- (1994 -Official Website - JUNE-PT 3-2018 )-- 

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018        JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018        JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE 

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

WHY I WANT

OUT OF THE EU

 

I want out because I fear that our

NATIONAL IDENTITY

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and tradition of liberal democracy are under

THREAT

from the EU's rules on the

FREE MOVEMENT of PEOPLE

and its

INSANE

HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME

I WANT OUT

because I believe that

BRUSSEL'S

attempts to impose

UNIFORMITY

on hugely diverse peoples are holding economies back, destroying livelihoods and breeding dangerous ill-feelings between

NATIONS.

I WANT OUT

so that we can regain the right to elect those who make our laws-and to

DISMISS THEM IF THEY FAIL US

I'm sick of seeing my country infantilised by an

UNSACKABLE NANNY STATE.

IN A WORD

I WANT OUT BECAUSE I WANT

BRITAIN

[ENGLAND]

TO BE FREE

*

Tom Utley for the Daily Mail

[We couldn't have put it better-Thank you!- Tom Utley.

TOM UTLEY: Oh dear. Is the fact my wife was a bus ... - Daily Mail-Friday, June 3,2016l

*  *  *

News for DAILY MAIL-Father's Day cards for single mums by Tom Utley-June 8, 2018.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.805

 

Elizabeth 1st

OF

ENGLAND

  reviewed her troops at Tilbury-(1588).

'My loving people,' she said, we have been persuaded by some that are careful of our safety to take head how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people

LET TYRANTS FEAR!

I have always so behaved myself that , under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects; and therefore am I come amongst you, as you see,

AT THIS TIME

-to lay down my life for my God

AND FOR MY KINGDOM

and for

MY PEOPLE

MY HONOUR

and

MY BLOOD

even in the dust.

I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble women;

BUT I HAVE A HEART OF A KING

and of a

KING of ENGLAND

too, and I think foul scorn that Parma or Spain,

or any

PRINCE of EUROPE

SHOULD DARE TO INVADE THE BORDERS OF MY REALM.'

1588

...Shakespeare, the greatest of them all, expressed the feeling which taught Englishmen that their well-being lay in unity among themselves which sprang from their devotion to their queen, when he wrote:-

 

'This England never did-nor never shall

Lie at the proud foot of a conqueror,

But when it first did help to wound itself.'

 

 

[S.R. Gardiner-Outline of English History]

In June 2008

 Her Majesty The  Queen

[Each word  above has a separate bulletin]

rather than say

'NO'

or threaten to abdicate if asked to sign the

LISBON TREATY

without

HER PEOPLE

being given a

REFERENDUM -AS PROMISED

has

BETRAYED HER PEOPLE.

We await the decision of the

LAW LORDS

the Lions under the Throne

of

ENGLAND

[Each word has a separate bulletin]

To protect the accustomed

"Rights and Liberties"

of the

ENGLISH PEOPLE

as stated in our Great Charter

MAGNA  CARTA  

  of 1215

 

And the rallying call of the English people at times of peril from unaccustomed demands from their representatives in

PARLIAMENT

More!

In June 2008

AND LATER ADDITIONS

H.F.1088 

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

LITTLEJOHN

We need a fearless leader to deliver

BREXIT

- Nigel Farage:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN believes the former Ukip leader should be an integral part of the process after campaigning for so long

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly

Enoch Powell said famously that all political careers end in failure. Nigel Farage should have proved him wrong.

Farage’s career should — repeat should — have ended in triumph. After all, he went into politics with just one aim and succeeded spectacularly.

Up to a point.

The magnificent Leave victory in 2016 was a vindication of Farage’s virtually single-handed campaign to get Britain out of the EU.

Yes, others can also take credit. But Farage was the figurehead, often a lone voice in the wilderness. 

No one had to endure the vilification and violence directed at Farage as he took his message around the country year after year, well before Call Me Dave finally buckled and gave the people a long-overdue referendum.

Fifteen years ago, when I was presenting a nightly show on Sky News, I was about the only broadcaster who would give him a regular platform. The mainstream media treated him as a pariah — at best a circus act, at worst a neo-Nazi. 

This was around the time that New Labour was almost unanimously agreed to have established a 1,000-year reich and opposition to our glorious future as a European statelet was considered futile.

Aside from a few principled players in the Conservative Party — former leader and one-time Maastricht rebel Iain Duncan Smith prominent among them — the political establishment wholeheartedly embraced the EU project. 

But Farage kept banging away, making mischief in Brussels, where he’d managed to get himself elected as an MEP and used his position to ridicule the pompous panjandrums running the show.

Who can forget his wonderful denunciation of the ridiculous Herman Van Rompuy, self-styled former European ‘president’?

‘You have the charisma of a damp rag, and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk . . . Who are you? I’d never heard of you. Nobody in Europe had ever heard of you.

‘I would like to ask you, President, who voted for you . . . oh, I know democracy’s not popular with you lot, and what mechanism do the people of Europe have to remove you?

‘Is this European democracy? You appear to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states — perhaps that’s because you come from Belgium, which of course is pretty much a non-country . . .

‘Sir, you have no legitimacy in this job at all, and I can say with confidence that I speak on behalf of the majority of British people in saying: We don’t know you, we don’t want you, and the sooner you’re put out to grass, the better.’

The Westminster bubble was horrified. How dare this upstart show such a lack of respect to our European masters? But out in the suburbs and the shires, and on the rundown council estates in the North of England, millions of decent British citizens gave a silent cheer.

Call Me Dave dismissed Farage’s Ukip as a collection of ‘fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’. It was a cruel caricature, but partly accurate. Ukip’s annual conference certainly resembles a roomful of Hyacinth Buckets and men who model themselves on the Major in Fawlty Towers.

But Ukip was on a roll — and by now Farage was a ubiquitous presence in radio and TV studios, even if he was often only there as an Aunt Sally, to be shouted at by self-righteous presenters and panellists alike.

Yet Farage stood up to the verbal slings and arrows, and to the nasty physical abuse he frequently had to endure. Cigarette in one hand, pint of best in the other, he kept on plugging away.

In the 2015 General Election, Ukip polled almost four million votes, a large chunk of them in former Labour strongholds in the North, which felt ignored and abandoned and had suffered the greatest impact from mass immigration.

Farage’s ‘fruitcakes’ didn’t make a parliamentary breakthrough but they delivered the Tories their first Commons majority since 1992, simply by denying Labour seats they had taken for granted.

Now, Cameron feared, they were coming for the Tories, so he panicked and promised a referendum on EU membership. 

Say what you like about Call Me Dave, but this was his greatest gift to the people of Britain, an opportunity we seized, asserting our sovereignty and overturning the decades-old project of submerging our country into an anti-democratic United States of Europe.

 

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be

Cameron’s gamble backfired. He resigned immediately and is now reduced to scraping a living on the international lecture circuit, essentially a political end-of-the-pier show.

Next week, he’s playing a small town theatre in Florida, but has sold fewer seats than its current production, Million Dollar Quartet, a jukebox musical featuring hits by Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis.

In the States, where they value national independence, Farage is a folk hero, a bigger draw than our former Prime Minister.

And yet.

OK, so the referendum wouldn’t have been won without Boris, Gove and the brave career politicians who dared to defy the Establishment stitch-up. But without Farage, there would have been no referendum, nor would there have been any Brexit.

What kind of Brexit, if any, remains to be seen. Which, presumably, is why Farage is now muttering about making a comeback as part of a Ukip Mark II.

The corpse of the old Ukip is still twitching, but without Farage it’s nothing. The party’s on its third post-Farage leader, no one you’ve ever heard of, and he’s on the way out over a few incendiary tweets sent by some dopey bird half his age he’s got himself hooked up with. I can’t be bothered to go into details, because it’s a waste of time.

To paraphrase Monty Python’s parrot sketch, Ukip is an ex-party, it has ceased to be.

One of the reasons Ukip imploded was because those four million voters returned to the two main parties, both of which made manifesto promises to implement Brexit in full, yet now seem hell-bent on either reneging or watering it down so far it becomes meaningless.

