(1994 - EDP Official Website - JULY - PT1- 2020 )-

PT 2- PT - 3 - PT 4 -  PT 5  PT 6

NOVEMBER - HOME-  PART 1 -  PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

OCT H  1 2 3 4 5 6

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019      MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019      

  MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2019

       MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

 

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

 

*

FOR THE RETURN

OF THE

ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

AT

WESTMINSTER

AND

 

 

 [A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT FROM WALES AND SCOTLAND]

 

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined capitals - words have a separate bulletin]

   

 

 

TOP SPOT!

 

 

H.F.1424

 

*

 

 

LITTLEJOHN
 

 

As MPs go off on their

summer holidays...

BASKET CASE

BRITAIN

IS GOING

 

 

BANKRUPT

 

 

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: As MPs go off on

 

 

their

 

 

summer holidays ...

 

JULY24,2020

 BORIS JOHNSON wants to clear Backing Britain by the end of September. Good luck with that.

He hasn't a hope in hell's chance of persuading feather-bedded civil servants back to their desks any time soon.

Why would they

, when M P's  have just knocked off for six weeks' summer holiday? If the Government was serious about getting the country up to speed again. Parliament would have scrapped the summer recess.

It's not as if MPs have been rushed off their feet lately, Most of them have been content to stay at home, working out how to spend the extra

£10,OOO

they awarded themselves to cope with the

CORONA CRISIS.

THEY SHOULD BE AT WESTMINSTER SUBJECTING THE GOVERNMENT'S INCREASINGLY BAFFLING AND INCONSISTENT COVID RESPONSE TO PROPER SCRUTINY, BUT WHILE MPS ARE MISSING IN ACTION, THE UNIONS WOULD SCREAM BLUE MURDER IF CIVIL SERVANTS WERE ORDERED BACK TO WORK.

Given the way ministers caved in to the teachers, there's not the remotest possibility that the Civil Service will be back to normal by September. The backlog of

PASSPORT APPLICATIONS

DRIVING LICECENCES

BIRTH CERTIFICATES

Will only get worse.

Of course, the Government could have set up a simple system which would have allowed people to download the documents online. They could have issued six-month or one -year extensions, complete  with readablle bar codes, to be attached to licences and passports.

It shouldn't be any more complicated than Amazon's system for returning  unwanted or faulty goods. passports.

But that would have called for innovation, flexibility and political courage. And the unions would never agree to it, so it ain't gonna happen. My best guess is that it will be in the middle of next year before the backlog is cleared. If ever, the way things are going...

*  *  *

...It can't go on. Parliament should be recalled and the Civil Service ordered back immediately.

Instead of continuing to chuck money we haven't got at everything from the extended furlough scheme to half-price hamburgers, the Chancellor should be offering generous tax breaks, whatever it takes to get factories and offices back up running again.

Frankly, I fear few people-including half the Cabinet - have any idea of the scale of the carnage coming down the pipe.

NEVER MIND BACKING BRITAIN, ITS BANKRUPT BRITAIN WE SHOULD BE WORRYING ABOUT NOW.

[IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY A GOVERNMENT CAN DO WHAT IT WANTS TO KEEP THE PEOPLE SAFE AND KEEP EVERYONE AT THEIR POSTS!].

This is an extensive article and full details are available in

FULL ARTICLE

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JULY24,2020

 

H.F.2056

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

PETER HITCHENS: Face masks turn us

 

 

 

into

 

voiceless ...

 

 Daily Mail

JULY 21,2020

in the name of Covid, the State has already thrust itself into every corner of our existence.

It has come between husbands and wives at the ends of their lives. It has forbidden the old to embrace their grandchildren.

It has denied us funerals and weddings, locked the churches, silenced the ancient monastic music of cathedral choirs and prevented the free worship of God for the first time in 800 years, and banned us (unless we are Left-wing) from holding or attending public meetings.

It has ordered us to stay at home, scolded or fined us for sunbathing, going on country rambles or even entering our front gardens.

It has forced millions of us to stop working, sabotaged the educations – at school and university – of untold numbers of young people and has become our boss and paymaster in the biggest state takeover of life and work ever attempted by non-Communists.

The Case Against

 

Masks...Heckenlively, KentBuy New $12.99

Soon we will discover that it has also wrecked an already wobbly economy and separated untold numbers of us from jobs and businesses we thought were safe. Soon, too, it will also separate us from our savings, through punishing tax and savage inflation, to pay for the disaster it has caused.

Now it presumes to tell us what to wear. And what it wants us to wear is a soggy cloth muzzle, a face-nappy that turns its wearer from a normal human into a mumbling, mouthless submissive.

And this, it seems, is popular. Is there nothing the modern British people will not put up with? Britain’s muzzle consumption is now so high that six months from now there will be reports of dolphins and whales floundering about in an ocean made sticky by millions of gallons of hand-sanitiser, as they choke on congealed clumps of used muzzles. These items are set to become the new plastic bags.

Why is this frenzy taking place?

Here is a clue. On July 12, Deborah Cohen, the medical correspondent of BBC2’s Newsnight, revealed an astonishing thing. The World Health Organisation (WHO) had reversed its advice on face masks, from ‘don’t wear them’ to ‘do wear them’.

But the key fact was that it had not done so because of scientific information – the evidence had not backed the wearing of face coverings – but because of political lobbying.

She revealed on Twitter that: ‘We had been told by various sources [that the] WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying.’ She said the BBC had then put this to the WHO, which did not deny it.

In March, the WHO had said: ‘There is currently no evidence that wearing a mask (whether medical or other types) by healthy persons in the wider community setting, including universal community masking, can protect them from infection with respiratory viruses, including Covid-19.’

The American TV news channel CNN reported on March 31 that Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO health emergencies programme, had said at a briefing in Geneva: ‘There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population

has any potential benefit.

Technocracy: The Hard ...W

‘In fact, there’s some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly.’

A few weeks ago, the WHO changed its advice to say it ‘advises that governments should encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult, such as on public transport, in shops or in other confined or crowded environments.’

Earlier that same month, England’s chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, had said that wearing face masks would do little to combat the outbreak.

While noting that if someone was infected, they might reduce the danger of spreading the disease by covering their faces, Prof Whitty said wearing a face mask had almost no effect on reducing the risk of contracting the illness.

He stated: ‘In terms of wearing a mask, our advice is clear: that wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all. So we do not advise that.’

Read the Whole Article

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

'A law which supports a lie we must all defy-Freedom can be lost unless truth leads the way.'

 

 

JULY 21,2020

H.F.2053

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

FREE SPEECH

 

 

 

DEMONISED!

 

IT IS TIME TO TELL THE 'WOKE' BRIGADE

 TO GO TO

HELL!

 

 

['WOKE' IS AN INSIDIOUS DISEASE OF THE MIND WHICH MUST BE BROKEN! FOR JOHN MILTON WARNED DURING THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR THAT ONLY FREE SPEECH WILL SEEK OUT THE TRUTH]

 

 

 

 

IN 1945 THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT-FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT (1882-1945)

 

 

STATED:

 

'A world founded upon four essential freedoms

 

 

The first is freedom of speech and expression - everywhere in the world

 

 

The second is freedom of every person to worship god in his own way-everywhere in the world.

 

 

The third is freedom from want...everywhere in the world.

 

 

The fourth is freedom from fear...anywhere in the world

 

 

( Speech,6 January,1941)

 

 

*

 

[Since that time  the scourge of political correctness has embedded its insidious doctrine into the LAW of once FREE SPEECH DEMOCRACIES the  FIGHT BACK must BEGIN-NOW!- TO RECOVER OUR INHERITED RIGHT BELONGING TO  A FREE DEMOCRATIC NATION STATE.

 

 

It has been long stated that a BAD LAW which is IGNORED by a large  part of the nation is NO LONGER A LAW.]

 

 

THE BATTLE FOR FREE SPEECH

MUST NOW

BEGIN!]

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

Broadcaster John Humphrys lifts the lid on 'institutional ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7487661/amp/Broadcaster-John...

John Humphrys today lifts the lid ... ‘Management’ has become a dark art and its practitioners too often leave common sense at the door of the board room. They use language mere humans ...

 Britain's in the grip of a sinister new censorship: 'cancellation' of celebrities deemed to have transgressed the moral code of a self-appointed, self-righteous mob.

BUT IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIGHT BACK...

H.F.2047

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

TREASON OF THE INTELLECTUALS

[WHY THERE IS SO MUCH STRIFE IN THE WORLD SINCE  THE 1920s]

"From the savage flowering of ethnic and religious hatreds in the Middle East and throughout Europe today to the mendacious demand for POLITICAL CORRECTNESS on college campuses everywhere in the WEST, the treason of the intellectuals continue to play out its unedifying drama..."

-Roger Kimball.

 

Arrives: July 18 - 20 Details
 

Fastest delivery: Wednesday, July 15 Details

 

*  *  *

 

 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the

 

TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

 

 

 

*

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

H.F.2043

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MARCH,2007

THE SLAVERY PROTESTORS FAIL TO LOOK WITHIN THEIR OWN CULTURE AND HISTORY

*

The slavery protests' guilty secret

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-March 30, 2007]

 

The other celebration this week has been confused. Were we proud that Parliament had backed William Wilberforce's Bill to abolish the shameful slave trade, or were we in a familiar

ON-OUR-KNEES

POSITION

-and apologising for ever being involved in it?

If the latter, then it would have been helpful to hear someone of African descent also apologising for the

FACT

-that SLAVERY continued throughout that continent for decades afterwards, except where colonial governments like Britain managed to suppress it -in face of fierce [African] local opposition.

It might have been helpful, too, if the protesters of African descent had vented some of their spleen on the

ARAB SLAVE TRADERS

-who carried on for so long with their particularly vicious form of

SLAVE TRADING

They systematically

and crudely castrated their victims, which killed the great majority of them

PERHAPS

-the slavery protesters have called on the

ARAB NATIONS

-for a few billions of their oil revenues in

COMPENSATION

BUT IF SO, I FAILED TO NOTICE IT.

*          *          *

A SUMMARY OF THE SLAVE TRADE

 

..From Britain, the largest slave trader and the greatest offender the movement sprang which successfully abolished slavery in the British Isles in 1772, then the slave trade in 1806, then slavery itself in the British Dominions in 1833, and finally so worked on the conscience of the world as to secure a large and nearly universal concurrence of action for the extirpation of the evil.

The credit for securing from Lord Mansfield the famous decision in the case of

JAMES SOMERSET (1772)

-that the status of slavery was unknown to the

COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND

was due to

GRANVILLE SHARP

-a civil servant, inconspicuous in wealth and station, but of a rare warmth of heart and persistence of character, who once fired by the cruel usage of a negro slave in the streets of London, never rested until he had obtained the verdict which for ever afterwards rid the British islands of the taint of slavery.

Thereafter comes a roll of English emancipators whose names even in a general history of Europe are worthy of

COMMEMORATION

-William Wilberforce, Thomas Clarkson, Zachary Macaulay and James Stephen, whose preparatory labours, sustained over a period of twenty years, enabled Charles Fox to carry the

ABOLITION OF THE SLAVE TRADE

Thomas Fowel Buxton, the parliamentary leader of the

ABOLITIONISTS

-who worked up the

HOUSE OF COMMONS

-to abolish slavery; and Lord Brougham, who carried the torch through the country; Lord Palmerston, who stopped the slave trade between

PORTUGAL and BRAZIL

-and the noble group of missionaries, soldiers, and statesmen, David Livingston, Charles Gordon, Sir John Kirk, and Lord Lugard, by whose efforts in large measure

AFRICA

-has been opened up and

RID OF THE CURSE

of the

ARAB SLAVE -RAIDER

Lecky does no more than

JUSTICE

when he states the

THE CRUSADE of ENGLAND

AGAINST SLAVERY

"may probably be regarded as among the three or four perfectly virtuous pages in the history of nations'

[A History of Europe by H.A.L.FISHER -1936]

 

*

 

[Today in March 2007 we have a Government which does not deserve a mention in history as it has had no virtuous events in the past ten years. It will be remembered as a Government not trusted by the people and which has brought a once proud and just nation to kneeling before the  politically correct diverse minority who have not lost any opportunity to degrade the nation which today should not be on its knees but standing with thankfulness that their descendents had showed Christian fellowship with all mankind remembering the words dedicated above to the many who saw an injustice and abolished a vile trade which at the time was responded too because of our standing and reputation in the corridors of power throughout the world.]

What is unforgivable that an opportunity to honour an 18th and 19th century of a

BAND of BROTHERS

-had been lost because a people who once had confidence and pride in their country and have lost their way and  have become the 'silent people' because they are afraid (they think) to offend.

Our minority cultures have all been taught that they can be a part of our country but not of it. They can demand their voice is heard but not that of the majority who are of this country. this pattern was launched by

MULTICULTURALISM

-which has now been discredited -as it has done immense harm to community relations in our country.

IT IS TIME FOR OUR MINORITIES TO FORGET THEIR ENCOURAGED DIFFERENCES AND IN FUTURE TO BE AS WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN THE PAST

ALL ONE

Whoever you are and from wherever you have come.

 

LET US ALL BE

A

 

BAND OF BROTHERS AND SISTERS

AND

NOT LOOK FOR OUR DIFFERENCES.

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

*

13th October,2007

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

H.F.2044

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2016/04/slavery--guilt-as-a-jewish-weapon.html
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at henry@henrymakow.com

[+] Show Comments for " Slavery -- "Guilt" as a Jewish Weapon "

Dan said (April 24, 2016):
 

I've never heard any say that any incarnation of the KKK was "philo-Semitic, and welcomed Jews as members". Read the case of Leo Max Frank - the president of the Atlanta chapter of the B'nai B'rith who was convicted of the rape/murder of 13 year old Mary Phagen one Saturday at his pencil factory in 1913.

This is the historic event as a matter of fact the prompted the founding of the ADL. Such pressure was brought to bear that Georgia Governor John M. Slaton commuted Frank's sentence in 1915, when his conviction was upheld to the US Supreme Court. This was the incident that prompted the resurrection of the Ku Klux Klan.
The "Knights of Mary Phagan" kidnapped Frank from prison in Marietta Georgia and lynched him.

I haven't read The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, but any claim that the KKK was 'philo-Semitic' is just plain wrong. The Klan didn't even accept Irish Catholics.

The 'philo-Semitic' enemies of black Americans I know of are "white liberals", Planned Parenthood, ACORN, Black LIves Matter, the Boule, the music industry, and most of ALL the DEMOCRAT PARTY.
 


Robert K said (April 24, 2016):
 

People raised in and educated by a system tend to conceive of it as being normal. Probably many black slaves in the USA didn't conceive of a life very different from the one they grew up in. Nothing is different today. The vast majority of people are wage slaves in a system that is not inherent in the nature of things but, rather, designed and imposed.

This explains how the transformation of productivity through the application of automation and robotics can result in increased stress and insecurity for people, instead of an increasingly free and prosperous lifestyle. The control is exercised through the money system: money is required in order to live, and in order to get money people must kowtow to others in hierarchies, both private and public. Instead of the financial system releasing individuals, which is its proper function and could easily be done (and at an accelerating pace concomitant with the progress of technology), the power-mongers who operate it have fashioned it to be a means of control. Sadly, most of the slaves swallow the propaganda constantly streaming from government mouthpieces, media sheets and screens, and academic prostitutes to the effect that the "authorities" are really "doing the best they can in difficult circumstances".
 


JG said (April 24, 2016):
 

The WASP power base in America was the biggest threat to NWO Communism in the entire world until it was systematically dismantled beginning with the cultural Marxist Revolution of America in the late 1960's.

The prosperity of the White American population made them easy prey for the "guilt psy-op" of slavery which 99% of the whites had no direct role in.

They guilt they carried, if any, was for succeeding in life and building a strong family unit that resided in it's once crime free communities. Somehow they were successfully convinced to carry the guilt for the failure of others. This was the beginning of the doctrine of 'political correctness' that was intended to destroy them.

The Jews may have been broker's in the American slave trade but the blacks were sold into slavery by their own nation first.

It really doesn't matter much anymore because the WASPS have little left to give as we all watch America collapse a little more each day. America, as a nation, has lost the good fight.


Alfred said (April 24, 2016):
 

Some of the earliest Marxist propaganda specifically states using the Negro as a wedge against the United States https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/black.htm This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.
 


 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

[AS WE HAVE ALREADY STATED: THE EU ONLY LOOKS TO ITS OWN INTEREST NOT TO THOSE WHO HAVE DECIDED THEY HAVE

HAD ENOUGH

THEY KNOW THAT A

 FREE ENGLAND

IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THEIR VERY EXISTENCE.]

*  *  *

 

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Britain and the European Union (EU) failed to make progress in talks on post-Brexit relations this week due to major differences and called off a one-on-one meeting between their chief negotiators, officials said on Thursday.

By John Chalmers

JULY 2-2020

 

© Reuters/Yves Herman FILE PHOTO: EU's Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier gives a news conference

after Brexit negotiations, in Brussels

After the teams' first face-to-face talks in Brussels since the coronavirus pandemic consigned them to video-conferencing, UK chief negotiator David Frost and EU counterpart Michel Barnier had intended to meet alone on Friday.

But officials said that plan had been ditched.

"The negotiations have been comprehensive and useful," Frost said in a statement. "But they have also underlined the significant differences that still remain between us on a number of important issues."

Barnier said the bloc continued to believe an agreement was possible and in everyone's interest, but its major demands for an economic partnership were unchanged.

"After four days of discussions, serious divergences remain," he said in a statement.

"The EU expects, in turn, its positions to be better understood and respected in order to reach an agreement. We need an equivalent engagement by the United Kingdom."

Britain left the world’s largest trading bloc on Jan. 31, but there has been little progress on designing a new relationship with a year-end deadline looming. Both sides had hoped this week's negotiations would reboot the process.

The EU says Britain cannot retain all the economic and trading benefits it had as an EU member, while London says Brussels is not showing enough flexibility.

It insists that Britain must commit to maintaining EU standards on everything from state aid to labour to environment regulations to prevent it undercutting EU products in the future.

Barnier said the EU's position remained that there could be no economic partnership without "robust guarantees for a level playing field – including on state aid – to ensure open and fair competition among our businesses".

(Reporting by John Chalmers, Guy Faulconbridge and Kate Holton; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne)

*  *  *

[WE WERE PROMISED A NO DEAL IF THE EU FAILED TO COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS BY END OF JUNE 2020- NOT A DAY LONGER AFTER 4 YEARS OF WASTED TIME.]

'Fortune befriends the bold.'

-Dryden

'It is wonderful what strength of purpose and boldness and energy of will are roused by the assurance that we are doing our duty.'-

Scott.

*  *  *

 

[OUR  OLD FRIENDS IN THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH WHO WE BETRAYED IN 1973 AWAIT OUR NATIONAL FREEDOM FROM HITLER'S EU PLAN OF1943  IN ORDER TO REBUILD  A BOND OF PROSPERITY AND PEACE.]

 

 

The Commonwealth Realms v The Constitution for Europe.

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JULY 2-2020

H.F.2041

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

[A REMINDER

TO OUR NEGOTIATOR

IN JULY 2020.]

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

WHY I LOATHE  BRUSSELS

 

 
 

 

They steal our fish, squander our cash and treat our views with contempt. For decades Labour's Grimsby

 MP Austin Mitchell passionately campaigned against the

E U.

On the second anniversary of the referendum, his cri de coeur will cheer the

HEART OF EVERY BREXITEER.

 

Why I loathe Brussels: They steal our fish, squander our cash and treat our views with contempt, writes AUSTIN MITCHELL

 

513

View
comments

 

Austin Mitchell was a backbench Labour MP for 40 years before stepping down in 2015. 

A self-confessed maverick who refused to toe the party line, he has always been fiercely opposed to Britain remaining in the EU. 

Here, on the second anniversary of the EU referendum, he delivers a powerful and timely reminder of why Brexit must be seen through.

 

My long-held and passionate attitude to the European Union is summed up in four words — three of which are ‘the European Union’, preceded by a commonly used four- letter verb of exhortation that the Oxford English Dictionary describes as ‘vulgar’.

I’ve always been a Eurosceptic, ever since I first stumbled across the Common Market, as the EU then called itself, in 1962. I was 28, Yorkshire born and bred, and, with my doctorate from Oxford, was teaching history at a university in New Zealand. A colleague gave a lecture on the Common Market — and, to my horror, he endorsed it as ‘a good thing’.

Incredible. Almost blasphemy. Britain led the Commonwealth. New Zealand, rich in dairy products, was its antipodean farm. Europe was there for us to defeat in war. How could an Englishman be so daft?

 

Austin Mitchell campaigning for fishermen in 1978. He was a backbench Labour MP for 40 years before stepping down in 2015

Fortunately General De Gaulle, the French president, agreed with me and dismissed British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan’s efforts to join a club he should never have applied for in the first place.

I was further comforted when a succession of British politicians came out to New Zealand to assure us that if Britain did join this alien institution then, scout’s honour, New Zealand’s access to the British market would be protected. The old relationship would carry on.

They lied. Albion can be perfidious and was particularly so when it betrayed New Zealand by joining in 1973 — egged on by Tory prime minister Ted Heath, who was so eager to get us into Europe that he did so on less than favourable terms. We were asking to be clobbered and duly were.

I was back in Britain and had switched jobs to become a journalist and a presenter on regional television when two years later Harold Wilson, the new Labour PM, called for a referendum to endorse or reject that decision. 

I voted ‘No’. But two-thirds of the country said ‘Yes’. We were staying in.

