IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT
A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?
the Daily Mail on Wednesday, March 2nd 2005 an article by John Mortimer on
a subject which no inhabitant in our Island would previously expect to be
highlighted in a once Free Country shows the depths to which a Government in
the early years of the 21st century can destroy the very Key-stone
of our Constitution which is considered world -wide as the essence of English
A SHAMEFUL DAY
AND BRITISH JUSTICE
Without exploding a suicide bomb or firing a shot, the
terrorists have managed to strike a successful blow at our most cherished
look like succeeding in destroying our civil rights and liberties, our right to
a fair trial and the proper protection of the law.
as I say, they haven’t had to move a finger to do it. Mr Charles Clarke and the Government have been only too eager to
do the work for them.
Monday night, the Government’s shameful and ill thought out anti terrorist legislation
was passed amid a Commons revolt which resulted in Tony Blair’s majority
falling to 14 votes.
this was after the Home Secretary had abandoned the most contentious part of
the Prevention of Terrorism Bill, a Bill which would allow the Government to
put suspects under House Arrest without trial.
would mean any British citizen could be detained, for an indefinite period, in
his or her home without knowing what they are accused of and without being
allowed to challenge the evidence against them.
this muddled, unnecessary and destructive law reaches the Statute Book, it
will be a victory for terrorism.
Clarke has dismissed
talk of civil rights as ‘rhetoric’ and has said that he is tired of being
patronised by lawyers.
what he calls ‘rhetoric’ is our centuries-old pride in the right to a fair trial
- an unshakeable privilege that has been called the golden thread running
through our justice system and has made it the envy of the world.
was the Magna
Carta in 1215
that gave us the right to a fair trial, and the 1628 Petition of Right that followed ensured there
would be no
imprisonment without such a trial.
contrast to European countries, we have the right to habeas corpus,
after the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679.
from the Latin habeas corpus means ‘you should have a body’,
for under the Act a judge can command the Government to bring any body -or person
- in its custody to a specified court for a trial to ensure he is accorded
due process of law.
These rights didn’t come
easily. They were fought and striven
for over the centuries, and preserved during times of far greater danger than
we are facing today.
if we assume that the dangers are as the Government and the Secret
Services say they are - the same Government and Secret Services, remember that led us into the Iraq war
on totally unreliable information - this would be no excuse for the wanton destruction
of our hard-won rights and liberties under the law.
truth of the matter is that we have a Government, which has shown itself as
impatient and contemptuous of civil rights as it is of proceedings in
Parliament; and its Home Secretaries have snipped off more of the golden thread
than those of any party before them.
Straw brought in plans to restrict the right to trial by jury. In rape cases, inroads have been made on the
presumption of innocence, another precious right which separates us from other
Blunkett, totally ignoring the right to free speech, introduced a Bill stopping
people from criticising or even making jokes about other religions.
he plunged into the shame of imprisonment without trial - locking up nine
foreign citizens suspected of terrorism in Belmarsh Prison, only to have the
Law Lords insist they must be set free.
Charles Clarke has launched his attack on the Magna Carta, a subject of such
apparent unimportance to our present rulers that Parliament was allowed only some six hours
to discuss it.
As Edward Leigh, the Tory MP for Gainsborough said during
the debate, this amounted to just one hour for every century that had passed
since the Magna Carta was signed on the island of Runnymede.
Bill as it was originally presented to the House of Commons -with brisk
instructions to get on with it because the Belmarsh prisoners are due for
release on March 14 -beggars all description.
is less like a provision that might be suggested in a country allegedly
civilised under the RULE of LAW than the arbitrary regulation of a backward
politician, who happened to be Home Secretary could order the House Arrest, the isolation, the
removal from his or her family and friends, of any British citizen, and forbid
them to communicate, make telephone calls or use the internet.
The advice on which the Home Secretary would be relying
would not be made public, and the victim would have no idea what was happening
or what the charges were.
It’s only too easy to imagine this very secret weapon
being used by some future ruthless politician to stifle and silence dissension
or immobilise lawful protesters.
as it stood, it was a proposal that couldn’t be accepted in any country proud
to live under the RULE of LAW.
Mr Clarke’s concession, introduced in the most cack-handed
manner by a letter to the Opposition, delivered in the middle of the debate,
hardly took a step back to the Magna Carta.
