- (1994 - EDP -Official Website - AUGUST- PT 2 - 2019 )
AUG H 1 2
3 4 5  6

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 1-2019      JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 2-2019

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 3-2019        JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 4-2019

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY ORG.UK.

*

FREEDOM & UNITY

Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

————————————————————–

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

As many of us are aware, U.S. politics has been stuck in an endlessly repeating loop for two years, with hysterical Democrats using control of corporate media and every legal tool possible to remove Trump, while Trump endlessly tweets “witch hunt.”

To understand why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock, we need to take a quick look at the FISAgate scandal. Basically, in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi (Zionist) -allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S., according to Pentagon sources.

“Trump giving [U.S. Attorney General William] Barr power to declassify gives him clean hands to terminate Zionists when files are released about 9/11, 3/11 [Fukushima], and other military intelligence,” Pentagon sources promise.

A foretaste of the sorts of files that are about to be released came with this leak from Holland of video and photographs taken immediately after “Malaysian Air” Flight 370/17 was shot down over the Ukraine. The film has been made available for download until June 1, but be warned that it contains graphic, stomach-churning images of mangled corpses.
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/8e718ace300809f836f75aa75afa9c4d20190525075927/

052f8e1fdfa9cc40fc40a40a53ff05c820190525075927/

c4f5f5?utm_campaign=WT_email_tracking&utm_content=general&utm_medium=download_button&utm_

source=notify_recipient_email

The whistleblower who sent the file noted that the victims of “Flight 17” had invalid Dutch passports belonging to people who boarded Flight 370. Also, many of the bodies were decomposed, wearing winter clothes for a summer flight or else naked, and had no blood. The information contained on the flights’ black boxes has “never been made public by the English, who received them,” the source notes.

British MI6 sources say, “Both the current and former prime ministers colluded to pervert the…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account

About Kauilapele

I am a Spirit of Light working with energies on this planet on the Big Island of Hawai'i (for 15 years). My spiritual missions have taken me from the Big Island of Hawai'i to neighbor islands (Oahu, Kauai), as well as to Turtle Island (N. America), Peru (Cusco), Bolivia (Lake Titicaca), and Egypt (Gizeh, Saqqara, the Pyramids) (see my YouTube page).
Gallery | This entry was posted in apocalypse, cabal, new energies, partners in contrast and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
 

H.F.1853

 

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

SEP-19

OCT-19

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

 

 

(LIBERTY-FREEDOM)

 

'By liberty I mean the assurance that every man shall be protected in doing what he believes his duty against the influence of authority and majorities, custom and opinion.'

Lord Acton

1834-1902

 

 

*

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE

 BEAST!

 IN BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

In September 1654 Cromwell summoned his first Parliament. The Speaker was  William Lenthall the greatest and most respected holder of that HIGH OFFICE during the English Civil War.

The Lord Protector said

"the main object in calling Parliament was that

"the ship of the commonwealth may be brought into a safe harbour."

 

 [Is not this our aim in our day?]

 

 [LETTER]

For the Honourable William Lenthall, Speaker of the Commons

House of Parliament: these,

Sir                                      Harborough, 14th June, 1645           

Being commanded by you to this service, I think myself bound to acquaint you with the good hand of God towards you and us.

We marched yesterday after the King, who went before us from Daventry to Harborough; and quartered about six miles from him.  This day we marched before him.  He drew out to meet us; both Armies engaged.  We, after three hours fight very doubtful, at last routed his Army; killed and took about 5000,-very many officers, but of what quality we yet know not.   We took also about 200 carriages, all he had; and all his guns, being 12 in number, whereof two were demi-cannon, two demi-culverins, and I think the rest sackers.  We pursued the Enemy from three miles short of Harborough to nine beyond, even to the sight of Leicester, whither the King fled.

Sir, this is none other but the hand of God; and to Him alone belongs the glory, wherein none are to share with Him.  The General served you with all faithfulness and honour: and the best commendation I can give him is, That I daresay he attributed all to God, and would rather perish than assume to himself. Which is an honest and a thriving way:-and yet as much for bravery may be given to him, in this action.  Sir, they are trusty; I beseech you, in the name of God, not to discourage them. I wish this action may beget thankfulness and humility in all that are concerned in it.  He that ventures his life for liberty of his country, I wish he trust God for the liberty of his conscience, and you for the liberty he fights for.  In this he rests, who is

Your most humble servant,

OLIVER CROMWELL

*

[Page 171-PART II FIRST CIVIL WAR-14th June 1645-LETTERSXXiX., NASEBY-OLIVER CROMWELL'S LETTERS AND SPEECHES by THOMAS CARLYLE-1888 ]

 

Is not this the wish of the majority in England in our day with regard to

BREXIT?

The dangerous and ironical situation we have faced in our day could have been avoided if Cromwell's "Fundamentals of the Constitution" -had been protected in law as with certain articles in

 Magna Carta.

What a previous Speaker of the House of Commons stated about the PROTECTION of the CONSTITUTION in the 1980's

 

The English People

 were betrayed by

 Parliament and the Monarchy.

TREASON

 

*

AND

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

AUGUST 21,2017

H.F.1285

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

————————————————————–

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

As many of us are aware, U.S. politics has been stuck in an endlessly repeating loop for two years, with hysterical Democrats using control of corporate media and every legal tool possible to remove Trump, while Trump endlessly tweets “witch hunt.”

To understand why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock, we need to take a quick look at the FISAgate scandal. Basically, in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi (Zionist) -allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S., according to Pentagon sources.

“Trump giving [U.S. Attorney General William] Barr power to declassify gives him clean hands to terminate Zionists when files are released about 9/11, 3/11 [Fukushima], and other military intelligence,” Pentagon sources promise.

A foretaste of the sorts of files that are about to be released came with this leak from Holland of video and photographs taken immediately after “Malaysian Air” Flight 370/17 was shot down over the Ukraine. The film has been made available for download until June 1, but be warned that it contains graphic, stomach-churning images of mangled corpses.
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/8e718ace300809f836f75aa75afa9c4d20190525075927/

052f8e1fdfa9cc40fc40a40a53ff05c820190525075927/

c4f5f5?utm_campaign=WT_email_tracking&utm_content=general&utm_medium=download_button&utm_

source=notify_recipient_email

The whistleblower who sent the file noted that the victims of “Flight 17” had invalid Dutch passports belonging to people who boarded Flight 370. Also, many of the bodies were decomposed, wearing winter clothes for a summer flight or else naked, and had no blood. The information contained on the flights’ black boxes has “never been made public by the English, who received them,” the source notes.

British MI6 sources say, “Both the current and former prime ministers colluded to pervert the…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account

About Kauilapele

I am a Spirit of Light working with energies on this planet on the Big Island of Hawai'i (for 15 years). My spiritual missions have taken me from the Big Island of Hawai'i to neighbor islands (Oahu, Kauai), as well as to Turtle Island (N. America), Peru (Cusco), Bolivia (Lake Titicaca), and Egypt (Gizeh, Saqqara, the Pyramids) (see my YouTube page).
Gallery | This entry was posted in apocalypse, cabal, new energies, partners in contrast and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
 

H.F.1853

WHY ARE WE

 

ENGLISH

 

MADE TO FEEL GUILTY ABOUT OUR IDENTITY?

 by

Simon Heffer

 

Daily Mail

Thursday, April 21, 2005

 Over the past decade or so there has been a stark change in the way the majority of people in these islands see themselves.

Whereas most living south of Hadrian’s Wall and east Offa’s Dyke used to consider themselves ‘British’, they now consider themselves, instead ‘English’

 

After all, thanks to the cynical devolution policies of our Scottish- dominated Government, the Kingdom is no longer United. ‘Great Britain’ is a geographical term rather than a political fact.

 

And the English, more than five-sixths of the British people, have been bombarded with ostentatious displays of Scots nationalism and Welsh separation -both phenomena for which the English taxpayer is still having to shell out.

 Little wonder, with the Celtic fringe making it clear to the English that they would rather not be associated with us except financially, that we have reassessed our own identity.

 

And little wonder that this should inspire Englishmen such as Tony Bennett, landlord of the Otter pub in Thorpe Marriott, Norfolk, to seek to celebrate St George’s Day this Saturday in a traditional English fashion: with longer drinking hours.

 

Mr Bennett had already successfully obtained an extension to celebrate the Chinese New Year. And he has been assured that, had he applied for an extension to mark St Patrick’s Day, or The Hindu feast of Diwali, he would have been granted one.

 

However, when he sought permission to allow English men and women to celebrate the feast of St. George, Norwich magistrates turned him down. St George’s Day, Mr Bennett was informed by magistrate Roy Church, simply isn’t ‘special’ enough.

 

As an Englishman, I greatly respect the culture and economic contribution that the Welsh, Scottish, Irish, and other minorities such as Asians have made to this country.

 

But throughout the General Election campaign, several prominent politicians have, in search for votes, made the questionable assertion that a ‘diverse’ society-it is no longer politically-correct to talk of a ‘multi-cultural’ one - is better than a monocultural one.

 

This is the prevailing mood among the small out- of- touch clique who rule our country, those who fawn on them, and those who take orders from them.

 

The English, owning as they do the majority culture, are whipping boys for this obsession with diversity. You cannot, after all imagine a less diverse human being than the white, middle-aged male Mr Bennett, swathed in his St. George’s flag, and fulfilling one of the oldest and important functions known to English society: selling ale in his pub.

 

It is all right to celebrate St Patrick’s Day, because the Irish are a historically oppressed minority. A faintly similar case, far more laughable can be made for the feasts of St. Andrew and St.David.

 

And when it comes to celebrating the Chinese New Year, or Diwali, or Ramadan (unlikely, I know, but I include it for the sake of ‘diversity’), the English Establishment can find no objections at all.

 After all, these people are genuine ethnic minorities, the obvious victims of prejudice.

 English politicians and magistrates can thus demonstrate their post-imperial guilt by sanctioning whatever celebrations of such feast days may be required, and taking the much- needed opportunity for some self flagellation about being English into the bargain.

 

Mr Bennett is fuming about this. He is not alone. I am fuming about it, too. And millions of other English men and women will rage at this latest insult to our people, our nation, our traditions, our culture, our way of life, our history, and above all, to our good sense.

 

For we, being fair-minded, know we have as much right to our national and cultural identity as any Irishman, Scotsman. Welshman or Hindu does to his.

 

After all, the reasons adduced by the liberal fascists for our need to feel guilty, and to keep quiet about our national identity, are thoroughly bogus.

 

Our history is not one of oppression, nor of tyranny. Why uniquely among the Great European powers did England avoid revolution in the past 300 years?

 

Was it not, quite simply, because the benign and honest nature of our Constitution and those who implemented it maintained the happiness of the English people?

 

Did not Wales and Scotland benefit greatly from their association with England? Do they not benefit from it greatly still?

 

And have we not gone far-some argue much to far-to try to put right the historic wrongs done in Ireland, wrongs that pale into insignificance compared with what other great powers used to inflict on their minorities?

 

Why is it that nationalism, or the sense and idea of national identity, are entirely acceptable to the liberal fascists when expressed by an Irishman, a Scotsman, a Welshman or a Hindu, but are so unacceptable when expressed by the English?

 

What have we done that is so evil we should hide our culture away? Our crime, quite simply, is to have been so large and so economically successful. The liberal fascists are embarrassed by our power.

 

A

Clownish

Magistrate

 

Who refuses to allow an English publican to serve his customers for an extra hour on the evening of St.George’s Day is either Stupid or has a political agenda of his own.

 

There is a feeling, handed down from the top of the most anti-English Government in our history, that you cannot celebrate Englishness and cannot institutionalise a celebration of Englishness such as the feast of St. George, without being ‘racist’ or ‘diversive’.

 

It may be, of course, that so poorly educated are the new English official class that they cannot understand that

 

English history,

culture and nationalism are something to be proud of: not merely for what they have given us as English people, but for what they have given the world.

 

Either way, the Government’s purpose of creating a society in which minorities are lauded and the English majority are made to feel as bad about themselves as possible is furthered by their actions.

 

To many publican Tony Bennett’s desire to allow his customers to have an hour’s more drinking on St. George’s Day is but a trivial matter. He, and I, would beg to disagree.

 

Our national identity is something to which we have an absolute right to express.

 

For an official of the state [we would say servant of the people] to say that England’s national day is not ‘special’, unlike other similar feasts celebrated by minorities, must be politically motivated as it is illogical.

 

The Government should be warned. The people of England who are being bled white, ignored, exploited and misused by a state machine that clearly detests them, will not have their tempers improved by being treated like pariahs in this way.

 

Never let it be forgotten that it is [New] Labour that let the genie of separate nationalisms out of the bottle in this country by encouraging devolution. We English now want the same rights to self-expression and independence as our fellow Britons.

 

Our nationalism is utterly benign: however, if it is not shown the same respect accorded to others it may not remain so indefinitely.

 

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used -comment in brackets.]

 

* * *

APRIL/05

 

 

The Tories offer YOU £4 billion - UKIP can offer YOU £40-£100 billion a year-Why wait-Vote UKIP on May 5, 2005.

