taking place in the church. Though still not permitted, it seems likely they soon will be.

At the same time, he has celebrated the importance of the family and sanctity of marriage in a way that would have been familiar to Anglican worshippers half a century ago, but is now unusual.

Whatever one may think of his particular views, I find it impossible not to admire Dr Nazir-Ali for the rigour of his thought, and for his courage in speaking out in defiance of fashionable opinion.

His background  largely explains why he is so different from the run-of-the-mill Anglian prelates. Born in overwhelming Muslim Pakistan, he became a bishop there while still in his thirties, before leaving the country when his life was in danger.

For him Christianity was not a set of safe and comfortable beliefs which can be bent to accommodate progressive thought. It was a minority sect fighting for survival, and sometimes threatened  by radical Islam.

That explains why, since his retirement as Bishop of Rochester in 2009 after 15 years in the role, he has spent  a lot of time in communion with Anglicans in the Third World, who are sometimes persecuted. He is above all a serious man.

Not a few Anglicans will agree with him when he says he wants  to be in a Church 'where there is clear teaching for the faithful'. It does exist in parts of the Church of England, but many priests seem too frightened of offending worldly values to speak out with much clarity.

Dr Nazir-Ali's criticism of the C o E for jumping on to every faddish  bandwagon about identity politics, cultural  correctness  and mea culpa about Britain's imperial past ' will also strike a cord with many people.

Of course there are historical events of which we should be rightly ashamed . What is so wearisome is the preoccupation with supposed misdeeds in the distant past, and the constant self-flagellation, when there are so many challenges and problems in our own time.

Yet the Church of England's hierarchy  has instructed  cathedrals and churches  to review their monuments  for links to slavery and colonialism , and take action  if any are found . Some  12,500 parishes and 42 cathedrals have been scouring their grounds and buildings for shameful connections.

Meanwhile the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby , has declared in the tones of a trendy Labour MP : 'Some will have to come down, some names will have to change.' Aren't there more pressing things for the Church to be doing?

Equally, although the Church is right to be deeply concerned about despoiling  of God's world, it shouldn't  be involving  itself in the politics of climate change. There are scientists and politicians aplenty to do that.

And yet earlier this year the CoE appointed a Bishop of the Environment to spearhead the crusade against climate change, and tackle the looming 'chaos and destruction' of 'this precious planet'. At a  Christmas service not long ago, I heard preach about global warming.
 

What about spearheading the fight against the seemingly ineluctable decline of religious belief in this country? , Religious attendance continues to fall, and the response of the Church of England, when it is not fretting about secular matters, is to talk about closing churches?

Indeed, a recent C of E document called into question 'the sustainability of many local churches', and warned that most dioceses intend to 'prune' the number of clergy.

ADMITTEDLY , there are still, particularly on the evangelical wing of the Church, vibrant parishes that aren't prepared to roll over and accept the inevitability of decline. But much of the C of E has become defeatist and inward looking.

So one can understand why Dr Nazir-Ali yearns for the clarity and robustness of the Roman Catholic Church, though there is room for doubt whether he will find that. After al, it is itself divided between traditionalists and liberals over issues such as abortion, contraception, the celibacy of the clergy and same-sex marriage

All one can say with confidence is that if there are more devout and committed bishops like Michael Nazir Ali in our national Church, it would be sending out a stronger message tpo a country that is drifting even further from GOD

*  *  *

By Stephen Glover

DAILY MAIL

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS ETC. ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 15,2021

*  *  *

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

His  warning over Empire 'fixations'
 

CHURCH of ENGLAND guidance issued earlier this year said paintings and mosaics in churches with links to slavery could be altered or removed as part of a review into 'offensive' memorials against blanket judgments

 

Sculptures and artworks that use racist terms or 'glorify' those who profited from the slave trade risk making people from ethnic minorities feel unwelcome, the document stated

At the time, Dr Nazir-Ali warned against 'blanket judgments'   on figures connected  to the Empire, and said supporting cash-strapped congregations reeling from the pandemic was a higher priority. He said: The Church of England is fixated on the dark and bad side of the Empire.

Also earlier this year, a Church of England anti-racism task force set up following George Floyds death in the USA called for all church shortlists to have at least one ethnic minority candidate, one of 47 recommendations.

In a second article for the Daily Telegraph in May, Dr Nazir-Ali wrote about how the Church had been embroiled in identity politics. He said there is no question racism must be taken seriously 'but conceding ground  to divisive politics is no way to do so.

*  *  *

DAILY MAIL

Friday, October 15,2021

By Simon Caldwell and David Wilks

 

Ex-Bishop of Rochester defends his decision to convert to ...

 

Bishop Of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali Converts To Catholicism

 

Ex-Bishop of Rochester defends his determination to ...

*  *  *

 

H.F.2154 /B

 

EU warned it faces

DEATH

over legal showdown with Poland.

 

By John Stevens

Deputy Political Editor

DAILY MAIL

October 20,2021

THE European Union faces a possible collapse unless it can pull Poland back in line following a major falling out, leaders were warned last night.

A bubbling row between the two sides spilled over in the European Parliament yesterday as Polish prime minister Mateusz Morawiecki clashed with Ursula von der Leyen in a heated exchange.

Mrs von der Leyen , the European Commission President, vowed that Brussels 'will act' to rein in the Polish Government after it challenged the supremacy of EU law.

In retaliation, Mr Morawiechi accused the bloc of 'blackmail' over its threats to withhold billions in Covid recovery funding, with one minister warning that 'Europe will die' if the warring pair cannot reconcile.

The two fell out earlier this month, when the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, asked by its government, ruled that the country's laws take precedence over EU legislation, becoming the first member state to contradict its founding treaties.

The Right-wing ruling Law and Justice Party, which Mr Morawiecki leads, has been at loggerheads with Brussels over issues such as LGBT rights and judicial independence, both of which have recently been eroded in Poland.

Mrs von der Leyen told MEP's in Strasbourg yesterday that Warsaw's ruling challenges 'the unity of the European legal order.

She added: 'The rule of law is the glue that binds our union together. We cannot and will not allow our common values to be put at risk. But Mr Morawiecki dug in, arguing that his country was being intimidated and attacked by the EU. 'It is unacceptable to talk about financial penalties, ' he said. 'I will not  have EU politicians blackmail Poland.

He insisted the bloc remain a union of sovereign states unless all its members agree by special treaty to give up more of their own national powers.

'WE are now seeing a creeping revolution taking place by way of the verdicts of the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, he added.

The European Commission has several options to try to make Poland comply with EU law, notably by continuing to deny it access to billions of euros to help revive its economy in the wake of the COVID PANDEMIC -Warsaw has asked for £19 billion in grants and 29 billion in loans.

'We cannot and we will not allow our common values to be put at risk, 'insisted Mrs von der Leyen. 'THE COMMISSION WILL ACT'

In a letter released last night, Mr Morawiecki accused the EU of 'starving' and punishing' his country by withholding the COVID RELIEF MONEY.

And he warned against a 'dangerous phenomenon that threatens the

FUTURE OF OUR UNION'

Jean Asselborn, Luxembourg's FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTER, had an even starker warning: 'Europe will not digest the end of of the RULE OF LAW, 'he said. Europe will die from such a development.' The problem is bound to dominate a two-day EU summit starting tomorrow, where Mr Morawiecki will face his critics, chief among them

GERMANY and FRANCE

The two leading EU nations have said that disregarding its rules would come

AT A COST

'To think it is a simple piece of paper that you can tear up, from which you can choose what you like and what you don't' said France's EUROPE MINISTER Clement Beaune.

'Those are values sovereignty chosen and sovereignty shared.'

His German counterpart Michael Roth insisted it was 'very important that we send a signal to POLISH SOCIETY'

He added: We are on the side of all those who stand up for Europe, and that is the overwhelming majority of Poles.

[A referendum would decide if that were TRUE. WE have always considered that Poland would be the FIRST  to EXIT Hitler's so-called European Union, after the UK.]

*  *  *

By John Stevens

Deputy Political Editor

DAILY MAIL

October 20,2021

[CAPS and COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.2154/C

September 6,2021

As World is Distracted by Afghanistan,

 

Germany and Japan Declare Independence 

 
 

By  Weekly Reports  436 Comments

 

Western “globalist” regime is accelerating.  The U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan and much of the rest of the Middle East is just the beginning of the end for the Khazarian Mafia.  Perhaps the biggest overlooked story is regime change in Germany and Japan, their opponents during WWII.

This is not just about the resignation of German Chancellor Angela Hitler (Merkel) and Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga.  This is about these countries reasserting their independence for the first time since 1945 (see below for details).  Without Germany and Japan, the G7 will become the G5 and eventually the G0.

Of course, if you live in the ever-shrinking bubble of the KM corporate propaganda media, you will be told the U.S. is withdrawing from the Middle East in order to focus on China.  However, since the fake U.S. Biden regime depends on Chinese money for survival, they are trying to convince people that China is going to finance their war against China.

As Qin Gang, China’s ambassador to the United States told a group of U.S. “leaders” last week, the U.S. “government” is depicting China as “its rival and imaginary enemy, just like when Don Quixote tilted at windmills.”  https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/01/china-new-ambassador-speech-508465

This nonsense is just part of what can only be described as chaos.  The tired old metaphor about running around like a headless chicken best describes the situation in the West now.

To understand how the G7 dominoes are destined to fall let us look at the real impact of what happened in Afghanistan.  Here is how a senior CIA official in Asia describes the situation:

“Don’t let this Afghanistan pre-planned scenario get to you.  It is mostly all turned around by the MSM and their puppet masters.

For example, the prisoners that were released from jail were not terrorists or Isis.  They were political prisoners who were against the cabal that had been controlling the country for the last 20 years.

Now 90% of the opium fields were burned to the ground by the Taliban.  This has stopped the cash flow for the cabal/deep state.  They are very desperate now.   They cannot get cash from the Federal Reserve.  London is also not issuing any more cash.  The ECB is not printing any more cash as well…Watch for a big false flag.”

Speaking about big false flags, it is no coincidence that as the 20th anniversary of 9.11 approaches, we are

 

seeing a systematic reversal of the neocon “Project for a New American Century” plan for world dominance it kicked off.

Let us look at Afghanistan again.  The real reason the U.S. invaded that country was to secure a pipeline and to protect heroin production.  Before the U.S. invasion, the Afghan government supported a plan by Argentina’s Bridas Corporation for a Chinese/Argentine/Turkmenistan pipeline.

When the Neocons controlling George Bush Jr.’s regime proposed giving the pipeline deal to the U.S. company Unocal, they were told it was too late and that a deal had already been signed.

The neocons famously responded, “if you do not accept our carpet of money, you will get a carpet of bombs.”  Then, as soon as the Americans invaded, Bush named former Unocal consultant Zalmay Khalilzad as his special envoy to Afghanistan.

Now the original Bridas/Chinese/Argentine/Turkmenistan plan is back in play. https://www.voltairenet.org/article213876.html

An alliance between Pakistan and China made this possible.  So now, Iran, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India are all building their own pipelines in the central Asian region the neocons had tried to conquer.

So what did the Americans achieve after spending over $2.3 trillion on 20 years of war in Afghanistan?  Afghanistan is the world’s seventh poorest nation with 47 percent of the population living below the poverty line, while over 75% of the hopelessly corrupt former Kabul regime’s budget came from international aid. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/escobar-forever-war-benefiting-afghans-follow-money

Remember though, Afghanistan was not a U.S. military defeat.  In those 20 years of war, only 2,448 U.S. troops died in battle there.  So the U.S., an economic superpower, with a population 10 times that of Afghanistan, was killing impoverished Taliban at a rate of about 100 to 1.  And yet they lost.  What this shows is that even if the military wins all the battles, if they do not have the financial backing and proper strategic goals, they will lose.  You can win all the battles you want but if your paycheck bounces, it’s game over.

The question now is what will the U.S. military do to stop all of their paychecks worldwide from bouncing

 

after the September 30th fiscal year-end?

 

On this front, the White Dragon Society is setting up a meeting with the Asian Dragon family in…

The remainder of this article or audio is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net holding the respective level of subscription
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

H.F.1806/G/1

 

Whoever

claims the crown will drag

Germany

Further into a

Giant EU

BLOB .

*

 

COMMENTARY

by Alexander Schoenburg

EDITOR-AT-LARGE OF BILD

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

 

DAILY MAIL

September 28,2021

Now begins the wrangling. The imminent departure of Angela Merkel [Angela Hitler] as Germany's chancellor amid the country's closest election results in decades, leaves Europe's powerhouse facing an uncertain future.

In a nation where coalitions are the norm all politics is done by debate and negotiations rather than the ballot-box victories.

But this time the power sharing is more complex than ever. The most likely outcome might be a union of three Left of centre parties, in a wobbly triple combination. That's something Germany hasn't experienced since the early 1950's

Only one thing is sure. Frau Merkel has embedded Germany so deeply in the European Union

SUPERSTATE

that there can be no reversal of our headlong

PRO-EURO

DIRECTION.

GERMANY IS EMASCULATED.

We have handed over our

SOVEREIGNTY

TO

BRUSSELS

 

Whoever is sitting at the top of the table in BERLIN is now of secondary importance.

In 16 years as head of state, Angela  Merkel has achieved her goal of turning Germany into a locomotive engine, pulling Europe ever deeper into integration.

Coming from Eastern Germany she has, consciously or not, cemented a change of mentality in this country, the most populous in Europe. Frau Merkel has reminded us in an image resembling something closer to her former home,

 THE COMMUNISTIC GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC. (GDR)

But she has done so at the expense of her party, the formerly

CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC (CDU).

Union party leader Armin Laschet, the CDU suffered its worst result since the existence of the

FEDERAL REPUBLIC.

It was virtually wiped out in the east of the country. In Saxony, the party that was once triumphant under Helmut Kohl was relegated to third place, with the ultra-conservative

ALTERNATIVE FOR GERMANY (AfD)

now the biggest party in the eastern federal state.

It is a defeat so ignominious that, by the time you read this, Laschet might be ousted.

MERKEL has moved the CDU so far to the Left of centre, that conservatives no longer feel represented by her. They resent her politics and either no longer vote at all or give their vote to other parties out of frustration.

Nobody has any idea what the CDU stands for these days, as Merkel threw overboard all ideologically luggage from the past and enthusiastically adopted formerly Left-wing positions.

She embraced open borders and the centralisation of government, she slashed spending on the Armed Forces, she was lax on

LAW and ORDER.

IN short she has dragged her party so far to the Left that it became indistinguishable from the Social Democrats. Gleefully, they positioned themselves as her appointed heirs.

Merkel has done to the Christian Democrats what Tony Blair did (in the other direction) to Labour, hauling her party into the centre and then across to the other side.

The CDU is no longer a conservative party. Like a football team that loses its superstar player, it must now completely redefine itself-and it doesn't know how to do it

Just as Labour in Britain has been unable to pull out of its downward spiral since Blair's departure, it must now completely redefine itself - and it doesn't.

KNOW HOW TO DO THAT.

Just as Labour in Britain has been unable to pull out of its downward spiral spiral since

Blair's departure, it is hard to see what the  can do in the post-Merkel era.

But this is Germany, of course. Don't imagine there will be overt chaos. We're far too well-organised for that.

The key to power now lies with the minority parties, particularly the Greens and the Liberals (FDP). They have each scooped up between 10 and 15 per cent of the national vote.

 The CDU and their main rivals, the centre-Left SPD , both polled around 25 per cent. Whoever can persuade the Greens and Liberals to come aboard will form the next government.

During months of haggling both leading parties will offer to rewrite their manifestos, adopt new polices, abandon pledges and ditch allies. There is nothing more cynical than coalition politics in action.

[WE WOULD LABEL THE ABOVE AS

CONVENIENCE POLITICS.].

 

In the meantime, Merkel will stay on as the caretaker chancellor ,probably into the New Year, allowing her to deliver one more traditional address to the nation.

Her potential successors are Laschet (if he's still standing) and the SPD's Olaf Scholz, whose face is fixed with a permanent grin. He was a hard-Left radical in his youth fighting for 'victory over the capitalist economy'.

His task is to convince the pro-business Liberals that he will allow industry to thrive, while persuading the Greens that he will follow a course of reducing emissions.

With typical German hubris, the Greens want Germany to be a global leader on climate change, the world's No 1 example of clean energy. Liberals prefer to focus on lower taxes and are ardently against an increase in the cost of living of the middle classes.

Right now, they both seem more likely to reject the CDU and back Scholz. Wags are calling this the 'Jamaica coalition'. because the party colours (red and green, plus yellow for the FDP) match the Jamaican flag.

But it really doesn't matter what the coalition looks like. They all sing from the same hymn sheet, particularly AS FAR AS EUROPE AND FOREIGN POLICY IS CONCERNED.

And even when she has stepped down as chancellor. Merkel will continue to be Europe's most respected elder statesman. Her protégé, Ursula von der Leyen, will still be president of the European Commission. In other words, no change there. Whether our next chancellor is Scholz, Laschet or Latchet's successor, Germany will forge ahead with the continued integration of EU countries [Slave states!] into a

HUGE BLOB.

Laschet grew up at the  French border and sees no point in .

NATION STATES

AT ALL.

He comes from Aachen, which is close to the  state lines of Belgium and the Netherlands (the city where .the first European emperor, Charlemagne, was crowned), it is no big surprise that he sees France and Germany as

ONE...

into

Scholz is even more in favour of E U integration than Merkel. Like the socialist activist he once so passionately was, he is an internationalist. His dream is to melt

EUROPE

into

ONE SUPERSTATE

In fact, modern Social Democrats, particularly the young yearn for a future where NATION STATES

CEASE TO EXIST

and we all live in a colourful. multi-cultural society where it is no longer matters where anybody comes from.

 

For Britain, this is by no means all bad news. For one thing whatever  his delusions, French president Emmanuel Macron has no hope of stepping up and taking Merkel's place as the most prominent politician in Europe.

Ignore his posturing. The man is a laughing stock in Germany, and barely respected in his own country. He could not be 'first among equals' among Europe's leaders, even if he had a complete change of personality. It would take more than that to make him any match for Frau Merkel.

