A REPLY
TO THE
DAILY TELEGRAPH
LEADER
OF FEBRUARY 29, 2008 -
A PRINCE IN AFGHANISTAN?
Prince Harry: a proud soldier in
Afghanistan
The news that Prince Harry has been fighting in
Afghanistan is extremely gratifying on two accounts.
DT.- First, it will strengthen the
monarchy's links with the people of this country.
[FALSE
as we have already witnessed the Queen has broken
her Coronation Oath on six previous occasions
in signing the EU Treaties and there is more than a
possibility that Her Majesty will sign the New EU
Treaty which destroys England a nation state
of 1400 years in the making. The country to be
replaced by Regions /Provinces and our unique
parliament at Westminster and Buckingham Palace and
all other residences of the dismantled MONARCHY to
become a Theme Park for visitors from around the
world to see what remained of a once respected and
once protected CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY.]
*
DT -Excluding
the prince would have suggested there was one rule
for the rest of the Armed Forces would have
suggested that there was one rule for members
of the Royal family and another for the rest of the
Armed Forces.
[[FALSE
- To compare the situation of today in Afghanistan
and in Iraq where the enemy faced is not in a
conventional battle but a conflict with insurgents
willing to blow themselves up to achieve their aims.
In the Falklands it was possible for a member of the
Royal Family such as Prince Andrew with his feet
above the ground to survive such an enemy at close
quarters so long as he was not shot down.
The irony of the
situation for Prince Harry is that he unfortunately
chose the wrong Service - as being at sea or in the
air and the problem would most likely have not
arisen. Possibly the Argentineans will give Prince
Harry an opportunity to give them hell if the
conflict should return in the future?
As we have stated before if Prince
Harry wished to serve in that theatre of operations
he should have been willing to use a pseudonym, and
take his chances with his comrades in arms, asking
no favours and accepting he may have to give up his
life for his country ,which his mother might give
away in June, 2008.
What we are not told is that he was
almost certainly shadowed by a unit of the SAS,
which would mean that that unit was un-operable for
other special operations ,which could place
other units in great danger. Of course this would
not be admitted by General Dannatt.
During the Second World War even Prime Minister
Winston Churchill was told by his sovereign
who did not want Winston to face the great danger
involved , that if he wished to visit the D
Day beaches the King would also go. Winston
realised he had lost his chance but took it in good
spirit. As
most people are aware in the past the Royal Family
have also shared the grief of lost one's on the
battlefield. It has also been so for many sons of
the nobility and commanders in the field. The
question is should those who belong to this section
of the community be given special treatment. We
believe the answer to be NO! though it would be
impossible to maintain that there was not some
special treatment in the way of posting and other
methods. As
we have already stated we believe the PRESS were
wrong in their blanket smokescreen to cover Prince
Harry. As to his activities in Afghanistan apart
from our observations above ,would it not have been
possible to keep him off the ground and possibly out
of danger. Of course there is no such term as out of
danger on the Battlefield.]
DT.- Second, seeing action with the
Blues and Royals in Helmand fulfils a dream for a
young man who has obviously found his vocation as a
soldier. In a TV interview to mark his 21st birthday
in 2005, he said: "There's no way I'm going to
put myself through Sandhurst and then sit on my arse
back home while my boys are out fighting for their
country. That may sound very patriotic but it's
true."
[FALSE:
A soldier is expected to go where he is sent and
it is not his place to decide which area of conflict
he would like to serve. Of course this has happened.
The well known case of Winston Churchill who in the
First World War went into the front line.
In his earlier career he was fortunate to have a
mother with many contacts which helped him to visit
a number of countries in his passion to make a name
for himself. His mother as far as we are aware did
not ask that her son should not be placed in danger.
We would have thought that having
been in Sandhurst was a great achievement in itself.
As for sitting on his arse. In many wars there were
many occasions where many a soldier who desired to
serve in the front line found themselves doing an
important duties without which those on the front
line would not receive the necessary back-up in
material and support. There is a saying by President
Thomas Jefferson which has some bearing on the
matter
'When a man assumes a public
trust, he should consider himself as public
property'
Prince Harry obviously knows this and
realises that he is on occasions not able to do the
things that he would wish to do. However, this will
change should his mother decide to sell our country
to Europe in June of this year. Then the Monarchy
will no longer represent the People when the
constitution has gone -possibly by 2009 which will
also mean that there may never be another general
election. The prince will have many
opportunities then to do as he pleases with no
restrictions whatever. We wish him well!]
*
The decision not to send him to Iraq,
reached after unedifying vacillation by Des Browne,
The Defence Secretary, and Sir Richard Dannatt,
Chief of the General Staff, was intensely
frustrating for the prince, all the more so since
his uncle served a helicopter pilot during the
Falklands War in 1982. It also handed a propaganda
coup top the Iraqi insurgents, who could boast that
they had forced the British into a humiliating
U-turn.
[FALSE:
We believe that General Dannatt's first instinct was
CORRECT and it was the great pressure brought to
bear on order for him to reverse his decision. It is
impossible that the General did not realise that it
was ONLY a matter of TIME before the whole deceitful
matter would be discovered by those looking for a
scoop, and we are pleased the FREE PRESS exists
outside of TOTALITARIAN BRITAIN.
The Daily Telegraph's sycophant tone
is there for all to see. Would there be a knighthood
on the cards or whatever. The article could
well have been written by Prince Harry or one of his
chums. The endeavour to compare the situation
in the Falklands in 1982 with the insurgent
hostilities in Iraqis was farcical as we have
mentioned above. The question about the
propaganda coup handed to the Iraqi insurgents . Is
that not the case now under the new circumstances.
