BLOCKBUSTER EXPOSE
OF THE
ILLEGAL- CORRUPT AND UNDEMOCRATIC
EUROPEAN UNION
A Criminalized Organisation
What is
to follow will at first for
some will arise a possible scepticism of the
events which we are about to unravel BUT do read
what follows before you decide.
The
following extracts are taken from the respected]
International Currency Review
-
The
only INDEPENDENT global quarterly Journal of the
World Financial Community Est. 1969
www.worldreports.org
*
*
SPECIAL
ISSUE
E.U. CORRUPTION.
*
Launched on Monday October 10-2005
SUMMER-AUTUMN 2005-VOLUMN 30 NUMBER 4
(ISBN
1-899798-05-6)
Consists of 152 pages
of useful and generally unknown information of the
corruption and treachery and skulduggery of public
figures worldwide over the past half-century-below
there are some extracts.
*
CONTENTS
EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL
* * *
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITAMATE
* * *
THE EU TREATIES ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY FRAUDULENT
MEANS [BRIBES?]
* * *
EXPOSURES TRIGGERED
BY THE DEATH OF SIR EDWARD HEATH
* * *
EUROPEAN UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION
* * *
WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION MUST
CEASE FORTHWITH
* * *
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW-NO
PROBLEM
* * *
See what Douglas Hurd our then Foreign
Minister said after signing the 1992 Maastricht
Treaty
* * *
Also
AVAILABLE SOON
THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER
*Published by: EDWARD
HARLE LTD
(Source
of ‘politically incorrect’
intelligence books.
108
Horseferry Road, Westminster, LONDON SW1P 2EF
Orders@edwardharle.com . Tel-Orderline +44
[0207-222-2635
*
EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL
A
criminalized organisation
Monday 10th October, London.
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE
THIS
ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’
TOMORROW
The
European Union Collective is
illegal
and so extensively
criminalized that it has become all but
indistinguishable from
a criminal organization.
It is
illegal
because
key EU treaties were procured
by means of slush fund
payments.
It is
criminal
because, being born in
corruption, its procedures are designed to mask the
corrupt activities of many of its officials, while
it publishes false accounts.
Britain is free to leave immediately, as explained
below.
These
findings are published today the 10th
October 2005 in the latest issue of
International Currency Review, the London
–based Journal of the International Financial
Community.
·
The
fraudulence of the European Commission’s accounts
necessitates urgent consideration of its Triple-A
Credit Rating by the leading Rating Agencies.
Precise evidence of the fraudulence of the EC’s
accounts is presented in the issue. (Normally
this scandalous state of affairs is ‘successfully’
shoved under the carpet).
·
International Currency Review has advised the
agencies accordingly, and anticipates that they will
carry out the necessary overdue reassessment of the
EU’s ‘integrity’. In the event that zero action is
taken, given the extreme gravity of the evidence of
institutionalised accounting fraud presented in the
journal, the integrity of
the Credit Rating Agencies themselves may be called
into question – not least by International
Currency Review.
This
may have repercussions for the International
Financial Community generally.
*
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE
But
first things first.
The illegitimacy and illegality of the European
Union-and thus of ALL its constituent
structures, including the European Central Bank –
arises from the following facts:
The British Treaty of Accession was signed by two
agents of the German ‘Black’ Nazi intelligence
continuum, DVD
–This
is the ultra-secret German Nazi continuing ‘Black
Operations’ intelligence organisation based,
appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich.
Intelligence concerning the existence was passed to
the Editor of International Currency
Review:
Christopher Story FRSA – Veteran UK financial and
intelligence analyst
E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org Telephone +44-(0)
20-7222 3836
by
British intelligence sources
The
Editor then had its
contents checked out by high -level US intelligence
contacts, who confirmed the
entity’s existence and importance.
There
remains some uncertainty about what the initials
DVD stand for- alternatively Deutsche
Versicherungs Dienst [German Insurance Agency]
or else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German
Defence Agency] – the context here
being that DVD is the intelligence [Abwehr]
continuum of the
NAZI INTERNATIONAL
Originally established by the Nazi
Abwehr
as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1942.
Therefore, in this context, ‘insurance’ would mean
‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring
the continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for
the controlling
a
Thousand-Year Reich.’
While
‘defence’ in this same context would mean
‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global
hegemony strategy.
