&nbsp;

" Apart from a brief, last - minute postponement (designed to buy off Polish opposition) of the introduction of a new system of qualified majority voting [QMV], the remaining adjustments to be made to the treaty signed in 2004-but still not ratified by nine member states are essentially presentational and have no perceptible legal effect."

Eurofacts-July 27-2007

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

A NEW WORLD CASE FOR PRESERVING THE' RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN'

PART I

[The following extracts are from :

The Influence Of Magna Carta on American Development

by H.D. Hazeltine, M.A., Litt.D

[1917]

-because of the extensive research developed in this subject we will be only selecting some of the available material to emphasis what we have already lost and why we must fight to regain the treasonable handovers by our politicians over the past 35 years of:

'The Rights and Liberties Of Englishmen.']

THE INFLUENCE OF MAGNA CARTA ON AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT

For seven centuries Magna Carta has exerted a powerful influence upon the constitutional and legal development. During the first four centuries after 1215 this influence was confined to ENGLAND and the British Isles.

With the growth of the British Empire during the last three hundred years, the principles of the Charter have spread to many of the political communities which have derived their constitutional and legal systems from ENGLAND, and which have owed in the past, or which still owe, allegiance to the mother-country.

The earliest, and perhaps the most important phrase of this imperial history of Magna Carta is its effect upon the constitutions and laws of the American colonies and of the Federal Union [of the United States of America] that was established after the War of Independence.

[In 2007 every Englishman must be aware that we are ourselves in a battle in our own

WAR of INDEPENDENCE

-the first shots have yet to be fired to reclaim of inherited rights and liberties should it be the only way forward to reclaim that which has been by stealth and treacherous and illegal means has been taken from us. As in the Great Rebellion the Cause will divide families and brothers and sisters but the result will be Victory for our Cause because we have Right and Legitimacy on our side.]

In this story of the Charter's influence upon American constitutional development three separate periods should be distinguished. The colonial period, which began with the granting of the first Virginia Charter by James 1 in 1606 and ended about 1760, was followed by the epoch of the American revolution.

With the Treaty of Paris of 1783, in which Great Britain acknowledged her former colonies to be

"free, sovereign, and independent States,"

-the present period of national existence had its definite beginnings.

[As in 2007 all loyal citizens of our ancient constitution are fighting to defend the same ideals which were given to our colonies those hundreds of years ago. It is the mother-of parliaments appealing to her children to come to her aid to defend those rights and liberties which have been treasured for almost 800 years.]

Each one of these periods is closely related to earlier events and ideas in the history of ENGLAND and of the Colonies. Together the three periods constitute American constitutional and legal evolution is one that rests for its FOUNDATION upon the long centuries of ENGLISH development that preceded its own beginnings, and that bears also, in a marked degree, the imprint of the constitutional and legal changes in ENGLAND during the period of colonization and even in later times.

Indeed, rightly to understand the constitutional and legal history of the colonies and of the United States of America, in each period of which magna Carta plays a role, we should not forget that the Englishmen who settled in America in the seventeenth century inherited all the preceding ages of ENGLISH history.

To them belonged Magna Carta and the Common Law; to them belonged the legal traditions of the Tudor age - the age that immediately preceded the period of colonization. The colonies did not fail to enter upon their inheritance; and the result has been that colonial institutions and principles, both of public and of private law, retained much of the Tudor and pre-Tudor tradition, and that even today [1917] American institutions and principles bear the impress of its influence today in 2007.]

For ENGLAND the seventeenth century was the first great age of the Empire - the age of commercial and colonial expansion not only in the West, but in the East; and it was the age also of the momentous struggle at home between the CROWN and PARLIAMENT - between the claims of the royal prerogative and of parliamentary supremacy.

[In 2007 the CROWN and PARLIAMENT has deceived the PEOPLE by the gradual process of handing over our 'accustomed rights and liberties' under the smokescreen of an illegal war and its consequent backlash of resentment from the Muslim world and a great majority of the people in our once respected and law-abiding democratic country.]

In America the seventeenth century was pre-eminently the age of settlement and the growth of chartered conies, either of proprietary or corporate character, this American development constituting one phrase of ENGLISH expansion; and it was likewise the age in which results of constitutional conflict in ENGLAND exerted their first influences upon the development of colonial institutions and of colonial legal and political ideas.

The growth of the colonies in America meant, from the very beginning, the extension of ENGLISH institutions and laws to these little ENGLAND'S across the sea. To their birth-right of the ENGLISH traditions of the sixteenth and earlier centuries was now added the gift of the constitutional and legal principles established in seventeenth-century ENGLAND, the ENGLAND of Stuart kings, of Commonwealth and Protectorate, of REVOLUTION; for changes in the public and private law of ENGLAND during the century directly and vitally affected constitutional and legal growth in the colonies.

As the Common Law heritage of ENGLISHMEN in the colonies. Thus , Like Magna Carta itself, the great constitutional documents of the seventeenth century, such as the

PETITION OF RIGHT

HABEAS CORPUS ACT

-and the

BILL OF RIGHTS

-have a colonial as well as a purely ENGLISH history. To these STATUTES, as to Magna Carta, the colonists turned as the documentary evidence of the

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ALL ENGLISHMEN

-whether they resided in the home-land or in the ENGLISH communities of America.

[How can Englishmen of the 21st century stand by and see that great inheritance which has proved its sacred nature in America and in many new nations in the world to be sacrificed by our Government in order to join a system which destroys the very sacred inheritance developed and defended with much blood over the centuries be cast aside by a 21st century King John and even worse supported by that very ancient institution our House of Commons the very institution which was developed to protect our inherited rights and liberties. We cannot allow this to happen and with the world looking on - we cannot let it happen.]

.... From the early eighteenth century down to the present day American institutions have developed, in the main, along their own lines, largely upon the basis of English development in the seventeenth century and earlier centuries, colonial development in the seventeenth century, and American political thought and constructive statesmanship of the eighteenth , nineteenth , and twentieth centuries.

This striking divergence of American from English institutions, dating from the early eighteenth century, is in sharp contrast with the history of law. Through out the eighteenth century, though perhaps less in the period of the Revolution, English Common Law continued to influence the development of colonial legislation and judicial decisions; and even today the American system of Common Law and Equity is in its fundamental characteristics the same as that of England.

So, too, in certain leading features of constitutional law - as distinct from constitutional institutions, such as the American system of three co-ordinate departments of government and the power of the judicature to declare an Act of the legislature null and void because in conflict with the written constitution -we see a striking persistence of English principles.

[Unfortunately the omission of a written constitution in Britain has made the progress of its absorption into a United States of Europe that much easier for its politicians over the last 35 years. Our safety depended on our representatives honouring the 'Checks and Balances' or Conventions of the Realm which they soon realised were easy to assail and demolish with their task over 35 years almost complete before the people had realised what was afoot. Fortunately at the eleventh hour which appears an English characteristic it has now begun to awake from its slumber and realising just in time that there was indeed a threat to their Customs (Values) Constitution and Country.]

Rights and Liberties of Englishmen embodied in Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, and other constitutional documents became vital features of colonial constitutional law, and have continued throughout the revolutionary and national epochs to the present day to be essential elements of American constitutional law.

The story of the influence of Magna Carta on American constitutional development is but one phase of the whole history of English institutions and law in America, and this in turn is but one chapter in the history of a broader, a further-reaching development -the extension of English institutions and of English Common and Statutory Law to the many communities that have formed or still form parts of the British Empire [1917]

In studying Magna Carta in America we are concerned, therefore, with one feature and one only, of this whole vast process. But just as the influence of Magna Carta in England itself cannot be understood apart from the long history of the ever changing body of rules and principles that go to make up the system of English Common Law, of which the provisions of Magna Carta form only a part, so, too an understanding of the influence of Magna Carta in America can only be reached by considering this great legal document as but one of the many sources of English Common Law in its American environment. In the present paper certain main features of the American development, throughout its three period, will be suggested; but without any attempt at exhaustive consideration.

I. From the very beginning the colonists claimed they were entitled as Englishmen to the law of Englishmen - the Common Law as a great corpus juris based on the decisions of the courts and on the statutory enactments of Parliament, in a body of rules of private and public law which secured to Englishmen their rights as private individuals in their relations one with another and also their rights and liberties as subjects of the Crown.

It was the Common Law of England which the various colonies, acting through their executive, legislature, and judicature, adopted or received, either partially or wholly, as the law adapted to the needs of English communities in America.

Along with the English Law thus received by the colonists, there grew up in various American communities new rules and principles based on colonial customs, the reformative skill of colonial law-makers, and in the Puritan colonies of NEW ENGLAND

-natural or Divine law.

[In claiming the Common law as their own the colonists were but applying Lord Chief Justice of England - Edward Coke's (Cook's) doctrine (12 Rep.39) (1603) that

"the law and custom of England is the inheritance of the subject"

That Lord Phillips, our present Lord Chief Justice of England, is what the millions of loyal subjects to the true constitution of England intend to defend in the year 2007 as our forebears in the past .

TO BE CONTINUED in

PART 2

* * *

[Font Altered-Bolding &Underlining Used -Comments in Brackets]

FEBRUARY/07

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

* July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

The Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

'The Spirit of England'

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

VOTE

-2007

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

ONLY

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

A NEW WORLD CASE FOR PRESERVING THE 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN'

PART 2

If for a moment, we view the whole system of English Common Law as partly public and partly private law, even though English legal thought does not draw a sharp distinction between the two, we may the more easily grasp the early attitude of the colonists towards the law of the home-land.

Reinsch has expressed this attitude in these words:

"English colonists in their general ideas of justice and right, brought with them the fruits of the 'struggle for law' in England....

Most of the colonies made their earliest appeal to the [English] Common Law in its character as a muniment of

ENGLISH LIBERTY

-that is considering more its public than its private law elements,"

Hallam, " Constitutional History of England," iii.1906, p.338:

"In quitting the soil of England to settle new colonies, Englishmen never renounced her freedom. Such being the noble principle of English colonisation, circumstances favoured the early development of colonial liberties,"

On the claim of the colonists to the benefits of Magna Carta and other constitutional statutes of England, see Osgood "American Colonies in the seventeenth century," 1902,i.p.258.

Or, in Channing's [History of the United States,"i.1905,p.529] phrase:

"So far as [the English Common law] protected them from the English government and the royal officials they looked upon it as their

"BIRTHRIGHT"

-so far as it interfered with their development it was to be disregarded"

If we bear this in mind , we shall see the more clearly that English constitutional statutes and cases were, as their "birthright"

-of fundamental importance to the English colonists of America in their struggles with colonial and imperial authorities.

[As in 2007 when we find that over the past 35 years our politicians have been undermining our fundamental liberties in order to enslave us into a corrupt totalitarian police state calling itself the United States of Europe.]

In the earlier Stuart reigns Magna Carta, as the greatest of all English

STATUTES OF LIBERTY

-was regarded by the colonists as a bulwark of their rights as Englishmen.

As the seventeenth century advanced, the great constitutional struggles in England were reflected in the colonies; and the

Petition of Right

the

Habeas Corpus Act

the

Bill of Rights

and the

Act of Settlement(1701)

-took their place beside

MAGNA CARTA

-in the minds of the colonists as

statutory guaranties

of the

Rights of Englishmen

-both at home and away from home, in respect of

LIFE

LIBERTY

and

PROPERTY.

[In 2007 in England our guaranties have been stolen from us by those who had taken the constitutional oath to defend our accustomed rights and liberties and who in 1998 by legislation passed through the House of Commons in defiance of their Oaths an unannounced measure which took away any danger from the courts for their crimes of TREASON.

For confirmation:

http://eutruth.org.uk

It is for this reason that we must view Magna Carta in its history in the colonies as only part - though a most valuable part - of the whole body of English constitutional law, the Common law in its character of public rather than private law, the Common Law as it is found in constitutional cases and constitutional statutes.

As Englishmen owing allegiance to the Crown and settling upon land claimed by England as under its sovereignty, the colonists were, it would seem, entitled to the

'RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN'

-embodied in

MAGNA CARTA

and other sources of Common Law without further sanction of royal charter or colonial legislation. But , not only did royal charters to the colonists secure these constitutional rights, they were incorporated also in colonial legislation.

The history of Magna Carta in America has a meaning far deeper than the influence of a single constitutional document; for Magna Carta typifies those ideals of law and government which have spread to America and to many other political communities that lie beyond the four seas encircling the island realm [of England] itself.

The world diffusion of those ideals of liberty and justice deserve to be studied in its entirety, as a vast historical process which had its beginnings far back in the middle ages, and which has shaped and is still shaping in modern times the institutions of all the political commonwealths that owe their spiritual inheritance to

ENGLAND.

'In England the actual and practical security for English liberty against legislative tyranny was the power of

FREE PUBLIC OPINION

-represented by the

COMMONS of ENGLAND

In [America] written constitutions were deemed essential to protect the rights and liberties of the people against the encroachments of power delegated to their governments [States], and the provisions of Magna Carta, were incorporated into [States]

Bills of Rights

They were limitations upon all the powers of government, legislative as well as executive and judicial...'

Applied to England only as guards against executive usurpation and tyranny, here [America] they have become bulwarks also against arbitrary legislation; but ,in that application, as it would be incongruous to measure and restrict them to the ancient customary English law, they must be held a guarantee, not particular forms of procedure, but the very substance of individual rights of

LIFE LIBERTY and PROPERTY.