And readers who still harbour fears about the re-emergence of a powerful Germany can be reassured that the ultimate goal of German politicians on all sides is the abolition of

NATION STATES

, where nationalism is impossible

[No doubt their aim is  is the formation of a WORLD GOVERNMENT-a DICTATORSHIP.]

All of which makes one conclusion very plain, if nothing else

BREXIT

was a fortuitous escape for you in Britain.

Many Britons were always opposed to being on the Euro juggernaut, with unelected technocrats at the wheel. That's what Merkel has bequeathed to

GERMANY

and no matter who succeeds her, our country can no longer escape the ride.

 

*  *  *

[The EDP. ORG. UK, from information over the past 20 years, considers that the secret contacts between Germany and Russia over the past century have always been ongoing, whoever is in power. Russia owes its  very identity to outside influences-particularly from ILLUMINATI JEWS...]

ALSO
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND HIGHLIGHTING ARE OURS.]

H.F.1784.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

 Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

 Regret

The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

 Brexit

was a

BRITISH PROBLEM

and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

PARAMOUNT.

Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

YOUR PROUD NATION.

It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

[TREASON]

This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

Here!

 

*  *  *

[We were against entry to

Hitler's plan for Europe

in 1972 and again in 1975.]

[WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

[ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/ ****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 

AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

 

H.F.1784
 
 

 

THOUGHT CRIME

ON

CAMPUS

 

 

 
 

A professor vilified

by students and even

her own union for

saying sex is a biological fact...this

top historian asks:

WHAT HOPE FOR

FREE

SPEECH

AT OUR CRADLES

OF

LEARNING

By Dominic Sandbrook

DAILY MAIL

Thursday, October 14,2021

 
 

AT FIRST glance Professor Kathleen Stock seems an unlikely freedom fighter. Crop haired and soft spoken, she appears far too measured for a place on the barricades, risking her career to

DEFEND FREE SPEECH.

The product of a Scottish comprehensive school, Stock has taught philosophy at the University of Sussex since 2003. Her academic work, which covers subjects such as the philosophy of fiction and music, is very highly regarded, but it's hardly the stuff of incendiary public debate.

Yet when she arrived for work a week ago, she found the campus plastered with posters calling her' one of this wretched islands most prominent transphobes espousing a bastardised version of radical feminism.

Meanwhile, a concerted social media campaign, encouraged by some of her colleagues, demanded Sussex sack her immediately.

'Fire Kathleen Stock,

'read an online ultimatum from a group of transgender activists.

'Until then, you'll see us around.

Fury

So what was her crime?

Put simply, it was to have questioned the new transgender orthodoxy that has conquered so much of British academia.

To the activists' fury, Professor Stock has dared to suggest that a person's sex is an immutable biological FACT And to compound  her offence, she has even indicated tit may not be an idea to allow people with male genitals into women's changing rooms.

In an age when most university authorities are notable for cowardice, it was refreshing to see

Sussex's VICE CHANCELLOR Professor Adam Tickell , stick up for Professor Stock

AND DEFEND HER RIGHT TO ACADEMIC FREEDOM.

 But if she expected any support from her trade union, the

HARD - LEFT UNIVERSITY

AND COLLEGE UNION (UCU)

She was cruelly disappointed

In a statement dripping with malevolent hypocrisy the Sussex UCA declined to mention Kathleen Stock by name. Nor did it

DEFEND HER RIGHT

TO THINK AND WRITE AS SHE CHOOSES.

Instead it demanded an urgent investigation into

'institutional transphobia',

and insisted that the university must do more to root out the heritics-clearly meaning her...

[This  statement is reminiscent of the Witch finder General of Salam-USA.]

 

Matthew Hopkins ( c. 1620 – 12 August 1647) was an English witch-hunter whose career flourished during the English Civil War. He claimed to hold the office of Witchfinder General, although that title was never bestowed by Parliament. His activities mainly took place in East Anglia.

Matthew Hopkins is probably the biggest figure in British witchcraft and witch hunting history. He condemned over 200 people to die in about 3 years (the exact number he killed is unknown). This widespread witch killing craze is nothing like anything seen in Britain previously or later on, after Hopkin's death. It resembled the European witchcraze much more than the British one.


 

*  *  *

TO BE CONTINUED

[This is a most extensive article for FULL ARTICLE

DAILY MAIL

Thursday, October 14,2021

 

 

 i

H.F.2154/B

 

OUR WONDERFUL NHS:NOW IT'S TERMINAL  

 

SATURDAY ESSAY

by BeL Mooney

Saturday,October 16,2021

By BEL MOONEY FOR THE DAILY MAIL

Frustrated by a GP’s receptionist blocking a face-to-face appointment for my 97-year-old mother, in June this year, I wrote a special report for this newspaper, criticising the very situation that has been the subject of the Mail’s recent, successful campaign.

It so happens that the medical attention my mother has received recently has been impeccable, and I do appreciate the pressures doctors face — with rising patient numbers due to an increasingly elderly and growing population.

Writing about the NHS must involve an understanding of complexity. You can express gratitude for good care from a family doctor or hospital consultant, but at the same time recognise that the system cannot be above criticism.

The article in question — just like this paper’s trailblazing campaign — drew a huge response from people who were equally frustrated and disappointed.

 

Appalled by long waiting lists, cancelled operations, relatives’ cancer treatment put on hold until too late, furious (as I was) that a loved one’s cause of death was routinely certified as ‘Covid’ when untrue, and face-to-face appointments with GPs were as rare as hen’s teeth, exasperated and angry citizens wrote to me and to this paper asking: ‘Why?’

Such people — the silent majority — will be relieved that due to our campaign, Health Secretary Sajid Javid has called out GPs, launched initiatives and allocated funding to improve access.

Naturally, this prompted a howl of protest from the usual suspects — most notably the British Medical Association (the doctors’ union in effect). Former health secretary Jeremy Hunt predicted the measures aimed at increasing face-to-face appointments would spark an exodus from the profession.

‘This is a burnt-out workforce running on empty because of a massive mismatch between supply and demand,’ he tweeted. ‘The only thing that will convince them not to continue retiring or opting for part-time hours in droves is a clear plan to end the unsustainable pressure they face.'

 

Royal College of General Practitioners ' chairman Professor Martin Marshall, said the critism

of GPs by politiansand the media over in-person appointments was 'demoralising and indefensible'.

The proposed support package was

 'not the answer'.

And so the battle - and the disconnect between patients and the institutions representing GPs-looks set to rage on, even as our beleaguered health service is about to under go another of its frequent 'reorganising', introducing a blizzard of new acronyms.

 

’From spring 2022, for example, the current CCGs (Clinical Commissioning Groups) and their staff will become ICSs (Integrated Care Systems. As ever, the chances are slim.

Let's cast our minds back to the early days of the NHS. Ironically, doctors were among the most vociferous objectors when it was first proposed.

 

Aneurin Bevan, the Labour politician who led the establishment of the NHS in 1948, was asked how he convinced them to take part, and he allegedly replied: ‘I stuffed their mouths with gold.’

 

Bevan recognised that to win over doctors to the world’s largest socialist experiment in healthcare, he had to appeal not so much to their morals, as to their pockets.

In the following decades, the system he created, with services free at the point of delivery, became not just the best-loved state-run body in the country but a key part of our national identity.

A good example of its totemic status came during the Olympics opening ceremony at London 2012, when nurses danced around hospital beds as a tribute to the NHS.

Against this backdrop, as many have found, if you write anything faintly critical of the NHS on social media the zealots pile in, like fundamentalists permanently on their knees to an out-dated dogma.

A few years ago, waiting with my late father for his eye appointment, I took a picture of a sign detailing the number of missed appointments that month — and what this selfishness had cost the hospital.

On Facebook, I suggested we should question whether people truly value what is free. Was it time to look again at the ‘free at the point of use’ principle? You’d have thought I had uttered the vilest blasphemy. All the nonsense about the ‘secret privatisation’ of ‘our NHS’ planned by wicked Tories was trotted out.

Similarly, when some years ago I wrote about the shocking ‘health tourism’ figures, middle-class bien-pensants with health insurance (for whom ‘waiting list’ is a foreign phrase) told me that of course the NHS should be free at the point of use, for everybody and anybody, for ever and ever, Amen.

A highly respected novelist I knew rebuked me loftily: ‘Criticism of the NHS is both ungrateful and unhelpful.’

And that is part of the problem about the future of healthcare in Britain. If members of t, it transformedhe intelligentsia can be so blinkered about what is evidently wrong with this system, what hope do we have of improving something on which so many lives depend?

Former Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson's assertion that 'the NHS is the closet thing the English people have to a religion' goes some way towards explaing the outcry that follows any rational suggestion THAT THE NHS IS BROKEN AND NEEDS FIXING.

Yes, it transformed public health and wellbeing in Britain - but even before Covid it lurched from crisis to cricis, despite repeated reforms and huge investment, IT WAS LETTING US DOWN.

 

Who wouldn’t agree there are too many highly paid managers? That job adverts for ‘equality, diversity and inclusion’ managers in the NHS are obscene, when some of these roles pay more than £75,000 per year — a far healthier salary than junior doctors or nurses take home?

That there’s been a shortage of midwives for over ten years, after 3,000 promised by David Cameron didn’t appear? That our attempts to reduce stillbirths lag behind those of Poland and Estonia?

That levels of waste and profligate spending (e.g. prescribing at great cost over-the-counter painkillers, when a pack of 16 paracetamol caplets is 29p in Aldi) are a disgrace? And so on.

The NHS is not a sacred cow. Like it or not, that bitter pill has to be swallowed if we are to have any chance of making things better.

The National Health Service Act (establishing its structure) received royal assent in 1946, one month after I was born, and the NHS was founded when I was nearly two. So the bloated behemoth is as venerable and creaky as I am — and serious maintenance is essential.

That’s why all politicians should drop the dishonest sentimentality that prohibits discussing the NHS, and think of the welfare of patients instead of scoring points.

We need a new way to deliver healthcare in coming decades — when the demands will be greater even than they are now.

That was the verdict of the Institute of Economic Affairs back in 2003: ‘…the NHS was designed for the 1940s. Since then there have been three major developments which have directly affected the provision of health care. We have become an infinitely more affluent society, which means that people want, and can, afford to spend more on keeping well.

Secondly, the proportion of old people in the population has greatly increased and will continue to do so, which means that people need medical services longer.

 

‘Thirdly, there have been huge advances in treatment which have mostly, but not invariably, increased its cost, often requiring expensive equipment and drugs.’

The problems have long been predicted. Yet politicians and campaigners parrot that we have ‘the best healthcare system in the world’. This was asserted by disgraced former health secretary Matt Hancock at the NHS’s 73rd ‘birthday’ in July.

Do these people take us for fools? We are the fourth-highest spenders on healthcare in Europe, yet routinely come near the bottom in terms of outcome.

The World Health Organisation says the French health service is the best in the world. We should learn from it.

A friend has a brother with a French wife. Pregnant and suffering swollen ankles she went to their English GP, who said nothing could be done. Back in France her doctor gave her anti-water retention tablets, an appointment with a physiotherapist and good nutritional advice.

And a young British woman I know living in France, expecting her first baby, said the maternity care was efficient, caring and she was offered every possible choice. I’m afraid she had a shock when she decided to have the baby in England, to please her parents.

Anecdotal evidence is one thing, but facts cannot be denied. Percentages can become tedious, but the French have more doctors for every 100 people and more hospital beds than us. As a percentage of GDP, UK healthcare spending was 10.2 per cent in 2019, but France spent 11.1 per cent.

 

Determined defenders of the NHS seem to think the only solution is to chuck yet more money at the problem, even though our taxpayer-funded model is as burdensome as it is inefficient. The French system is paid for partially by obligatory social security contributions, usually deducted from your salary.

France offers a high level of preventative healthcare (for example, not dismissing swollen ankles). Available services include addiction prevention, regular medical check-ups and the promotion of physical activity and healthy eating. France also has the lowest rate of heart-disease mortality in Europe.

When people go to see a family doctor, or have any other kind of out-patient appointment, they pay the cost of it — a basic consultation is ¤25 Euro — but then about three-quarters of the fee is refunded by their National Health Insurance Fund. (Patients on a low-income or who are sick long-term receive 100 per cent coverage.)

Would the British be so careless about appointments they demand as a right if they had to stump up and then get most (but not all) of the money back? Would it be heinous to require a small deposit on equipment such as crutches? I think not.

 

Before you protest, remember that in France people on very low incomes or who are not insured are covered. We can boast all we like about ‘our’ flawed NHS, but the French have arguably a better way of ensuring the principle of the common good.

Remaining in Europe for a moment, under German law, everyone must pay public health insurance. As of 2019, this amounts to 14.6 per cent of each citizen’s gross income, with the individual paying half (7.3 per cent up to a maximum monthly income of €4,538) and the other half paid by their employer. Deductions from salaries are automatic.

This covers every citizen’s primary care with registered doctors, hospital care (in- and out-patient) and basic dental treatment. It works.

Covid-19 threatened the globe but we should not let the panic it caused blind us to the fact cancer is the world’s second-biggest killer. It was responsible for 9.6 million deaths in 2018 — roughly one out of six everywhere — and the leading or second-largest cause of mortality before the age of 70 in more than half of countries.

An Economist Intelligence Unit report looked at the growing menace of cancer (in all its variations) and asked whether the world is ready to face it.

 

But the graph for care delivery is far more worrying. We are joint 14th with South Korea, behind (in order) Japan, the Netherlands, Germany, Australia, Spain, France, Sweden, Italy, U.S., Brazil, Colombia, Canada and Chile.

That is far from impressive. We all know it.

Anecdotal evidence of a broken system abounds. I know a mother in her early 40s who, failing to obtain joined-up care (in a very prosperous area) for a terrible flare-up of her chronic medical condition, was driven by neglect to make four 300-mile round-trip journeys to an area where a senior anaesthetist friend ensured she got treatment from a sympathetic consultant.

That should never be necessary in a wealthy nation like ours.

Small, individual moans and cries about NHS shortcomings and failures combine into a shocking crescendo nationally.

Yet that noise, which urgently demands to be heard, is routinely shut down — silenced like a shushing in a church by the pious ones who keep their eyes tightly closed.

This cannot go on. If as a nation we wish to show pride in our healthcare system in order to bequeath it in good nick to our grandchildren, we must now (post-Covid) insist that politicians work together towards radical reform. But that would require trusting them with an enormous task — and frankly, I don’t.

We need an independent Royal Commission — an inquiry at the highest level established by the Queen at the behest of the Prime Minister — to delve deep into the problems that confront us today.

Then it should come up with a set of recommendations that will enable us to confront 21st-century challenges.

This is, after all, a matter of life and death.

H.F.2154/C
 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the

 TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.
 

REFERENCE ONLY

 

 

Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?

by

 

  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of

  • humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all

  • over the world.

  • Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the

  • West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement,

  • censorship and retreat in order not to have to face the possibility of such

  • horribleness and actually having to fight it. That is why radical Islam has been

  • able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralyzed ourselves. We

  • censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the

  • faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are

  • not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to kill and die in the name of what

  • they care about.

  • Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify

  • the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even

  • more dangerous than the jihad causing the war. The result is to erase our

  • enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become

  • synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

September 2015. Thousands of Syrian migrants crossing the Balkan route were heading toward Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel was on the phone with Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, talking about a number of measures to protect the borders, where thousands of policemen were secretly located along with buses and helicopters. De Maizière turned for advice to Dieter Romann, then head of the police. "Can we live with the images that will come out?" de Mazière asked. "What happens if 500 refugees with children in their arms run toward the border guards?"

De Maiziére was told that the appropriate use of the measures to be taken would have be decided by the police on the field. When de Maizière relayed Romann's response to the Chancellor, Merkel reversed her original commitment. And the borders were opened for 180 days.

"For historical reasons, the Chancellor feared images of armed German police confronting civilians on our borders," writes Robin Alexander, Die Welt's leading journalist, who revealed these details in a new book, Die Getriebenen ("The Driven Ones"). Alexander reveals the real reason that pushed Merkel to open the door to a million and a half migrants in a few weeks: "In the end, Merkel refused to take responsibility, governing through the polls." This is how the famous Merkel's motto "Wir schaffen das" was born: "We can do it."

According to Die Zeit:

"Merkel and her people are convinced that the marchers could only be stopped with the help of violence: with water cannons, truncheons and pepper spray. It would be chaotic and the images would be horrific. Merkel is extremely wary of such images and of their political impact, and she is convinced that Germany wouldn't tolerate them. Merkel once said that Germany wouldn't be able to stand the images from the dismal conditions in the refugee camp at Calais for more than three days. But how much more devastating would images be of refugees being beaten as they try to get to Austria or Germany?"

Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror.

 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror. (Photo by Adam Berry/Getty Images)

 

Now, the main German sentiment that seems to be driving public opinion and politics is a dramatic sense of guilt. It is a "secular sin", according to a new book by German sociologist Rolf Peter Sieferle that is topping the German bestseller list, "Finis Germania".

The behavior of Germans during the current migrant crisis, however, is symbolic of a more general Western condition. On April 30, 1975, the fall of Saigon was part of a war fought and lost by the United States as much on television as in the Vietnamese forests and rice paddies. It ended with the the escape of helicopters from the rooftop of the US embassy.

In 1991, the imagery of the "highway of death" of Saddam Hussein's bombed army of thugs fleeing a plundered Kuwait also shocked the public in the West, and led to calls for an immediate cessation of the fighting in Iraq and Kuwait. The result was that Saddam Hussein's air force and Republican Guard divisions were spared; during the "peace" that followed, it was these troops who butchered Kurds and Shiites.

The photograph of a dead American soldier dragged through the streets of Mogadishu after the "Black Hawk Down" incident pushed President Bill Clinton to order a shameful retreat from Somalia. That photograph also led the US Administration to rethink and cancel plans to use US troops for United Nations peace operations in Bosnia, Haiti and other strategic points. General David Petraeus would describe America's engagement in Afghanistan as a "war of perception".

Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement, censorship and retreat, in order not to have to face the possibility of such horribleness and actually having to fight it.

That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralysed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to die and kill in the name of what they care about.