DVD
is not
funded by the German Government and Taxpayer, since
it operates its own covert sources of giga-finance;
but its primary operations
and strategy are routinely approved by the
German Chancellery.
Any official denial of this fact is a lie
To
continue:
The
signatories, both - of The British treaty of
Accession whom received substantial
financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’,
were Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon.
Together with the late Roy Jenkins,
they were recruited by the
German Abwehr while studying at Balliol
College, Oxford.
This intelligence has emerged since the recent death
of Sir Edward Heath [Another Traitor
amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen
with a title]
*
THE E.U. TREATIES ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY
FRAUDULENT MEANS:
That is
to say, official signatories and senior
policymakers/operatives have received substantial
corrupt payments, remitted to their secret offshore
bank accounts, in exchange for their ‘co-operation’
in pushing through successive E.U. Treaties.
The
bribery funds are derived from a colossal secret ‘Black
Operations’ slush fund account located in
Switzerland –the title and
size of which is divulged in the REPORT.
For
instance:
$5.0 billion was allocated in 2004 from the secret
Swiss slush fund to ‘procure’ the
European Constitution Treaty,
divided into two branches:
1)
$2.5 billion was allocated (and paid out) on
completion of the
Inter Governmental Conference [IGC],
in July/August of 2004, with
$100 million allocated for each of the
25 EU’Member States’.
The corrupt bribery funds were remitted to the
National officials concerned in
Euros.
2)
A further $2.5 billion ($100 million for
each ‘Member State’) was payable on ratification of
the Collective Treaty.
Given the negative referendum results
delivered by the French and Dutch electorates,
payment of the second branch has been a matter of
understandable tension and contention ever since,
not least since such
‘Black’
remittances, which are common place at the
intergovernmental level are illegal –and
therefore ‘never happened’.
Intelligence sources have provided
International Currency Review with the NAME of the
secret Swiss bank account, the vast amount of
‘Black’ money it holds, the amounts allocated for
each corrupted EU ‘Member State’, plus the names of
three of the most prominent alleged recipients of
‘Black’ payments, together with details of the
alleged transactions concerned.
[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK BUT THIS
REPORT MUST PUT THE PRO-EUROPE FACTION LITERALLY IN
A SPIN AND FEAR OF THE OUTCOME WHEN THE CONSPIRACY
IS
FULLY REVEALED]
We have
more to follow
*
EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF
SIR EDWARD
HEATH
These revelations have become possible
following the death of Sir Edward Heath,
who was a German agent and asset for six decades -
the longest known foreign intelligence penetration
in modern history.
It is significant
that the extensive Obituary of Heath
published in the
Guardian
on 18th July 2005, closed with the
cryptic sentence:
‘He [Heath] remained determined that he
would be vindicated, until close to the end.
This referred to the fact
that when Heath visited Salzburg in 2003, ostensibly
to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason
for his visit was that he had been summoned to
Dachau, where DVD officers warned him
that
British
intelligence were intending to confront him with his
treachery.
It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath
literally ‘blew a fuse’:
he suffered a pulmonary embolism.
A similar fate attended the demise of
the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a
severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence
officials with the fact that he was about to be
exposed for his long-term treachery against the
United Kingdom.
Roy Jenkins was one of the most lethal
of all long-term German agents operating at the
highest levels of the British Government.
And
-the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair
is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.
Heath, Rippon
and Jenkins were far from being the only
long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the
DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi)
intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.
In the United States, the Dulles
brothers were German agents to this day.
Substantial transfers of ‘Black’ Operations’ funds
originally controlled by the United States
authorities are known to have been transferred into
the hands of the German ‘Black’ covert intelligence
community. The CIA
is belatedly being to some extent purged of
operators with ethnic and other loyalties and ties
to Germany.
TENSIONS
EXIST WITHIN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES BECAUSE OF
THIS PENETRATION
*
THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES.
Given
that
(a)
The
United Kingdom’s EEC Accession Treaty,
(b)
The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and
(c)
The (aborted) European Constitution Treaty
were among E.U. bilateral and collective Treaties
that were procured by corrupt and fraudulent means,
THE EUROPEAN UNION IS AN ILLEGAL
ORGANISATION.
This is because Article 49 of the 1969 Vienna
Convention on Treaties, to which Britain and the
other EU ‘Member States’ are parties, provides as
follows:
‘If a State has been induced to conclude a Treaty by
the fraudulent conduct of another negotiating State,
that State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its
consent to be bound by the Treaty.