Judge would, after all, be asked to look at a case of House Arrest, but
could do so only after the politician had decided it.
sort of an effective trial the judge could conduct is extremely doubtful, and
he would have no power to interfere with the banning of telephone calls and so
on that the politician had commanded.
This week, a young man, said to have been a bright grammar
school boy - but an undoubted terrorist -was put on trial for planning to blow
up a transatlantic plane with explosives in his shoes.
He stood in the dock at the \Old Bailey, there was nothing
secret about his trial and he knew exactly what the charges against him where.
he hadn’t changed his plea to guilty, his trial would have been conducted along
the lines of the golden thread, which stretches from Magna Carta to today.
one terrorist can be tried, and I mean really tried and not merely his guilt
decided by a politician, why can’t they all be arrested, charged and have the
case proved against them?
to ask such a question would, presumably make Mr Clarke sigh heavily, mouthing
about rhetoric and being patronised by lawyers.
so much easier to enact ‘justice’ by signing where the Secret Services ask you
to sign and by doing so to cut someone of from life for reasons, which he or
she may never know.
his part Tony Blair says that protection from terrorism is more important than
Blair is wrong. Of course terrorism must be fought, terrorists caught, tried and, if
guilty, convicted. But this is only half the
We must learn to defeat them without being scared into
betraying the most precious things we have struggled to establish over hundreds
we don’t do this, we may, perhaps, win the war against terrorism and then find
out that we have lost the very civilisation we were fighting for.
altered-Bolding &Underlining used -comments in brackets.]
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the
controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF THE
have signed a
DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street website is
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the
absolute necessity of a
HEAR HIM ON
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER
BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.
TIME FOR DECISION
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.
The Act of Settlement of
1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!
The Common Law of ENGLAND
is the LAW of
THE COMMONWEALTH and
The Commonwealth Realms V
The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND
WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE
YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT
OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE
WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD
BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF
OUR PROTECTOR OF THE
Will keep by HER SACRED OATH
or the MONARCHY be nothing more
than a THEME PARK in the future
THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS
THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.
We are told on
the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the
23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage
of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as far as many patriotic
subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns
the protection of our
FREEDOM and COUNTRY.
Change we have had and will continue
to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of
England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and
Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened in the
17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very
and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in
the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of
PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity exercise is to be used to
soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a
Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and
WE ASK WHAT
PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?
The Choice is Yours!-but time is
running out FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
to join THEM
not joining US
WE have more to LOSE
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of
dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY
been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!
Our Queen and the EU
The Spirit of England
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH
We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT
on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic
fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year
reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and
the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR
CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel
LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE
GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost
achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.
The reason for the marked drop in the
number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people
have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while
it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks our Rights
and Liberties are being taken from us under our very noses?
course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and
Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to
be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the
MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.
We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who
is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this late
stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE
at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for
their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.
IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been
pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects
some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is
after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and
therefore nothing more than a
Hear Tony Benn's comments about the
despotic and corrupt
and the need for a
From a politician with INTEGRITY and
love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the
monstrous creature soon to be a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]
ALL OUR VIEWERS.
WE WISH YOU ALL A
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR
[Since our Xmas message to you all last
year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added
emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors
in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN
We Remember The Year 2006
of England-Winston Churchill-1953
[We were warned in 1953 to
beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken
Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds
they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor
Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final
signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000
year PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of
HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN
Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred
'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897
'We still leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state
which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has
already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final
signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE
It is within the power of Her
Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever
lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now
clear for ALL TO SEE.
In the Netherlands a number of years
ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put
before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over
1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS
which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the
Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS
BE THE LAST
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL
PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD
'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '
"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions
taking place in the open air"
Guenter Burghardt, a former EU
ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic
service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should
not be discussed in public before the
had ratified the NEW EU TREATY
and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next
summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007
has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until
the English have ratified their TREATY.
next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of
the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in
a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what
has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they
are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you
will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for
Referendum: how Labour could
still smell of roses.
leave the EU in 2008?
Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13
- Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent
- Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p
Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent
Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in
less than a year
AND MUCH MORE
Commons debate on the European Communities
(Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.
A TIME FOR
EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING
VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
[All underlined words have a separate