[AS we all know over the past 35 years our COMMONS of ENGLAND the ancient protector of the English people has betrayed the People by its willingness to pass many TREATIES with the EUROPEAN UNION which has stealthily eroded the power of Parliament to a point today in 2007 when it will only require the ratification of a FINAL TREATY to make Parliament into a Regional storehouse for the mountains of farm products which the EU with their allies in that historic building who have encouraged those policies and paid for.

In America this could NOT possibly happen because they have a Supreme Court to protect State rights and liberties as the States themselves their individual Bill of Rights.

ONLY people power using the INTERNET as its COMMONS of ENGLAND has any chance of putting our traitorous representatives ON TRIAL by the JURY of the PEOPLE where they cannot hide where ever they are from final retribution wherever they may be whether visiting the ice flows of the Antarctic or enjoying their traitorous reward in the Elite body of the EU or on a lecture tour of the United States of America.

As during the last two World Wars when governments in Europe which had been overrun by the NAZIS sent their Governments in Exile to England so we today in February 2007 have no need to leave OUR COUNTRY but as ALL loyal citizens of the TRUE CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND will form our own COMMONS of ENGLAND and conduct our deliberations through the INTERNET.

LET US SHOW THE PRESENT EXCUSES FOR REPRESENTATIVES THAT WHAT THEY SAY IN THEIR EU REGIONAL OFFICE AT WESTMINSTER IS OF NO INTEREST AS WE HAVE OUR OWN FORUM AND OUR OWN PARLIAMENT AT THE CLICK OF A BUTTON.

LET US SELECT OUR OWN GOVERNMENT IN EXILE without leaving our homes and use the only means now available to form an alternative government without the need of expensive buildings and rental etc. What a shock when Blair learns there is another Prime Minister of England out there who will have more support than he will expect at the next General Election which might never happen because by 2009 we will have no Government in England but an EU regional office for the Elite wasters owing their allegiance to Brussels.

One would love to see the look on the faces of those detestable traitors when they hear that there is a loyal Commons of England in England open to everyone and it has no connection with the traitorous brigands who will soon be turning that most ancient and hallowed corner of England into an EU Food Store.

The fragmentation of the eurosceptic opposition to the EU has been working in its favour - it is time for ALL organizations to be represented under an umbrella organisation that can speak for ALL eurosceptic opinion. In our communities today we have numerous such bodies to look after the interests of its members many representing new comers to our island home. We have been late to learn that ONLY IF THERE IS ONE BODY AND ONE VOICE and a UNITY which we have lacked up to February 2007 will we ever be taken seriously by ANY GOVERNMENT.

The 50th anniversary of our entrapment into a supposed Common Market is an opportunity to after all be serious about our campaign and UNITE in a common cause and reap the benefits of that UNITY as we are ONLY *two years from the extinction of our own Parliament at Westminster.

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

http://eutruth://org.uk

CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS OF:

THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND ITS HERITAGE AND IMPORTANCE TO PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY TODAY

WHY THE USA NEEDS A 21st CENTURY MONROE DOCTRINE.

WARNING AND A PROPHECY -TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS FROM AN ENGLISHMAN AND DEFENDER OF AMERICAN LIBERTY IN 1775.

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

FEBRUARY/07

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

www.eutruth.org.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

* July 18-2007

VOTE

-2007

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

ONLY

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

BLAIR HAS STAGED A COUP -FIRST AGAINST THE LABOUR PARTY

-AND YOUR CONSTITUTION -AND THE TRAITOROUS SO-CALLED OPPOSITION ALLOWED HIM TO GET AWAY WITH IT.

Blair's coup d' etat

Peter Oborne

This week the killing of the Privy Council is all part of New Labour's mission to vandalise Britain's great institutions.

[Before we commence with the article we should remind ourselves that the damage is to

English Institutions

for as everyone knows Scotland has its parliament back and has always had its corpus juris law system in place.

As for Wales they have an Assembly and no doubt in the future their own parliament.

It is this persistent reference to British institutions by a battery of misinformed so-called commentators on the destruction of what they call BRITISH which in reality is in fact the

ENGLISH CONSTITUTION

-reaching back over a thousand years in the past and the

ENGLISH -MAGNA CARTA

ENGLISH - PETITION OF RIGHT

ENGLISH - BILL OF RIGHTS

ENGLISH-ACT OF SETTLEMENT

12 & 13 Will,III.c.2 (1700 and 1701)

Nowhere in this Act of Parliament does it mention BRITAIN -we have the kingdoms of England, France and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging...

NOT

BRITISH

By the general press refusing for years to name the country which occupies 87 per cent of the land space in our shared island home

ENGLAND

It has been possible over 35 years and particularly over the past 10 years of the

GREAT DECEIVER

and

GREAT DESTROYER

Tony Blair and his traitorous cohorts to virtually achieve his objective with only one more signature to consign a once great independent god -fearing nation-state into a despotic - corrupt - unaccountable police state to call itself

United States of Europe.

As we are now being told by Peter Oborne this weeks killing of the Privy Council once the "Continual" or Ordinary Council of our earlier Kings (the source of the later Privy Council) not only as an upper court of appeal, but as a direct court of Royal justice in all cases which had not been specially delegated to the recently constituted Courts of the Common Law

It has been the Press in general which has consistently pushed the British label for well over a hundred years. Even in the 1930's an English prime minister Stanley Baldwin mentioned the increased habit of overlooking the fact that

THERE WAS AN ENGLAND.

Today in March 2007 whether it is the Press or the BBC or any other body in the public eye you will observe unless they are in Scotland or Wales their utterances are proscribed so that the word which has been forbidden for many decades

ENGLAND

-is never mentioned

We admire our close neighbours in our island home and whether it is Songs of Praise or any other activity they portray their nationalism without apology and even encroach on the territory of England with their two language road signs hopeful that Englishmen may learn the language and when they have no country to defend will find the language lessons most useful in their new homes across Offa's Dike.

Well we have had our say and will return you to:

Peter Oborne's

Blair's coup d' etat

LAST WEEK , the former cabinet Secretary Lord Wilson made an acute remark. he noted that Tony Blair and his New Labour faction' had staged a coup, first against the Labour party and then against the

PROCESSES of GOVERNMENT'

[YOUR GOVERNMENT]

I have never read before such an accurate summary of the trajectory of British politics [English politics as it concerns in the main that country] over the past 13years.

In Opposition, Tony Blair and his coterie began destroying the Labour Party. The link with the Unions was cut -Party Conference was emasculated and the once governing national Executive Committee stripped of POWER.

After the 1997 General Election the Blair clique embarked , quite deliberately, on the destruction of the defining [ENGLISH ] INSTITUTIONS

-of the BRITISH [In reality the ENGLISH, Nation -State]

THEY ACHIEVED THIS WITH HUGE SUCCESS

During ten years in POWER, New Labour has wrecked:

THE CIVIL SERVICE

SIDELINED PARLIAMENT

DEMORALIZED THE FOREIGN OFFICE

SMASHED THE INTEGRITY OF THE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES

ABOLISHED THE ARMY'S REGIMENTAL SYSTEM.

In addition, it launched an audacious, but so far unsuccessful, attempt to undermine the MONARCHY, and initiated a long and sustained attack on the JUDICIARY.

[What we have to ask ourselves is WHY the protector of the over 1100 year-old House of Wessex did NOT refuse to sign the five EU treaties which made no secret of the plans to enslave HER subjects into a god-less despotic corrupt unaccountable police state to call itself the

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

- particularly by the open door of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992

And you have all heard of YOUR Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd being overheard saying:

'We'd better find out what we have signed'

His colleague Francis Maud (now the Conservative chairman in 2007) must have had no doubt a similar frame of mind or he would have surely enlightened his counterpart of the enormous consequences of such a TREATY on the future enslavement of the ENGLISH PEOPLE.]

This has all been carried out in the name of MODERNISATION

[In reality it is the name of a future United States of Europe and if the majority of the English people cannot not see it then they deserve their

ENSLAVEMENT.]

New Labour is distrustful of INSTITUTIONS, and favours instead, a system of

DIRECT PERSONAL RULE

[Napoleon-Bismarck-Hitler]

Indeed, this impulse remains predominant and, last week, saw two fresh instances of Blairite hostility to the

INSTITUTIONS OF THE STATE

On Wednesday, practically in secret, the Prime Minister abolished the

PRIVY COUNCIL

Office

The move was scarcely reported - and not even announced in [YOUR]

HOUSE of COMMONS

-even though it was made on a day when the Prime Minister was answering questions on. among other urgent matters, phone-in charges for TV competitions.

[Future generations will be astonished that their inheritance of over 1500 years in our new island home of the original and ancient Council of the Wise of the people about the person of the Monarch was demolished while the House talked about charges for TV competitions. ]

Presumably the modernisers would argue that this lack of fanfare simply reflects the fact that the Privy Council -an ancient government office dating back to the Middle Ages, when it comprised the inner corps of advisers who surrounded the Monarch -no longer matters.

Although Cabinet ministers and certain senior public figures are still appointed to the COUNCIL (which entitles them to place the title 'Rt Hon' in front of their name), in practice, it rarely meets and its executive functions are mainly irrelevant. But the Privy Council still possesses one rare and valuable quality. It is totally free from any taint of political bias, because it owes loyalty purely to the MONARCH [And as we all know from http://eutruth.org.uk there will soon be no need for MONARCHY in the new EU REGIONS only identity -to be blunt it will be the end as we see little chance that THE QUEEN will not accede as SHE has done so far on five previous occasions to sign the final document which will bring slavery of a once free people of 1500 years in the making within a despotic-corrupt-unaccountable-totalitarian police state calling itself the

United States of Europe

-and a torrent of thousands of new laws waiting the final signature will cascade on to everyone and no doubt wake up many who had other things on their minds that Tony Blair was not kidding and with not so much as a whimper from YOUR REPRESENTATIVES in WESTMINSTER who have no doubt already been told of their more remunerative jobs awaiting them in Regionalised ANGLOLAND.

[It is said a PEOPLE get the GOVERNMENT they DESERVE and from the INACTIVITY in the COUNTRY and IN PARLIAMENT we have to AGREE.]

Mr Oborne further states that this means that the Privy Council has been the ideal mechanism for carrying out its surprisingly numerous residual functions

These include a judicial role in British dependent territories; administration of the honours system; public inquires the safe keeping of public charters; the provision of neutral ground where political hostilities are suspended and leaders of rival parties can communicate on so-called

'PRIVY COUNCIL TERMS'

-in other words, under conditions of total confidence and mutual trust.

For all its quaintness and antiquity the Privy Council has filled a vital role in our

PUBLIC DOMAIN.

-In its quiet way , it guaranteed ( once ) guaranteed the integrity of the British State.

[Here again we have that out- of- date description of a landmass that is no longer BRITAIN. The Privy Council was and is an ENGLISH INSTITUTION it is not of a British heritage which has only been in partial existence for the past 300 years.]

To continue:

For these reasons, I do not believe that Tony Blair's decision to abolish the PRIVY COUNCIL was an accident or even, as modernisers claim an innocent 'tidying up exercise' [haven't we heard this expression used in the past when they are at their most dangerous?] On the contrary ,it looks very much as if a sinister motive underlies this apparently casual act of constitutional vandalism.

[Tony Blair is as they have said is tidying-up before he shortly puts his signature to the

DECLARATION OF BERLIN

-a cosy get together of the 27 member states many of whom are determined to get an EU Constitution installed by whatever means they can. The words no doubt will NOT mention the word CONSTITUTION but that is

WHAT IT WILL BE!

-and after that all talk about Privy Council or any other part of our inherited constitution will mean NOTHING!.]

We will continue with Peter Oborne's list of destruction:

Consider the facts: the Political Honours Scrutiny Committee is administered from inside the Privy Council office, precisely because only the Privy Council can offer the independence and protection need to carry out its work.

Significantly, the current cash-for-honours investigation by the Metropolitan Police started only after this COMMITTEE objected to some of the Prime Ministers sleaziest recommendations to the peerage. But as a result of the new reforms, the committee will probably be moved to the cabinet office, where

MINISTERS CAN KEEP IT UNDER MUCH CLOSER POLITICAL CONTROL.

Another key function of the privy Council involves safeguarding the charters of great public bodies.

This means, for example, that Oxford and Cambridge Universities ultimately report to it. Both these world-famous centres of learning are under constant attack from New Labour ministers, who deep dislike their heritage of academic excellence and moral independence, and yearn to adapt them into instruments of social engineering.

I have been told that the Treasury makes regular calls to Cambridge dons, pressuring them to surrender the university's independence. There was the disgraceful episode when the Chancellor of the Exchequer tried to intervene in Oxford's selection methods when he said it was 'an absolute scandal' that a comprehensive school pupil had been refused a place 'by an interview system more reminiscent of an old boy network than genuine justice for society'.

One further key function provided by the Privy Council is the provision of a forum for

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC INQUIRIES

-where they can be conducted without fear of being knobbled by ministers.

Only last week , William Hague, the Conservative Foreign Affairs spokesman, called for a

'PRIVY COUNCIL INQUIRY

-into the origins and conduct of the IRAQ WAR'.

NOBODY would have FAITH in such an INQUIRY if it was ADMINISTERED from inside the CABINET OFFICE which has been POLITICISED in such a naked way during the New Labour years.

The truth is that New labour's attack on the Privy Council is just the latest strike in its sustained war against the INTEGRITY of the BRITISH STATE

[But we would say the English]

-and INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS

Wednesday's Commons vote on Lords reform was another dismal calamity for British [more particularly English] public life.