[* The
first tranche of corrupt payments for the European
Constitution Treaty was paid out, but the fate of
the second tranche, given the negative French and
Dutch referenda outcomes, is uncertain – as well as
being the subject of vicious secret controversy]
According to intelligence sources, earlier EU
Collective treaties were likewise procured by
fraudulent means.
In
the British case,
UK Membership of the European Union Collective –an
illegal organisation which exists to subsume, usurp
and collectivise national sovereignty under the
enticing cover of ‘co-operation’ (code for
collectivisation)-contravenes the
1689
Bill of Rights
which
remains the LAW of the United Kingdom to this
day and which incorporates the following Oath:
‘I
do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate,
state or potentate hath or ought to have
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or
authority with this Realm’
*
WHY THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION
In addition to exposing the illegality and
illegitimacy of the European Union as a whole,
International Currency Review
[Volume 30, Number 4] demonstrates, with extensive
analysis and documentation, that
the European Commission is a criminal organisation.
The issue has been prepared in close collaboration
with Ashley Mote, -Independent MEP for Southeast
England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk]
and Continental MEP colleagues.
In October 2004, Mr Mote and Marta Andreason, the
former Chief Accountant of the European Commission,
presented the UK Serious Fraud Office with two large
lever-arch files containing voluminous damning
information about institutionalised corruption in
the EU Commission and related EU structures.
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN
[Does the stink of corruption in high places prevent
the Rule of Law from taking place?]
Among the reasons for concluding that the European
Union is a criminal organisation, are the following:
1)
Because
successive Presidents of the European Union preside
over the disbursement of the corrupt ‘Black’
‘facilitation fees’ identified, each successive
(six-monthly) President is and has been aware of the
corrupt mechanism used to procure the EU’s
successive collective Treaties.
2)
The
incidence of fraud committed within the EU’s
structures is so extensive and routine, that the
European Commission has been condemned as openly
condoning a ‘culture of corruption’, and
presiding over a system of ‘institutional
looting’. Scandalised EC whistle blowing
officials refer to the European Commission as a
‘festering dustbin of corruption’. In
2004, there were nearly 3,500 cases of EC fraud.
3)
When
informed in 2004 that the EC Vice –
President-designate, Jacques Barrot, had been
convicted for embezzlement of funds, and had
withheld this information from the European
Commission’s President-designate, Sr. Jose-Manuel
Barroso, the new President denied any prior
knowledge of this fact, and left Barrot in
place.
4)
It is
nothing unusual for European Commission officials
to be associated with lucrative corrupt ‘side
businesses’-often using offshore accounts-from
which they benefit financially, consequent upon
contracts being awarded to the businesses in
which they themselves have a secret pecuniary
interest. For instance:
5)
The
Sunday Telegraph
reported on 25th September –2005 that two
EC employees own a Brussels sex hotel, Studio
Europe, which rents out rooms for 13 euros an hour.
No doubt this location is used for blackmail
purposes. The EC officials in question were named
as Carmela lo Guidance, an assistant in the
EC Budget Directorate-General and George
Tizzies a porter in the Directorate-General
responsible for employment. This is the latest of
innumerable EC scandals to have erupted into the
public domain, some of which are examined in the
Special Issue [out on Monday 10th
October 2005.]
6)
Unhealthy and evidently pervasive masonic links
exist between European Commission officials and
contractors, resulting in corrupt and unhealthy
‘business relationships’.
7)
The
European Commission’s accounting is NOT only
shambolic,
but
also fraudulent. Evidence to this
effect is presented, inter alia, by the well-known
British forensic accountant Christopher Arkell,
FTCA, and by former Chief Accountant of
the European Commission, Marta Andreason.
She was ‘suspended’ after five months en poste,
and then fired, after she questioned the legitimacy
of payments that Directorates-General
required her to authorise. She asked awkward
questions, and was effectively told to
‘shut
up and just sign’.
8)
The
EC’s accounting irregularities, which are glaring,
include the following abuses:
When
certain accounting modifications were implemented at
the end of 2004, the closing balances in 2004 and
the opening balances in 2005 were not reconciled-
thereby permanently embedding false accounting data
for the future. This
means that henceforth no European Commission
accounts can ever be accurate (not that this has
ever been the case).
en though EU ‘Member States’ have been making
payments to the Commission for decades to cover the
costs of pension liabilities for approximately
39,000 EC employees (as of 2005),
the EU ‘Member States’ have simultaneously been
charged with the liability of making/guaranteeing
the resulting pension payments.