This week, the German media was shocked by the revelation that the German air force will probably come under fire during its Syrian mission. "Endangering German soldiers!" -- with an exclamation point -- wrote Bild, the largest-selling newspaper in Germany. The statement exposed the anxiety of what John Vinocur of the Wall Street Journal called a "country where the army and air force basically do not fight". A pacifist Germany is now a source of trouble also for its own neighbors, such as Poland. "For centuries, our main worry in Poland was a very strong German army", said former Polish Defense Minister Janusz Onyszkiewicz. "Today, we're seriously worried about German armed forces that are too weak."

The Western establishment censors images of our enemies' crimes while giving prominence to our "guilt". The French government censored the "gruesome torture" of the victims at the Bataclan Theater, who were castrated, disemboweled and had their eyes gouged out by the Islamist terrorists. It was a mistake: it was in the public interest to know exactly what enemy we are facing.

The FBI and Department of Justice released a transcript of the Orlando jihadist's 911 call, but omitted all reference to the terror group ISIS and to Islam. These authorities did not want the public to know that Omar Mateen identified himself as an "Islamic soldier".

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance then told the British press it should not report when terrorists are Muslim.

The CEO of Twitter, Dick Costolo, suspended accounts that showed photographs of the beheading of John Foley, along with other Islamist beheadings and savagery. But Twitter did not mind being flooded by images of a little dead boy, Alan (Aylan) Kurdi on a beach.

The mainstream media in the US fought hard to lift the photo ban on military coffins during the war in Iraq. Its goal, apparently, was to humiliate and intimidate the public, to lower the support for the war.

Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even more dangerous than the jihad causing the war.

Amnesty International's Secretary General, Irene Khan -- referring to concentration camps in the Soviet Union, where millions of people perished -- infamously called Guantanamo "the Gulag of our time". The result is to erase our enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

Ten years ago, after the brave surge in Iraq, US soldiers discovered Al Qaeda's torture chambers. No one -- not ABC, not CBS, not the New York Times -- published one photo of them; they just filled our eyes with naked bodies at Abu Ghraib.

We are utopian technophiles and, contrary to the traditional Western view that we are flawed human beings in a tragic world. We now believe in Mark Zuckerberg's brave new world where no one should ever suffer and everyone should be happy and peaceful all the time. That is an exorbitant dream. For a short time we can afford it, as with Angela Merkel and Europe's migrant crisis. Unfortunately, that fantasy will not last. The conflicts at our gates, together with our aversion to making hard choices, will exact a far higher price.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

 

 

H.F.700/1
 
 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE
comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

Posted on 2019/05/27 by

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
 By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

May 27, 2019

 

H.F.1853/1

 

Images of Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter

bing.com/images

Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter
Image result for Merkel Is Hitler's Daughter

 
 
 
 

 

If it's good enough for the Scots -It's good enough for the English.

 

By

 

Simon Heffer

 

Daily Telegraph -November 29-2006

 

ONE of the more astonishing features of our politics is the way in which really quite clever and experienced people fail, from time to time, to see the blindingly obvious.

ONE example is the way in which some of those around Tony Blair -

and for all I know Mr Blair himself -

 have believed, on and off over the past few years, that it might be possible to stop Gordon Brown becoming PM.  Another was the even more foolish, and much more widely held fantasy that granting devolution to Scotland would not , sooner rather than later lead to a rampant rise of Scottish nationalism.

 

As the more astute among you will immediately realize, these two concerns are inextricably linked.

I begin to suspect that the likely timing of Mr Blair's departure from office in the late spring or early summer of has been set to cause the most difficulty for his probable successor. For on May 3, the third elections for the Scottish Parliament is now governed by a coalition of Labour and the Libdems.

However, the SNP was five points ahead of Labour in the poll published this week. That this is no flash in the pan can be judged from how the Scottish Labour conference in Oban last weekend was dominated by big beasts of the Cabinet, from the Prime Minister downwards, warning the assembled multitude that waste, devastation and quite probably complete apocalypse would follow for Scotland if it elected the SNP.

 

The SNP reported a further groundswell of interest as a result of these attacks, and a Labour internal poll revealed yesterday that the SNP's lead had extended to

8 per cent

 

So: imagine you are Mr Brown, and you have just become Prime Minister of the [so-called] United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

 

Imagine, too, that the people of Scotland have a few weeks earlier, elected an SNP government to rule them -

a minority government, no doubt, but a government none the less. You, as Prime Minister of a nation that is  about 85 per cent English, are yourself Scottish. You sit for a Scottish seat at Westminster.

Your fellow Scots have , however, put into power a party committed to calling a referendum on whether Scotland remains part of the [so-called ] United Kingdom.

 

More than two thirds of the 85 per cent of the foreigners over whom you rule want (according to a poll just published by The Sunday Telegraph ) an

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

And all concerned have the temerity to do these things despite the fact that you yourself, sensing trouble ahead, have spent much of the past two or three years making regular cynical and implausible speeches about"Britishness". Oh dear!

Please forgive a moment of self-regard, which I introduce purely (well, almost purely) because it is relevant. Eight years ago , I wrote a book entitled

 

'NOR SHALL MY SWORD: THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND'

It appeared a couple of months before the first Scottish elections and it made the following points.

FIRST, that devolution would lead inevitably to SEPARATISM

.       SECOND, that if the Scots wished to separate from England, there was nothing we could ,or should, do to stop them (oh!, if only Gladstone's Irish Home Rule Bill in 1886 had been passed, etc etc)

      THIRD, that this might actually be beneficial to the English taxpayer.

      FOURTH, that in any political system the rulers ignore  the rights of majorities at their peril: and that the inevitable consequence of denying the ENGLISH, the same rights as the SCOTS -a referendum on their own separateness, and allowing any wish for separateness to be expressed in an

 INDEPENDENT

 ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

-would lead to towering resentments.

The way in which this book was received speaks much of the flavour of those bless enlightened times. It had a rave review from Alex Salmond, the leader of the SNP.

Michael Portillo, then in the middle of reinventing himself as a proto-Cameronian, addressed the work in a tone that suggested the men in white coats would be coming for the author with a matter of hours.

When I read The Sunday Telegraph not just that 68 per cent of my fellow English now want their own

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

-but that 59 per cent would be happy for Scotland to be fully INDEPENDENT

 

-I know we will never be able to build the madhouses fast enough.

 

It is not hard to see why the English feel these things.

FIRST, they have had largely alien rule for the past ten years.

SERVE YOU RIGHT,

-the Scots would say, recalling the Thatcher years, when they, too, felt occupied.  But the Scots sought and received, a remedy for their alleged sufferings; all the English now want is equal treatment.

SECOND, the English have been treated to the most preposterous justifications of why Scottish MPs should still vote in the Westminster Parliament on matters that, in Scotland, are dealt with by the Parliament in Edinburgh.

Foundation hospitals and top-up fees are only on the statute book because of the help the Government received from Scottish MPs with no interest in the matter.

 

No Wonder, with a much smaller majority now than when those measures went through, Labour is desperate to retain this lobby-fodder.

Increasingly, though, in a era when we are all feeling grotesquely overtaxed, there is the question of money.

Sixty per cent of those questioned in THE SUNDAY TELEGRAPH poll resented the far higher per capita public spending in Scotland compared with England.

The revenue powers of the Scottish Parliament do not have to be used to fund handsome new capital projects in Scotland -

 not least their extravagant new Parliament building - [Just a reminder that we were first told that it would cost approx. £41,000,000 but ended up at

£400,000,000

-at least.

When our NICE (not really very nice!) refuses to agree for essential medicines  at a cost in one case of £2.50 a week and many other instances which are denying life saving treatment it is no wonder there is so much great anger at the increased subsidy in Scotland.]

 

-while the English taxpayer is standing by to have his pocket picked.

As an article on this subject in this month's Prospect points out, per capita spending is 30 per cent higher in Scotland, but the GDP per capita is five per cent lower.  Despite this Herculean level of bribery of the Scottish voter, growth rates simply do not improve.

 

It is a glowing, and ghastly , example of the evils of the

SUBSIDY CULTURE

 

And, quite clearly, not only is it not doing the

ENGLISH

 

-taxpayer any good, it is also not doing the

SCOTS

any long - term good either.

 

Scotland is on its way to sovietisation

 

The amount of GDP spent in the public sector, at 50 per cent, is 10 per cent higher than in the [so-called] United Kingdom as a whole.

£11 Billion

more is spent in Scotland than is raised in revenue there.

The SNP says this takes no account of the oil revenues. BUT, should Scotland ever become INDEPENDENT, there will have to be an interesting discussion about the nature of territorial waters, and the origins of the money used to develop the oilfields.

There might also be a DEBATE about whether Shetland, in the event of independence, would want to be part of [sovietised] Scotland, or would prefer to remain a dependency of England, or would like to revert to being a part of NORWAY.

So far, all the decision -making in these matters has been placed on the Scots.

THAT HAS TO STOP!

 

The English deserve their referendum, too, on whether they wish to remain in any sort of UNION with Scotland.  If they can have their

OWN

PARLIAMENT

WHY shouldn't ENGLAND

 

[WE all know about Lord Falconer's comment that he wouldn't like England to have her own PARLIAMENT as it would BULLY Scotland. The soon he and his tartan hangers-on depart England on the high-road back to Scotland the better it will be for those who live on this side of the border.]

If [Scotland] wishes to separate, then why should the ENGLISH subsidise them?

 

Above all, why should the rights of the English majority be aggressively denied?

I know this is horrid for Gordon brown, who , like Napoleon, or Stalin, or Hitler, aspires to come to a distant province or satellite STATE and take over the

MOTHER COUNTRY.

BUT he and his friends started this process: It is a shame, given how very brilliant we are always told he is, that he wasn't clever enough to realise how we might finish what he had started.

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

*

[The tragedy was that Gordon Brown put the his ardour for a united party above personal ambition whereas if he had moved earlier onto the backbenches in opposition to Iraq and fought to rectify the great injustices to the English people he would have succeeded as the leader of the ENGLISH PEOPLE

whatever his ancestry.

He held on to the vision of 'Britishness' when to support such an IDEAL was an affront to the English who could see clearly that they were being denied their just rights whereas he and  his  numerous countrymen around him were gathering up their emoluments and at the same time to enslave the English in an European State with the proud name of ENGLAND eradicated from their homeland.  If for once Mr Brown had put himself into to the mindset of an Englishman he would have realised the great wrong and as the man we all know he would have righted the wrong.]

 

IN ORDER TO HONOUR OUR NORTHERN NEIGHBOURS AND OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR WISH FOR INDEPENDENCE SOMETHING THE MAJORITY OF THE ENGLISH UNDERSTAND WE STATE HERE

FROM THE

Arbroath Manifesto

sent by the

Nobles and Commons of Scotland

to the

Pope

in

1320

 

'We fight not for glory nor for wealth nor for honour but for the freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

*

NOVEMBER/06

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

 

 

H F 1839

 
 

I wish, sir, an English Parliament to speak the free unbiased sense of the body of the

ENGLISH PEOPLE

and of every man among us,  of each individual who may be justly supposed to be a fair majority...and we ought always to remember the important truth, acknowledged by every free state-that all government is instituted for the good of the mass of the people to be governed that they are the original fountain of power, and even of reverence and in all events the last response...I mention them now to show the necessity of a new regulation

[To introduce PR-Proportional Representation in 2020.]

  of the representation of the Kingdom of ENGLAND...the monstrous injustice and glaring partiality of the present representation of the Commons of England

 [In fact there is no Commons of England  since 1707 at Westminster since 1707]

has been fully stated, and is, I believe almost universally acknowledged, as well as as the necessity of our recurring to the great leading principle of our free [English] constitution which declares the House of Parliament [English Parliament] to be only a delegated power for the people at large. Policy, no less than justice, calls our intention to the momentous point; and reason, not custom, ought to be our guide in a business of this consequence [PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION in 2020 in an ENGLISH PARLIAMENT] where the right of a free people are materially interested.

[In Germany which has PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION those who wish for the return of their NATIONHOOD are protected in their democratic decision by the LAW of the LAND as we have seen only recently.]

Without a true representation [Introduction of PR in 2020] of the commons our constitution is essentially defective ,our Parliament is delusive name, a mere phantom, and all other remedies to recover the pristine purity of the form of government established by our ancestors would be ineffectual, even the shortening of the period of Parliament and a place and pension bill, which iI highly approve, and think absolutely necessary. [As we the EDP in 2020 fight for the return of the ENGLISH PARLIAMENT at WESTMINSTER.]  I therefore flatter myself sir, that I have the concurrence of the House with the notion which I have the honour of making, That leave be given to bring in a bill for a just and equal representation of the

PEOPLE of ENGLAND in PARLIAMENT.

 

 

BORIS JOHNSON HAS A STRIKING MAJORITY IN WESTMINSTER TO ENABLE HIM TO BE A MAN OF HISTORY TO RIGHT THE WRONG AND RETURN WESTMINSTER TO ITS HISTORIC PLACE AS THE HOME OF THE

 ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

JUNE 14 -2020

 

The above extract of an article

JOHN WILKS

A Warning and a Prophecy

The Commons and its Rights

1727-1797

 

taken from

 

International University Reading Course

Copyright by

International University Society.

 

 

H.F.2031

 
Ministers: Schools must not teach children that white privilege is a FACT.

 

By Eleanor Harding-DAILY MAIL -Education Editor

Friday, October 22,2021

Schools must not teach children about 'white privilege' as if it were a fact, Education  Secretary has said.

Nadhim Zahawi warned it is a 'contested view' and teachers who promote it risk pushing 'partisan' politics on to pupils.

His intervention comes in response to a report by the Commons education committee, which said teaching white privilege could be against the EQUALITY ACT.

White privilege is understood as the everyday benefit white people enjoy over other ethnicities due to systemic racism. But the committee said telling children they are different because of their race is UNLAWFUL.

In a Department for Education response last last night, Mr Zahawi said teachers must focus instead on 'respect for other people and for difference'.

He said: 'Schools must not teach contested theories and opinions as fact, and this includes contested views about "white privilege"

He added that political issues on race should be taught 'in a balanced and factual manner'. And he said schools have a legal duty' to maintain 'political impartiality' when covering 'sensitive and complex issues' .

The Committee's report. published in June was called 'THE FORGOTTEN: how white working class pupils have been let down, and how to change it.' It argued that white working class pupils have been let down, and how to change it.' It argued that white working class pupils would feel alienated by concepts of white privilege WHEN THEY ARE THE WORST - PERFORMING GROUP IN THE COUNTRY.

Tory committee chairman Rob Halfon said the term was 'divisive' and 'pitted groups against each other'. He added it was wrong-headed' because it blames people based on skin colour.

[ABOUT TIME TOO! though because of the delay, a great deal of damage has already been done in the minds of the children, and no doubt a number of teachers will ignore this advice and continue their persecution of white working class pupils - and the consequences will no doubt rear their head in the years ahead. Political correctness is the most wicked scourge on society.]

The report also stated white working class pupils had been neglected by the education system for 'decades'. They are one of the worst-performing groups at ages five, 16 and 18, in comparison to disadvantaged children from other ethnicities. Mr Halfon added: Disadvantaged white people feel anything but privileged when it comes to education.

'Privilege is the very opposite  to what disadvantaged white children enjoy or benefit from in an education system which is now leaving FAR TO MANY BEHIND.

Many teachers are in favour of teaching 'white privilege' as part of wider efforts to tackle racism in schools. Brighton and Hove councillors even said last year they would provide training to schools on this topic.

But critics say it is teaching children at a young age to feel resentful of each other based on colour, instead of encouraging THEM TO BE FRIENDS.

It comes after Mr Zahawi was caught up in a race row when fellow Tory MP confused him with Health Secretary Sajid Javid.

James Gray admitted getting the two mixed up but said reports he had added. 'they all look the same to me' were untrue.

*  *  *

By Eleanor Harding-DAILY MAIL -Education Editor

Friday, October 22, 2021

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS - CAPS ...  ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.2154/D
 

Multicultural policies have effectively divided the population  into ethnic and faith 'communities'.

*

DON'T TALK ABOUT DIFFERENCES-TALK ABOUT COMMUNITY.

by

Munira Mirza

(writer and researcher)

Daily Mail- Monday, January 29 ,2007.

 

WHEN my colleagues and I began researching the attitudes of young British Muslims, we already suspected that some had become more religiously and politically committed over the past decade.

BUT our findings surprised us. While most Muslims feel a sense of belonging to Britain and are reasonably well integrated, there is a definite shift away from the mainstream among a growing number of younger Muslims.

[ At this point we would draw a parallel with many English children and others of other ages in our schools who complain that everyone else has a country whether from Poland or India or China or from any number of the 190 plus countries in the world today. Identity is important to promote a sense of belonging and loyalty to one's home whether adopted or not. Britishness an over used term introduced by newspaper proprietors  to replace the word ENGLAND which was in vogue for much of our past but particularly after the Second World War it did not fit in with those who decided British was Best!. This was strange as the term British is a geographical expression and NOT political -of course over 1500 years ago it was political but the English and their neighbours changed THAT!. It has been and still is a travesty that the word ENGLISH has been in decline for decades whereas the individual nation state whether Wales or Scotland in our island home has become the norm.]

They are more likely to prioritise allegiance to their religious community and be assertive about expressing their cultural difference. An increasing number express support for faith schools; say they would prefer to live under Muslim law, known as Sharia, and have become less tolerant about women's rights and homosexuality.

WHY? Are Muslims simply unable to adjust  to life in the West?

The answer to that is a firm No. After all, the first generation of Muslim immigrants largely adapted their religion and culture to suit life in Britain.

It is their children and grandchildren who are more strident about criticising British society and asserting their religious identity.  Many younger girls in Muslim communities will now wear the headscarf -the hijab-although many of their mothers do not. Slowly but surely, sections of the Muslim community are separating from the rest of Britain.

Instead of looking abroad to the influence of the Muslim world or the conflicts in the Middle East for an explanation, our research suggests that it lies closer to home. In particular, the

RISE OF MULTICULTURALISM.

Over the past two decades, with its stress on 'difference' and downgrading of Britishness has led many young Muslims to see themselves as separate from society.