I would guess that the last quarter of a century has seen the finest period for the UPPER HOUSE since the late 19th century (the last time it played a genuinely creative role in GOVERNMENT.

The Lords have been playing precisely the role set out for them in the text books of constitutional practice - challenging half-baked or illiberal legislation that has been passed their way from the

HOUSE OF COMMONS

-be it Mrs Thatcher's poll tax or barbaric recent proposals for the abolition of ancient...

ENGLISH LIBERTIES

ENGLISH -JURY TRIAL

ENGLISH- HABEAS CORPUS

While the quality of debate in the Lords is higher than ever, in the Commons it has fallen sharply. this is partly because some of the rancour of partisan debate is absent from the Lords. But the real reason is that the speakers include some of the wisest and most distinguished men and women in Britain:

Senior Judges

Generals

Bishops

Philosophers

Former Prime Ministers

and other politicians of high rank.

(The recent DEBATE on the IRAQ WAR, called on the instigation of the former Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd, was an example of excellence.)

[But as we have explained elsewhere at the time of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty -the open door to a United States of Europe ,this same distinguished speaker was heard to say after signing possibly one of the most important TREATY'S in our long history in our island home.

'We'd better find out what we've just signed'.

His colleague that day was Francis Maud the present chairman of the so-called Conservative Party who no doubt also had no idea of the contents of the document of future slavery of a once free people in a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

A document called the Declaration of Berlin is to be signed by the 27 member -states on the 25th March -2007 -Yes! just over a week ahead -A document which they will avoid mention of the word CONSTITUTION but in substance that is WHAT IT WILL BE.]

This week's vote towards a fully elected Lords, shamefully supported by the Conservatives, means the end to all this. The new elected house will be populated by

INDIVIDUALS TOO DIM OR DEADBEAT TO WIN SEATS IN THE COMMONS.

-They will have nothing to say, and will be dependent on their PARTY WHIPS.

This is a job creation scheme for Britain's strutting political class, and it makes you want to weep.

Many commentators have expressed bafflement at why the apparently minor issue of Lords reform should have come top of the Government's agenda this year. But it is simply part of Tony Blair's desire for measures that will cement his legacy before he leaves office this summer. This destructive modernising drive has earned him both the enmity and contempt of a long list of the most senior people in

PUBLIC LIFE

In the past few months:

THE Archbishop of Canterbury

THE Chief of the General Staff

Several Law Lords

and

-last week-two former Cabinet secretaries have taken the unprecedented step of publicly attacking the Prime Minister and his GOVERNMENT.

This is because Tony Blair has done lasting damage to this country's system of GOVERNANCE which embodies long-held wisdoms and values that he has never liked or understood.

[And remember all this has been carried out with Her Majesty's so-called OFFICIAL OPPOSITION PARTIES looking on.

We called for a Coup de Main some time ago as the ONLY way to protect our valued Constitution with its Checks and Balances but as the world today has shown that even the

Mother of Parliaments

- with its Great Charter of 1215 still on the Statute Book has been paralysed by its inability to protect an original institution which has offered so much hope of

FREEDOM

to a warring world for over 700 years..

Now do you believe us that YOUR friend Tony Blair is just clearing his desk and as you can see it has many different descriptions while he goes on his vengeance route through

YOUR CONSTITUTION

-which he does not wish to face when he becomes possibly the new EU president of the new European Union as reward for his demolition work to our Inheritance and once hindrance to the enslavement of ENGLAND.

* * *

http://eutruth.org.uk

1] EUROFACTS - THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

[OTHER BULLETINS FROM PETER OBORNE ON POLITICS AND POWER]

[Every underlined word has a separate bulletin]

MARCH/07

* * *

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

*
*

13th October,2007

So You Want Out Of The EU

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

*

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

www.speakout.co.uk

*

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

* July 18-2007

VOTE

-2007

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

SHORT CUT TO THE BROWN YEARS-JULY 2007- EU AND NAZI MATTERS...

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

2] WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3] THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4] THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!

5[ THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6] COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION OF EUROPE

7] OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8] MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9] OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11] THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12] 'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13] PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15] A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16] WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17] COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18] WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19] 200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20] 100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21] THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22] UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23] EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24] BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25] FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26] SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27] NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28] IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29] BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30] WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE

31] LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32] BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33] BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

113,317

Total signatories to January 20, 2008

JOIN THEM!

*95% of the British people want a referendum

* Source YouGov Poll June 2007

A MESSAGE TO ALL MPS FROM SPEAKOUT CAMPAIGN

WRITE TO YOUR MP

today and visit

WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION?

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008

Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

on

21st January, 2008

Letters to the Daily Telegraph

Wednesday 27th June-2007

Stop the excuses and hold an EU referendum

SIR - In April 2004, we sent a PETITION of over

1,000,000

signatures to the Queen requesting

NO ROYAL ASSENT

to any

BILL

-authorising the proposed

EU CONSTITUTION

-unless approved by at least two thirds of the

ELECTORATE

in a

REFERENDUM

Three weeks later, Tony Blair promised a referendum, on which

HE and GORDON BROWN

have since reneged as being unnecessary.

The revamped version of the

EU Constitution

-is virtually identical with its predecessor, and Mr Blair's attempts to hide this is a shameful

BETRAYAL OF THE COUNTRY.

THEREFORE

If our elected politicians refuse

TO HONOUR THEIR OATHS

I propose that an

INDEPENDENT REFERENDUM IS ARRANGED

-funded and conducted without further ado, preceded by a

FULL HONEST PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS.

This would at least provide a reliable unspun indication of public opinion. We should also insist that there is

NO GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BRUSSELS.

until the outcome of the

REFERENDUM

IS KNOWN

The British people can then choose whether they wish to be subjugated by

AN ALIEN POWER

SET FREE!

JOHN GOURIET

Dilton Marsh, Wiltshire

[ Mr John Gouriet needs no introduction as his eminent work together with his once close colleague the late Chairman of the Freedom Association Norris McWhirter whose life was brought to an end by his patriotic and persistent hard work on behalf of his country - has been on our front page since its beginning.]

SIR - An Act of Parliament to ratify a

NEW EU TREATY

not only alters the external relationship between the British State and foreign states, but also the internal constitutional relationship between the

BRITISH STATE AND ITS CITIZENS

The Irish Republic has a

CODIFIED CONSTITUTION

-which can be amended

ONLY

REFERENDUM

That is why the Irish Government has been

COMPELLED

to hold

A REFERENDUM

ON EACH OF THE EU TREATIES.

At one time, Labour politicians were in favour of

REFERENDUMS

-to settle constitutional questions-for example on whether there should be

DEVOLVED GOVERNMENT

SCOTLAND

But their enthusiasm for letting us have a say began to wane when voters in

NORTH EAST ENGLAND

threw out John Prescott's proposal for an elected

REGIONAL ASSEMBLY

None the less, every Labour MP was elected in 2005 on the

MANIFESTO PROMISE

of a

REFERENDUM

on the

NEW EU TREATY

-and they must not allow themselves to be bullied

INTO BREAKING THEIR WORD.

Dr D. R. Cooper

Maidenhead, Berkshire

[We know of Dr Cooper a regular contributor to Eurofacts a fortnightly journal

www.junepress.com]

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

June27-2007

Words of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:

‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)

Lord Pearson of Rannoch

Eurofacts

THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE

A fortnightly journal of facts, figures and
comment on the European Union from which we
will from time to time select items of interest.

THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION

Answers!

A PLAIN MAN'S

GUIDE

Join the DEBATE with Daniel Hannon- Forming an

OPPOSITION

to the

EUROPEAN UNION

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

Iraq & Afghanistan
Click Here For

' Iraq File'

Breaking News!

Click Here For 'England Matters'

European Union
Click Here For'

E. U. File'

*

WHY THE BRITISH PEOPLE MUST HAVE THEIR REFERENDUM

ON

EUROPE

DAILY MAIL COMMENT

*

Join

UKIP

www.ukip.org

For

A Free Nation State
Beyond the
European Union
Within a True
Commonwealth of free Nations
'Trade not Slave'

NEW CORRUPTION EXPOSURES HIGHLIGHT THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU STRUCTURES

Each underlined word contains a separate bulletin.

[The following information came to our attention October 10-2005 and after careful consideration we believe strongly that the respected INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

a journal uncovering CORRUPTION deserves our support - how little it is -in their courageous stand when ALL others stand by the wayside and look BUT DO NOTHING for TRUTH

The new revelations, which we published for the first time –October 10-2005-that the European Constitution Treaty was signed and partially ratified (though ostensibly stalled for the first time being following the French and Dutch referenda rejections) in exchange for substantial sums of bribery money distributed from a ‘Black’ (originally Nazi) fund in Switzerland, and that the two signatories of Britain’s Accession Treaty in 1972 [details on our bulletin board] were Nazi agents on the covert German intelligence payroll, represent body- blows at the ‘heart of Europe’ from which this corrupt supranational regime may be unable to recover.

In the preceding (double) issue of this service [provided by INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW_

www.worldreports.org –Editor:

E-mail

cstory@worldreports.org. ]

‘We demonstrated that we are not afraid to stand up to the abuse of free-wheeling intelligence power, by exposing operations intended to discredit us and the Editor of this service [ICR] so that details of international corruption which they knew were about to publish (which was indeed published in that [previous ]double issue -) might not appear.

We now expect a similar operation, or series of operations, following the exposures of EU CORRUPTION, and of the bribery associated with the procurement of EU Treaties, published in this issue [details on EDP-bulletin Board]

We therefore reiterate the warning published on Page 34 of the preceding (double) issue [Not yet on EDP website] to the effect that any repetition, elaboration, insinuation or other false and malicious attempt to denigrate our work, the Editor and /or his publications and businesses anywhere in the world, would be responded to with the utmost legal rigor.

Since no-one else seems to be prepared to expose international scamming and corruption at the intergovernmental level this is a task that seems to have fallen to us: and we intend to fulfil our Mission.

The obituary of Sir Edward Heath published in The Guardian on 18^th July 2005 contained, in its final short paragraph, an oblique confirmation of the intelligence revealed in the next section of this Issue [Vol 30 NUMBER 4] - namely,

[Edward] Heath’s lifelong service as a German agent, and his internal exposure in 2003.

The Guardian’s obituary ended on the following ambiguous note, revealing of course that the several authors of it had been informed of the TRUTH:

‘He remained determined that he would be vindicated, until close to the end’.

Editor: E-mail cstory@ worldreports.org

www.worldreports.org

THE GERMAN GEOPOLITCAL CENTRE

To understand the significance of all this it is necessary to recall that the Nazis, as indicated established a central planning organization in Madrid in 1943, called the German Geopolitical Centre (or Deutsche Geozentrale). On 13th December 1944, the Associated press reported that Heinrich Himmler had initiated plans for the establishment of an underground network at the end of 1943, and that propaganda and related warfare operations were to be carried on by some 200,000 Nazi followers in Europe ,and elsewhere.'

The news report, clearly based on reliable Allied intelligence, asserted that many Nazi Party operatives and members had equipped themselves with double or even triple identities, and that the pre-planned Nazi agitprop operations were intended to set the Allies against each other.

The Nazi Geopolitical HQ in Madrid was funded for many years by financial and bullion resources, and doubtless by 'Black Ops' funds, infiltrated into Spain long before the collapse of the THIRD REICH. For years it was known that the Nazi headquarters in Madrid operated an international organization called

'Die Spinne',

meaning 'THE SPIDER'

Related Nazi organisations were and are known by various exotic cover names ' -no Die Hague is not one of them. such as Edelweiss, Konsul, Scharnhorst, Sechsestirn, Liebwache and Lustiger Bruder, while the covert organization of the Nazi Elite Guard operated under the name

'ODESSA'

In the Frederick Forsyth film of the same name the information given by the Austrian Nazi -hunter

Simon Wiesenthal

So aptly put it - 'The Odessa a secret organization formed by former members of the SS before the end of the [2nd] World War in order to get them out of Germany to the world at large where they infiltrated into every facet and sphere of life'

[Where they are today?]

When one hears about a Nazi slush fund in existence in 2006 it should be no surprise for again Simon Wiesenthal said over fifty years ago about the resources of the SS.

'Money!-they have millions -the SS smuggled out most of the gold and treasures before Germany collapsed - a large part - lies in vaults under the pavements of Zurich. Switzerland.'

BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM

The Government can walk away from the European Union tomorrow - the use of the 25% of Gross Domestic Product represented by all current and future costs of EU membership, to rebuild the PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION system -build spanking new 'schools'n'ospitals' wherever demand exists, and revitalize the British economy generally - all without suffering any losses, since EU membership has brought Britain

NO CLEAR BENEFITS AT ALL

-that could not have been procured domestically. It has, however, meant that BILLIONS of TAXPAYERS' FUNDS

that the British Government should have been spending at HOME, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying, corrupt collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and operatives.

All EU 'Member States', valuing the huge British market for their goods, would be compelled to negotiate arm' -length bilateral trade and other agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK markets. Any prospective interim disruptions could be accommodated by the British Government directing the UK taxpayers' funds that it normally squanders with the EC's 'festering dustbin of corruption' into temporarily vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.

A Free Trade Agreement

linking Britain, the United States and Canada has been readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the European Community.

For contrary to what is in the public domain, contingency plans do exist for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.

These were recently reviewed and dusted down' in the context of key connections made by certain intelligence circles following the 7/7 [London] attacks, which have shown that EU 'Member States' that profess to be allies of the United Kingdom, are anything but.