The War in Iraq and Afghanistan are unjust and
illegal and morally indefensible and though our
brave soldiers cannot pick and choose like Prince
Harry and many of them know the end is in sight in
Afghanistan as they know it is coming to a close in
Iraq. As we and others have stated in
the past it would be unwise for a member of the
Royal Family to openly face the insurgents with such
a distaste for the unpopular war back home and
which would give validity to the conflict. ]
*
The clandestine interview which
Prince Harry gave in Clarence house before he left
for Afghanistan reveals an engaging young man,
obviously excited that he is at last being given the
chance to do the soldiering for which he joined the
Army and pleased that the theatre would be
Afghanistan, which he says he prefers to Iraq. The
chance of being treated as a normal officer he
describes as "massively important for me" and a
possible "turning point". He speaks of joining
the Army "because I loved it so much and when I
actually did try it, it was actually a lot of Fun"
[FALSE:
For the reasons we have already
given above. We are baffled by the phrase "
chance of being treated as a normal officer".
Many officers still consider themselves officers
even if they are not at the sharp end of the action.
As we have stated before it is the important work of
officers not engaged with the enemy at close
quarters who keep the boy's at the front with their
close support and material of war and the
speedy evacuation of the wounded.]
*
Prince Harry's life seemed rather
aimless after he left Eton in 2003. Entry into the
Royal Military Academy Sandhurst two years later
gave direction to his life. Second Lieutenant Wales
has now seen active service in one of the dangerous
areas in the world. We are delighted with Him.
[FALSE:
We cannot understand why Prince
Harry could not have been attached to a
Peace-Keeping Force. We have our troops in many
trouble spots in the world. Of course he wished to
be with his unit but not every soldier can do what
he desires. The implication of the
statement about Second Lieutenant Wales 'has now
seen active service' seems to indicate that Prince
Harry was determined to go to Afghanistan whatever
the difficulties. Can he not now see that his
secretive presence in Afghanistan has rebounded on
himself and the Royal Family with the Muslim
population in Britain deeply wounded by the Prince's
determination to have some action, whatever it
took. We can only speculate that he knows that his
mother will sign the EU TREATY and therefore there
will no longer be a British Army to fight for and
hence his determination at this late stage to fight
in Afghanistan.]
The Daily Telegraph has at least put
the matter up for discussion:
'Should Prince
Harry be in the on the front line'
www.telegraph.co.uk/news
[As we have stated above Prince could
have been at a front elsewhere where he presence
would not have attracted such attention. The
question is too simplistic. Recent events have
themselves answered the question by clearly showing
that the decision to go to Afghanistan and expect
the information to remain secret was obvious from
the start. The greater question is political
in that the presence of Prince Harry in a
Muslim country, was bound to rebound on the
Government and the MONARCHY. Of course Prince Harry
should be able to be on the front line but in a
theatre of war without the complication of fighting
a people who consider that the invaders are in their
country for their own economic reasons and that the
so-called DEMOCRACY is a foreign ideology not suited
to their feudal and tribal country. When one
sees what Gordon Brown and his past pal in TREASON
have done in refusing Devolution for England
and the refusal to have the promised REFERENDUM it
is no wonder that the Afghans consider that they
want no part of a system which allows a Prime
Minister to sell YOUR COUNTRY and refuse to HONOUR
an undertaking because they are afraid that the
PEOPLE would rather be FREE than SLAVE.]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & underlining
Used-Comment in Brackets]
FEBRUARY, 2008
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
The
abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform
Treaty in its Second Reading on Monday 21st
January. This sixth and final treaty, now
renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally replaces
Britain with the European Union on 1st
January 2009. This is a year before the
deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany,
Angela Merkel.
The Treaty will abolish the British
Constitution, and therefore the nations of
Britain and England, sweeping away our
Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU
the power to close it.
The Treaty sets up an unelected three
tier politburo executive in Brussels with
absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet
model. The EU parliament has no power and is
a sham.
Read the Reform Treaty one page summary
on the left. Gordon Brown was lying: the
Treaty is worse than the constitution.
This sixth treaty is the fastest moving
and most secret the EU has drafted;
opposition to and recognition of the EU as a
police state is growing, and they know speed
is vital.
This Commons vote, one of the most
important in our history, was largely
unreported by our controlled press and
media.
The Queen and Parliament to complete
ratification this spring, 2008
Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss
this treaty in February (not much for its
own abolition). They will probably have the
final ratification vote in March. The Queen,
the EU's most loyal supporter, plans to give
her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means
Westminster and the Queen will ratify it
behind our backs, as they have the other
five treaties.
No referendum
German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth
Treaty instead of pushing it through as a
constitution to avoid referendums in its
member nations. She twice visited 10 Downing
Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel
both his promised referendum, and his
General Election.
"Anti-EU" groups have
encouraged us to call for a
referendum precisely because
the EU has already
prohibited it. They know we
are wasting our efforts: our
four party leaderships take
their orders from the EU,
not from the voters.
How to fight
The real course of action is to change
the minds of 70 MP's and get a majority
against. MP's have been selected on the
Party list system over the last 20 years to
ensure an obedient majority of pro-EU MPs.
These MPs now need to understand the EU
has the constitution (the six treaties) of a
dictatorship, the laws of a police state,
and when enforced, its 111,000 regulations
will create a government command economy,
soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty.
They also need to realise that MPs are
the people who put this dictatorship in
power. If they put it in power, they are the
greatest threat to take it out of power. All
dictatorships in the past have eliminated
that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs
will be even worse than our own; at best,
they are likely to be institutionalised and
held against their will. (This is the only
good bit - these hated traitors will suffer
severely.)
Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and
explain this. (Instructions top left)
The EU remains illegal
Each of these six treaties are completely
illegal under the British Constitution, our
1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and
under our common law. It is unforgivable
that the Queen, her Ministers and our
Parliament have committed the criminal act
of treason by signing these treaties, and
broken our laws to abolish our nation.