So I understand and share Farage’s concern. As I’ve said all along, the fix has been in since the result of the referendum was announced. The political class have stolen our biggest vote in history for anything and made it all about them — not the people they are paid to serve.

Frankly, I don’t trust any of them to deliver the Brexit we voted for. If the vast majority of MPs had their way, they’d stop the whole process in its tracks today. When Theresa May succeeded Call Me Dave, she should have established a grand cross-party coalition to negotiate our departure, including heroic Labour figures such as Gisela Stuart and Kate Hoey.

But the central player should have been Farage, a man who knows his way around Brussels and scares the EU to death.

He’d never have put up with the contemptuous treatment being meted out to Britain by Michel Barnier and his ‘damp-rag, low-grade bank clerk’ bureaucrats.

Instead, we’re stuck with Mother Theresa, who spent the referendum hiding behind the sofa and still won’t say whether she’d vote Leave if it was held today.

Her new de facto deputy, David Lidington, is a full-on federast, already speculating we could rejoin the EU at some stage. Rejoin? We haven’t even left yet — and never will, other than in name only, if the political establishment prevails.

Even David Davis seems to have gone native and Boris has been banished to the outer darkness, certainly when it comes to Brexit. In what kind of Fred Karno government is the Foreign Secretary excluded from the biggest foreign policy issue facing the country in modern history?

Never mind Boris, though. Mrs May should be making plans for Nigel, bringing him into the fold, allowing him to be an integral part of the very Brexit process for which he has campaigned so long, so hard and so selflessly.

He doesn’t need a knighthood, or a sinecure in the Lords — each of which would have been a traditional reward for his service to this country. Given the fuss over Mrs Thatcher’s memorial, I suppose a statue in Parliament Square is out of the question, too.

But what is beyond doubt is that, after Thatcher, Farage is the most influential, most significant British political figure since Churchill — much more so than the Westminster pygmies and time-servers who treat him with unwarranted disdain.

Ukip, the party he led, may be sleeping with the fishes, but if there is any justice, Farage’s career deserves to end in triumph.

Let’s hope Enoch was wrong.

 


Read more:   
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5300489/We-need-fearless-leader-deliver-Brexit-Nigel-Farage.html#ixzz55RBjzeYS

 

H.F.1460

*  *  *

 
 

Public sector pay branded a 'gilded staircase' where officials are handed ever growing salaries by a senior MP

  • Labour MP Meg Hillier expressed concern about public sector 'fat cats' 

  • The head teachers of some academy schools earn more money than the PM

  • Ms Hillier described the rapidly increasing pay awards as a 'gilded staircase'  

 

he ‘gilded staircase’ of public sector pay where officials are handed ever-growing salaries was condemned by a senior MP yesterday.

Meg Hillier, who chairs the Commons public accounts committee, said it was worrying how much public money went to fat cats.

In her annual report, the Labour MP highlighted the issue of head teachers at academy schools being paid more than the Prime Minister.

 

Labour MP Meg Hillier, pictured, expressed

concern

over so-called public sector fat cats 

‘We see a worrying trend in pay escalation in some sectors – a gilded staircase where pay keeps going up because the senior people in the sector convince themselves they are worth more,’ she said.

‘The recent examples are vice-chancellors of universities and senior staff in the academy sector.

‘Academies were set up to have certain freedoms but overly high salaries paid by taxpayers should be called out. It is particularly galling, when many schools are losing staff, that some individuals are being paid well beyond what most people would consider to be reasonable.’

Miss Hillier also noted the high redundancy payments for executives behind the HS2 high-speed rail line.

She wrote: ‘It made £1.76million of unauthorised payments to staff at enhanced terms. This is money that cannot be recovered.’

Miss Hillier also warned against ‘selling off the taxpayers’ silver’. She wrote: ‘We are seeing a worrying trend of assets being sold for a short term capital gain at the expense of lost future income and, critically, a loss of control of a taxpayer owned asset.’

‘The sell-off of court buildings are part of plans to reduce the need for physical appearances in court, and part of the Ministry of Justice’s wider reforms and efforts to make savings. But these buildings were built for a specific purpose and once gone would be costly to rebuild.’

 

 

ADDITIONS

 

Five householders cannot identify Japanese...

 

 

Cyclists in tight shorts 'put fertility at risk' as so...

 

FULL ARTICLE

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

[OVER THE PAST DECADES WE HAVE RAISED THIS ISSUE, ONE OF MANY-WHETHER IT IS REDUCED IMMIGRATION-POTHOLES-MORE PRISONS-'BOBBIES-ON -THE -BEAT' AS SHOWN TO BE MOST EFFECTIVE BY DURHAM CONSTABULARY- WASTE OF FOREIGN AID TO DICTATORS-EVEN TO OUR ENEMIES-A GREAT DEAL OF WHICH COULD BE USED MORE EFFECTIVELY AT HOME...AND THE ARTICLE ABOVE SHOWS HOW THE HARD-PRESSED TAX-PAYER IS PAYING OUT LOTTERY-SIZE SALARIES AND PENSIONS SHOWING THE INSATIABLE GREED - EPITOMISED BY THE MONEY-BAGS -CITY OF LONDON.]

 

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

H. F.1593

 
 

LETTER TO THE LETTERS SECTION OF THE DAILY MAIL-MONDAY,AUGUST 25,2014

COMPLY or DIE

FOR generations, the British people have welcomed people of all nations to share their life and economy

It is true that not everyone liked the new arrivals, but the immigrants integrated, embraced democracy and contributed to society in what was essentially a Christian country and which was viewed as such by those incomers.

Recently, these dynamics have been changed drastically by the emergence of a belligerent, vocal, fundamentalist Islam. These are not ignorant peasants, but include intelligent, well-educated individuals, who are fanatical in their beliefs, unafraid to die and capable of using the civil liberties and human rights laws to pursue their objectives.

Why haven't the hard-working family-orientated Muslims, many of whom are second and third generation citizens, raised their voices and rejected them? The answer is simple:

FEAR.

Look around the world and see what Muslim is capable of doing to Muslim Families fear the radicalisation of their young and repercussions of raising their head above the parapet.

Fundamentalist Islam

is a

TOTALITARIAN SOCIETY

 where the choice is simple:

COMPLY or DIE

You cannot blame law-abiding  and fearful Muslims for

KEEPING QUIET

when the British authorities are unwilling or incapable of action because the very laws EUROPE  has passed to protect DEMOCRACY and eliminate racism are CLEVERLY manipulated by

EXTREMISTS to pursue their own AGENDA

How many church bells have been silenced because Muslims were offended by the sound of them? How many people have been told not to wear crosses in the workplace because it could be considered offensive to Muslims?

The question is which Muslims?

 Certainly not my neighbours.

Women are permitted in this country to walk about in public with their faces entirely covered but this is not a requirement of the KORAN as interpreted by most Muslims and not a requirement in a great many Muslim countries

Radical religious teachers are allowed to indoctrinate Muslim children, young men and women are persuaded to go and fight abroad for

 TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS

and then return as full citizens with their rights intact.

Are the British authorities so blind that they cannot see what is happening under their noses. Perhaps when the flag of the

CALIPHATE

is flying above civic buildings they will realise thety have the choice of

'COMPLY or DIE'

Name supplied, Manchester

*

[The majority of politicians turn a blind eye because they wont the votes and until the Human Rights legislation is scrapped and we leave the EU it is very unlikely that anything will change.   We understand the reluctance of many Muslims to keep under cover knowing the character of the opposition but with such a dangerous situation at the present time it is going to get even worse in the near future so it is most vital that democratically minded Muslims must  fight for what they believe in- as there is no other way out of the present impasse except that they

VOTE FOR UKIP

who want

OUT OF THE EU AND THE  HUMAN RIGHTS LAW SCRAPPED

*

AUGUST 25,2014

 

[In a park in Birmingham in June 2018 we saw 140,000 devote Muslims on their knees praying to their God. Such a scene is awesome to witness - its power as ONE! that which any Government should understand must be  integrated as a necessity to be assured that such Godly power is for the benefit of all who live in our island home and not a preface to the introduction of an ISLAMIC STATE..]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H. F. 54

 
July 19, 2016

5 facts about the Muslim population in Europe

Recent killings in Paris as well as the arrival of hundreds of thousands of mostly Muslim refugees in Europe have drawn renewed attention to the continent’s Muslim population. In many European countries, including France, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, concerns about growing Muslim communities have led to calls for restrictions on immigration. But just how large is Europe’s Muslim population, and how fast is it growing?