 

What appears to be lost on many commentators is that the insidious measures taken by the present Government are about one thing, which is also sought by the other political parties in OUR Parliament today and over the past 33 years:

 

It is the ultimate aim to have Britain within a:

 

‘United States of Europe’

 

In order to achieve this objective ALL Governments -Tory - Labour [New Labour] -with the help of LibDems have over the last three decades given away almost all our cherished liberties.

 

The recent Terrorism Bill was passed because George Kennedy and 17 of his party decided not to turn up to vote to defend our Habeas Corpus of our Great Charter -the Magna Carta of 1215.

 

New Labour have flooded the country with as many diverse nationalities in a drive to build up a multicultural society in order to weaken the English national identity in a land which does not appear as England on the EU Regional map of Europe.

 

Many of our cities are suffering from ‘White-Flight’ with many indigenous people leaving the cities in the hands of the large immigration of many -over a million - who have no intention of assimilating into our community but instead are in the process of creating a State within a State.

 

There are now many cities which have from 30 to 45% alien population (could be much higher as many immigrants and asylum seekers have melted into the background -but recently a figure of 500,000 has been mentioned from official sources and there are also the dependents of many of the these

migrants to consider which would put the final figure possibly around - 750,000-could be higher-No one really knows?

 

It has been stated only recently that council taxpayers are paying £3 billion a year for the care of at least 250,000 illegal immigrants [those they know of]

 

Might there be in the future a case for UDI- A Unilateral Demand for Independence by a major conurbation -such as Leicester or Bradford or a number of other cities who will be completely in the hands of those who consider they owe no allegiance to our country.

 

Even today there are ‘No-Go areas’ in all but name where the police keep a very low profile and leave the communities to their own clan leaders.

 

This could all have been avoided if only those peoples from the world who wished to assimilate into our community where accepted with tight control of numbers so that the new peoples are dispersed over the greater part of the country and not creating ghettoes.

 

Unfortunately Tony Blair has in mind only the multiple family votes he will get from his fraudulent postal scheme. His chums in Birmingham and elsewhere have showed him the way.

 

Many immigrants who arrived in our country over forty years ago from the Commonwealth are themselves concerned at the large influxes of the never ending deluge of new immigrants and asylum seekers joining them which is now putting a great strain on their limited resources in THEIR community.

 

We are now warned that a new breed of British Muslim zealot -set on destroying this country who believe that:

Freedom is a form of false God or deity and Muslims are obliged to reject anything which is worshipped, obeyed or followed other than Allah’ [Daily Mail-April 23-2005 -THE ENEMY IN OUR MIDST-by Richard Pendlebury.]

 

and there is no doubt there is plenty of material for them to inflame because of the illegal war in Iraq and the actions of politicians over the last three decades in not taking stronger action to control immigration and use more selective measures to ensure that only those who will join us and take a full part in our community were accepted.

 

It has always been Tony Blair’s plan to encourage the break-up of the once United Kingdom into fragments which meant that poor old England being so large had to be divided up into convenient Regions.

 

Well! We know how those plans for Regions are falling a-part thanks to the vigour of the major part of the voting population of the North-East who despite the Pro-Regional stance of the BBC-North-East and pots of money from Government for the ‘Yes’ campaign and the support of a chunk of the business community- with the numerous Blair cronies who had rubbed their hands with delight at the wonderful pickings they would receive -the voters

told Prescott and his cronies to get lost -they preferred their local accountability -Thank you!

 

In order to ensure a trouble free progress into the EU Superstate it was vital for ALL Governments to encourage the politically-correct notions in order to neuter the English people - after all they are a kindly people who will stand anything rather than complain that they have been badly treated. Or is this now to end?

 

So it has not been too difficult for New Labour to have almost completed our enslavement in the New European police state where the many will be at the bid and call of the privileged Elite who have immunity from arrest and so - so many special perks.

 

It is the inaction of the majority of the English people which has made it so easy for politicians of ALL parties to insult us and push us to the brink of Revolution but knowing that many have their eyes on the latest give-away rather than the future of our nation-state of England and it’s Ancient ‘Rights and Liberties’.

 

As much as we loathe Tony Blair and his cronies and want to see the back of them the greater enemy is the large Pro-EU factions in all the parties who when the moment is right will sell us out to a European Super State. It may not be this year or next - but they will not give up.

 

If the English wish to fight back against the repeated insults from the politically-correct brigade which are within All the main parties then why not vote where your vote will hurt them ALL by supporting the only party with a Mandate to leave the EU-

THE UKIP

 

The United Kingdom Independence Party.

www.ukip.org

 

 

And by so doing you will not only send a message to the main parties that you are not happy with the treatment they have meted out to you but there will be a saving of £40-£100 billion a year [Not the measly £4billion from the Tories but the return of our Fishing Fields -No more expensive Common Agricultural Policy which will not only help us but the poor in the world and which will make ALL the other give-aways look poultry by comparison.

 

Whatever bribes you may receive from the other main parties it will mean very little because you will soon have to pay more tax for poorer services and of course the EU dimension will expect to cobble up our £4 billion rebate and there is the increased yearly contribution to the corrupt and unaccountable police state the European Union - after all there are now 10 more open mouths to feed at the trough of plenty at Brussels - funded mainly by the English taxpayer.

 

The time has come for the English people to march into battle to preserve their Country and Identity and there can be no excuse at all because the facts are now clearly visible and the time to make a stand is NOW - to be precise on May 5, 2005 - to give your answer to Tony Blair and all the other Pro-EU factions in the main parties who think you no longer have the bottle to do anything like fight for your Freedom and Identity.

 

LETS PROVE THEM WRONG?

 

On

 

MAY 5 -2005

 

 FINALLY REMEMBER!!!

 

*DID YOU KNOW?

The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire.

One example is
the United States Federal
Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies.

"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful."

"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati.
(See: +(1)+(1)+(1)

Government Conspiracies - World of Lies - Award Winning Documentary

ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM

-A struggle for the soul of the Jewish People by the Rt.Hon. Winston S. Churchill-written in 1920

 

AUGUST - 2010

 

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

 

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

Daily Mail

Thursday, April 21, 2005

 

 

H.F.1860

 

 

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019

 

May 'doesn't see upside from

BREXIT

[AS WE SUSPECTED FROM THE BEGINNING. HOW COULD AN AVID SUPPORTER OF THE EU  HAVE ACTED OTHERWISE?]

DAILY MAIL

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

Nick Timothy-THERESA MAY'S FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF HAS CLAIMED SHE REGARDS

BREXIT

AS

'DAMAGE LIMITATION'.

Nick Timothy, who lost his job over the Tories' disastrous election campaign of 2017, said she and mainly her ministers' struggle to see any economic upside to BREXIT.

He told the BBC:

They see it as a damage limitation exercise.

If you see it in nthat way inevitably you're not going to be prepared to take the steps that would enable you to fully realise the economic opportunities of

LEAVING.

In a separate interview with Channel 4 News, Mr Timothy said the UK had made4 mistakes in Brexit negotiations, including

 by

allowing the EU to determine the sequence of talks.

 

He said the Government should have spent money earlier on preparing for a

NO DEAL BREXIT

and should have been more 'robust' in pushing areas of UK advantage. 'Some of it is to do with negotiating style,' he said.

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

SATURDAY, MARCH 2,2019

*  *  *

[AND WHAT WE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION

IN APRIL 2018]

 
 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICE DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

H.F.1800

 

 

Anti-Semitism And The Pro Israel Lobby — 1

In this 3 part report I’ll investigate the powerful pro Israel lobby, which has had an impressive global presence almost since the inception of Israel as a state.

In the first part I’ll look at the history of anti-Semitism and how it became deeply ingrained within Christianity, leading to widespread persecution of Jews.

After citing an overview of Paulo Freire’s work, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, I discuss how this could be relevant to the emergence of the Zionist movement and also how it could equally offer a foundation for a non violent reconstruction of Palestinian society.

I then look at how a modern more sophisticated globalised Israel lobby emerged in the wake of the second Intifada.

The second part will look at what makes the Israel lobby tick, the various techniques and tactics used by Public Relations actors and how anti-Semitism is being used as a tool to distract attention away from Israeli atrocities.

Part 3 analyses the media approach to the conflict and how a complicit corporate media disseminates ‘fake news’ and propaganda.


According to the Israel lobby, criticism of the State of Israel constitutes anti Semitism. It is a charge that is completely irrational and has no context whatsoever. It effectively means that taking a political viewpoint on Israeli policies constitutes a form of racism. It is a charge that is both arrogant and dangerous.

A definition

According to the UK Government there is an ‘absence of an agreed international definition of antisemitism.’ On the website, the Government reproduces a ‘working definition of antisemitism’ from the UK’s College of Policing. It makes references to criticism of the State of Israel. However it does make this clear statement that:

‘criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).’

It goes on to say that

‘Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.’

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) is another body that has adopted a working definition of anti-Semitism. The role of the IHRA is to ‘place political and social leaders’ support behind the need for Holocaust education, remembrance and research both nationally and internationally.’

The definition is as follows:

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

Not surprisingly, Israel is a member of the IHRA. As such, the country would have agreed to the adoption of the above definition. However just like the police definition above, criticism of the State of Israel is linked into the guidance:

‘Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.’

Its pretty clear from the above definitions that criticism of Israel can only be regarded as anti-Semitic if there is an element of racism that targets Jews specifically. More often than not, criticism of Israel falls into the ‘similar to that levelled against any other country’ category, but is then intentionally or otherwise conflated with anti-Semitism.

The Holocaust

The Nazi Holocaust and persecution of Jews before and during world war 2 is a vital essence of Israeli culture. And of course it has a great deal of significance to Jews, regardless of their association with Israel. The word ‘shoah’ has become the Hebrew term for the holocaust and is used to specifically refer to the Nazi holocaust.

However from a historical perspective, limiting the definition of the holocaust to encompass Jews only, could be regarded as a narrow definition. A broader definition encompasses other ethnic groups such as Romani, Poles, other Slavic ethnic groups, mentally and physically disabled people, Soviets, prisoners of war, homosexuals, black people, political opponents of the Nazis, and members of other groups that didn’t measure up to the Nazis racial profiling. In other words a more accurate definition of the holocaust would account for the full spectrum of persecution of all peoples targeted by the Nazis.

The book The Columbia Guide to the Holocaust considers many aspects of the holocaust.

This does not of course detract from the deliberate, systematic and specific treatment of Jews within the context of the ‘final solution’, a Nazi term used in the phrase ‘Final Solution to the Jewish Question’. This was actually a Nazi code name for the plan to murder all Jews within reach, and was not limited to the European continent. This form of ‘industrialised murder’ where Jews were rounded up en masse and sent to extermination camps was unprecedented in history.

There’s no doubt that an extreme form of anti-Semitism had developed in Germany. Understanding the roots of this issue is an important prerequisite in understanding the status of Israel as a ‘Jewish state’.

Historic Persecution

The roots of anti-Semitism stem from the Christian belief that the Jews were responsible for rejecting and killing Jesus Christ.

In A viewers Guide to contemporary Passion Plays, an explanation is offered on the background to productions such as The Passion of Christ. The paper goes on to define anti-Semitism and the reasons behind Jewish persecution. In essence, Jewish persecution had become a component of the Christian faith. It is defined thus:

‘In the Gospel of Matthew, when Pilate declares himself innocent of Jesus’ death, it is said, “And all the people answered, ‘His blood be on us and on our children!“ (Mtth 27:25). Over the course of time, Christians began to accept this interpretation of the crucifixion to mean that the Jewish people as a whole were responsible for killing Jesus. According to this interpretation, both the Jews present at Jesus’ death and the Jewish people collectively and for all time, have committed the sin of deicide, or God- killing. For 1900 years of Christian-Jewish history, the charge of deicide has led to hatred, violence against and murder of Jews in Europe and America.

The charge that the Jews killed Christ/God gave rise to a belief that Jews were inhuman. They were often portrayed in Christian art and commentary as demons, complete with fangs and hooves, committing hideous crimes against Christians. The Jew, historically the object of derision and animosity, became the living incarnation of Satan. Holy Week, the week beginning with Palm Sunday and culminating with Easter, became a particularly dangerous time for Jews, as Christians perpetrated violence against Jews living in their communities.’

As a result, anti-Semitism became deeply rooted in Christian culture and its influences. The fall out from this was widespread persecution of Jews through the middle ages and beyond up until the present day, where Jews were used as scapegoats whenever some calamity occurred.

The paper points out though that from a historical perspective, Jesus was tried and convicted under Roman law. Jews played no part in that process.

In 1962, the Vatican ‘officially repudiated the charge of deicide against the Jews, as well as all forms of anti-Semitism.’ Other Christian Groups followed suit following this high level decision within the Catholic Church.

But despite recognition of historical misinterpretations, including references within the Gospels, anti-Semitism still prevails within certain Groups.

Taking account of the widespread historical persecution of Jewish communities, the actions of Nazi Germany are not unique.

Another key component that played a role in Jewish persecution was the accusation of blood libel.

In essence, blood libel (or accusation) is an accusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered the children of Christians in order to use their blood as part of their religious rituals during Jewish holidays. This revolved around the baking of matzos (an unleavened flatbread that is used during Passover) using the blood as an ingredient in the bread.