Multicultural policies have effectively divided the population into ethnic and faith 'communities', each demanding its own identity as well as separate funding and resources.

This divisive approach has encouraged a kind of tribal thinking, where each group is encouraged to look after 'their own' In such a climate, younger have grown up believing that they have more in common with other Muslims than the wider population.

The weakening of collective identities through attacks on British traditions and history and the decline in old-style working class politics has led to a vacuum in which many young Muslims have turned to religion to seek a sense of belonging.

This emphasis on difference has also cultivated a powerful sense of victim hood. Instead of demanding equality anti-racist groups since the 1980's have been demanding the right to be different and 'respect' for cultural identities.

Muslim lobby groups have been particularly successful at claiming that Muslims need special protection by exaggerating the problem of Islamophobia and demanding curbs on free speech.

 

But instead of making Muslims safer and more included, these demands have only made younger Muslims feel more alienated.

Paradoxically telling Muslims that they are vulnerable and need to be listened to has only made them feel more like outsiders who cannot be expected to handle criticism like everyone else. Although younger Muslims are far less likely than their parents to be victims of racist abuse, they are more sensitive about the slightest criticism or attack.

 

EVEN WORSE, by trying to engage with Muslims through 'community leaders' (who are considered by most Muslims to be largely unrepresentative), the Government is sending the message:

'You lot are so different, we just do not know how to talk to you ourselves.'

This has meant that many younger Muslims who feel unrepresented by their community leaders feel even more ignored and excluded, because the Government is listening to them in the WRONG WAY.

The Government must stop emphasising difference and engage Muslims as citizens, not through their religious identity. The 'Muslim community' is not homogeneous. People should be entitled to equal treatment as citizens in the public realm, with the freedom to enjoy their religious identities in the private sphere

THE negative effects of MULTICULTURALISM are also experienced by many other groups, including white people who have been encouraged to feel ashamed of

THEIR COUNTRY.

We need to revive a sense of shared purpose and confidence in British society. Islamism is only one expression of a wider cultural problem of self-loathing and confusion in the West. There are signs that people in general feel alienated and are increasingly retreating to their cultural or ethnic backgrounds. This is the driving force behind a rising interest in regional identities among the Scottish, Welsh and English.

We need to bring to an end to the institutional attacks on NATIONAL IDENTITY

-the cancellation of Christian festivities, the bans on displays of national symbols and the sometimes crude anti-western bias of history lessons -which can create feelings of defensiveness and resentment.

 

We should allow people to express their identity freely in a climate of genuine toleration. Society needs to work together to assert our shared British identity and Western values in a way that will inspire the younger generation -from all backgrounds.

[Shortly before the 1997 General Election a BBC reporter arrived to question us and the first question was what did we think of MULTICULTURALISM.  Our reply was that we believed in each individual from wherever they came form and that when people arrived in England their first breath of English air was of FREEDOM which was a statement made by the Chief Justice of England to the case of a captured slave in a ship in English waters.  So it is that when anyone arrives in our country they have FULL RIGHTS secured by the Rights and Liberties which have been fought for in England for over 1500 years. The curse of multiculturalism was known as a community wreaking policy years ago but was a useful instrument of many politicians to ingratiate themselves with newcomers to secure their votes- need we say more. ]

Except:

'The worth of a State, in the long run, is the worth of the individuals composing it.'

John Stuart Mill

(1806-73)

 

*          *          *

[Font altered-Bolding & Underlining Used -Comments in brackets]

JANUARY/07

*

 
 

ENGLAND

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED-  PARTS 1-5****AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****"THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

H F 2154/B-A 61
 

 

Letters to the Editor - Oct. 2nd 2021

By  Letters to the Editor  2 Comments

 

On my honor, I read this article below after I sent my last to you.

Is it hopium?

He seems to see what I see.

-Sender wishes to remain anonymous.
The Article:

Good News, No News

We’ve got good news and no news to share on this day, the first day of a New Year for a destructive, bankrupt, US Gov.

The Good News first since it’s all that matters, every attempt at destroying our livelihood and our spirit – sense of Freedom, (CV 19, lock down, mandates that are acted on as if law) , our resolve remains intact. We’re all proving amazingly resilient in the face of adversity. We, in Tier 4, know that in every way, our every thought is manifesting. Collectively we’ve anchored the belief that right here, right now, Love will prevail. God is pitching for Our Team. Nothing can deter us from our vision of a beautiful turn-around, coming right now.

Today was to be the fulcrum, the tipping point, bringing the end to US Gov, instead the Congress, the US Gov. Inc., and their evil Agenda 2021/2022, got a 2 month reprieve. Doesn’t mean that they’re let off the hook, no Sir. The System is broke and no amount of delay will deter this eventual tumble. They are going down.

With the start of the new Fiscal Year comes pressing demands for immediate action both legal and lawful. There are multiple actions from well-meaning individuals, leading national efforts, both in United States of America and internationally; to coalesce the Grand Finale to bring about the Grand New Start. We’ve heard all about the scope and scale of this endeavor, what we’ve not heard about (for obvious good reason), is the minutiae leading to the Big Reveal.

1. Will this include a New Financial System? YES, but not one lead by Rothschild/Rockefeller, and their fiat schemes. No matter how they try and hide their constant fake-paper-capers (ala Green New Deal), it’s known, recognized even with camouflage, and won’t be happening in our timeline.

2. Will this include a New System of Government? YES, and immediately, as we return to the Law of the Land, departing from our birth at sea and forever subjects of the Crown. Admiralty/Maritime Law will be walking the plank, disappearing with the fishes, where it belongs. We’re returning to the 1776 version – a Constitutional Republic as Sovereign Nationals. How we make this leap is still fuzzy, but there are a few possible likely events leading us (especially those of us in Tier 4), up to this.

3. Will this include the opportunity to exchange our currencies/redeem our ZIM Government Bond Notes? YES, this is the plan. Reason being, WE are the Ones that will fund the resurrection of this Beautiful Planet rising from the onslaught of the present criminal Agenda.

There has been a concerted effort to launch the Green New Deal, a gravy train of Ponzi money for those involved in the scheme of Carbon Credit trade. This along with the further enslavement of the US Nationals, the reduction in Freedom; all evil Agendas are going to fail. The Military is in Control now. They are keeping quiet because something BIG is coming. This global Military effort will quell all Nazi/mafia acts, setting right our world, leading to the Rule of Law, by the People, as each Nation’s individual Rights and Privileges are restored.

The New System of Government for US, the restored Republic, a Federation of States, honoring each State’s Rights; safeguarded by a National coalition led by (newly, lawfully) elected individuals, will be created once the Signal is given – like Paul Revere, “The Redcoats are Coming!” For Tier 4, it might be the EBS – the Emergency Broadcast System. With President Trump stating, “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us……..,” we will begin our Transition of from onlookers, bystanders, to activists, taking back this nation. Leading the way for People in every Nation, to follow suit. The process for creating this “Safe World” is Ready. There are a few (verified, known) steps to take and in one fell swoop the monolith will fall to be reborn anew, Rightfully.

The ability to exchange our fiat currencies, for solid, asset-backed currency, has been in process already for years. Many have moved forward with privately/bank facilitated exchange, with a window-time established, showing a solid rate for currency and leaving these lucky souls with assets ‘on account’, spendable with a lien against the asset. This is especially true with those who have exchanged their Dinar, easily valued as discussed and demonstrated by Iraqi Nationals living here in the US, with their Qui (pronounced “Key”) Card, which this week is showing 1 IQD = $3.95 USD. There have been thousands that have already benefited from this exchange through privately facilitated deals. These thousands won’t benefit either, not unless/until Tier 4 has their exchange. This is written in the contract – the Global Treaty, negotiated just for this Grand Event.

Once this is “internationally recognized” and launched, we here, in US, and all over the world, will be able to exchange our Dinars, just the same. It’s not international yet. There were no announcements in the mosques – which is what we were absolutely expecting. What’s the holdup? Iraq is still following the US Treasury’s lead. That’s our best guess. We’re waiting for the Grand Event to take us to the Next Level.

All currencies will revalue simultaneously as the New Financial System is launched. This might as well be written in stone. It is going to happen. Exactly when it will happen is the only unknown.

Today was a benchmark day for Venezuela though.

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Venezuela-introduces-new-currency-with-6-fewer-16501031.php CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — A new currency with six fewer zeros debuted Friday in Venezuela, whose currency has been made nearly worthless by years of the world’s worst inflation.
Hard to imagine how one of the most wealthy, prosperous Nation’s in the world, Venezuela, has fallen so far. Hard to imagine how US could follow in these same footsteps, to instability, crime and corruption. Venezuelans are using the USD right now, because their currency is recognized as “unstable” and experiencing severe hyperinflation.

This will all change once the IQD is validated and Military all over the world step up and take charge to end the Socialist/Communist/Nazi takeover that has plagued so many prosperous Nations for decades. Simultaneously, all currencies in all of the several hundred nation’s now participating in Global Trade, will together benefit with their announcement of the formation of a new (Sovereign, Republic) government and a new currency. Including in China, which today is suffering the same death throes the US Gov.

We shouldn’t have much longer to wait…..

As soon as you see the words Zimbabwe Dollar, Vietnamese Dong or Iraqi Dinar be aware you are dealing with fraudsters and con artists and stay away. – Benjamin Fulford.

Letters to the Editor - Oct. 2nd 2021

By  Letters to the Editor  2 Comments

 

*  *  *

H.F.1806H

 
 
 
 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

[THE TWO MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES PLAY MUSICAL CHAIRS AND HAVE FAILED OVER DECADES TO CUT CRIME - IMPROVE STATE PENSIONS-EVEN PORTUGAL PAYS MORE. STILL NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT AND POLICE STATIONS CLOSED  - CROWDED PRISONS AND THE  OBVIOUS ANSWER NEW PRISONS IGNORED AND DECIDE TO FIT PHONE IN EVERY PRISON CELL  AND THE LATEST! ALLOW SEX AND DRINK IN THEIR 5 STAR ACCOMMODATION-CRIMINALS COMING UP BEFORE  THE BENCH WILL BE PLEADING TO BE LOCKED UP  FOR SUCH WONDERFUL OFFERINGS.   WE HAVE HEARD OF OPEN PRISONS BUT THIS MUST BE A NEW DIMENSION IN THE WORD PUNISHMENT AND REHABILITATION.]

*

WE ARE CONTINUALLY HEARING OF THE WASTE OF FOREIGN AID-

THE LATEST!

DAILY MAIL, Saturday, January 5,2019

UK handing £1.5 bn aid to the world's corrupt countries

by

JASON GROVES-Political Editor

*

[After the TORY  BETRAYAL of 1972 there is an urgent need for an

 ENGLISH Patriotic political party to

PROTECT the INDEPENDENCE of our COUNTRY and the RETURN after over 300 years

OUR

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT IN HER ANCIENT HOME of WESTMINSTER.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1388
 
 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT

Wednesday, August 25,2021

Bordering

on

LUNACY

THE ARRIVAL ON THE SOUTH COAST BEACHES OF A RECORD 828 CROSS-CHANNEL MIGRANTS IN A DAY REPRESENTS A MONUMENTAL AND ABJECT FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT.  TIME AND AGAIN THE PRIME MINISTER AND HOME SECRETARY HAVE PROMISED TO CRACK DOWN RUTHLESSLY ON THOSE MAKING THE TREACHEROUS JOURNEY IN RICKETY BOATS.

YET SO FAR THIS YEAR

1200

HAVE REACHED OUR SHORES.

 SOME RUTHLESSNESS!

All WE GET IS GIMMICKS, SPIN AND A KING'S RANSOM IN TAXPAYERS' MONEY STUFFED INTO
FRENCH POCKETS

IN THE VAIN HOPE THEY'LL SMASH THE TRAFFICKING  GANGS.

ACTION TO STOP THESE ILLICIT ARMADAS PUTTING TO SEA IS URGENTLY NEEDED. NOT IN THE NAME OF SMALL-MINDED, LITTLE ENGLAND JINGOISM. BUT BECAUSE WE CARE THAT THOUSANDS OF MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN RISK DROWNING.

IN THE FACE OF SUCH A FIASCO<HOW CAN ANYONE SERIOUSLY CLAIM BRITAIN IS IN CONTROL OF ITS BORDERS? WE MIGHT AS WELL RUN UP THE WHITE FLAG ON THE WHITE CLIFFS OF DOVER.

 

*  *  *

[We are not at all surprised by the in-action not only of the present government but of all others over the past decades. As we have stated constantly there are many issues still not dealt with-but at the top of the list must be IMMIGRATION for the fact has been known for many years that ENGLAND is one of the most densely populated countries in the world. The future prosperity and the invasion of our precious countryside is under severe THREAT!

With the robotic age now before us the future of employment will decline massively and the accumulated cost to the already hard -hit taxpayer will result in a much lower standard of living  for all - because there are more mouths to feed.

As we have stated many times over the years there needs to be massive funding of the poorest countries to raise their standard of living. THE PROVIDERS OF FOREIGN AID TOTAL

£89 BILLION A YEAR

BUT WE MUST CLOSE THE DOOR TO

BRITAIN!

NOW!]

 

AUGUST 25,2021

H.F.2153
 

A REMINDER

AS WE HAVE STATED HUNDREDS OF TIMES OVER 20 YEARS - ENGLAND IS ONE OF THE MOST POPULATED COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD. THERE IS A  TOTAL  OF 89 BILLION A YEAR OF THOSE CONTRIBUTORS TO FOREIGN AID  YET THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN MANY COUNTRIES IS STILL EXTREMELY LOW-NO WONDER ASYLUM SEEKERS RISK LIFE AND LIMB TO REACH OUR SHORES. WITH THE PRESENT PANDEMIC AND NO DOUBT OTHERS IN THE FUTURE AND THE MOVE OF JOBS TO ROBOTS WE ARE BUILDING A FUTURE POPULATION WITH MANY WITHOUT WORK OR HOPE! ONLY A STRICT IMMIGRATION POLICY NOW WILL ALLEVEATE THE PROBLEM IN YEARS AHEAD.

ON AUGUST 19-2021  WE ARE TOLD  - NO DOUBT BECAUSE OF THE FOLLY AND ARROGANCE OF TONY BLAIR AND OTHERS WHO SUPPORTED THE ILLEGAL INVASION OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN AND ATTEMPTED TO INVADE SYRIA- WE ARE NOW TOLD THE WE ARE TO ACCEPT UP TO 50,000 AFGHAN CITIZENS TO LIVE IN OUR ALREADY WELL OVERPOPULATED COUNTRY. AS WE HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED WITH HUNDREDS OF MPs IN THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES WHO PRIDE THEMSELVES AS BEING MEMBERS OF THE LOBBY FOR ISRAEL - WHO SUPPORTED BRITISH TROOPS  FIGHTING ISRAEL'S ENEMIES -THE CFI and the LFI -  IT IS NO WONDER THAT THE PEOPLE'S CALL FOR A HALT TO IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN IGNORED SINCE 1948. 
 
Who's really affronted our National Integrity? An Honest soldier or a lying Blair.?

2)  We still need more kit to beat Afghan bombers say Marines.  .

3)    We must quit Iraq Iraq says  new Head of the Army.

4)   A Very Honest General

5)  BETRAYAL of the WOUNDED

6)  A TROOP and a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE..

7)  Listen to the Soldiers if you want the TRUTH..

8)  Friendly Fire widow's fury as case is dropped..

9)   Afghanistan the road to ruin and death for the British Army.

10) I'll reveal evidence that the Iraq war was illegal-says Envoy.

11)  Spin Doctor 'drafted WDM dodgy dossier.

12)  .Soldiers denied payouts because MoD wants to keep the SCALE of casualties SECRET.

13)   British troops are seen in Afghanistan by local people as no better than the Taliban.

14)  There must be an Inquiry into the Iraq War.

15)   We'd be better off with Saddam still in charge.

16)   Abandoned heroes fighting and dying on £2 an hour -Iraq-Afghanistan and other conflicts throughout the world.

17)   Tony Blair will not admit invasion of Iraq made Britain vulnerable to terrorist attack-Almost everyone knows it did.

18)   Saddam had NO LINK to Al Qaeda -says THE SENATE of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

19)  Tell the TRUTH Mr Blair how long will our troops remain in Afghanistan.

20)  While our troops die in unprotected landrovers.

21)  MoD refuse to provide suitable armoured vehicles as casualties in Afghanistan reach 10 killed in none month.

 22)  Our soldiers are forbidden to show their anger and resentment-WE MUST DO IT FOR THEM.

23)  Iraqi society descending into CIVIL WAR between Sunnis-Shi-ites and Kurds.

24)   Landrovers in Iraq lack suitable armour against roadside bombs.

25)  Our Armed Forces -abused and held in contempt by politicians-no wonder they want their own UNION.

26)  How troops wounded in Iraq conflict don't count with the MoD.

27)  THe TRUTH is out SIX REDCAPS left to DIE by British officers with reinforcements only a few hundred yards away.

27)  Tommy Atkins Fed-Up with Blair's War and MoDs-Shoot if YOU WILL we'll have the International Court on YOU -No flak jackets-boots or radios for YOU.

28) .I've changed my mind on Iraq -it is time to start talking about when and how we go -said respected historian.

CLICK

TO RETURN TO

'IRAQ FILE'

ADDED AUGUST19, 2021

AT THE NEXT ELECTION IF YOU WANT NO MORE ILLEGAL WARS FOUGHT FOR ISRAEL BY BRITISH ARMED FORCES -DON'T VOTE FOR ANY MP THAT IS A MEMBER OF THE CFI  - CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL OR THE LFI THE LABOUR  FRIENDS OF ISRAEL-AND WE WILL HAVE NO MORE ILLEGAL WARS.