Muslim population in EuropeUsing the Pew Research Center’s most recent population estimates, here are five facts about the size and makeup of the Muslim population in Europe:

1Germany and France have the largest Muslim populations among European Union member countries. As of 2010, there were 4.8 million Muslims in Germany (5.8% of the country’s population) and 4.7 million Muslims in France (7.5%). In Europe overall, however, Russia’s population of 14 million Muslims (10%) is the largest on the continent.

2The Muslim share of Europe’s total population has been increasing steadily. In recent decades, the Muslim share of the population throughout Europe grew about 1 percentage point a decade, from 4% in 1990 to 6% in 2010. This pattern is expected to continue through 2030, when Muslims are projected to make up 8% of Europe’s population.

3Muslims are younger than other Europeans. In 2010, the median age of Muslims throughout Europe was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans (40). By contrast, the median age of religiously unaffiliated people in Europe, including atheists, agnostics and those with no religion in particular, was 37. The median age of European Christians was 42.

4Views of Muslims vary widely across European countries. A Pew Research Center survey conducted this spring in 10 nations found that in eastern and southern Europe, negative views prevailed. However, the majority of respondents in the UK, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands gave Muslims a favorable rating. Views about Muslims are tied to ideology. While 47% of Germans on the political right give Muslims an unfavorable rating, just 17% on the left do so. The gap between left and right is also roughly 30 percentage points in Italy and Greece. 

5As of 2010, the European Union was home to about 13 million Muslim immigrants. The foreign-born Muslim population in Germany is primarily made up of Turkish immigrants, but also includes many born in Kosovo, Iraq, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Morocco. The roughly 3 million foreign-born Muslims in France are largely from France’s former colonies of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.

Note: This is an update of a post originally published on Jan. 15, 2015. 

Category: 5 Facts

Topics: Europe, Muslims and Islam

  1. Photo of Conrad Hackett
    is a demographer focusing on religion at Pew Research Center.

509 Comments

 

H.F.1027 BREXIT NOW

 
 
  1. DAILY MAIL

  2. Islamic extremists call

     

     

     to set up three

     

     

     

     

    Independent states in the UK

     

     

     

    [ENGLAND]...

*

 

 

[This article was written in 2011 -Why the Press insist in using the synonym UK when ENGLAND is the correct designation particularly as we now live in an island home which includes in almost all respects two other separate States-to remind -of WALES and SCOTLAND. To say something happened in the UK dissipates the importance and seriousness of the matter to those who live in the areas concerned . This is the obvious result of the persistence in the 1930's onwards of the use by  Editors of the islands territorial limits name of BRITAIN instead of ENGLAND which Gordon Brown was so found of raising so persistently even when on occasions it was obvious that he was talking about ENGLAND. However , when he was in France at the D-DAY Celebration he was more realistic when he stated he was the PRIME MINISTER of ENGLAND

 

 

THE ENEMY WITHIN

 

With regard to the article we can see that with no  effective measures having  been taken in the Birmingham  Muslim 'Trojan Horse' schools indoctrination programme that the extremists of the schools are laughing about how stupid and naive were the government that permitted such large immigration from a MUSLIM CULTURE without realizing that a hard core of Muslim extremists would take advantage of our FREE SOCIETY for their OWN ENDS to create a MUSLIM STATE  with SHARIA LAW within

ENGLAND.

We hear today that the SECURITY SERVICES and POLICE have their hands full in watching the hundreds possibly thousands of Muslim extremists that must be queuing up to have a few years in prison -if they were so lucky-so that they could indoctrinate many more of their FAITH within the prison walls but most likely as is the usual practice to enjoy a holiday at BUTLINS - sorry- I meant the so aptly called OPEN PRISON.

 

 
DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT -July 5-2014

This paper applauds the 100 imams from every branch of
ISLAM,

who have written to UK Muslims urging them to stay away from Syria and Iraq, where more than

600

 BRITONS

are said to be fighting

In a religion LACKING A FIGUREHEAD-A POPE, ARCHBISHOP or CHIEF RABBI-

the voice of the moderate majority is far too seldom heard

Let this be the start of a concerted and sustained campaign by preachers to remind the young of their religious duty to

PEACE.

*

[On   August 22-2014 we have seen no evidence that those of the Islamic faith are on the streets protesting against ISIS and their brutality.]

H F-SP2/ 10

 

  We stated many years ago that immigration from Muslim countries should have been severely restricted to ensure that they integrated fully into our FREE SOCIETY before any further immigration from that CULTURE was renewed. With the BIRTH-RATE in favour of the Muslim of 4 to 1 it will not take many generations before they realize their dream of that ISLAMIC STATE. There are already over  56 independent SHARIA COURTS dispensing  THEIR KIND OF JUSTICE in ENGLAND which should not have been permitted because of the affect on the rights of women.   There is no doubt that this has been permitted to happen because the JEWISH population also have their own privileges which might explain WHY! little or nothing has been done in the cases of MUSLIM EXTREMISM.

WE have one LAW in ENGLAND and ALL! should abide by it or LEAVE! there can be NO ALTERNATIVES.]

*

 

 
DAILY MAIL

The-coming-apocalypse-Last-week-historian-DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-wrote-damning-critique-West-s-failure-halt-Islamic-fanatics-Now-savage-murder-confirmed-worst-fears-looks-future.

AUGUST 23-2014

H F S P2- 12A

 

[comments in brackets are ours!]

OCTOBER 16-2014

 

 

H F 354

 
 

 

KILLERS
BETRAY ISLAM AND ALL MUSLIMS

COMMENTARY by Dr Taj Hargey

DIRECTOR OF THE MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL CENTRE OF OXFORD

*

DAILY MAIL, Friday, January 9, 2015

 

 

THERE has understandably been revulsion and outrage across the world at the massacre in Paris, one of the darkest atrocities perpetuated in France for decades. All right-minded people will join  unequivocally in condemnation of this barbarous pitiless act

Our response must be one of resolution in defence of liberty and freedom of expression, two of the central foundations of our democratic society. There can be no compromise with the twisted extremist ideology that inspired this slaughter.

LikLike all Islamic fanatics, the perpetrators of the Charlie Hebdo killings loathe the liberal values of open ,pluralistic societies.  Driven by their wilfully perverted misinterpretation of the MUSLIM FAITH, they want to establish theocratic, authoritarian rule across WESTERN EUROPE, complete with all the instruments of dogmatic oppression, including the compulsory wearing of the face veil for Muslin women.

European authorities must not give in to this blackmail, imposed through the barrel of a Kalashnikov or the shell of a suicide bomb. The principles of freedom must be upheld for all citizens including Muslims.

For the truth is that there is nothing remotely Islamic about all this murderous fundamentalism. The true tradition of the Muslim religion is one of

TOLERANCE and RESPECT for OTHERS.

 When the Prophet Mohammed moved from Mecca in 622AD to establish the first Islamic State, he did not set up a sectarian Caliphate like today's violent thugs in Al Qaeda and ISIS demand. On the contrary, in the Charter of Medina he created a multicultural, multifaith society where the rights of everyone, Muslims , Jews, Christians or pagans were upheld.

So the idea, so popular among the zealots, of Islamic supremacy under

SHARIA LAW

has absolutely no basis in either the Koran or the earliest biography of the Prophet.

Just as false is the belief that the Koran provides some sort of justification for the Charlie Hebdo murders, on the grounds that the satiracal magazine has consistently published derogatory images about Islam.