Exposure information for the special issue of International Currency Review [Volume 30, Number 4] been developed with the practical assistance of Ashley Mote MEP, Paul van BuitenenMEP, Marta Andreason, Christopher Arkell FTCA, and US and UK intelligence sources special to the Editor, Christopher Story. For further details, see Ashley Mote's website: www.ashleymote.co.uk.

www.worldreports.org

E-mail: cstory@worldreports.org

Also further details on EDP Bulletin Board

Words of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:

*'SHORT -CUT

1,000 Bulletins'

Each underlined word has a separate bulletin

Iraq & Afghanistan

Click Here For

' Iraq File'

Breaking News!

Click Here For 'England Matters'

European Union

Click Here For'

E. U. File'

Germany plans to revive the NEW EU Constitution

[Eurofacts October 6 -2006]

Germany aims to map out a time-table and blueprint for the EU Constitution by the end of its presidency, according to German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier. In a speech to members of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) ahead of Germany's Presidency in the first half of 2007, Steinmeier urged critics of the Constitution to start moving activities along. "Two thirds' are behind the

NEW CONSTITUTION"

of a

UNITED STATES of EUROPE

He said:

"I believe everyone should feel an obligation because of that. If It is to be saved, and we urgently need it, everyone has to move their position. But some have to move more than others."

*E-mail: info@junepress.com**

OVER

1000 Bulletins

EDP Bulletin Board.

'ENGLISH MATTERS!

'EUROPEAN UNION'

'IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN'

'TOO MUCH LAW and TOO MUCH DISORDER '

'CROWN'

CONSTITUTION

''COMMONWEALTH'

Etc. *

* * *

BRITAIN'S MOST SENIOR

SOLDIER

General Sir Richard Dannatt's-comments

Daily Mail

Friday October 13-2006

'We are in a Muslim country [IRAQ] and Muslim's views of foreigners in their country are quite clear.

We weren't invited, certainly by those in Iraq at the time.

Let's face it, the military campaign we fought in 2003 effectively kicked the door in.

We should get ourselves out some time soon because of our presence exacerbates the security problems.'

CLICK HERE FOR FURTHER DETAILS.

* *

REASON 81

TO LEAVE THE EU

Bureaucrats galore!

Much of the new employment generated within the EU in recent years has involved the hiring of more bureaucrats and civil servants. In large areas of the EU more than half of all employees are civil servants -working either for the EU or for nationalised industries. Inefficiency and over-employment is commonplace.

For example the Banque de France employs nearly three times as many people as the Bank of England -

although both institutions serve much the same purpose. The apparently unceasing increase in the number of bureaucrats in the EU has two adverse effects on the economy of the countries within the EU region.

First, the salaries and pensions of all these civil servants add to the growing tax burden.

Second, all these bureaucrats feel they have to do something to justify their existence. And so they create paperwork. The bureaucratic demands they make on entrepreneurs mean that new businesses have to struggle to survive.

The economic future for the EU is bleak indeed. very few EU politicians have ever had a 'real' job in the 'real' world and so don't understand how damaging this is.

(John Prescott, England's Deputy Premier, is one of the small number of politicians in Europe who has ever had a 'real' job in the world outside politics. Prescott used to work as a ship's steward.)

* *

Reason No 188

To Leave the EU

The EU's path to power has been exactly the same as Hitler's using the law (apparently convincingly and with good purpose), taking power bit by bit and making decisions quickly and without public discussion.

For more Reasons:

www.vernoncoleman.com

Reason No 206

To Leave the EU

[The Germans have already thought about it with their £20 billion of Gold much of which we kindly sold them to enable them to relaunch their deutschmark]

Also Germany played its EU membership very cleverly. The Germans, unlike other Europeans, have kept themselves an opt out clause if things go wrong. The provincial governments within Germany control most things within their regions. The federal German government cannot act without unanimous approval from the 16 provinces. The 16 German provinces have never signed any agreement (Deliberately at the time) with the EU. It was the federal German government which signed up. If things go badly wrong the individual regions can leave the EU.

[You cannot help but admire them for their doggishness to protect their nation. Not like the two-timers we had and still have in the UK in 2006]

'The Bilderbergers'

Asked in the Lords by the Independent Peer

Lord Stoddard.

'Which member of the Government attended the most recent Bilderberger Conference-The secretive -and to some - sinister Kanauta gathering of business tycoons and politicians which in June convened at Kanata, Ottawa?

Ephraim

Hardcastle

Column

(D. Mail -Oct31-2006.)

We'll have a guess!

Kenneth Clarke - Paddy Ashdown-Tony Blair-David Cameron- Geoff Hoon -Jack Straw and a great many others who have the destiny of England in their hands.

For details of:

'The secretive Bilderberger Group will destroy True Democracy'

Part I and 2

Reason No 117

To Leave the EU

There are 30 crimes for which European nations are legally entitled to 'kidnap' one another's citizen.

These crimes include xenophobia and trafficking in endangered plants [not atomic].

Fraud is on the list of crimes for which extradition must be granted, but whereas in England a prosecutor intending to show that a fraud has been committed must show that there was some intention to defraud, in other countries in the EU an individual who made a genuine error can be charged with fraud.

A cafe owner in England who accidentally overcharged a foreign tourist could find himself being frogmarched to the airport to face charges of fraud in a foreign court. An English citizen can be arrested for a crime allegedly committed in England and then taken abroad to face trial -

even when the crime which was allegedly committed in England isn't a crime under English law.

[Now have you awaken up to what the EU really means -to YOU?]

FOR

OUT OF EU

www.eurosceptic.org.uk/campaign

Reason No 220

TO LEAVE THE EU

The remains of democracy as we know it will disappear by 2009 when there will be European candidates for the European Parliament .

The European candidates will represent the Federation of European countries.

National political parties will cease to exist

Voters will vote for a party NOT an individual.

There will be NO opposition -just the European federation candidates,

That's just [2] years away.

What does it remind you of?

What's that big country to the east? LOTS OF SNOW.

Meanwhile, all citizens of countries in the EU are already 'citizens of the union' and subject to the duties imposed thereby. What are the duties?

What are your obligations?

NO ONE KNOWS.

They have never been defined. Our leaders have signed away our rights in an open contract -without even telling us , let alone asking for our views.

Mind you, I expect you'll find out what your obligations are when you break one.

(Did your MP or MEP tell you any of this when they last stuffed a leaflet through your letter box?)

FOR

OUT OF THE EU

www.eurosceptic.org.uk/campaign

For More Reasons

To Leave.

www.vernoncoleman.com

'A Tribute'

A eurosceptic hero

Only a short while ago we lost a true

'Defender of the Realm'

in the passing of

Norris McWhirter

who had for decades fought to regain the Liberties of his country.

In November -2006 we now remember another irreplaceable patriot in the recent death of

Lord Harris of High Cross.

But for these great patriots and countless others who have truly served their country our country would have many years ago succumbed to the

Hitlerite monstrosity

wishing to call itself the:

United States of Europe.

The following passages are from Eurofacts of 3rd November 2006.

'It was with immense sadness that we learned of the death of Lord Harris of High Cross, the former General Director of the Institute of Economic Affairs .

Lord Harris was the founder chairman of the Bruges Group,

www.brugesgroup.com

a founder of Global Britain

www.globalbritain.org

-and a constant friend and supporter of this publication

(eurofacts)

THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE

www.junepress.com

and

email:eurofacts@junepress.com

He was, of course, most famous for the creation of the IEA. This laid the intellectual foundations of what came to be known as Thatcherism, thereby paving the way for a major sea-change in British politics.

This in turn led to a world -wide renaissance in the ideas underlying the free market.

His success in confronting the prevailing economic and political orthodoxies and , with the help of Arthur Seldon, the IEA's editorial director, in plotting an alternative way forward based on market solutions depended on a rare combination of intellectual rigour, passion, humour, high principle and presentational brio

All of those who fought in the same battles will feel lonelier at his passing.

In recent years Lord Harris had become more and more concerned about the way in which rising levels of prosperity and an expanding area

individual liberty - which were the result of the IEA's victory in the battle of ideas - were being put at risk by virtue of Britain's membership of the European Union.

Unlike others who shared his analysis but shrank from its implications he made his support for withdrawal from the EU clear in elegantly-crafted speeches in the

HOUSE OF LORDS

-and through his support and encouragement for eurosceptic organisations and publications.

He will be greatly missed by the many people who regarded him as both a friend and a beacon of consistency, principle and decency at a time when such qualities were perhaps becoming more rare.

*

'PRINCIPLE'

'Principle is a passion for truth and right.'-

William Hazlitt. (1778-1830) Eng.critic and author

'Always vote for a principle, though you vote alone, and you may cherish the sweet reflection that your vote is never lost'-

John Quincy Adams(1767-1848) 6th President of U.S.

*

What UKIP is all about

Dear Sir,

No wonder that Freddie Forsyth is such a successful fiction writer if he can convince even himself that the Tory party is changing for the good.

I seem to remember a letter from Sir Freddie prior to the 2005 general election in which he looked forward to the election of "young Turks" who would shake up the Tory party regarding the EU issue

Alas the only Turks on the horizon are the 70 million who want to join the European Union, supported by the Conservative Party.

UKIP does not "spilt the vote" as Sir Freddie believes. Everyone knows that we stand for unconditional withdrawal and the Tories stand for continued membership.

IT'S CALLED CHOICE.

Were a Conservative government to be elected at the next election (which looks extremely unlikely) there is no reason what soever to believe that the surrender of our liberties to the EU will cease, LET ALONE BE REVERSED.

The best way of encouraging the leaders of the Conservative and Labour parties to change their EU policies is precisely by means of THE THREAT OF COSTING THEM THEIR SEATS

-and decreasing the numbers of their lobby fodder. It has taken a generation for the Tories and Labour to sell our country down the river and the only hope for the future is to build

A NEW PATRIOTIC PARTY

THAT'S WHAT THE

UKIP

IS ABOUT.

Gerald Batten MEP

London

[Letter to Eurofacts-October 2006]

www.junepress.com

*

Sir Richard's moment of TRUTH.

by Charlotte Horsefield

A Democratic Europe: An Alternative to the EU.

In his latest book Sir Richard Brady provides a distillation of his ideas, developed during an active political life, some 40 years of which have been spent as a Conservative Member of Parliament.

In 1955 he was one of a small number of MPs who favoured joining what was then the Common Market and because of his views he was invited to the Communities' institutions in Brussels, Strasbourg and Luxembourg.

After an evening of entertainment, a Commissioner confided in him that separately the countries were powerless but together they would have far greater power than ever.

It was this revelation, that the European Communities were not about PEACE but about POWER, that led him to give up his practice as a barrister to devote more of his time to opposing Britain's membership.

Even when Mr Heath's government 's negotiations were successful, Sir Richard maintained his opposition, being one of a selected body of MPs who supported an otherwise unrepresentative band of eurosceptics who watched, with growing anxiety, the Common Market develop into a political union.

This book is constructive in that it offers a solution to the undemocratic nature of the present government of the European nations.

He points to the merits of FREE TRADE over a CUSTOMS UNION and suggests that the Council of Europe could be a better forum for forging agreements, depending as it does upon cooperation rather than coercion

This is a very positive and timely book.

Available from the June Press

Price £10+p&p

www.junepress.com

*

Disunited Kingdom

WITH only months to go before the 300th anniversary of the

1707 Act of Union

-joining England and Scotland, there are uncomfortable signs of strain in this [once] United Kingdom.

In Scotland, an ICM poll suggests that for the first time since devolution a majority -

51 per cent -supports

SCOTTISH

INDEPENDENCE

At the same time, there is a growing English tetchiness [About time] at what is seen as unduly favourable treatment for the Scots.

So are the ties of nationhood really loosening? What is happening in Scotland, it may be argued, owes more to Labour's unpopularity and the charismatic leadership of the SNP's Alex Salmond that any desire to go it alone.

Nevertheless, there seems little doubt that anti-English sentiment is on the increase, while voters South of the Border are increasingly asking questions.

Is it fair for example that the Government spends £1,503 more per head in Scotland than in England?

Why can't English cancer patients get life-saving drugs available to the Scots?

Why must English university students pay tuition fees while their Scottish mates don't?

And WHY should Scottish MPs vote on English matters, while England's MPs can't discuss Scotland? For all our sakes, such issues must be settled.

Three hundred years on , we should be grateful to an

Act of Union

-that is one of the great achievements of our

[ISLAND]

HISTORY

How sad it would be if we allowed devolution, skewed funding and political myopia to undermine a UNITY

-that strengthens US ALL.

Daily Mail-Comment

Saturday, November 4, 2006.

*

[Well there are so many answers on our bulletin board to the above assessment that we will only say that the seeds of Scottish Independence have always been there and the emergence of the SNP in the 1930's meant it was only a matter of time before they reached their objective.

Ironically our superior political opponents from across the northern border couldn't keep their hands off governing England as if it were a subsidiary of Scotland and naturally pressed for every advantage as we have seen from the minorities which have joined us over the past few decades.

Englishmen will be glad to see the back of our political northern cousins who enjoy such levels of power which will be rapidly reduced when they take the High-Road back to Scotland as Dr Samuel Johnson so graphically intimated over 250 years ago.

Scots-Welsh-Irish in fact anyone is welcome so long as they let

ENGLAND

-have the same national instincts and aspirations as those of our sister nation states.

