CONTROL OUR COURTS AND BORDERS IS KEY TO A SUCCESSFUL EUROSCEPTIC
Mobilising the support of the millions
who want to win back the right to control our courts and our borders is
a key to a successful eurosceptic strategy.
A ruthless drive to a referendum is
the only viable way left.
There are two covert truths at the
heart of the Conservative Party's attitude towards the European Union
and both inspire utter terror. As few politicians are renowned for their
steely courage, that is why they remain covert
One is that it used to be the case that
there existed two quite clear, distinct and separate destinations to the
European journey. One was a totally integrated United States of Europe,
the heritage of Monnet -Hallstrom and Delors, entailing an absolutely
unavoidable (indeed desired) termination of the NATION-STATE.
The other was the Europe of [Free]
Nations, deriving from de Gaulle's Union des Patries.
For thirty-five years the Tory Party
has espoused the latter, loudly proclaiming that it would never
entertain the former.
IT STILL DOES
The terrifying truth is that the other
option [of Free nation-states] is DEAD, DEFEATED, off the menu and has
been for at least a DECADE. Despite the DEFEAT (for a while) of
the Giscardian Constitution, the United States of Europe has wiped the
floor with its rival and WON HANDS DOWN.
[A book by an MEP espousing the
importance of the above defeated option shows that they are so convinced
by their own propaganda that some kind soul should gently approach the
MEP for the West Midlands Philip Bushill-Mathews and let him know the
TRUTH because his latest publication 'Who Rules
Britannia' he is so dedicated to his mission that he is
selling a product that the Trading Standards Department would agree is
out of date and misleading to his viewers. Possibly he might consider a
reprint to put the record straight as he appears a straight kind of
Turning the Ship
Despite this the Tory leadership, since
Major's first hours of incumbency, has bleated on about turning the ship
around, being in the driving seat, being at the Heart of Europe,
converting everyone to the British point of view and 'reforming' the EU
to bring it back to the British wish.
TRUTH ONE: This is a pipe dream
and everyone knows it.
The Euro-fanatics in the party do nor
gloat because they recognise that in a few years their supremacy will
have become irreversible; that successive leaderships dare not admit
their complete defeat because daring takes moral courage which the
Tories have NOT HAD since 1990.
So the charade is pursued year after
year. Posture, declaim, beat the drum, shout the platitudes, strike
Conference poses, and then [as always] capitulate again.
TRUTH TWO: Goes back to
1992 Maastricht Treaty
-After John Major used the methodology
of the Kray twins to force the ratification of the birth-treaty of the
United States of Europe through a rebellious party, the canard was put
about that the sceptics were a danger to the unity of the party and thus
to re-election. The media seldom the sharpest knives in the
drawer, have propagated this amiable fiction.
IN TRUTH THE REVERSE IS THE CASE.
The Conservatives' euro-fanatics are
the same coterie that connived, plotted and executed the political
assassination of Margaret Thatcher -not the Poll Tax (another cosy
canard) but for
No! No! No!
And in pursuit of their Utopian vision
they are quite prepared to tear the party apart and guarantee that a
euro-sceptic Tory Party does NOT TAKE POWER -IF NEED BE.
Thus five consecutive party
leaders have been told quietly but in terms they understand, that it
would be suicidal to affront the Euro--fanatic minority.
[ We have on a number of occasions
suggested that the Eurosceptic majority should go it alone under a new
label such as
'The Real Conservative Party'
-after all if the Labour Party could change its label
why not the True Conservative Party. And of course we have seen the Real
David Cameron fits perfectly into the
succession. He has grouped half a dozen EU-fanatics around him, he
despises euro-sceptism, wishes the whole thing would go away and will do
all he can to avoid it. The point of this article is to claim that
he has one huge Achilles heel and that if the patriotic majority wants
to win this time (and it may be the last) they simply have to renounce
more verbal protests and meet iron with steel.
Can it be done? Oh Yes. Will It? let's
give it a shot.
FIRST a few harsh realities. words
Only an incumbent British Government can
repeal the Act of Accession to the Treaty of Rome.
No British government under any circumstances is going to
do that. That is a given pledge. Only one party, the United Kingdom
Independence Party would pledge it, and UKIP is not going to be the next
British Government , and we all know that.
The Better Off Out movement? Nice Idea -but NO! I support
it of course, but it is not going to change David Cameron's mind.
By issuing the 'NO CAREER UNDER ME' he has curbed the
converts to a maximum of fifty. And he does not need to give a damn
about them. he needs to keep every one of his 197 and win another 123
back from Labour and the LibDems.
Inside the figure of 330 he can easily absorb fifty or a
hundred rebels. If they had to swear to believe in the tooth fairy to
win, so be it. So long as they win and put him in Downing Street. After
that , the whips take over and he can go on beaming his way around
Brussels. Fifty among three hundred is quite manageable.
WHAT THEN? Three things.
the key is not cold-turkey extraction but a second NATIONAL REFERENDUM.
David Cameron will hate it and fight it. But if he is
forced to give an irreversible manifesto pledge to hold one, he would be
in desperate trouble if he tried, after entering Downing Street, to
Second, not a referendum on in/out but on Repatriation of
Powers. WHY? Because the first, with enough bribery and mendacity could
even be lost. BUT millions and millions of our fellow Brits see
repatriation of the right to control our borders and courts as perfectly
reasonable. This must be a referendum won by such a majority that it
could not be rigged or repudiated. And the third thing. It is a
phenomenon that is changing our lives.