The EU will always be
illegal in Britain; but once
the EU has complete power
and control here, we can no
more get rid of it than we
could Germany, had their
planned illegal occupation
of Britain in 1940 been
successful.
The Countdown to abolition
Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution
would have abolished the five treaties and
replaced them with a single document
conferring absolute power, the Reform Treaty
adds to the existing five treaties, bringing
them up to the powers of the EU
Constitution. All six treaties with
appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex
and unreadable pages. Tony Blair agreed to
it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in
Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was
an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when
we should have seen a first draft of the
Treaty.
Foreign ministers agreed its terms on
7-8th September at the resort of Viana de
Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in
Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where
they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon
Brown signed it on December 13th 2007,
committing treason, the most criminal act on
the statute book.
The EU has decided to act now as if the
Treaty were already in force; they are
consolidating their power each day. On
1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other
five seize all remaining power from our
Westminster Parliament, which becomes
defunct on that day; it has no remaining
powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow
Brussels to return minor powers, but that is
very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have
bogus elections to the sham Brussels
Parliament, the only elections we will get
in the future.
Westminster's five year term expires on
5th May 2010 and a British General Election
is due. The six treaties make no provision
for an election to our Parliament. By that
time the EU will have consolidated its
absolute power, and it will almost certainly
use it cancel that election and to close
Westminster. The EU has always planned to
rule what was Britain directly through its
12 nominated Regional capitals, by passing
Westminster, from which every function will
be removed.
Its founders knew the EU dictatorship
cannot be built while there is a strong and
freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They
tried twice before in 1914 and 1939. Britain
has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to
succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt
School subversion techniques on Britain (see
left) has been astonishing; the abolition of
Westminster is one of their final remaining
goals.
You have 11 months left
Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s
crimes. You have just 11 months left to
bring these vile British traitors to
justice, and get us out of the EU
dictatorship.
Around 45 million British
people are against the
abolition of our nation, and
with the little European
voting that has been
allowed, it seems clear over
200 million of its victims
don’t want the EU. But we
will never be given the
choice. YOU have to decide
to act yourself.
There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your
Campaigns" on the left. Then we will need a
mass blockade of Westminster to stop our
criminal MP's and Queen breaking our
constitution and laws for the last time.
Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC.
Original 2009 article from German Parliament
-.pdf for download
Then check it at the German Parliament
here
|
Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One
or two pages each.
Your
Campaigns
Ten
EU truths
Reform
Treaty one page
50
reasons to leave
EUtruth
flier
Common
Purpose
Abolition
of Councillors
Abolition
of 48 Counties
Map:
the 9 EU regions
Transnational
regions
Reform
Treaty full text
EU
Constitution, one page pdf
EU
Constitution: one page html
Signs
of EU police state
The EU's
degraded our lives
What will the EU be
like?
List
of British traitors
Beef up the British
Constitution
Lib Lab Con: One Party State
The Queen
The EU's Hitler
The
EU costs £200 billion pa
The
dictatorship: Quotes
UK
> EU handover of power.
EU
subversion diagram.
Subversion:
Common Purpose
Frankfurt
subversion.
The
terrorism deception
Abolition
of our 48 counties
Abolition
of Parliament.
Church
flier
Some
revolutionary lyrics
drjn.co.uk - copy of
this site
The
Westminster News
The
Devonport Column
The
Cornish Free Press
The
British Free Press
Government
disinformation
Mobilisation
talk
Blueprint
to get out
SS
child snatching
Wood's
rigged elections
Stood
for the leadership
Where we are now:
1. Since 1972 The Queen has
illegally signed five of the six EU
Treaties.
2. The five treaties define and
build the EU as an unelected
dictatorship.
3. The EU's laws, passed by
Westminster, give it the powers of a
police state.
4. The sixth EU treaty will
complete the abolition of Britain as
a nation
- the Queen is
due to sign it this year.
A foreign power, the EU, will
then rule us, and enforce the laws
of a police state.
Shouldn't we repeal the 1972
European Communities Act now
before we are imprisoned permanently
inside? We've only got till July
2008.
Please fight
the campaigns at the top of the menu
on the left.
The
leaderships of the Conservative,
Labour and Lib Dem parties have been
controlled by the European Union for
two decades. It is the EU agenda
they implement in Parliament, not
your wishes, which is why your vote
doesn't count.
Our controlled press and media
haven't reported it, but Britain
would have been abolished in
November 2006 if the French and
Dutch hadn't voted down the EU
Constitution.
Instead a sixth and final Treaty
will now be signed; after which EU
Commissioners will have the power to
impose the Constitution (and the
Euro) on us, and enforce the laws of
a police state.
5. Thirty three years inside
the EU - have you noticed how our
democracy is being withdrawn?
The EU has already denied us that
most basic of human rights - the
right to vote against the EU and to
keep our own nation. A majority of
us don't want to be in the EU. We
are being forced in against our
will.
Do you feel you've become
powerless, unable to influence
events, or your vote is worth less?
The six treaties have been gradually
removing our democracy; for thirty
years our laws have been
"harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the
laws now passed by our Parliament
are EU laws, not ours. Isn't the
real reason people have lost
interest in politics precisely
because the EU has taken away our
ability to change things?
Common law, where the government
was our servant, is now largely
replaced by the EU's Corpus Juris,
which puts the government above the
law, and we don't participate. We
have already lost most of our rights
(including habeas corpus). The power
of government grows unchecked, as
does that of large corporations.
Politicians continuously lie about
the EU, pretending its not
significant.
6. Massive EU corruption
The EU's auditors have found the
fraud is so widespread they've
refused to sign off the EU's
accounts for each of the last ten
years. Whistleblowers like Marta
Andreason, the EU Budget Director,
who in 2005 found the EU couldn't
account for 95% of its £66
billion budget, are simply fired for
telling the truth.