THIS IS DANGEROUS NONSENSE

As a devote Muslim, I have been deeply offended by some of the vulgar material in Charlie Hebdo. Indeed, it has often seemed the magazine went bout of its way to be gratuitously childishly provocative. But I would defend without reservation the magazine's right to publish such stuff.

THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

MUSLIMS who want to avoid being offended don't have to buy the magazine or read it. In our open society, we cannot allow one group to impose censorship in the name of protecting

THEIR FAITH

from any ridicule, mockery or even criticism.

As they left the scene of the massacre at the Charlie Hebdo office on Wednesday, the assailants shouted

'Allahu Akabar'

(God is the greatest.)

and 'the Prophet Mohammed has been avenged'. But this is another warping of theology.

NOWHERE does the KORAN sanction taking any human life in the name of defending the Prophet's reputation.  A host of verses, like Chapter 109, verse 6, or chapter 10, verse 99, actually set out the need to defend

FREEDOM of RELIGION.

According to the Muslim scripture, no one has the right to deny other people-whether they are Christian, humani9st or even atheist-their beliefs. Similarly, the

CHARTER of MEDINA

lays down the right of all citizens to be

FREE and EQUAL.

So, contrary to all the vicious despotic propaganda from ISIS and Al Qaeda, respect for essential liberties is at the crux of

ISLAM.

The supposed 'crimes' of blasphemy and apostasy have  been invented by the

RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS

to justify their jihadism and have no basis in

TRUE ISLAM.

That is highlighted by two key incidents in the life of the Prophet, who called on his followers to ignore the ridicule and contempt on him.  In Chapter 74, verse 11, responding to complaints that he had been labelled 'crazy' and 'a sorcerer' the Koran reveals that God will ultimately deal with all those who mock him. It is not for us on Earth to decide their fate.

In the same vein , when Mohammed first put forward the revelations he received from God that would constitute the

KORAN

one of the renowned poets of the time, Musaylimah, became vexed at Mohammed's growing power.  He therefore claimed that his own poems had been inspired by divine revelations and that he and Mohammed should work together to rule the nascent Muslim community.

Mohammed's followers were appalled at this effrontery and urged the Prophet to take action.  But Mohammed merely said:

'Let him be. He is just a liar. Ignore him.'

So,' Musaylimah, the Liar'  is the name history remembers him by -profound theological proof that the Prophet felt distain, not blood-soaked vengeance, was the correct response to mockery.

 That should have been the reaction of all Muslims to even the most provocative Charlie Hebdo cartoons.  The Prophet does not need to be protected by self-proclaimed zealots.

 God will protect his reputation.

Indeed, it is an offence against Islam to assume the role of religious defender, with the arbitrary power of life and death against declared enemies of the faith.

 

FREEDOM of RELIGION.

According to the Muslim scripture, no one has the right to deny other people-whether they are Christian, humani9st or even atheist-their beliefs. Similarly, the

CHARTER of MEDINA

lays down the right of all citizens to be

FREE and EQUAL.

So, contrary to all the vicious despotic propaganda from ISIS and Al Qaeda, respect for essential liberties is at the crux of

ISLAM.

The supposed 'crimes' of blasphemy and apostasy have  been invented by the

RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS

to justify their jihadism and have no basis in

TRUE ISLAM.

That is highlighted by two key incidents in the life of the Prophet, who called on his followers to ignore the ridicule and contempt on him.  In Chapter 74, verse 11, responding to complaints that he had been labelled 'crazy' and 'a sorcerer' the Koran reveals that God will ultimately deal with all those who mock him. It is not for us on Earth to decide their fate.

In the same vein , when Mohammed first put forward the revelations he received from God that would constitute the

KORAN

one of the renowned poets of the time, Musaylimah, became vexed at Mohammed's growing power.  He therefore claimed that his own poems had been inspired by divine revelations and that he and Mohammed should work together to rule the nascent Muslim community.

Mohammed's followers were appalled at this effrontery and urged the Prophet to take action.  But Mohammed merely said:

'Let him be. He is just a liar. Ignore him.'

So,' Musaylimah, the Liar'  is the name history remembers him by -profound theological proof that the Prophet felt distain, not blood-soaked vengeance, was the correct response to mockery.

 That should have been the reaction of all Muslims to even the most provocative Charlie Hebdo cartoons.  The Prophet does not need to be protected by self-proclaimed zealots.

 God will protect his reputation.

Indeed, it is an offence against Islam to assume the role of religious defender, with the arbitrary power of life and death against declared enemies of the faith.

There is not the slightest theological vindication for that kind of savagely arrogant conduct in Islam, all life is sacred and no one has the right to end it in the name of the deity or to take the

LAW INTO THEIR OWN HANDS.

 Filled with HATRED, the Charlie Hebdo KILLERS took it on themselves to act as

JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONERS.

IN doing so, they were real heretics . They not only betrayed Islam but also shamed Muslims...

  When Muslims are finally able to move away from clerically-manipulated theocracy and return to the uncorrupted divine text of the religion, they will clearly see through all the horrific posturing of the jihadi militants

Muslims will then be able  to embrace the Koran's pristine vision, with its emphasis on

INCLUSIVENESS -PLURALISM- PEACEFUL

co-existence and mutual respect.

This  is the message that will be preached at our mosque in Oxford. And it presents a far more appealing world that the terrifying, macho sectarianism the crazed zealots want to inflict upon us all,

*  *  *

[TO BE CONTINUED.]

 

 

WE ARE TOLD THAT ONLY A SMALL NUMBER OF PROFESSED MUSLIMS ARE UNTRUE TO THE TEACHING OF THE PROPHET SO WHY HAVEN'T THE GREATER NUMBER OF  TRUE MUSLIMS NOT TAKEN EFFECTIVE ACTION TO DESTROY THE IMPOSTORS OF THE MUSLIM FAITH. 

 AS GHANDI SHOWED MOST EFFECTIVELY THAT NON-VIOLENT ACTION CAN BE MOST SUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING AN OBJECTIVE SUCH AS FREEDOM>  SO WHY DO TRUE MUSLIMS NOT ARISE AND COVER THE COMMUNITIES THEY LIVE IN FROM THE ACTIONS OF THE IMPOSTORS OF THEIR TRUE RELIGION>

OVER THE YEARS MANY CLERICS SUCH AS DR TAJ HARGEY HAVE VOICED THEIR CONCERNS AT THE LACK OF ACTION BY TRUE MUSLIMS AND IT IS THAT VERY FAILURE WHICH IS BAFFLING THE ONCE SETTLED PEOPLES OF THOSE COUNTRIES WHO HAVE RECEIVED MILLIONS OF MUSLIMS WITHIN THEIR COMMUNITIES>

TO MANY PEOPLE IT IS AS IF THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED TO ACHIEVE AN ISLAMIC STATE RATHER THAN INTEGRATE INTO THEIR NEW ONCE SETTLED LANDS.

TO STAND BY AND ALLOW  THE  NAME OF ISLAM TO BE USED IN THE SLAUGHTER OF INNOCENTS  MUST SURELY BE UNWORTHY OF ANY TRUE RELIGION .

JANUARY  20-2018

ON THE 4TH JUNE-2018 DOC

Dr Taj Hargey

DIRECTOR OF THE MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL CENTRE OF OXFORD

AFTER MANY YEARS YEARS REQUESTING THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE STRONGER ACTION AGAINST THE CRIMINAL ELEMENT WITHIN THE FAITH AND THOSE WHO REFUSE TO INTEGRATE ESTIMATED BY THE MAIL TO BE APPROXIMATELY 60 %-OF THE OVER 3.000,000 MUSLIMS IN ENGLAND.

IS STILL WAITING.

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS ARE OURS!]

DAILY MAIL, Friday, January 9, 2015

H.F.1445

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM OCTOBER 16-2006

Daily Mail

Monday, October 16,2006

 

SUDDENLY, Britain seems to be developing into a cultural and religious battleground. Hard on the heels of Jack Straw’s criticism of the Muslim full-face veil, local government minister Phil Woolas has said that Aishah Azmi the Dewsbury teaching assistant who insists on wearing a veil in her primary school class-room, should be sacked.