I was far from convinced this was the right decision, and my hostility increased when in 1977 I was elected Labour MP for Grimsby.

The town’s fishing industry had been ruined when the Europeans cunningly declared the seas around Britain common waters and gave other members, even landlocked Luxembourg, equal access. 

As a result, we got only a small proportion of our own fish.

I formed a Save Britain’s Fish campaign, which attracted support from all over the country.

Tory MP Edwina Currie pointed out that: ‘You don’t want to save Britain’s fish. You just want to eat them.’ Which was true, but far better for us to eat them than have them gobbled by undeserving Europeans who took our jobs and the processing industry with them.

 

Tory MP Edwina Currie pointed out that: ‘You don’t want to save Britain’s fish. You just want to eat them’

There was more to my scepticism about Europe than a lingering desire to catch our own fish, however. 

I believed then, and still do now, that the nation state is not only the best but the only way of advancing the cause of the people while maintaining their democratic control of the process.

There is nothing the EU can do for us that we can’t do better for ourselves. Europe is too big, amorphous, divided and powerless. 

It’s not a democracy but a plutocracy with a rootless bureaucracy, always pursuing an ever-closer union the people don’t want, yet never able to reach it.

As a concept it is a piece of sublime mysticism and nonsense, a mirage.

The trouble was that the EU couldn’t break away from its original purpose of protecting French agriculture and boosting German industry. 

With these two states dominating, Europe embarked on a journey where few wanted to go, to an ever-closer union only the Brussels bureaucrats sought, imposing policies without democratic consent and ever prepared to overrule the people for their own good.

My basic reason for opposing membership was economic. The European Union drained Britain of jobs, money, demand and growth. 

It became a brake on our economy, not an accelerator. 

Being a deal between the interests of Germany, which needed a bigger market for its manufacturing, and France, which wanted agricultural protection for its food, the EU didn’t suit Britain, a net agricultural importer with a less modern and less well-invested industry.

The basis of British trade had been buying cheap food, particularly from Commonwealth countries, and sending them our manufactured goods in return.

That stopped after we joined. The Common Agricultural Policy required us to buy France’s more expensive food. Costs went up and every family of four lost £20 a week.

Meanwhile, Labour’s policy to boost jobs in the regions had to be scrapped because it was against the rules. What had been a surplus in our trade with Europe before we went in became a steadily growing deficit.

Our membership contributions — in effect, our payments for being damaged — went up year by year, siphoning off money to Europe, particularly to the powerful German economy, which generated ever-bigger surpluses at the expense of everyone else and particularly us.

To cap all this, Europe’s fast growth, which enthusiasts had claimed Britain would hitch up to, slowed substantially.

That’s why in my successful campaign in the 1979 General Election, I stood on a soapbox outside the Bird’s Eye frozen fish factory in Grimsby to denounce Brussels. And I’ve been doing so as vigorously as I can ever since.

But I’ve increasingly found myself out on a limb in a political class inexorably drawn to Brussels.

Europe is very attractive for those who don’t like Britain. 

For the liberal intellectuals and many of our elite, who saw themselves as cosmopolitan rather than nationalist, Europe was nicer than their brutal, xenophobic compatriots. 

Those suffering in Britain — the unions, local government and the Labour Party — came to love the beguiling hopes Europe held out for them.

They didn’t see that it had no ability to help lame dogs over stiles and that its handouts were really the nation’s own money coming back, but with the EU’s heavy costs deducted.

My views remained unchanged as the Common Market marched on, grandiosing into the European Community, then the European Union.

Major Labour figures from Roy Jenkins to Peter Mandelson went off to Brussels and found a bigger and better stage to strut on.

 

Brussels came up with the Exchange Rate Mechanism, to set in stone rates of exchange between the various European currencies. Tory Prime Minister John Major took us in briefly. It was a disaster

There, people actually listened to them rather than dismissing them out of hand. They came back to proclaim Europe’s benefits. 

Then Brussels came up with the Exchange Rate Mechanism, to set in stone rates of exchange between the various European currencies.

Tory Prime Minister John Major took us in briefly. It was a disaster. The whole system collapsed and Britain was humiliatingly forced out.

We sceptics heaved a sigh of relief, forgetting the propensity of dogs to return to their own vomit.

Instead of backing off, the EU went for an even stronger monetary union by creating the common currency, the euro.

Unable to get electoral support for ever-closer union, the EU bureaucracy tried to smuggle it in through the back door. 

A common currency, they hoped, would lead to convergence and develop the central institutions necessary to manage it.

By now Tony Blair was in Downing Street with his New Labour re-make. It wasn’t a respray job on the old jalopy but a total re-engineering.

Daft as a Liberal when it came to anything that would demonstrate his Euro-enthusiasm, he was passionately in favour of a single European currency.

Not understanding economics, he didn’t realise that Britain would be shackled by a fixed, and inevitably overvalued, exchange rate, with consequences ruinous for our weaker economy.

Fortunately, Gordon Brown, his Chancellor, saw the dangers and managed to think up five tests, failure in any of which would deny entry until the time was ripe. Which in my view it never would be.

Britain stayed out of the euro, thank heaven, leaving us peripheral to the Eurozone, the EU’s great adventure into the clouds. 

The Eurocrats persisted with monetary union, even though it forces deflation on weaker and less competitive partners. 

Britain would have been one of these if we had been foolish enough to join in.

Brussels showered money on the weaker European economies, then crippled them with unsustainable and unrepayable debt, as the Germans refused to underwrite it. Any grudging help went to save the banks, not the individual nation.

Increasingly the EU was losing its shine. Unemployment was high, with a quarter of its young people out of work.

Germany built up huge economic surpluses, which it didn’t spend or recycle to the less successful economies. 

To manage the euro, the EU needed the economic institutions of the nation state, but the Germans couldn’t accept that.

The EU could only move forward by greater federalism to create ‘ever-closer union’ but the members didn’t want this straitjacket. It was hit by the refugee crisis and couldn’t agree on what to do about it.

 

By now Tony Blair was in Downing Street with his New Labour re-make. It wasn’t a respray job on the old jalopy but a total re-engineering

It could possibly have conciliated British public opinion by delivering benefits to Britain, whose EU membership costs were spiralling all the time. 

But it wouldn’t and didn’t. It was deadlocked: rudderless and dominated by Mrs Merkel, the most cautious politician in Europe.

Yet still Britain clung to the edge of this rickety raft.

The public were told to be happy with this developing disaster, and a Euro-enthusiastic Tory-led coalition government did nothing about it.

That is, until an overconfident David Cameron buckled to pressure in his own party and announced that he would solve his party problems by renegotiating improved terms for our membership, to be endorsed by a referendum.

 

He asked Brussels for changes to make the EU more acceptable in Britain. He got nothing worth having but still embarked on what he confidently assumed would be an easy victory.

The battle of Brexit was a thrill for me. I had stood down from Parliament by the time of the referendum. I was into my 70s and had been an MP for nigh on 40 years.

Suddenly I was in demand again. 

As one of the few survivors of that rare breed, the Labour Eurosceptic, I was hauled into debates to provide a balance to overconfident Euro-enthusiasts who couldn’t believe anyone would be insane enough to want to leave the Franco-German condominium.

It was the best fun I’d had for years. It was marvellous to harangue large audiences who were with me, for a change, rather than sitting there in stony-faced silence as Labour audiences had.

Even more wonderfully, the campaign ended in triumph. To the amazement of Cameron and the rest of Britain’s elite, he lost. The British electorate, two-thirds of whom had voted to stay in 1975, had changed its mind.

Victory was a strange new phenomenon. It had never happened to me before. I was as euphoric as any politician is ever allowed to be.

What happened, though, was in fact a peasants’ revolt rather than a triumph for my arguments.

 

The people, angered by cuts, stagnant living standards, de-industrialisation and austerity, used this unaccustomed power to express their unhappiness not just at Europe but at three decades of neo-liberal politics and globalisation which had done little or nothing for them.

The educated and the liberal middle classes had come to identify with Europe as part of their privileged way of life, and supported a union that they saw as the symbol of enlightened internationalism and civilised (ie their own) values. 

The less well-off, the less educated and the people who’d been left behind felt differently.

Britain’s elite were shocked by the nation’s rejection of their wisdom and advice. George Orwell once remarked that ‘England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality’. 

That remained true of the liberal intellectuals, who’d given up on Britain and saw Europe as the future.

For the people to reject the EU just showed how irredeemable the British were.

It was, as they saw it, a surrender to racism, xenophobia, insularity and everything liberal intellectuals dislike in their own people.

On the other hand, Eurosceptics like me saw the vote as the result of a 40-year learning experience.

For me, the referendum result was the turning point I’d hoped for since 1979. The people had achieved what the politicians had failed to do. 

It’s a shame it took so long and that so much damage was done before it came. Winning is rare in the political game. But it’s nice.

It has not, though, led to any belated acclaim coming my way. After the referendum, invitations to speak dried up as if I’d been a personal friend of Jimmy Savile. 

The Guardian lost every article I sent them (as it had before, but now without explanation or reply).

The BBC, which had used me as a tame Brexiteer throughout the campaign, once it was over immediately replaced me with a Muslim to keep up their other diversity targets.

As for what lies ahead of us, the EU’s intransigence and the weakness of an insecure Government in negotiating are making withdrawal messy and difficult. 

The Remainers don’t help. 

They denounce the vote as the result of fear, ignorance, even Russian deceit, and have unleashed another, even bigger tide of fear about the consequences.

They do everything they can to discredit the British case for withdrawal, to shackle, soften and weaken the Government’s negotiating position and to collude with the EU to resist it, in the hope that eventually the people will give up their foolishness and stay, unhappily or not, in the promised land.

The Brexiteers, in contrast, can only wait and see, hoping for a good outcome which can’t emerge until negotiations end.

The British Government has been weakened by its second election and Remain’s long rearguard action.

The EU Commission, struggling to keep its rickety show on the road and facing unmanageable difficulties in Eastern Europe and Italy, wants to punish Britain pour décourager les autres.

These are the symptoms of an impossible negotiation. I fear that the account by the former Greek minister of finance, Yanis Varoufakis, of the way the EU crushed his country’s aspirations may well be an omen of what’s to come.

Intransigence, delay and simple bloody-mindedness were their weapons — and clearly still are.

Those who believe they have a divine right to rule don’t give up easily. Nor must we.

  • Extracted from Confessions Of A Political Maverick by Austin Mitchell, to be published by Biteback on July 3 at £20. © Austin Mitchell 2018. To order a copy for £15 (25% discount), call 0844 571 0640 or go tomailshop.co.uk/books. P&P is free on orders over £15. Offer available until July 9, 2018.

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1583

*

 

 

 

 

 

How The USA Became a Babylonian Slave State

Note to readers: The next three issues of this newsletter will be pre-written so that I may take my annual sabbatical. If something truly important happens I will inform you with an update.

My battle against the Khazarian mafia started in Japan, where over a 30-year career as a frontline journalist, I watched as Prime Minister after Prime Minister was murdered and a successful economic system was dismantled.  When I started reporting in Japan in 1985, it had the highest per capita income in the world and the lowest gap between the rich and poor in any developed nation.  This was the result of decades of double-digit economic growth: the so-called Japanese miracle.  Now, Japan is ruled by Khazarian gangster hedge funds and their slaves.  The country now has the second-biggest gap between the rich and poor in the OECD (after the U.S.) and the average Japanese barely scrapes along.

It was anger at what had been done to the Japanese that set me out on the path to liberate this country by trying to convince them to stop paying tribute to their enslavers.  This was personal, because many Japanese journalists, central bankers, and politicians I knew and respected had been murdered by these people.  I found this out from Japanese yakuza bosses who told me they were sub-contractors to the Khazarian mob.

When Asian secret societies agreed to help liberate Japan and the rest of the world from Khazarian rule, then all sorts of people from all sorts of secret societies came out of hiding to talk with us.

One who was particularly influential was a Senior British agent, Dr. Michael Van de Meer, AKA Michael Meiring.  He gave me some reading assignments so I would know exactly what I was dealing with.  Van de Meer had been fighting the Khazarians for decades and paid a steep price.  He had both of his legs blown off by a bomb set, according to him, by agents of George Bush Sr. and David Rockefeller.

The information he gave me made me realize what I witnessed first-hand in Japan was a gradual process of enslavement that was already completed in the United States.  These were the people who murdered Abraham Lincoln, John F, Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and many others.

It is interesting to note that even though official documents about the Kennedy assassination have been released after great anticipation, not a single media outlet reporting that his murder was ordered by…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
 

H.F.1806

 

*

 

 

 

 

 Why DO our judges put terror

 

 

suspects ?

 

 

 

 

 

[FIRST!

 

 

 

 

 

before the security

 

 

 

 of the

 

 

 

Realm OF ENGLAND.

 

 

 

 THE SIMPLE ANSWER

 

 

 IS

 

 

 

BECAUSE

 

 

 

 

WE DO NOT HAVE A

 

 

 

 

 HOME GROWN

 

 

 

 

HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

 

 

 

  

 

TO PROTECT

 

 

 

OUR

 

 

 

DEMOCRACY AND SECURITY?

 

 

We have been out of the EU over six

 

 

months yet we are still tied to an EU

 

 

so-called

 

 

 HUMAN RIGHTS LAW-

 

 

 

WHY?

 

 

 

...

 

*

[ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

*

JULY 18,2020

H.F.2051

 

 

 

 

*

 

Bilderberg Founder Ex-Queen Beatrix Offers Vladimir Putin Huge Bribe to Steal Global Wealth

The battle to liberate Planet Earth has reached a key juncture: the choice between freedom or techno-slavery.  The faction that wants to kill 90% of humanity, then microchip and enslave the rest, is now making a big push to steal global wealth.  Specifically, ex-queen Beatrix of Holland, together with Rothschild family members in Switzerland, offered Russian President Vladimir Putin an astronomical bribe to help them, together with the lifetime rule of Russia.

Last week, acting on Putin’s orders, Serbian gangsters illegally detained a Golden Dragon Family representative, family sources say.  They are now trying to force her to hand over the keys to quadrillions of dollars in wealth.  If they succeed, humanity will be in big trouble.

Remember, the Dutch Royals have always been high-ranking Nazis.  It is they and their Nazi camp followers like Bill Gates who are behind the push to replace cash with digital money.  People will have to accept being microchipped in order to access their digital wallets with free government support payments, NSA sources say.  The microchips will allow for complete and permanent control of the global population by the Satan worshipping Khazarian Mafia.  These are the people pushing the COVID-19 (Certificate Of Vaccination ID-19) scamdemic.

For this reason, a copy of the passport of the detained Dragon Family member has been given to various intelligence agencies.  If they fail to arrest the Dutch Royals and the Rothschild family members hiding in Switzerland, then the White Dragon Society will be forced to consider more drastic measures.  The WDS has nuclear weapons at its disposal that could be used to target the Hague, Tel Aviv and Zurich (local people will be given time to evacuate) if the Dragon Family representative is not released.

As this report was about to go live we received unconfirmed reports that David de Rothschild, head of the French branch of the family, was arrested in Zurich, Switzerland.  Keep your eyes out for announcements concerning Beatrix and Putin.

The detained Dragon family representative holds the keys to releasing to humanity quadrillions in gold-backed currency.  The money is intended to be used to finance a jubilee, followed by a massive campaign to end poverty and stop environmental destruction.

Without this financial freedom, the world could be headed for extremely dangerous and chaotic times.  Pentagon sources say that already, inside the U.S., the Rothschilds and their Nazi Dutch royal allies are financing…

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

July 6, 2020

 

H.F.1424

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

[AT  LONG LAST PATRIOTS

 

OUTNUMBER

 

TRAITORS]

 

*

 

EDWARD LUCAS: At last! The

 

 

 

end of the age of appeasing

 

 

 

 Beijing bullies...

 

 

by Edward Lucas

 

EDWARD LUCAS: At last! The end of the age of

appeasing ...

CHINA'S plan for world domination faces a hitch. That is the upshot of our Government's impending decision to curb Chinese technology giant Huawei's role in our next-generation 5G mobile data network...to BE CONTINUED

Tortured...

*

Unsafe...

*

Struggle

Our spies use this information too, for example to expose Russian hitmen who tried to murder ex-spy Sergi Skripal in Salisbury two years ago. But our agencies operate under the strictest legal framework, Chinese espionage faces no restraints.

For this reason, banning Huawei from the 5G network, costly and risky though it will be, is a necessary first step, but far from a sufficient one. We face a long and arduous battle to extricate ourselves from the technological tenacies of

CHINESE POWER

China has already gained an alarming edge in vital fields such as artificial intelligence and quantum computers.

Some of that comes from the brilliance of Chiese scientists. But much comes from countries such as Britain.

Self-interest and misplaced idealism has led us to allow China to rampage through our universities and industries, hoovering up

HUMAN TALENT and TECHNICAL SECRETS

The Chinese presence in Cambridge is of particular concern. Last month the local authority there ignored security concerns to give approval to a £1 billion Huawei research centre in the university city.

SWE are in a existential struggle with a

DICTATORSHIP

that regards us with

VENGEFUL CONTEMPT

We have seen, with chilling clarity, the brutal treatment Chinese leaders mete out to their own people. Given the chance

WHY WOULD THEY TREAT US ANY BETTER.

[AFTER THEY HAVE EXTRACTED ALL OUR SECRETS TO MAKE US FEAR FOR OUR SAFETY AND OUR VERY EXISTENCE?]

FULL ARTICLE

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

*  *  *

 

READ MORE!

Daily Mail - JULY 8-2020

By Richard Pendlebury and Larisa Brown

Former MI6 spy's dossier sparks Huawei storm over

 'useful idiots'

claims

HOW LEVIATHANS OF THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT -WITH ACCESS TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF POLITICS, INDUSTRY AND EVEN THE MONARCHY-ARE LABELLED CHINA'S 'USEFUL IDIOTS' FOR BEING ON THE PHONE GIANTS PAYROLL. SO THE QUESTION:

WHAT DOES HUAWEI GET FOR ITS MONEY?

HUAWEI'S VERY

BRITISH COUP.

[IN OUR MIND THEIR ACTIONS ARE TREASONABLE.]

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.2042

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHINESE

 

 

 

 

FIXER

 

 

 

 

TARGETS

 

 

 

 

 

 PRIME

 

 

 

 

MINISTERS

 

 

 

[USEFUL IDIOTS]

 

 

 

TONY BLAIR

 

 

GORDON BROWN

 

 

DAVID CAMERON

 

 

THERESA  MAY

 

 

BORIS JOHNSON

 

[BUT AT LEAST BORIS JOHNSON HAS AT THE ELEVENTH HOUR  TAKEN TO HEART THE WARNINGS FROM HIS BACKBENCHERS JUST IN TIME BEFORE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A GREATER TASK  OR EVEN IMPOSSIBLE TO EXTRICATE OUR SECURITY FROM THE TOTALITARIAN COMMUNIST CHINESE SECURITY NET! TO ENCOMPASS THE WORLD. ]

 

 

EXCLUSIVE: New evidence

 

 

of Beijing's infiltration of

 

[THOSE 'USEFUL IDIOTS 'WITHIN]

 

the

 

BRITISH

 

ESTABLISHMENT

 

By   Glen Keogh- Daily Mail

 

 

JULY 13,2020

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

Cyber alert

 

 

 

as Huawei faces

 

 

 

5G ban

 

 

By Jason Groves -DAILY MAIL

 

JULY 13,2020

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

[THE CHINESE SECURITY NETWORK WILL NOW GO ON OVERDRIVE TO DISRUPT OUR COMMUNICATIONS AND THE CHAOS WHICH WILL FOLLOW SHOULD BE LAID ON THOSE PRIME MINISTERS MENTIONED ABOVE AND OTHERS INVOLVED AND LEAD TO CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR PUTTING THE SECURITY OF THE REALM IN DANGER.]

 

[LINKS UNOBTAINABLE AT THE PRESENT TIME]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

H.F.2042

 

 

 

*

 

 

SEDUCED BY CHINA'S HONEY TRAP

SPIES

IT's the book that's laid bare how deeply the Chinese have infiltrated Britain. Now, inthis devastating  extract, we reveal how they steal intelligence using blackmail, money...and sex

by CliveHamilton and Mareike Ohlberg.

JULY 14,2020

 

EXTRACT

... THE HARSH and undeniable reality we in the West have to face up to  is that Beijing wields its economic power like a great  weapon.

its economic blackmail has proved highly effective, distorting decisions made by elected governments, frightening bureacrats, silencing critics, and  making countless companies beholden to it.

[Just two words surfice to describe them as Lenin and Stalin stated many decade ago.

'USEFUL IDEOTS.'

When it was mentioned a few years ago with much gusto that China had invested in the CITY OF LONDON we knew they would rue the day they opened the door into the heart of our financial system]

That power is only amplified when Chinese companies, answerable to Beijing, own critical infastructure in other countries

The West needs to inoculate itself against these pressures where it can, but where it can't, it needs to make some hard choices and

WALK AWAY.

All industries, including the education and tourism sectors must understand the

POLITICAL RISKS

of becoming heavily reliant on revenue flows from China.

SHORT -TERM PROFIT-MAKING

exposes them

TO LONG-TERM DAMAGE.

When considering partnerships with Chianese organisations much better due diligence is required by people who understand how the

CCP SYSTEM WORKS

Companies should not expect their government to compromise

HUMAN RIGHTS

and

CIVIL LIBERTIES

to appease

Beijing.

As long as the current CCP regime rules China, prudent corporate management requires diversification of markets.

