DAILY
MAIL
PETER-McKAY
-Slippery-Daves-right-European-Union-Our-real-enemy-Frau-Merkel.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
We have taken the rare case to outline the above work by
Peter MCKAY because it has touched on so many important
matters with regard to the NAZI PLAN in 1943 for their
domination of EUROPE under a EUROPEAN UNION which was to
become in time a ONE-STATE EUROPE on the road to a
ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT UNDER A SMALL ELITE who would oversee
a SLAVE STATE of the MAJORITY reminiscent of
H. G. WELLS'S
1984
[COMMENTS and many CAPS are OURS!]
JUNE-2014 |
Forget
tipsy Jean-Claude Juncker. Our real EU ENEMY is the GERMAN CHANCELLOR
ANGELA MERKEL.
Initially she agreed
with David Cameron that Juncker was a useless candidate for presidency
of the EU COMMISSION. But then she supported the ill-regarded
Luxembourger.
WHY? Because she could
easily manage him and he suited her purposes better than the main
alternative candidate who is her Socialist rival in Germany.
Meanwhile, surprise is
expressed about how several other national leaders who had agreed with
Cameron privately that Juncker was unacceptable then voted otherwise.
This is to
MISUNDERSTAND the NATURE of the EUROPEAN UNION.
In
theory, the 28 [so-called] enjoy EQUAL RIGHTS, but in practice its run
[on behalf of NAZI INTERNATIONAL] by [GERMAN
CHANCELLOR]
ANGELA MERKEL
There's fancy talk
about EU community spirit and a vision of what 'EUROPE' can be in the
world, but the TRUTH is that MERKEL is QUEEN BEE and the 27 other
NATIONAL LEADERS are HER DRONES
It's said by
Cameron-haters that he is a secret EUROPHILE who only seeks changes in
Britain's relationship with the EU so as to head off Eurosceptics in his
own party,and UKIP.
If that was ever
true it can't be the case now.
The dislike European
citizens have expressed in elections for FEDERALISM - and the CONTEMPT
for their voters which national leaders have now indicated by choosing
arch-federalist Juncker-might even made Europhobes out of the EU's
FOUNDING FATHERS.
SO WHERE DOES HER
MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION STAND?
Labour's posture on
Juncker is surely beneath contempt. They pretend to share Cameron's
belief that the EU NEEDS REFORM-and POWER must be RETURNED to NATIONAL
GOVERNMENTS - but claim that the PM went about it THE WRONG WAY.
So what would have been
the right way? Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls didn't manage to explain that
on ANDREW MARR'S TV SHOW yesterday.
He had simply
mesmerised a sound bite which he repeated:
'We won't be
influential in the world if we're not influential in Europe.'
Which I took to mean:
'AGREE WITH GERMANY AT
ALL COSTS. IGNORE PUBLIC DISSENT ABOUT FEDERALISM AND THE EU's
UNDEMOCRATIC PROCEDURES.
Keep our heads down and
avoid argument.'
As for Cameron, he has
played Mr Nice Guy too long. The reforms he sought were minimal until
Jean Claude Juncker appeared. But the determination of MERKEL and HER
DRONES to impose an ever-FEDERALIST EUROPE changes EVERYTHING.
SO, NO MORE MR NICE
GUY, I HOPE
Meanwhile in Scotland,
SNP leader and FIRST MINISTER ALEX SALMOND - always seeking new reasons
for ditching the UNION-warns that Cameron's promised REFERENDUM in 2017
[WHY ARE WE WAITING MR
CAMERON?]
on Britain's EU
Membership might take us OUT OF THE EU, something HE'D OPPOSE.
Another reason for
voting YES to SECESSION, Salmond suggests.
Is that true for a
majority of Scots?
I wouldn't have thought
so. Besides, if Scots vote to quit the UK, they will lose their
membership of the EU and have to apply to rejoin.
IT'S A CURIOUS KIND OF
COUNTRY WHICH DUMPS A 300-PLUS YEAR UNION WITH A CONTIGUOUS NEIGHBOUR
FOR ONE LED BY GERMANY WHICH IT HAS TWICE FOUGHT AGAINST IN TWO WORLD
WARS.
[But what we find even
more curious is how IRELAND which has fought the ENGLISH for CENTURIES
for its INDEPENDENCE as a FREE NATION STATE has so readily given it
away to be part of a Satanic-collectivist-undemocratic-FEDERALIST
EUROPE. Of course we all know that it is the POLITICIANS in the
so-called MEMBER STATES out of touch with THE PEOPLE, who love to be
IMPORTANT INDIVIDUALS in such a POWERFUL CLUB]
I surpose I am like
most voters: I see the advantage of a friendly trading relationship with
other nations
BUT NOT
when I am
affected by laws made elsewhere, over which I have no control.
And like most people I
dislike the coercive arguments used by EUROFANS who say we'll lose
millions of jobs if we quit the EU. As if it were impossible to trade
with EU members without belonging to the club.
Fans of Europe used to
argue that membership of the EU would entail
NO LOSS OF
SOVEREIGNTY
NOW THEY SAY IT DOESN'T MATTER
BUT IT DOES MATTER TO MANY PEOPLE
And if the public votes against
federalism, that should be taken into account and not ignored.
The cynicism of powerful FRAU
MERKEL, backing the useless JUNCKER is a WAKE-UP CALL: the EU is headed
for a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE
run by
GERMANY
Eurofans will say this is not so,
just as they denied that we'd SUFFER any LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY. They LIED
then and they'll LIE NOW. Or they will say NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY
DOESN'T MATTER
in 2014.
DON'T BELIEVE A WORD OF IT.
The PUBLIC DEMAND for the
RESTORATION of NATIONAL POWERS frightens OUR EU RULERS. They worry over
where it can end. the EU leaders solution: ignore it and speed up the
federalism of Europe. Its for it's own good.
David Cameron isn't to every taste.
And he's been slipery about Europe for years,
BUT
HE WAS RIGHT about JUNCKER, and
HE'S RIGHT about EU REFORM.
More!
*
[An excellent article at a crucial
moment in the history of our country when the PEOPLE have it in THEIR
HANDS to return THEIR COUNTRY to a FREE INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATIC ISLAND
NATION STATE.]
[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS
JUNE 30-2014
H F 162 |