H.F.1131

*  *  *

IMMIGRATION FILE
 
 
 HOW MISINFORMATION IS USED BY GOVERNMENT TO COVER THEIR INCOMPETENCE IN CONTROLLING IMMIGRATION - LEGAL AND ILLEGAL
 

 

Migrants have cost the Exchequer £140billion since the mid-1990s, more than £22million a day, it was claimed yesterday. A new study starkly contradicts Left-wing claims that immigration helps to cut taxes

News  

Article

How immigrants 'have cost Britain £140bn since 1995': Study contradicts claims immigration helps to cut taxes

By JACK DOYLE All By This Author - 13/03/2014 00:35:30

Think-tank MigrationWatch has responded to another study - given substantial coverage by the BBC last year - which purported to show that immigrants made a contribution of £25billion to the public purse between 2001 and 2011.

 

 

 
 
STEPHEN GLOVER:

 

Blaming PM for new 'winter of discontent' shows

 

a chronic

 

shortage of common sense-

 

DAILY MAIL

SEPTEMBER 27,2021

A Winter of Discontent? That is what some sages are promising us.

 

They

 

don’t know what they are talking about.

 

 

I can remember the original 1978-79 Winter of Discontent — public-sector strikes orchestrated by rampant trade unions, rubbish piling up in the streets, gravediggers downing their shovels. And inflation at over 8 per cent.

I recall having to wait hours for an ambulance to take my ill father to hospital. When it finally arrived, it was crammed with other sick people.hat have we now? Some panic-buying of petrol which, as Transport Secretary Grant Shapps pointed out yesterday, is a ‘manufactured’ crisis as there is plenty of the stuff around. The only real shortage is one of common sense.

Hysteria

Mr Shapps blames the Rothe Ghe hope that a short-term difficulty may turn into a full-blown crisis that can be attributed to Brexit.

The Government plainly has a lot of thinking and planning to do if we are to cope with future gas price increases and shortages. But I repeat that it is absurd to try to pin the blame for our present woes on Mr Johnson.

The country faces two main short-term problems. One is the soaring wholesale price of gas, which is affecting the whole world and has nothing whatsoever to do with Brexit.

The other is the relative scarcity of lorry drivers, also experienced by several EU countries. Brexit is certainly one cause but there are many others, and it is childish to try to blame everything on it.

Let’s look at gas first. I’m afraid spiralling costs are going to lead to higher bills for us all, which will mean an unhappy winter for some, particularly if it is a cold one.

But all this Boris-bashing is misguided — and I say that as someone perfectly happy to bash him when he deserves it. It is not his, nor the Government’s fault that gas prices are going through the roof.

A fair criticism is that previous administrations made poor decisions about our energy supply. One was to reduce our dependence on coal power stations from about a quarter ten years ago to close to zero, without securing enough dependable alternatives.

Only 2 per cent of the UK’s energy now comes from coal, compared with about a quarter of Germany’s. Of course coal is dirty and polluting, but it was reck

So the Government plainly has a lot of thinking and planning to do if we are to cope with future gas price increases and shortages. But I repeat that it is absurd to try to pin the blame for our present woes on Mr Johnson.

As for the dearth of HGV drivers, which has led to bare supermarket shelves and the panic-buying of petrol, there are several causes. The Covid pandemic has encouraged some drivers to give up, while potential recruits have been prevented from training.

Low wages and poor conditions (such as sleeping the night in lay-bys), tax increases in April for some freelance workers and the astronomical costs of becoming an HGV driver are other factors.

And, yes, Brexit has played a part; but one nothing like as big as the Government’s gleeful critics pretend. The Office for National Statistics says that before the pandemic there were 37,000 EU drivers in the UK. There are now about 24,500, which amounts to a drop of 12,500.

But there is a shortage of more than 100,000 drivers in this country, out of a pre-pandemic total of about 600,000, according to a Road Haulage Association survey of its members. So there are many more factors than Brexit.

Moreover, the Government has acted swiftly in agreeing to hand out 5,000 special visas to EU lorry drivers, though whether it will succeed in attracting them while there are so many shortages in Europe remains to be seen. Poland, once an EU source of drivers, has an even bigger shortfall than Britain.

So unreasonable has the debate become that the Government is mocked by its critics for relaxing visa rules in what is allegedly a climb-down from the principles underlying Brexit. It’s not true.

Confected

Sensible Brexiteers never argued that we wouldn’t need foreign labour in the future. The justification was that we would be able to control our own borders by regulating immigration. Letting in 5,000 temporary lorry drivers — if they come — doesn’t offend against that proposition.

What must end is the ceaseless supply of cheap foreign labour, which for years depressed the wages of British workers, not least lorry drivers. Many road haulage businesses got used to depending on low-paid Eas

Beware

But what is happening, and likely to happen, shouldn’t be compared to the Winter of Discontent even in the wildest fantasies of inveterate Remainers looking for any weapon with which to beat

 

Boris and Brexit.

 

If you don’t believe me, listen to Joe Haines, press secretary to Harold Wilson from 1969 to 1976. 

This period covered the two years from March 1974 when Wilson’s Labour administration was beset by strikes and rising inflation.

In a letter to The Times on Saturday, Mr Haines recalled ‘miners on strike, darkened streets, soaring unemployment and staggering wage inflation’. 

 remembered the effects of the oil-price hike and ‘the railwaymen’s union’ rejecting a 33 per cent pay rise.

Mr Haines’s point is that our present trials and tribulations, though not negligible, pale into insignificance in comparison with those of the 1970s which culminated in the Winter of Discontent.

He’s right, of course. We are a long, long way from those awful times. That’s not to say I have unbounded confidence in the Government’s competence. I don’t. Nor is Boris Johnson half as focused as Margaret Thatcher, the Tory prime minister who eventually saved the country from being an economic basket case.

But let’s restore a sense of proportion. Away with hysteria. And beware of those who, in trying to heap blame on the Government, are really fighting old battles about

 

Brexit.

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

SEPTEMBER 27,2021

 

 

H.F.2154/A/6

 
 
 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week
  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

By Daniel Martin, Policy Editor For The Daily Mail

February 12, 2018

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.
 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.
 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

February 12, 2018

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

 Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

 Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

February 12, 2018

*

LATEST!

ON THE CONTINUING GROWTH OF THE GROTESQUE AND WASTEFUL VANITY PROJECT

FOREIGN AID BUDGET

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 30, 2018

Foreign Aid will top £14bn a year
 

Britain's foreign Aid budget will soar by £230million next year, taking it above£14billion for the first time

The UK is committed to spend 0.7per cent of its national income on aid.

Britain is one of only seven countries in the world to meet the target.

The foreign aid budget soared by £555million to a record £13.9billion last year. Our aid budget has more than doubled from the £6.4billion spent in 2008 and more than quadrupled from the £3.3billion doled out in 2002.

[Why with such vast sums to alleviate the distress around the world are we still seeing adverts on our television screens for such a basic-common and vital need as drinking water?]

 

With billions spread abroad like confetti why are UK state pensions not up with the best in Europe. With a strongly extreme Left Labour Party we would have expected them to have this at the top of their agenda-If it is-they are keeping it a SECRET!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 30, 2018

 

H.F.1716

 
 

Read more: Britain’s Israel Lobby, The Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) Pressures HM’s Government: Is David Cameron Complicit in War Crimes?

THERE ARE AT LEAST 80 PER CENT OF CONSERVATIVE MPs IN THE ISRAELI LOBBY IN PARLIAMENT AND OTHERS IN THE LFI IN THE LABOUR PARTY. WE HAVE ASKED THE QUESTION FOR MANY YEARS WHERE ARE THE TRUE

FRIENDS OF ENGLAND?

 

 

*  *  *

 

Conservative Friends of Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

labour friends of israel

*  *  *

 

NOVEMBER 11- 2017

H F 211
 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 17

AUGUST-2005

RESPONDING TO ISLAM

The long-term danger of an Islamic state in Britain may be far off as not to be significant, but the short-term threat of terrorism and the medium-term threat of Islamicisation in Muslim enclaves both demand a response. The Government has already announced a number of measures which it is actively considering [They are still doing so in 2018] Among these are proscribing organisations, naming Hizb-ut-Tahir and successor organisations of al-Muhajiroun.  What more should our Government do? What should we as Christians pray for, apart from the salvation of Muslim souls?

It is important to recognise that nothing can be achieved by multiculturalism. The insistence that all cultures are equally valid is part of the problem. Even Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality, said in 2004 that multiculturalism was dead and integration based on shared values and loyalties was the only way to avoid friction. His call to accept "common values... the common currency of the English language, honouring the culture of these islands, like Shakespeare and Dickens," led to the claim from Asian MP Keith Vas MP that imposing British values would be like "the work of Christian missionaries." Yet the one 'common value' and essential part of the 'culture of these islands' Phillips ignored was Christianity and the Bible.

The single most important thing our Government should do is to emphasis, not a nebulous 'Britishness', but Britain's Christian heritage and Constitution.  As a small step, the Queen should announce a day of prayer to Almighty God for protection and guidance in the glorious name of Lord Jesus Christ. The God who brought this nation victorious through two world wars in answer to prayer made in that mighty Name is still strong as powerful and as able to save today.  He can frustrate the plans of bombers and reveal their hiding places if we acknowledge Him as Sovereign of the universe and  turn to him with all our hearts.

Secondly, the Government must recognise that the United Kingdom has sinned by diluting our Christian heritage with secularism to the point where there is scarcely any Christianity left.  Muslim activists use the immorality and injustice of our land to prove that Islam is superior to Christianity, and to claim that Sha'ria would bring peace and tranquillity.  They fail to understand that Christianity has not failed in these islands, it has been cast away in favour of a law-system dreamt up by sinful men. It would not be enough to pray to God for protection and then refuse to listen to Him when he commands us to repent.  The Government should must begin to rely again on the wisdom of the Bible in framing law, and reverse current trends which encourage wickedness.

Thirdly, the Government should say frankly and unapologetically that this was, is and is going to be a Christian nation, and that anyone who does not like it that state of affairs is free to leave. They have announced quicker deportation of foreign nationals and widened the grounds, and in the case of to who encourage terrorism, will strip the British element of citizenship from those with dual citizenship or those who are naturalised.  They plan to refuse asylum to terrorists. However, they have little idea of how to deal with British-born jihadists, beside control orders, and one idea they should consider is how they might assist those second-generation British followers of other religions who wish to find a more agreeable place to live..

Closure of places of worship which are used as centres of extremism would be useful, but the Government should know that much indoctrination of Muslim youth is done outside the mosques. A more practical measure would be to remove public money from British madrassahs, Islamic centres and Muslim associations and scrutnise them and Muslim charities for any signs of jihadist teaching or overseas funding.  Planning permission for Islamic centres and mosques should be put on hold.  Foreign policy-including trade policy-should also be much more assertive against those regimes where Christians are under threat either from government action or from Muslim mobs.  Our foreign policy should be righteous rather than 'ethical'. Britain should pull our soldiers out of Iraq and not engage in further excursions in sovereign Muslim lands where no British interest is served. We should also be more supportive of the modern state of Israel, flawed as it is, recognising the unification of Jerusalem, and the rightful place of Judea and Samaria in Israel as a whole.

It could be  objected that one effect of such measures, and even those which the Government is proposing at the time of writing, is that Muslim youth will be even more disaffected with Britain than they are at the moment and more inclined to terrorism. However, Britain is now Dar-al-Harb in any case and reliance on Almighty God is the key element in any successful programme of surveillance and intelligence-gathering.  he 7/7 bombers were unknown to the security forces.  Many praying Christians will have a strong sense that the failure of 21/7 was by the grace of God alone, and He was demonstrating His power as the One who brings wicked schemes to light.  He was also saying that He has given us a window to repent and turn to Him, who alone can save.

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/17

 
 

AFGHANISTAN THE ROAD TO RUIN AND DEATH FOR THE BRITISH ARMY.

 *

 Don’t allow slow death of our proud Army

 by

 Andrew Alexander

Column

 *

 DAILY MAIL

Friday June 9, 2006.

 DO YOU remember the 1980 Olympic Games? Probably not. But they were a major political event because the U.S. called for a boycott of the Great Moscow event - which 59 other countries followed, but not us, I am glad to say.

 The protest arose because the Soviet Union had - Oh, the horror of it! - sent troops into Afghanistan. Such wickedness could not be forgiven.

 

The Russians offered the excuse that their intervention had been asked for by the Afghan president (that rings a bell somewhere?). But of course, such feeble justification was not going to be accepted by the U.S. and its best friends. Vietnam, did I hear you say? Oh well, that was different.

 In the event, the Soviet Afghanistan intervention was such a failure and so unpopular among Russians that it made a major contribution to the collapse of Communism.

In the pot-and-kettle context, I was looking recently at some of the exchanges during the Big Three meetings in 1945 to plan a brave new world. The U.S. and Britain were insisting that there should be proper elections in Eastern Europe. An interesting view said Molotov, and the Soviet Foreign Minister asked what were we planning to do about Franco’s Spain.

 But Spain was a major British trading partner, was Churchill’s rather weak retort. Whether Molotov produced one of his icy smiles at that point is not recorded.

 British and American protests about Soviet behaviour in Eastern Europe were also met by Molotov’s comments about human rights being violated in Greece - where Britain was aiding the Greek Right and against the Greek Left.

 Our side insisted that such a claim was a complete distortion of the truth. Were could he have got such information from? The British Press, responded Molotov.

 But we must not stray too far from Afghanistan, which is where disaster now lies. A British military contingent about the size of the police force of Wales is expected to control an area of similar size. To do so when hostility comes only from local warlords would be difficult enough.

 With the expectation that the region will draw in Muslim fanatics from other countries, it is hopeless. The country is made for guerrilla warfare with its mountains, caves, ravines and primitive roads.

 As the casualties start to mount -as they will

the public, already disillusioned about IRAQ, will want us to disengage. As we must. For we may face the slow death of the BRITISH ARMY

-one of the few institutions these days, which commands national and international admiration.

 

Iraq has been a brutal wound. Afghanistan could be mortal. Recruitment figures are liable to collapse.

 

But do not look to the Official Opposition for help. Already discredited by support for the Iraq war, the Tory Front Bench offers supine support for the

GOVERNMENT.

 Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague, normally a sensible man, prates about our ‘building’ a country alongside the Americans.

 

Shadow Defence Secretary Liam Fox talks of the ‘construction of a free and democratic Afghanistan’. [Well in England in particular many people would be appreciative if that was true in their country] But the first instinct of the Afghans must be that they should not be ruled or controlled by foreigners. [Well as the Press and Media have aired recently we have the same problem in England].

 Fox adds sonorously that:

‘We cannot fail to act and we cannot act and fail’ (I am working on that.)

 One wonders if the politicians have the slightest understanding of that country, its people or its tribal rivalries. Even the writ of the elected president does not run far outside Kabul and not much there.

 A riot in the city a week ago, after an accident involving an American vehicle, left eight dead and 100 injured. It could be more than that, agitators proclaim to a population all too ready to believe the worst.

 The Tories believe it is their duty at all times to stand by our armed forces whatever the conflict. This is ludicrously short-sighted.

 

If they want to support the Army, they should resist it being given impossible tasks.

 *

Late News!

*

Troops in Afghanistan

Face ‘human shields’

*

Daily Mail Reporter

Tuesday, June 20-2006.

British soldiers taking part in the biggest coalition offensive in Afghanistan told yesterday how the Taliban fighters had used women and children as ‘human shields.

 [NOW! Mr Blair you know what our troops will have to contend with and no doubt a number of lawyers in the UK will be hoping our lads will be on the road to the Old Bailey.]

 

Paratroopers revealed how they had to give pursuit of insurgents after coming under fire. Corporal Quinton Poll, a 29-year-old section commander with A Company of 3 Para, said:

 

‘I followed the gunman into a house and he started pushing women and children towards me.’

 ‘We know who we’re dealing with. But when you find out they are using human shields, you are just surprised.’

The troops came under fire as they arrived by helicopter in the remote mountain town of Nowzad as part of the U.S led Operation Mountain thrust, the biggest drive against militants since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

The 11,000-strong coalition force of American, British, Canadian and Afghan troops have killed nearly 100 Taliban in recent days. But yesterday Taliban units retaliated, killing more than 30 civilians and abducting a dozen more. The firefight, which took place earlier this month, was part of the first major battle British troops faced since moving to southern Afghanistan this year.

 Details of the fight are only now becoming public after troops involved met reporters at a British base in Helmand province.

Lieutenant Colonel Stuart Tootal, the British battle group commander, sad his troops were ambushed by more than 50 Taliban operating in small groups. More than 20 Taliban were killed, while British forces sustained only minor injuries [?]

 He said the outcome of battles such as the clash at Nowzad could determine the success of a new Nato force now taking over security for southern Afghanistan.

‘I’d like to think it sent a message to the Taliban that they might want to think twice about attacking us again,’ he said.

 

But the commander insisted that winning hearts and minds was paramount.

He said:

 ‘If every day we could go out and improve the lot of the Afghan people, that would have a far greater effect than killing Taliban’

 *

[Well he would have to say that for morale but the fact is they were taken in an ambush, which the terrain easily facilitates, and it will happen on a regular basis because the Taliban are the defenders of their own territory and the Afghan people are no different to any other people in wanting the invader to leave THEIR COUNTRY.

The only result that will be accomplished will be a regular flight of body bags to the UK and the injured - many for life - and the distress of their families and friends.]

To Continue:

Canadian and Dutch troops will be taking over neighbouring provinces, which are under U.S. command until NATO takes over next month. The Nowzad battle gives a sense of the unpredictable threat the NATO troops will face in what the alliance says is a tough mission

 The past few weeks have seen British forces move into areas in the high mountains of Helmand province that have seen no outside military presence for decades.

It is a wild country where the Taliban, who governed until the U.S.-led strikes in 2001, have been making a violent comeback against a new governor and the Western-backed government in Kabul.

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underling used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

 *  *  *

IN  AUGUST 2021

-  WE SEE THE SUDDEN DEPARTURE OF NATO TROOPS WITH THE USA TROOPS  DEPARTING ON THE ORDERS OF THEIR PRESIDENT BILL BIDEN - LEAVING THE AFGHANISTAN POPULATION AT THE MERCY OF THE TALIBAN.

WHEN WILL TONY BLAIR FACE

 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OF JUSTICE

 FOR HIS ILLEGAL INVASION OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN?

There were suggestions at the time that 9/11 was the work of the MOSSAD?