We hope for a NEW UNION one day of a Family of Independent Nation States of a

Greater Britain

BUT THE EU WILL NO DOUBT BRIBE SCOTLAND AND WALES TO REMAIN THEIRS

BUT

AN ENGLAND OUT OF THE EU WOULD NOT BE PAYING THE BILL

[The EDP was formed over 12 years ago to achieve just that]

*

Reason 292

To Leave The EU

Remember that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V , Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser)

Remember that it was Adolf Hitler, who first used the phrase

'United States of Europe'.

Remember that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing REGIONS OF EUROPE

in order to DESTROY national identities. He wanted to break European nations into regions so that they could be ruled from Berlin.

Does that simple and ignoble ambition remind you of anything? IT OUGHT TO

That is exactly what EU policy is now - although for various historical reasons Berlin has been replaced by the more neutral BRUSSELS.

AND CAN YOU REMEMBER WHERE THE TERM EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY COMES FROM?

The increasingly rabid proponents of the EU won't tell you this,

(such as our latest propagandist -Geoff Hoon [can't get a word in edgeways -and we know what a mess he made when so-called Defence Minister and his latest clamour to raise the so-called advantages of the EU when on every occasion the lies stick to the top and can't be hidden whatever he tries to justify]

-and may be embarrassed at my having had the ill grace to drag it up, but it was

HERMANN GOERRING

Who made the first reference to the European Economic Community.

(who during the Battle of Britain in 1940 (not the present one) asked his flyers when things were going badly for them in the dog-fights over London and the Home Counties in 1940

'What do you want to finish the job?

They cried out

'A Squadron of Spitfires'

Goerring is the true father of the EEC, though the Europhiles tend to forget to give him the credit.

There is much more to say but space is limited so for the publication of 295 reasons contact

www.vernoncoleman.com

www.junepress.com

*

'Empires have gone and most people live in Nation States.'

'Almost everything that is most precious has come from small States.'

*

Magna Carta!

English citizens used to be able to petition their Monarch if they had a concern or grievance. This right was given under Magna Carta.

According to the LAW OF ENGLAND the House of Lords must accept petitions from citizens, and take them to the reigning Monarch.

The Monarch must then hear them.

This right has now been quietly set aside. Petitions raised by citizens now go to the relevant minister and are invariably simply shredded

The Magna Carta, signed by King John in June 1215, still stands. It is doubtful if even the fat burghers of Brussels can make it go away

Much of what has been done in recent years is undoubtedly illegal, unconstitutional and contrary to both English common law and the Magna Carta.

So, why not test the legality of EU legislation in COURT?

YOU CAN'T

Try it, and you will be dismissed as a vexatious litigant'

The courts will not even hear the case.

Ministers and the EU regard themselves as above the LAW -

out of the reach of ordinary citizens. When I recently tried to take the Home Secretary to COURT (for stomping on my human rights and my freedom to speak out) I was told that I could NOT.

[2002]

WE HAVE TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION

[Reason 248]

Since this article was written in 2002 a Petition from the readers of

'THIS ENGLAND'

Of

900,000 signatures

had been delivered to the rear entrance of Buckingham Palace

We [EDP] know because we were there as were other members of the

' Defenders of the Realm'

as was John Gouriet

'Government by Consent'

and the late grievously missed patriot Norris McWhirter

'Treason -A Constitutional Analysis'

[If anyone looking at this column wishes to DO SOMETHING rather than just look there are many eurosceptic organisations looking for help - Don't Delay -

British Declaration of Independence

www.bdicampaign.org

British Weights & Measures Assoc.

www.bwmaOnline.com

Campaign Against Euro -Federalism

www.caef.org.uk

Campaign for an Independent Britain

www.cibhq.co.uk

Democracy Movement

www.democracymovement.org

European No Campaign

www.europeannocampaign.com

Freedom Association

www.tfa.net

Global Britain

www.globalbritain.org

June Press [Publications

www.thepeoplesnocampaign.co.uk

The People's "No" Campaign

United Kingdom Independence Party.

'For other websites on bulletin board'

There are also many other websites quoted throughout our 1,000 bulletins.

WE CAN

Leave the EU and save Billions

www.eurosceptic.org.uk/campaign

YOUR COUNTRY

NEEDS YOU

NOW!

*

Winston Churchill

defeated the

NAZIS

Margaret Thatcher

defeated the

UNIONS

WHO WILL DEFEAT

THE THREAT TO OUR CONSTITUTION

AND OUR WAY -OF-LIFE OUT OF THE EU

We understand that there are 2,000,000 more women voters than men. Well that is not a bad thing as they know what a FAMILY means and the

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

passed down through the generations belong to future generations -they are in TRUST and must never be DISCARDED They are an INHERITANCE from the PAST.

*

SPECIAL INVESTIGATION

INTO

NHS 'BIG BROTHER'

20BILLION DATABASE

-IN BREACH OF PATIENT

CONFIDENTIALITY-

MAJORITY OF DOCTORS AGREE

BBC Bias

[Correspondent to Eurofacts journal 15th December-2006]

Dear Sir,

Your criticism of the BBC's superficial and biased coverage of EU affairs was fully justified. Indeed, it may not have gone far enough.

The European Parliament's debates may be excruciating and boring and the documents and press releases from the Commission and other EU agencies written in style that is designed to discourage public interest. But this does not excuse the BBC's very evident lack of interest in what is going on behind the scenes.

Indeed, now that 60% of LAWS or thereabouts are made in BRUSSELS the BBC has a statutory obligation to describe the political forces which are shaping our future.

But it has almost entirely ignored the current attempts to press ahead with the task of European political integration regardless of public opinion and has similarly ignored the phenomenon of what has been 'the creeping constitution'

This is a huge story to be told -but the BBC does not wish to tell it

Mark Thompson , the BBC Director General has backed up his promise of improved coverage of EU affairs by pointing to the appointment of a senior television journalist, Mark Mardell, as it's European Editor.

It should be noted the Mardell's task is very different from that of the huge staff that reports Westminster. although far more numerous than the BBC's European staff its concern is exclusively with political news.

Mardell's remit is so wide that he is expected to report on terrorist activities in European cities. Papal visits to European capitals, natural and man-made disasters, the domestic political affairs of member states and much else that occurs in Europe but little to do with the functioning of the EU.

Even if he wished to devote his time and talents to describing and analysing the interplay of political forces in Brussels and their impact on the lives of ordinary British citizens -which is surely what he ought to be doing -he would not have the opportunity to do so.

The inescapable conclusion must be that the BBC does not wish to report what is happening in the EU because it does not wish to draw attention to a process which is systematically destroying

THE

FOUNDATIONS

OF

DEMOCRATIC

SELF-GOVERNMENT

*

[Correspondent from London.]

www.junepress.com

Trade deficit with the EU is huge -and rising

Ian Milne

UK sells to EU

Goods £120.2billion

Services £45.4billon

Income £76.9billion

Transfers £10.0billion

Total £252.4billion

EU sells to UK

Goods £156.2billion

Services £47.2billion

Income £ 65.6billion

Transfers £15.6billion

Total £284.6billion

UK balance (£32.2 )billion

UK sells to non-EU

Goods £91.0billion

Services £65.7billion

Income £110.1billion

Transfers £6.3billion

Total £273.2billion

Non-EU sells to UK

Goods £122.3billion

Services £40.9billion

Income £91.6billion

Transfers £ 12.9billion

Total £267.6billion

UK balance £5.6billion

[Eurofacts 15th December 2006]

*

THE SHEER FOLLY OF WIND FARMS

From David Bellamy, one of our leading conservationists, a blistering attack...

[Click for details above]

[Daily Mail-December 20,2006]

*

Channel4

REVEALS

CHRISTIANITY

COLLECTIVIST

CHINA

is GROWING

With a Congregation of 68-80 million

-and is growing

BUT IN

So-called Democratic

CHRISTIANITY

Being persecuted by the ultra secular sect in

BLAIRDOM

AS the individualistic and freedom loving Christians are a threat to his dreams of enslaving Britons into a corrupt despotic and unaccountable and god-less agenda of the

EUROPEAN UNION

Channel4-Dec20-2006

*

IN

AMERICA

MURDERERS

ARE BURIED

IN THE

PRISON GRAVEYARD

IN

ENGLAND

THEY ARE

OUT OF JAIL

IN A FEW YEARS

AND

MURDER AGAIN

They have 220,000 criminals on parole and 14,000 -low to risk high.

We are told that there is always a risk but what we say is that the more criminals that remain in prison the risk is reduced even further.

The Government's refusal to build more prisons means that they have to come up with crack-pot schemes in the short term such as tagging and open prisons which as the name applies offers no security to the terrified victim that the offender will (as has happened on many occasions) will make a return visit.

The Home Office admitted a few months ago that it had £30million earmarked for more prison places but no start in the building programme has been made.

WE WANT MORE PRISONS AND LESS CRIMINALS ON PROBATION AND THE REPEAL OF THE 1988 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

WHICH IRONICALLY HAS LEAD TO THE LOSS OF THE RIGHTS OF THE VICTIM AND THE INCREASED RIGHTS OF THE CRIMINAL.

SINCE 1997 THE GROWING ARMY OF LAWYERS HAVE FOUND A LOTTERY PAYOUT ON THEIR DOORSTEP IN THE INCREASE FOR THEIR SERVICES BECAUSE OF THE 3000 NEW LAWS AND THE FLOOD OF REGULATIONS FROM BRUSSELS.

LOCAL AUTHORITIES ARE IN ON THE ACT WITH AN INCREASE IN THEIR PETTY INTERFERENCE IN THE LIVES OF THEIR PAYROLLERS WITH MANY SPEED CAMERAS IN PLACE SIMPLY TO MAKE MONEY. AS TO RECYCLING THIS IS ANOTHER AREA WERE THE GESTAPO UNITS ARE AT THEIR BUSIEST.

CO-OPERATION IS ONE THING BUT FORCE IS OUT OF PLACE>YOU ONLY HAVE TO COMPARE THE LIFESTYLE OF A CONVICTED MURDERER AND OTHERS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM WITH THE HELP OF THEIR LEGAL TEAMS.

A HARMLESS RATEPAYER WITH NO LEGAL TEAM IN TOW WILL BE DEALT WITH STERNLY AND SEVERELY TO SEE THAT THE PUNISHMENT IS EXACTED WITHOUT COMPASSION.

OF COURSE ONE DAY ANY OF US WILL NEED LEGAL ADVICE BUT THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND THE FLOOD OF REGULATIONS FROM BRUSSELS HAS MADE OUR COUNTRY WITH ITS COMPENSATION CULTURE A MENACE WHICH OUR CHILDREN AND FUTURE GENERATIONS WILL BE MADE TO SUFFER.

[Please note that all words underlined have separate bulletins]

*

THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION-PART 1

AND

12-POINT SUMMARY

OF

EU CONSTITUTION

By Anthony Coughlan

AND

British Vote No! Campaign-

www.vote.no.com

EUROPE

AND A

CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

By SIMON HEFFER

'Taking Liberties'

is on show in cinemas across the country.

Visit: www.noliberties.com

* * *

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

www.eutruth.org.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

* July 18-2007

VOTE

-2007

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

ONLY

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO
NEW FRONT PAGE

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

GORDON BROWN YOU COULD KEEP YOUR CROWN AND SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE FUTURE OF EUROPE

Epochs of English History

In the life of a nation state there comes a time when some great event changes the direction of that State. In the case of our own nation we had the arrival of St Augustine in the 6th century and the Christianisation and bonding of the Heptarchy. The battles of King Alfred in the 9th century and the arrival of a uniting force for England of William the Conqueror in 1066.

Of great importance in the 13th century was the passing of the

GREAT CHARTER

The Magna Carta.

and the creation of

Parliament

of which in form is still with us today in 2007.

We have had strong and weak kings and queens of which the most illustrious was

QUEEN ELIZABETH THE FIRST

and the most traitorous in the form of

KING JOHN

in company with King Charles I and JAMES II and of course our own King Tony in our own times which had been willing to sell our country to a foreign power.

In the seventeenth century we had the civil war and the

Commonwealth under Cromwell

and the birth of the principles of democracy as we have today and which are under threat by the traitorous activities of our once

LOYAL

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

At this precise date in our long history we are again at a crossroads which will be an Epoch of either of greatness or of failure for our

NATION STATE

We are confronted with a House of Commons which in the main appears to be content to see the demise of

OUR COUNTRY and NATION STATE.

Gordon Brown has it within his power to save our Nation State and redirect the Nation States of Europe on a road to a looser arrangement which will preserve the democracy which we with much sacrifice have fought for centuries and particularly in the 20th century by the lead of England with her sister nation states of Wales and Scotland and Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth and with our closest friends in the USA who prize the

'Common Law of England'

AND

'Rights and Liberties'

Englishman

as their slogan for justice in their

War of Independence

had shown.

Our Prime Minister has just two ways to go. He can continue on his way to surrender our country and nationhood to a foreign power and extinguish a unique force for free action on the world stage

He could claim back our sovereignty from the EU and be the instrument of change in a Europe which needs to return power to the people and dismantle the totalitarian structure which poses as a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

The next few months will tell if we have a man of independent thought and action or whether he is a puppet of the growing

ELITE in the EU.

If he is the latter he WILL NOT have an early election because the question of a REFERENDUM is an unknown risk for him. Far better to get the New Treaty in being in the next few months and early next year go to the polls with the treaty ratified and the so-called Conservative Party lacking any credibility after wearing the clothes of every political party at Westminster -except their own. They will be lucky to see power for at least a decade and they deserve their outlawry for their treasonable actions over the past 35 years.