Above all, the

WEST

 needs to

WAKE UP

to the

FACT

that a

CCP-LED CHINAH.

IS NOT

AND NEVER WILL BE

IT'S

FRIEND.

* ADAPTED from Hidden Hand Exposing How The Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping The World by Clive Hamilton and Mareike Ohlberg, to be published by Oneworld on July 16 at £20 *2020 Clive Hamilton and Mareika Ohlberg.c

JULY 16,2020

 

H.F2049

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

GENERATION

OF

WOMEN BETRAYED

IN THE

NHS

Thousands harmed by THREE health scandals amid culture of arrogance and intimidation,reveals damning report.

By Kate Pickles- Daily Mail Health Correspondent

JULY 8,2020

TENS of thousands of women and children were 'catastrophically ' harmed by three avoidable health scandals, a damning report concludes today.

It says crippling symptoms were dismissed as 'women's problems' by intimidating or arrogant doctors and surgeons. Patients who complained faced an'unresponsive and defensive' healthcare system.

The inquiry said lives were catastrophically affected' by mistakes made with three different products: pelvic mesh implants, a pregnancy test drug and an epilepsy treatment

 

heIt criticised the NHS, private health firms and regulators for failing to listen to patients or spot the signs when things went drastically wrong.

The scandle unfolded over many decades. Baroness Cumberiege, the former health minister who led the review called for sweeping reforms, including an overhaul of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, which polices the

SAFETY OF DRUGS AND MEDICAL DEVICES

She also urged the Government to appoint an

INDEPENDENT PATIENT SAFETY COMMISSIONER.

 An official response to her recommendations is expected in Parliament today July 8, 2020.

dThe inquiry gathered evidence from hundreds of families affected by t6he

PUBLIC HEALTH DISASTERS

some dating back 60 yeasrs

It examined the use of pelvic mesh, the hormone pregnancy test drug Primodos and epilepsy drug sodium valproate.

In a letter to Health Secretary Matt Hancock, Baroness Cumberiege said patients had been let down by the

ENTIRE HEALTH SYSTEM

-from the NHS to manufactures of medical equipment.

'I have conducted many reviews and inquires over the years, but I have never encountered anything like this- the intensity of suffering experienced by so many families and the fact that they have endured it for decades,' she said.

'Much of this suffering was entirely avoidable, caused and compounded by failings in the health system itself.'

'The first duty of any health system is to do no harm to those in its care, but I am sorry to say that in too many cases concerning Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh, our system failed

We met with people, more often than not-women, whose worlds have been turned upside down, their whole lives, and often their children's livesz, shaped by the

PAIN, ANGUISH and GUILT they feel as the RESULT of PRIMODOS, SODIUM VALPROATE or PELVIC MESH...
  • A generation of women betrayed: Thousands were harmed by ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8499945/A-generation-women...

    generation of women betrayed: Thousands were harmed by THREE health scandals – mesh implantspregnancy test drug and epilepsy treatment - which saw agonising symptoms dismissed as 'women's...

  • A generation of women betrayed: Thousands were harmed by ...

    https://distincttoday.net/2020/07/07/a-generation-of-women-betrayed...

    07/07/2020 · By Kate PicklesHealth Correspondent for the Daily Mail . Hundreds of babies are being born each year to mothers who were unaware their medication could harm them in the womb. It is thought that as many as 20,000 infants were badly affected by the anti-epilepsy drug sodium valproate.

  • Damning NHS failures that led to a ... - Daily Mail Online

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6697733/Damning-NHS-failures...

    By Kate PicklesHealth Correspondent for the Daily Mail Women are being put off cervical screening over fears the results could suggest they or their partners have been cheating, a survey has found.

  • Women who miss their cancer screening ... - Daily Mail Online

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6832435/Women-miss-cancer...

    20/03/2019 · Women across the UK will be offered DIY smear tests in a bid to cut cervical cancer deaths. ... By Kate PicklesHealth Correspondent For The Daily Mail. Published: 18:00 EDT, ... Part of the ...

  •  

    H.F.2046/1

     

    [NHS

    IS A LAW

    UNTO ITSELF. ]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    JULY 10-2020

    H.F.2045

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

    TOP SPOT!

     

     

    H.F.1424

     

    *

     

     

     

     

       

     

     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

     

     

     

     

     

     
    [THE BATTLE FOR THE SURVIVAL OF THE GREATER MAJORITY OF MANKIND IS NOW AT ITS MOST CRITICAL STAGE - AS YOU WILL READ BELOW.]

    Chaos Increasing in U.S. and Worldwide as Khazarian Mafia Desperately Struggles to Survive

    This week we would like to inform readers that our newsletter is under unprecedented attack and that your support is needed now more than ever.  One of our main intelligence sources in South Asia is being held indefinitely in prison under life-threatening conditions based on planted evidence and trumped-up charges.  Another has vanished.  Yet another was poisoned with ricin.  Your correspondent has also been targeted over the past two months by no less than three poisoning attempts and survived with assistance from both NSA and Asian secret society sources.  This work carries risks that we all understand, but there is no alternative except to fight on as the fate of humanity is at stake.

    Also, this writer was physically stopped from attending a press conference at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan to prevent me from asking Japanese Defense Minister Kono Taro about the Fukushima mass murder event.  Of course, similar harassment is being reported by multiple truth reporting media outlets.

    This is all part of an incredibly hysterical propaganda war based around the so-called COVID-19 coronavirus.  We are seeing fake news portals like the New York Times, Reddit, and the Drudge report filling over half their output with fake stories.  If you see the words COVID, Russia, Trump, or Hong Kong in any of these, or related outlets, you are almost certainly reading fiction.  As far as COVID is concerned, any reader can visit local hospitals and see what’s happening with their own eyes.

    It is true that old people are dying from pneumonia and other causes, as always. But now, hospitals are being ordered to bypass typical treatment protocols and put patients with any sort of breathing difficulty on ventilators that result in fatalities with insurance bribes as incentives to label unrelated deaths as COVID.  The whole thing is a well-organized, coordinated fraud.  And yet it is resulting in incredible economic damage and personal harm to millions of people.

    The source of the COVID fake news infection has been forensically traced to the Knights of Malta and the P3 Freemason lodge.

    322 new Covid cases in Mississippi!
    322 new Covid cases in Ohio! 
    322 new Covid cases in Oman!
    322 new Covid cases in Kentucky!
    322 new Covid cases in Mississippi! 
    322 new Covid cases in Armenia!
    322 new Covid cases in Iraq!
    322 Covid cases in Bangkok!
    322 new Covid cases in Juarez!
    322 new Covid cases in El Paso!
    322 new Covid cases in Mexico City!
    322 new Covid cases in Oaxaca!
    322 new Covid cases in WISCONSIN!
    322 new Covid cases in IOWA
    322 new Covid deaths in DELAWARE
    322 new Covid cases in Italy
    322 new Covid cases in Massachussetts

    (thanks to Jim Stone for spotting this)

    Where have we seen this number before?

    The original skull and bones can be found in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, a church built by the mother of Emperor Constantine, founder of Roman Christianity.

    To quote from Wikipedia:

    “The number “322” appears in Skull and Bones’ insignia and is widely reported to be significant as the year of Greek orator Demosthenesdeath.[19][26][5] A letter between early society members in Yale’s archives[27] suggests that 322 is a reference to the year 322 BC and that members measure dates from this year instead of from the common era.  In 322 BC, the Lamian War ended with the death of Demosthenes and Athenians were made to dissolve their government and establish a plutocratic system in its stead, whereby only those possessing 2,000 drachmas or more could remain citizens.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones

    The fact that this number celebrates the triumph of plutocracy over democracy tells us exactly who we are dealing with in this COVID conspiracy: the families who own the fortune 500 companies.

    They are pulling out all the stops because their control grid is threatened by secret negotiations now taking place concerning the Bretton Woods financial architecture set up after World War II, according to members of the Rothschild family.  This includes the World Bank, the Global Debt Facility, the International Bank for…

    The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
    Please Log In or Register to create an account.
     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS IN HEADING ARE OURS!]

     

    June 29, 2020

     

    H.F.2040

     

     

     

    [WHY THE EU  IS DELIBERATELY AVOIDING A DEAL WITH THE UK-AND WHY BORIS JOHNSON SHOULD KEEP HIS PROMISE TO LEAVE THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL AT THE END OF JUNE-2020.]

    ZURICH (Reuters) - Switzerland and the European Union are unlikely to agree a deal on a new treaty regulating their relations until next year, when the outcome of Brexit talks is known, former EU Commissioner Guenther Oettinger said in an interview published on Monday.

    Switzerland, which is not part of the EU, has a patchwork of 120 sectoral accords with the bloc, and the two sides have spent years negotiating a framework agreement.

    But officials have said a Swiss-EU accord is unlikely to emerge until the terms of Britain's future relationship with the bloc have been settled, because Brussels has been loath to give the Swiss concessions that Britain might seize on.

    Britain, which quit the EU at the end of January, has until the end of this year to reach an agreement with the EU on their future relationship but the talks are at an impasse.

    "I don't think that an (EU-Swiss) agreement will be reached in the second half of the year before the exact course of Brexit is clear," Oettinger, the former point person in Swiss-EU ties, told the Neue Zuercher Zeitung newspaper.

    "The willingness to agree is likely to be low," said Oettinger, a German who was an EU commissioner from 2010 to 2019.

    Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis has said a new agreement is not his country's top priority as it tackles the COVID-19 pandemic. Bern wants to keep the treaty issue under wraps before a September referendum on ending a Swiss-EU pact on the free movement of citizens.

    Brussels wants the Swiss to endorse terms under which Bern would routinely adopt single market rules and create a more effective platform for resolving disputes. The Swiss want to forge domestic consensus on how to proceed.

    The talks between the two sides should be a priority for 2021, Oettinger said.

    (Reporting by John Revill, Editing by Timothy Heritage)

    [GERMANY HAS NEVER HAD ANY INTENTION WHATSOEVER OF AGREEING A DEAL  WITH THE UK UNLESS IT WAS ON THEIR OWN DICTATORIAL TERMS.-AS IT HAS SHOWN FOR ALL TO SEE OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS. OBVIOUSLY FRAU MERKEL-SORRY! I MEAN FRAU HITLER WAS CONFIDENT THAT YET AGAIN A UK PM PROMISE TO LEAVE WITH A NO DEAL AT THE END OF JUNE NEEDED TO BE TAKEN WITH A PINCH OF SALT!]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    JUNE 20,2020

    H.F.2039

     

     

    *

     

    The world is also about to find out that Angela Merkel is Adolf Hitler’s daughter.  The Italians, who have just broken free of German (EU) control sent us a copy of the only known picture of Hitler with his daughter Angela. The message reads, “and when you grow up Angela, destroy all of Europe.”

    .” https://news.yahoo.com/merkel-isolating-pressure-mounts-her-040052387.html

     

    APRIL 6,2020

    H.F.1806

     

    *

     

       

     

    ENGLISH IDENTITY IN A LAND CALLED ENGLAND

     

    We have to thank the membership of the BLACK LIVES MATTER

    for their campaign which has illustrated their attitude of intolerance and lack of respect for British history.  When they came to our shores to be citizens we did not expect they would tear down anything they feel  alien to their feelings rather than respect the right of their hosts to protect their past history, rather than bury the past as if it had never happened.

    What these newcomers to our country have illustrated is their gross arrogance in wishing to obliterate our past to suit their pandering guilt complex instead of integrating into the culture of their tolerant hosts. This has been brought about because of government inaction to curb immigration over the past decades - the patriotic population have had enough.

    What we have seen is that newcomers from other cultures do not appear to have joined the 'mad mobs' which shows that that the BLACK LIVES MATTER role in the UK was ill conceived and the repercussions of that decision will reinforce the anger of the host nation to further demands that those who are seeking a home in ENGLAND should sign a declaration of good citizenship to respect the LAWS-CUSTOMS-HISTORY... of their NEW HOME in ENGLAND

     

    *  *  *

    OUR PAST

     

     

    'Methinks I see in my mind a noble and puissant nation

     rousing herself like a strong man after sleep,

     and  shaking her invincible locks. Methinks I see her as an eagle

    mewing her mighty youth, and kindling her undazzled eyes

    at the full midday beam.'

     

     

    *

     

    'Yet sometimes Nations will decline so low

    From virtue, which is reason, that no wrong,

    But Justice, and some fatal curse annext

    Deprives them of their outward libertie

    Their inward lost.'

    MILTON (Paradise Lost)

     

     

    *

     

    'All our past proclaims our future; Shakespeare's voice and  Nelson's hand.

    Milton's faith and Wordsworth's trust in this

    our chosen and chainless land

    Bear us  witness; come the world  against her,

    England  yet shall stand.'

     

    SWINBURNE

     

    *

    [TO EACH THEIR OWN]

     

    'The social price that a successfully aggressive civilisation has to pay is a seepage of its alien victims culture into its own life-stream. The effect on the victims of assault is  of the same order, but more complex. The introduction of Western ideals and institutions into non-Western societies often produces disconcerting results, for

     'one man's meat is another man's poison'

    The attempt to introduce one element of an alien culture, while excluding the rest is doomed to failure. '

     

    Page 388-2a

     

    A study of History-Toynbee.

     

    JUNE 13-2020

     

    H.F.2028

     

     

    *

    **

     

     

     

     

     
     

     

    [A WARNING FROM THE PAST

    WHICH THE ENGLISH PEOPLE IGNORE AT THEIR PERIL.]

     

    THOUGHT OF THE DAY

    We do not know why Empires Fall and States decline; but we can at any rate conjecture, with no little justice that a disturbance of the racial composition of the Roman Empire was one great cause of its fall. Right laws, Sound morals for the strongest safeguard of every national state; but a sound [English] racial basis is also necessary. A nation may be enriched by a [small] varied contribution of foreign immigration.

    BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION [AS WE FIND IN 2020] GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER, A NATION MAY [WILL] LOSE ITS INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID [ENGLISH]  CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS [ENGLAND] HAS LOST ITS VERY

    SELF.

    Ernest Barker-NATIONAL CHARCHER-1927

    *  *  *

    [THE CURSE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS  NOW WELL EMBEDDED INTO OUR GOVERNMENT IN 2020 - POLITICIANS -POLICE... HAS TAKEN ITS TOLL AND WITH A GREAT NUMBER OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE TAKEN IN BY THIS NATION DESTROYING CURSE -THEIR COUNTRY WILL SOON BE NO LONGER  BE THEIRS AND THEIR NEW MASTERS WILL APPLAUD THEIR SUCCESSFUL CRUSADE TO DESTROY ENGLAND FROM WITHIN.

    JUNE 23,2020

     

    WE thank RICHARD LITTLEJOHN of the Daily Mail of June 23,20

    for his timely article

     

    JUST STOP THESE STUPID RIOTES - IT'S GETTING SILLY

     

    * * * Black Lives Matter may have managed to get 150,000 people out onto the streets but there are another

    63 MILLION

    of us sitting at home utterly bewildered at the way in which the

    POLITICAL

    BROADCAST

    COMMERCIALt

    INSTITUTIONAL

    and

    CRIMINAL JUSTICE ESTABLISHMENT

    has simply caved in to these

    REVOLUTIONARY VANDALS

     

    Those behind BLM may be hell - bent  on toppling statues of long-dead white men, but their real aim is tearing down tearing down the PRESENT and CONTROLLING THE FUTURE.

     

    They have tapped in to genuine feelings of remorse and anger and anger at an unlawful killing 4,500 milesw away to advance their SINISTER AGENDA of SMASHING OUR TOLERANT, CIVILISED SOCIETY and replacing it with their own, rigidly enforced,

    LEFT WING, REVISIONIST, HISTORICALLY ILLITERATE BIGOTED TOTALITARIANISM.

     

    And they're getting away with it.

     

    WHO WILL SPEAK FOR US,THE [ENGLISH]LARGELY SILENT,UNDEMONSTRATIVE,LAW-ABIDING MAJORITY??

    WHO WILL DEFEND THE TRADITIONAL VALUES WE HOLD DEAR?

     

    Certainly not the spineless  [politically-correct]political class, or the ghastly, cringing broadcasters [CH 4]and definitely not  SCOTLAND YARDor any of the other brainwashed COMMON PURPOSE careerists running what used to be a   POLICE FORCE

     envied the world over

     

     now an international laughing stock

     

    Hears a plan. With OurAmasing NHS currently running at just 40 per cent capacity because of COVID, why don't they all elect to have one of their lega amputated as a gesture of solidarity with BLM? Then they can spend the rest of their lives on one knee, to demonstrate their woke piety.

    Until this happens, maybe we can  take a lead from the farmers who housed down a field in Derbyshire with manure to stop an illegal rave. Locals dubbed it Poo Corner. How about enlisting them to do the same in Trafalgar Square, to discourage demonstrators?

     

    If the usual suspects still insist on showing off every weekend, we could call it The Slurry With The Lunatic Fringe On Top .

     

    The Black Lives Matters sketch has run its course.

     

    JOKE'S OVER, CUE COLONEL CHAPMAN

     

     

    STOP THIS, IT'S GETTING SILLY

     

    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Just stop these stupid protests - it's ...

     

    FULL ARTICLE

     

    *  *  *

     

    [ HIGHLIGHTING - COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

     

    http://FreedomKeys.com
    Freedom Keys

     

    Professor R. J. Rummel, who keeps track of such things, now estimates that in the 20th century

    262,000,000

    people were murdered by their own governments.  And all these horrors were perpetrated by collectivist governments for the alleged sake of "the proletariat," the "master race," and especially, "the greater good."

    None were done by countries based

    on

    individualism

     

    See:  http://tinyurl.com/RJRummel 

     

     

    JUNE 23,2020

     

     

    H. F .1424

     

     

    [A MATTER OF BALANCE!

    WHAT BLM FAILED TO MENTION WHEN THEY BROUGHT THEIR CAMPAIGN TO THE UK.]

     

    Black Lives Matter: Racism

     in the

    Middle East and North Africa -

     and how to combat it

     
     
    nyanesh Kamat | Political analyst
    Updated Jun 29, 2020 | 17:15 IST

     

     

    From Basra to Beirut and from Tunis to Tel Aviv, anti-Black racism exists in various forms across the region.

     
    Racims in middle east
    Representative image  |  Photo Credit: iStock Images

    While much of the Western world remains convulsed with Black Lives Matter protests, the Mena (Middle East and North Africa) region should use this moment to address its own anti-Black racism problem. From Basra to Beirut and from Tunis to Tel Aviv, anti-Black racism exists in various forms across the region.

    In the Mena region, it is mostly the consequence of centuries of slavery, with Black Africans enslaved and sold in slave markets across the Indian Ocean and Arabian Gulf. Indeed, in some parts of the Gulf, slavery was abolished only as recently as the 1970s. This is also why racial insults hurled at Black people in these countries often refer to them as “slaves” or “servants.”

    This racist mindset also leads to widespread systemic discrimination against Black people throughout the region. Basra in southern Iraq is home to the majority of the country’s estimated 1.2 million Black population. Black Iraqis have long complained of systemic racism, with limited access to housing, education, healthcare and all but the most menial jobs.

    While Black communities in some Mena countries grapple with the legacy of slavery, others still face modern-day slavery or conditions akin to it. Mauritania is one of the last countries on the planet where slavery continues to this day. The Global Slavery Index of 2018 estimates there are approximately 90,000 Black Mauritanians, or roughly 2.4 per cent of the population, bound to a caste system that is a form of modern-day slavery, with their enslavement inherited from ancestors and passed down to their children. Slavery was abolished in 1981 but it was not until 2007 that it was made a crime, and that too in response to international pressure, with successive governments failing to eradicate the scourge.

    A similar caste-like Black community exists at the margins of society in Yemen. They call themselves the Muhamasheen (“the marginalized”), but other Yemenis refer to them pejoratively as the Akhdam (“the servants”). Many survive by begging. Needless to say, this community has borne the brunt of Yemen’s ongoing civil war.

    While countries like Mauritania and Yemen grapple with centuries-old practices, others have seen slavery rear its ugly head in modern times. Black Africans have long used Libya’s long Mediterranean coast as a staging post from which to attempt to reach Europe. Several migrants have been enslaved and tortured by Libyan militias, and subsequently sold in open-air slave markets.

    Popular culture in the Mena region is also rife with anti-Black racism, from caricatures of Black people used for comedy to erasing them completely from depictions of national culture. The national media in countries like Tunisia portray the country’s citizens as light-skinned. It might come as a shock that 15 per cent of Tunisians are black.

    Iran has a sizeable Black population living along the country’s southern coast. Their contribution to the culture of that region – whether in terms of cuisine, spirituality or to the unique bandari music – is immense. But Iranian popular culture would have us believe the country is populated only by fair-skinned Persians. This comes largely from the “Aryan myth” of Iranian nationalism. Depictions of Black people are limited to stereotypes or pale-skinned people in “blackface” – theatrical make-up used to portray racist caricatures of Black people. Indeed, early Iranian theatre often featured a type of comedy performance known as Siah Baazi, a term meaning “playing black.”

    In the Arab world, more recently, several Arabic-language networks have come in for criticism for their racist depiction of Black people in hidden camera-practical joke reality television shows.

    Almost a year ago, protesters marched through cities in Israel calling for an end to anti-Black police brutality and discrimination in housing, healthcare and education. One of the most horrifying examples of anti-Black racism in Israel occurred in 2016 when the government admitted to having given Ethiopian-Israeli women long-term contraceptives without their consent. The community’s birth rate has halved over the past decade.