7.The bribing of our
Politicians by the EU
Europe works by bribing politicians
with huge salaries and expenses to
vote for Europe, against the best
interests of their own voters.
As a result all three parties are
in favour of the EU - Westminster
acts like a one party state of
politicians: the Lib-Lab-Con. The
parties are run top down and
implement the policy of their
leaderships, not that of their
members. (unfortunately UKIP is run
in the same way). If you have voted
for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since
1969, you have voted for
the EU dictatorship.
8. EU corruption is now
exploding through our Civil Service,
our local government, and our 7,000
QUANGOS.
A shadow EU government lives inside
our bureaucracy, headquartered in
the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister (ODPM.) It includes many
parts of government including the
RDA and the Regional Assemblies.
Common Purpose, an EU
organisation, the UK branch also
headquartered in the ODPM, has
members across many government
organisations including some city
and county councils, the Land
Registry, the police and the NHS,
which it is destroying from within.
Common Purpose is the glue
that enables fraud to be committed
across these government departments,
most of it lining the pockets of
politicians and bureaucrats. It
often involves the sale of public
assets such as land to friends of
politicians or their businesses.
(The RDA -The EU Regional
Development Agency, is a major
player in this type of fraud.) And
the handing out of plum government
non jobs with big salaries and
expenses to members of Common
Purpose, all of it involving the
theft of our money as taxpayers. The
Chief Executive Officer of Common
Purpose is Julia Middleton of the
ODPM.
9. Businesses closing under EU
regulation
The EU's 111,000 regulations, when
fully enforced, will transform
Britain from a free market economy
into a Soviet style command economy,
closing hundreds of thousands more
businesses. They will also control
our personal lives far more closely
than were those of Soviet citizens.
(In a Parliamentary answer to Lord
Stoddart in January 2003, the
government admitted there were
101,811 EU regulations, growing at
3,500 pa).
The cost of Britain's 8,500
quangoes is £124 billion a year, and
they raise an additional £40 billion
from us in charges, according to the
Cabinet Office. The Public Bodies
Directory 2006 describes only 882 of
them. Most exist to enforce EU
regulations; nearly all should be
closed.
10. The EU costs us £200
billion pa, 20% of our economy
According to the government's Better
Regulation Task Force Annual Report
2005 (Introduction written by Tony
Blair,) complying with EU
regulations now costs our economy
over £100 billion a year.
By far the largest treasury
expense is now the £167 billion
spent on the EU's 8,500 quangos,
(Cabinet Office figures) most of
which enforce EU regulation. This is
patronage, bribery, putting
thousands of officials and
influential businessment on £100,000
- £300,000 a year salaries. That's
why the Exchequer is so desperate
for cash and can't pay for the navy,
nurses, students etc.
Economists say we lose £80
billion pa by associating with the
EU's inferior economies. The EU took
our fishing industry, which costs us
£5 billion pa. EU damage to other
industries (like forcing us to close
the Rover Car Co) a further £20
billion. Our EU contribution is a
relatively minor £10 billion, the
only bit the Press discuss.
Before we joined the EU we had an
even balance of trade with them. Now
EU regulations have fixed it so we
lose £30 billion year trading with
the EU on our balance of payments.
We'd be enormously more wealthy if
we left.
The main use of taxes is now to
finance government and its greedy
whirlpool of waste; they've doubled
in real terms in the 33 years we've
been in the EU. There's less money
in the economy left for wages,
creating a growing underclass who
can't make ends meet.
11. Our counties to be
abolished
The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht
Treaty, which adopts the EU
Regionalisation Plan. This will
abolish England's 48 counties and
replace them with 9 European
regions, each with their own
Regional Capital, which reports
directly to Brussels, not to
Westminster. This effectively
obliterates the country of England.
For example the County of Cornwall
is replaced by the South West
Region, which stretches from Lands
End and includes Gloucestershire and
Wiltshire; its regional capital is
Exeter. As this move is unpopular it
is being kept low-key and will not
be implemented until the sixth
treaty is signed, when we lose our
right to object.
12. The deliberate destruction
of our standards and way of life,
From Sunday trading, where large
stores force staff to work Sundays
for derisory pay - or they don't get
a job, to the deliberate undermining
of the family and teachers, to sex
education for the under 13's, to
children being given obscene
homework, its all traceable via our
compliant government back to the EU
over the last 34 years, as it
sucessfully implemented the
subversion of the Frankfurt School.
While inside atheist Europe, British
Christianity has almost died out;
safety on our streets and a great
chunk of civilised life has left
with it.
13. The EU has controlled our
immigration since 1997
In January 2007 on the front page of
The Westminster News we forecast 1.5
million immigrants for the year, and
people laughed at us. On January
24th 2008 the Daily Express
published government figures of 1.3
million Polish immigrants alone for
2007. With Romania and Hungary
joining in that year the total was
probaly double that. The Amsterdam
Treaty handed control of our
immigration to the EU. 30,000 a year
used to arrive - the EU's increased
it by 60 times That's why
house prices have been screaming up,
even though the population of
original British people is falling.
Politicians and huge corporations
like immigration - with thousands of
immigrants available on low pay,
they can impose the minimum wage on
millions. Politicians then lie that
they can't get British workers to do
dirty jobs. The truth is they won't
offer a decent wage, and cynically
use immigrants to drive wages down,
adding to the huge underclass.
The Government pretends there are
a maximum of 145,000 immigants
annually, and 1.5 million new houses
will be needed to house them. But
then Jack Straw admits that 2.6
million immigrants applied to stay
here last year.
Our infrastructure and services
can't stand such huge numbers and is
breaking down in some cities, where
English people are becoming a 10%
minority. But the EU controls it,
not the Foreign secretary, and he
has no power, no options but to do
as EU policy dictates, and accept
it.