At this late state in the defence of our country's nationhood and democracy there is a need for a booklet -similar in form to that offered by the main parties to their followers. It should in concise form put the case for our retention of our Nation State and of all available information on the benefits of remaining a

FREE COUNTRY

As our many viewers will have found with the hundreds of bulletins on our website on the subject of the EU the majority from independent sources the amount runs into thousands of pages. The booklet we have mentioned could be produced with the hundreds of thousands of pounds held by eurosceptic parties. It should have been done a long time ago and it is essential that it is brought into existence NOW!

IGNORANCE!

As our great lexicographer and conversationalist Samuel Johnson has said:

'ignorance, when voluntary, is criminal, and a man may be properly charged with that evil which he neglected or refused to learn how to prevent'

and some may say

'Where ignorance is bliss 'tis folly to be wise'

But one must admit that those who form the EU ELITE have no difficulty in putting across their message because they are so confident of the way their message has been surreptitiously applied over the past three decades that the last thing they want is for the public to question at this last hurdle their wondrous expectations of being a PROVINCE of the EU instead of remaining a SOVEREIGN NATION STATE. That is a message they do not want you TO HEAR.

IT IS YOUR COUNTRY NOW BUT IF YOU DO NOT HEED OUR WARNING IT WILL NO LONGER EXIST.

There is a saying 'a little knowledge is dangerous.'

IT CAN BE IF YOU ARE A PRO EU ADHERENT.

* * *

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1] EUROFACTS - THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2] WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3] THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4] THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!

5[ THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6] COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION OF EUROPE

7] OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8] MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9] OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11] THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12] 'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13] PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15] A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16] WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17] COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18] WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19] 200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20] 100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21] THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22] UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23] EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24] BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25] FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26] SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27] NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28] IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29] BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30] WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE

31] LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32] BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33] BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34] GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35] HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36] SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS

37] NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK

38] A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

39] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

40] IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATYon us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY by Christopher Booker-- D.M. August-2007

41] David Cameron at last is converted to TRUE CONSERVATIVE policy on LAW and ORDER -while a Past Tory Prime Minister is hoping to SAVE YOUR COUNTRY-DO YOU BELIEVE THEM?

43]WHY OUR TRAITOROUS PRO-EU MP'S WANT THE BEST OF TWO WORLDS.

44] WHY SWITZERLAND REJECTS EU MEMBERSHIP-A LESSON FOR ENGLAND

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

95% of the

British people want a referendum

* Source YouGov Poll June 2007

A MESSAGE TO ALL MPS FROM SPEAKOUT CAMPAIGN

WRITE TO YOUR MP

today and visit

WHY THE BRITISH PEOPLE MUST HAVE THEIR REFERENDUM

HOW WE SEE THE REVISED CONSTITUTION

EUROPE

Daily Mail

COMMENT

[Wednesday, July 25,2007]

The Moral Case for an

EU REFERENDUM

Labour voters ready to rebel in row over a Euro referendum

Jane Merrick

Political Correspondent

[Daily Mail, Monday, August 20,2007]

THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION-PART 1

AND

12-POINT SUMMARY

EU CONSTITUTION

By Anthony Coughlan

AND

British Vote No! Campaign-

www.vote.no.com

EUROPE

AND A

CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

By SIMON HEFFER

Treaty changes designed only to sell document

TRUTH

from Dr Garret FitzGerald, former Irish Taoiseach and leading member of the [PRO-EU] international European Movement writing in the Irish Times on 30th June 2007.

" As for the changes now proposed to be made to the constitutional treaty, most are presentational changes that have no effect.

They have simply been designed to enable certain heads of government [YOU KNOW WHO] to sell to their people the idea of ratification by parliamentary action rather than by

REFERENDUM....

Eurofacts-July 27-2007

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

IF YOU CAN SAY

'WE WANT OUT-WITHOUT A DOUBT'

THEN

[Only an ultimatum by millions of subjects that the new EU TREATY can never be accepted such as signing the

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

*

"ASK US FIRST"

(philiplockwood65@yahoo.co.uk

PHILIP LOCKWOOD

Cambridgeshire.

METRIC MARTYRS WIN VICTORY OVER EU

SOFT TALK FROM EU ON EVE OF OUR BATTLE AGAINST NEW TREATY-THEY

NOW BACK DOWN TO ALLOW IMPERIAL MEASURES TO REMAIN FOR EVER

[Daily Mail - Tuesday, September 11,2007]

PROOF OF WHAT WE SAY-ONLY DIRECT ACTION CAN GET RESULTS

Another blow to Conservative West Midlands MEP Philip Bushill-Matthews-who couldn't understand what imperial measures meant 'to the people'.

In one word 'IDENTITY' now do you understand?

Download the RENUNCIATION OF CITIZENSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION FORM.
"Right Click" on the image and select "Save As.."to download the form in word document.

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

www.eutruth.org.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

* July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

The Petition reads as follows:

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

'The Spirit of England'

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

VOTE

-2007

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

ONLY

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

'Corner of France where it will be forever England'

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

JERUSALEM

[From the Prophetic Book, “Milton”.]

JERUSALEM

[From the Prophetic Book, “Milton”.]

‘And did those feet in ancient time

Walk upon England’s mountain s green?

And was the holy Lamb of God

On England’s pleasant pastures seen?

And did the Countenance Divine

Shine forth upon our clouded hills?

And was Jerusalem builded here

Among these dark Satanic mills?

Bring me my bow of burning gold!

Bring me my arrows of desire!

Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!

Bring me my chariot of fire!

I will not cease from mental fight,

NOR SHALL MY SWORD

sleep in my hand,

Till we have built Jerusalem

In England’s green and pleasant land.’

William Blake (1757-1827)

NOR SHALL MY SWORD

SIMON HEFFER

England is F****D

FRANCIS FULFORD

More Union Jacks are flying along 25 miles of the Normandy coast than in the whole of London.

That's what you see between Vierville and Arromanches drenching the seashore, tens of flags laying down easy in the calm of midday, then snapping out in full pride when the evening breeze takes them.

This is the last great show of TRUE BRITAIN anywhere on EARTH. And it is in FRANCE, in sunshine and all through the seaside villages behind the monuments on all those famous D-Day beaches.

'Battle of the Somme-of 90 years ago'

We make no apology in using the above revered term 'Longest' in the way we have used it because we believe the 'Fallen' are with us in our Battle over the next twelve months to protect the

Constitution

and

Conventions

our Country

for which millions of our countrymen have died in two World Wars have been almost destroyed by a number of our citizens who have no respect for our

Past History, our Tradition, our Common Law and our Way-Of Life.

A NATION’S HONOUR SHOULD NOT BE BLEMISHED

This essay was written some time ago but was only today the 25^th August 2004, appeared on our Bulletin Board.

A Crime Against The People

A Referendum has been offered to the British People for them to decide on the future or otherwise of their country. With the lies and deceit from successive governments since 1972 and beyond which has almost taken away the ‘Rights and Liberties of the People.

In the previous Referendum there was no doubt that the People were lied to by the Government of the day.

What can we do? Well we can bring those traitors responsible to justice as the evidence against them is in the public domain. As their offence is against public law it will require an Impeachment in our Parliament or for a future loyal government to bring an action against the offenders.

The last Referendum in 1975 was deliberately compromised by the Government of the day by its lying to the public about the true course and direction which the new legislation would take. Apart from the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ campaign the Government itself had its own campaign at the taxpayers expense with its usual tactic of lies and deceit.

In English Law – A Contract that is obtained by undue influence (using taxpayers money) with untrue and misleading statements – it is said the Judgment would be put aside.

Another way for us all to obtain Justice might be by a ‘Petition of Right’- which is lodged with the Home Secretary who after due investigation receives in suitable cases the Royal fiat ‘Let Right Be Done’- but don’t hold your breath?

Our contention of misrepresentation to put it mildly can be compared to the Rules of Contract.

Where one Party has been guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation or concealment he is not permitted to hold the other Party to the bargain.

Well! I’m sure millions of our citizens would consider that they are no longer bound (if they ever thought they were) by the previous Referendum and now demand Justice. [See Bulletin Board for Renunciation of EU Citizenship]

It is said that the Law of England is grounded on six principles:

1) Law of Reason

2) Law of God

3) General Customs of the Realm

4) Principles called maxims [Rules]

5) Particular maxims [Rules ]

6) Statutes made in Parliament

(T.E. Holland –Jurisprudence –1906 )

Additional to the above we now have 50,000 (?) Regulations and Directives from the EU. And in the future there will be 24 [26 in 2008] other countries that will decide the affairs of our nation, if we agree to the New European Constitution.

Well though some will dispute it we are still a Christian nation as is shown by the integral place our faith occupies in our nation and as confirmed in our Ancient Constitution. (Coronation Oath)

The general customs of the Realm have been built up over a thousand years – the substance of which can be illustrated by the habitual courses of action –the move in which a path (our customs-law and way-of-life) is found formed across a Common. One man crosses the Common in the direction, which is, suggested either by the purpose he has in view, or by mere accident. If others follow in the same track, which they are likely to do after it has once been trodden, a path has been made.

Our path to our once destined future has been blocked as by a dam of untruths, which have been built up over the past 40 years.

As a Christian nation we should uphold in first place TRUTH as well as JUSTICE in our dealings with other nations – our Government which deceived their own People was not immune to carry the same deceitful practice into their foreign relations-as instanced in their illegal invasion of Iraq.

The Intelligence Service has given the wrong message to the image of our nation at home and abroad by the appointment by Mr Blair of John Scarlett to the future head of MI6 of a man (1) who if he had the welfare of his country in mind might well have prevented an unjust war and the shameful aftermath - an event which will be a mark of dishonour on our country which has in general a just record in its past actions in the affairs of other nations as outlined in our long history.

(1)We are of course speaking of Mr John Scarlett –who was Chairman of the JIC.

* * *

IF YOU CAN SAY

'WE WANT OUT-WITHOUT A DOUBT'

THEN

[Only an ultimatum by millions of subjects that the new EU TREATY can never be accepted such as signing the

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.

*

TIME FOR DECISION

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

THANK GOD WE ELECTED A MONARCH

(by the Late -William Rees-Mogg-Independent Peer)

*

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons (1976-83) says:

' WE MUST NOT SURRENDER OUR SOVEREIGNTY INTO FOREIGN HANDS'

*

WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY

*

IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?

(John Mortimer)

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

THE EU

WE-AND THEM!

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

*

*

Nazi Spy Ring revealed by the Master of Balliol College in 1938. It included the late ex prime minister Edward Heath and Ministers Geoffrey Ribbon and Roy Jenkins.

[Additional information to hand]

[All words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]



A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.

In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

*

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

*

A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE

*

THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD

'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '

"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions taking place in the open air"

Guenter Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should not be discussed in public before the

UK PARLIAMENT

had ratified the NEW EU TREATY

and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007

The EU has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until the English have ratified their TREATY.

Over the next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for

YOU!

Referendum: how Labour could still smell of roses.

and

'Money to spare'

when we leave the EU in 2008?

Open Europe says:

Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13

or

Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent

or

Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p

or

Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent

or

Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in less than a year

AND MUCH MORE

Commons debate on the European Communities (Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.

REFERENDUM DAY

will be

RECOMPENSE DAY?

*

A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.

*

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

http://eutruth.org.uk

[Added February-2007]

*          *         *

[Reprinted]

AUGUST/04

Why Tony Blair must face Impeachment

The greatest authority on the Constitution A.V Dicey wrote in 1885:

How is it that the ancient methods of enforcing Parliamentary authority, such as Impeachment, the formal refusal of supplies, and the like, have fallen into disuse?

In today’s Daily Mail of Thursday the 26^th August their political Correspondent James Chapman in a brief report mentioned’ that Tony Blair is facing an astonishing bid for misleading Parliament over the Iraq war, it emerged last night.

An all-party group of MP’s is hoping to use an ancient Parliamentary mechanism to bring the Prime Minister to trial in Westminster Hall.

The power of Impeachment has not been used for 150 years, when it was alleged that Lord Palmerston had entered into a secret treaty with Russia.

The MP’s behind the bid argue Mr Blair could be ousted on the grounds that he has breached his constitutional duties as Premier.

The say he could be Impeached for making assertions about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction that were contradicted by his own intelligence assessments.

Alternatively, he could be charged with making a private agreement with George Bush to take Britain to war, as they say.

This, along with deceiving the Commons, is an Impeachable Offence.

The Scottish National Party [Ironic that it was with the assistance of the Scottish People that English People were freed from the yoke of other Tyrants in the 17th Century is leading the assault on Tony Blair. If this Impeachment succeeds

And it must

We shall be for ever grateful to our neighbours beyond our Northern Wall] and Plaid Cymru, but it is expected that Tories, Liberal Democrats and disaffected Labour backbenchers will also back the move.

Tory MP Boris Johnson is one who has signed up to the Impeachment bid, which will be widely seen in Westminster as a publicity stunt.

But even if it is doomed to failure, Mr Blair’s critics hope that it will keep the issue of Iraq in the public spotlight during Parliament’s summer recess.

[The fact that such a procedure has been attempted will in itself bring back some respect for our once highly respected and honourable House of Commons.]

Today’s Spectator magazine will argue the process is ‘soundly based’ in British law.

Though it is usually thought of as a feature of the American political system, there have been 70 attempted Impeachments in the history of Parliament.