Not to be outdone, the Shadow Home Secretary, David Davis, has accused Muslims of promoting a kind of ‘voluntary apartheid’

-by shutting themselves away in closed societies and demanding immunity from criticism, corroding the very foundations of

BRITISH

 [ENGLISH] CULTURE

Meanwhile, British Airways is being sued for religious discrimination after it required a Christian women employee to conceal her cross while permitting other faiths to wear turbans, hijabs or Hindu bangles.

*

[This is classic political-correctness, which identifies with any faith or mantra provided it is

NOT CHRISTIAN.

The home culture is to be suppressed to show how tolerant and noble we are in our diversity agenda even if it places in peril the very identification of a land and people of over 1400 years as the home of

CHRISTIANITY. ]

To return:

This echoed the controversy earlier this month when the BBC agonized over whether newsreader Fiona Bruce should wear a small cross on a chain in case it might cause offence.

[In a Christian country whose people in a recent poll  - with 70 per cent who acknowledged their faith whether practiced or not.]

How can Britain have arrived at a situation where it is seriously argued that a class of children who don’t speak English as their first language should be taught by a shrouded women whose expression they can’t see and whose voice they can’t hear properly – while the BBC thinks that wearing the symbol of Britain’s established religion might be offensive?

Extreme

 The source of this confusion is a profound loss of:

NATIONAL

CULTURAL

AND

RELIGIOUS NERVE.

 The Christian values that once defined NATIONAL IDENTITY

have simply collapsed, creating a cultural vacuum which

ISLAM –

Britain’s fastest –growing and most assertive religion –

is busily filling.

Those who defend the Muslim veil are grossly misreading the situation.  It is not some picturesque religious garment equivalent to the often-curious attire  worn by members of other religions.  It is associated instead with the most extreme version of

ISLAM

-which holds that Islamic values must take precedence over the secular state. Only a small minority of British Muslim women chooses to wear this veil.

BUT unlike other religious attire, it is thus inherently separatist and perceived by some as intimidatory.

 

That is WHY it is UNACCEPTABLE.

, there seems to be a dawning recognition in Government of the extreme danger into which British [English] society has been placed by the doctrine of MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow illegitimate, and by the official policy of appeasing Islamic extremism.

[We have over the past few days seen a fight back by the

Roman Catholic Church

to maintain

CHRISTIANITY

In Britain by gathering their flock to protect their religion brought to the islands those many tens of hundreds of years ago. 

The Anglican Church has been too accommodating with politicians for many decades and with a few exceptions particularly the recent appointment Archbishop of York  - Dr John Sentamu there has been silence and collusion with the secular State supported by Prince Charles

 ‘the man of many faiths and true supporter of none’

 

as he does not wish to offend anyone.

 

The CHRISTIAN religion is ENGLAND  and ENGLAND is the CHRISTIAN religion

and if Prince Charles cannot accept this covenant made over with the blood and soil and  stone of our land he should NEVER ascend the

CHRISTIAN THRONE OF ENGLAND.

The throne of England is not heredity it is for the Commons of England and the People to decide who they wish to defend their Christian Faith and Values.

 *

To return:

Hence Mr. Woolas’s remarks, the show of ministerial support for Jack Straw, and the threat last week by Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly to withstand funding from Muslim institutions that do not combat extremism.

Although hundreds of thousands of British Muslims have no truck with extremism, opinion polls reveal that between 40 to 60 per cent of British Muslims want to live under

SHARIA LAW

-and parts of our inner cities are fast becoming unofficial sharia enclaves.

 [MUCH INCREASED BY JUNE 2017]

IN 2018 THERE ARE AT LEAST 85 SHARIA COURTS]

This has led to desperate suggestions to combat such a threat to social cohesion. Lord Bruce-Lockhart, chairman of the Local Government Association, says schools should have racial quotas, while the Government is proposing to force faith schools to open a quarter of their intake to other faiths.

Both approaches are badly misguided. Faith schools would be forced to turn away children of their own religion in favour of others who would significantly dilute the cultural and religious identity of the school.

[This is typical New Labour they create the problem and then ask the innocent to pay the price

 

We now learn the Government has been forced on the back foot by the acquired lesson learnt by the Roman Catholic hierarchy that Blairites only react to strength as has been the case of the so-called minorities in our midst over the past nine years who have learnt that they only need to plead racial discrimination to obtain preferential treatment in disregard of the needs of the majority.]

*

And can anyone really see non-Muslim parents being forced to send their children to Muslim schools where-

 As one Muslim headmaster has already declared –non-Muslim girls would have to wear the hijab?

But the problem lies deeper still. It is not so much separation as a desire in some quarters to Islamise Britain.

 *

[This difficulty of integration by followers of the Muslim faith has been known for decades but successive governments continually allowed uncontrolled immigration from Muslim countries instead of only allowing only a moderate number of immigrants into the country and placed higher quotas to those who have proved their willingness to integrate.

As we have said on a number of occasions it is successive British governments who are responsible for the hundreds of Ghettos and No-Go areas growing in our cities containing up to a million possibly higher numbers who have declared openly their desire not to integrate but to change the cultural Christian religious structure  to one of ISLAM and SHARIA LAW.]

*

To return:

Mohammed Abdul Bari, chairman of the Muslim Council of Britain has said explicitly that he wants to encourage Britain to adopt Islamic traditions, including arranged marriages, and can’t see any reason why anyone should object. Unsurprisingly the MCB is now accusing MINISTERS of being ISLAMOPHOBIC.

[As we have already indicted above it is the successive governments who are to blame in allowing settlement in the first place knowing that millions of Muslims would naturally wish to make

 ENGLAND

a

MUSLIM COUNTRY.

 

ON THIS ISSUE

NOT ONE MUSLIM IS AT FAULT. 

 OUR GOVERNMENT –OUR CHRISTIAN LEADERS AND THE PEOPLE WHO LET UNLIMITED IMMIGRATION HAPPEN WITHOUT PROTEST ARE THE GUILTY PARTIES.

 

We now have amongst us millions of new comers who have no loyalty to our country and who long for the day when their ISLAM is the official religion of their adopted country.  As each day of each week and each month of the coming years there will be no way to stop the takeover of OUR COUNTRY as many cities now show..  And all they need to do to keep their silent conquest proceeding smoothly is to continuingly condemn the racist population on every opportunity [AS they did again in June-2018 ] and Tony Blair has given them enough reason for HATE to last for decades to come.

Our ONLY HOPE is that there will be a number of Muslim leaders who realize that COMPROMISE is in ORDER a confrontation must not take place and encourage their followers to integrate and understand the tolerant cultural and religious heritage of

ENGLAND

So that the strengths of both communities will become one to each mutual benefit.

 ANY OTHER WAY WILL LEAD TO TRAGEDY FOR ALL IN OUR SMALL ISLAND WHICH APART FROM AN INCIDENT OVER 700 YEARS AGO BUT RECTIFIED IN THE 19th CENTURY

WE HAVE NEVER REFUSED NEWCOMERS BUT ASKED FOR ALL TO BECOME ONE.]

 *

To return:

Certainly , it is vital to prevent the demonisation of all Muslims. But the fact is that the persistent failure to tackle extremism is providing fertile territory for white racists to exploit.

*

[BUT it is a fact that had successive governments controlled immigration by quotas and only permitted the bulk of that immigration to those who were able to integrate.  By controlling immigration it would have allowed for more housing to be provided and sufficient support services for those who would integrate.

What ever the Far Right have been accused of - the means for their support was provided by the silence of governments of the day.]

*

The recent disturbances in Windsor sounded an urgent alarm. The Muslim owner of a dairy in the town applied for planning permission to turn it into a MOSQUE and ISLAMIC CENTRE.

Although the Council turned down the application, locals say the owner ignored this and extremist worshippers regularly turned up in the dairy to pray.