This accusation has no basis in fact and is based on heresy, surrounded by stereotypical notions of Jews. Origins of the phenomenon are discussed in the article Blood Accussation from the Jewish Encyclopedia. The article notes:

‘The origin of the blood accusation has not yet been discovered. The annals of Erfurt state that the Jews used waxed sacks (“in saccis cera linitis”) for collecting the blood of the children killed at Fulda in Dec., 1235. According to the Marbach annals (also contemporaneous with the event) the Jews confessed that they wished to utilize the blood for remedial purposes. The annals also state that the emperor Frederick II. (as mentioned above) consulted a number of distinguished converted Jews in order to ascertain whether the Jews required Christian blood on Parasceve — a term frequently used to designate Good Friday. As early as the twelfth century it was several times reported that the Jews had crucified Christian children during Easter (e.g., William of Norwich, 1144, see above; Gloucester, 1171; Blois, 1179; Richard of Paris, in Pontoise). Whether all or part of these reports agree with the facts, or are alike unworthy of credence, the theory of a ritual murder is in no case justified; and, if the accounts are historical, it can only be assumed that the Jews in one instance or on several occasions put Christians to death. A ritualistic feature was imparted to these real or supposed crucifixions or other murders of Christians, and especially of Christian children, by the suggestions: (1) that the murders involved the acquisition of blood; and (2) that the crimes were related to the Passover festival.’

Another slant at Jewish persecution and its origins comes from this article from National Geographic. It describes the discovery of The Judas Gospel, which along with other Gospels not published in the Bible offers a different portrayal of early Christianity.

The article sums up the contrasting role of Judas as Christ’s closest Apostle compared to the accepted narrative and how he became a scapegoat for the Jews:

‘There is a sinister backdrop to traditional depictions of Judas. As Christianity distanced itself from its origins as a Jewish sect, Christian thinkers found it increasingly convenient to blame the Jews as a people for the arrest and execution of Christ, and to cast Judas as the archetypal Jew. The four Gospels, for example, treat Roman governor Pontius Pilate gently while condemning Judas and the Jewish high priests.

The “secret account” gives us a very different Judas. In this version, he is a hero. Unlike the other disciples, he truly understands Christ’s message. In handing Jesus over to the authorities, he is doing his leader’s bidding, knowing full well the fate he will bring on himself. Jesus warns him: “You will be cursed.”’

In essence, Christianity was a breakaway sect of Judaism, which in turn formed other factions with different views of Jesus and His relationship with the Apostles, especially Judas. That was ultimately reflected in the dominant hierarchical Group, which painted Judas into a corner as a despicable Jew in order to vilify the religion they rejected. As such, anything that contradicted that narrative was rejected. The rest — as they say — is history.

A translation of the Gospel was published by National Geographic.

The Oppressed Become The Oppressor

One of the most important works in the realm of oppression, is Paulo Freire’s, Pedagogy of the Oppressed.

In his book, Freire analyses the relationship between the oppressor and the oppressed.

He argues that through the process of liberation ‘the oppressed, instead of striving for liberation, tend themselves to become oppressors, or “sub-oppressors.’ He goes on to say:

‘Their ideal is to be men; but for them, to be men is to be oppressors. This is their model of humanity. This phenomenon derives from the fact that the oppressed, at a certain moment of their existential experience, adopt an attitude of “adhesion” to the oppressor. Under these circumstances they cannot “consider” him sufficiently clearly to objectivize him — to discover him “outside” themselves. This does not necessarily mean that the oppressed are unaware that they are downtrodden. But their perception of themselves as oppressed is impaired by their submersion in the reality of oppression. At this level, their perception of themselves as opposites of the oppressor does not yet signify engagement in a struggle to overcome the contradiction; the one pole aspires not to liberation, but to identification with its opposite pole.’

Essentially, because people have been exposed persistently to oppression, they know nothing else. As such they have adopted the mindset of the oppressor. They then model their own existence on that of the oppressor.

Freire discusses the paradox of freedom. Freedom being the ultimate goal, it nevertheless becomes something to be feared. Having developed a dependency on the oppressor, how does freedom transform into independence? Ultimately this boils down to education — something that Freire goes into considerable detail in his book — and the perception of a critical reality that Freire calls the oppressor-oppressed contradiction.

The oppressor also needs to change his outlook. That means breaking the chains of power and altering what is essentially a false reality, a condition that affects oppressed and oppressor alike:

‘A different type of false perception occurs when a change in objective reality would threaten the individual or class interests of the perceiver. In the first instance, there is no critical intervention in reality because that reality is fictitious; there is none in the second instance because intervention would contradict the class interests of the perceiver In the latter case the tendency of the perceiver is to behave “neurotically.” The fact exists; but both the fact and
what may result from it may be prejudicial to the person. Thus it becomes necessary not precisely to deny the fact, but to “see it differently.” This rationalization as a defense mechanism coincides in the end with subjectivism. A fact which is not denied but whose truths are rationalized loses its objective base. It ceases to be concrete and becomes a myth created in defense of the class of the perceiver.

Herein lies one of the reasons for the prohibitions and the difficulties designed to dissuade the people from critical intervention in reality. The oppressor knows full well that this intervention would not be to his interest. What is to his interest is for the people to continue in a state of submersion, impotent in the face of oppressive reality.’

Freire discusses the root source of oppression as coming from the ruling classes, who impose their power through the use of violence. ‘Once a situation of violence and oppression has been established, it engenders an entire way of life and behavior for those caught up in it — oppressors and oppressed alike. Both are submerged in this situation, and both bear the marks of oppression.’

Freire then sums the mindset of the oppressor perfectly:

‘The oppressor consciousness tends to transform everything surrounding it into an object of its domination. The earth, property, production, the creations of people, people themselves, time — everything is reduced to the status of objects at its disposal.’

He notes their ‘strictly materialistic concept of existence’ and the fact that ‘Money is the measure of all things, and profit the primary goal’.

‘As beneficiaries of a situation of oppression, the oppressors cannot perceive that if having is a condition of being, it is a necessary condition for all women and men. This is why their generosity is false. Humanity is a “thing” and they possess it as an exclusive right, as inherited property. To the oppressor consciousness, the humanization of the “others,” of the people, appears not as the pursuit of full humanity; but as subversion.’

Freire then analyses the student/teacher relationship. The terms student/teacher can have a universal context. His key analysis is the sterility of education, in which a narrative is dispensed to the student. As such:

‘Narration (with the teacher as narrator) leads the students to memorize mechanically the narrated content. Worse yet, it turns them into “containers,” into “receptacles” to be “filled” by the teacher. The more completely she fills the receptacles, the better a teacher she is. The more meekly the receptacles permit themselves to be filled, the better students they are.

Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiques and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat. This is the “banking” concept of education, in which the scope of action allowed to the students extends only as far as receiving, filing, and storing the deposits.’

This Freire argues is a process of

‘Projecting an absolute ignorance onto others, a characteristic of the ideology of oppression, negates education and knowledge as processes of inquiry. The teacher presents himself to his students as their necessary opposite; by considering their ignorance absolute, he justifies his own existence.’

In short, the dissemination of information is controlled by the ruling classes through a narrative that is designed to further their own interests (see below).

Having been systematically ‘programmed’, those who have been ‘educated’ will then disseminate the ‘program’ to others as they have no other base from which to refer to.

The solution to this problem is to alter the relationship between Teacher/Student where ‘no one teaches another, nor is anyone self-taught. People teach each other’. This means

‘They become jointly responsible for a process in which all grow. In this process, arguments based on “authority”are no longer valid.’

Freire sums up his analysis:

‘Once again, the two educational concepts and practices under analysis come into conflict. Banking education (for obvious reasons) attempts, by mythicizing reality, to conceal certain facts which explain the way human beings exist in the world; problem-posing education sets itself the task of demythologizing. Banking education resists dialogue; problem-posing education regards dialogue as indispensable to the act of cognition which unveils reality. Banking education treats students as objects of assistance; problem-posing education makes them critical thinkers. Banking education inhibits creativity and domesticates (although it cannot completely destroy) the intentionality of consciousness by isolating consciousness from the world, thereby denying people their ontological and historical vocation of becoming more fully human. Problem-posing education bases itself on creativity and stimulates true reflection and action upon reality, thereby responding to the vocation of persons as beings who are authentic only when engaged in inquiry and creative transformation.’

There is a parallel in Freire’s analysis to the emergence of the Zionist movement. Then there is the development of the state of Israel itself, where ordinary Israeli’s may not be repressed but are kept in ignorance from the roots of Israel’s formation.

Freire also speaks in terms of what he calls ‘reversing the poles’ in which the oppressed become what they have tried to escape. The subjugation of the Palestinians is such an example, which ultimately led to the ‘Jewish State,’ a phrase that implies a form of racial superiority.

Freire’s narrative can also be relevant to the Palestinians in seeking to break the yolk of the occupation, in building a transformative grassroots movement that is non violent and may lead to genuine freedom for the Palestinians. Indeed such a process is already underway, as will be discussed later below.

Much of what Freire focuses on would be regarded as propaganda. That’s the subject of the next section.

The Pro Israel Lobby

Public Relations and propaganda is almost as old as history itself. The term propaganda comes from Pope Gregory XV, when he created the Congregatio de Propaganda (“congregation for propagating the faith”).

Modern PR emerged early in the last century. An article from the New York Times looks at some of the pioneers of PR in the 20th Century.

Ivy Lee was one of the earlier developers of PR. Lee was hired by John D. Rockefeller, who established the Standard Oil Company, which ultimately became one of the most successful corporate entities in the world.

‘Mr. Lee tried to repackage the industrialist as a humane philanthropist, and in so doing became an important counsel to John D. Rockefeller Jr. as well. Mr. Lee, whose career later foundered when it was revealed that he did promotional work for the Nazis, advised the Rockefellers to be frank and direct when discussing their business practices with the press — a relief to a family averse to the practice, then common, of bribing reporters for coverage.’

Another key figure was Edward Bernays, who was a nephew of Sigmund Freud. Bernays was strongly influenced by his uncles work in psychology and began to apply psychology within the context of PR, seeing PR as an applied social science that uses insights from psychology, sociology, and other disciplines to scientifically manage and manipulate the thinking and behaviour of an irrational and “herdlike” public.

He was the author of several books on the subject, including The Engineering of Consent (1947) (Noam Chomsky later picked up the notion with Manufactured Consent). In addition, the New York Times notes that ‘He professionalized the business while introducing other new forms of manipulation, like establishing bogus front groups to promote the benefits of smoking.’

The article The History of Public Relations gives a good overview of the history of PR. The article points out how Ivy Lee placed emphasis on openness and transparency, with the belief that being honest with the public was a sure winner and that way trust could be built. Not-for-Profit Organizations and Social Movements tended towards Lees version of PR.

Edward Bernays by comparison applied the art of persuasion within PR, what to today might be referred to as ‘spin’. As the article notes:

‘Bernays understood that publics could be persuaded if the message supported their values and interests. In many ways, the thrust of his philosophy is made clear in his first book, Crystallizing Public Opinion. At the time, he saw public relations as being more or less synonymous with propaganda, which he defined as “the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses.”’

The post-war period saw the rapid expansion of modern PR. Many proponents learnt their trade during the war from wartime propaganda campaigns. Many of the now well established PR companies cut their teeth during this period. The article outlines how all this came together:

‘…the hallmark of postwar public relations growth took place in the private
sector, in corporations and agencies. A consumer economy made use of both public relations and advertising to market products. Agencies came into full being, providing media relations and media contact capabilities not always available on the corporate side. The need for these skills was driven in part by the explosive growth of media outlets not available before the war — including FM radio, general magazines, suburban community newspapers, and trade and professional association publications. Their services expanded from a base of counselling and media relations to include public affairs or government relations, financial and investor relations, crisis communication, and media relations training for executives.’

But PR was not the sole province of Corporations and individuals. Countries would use the expertise of PR companies to sanitise their image. Israel is amongst those countries. Indeed the Israel lobby has become a potent force over the years.

This was highlighted in a report published in 2006 by John J. Mearsheimer, Department of Political Science, University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, called The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. The report investigates the unique relationship between the US and Israel that is unparalleled in global affairs.

There are some eye opening revelations within the report. Perhaps the most remarkable is the basic assertion that the US is sacrificing its own national security by supporting Israel. And it isn’t cheap:

‘Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one‐fifth of America’s foreign aid budget. In per capita terms, the United States gives each Israeli a direct subsidy worth about $500 per year.’

And Israel doesn’t have to account its spending to Washington, it can ironically invest in projects that run counter to US policy ‘like building settlements in the West Bank.’

But perhaps one of the most sinister aspects of US support is Israel’s access to advanced US intelligence facilities:

‘The United States gives Israel access to intelligence that it denies its NATO allies and has turned a blind eye towards Israel’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.’

‘According to the American‐Israel Public Affairs Committee’s (AIPAC) website, 
“the United States and Israel have formed a unique partnership to meet the 
growing strategic threats in the Middle East . . . . This cooperative effort provides significant benefits for both the United States and Israel.” This claim is an article of faith among Israel’s supporters and is routinely invoked by Israeli politicians and pro‐Israel Americans.’

This — on the surface — gives the impression of a sound stable relationship between the US and Israel. But there’s a catch. The US wants to maintain its influence in the Middle East, with the support of Arab allies. But US support of Israel during the 1973 war ‘triggered an OPEC oil embargo that inflicted considerable damage on Western economies.’