    Perhaps the most egregious form of institutionalized racism in the Mena region is the kafala system of hiring migrant workers in Lebanon and parts of the Gulf, which has been described as a modern-day form of slavery. The kafala system, which is not covered by regular labour laws in Lebanon, gives employers total control over the legal residency of “their” workers. Every so often, horrific kafala-related stories emerge of migrant workers, most of them African, being made to work long hours without pay, tortured, sexually abused and even murdered, with little or no recourse to the law for help. Racism also pervades the tourism and hospitality sector in Lebanon and parts of the Gulf, with African and South Asian tourists complaining of being denied entry to trendy bars and clubs.

    If there is to be any impetus for change in the Mena region, it is likely to come from civil society. For example, recent protests against Lebanon’s corrupt political class were led by the youth of the country and included calls to abolish kafala. In 2018, Tunisia became the first Mena country to pass a wide-ranging anti-racism law.

    But much more needs to be done. Mena countries need to rethink their concept of nationalism, redefine the meaning of citizenship and re-negotiate the social contract between citizen and state. If there is to be any hope of dismantling racism and every vestige of slavery in the region, those are fundamental imperatives. Let the Black Lives Matter movement be the catalyst.

    In arrangement with Syndication Bureau

    Dnyanesh Kamat is a guest contributor. Views expressed are personal.

     
     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

     

    JULY 1, 2020

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.2037

     
     

    If we only ever sanctify the NHS, its harrowing failures will never be cured

     

    By Ian Birrell-Daily Mail

    JULY 9,2020
     

    GENERATION OF WOMEN BETRAYED

    Daily Mail -JULY 8,2020

     

     

    DANIEL MASON was born a half century ago without hands, with missing toes, a malformed mouth and impaired vision.

    From an early age, he - and his family-had to deal with people asking about his disabilities. The impact on his life has been considerable.

    His car, clothes and his eating implements must be tailored to his needs. He has not been able to form intimate relationships. Not surprisingly, he has suffered bouts of depression.

    leDanil's mother Daphne long suspected the cause of his problems was a powerful hormone tablet called

    Primodos

    that was given to women to determine whether they were pregnant. But when she raised her concerns with doctors they were dismissed.

    Now at last, Daphne, has been vindicated with official confirmation this week that her fears were RIGHT!, in a 277-page landmark review by Baroness Cumberlege into THREE separate HEALTH SCANDALS that has EXPOSED a litany of SHAMEFUL FAILINGS by the NHS , regulatory authorities and private hospitals

    DAMNING...

     

    Disdain...

     

    Suffer...

    Some critics point to the rising costs of compensation paid out by the NHS with an estimated bill of

    £9 BILLION

     a year.

    , as one reason for the refusal of managers and clinicians to face up to the problems. But these costs would plummet if the NHS was more open about its

    MISTAKES

    stopped trying to silence those raising concerns and was more prepared to

    APOLOGISE..

    We must accept that everyone even doctors and nurses , can make errors. And it would be kinder to distressed families not to drag out hostile legal battles for years, driving up the

    BILLS and PAIN.

    Now there is a proposal for a

    Patient Safety Commissioner.

    This  has potential but only if they are empowered as a strong, independent voice for  harmed patients and families.

    Those who suffer  are often the most vulnerable in society:

    THE ELDERLY

    NEW BORN BABIES

    and

    PEOPLE WITH LEARNING DIFFICULTIES.

    Three of whom die each day on average because of the avoidable failings of the  NHS

    Clapping dedicated carers in this crisis has united this nation. But we should NOT ignore how the same precious health service routinely inflicts

    GRIEF

    PAIN

    and

    SUFFERING

    on those it is meant to

    HELP,

    such as

     Daniel and Daphne Mason.

    If we really love the NHS, then, as with any marriage, we must cherish it both for

    BETTER AND FOR WORSE

    *  *  *

     

    If we only ever sanctify the NHS, its

     

    failures will NEVER ...

    www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8504295/If-sanctify-NHS...

    08/07/2020 · If we only ever sanctify the NHSits harrowing failures will NEVER be cured, says IAN BIRRELL as a damning report exposes three health scandals . By Ian …

     

     

    Daily Mail -JULY 8,2020

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

     

     

    H.F.2048

     

     

     
     

     

    HOW WE TOOK A WRONG TURN ON JANUARY 1-1973

    *

    THE WAY WE WERE

    THE BRITISH POLITICAL TRADITION

    The Concept of Empire

    BURKE TO ATTLEE

    1774-1947

    Edited by

    George Bennett

    *

    LONDON

    ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK

    79

    J.A.FROUDE. Oceana-1886

    [Below an excerpt which we feel appropriate to mention with

    BREXIT

    in mind.]

    Page 297- Concept of Empire. -1947

     ' IMPOSSIBILITY ' is a word of politicians who are without the wish or without the capacity to comprehend new conditions. An 'empire' of Oceana there cannot be. The English race do not like to be parts of an empire [or a European Union in our day] But a 'commonwealth' of Oceana held together by

    COMMON BLOOD

    COMMON INTEREST

    and a common pride in the great position which

    UNITY can secure-such a commonwealth as this may grow of itself if politicians

    CAN BE INDUCED TO LEAVE IT ALONE.

    ...It has become doubtful even to the political economist whether England [1886] can trust entirely to free trade and competition to keep the place which she has hitherto held.  Other nations press us with their rivalries. Expenses increase, manufactures languish or cease to profit. Revenue, once so expansive, becomes stationary. 'Business' may probably will, blaze up again, but the growth of it can no longer [1886] be regarded as constant, while population increase and hungry stomachs multiply, requiring the three meals a day whatever the condition of the markets. Hence those among us who have disbelieved all along that a great nation can venture its whole fortunes safely on the power of underselling its neighbours in calicoes and ironwork no longer address a public opinion entirely cold.  It  begins to be admitted that were Canada and South Africa and Australia and New Zealand members of one body with us, with a free flow of our population into them , We might sit secure against shifts and changes.  In the multiplying number of our own fellow citizens animated by a common spirit, we should have purchasers for our goods from whom we fear no rivalry; we should turn in upon them the tide of our emigrants[1886] which now flows away, while the emigrants themselves  would thrive under their own fig tree, and  rear children with stout limbs and colour in their cheeks, and a chance before them of a human existence.  Oceana would then rest on sure foundations; and her navy - the hand of strength and the symbol of her unity- would ride securely in self-supporting stations in the four quarters of the globe [1886].

    *

    WILLIAM HUSKISSON . Speech on moving for a Select Committee on the Civil Government of Canada

    House of Commons,3 May, 1828.

    Sir, England is the parent of many flourishing colonies-one of them is become an empire among the most powerful in the world. In  every quarter of the globe we have planted the seeds of freedom, civilisation, and Christianity.  To every  quarter of the globe we have carried the language, the free institutions, the system of laws, which prevail in this country; - in every quarter they are fructifying and making progress; and if it be said by some selfish calculator, that we have done all this at the expense of sacrifices which we ought not to have made, my answer is,- in spite of these sacrifices, we are still the first and happiest people in the old world; and, whilst this is our lot, let us rejoice rather in that rich harvest of glory, which must belong to a nation that has laid the foundation of similar happiness and prosperity in other nations, kindred in blood, in habits, and in feelings to ourselves. [1828]

    Ibid., Vol iii.pp286-7

    *

    126: CLEMENT R. ATTLEE. Speech in the House of Commons

    15 March 1946

     

    ...We should be conscious that the British have done a great work in India. We have united India and given her that sense of nationality which she so very largely lacked over the previous centuries,. She had learned from us principles of democracy and justice. When Indians attack our rule, they base their attack, not on Indian principles, but on the basis of standards derived from Britain. I was struck the other day in the United States, at a dinner where I met a number of distinguished Americans, including a very distinguished Indian, where the talk was turning on the way in which principles worked out here have been applied on the Continent of America.  It was pointed out that America had a great heritage from Britain.  My Indian friend said to me, " You know, the Americans sometimes forget there is another great nation that has also inherited these principles and traditions, and that is India.  We feel that we have a duty, a right and a privilege because we also bring to the world and work those very principles that you evolved in Britain."

    Hansard, Fifth Series, Vol. 420, cs.1421-2.

    *

    [That is why by joining the EU  on January 1-1973 England renounced her historic PAST to become a tool of its planned mischief maker, our enemy of

    TWO WORLD WARS

    -Adolf Hitler

     H.F.1211-BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

       

     

     

    THAT IS WHY WE NEED TO RECOVER OUR  ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

    IN

    WESTMINSTER

     

    'I wish, sir, an English Parliament to speak the free unbiased sense of the body of the

    ENGLISH PEOPLE

    and of every man among us,  of each individual who may be justly supposed to be a fair majority...and we ought always to remember the important truth, acknowledged by every free state-that all government is instituted for the good of the mass of the people to be governed that they are the original fountain of power, and even of reverence and in all events the last response...I mention them now to show the necessity of a new regulation

    [To introduce PR-Proportional Representation in 2020.]

      of the representation of the Kingdom of ENGLAND...the monstrous injustice and glaring partiality of the present representation of the Commons of England

     [In fact there is no Commons of England  since 1707 at Westminster since 1707]

    has been fully stated, and is, I believe almost universally acknowledged, as well as as the necessity of our recurring to the great leading principle of our free [English] constitution which declares the House of Parliament [English Parliament] to be only a delegated power for the people at large. Policy, no less than justice, calls our intention to the momentous point; and reason, not custom, ought to be our guide in a business of this consequence [PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION in 2020 in an ENGLISH PARLIAMENT] where the right of a free people are materially interested.

    [In Germany which has PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION those who wish for the return of their NATIONHOOD are protected in their democratic decision by the LAW of the LAND as we have seen only recently.]

    Without a true representation [Introduction of PR in 2020] of the commons our constitution is essentially defective ,our Parliament is delusive name, a mere phantom, and all other remedies to recover the pristine purity of the form of government established by our ancestors would be ineffectual, even the shortening of the period of Parliament and a place and pension bill, which iI highly approve, and think absolutely necessary. [As we the EDP in 2020 fight for the return of the ENGLISH PARLIAMENT at WESTMINSTER.]  I therefore flatter myself sir, that I have the concurrence of the House with the notion which I have the honour of making, That leave be given to bring in a bill for a just and equal representation of the

    PEOPLE of ENGLAND in PARLIAMENT.

    BORIS JOHNSON HAS A STRIKING MAJORITY IN WESTMINSTER TO ENABLE HIM TO BE A MAN OF HISTORY TO RIGHT THE WRONG AND RETURN WESTMINSTER TO ITS HISTORIC PLACE AS THE HOME OF THE

     ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

    JUNE 14-2020

     

    The above extract of an article

    JOHN WILKS

    A warning and a Prophecy

    The Commons and its Rights

    1727-1797

     

    taken from

     

    International University Reading Course

    Copyright by

    International University Society.

    JUNE 14-2020

    H.F.2031

     

     
     

    A REMINDER FROM-2006

    *

    Daily Mail -November 27, 2006

     

    LET THEM EAT PORRIDGE-WE'LL KEEP OUR CAKE

    By

     

    Max Hastings

     

    Daily Mail -November 27, 2006

     

    MONTHS before the 300th anniversary of the

    ACT OF UNION

    -Which brought together Scotland and England under a common Parliament, new opinion Polls suggest that the two peoples have had enough of each other.

     

    More than half the respondents to a weekend ICM survey on both sides of the border claim to believe that the two nations should go it alone again. The figures reflect sentiments which anyone who travels the United Kingdom can endorse. In Scotland, ill-will and resentment towards the ENGLISH HAS BEEN MOUNTING FOR MANY YEARS.

     

    A 1995 Nuffield Foundation study found that 75 per cent of Scots felt 'some antipathy towards the English, thinking them aggressive, arrogant and untrustworthy.

    Today, hostility has grown. It was highlighted by ugly incidents during the World Cup, when some fans rash enough to wear English colours in Scotland were physically assaulted, and Scottish First Minister Jack McConnell defiantly asserted that he was more interested in the fates of the Trinidad and Angola teams than that of ENGLAND.

     

    Meanwhile, south of the border, after decades in which the English seemed unmoved by Scottish animosity, suddenly passions are stirring.  There is growing awareness, and resentment of the bills we pay for the northern kingdom's fecklessness.

    Per capita PUBLIC SPENDING in Scotland is much higher then in ENGLAND. Official figures this year put it at £8,265 per head in Scotland and £6,762 in ENGLAND.

     

    The Scottish parliament has recently decreed that the elderly should receive free long-term health-care regardless of their wealth. In England it is a source of bitter grievance that no such provision is available - yet we are funding Edinburgh's largesse to its own.

     

    Am astonishingly recent statistic suggests that of Scotland's  population of five million, just 163,000 people are taxpayers when all relief's and subsidies are discounted.  The remainder are takers from - and not contributors to - the NATION EXCHEQUER.

     

    And yet this same nation of dependents possesses a vice-like grip on BRITAIN'S governance.

    Scottish MPs vote on ENGLISH issues in the COMMONS, while ENGLISH  MPs are barred from voting on Scottish ones.

    Many key OFFICES of GOVERNMENT are filled by SCOTS MPs, and we shall have a Scottish prime minister if Gordon Brown succeeds Tony Blair.

    The English might swallow all this with good grace, if the SCOTS seemed grateful or even merely friendly.

    BUT THEY ARE NOT

    And as abuse grows, as English visitors perceive ever more hostility when they cross the border, southerners are GETTING ANGRY.

    Now , their feelings are reflected in opinion polls, and building a head of steam.

    'If the Scots don't like it, why don't they just b***** off and become INDEPENDENT? demand a host of voices in English bars and homes.

    If the latest ICM poll is to be believed, 68 per cent of the southern public wants an

    ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

     to match the

     Scottish one.

     

    THIS, it seems to me, would be the worst possible response to the tensions in the [so-called] UNION. It would create another vastly expensive layer of GOVERNMENT in a [so-called] United Kingdom which is already over-governed.

     

    [England OUT -OF-EU which be an even richer country and a NEW UNION of Independent Nation States would add little to the wealth of an EU FREE zone.  There is the possibility that Scotland would prefer to remain in the EU but with English withdrawal any cost would have to be shared by the other contributors in the EU and  NOT ENGLAND.]

    If we do not think much of most Commons MPs, imagine what the members of a subordinate English Parliament would be: rejects from Westminster scrambling to board a branch gravy train.

    Take a look at the McPygmies' who squander our money in Edinburgh. They are most famous for promoting a measure to give women rights to breastfeed in public places, and venting their spleen on the English as the source of all Scotland's woes.

     

    Do we really want the same sort of thing in an English Parliament HOUSE, to be established -

    let us say in the forthcoming and soon-to-be-derelict Olympic stadium in East London?

    [The historical home of the INDEPENDENT ENGLISH PARLIAMENT is at WESTMINSTER and there it will always remain]

    The only rational debate must be about whether the UNION should continue at all. Economically from an English standpoint there is no case. Scotland brings nothing to the party except glorious scenery.

    The northern kingdom has suffered a tragic decline since the 19th century when it was a thriving heartland of heavy industry, coal mining and shop building.

     

    As engineers, architects, soldiers and traders. Scots were among the foremost builders of the British Empire.  In the 20th century, however, since the collapse of the old manufacturing base, Scotland has languished.

    Nationalism began its resurgence some 30 years ago, when Scottish football fans started to sing

     Flower of Scotland

    -at International matches in place of

    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

    The movement gathered pace dramatically during the years of Margaret Thatcher. Scots bitterly resisted her campaign to strip their decaying industries of public funding and make them stand on their own feet.

    'With the precise and good intentions of a nurse,'

     historian Richard Weight has written,

     

    'Mrs. Thatcher unpeeled the fiscal bandages which British government  since the 1930s had placed on Scotland and Wales in an effect to heal the wounds of industrial decline.

    THATCHER WAS RIGHT, of course, but the Scots have never forgiven her or the ENGLISH. They cling to an implacable conviction that we had shafted them, above all by stealing 'THEIR' OIL.

    IN TRUTH, if we had given them every penny from the North Sea bonanza but made them pat their own way for say, the past half century, SCOTLAND WOULD STILL BE IN DEEP DEFICIT.

    While England has transformed itself into a post-industrial society the northern  kingdom has lagged helplessly. Scots make many excuses for their failure, but frequent studies have concluded that they simply lack the entrepreneurial energy and skills to complete.

    Edinburgh has become a significant financial centre, but Scottish businesses start-ups have an appalling survival record. As ambitious young Scots migrate south, the population sustained  only by a steady inflow of ENGLISH retirement couples, who appreciate cheap housing and a low cost of living.

    The country employs vastly more public-sector workers per head than ENGLAND

    Its Parliament promotes a shamelessly Stalinist vision of STATE dominance and STATE provision.  Politically, socially, economically, SCOTLAND has become retirement home for 20th century lost causes and discredited ideals

     

     

    The Scots tragedy is that they cannot make their own country work, and want somebody else to blame. They measure their history alongside that of the IRISH, and imagine an INDEPENDENT future as bright as that of modern Ireland. Both propositions are ill-founded.

    [Ireland receives annually a Billion pounds from the EU partly paid for by the English taxpayers.]

     

    FIRST, even admitting the 19th century Highland clearances, Scotland never suffered at English hands as Ireland did. Indeed, it has profited mightily from the UNION for most of its history, as economists acknowledge.

    SECOND, Ireland's take- off was made possible by a tidal wave of U hand-outs [much from the English taxpayer] in the 1970s and 1980s. This will not be repeated if Scotland votes for INDEPENDENCE, because the cash isn't there.

     

    THE WORST - and likeliest -

    outcome of current surge of nationalist sentiment is that the Scots will go on whinging, but stop just short of going INDEPENDENT. They will be terrified of losing access to all that lovely

     

     ENGLISH MONEY

     

    [WE HOPE THEY KEEP THEIR NERVE-some of the most successful countries in the world are SMALL NATION STATES. Mr Salmond needs to visit those countries and learn from their success.  He of course needs to get rid of the many nut- cases which give his historic country a bad image on the international scene.  Wealth is NOT the most important objective but the happiness of the PEOPLE and their commitment to each other to make a transition to the necessary changes to give their people a decent standard of living but more IMPORTANTLY a 'breath of fresh air' of Freedom and modest contentment.  Scottish Independence will pave the way for an

    INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

    OF

    ENGLAND

    AT

    WESTMINSTER.  ]

     

     

     

    If I were David Cameron, however, as the next General Election approaches I would play the English card ruthlessly. Whatever the Tories do, they will never again win significant seats in Scotland, so they have nothing to lose.

    [We are not so sure as the possibility of England leaving the EU is almost assured if she becomes again an INDEPENDENT ENGLAND.  Many in the Tory party and particularly Mr Nice Guy Dave are committed to the EU and they will do anything to see that the name of England is never shown on the map of the British Isles again. There would also be a clamour for Proportional Representation as most of the voters are no longer pleased with Tweedledee and Dave's Tweedledumb.]

    Cameron can ride a tide of mounting English anger, about how much the Scots cost us, and how wretchedly they behave in return.

     

    Why should we accept governance by the [TARTAN CABAL] Labour ministers who sit for Scottish rotten boroughs? Why should we go on pretending to bear responsibility for Scotland's social and economic failure\?

     

    I am an ENGLISHMAN  who has loved SCOTLAND

    - all my life , but like many of us, I have had enough.

    IF THE SCOTS CLAIM TO WANT INDEPENDENCE, LET THEM HAVE IT.

     

    The break-up of the UNION will be a sorrow to those of us to whom its heritage means so much

    But now that it has become a source of rancor and resentment among the Scottish people, let them see how they fare without it.

    THEY CAN EAT SCOTS PORRIDGE INSTEAD OF ENGLISH CAKE< AND DISCOVER HOW THEY LIKE IT,

     

    [As we have mentioned elsewhere a break-up of partners is not always a disaster it might lead to a more understanding and at a later stage a new partnership where they have learnt not to take their partner for granted. Scotland with Wales and England share the same Island and a

    NEW UNION 

    Of a Family of Independent Nation States

    of

    Greater Britain

    would be a great force for FREEDOM and JUSTICE in the WORLD of the 21st century.]

    *          *          *

    NOVEMBER/06

    SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT

    -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

     

    *

     

    Home Rule for Scotland

    WHY NOT

    HOME RULE for ENGLAND

     

    *

     

     

     

     

    [All underlined words above have a separate bulletin]

     

     

    ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

     

     

    *

     

     

    H.F.1521

     

     

     

     

    [A REMINDER FROM 2008 TO BENDING A KNEE IN JUNE 2020.]

     

    *

    [A STRAW IN THE WIND?]