Michael Howard was lying on the
24th January 2005 when he said he'd
fix immigration - as Prime Minister,
he'd have had no control over it
whatsoever. Immigration hurts our
existing immigrants first - new
immigrants move into their areas,
decreasing the wages and increasing
the pressure on housing.
If the sixth Treaty is signed,
we lose our right to withdraw and
Britain ceases to be a nation. Like
the other six, it only requires two
signatures: the Prime Ministers, and
the Queen's |
|
Examples of how our lives
have degraded since we've
been in the EU:
In the EU, (which
means in Britain) government
is above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now
pervades right through our
legal system. A policeman
was let off by magistrates
this year (2005) for driving
his private car at 159 mph
in Ludlow, Shrops. Under
Corpus Juris the government
are above the law and cannot
be prosecuted The judge
ruled correctly under EU
law. 45,000 police officers
got off speed cameras in
this way in 2004, although
their speeding killed 44
innocent people. (Daily Mail
27.12.05.)
EU "monitoring
Officers" have the right to
dismiss our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of
2000 empowered the head of
the EU government in
England, the Office of the
Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM)
to appoint a monitoring
officer to spy on every
council. If an elected
councillor disagrees with
the EU or government line,
the unelected "Standards
Board for England" can
suspend him for up to five
years. An example is in
Cambridgeshire, where the
ODPM has threatened cllr
Alex Riley with suspension
if he attends any debate
discussing the ODPM's plans
to build a new town of
20,000 people called
Nothstowe on his ward. The
ODPM has the conflict of
interest here; but its
powers are becoming
absolute.
We have lost the right
to freedom
The EU arrest warrant
(signed by the Queen on 18th
November 2003) allows us to
be arrested without charge
and held indefinitely with
no right to see a solicitor,
make a phone call, or even a
right to a trial. You can
simply disappear.
Under the Serious
Organised Crime and Police
Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now
be arrested and held in the
cells by any police officer
for any petty offence, like
dropping litter. Before it
had to be an offense that
carried a 5 year jail term.
This also applies to all of
the EU's 107,000
regulations. Do you know
them all?
The Civil Contingences
Act 2004 allows government
to confiscate anything you
possess permanently; you
have no right to object.
This includes your house. It
also gives government the
right to forceably move its
population around to
different locations; you can
be left with no place to
call your own and live like
a refugee. The only check
and balance here is a
Minister just needs to utter
the words "This is a
national emergency." If a
demonstration or strike
government doesn't like is
being organised, they can
cut off all communications
in a town - phones, mobiles,
the internet, TV, and block
all access to that town
including closing roads and
railways. It has all the
powers and more of Hitler's
Enabling Act of 1933.
We have lost the right
to free speech
At the Labour Party
conference the police held
an 82 year old man, Walter
Woolfgang, and denied him
access to the conference
under the EU's "anti
terrorist" legislation
because he had shouted the
word "nonsense" at Jack
Straw, who was speaking
about Iraq. Terrified the
true nature of the laws they
have passed on behalf of the
EU was escaping too early,
the Labour Party stopped the
police and begged the man to
return to conference.
On October 25th 2005 Miss
Maya Evans was arrested
under the Serious Organised
Crime and Police Act 2005,
for a lone protest at the
Cenotaph by reading out the
names of the 97 British
soldiers killed in the Iraq
war. She was arrested by no
less than 14 police officers
and found guilty at Bow
Street Magistrates Court on
the 8th December 2005.
Would you hand over our
nation, to be ruled by a
foreign power, with
oppressive laws like these,
? That's what's happening.
We have lost the right
to protest
These laws make protest very
difficult; if we did hold a
General Strike and blockade
Westminster it would now
require some bravery: the
powers the EU has demanded
from our government enable
it to respond in a way
similar to the Chinese
government's in Tiaanamen
Square should it so wish.
It is no coincidence that
since 2004, all MP's offices
in Westminster are guarded
by police with machine guns,
inside and out.
The Governments
"terrorism" deception
All these new EU laws,
including massive "anti
terrorism" acts (recently
2000, 2001, 2005) were
passed with the pretence
they were only directed at
terrorists, or in the
case of Asbos, ruffians who
terrorise the streets. In
each case they are used far
more often against ordinary
law abiding people,
particularly to suppress
dissent. (91% of those
detained under Terrorism
Acts are innocent and have
been improperly arrested.
Most of the remainder are
charged with offences that
have nothing to do with
terrorism, but cover up over
zealous arrests).
We have lost the right
to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to
kill" policy did not need
democratic authorisation.
Just two senior police
officers authorised the
police to kill British
people. A democratic vote by
Parliament was not required,
but even that would not have
legalised the killing under
British common law. A recent
victim was an innocent
Brazilian, Jean de Menezes,
shot dead in Stockwell
underground station, even
though he was being held
down by police officers at
the time of the execution.
The police used dum-dum
bullets, outlawed under the
Geneva Convention because
they blow a man to pieces
inside.
The police can no longer
be convicted for killing
innocent people - Philip
Prout shot at Lewannick in
East Cornwall is just one of
30 people shot dead by
police since 1992 when
corpus juris crept in. At
least one was shot in the
back; most were no threat to
anyone. Not once since 1992
has a policeman been
convicted of any crime for
these murders.
Have you noticed this
growing police state?
In addition to many more
laws than those above, add
the 107,000 regulations, and
whole bureaucracies such as
VOSA building up networks of
cameras and databases to
record our movements and
criminalise us when we can't
comply. Persecution is no
longer confined to
motorists; under EU Corpus
Juris our courts have become
extensions of government
power instead of independent
arbiters of justice.