*

[This incident is not unusual as after nine years of Tony Blair and his politically correct cronies and in the main the sheepish and defeatist attitude of Councils all over the country to any resentment by Muslims of rejections of planning consent for Mosques it would be most surprising if the Muslim did not dig in his heals knowing from what has happened in the past that the Council will give in rather than be accused of being racist.]

 *

Trouble flared when a 15-year-old non-Muslim boy was attacked outside the ‘mosque’. When the boy’s mother and 18-year –old-sister arrived to remonstrate they were apparently set upon by people, allegedly, wielding iron bars and pitchforks.

 They set in train four nights of disturbances when, according to the police, both white racists and Muslim extremists muscled in and the dairy was firebombed.

In a further unrelated but disturbing development in the town, four British soldiers returning from Afghanistan were forced to abandon a house they were planning to rent after threats and intimidation by Muslims. And all this in the heart of the Home Counties.

 

Such Islamic aggression is gaining ground because of the collapse of British majority values. In remarks in his controversial interviews that have been largely ignored, the head of the Army General Sir Richard Dannatt , observed that Britain’s Christian anchor had been pulled up, leaving the country’s ‘

moral compass spinning.’

As a result, its values were being threatened by a ‘considerable body of opinion that would like to challenge the nature of society.

*

[We have the reoccurring comment from

 Prince Charles

that he wishes to be

‘Defender of the Faiths’

NOT as before and since Alfred the King of the English over a thousand years ago.

‘DEFENDER OF THE FAITH’

 

And to remind Prince Charles that the FAITH the majority of people in this country have in mind is

CHRISTIAN FAITH.

 

Fortunately with King Alfred as an great  king who came to the throne by the wish of the witan and not as a hereditary king. We leave it to the

COMMONS of ENGLAND

And the PEOPLE

To decide who should be trusted with the protection of the Christian religion and values so ingrained over the centuries in the life and culture of our country.] 

 

Offensive

 

On this issue, the General was absolutely right.  Christianity is being written out of the national script.  Local councils have abolished Christmas as offensive.  Christian voluntary groups are denied funding on the grounds that they are not committed to ‘diversity’. And despite Ruth Kelly’s recent strictures, the Church of England is dismayed that her Commission for Cohesion and integration contains –

Astoundingly –

NO CHRISTIAN REPRESENTATIVE

[For the 70 per cent of people in a recent poll who professed the Christian faith –practiced or not.]

Within the Church itself, there are faint stirrings of a challenge to its hitherto supine surrender to cultural collapse. An unpublished paper written by the inter faith adviser to the Archbishop of Canterbury has been sidelined by’ preferential’ treatment afforded to the Muslim community, including using public funds to fly Muslim scholars to Britain, shelving legislation on forced marriage and encouraging national financial arrangements to comply with Islamic requirements.

The most grotesque example of all however, is surely the proposal to build the largest mosque in Europe on the site of the Olympic village in East London.

 [No doubt to be opened by Prince Charles with his banner to all the faiths unfurled –he should hang his head in shame for his not so much an act of toleration but the rejection of the identity and cultural heritage of the ESTABLISHED CHRISTIAN FAITH in our island HOME.]

*

To return:

[The mosque to occupy] the most prominent landmark on the Olympic site, West Ham –London it is intended to symbolize

ISLAMIC POWER

In

[ENGLAND]

BRITAIN.

[As there will soon be no such country as Britain with the independence of Scotland in the very near future it is time that commentators no longer use a term, which has virtually no significance.  Politicians have done great damage by hiding their destructive policies under a British label for too long.  It will be ENGLAND

to which will be identified the home of the largest mosque outside Europe –

NOT BRITAIN. ]

 

Worse still, it is being funded by the Tablighi Jamaat

Said by French intelligence and the FBI to be the most significant recruiters for al Qaeda in Europe.

 

And to cap it all, within a mile of the site, the largest

CHRISTIAN CHURCH

-the Kingsway International Christian Centre –

 has been  compulsorily purchased  and is about to come down.

 

 

What GREATER SYMBOL CAN THERE BE OF THE RETREAT OF CHRISTIANITY AND ITS REPLACEMENT MILITANT ISLAM?

 

THIS IS WHY THE ARGUMENT OVER THE PLACE OF THE VEIL AND THE CROSS IN PUBLIC LIFE IS SO SIGNIFICANT.

 

THIS IS NOT ABOUT PREJUDICE

OR
DISCRIMINATION

 

IT IS ABOUT CULTURAL SURVIVAL

 

*          *          *

[OF OUR OWN HERITAGE

 

[Font altered- bolding & underling used –comments in brackets]

 

[We now hear on Sunday 29th October 2006 that we have an Ambassador in the form of

Prince Charles

 on his way to a Muslim country.

 

Unfortunately we have the same apprehension when our Foreign secretary is out of our country that the FO seems to delight in apologising for some past event from our history and at the same time place at a disadvantage our citizens wherever they are in the world –some incarcerated.

We now have Prince Charles on another of his ‘All Faiths Crusade’ to right Justice and we know that there will be a penalty incurred for our CHrISTIAN people in his misjudged concessions have already shown themselves in the weakness of THE ANGLICAN Church –the Archbishop of York Dr John SEntamu excluded  -to defend the tenets of Christianity now for some years undermined by a Prince of the realm’s unconstitutional breach of the Coronation Oath which all past princE’s of the realm have held sacrOsAnt.

 

ONLY a Prince of the realm –a firm defender of the christian Faith  -will be respected by the World leaders of the World’s Faiths.

 

As over 800 years ago King Richard the Lionheart of England

and Saladin fought each other nobly and held each other worthy antagonists.

 

THE GREATER THE RANK THE GREATER THE RESPONSIBILITY

IN OCTOBER 2006 we send to a muslim country a prince of the realm who deserted his wife on the eve of his wedding and betrayed his wife and family and has betrayed his faith and country and still holds his illustrious RANK, WHICH should have been removed on his remarriage TO A DIVORCED WOMAN and destroyer of the marriage.

  

He is no FIRM friend of the Christian Faith

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND of the ENGLISH CONSTITUTION

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND OF TRUE ENGLISH VALUES AND WAY-of-life.

 

HE IS NO FIRM FRIEND OF HIS COUNTRY.

 

HE IS A FIRM FRIEND OF ISLAM

BUT

WILL NOT DEFEND

HIS ONCE INHERITANCE

 

‘DEFENDER OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH’

 

CO-JOINED WITH THE ANCIENT THRONE

 OF

 ENGLAND

ALFRED-CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH 

 

*          *          *

[FoNT altered-bolding & underlining used –comments in brackets.]

OCTOBER/06

 

 

H.F.730

 
 
 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

[ IN 2018 GERMANY  BANNED THE BURKA- IF THERESA MAY IS SO FOND OF ALL THINGS EU  WHY DOES SHE NOT ALSO FOLLOW SUITE? POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS NO DOUBT THE ANSWER.]

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

[WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.]

Tuesday, August 29,2017

H.F.1289

 

 

 DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

 

I DESPAIR OF BRITISH MUSLIMs

 

WHO CHOOSE TO LIVE UNDER

 

VIRTUAL APATHEID

 

 

 

 

 

by Dr Taj Hargey

 

is director of the MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL CENTRE of OXFORD and IMAM of the OXFORD ISLAMIC CONGREGATION

 

+

 

DECEMBER 6-2016

 

 EXTRACT

AT LONG LAST, a senior government official has the gumption to warn about the devastating effect of MASS IMMIGRATION on LOCAL COMMUNITIES, highlighting the SEGREGATION, DIVISION and TENSION it causes in SOCIETY.

Such is the scale of the problem that in a report into our increasingly fractured communities, Dame Louise Casey, the Social Cohesion tsar, has called for all migrants to

SWEAR AN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO BRITAIN

Currently, immigrants do not have to make any formal commitment to integrating with the

REST OF SOCIETY

Unless they are actually applying for

UK CITIZENSHIP

Even then it is a facade.

