Simon Heffer in the Daily Telegraph warns: Cameron  must promise to take us out of the Treaty of Lisbon

" Do NOT believe the casuistic claptrap that the Prime Minister comes out with"

Daily Telegraph -23 January, 2008

For the Avoidance of doubt -and I would never want you to have any of that -let me state where, for what it is worth, I stand on the

European Union

I AM AGAINST IT

This is a not a johnny-come-lately position.  I have been against it since before we were in it.

I WAS AGAINST IT

when many of those now against it were actually

FOR IT

I can still recall the visceral disappointment when , in

 JUNE 1975

[Because of the blatant lies and deceit and the massive sums provided by the Government 'YES' campaign at the time]

we missed the chance

TO COME OUT OF IT.

I look at Third -World and collapsing economies such as

NORWAY

and

SWITZERLAND

and think wistfully of

WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN

The root of my opposition is straightforward.

1)   I WISH TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY WHICH GOVERNS ITSELF

2)  I WISH TO VOTE FOR PEOPLE WHO, IF ELECTED, HAVE POWER TO TAKE DECISIONS AND ALTER THE POLICES WITH WHICH WE ARE GOVERNED.

I AM NOT SURE THAT IS TOO MUCH TO ASK.

I grew up believing that was why my father and grandfather fought in

TWO WORLD WARS.

I have never understood why so many of our politicians who bang on about

"rights" and "democracy"

when they stand in our elections seem happy to forgo the same where

EUROPE

is concerned.

What is the point of electing governments, if there are vital policies

THAT THEY CANNOT ALTER?

That to me has always been the clinching argument against our entering the

SINGLE CURRENCY

We would be SLAVES to someone else's

ECONOMIC POLICY.

At present, if the way a government runs our economy is offensive, we can change the government and with it the policy

If we are economically administered from Frankfurt, simply unelecting one government and replacing it with another would be a footling exercise.

THE ECONOMIC POLICY WOULD STAY THE SAME

The only way we might change things would be to riot to such an extent that a new European political accommodation would have to be made. if you think I exaggerate look at France. President Sarkosy is doing his nut because of what he regards as the

OVER VALUATION OF THE EURO

and the effect this is having ion his country's industries, notable aerospace. Short of restoring the

FRANC

there is nothing he can do about it, though that will not stop his insurrectionists from punishing him for the problem, once the weather improves.

[In parts of Italy the LIRA is still being used surreptitiously.]

We are not in the

SINGLE CURRENCY, though its temporary strength is sure to provoke another round of ignorant claims that we should be

[IN THE EURO]

We are however, in the process of ratifying the

TREATY OF LISBON

which will allow much wider European interference in many of our already

DIMINISHED SOVEREIGN RIGHTS:

Such as in:

HOME AFFAIRS

JUSTICE

IMMIGRATION

ENERGY POLICY

-and that's only the start.

This, you will recall, is the TREATY that our great leader was too ashamed to turn up to sign when everybody else did: he sneaked in while they were having lunch, rather like one of the under-garners hoping for a sly plate of leftovers.

For those of us who were at

MAASTRICHT

and recall that treaty's ratification from early 1992 until the summer of 1993, a sense of deja vu is about to engulf us

We can bet the Government will be taken to the wire on

RATIFICATION

Some of its own backbenchers -but not so many as hoped -will stand out against it. Some of the opposition parties will attempt to enhance the Government's discomfort by seeking to prevent ratification by joining forces with the rebels. if this does not succeed - and it is hard to see it will, at this stage -then, in the end , the wretched thing will be on the

STATUTE BOOK

[We believe that it is possible for the QUEEN to make it clear in one of their weekly meetings at the Palace that if HER PRIME MINISTER refuses to allow HER PEOPLE A REFERENDUM then HER MAJESTY WILL NOT SIGN THE TREATY.

As we have previously said unless we can depend on THE QUEEN under these unique circumstances to come to the help of HER SUBJECTS to save THEIR FREEDOMS and LIBERTIES and COUNTRY what on earth is the value of a CORONATION OATH and the institution of THE MONARCHY?]

[EACH UNDERLINED WORD HAS A SEPARATE BULLETIN]

The EU's principle aim -

TO GET ITS OWN WAY

irrespective of the democratic feelings of its member states - would have been fulfilled. A significant step closer towards

FEDERALISM

would have to be taken.

THE RIOTERS WILL BE A LITTLE NEARER THE

BARRICADES.

This treaty is, though, poisonous in a way even

MAASTRICHT

 was not.