Westminster had passed
sufficient of the EU's
oppressive laws (the
"harmonisation" in the
Treaties) by the end of 2004
that we have been living in
what is legally a police
state since then. But at the
moment, its only one per
cent enforced. After the
Queen signs the sixth
Treaty, the EU has the
absolute power to enforce
100% of its regulations and
laws.
|
|
|
On the basis of
the laws and treaties
already signed by our Queen
and Prime Ministers,
What will
life be like in the EU after
the 6th Treaty is signed?
Our Westminster Parliament
immediately becomes pointess
as its remaining powers are
transferred to Europe.
It is the formal end of
Britain and England as
nations.
Britain's 153 embassies
around the world will be
closed as the ink from the
Queen's signature dries. (As
Tony Blair refused to admit
this has been agreed to,
Jose Zapatero, the Prime
Minister of Spain, confirmed
it in a February 2005 radio
broadcast.)
After the EU abolishes
our 48 counties your address
will change from 4 High St,
Taunton, Somerset, Great
Britain, to 4 High St,
Taunton, Area K, European
Union. (The glorious EU
county "The South West
Region" has had the postal
address "Area K" assigned
for over a decade.)
The Official National
Anthem of the EU, which you
should have known since 1971
is based on the melody "Ode
to Joy" by Beethoven,
formally replaces God save
the Queen. The EU flag
replaces the Union Jack, the
red, blue and white nautical
ensigns etc. (The EU
Commission has already
ordered (24.11.2005) our
Merchant Navy to fly the EU
flag in place of the red
Ensign.)
The EU takes ownership
and command of our Police,
Army, Royal Navy, RAF,
nuclear weapons, currency
reserves, North Sea Oil.
(See the EU Constitution
below)
Serving officers in our
police, army, navy and air
force already know they will
have to take an oath to the
EU instead of to the Queen.
If they don't many have been
told they will be dismissed.
The EU will have complete
military control of the UK.
The UK Independence Party
will be banned under the
1999 ruling of the European
court of Justice case
c274/99, where it was held
that it is illegal to
criticise the EU.
The Conservative, Labour
and Lib-dem parties will be
abolished (only pan EU
parties like the EPP or PES
are allowed -see clause
I.46.4 of the EU
Constitution). It will then
be blindingly obvious to
even the dumbest politician
there is no reason to keep
Westmister open, and that
the EU has the legal right
to close it.
Many people will be
excluded from the jobs they
know best, as the EU's
demand that you must pay to
be re-taught the job, and
pay for a certificate before
you can be employed, becomes
universal.
Hundreds of thousands
more small businesses will
close on the enforcement of
the remaining 100,000 EU
regulations our government
has already passed. Several
million will be permanently
unemployed as a result.
We will all be
criminalised by the 107,000
regulations. Its impossible
to know or understand
107,000 regulations, and the
poor can't possibly afford
to comply. We will all be
subject to frequent fines
and arrest as a result. Here
are just 4 examples:
Under EU regulations it
is now illegal for you to
repair your plumbing,
electrics or your car (from
1st January 2006). If you
buy a boat over six feet
long, built after the EU
Recreational Craft Directive
of 1999, and don't pay the
EU £4,000 to "measure" the
boat, you get 6 months
imprisonment. We will live
under permanent threat of
arrest and fear of the knock
at the door that takes us
away.
Massive corporations will
do well, but with huge
immigration allowed from the
EU, they'll be able to pay
minimum wage everywhere, not
just in the provinces as
they do now. If you don't
accept the minimum they'll
employ a Pole or a
Czekoslovakian.
Big corporations will
also have a near monopoly
(with the government) on
employment and will be able
to dictate unfavourable
terms to staff without fear
of contradiction.
Plum government jobs and
corruption will ensure the
wealth of politicians,
bureaucrats, their
businesses and associates at
all levels of government,
including local government
and amongst our 7000+
quangos.
Society will divide into
two: the remaining 60% of us
will be either unemployed or
treated abysmally on minimum
wage.
Taxes will rise more
steeply to pay for the even
larger explosion in
government growth and
corruption
There will be no redress
through local democracy
because there won't be any.
The nine UK regional
governments, which replace
our 48 counties and
councillors, will be
unelected (see the European
Regionisation plan). Our
only vote is to the
powerless EU parliament. We
will be ruled by the 25
unelected Commisssioners,
and have have no redress at
any level; we will be as
poor but have less freedom
than Soviet Citizens.
If we demonstrate or
protest we can be be seized
and relocated to another
region. The EU Arrest
Warrant and Civil
Contingencies Act 2004, with
20 other oppressive Acts the
Queen has signed between
1972 and 2005, give the
government absolute power
over us. They can shoot us
if they wish with no legal
comeback - the shootings of
innocents Philip Prout and
Jean de Menezes were
entirely legal under EU law.
The tendancy to pick on
Muslims, as Germany used to
pick on Jews, has already
begun. Europe will be a very
nasty place.
How long will the EU
last?
Eventually, perhaps 15 years
down the track, Europe will
collapse under the weight of
its own corruption,
bureaucracy, and
regulations. There will be
so few productive businesses
that even at 100% tax rates
we will not be able to
support the massive, corrupt
and wasteful government.
Many of us will be starving
in the lead up to the
collapse. After the collapse
we may be able to leave the
EU, if a dictator has not
taken advantage of the
complete absence of
democratic checks and
balances by seizing power.
The Constitution of the EU
is similar to the Soviet
Union's. That dictator is
free to choose between a
Soviet or Nazi style
government. Then it could
take 70 years to break free.
|
|
|
Fifty years ago our greatest threat
might have been violence or mugging.
Now the greatest threat to our
economic well being, our way of
life, our freedom and the very
existence of our nation, is our own
government.
What do we
want?
After the repeal of the
EU treaties we want a change
to our British Constitution
so politicians can never
hijack our nation again.