To live here, no newcomer need make any promises at all to be productive stakeholders in BRITISH SOCIETY

Dame Louise's suggestion of an

OATH OF ALLEGIANCE

is a step in the right direction.

 BUT IT DOES NOT GO FAR ENOUGH.

Every single person who comes

HERE

to live should be obliged to sign up, in writing to the

BRITISH WAY OF LIFE.

Think of the UNITED KINGDOM as a prestigious golf club, the kind where membership is keenly sought after.

Anyone who wants to join will be expected  to

OBEY THE RULES

-all of them, not just the one's that confer

BENEFITS.

Applicants who refuse to sign to this will be turned away at the door, and members who f

FAIL TO HONOUR THE PLEDGE

will be swiftly

EXPELLED.

 No one forces the new members to apply to join in the first place - it's entirely their free choice. But there    should be no option other than abide by the rules, and no pussyfooting around with anyone who transgresses them. Otherwise, the club will fall apart and a

GREAT INSTITUTION WILL BE DESTROYED

...Supremacist

*

...Segregated

*

 

... Irrational

 

Above all, we must accept it is not racist to face up to the nightmare of the failure of

MULTICULTURALISM

To claim that some immigrants, because of their origins should be exempt from the common duties of

INTEGRATION

-THAT'S RACIST.

It is idiotic to champion the view that all cultures are equal when some endorse misogyny,  homophobia, honour killing and so forth

To say that some people because of their  religion or the colour of the skin, can ignore BRITISH VALUES of -RESPECT-PATRIOTISM DEMOCRACY-TOLERANCE and EQUALITY-THAT'S RACIST and IRRATIONAL.

 

We need to be FORTHRIGHT and ROBUST about THIS. If IMMIGRANTS are NOT prepared to FULLY INTEGRATE into BRITISH SOCIETY, arguing that it means sacrificing their religious identity, they can head to places such as

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Sudan.

In other words, if newcomers and other immigrants are NOT HAPPY in the UNITED KINGDOM and DO NOT WISH TO BE AN INTEGRAL PART of this VIBRANT DEMOCRACY,

THEY SHOULD LEAVE.

 

*  *  *

[A BRILLIANT CONSTRUCTIVE AND COURAGEOUS AND NECESSARILY BLUNT ANALYSIS GETTING TO THE CORE OF THE PROBLEM BUT HAD THIS ARTICLE BEEN IN PLACE DECADES AGO IT WOULD HAVE FORCED THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY TO PUT IT IN PLACE. UNFORTUNATELY ,TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE AND THERE IS LITTLE ENTHUSIASM BY GOVERNMENT TO IMPLEMENT SUCH  A DARING BOLD AND MOST NECESSARY  NATION STATE SAVING AGENDA.   WE HOPE WE ARE PROVED WRONG ,BUT ,UNLESS WE ACHIEVE A PARLIAMENT OF PATRIOTIC -HONEST-MEMBERS  IN THE SHORTLY COMING GENERAL ELECTION THERE WILL BE NO EFFECTIVE CHANGE POSSIBLE AND THE SETTLED PEOPLE OF ENGLAND WILL PAY THE ULTIMATE HEAVY PRICE! OF A TOO DREADFUL TO CONTEMPLATE

 FAILURE.]

 

*

 

 

Full article

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER 6-2016

H.F.1048 BREXIT NOW

 
DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

I rejoice that this toxic preacher is in jail. But why didn't more Muslims stand up to him.

 

 by Dr Taj Hargey

 EXTRACT

...Barbarous

Heavy funding from the Saudi regime ensures Wahhabism is now the most powerful force in most British mosques, faith schools, Muslim organisations and pressure groups like the Muslim Council of Britain.

The outward symbols 0f this primitive doctrine, like the burka and the niqab and bushy beards are increasingly seen as integral to British Islam, though they stem from archaic Arab life and have no theological basis in the Koran.

Yet tragically, it is the stranglehold of Wahhabism that has enabled figures like Choudary to flourish in our midst.

While most  Muslims are decent and peace-loving, characters like Choudary long went unchallenged by Muslim organisations because so many of them shared a similairly doctrinaire outlook, reflected in dress codes, the need for Sharia courts, the rejection of woman's equality, and distain for liberal values.

Groups like the Muslim Council of Britain do not do nearly enough to root out extreme versions of ISLAM here because they too have come under the influence of Wahhabism, whose logical progression is to end up with a

BARBAROUS THEOCRACY

 not dissimilar to that of

ISIS

Rather  than doing more to confront extremists, the

Muslim Council of Britain

acts defensively whenever the all-too-valid link between

TERRORISM and ISLAM

IS

MADE

 

*

[It has been the complicity of prime ministers since Tony Blair to put the wealth of Saudi Arabia as more important -with profitable Arms deals...rather than preventing their insidious religious doctrine from taking a firm hold in our accustomed

 FREE SOCIETY.

 Dr Taj Hargey comments on the English Defence League and Britain First parties using the over worn term 'Racists' which when one considers the extremism of those Muslims who left our shores for jihadism and the recent research that showed well over 60 % could be significantly  more ,  of the

 3,000,000

 Muslims in our country have no intention whatsoever in

INTEGRATING INTO OUR  SOCIETY

, then the above members of those English parties are in comparison choir boys and without a doubt

 PATRIOTS!

As we have stated over the past decades  only a limited number of Muslims should have been permitted to live in our FREE SOCIETY to ensure that they INTEGRATE before allowing others to follow knowing that the Muslim puts their religion before anything else and that they would bring their CUSTOM-SHARIA LAW and work to create a ISLAMIC STATE within ENGLAND which they have certainly made a major beginning-and with a favourable birth-rate of 4 to 1 their population will give them the voting power to create just this...

Because of the British government connection with Saudi-Arabia the flood -gates were opened and NOW we have SHARIA COURTS in 86 Centres in ENGLAND and many of our towns and cities are now reminiscent of a

ISLAMIC COUNTRY.

It is stated that there are 300,000 Jews in our country and others of different faiths who have successfully integrated into our society and are no threat to our

CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION-COUNTRY.

The gross stupidity of our so-called leaders over the past decades has turned many of our once familiar towns and cities of our country into

FOREIGN ENCLAVES

and there is a need to rectify the situation while there is still time to do so and that means that strict measures should be implemented by parliament to prevent the present inevitable future society of a foreign power in our country by passing laws to counteract the expressed intentions of the majority of Muslims-to turn

ENGLAND

into a

ISLAMIC STATE

 

If being a PATRIOT is seen as being a RACIST so be it-it is a small price to pay- for wishing to prevent your own

ENGLISH-CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION-COUNTRY

of over a 1000 years in the making

from being taken from you.

*  *  *

TOLERATION

'Toleration is a good thing in its place; but you cannot tolerate what will not tolerate you, and is trying to cut your throat.'-Froude.

*

'Religious liberty, according to both Locke and Montesquieu, may and does require intolerance of an intolerant religion; and the very spirit of peace and gentleness may require war to be waged by the state against an aggressive religion.- Conneily

 

*

 Full article

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

DECEMBER 6-2016

 

H.F.946 FREEDOM NOW

 
 

SHADOW OF A BLOODY PAST

SATURDAY

ESSAY

by

Tom Holland

For centuries, Islam and Christianity were locked in a brutal conflict most have forgotten. The horror, a top historian argues, is that for jihadis it's as real today as it was in the Middle Ages.

 

EXTRACT

...year after year, Turkish forces probed Christian defences, crossing the plains of Hungary or churning the waters off Malta with their warships. In 1529 and again in 1683, an Ottoman army almost took Vienna.

Yet that was to be the last great attempt to extend the Caliphate across Europe. The global balance of power was shifting, and nearly a millennium of Muslim preponderance was drawing to a close.

It was the Christians who colonised America, established trading empires that spanned the globe and started the process of industrialisation.  By the 19th century with India ruled by the British Raj and the Islamic Ottoman Empire scorned in Western capitals as 'the sick man of Europe', Muslims could no longer close their eyes to the sheer scale of their decline.

