| A
NEW WORLD CASE FOR PRESERVING THE 'RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ENGLISHMEN'
*
PART 2
If for a moment, we view the whole
system of English Common Law as partly public and partly private law,
even though English legal thought does not draw a sharp distinction
between the two, we may the more easily grasp the early attitude of the
colonists towards the law of the home-land.
Reinsch has expressed this attitude in
these words:
"English colonists in their general
ideas of justice and right, brought with them the fruits of the
'struggle for law' in England....
Most of the colonies made their
earliest appeal to the [English] Common Law in its character as a
monument of
ENGLISH LIBERTY
-that is considering more its public
than its private law elements,"
Hallam, " Constitutional History of
England," iii.1906, p.338:
"In quitting the soil of England to
settle new colonies, Englishmen never renounced her freedom. Such
being the noble principle of English colonisation, circumstances
favoured the early development of colonial liberties,"
On the claim of the colonists to the
benefits of Magna Carta and other constitutional statutes of England,
see Osgood "American Colonies in the seventeenth century," 1902,i.p.258.
Or, in Channing's [History of the
United States,"i.1905,p.529] phrase:
"So far as [the English Common law]
protected them from the English government and the royal officials they
looked upon it as their
"BIRTHRIGHT"
-so far as it interfered with their
development it was to be disregarded"
If we bear this in mind , we shall see
the more clearly that English constitutional statutes and cases were, as
their "birthright"
-of fundamental importance to the
English colonists of America in their struggles with colonial and
imperial authorities.
[As in 2007 when we find that over the
past 35 years our politicians have been undermining our fundamental
liberties in order to enslave us into a corrupt totalitarian police
state calling itself the United States of Europe.]
In the earlier Stuart reigns Magna
Carta, as the greatest of all English
STATUTES OF LIBERTY
-was regarded by the colonists as a
bulwark of their rights as Englishmen.
As the seventeenth century advanced,
the great constitutional struggles in England were reflected in the
colonies; and the
Petition of Right
the
Habeas Corpus Act
the
Bill of Rights
and the
Act of Settlement(1701)
-took their place beside
MAGNA CARTA
-in the minds of the colonists as
statutory guaranties
of the
Rights of Englishmen
-both at home and away from home, in
respect of
LIFE
LIBERTY
and
PROPERTY.
*
[In 2007 in England our guaranties have
been stolen from us by those who had taken the constitutional oath to
defend our accustomed rights and liberties and who in 1998 by
legislation passed through the House of Commons in defiance of their
Oaths an unannounced measure which took away any danger from the courts
for their crimes of TREASON.
For confirmation:
http://thewestminsternews.co.uk
http://eutruth.org.uk
It is for this reason that we must view
Magna Carta in its history in the colonies as only part - though a most
valuable part - of the whole body of English constitutional law, the
Common law in its character of public rather than private law, the
Common Law as it is found in constitutional cases and constitutional
statutes.
As Englishmen owing allegiance to the
Crown and settling upon land claimed by England as under its
sovereignty, the colonists were, it would seem, entitled to the
'RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN'
-embodied in
MAGNA CARTA
and other sources of Common Law without
further sanction of royal charter or colonial legislation. But , not
only did royal charters to the colonists secure these constitutional
rights, they were incorporated also in colonial legislation.
The history of Magna Carta in America
has a meaning far deeper than the influence of a single constitutional
document; for Magna Carta typifies those ideals of law and government
which have spread to America and to many other political communities
that lie beyond the four seas encircling the island realm [of England]
itself.
The world diffusion of those ideals of
liberty and justice deserve to be studied in its entirety, as a vast
historical process which had its beginnings far back in the middle ages,
and which has shaped and is still shaping in modern times the
institutions of all the political commonwealths that owe their spiritual
inheritance to
ENGLAND.
*
'In England the actual and practical
security for English liberty against legislative tyranny was the power
of
FREE PUBLIC OPINION
-represented by the
COMMONS of ENGLAND
In [America] written constitutions were
deemed essential to protect the rights and liberties of the people
against the encroachments of power delegated to their governments
[States], and the provisions of Magna Carta, were incorporated into
[States]
Bills of Rights
They were limitations upon all the
powers of government, legislative as well as executive and judicial...'