9-11+(1)

 WITH ENGLAND ONE OF THE MOST DENSELY POPULATED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD  BECAUSE OF THE FAILURE OF SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS SINCE 1948 TO CONTROL IMMIGRATION WE NOW HAVE AN ALIEN POPULATION OF 21%WE ARE NOW TO ALLOW 50,000 AFGHANS TO SETTLE IN OUR COUNTRY BECAUSE OF THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF TONY BLAIR AND OTHERS WHO STOOD BY AND DID

NOTHING!

 

 

BRITISH FORCES (OVERSEAS) BULLETINS

 

 

B F 1-BLAIR'SCRAPED THE BARREL' TO JUSTIFY INVASION OF IRAQ****B F 2-The Security Services and the Safety of YOUR REALM****B F 3-It's impossible to win a conflict without enough men on the ground.****B F 4-FIVE WARS BLAIR TO REDUCE OUR ILLUSTRIOUS FIGHTING REGIMENTS****B F5-The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at further RISK!**** B F 6-IRAQ NOT WORTH THE LIFE OF ANOTHER BRITISH SOLDIER****B F 7-Former Chief of Defence Intelligence supports Whistleblowers****B F 8-TONY BLAIR-THE MAN WHO NEVER

DID-YET!****B F 9- The JUSTIFICATION for WAR offered by MR BLAIR may have been the  WRONG ONE, but it was a JUST WAR-says DAILY TELEGRAPH ****.  B F 10-A TROOPER and a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE****B F 11-House of Commons must REGAIN its RESPONSIBILITY****B F 12-Why wont Mr Ingram realise he CANNOT compare FUNDING of ARMY RECRUITMENT TRAINING with PRIVATE CORPORATIONS****B 490-TONY BLAIR WILL NOT ADMIT INVASION OF IRAQ MADE BRITAIN VULNERABLE TO TERRORIST ATTACK-ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS-IT DID!****B484-ABANDONED HEROES FIGHTING AND DYING ON £2 AN HOUR-IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN-AND OTHER CONFLICTS-WHY?****B492-TELL THE TRUTH!-MR BLAIR-OF HOW LONG OUR TROOPS WILL REMAIN IN AFGHANISTAN****B 499-Three more British deaths take Afghan toll to 19 in 6 days.****B 501-SADDAM HAD NO LINK TO AL QAEDA-says THE SENATE of the USA***B 504-BLAIR CONFESSES HIS FAULTS BUT STILL CONTINUES WITH HIS DISASTROUS POLICIES.****

 

 

[OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS  WE HAVE SHOWN A GREAT NUMBER OF BULLETINS WITH REGARD TO OUR ARMED SERVICES WHO WERE NOT ALWAYS GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS TO DO THE JOB- MR HOON-COMES TO MIND-SHORTAGE OF BODY ARMOUR AND SUITABLE AND SAFE TRANSPORT. THE ABOVE ARTICLES ARE BUT A FEW OF THE MANY BUT WE WILL ADD TO THE LIST OVER THE FOLLOWING WEEKS. A VISIT TO IRAQ FILE & BULLETIN FILE WILL REVEAL MUCH INFORMATION.]

 

 

FOR FURTHER INFO GO TO:

PT 2/ PT3/PT4/PT5/PT6

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

H.F.1094
 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART ONE

AUGUST 2005

WHAT IS ISLAM

Islam (which means 'Submission', in particular, submission to 'Allah') is the world's fastest growing major religion, and the second biggest after Christianity. Islam is estimated to have as many as 1.3 billion followers,21% of the world's population [in 2005] compared with possibly 2.1 billion Christians (33%) and 900 million Hindus (14%).  The United Kingdom is of course overwhelmingly Christian, with 70% of the population describing themselves thus.  However, discounting atheism, Islam is the second biggest religion in the United Kingdom, with 1.6 million adherents, forming almost 2.7% of the population. The Muslim population is heavily concentrated around the M1 corridor from London to Leeds and Manchester in England and in the far south west of Wales and is growing by conversion, immigration and by means of a higher birth-rate [4-1] than other groups.  But what is Islam? Politicians, the police and Islamic leaders have portrayed it as a religion of peace in which terrorism is an aberration.  Is this true? In any case, circumstances demand that Christians are well informed about Islam, and this paper is an attempt to understand and condense a mass of available information.  The author hopes that understanding  more about Islam will help Christians better expound their own faith, pray for government, evangelize amongst Muslims, and that if those things happen, this work will in some small way help to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ, who alone is the Way, the Truth and the Life.

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 
About 903,000 results
 

    Muslim Population Growth in Europe - Pew Forum on Religion and ...

    www.pewforum.org/2017/11/.../europes-growing-muslim-population/
    ‎
    29 Nov 2017 ... To see how the size of Europe's Muslim population may change in the coming
    decades, Pew Research Center has modeled three scenarios ...
     
    ‎Germany is top destination ... - ‎How Europe's Muslim ...

    Europe's Muslim population will continue to grow - Pew Research ...

    www.pewresearch.org/.../europes-muslim-population-will-continue-to-grow-but-how-much-depends-on-migration/
    ‎
    4 Dec 2017 ... While Muslims are still a relatively small share of Europe's population (roughly 5
    %), they are set to continue rising as a percentage of Europe's ...
     

    5 facts about the Muslim population in Europe - Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/.../5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/
    ‎
    29 Nov 2017 ... In the coming decades, the Muslim share of Europe's population is expected to
    grow – and could more than double.
     

    Muslims and Islam - Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/.../muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
    ‎
    9 Aug 2017 ... Indonesia is currently the country with the world's largest Muslim population, but
    Pew Research Center projects that India will have that ...
     

    The size of the European Muslim population in 2050 depends ...

    www.pewresearch.org/...muslim-population.../ft_17-12-04_muslimpopulation_thesize_1/
    ‎
    1 Dec 2017 ... Europe's Muslim population will continue to grow – but how much depends on
    migration. The size of the European Muslim population in 2050 ...
     

    A new estimate of U.S. Muslim population - Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/.../new-estimates-show-u-s-muslim-population-continues-to-grow/
    ‎
    3 Jan 2018 ... An estimated 3.45 million Muslims of all ages were living in the United States in
    2017, accounting for about 1.1% of the country's total ...
     

    Why Muslims are the world's fastest-growing religious group

    www.pewresearch.org/.../why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/
    ‎
    6 Apr 2017 ... Pew Research Center ... In 2015, Muslims made up 24.1% of the global
    population. ... of the seven other major religious groups analyzed in the study. ...
    The growth of the Muslim population also is helped by the fact that ...
     

    Muslims and Islam | Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/topics/muslims-and-islam/
    ‎
    Most Western Europeans favor at least some restrictions on Muslim women's ...
    live in India, there also are substantial populations of Muslims, Christians, Sikhs,
     ...
     

    Muslim population in some EU countries could triple, says report ...

    https://www.theguardian.com/.../muslim-population-in-europe-could-more-than-double
    29 Nov 2017 ... The report, Europe's Growing Muslim Population, shows a stark west-east divide.
    ... 9.3. 16.2. Guardian graphic | Source: Pew Research Center ...
     

    Muslim population growth - Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_population_growth
    ‎
    Muslim population growth refers to the topic of population growth of Muslims
    worldwide. .... Pew Research Center projects a slowing down of Muslim
    population growth in China than in previous years, with Muslim women in China
    having a 1.7 ...
     

 

H.F.1711
 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

Menu

 
 

2017-10-20

Letter to the Editor – A Note on “Jewishness” and Zionism

By  White Dragon Society  6 Comments

Hello Ben,

I read the complaint of the individual objecting to your use of the term “Jewish” in your description of events last week.  There is, I think, reason to differentiate carefully between the term “Jewish mafia” and the Italian Mafia.  They are not necessarily correct analogs.

In the case of Jewish people, one awful risk they face, which apparently is largely unseen by many of them, is the Zionists.  The Zionists are the Jewish mafia, and it is apparent to me that they are hiding behind the Jewish religion as a front for their activities.

This places Jewish people in a terrible position of “shield.”  And in order for an entire people to serve as that shield, they often express strong belief in support of the Zionists, apparently not understanding that in no way does Zionism serve the Jewish religion.  I don’t think Italians have anywhere near this level of identification with their captors.

Just a thought.  As a friend to all people, I find this situation very aggravating, as any negative criticism of Zionism very often incites attacks decrying “anti-Semitism.”  (As you pointed out, a misnomer.)  Actually, most people identifying with Judaism today have nothing to do with Semites.  They’re effectively Khazarians filtered through European bloodlines.

 

2017-10-19

Letters to the Editor

By  White Dragon Society  7 Comments
Hello Benjamin:

I am a subscriber and appreciate your contribution to current events.  However, I am disturbed that today for the second time in a short period you have seen fit to include quotes from sources that use the term “Jewish” in a way that seems inaccurate and incendiary.  I know there is indeed a Jewish mafia.  But there is also an Italian mafia, and their behaviour doesn’t get tied to their religion.

I appreciate your use of the term Khazarian, for example.

Yes, I am Jewish… a truth seeker… and very unhappy with Zionism, the situation in Israel, the treatment of Palestinians, and rationalization of such treatment.  I agree the cabal and all of its engines need to be eliminated.

I am very happy to see the pedophile and sexual predator nightmare getting unveiled.

But just because so-called Jewish names are so easily identifiable, it is important to resist the superficial conclusion that having a Jewish name is part of the true problem.  Let’s resolve to find the true roots of all of this sickness and change our world to leave that sickness behind.

I appreciate your use of the term “pseudo-Jewish” as well.

Thanks for your consideration.

 

Hello:

First of all, please understand that my mother’s mother was Jewish and my father’s mother is Jewish, so technically that makes me Jewish, too, although I do not like the word Jew, which was created in the 17th century.  My family was never ruled by the Torah or Talmud, but were atheists and thus forced to live within the ghettos in order to survive.

In any case, the reason “Jewish” appeared in that context in my report was because it was in a quote, and I felt it important to convey to readers the thinking of this source.

I have repeatedly explained to would-be anti-Semites (“Semite” is also a problematic term since it includes Arabs) that just because most members of the Mafia are Italian, it does not mean most Italians are Mafiosi.  In the same way, while Jewish gangsters are all Jewish, most Jews are not gangsters.

Trust me, there is no way we will allow for innocent people to be hurt because of the actions of a few high-level criminals.

Sincerely yours,
Benjamin Fulford

 

Hi Ben,

Do you still insist there is a coalition between Russia and the USA fighting against ISIS in Syria?  Every serious news talks about the war crimes the USA has been committing in Syria.  Just take the recent bombing of Rakka and murdering of many innocent civilians.  Or news claiming the Americans are saving senior ISIS leaders and taking them away from Deir es Zor at night together with their families.  Or killing Russian General Asapov by the American spetsnaz.  There has been no such thing as Russian-American coalition in the Middle East, unless you accept the fact the American army is badly split into the good guys and the bad guys, which is extremely dangerous.  What do you say?

Sincerely,
Vlad

 

Hello Vlad,

It is a sad truth that Western mercenary armies working for oil companies and the Zionists have been doing very bad things in Syria and the region.  The fact is the U.S. is bankrupt and needs to keep stealing oil in order to survive.

However, the people at the top of the U.S. military are now trying to do the right thing in my view, and at the very least they are determined not to let the Khazarians start World War 3.

The U.S. military did tell me they had a deal that Russia’s zone of influence was supposed to be to the west of the Euphrates and the American zone to the east of the Euphrates.  I guess they felt the Russians broke that deal when they crossed east of the river.  However, it is also a fact that the Americans are breaking international law by being in Syria in the first place.

I think a big meeting will be needed to determine once and for all how to divide up the oil and gas in the region.  Also, of course, the rogue state of Israel needs to be forced to give up their plans for creating a greater Israel and instead do what international society has been asking them to do since 1967, and that is to reach a permanent peace deal with the Palestinians.

Sincerely yours,
Benjamin Fulford

 

2017-10-16

Summit between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un Being Negotiated as Khazarian Mafia Attempts to Start War Fail

By  White Dragon Society  206 Comments
The Khazarian mafia’s rule by murder, blackmail, bribery, and propaganda is being systematically dismantled in ways that can no longer be denied.  These fanatics, who wish to force human history down a path to destruction based on ancient books, have failed yet again in recent efforts to start World War 3.  This was seen in North Korea, in Kurdistan, and in Iran as their increasingly desperate gambits are checked at every corner.

In the case of Iran, U.S. President Donald Trump was threatened and blackmailed into renouncing the nuclear deal with Iran, but facing opposition from the military as well as top allies, all that Trump could do was to appease the Khazarians with bellicose rhetoric.  Even Trump’s rhetoric was met with a statement by the leaders of top U.S. allies the UK, Germany, and France contradicting Trump’s claims that Iran was breaking the nuclear deal.

The statement read in part that the deal “was unanimously endorsed by the UN Security Council in Resolution 2231.  The International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly confirmed Iran’s compliance with the JCPoA through its long-term verification and monitoring programme.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/declaration-by-the-heads-of-state-and-government-of-france-germany-and-the-united-kingdom

In other words, they were telling Trump not to start a war based on lies.  This is something I have never seen the like of in many years of watching diplomatic statements.

In fact, the only country to support Trump’s bellicose rhetoric was the rogue Khazarian slave state of Saudi Arabia.  In any case, Saudi Arabia’s satanic rulers are about to lose their main protector, as Israeli police close in on satanic pseudo-Jewish Israeli leader Benyamin Netanyahu.

The attempts by the Khazarians to use North Korea to start World War 3 are also failing.  Last week two senior Japanese politicians made a secret visit to North Korea to negotiate a summit meeting between Donald Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un when Trump visits Asia in November, according to a source close to the Japanese imperial family.

This meeting, if it takes place (a final decision is pending), would probably pave the way for a peace deal as well as reunification of the Korean Peninsula.  However, an even bigger announcement than that may also be in the works.  According to senior Pentagon and Asian Secret Society sources a decision to

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
 
2017-10-13

Cryptocurrency State of Play – Special Report from the WDS

By  White Dragon Society  31 Comments
(Some sections translated from Chinese)

The purpose of this article is to summarize the financial and economic state of the world and the potential for cryptocurrency technologies to replace existing financial systems.  We delve into some of the many interesting new cryptocurrency startup projects that are springing up, and also explore the more esoteric and nefarious side of the growing cryptocurrency world.

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
 

H.F.1355/2

*  *  *

VIGILANCE IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY!

*

 QUOTE 684 of 900

ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS

Jewish objectives as outlined in Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

1) Banish God from the heavens and Christianity from the earth.

2) Allow no private ownership of property or business.

3) Abolish marriage, family and home. Encourage sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, adultery, and fornication.

4) Completely destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism.

5) Establish a one-world government through which the Luciferian Illuminati elite can rule the world. All other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose.

6) Take the education of children completely away from the parents. Cunningly and subtly lead the people thinking that compulsory school attendance laws are absolutely necessary to prevent illiteracy and to prepare children for better positions and life's responsibilities. Then after the children are forced to attend the schools get control of normal schools and teacher's colleges and also the writing and selection of all text books.

7) Take all prayer and Bible instruction out of the schools and introduce pornography, vulgarity, and courses in sex. If we can make one generation of any nation immoral and sexy, we can take that nation.

8) Completely destroy every thought of patriotism, national sovereignty, individualism, and a private competitive enterprise system.

9) Circulate vulgar, pornographic literature and pictures and encourage the unrestricted sale and general use of alcoholic beverage and drugs to weaken and corrupt the youth.

10) Foment, precipitate and finance large scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt the nations and thereby force them into a one-world government.

11) Secretly infiltrate and control colleges, universities, labor unions, political parties, churches, patriotic organizations, and governments. These are direct quotes from their own writings (The Conflict of the Ages, by Clemens Gaebelein pp. 100-102).

12) The creation of a World Government.

KGB CHART NOW TO DESTROY A PEOPLE AND NATION

More!

 

*  *  *

[IN JANUARY 2020 WE CAN SEE HOW MUCH OF THE ABOVE DOCTRINE IS ALREADY IN PLACE WITHIN OUR ONCE FREE AND TOLERANT

ENGLISH SOCIETY.]

  

 

H.F.741

 

 
 

 

 

*  *  *

Christianity

 is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force, which makes us what we are.

The following article by Susan Elkin who has taught English for over 30 years appeared in the Daily Mail, on Tuesday, April 15th, 2003 during Holy Week of that year.

 

The cutting had been kept because of the message, which it so clearly outlined of our Christian Heritage and with the forthcoming Festival of Christmas only a few months away it is as well that we should all acknowledge ‘that Christianity is more than a religion’.

Understanding Easter

 For centuries, Christians have used this week [April 15, 2003] Holy Week to commemorate the last few days in the life of Christ.

 It starts on Palm Sunday when Christ is said to have entered Jerusalem for the last time, riding a borrowed donkey.  And it ends with the near-despair of Easter Eve on Saturday after the crucifixion, but before the bright hope of new life, which comes with the resurrection on Easter Sunday.

 General knowledge? It certainly should be.  But how many children know what Holy Week stands for, why it is so called and why it matters?

Alarmingly few.

 It is not an insult to other great world religions to remind ourselves that culturally Britain is a Christian country and has been for 14 centuries.

Our way-of-life, law and attitudes are deeply rooted in it.

 It doesn’t matter what any individual may or may not believe (and I, for the record, am not a Christian believer).

 However, much as we work at human and liberal understanding, especially during a war, this country is not predominately Moslem, Buddhist or Hindu. It is Christianity that underpins European thought, and children being educated as young British citizens have a right to understand that.

 Christianity has the ‘advantage’ of being a potentially pretty tale and an excuse for a sentimental wallow.

 But there is nothing remotely nice about the events of Holy Week. So although children are accustomed on a daily basis to TV screens full of graphic and horrifying violence, schools seem to shy away from the crucifixion story.

 What do they do instead? 

Like the rest of our shallow, secularised and anything but spiritual society, they look anywhere other than to the Bible for the naff and romantic version of Easter.

 

The result?

For most children, Easter is just a spring festival and a holiday, one reduced to a season of boot fairs and chocolate guzzling.  School halls are full of pre-Christian fertility symbols, although few recognise them as that.  Rabbits, chicks and eggs are everywhere. There is hardly a cross in sight.