In 1992-93 we wanted a

REFERENDUM

but none was promised: John Major knew

WHAT THE RESULT WOULD BE

So, now, does Gordon Brown: and he therefore has reneged on his predecessor's

PROMISE TO HOLD ONE.

DO NOT BELIEVE THE CASUISTIC CLAPTRAP THAT THE PRIME MINISTER AND HIS MORALLY DEFECTIVE CRONIES COME OUT WITH TO SEEK TO JUSTIFY THE BREACH OF PROMISE.

THE TREATY IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE REJECTED CONSTITUTION.

EVERYBODY KNOWS IT, AND MANY HIGH OFFICIALS HERE AND ABOARD HAVE ADMITTED AS MUCH.

Mr Brown, who treats the electorate as if we were something he has trodden in on the pavement, may regard this as simply another act of contempt with which he will, in time, get away.

HE IS WRONG

The EU is now reaching a point where its centralising sovereignty -stealing obsessions will cause day-to -day outrage to the public. It may take this, or perhaps even one more federalising pile of dishonesty after it, to push us to breaking point: but we will break.

We will break because we are in our hearts , a democratic people. We resent the spectacle of our politicians -low though so many are -being humiliated by having to kow-tow to their, and our

MASTERS in BRUSSELS

We are revolted by the sight of

OUR PARLIAMENT

being rendered

IMPOTENT.

We feel special disgust - and here the Conservative Party should take note - at being offered an adequate choice at elections on the

FUTURE OF EUROPE

That is why for all the ridicule heaped on it, the

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

continues to have MEPs elected, and to cost the Tory Party seats at WESTMINSTER elections.

*

[ We believe that the greater majority of MPs are more interested in obtaining the more elitist and more lucrative employment in Brussels rather than in the future reduced power of a Regional Assembly at WESTMINSTER - as a PROVINCE of EUROPE.  David Cameron has eyes on the top job in the EU and he is simply going through the motions  at the present time as he has only to wait about six months to a year to obtain

HIS PROMISED REWARD.

HE CAME FROM NOWHERE  HE KNEW LONG AGO THAT HE WOULD BE THE EU REPLACEMENT FOR TONY BLAIR]

[EACH UNDERLINED WORD HAS A SEPARATE BULLETIN]

I am in no doubt that , for all sorts of reasons, both honourable and cynical, the Conservatives will fight this TREATY. I applaud their opposition to the ratification process, and their failed attempt-thwarted by the Speaker -to have  the Bill amended to force a

PLEBISCITE.

*

[ It is all pretence by the so-called Conservative Party and we believe that the majority of Tory members are only supporting a REFERENDUM because it will look good in the future General Election in 2009. As for their attempt to obtain a plebiscite it was possibly already realised that hear again it shows they care?   The political system in the country stinks to high heaven. As we have said before what was needed is for

HER MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION

to refuse to co-operate with the GOVERNMENT to ratify this

NATION DESTROYING LEGISLATION.

They are not on the playing fields of ETON they are taking part in a monstrous betrayal and destruction of a Unique ENGLISH Constitution of over 1400 years in the making, in a country where the majority of politicians refuse the RIGHTS already enjoyed in our sister nation states of SCOTLAND and WALES of a proportional representation in a country which has 87% of the population and the greater land area of the once United Kingdom and is treated as an off-shore island instead of that which should be accorded to a once great nation state called

ENGLAND.

But they [Conservatives] need a clear plan of what to do if, or rather when ,all else fails. It is obvious

WHAT IT MUST BE:

an unequivocal commitment to

REPEAL THE TREATY

ratifying the TREATY should they be returned to office after the next election [2009?]

[NO CHANCE!]

David Cameron is nervous about giving such an undertaking. Does he seriously want to win power, or is he interested only in making a series of fashion statements?

HE HAS SHOT HIMSELF IN BOTH FOOT ALREADY

-by refusing to promise proper tax cuts and his foolish distain for grammar schools. I dread to think which part of his anatomy, having run out of feet, he will shoot himself in now if he chooses not to promise, when and if ratification happens, to seek to reverse it.

[WE REITERATE AS ABOVE]

[ It is all pretence by the so-called Conservative Party and we believe that the majority of Tory members are only supporting a REFERENDUM because it will look good in the future General Election in 2009. As for their attempt to obtain a plebiscite it was possibly already realised that hear again it shows they care? The political system in the country stinks to high heaven. As we have said before what was needed is for

HER MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION

to refuse to co-operate with the GOVERNMENT to ratify this

NATION DESTROYING LEGISLATION.