Most came during the reign of Charles 1

[As we have outlined in our Bulletins we see no difference between the character of the above monarch and our present tyrant Tony Blair. Both sought to take away the:

‘Rights and Liberties of Englishmen’

We hope that those MP’s that have yet to make up their minds that this is the last time they will be able to redeem their honour and that of the Chamber in which they sit.]

A single MP can trigger the process, but he must then get the backing of the Commons in a vote.

Labour’s huge majority makes this prospect so remote.

[Members of the House must prove this statement is not a true reflection of your feelings.]

-That Mr Blair is unlikely to lose much sleep over the bid to oust him.

But if the Impeachment attempt was to be approved by MP’s, Mr Blair would be arrested and delivered to Black Rod.

The House of Lords could then release him on bail pending a trial.

Peers would then pass judgment, though the potential penalties Mr Blair might face remains unclear.

[Off with his Head!]

A draft document on the case for Impeachment, prepared by two academics, is being circulated at Westminster.

Plaid Cymru MP Adam Price has been masterminding the Impeachment bid. He said last night:

‘This will be the first time a group of MP’s has taken a step [for Impeachment] for over 150 years.’

‘For the Prime Minister to mislead Parliament and the public and get away with it –is simply not acceptable.

‘Parliament now, I believe, needs to make its voice heard on the matter.

SNP leader at Westminster Alex Salmond said:

‘There is no more serious charge than leading the country to war based on a lie.’

[We are sure that those honourable MP’s will have on their minds the thoughts of the families who have lost loved ones –who if their loss had been the result of a just war –to protect the Nation as whole though as painful as the loss would be at least have the memory of what a great sacrifice had been made for a worthy cause and the thanks of our Nation. If there was ever a case for which self sacrifice should be honoured it is in the present circumstances where our soldiers have given their lives]

The Impeachment of Tony Blair might at least partially balance the scales of Justice in the eyes of the families of ALL who have suffered:

A Roll of Honour of those who have died in the service of their country and those who have exposed the Corruption and Lies of a run-away Government, should be given a place within the sacred walls of Westminster Hall as a reminder when Tyranny is allowed to rule in our Democracy.]

‘Necessity[So called] is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.’ William Pitt – Lord Chatham

Last night Downing Street refused to comment.

*

Why Impeachment of Tony Blair is vital for the Integrity of Parliament and the Ethics of our Society.

PART 1

There will be no doubt be a number of Westminster MP’s who are longing for the day when they can enjoy their advantageous place in Brussels and be themselves Kings of the Regions. To them we speak in vain about Tradition and a Constitution of over a thousand years in the making.

The majority we are sure need only a prompting to abide by the rules of Parliamentary Procedure in the case of the Impeachment of Prime Minister Blair, which will send out a message to our People and the world about that we will not tolerate Tyranny in the land of the Free.

Obviously there will be some soul searching by many members of the House as to the possible loss of seat and earnings of approx. £150,000 a year – a job in a million -with the additional benefit a cast iron pension. The enticement must be great –so we must not hold our breath just yet.

It is said that being a member of the House of Commons Club has for centuries been the best club in Town or even the Country. As we are all aware all clubs have rules be it a football club or social club or any number of clubs serving every need in society.

The Best Club in town has rules, which have been developed over seven hundred years, and those based on earlier custom of the Realm. To break a cardinal rule as Tony Blair has done –lying to the House and the Country and for other actions for which many other Statesmen in the past have paid the ultimate punishment of Death or Banishment, it is inconceivable that Justice would not be done under such circumstances.

However, the Integrity and Honour of our Parliament may in our day mean little or nothing to many in the House. Nevertheless, at such a time in our history with the world looking on to see either the degradation of the Founder of Western Democracy or the reassertion of our histories old standards of honourable conduct in line with the spirit of our ages old Parliamentary Democracy.

If Prime Minister Blair should escape his well earned punishment it will send a signal to the world that England with its unique Common Law which covers many areas of the Globe will be soiled with the Dishonour associated with the lack of Justice in home of the Common Law of England our once illustrious Parliament.

We hope that Justice will be done in our House of Commons in order for the House to retain its Integrity and Honour in the eyes of our People and those of our Kin and friends around the World.

For an example of a true honourable Christian King of the English of bygone days see: Alfred –Christian King of the English –on our Bulletin Board.



Crimes against the Authority and Integrity of Parliament are punishable by Impeachment.

PART 1

One of our greatest authorities on the Law and the Constitution on the question of the future use of refusal of supplies or Impeachment says:

The answer is, that they are disused [not obsolete] because ultimate obedience to the underlying principle of all modern constitutionalism, which is nothing else than the principle of obedience to the will of the nation as expressed through Parliament is so closely bound up with the law of the land that it can hardly be violated without a breach of the ordinary law.

Hence the extraordinary remedies which were once necessary for enforcing the deliberate will of the nation, having become unnecessary, [until another Tyrant such as Tony Blair as with Charles the First in history assumed he was above the Law of the Constitution.], have fallen into desuetude.

If they are not altogether abolished, the cause of the conservatism of the English people, and partly in the valid consideration that crimes may still be occasionally committed [as with Tony Blair] for which the ordinary law of the land hardly affords the punishment, and which therefore may well be dealt with by the High Court of Parliament.

In the words of Mr Dicey… one essential principle of the Constitution is obedience by ALL persons to the deliberately expressed will of the House of Commons in the first instance, and ultimately to the will of the nation as expressed through Parliament.

   . . . The Law of the Constitution, again is all its branches the results of two guiding principles, which have been gradually worked out by the more or less conscience effects of generations of English Statesmen and Lawyers.

This curious process by which the personal authority of the King has been turned into the sovereignty of the [Queen] King in Parliament, has had two effects:

1)         It has preserved the arbitrary power of the Monarch. It has preserved intact and undiminished the supreme authority of the State.

2)         The second of the principles is what I have called the “Rule of Law” or the supremacy through all our Institutions of the ordinary laws of the land.

This rule of law, which means at bottom the right of the Courts to punish any illegal act by whomsoever committed, is the very essence of the English institutions.

If the sovereignty of Parliament gives the form, the supremacy of the law of the land determines the substance of our Constitution.

The English Constitution, in short, which appears when looked at from one point of view to be a mere collection of practices or customs, turns out, when examined in its legal aspect, to be more truly than any other polity in the world, except the Constitution of the United states of America, based on the Law of the land.

A few words may be in place as to the method by which the gradual transfer of power from the Crown [in 1669] to a body which has come more and more to represent the nation. [To the First minister or Prime Minister]

The leaders of the English People in their contests in their contests with Royal power never attempted, except in periods of revolutionary violence, to destroy or dissipate the authority of the Crown as Head of State.

Their policy, continued through centuries, was to leave the power of the King untouched [this is how Tony Blair has been able follow his own agenda with no concern for any one else’s views.] but to bind down the action of the Crown to recognised modes of procedure which, if observed, would secure first the supremacy of the law, and ultimately the sovereignty of the nation.

The King was recognised as the only legislator, but he could enact no valid law except as King in Parliament; the King held in his hands all the prerogatives of the executive government, but, as was after long struggles determined, he could legally exercise these prerogatives only through Ministers who were members of his Council, and incurred responsibility for his acts.

Thus the personal will of the King was gradually identified with and transformed into the lawful and legally expressed will of the Crown. This transformation was based upon the constant use of fictions. It bears on its face that it was the invention of lawyers.

When we see what are the principles, which truly underlie the English polity, we also perceive how rarely foreign statesmen who more or less intended to copy the Constitution of England have followed them.

The sovereignty of Parliament is an idea fundamentally inconsistent with the notions, which govern the inflexible or rigid constitutions existing in by far the most important of the countries, which have adopted any scheme of representative government.

The “Rule of Law” is a conception, which in the United States indeed has received a development beyond that which it has reached in England; but it an idea not so much unknown to as deliberately rejected by the constitution-makers of France. [This is an important aspect of the great differences between the systems of England and other nations in Europe particularly France. That is why Tony Blair has done everything he can to destroy our form of Constitution.] And of other continental countries which have followed the French guidance.

For [us] the supremacy of the law of the land means in the last resort the right of the judges to control the executive government, whilst the separation des pouvoirs means, as construed by Frenchmen, the right of the government to control the judges. [If we had not implemented the Human Rights Act into our law we would have had less ridiculous decisions from our Judges and if we left the EU our Judges would be again as previously over 700 years ,Guardians of our: ]

“Rights and Liberties of Englishman”

To say this is not to assert that foreign forms of government are necessarily inferior to the English Constitution, unsuited for a civilised and free people.

All that necessarily results from an analysis of our institutions, and a comparison of them with the institutions of foreign countries, is that the English Constitution is still marked, far more deeply than is generally supposed, by peculiar features, and that these peculiar characteristics may be summed up in the combination of Parliamentary Sovereignty with the ‘Rule of law.’

[The author of the above work was obviously being diplomatic in his final judgment because if his statement was so accurate why have our politicians over 40 years been gradually endeavouring to change our superior Constitution for a continental system, which is counter to the manner of our People.]

PART 2

[Fonts altered-bolding used –comments in brackets]

*          *          *

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country.

PART 2

Many people in this country will have no difficulty in remembering the name of the late Norris McWhirter CBE who died recently and who had amongst many other well known achievements had been a staunch defender of the Rights and Liberties of the people of this country for over 40 years.   He was one of the Founder members of the ‘Defenders of the Realm’.

Our other patriot belongs to the Civil War of the 17^th Century when another fighter for freedom– John Hampden an English Statesman; born in London in 1594. Was mortally wounded on Chalgrove Field one of the sites of the early battles between Parliament and the King in 1643.

The subject of the conflict between Parliament and the King [Charles] in the Civil War is a constant reminder that we all have to be alert to any attempt by any element in our Constitution, which attempts to take away our Freedom. Today the position is reversed and it is now a weak Parliament, which over the last 40 years has almost given away the fruits of freedom, accumulated over seven centuries.

This essay is a reminder of how this country was saved by a Parliament loyal to the key principles of the Constitution and we hope that many who now sit in that hallowed building will reflect on what their ancestors did to prevent tyranny in their day.

The following extracts are from ‘some, memorials of John Hampden, his Party and Times by Lord Nugent –London: 1831. (T.B. Macaulay)

‘The public life of Hampden is surrounded by no obscurity. His history, more particularly from the year 1640 to his death, is the history of England.

These Memoirs must be considered as Memoirs of the history of England; and, as such, they well deserve to be attentively pursued.

They contain some curious facts, which, to us at least, are new, much spirited narrative, many judicious remarks, and much eloquent declamation.

We are not sure that even the want of information respecting the private character of [John] Hampden is not in itself a circumstance as striking characteristic as any which the most minute chronicler, or Boswell himself, ever recorded concerning their heroes.

The celebrated Puritan leader is an almost solitary instance of a great man who neither sought nor shunned greatness, who found glory only because glory lay in the path of duty.

During more than forty years he was known to his county [sat in Parliament in June 1625 as burgess for Wendover-Bucks] neighbours as a gentleman of cultured mind, of high principles, of polished address, happy in his family, and active in the discharge of local duties; and to political men as an honest, industrious, and sensible member of Parliament, not eager to display his talents, staunch to his party, and attentive to the interests of his constituents.

A direct attack was made by an arbitrary government on the sacred right of Englishmen [As we are experiencing today – as over 360 years ago], on a right, which was the chief security for all other rights [As it would be today – 30^th August, 2004]

The country looked around for a defender. [As we do today –do we see any prominent member of OUR Parliament from any of the main parties leave his party on a matter of principle in order to lead the fight to protect our sacred Constitution as the subject we are now revealing?].

*

Calmly and unostentatiously the plain Buckinghamshire Esquire placed himself at the head of his country, and right before the face and across the path of tyranny.

The times grew darker and more troubled. Public service, perilous, arduous, delicate, was required; and to every service the intellect and the courage of this wonderful man were found fully equal.

He became a debater of the first order, a most dexterous manager of the House of Commons, a negotiator, and a soldier. He governed a fierce and turbulent assembly

[We don’t see much of this when our rights and liberties have almost been given away without a fight]

…Abounding in able men, as easily as he had governed his family [We in our time appear to do everything to destroy this boundless asset of mankind].

He showed himself as competent to direct a campaign as to conduct the business of the petty sessions.

We can scarcely express the admiration which we feel for the mind so great, and, at the same time, so healthful and so proportioned, so willingly contracting itself to the humblest duties, so easily expanding itself to the highest, so contented in repose, so powerful in action.

Almost every part of the virtuous and blameless life, which is not hidden from us in modest privacy, is a precious and splendid portion of our national history.

[We hope that future generations will be able to say the same about our Hampden –if he ever emerges during this perilous time in our history.]

PART 3

http://thewestminsternews.co.uk

http://eutruth.org.uk

*

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

*

13th October,2007

So You Want Out Of The EU

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

WHY WE ASK YOUR SUPPORT
When we first saw the petition we reasoned that it had no chance of success from No 10 but we supported it in order to gauge the number of BRITONS who would publicly put their name to a list which stated that they wished to RENUNCIATE EU CITIZENSHIP and retain only BRITISH.-THAT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. To hide behind a negative premise is both cowardly and playing into the hands of the EU FEDERALISTS. DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT- Place your vote so ALL can see that YOU CARE. about YOUR COUNTRY and YOUR FREEDOM.

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

*

The Lisbon Treaty: was it an historic turning point?