Every Parliamentary Bill,
after its Second Reading,
should come down to us, the
people, to vote yes or no as
to whether the Queen should
give it Royal Assent. This
will take power away from
our destructive politicians
and return it to the people,
where it belongs. (They do
this in Swtizerland - they,
not us, are the most
democratic nation on earth.)
We can then return to being
a peaceable, just, honest,
prosperous and fully
democratic society where
everyone's rights, no matter
how high or low are
respected, and the
disadvantaged properly
looked after. And where
neither governments,
corporations nor individuals
have obscene wealth and
power.
David Noakes 07974
437 097 ;
drjnoakes@yahoo.co.uk
Campaign to repeal the
1972 European Communities
Act and get clean out.
What can you do to
help?
1. Find out when your local
MP holds their surgery and
attend with a printout of
this, and the one page
summary of the EU
constitution below. Ask that
MP to cross the floor to be
the leader of the first Anti
EU Parliamentary Party
(representing 65% of our
nation). The publicity would
be stunning, and might force
an in/out vote.
2. Make appointments with
your local journalists, give
them the same two print outs
and ask them to write about
the truth about the EU.
3. Do you know anyone
famous? Persuade them in the
same way to join our cause
and get the truth known.
4. Print little stickers:
"We didn't vote for this -
it has no mandate," and
stick them on everything
that represents the police
state and rip off
government.
5. Tell your Town, District
and County councillors they
are about to be abolished.
See below.
6. Do anything you can to
get the truth about the EU
published.
Or print and hand out this
flier (a .pdf), or
flier (as a word document).
It can be photocopied double
sided on to one page.
.
|
Our Councillors abolished
Our 20,000 Councillors will be
permanently abolished after the EU
Regionalisation Plan has established
the nine EU Regions. Point out they
were elected to serve the public,
not the government, and the public
has not agreed to their abolition.
Try to persuade them to stand up for
the people who voted for them,
(which is only doing their duty) by
holding a yes/no local ballot on
whether the public agree with the
abolition of our counties,
councillors and nation.
If the public vote no, they
should declare, for their Town or
county, UDI from Europe and the
illegal actions of our government
since 1971, particularly the
abolition of our British
Constiution, common law, our nation
and counties. The press coverage
this would generate would force the
truth into the open nationally,
leading to a national in/out ballot
on the EU. Just one council could
achieve this fabulous result alone.
Download:
A summary of the loss of our 48
counties (a WP file)
Download:
A map of the nine EU regions (.pdf)
The Devonport Column, exposing
Common Purpose nationally, and
corruption in Plymouth.
The six treaties are:
1. The European Communities Act
1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
The sixth will be called
something equally innocuous, like
the Treaty of Lille. Then the loss
of our nation, way of life and
freedom will be complete.
The best
summary of the six treaties is the
Constitution
It
reveals the true nature of the EU.
Some British politicians were
horrified when they saw the EU's
absolute power revealed in its new
constitution, and falsely accused
the EU of much more than a tidying
up exercise. It wasn't, it was a
re-statement of the 6 treaties in
almost readable English. Our
politicians simply hadn't read the
six treaties before they voted for
them. The French and Dutch "No"
votes are being ignored as usual;
the EU Constitution is 2/3rds
implemented and still being
implemented. Dan Hannan of the
Brussels EU Constitutional
Committee, confirms it will be fully
implemended in two years. Brussels
can enforce it fully after the Queen
signs the sixth EU treaty. Here's a
one page summary with Article
numbers:
One page summary of the Constitution
- pdf for download
UKIP is way understating the
costs of the EU. Even the British
and EU governments admit to four
times the UKIP figure.
The EU is costing us 200 billion pa,
20% of our economy
Quotes from our leaders revealing
they know they built the EU as a
dictatorship.
EU treaties and publications
abolishing our 48 counties
The Conservative Con trick
Many people have been fooled by the
Conservative Party into believing
the party is anti EU. It was the
Conservatives, under Ted Heath, who
took us in to the EU, and then he
lied that his 1972 EU Treaty
wouldn't affect our sovereignty.
Three out of the four Prime
Ministers who signed the 6 EU
treaties were Conservatives, every
one af them legally a traitor under
the British laws of their time. Do
you see a pattern here?
In 2005 Party Leader Michael
Howard could have won the election
for the Conservatives by making one
simple statement: "We will repeal
the 1972 EU Communities Act and
leave Europe". Millions of
Conservative voters would have
rejoined the fold. A million
Lib-Dems and Labour voters would
have joined him. But he didn't.
Because the Conservative
leadership would rather be in Europe
than be in power.
Instead Howard continued
betraying Conservative voters, so he
lost. (And to be fair, why should
Conservative leaders miss out on the
EU corruption gravy train?)
The Conservative leadership is
completely dedicated to joining
Europe, none more so than David
Cameron, who is using the language
and methods of Common Purpose
against the Conservative Party.
Conservative policy is to reform
the EU from the inside
(renegotiation). We've been in it 34
years and failed to refom this
dictatorship one jot. Their policy
is to continue this complete
failure, and they know this pretence
is wholly dishonest. You either
submit to 100% of the EU or don't
join it at all; that is the only
choice open to us.
Half a cheer for the Lib-Dems
They realise we're now living in
what is legally a police state, and
speak out against it. We've been
forced to harmonise our laws with
the EU during the 34 years we've
been inside, and the police state
we're living in is the EU's. The
Lib-Dems tell us with stunning
naivity its Labour's police state,
don't seem to realise the EU is
behind it, and are still madly in
favour of the EU. Its no comfort
that they will suffer for their
stupidity. Lately some Lib-Dem MP's
have been talking about the Tories
pathetic "reform the EU" idea. Will
they never learn?
With the Labour and Lib-Dem
parties openly for Europe, and the
Conservative leadership secretly for
it, its clear the three parties will
never give us a vote to leave the EU
and keep our nation. Massive civil
disobedience, a permanent General
Strike, or a blockade of Westminster
until MP's resign might be
effective.