During the 1991 Gulf war, the US could not deploy forces in Israel, otherwise it would have lost the coalition support against Saddam Hussain’s Iraq. Similarly, the so called ‘war against terror’ that followed the twin tower attacks on 9/11, was in a manner of speaking, the closing of a circle generated by US support of Israel:

‘According to the U.S. 9/11 Commission, bin Laden explicitly sought to punish the United States for its policies in the Middle East, including its support for Israel, and he even tried to time the attacks to highlight this issue.’

Israel likes to paint itself as the underdog, surrounded by hostile Arabs and exaggerating the threat posed by Palestinians. But Israel’s military prowess out-guns just about every country in the Middle East put together. This has been the case right from the beginning when Israel deflected the Arab offensive after Israel was created. And the Palestinians have no military capability whatsoever. Indeed:

‘According to a 2005 assessment by Tel Aviv University’s prestigious 
Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, “the strategic balance decidedly favors Israel, which has continued to widen the qualitative gap between its own military capability and deterrence powers and those of its neighbors.” If backing the underdog were a compelling rationale, the United States would be supporting Israel’s opponents.’

Then of course there’s the argument that Israel is a democracy. But that’s knocked on the head:

‘Israel was explicitly founded as a Jewish state and citizenship is based on the principle of blood kinship. Given this conception of citizenship, it is not surprising that Israel’s 1.3 million Arabs are treated as second‐class citizens, or that a recent Israeli government commission found that Israel behaves in a “neglectful and discriminatory” manner towards them.’

As noted above, the holocaust played a critical role in Israel’s existence. The report suggests that this and historic persecution of Jews serves as a moral justification for Israel’s existence. That may be debatable. But does the ends justify the means?

Israel attempts to cover up its past misdemeanour’s and will deny displacing the Palestinians and committing ethnic cleansing. Yet the early leadership in Israel admitted as much:

‘The mainstream Zionist leadership was not interested in establishing a bi‐
national state or accepting a permanent partition of Palestine. The Zionist 
leadership was sometimes willing to accept partition as a first step, but this was a tactical maneuver and
not their real objective. As David Ben‐Gurion put it in the late 1930s, “After the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we shall abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine.” 
 
To achieve this goal, the Zionists had to expel large numbers of Arabs from the territory that would eventually become Israel. There was simply no other way to accomplish their objective. Ben‐Gurion saw the problem clearly,
writing in 1941 that “it is impossible to imagine general evacuation [of the Arab population] without compulsion, and brutal compulsion.” Or as Israeli historian Benny Morris puts it
, “the idea of transfer is as old as modern Zionism and has accompanied its evolution and praxis during the past century.” ’

Ben-Gurion went on to say:

“If I were an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. . . . We come from Israel, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti‐Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept that?”

The report is frank about the atrocities that Israel has committed. To document everything in detail would fill a separate article. But suffice to say those atrocities were both confirmed and affirmed by the Israeli leadership:

‘These facts about Israel’s conduct have been amply documented by numerous 
human rights organizations — including prominent Israeli groups — and are not disputed by fair‐minded observers. And that is why four former officials of Shin Bet (the Israeli domestic security organization)
condemned Israel’s conduct during the Second Intifada in November 2003. One of them declared “we are behaving disgracefully,” and another termed Israel’s conduct “patently immoral.” ’

And:

‘As former Prime Minister Barak once admitted, had he been born a Palestinian, he “would have joined a terrorist organization.” ’

Israel’s influence is not restricted to the US. It very much operates on a global scale, thanks on large part to the ‘Israel Lobby’, which the Report goes into in some detail (see below).

The UK is a productive hunting ground for the Israel lobby. In 2013, a report was published in collaboration by Spinwatch and Middle East Monitor, The Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre: Giving peace a chance? The Report scrutinises the activities of the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM).

In short:

‘BICOM is an important pro-Israel grouping that focuses on managing the British media. It is important because it is at the more sophisticated end of the pro-Israel lobby and because it works behind the scenes to cultivate elite opinion on Israel. BICOM is primarily about taking standard pro-Israel arguments, but repackaging them in ways that resonate with opinion-forming elites, and teaching other activists to do the same. So, although it focuses on the media and communications its main audience is not public opinion but a political elite that is insulated from the public.’

BICOM emerged during the second intifada, with Finnish financier Poju Zabludowicz at the helm. Its roots stem from his father’s role in the arms trade, during which Shlomo Zabludowicz forged links with key contacts within Israel.

Shlomo Zabludowicz was a Polish holocaust survivor from Aucshwitz. After repatriation he moved to Israel. But subsequently moved to Finland, where he got involved with arms company Tampella. This eventually led to deals being forged with Israel.

Over the years he developed close relationships with Israeli politicians, including Shimon Peres. This ultimately became very lucrative and as a result Shlomo Zabludowicz amassed a fortune and a well established business base that was succeeded by his son following his death in 1994.

However, following the end of the cold war and the breakup of the Soviet Union, the global arms industry had gone into decline. This also impacted Israel. The result was a diversification of the business into other areas such as property.

The 1990’s also saw other changes taking place. There was the steady expansion of the global neoliberal economic system that began to consolidate itself following the cold war. Indeed Israel itself became host to over 600,000 Russian immigrants. This provided the impetus for change within Israel.

Israel had an image problem. From a Global economic perspective, Israel was regarded as a war zone. Israel wanted to join the neoliberal ‘club’. When the Oslo peace process began during this period this presented an opportunity for Israel to ‘normalise’ itself. In addition there was the Arab league boycott of Israeli companies that has been in effect practically since Israel’s inception:

‘A key objective for the business sector was the lifting of the Arab League’s boycott of Israeli companies and especially the so-called ‘secondary boycott’, under which companies doing business with Israel or Israeli companies were barred from business with Arab countries and companies. Shafir and Peled note that: Many Israeli business leaders realized that the Arab boycott was an obstacle on the road to integrating the Israeli economy into the world market; that while it was in effect all efforts in this direction would yield only limited results. Similarly, only the stability ensured by peace could bring foreign investment and foreign corporations into Israel in significant numbers.’

This was the image of Israel of a country seeking peace that was fostered during the Oslo peace process. But the underlying objective was economic expansion and Israel’s integration into the global economy.

With agreements secured between the PLO and Israel, with both factions recognising each other, it wouldn’t be long before Israeli’s could order Big Macs in their local McDonald’s or buying western cars and investing their money in global financial institutions. Not everyone in Israel agreed with the peace accords. But the economy took off.

During this period, relations between Israel and the UK strengthened. In 1995, Prime Minister John Major ‘visited Israel with a group of British business people and jointly with the Israeli Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin
established the Israel-Britain Business Council, which was backed by public funds and tasked with promoting business relations between the two countries.’

Poju Zabludowicz became involved in the process. He became chair of the Britain-Israel Parliamentary Group’s (BIPG) newly formed business advisory group, ‘a ‘lobbying forum’ established to promote commercial and technological links between Israel and the UK.’ He also joined the advisory board of the Israel-Britain Business Council. This allowed him to link up with well placed people in the business community as well as political.

The original business set up by his father had became absorbed into the Tamares Group, now run by Poju Zabludowicz, that consists of various holding’s around the world that includes real estate and media interests. The main centre of operations though appear to be based in Israel.

From 2002 to 2007, Tamares Capital was managed by Pinchas Buchris, a retired Israeli Brigadier General who headed the IDF’s Unit 8200 (also called the Central Unit of Technology Intelligence). He left when he was appointed Director-General of the Israeli Defense Ministry.

‘This revolving door, whereby individuals traverse multiple public and private roles, is familiar in the UK and the US and is an indication of closely intermeshed networks operating between business and the state.’

Zabludowicz also moved into the venture capital and Hedge fund sector. Some of his contacts there would go on to become involved with BICOM. Zabludowicz had now positioned himself as a key business operator between the UK and Israel. Indeed:

‘In March 2011, he hosted secret talks between Shimon Peres and the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas at his North London home. The meeting was one of several reportedly arranged by the venture capitalist Sir Ronald Cohen, the UK’s leading exponent of Peres-style neoliberalisation through peace.’

Although it would appear that Zabludowicz’s relationship with the political elites in London and Tel Aviv are primarily business oriented, he nevertheless has integrated himself well. Even though current Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu is a hard liner and no great fan of the peace process, Zabludowicz ‘compares him favourably to Thatcher and Reagan.’

Although the peace process had the intended effect of improving Israel’s image on the global stage, the Palestinian’s did not benefit. On the ground it was business as usual as far as the occupation went. Indeed the economic position of the Palestinians stagnated during this period.

The closer relationship with the UK:

‘ended the arms embargo on Israel imposed by the Thatcher Government in 1982, and worked to end the Arab boycott (encouraged in both initiatives
by business orientated pro-Israel groups in the UK). Economic relations with Israel were stepped up, with imports and exports more than doubling during the decade, and a relationship ‘blossomed’ between the UK and Israeli arms
industries.’

Ironically during the peace process, the Israel lobby had declined somewhat:

‘Organisations working to secure support for the country in the UK were increasingly considered redundant. In 1999, the forerunner to BICOM, the British-Israel Public Affairs Committee (BIPAC), was closed.’

However, trouble was brewing. Discontent was simmering amongst Palestinians:

‘The Oslo process did not bring an end to Israel’s occupation or to the construction of illegal settlements on occupied land. The Netanyahu government had demolished Palestinian houses in East Jerusalem and approved plans for new settlements in the area around the city.’

‘Under the Oslo Accords Israel had pledged to withdraw from 90 per cent of the occupied territories by the beginning of 2000, but by that time they had in fact withdrawn from only 18 per cent. The ‘final status’ talks held at Camp David in July 2000 ended with no agreement between Barak and Arafat, each side blaming the other for the failure.’

The Second intifada was about to erupt. A provocative visit to the Al Aqsa mosque by Ariel Sharon triggered widespread protest that was initially non violent. But these were ‘met with excessive and lethal force by Israel, whose reaction to the uprising has been characterised as one of ‘brutal repression’.’

The force implemented by the IDF against the Palestinians triggered terrorist reprisals from Palestinian extremists. It wasn’t until 2005 that the violence began to recede.

‘Taking stock, human rights groups concluded that the vast majority of Palestinians killed had been unarmed civilians. Most saliently for our purposes, the intifada had also been a ‘public relations disaster’ for Israel.’

The Israel lobby was about to crawl back out of the woodwork. The establishment of BICOM would be an important vehicle for a UK based PR network that would develop ‘a war room to ensure correct information and solidarity with Israel is maintained.’

The report sums up BICOM’s creation:

‘As a permanent organisation, it emerged out of the Emergency Co-ordinating
Group’s ‘British Israel Communications Office’, which had used the acronym ‘BICOM’ for several months before the organisation was formally created. Mick Davis, chair of the United Jewish Israel Appeal, later recalled: ‘Poju had a vision of a new era in Israel advocacy for the UK. He took the fledgling crisis room created in response to the outbreak of the second intifada and turned
it into the renowned and respected organisation that BICOM is today.’ ’

The key figures involved in its founding were:

‘Poju Zabludowicz, Philip Rubenstein (a marketing consultant who at that
time worked at the accountancy firm BDO), David Green (a businessman who became the organisation’s treasurer) and the joint chairs of the Emergency Co-ordinating Group, Jo Wagerman and Brian Kerner.’

Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks was also closely associated with BICOM. It was also supported by the Israeli Embassy in London and the ‘ ‘highest level’ of the Israeli foreign ministry.’

The Israeli PR machine would begin its global march, lobbying the UK, the US and Europe, with the EU as an important target.

In an article published by Spinwatch in 2014, David Cronin investigates the European Friends of Israel: Founded by Tories, funded by big business. Its perhaps not surprising that a key PR group in the EU has its roots in the UK.

In 2006, the European Friends of Israel (EFI) was founded. It was modeled on the UK Conservatives Friends of Israel (CFI). Driving its formation was Stuart Polak, a former director of CFI.

Other key figures involved with EFI are Hannu Takkula, a Finnish Liberal MEP. Three Tory MEP’s; Charles Tannock, Geoffrey Van Orden and Timothy Kirkhope.

Tannock was a foreign affairs specialist who ‘sat on the EFI’s political board between 2006 and 2011.’

Van Orden was ‘a retired brigadier-general in the British Army who served in NATO’s headquarters during the 1990s.’ He was ‘a strong advocate for UK industry, including the arms industry’.

Timothy Kirkhope is the Chair of CFI.

To sum up:

‘Papers filed with the Belgian authorities state that EFI was officially established as a not-for-profit association by Stuart Polak, along with Marc Cogen, a Belgian academic, and Jean-Pierre Haber, a veteran Brussels official. Its stated objective was to ‘unify’ the various pro-Israel groups within the national parliaments of EU countries by coordinating their activities. Such groups would be linked to one in the European Parliament, according to these papers.’

Cogen, a professor of international law, has a rather chequered history. He supports the ‘war on terror’ and he ‘signed a letter to Flemish newspapers defending Israel’s attack on Gaza’ in 2008. Although he left the EFI (along with Polak). However:

‘Cogen remains in contact with the Zionist lobby. The 2013 annual report of NGO Monitor lists him as a member of its legal advisory board. Run by Israeli academic Gerard Steinberg, NGO Monitor is dedicated to preserving Israel as an apartheid state, in which Palestinians face systematic discrimination. It campaigns against the public financing of human rights and peace activists who promote a ‘one-state solution’ based on full equality for Jews, Muslims, Christians and non-believers, accusing such activists of striving to ‘eliminate’ Israel.’