Applied to England only as guards
against executive usurpation and tyranny, here [America] they have
become bulwarks also against arbitrary legislation; but ,in that
application, as it would be incongruous to measure and restrict them to
the ancient customary English law, they must be held a guarantee, not
particular forms of procedure, but the very substance of individual
rights of
LIFE LIBERTY and PROPERTY.
[AS we all know over the past 35 years
our COMMONS of ENGLAND the ancient protector of the English people
has betrayed the People by its willingness to pass many TREATIES with
the EUROPEAN UNION which has stealthily eroded the power of Parliament
to a point today in 2007 when it will only require the
ratification of a FINAL TREATY to make Parliament into a Regional
storehouse for the mountains of farm products which the EU with their
allies in that historic building who have encouraged those policies and
paid for.
In America this could NOT possibly
happen because they have a Supreme Court to protect State rights and
liberties as the States themselves their individual Bill of Rights.
ONLY people power using the INTERNET as
its COMMONS of ENGLAND has any chance of putting our traitorous
representatives ON TRIAL by the JURY of the PEOPLE where they cannot
hide where ever they are from final retribution wherever they may be
whether visiting the ice flows of the Antarctic or enjoying their
traitorous reward in the Elite body of the EU or on a lecture tour of
the United States of America.
As during the last two World Wars when
governments in Europe which had been overrun by the NAZIS sent
their Governments in Exile to England so we today in February 2007 have
no need to leave OUR COUNTRY but as ALL loyal citizens of the TRUE
CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND will form our own COMMONS of ENGLAND and conduct
our deliberations through the INTERNET.
LET US SHOW THE PRESENT EXCUSES FOR
REPRESENTATIVES THAT WHAT THEY SAY IN THEIR EU REGIONAL OFFICE AT
WESTMINSTER IS OF NO INTEREST AS WE HAVE OUR OWN FORUM AND OUR OWN
PARLIAMENT AT THE CLICK OF A BUTTON.
LET US SELECT OUR OWN GOVERNMENT IN
EXILE without leaving our homes and use the only means now available to
form an alternative government without the need of expensive buildings
and rental etc. What a shock when Blair learns there is another Prime
Minister of England out there who will have more support than he will
expect at the next General Election which might never happen because by
2009 we will have no Government in England but an EU regional office for
the Elite wasters owing their allegiance to Brussels.
One would love to see the look on the
faces of those detestable traitors when they hear that there is a loyal
Commons of England in England open to everyone and it has no connection
with the traitorous brigands who will soon be turning that most ancient
and hallowed corner of England into an EU Food Store.
*
The fragmentation
of the eurosceptic opposition to the EU has been working in its favour -
it is time for ALL organizations to be represented under an umbrella
organisation that can speak for ALL eurosceptic opinion. In our
communities today we have numerous such bodies to look after the
interests of its members many representing new comers to our island
home. We have been late to learn that ONLY IF THERE IS ONE BODY AND ONE
VOICE and a UNITY which we have lacked up to February 2007 will we
ever be taken seriously by ANY GOVERNMENT.
The 50th anniversary of our entrapment
into a supposed Common Market is an opportunity to after all be serious
about our campaign and UNITE in a common cause and reap the benefits of
that UNITY as we are ONLY *two years from the extinction of our own
Parliament at Westminster.
*
*
http://thewestminsternews.co.uk
http://eutruth://org.uk
*
CLICK
HERE FOR MORE DETAILS OF:
THE
COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND ITS HERITAGE AND IMPORTANCE TO PARLIAMENTARY
DEMOCRACY TODAY
*
WHY THE
USA NEEDS A 21st CENTURY MONROE DOCTRINE.
*
WARNING
AND A PROPHECY -TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS FROM AN ENGLISHMAN AND DEFENDER
OF AMERICAN LIBERTY IN 1775.
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY/07
*
|
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
*
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
SAY VOTERS
by
Daniel
Martin
Political
Reporter
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
IRISH REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF
THE TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING STREET-
WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street
website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
|
*
Let the people speak!
www.makeitanissue.org.uk
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
*
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
SCOTLAND
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin]
|