The abolition of the Labour,
Conservative and Lib-Dem parties.
So sloppy have our politicians been
in their reading of the EU treaties,
most haven't noticed that the EU
will abolish our Labour,
Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. It
was clear in the Madrid 1999 party
financing document, and it was
re-stated in the Constitution,
clause I-46-4. Only pan European
parties like the EPP will be
allowed. Some politicians, like
Heseltine and Ken Clarke, can't wait
for this to happen.
A date for the abolition of
Westminster has tactfully not been
given
Once the 6th treaty is signed,
Westminster's remaining powers are
transferred to Brussels, and
Westminster is left with the powers
of a county council. Except it won't
have a county, because they will be
abolished under the Regionalisation
plan. The 9 EU regions report direct
to Brussels, so Westminster will be
a county council without a county.
Anyone with half a brain can see
Brussels will abolish Westminster,
as it's only potential use would be
as a rallying point to challenge the
power of Brussels.
The Queen, Treason and the
Coronation oath
Together with Churchill, King George
VI saved our nation; he was a
Monarch to be proud of. But his
daughter the Queen is the only
monarch to have broken her
coronation oath, by signing these
five treaties that abolish our
common law, the British
Constitution, the British and
English nations, and our
sovereignty. She has also committed
treason, together with
co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret
Thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair.
Realising they stood a good
chance of spending the rest of their
lives behind bars, Tony Blair and
the Queen signed the Crime and
Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which
secretly abolished much of the crime
of treason - they didn't tell the
MP's what they had just voted for.
1.4 million British Servicemen
gave their lives for our
independence. The Queen has thrown
their sacrifices away and made them
worthless.
At no physical risk to herself,
she could have fulfilled her duty as
a constitutional check and balance,
by refusing to sign the five
treaties until an in/out referendum
had been held. In the unlikely event
the vote went against her she might
have lost her crown (not her life or
a limb), and kept her £9 billion
plus palaces. Those servicemen's
lives would still have meant
something.
But she's dead keen to sign;
she's already said she'll sign the
last treaty. Princes Charles,
William or Harry can then never be
King. You can't have a King without
a Kingdom: they can only be princes
of a region (principality) within
Europe.
The Queen's aspirations are not
ours; she clearly serves a higher
and darker master; the faith she
defends cannot be the one we think
it is. King George VI must be
turning over in his grave.
The new EU Hitler doesn't have
to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler
first had to get elected, if on a
35% minority vote, and then get his
Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator
has no such problems. Our EU rulers
do not submit themselves for
election now. And the Queen has
already signed the Enabling Act
(Civil Contingencies Act 2004).
The EU's Hitler will have a much
easier rise to power, and will have
the formerly British and French
nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf
Hitler killed 54 million people. The
EU's dictator could kill a billion
at the touch of a button, with no
democratic checks and balances to
answer to. How could any aspiring
dictator resist the EU opportunity?
.
Some revolutionary lyrics -
We're being fooled again
A diagram of the parallel
EU Government in the UK.
The wiring of the EU in Britain
EU subversion of our Government.
A link to
ukip-plymouth.org.uk
Our other site:
drjn.co.uk
Common Purpose, training 18,000
of our new EU rulers at all levels
of our government now.
As a word doc.
The Legislative and Regulatory
Reform Bill 2006 -
government doesn't need Parliament.
Cromwell had something similar in
the 1680's. Is there anyone out
there who doesn't realise all the
treaties and laws of a dictatorship,
and more, are now enacted? And that
all it takes is for a foreign power,
the EU, to enforce them?
Do we want to be in Europe? Do we
want to lose democratic government,
the nations of Britain and England,
and all our counties? Do we want to
put ourselves in the EU, where we
will be at the mercy of any dictator
who chooses to control us? Isn't the
answer obviously "No" ?
We can live again outside
Europe
Outside the EU we can be a free and
properly democratic nation. Free
from Europe we could stop half our
government spending being wasted,
could save the £200 billion a year
it costs us to be in Europe, repeal
all its 107,000 regulations, and
stop losing the £22 billion a year
to Europe on our balance of
payments. With those vast savings we
could easily pay all our people a
good living wage. According to the
OECD we are the 4th strongest
economy amongst the world's 205
independent nations, and we will
make it handsomely.
We could leave the EU in 14
hours
The fastest an Act of Parliament has
been drafted, passed by Parliament
and signed by the Monarch was the
abdication of King Edward 8th. It
was done in 13.5 hours. We could
repeal the 1972 European Communities
Act and be out of Europe in just
fourteen hours, if our traiterous
MP's, Prime Minister and Queen so
wished. So far they've illegally
denied us the choice. We need to
change that, but we may only have
two years left before the final 6th
treaty is signed.
Thank you. Please choose one of
the six actions above and complete
it.
Questions? Call David
Noakes: 07974 437 097
drjnoakesdel@yahoo.co.uk
but delete the three letters "del"
-this is to stop automated spam.
The Westminster News
Please donate to help us spread
the word:
Paypal accepts credit cards.
The EU dictatorship: Poverty under a
brutal police state.
This is: http://eutruth.org.uk
Questions for Bush.
This site is ©
Copyright David Noakes 1997-2007,
All Rights Reserved, but permission
to copy and republish is granted.
07974 437 097.
|
|
*
THE PEOPLE
HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
*
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
SAY VOTERS
by
Daniel
Martin
Political
Reporter
[Daily
Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters
believe Britain should drop the
controversial European Treaty in the wake of
its rejection in last week's
IRISH
REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories
launch a last-ditch bid in the
HOUSE of
LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION
OF THE TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING
STREET- WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T
YOU?]
Downing
Street website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
|
*
|