    Daily Mail-St George's Day-23rd April 2008

     

    [We have the so-called JUSTICE MINISTER Jack Straw looking no doubt to the future elections in his constituency with a St George's Day address to the NATION.  This is the man who has been in the hot seat of a government that has done more harm than any other  to the values of our FREE SPEECH-FREE EXPRESSION in English society.  His Government has been responsible for the greatest flood of IMMIGRATION in our long history and he wonders why so many people no longer feel they live in the same country and if they happen to be WHITE they will have to join the end of the queue for funding because the diversity culture takes precedence .    He is well aware of the no-go areas now so prominent in our towns and cities where SHARIA LAW is conveniently ignored by the police and the authorities.  We now have the Ghettosization of ENGLAND.    In our country there is but one RULE of LAW and Jack Straw obviously knows it but turns a blind eye to it as is the case of the at least 200 so-called honour killings over the past decade.   It is no wonder many voters are now joining the BNP.  Even a prominent ministerial  member of  the Labour Party voiced the stark truth that many voters  who's concerns are ignored find that the BNP are the only party which will listen to their great concerns.  The main political parties in Westminster are so avaricious for votes that they will do anything it takes , whatever the damage done to the rights and liberties of the indigenous people.  Their record to reduce CRIME and build urgently needed PRISONS is a shambles and worst of all the VICTIMS of CRIME are ignored when the so-called PUNISHMENT in many cases a travesty of so-called JUSTICE that we wonder that Jack Straw as so-called JUSTICE MINISTER has not decided to change the name as it certainly is a misnomer and must fall foul of the TRADE DESCRIPTION ACT.  The BNP has always been a convenient target and a scapegoat to bring to the fore whenever the main political parties are concerned about their dropping voting figures and it is obvious to many voters that though there are no doubt some hot heads the majority are voters  have been ignored so many times that in sheer desperation they have sought their aid to resolve their serious concerns.  We now learn that East Europeans are failing to integrate  and the reality is that too many immigrants are now here which makes any possible INTEGRATION in ENGLAND even more difficult to achieve.   Mr Straw may be an Englishman but he and his GOVERNMENT have done more to damage the home of our patron saint

    St George of England

    that it is an absolute marvel that he has had the sheer audacity to speak to the PEOPLE of ENGLAND after he and his companions in CRIME have sold our country to a FOREIGN POWER.]

    *

     

    A TREATY TOO FAR!

    *

    [EACH UNDERLINED WORD HAS A SEPARATE BULLETIN]

    As demonstrated with seven words above

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

    23rd April, 2008 

    *

     

     

     

    H.F.2050

     

    RDS- Open Letter to the President – Leverage NSA, Clean Up Wall Street, Engage Authentic Black Leaders

    11 June 2020

    Mr. President,

    It is my good fortune to be a former spy and also good friends with Bill Binney and known to Mike Flynn.  It has taken me months to arrange for Bill Binney to speak on the record, in a sixteen-minute video at https://tinyurl.com/NSA-10-30-100. With ten people in thirty days, Bill can deliver all the data you need to confiscate, through civil and criminal forfeiture, $100 trillion (or more) in assets acquired by varied Wall Street financial criminals among whom Goldman Sachs is by far the largest, using naked short selling and money laundering to steal from all.

    On the next page are four cartoons from Ben Garrison that I commissioned to help explain to the American people – and to remind you – that the greatest criminals in America are the banks, not the bank robbers. Wall Street has destroyed over 10,000 companies, thousands of innovations, and millions of jobs through its criminal financial practices, all condoned and enabled by the Senate Banking Committee, the Department of Justice (notably the Holder Memorandum taking jail off the table), the FBI, and the SEC.

    By combining data from NSA, from a forced audit of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) that has spit on our laws since its inception, and data from ShareIntel, a company ripe for acquisition by DoJ, you can completely by-pass all Wall Street lawyers and the decades of delay that come with lawyers, and begin confiscating stocks of gold and silver, art, waterfront mansions, condos all over the world, superyachts, private airplanes, private islands, and more. You were deceived when you were told that $17 trillion was all you could get. Bill Binney and I can find you another $100 to $200 trillion to help Make America Great Again.

    Furthermore, once you finish eradicating financial crime on Wall Street, all my experts tell me that the stock market will explode as everyone smart enough to stay away now comes back to the capital markets. America will experience a BOOM of innovation and entrepreneurship. There is legislation you could sponsor that would receive bipartisan support: we need to restore the $25 million IPO and break up the too big to hold accountable funds. We need to end flash trading, enforce good laws on the settlement, and put integrity back into banking.

    I believe NSA has been rolling you and the Attorney General. By now, had Bill Binney been there, you would have every traitor, every elite pedophile, every #RESIST and Antifa terrorist funder and organizer, and most crooked judges and prosecutors lined up for justice.

    Separately I have arranged for the top authentic Black leaders of America – not to be confused with celebrities or those who have been “made” by the white system – to reach out to you.  They all condemn the protests, which they have not organized; they are all ready to support you contingent on your hearing them out and being responsive to their suggestions.

    My varied memoranda in the past do not appear to have reached you. You will find my best and latest memorandum at https://tinyurl.com/POTUS-5.

    I have done all one man can do. Be assured of my vote in November 2020, but also be assured that it causes me great distress to see you betrayed every day by people who are in service to foreign powers, who are not loyal to you nor to America the Beautiful, and who continue to prevent you from being the greatest President ever.  I am local (Oakton, Virginia).  I would like to help you build an Open Source Agency that includes Web 3.0, a Trump Studio, and Truth Channel, and “the President’s Own” Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) service.

    Semper Fidelis,

     

    June 15, 2020

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.1806

     

       

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    IMMIGRATION

     

     

     

     

    THE REAL PROBLEM

     

     

     

    IS

     

     

     

    NUMBERS

     

     

     

    NOT

     

     

     

    RACE

     

     

     

     

    Because with smaller

     NUMBERS

     of

     NEWCOMERS

    years ago

     and

    REAL ACTION OF GOVERNMENT

     

     

     

    The matter would have SOLVED YEARS AGO.

     

     

    The only realistic

    answer

     is for the government

    to introduce a   REPATRIATION SCHEME WITH RESETTLEMENT ALLOWANCE TO THOSE WISHING TO RETURN TO THEIR

    HOMELAND.

     

     

    TRY AS WE MIGHT THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION

    BECAUSE THE PRESENT POPULATION LEVEL IN ENGLAND IS

    IS MUCH TOO HIGH

    WITH AT LEAST

    16MILLION WORKERS

    LOSING THEIR JOBS TO ROBOTS

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Far better for IMMIGRANTS

    TO RETURN TO THEIR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN TO HELP

    RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING THERE

    AMONGST THEIR OWN KIN

     

     

     

    [The Coronavirus factor to also consider which will no doubt result in a large number of jobs which will never return.]

     

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

    Governments since Enoch Powell

     have ignored calls for a halt to immigration

    except for to fill important and essentional job vacancies.

     

     

     

     

    The present situation we face in England

     in June 2020 is due to successive governments ignoring the wishes of the English People for a stop to immigration except for essential job vacancies  has led to tens of thousands possibly millions of newcomers which local councils have had great difficulty in housing-the greater number in tower blocks 'caged' hence the anger and frustration of their occupants

     

    As we have already stated our land mass -50,300 square milesis less than a third the size of Germany with137,800 square miles which has a population of approximately 83 million yet we have over 55 million in England whereas a reduction of at least 20 million would have been an ideal number with an anticipated job loss in the near future of at least 16 million jobs due to the mass introduction of robots.

     

    For the past twenty years the EDP has brought this matter to the English People yet they still voted for governments of the LEFT and RIGHT who have brought this country to one of the most crowded in the world.

    We can only suggest the the English People in the main have been 'too laid-back' in their attitude about the takeover of their country by millions of newcomers who hold them in contempt -hence the riots of the past weeks.

    ONLY PR -  PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION WILL RETURN POWER TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

     

     UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

    by

    Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

     

    BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

    [MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

    SEE HERE!   ]

     

    JUNE 2-2015

    [THE TWO MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES PLAY MUSICAL CHAIRS AND HAVE FAILED OVER DECADES TO CUT CRIME - IMPROVE STATE PENSIONS-EVEN PORTUGAL PAYS MORE. STILL NO BOBBIES-ON-THE-BEAT AND CROWDED PRISONS AND THE  OBVIOUS ANSWER NEW PRISONS IGNORED AND DECIDE TO FIT PHONE IN EVERY PRISON CELL  AND THE LATEST! ALLOW SEX AND DRINK IN THEIR 5 STAR ACCOMMODATION-CRIMINALS COMING UP BEFORE BEFORE THE BENCH WILL BE PLEADING TO BE LOCKED UP  FOR SUCH WONDERFUL OFFERINGS.   WE HAVE HEARD OF OPEN PRISONS BUT THIS MUST BE A NEW DIMENSION IN THE WORD PUNISHMENT AND REHABILITATION.]

    *

    WE ARE CONTINUALLY HEARING OF THE WASTE OF FOREIGN AID-

    THE LATEST!

    DAILY MAIL, Saturday, January 5,2019

    UK handing £1.5 bn aid to the world's corrupt countries

    by

    JASON GROVES-Political Editor

    *

    [After the TORY  BETRAYAL of 1972 there is an urgent need for an ENGLISH Patriotic political party to

    PROTECT the INDEPENDENCE of our COUNTRY and the RETURN after over 300 years

    OUR

    ENGLISH PARLIAMENT IN HER ANCIENT HOME of WESTMINSTER.]

    *

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    H.F.1388

    H.F.2032

     

     

     

     

     
     

     

     
    BLACK
    LIVES
    MATTER

     

     

    An

     

    archist Manifesto

     

    Abolish the police

    Smash capitalism

    close all prisons

    -the avowed aims of the British arm of

    BLACK LIVES MATTER

    which would dismantle society as we know it.

    SO THE QUESTION FOR ITS

    33.000 DONORS:

     

    Do they really know the

    TRUTH

    of the

     

    Anarchist Manifesto

    Guy Adams

    INVESTIGATES

    DAILY MAIL-SATURDAY-JUNE 20-2020

    H.F.2035

     

     

     
     

     

    JUNE-2020

    H.F.2037

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a

     valuable tool for the elites.

     

     
     THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

    AS the year passes we are witnessing that England is becoming like the USA a country divided by

    RELIGION-CUSTOM and RACE

    Since the first arrivals many decades ago our country has the appearance of a global mishmash of peoples of different colour-creed and custom.

    ENGLAND IS NOW A DIVIDED NATION.

    Millions of newcomers have only contempt for our

    RULE OF LAW

    CUSTOM and HISTORY

    and seek to destroy our

    NATION STATE

    to

    DESTROY OUR DEMOCRATIC HERITAGE

    forgetting that many countries in our once

    BRITISH EMPIRE

    were bestowed a immense benefit of

    DEMOCRACY

    which later led to their

    INDEPENDENCE.

     

    Events of the last few months has shown that a malignant core of traitors of politically correct RABID idiots from within and of resentful newcomers are determined to

    DESTROY THE ENGLISH NATION

    It is now clearly obvious that many newcomers have no intention of protecting our

    ENGLISH HERITAGE

    which they were aware of when they decided to join the

     PEOPLE

    of

     ENGLAND

    They have proved their unfitness to being

     citizens of ENGLAND

    A proud nation state

     known the world over with a once

     ENGLISH PARLIAMENT

    known as the

    MOTHER OF PARLIAMENTS

    .

    Unless the true

    ENGLISH PEOPLE fight back and legislate to remove trouble-makers that came to our English shore who wish to

    DESTROY OUR HISTORY- LAW- CUSTOM-RELIGION

     

    and unless the true English People stand firm to protect their

    CUSTOM -LAW and RELIGION

     

    THEIR PRICELESS INHERITANCE

     

    Then the island which has housed the English people for over 1400 years will be obliterated from within and the words of our true feelings will be consigned to history.

     

    ENGLAND

     

    This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle

     

     This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars.

     

    *  *  *

     

    This precious stone, set in the silver sea,

     

    Which serves it in the office of a wall,

     

    Or as a moat defensive to a house,

     

    Against the envy of less happier lands;

     

    This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this

     

     ENGLAND

    *  *  *

     

    THE FAULT WE FACE IS BECAUSE THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

     

    HAVE BEEN RULED BY THE

     

    GANG OF THREE

     

    Who have ignored the constant call for a stop to immigration OVER THE DECADES except to fill urgent vacancies

     

    ONLY

    PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

     

    WILL ENSURE THAT ENGLAND TO ITSELF WILL BE TRUE.

     

    *  *  *

     

    JUNE 15,2020

     

    H.F.2017

     

     

    A REMINDER FROM 2006

     

     

     

     

    HOW COULD A MULTICULTURAL BRITAIN WORK

     

    By

    Andrew Alexander

    Column

    [Daily Mail-December 15, 2006]

     

    TONY BLAIR has admitted at last that MULTICULTURALISM has failed, but future historians will puzzle why anyone thought it would ever succeed

     

    After all, history is one long tale of cultural clashes - religious, sectarian, racial and national. As they contemplate the remains of what was once one of the world's most stable societies, blessed with a common cultural heritage, they will marvel that vast waves of immigrants were admitted -

    AND ARE STILL COMING.

    Of course , there had always been immigration but the numbers had been small, the arrivals often talented; and many of them not just ready but eager to embrace the British

    WAY-OF-LIFE

     

    For an explanation, we need to go  back to the 1962 Commonwealth Immigration Act. When Harold Macmillan finally brought in that legislation, peppered with loopholes to pacify critics, the Left sternly opposed it.

    The Far left was intelligent enough to see that mass immigration could overturn a society they hated. The opposition of more moderate Socialists was based on a firm if vaguely-defined belief in the

    BROTHERHOOD OF MAN

    - those from less prosperous countries should be automatically welcomed.

     

    Besides, there was the delicious lure that nearly all immigrants would

    VOTE LABOUR

    -But that was not publicly aired.

     

    MacMillan reluctantly introduced the legislation, whose outlines had been drafted in 1955.  As with others in his party, he was in thrall to the Multiracial Commonwealth fantasy, prolonging a belief that though the

    BRITISH EMPIRE

    -was dead, we could be-

    or pretend to be -

    a serious global power.

    The biggest hindrance to clear  thinking about immigration and multiculturalism has always been the 'moderates' who dominate what is called the political class-party activists, information professionals, social scientists and opinion formers generally. these people are always proud of their 'moderation'.

     

    MULTICULTURALISM was a natural attraction. It sounded, you see, so 'decent'

     

    . These predominately middle-class moderates could also think of themselves as more enlightened than the working class (who bore the brunt of the tidal wave of immigrants).

     

    You encountered these high-minded souls in the Press and TV and radio, insisting that immigration was by definition a good thing.

    THEY STILL DO IT.

    -but their postal codes always give then away.

    If you lived in Hampstead or Kensington or Richmond you could enjoy the advantages of a moral smugness without the disadvantages of an alien wedge in your midst. When I point out to multicultural enthusiasts the tremendous property values in Brixton, they seem curiously uninterested.

     

    Their cause was certainly helped by media self-censorship. Not since the British Press kept silent about Edward VIII's dalliance with Mrs. Simpson had the media exercised such nervous restraint. Anything that was alarming about IMMIGRATION was PLAYED DOWN.

    [We have at the present day the same reluctance to thoroughly open discussion on the benefits or otherwise of the European Union -though there appears to be a slight fissure appearing in the 35 year-old dam of silence but no real momentum by the pro-Europeans to sell their wonderful dream in their utopian wonderland. We wonder WHY?]

    The moderates who dominated the Press became terrified of the accusation of 'racism'. The U.S.,because of well-deserved bad conscience had declared that the ultimate sin; and with our habit of importing everything American good or bad, we adopted the same values.

     

    Anything that might suggest their thinking was racist had newspapers in a flap. Disagreeable forecasts about immigration levels were ignored, reassuring figures emphasised. Anyway, ran the moderate view, even if the numbers did prove large, our oh-so-tolerant multicultural society would comfortably absorb them.

    When facts became unavoidable, real issues would be evaded. if the number of blacks in prison was reported as disproportionately high, the required conclusion was that something was wrong with the judicial system.

    If there were riots in Brixton or Tottenham , some extreme moderate like Lord Scarman would be sent to conclude that

    WE WERE ALL GUILTY.

     

    Blair's insistence that we must have integration is hopelessly late. he says, for example that immigrants must learn English. But there is no way to compel that on the inflow [flood] of immigrants from Eastern Europe.

    They may unlike the Commonwealth immigrants, be less alien to British ways. But they will regularly form their own communities rather than integrate and the process of constant, ethnic fragmentation will be common place.  Poles are already setting up Polish branches of trade unions in Southampton - where they number up to 30,000-and in Glasgow.

     

    AS for the insistence that immigration is economically advantageous

    IT SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE.

    it may produce good economic growth, but income per head rises little.

     

    The strain upon public services ranging from HEALTH to TRANSPORT is also very costly. Moreover, IMMIGRATION has been a key factor in raising HOUSE PRICES-inevitably in one of the

    WORLD'S MOST CROWDED NATIONS.

    Further waves will be coming soon from Romania and Bulgaria but they will be 'managed'. claims the Home Office [You know! -the 'unfit for purpose 'establishment.] unconvincingly. One day, no doubt, from Turkey too (whose admission to the EU is supported by the Conservatives!)

     

    THE FUTURE IS BLEAK

    *          *          *

     

     

     

    DECEMBER/06

     

     

     

    POPULATION IN ENGLAND...

    INDIANS OVERTAKE POLES AS OUR LARGEST MIGRANT POPULATION

    BORN ABROAD LIVING IN UK

    1)India-837,000

    2)Poland-837,000

    3)Pakistan-533,000

    4)Ireland-358,000

    Daily Mail-November 29,2019.

    *   *   *

     https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

    NOVEMBER 29,2019

     

     

     

    *

     

    ONLY

    PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

    WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

    *

     

    SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

     

    *

     

    Home Rule for Scotland

    WHY NOT

    HOME RULE for ENGLAND

     

    *

    [All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

    *

     FOR RETURN TO

    IMMIGRATION FILE

     

    *

    H.F.1927

     

     

     

     

     

    Open Letter from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi

    to

    German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel

    Languages: DE, EN; EE, ES, FR, GR, HE, IT, NL, PT, RU, SK, TR

    An Open Letter from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, to the German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel. Professor Bhakdi calls for an urgent reassessment of the response to Covid-19 and asks the Chancellor five crucial questions. The let­ter is dated March 26. This is an unofficial translation; see the original letter in German as a PDF.

     

     

    Open Letter

    Dear Chancellor,

    As Emeritus of the Johannes-Gutenberg-University in Mainz and longtime director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology, I feel obliged to critically question the far-reaching restrictions on public life that we are currently taking on ourselves in order to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

    It is expressly not my intention to play down the dangers of the virus or to spread a political message. However, I feel it is my duty to make a scientific contribution to putting the current data and facts into perspective – and, in addition, to ask questions that are in danger of being lost in the heated debate.

    The reason for my concern lies above all in the truly unforeseeable socio-economic consequences of the drastic containment measures which are currently being applied in large parts of Europe and which are also already being practiced on a large scale in Germany.

    My wish is to discuss critically – and with the necessary foresight – the advantages and disadvantages of restricting public life and the resulting long-term effects.

    To this end, I am confronted with five questions which have not been answered sufficiently so far, but which are indispensable for a balanced analysis.

    I would like to ask you to comment quickly and, at the same time, appeal to the Federal Government to develop strategies that effectively protect risk groups without restricting public life across the board and sow the seeds for an even more intensive polarization of society than is already taking place.

    With the utmost respect,

    Prof. em. Dr. med. Sucharit Bhakdi

    1. Statistics

    In infectiology – founded by Robert Koch himself – a traditional distinction is made between infection and disease. An illness requires a clinical manifestation. [1] Therefore, only patients with symptoms such as fever or cough should be included in the statistics as new cases.

    In other words, a new infection – as measured by the COVID-19 test – does not necessarily mean that we are dealing with a newly ill patient who needs a hospital bed. However, it is currently assumed that five percent of all infected people become seriously ill and require ventilation. Projections based on this estimate suggest that the healthcare system could be overburdened.

    My question: Did the projections make a distinction between symptom-free infected people and actual, sick patients – i.e. people who develop symptoms?

    2. Dangerousness

    A number of coronaviruses have been circulating for a long time – largely unnoticed by the media. [2] If it should turn out that the COVID-19 virus should not be ascribed a significantly higher risk potential than the already circulating corona viruses, all countermeasures would obviously become unnecessary.

    The internationally recognized International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents will soon publish a paper that addresses exactly this question. Preliminary results of the study can already be seen today and lead to the conclusion that the new virus is NOT different from traditional corona viruses in terms of dangerousness. The authors express this in the title of their paper “SARS-CoV-2: Fear versus Data”. [3]

    My question: How does the current workload of intensive care units with patients with diagnosed COVID-19 compare to other coronavirus infections, and to what extent will this data be taken into account in further decision-making by the federal government? In addition: Has the above study been taken into account in the planning so far?  Here too, of course, “diagnosed” means that the virus plays a decisive role in the patient’s state of illness, and not that previous illnesses play a greater role.

    3. Dissemination

    According to a report in the Süddeutsche Zeitung, not even the much-cited Robert Koch Institute knows exactly how much is tested for COVID-19. It is a fact, however, that a rapid increase in the number of cases has recently been observed in Germany as the volume of tests increases. [4]

    It is therefore reasonable to suspect that the virus has already spread unnoticed in the healthy population. This would have two consequences: firstly, it would mean that the official death rate – on 26 March 2020, for example, there were 206 deaths from around 37,300 infections, or 0.55 percent [5] – is too high; and secondly, it would mean that it would hardly be possible to prevent the virus from spreading in the healthy population.

    My question: Has there already been a random sample of the healthy general population to validate the real spread of the virus, or is this planned in the near future?

    4. Mortality

    The fear of a rise in the death rate in Germany (currently 0.55 percent) is currently the subject of particularly intense media attention. Many people are worried that it could shoot up like in Italy (10 percent) and Spain (7 percent) if action is not taken in time.