After the end of the second intifada, the Israeli arms industry picked up again. The EFI received support from the (re)emerging industry:

‘During the first nine months of 2006, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) reported a profit of $115 million, a 247 per cent increase over the same period in 2005. As one of the largest suppliers of weapons to the Israeli military, IAI evidently did well from the attack on Lebanon in the summer of that year. The offensive enabled Israel to ‘battle-test’ its armed drones for the first time. Since then IAI has become one of the world’s top drone manufacturers.

IAI (then called Israel Aircraft Industries) was among the sponsors for the EFI’s launch; the company’s information stall can be seen in a video taken at the event. Stuart Polak, meanwhile, doubles up as an arms industry lobbyist. The Westminster Connection, a consulting firm that he set up, puts ‘defence’ at the top of the list of the sectors to which it has provided advice. Elbit, another Israeli warplane-maker, has been named by The Sunday Times as one of his clients.’

One of the most influential lobbying Groups in the US is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). AIPAC has had some influence on EFI. Ranaan Eliaz a former staff member of AIPAC in 2004 was involved in the creation of EFI. Dimitri Dombret, EFI’s first director confirmed ‘that he had met AIPAC representatives in Washington a number of times. More recently, EFI has sent as many as 70 delegates to the annual AIPAC conference.’ Elinadav Heymann, the group’s current director, had spoke ‘at a side event held during the conference in March 2014.’

As EFI gained a secure foothold within EU affairs it started attracting some big business backers. Yaron (Ronny) Bruckner, one of EFI’s founders had become administrator of the Group before his death. He had founded a company called Eastbridge. At the same time ‘Marc Grosman became EFI’s vice-president and treasurer.’ He had served on Eastbridge’s supervisory board.

Another prominent member of EFI is Vladimir Sloutsker, the EFI’s president. He is also a co-founder and President of the Israeli Jewish congress and was vice president of the European Jewish congress:

‘A Russian senator from 2002 to 2006, he has a background in banking and private equity. He also has a reputation for giving generous assistance to causes and individuals. He reportedly donated $250,000 per year to the Russian Jewish Congress in 2005 and 2006.’

Another key supporter of EFI was Liberal Democrat MEP Sarah Ludford, who defied party policy by aligning herself with the far right in the EU. She is also involved in a pro Zionist faction within the Lib Dems.

EFI began to focus on achieving closer trade ties between the EU and Israel. This was achieved with the Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (ACAA), which was the culmination of a sequence of agreements designed to pivot Israel into the EU single market. It has also established close relations with openly racist politicians from Israel:

‘In April 2014, EFI hosted a lunch for Naftali Bennett, Israel’s economy minister. The leader of the Bayit Yehudi (Jewish Home) party, Bennett had been a vociferous opponent of EU moves during 2013 to bar firms and institutions based in Israel’s West Bank settlements from receiving scientific research grants. Settlers should respond to such efforts with ‘more kids, more trees, more vineyards, more homes’ on occupied Palestinian land, he argued. Bennett’s advocacy of perpetual colonisation did not deter Sarah Ludford from dining with him in a gesture of solidarity despite how she had previously acknowledged that the settlements are illegal.’

David Rotem was another close ally of EFI. He represents the far-right Yisrael Beitenu (Israel Our Home) party and is a Knesset member:

‘Described as a ‘one-man legislative machine’ in Max Blumenthal’s book Goliath, Rotem has authored a series of measures aimed at making Palestinians face new types of discrimination. Among them were a bill requiring Palestinian citizens of Israel to sign an oath of allegiance to a ‘Jewish and democratic state’ and a ban on funding organisations deemed to clash with Israeli values. The latter initiative was originally known as the ‘Nakba law’ after the Arabic word for catastrophe; it targeted Palestinian groups who held events which recognised that some 750,000 Palestinians were driven from their homes in the Nakba, the wave of ethnic cleansing at the time of Israel’s establishment in 1948.’

Rotems’ association with EFI was arranged by Dutch MEP Bastiaan Belder, a Christian Zionist, who ‘has supported almost every Israeli act of aggression. Israel, he has claimed, displayed a ‘real concern for Palestinian lives’ when it bombed Gaza for three consecutive weeks in late 2008 and early 2009. ‘Look at all the precautions they [Israel] took during the operation,’ he added.’

He was also serving chair of the European Parliament’s committee, tasked with handling its relations with the Knesset, along with other members of EFI, who sit on the Parliament’s official delegation to Israel.

EFI is closely linked to the Israeli Embassy in Brussels:

‘At least three of the staff in Israel’s Brussels embassy have been assigned the task of cultivating a good relationship with MEPs. One of the three, David Saranga, has trained EFI staff on how to make optimal use of ‘social media’ websites like Twitter and Facebook. And when Israel began a new round of airstrikes against Gaza in October 2012, Saranga travelled to Strasbourg, where the Parliament was meeting, so that he could brief EFI stalwarts. His key messages were that Israel was seeking to avoid harming civilians and that it was providing Gaza with humanitarian assistance. Both messages were dishonest: Israel soon launched an all-out attack, while Israel’s siege of Gaza has created a situation where 80 per cent of its inhabitants have become dependent on aid for survival.’

Saranga has also been ‘portrayed as a ‘rebranding’ specialist by The Jewish Chronicle. During a previous stint as a media officer in Israel’s New York consulate, he placed a feature in ‘lad’s magazine’ Maxim in which women who had served in the Israeli military were photographed in skimpy swimwear.’

By 2013, EFI had adopted the ‘tricks of the trade’. It went out of its way to push ‘brand Israel’. In so doing it hosted ‘a conference within the European Parliament titled ‘Humanitarian aid — Israel as a world leader’.’

As part of its PR campaign it claimed that ‘whenever disasters occur around the world, Israel has teams ready to assist rescue efforts. One of these teams was first on the ground after an earthquake devastated Haiti in 2010, invitees were informed’. The PR blurb is also played out on social media.

The EFI has now become a powerful voice and vehicle for the pro Israel lobby within the EU. As Cronin sums up in his article:

‘Its ability to convince elected representatives to bolster an apartheid state indicates it is a very dangerous organisation.’

Part 2

 

H.F.1700

 

[BROUGHT BACK FROM 2006]

[IN 2018 OUR COUNTRY APPEARS TO BE BACK IN THE DARK AGES WITH LAW AND ORDER IN CHAOS-MUCH MORE VIOLENT CRIME-FEW IF ANY BOBBIES -ON-THE-BEAT (EXCEPT IN DURHAM-LUCKY POPULATION)-MORE PRISONS REQUIRED AND TOUGHER SENTENCES. 12 BILLION IN OVERSEAS AID MUCH OF IT WASTED ON DANCERS AND DICTATORS... THE GOVERNMENT IS EVASIVE AND AS WITH BREXIT THEY IGNORE THE POPULATION WITH DECEIT AND MENDACITY. WHERE HAVE CONSERVATIVE VALUES GONE?]

*  *  *

JOHN REID HIT BY FIRST RISE IN CRIME FOR 11 YEARS

-WITH VIRTUALLY NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT- NO SURPRISE!

*

REID hit by first rise in CRIME for 11- YEARS.

BY

Matthew Hickley

Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent-Dec., 9, 2006

JOHN REID suffered a fresh blow yesterday after it emerged that levels of crime have risen since he took over as Home Secretary this year.

According to the British Crime Survey, the number of offences went up between March and June, the first such increase since 1995.

Ministers have always insisted the BCS is the most accurate measure of CRIME.

The news came out in a Home Office performance report that also showed targets to cut reoffending and hard-drug abuse were missed.

The reversal of an 11-year fall in CRIME on his WATCH will embarrass Mr Reid, who has portrayed himself as a tough Home Secretary.

He still holds ambitions of taking on Gordon brown to become party leader and Premier.

[Well to have any chance at all he needs to use the £30,000,000 which was earmarked for prison building and still not spent and put Bobbies -on-the -Beat back on their plod in every community in the once almost law-abiding and safe and pleasant land]

 

Mugging, low-level violence and drug possession are up [NO SURPRISE!] after MINISTERS eased the LAW on DRINKING and CANNABIS and axed a ROBBERY crackdown.

The Home Office Report describes the rise in CRIME as a 'slippage' [Not a 'Gap' in this instance] in the flagship target to cut offending by 15 per cent from 2002 to 2007.

[Criminals across the world are converging on our Capital City and throughout our land as they realize what a lot of looney politically correct  police chiefs- politicians and their ardent helpers have made our country the ideal place to make loads of money and if -which is most likely they may have a chance of a jackpot of £50,000 because life was so marvelous in the nick that they decide to stay put rather than accept their black plastic bag at the door to freedom.  With what we hear the facilities in many prison would put many hotels to shame]

In the twelve months to March this year, the BCS showed

10,912,000

- offences were committed against adults in England and Wales [And these figures do NOT include the great number of crimes which are not recorded because the public has given up trying to get any response from their overburdened  paper-chase police who are confined to their safe blockhouses.  ]

While the increase is small, the Government can no longer claim that crime is falling. In recent years the BCS -based on household surveys in England and Wales -showed crime falling even while police logged more offences. [Well it is easy to see why-because so many people have come to accept the futility of giving information about crime levels when they see that the statistics later show that the state of the war on the streets that they see is totally different to the message they are palmed off with that things aren't half so bad -Want a bet many would say?]

Ministers said the BCS results were the best measure of trends, claiming police figures were distorted by new counting rules [OH! Yeah!]  But with the BCS showing a two per cent year-on-year rise in over-all crime, the Home Office stressed police recorded crime fell by a similar amount and called the BCS rise by a similar amount and called the BCS rise .not statistically significant' [Well those suffering from crime would have something to say about that.]

 

The Home Office report lists targets that have been hit, such as reduced fear of crime among the public and more offenders brought to justice [What JUSTICE! from what most people see it is a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE they see when they see so many criminals escaping from REAL PUNISHMENT whether MURDERERS or THIEVES. The increase in CRIME is because the criminal can see what a soft option it is if they are -most unlikely to be nicked in the act -with the traditional Bobbie -on-the -Beat nowhere to be seen]

It also boasts that the number  of 'unfounded asylum claims' in Britain has dropped from a peak of 70,000 in 2002 to around 40,000 this year.

BUT the number being removed fell by 30 per cent and the backlog of deportations is growing. [We understand from reports that it will take 27 years in order to clear the backlog and the time scale is growing each month New Labour stays in power]

The Home Office is missing its target of cutting reoffending among young criminals by five per cent over five years, with more than 41 per cent still being caught again within one year.

There has been no significant fall in targets to cut Class-A drug use among young people in eight years [Now isn't that a coincidence considering that New Labour has been the main culprit in giving the wrong message on DRUGS and so much more with their looney schemes of understanding such as are held by the Inspector of Prisons who believes there are too many young people in prison. The problem we have today is that the young have figured out the so-called system to suit themselves. The Home Office possibly doesn't know it but it is the CRIMINALS who are in CHARGE not the HOME OFFICE.]

The proportion of under -25s using HARD DRUGS still at 8.4 per cent.

 

Class-A drug abuse among vulnerable youths rose from 14.1 per cent in 2003 to 14.3 per cent.

 

ROBBERIES rose by five per cent in the year on June,  after police abandoned a street crime initiative when Home Office funding ended. [The £5 billion cost of the illegal Iraq War -no doubt.]

A 16 per cent rise in drug offences reflected an increase in cannabis possession after the law was relaxed [They were told it would happen -just as they have been told of the dangers of excess of GAMBLING-DRINKING-DRUG USE but there is no EXCESS PUNISHMENT for MURDERERS or VIOLENT CRIME and the street monsters who now rule the streets throughout the country because there is NO -Bobbie-on-the-Beat -released from paperwork and PC garbage and the return of powers to put the troublemaker in stir and the fast building programme to house the thousands of Hardened offenders out of the 200,000 on parole who should Be- Out-Of -Sight and Out-Of -Mind -DON'T YOU AGREE?]

Low-level violence was up 14 per cent year on year, which critics link to 24-hour drinking.

 

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said:

'Despite the tough talk from this Home Secretary, the Government has failed to meet targets for reducing CRIME, DRUG USE by YOUNG PEOPLE and RE-OFFENDING. This amounts to a SERIOUS FAILURE.

[In every cloud there is a silver lining or in the words of a  Elizabethan poet ...'O'er lawyers' fingers, who straight dream in fees...' To our second greatest poet we have the following lines which fit a man now in imperseverant mood who's departure is near at hand...

"Horror and doubt distract

His troubled thoughts, and from the bottom stir

The Hell within him; for within him Hell

He brings, and round about him, nor from Hell

One step, no more than from himself, can fly

By change of place, Now conscience wakes despair

That slumbered; awake the bitter memory

Of what he was, what is, and what must be."

BUT

[We are not either very pleased with the cuddly approach of his 'Out-of this -World' leader who has only in the last few days after a year in the job to acknowledge that the

FAMILY is the BEDROCK

of a stable law-abiding society.