They are not on the playing fields of ETON they are taking part in a monstrous betrayal and destruction of a Unique ENGLISH Constitution of over 1400 years in the making, in a country where the majority of politicians refuse the RIGHTS already enjoyed in our sister nation states of SCOTLAND and WALES of a proportional representation in a country which has 87% of the population and the greater land area of the once United Kingdom and is treated as an off-shore island instead of that which should be accorded to a once great nation state called

ENGLAND.]

He [David Cameron] would simply be undoing the betrayal by the present Government that the

[NEW EU] TREATY

would represent, given the

BREACH OF PROMISE

about a

REFERENDUM.

Some of his MPs -seven [what a pathetic number -don't you think?] have signed up to the

BETTER OFF OUT MOVEMENT

and many more who lack the guts or have too much greasy ambition to do so-would rather he

PROMISED

to

REPEAL

the 1972 Act of Accession

ratifying the

TREATY of BRUSSELS

which took us in to this neo-soviet cartel

IN THE FIRST PLACE.

I know he cannot go that far. But he can make a principled and populist commitment to stop any more of our democracy being flushed down the euro lavatory.

We must hope it doesn't come to that. However, there is no excuse for a responsible

OPPOSITION [?]

and a opposition that says it would like to win power - to have no plan for when and if the horrid day comes, however much it might frighten the horses.

*

[We make the following comments:

1) An undertaking by David Cameron to give an undertaking to repeal the

New EU TREATY

would need to be coupled with an understanding that the promise applies to whoever is

LEADER

at the time.

2)  We believe that the only real solution would be if THE QUEEN at one of HER weekly sessions warns Gordon Brown that unless he gives HER PEOPLE a REFERENDUM

HER MAJESTY WOULD NOT SIGN THE TREATY.

After all what is the use of a QUEEN if

HER CORONATION OATH

is not worth the paper it is written on?

  3)   What we fail to understand is WHY there is such a determination of the so-called

 HER MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION

to act normally at such a time as a TREATY which takes away the

POWER of PARLIAMENT

that the OPPOSITION does not consider not co-operating with the GOVERNMENT in order for the BILL of SLAVERY to be RATIFIED?

In the 17th century PARLIAMENT was determined NOT to cow down to a DESPOTIC MONARCH.  So why should THE QUEEN in 2008 cow-down to a DESPOTIC PARLIAMENT?

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

The CORONATION OATH ACT of 1688 declares OATH TAKEN for the PURPOSE of MAINTAINING our SPIRITUAL and CIVIL RIGHTS.

Can the QUEEN veto the New EU Treaty?

'YES!'

-Most looked at bulletin since  placed on our website Jan.5 again on 6 and 7-and 8 and now up to the 23rd. We know we have touched a nerve so keep  coming and pass on the message. We want a REFERENDUM not a fait accompli in your traitorous House of Commons.

At this most momentous and dangerous hour in our long history in our Island Home the following expressions comes to mind:

fortes Fortuna adjuvat -  Fortune helps the brave.

fori et fideli nihil difficile  -to the brave and faithful nothing is difficult.

fortis cadere,cendere, cedare non potest -  the brave man may fall - he cannot yield.

*

*

ALSO 

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

113,317

Total signatories to January 29th, 2008

JOIN THEM!

THE ENGLISH ARE BEING DENIED DEMOCRACY

SSays JANICE SMALL a candidate for CON PARTY parliamentary and MEP seats. 