    At the same time, the mistake is being made worldwide to report virus-related deaths as soon as it is established that the virus was present at the time of death – regardless of other factors. This violates a basic principle of infectiology: only when it is certain that an agent has played a significant role in the disease or death may a diagnosis be made. The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies of Germany expressly writes in its guidelines: “In addition to the cause of death, a causal chain must be stated, with the corresponding underlying disease in third place on the death certificate. Occasionally, four-linked causal chains must also be stated.” [6]

    At present there is no official information on whether, at least in retrospect, more critical analyses of medical records have been undertaken to determine how many deaths were actually caused by the virus.

    My question: Has Germany simply followed this trend of a COVID-19 general suspicion? And: is it intended to continue this categorisation uncritically as in other countries? How, then, is a distinction to be made between genuine corona-related deaths and accidental virus presence at the time of death?

    5. Comparability

    The appalling situation in Italy is repeatedly used as a reference scenario. However, the true role of the virus in that country is completely unclear for many reasons – not only because points 3 and 4 above also apply here, but also because exceptional external factors exist which make these regions particularly vulnerable.

    One of these factors is the increased air pollution in the north of Italy. According to WHO estimates, this situation, even without the virus, led to over 8,000 additional deaths per year in 2006 in the 13 largest cities in Italy alone. [7] The situation has not changed significantly since then. [8] Finally, it has also been shown that air pollution greatly increases the risk of viral lung diseases in very young and elderly people. [9]

    Moreover, 27.4 percent of the particularly vulnerable population in this country live with young people, and in Spain as many as 33.5 percent. In Germany, the figure is only seven percent [10]. In addition, according to Prof. Dr. Reinhard Busse, head of the Department of Management in Health Care at the TU Berlin, Germany is significantly better equipped than Italy in terms of intensive care units – by a factor of about 2.5 [11].

    My question: What efforts are being made to make the population aware of these elementary differences and to make people understand that scenarios like those in Italy or Spain are not realistic here?

    References:

    [1] Fachwörterbuch Infektionsschutz und Infektionsepidemiologie. Fachwörter – Definitionen – Interpretationen. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin 2015. (abgerufen am 26.3.2020)

    [2] Killerby et al., Human Coronavirus Circulation in the United States 2014–2017. J Clin Virol. 2018, 101, 52-56

    [3] Roussel et al. SARS-CoV-2: Fear Versus Data. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 105947

    [4] Charisius, H. Covid-19: Wie gut testet Deutschland? Süddeutsche Zeitung. (abgerufen am 27.3.2020)

    [5] Johns Hopkins University, Coronavirus Resource Center. 2020. (abgerufen am 26.3.2020)

    [6] S1-Leitlinie 054-001, Regeln zur Durchführung der ärztlichen Leichenschau. AWMF Online (abgerufen am 26.3.2020)

    [7] Martuzzi et al. Health Impact of PM10 and Ozone in 13 Italian Cities. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. WHOLIS number E88700 2006

    [8] European Environment Agency, Air Pollution Country Fact Sheets 2019, (abgerufen am 26.3.2020)

    [9] Croft et al. The Association between Respiratory Infection and Air Pollution in the Setting of Air Quality Policy and Economic Change. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2019, 16, 321–330.

    [10] United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Living Arrange­ments of Older Persons: A Report on an Expanded International Dataset (ST/ESA/SER.A/407). 2017

    [11] Deutsches Ärzteblatt, Überlastung deutscher Krankenhäuser durch COVID-19 laut Experten unwahrscheinlich, (abgerufen am 26.3.2020)


    Share this letter on: Twitter / Facebook
    Back to main article:
    Facts about Covid-19

     

    *  *  *

     

    HENRY MAKOW 

     

    FOR  EVEN MORE INSIGHT ABOUT COVID-19

     

     

     

    H F 2042

     
     

     

    BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER/06

     

     

     

    A BLUNDER FOR WHICH WE'LL ALL PAY THE PRICE

    A

    COMMENTARY

    BY

    Sir Andrew Green

     

    BRITAIN is facing the largest wave of immigration for nearly 1,000 years.  The number of Huguenots in the 17th century and the Jews a century ago are trivial compared to the present flows. Recent GOVERNMENT figures put the net inflow at almost 500 every day

    On part of this inflow comes from  the new East European members of the EU.  If these people wish to work, they must register, and today's figures show that the number who have registered since eight countries joined in May 2004 has hit 500,000 mark

    THE HOME OFFICE - NEVER LET IT BE FORGOTTEN, PREDICTED THAT THIS FIGURE WOULD BE A MAXIMUM 26,000 OVER TWO YEARS.

    [So much for their statistics]

    What effect is all this having and how long can we expect it to continue?

    For a start, the registration numbers are looking increasingly DUBIOUS. They have never included the self-employed or temporary workers -the Government themselves have added nearly 50% to take account of this. Even more worrying is the real number of East Europeans who have decided to stay in Britain compared with the number the GOVERNMENT claims have stayed.

    Official; statistics suggests that three-quarters of them go home within a year. But these figures are based on a passenger survey which focuses almost entirely on Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester -while East Europeans arrive on budget airlines, mainly at Luton, Stansted and regional airports.

    The Governor of the Bank of England has complained twice publicly that the numbers of immigrants are so unreliable that he cannot estimate how tight the labour market has become and, consequently whether or not there is a need to raise interest rates.

    There is growing evidence of British workers being replaced by East Europeans. And since East Europeans accept lower wages, British workers -from construction workers to truck drivers to flower arrangers -are suffering pay cuts.

     

    The East Europeans can afford a lower wage. They are mainly single. They can, and often do, live in very crowded conditions. And, of course they can earn four or five times what the would earn at home.  This is all good news for them and for their employers. East Europeans have established a solid reputation for hard work, turning up on time and making few demands.  Lower wages mean higher profits. They also mean lower inflation and somewhat lower interest rates [Provided the Bank of England can get the correct immigration figure for their calculation]

    The Middle Classes are happy too. Cheap nannies, cheaper restaurants and a cheap hand-wash for the gas guzzler.

     

    But there are snags. Not only do the low-paid suffer a reduction in wages. Worse, we risk building up an underclass of long-term unemployment.

     

    There are a million young people who are neither in work or education. If you add those on incapacity benefit to the unemployed (now at a six year high), you have nearly

    5,000,000

    -young people who are NOT WORKING and , more importantly have little prospect of doing so for the foreseeable future.

     

    Which employer is going to take a young British worker of incapacity benefit when he can take a bright young energetic and probably over-qualified Pole?

     

    The Government frequently claims the East Europeans are filling gaps in the labour market. But we have to examine the facts, NOT THE SPIN.  It is five years since the Government first proclaimed that we need immigration to fill

    600,000 vacancies in OUR LABOUR MARKET.

    Since then, immigration has added about three-quarters of a million to our population. YET believe it or not, VACANCIES are still at

    600,000

    The REASON is that immigrants are not only filling jobs, but they are also adding to consumer demand, which in turn creates more jobs so that vacancies in the labour market remain the same. 

    The Government argument is demonstrably FALSE

    The main outcome is that we become an ever-more crowded island. And that is where the shoe really pinches.  The strain on our public services and infrastructure grows by the day.  Children are turning up at school gates with NO ENGLISH and NO WARNING.  Rents are rising sharply as the buy-to-let market booms and house prices rise.  More young people find it impossible to get on the housing ladder as prices spiral.

    I do not mean in any way to be critical of the new arrivals. They work hard and fit in. BUT the bottom line is that we are a small island and are already overcrowded-especially in the

    SOUTH EAST

    The Department of Transport has forecast that traffic on our roads will increase by 30 per cent in the next ten years and by 40 to 50 per cent on motorways. GRIDLOCK APPROACHES. It is time that serious thought was given to how many people we can sensibly accommodate on this island.

    Is there any relief in sight? Not in the Third World, from where the majority of immigrants still come.  As for Europe, Romania and Bulgaria are no longer on the horizon but on our doorstep. From next January 2007 30 million people from those countries will be free to enter Britain.

     

    In the longer term much depends on how much time it will take these countries, given substantial aid from Brussels, to reach our level of economic prosperity. Poland, the source of 60 per cent of East European immigration, will be a key factor. At present, its wealth per head is only just over a third of ours.

     

    Even if its economy grows at five per cent a year (and we maintain our long-term growth of 2.5 per cent), it will be 34 years before they catch up.

    Demographics will help. The two most populous countries -Poland and Romania -will both have a declining number of 18 year-olds in the years to come, down by about a third over the next 20 years.

    Eventually too, the other EU countries will be obliged to open their labour markets to the new member states.

    The biggest factor of all is how long our newcomers decide to stay.

    Eventually, the flow of those going home will balance those arriving and we will be in the same situation as we are with say FRANCE.

     

    This interchange of people is what the EU is all about. Eventually it will enrich our lives. The Government's mistake has been to rush into the free movement of labour with countries so much poorer than ourselves.

     

    It now tries to SPIN this DECISION as a GREAT SUCCESS, hoping perhaps that we will overlook its massive miscalculations which originally forecast ONLY 13,000 East Europeans would come here a year.

     

    THE REALITY IS IT IS PUTTING A BRAVE FACE ON A BLUNDER FOR WHICH THE LESS FORTUNATE IN OUR SOCIETY ARE NOW PAYING

    *

     

    [We have not commented about the usefulness or otherwise of belonging to the EU as we have hundreds of thousands of words already on our bulletin board asking for a quick exit]

     

    [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

    Sir Andrew Green is chairman of MigrationWatch and former ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria.

    NOVEMBER/06

    *          *          *

     

    ONLY

    PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

    WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

    *

     

    SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

     

    *

     

    Home Rule for Scotland

    WHY NOT

    HOME RULE for ENGLAND

     

    *

    [All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

    *

     FOR RETURN TO

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    *

     

     

     
     

    IIMMIGRATION-

    THE ENEMY WITHIN!

    WHY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE IGNORED GRASS ROOTS CALL FOR A HALT TO IMMIGRATION SINCE ENOCH POWELL SPOKE FOR THE PEOPLE OF OUR SMALL ISLAND THOSE MANY DECADES AGO. THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T SUFFICIENT HOUSING AVAILABLE AS LOCAL PEOPLE

    WON'T A STOP

    TO CONCRETING ANY MORE OF THEIR

    BEAUTIFUL COUNTRYSIDE.

     We hear that millions of robots will soon be a part of our life. Hasn't anyone thought about the consequences of this on our everyday life. Our transport system already overloaded will have to accommodate those extra bottoms. Millions of people will lose their jobs and become the responsibility of the general taxpayer.

    As a small island a quarter the size of Germany it was stated many decades ago that the population of between 20 to 30 million would be a comfortable number to match the energy and other resources necessary for a comfortable existence. We have been recently informed that by 2050 we will have an island population of 80 million. Germany which is four times our landmass had 82 million not so long in the past and has accepted over a million immigrants in the last year alone.

    It is the political parties, particularly the GANG OF THREE who over the past decades have looked on increased immigration as their source of future voters and as has been demonstrated they decided to ignore local objections to more housing and put pressure on local councils to build to accommodate the millions of immigrants in their back yard.

    We mentioned a number of years ago that governments should not put the cart before the horse by allowing millions of immigrants to settle in our once settled and comfortable island home. As we all know there isn't sufficient housing for those many elderly who wish to downside which has been ignored for decades.

    It is time for the politicians of all parties to face reality and immediately embark on a programme of an immediate block on future immigration except for the need for particular needs of the moment and the encouragement of immigrants to return to their own back yard .

    We have over 3 million of the Islamic faith of which we are told over 60 per cent have NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING INTO OUR SOCIETY-their own CLERICS who have integrated have criticized  successive governments for their failure in not bringing in strict measures-

    EITHER INTEGRATE-OR GO!

    Instead, with successive governments looking to  Saudi Arabian Government investment and ARMS CONTRACTS they have chosen to ignore the repeated calls for ACTION! and simply leave the matter for a future government which means

    THAT NOTHING IS DONE!

    DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS ARE IN POWER TO CARRY OUT THE WISHES OF THE ELECTORATE

    NOT

    THE SELFISH WISH

    OF

    UNPATRIOTIC POLITICIANS.

    This is a matter that UKIP should have been covering but their internal bickering and unpatriotic mischief's have proved that they have been a tool of successive governments since its formation decades ago. We in fact were invited to the House of Lords at its inauguration and have not been impressed by their usual lack lustre performance over the years.]

    ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE

     by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]

    *

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

     

    JULY 6-2017

    H. F.1243 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

     

    If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

    E Pluribus Unum?

     

    This is banned but separation is not

    Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

     

     

    Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

    Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

    Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

    Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

    The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

    The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

    Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

    Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

    If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

    The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

    See also:

    The Roots of New Labour

    Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

    Diversity in the UK

    A ranking of social evils 

    Multiculturalism and truth

    Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

    The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

    Against racism

    The aims of Localism

     

     

     

     

     H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

     

     

       

     

     

     

    AN URGENT APPEAL

    TO

    THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

     

     

     

    AT HOME AND ABROAD

     

     

     

     

    THE EDP WISHES TO CONTEST THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS AN ENGLISH LOBBY IN OUR ONCE FREE ENGLISH PARLIAMENT AT WESTMINSTER WHICH WE HAVE SUGGESTED SHOULD BE RETURNED TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE AND A NEW BRITISH PARLIAMENT EQUIDISTANT BETWEEN WALES AND SCOTLAND.

     

     

    MEMBERSHIP WILL BE OPEN TO ALL WHO SUPPORT OUR AIMS TO PROTECT OUR ENGLISH INHERITANCE OF LAW-CUSTOM-CHURCH-STATE-RELIGION.-TRADITION.

     

    OTHERS WHO HAVE JOINED US IN OUR ISLAND HOME FROM AROUND THE WORLD HAVE THEIR OWN CHURCHES-CUSTOMS-RELIGION-EVEN LAWS...

     

     

    PLEASE WRITE TO: 6,FIELD BARN ROAD

    HAMPTON MAGNA

    WARWICK,CV 35 8RT

     

     

    My name is Michael Gibbs the Chairman of the EDP and the only member for the past 20 years.  I  am 87 years of age and I look forward to handing over the task to other hands as the intense workload of decades has taken its toll.

     

     

     

     IF YOU WISH TO BE A MEMBER:PLEASE WRITE TO

     6,FIELD BARN ROAD,HAMPTON MAGNA WARWICK,CV 35 8RT-PLEASE ENCLOSE A STAMPED ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.

     

     

     

    WITH AN ENGLAND WITH A POPULATION NOW AFTER MASSIVE IMMIGRATION OF SUCH A VARIED TRADITION  AND CHURCH IT IS IMPORTANT

    THAT THE

    ENGLISH PEOPLE DEFEND THEIR INHERITANCE OF CHURCH-LAW-CUSTOM-TRADITION BECAUSE POPULATION CHANGES OVER THE NEXT FEW DECADES COULD CHANGE OUR COUNTRY TO A FOREIGN ENCLAVE

     

     

    IT IS NOT RACIST TO PROTECT YOUR PRICELESS INHERITANCE

     

     

     

    *

     

     

    WE MAKE NO APOLOGY IN DEFENDING THE RIGHT OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE TO PROTECT THEIR IDENTITY AS OTHERS OF OTHER CULTURES ARE ACTIVELY DOING IN ENGLAND. MAKE NO MISTAKE, THE WHITE RACE IS UNDER ATTACK IN ITS HOMELAND AND WORLDWIDE, AND NEEDS TO UNITE FOR ITS PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL.

     

    LITTLEJOHN

     

    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: When I saw

     

    police officers 'taking the Knee' I knew it

     

    must end in tears...

     
     When I saw cops

     

    'taking the knee'

     

    I knew it must end in tears.

     

     

    THIS IS HOW IT ENDS.

    This is how it always ends. Badly. What did they think was going to happen?

    By the time the 'largely peaceful' Black Lives Matter protest had called it a day,48 coppers had been injured and one female officer was lying in hospital with cracked ribs, a broken collarbone and a collapsed lung

    It was yet another humiliation for the forces of law and order, a spectacular own goal.

    Pity the poor policeman and women who were filmed running away from a masked mob along Whitehall after they had the audacity to arrest a single demonstrator.

    In the view of a watching BBC reporter the arrest was clearly a mistake since it was 'bound to raise the temperature'.

    Far better, surely, to stand back and allowed the crowd to carry on baying for blood and lobbing missiles,

    IMAGES of the GREAT BRITISH BOBBY in FULL RETREAT were soon being BOUNCED around the WORLD on SOCIAL  MEDIA . Still the brass at SCOTLAND YARD will have calculated, rather BLOD ON THE RUN than an embarrassing VIDEO of RIOT POLICE clobbering a BLACK LIVES MATTER demonstrator.

    From the moment I saw pictures of those coppers

    'taking the knee'

    in solidarity with the protesters

    I KNEW IT WOULD END IN TEARS.

    The mob can smell weakness, fear and moral cowardness. Once the more violent elements worked out that the police were froightened to confront them, there was never any doubt about the outcome.

    I don't blame the young officers on the

    FRONT LINE

    They were only doing what has been drummed into their heads since their first day at Hendon.

    Playing politics is far more important than proper policing. The tone for the fiasco was set by an OFFICIAL STATEMENT MOST OF YOU MAY HAVE MISSED.

    It was issued last Thursday by all Britain's Chief Constables, the chair of the National Police Chiefs Council, the chief executive of the College of Policing and the President of the Police Superintendents Association, The statement read.

    'We stand alongside all those across the globe who are appaled and horrified by the way George Floyd lost his life. Justice and accountability should follow.

    Officers are trained to use proportionately, lawfully and only when absolutely necessary.We strive to continually learn and improve, we will tackle bias, racism or discrimination whereever we find it...,'

    WHAT WAS THAT ALL ABOUT?

    Why did the most senior police officers in Britain feel it necessary to pass coment on an incident which happened

    4000 miles away?

    WHAT THE HELL HAS IT GOT TO DO WITH THEM?

    [This is a long and most instructive article-for further details click

    HERE!

    *  * *

    [REGRETTABLY-The curse of political correctness is still with us.

     

    The beneficiaries of this BETRAYAL OF LAW AND ORDER  ARE THE CRIMINALS.]

     

    [ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND Alteration of style and form are ours!]

     

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/1959/

    black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

    *  *  *

     

    JUNE 9,2020

    H.F.2024

    *

     

    Author: Benjamin Fulford

    Huge Victory for Humanity as Khazarian Mafia’s Long-planned 666 Revolution Fizzles

    The forces of light scored a huge victory against the Khazarian Satanists as their long-planned 2020/06/06/.06 offensive was stopped dead in its tracks, multiple sources agree.  Instead of massive bloodshed involving armed demonstrators (million man occupation of the white house) and the U.S. military, there was a small, peaceful march against racism.  This was because the armed saboteurs and their financial backers were all rounded up before their planned climax of mayhem, Pentagon sources say.

    Even those of us who are not religious took note that very unusual lightning struck the Washington memorial immediately before the 6/6 offensive fizzled out.

    The plan that was stopped, (with or without divine intervention) aimed to use massive bloodshed to replace the Republic of the United States with a draconian totalitarian government.  As Rothschild front man George Soros, told Bild Magazine in September 2014:

    “I’m going to bring down the U.S. by funding black hate groups.  We’ll put them into a mental trap and make them blame white people.  The black community is the easiest to manipulate.”

    Note: attempts to label this quote as fake appear at the top of internet searches such as “Lead Stories” but NSA sources say it’s real.

    The plan nearly worked as the death of African American George Floyd triggered huge, coordinated acts of looting and vandalism all over the United States.  Take a look at this video here, for example, to see the damage in New York City.

    U.S. military intelligence says the rioting was stopped only after over a thousand armed looters were shot.  In addition, U.S. and Russian Special Forces teams went around hunting down and killing the financiers and Khazarian agents stoking the flames.  Also, on June 5th U.S. military White Hats found and disarmed three nuclear devices, seized countless pipe-bombs, and arrested two snipers,” according to NSA sources.

    For those of you who still think that U.S. President Donald Trump is responsible for the rescue of the Republic of the United States of America, please remember that as a businessman he was bailed out by the Rothschilds each time he went bankrupt.  This is a matter of public record.  Also, his son in law is the Satanic 666 5th Avenue Jared Kushner who has been trying to mark of the beast microchip everybody.  Please check the facts for yourself.

    In any case, Trump’s attempt to use the military to shoot down civilians caused a long overdue Pentagon revolt against his rule.  “The 11 retired 4-stars who criticized Trump for using the military to suppress protests,” were retaking the Trump presidency, Pentagon sources say.  “Led by Generals James Mattis and John Kelly with former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairmen Mike Mullen and Marty Dempsey these onward Christian soldiers are declaring jihad against the Zionists and raising their profile at a critical time prior to the global currency reset,” the sources add.

    General Kelly also uncharacteristically went public to say:

    “There is a concern, I think an awful big concern, that the partisanship has gotten out of hand, the tribal thing has gotten out of hand…I think we should look at people that are running for office and put them through the filter: What is their character like? What are their ethics?”

    Translation: neither Trump nor Joe Biden is fit to be the next president.  CIA sources, for their part, are saying the trigger for the recent chaos really was…

    The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
    Please Log In or Register to create an account.
     

    June 8, 2020

     

    *

     

     

    'The poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he '

     

     

    [Debates at Putney,29 Oct.1647-Cromwell's Army

     

    There is an inbalance of reward within our society which needs urgent adjustment.

     

    ENGLISH LIVES

    MATTER

    IN THE LAND

     CALLED

     ENGLAND

     

     

    Policy of the EDP TO PROTECT THE COMMON MAN AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     

    England Population 2020 | Population UK

    www.ukpopulation.org/england-population

    Based on our research,

     

    England population will reach 55.93 million by 1st July of

     

    2020.