After a year on trial we have to say that he has fulfilled what we expected from him

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

He goes into his second year with a possibility that he is heading in the right direction and we don't mean the ice packs or sky diving over the hole in the ozone layer but down on EARTH and build on a fellow colleagues example-But please no apologizing for ANYTHING because up to now you have done NOTHING that even resembles a SERIOUS THOUGHT but there are now hopes that the Iceman is beginning to melt to show - dare we say it -a prospective PRIME MINISTER in the making. But is early days yet because he is still the SILENT MAN when the matter of the EU is raised and unless he takes into his confidence his deepest thoughts on the most important subject which has faced the country  in its long history many more will desert him and his party.

 

HAVE YOU ALL NOTICED THAT THE MEDIA  AND THE PRESS APPEAR UNWILLING TO RAISE THE SUBJECT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF ENGLAND COMPOSED OF THE REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

SURELY

IF THE EUROPEAN UNION IS SUCH A GOOD IDEA WHY  WONT THE POLITICIANS APPEAR IN PUBLIC AND DISCUSS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE OF A NATION STATE

-ITS FREEDOM AND LIBERTY?]

AND

ITS  ETHICAL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION

 

History tells us that it is to those nations in which the religious instinct is most implanted that their supremacy of the world belongs, and that because the struggle for existence is most strenuous. So in ethics the moral qualities descend from parents to children as distinctly as physical ones. A father and mother live wholesome lives, who do not allow their minds to be debased by ignoble thoughts and bequeath to their children minds of fine moral fibre which will bias their character towards the GOOD rather than to EVIL. By the coming together of similar minded individuals who will hand down their ethical strengths to future generations of healthy minds and bodies.

On the other hand  if parents give a loose rein to passion - if they poison their blood with the madness of blood, if they are flabby in moral principle and are given to lying and cheating these characteristics WILL descend upon their children. As is said the sins of the fathers shall be visited upon the children unto the third and fourth generation

Of course many spend their lives endeavoring to achieve these aims but the reality is that the absence of any interest at all in even contemplating the difficult but only true journey of life will result in the total breakdown of society and the eventual demise of a people who more than most has it in its power to regain its treasured links with the past and prove itself a force for GOOD

Many will say we live in a secular STATE and that there is no place for such matters but what have they to put in its place but the 'anything goes dogma' whatever its destructive character on society as a whole. Of course the individual has the freedom of his actions but unless the majority maintain the corrective course which in our usually cool though warming climate our people were renowned for their greater energy, greater keenness, industry, and all the qualities of the heart and head which came from a stern, strong nerved hardy race.

The drift over the past decades but even more so over the  past ten years to an abandonment of past values for the greater temporary excitement of release from all restraint has according to a recent poll left our people the most unhappy people among a host of nation states and a growing appetite for any new innovation which has cost the bodily health  and mind of many of our children and adults alike.

There has been much talk over the past few days of Victorian values and it is not too late to take in train the lessons to be learnt or find our future in the hands of those who have their own culture and values which if not matched by our own inherited truth will fill the void thus created and a different future will be ahead for our children and their children's children'

 

*

[The greater part of the above message is from the work of an author of the Victorian age and the early years of the 20th century -Sir Phillip Gibbs ]

 

*          *          *

[  Font altered -Bolding &Underlining used- Comments in brackets]

DECEMBER/06

*

 

H.F.1591

[WE WARNED YOU THAT MAY WAS

SUSPECT!]

 

HOLD YOUR NERVE!

BRITAIN.

 

On Independence Day

America's ambassador to the UK

 

believes Brexit WILL be a success.

 

 

On Independence Day, a rousing and timely-

CALL TO ARMS

from the U.S. Ambassador

by Robert Wood Johnson

AMERICA'S AMBASSADOR TO BRITAIN.

 

 

Robert 'Woody' Johnson (pictured with Liz Hurley last year) said Britain needs to 'hold its nerve' to make the most of Brexit

 

The path of least resistance is always the same: do nothing. It is easy to maintain the status quo. Choosing a new direction is much more difficult. It takes nerve. Change calls for courage, conviction and confidence.

Fortunately those qualities weren't lacking in the people who came to settle America.

They weren't afraid to take a risk. They sailed the high seas. They ventured out with their wagons across a vast and unknown continent.

Their can-do spirit built our country and made us who we are today. And there is no finer example of that spirit in action than the Declaration of Independence which we celebrate today. It was the boldest and bravest moment in the whole of American history.

Don't forget it wasn't an easy decision at the time.

Despite what the Declaration described as the 'long train of abuses and usurpations' they had been subjected to under the British, thousands and thousands of colonists wanted to remain.

They strongly opposed breaking the union — not only did they feel British, even more importantly, it was Britain who bought their goods.

And even those in favour of revolution were anxious about the risks involved. 

It is said that after signing the Declaration of Independence, the president of Congress, John Hancock, urged Congress to hang together.

Fellow signatory Benjamin Franklin responded with gallows humour: 'We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.'

The colonists' decision could have ended in disaster. But they had a unity of purpose and a clarity of vision that drove them forward.

The Declaration itself was a masterpiece. With its self-evident truth that all men are created equal, and its unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, they came up with the most ambitious and inspiring statement of political intent ever written.

They gave birth to a free nation that would become an industrial powerhouse, a military superpower and an intellectual and cultural giant.

The Revolutionary War was also the best thing that could have happened for the relationship between America and Britain.

Mr Johnson cited the Declaration of Independence, which is celebrated today – July 4

 

Ultimately it paved the way for our great alliance as independent nations. An alliance which, as Margaret Thatcher said, has done more for the defence and future of freedom than any other alliance in the world.

None of that would have happened if those men and women hadn't dared to take a risk. If they hadn't looked beyond the difficulties and dangers and uncertainties ahead.

That is exactly the attitude needed when, as stated in another section of the Declaration of Independence, 'in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another'.

And that is the attitude Britain needs now.

Brexit is no Revolutionary War, but it's no picnic either.

Breaking up is hard to do and make no mistake, this is as complicated as any negotiation gets. It's going to be a long journey to agree on the way forward. And, yes, it could be a difficult few years for Britain.

I'm not going to underestimate the challenges involved, especially in the short-term. But that doesn't mean it's not worth doing. I was never a Brexiteer or a Remainer. It wasn't for me to say. I don't support a hard Brexit and I don't support a soft one. That's not my call.

But I do support the British people and the decision you have taken. And I have never doubted for a moment that you are going to make it a success. The better I get to know this country, the more confident I've become.

I've travelled around the UK — from Belfast to Birmingham and Newport to Newcastle. I've spoken to some of the best scientists in the world, the most skilled and dedicated factory workers, the most exciting entrepreneurs. I've seen what this country can do and I've seen what this country can offer the world. 

President Trump understands Britain's potential better than anybody, Mr Johnson says

President Trump understands Britain's potential better than anybody. He has a deep, personal respect for this country and its history. He is proud of all the incredible things America and Britain have achieved together — not least to rally the West and save Europe from oppression in two World Wars and one Cold War.

But the President knows that the work of our Special Relationship is not done. There are still serious global threats which we cannot afford to underestimate — whether from China or Russia, Iran or North Korea. Our security, and the security of others, still depends upon our two nations standing together.

When President Trump visits the UK in just over a week, he will be visiting a country which is as important to America's future as it was to our past. Our prosperity and security are intertwined with yours.

You pay your way and shoulder your commitments to Europe's defence. Your soldiers are there side-by-side with ours in the fight against terrorism. Your businesses invest billions in America, and hire over a million American workers. And in almost every field of science and research, you'll find a Brit and American working in the laboratory together.

So the President will be coming here determined to work with the Prime Minister to make this crucial relationship even stronger.

Britain is quite simply an indispensable ally for the United States — as it is for many other countries, including, of course, the member states of the European Union. 

Even after Brexit, Britain will remain at the heart of the West — bound to the EU not by institution but the shared values of democracy and freedom.

And just as we saw with America and Britain, Brexit may appear to be a split at first, but it could be the foundation for a much stronger and more enduring friendship long-term.

What is clear is that Britain has a bright future ahead and a crucial role to play in the world. This isn't a time for the UK to panic. It isn't a time to fall into defeatism or to talk yourselves down. Take a leaf out of the book of America's revolutionary heroes. Hang together. This is a big moment in British history.

You have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to go in a different direction and define who you want to be and what you want to accomplish. That is an exciting opportunity. So hold your nerve Britain. This could be the start of something great.

I wish you all a happy

Independence Day.

 

Share or comment on this article:

 

america's ambassador to the UK believes Brexit

 WILL be a success

 

ADDITIONS

 

It's a muddle': Theresa May is warned not to revive

 

Unite piles pressure on Corbyn to soften his

 

America's ambassador to the UK believes Brexit WILL ... - Daily Mail

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1600

 

 

 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

H.F.1300

 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 

PETER OBORNE

ON POLITICS AND POWER

 

 

 

IT'S TIME MRS MAY TOOK A LEAF OUT OF TRUMP'S BOOK

 

 

 

 

 

Donald Trump and Theresa May could hardly be further apart in their character as national leaders.

Whereas Trump is seen to be decisive, Theresa May dithers. Trump is flamboyant and May is dull. While the British Prime Minister tends to seek out compromise, a headstrong U.S. President wants everything on his own terms.

And recently these huge differences in personality and style have been more evident than ever.

While Mrs May has inched forward very carefully with Britain’s negotiations to leave the EU, Mr Trump has ripped up the rulebook by arranging a meeting with North Korean despot Kim Jong-un.

The move is pure Trump — a bombastic, boastful and arrogant man who conducts high-stakes diplomacy by Twitter and is contemptuous of the advice of the Washington establishment, which despises him and is determined to destroy him.

 

Donald Trump and Theresa May could hardly be further apart in their character as national leaders, says PETER OBORNE

Yes, it’s very early days, but the dramatic news that Trump is to meet Kim brings hope of an end to the threat of nuclear war which has hovered in that part of the globe for years and defied the best efforts of the world’s best diplomats.

If a deal is struck, it will be an extraordinary vindication of The Donald’s way of doing politics. His bravado, aggression and brinkmanship will have paid off.

Remember that when Barack Obama was in the White House, the liberal media applauded his judicious approach to North Korea. But it did absolutely nothing to stop the Pyongyang regime building missiles with the reported capability to reach California.

I’m not suggesting in any way that Mrs May copies Trump, but there are lessons from his leadership style.

Generally, the consensus has been that the Prime Minister’s calm and self-effacing approach has been the right one for a Government with a wafer-thin majority to handle historic negotiations.

Nevertheless, it’s time to ask whether in her dealings over the EU, Mrs May ought to take a leaf or two out of The Trump Book Of International Diplomacy. To date, she’s behaved in the opposite way to Trump.

She’s played by the rules. She’s been careful not to cause offence to Brussels. She’s always ready to offer compromise. She habitually does what Whitehall civil servants tell her.

In the early days of her premiership, Mrs May was tougher, saying about Brexit that no deal is better than a bad deal. She was right.

However, she has backtracked and there has been none of that resolute language recently. Quite the reverse, in fact.

True, her measured speech at London’s Mansion House eight days ago was pragmatic and sensible — setting out her government’s position while also handing out olive branches to Brussels.

So what was the result of being reasonable? The Prime Minister was put down by contemptuous EU leaders. They made clear that they have no intention of striking a deal with Britain except on their own terms.

The European Parliament’s Brexit chief, Guy Verhofstadt, with leaden sarcasm, insultingly spoke of Mrs May’s goals as ‘vague aspirations’ and said he hoped that ‘serious proposals have been put in the post’.

 

Donald Trump, right, speaks to Theresa May during in a working dinner meeting at the NATO headquarters

The preening Donald Tusk, President of the European Council, sneeringly said it was not in the EU’s interests to give way to what he called her ‘pick-and-mix’ approach.

And with his own bucket of cold water was the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier, whose office lectured the British Government that it should not be allowed to ‘cherry-pick’ a bespoke Brexit deal. It’s easy to guess how Trump would respond to such pipsqueaks. This is the man, remember, who called the North Korean leader ‘Little Rocket Man’ and who tweets scathing ripostes to his critics at 5am.

Mrs May, of course, disdains Twitter — unlike her predecessor in No. 10, David Cameron, who was an oh-so trendy social media obsessive.

(Indeed, on the evening of the EU referendum he was foolishly busy tweeting: ‘Just 1 hour left to #VoteRemain — and keep Britain stronger, safer and better off in Europe.’)

Without resorting to such gimmicks, Mrs May could start tearing up the diplomatic textbook and making her own ultimatums.

For the truth is that Britain has aces to play. If the Brussels bully-boys try to pull up the drawbridge, we must retaliate.

A bankrupt Brussels is desperate for the billions we have offered as a divorce settlement. If they cut up rough, we should threaten to withdraw our offer.

These Eurocrats need to be forcefully reminded that German and French manufacturers would be severely damaged if there was no deal.

Certainly, an area where Mrs May ought to be more Trump-like is on UK fishing rights.

In recent days, two ministers — Philip Hammond and George Eustace — shamelessly signalled to EU negotiators that Britain might be happy to sell out this country’s fishermen and allow boats from the remaining 27 EU nations into our coastal waters if we can secure a better deal for some sectors of our economy such as the City.