It was they who were now the imperial subjects, and Islam the civilisation looked down on by its adversaries as backward, as Christendom had once been.

Ever since the first days of their faith, Muslims had tended to take for granted that its truth was manifest in its worldly success.

As a result, subordinated to the infidel British or French there were many in the Muslim world who looked to the golden age of the Caliphate for their  inspiration.

The age of Muhammad and his successors, which had seen Islam emerge from desert obscurity tom global empire, was enshrined as the model to follow. Over recent decades resentment at continued Western interventions in Muslin countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq have only burnished the appeal of the glorious past.

Today, according to a poll some two-thirds of Muslims worldwide want to see the

RESTORATION of a CALIPHATE

It is not empires per se they are apposed to -just

NON-ISLAMIC EMPIRES

Hardly surprising then that al-Qaeda and ISIS should be so obsessed by periods of history that to most Westerners are thoroughly obscure.

That Constantinople

has been a Muslim city for almost 600 years, that the Crusades are done and dusted and that Europe no longer defines itself as Christendom, barely intrudes on the consciousness of many jihadis.

They inhabit a mental landscape in which the Middle Ages never went away. The menace of this way of thinking is brutally evident-a world in which young people murdered a rock concert, can be cursed as 'Crusaders' is a world on the verge of going mad.

It is not just non-Muslims who are threatened by this imperialist nostalgia.

 'Either you are with the Crusade, 'ISIS has warned European Muslims,' or you are with ISLAM

...

More!

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

[WHAT WE HAVE IS A NIGHTMARE SITUATION OF A GUERRILLA WAR UNFOLDING SUPPORTED BY THOSE HARD-LINE FUNDAMENTALISTS  AND THEIR SUPPORTERS WITHIN THE 3,000,000 MUSLIM COMMUNITY AND WITH THEIR ADDITIONAL ADVANTAGE OF FULL COVER FROM THE ACCEPTED DRESS  OF THE VEIL AND BURKA-SYMBOLS OF EXTREME ISLAM. IT IS MOST UNLIKELY THAT A MUSLIM WILL BETRAY A FELLOW MUSLIM AS MUCH AS THEY MIGHT DISAGREE WITH THEIR MESSAGE AND INTENDED ACTION.  AS MANY OF OUR TOWNS AND CITIES HAVE ALMOST A PREPONDERANCE OF THOSE OF THE MUSLIM FAITH IT WILL BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO PROTECT THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY. THE ONE VITAL ADVANTAGE WE HAD MANY YEARS AGO -THE BOBBIE-ON-THE -BEAT IS NO LONGER THERE-THE VITAL LINK OF TRUST WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY SO VERY IMPORTANT IN THE EVENT OF A CRISIS WE SEE BEFORE US TODAY.  WE MENTIONED THIS VERY MATTER MANY YEARS AGO KNOWING HOW IMPORTANT THE LINK WOULD BE IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY.  AS WE NOW HEAR ISIS HAS ASKED ITS SUPPORTERS IN OUR COMMUNITIES TO STAY PUT-NOT TO JOIN THEM AS THEY THEMSELVES WILL BE ON THEIR WAY TO JOIN THE FIGHT!.]

 

THE GREAT ERROR FROM THE BEGINNING WAS TO ALLOW THE THE LARGE SCALE IMMIGRATION OF THOSE FROM A HISTORICALLY OPPOSING CULTURE  TO SETTLE IN ENGLAND.  THE JEWS NUMBER 300,000 WHEREAS THE MUSLIMS ARE NO DOUBT OVER 3,000,000 WITH A AN ADVANTAGEOUS

 BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1.  MAKE NO MISTAKE THERE ARE MANY OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH WHO LONG TO BELONG TO AN ISLAMIC STATE  .WE HAVE ALREADY GIVEN THEM SHARIA LAW OF PARTS!

 

 IT WAS AND STILL IS OUR STUPID POLITICIANS WHO HAVE PUT AT RISK THE LIVES OF THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE. IN WARTIME ONE HAS INTERNMENT CAMPS BUT IN THE PRESENT SITUATION THIS WOULD BE MOST DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO CONSIDER BUT IF THE CARNAGE BECOMES UNCHECKED THEN WHO KNOWS WHAT MEASURES WILL BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO STILL THE VIOLENCE. OVER THE PAST DECADE THERE HAVE BEEN MANY WARNINGS FROM EMINENT AUTHORITY OF THE DANGERS WHICH WOULD ARISE BUT THEY WERE ALL IGNORED BECAUSE OF THE PREVAILING ATTITUDE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS-THE DETAILS ARE SHOWN IN OUR

 

 IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

 

  Daily Mail-

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

NOVEMBER 21,2015

H F 621/1

 
 
 

WHY HE IS SO SORELY MISSED IN ENGLAND AND IN DEMOCRACIES WORLD WIDE

 

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

by

WINSTON CHURCHILL

DEATH OF THE LAST GIANT - A DAY TO REMEMBER!

Winston+Churchill-

'We are a part of Europe

but not of it'...-

 


    Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said - Google Books Result
     

    Britain's attitude, Churchill explained, resembles that which we adopt about the
    European Army. We help, we dedicate, we play a part, but we are not merged
    with and do not forfeit our
    insular or commonwealth character. Our first object is
    the unity and consolidation of the British Commonwealth. Our second, “the
    fraternal ...

*

ALSO WISE WORDS

FROM

A Prime Minister in 1848

Over a Hundred and Sixty Four years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister - Foreign Secretary - Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) - beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:

Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)

 “…We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

 . It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”

[Of course the  MONARCHS  of ENGLAND since the 19th Century have been under the INFLUENCE of the ILLUMINATI.]

 

Winston Churchill warned the populace in the

1920's

 of the true facts of the ILLUMINATI who  have virtually ruled the world  since

 

WATERLOO

*

In the 1920's Winston Churchill mentioned the Jewish Bolsheviks the details a

JEW WATCH

[As we have explained the social circles which Winston Churchill  was connected  with during his long life such as the Rothchilds and like-others were the Establishment existing at the time from the Disraeli era. It was an impossibility to ignore particularly as he wished to further his career.  Of course he was a strong and enthusiastic supporter of the BRITISH EMPIRE in its outer image and must have been aware of the true nature within.   Those that might criticize him should consider the circumstances of the time which have ameliorated somewhat over the past decades until the present day when there are at last changes afoot.]

 

 

A WARNING!

 FROM A PATRIOTIC PRIME MINISTER

BENJAMIN DISRAELI

IN

 1852

In the 19th Century, Benjamin Disraeli, [Beaconsfield] a baptised Jew,[Prime Minister of England-1868 ] proclaimed:

 

...the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes...The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property...The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them.'
 

WE MUST NOT FORGET!

William Ewart Gladstone

 a great prime minister

 symbolised by his rolled  up sleeves-

 a man with the common touch.

*

BENJAMIN FREEDMAN -

 A JEW

UNCOVERED TO THE WORLD IN 1961 IN WASHINGTON D.C. THE

 ZIONIST CONSPIRACY.

-HE SPENT HIS LIFE WARNING THE PEOPLE OF THE GREAT DANGER TO THEIR LIVES AND LIBERTY

JEW WATCH

[As we have stated elsewhere many JEWS world-wide do NOT! agree with the  NEW WORLD ORDER - ZIONIST MESSAGE.]

JewsnotZionists

[THE FLAG ABOVE OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS THE TRUE FLAG OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE.

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM 2012

H.F.1335

 
 
BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 12 MONTHS

 

JULY-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

JULY 23-2017.

*

 

[No 1]

 

    DAILY MAIL

     

    -MAY: EU MIGRANTS CAN STAY IN UK


    Daily Mail
    May says 3.2million EU citizens CAN stay in Britain after we leave
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    May insists her offer to let three million EU citizens stay after Brexit is 'fair' ... All of
    the 3.2million EU nationals currently in the UK will be allowed to stay ..... in case
    there is a late surge of migrants arriving as Brexit approaches.

    JUNE 23,2017

H.F.1226 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
 
 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018        JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018        JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018