[ FREEDOM TODAY-New Year 2008 -  www.tfa.net

SO THE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY ARE NOW  BEING PETITIONED BY A FORMER TORY PARTY REGIONAL PRESS AND MARKETING PRESS OFFICER (OH!- NOT ANOTHER PR SPECIALIST?   -PLEASE NO!) IS CURRENTLY CAMPAIGNING FOR -(WAIT FOR IT!) FOR ELECTORAL REFORM.  WHAT HAS THE CON PARTY BEEN DOING OVER THE LAST FOUR DECADES? THEY HAVE SIGNED EVERY EU TREATY PUT BEFORE THEM. THE REASON WHY THE NATION DESTROYING PARTY HAS NOT FOUGHT FOR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION_-SINGLE TRANSFERABLE VOTE IS BECAUSE  A PARTY SUCH AS UKIP WOULD BY NOW HAVE SEATS IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.    THEY AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE TRIPARTITE PACT IN THE CHAMBER DO NOT WISH TO SHARE WITH ANYONE.   WHY IS THERE NOW A PUSH TO OBTAIN THE ONCE SUPPOSED UNHOLY CHALICE - AN ELIXIR OF FAIR-PLAY AND THEIR FORBIDDEN FRUIT OF DISINTERESTEDNESS WHICH THEY NOW FIND MOST CONVENIENT TO ENJOY - IT IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE DONE THEIR JOB WELL TO SELL THEIR COUNTRY AND NOW LOOK FORWARD TO THE NEXT ELECTION WHEN THERE WILL BE NO COUNTRY TO BOTHER ABOUT -WHICH OF COURSE THEY HAVE NOT BOTHERED ABOUT SINCE 1972 AND CONCENTRATE IN TAKING OVER THE EU REGIONAL ASSEMBLY  AT WESTMINSTER WITH ITS MOST LUCRATIVE LINKS TO BRUSSELS.  AS WE HAVE SEEN SINCE THE NAZI  TRAITOR EDWARD HEATH -GEOFFREY RIPPON-ROY JENKINS SOLD THEIR COUNTRY AND THE LACKLUSTRE RESPONSE TO PROTECTING WHAT LITTLE THERE IS LEFT OF OUR CONSTITUTION AND FREE COUNTRY WHICH UNLESS THE QUEEN VETOES THE EU TREATY WE SHALL ALL BELONG AS A PROVINCE OF THE EU. 

OF COURSE WE SUPPORT PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION -SINGLE TRANSFERASBLE VOTE - BUT ONLY WHEN IT WILL BRING REAL DEMOCRACY TO A

FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND.

PROMISES! PROMISES! We have heard it all before -

WHERE IS OUR REFERENDUM?

SO NOW WE HAVE IT!  

WITH ONLY MONTHS UNTIL THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IS FINALLY NOTHING BUT A REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE CORRUPT GODLESS ,UNACCOUNTABLE POLICE STATE- UNITED STATES OF EUROPE. DAVID CAMERON'S STATEMENT THAT THE COMMONS IS ROTTEN AT THE CORE NEEDS NO MORE CONFIRMATION THAN THE HOUSE WILL SOON RATIFY THE NEW EU TREATY OF SLAVERY AND ITS MEMBERS WILL ENJOY EVEN GREATER SPOILS TO SHARE IN THAT BLACK HOLE OF EU CORRUPTION.  AS USUAL DAVID CAMERON IS TOO LATE! IN HIS APPEAL TO THE VOTERS WHO LOOK ON THE MAJORITY OF THE WELL-LINED MISFITS IN THE HOUSE AS TRAITORS TO THEIR COUNTRY.

IT IS AS IF

 WINSTON CHURCHILL

ADDRESSED THE COMMONS ON THE EVE OF WAR WITH GERMANY  IN SEPTEMBER 1939 TO COMPLAIN THAT MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE NEEDED TO PUT THEIR OWN AFFAIRS IN ORDER RATHER THAN CONCENTRATE ON THE GROWING DANGER OF WAR AND OUR DETERMINATION TO WIN THAT WAR WHATEVER THE COST.  WHAT WOULD BE THE HEADLINE IN THE DAILY MAIL AT THAT TIME ABOUT THIS FARCE OF PARTY POLITICS WHEN THE COUNTRY COULD SOON BE INVADED AND ITS SUBJECTS UNDER NAZI SLAVERY?   IN 2008 , AFTER 60 YEARS OF SUSTAINED NAZI INFILTRATION GERMANY WILL ACHIEVE ITS FINAL VICTORY WITH THE HELP OF YOUR HOUSE OF COMMONS AND THE FINAL RATIFICATION BY THE SWORN PROTECTOR OF YOUR FREEDOM BY

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

WE NOW HEAR on 22 JANUARY,2008 OF THE UNEDIFYING STANCE OF 100 MPS WHO ARROGANTLY AND WITH UTTER CONTEMPT STATE THAT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND THEIR PAYMASTERS SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO VIEW THEIR EXPENSES.  THIS DISGRACEFUL BEHAVIOUR IS DUE TO THEIR BEING NO PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION -STV IN PLACE IN ORDER TO GIVE THE TRIPARTITE CABAL IN WESTMINSTER THE COMPETITION FOR THEIR OVERPAID JOBS WHICH THEY RICHLY DESERVE.  OF COURSE THE MAJORITY OF MPS KNOW THAT THEY NOW RULE THE ROOST BECAUSE THEY WILL BE ANSWERABLE TO BRUSSELS  WHEN THEY RATIFY THE NEW EU TREATY OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. 

www.iwatareferendum.com

WHERE IS OUR FREE PRESS AT THIS HOUR OF PERIL TO PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION AND LIBERTY?

*

[Each underlined word above has a separate bulletin]

*

*