 

It’s time for Theresa May to be bolder, put EU negotiators in their place — and win a really good deal for Britain

What a shabby betrayal of the democratic wishes of the 17 million who voted for Brexit (and, I wager, of many who voted Remain who also care for the protection of British fisheries).

Fishing rights are a deeply emotive issue, like immigration. Mrs May would be justified to do a Trump and threaten to walk away from the negotiating table if Brussels tries to con us on that issue.

She needs to make absolutely clear that any border arrangement between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic cannot be allowed to damage the constitutional integrity of the UK, and if she needs to use brinkmanship to secure this, so be it.

Let’s never forget that it was the unequivocal resolve of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan — another leader unconscionably sneered at by the liberal classes — who out-stared the Russian bear, resulting in the collapse of Communism.

Timidly and limply following the advice of diplomats never achieves much in the face of obdurate foes.

It’s time for Theresa May to be bolder, put EU negotiators in their place — and win a really good deal for Britain.

 
 

An over-ambitious liability 

As police continue to investigate the Salisbury poisonings, the Government is planning how to respond if it is proved that the Russian state was responsible.

In such circumstances, I wish I had more faith in our novice Defence Secretary, Gavin Williamson. Since his appointment four months ago, he has shown poor judgment.

First, he appalled senior military figures by revealing sensitive information about the Russian threat in what looked like a cack-handed attempt to distract attention from embarrassing revelations that he became close to a female office colleague during the early years of his marriage.

Then he self-aggrandisingly announced that he planned to challenge China by sending a British warship through the South China Sea — which must have had the Chinese quaking in their boots!

Most worryingly, I understand that Mr Williamson’s relations with his military chiefs of staff are poor.

I’m told he has taken to summoning them to his office and berating them in front of junior colleagues. Apparently, senior generals are so alarmed that they may raise their concerns with No. 10.

Mr Williamson makes little secret of his ambition to be prime minister one day. Let me tell him, if he continues alienating so many people, he’ll be lucky to stay in his present job, let alone make it to Downing Street.

As the storm clouds gather, Britain needs a wise head as Defence Secretary. Not an inexperienced lightweight who is consumed by his own vaulting ambitions.

 
 

Despite winning four of the five general elections he fought, Harold Wilson’s reputation was abysmally low when he died 23 years ago.

However, there are signs that it is being rehabilitated.

One reason, I believe, is because his skill in keeping Britain out of the Vietnam War contrasts with Tony Blair’s calamitous decision to take this country to war in Iraq.

The latter choice resulted in the wider region becoming a bloodbath that continues to this day.

An insight into Wilson’s mind was offered last week when his chief policy adviser, Bernard Donoughue, 83, delivered a speech in Westminster.

He said the Labour PM ‘never entered a room without first establishing the best exit’.

Donoughue added: ‘That was a metaphor for Wilson’s political tactics.’

Donoughue also said that Wilson warned his speechwriters: ‘Remember that I don’t want too many of these Guardianisms, Environmentalism, Genderism etc.

‘I want my speeches always to include what working people are concerned with: jobs, pay, prices, pensions.’

Sound advice for any prime minister. 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5484335/PETER-OBORNE-time-Mrs-took-leaf-Trumps-book.html#ixzz59Qv1fdRl
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

MARCH 10,2018

 

*  *  *

PATRIOTISM

'Of the whole sum of human life no small part is that which consists of a man's relations to his country, and his feelings concerning it.'-   GLADSTONE

*

'Love of country is one of the loftiest virtues; and so treason against it has been considered among the most damning sins.'

E.A.Storrs

*

[A MESSAGE TO PRIME MINISTER MAY:

'Be just and fear not; let all the ends thou aimest at, be your country's thy God's, and TRUTH'S.

Shakespeare.

WE look to Mrs May to 'RIGHT THE WRONG' OF A CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT IN 1972 AND LET 'RIGHT BE DONE! ]

*

H.F.1500 -BREXIT MEANS BREXIT-PRIME MINISTER MAY-JUNE 23-2015.

 

EU fatcats want BRITAIN to help fund their £166,000 gold-plated pensions for decades to come

 

  • Brussels expects Britain to fund its £55 billion pension pot for decades to come
  • It would give the average EU official £59,000 and the top officials £166,000
  • The average Brussels pension payout is more than twice the UK average salary 
  • Theresa May would face intense criticism from MPs if she agrees to foot the bill 

 

According to analysts, Brussels could demand between £4.4 billion and £5.7 billion from the UK for its pension pot during Brexit negotiations.

Theresa May would face intense criticism if she agrees to foot the bill for lining the pockets of thousands including a string of Remain-supporting British peers.

At £59,000, the average Brussels pension payout is more than twice the UK average salary.

And it is almost three times the average income of £21,800 for a retired household in the UK at the end of last year.

About 1,730 Britons are among the 22,000 retired EU officials currently benefiting from the scheme – which cost EU taxpayers £1.3 billion in 2015 – including high-ranking British politicians. One of the most generously rewarded is former Labour leader Lord Kinnock, who draws an estimated £87,800 every year from his role as vice president of the European Commission.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4524310/EU-want-Britain-fund-166-000-pensions.html#ixzz4hthOtx6Q
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

EU museum that cost £47m opens ten years late: Controversial project is still not complete despite grand opening at the weekend 

By Mario Ledwith Brussels Correspondent For The Daily Mail - May 5th 2017, 12:59:24 am

The £47million House of European History, which has been described as a vanity project, has caused years of uproar due to its soaring cost and repeated construction delays.

 

 

[TYPICAL EU MINDSET- SIMPLE!-THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT FIRST AND LATER LET THE FUTURE DEAL WITH IT! - IT IS A BANKRUPT SCENARIO KEPT GOING BY THE FEW  MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS AND ONLY WHEN ONE LEAVES THE EU -ONLY THEN DOES REALITY REAR ITS HEAD. THE FIRMER UK IS IN ITS STANCE NOT TO BE SUBJECT TO BLACKMAIL AND PAY ONLY WHAT  IS RIGHT IN LAW AND WITH THIS IN MIND THE MORE CHANCE THAT OTHER MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS WILL LEAVE THE WASTEFUL- EXPENSIVE- ELITIST CLUB.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1200 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

 

 

HOW WE TOOK A WRONG TURN ON JANUARY 1-1973

*

THE WAY WE WERE

THE BRITISH POLITICAL TRADITION

The Concept of Empire

BURKE TO ATTLEE

1774-1947

Edited by

George Bennett

*

LONDON

ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK

79

J.A.FROUDE. Oceana-1886

[Below an excerpt which we feel appropriate to mention with

BREXIT

in mind.]

Page 297- Concept of Empire. -1947

 ' IMPOSSIBILITY ' is a word of politicians who are without the wish or without the capacity to comprehend new conditions. An 'empire' of Oceana there cannot be. The English race do not like to be parts of an empire [or a European Union in our day] But a 'commonwealth' of Oceana held together by

COMMON BLOOD

COMMON INTEREST

and a common pride in the great position which

UNITY can secure-such a commonwealth as this may grow of itself if politicians

CAN BE INDUCED TO LEAVE IT ALONE.

...It has become doubtful even to the political economist whether England [1886] can trust entirely to free trade and competition to keep the place which she has hitherto held.  Other nations press us with their rivalries. Expenses increase, manufactures languish or cease to profit. Revenue, once so expansive, becomes stationary. 'Business' may probably will, blaze up again, but the growth of it can no longer [1886] be regarded as constant, while population increase and hungry stomachs multiply, requiring the three meals a day whatever the condition of the markets. Hence those among us who have disbelieved all along that a great nation can venture its whole fortunes safely on the power of underselling its neighbours in calicoes and ironwork no longer address a public opinion entirely cold.  It  begins to be admitted that were Canada and South Africa and Australia and New Zealand members of one body with us, with a free flow of our population into them , We might sit secure against shifts and changes.  In the multiplying number of our own fellow citizens animated by a common spirit, we should have purchasers for our goods from whom we fear no rivalry; we should turn in upon them the tide of our emigrants[1886] which now flows away, while the emigrants themselves  would thrive under their own fig tree, and  rear children with stout limbs and colour in their cheeks, and a chance before them of a human existence.  Oceana would then rest on sure foundations; and her navy - the hand of strength and the symbol of her unity- would ride securely in self-supporting stations in the four quarters of the globe [1886].

*

WILLIAM HUSKISSON . Speech on moving for a Select Committee on the Civil Government of Canada

House of Commons,3 May, 1828.

Sir, England is the parent of many flourishing colonies-one of them is become an empire among the most powerful in the world. In  every quarter of the globe we have planted the seeds of freedom, civilisation, and Christianity.  To every  quarter of the globe we have carried the language, the free institutions, the system of laws, which prevail in this country; - in every quarter they are fructifying and making progress; and if it be said by some selfish calculator, that we have done all this at the expense of sacrifices which we ought not to have made, my answer is,- in spite of these sacrifices, we are still the first and happiest people in the old world; and, whilst this is our lot, let us rejoice rather in that rich harvest of glory, which must belong to a nation that has laid the foundation of similar happiness and prosperity in other nations, kindred in blood, in habits, and in feelings to ourselves. [1828]

Ibid., Vol iii.pp286-7

*

126: CLEMENT R. ATTLEE. Speech in the House of Commons

15 March 1946

 

...We should be conscious that the British have done a great work in India. We have united India and given her that sense of nationality which she so very largely lacked over the previous centuries,. She had learned from us principles of democracy and justice. When Indians attack our rule, they base their attack, not on Indian principles, but on the basis of standards derived from Britain. I was struck the other day in the United States, at a dinner where I met a number of distinguished Americans, including a very distinguished Indian, where the talk was turning on the way in which principles worked out here have been applied on the Continent of America.  It was pointed out that America had a great heritage from Britain.  My Indian friend said to me, " You know, the Americans sometimes forget there is another great nation that has also inherited these principles and traditions, and that is India.  We feel that we have a duty, a right and a privilege because we also bring to the world and work those very principles that you evolved in Britain."

Hansard, Fifth Series, Vol. 420, cs.1421-2.

*

[That is why by joining the EU  on January 1-1973 England renounced her historic PAST to become a tool of its planned mischief maker, our enemy of

TWO WORLD WARS

-Adolf Hitler

 H.F.1211-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

TREASON

Conservative skulduggery

BACK in 1972 -Tories desert to EU camp

SHORT-TERM SELF-INTEREST EXPLOITED

The UK Accession Bill passed its Third reading on 13th July 1972 by a majority of 17.

Earlier, the debate on the Second reading had lasted for four days (16-19 February), with the Labour Party then officially committed to opposing the legislation. BUT, as happened with the Maastricht Bill two decades later, as Christopher Booker and Richard North observe, 'faced with the possible collapse of their Government, most of the Conservative 'anti-marketeers gritted their teeth' (treacherously, short-sighted and very foolishly -Ed.) 'and walked through the 'aye' lobby. Despite that, 15 Tories voted with the Opposition. TRAITOR

Edward Heath

 got his vote, but only by a water-thin margin:

309 to 301'.

*  *  *

 

IN 2018

 WE COULDN'T TRUST THE CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 1972 AND IT APPEARS WE ALSO CANNOT TRUST A CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IN 2018-BOTH WITHHELD VITAL LEGAL INFORMATION ON THE EU FROM MPs-WHICH AS IN THE PAST INDICATES A

COVER-UP.

*  *  *

 

Tony Benn MP commented after the passage of the Third Reading that

 ‘it was a coup d’etat by a political class who did not believe in popular sovereignty’.

 

Actually, it was worse than that .\It was the start of a coup d’etat by installments’ by a corrupted political class initially led by two operatives-Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon,

 both of whom were recruited German agents  (like Lenin, Rasputin and Lavrentii Beria in the Soviet context, before them) who signed the UK Accession Treaty in exchange for corrupt payments.  Both lied to the British people; and the authors specifically identified one of Geoffrey Rippon’s worst lies, associated with the alienation of Britain’s fishing waters, the richest in the world.  Here it is worth citing the whole of the authors’ relevant paragraph:

 ‘Desperate to hide how much had been conceded[over fisheries], Geoffrey Rippon…said:

 ‘I must emphasise that these are not just transitional arrangements [in the relevant context, allegedly beneficial to the British fisheries-Ed.]

 which automatically lapse at the end of a fixed period’.  This claim drew fierce challenge from Dennis Healey and Peter Shore [later Lord Shore –further details on EDP bulletin board] both of whom suspected he was lying. 

 What neither had yet seen was the wording of the UK Accession Treaty, which MP’s would not be allowed to examine until after the treaty was signed a month later.  Only when this became available [and Heath and Rippon had accepted their bribes-Ed.]  was it clear that Rippon had told a blatant lie’. [Booker and North, op.cit., page 155]

 International Currency Review

 October 10-2005

 Notes and References:

 ‘Obituary of Sir Edward Heath, the Prime Minister who took Britain into the EEC and presided over constant turmoil at home’,

1. The Daily Telegraph, 18th July 2005.

This was probably the rudest obituary of a prominent UK statesman ever to have appeared in print.  Even so, it omitted any reference to Heath’s recruitment by German (Nazi) intelligence.   However , there are many [coded] references in this obituary, not least the three telling words:

‘He never married’, which observers accurately interpret as meaning that he was homosexual, and therefore an obvious recruitment/blackmail target.