Thus pension liabilities appear on both sides of the
balance sheet.
Proper
accounting practice would require a charge to the
Income and Expenditure Account of
EUR 19.5 billion
And a consequent reduction in reserves.
The European Commission should have been acquiring a
liability for pensions throughout its existence
instead of fudging the accounts in this fraudulent
and irregular manner.
The European Commission ‘makes’ massive surpluses
out of the ‘Member States’ annually, which it covers
up
Surpluses are supposed according to the EU’s own
regulations, to be returned to the ‘Member
States’. What happens in practice is that the EC
surpluses that have arisen after all accruals have
been accounted for, are eliminated by the simple
manipulative expedient of providing for potential
expenditures not openly through the Income and
Expenditure Account, but by means of corrupt
adjustments to the Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).
This method of accounting is prohibited by all
recognised accounting standards around the world as
DISHONEST.
Its use by the European Commission represents a
clear fraud perpetuated upon ‘Member States’
and their troubled and exploited peoples.
EC
accounting records can be changed two or more years
in arrears.
The
amount and the payee, but not the unique identifying
number, can be altered, and no record whatsoever of
such changes is/has been maintained in the records.
This represents an
open-ended invitation to scam the system, especially
as it is routine for the EC’s Annual Accounts to be
adjusted retrospectively.
The
huge Eurocracy (or self-interested EU
nomenklatura)
has perfected subtle mechanisms
for ensuring that hardly
anything is ever done to stamp out the corruption
over which it has presided for decades. These
techniques include, but are not confined to the
following:
The use of ‘candour’,
which
is NOT to be confused with the truth. ‘Candour’ is
deployed in order to disarm, mislead, divert and
mollify critics, so that
any underlying fraud goes undetected.
The ‘multiple investigations’ technique
8.2)
What happens is that several investigations are
‘opened’ separately. Further internal ‘investigations’
may follow. Some are then ‘closed’, or
‘suspended’, ostensibly ‘pending’ the
‘results’ of other investigations.
The resulting, deliberately contrived, confusion,
with successive reports contradicting others,
ensures that the corruption trail is buried and
lost.
Report-writing is used to smother transparency,
clarity, and TRUTH, with the sole objective of
obfuscating the underlying looting and corruption.
8.3)
The EC and its structures have at least
3,094 secret ‘working
groups’ or committees,
all of which are answerable
to no-one, and the operations of which are secret.
8.4)
The
main objective of any EC fraud investigation is to
procure that the case is ‘exported’ as quickly as
possible to the ‘Member States’ concerned, so that
any corruption at the EC centre is consequently
hidden from scrutiny.
8.5)
Wherever possible, investigations are kept
unresolved until the existing Commission is duly
replaced by its successor-when
the ‘that was then, this is now’ excuse kicks in.
8.6)
Innumerable other deliberate obstruction methods,
identified by
International Currency Review with the
guidance of Ashley Mote MEP and his colleagues, are
routinely employed by the EC and related structures,
to maximise the obfuscation of troubling problems.
For
instance, one external corporation, based in
Luxembourg, in which EC officials had an
interest, was ostensibly established on
29th February
1989-a date which never even existed,
which meant that the entity was ‘invisible’.
When a
sanitised official report on the entity’s fraudulent
activities was presented to the former President
of the European Commission, Signor Romano Prodi
- that allegedly corrupt Italian ‘machine’
politician- the date was altered to
22nd February
1989.
This
further illustrated the devious standard European
Commission technique of promulgating conflicting
information in separate contradictory reports. By
this means, controversy is deflected into sterile
arguments over the conflicting information-diverting
attention from the institutionalised internal
looting itself.
8.7)
The European
Court of Auditors has given an adverse opinion for
many years, on 95% of all European Commission
Expenditure.
It has never, ever, approved the EC’s accounts.
Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the
Court’s own accounts –one of several indications
that the Court itself cannot be trusted. Indeed,
like the Commission’s own internal Audit Service,
its main task, by open official admission, is to
minimise embarrassment to the Commission.
The damning evidence of institutionalised European
Commission looting and serial corruption covered up
by the EC authorities contained in the single issue
of
International Currency Review
is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the
European Commission.