     

    We use first day of July each year due to Office for National Statistics (ONS normally publishes the estimated population data for the same period. The calculation is based on the average growth rate of …

    1. Muslim population of England smashes threemillion mark ...

       

      04/01/2020 · Official ONS figures for 2018/19 that were released in December show that there are 3,194,791 Muslims living in England, with over a third aged under 16. English Muslims make up …

     JUNE-2020

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

    JUNE 6,2020

     

     

    A MATTER OF PATRIOTISM

     

     

    [GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO

     'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

    LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT

     LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

    GERMANY.

    ADDED JULY 28,2018

    AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    OCTOBER 21,2017

     

    H.F.741

     

     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

     

     

    'You can fool  all the people some of the time,

    and some of the people all the time,

     but you cannot fool all the people all the time.'

     

    ABRAHAM LINCOLN -Speech -Sept.8-1858

     

    [The majority of the common people at the General Election of December 12/13-2019  by their actions confirmed the above statement.

     

    How the common populace rose up to confront the never-ending audacity of pompous - self-centered  -  arrogant - undemocratic elected persons, and sent them on their way']

     

     

    "You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing .

    Depart I say, and let us have done with you!

    In the name of God. go!"

     

    Oliver Cromwell-1653

     

     

       

     

    The English People's

    VoicE

    WELCOME!

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT THE MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN WALES AND SCOTLAND PREFERRED TO REMAIN AS SLAVES WITHIN HITLER'S SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

    IN OR OUT OF THE EU THE ENGLISH PEOPLE PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO THEIR NEIGHBOURS PARTICULARLY IN SCOTLAND WHERE THEY STILL RECEIVE A HIGHER PER CAPITA FIGURE , AS IT HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.

    A UNITED BRITISH ISLES IS A BOUNTY FOR EVERYONE IN OUR SHARED ISLAND HOME

    FOR  SECURITY-TRADE-PROSPERITY AND PEACE.

    LET US UNITE AND THE WORLD WILL SEE US AT OUR BEST.

    OUR SHARED HISTORY  AND SACRIFICE IS OUR STRENGTH AND PURPOSE.

     

    H.F.1773

     

     

     

     

     

    *

     

     

     

     

     

     

       
     

    [WHITE LIVES MATTER]

     

     

    [A MATTER OF FACT!]

    [A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

     

    Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
     

    The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
     

    White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
    Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

    The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

    The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

    All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
     

    Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

     If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
    http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

    Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

    what is the soul made of

    afflict your souls in the bible

    what is a person's soul

    what is the soul of man

    afflict your soul means

    what is the soul according to the bible

    afflict your soul kjv

    what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

    H.F.1424/2

     

     

    *  *  *

     

    ADDED JULY 2020

     

     

     

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/

    1959/

    black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since

    the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a

    valuable tool for the elites.

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

     

       
     
     
     

     

     

    THE RETURN

    OF OUR

    FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

    OF

     ENGLAND

     

     

     

     

    [WE MUST NOT BE DETERRED BY THE COMING PANDEMIC SOON TO BE AMONGST US BUT REMAIN STEADFAST IN OUR RESOLVE TO LEAVE THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL IF NEED BE AT THE END OF JUNE 2020

    THE PEOPLE IN THEIR MILLIONS HAVE SPOKEN AND WITH THE SPIRIT OF THE BLITZ STILL IN MANY MINDS WHEN THOUSANDS DIED IN ONE NIGHT BY THE AERIAL BOMBARDMENT BY HITLER'S LUFTWAFFE THE PEOPLE STOOD TOGETHER FOR 5 YEARS UNTIL VICTORY WAS WON.

     MANY OF THE SURVIVORS OF THOSE TIMES HAVE YET ANOTHER FIGHT ON THEIR HANDS AND THE KNOWLEDGE THAT VICTORY HAS FINALLY BEEN ACHIEVED AGAINST HITLER'S WARTIME PLAN TO DOMINATE OUR COUNTRY AGAIN IN THE PEACE WILL END  ON 30TH OF JUNE 2020 WILL BOLSTER THEIR  SPIRITS.

     

    IF THE EU HAD TRULY WANTED A DEAL THEY WOULD HAVE DONE SO IN THE PREVIOUS 60 MONTHS- 5 YEARS. THEY REALISE THAT WITHOUT THE SUBSTANTIAL UK CONTRIBUTION TO THE EU YEARLY BUDGET THE FINAL COLLAPSE OF HITLER'S BRAINCHILD WOULD BECOME A REALITY WITHIN A MATTER OF A YEAR OR TWO.

     

     

    IT MUST BE REMEMBERED THAT AFTER THE REFERENDUM RESULT OF JUNE 2015 -A BREXIT VICTORY - BORIS JOHNSON AND MICHAEL GOVE BY THEIR INTER-RIVALRY AT A CRUCIAL MOMENT IN ENGLISH HISTORY

     ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIVE YEAR DELAY IN LEAVING HITLER'S WAR-TIME PLAN TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE

     

    THEY PUT SELF BEFORE COUNTRY

     

    A PROMISE HAS BEEN MADE TO LEAVE THE EU AT THE END OF JUNE,2020

     

    'IT MUST BE KEPT'

     

    *

     

    WE WOULD, HOWEVER, SUPPORT A LOOSE

     

    DEMOCRATIC FEDERATION OF THE

     

     FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

     

    OF

     

    EUROPE.

     

    *  *  *

     

    What did Israel hope to gain from Priti Patel's secret ...

     

    [Certain events have occurred  over the past t few days 14th to 18th March  have led us to believe that our website of over 20 years could be  under threat. Should our website fail to appear in the coming months you will have had your confirmation.]

     

    *

     

    UK coronavirus cases: find out how many are in your area ...

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/12/uk-coronavirus-cases-how-many-are-in...

    12/03/2020 · UK coronavirus cases: find out how many are in your area Latest figures from public health authorities on the spread of Covid-19 in the United Kingdom. Find out how many cases

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

     

    MARCH 16-2020

    H.F.1424

       
     

     

    Boris Johnson warns Brussels

    over demands that we keep following

     European Union rules.

     

    NO TRADE DEAL BY JUNE?

    WE WALK AWAY

     

    By Jason Groves-Political Editor-DAILY MAIL

    FEBRUARY 28,2020

     

     

    BORIS JOHNSON yesterday vowed to walk away from

     

    Brexit talks in the summer unless Brussels drops its demand

     

    for Britain to continue following EU rules.

     

     

    IN a hardline ultimatum, Downing Street said talks on a Brexit trade deal would be called off in June unless the 'broad outline' of a deal was in sight.

    At that point ministers would switch their focus to

     

    LEAVING WITHOUT A DEAL

     

    at the end of the year. In a 30-page 'negotiating mandate' the Government confirmed it was pursuing a Canada-style

     

    FREE TRADE DEAL

     

    in which there are no tariffs or quotas.

     

    But ministers also laid down a series of red lines which are likely to lead to an acrimonious start to the talks in Brussels on Monday.

    These included ruling out any supervision by the

     

    EUROPEAN COURTS

     

    rejecting the EU's demands to retain the status quo on fishing and ruling out ant extension of the transition period beyond the end of this year.

    [2020]

    Brussels has said that the EU will open up its markets only if the UK agrees to comprehensive 'level playing field' obligations in which Britain continues to match Brussels regulations in areas such as competition law, workers rights and environmental standards.

    The Prime Minister yesterday said that the EU needed to understand that

     

    BRITAIN WAS GOING TO TAKE BACK

     

    CONTROLS OF ITS LAWS.

     

    'The whole objective [of Brexit]  is so the UK

    can do things differently and better,' Mr

    Johnson said.

     

    ' The crucial thing for our friends and partners to understand is that this is a great country with possible standards for the environment, for animal welfare, for workers' rights. WE are not going to engage in some race to the bottom.

    'BUT we do not ask the EU to follow every change in UK legislation and so it doesn't make sense for them to make the same request of us.'

    Ministers insisted that the new economic freedoms would benefit the UK, but there was no commitment to publish a detailed economic impact statement of the deal.

    In the Commons, Michael Gove evoked Margaret Thatcher, declaring, No No, No, when Labour suggested a closer approach.

    [In other words a surrender of the wishes of the 17.4 million British citizens who voted in December ,2019 to be

     FREE OF THE SMOTHERING and INTERFERING so-called EUROPEAN UNION in order to

     

    REGAIN OUR FREEDOM

     

    as a

     

    FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.]

     

    He said Labour's plans would mean

     

    'no control over our borders, and no way

     

    of charting our own

     

    INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC

     

     

    DESTINY'.

     

    Government sources said the tough new timetable for talks was designed to

     

    focus minds and provide certainty for business.

    The UK is demanding that the outline of a deal is in place by June[2020], with the agreement finalised by September[2020]. The new document states that if there is no deal in sight in June, 'the Government will need to decide whether the UK's attention should move away from negotiations and focus solely on continuing domestic preparations to exit the transition period in an orderly fashion'.

    Sources yesterday confirmed that

     

    LEAVING WITHOUT A DEAL

     

     would require new 'customs infrastructure' at ports and airports. But they said much of this would be needed even in the event of a

     

    FREE TRADE DEAL

     

    as the UK is leaving both the

     

    CUSTOMS UNION

     

    and the

     

    SINGLE MARKET

     

    at the end of the year.[2020]...

     

    *  *  *

     H.F.1990

     

     

     

     
    Deal or No Deal: Those dividing lines explained

    ANALYSIS

    by  Jason Groves

    POLITICAL EDITOR OF THE DAILY MAIL

     

    February 28,2020

     

    TIME TABLE FOR NEGOTIATIONS

    What the UK says:

    No extension of the Brexit transition period beyond this year, Boris Johnson said he was ready to walk away from the talks as early as June. [2020] if no deal is in sight.

    EU: What the EU says: Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier has said the December 31 deadline does not leave enough time to settle all issues and has urged the UK to consider extending the transition. The French claim the tight timetable amounts to 'blackmail'.

    FLASHPOINT:3

    [The EU have taken up almost four years of wasted time because of their arrogance so typical of its undemocratic and bullying nature. All they are interested in, is to show others within their captive nation bloc, that their growing feelings of FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE will never be granted.]

    *

    THE LEVEL PLAYING FIELD

    *

    FISHING

    UK: 'Ready to consider' access for EU trawlers, but only as part of separate negotiations. Any quota for EU fishing fleets would be decided at annual negotiations run by the UK. Ministers previously said UK fishermen will get a bigger share of quota.

     [A SELL OUT!]

     

    *

    EU: Brussels wants access to for EU trawlers granted on the same basis as now. The issue is a 'redline' for the bloc-it says without a fish deal 'there won't be any agreement.

    [A typical response from Hitler's wartime planned EU.]

    EU: Brussels wants access to for EU trawlers granted on the same basis as now. The issue is a 'redline' for the bloc-it says without a fish deal 'there won't be any agreement.

    [A typical response from Hitler's wartime planned EU.]

     

    LEGAL OVERSIGHT

    UK Rejects any role for EU laws and judges after Brexit, warning it 'will not negotiate any arrangement in which the UK does not have control of its own laws and political life'.

    Says European Court of Justice will not have any jurisdiction in the UK'. Disputes should be settled by joint committee reflecting 'judicial autonomy of the UK'.

    *

     

    EU: UK to follow EU laws forever on state aid-regulations governing subsidies to industry. In other areas, It insists that the ECJ [The Criminals Friend] should be the 'sole arbiter'  in settling disputes over interpretations of EU law

    Flashpoint rating 4

     

    *

    SECURITY

    *

    UK: WANTS close co-operation with EU on sharing DNA, fingerprints and criminal records.

    However, it is not seeking to continue with the EU Arrest Warrant for reciprocal extraditions.

    *

    EU: wants 'reciprocal access' on DNA and fingerprints in fight against crime and terror.

    Access could be limited by EU data laws, potentially blocking the release of vital intelligence.

    FLASHPOINT:2

     

     

    APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKED WITH HITLER'S NAZI GERMANY

    AND IT WON'T WORK WITH HITLER'S NAZI PLAN IN 2020

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    H.F.1991

     

     

     

     

     

     

    DO YOU KNOW?

    THE EUROPEAN UNION

    COLLECTIVE

    IS THE

    Enemy of its Member State

    www.edwardharle.com

     

    [We shall be showing blockbuster extracts from the above publication of over 270pages which will confirm the suspicions of many that the  above title does not EXAGGERATE the DANGER to your FREEDOM and once FREE COUNTRY.]

    *

    A NAZI EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

    [BERLIN-1942]

    At the conclusion of the 'Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft' Dr Professor Hunke drew together the themes set out in the book by the following contributors:

    +   Reichsswirtschatsminister und President dur Deutschen Reichsbank, Dr Walter Funk, who expostulated on

    'The economic character of the New Europe

    *

    +    Dr Horst Jecht, from the Berlin School of Economics, who anticipated the development of the intended

    'European Economic Community'.

    *

    +    Dr Emil Woermann. a professor from the University of Halle, who described the

    'New European Agricultural Order'

    which would rig farm prices [the forerunner of the EU's disastrous Marxist Common Agricultural Policy.

     [If you need some background possibly our Foreign Secretary David Miliband

     might be able to help.]

    *

    +    Dr Anton Reithinger, from I.G.Farben, Berlin, the manufactures of Zyklon-B extermination gas, who invoked the

    'New European Industrial Economy'

    *

    +    Dr Philip Beisiegle, Director of the Reich Ministry of Labour, who gave details of the

    'New Labour Order'

    with emphasis on the rigging of labour markets, the movement of workers in accordance with inter-state agreements, and the de facto direction of labour (which the EU has so far not dared to emulate)

    *

    +    Gustav Koenigs, a State Secretary, whose paper discussed

    'European traffic Questions'

    -the forerunner of today's

     'Trans-European Networks';

    *

    +    Dr Bernard Benning, Director of the Reichs-Kredit-Gesellschaft A.G., Berlin, who elaborated upon

    'European Currency Questions'.

    including in particular:

     The harmonisation of European rates of exchange

    'the future form of the European Currency System'

    ['Die Zukunft des europaisches Wahrungssystems'], and

    'The European Currency Bloc'.,

    *

    + Dr Carl Clodius, the Manager of the Foreign trade Centre in Berlin, who described

    'European Trading and Economic Agreements'

    touching inter alia upon: 

    'Principles of European cooperation'

    'The regional principle' [which was the precursor of the Maastricht Treaty's Common Regional policy]

    and finally 'Methods of European cooperation' [the original thinking behind the oppressive system of extreme collectivist legalism and Treaty-based complexity].

    With the possible partial exception of the chapter on the common labour policy, given its emphasis on the direction of labour, the main subjects aired at the Berlin brainstorming sessions in 1941 presided over by Dr Funke, have formed the framework for the EU Collective's Maastricht Treaty and its derivatives, particularly striking are the Nazis' published blueprints for a

    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

    the harmonisation of European rates of exchange, a European Currency System and the reinvention of coercive legalism as the primary basis for 'methods of European cooperation', and such collectivist concepts as 'trans-European networks' and Common agricultural policy.  The primacy of the European Union's Common Agricultural policy today can be traced not to pressure from the French farming lobby, as is usually supposed, but to the proposals put forward by the leader of the powerful German agricultural community, R Walther Darre, whose seminar in January 1939 was entitled:

    'Market organisation of national Socialist agricultural policy as a pacemaker for a new foreign trade organisation.'

    On 3rd April 1992, in an address to a meeting of the globalist Bertelsmann Forum, Dr Helmut Kohl omitted to credit the Nazis for linking Germany's destiny with European unification -claiming the authorship of this scheme himself.

    He explained: 'There is no alternative to a policy which aims at combination, unless we wish to challenge fate and follow the way back to the system of small countries and rivalries of yesterday... It has been my policy from the outset to combine indivisibly German unity and the political unification of Europe.  For myself, these are two sides of the same coin... We shall be able to create this greater Europe provided we irrevocably advance the European core'.

     

     

    Chapter and Section headings of 'EuropaischeWirtscaftsgemeinschaft

     

    The main Contents Pages of 'Europaische Wirtschaftsgesellschaft', published in 1942 by Haude & Spenersche Verlaagsbuchhandlung, Max Paschke on instructions of the Association of Berlin Business People and Industrialists and the Berlin School of Economics, containing the previous year's Berlin papers on proposals for a new

    European Economic Community

    were as follows [names of speakers first]:

     

     

     

     

    [YES! They were planning it back in 1942-No surprise as the Germans are not so stupid even if they lost TWO WORLD WARS they have always been an aggressive GERMANIC nation

    and the ENGLISH nation within its protective island home for over 1400 years has fought with the Germanic spirit of FREEDOM to protect its isolation and has since with its new arrivals from Europe and beyond remained a more settled people and should have known better than to fall prey to our accustomed enemy over the past 100 years into the trap in 1972 in a so-called EEC-European Economic Community even though the information was known by the Intelligence Services after the war but possibly even earlier.  We have the NAZI-TRAITOR of 60 years

    Edward Heath

     who admitted before his death in 2005 that he had lied about the true implications of the Accession Treaty which

    Lord Irwin

     had confirmed before the Treaty was signed.

     

     

    Returning to:

     

    * Professor Dr Heinrich Hunke, President of the Association of Berlin Business People and Industrialists and of the Institute of the German Economy.

     

     

     

    Introduction

     

    * Economic practice

    * Problems facing the Continental European Economic Community.

     

     

     

    TO BE CONTINUED.

     

     

     

     

     

    [As many people realise the impetus for the EEC was from the top levels of the Nazis hierarchy. There was no place in their plans to create a fully democratic and therefore a fully accountable system but to consider how they must hold tight control from the top and only give the impression of their willingness to make changes which they knew could never take place as their NEW EUROPE would be ruled from the TOP for the benefit of those at the TOP and for those in the community that did their bidding. And so it has been proved over the past 35 years.    In a real democracy the impetus as shown in the case of the American Declaration of Independence had to have the backing of the people.  Of course there were loyalists who would not support the Revolution and many left their country for Canada or back to what they considered their country.  But the Revolution was successful because the majority felt the need for 'THEIR COUNTRY'.

    Over the past three decades the English people have been lied to by their Governments of all colours.  The Nazi traitor Edward Heath who was part of a spy-ring in Balliol College Oxford in 1938 admitted a few years before his death in 2005 that he had lied to the people about the question of no loss of sovereignty and it was later revealed that the EU negotiators were astounded when Heath offered them our FISHING GROUNDS simply as a sweetener.  The fractional elements of eurosceptic opposition failed when they became aware of the true facts to take firm united action of civil disobedience and as a consequence their country has been sold to a Foreign POWER. Not relying on orderly queuing in the precincts of Parliament with their balloons and piece of paper in their hands - hadn't they remembered the so-called 'Peace in our Time'  lesson of 1938.  As you can observe above you have been ensnared in a Nazis horror story because you trusted YOUR REPRESENTATIVES to 'play the game' with honest answers and behaviour -you received neither and as a consequence you no longer for all intents and purposes have  a country.] 

    *

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

     

     

    [More background information will be available in the near future or for your copy contact the under-mentioned website]

     

    [This is a new series of single statements from

    THE EUROPEAN UNION

    COLLECTIVE

    IS THE

    Enemy of its Member State

    www.edwardharle.com

     

    for additional information on the EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE contact:

    International Currency Review

    www.worldreports.org

    c/story@worldreports.org

    *

     *THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

    [ 26 bulletins above- EACH Capital Letter * .

     

    DECEMBER-2008

    HOME

     

    H.F.1932

       
     
     

    [IN THE NICK OF TIME?-A LAST

     

    CHANCE APPEAL!]

    Despotism and the origins of the European Union

    by Don Briggs

    Don Briggs finds that Alexis de Tocqueville has much to teach us about freedom

    Peter Mullen, concerned about our feebleness today [Winter-2008/9], expressed bafflement at how the British people coped with casualty levels such as the death toll of 2,614 in one night in 1941.

    It was a mystery to A. L. Rowse. In his  'The use of History '(Hodder & Stoughton, 1946) Rowse attributed it to the fact that

     "Germany was a strong state with a weak people. Britain was a week state with a strong people."

    As regards the origins of the European Union, which Philip Warren believes days back to the 1920's, they could be earlier.

    In the wake of the French Revolution of 1789, which shook the world, Edmund Burke said to the French:  " You wish to correct the abuses of your government, but why not return to your old traditions? Why not confine yourself to ma resumption of your ancient liberties? Or, if not possible to recover the obliterated features of your original constitution why not  look towards England." There you would have found the ancient common law of Europe.

    Burke was chided by a wise Frenchman for failing to understand the true meaning of the revolution.  In his L'ancien regime et la revolution, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote:

    " Burke did not see that what was taking place before his eyes was a revolution whose aim was precisely to abolish the 'ancient common law of Europe' and that there could be no question of putting the clock back."

    In a version published by Doubleday Anchor in 1955, written three years before his death in 1859. De Tocqueville lamented that his countrymen had abandoned the original ideal of the Revolution and turned their backs on freedom to " acquiesce in an equality of servitude under the master of all Europe" (sounds familiar).

    In place of the old regime they had created and accepted an all-powerful government, stronger and more autocratic than the one they had destroyed, and which " suppressed our dearly-bought liberties and replaced them by a mere pretence of freedom.  France's tamed Assemblies were there now only to give meaningless assent in servility and silence." (familiar?)

    "Thus was the nation deprived both of means of self-government and of the chief guarantee of its rights, that is the freedom of speech, thought and literature which ranked among the most valuable achievements of the revolution."