For the first time a shrewd, funded campaign, which the
Show YOUR SUPPORT and get YOUR COUNTY
or call us on
or Post to :
PO Box 440
-offensive intends to be, can vault over the heads of
Constituency MPs, party leaderships and the Media, and address millions
of voters in their own homes by mailbox or website.
The message will be simple. If you believe in this
country, stand up and be counted. Sign a pledge, by mail or on line. Say
that you will simply not vote for any party that takes a million Tory
Suppose two million more are added to that -even
as pledged abstainers. And suppose all three million came back to the
Conservatives on the pledge.....Do the maths.
Given the choice of bowing to the EU-fanatics with a
guarantee of staying in OPPOSITION, or giving the people what they want
and presumably going to Downing Street, which would David Cameron
The trouble with the Euro-fanatics is they are ruthless.
And the trouble with me is ...so am I.
[ We find the scheme original and a
possibility of working BUT there are a number of Buts to consider.
FIRST: It is more than possible that David Cameron would
rather keep his job as Opposition leader than give away his friends in
ALL the political parties in Westminster.
SECOND: Only if David Cameron was replaced as leader
would there possibly be co-operation.
THIRD : There may never be another General Election
because Gordon Brown would just sit tight until the danger is past.
FOURTH: In the end it could come down to the millions
against the Treaty to take to the streets in a Civil War.
In the 1215 Magna Carta the
keystone of English Liberty there is a provision for the twenty five
Barons to oversee that the provisions of the Treaty are carried out and
should the King renege on his promise to obey the Carta to take the
necessary action as indicated in it's historic document.*
Great Charter of Liberties*
The 61st clause of the CHARTER by which means were
provided for enforcing the due observance of the CHARTER.
61. (Enforcement) Since, moreover, for
the sake of God, and for the improvement of our kingdom, and for better
quieting of the hostility sprung up lately between us and our barons, we
have made all these concessions; wishing them to enjoy these in a
complete and firm stability forever, we make and concede to them the
security described below; that is to say, that they shall elect
twenty-five barons of the kingdom, whom they will, who ought with
all their power to observe, hold, and cause to be observed, the peace
and liberties which we have conceded to them, and by this our present
charter confirmed to them; in this manner, that if we or our justiciar,
or our bailiffs, or any one of our servants shall have done wrong in any
way toward any one, or shall have transgressed any of the articles of
peace and security; and the wrong shall have been shown to four barons
come to us of the aforesaid twenty-five barons, let these four barons
come to us or our justiciar, if we are out of the kingdom, laying before
us the transgression, and let them ask that we cause that
transgression to be corrected without delay. And if we shall not have
corrected the transgression or, if we shall be out of the Kingdom, if
our justiciar shall not have corrected it within a period of forty days,
counting from the time in which it has been shown to us or our justiciar,
if we are out of the kingdom; the aforesaid four barons shall refer the
matter to the remainder of the twenty-five barons, and let these
twenty-five barons with the whole community of the country distress and
injure us in every way they can; that is to say by the seizure of our
castles, lands, possessions, and in such other ways as they can until it
shall have been corrected according to our judgment, saving our person
and that of the queen, and those of her children; and when correction
has been made, let them devote themselves to us as they did before.
And let whoever in the country wishes to take an oath that in all the
above-mentioned measures he will obey the orders of the aforesaid
twenty-five barons, and that he will injure us as far as he is able with
them, and we give permission to swear publicly and freely to each one
who wishes to swear, and we ever forbid to swear. All those,
moreover, in the country who of themselves and their own will are
unwilling to take an oath to the twenty-five barons as to distressing
and injuring us along with them, we will compel to take the oath by our
mandate, as before said. And if any of the twenty-five barons shall have
died or departed from the land or shall in any way be prevented from
taking the above-mentioned action, let the remainder of the aforesaid
twenty-five barons choose another in his place, according to their
judgment, who shall take an oath in the same way as the others. In all
those things, moreover, which are committed to those five and twenty
barons to carry out, if perhaps the twenty-five are present, and some
disagreement arises among them about something, or if any of them when
they are summoned are not willing or able to be present, let that be
considered valid and firm which the greater part of those who are
present arrange or command, just as if the whole twenty-five had
agreed in this; and let the aforesaid twenty-five swear that they will
observe faithfully all the things which are said above, and with all
their ability cause them to be observed. And we will obtain
nothing from any one, either by ourselves or by another by which any of
these concessions and liberties shall be revoked or diminished; and if
any such thing shall have been obtained, let it be invalid and void, and
we will never use it by ourselves or by another.
(The majority rule.) There is one
other provision of this CHARTER which has received very little
attention, although it is the one provision in the whole document with a
truly modern ring. This is the clause saying that the opinion of the
majority of those present of the TWENTY -FIVE shall prevail. It is
an early statement of the MAJORITY RULE. Without such a RULE modern
GOVERNMENT would be IMPOSSIBLE and it is lamentable that so little is
known of it's HISTORY in ENGLAND.
Today in 2007 there must be many
members past and present of the House of Lords even Law Lords who will
at the time of choice decide to join the fight for our historic FREEDOM.
As a first step the 'Speak Out' campaign
will UNITE all loyal minded people and the greater the number the more the
possibility that MPs will change their alliances and join the Freedom
Only time will tell if this last option takes place
-which it certainly will if the Government refuses to listen and
COMPROMISE or the severe consequences are down to them.
TIME WILL TELL
- 9th February 2007
Vol 12 No 9
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used -Comments in Brackets]
is on show in cinemas across the
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
have signed a
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a