*
WHY BRITISH
PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.
Both
Ashley Mote MEP and the
journal’s Editor, Christopher Story, demand
that the UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice,
and withholds further contributions to the EC budget
pending elimination of institutionalised corruption
and looting in the European Commission’s structures
–which
will never happen.
In a
letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd
October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury
Minister, told the MEP that withholding British
payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an
‘option’ we would not consider’
BUT
Continued squandering of UK Taxpayers (OUR MONEY)
represents a dereliction by British Ministers and
their officials, of their duty of care towards UK
taxpayer’s funds.
Given
the conspicuous gravity of the situation, Ministers
are believed to be increasing the risk of being sued
for negligence as exposures of the European
Commission’s ‘culture of corruption’ proliferate.
[At
this moment in Time in the UK millions of people on
tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical
problems are being asked to hand the money back.
They should ALL insist that the Treasury
should try the European Commission and
ask their employees to point the finger and explain
were the billions of pounds of OUR money is resting
in banks in Switzerland. WE should certainly
have a great deal of compound interest to collect at
the same time]
Moreover
the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord
Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’
European Committee that the British Government
DOES possess the legal scope to give
itself powers to withhold payments to the
European Commission.
He
told the Committee:
‘You
have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK)
rebate…It would never have happened if we had not
made clear that if we did not get satisfaction, we
would withhold our contributions.
It was
never published, but it was printed. It was
discreetly known to those who we negotiated with,
that this is what would happen if we did not get
satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our
contributions, to the extent of having the UK law
officers produce a bill, we would have NOT got [the
Rebate].’
[Source:
Future Financing of the European Union, House of
Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th
March 2005.]
But since
Britain’s EU membership is illegal, because the UK
Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective
Treaties (notably Maastricht) were procured by
fraud, it is not even technically necessary for the
Government to extract that draft bill from the
official pigeon-hole into which it was shoved.
*
BRITAIN CAN
LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.
The
Government can walk away from the European Union
Tomorrow- and use the
25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all
current and future costs of the EU membership:
To rebuild
the Public Transportation system.
Build
spanking new ‘Schools and Hospitals’ wherever demand
exists.
And
revitalise the BRITISH economy generally.
All without suffering any
losses since EU membership has brought Britain no
clear benefits at all, that could not have been
procured domestically. It has however, meant
that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the
British Government should have been spending at
home, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying
collectivist project, led by corrupted and
blackmailed politicians and operatives.
All EU ‘Member States’,
valuing the huge British
market for their goods, would be compelled to
negotiate arms’-length bilateral trade and other
agreements with the United Kingdom, or risk losing
access to UK markets. Any prospective interim
disruptions could be accommodated by the British
Government directing the UK taxpayers’ funds that it
normally squanders with the EC’s ‘festering
dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily
vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.
A Free Trade Agreement linking
Britain, the United States and Canada has bee
readied, for implementation when Britain leaves the
European Community.
For,
contrary to what is in the public domain,
contingency plans do exist in the United Kingdom to
leave the European Union.
These were recently reviewed and
‘dusted down’, in the context of key connections
made by certain intelligence circles following the
7/7 attacks, which have shown that EU Member States’
that profess to be allies of the United Kingdom
are
anything but.
Exposure information for this
special issue of
International Currency Review
[Vol.30, No4]
has been developed with
the generous practical assistance of Ashley Mote
MEP. Paul van Buitenen MEP, Marta Andreason,
Christopher Arkle FTCA and the US and UK
intelligence sources special to the
Editor, Christopher Story.
For further
details, see Ashley Mote’s website:
www.ashleymote.co.uk.
International
Currency Review, VOL.
30 NO 4
[extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by
subscription from
www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying
subscribers worldwide on
10th
October 2005
Banks, Corporations and other
entities that use subscription agencies may
subscribe to World Reports Ltd serials (complete)
through their usual channels, or else direct from
our website, or from the London or New York
addresses shown in the lower red panel on the
www.worldreports.org Home Page. The website has
a secure and reliable subscription ordering system.
ABOUT
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW
International
Currency Review is the
only INDEPENDENT global
journal specialising in international
currency, financial and economic issues with a
geopolitical and intelligence dimension.
Published
since 1969, it specialises
today in exposing corruption in governance
structures, since the corruption of governance and
of the capitalist system is swamping all other
considerations.