 

One school recently got publicity for forbidding the consumption of hot cross buns in case the crosses upset Moslem pupils.

 

It is scandalous that children are passing through our schools without being taught in depth and in detail about the stories and the thinking, which gave rise to Christianity.  And that doesn’t mean just the pretty or easy bits.

 Of course, because we have children of many cultures in our schools-and it is vital to promote tolerance-it makes sense to celebrate major non –Christian festivals as well.

 

But it is Christianity, which should have primacy because of where we are.  Young Britons of all backgrounds should learn how Christianity came to our country.

They should know, too, about the later buildings of that astonishing heritage – the great cathedrals- and be taken to visit one.   What better time than Easter for this?  The national Curriculum for Religious Education is taught according to syllabuses agreed and approved locally rather than set nationally.

 The need to provide every child with his or her spiritual entitlement is at the heart of every syllabus.  How can you do that properly without providing information and ideas?

 The conflict between good and evil and the need to come to terms with the mysteries of life and death are central to spiritual thinking across all faiths.

 Children need to explore the differences between right and wrong too.  What better peg than the Holy Week story for discussing morality.

 Children in schools should study the four gospel versions of the main stories, learning that the details differ considerably and why, a basic ‘media studies’ lesson about reporting of events and how to read accounts critically.

 What a great opportunity to keep alive the King James Bible, too. With its powerful poetic simplicity, it is the most important work of literature published in English.

 For hundreds of years much of our high art and music has drawn its inspiration from Christian mythology.  How can a child appreciate Michelangelo’s Pieta or the profoundly spiritual ‘He was Despised’ from Handel’s Messiah if they don’t know the story of Holy Week?

 Wishy-washy, politically correct teachers and syllabus compilers have no right to deny young people informed access to some of the greatest of all works of art.

 Christianity is more than a religion.  In Britain it is the main cultural force, which has made us what we are.  So it is time schools recognised that it is too important to be reduced to a furry toy or a bit of chocolate confectionary.

  ALFRED -CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH.

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

 

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

ALFRED -CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH

 

Tuesday, April 15th, 2003

 

*          *          *

Fonts altered-bolding used-comments in brackets]

 H.F.1367-CP4

 
 

 

The Collapse of Christianity has wrecked British society

by

Steve Doughty

[Daily Mail-Thursday,29th May-2008]

THE collapse of Christianity has wreaked British society a leading Church of England bishop declared yesterday.

It has destroyed family life and left the country defenceless against the rise of radical Islam in a

moral and spiritual vacuum.

In a lacerating attack on liberal values, the

 Right Reverend Michael Nazir-Ali the

Bishop of Rochester

said the country was mired in a doctrine of

'endless self-indulgence'

that had brought an explosion in public violence and binge drinking.

*

In a blow to Gordon Brown, he mocked the

'scramblings and scratchings'

of politicians who try to cast new British values such as respect and tolerance.

The Pakistan-born bishop dated the downfall of Christianity from the social and sexual revolution of the 1960.s

He said Church leaders had capitulated to Marxist revolutionary thinking and quoted an academic who blames the

loss of

 'faith and piety among women'

for the steep decline in Christian worship.

Dr Nazir-Ali said the

'newfangled and sincerely founded'

doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

has left immigrant communities

segregated, living pararellel lives

Christian values of

human dignity, equality and freedom

could be lost as the way is left open for the advance of brands of

ISLAM

that do not respect Western values.

The Bishopric of Rochester is one of the ten most powerful positions in the Church of England. Dr Nazir-Ali's attack on the

DECLINE OF CHRISTIANITY

appears to be the opposite corner to the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams, and many of his fellow bishops.

But he holds some views in common with the Church's other widely- heard and popular prelate, Ugandan-born Dr John Sentamu,the

Archbishop of York.

Over the past six months, Dr Nazir-Ali has made a number of criticisms of Islam and its influence.  Among them have been charges about the spread of no-go areas for non-Muslims and worries over the impact of

new mosques.

Last weekend he was one of just three bishops who backed a move in the Church's parliament, the General Synod, to encourage the conversion of

Muslims to Christianity.

His latest attack once again criticises Dr Williams's backing for

SHARIA LAW

saying that

 'recognising its jurisdiction in public law is fraught with difficulties, precisely as it arises from a different set of assumptions than the

TRADITION

of

LAW HERE'.

Dr Nazir-Ali detailed his arguments in an article in the newly -launched political magazine

'Standpoint'.

The bishop, himself an immigrant from Pakistan in the mid-1980's, admitted that he might be thought the least qualified person top discuss the

British Identity.

But he quoted

Rudyard Kipling:

'What should they know of England who only England know?

The bishop said 'something momentous had happened in the 1960's-he quoted historians who point to a cultural revolution in which women ceased to uphold or pass on the Christian faith and to the role of

Marxist revolutionaries.

Dr Nazir-Ali-pointed with approval to the finding that 'instead of resisting this phenomenon, liberal theologians and church leaders all but capitulated.

He said: 

'it has created the moral and spiritual vacuum in which we now find ourselves.'

In the place of Christianity there was nothing

'except perhaps endless self-indulgence'

The bishop said the consequences were 'the destruction of the family because of the alleged parity of the different forms of life together, the loss of a father figure, especially for boys, because the role of fathers is deemed otiose, the abuse of substances (including alcohol), the loss of respect for the person leading to horrendous and mindless attacks, the increasing communications gap between generations and social classes -

THE LIST IS VERY LONG.

Another result, he said, was that immigrants had been welcomed, not on the basis of

BRITAIN'S CHRISTIAN HERITAGE

to which they would be welcome to contribute, but by the

'new fangled and insecurely founded doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM'

The bishop warned that views not founded on

Christianity

would not produce the same values.

'Instead of Christian virtues of humility, service and sacrifice, there may be honour, piety, the saving of face etc'.

He questioned what resources were available for an ideological battle against

 Radical Islamism

saying

'the scramblings and scratchings

around of politicians for values which would provide ammunition'

were hardly adequate.

*          *          *

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 

[Thursday-May 29,2008]

A MORAL and spiritual vacuum...endless self-indulgence...the destruction of the family...British identity is worth fighting for.

The Daily Mail agrees with virtually everything that the  Bishop of Rochester says, but we have one question to ask. When was the last time we heard a Church of England bishop daring to contradict so trenchantly the liberal consensus?

But Michael Nazir-Ali is an unusual churchman. Not only does he have the courage of his Christian convictions, but like another impressive and outspoken prelate, John Sentamu the Archbishop of York, he was born overseas.

WHY IS IT that it takes churchmen born outside our country to see that we have a society and religion worth defending?

Perhaps it's because Both Bishop Nazir-Ali and Archbishop came from countries (Pakistan and Uganda) where they had to fight for their beliefs, struggling against

persecution and prejudice.

 

THE SAME IS TRUE IN BRITAIN TODAY

If we don't fight for our culture and religion

WE WILL LOSE BOTH

If the Church of England had more like them in its ranks, its future-and Britain's-would be brighter.

*          *          *

 

Convert who crusaded against extremists

BORN into a Roman Catholic family in Pakistan , the young Michael Nazir-Ali converted to Anglicanism at the age of 20.

AS a young man, he suffered rough treatment of the kind regularly handed out to Christians in a country where failing to follow the official religion can sometimes end in murder.

He moved to Cambridge to study theology and then returned as a priest to Pakistan before being brought to London in the 1980's to serve as an assistant to the then Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Robert Runcie.

He is one of the bishops who has been called on by the Prince of Wales to give advice on Islam. However, Dr Nazir -Ali does not share the prince's enthusiasm for Islamic values. He has warned Charles to give up his hope of being

'Defender of Faiths'

because of the incompatibility of different beliefs.

Dr Nazir-Ali has accused Muslims of promoting double-standards by looking for both

'victimhood and domination'

Dr Nazir-Ali has called for powers for officialdom to remove veils from Muslim women for security reasons; and he warned repeatedly over the

DANGER OF EXTREMISM

In particular he has called on Islamic leaders to allow Muslims to abandon their beliefs and adopt other religions.

Dr Nazir-Ali has spoken up for an estimated 3,000 Britons under threat of retaliation for giving up their faith and has condemned Islamic states that maintain the death penalty for apostasy.

His outspokenness has put him in the vanguard of opposition to hard-line Islamism and made him one of the highest -placed enemies of the gay-rights movement.

He angered the Archbishop of Canterbury by threatening to boycott this year's

Lambeth Conference of Anglican Bishops from around the world.

He has criticised civil partnerships and opposed the extension of IVF treatment to single women and lesbians.

 Dr Nazir-Ali has much in common with the

Archbishop of York

DR John Sentamu.

Unlike him, however, he does not have the populist touch.  This may have contributed to his failure to win the post of

Archbishop of Canterbury

for which he was once considered a leading candidate

The 58-year-old Bishop has now remained in Rochester for nearly 14 years..

*          *

*

 

[Well! Christianity has been the loser.  For such a dedicated and fearsome defender of the

FAITH

there is no doubt that with his god-given gifts of service to the

CHURCH.

He would indeed have been able to stem the

FLOOD

from the Christian fold which has been to the detriment of the people of our land who have seen a catastrophic fall in

CHRISTIAN VALUES

which has made the greater majority their most sought after desire for insatiable

MAMMON

and our country unesco have stated is one the

most unhappy and crime ridden

on

GOD'S EARTH]

*          *          *

MAN of DESTINY

 

[As we have seen only a few days ago a Christian man gave his unstinting support and financial assistance in order that a CHRISTIAN COUNTRY was protected from the ravages of the God-less corrupt and unaccountable European Union.  But for this one man and his courage and faith  in a Christian land which would have been in time forced to deny its  inherited values of Christian heritage.

History is full of men and women who if they had  not lived would not  have changed the world for good or evil. The two churchmen the Archbishops of York and Rochester are such men on the side of God.  Around the world as in all ages there are tyrants and saviours  of men.  TRUE CHRISTIANITY is such a saviour of MANKIND and any other imitation is a grotesque slur on the  meaning of the TRUE FAITH.]

A MAN OF THE PEOPLE

*

 

[Font Altered- Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets.]

 

[Each word/words underlined has a separate bulletin]

*

JUNE-2008

*

HOME

H.F.303

 
 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.
 

 

NEW AGE

OF

 INTOLERANCE

 

A.N. WILSON on the new dark age of intolerance: You must believe in gay marriage, you can't question abortion and as for transgender rights...

By A.n. Wilson For The Daily Mail

 September 30- 2017

The great French writer Voltaire famously said: 'I disapprove of what you say and would defend to the death your right to say it'. In this way, he encapsulated what it meant to be an enlightened human being — someone prepared to consider all points of view.

But in recent years the principle of freedom of speech, sacred since Voltaire's 18th century, has been lost, and this is surely one of the most sinister features of our times. It is as if we are entering a new Dark Age of Intolerance.

The irony is that this intolerance has come about as a result of what were initially good intentions. One of the things which makes me happy as I grow older is the thought that during my lifetime we have all tried to become a kinder society.

When I was a boy and a young man, for example, racist jokes were the norm on radio and TV. Now they would be unthinkable. Mockery of homosexuals, and the equation of being gay with being limp-wristed and camp, were absolute norms of comedy when I was growing up. Now no longer.

Such jokes have gone the way of boarding-houses which used to put 'NO BLACKS. NO DOGS. NO IRISH in the window'. Obviously, all civilised people feel pleased by this.

But somehow those initial good intentions — to be kinder to and more tolerant of others — have morphed into a political correctness that has had the very opposite effect.

Two notorious recent examples of this concerned the treatment of a Christian baker in Northern Ireland, and some Christian bed and breakfast owners in Berkshire. The baker had not wanted to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who were getting married. The B&B owners had refused to let a gay couple share the same room in their establishment. In each case they were successfully sued for unlawful discrimination.

Now, a gay activist would no doubt say this was a good thing, arguing that the baker and bed and breakfast owners' behaviour was comparable to the racism of the past. Yet this is surely getting things wholly out of proportion.

The baker was not persecuting homosexuals, as Hitler did. He was not saying they should be put in prison, as all Home Secretaries in Britain did until the Sixties. He was merely saying that, as a Christian, he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that two chaps tying the knot were doing something rather different, which is contrary to traditional Christian teaching.

Whatever you think about this matter, the Northern Irish baker and the B&B couple were merely holding on to Christian beliefs.

I don't happen to share their views myself, and think that if two people are rash enough to promise to live together for the rest of their lives, good luck to them, whether they are gay, straight, trans or anything else. But surely you can understand both sides of this dilemma, can't you?

Well, the answer, more and more in our intolerant society, is 'No'. My concern here is not about the rights and wrongs of gay marriage, transgender rights, our colonial history, or any of the other emotive issues that are subject to endless debate in the modern age.

It is about freedom of thought and speech; freedom to disagree in a liberal society; freedom to have thoughts which are different from the current orthodoxy.

What began as our very decent desire not to be nasty to those of a different ethnicity, or sexual proclivity, from ourselves, has turned into a world as intolerant as monkish Christianity in the days of the Dark Ages, when any freedom of thought is questioned.

Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems during the General Election, was asked repeatedly about his views on gay marriage. As a fairly old-fashioned Christian, he did not believe it was possible — marriage should be between a man and a woman.

As the leader of a modern political party, he knew that it would be political death to admit this. He was finally forced to resign.

This was a signal to the world that if you want to succeed in modern politics, it is simply not allowed to hold views which, until a very short time ago, were the consensus among the great majority of people in the Western world.

I use the words 'not allowed' advisedly. What is sinister about living in the new Dark Ages, however, is that it is by no means clear who is doing the allowing and not allowing. In Mao's China, it was obvious: thought crimes were ideas which contradicted the supreme leader.

In Britain today, however, it seems an army of self-appointed censors — from internet trolls to angry students, lobby groups, town hall officials, craven politicians and lawyers and Establishment figures, as well as a host of other sanctimonious and often bilious busy-bodies — have taken it upon themselves to police what we can and cannot think or say.

Not believing in abortion, like not believing in gay marriage, is now, unquestionably, a thought crime. It was hardly surprising that the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg recently said he did not believe in abortion, because he is a man of conviction as well as a Roman Catholic, and this is the teaching of his Church. Yet his view was treated with incredulity and disdain by everyone from trolls and women's groups to the higher echelons of the political Establishment.

As in the case of abortion, debate is no longer allowed on transgender issues. There was a BBC2 Horizon Programme last Tuesday night called Being Transgender. The close-up shots of transgender surgery in a Californian hospital will not easily leave the mind.

We met a number of nice people who had decided for one reason or another that they were not the gender which they had once supposed. They were all undergoing some form of transformative medical treatment, either taking hormones or having surgery.

What made the programme strange as a piece of journalism was the fact that it did not contain one dissenting voice. Not one psychiatrist or doctor who said they doubted the wisdom of some of these procedures, especially in the very young.

Still less was there anyone like the redoubtable feminist and academic Dr Germaine Greer who once expressed her view that a man did not become a woman just because he had undergone transgender surgery — and was, as a result, decried from the rooftops with everything from petitions launched to stop her from speaking at university campuses to death threats.

Dr Greer had also been bold enough to say 'a great many women' shared her view, which is obviously true — a great many women do not think that transgender people have really changed sex. What has changed is that it is no longer permitted to say so.

A friend of mine who likes bathing in the women's pond on Hampstead Heath in London says that at least one person now uses the female changing rooms who is obviously in a stage of transition from man to woman, and is simply a hairy man wearing lipstick.

However uncomfortable this makes the women feel, they know that they cannot say anything.

There was an ugly incident lately at Hyde Park's Speakers' Corner, which used to be the place where anyone could go and stand on a soap-box and hold any opinion they liked.

Speakers' Corner was a symbol of British Freedom of Speech. As a schoolboy, I had a Jewish friend whose grandfather used to take us there to listen to people proclaiming that the earth was flat, preachers praising Hitler, Stalin, and others saying whatever they liked. It was the freedom to do so, said the old man who had escaped Hitler's Germany, which made the very air of Britain so refreshing to him.

What would he have thought had he witnessed the scene earlier this month at Speakers' Corner when a 60-year-old woman called Maria was smacked in the face, allegedly by a transgender fanatic, while listening to a talk on planned reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. Reforms which would allow men to 'self-identify' as female, and enter women's changing rooms or refuges unchallenged.

For Maria, as for the intimidated women of Hampstead swimming pool, and for Germaine Greer, it is by no means clear that transgender people have changed their sex.

Transgender activists have labelled women like Maria TERFS — Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists. When news of the assault on her reached the internet — ie instantaneously — the trolls began baying, like the bloodthirsty mob during the guillotine-executions of the French Revolution. 'Burn in a fire, TERF'. 'I want to f*** some TERFS up, they are no better than fascists'.

The use of the word 'fascist' is commonplace in our new Dark Age for anyone with whom you happen to disagree. You hear it all the time in the Brexit arguments which rage all around us and which I dread. As it happens, I voted Remain. But I do not regard Brexiteers as 'fascists', and many of their arguments — wanting to reclaim the power to make our own laws and control our own borders — are evidently sensible.

Yet I have lost count of the number of times I have heard Remainers say that Brexiteers are fascists. As a matter of historical fact, many of the keenest supporters of a united European superstate were actual fascists.

The only British politician who campaigned on the ticket of Europe A Nation during the Fifties was Sir Oswald Mosley who was leader of the British Union of Fascists. But then, today's PC censors don't let facts get in their way of bigotry.

Branding anyone you disagree with a fascist; hitting people in the face; tweeting and blogging abuse behind the cowardly anonymity of the internet — these are the ugly weapons used to stifle any sort of debate. And it is often in the very places where ideas should be exchanged and examined that the bigotry is at its worst: our universities.

This week on the Radio 4's Today programme, we heard James Caspian, a quietly-spoken, kindly psychotherapist, describing what has become a cause celebre at Bath Spa University.

He has been working for some years with people who for one reason or another have begun the process of gender-transition, and then come to regret it.

Caspian is evidently not a judgmental man. He wanted to write a thesis on this subject from a sympathetic and dispassionate point of view.