Eurofacts-2rd November,2007

Vol 13 No 2

WAS THURSDAY 18th OCTOBER 2007 the DAY on which BRITAIN ceased to be

AN INDEPENDENT NATION STATE?

will historians writing a decade hence pick some other date?

In according with the strategy laid down by the EU 's founding father Jean Monnet, the transfer of powers from member states to the institutions of European government has been gradual.

A case can be made for saying that previous EU treaties transferred equal or greater powers from member states to the European institutions, but that is to miss the MAIN POINT.

From Rome to Lisbon the EU treaties can be seen as staging posts on the route to a unitary European state. Historians are nevertheless conclude that

18th October, 2007 -"Black Thursday"

[or in our words "Traitors Day"]

as it may come to be known - was an important

TURNING POINT.

This was the moment when the pretence that

NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE

could be preserved in the context of a wider political union become not merely a

FRAUD

but an obvious one.

AT THAT MOMENT, the ratification of the treaty in sight, all the main building bricks of the new

EUROPEAN STATE

-in

COMMISSION

PARLIAMENT

SUPREME COURT

and

CONSTITUTION

-were firmly in place.

It was at this point that the claim that

SOVEREIGNTY

was being pooled rather than surrendered and that

BRITISH INDEPENDENCE

consequently remained intact was at last exposed as

NONSENSE

and therefore became counter-productive as a means of as assuaging public concerns.

THAT IS THE POINT WHICH WE HAVE NOW ARRIVED

[AFTER 35 YEARS

LIES]

Britain's involvement in the

EUROPEAN PROJECT

began with the

LIE

-that there would be

NO ESSENTIAL TRANSFER OF

SOVEREIGNTY

DECEPTION

upon which a whole series of lesser deceptions have subsequently been constructed.

It is entirely in keeping with the history of British membership of the EU that the Government's position on the Lisbon Treaty should be based on a

LIE

of almost equal magnitude

THE LIE

that the Treaty is not of a constitutional character, even though it gives the EU

LEGAL PERSONALITY

Abolishes the NATIONAL VETO

61 Areas

Creates a FOREIGN MINISTER

and

DIPLOMATIC SERVICE

in all but name as well as a

PERMANENT PRESIDENCY

while providing the means by which further powers can be transferred to

BRUSSELS.

In two respects the treaty is worse than Giscard's original document:

It is less honest in n that it seeks to conceal its own

SCOPE and PURPOSE

and it is almost entirely

UNINTELLIGIBLE.

Does Mr Brown believe in the provisions of the

TREATY

to whose defence he must now devote considerable political resources?

THE QUESTION IS ACADEMIC

As Daniel Hannan has written, whatever he thinks of it Brown is too establishment-minded, too risk-averse, too lacking in conviction and courage either to perform a historic volte face or to run the risk of running a campaign

WHICH HE MIGHT LOSE.

The British are traditionally slow to recognise challenges to their essential national interest, but they are currently taking such tardiness

TO NEW LIMITS

Indeed the present national obtuseness is of such an order that even mild-mannered eurosceptics, the kind who are not demonstrably swivel-eyed or prone to foam-flecked denunciations of all things European, are driven to despair

WHY

-is not

TRAFALGAR SQUARE

full of those angrily protesting against so obvious

BETRAYAL OF TRUST?

And yet it is still just possible that

"Black Thursday"

could turn out to be a very different kind of turning point.

To begin with, ratification may not turn out to be painless as Mr Brown's allies suggest.

By allowing a lengthy period for Parliamentary ratification the Prime Minister believes he can open divisions within the Conservative Party of the kind that emerged during the parliamentary battles over

MAASTRICHT.

He is surely deluded. Treaty ratification is bound to be a bigger problem for the incumbent government than for the

OPPOSITION.

And unlike Mr Brown, Mr Major never

PROMISED

REFERENDUM.

The more the

PUBLIC

learn of the

LISBON TREATY

the less they will like it.

In the past the British public, although inclined to eurosceptism, has put other matters-

CRIME

IMMIGRATION

ECONOMIC WELL-BEING

for example -higher up its list of concerns

THAN

EUROPE.

A line by line examination of the

TREATY

will demonstrate the inextricable link between those concerned and membership of the

[EUROPEAN] UNION.

More than any eurosceptic pamphlet, it will demonstrate the extent to which in these areas membership of the

EUROPEAN UNION

either prevents or inhibits the Government from following policies based on the

NATIONAL INTEREST

[ENGLISH/SCOTTISH/WELSH]

For the first time a majority may come to grasp the enormity of

WHAT IS AT STAKE

and begin to understand that

'EUROPE'

is not just something which happens 'over there'.

Further courageous and principled defiance by eurosceptics within the Labour party such as those that can be expected from Gisela Stuart and Kate Hoey will make Mr Brown's task more difficult, even though they are bound to be subject to blood-curdling threats from the Labour Whips 'OFFICE.

The Government is bound to be scarred and battered in the process but defeat in the

HOUSE OF COMMONS

remains an outside prospect [so close to obtaining their reward in an ELITE ridden

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE]

-unless, of course, a newly elected leader of the Lib-Dems recognises that the biggest blow it can strike against the

LABOUR GOVERNMENT

is to ask it to honour its

MANIFESTO PROMISE

to support the demand for a

REFERENDUM.

Mr Brown is also likely to face difficulties in getting the legislation through the

[HOUSE of] LORDS;

threats by the Upper House to turn back legislation seldom materialise but a group of highly motivated and extremely knowledgeable eurosceptic peers have it within their power to add to the

GOVERNMENT'S ACUTE PUBLIC RELATIONS PROBLEMS.

Already the

REFERENDUM ISSUE

is acting as a recruiting sergeant for the eurosceptic cause; this is becoming more vocal and self-confident, angrier and more determined. Tens of thousands have signed on-line petitions in favour of a plebiscite, while plans for the Westminster rally held on 27th October demonstrate a growing level of cooperation between eurosceptic groups.

[See our bulletin for details of the botched so-called cooperation between EUROSCEPTIC groups from one who was there - with NO march or rallying speeches from the Queen Elizabeth Conference Hall. WE HAD WARNED on many occasions in the past that unless they UNITED quickly, then in the words of our greatest War Leader Winston Churchill in his warning of the rise of Hitler and German rearmament to a packed House of Commons in the pre-World War II 'Gathering Storm' years when he forcefully reminded the House, it would be:

TOO LATE!

and so it has proved TO BE!]

Ratification of the TREATY will not of itself dissipate the head of steam now being built up; indeed it could have exactly the opposite effect.

A new pressure group - Global Vision - is already exploiting the referendum issue to argue for a new relationship with

EUROPE.

Its architects posit the possibility of achieving this without withdrawal from the EU. We frankly doubt whether this is remotely possible. But we welcome a debate on how its objectives might be most effectively achieved because it is at least

25 YEARS OVERDUE.

Meanwhile, the Conservative Party can be seen inching its way to a more robust policy under the impact of events.

[WE DOUBT IT! they will of course use the opportunity to make party political capital out of the EU issue but their past record had shown that they are not to be trusted. Only a few week's ago after assurances from William Hague that when they are returned to power they would repeal the Lisbon Treaty should it be ratified by PARLIAMENT. Shortly after David Cameron would give no such assurance. We have always considered Mr Nice Guy Dave as the EU man in the shadows to carry on the work of Tony Blair and his refusal to support William Hague's statement is another instance of support for our contention.

The Conservatives have signed the bulk of the EU TREATIES and on the occasion of their Foreign Minister Douglas Hurd signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 was heard after - saying to his colleague Francis Maude

'We'd better find out what we've just signed'

-obviously he felt his colleague at the signing was also as they say 'in the dark'

Since October 10, 2005 we have been made aware that Ted Heath had been a Nazi spy for over 60 years before his death in that year and that his companions in TREASON were Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon who were together in Balliol College Oxford in 1938 when the then Master A D Lindsay reported their Nazi spy ring to MI5. There are others with us today who have yet to be revealed. ]

[Eurofacts] -Our conclusion is that historians may conclude that

"Black Thursday"

was the day when Britain finally abandoned its long tradition of self-government, but it is also possible they might conclude that it was the moment when the eurosceptics began a belated but historic fight-back to halt the trend of previous decades and to recover what had been lost.

IT IS UP TO US.

Why the Treaty was meant to be unreadable

The Lisbon treaty which EU Prime Ministers signed up to on

18th October,2007

is not unintelligible by accident or design.

Explaining the background to the present text Giuliano Amato, the former Italian prime Minister and one of the principle architects of the rejected [2005] Constitution on which the text has been faithfully based made this clear in a speech in London on 16th July, 2007:

'They [EU leaders] decided that the document should be unreadable. if it is unreadable, it is not constitutional, that was the sort of perception. Should you succeed in understanding it at first sight there might be some reason for a referendum, because it would mean that there is something new'.

The document has been rendered unintelligible through the ingenious ruse of turning proposals contained in Giscard's original constitution into amendments to the existing treaties; these can subsequently only be understood if they are placed in the context of a consolidated version. But when Jens-peter Bonde, the Danish eurosceptic MEP recently pressed the [EU]Commission to [produce such a thing he was told that the Inter Governmental Conference had decided that an official consolidated text, which is expected to run to around

3000 pages,

would only be published after the TREATY had been RATIFIED.

[They're not bloody daft those lunatics. Why should they be. They have been pulling the wool over people's eyes for over 35 years. They have counted on the docile attitude of the majority in order to achieve their Super-State and they have not been disappointed though there is still the final hurdle to be overcome but if recent events have any message to give it is that unless the PEOPLE get interested then they deserve the fate that is just around the corner out of sight which will jolt them rigid when the door into SLAVERY is revealed and the door from FREEDOM has been SHUT- possibly for decades to come.]

There could be no clearer evidence that Europe's political leaders

DO NOT WANT

ordinary citizens to read or understand the

TREATY

UNTIL IT IS

TOO LATE!

TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

In Britain the Government PR machine has been used to stress the allegedly modest nature of the changes compared to previous treaties.

BUT IT IS WORTH POINTING OUT

that

LISBON

will result in the loss of a greater number of national veto's-

61 in all

-than was the case with any other treaty.

The Treaty of Rome

listed

38 areas

for qualified majority voting

The Single European Act

listed

12 areas.

Maastricht Treaty

listed

The Amsterdam Treaty

listed

Nice Treaty

listed

[And to think that so many British politicians over the past 35 years have by stealth and deceit and down-right LIES

are only months for reducing our country to a

PROVINCE of EUROPE.

In our first election leaflet in 1997 we asked for

'ENGLAND to AWAKE

BEFORE IT WAS TOO LATE'

regrettably many didn't want to know then and many are still of that mind today in November, 2007 only month's away if we let it happen from the loss of our

CONSTITUTION-CROWN and COUNTRY

* * *

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1] EUROFACTS - THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2] WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3] THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4] THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN YOU!

5[ THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6] COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION OF EUROPE

7] OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8] MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9] OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11] THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12] 'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13] PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15] A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16] WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17] COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18] WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19] 200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20] 100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21] THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22] UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23] EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24] BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25] FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26] SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27] NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28] IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29] BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30] WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE

31] LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32] BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33] BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34] GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35] HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36] SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS

37] NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK

38] A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

39] SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

40] IF Gordon Brown forces this EU TREATYon us, you can kiss goodbye to DEMOCRACY by Christopher Booker-- D.M. August-2007

41] David Cameron at last is converted to TRUE CONSERVATIVE policy on LAW and ORDER -while a Past Tory Prime Minister is hoping to SAVE YOUR COUNTRY-DO YOU BELIEVE THEM?

43]WHY OUR TRAITOROUS PRO-EU MP'S WANT THE BEST OF TWO WORLDS.

44] WHY SWITZERLAND REJECTS EU MEMBERSHIP-A LESSON FOR ENGLAND

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

95% of the

British people want a referendum

* Source YouGov Poll June 2007

A MESSAGE TO ALL MPS FROM SPEAKOUT CAMPAIGN

WRITE TO YOUR MP

today and visit

WHY THE BRITISH PEOPLE MUST HAVE THEIR REFERENDUM

HOW WE SEE THE REVISED CONSTITUTION

EUROPE

Daily Mail

COMMENT

[Wednesday, July 25,2007]

The Moral Case for an

EU REFERENDUM

Labour voters ready to rebel in row over a Euro referendum

Jane Merrick

Political Correspondent

[Daily Mail, Monday, August 20,2007]

THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION-PART 1

AND

12-POINT SUMMARY

EU CONSTITUTION

By Anthony Coughlan

AND

British Vote No! Campaign-

www.vote.no.com

Anthony Coughlan

Secretary
The National Platform EU Research and Information Centre
24 Crawford Ave.
Dublin 9
Ireland
Tel: 00-353-1-8305792

EUROPE

AND A

CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

By SIMON HEFFER

Treaty changes designed only to sell document

TRUTH

from Dr Garret FitzGerald, former Irish Taoiseach and leading member of the [PRO-EU] international European Movement writing in the Irish Times on 30th June 2007.

" As for the changes now proposed to be made to the constitutional treaty, most are presentational changes that have no effect.

They have simply been designed to enable certain heads of government [YOU KNOW WHO] to sell to their people the idea of ratification by parliamentary action rather than by

REFERENDUM....

Eurofacts-July 27-2007

BUT at July 27th-2007-

The British Government will not reveal the

FULL TRUTH

of the consequences of the TREATY

to the British people or hold a REFERENDUM