The Journal is one of a series of
intelligence sources published by World Reports,
details of which will be found on our website:
www.worldreports.org
International
Currency Review has
recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper Echelon’global
financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower
Echelon’ structure with which we are all familiar.
The ‘Upper Echelon’ is a
‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence
financial environment characterised by high –yield
investment programmes, scamming operations and
colossal stored fiat wealth running into trillions
of dollars
[Font altered-bolding &
underlining used-comments in brackets]
* * *
OCTOBER 10-2005
*
Added
August 26-2008
[As the Author has
explained elsewhere the Pan-German and Soviet
mindset has not changed since Lenin and his gang
were taken in 1920 by train from Germany to Russia
in order to dis-stabilise a new democratic
government which they did most successfully and this
same co-operation between the now Russian Federation
but still in substance the Leninist Soviet. Later
Lenin repaid the Germans by allowing them to send in
plain clothes men to train in Russia in tank and
aircraft warfare in preparation for World War II.
Even in 2008 there is still this close contact
between the Pan-German and Soviet Collectivist and
not to forget France which is part of the trilateral
TREATY to work together for the destruction of the
nation state and democracy in the furtherance of
their final objective of a collectivist
EUROPEAN UNION
with its nation
states destroyed and regions across once national
borders ready to be absorbed into a bland one
ideology collectivist communist
WORLD GOVERNMENT.
and those who will
not toe the line as happens today in Russia there is
the GULAG with its numerous camps with no doubt
hundreds of thousands of dissidents. It is said up
to 20,000 die in the camps every year. But the final
figure could be much greater.
The Author
(Christopher Story) mentioned that in 1932, William
Z. Foster, the late leader of the Communist Party
USA, wrote in his book
'Toward
Soviet America'
the objective of
Communism was the establishment of a
'New World
Social Order'
In 1985, two Soviet
apparatchiks, F. Petrenko and V.Popov, explined [in
'Soviet Foreign Policy, Objectives and Principles'
, Progress
Publishers , Moscow} that 'the transition step to a
'New World
Order'
involves merging
the newly captured nations into regional
governments'. In 1942 Stalin wrote:
As growing numbers
of nations fall to the revolution, it becomes
possible to reunite them under a
COMMUNIST
WORLD REGIME'
[International
Publishers, New York]
Lenin wrote that
the Communists' aim was 'a
future union of all nations in a single
world...system'.
This
objective - Single World
Communist Dictatorship-remains unchanged.
The point is' says Yelena Bonner, widow of Andrei
Sakharov, 'that the Communist goal is fixed and
changeless -it never varies one iota from their
objective of
WORLD DOMINATION
but
if we judge them only by the direction in which they
seem to be going,
WE SHALL BE
DECEIVED'.
SOVIET ANALYST,
a strategic intelligence newsletter, provides a
necessary antidote to fashionable
'politically-correct'
and therefore confused thinking, about revolutionary
developments in the so-called 'former'
SOVIET BLOC countries,
and their consequences
FOR THE WHOLE
WORLD
www.sovietanalyst.com
*
HOME
|
Austrian intelligence says US organizations are funding immigration into Europe
by Steve Goode • August 16, 2015
An anonymous employee from the Austrian Defense Office, which is operated by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Defense, says that some groups in the USA are paying smugglers to get more African and Middle Eastern immigrants into Europe.
“Traffickers demand exorbitant sums to bring refugees to Europe illegally. The conditions are often very poor, but still a transport does currently cost 7000-14000 Euro…” the Austrian Defense Office employee told Info-Direkt.at.
“There are insights that organizations from the US have created a co-financing model and contribute substantial amounts to trafficker’s costs.”
“Not every refugee from North Africa has 11,000 euros in cash. Nobody asks where the money comes from.”
The employee said that there was a “strict news blackout” on how the African and Middle Eastern immigrants were able to pay the traffickers fees.
If this is true, then it means various anti-White groups have resorted to paying for non-White illegal immigrants, instead of legal ones, all so they can make White Europeans a vanishing minority.
While these anti-Whites claim to be building “diverse” societies, it seems highly suspicious that ONLY White countries are targeted to
become
“diverse”.
http://whitegenocideproject.com/austrian-intelligence-says-us-organizations-are-funding-immigration-into-europe/
Comment by intruth on September 8, 2015 @ 1:52 am