What makes people feel so uncomfortable with their own apparent gender that they wish to undergo painful and invasive surgery to change it? What makes people then come to reassess their first idea? These are surely legitimate questions about a subject many of us can't quite comprehend.

I have two friends who started out as men, and decided in mid-life that they were really women, or wanted to become women, which is what they have done. I do not really understand what has happened to them, even though they have tried to explain it to me.

Surely a man like James Caspian, who has worked with transgender men and women, should be encouraged by a university to explain this area of medicine or psychology?

But no. The university, having initially approved of his idea for a thesis, then turned down his application. 'The fundamental reason given was that it might cause criticism of the research on social media, and criticism of the research would be criticism of the university,' he told Radio 4 listeners. 'They also added it's better not to offend people.'

This is all of a piece with students at Oxford wanting to pull down the statue of 19th century imperialist Cecil Rhodes from his old college, Oriel, on the grounds that he was racist.

Rather than having a reasoned debate weighing the evils of racist colonialism against Rhodes's benevolence, the student at the forefront of the movement — who had actually accepted a £40,000 Rhodes scholarship funded by the fortune the colonialist gave to Oxford — wanted to pull down the statue.

This is the same attitude of mind as that which led monks in the Dark Ages to destroy the statues of pagan gods and goddesses, or the Taliban to do the same to age-old Buddhist artefacts.

Reason, debate, seeing more than one side to an argument, surely these are the foundations of all that has fashioned the great values of the West since the Enlightenment started in the 18th century with an explosion of new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, and modern rational thought that ushered in the Age of Reason.

Realising that human actions and ideas are often mixtures of good and bad — isn't this what it means to have a grown-up mind? Surely we should be allowed to discuss matters without being accused of thought crime?

In universities, as at Speakers' Corner and in the public at large, there used to be the robust sense that sticks and stones may break our bones but words can never hurt us. Now, the 'hurt-feelings' card is regularly played to stifle any debate.

Little by little, we are allowing the Dark Ages of intolerance to come again. We should not be letting this happen.

We should be able to say: 'We disapprove of your views — on Europe, on Transgender Issues, on Islam, on absolutely anything, but we defend to the death your right to express them'.


 

Full article

 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4935418/A-N-WILSON-new-dark-age-intolerance.html#ixzz4uAFieZ6T
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTING - ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 30-2017

H.F.1329

 
 
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 17/1

/Of 28 sections.

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC JIHAD

The Islamic Jihad of the 7th to 10th centuries over-ran half of the then Christian World by the sword. Today, many western Muslims are peaceful and law-abiding, and those who are faithful to the Quran and to the Hadith may well stand beside Christians in campaigns against Materialism and immorality.

Equally, they can take the view that the decadent 'Christian' west is regarded as Dar-al-Harb (house of war). pagan and irredeemable. Only jihad, in the latter view, will bring 'peace' by the establishment of a new Khilafah (a Muslim state) worldwide and by the abolition of national boundaries to result in Izhaar ud-Deen (world domination by Islam).

Islamic states are at the forefront of persecution of Christians, a fact well documented by Operation Mobilisation, Barnabas Fund, Christian Solidarity and Frontline Fellowship amongst other Christian groups.  This topic alone would warrant a book about it and there is truly no space here to begin to do the subject the justice it deserves.

Even in non-Muslim countries, Islam shows its aggressive side, and this is putting the bombings in places like New York, Bali, Madrid, London and Israel on one side.  In Nigeria, Muslims are advancing Sha'ria and persecuting Christians, driving them out of Muslim areas by force of arms. In Australia, Muslims used the State of Victoria's Anti-Vilification Law to persecute Paster Daniel Scot when he described the persecution of Christians in Pakistan and described Islamic beliefs.  At the University of Pretoria, in South Africa, Frontline Fellowship Field Director, Timothy Keller, was threatened by a mob of Muslim students demanding that a missions display be taken down.  In the United Kingdom, author Salman Rushdie became the subject of a death sentence for writing his book "The Satanic Verses" and the arts and media worlds are terrified of offending Muslims.  And with good reason - Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh was murdered because he released a film criticising Islam and the oppression of women in arranged marriages.  His murderer, Mohammed Bouyeri, is unrepentant.

Believers are held in Islam by fear, making the Quranic promise that there is no compulsion empty. Mohammed said 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' (Bukhari: Volume 4, book 52, Number 260, Narrated Ikrima.)

Apostasy is punishable by death today in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen, Iran, Sudan, Pakistan and Mauritania.  Of point to us in evangelism is that the penalty for a Muslim converting to Christianity in Britain is still theoretically death.  Even if a convert's Muslims neighbours stop short of killing him, Muslim converts in Britain suffer severe persecution.  The Barnabas Fund estimate that some 3,000 Christian converts from Islam are in danger in the UK.  They include Nissar Hussain and his family from Bradford; his car was burnt out, he has endured bricks thrown through his windows, threats to burn his house down and much else.

 

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1
Brought forward from 2006

ANGER in the COUNTRYSIDE as POLICE STATIONS and POST OFFICES- SHUT UP SHOP

 

[The following letters to the Editor of the Daily Telegraph -Dec., 13-2006 -explain the full anger of members of the population to the further destruction of the vital organs which serve the body of the communities.]

 

SIR- A man kicked to death outside Henley police station as it reported that 900 stations have been closed.  Thousands more rural post offices are to be shut. Our Armed Forces are imperfectly equipped for the wars to which the Government has committed them. Gangs of feral youths roam the streets. Britain is in social collapse due to the decline in traditional family values.

 

WHY?

It's because a financially incompetent welfare state and a political determination not to be judgmental about wayward sections of society have destroyed the fabric of this once great nation. This will go on doing so unless a political leadership emerges with the courage to tackle the problem.

 

If this is to be the Conservatives, they need to emerge from the New closet in which they have been skulking for the past year, ..."'Don't Talk, Fix it"

Correspondent from

Chesham Bois, Bucks.

 

*

SIR- The Closure of police stations is yet another issue that is dealt with through spin rather than honesty.

The reality of the 24-hour police stations is that they provide reassurance to residents and the fact that patrolling officers come in and out of the premises at various times means that there is a guaranteed visible police presence in the local area. When these premises are closed officers may be based a significant distance away and local police will have to rely on a chance patrol to see a police officer.

The next issue for spin rather than substance will be police community support officers, just about the only visible "police" presence in my area. it won't be long before the Government presents these well-meaning, but under trained (when compared with police constables) officers as an integral part of overall police numbers on the streets.

Correspondent from

London,SW1

 

SIR- There used to be two sub-post offices within a reasonable walking and cycling distance of my home. They were of course killed off by the Government. Now I must drive a considerable distance to a shopping centre wherein now lies our nearest post office.

This office is overwhelmed with customers -the queues are long and slow. Fortunately, as we stand patiently in line , we are entertained by an overhead television screen showing advertisements for mail services and displaying the proud message

"The Post Office - serving you at the heart of your community"

Real services have been replaced by media spin. Joined up Government in action

Correspondent from Aberdeen

[No doubt this example is happening at countless other locations throughout the British Isles]

*

SIR- Our police station in Oxted became part-time a few years ago; about the same time as the crime rate went up.

Recently we had our first armed bank raid in Oxted High Street at midday. We have more chance of seeing a traffic warden than a policeman.

Correspondent from Limpsfield, Surrey

 

[I'm sure if we were to show the countless letters sent to the Press in the UK on the subject we would be sitting here for ever-and ever -and ever-and ever-and ever...........]

*          *          *

 

DECEMBER/06

THERE ARE IN 2021 OVER 200 BULLETINS COVERING THIS SUBJECT SINCE THE ABOVE DATE IN 2006.

THE LOCAL POLICE STATION IN WARWICK WAS CLOSED ONLY A JUST OVER A YEAR  AGO. NO BOBBIES -ON-THE-BEAT

H.F.1932
 
LITTLEJOHN

 

 

 

WE don't have a housing crisis-

We have a population crisis...

DAILY MAIL-Richard Littlejohn: We don't have a housing crisis...

 

We don't have a housing crisis - we have a population crisis: RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says the horror stories of 'Brexodus' are a pack of lies

By Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail

 November,17, 2017

 

The Prime Minister announced she is to take personal charge of solving Britain's housing crisis

The Prime Minister announced yesterday that she is to take personal charge of solving Britain's acute housing crisis.

In next week's Budget, planning rules will be relaxed, social housing debt cancelled, stamp duty cut and billions of pounds will be pumped into house-building projects.

New homes will spring up across the land, on brownfield sites, in back gardens, on the rooftops of existing buildings even.

Yet Theresa May says it can all be achieved while protecting the Green Belt. Build up, not out, is the new mantra. Pile 'em high and sell 'em cheap.

Marvel as Mother Theresa morphs into Bob the Builder. Can we fix it? Yes we can!

But hang on a minute. Are we really going to need all these little boxes post Brexit?

Not if the Remain scaremongers are to be believed. They're like those deluded Japanese soldiers after Hiroshima, hiding out in the jungle, still fighting the last war.

Once we leave the EU, they warn, jobs will dry up and millions of immigrants will flee the country. Indeed, scared migrants are doing so already, forced out by mobs of knuckle-scraping neo-Nazis roaming the streets stirring up a hate crime epidemic.

The NHS is on the brink of collapse, as nurses and doctors who came here from overseas seek sanctuary in safe havens abroad.

Crops are left to rot in the fields, as agricultural workers return home to Eastern Europe. Soon you won't be able to hire a Polish plumber for love nor money. Pubs and restaurants will close their doors because they can't recruit foreign bar staff and waitresses. There won't be a car wash left anywhere in Britain.

All those Polski skleps which have taken over from Asian corner shops will go bankrupt overnight, as their customers retreat in droves to Warsaw and Gdansk. Our inner cities will become ghost towns and our public services will implode, shorn of hard-working immigrants run out of Britain, virtually at gunpoint.

 

British Prime Minister Theresa May (centre) visited a housing estate in London on Thursday 

That, at least, is the apocalyptic vision post Brexit painted by the fanatics still trying to perpetuate Project Fear. If they're right, then we won't need to build millions of new homes, since Brexodus — as it's being dubbed — will free up housing stock everywhere.

Rents and house prices will come crashing down as demand plummets and young people will be able to scale the housing ladder like Barbary apes. Dream on.

Like all the other horror stories invented by the Remoaners, Brexodus is a pack of lies. Far from foreign nationals fleeing Britain, they are continuing to flock here in record numbers. We don't have a housing crisis, we have a population crisis — driven almost exclusively by immigration. It's one of the main reasons people voted Leave.

MigrationWatch UK — which has been about the only body to tell the unvarnished truth about immigration over the past couple of decades — reports that eight out of ten new households established between 2000 and 2015 are made up of migrant families.

As these new arrivals age, it will put even more pressure on housing. MigrationWatch says we should consider, for instance, the number of young men — especially from Eastern Europe — currently living as many as a dozen or more to a house. In time, they will all want to start families and set up homes of their own.

MigrationWatch's Lord Green said: 'We have a major crisis over housing affecting huge numbers of people, especially the young. Yet the focus of debate is still on supply; nobody dares talk about demand and its principal driver, immigration.'

What's more, in the five years up to 2015, the number of households headed by someone born in Britain actually fell. So if there is a Brexodus, it is comprised of British nationals moving abroad, many saying they don't want to live in a country they no longer recognise.

The reality is the polar opposite of the Remoaners' propaganda about frightened migrants fleeing racist Britain and plunging us into an economic crisis.

In truth, the economy has performed pretty spectacularly since the referendum result — certainly better than the rest of Europe — creating an explosion in jobs which are being filled by workers from home and abroad.

For instance, the preposterous Vince Cable claimed that 10,000 foreign staff 'have walked away from the National Health Service because they don't think they're needed or wanted any more'. Yet just a few days ago, a forensic Mail investigation blew Vinnie's little fantasy out of the water.

At the end of June there were 3,181 more EU nationals working in the health service than in 2016. Yesterday, official Government figures from the Office for National Statistics showed there were 2.38 million EU nationals working in Britain — an increase of 112,000 on a year ago.

The number of Romanians and Bulgarians who have found jobs here now stands at almost 350,000, up by a third in the past 12 months. They have no incentive to scuttle off back to Bucharest and Sofia any time soon.
 

Mrs May spoke to resident Val Lay (left) during a visit to a housing estate in Edgware, north London

Last time anyone looked, the 10,000 Poles, Lithuanians and other assorted Eastern Europeans who have made their home in Boston, Lincolnshire — Britain's Brexit capital — showed no signs of upping sticks and sloping off home, pursued by the provisional wing of Ukip. Nor will they have to.

Despite the pig-headed intransigence and obstructionism of the EU's Brexit negotiators, determined to punish the British people for voting Leave, Mrs May has already guaranteed the rights of EU citizens living here. And it's not just the EU, either. Immigrants from all over the world are still making Britain their top destination, often risking life and limb to get here.

Why would they want to join a sinking ship? Are they all crazy? Are they really determined to make their new lives in a racist, basket-case, post-Brexit wilderness?

Or could it be, perhaps, that they are attracted here to join friends and family who report that Britain is a tolerant, civilised, multi-cultural country with a generous welfare system and a bright, independent future offering endless opportunity for economic advancement?

Millions of migrants are choosing Britain over the sclerotic countries of the bureaucratic, moribund EU. And will continue to do so once we leave and become again a confident, outward-looking nation, free to embrace the globe and all it has to offer.

That will mean embracing not just free trade but the brightest and best immigrants, too, who will continue to be welcomed here.

That, in turn, will mean they're all going to need somewhere to live. Which is why the Prime Minister is right to make housing a priority.

Our innate resolve and pragmatic nature suggests we will tackle this housing crisis with the determination and elan we have applied to every other crisis in our history.

Ignore the hysterical lies and predictions of doom, the death rattle of the Remoaners determined to sabotage Brexit by any means fair or foul.

Britain, home of Bob the Builder, will rise to the challenge.

Can we Brexit? Yes we can!

Most watched News videos


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5091383/We-don-t-housing-crisis-population-crisis.html#ixzz4yoJrN7at
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

H.F.1384

 
 
 

I wish, sir, an English Parliament to speak the free unbiased sense of the body of the

ENGLISH PEOPLE

and of every man among us,  of each individual who may be justly supposed to be a fair majority...and we ought always to remember the important truth, acknowledged by every free state-that all government is instituted for the good of the mass of the people to be governed that they are the original fountain of power, and even of reverence and in all events the last response...I mention them now to show the necessity of a new regulation

[To introduce PR-Proportional Representation in 2020.]

  of the representation of the Kingdom of ENGLAND...the monstrous injustice and glaring partiality of the present representation of the Commons of England

 [In fact there is no Commons of England  since 1707 at Westminster since 1707]

has been fully stated, and is, I believe almost universally acknowledged, as well as as the necessity of our recurring to the great leading principle of our free [English] constitution which declares the House of Parliament [English Parliament] to be only a delegated power for the people at large. Policy, no less than justice, calls our intention to the momentous point; and reason, not custom, ought to be our guide in a business of this consequence [PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION in 2020 in an ENGLISH PARLIAMENT] where the right of a free people are materially interested.

[In Germany which has PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION those who wish for the return of their NATIONHOOD are protected in their democratic decision by the LAW of the LAND as we have seen only recently.]

Without a true representation [Introduction of PR in 2020] of the commons our constitution is essentially defective ,our Parliament is delusive name, a mere phantom, and all other remedies to recover the pristine purity of the form of government established by our ancestors would be ineffectual, even the shortening of the period of Parliament and a place and pension bill, which iI highly approve, and think absolutely necessary. [As we the EDP in 2020 fight for the return of the ENGLISH PARLIAMENT at WESTMINSTER.]  I therefore flatter myself sir, that I have the concurrence of the House with the notion which I have the honour of making, That leave be given to bring in a bill for a just and equal representation of the

PEOPLE of ENGLAND in PARLIAMENT.

 

 

BORIS JOHNSON HAS A STRIKING MAJORITY IN WESTMINSTER TO ENABLE HIM TO BE A MAN OF HISTORY TO RIGHT THE WRONG AND RETURN WESTMINSTER TO ITS HISTORIC PLACE AS THE HOME OF THE

 ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

JUNE 14 -2020

 

The above extract of an article

JOHN WILKS

A Warning and a Prophecy

The Commons and its Rights

1727-1797

 

taken from

 

International University Reading Course

Copyright by

International University Society.

 

 

H.F.2031
 
 
 
 

 

MAY-16 victory

JUN-16

REFERENDUM

 JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19
SEP 19 OCT-19 NOV-19 DEC-19 JAN-20

FEB-20

MAR-20

APRIL-20

 MAY-20 JUNE-20
JULY-20 AUG-20 SEPT-20 OCT-20 NOV-20  FREE OF THE EU

DEC-20

 AFTER  48 YEARS

JAN-21

A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

 THE

WORLD OUR OYSTER

JAN-21

FEB-21

MAR-21

APRIL - 21

MAY - 21

JUNE - 21

 

JULY - 21

AUGUST - 21

September 2021

 

 

 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003

[ OVER THE YEARS A NUMBER OF WEB-SITES HAVE HAVE DISAPPEARED FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER.
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/
Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967 DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

 YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

  
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

 HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 
UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 
 
 

 NOVEMBER. - PART 1 - 2021

BULLETINS -NOVEMBER-2021 -HOME - PART  1  - PART 1-PAGE 2  - PART 2 - PART 3 - PART 4 - PART 5 - PART 6

 

 

OCTOBER - HOME - PART 1  - PART 1 PAGE 1  - PART 2  - PART 3  - PART 4   - PART 5  - PART 6

SEPTEMBER -  HOME - PART 1  - PART 1 PAGE 1  - PART 2  - PART 3  - PART   - PART 5  - PART 6

 

BULLETIN FILES FOR AUGUST 2021: - HOME- PART 1 - PART 1-PAGE 2 - PART 2 - PART 3 -  PART 4 - PART 5 - PART 6
 

 

 

NOVEMBER- HOME-

-  PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

- (1994 -Official Website - MARCH-PT 5- 2019 )-

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

*

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012