 

2. The Daily Telegraph, 24th July 2005,

 

Christopher Booker (Column),

 

International Currency Review

 

JANUARY 6, 2019

A NO DEAL!

 

[A NO DEAL IS THE ONLY DEAL THAT HITLER'S SO-CALLED EU WILL RESPECT.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANY DEAL HAVE NO IDEA OF THE TRUE NATURE OF THE SATANIC BEAST THEY ARE DEALING WITH AFTER 46 YEARS.  IT'S DAYS ARE NUMBERED BECAUSE ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES CANNOT STEM THE NATURAL INSTINCT FOR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY FROM WITHIN.  THOSE CALLING FOR ANGELA MERKEL'S FRIEND THERESA MAY'S DEAL AT ANY PRICE ARE THE SAME PERSONS  WHO HAVE ALREADY SOLD THEIR SOULS TO A MONSTER STATE WHERE ONLY THE ELITE WILL PROSPER. THE MAN IN THE STREET IS IGNORED AND THAT IS WHY THERE ARE RIOTS ON THE STREETS OF MANY OF THE CAPTIVE PEOPLE'S WHO WERE DECEIVED BY THEIR NOW MASTERS. TRUE DEMOCRACY IS DEAD WITHIN HITLER'S BRAINCHILD AND IS REPLACED BY SUPPLE TOTALITARIANISM- ASK THOSE WHO ARE FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM IN CATALONIA AND NO DOUBT IN OTHER PARTS OF THE EU.]

*  *  *

 

H.F.1150

 

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18 APL-18 MAY-18 JUN-18 JUL-18 AUG-18 SEP-18 OCT-18
NOV-18 DEC-18 JAN-19 FEB-19 MAR-19 APL-19 MAY-19 JUN-19 JUL-19

AUG-19

SEP-19

OCT-19

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 THE DOWNFALL

OF

A ONCE DECLARED

 IRON LADY

AND

HER ARDENT AND PASSIONATE PROMISE

 IN 2016

 

'BETTER A

NO DEAL

THAN A BAD DEAL'

*

'BREXIT MEANS BREXIT'

*

'TO LEAVE

THE EU

ON

MARCH 29,2019'

AS we had previously stated

COMPROMISE

should never be considered

when the return of our ancient freedoms given away by a so-called

 CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT

IN

 1972

to be reclaimed in

March 2019

in answer to a people's vote in a

REFERENDUM

 in

JUNE 2O16

 

when an overwhelming

17.4 MILLION PATRIOTS

VOTED FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE

FREE COUNTRY

FROM THE CRUMBLING CONFIDENCE TRICK

calling itself the

EUROPEAN UNION

soon to be a

SUPERSTATE

*

A great historian has observed,-

'That honesty is the best policy, is a maxim which we firmly believe to be generally correct, even with respect to the temporal interest of individuals; but with respect to societies, the rule is subject to still fewer exceptions, and that for this reason, that the life of societies is larger than individuals.  It is possible to mention men who have owed great worldly prosperity to breaches of private faith: but we doubt whether it is possible to mention a state which has, on the whole, been a gainer by a breach of public faith.,'

[We all know politicians since we have been in Hitler's so-called European Union who fit this bill. Many have gained abundant riches and have left the People to suffer the consequences of their wicked deeds of death and destruction... and the result is clearly demonstrated further by the actions of many Remainer MPs who have decided not to keep their promise to accept the result of the People's referendum of June, 2016, which they sanctioned; which is a derogation of their duty to their constituents-a clear breach of political accountability to those they serve.]

August 8,2019

H.F.1424

'Trust not him that has broken faith.'

SHAKESPEARE

*
Could the European elections herald the end of the EU - Eurosceptic parties all across the EU look like doing well!.... - Daily Express

https://www.express.co.uk/.../expresscomment/.../european-election-2019-vote-end-eu-comment-ross-clark

*
AGITATION

Agitation prevents rebellion, keeps the peace, and secures progress. Every step she gains is gained forever. Muskets are the weapons of animals. Agitation is the atmosphere of the brains.-
Wendell Phillips. Am.orator

*
Eurosceptics are fighting for the return of freedoms once secured by MAGNA CARTA and the PETITION of RIGHT.
 

 

 

Benjamin Fulford 5-27-19… “As Theresa May loses battle of Britain,

 West Coast oligarchs sue for peace”

New weekly report from Ben. All I will add here is that this one is extremely fascinating. Suggest “holding on to hat”, if wearing one.

“The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

“…U.S. President Donald Trump has spent the Memorial Day weekend in Japan, in part to avoid assassination as moves begin to end the long political deadlock in Washington, D.C., Pentagon and Japanese right-wing sources say.

“…why the resignation of May is crucial to breaking the political deadlock… in 2016 the Rockefeller / Clinton oligarchs asked their Rothschild counterparts in the UK to circumvent U.S. law in order to spy on Trump and concoct the Russiagate scandal to impeach him. May’s resignation means the British Nazi…-allied oligarchs who fought against Trump are now all being purged from the British military / intelligence / political power structure, according to British royal family sources. This purge will be accompanied by a similar purge in the U.S.”

As Theresa May loses battle of Britain, West Coast oligarchs sue for peace
By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society, May 27, 2019

The forced resignation of British Prime Minister (and Hitler daughter) Theresa May marked a decisive turning point in the battle for the planet Earth, multiple sources agree. Already, her resignation has forced high-tech oligarchs Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk to seek peace negotiations with the White Dragon Society (WDS), according to P2 Freemason sources.

May 27, 2019

 

H.F.1853/1

 

 

 

 

H.F.1849

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCES.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

PETER OBORNE

 

 

PETER OBORNE: Our complacent and complicit foreign aid civil servants should hang their heads in shame over the Oxfam charity scandal which will take years to recover from

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti, but the UK Department for International Development is also in the dock. Former Secretary of State Priti Patel (pictured) is believed to have known about it all and stayed quiet

Oxfam will take years to recover from the sickening scandal in Haiti. Other charities, too, whose staff have been exposed for awful misdemeanours have seen their reputations badly damaged.

However, the Department for International Development (DfID), which has given hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money to these charities, is also in the dock.

We now know its officials were aware of the shocking culture of sexual abuse, exploitation and paedophilia that exists in Oxfam and in much of the rest of the aid sector that DfID oversees.

Former DfID secretary Priti Patel said government officials 'at the highest levels' knew about aid workers' sex abuse (with some victims being children) but tried to keep it hushed up.

She said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it.

This means the taxpayer-funded DfID — whose mission statement is to 'tackle the global challenges of our time, including poverty and disease, mass migration, insecurity and conflict' and to 'build a safer, healthier, more prosperous world' — must bear responsibility for what went on. Indeed, it's very possible that, without the newspaper investigation that exposed the Haiti scandal, DfID officials would still be condoning such appalling behaviour.

There is clearly something very rotten at the heart of DfID. Yet the department seems blissfully unaware of this.

As recently as January, DfID's permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft boasted that he was in charge of a 'well run and well organised department'.

Such complacency beggars belief. For the truth is that its complicity in the Oxfam scandal is just the latest example of DfID's tolerance of corruption and worse. 

As has been well documented, it shovels billions of pounds a year into countries run by some of the most brutal regimes in the world.

Very few dictators are too bloodthirsty or barbaric for DfID not to do business with.

Cynically, they abuse the generosity of people in the West by using their donations in order to spend less themselves on welfare programmes for their own people.

Instead, DfID's largesse allows them to invest huge sums in excessive arms budgets — or, worse, line their own pockets and amass personal fortunes in Swiss bank accounts.

 

Patel said the Oxfam scandal in Haiti was just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Yet DfID did nothing to stop it, writes Peter Oborne 

No wonder it is said — not in jest — that the definition of overseas aid is 'the transfer of cash from the pockets of poor people in rich countries to the bank accounts of rich people in poor countries'.

Lest it be forgotten, Britain's foreign aid budget last year alone totalled £13.3 billion. The cases of this money being abused are too numerous to list in full.

In Ethiopia, for example, DfID spent hundreds of millions with a Marxist government that puts communist propaganda into school textbooks. 

 

Mikelange Gabo (pictured) claims sacked Oxfam boss Roland Van Hauwermeiren started a sexual relationship with her when she was just 17 

In Syria, our taxes fund armed groups which my sources in the country say may be linked to Al-Qaeda.

In Pakistan, Imran Khan, the former national cricket captain and a leading opposition leader, called for foreign aid to be halted because he believes it corrupts and weakens his country.

He says: 'Why should the Pakistani rich bother to pay taxes when foreign loans and aid money are always there to cover up their incompetence and corruption and pay for their lavish lifestyle?'

Also, he asks: 'Why should politicians bother to fix the economy when they can artificially maintain it' with foreign donations?

 

Scandal-hit Van Hauwermeiren (pictured) is alleged to have spotted her in the street while she was eight months pregnant and told her: 'I find you very sexy, how can I help you?'

Many respected economic studies show the best way to lift people out of poverty is not through handing out aid but through trade, encouraged by free market capitalism. 

But this is frowned upon by many DfID civil servants and charity activists, a large proportion of whom hold Left-wing views and spend their lives going from one well-paid job in the bloated public sector to another.

Equally, I am convinced overseas aid has increasingly less to do with helping the poor in foreign countries and more to do with self-preening government ministers trying to flaunt their compassion.

 

Pictured: A mountainous region outside Haitian capital Port-au-Prince 

These virtue-signallers are more interested in boasting about the size of their budgets and posing for photocalls during short visits abroad rather than ensuring taxpayers' money is well spent.

And I'm afraid the truth is that DfID has not been well served in the choice of its ministers over recent years.

Under Tory-led governments there has been Andrew Mitchell who went native and was widely rebuked after claiming, at a time of austerity at home, that he wanted the UK to be seen around the world as a foreign aid superpower.

Tactlessly, he criticised his successor, Justine Greening, saying she never wanted the job and that she had failed to rebut claims that huge sums of foreign aid had been lost in corruption and waste.

Greening didn't last long. Her replacement was Priti Patel, who was only in the job 15 months before being sacked for breaking the ministerial code by holding undeclared meetings in Israel, in a clumsy bid, it seemed, to promote her own political ambitions.

Patel's position was all the more disingenuous because, before her appointment, she had argued that

DfID ought to be abolished. 

She quickly reversed this once in charge. And during her tenure, nothing changed.

Patel's replacement, Penny Mordaunt, now has an opportunity to restore discipline and standards.

 

The Oxfam Haiti scandal shocked the nation after it emerged earlier this month 

Above all, she should order a root-and-branch overhaul of her entire department.

Britain has spent about £70 billion of taxpayers' money on international aid since the Conservatives came to power in 2010. This is an incredible £2,500 from every British family.

Only a forensic audit can determine how much has been squandered and how much actually needs to be spent at all.

As a foreign reporter, I've visited many trouble spots around the world where DfID money is spent, and wouldn't deny for a moment that there are places where it has done a great deal of good.

Yet I've also witnessed evidence of a huge waste of money, not least in Pakistan, where hundreds of millions have been frittered away in a largely fruitless attempt to reform the education system.

I believe the Government's commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product on foreign aid a year is utterly misguided.

In a country where NHS beds are scarce and a care system is collapsing, we simply can't afford that largesse.

I dearly hope Penny Mordaunt, the latest minister in charge of what has become a gold mine for corrupt foreign dictators and child abusers, has the courage and will to restore discipline to her out-of-control department.

Otherwise, public belief in international aid, and respect for the noble principle of charity-giving, may never recover.

 

Too soft on Myanmar

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses. 

He should have gone further and accused the Myanmar government — led by Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi — of carrying out genocide. 

I'm convinced he held back because it would have necessitated the British government stepping in to try to stop the killing — something it hasn't the stomach for. 

Why won't the Foreign Office do anything to halt the rape and murder in our former colony? 

 

On his recent visit to Myanmar (formerly Burma) to see the devastation inflicted by the country's army on the minority Rohingya Muslims, Boris Johnson (pictured) challenged the government's false propaganda that the Rohingya burnt down their own houses

 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton.

He has become a figure of public ridicule — defying colleagues' calls for him to resign after he walked out on his wife and children for an affair with a far younger woman who has been exposed for appalling racist views.

Yesterday, Nigel Farage — who has acted like the most irritating back-seat driver since standing down as leader after the EU referendum — gave his backing to Bolton.

He's right. Useless though Bolton undoubtedly is, Ukip will become even more of a laughing stock if it has its ninth change of leader since 2009.

 

Today, Ukip members meet to vote on the future of their party's beleaguered leader, Henry Bolton (pictured)



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5402335/

PETER-OBORNE-foreign-aid-civil-servants-ashamed.html#ixzz57O0ZUQl3
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

Peter Osborne: Boris Johnson's

Brexit

views are persuasive

 

H.F.1479

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

SEP-19

OCT-19

 

[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSIONof the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

*  *  *

ADDED DECEMBER,2018

[FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

YOU.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

 
AUG H 1 2
3 4 5  6

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 1-2019      JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 2-2019

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 3-2019        JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-PART 4-2019

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

JUNE-FREEDOM-NOW-NEW-HOME-2019

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-2019