    Despotic government had made France the sick man of Europe, wrote de Tocqueville because it had virtually extinguished all those virtues which were so vital to a nation: a spirit of healthy independence, high ambitions, faith in oneself and in a cause, he said. (familiar?) De Tocqueville stated three facts with certainty about the future.

    1. All his contemporaries were driven by a force which might have checked or curbed but which they could not stop; the headlong destruction of the aristocracy.

    "Freedom alone is capable of lifting men's minds above mammon worship."

    2.  Those peoples whose constitutions make it most difficult to get rid of despotic government for any considerable period, were those where aristocracy had ceased to exist.

    3. Nowhere was despotism calculated to produce such evil effects as in social groups as these where ties of family, of caste, of class and craft fraternities no longer exist, people became self-seekers, think only of their own interests, narrow individualists caring nothing for the public good.  despotism encourages these vices, and money becomes the sole criteria of a social status, changing hands incessantly, raising and lowering the status of individuals and families.  Feelings for others' welfare cools; despotic government freezes them.

    " love of gain, a fondness for business careers, the desire to get rich al all costs, a craving for material comfort and easy living become ruling passions under a despotic government... and tend to lower the moral standards...(familiar?)

    " Lowering as they do the national morale, they are despotism's safeguard since they divert men's attention from public affairs and make them shudder at the mere thought of a revolution.

    " Despotism alone can provide that atmosphere of secrecy which favours crooked dealings and enables the freebooters of finance to make illicit fortunes."  Despotism gave these vices free rein.  " Freedom and freedom alone can extirpate these vices, for only freedom can deliver the members of a community from that isolation which is the lot of the individual left to his own devices..."

    And " Freedom alone is capable of lifting men's minds above mere mammon worship."

    Societies must be democratic, and Christian too, but if they were not free, " I make bold to say, never shall we find under such conditions a great citizen, still less a great nation; indeed I would...maintain that where equality and tyranny co exist, a steady deterioration of the mental and moral standards of a nation is inevitable." wrote de Tocqueville.

    In July 1971, Edward Heath, as Conservative Prime Minister, promised a government White paper, Britain and Europe:

    " The British safeguards of habeas corpus and trial by jury will remain intact. So will the principle that a man is innocent until proved guilty."

    " The common law will remain the basis of our legal system."

    As we watch habeas corpus and the common law go out of the window today along with our other freedoms, it is worth recalling what Winston Churchill; once said about the alternatives if we abandoned our parliamentary democracy:

    :" there is really only one, namely Dictatorship."  And of its many forms, " rule by a caucus of political secretaries driven by bigoted conviction" was one of them.

    That too sounds familiar.

     

    MAGNA CARTA

     

    [We chanced on this article with others a few days ago and realised that they had to be included in the Christmas message because as our heading above we have little time left to make a stand in the true Winstonian spirit to reclaim what is ours by RIGHT! and was in trust for future generations. What was the point of our people fighting in the past TWO WORLD WARS with such huge casualties and cost to let what we had held in trust to be given away by our own representatives. This is your last chance to make amends and show the greater number of your supposed protectors of your accustomed

    " RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMAN"

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS  AND HIGHLIGHTING AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

     

    THE ABOVE ARTICLE BY DON BRIGGS-FREEDOM TODAY-Winter-2008/9

     

    DECEMBER-2013

     

    *  *  *

    ON DECEMBER 12,2019 at the General Election those who wished to live again in a FREE NATION STATE voted to LEAVE THE EU. However though the People voted to do so in June 2016 they are now informed by

    David Churchill the Daily Mail Brussels Correspondent on Saturday December 28,2019

     

    EU 'Want us tied to single market for

     THREE YEARS

    [Making a total of over 6 years since the overwhelming

     victory

    to

    LEAVE THE EU in June 2016.]

     

    It is stated in the article of December 28,2019.

     

    THE European  Union may ask Britain to remain locked inside its single market until 2023.

    Ironically, the man of the hour Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, are greatly responsible for the delay, since their inter- rivalry after the June 23,2016 resulted in Theresa May a ardent REMAINER  becoming Prime Minister, and we all now know the result of that great fatal consequence, in delaying our delivery from

    Hitler's planned so-called EU.

    Because of this past history it is important that we

     

    LEAVE THE EU

     

    WITH A

     

    NO DEAL]

     

    DECEMBER 28-2019

     

    ]H.F.1805

       
     
    POLITICS IN THE UK

    HAS STALLED -

    IN FACT IT HAS BEEN

    ON A STEADY DECLINE SINCE WE WERE MISLEAD AND LIED TO

    IN THE 70's by

    EDWARD HEATH

     AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF OUR COMMITMENT TO HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

    Fortunately the PEOPLE on December 12-2019 decided they had had enough and demanded that their so-called

     SERVANTS remember who

    they worked

    FOR.

    .

     

     

     

    In 2003 the EDP began it's BULLETIN SERVICE to INFORM the BRITISH

    PUBLIC of the LIES and DECEIT of POLITICIANS. It is well documented that

    successive GOVERNMENTS of all COLOURS have FAILED to keep their

    MANIFESTO PROMISES. Whether it is the FAILURE of LAW and ORDER-

    TO  CURB IMMIGRATION-YOU NAME IT! and you will find that they are STILL

    MAKING THE SAME PROMISES in JANUARY 2020.

    WE have advocated in

    the past, that towards the end of a 5-year PARLIAMENTARY SESSION, each

    GOVERNMENT should FACE a PUBLIC ENQUIRY to see if THEIR

    MANIFESTO PROMISES HAVE BEEN carried out by PARLIAMENT. AND

    if NOT-WHY NOT?

    One is only to look at the thousands of bulletins on our website to realise that

     

    POLITICIANS and

     

    GOVERNMENTS

     

    NOT CARRYING OUT THE

     

     

    WISHES

     

     

    OF THE

     

     

    PEOPLE!

     

    As we have been informed the MPs are to receive an increased SALARY and no doubt other benefits and as we have seen over the past few years many of their predecessors failed to keep their REFERENDUM PROMISE and what are we to expect from their replacements?

     

    POLITICIANS SHOULD BE

     

     

     REMINDED THAT

     

     

    THEY ARE

     

     

     

    SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE

     

     

    NOT

     

     

     

    THEIR MASTERS.

     

    We have advocated on many occasions that MP's should

     

    SERVE THE PUBLIC

     

    FOR ONE TERM ONLY.

     

     

    IT SHOULD NOT BE A JOB

     

     

    FOR LIFE.

     

    JANUARY 1-2020

    H.F.1947

       
     
     

    PLEASE NOTE! A NUMBER OF BULLETINS HAVE BEEN MOVED TO PART 2 IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE SPACE TO FACILITATE A FASTER RESPONSE FOR OUR VIEWERS"

    FEBRUARY 27,2020

     

     

     
    E U ' want us

     tied to single market for THREE YEARS'.

    BY

     David Churchill

    Daily Mail-Brussels Correspondent

    DECEMBER 28-2019

     

    THE European Union may ask Britain to remain locked inside its single market and customs union until 2023 -

    [over 7 years after the REFERENDUM RESULT in JUNE 2016]

    EU Commission president Urania von der Leyen yesterday insisted it would be reasonable' to ask for an extension of the Brexit 'transition' period for up to two years.

    It would mean the UK continuing to accept

     

    FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT

     

    and paying

     

    MEMBERSHIP FEES.

     

    Mrs von der Leyen, who took over from Jean-Claude Juncker this month, said she was 'very worried' about Boris Johnson's time frame of striking a trade deal by the end of 2020. Speaking to a French newspaper, she said: 'We should seriously ask ourselves if all these negotiations are possible in such a short time.

    'I think it would be reasonable to take stock mid-year [2020] and, if necessary agree on an extension.'

     

    [THE BLAME FOR THE DELAY IS DUE TO THE EU'S OWN INTRANSIDENCE  RATHER THAN TO FIND A SETTLEMENT IN THE YEAR OF THE UK REFERENDUM  -AND THE UK IN APPOINTING A STRIDENT REMAINER AS PRIME MINISTER.]

     

    As it stands the UK will remain in the EU's single market until the end of next year, giving an 11-month window to strike a trade deal after Britain leaves the bloc's institutions on

     

    JANUARY 31,2020

     

    But according to the terms of the

     

     

    WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT,this window-

     

     

    also known as the 'transition' or

     

     

    'implementation' period-can be extended

     

     

    until the end of 2022.

     

    Either side can request an extension, but the UK and EU must finalise any agreement on whether to do so by July 1 next year

    Mr Johnson has ruled out any more delays, which would be deeply unpopular with hardline

    BREXITEERS,

    and has even begun the process of enshrining this in law.

     

    [WHILE BORIS JOHNSON IS DOING THIS HE ALSO NEEDS TO ENSURE THAT OUR ENGLISH CONSTITUTION --LAW AND INDEPENDENCE IS ALSO EMBEDDED IN LAW, AS RICHARD CROMWELL HAD WISHED AFTER THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR -(1642-1649).]

     

    *  *  *

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

     

    DECEMBER 28-2019

     

    H.F.1950

     

       
     

     

    Cod War II?

     Tell the EU

     to

    sling it's hook

     

    LETTER FROM A FORMER TRAWLER SKIPPER TO THE

     DAILY MAIL

    -February27,2020

     

     

    AS A FORMER trawler skipper heavily involved in the so-called Cod Wars during the Seventies, I am interested that political commentators are talking about the possibility of a new Cod War after December 2020.

     

    This is in reaction  to the French having the brass neck to tell us that their fishing rights within our waters are non-negotiable. It's about time our politicians started to stand up to our continental friends.

     

    The Cod Wars were fought over Iceland seeking to expand its territorial limits and prevent its fisheries being over-exploited. The UK's negotiations for joining the Common Market or EEC, as it was then, coincided with this. To understand the impact of the betrayal of our fishing industry, we need to go back to the Seventies when Conservative prime minister was manipulated by the French into allowing the best of our fishing grounds to be given away without any proper authority or consultation with Parliament or the British people.

    During the negotiations, the French hijacked the fisheries meetings and were pushing for fishing to be treated as a common resource with equal access for all, which the British and Irish governments initially rejected.

    The deep-sea trawler owners, then the most powerful players in the British fishing industry, were in favour because they thought Iceland and Norway would eventually join and they would have unbridled access to their rich waters, cancelling out the Cod Wars' losses.

    BUT Iceland and Norway rejected the EEC because of the fishing rights and the rest is history.

    It is worth considering just how much of that thinking was driving the lobbying to a gullible Government in not accepting any of the fair deals Iceland was offering. We never suspected these European fleets would eventually establish 'historic rights' to control our fishing  grounds, aided by massive EU grants, not only from their own governments but also from us.

    Decommissioning schemes to reduce the British fleet were brought in and our fishermen were put out of work while other nations, with the help of European grants, increased and modernised their fleets. The Spanish fleet was bigger than the rest of Europe's combined, but when they joined the EEC they declared they would not decommission even one vessel. They not only got away with that, they also secured grants to scrap, rebuild and modernise 850 0f their fishing boats.

    ..The French, Belgians and Spanish seem able to fish with impunity, while our fishermen are persecuted because we've got to be seen to be fair.

    WE  have not had one fisheries minister worth their salt. I was in Brussels for several December Councils when our minister never came out with the quota he went in with. It was always cut to benefit of the other states, resulting in us being a minority in our own waters. Can someone explain that?

     

    [WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE JOINED HITLER'S EU PLAN-IT WAS

     

    EDWARD HEATH

     

    A GERMAN SPY SINCE 1938 UNTIL HIS

     

    DEATH

     

     IN 2005 WHO JUST BEFORE, HAD ADMITTED HIS PART IN THE CONSPIRACY TO JOIN THE EU BECAUSE HE WANTED THE UK TO JOIN THE EU - WHATEVER IT TOOK,.]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    FEBRUARY 27,2020

     
     

    ENGLAND

     

     Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

    H.F.1989

       
     
    Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday,November 19,2018 

     

    Time to show some moral fibre

    How many of those like me who participated in World War 11 would have chosen to capitulate in the way the Prime Minister has in her Brexit negotiations with the EU

    I will be 96 this week and am housebound, but my life wasn't always like this . At 17, in early 1940, I joined the RAF ,serving in Bomber Command at RAF Brize Norton and also at Bletchley  Park. Posted to the Air Ministry in London. I was bombed out and 15 girls in my billet died. My husband was a wireless operator and rear gunner, who returned home from yhe two-year seige of Malta, weighing five stone. We had determination, pride and above all, moral fibre.

    I feel that the once-proud UK has been asset stripped, ground down and told what to do by unelected bureaucrats in Europe. I knew exactly what I wanted from the referendum

    TO LEAVE THE EU

    I fear for the generations that follow me because the EU seems to want nothing more that to become a FEDERAL STATE.

    WHY CAN'T THE GOVERNMENT SHOW SOME MORAL FIBRE?

    I AM SO ASHAMED OF THEM ALL

     

    Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday, November 19,2018

    R M Wangford -SUFFOLK

    [AS a pensioner couple of 87 and 89 we can understand the feelings of the above patriots and only a few days ago we watched the film the DARKEST HOUR. There was a sequence in the film when Winston Churchill was being driven in London after getting so much opposition to his plans from pro German-peace faction and suddenly when his vehicle stopped at a road junction near a tube station he suddenly without notice left the vehicle  in the vicinity of a underground railway station in London and entered it and went on to the platform where the many travellers recognised him. When a tube train arrived he entered the train and was soon in conversation with all the occupants of his carriage to the point that he conversed with everyone getting their names and there feelings about fighting the war and they without exception said the war must be fought vigorously and valiantly until VICTORY.  Later when he addressed members of the Cabinet he mentioned the names of those patriots and related their feelings of solidarity with their Prime Minister.  The climax of the film was as  with Winston's speech before the HOUSE which included towards the end with:

    We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. we shall fight them in the hills; we shall never surrender.-Winston Churchill.

    By this time the once quiet Opposition benches suddenly joined the Government benches and  broke into a stirring clamour of support with hundreds of order papers being thrown high into the air with gusto. The House was united for WAR and Churchill had won.

    Today, the feelings of the above patriotic pensioners show how our country after 46 years within Hitler's so-called EU how millions of our once proud patriots are now fellow - travellers of the

    UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE - CORRUPT - COSTLY-EU

    SOON TO BE A

    SUPER-STATE

     

    H.F.1442

       
     
     

    [A CHURCHILLIAN RESPONSE

     

    to Hitler,s so-called European Union.]

     

    PM: 'Taking back control on December 31,2020'

    MORE IMPORTANT THAN A TRADE DEAL'

    By Jason Groves-Political Editor-Daily Mail

    Tuesday,February 25,2020.

     

     

    BORIS Johnson last night warned Brussels his priority is to 'take back control' of Britain's borders and laws by the end of the year, even if that scuppers talks on post -Brexit trade deal.

     

    In a tough new ultimatum, Downing Street said it would not extend the transition period beyond the end of the year, even if that means

     

    LEAVING WITHOUT A DEAL

     

    EU leaders have warned there is not enough time to complete the comprehensive agreement both sides have signed up to deliver by the end of the year-[2020]

     

     Paris yesterday accused the UK of 'blackmail', and said it would mot sacrifice French interests to meet the timetable.

     

    BUT No 10 said ending the transition period, duriung which the UK has to abide by EU laws-including FREE MOVEMENT-was the Prime Minister's TOP PRIORITY.

     

    A spokesman said: 'The UK's primary objective in the negotiations is to ensure that we :

     

    RESTORE OUR ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL

     

    INDEPENDENCE ON JANUARY 1, 2021.

     

    A Whitehall source added: 'WE have to have back control by January 1.2021. We are being very clear about that so that there is no misunderstanding.' Brussels will publish its' 'negotiating mandate' for the Brexit talks today.

     

    It will say a Canada-style free trade deal with the UK is now off the table because of the 'geographical proximity' of the two econo0mies. The EU is also demanding Brirain agree a 'level playing field and wants 'robust commitments'that the UK continues to follow EU RULES on STATE AID,COMPETITION LAW,SOCIAL and ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS and RELEVANT TAX MATTERS'.

     

    No 10 yesterday rejected the idea that the UK should

    follow Brussels diktats in return for a deal.

     

    The PM's spokesman said there was 'no reason'why the proximity of the UK  and EU'should mean restrictions on trade, and pointed out that the US,Canada and Mexico have signed a FREE TRADE DEAL.

     

    France yesterday insisted that it will not be 'blackmailed' into accepting a 'bad' post-Brexit trade deal becauser of thev December 31 deadline. In a sign that the EU is prepared to take a tough line,French Europe minister Amelie deMontchalin said that her countries fgarmers.fishermen and businesses would not make sacrifices in order for a trade deal to be in place by the end of the year.

    She told TV station France 2: 'It must be understood by British businesses that we do not want a bad agreement-almost certainly, that we will sign up to no blackmail.'

     

    Refusing to allow the UK to dictate the time-table, Miss de Montchalin said: 'It is because Boris Johnson wants a deal at all costs for December 31 that we will sign, under pressure, a bad deal.' In an indication that access to UK fishing grounds will be one of the main flashpoints in the talks, the French minister added: 'The fishermen have the right to be protected, they know very well that if we sign a bad deal they will lose enormously.'

    The PM's Brexit inner circle will meet today to sign off on the UK's mandate before it is published on Thusrsday. Ministers are expected to confirm the want a Canada-style agreement with zero tariffs.

    The PM's Europe adviser David Frost and his team will then head to Brussels for the first round of negotiations on March 2,2020.

     

    *  *  *

     

     

    Tuesday,February 25,2020.

    H.F.1988

     
    Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday,November 19,2018 

     

    Time to show some moral fibre

    How many of those like me who participated in World War 11 would have chosen to capitulate in the way the Prime Minister has in her Brexit negotiations with the EU

    I will be 96 this week and am housebound, but my life wasn't always like this . At 17, in early 1940, I joined the RAF ,serving in Bomber Command at RAF Brize Norton and also at Bletchley  Park. Posted to the Air Ministry in London. I was bombed out and 15 girls in my billet died. My husband was a wireless operator and rear gunner, who returned home from the two-year siege of Malta, weighing five stone. We had determination, pride and above all, moral fibre.

    I feel that the once-proud UK has been asset stripped, ground down and told what to do by unelected bureaucrats in Europe. I knew exactly what I wanted from the referendum

    TO LEAVE THE EU

    I fear for the generations that follow me because the EU seems to want nothing more that to become a FEDERAL STATE.

    WHY CAN'T THE GOVERNMENT SHOW SOME MORAL FIBRE?

    I AM SO ASHAMED OF THEM ALL

     

    Letters to the Daily Mail-BREXIT SPECIAL, -Monday, November 19,2018

    R M Wangford -SUFFOLK

    [AS a pensioner couple of 87 and 89 we can understand the feelings of the above patriots and only a few days ago we watched the film the DARKEST HOUR. There was a sequence in the film when Winston Churchill was being driven in London after getting so much opposition to his plans from pro German-peace faction and suddenly when his vehicle stopped at a road junction near a tube station he suddenly without notice left the vehicle  in the vicinity of a underground railway station in London and entered it and went on to the platform where the many travellers recognised him. When a tube train arrived he entered the train and was soon in conversation with all the occupants of his carriage to the point that he conversed with everyone getting their names and their feelings about fighting the war and they without exception said the war must be fought vigorously and valiantly until VICTORY.  Later when he addressed members of the Cabinet he mentioned the names of those patriots and related their feelings of solidarity with their Prime Minister.  The climax of the film was as the to the end with Winston's speech before the HOUSE which included towards the end with:

    We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. we shall fight them in the hills; we shall never surrender.-Winston Churchill.

    By this time the once quiet Opposition benches suddenly joined the Government benches and  broke into a stirring clammour of support with hundreds of order papers being thrown into the air with gusto. The House was united for WAR and Churchill had won.]

    Today, the feelings of the above patriotic pensioners show how our country after 46 years within Hitler's so-called EU how millions of our once proud patriots are now fellow - travellers of the

    UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE - CORRUPT - COSTLY-EU

    SOON TO BE A

    SUPER-STATE

    H.F.1424

     

     

     

     

    [A REMINDER! FROM THE PAST]

    OF A COUNTRY RIDDLED WITH TREASON]

    The EU’s control structure in Britain

    The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.  An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside. This is not an exhaustive list.

    The Bilderbergers – Europe wide

    A society of 140 top politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state:  96%. All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.  This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader. They threw Margaret Thatcher out and replaced her with a compliant Bilderberger, John Major. Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), are Bilderbergers and work for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent. That is why your vote makes no difference.

    Britain is the target

    Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target. They know from our long history and two world wars the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. 

       For that reason the EU’s British sympathisers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.

        That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.

    The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department

    Controls development of the EU. Set up by Adolf Hitler in 1942, who created the EU as the EEC in 1940.  Recruits British politicians including

    EDWARD HEATH

     

    Geoffrey Rippon and Roy Jenkins

    , and major British newspapers for the EU.  Some of our top politicians are DVD assets now (possibly Milliband, Brown, Blair), we may not know who until their deaths.

    The Conservative Party

    The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.  The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.   

        The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he lied). They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.

    Labour and the Lib Dems

    Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years. A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship. We have a one party state. Nigel Farage leader of UKIP and Nick Griffin of the BNP both work for the EU.

    The Freemasons:

    The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 active freemasons.  Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are. See http://www.bilde4rberger.org/masons.html

    http://www.bilderberg,org/masons.html

     to find out.

    (It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF).

    The Legal Profession:

    Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.  British justice is now utterly corrupt. See our August issue. Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime. They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.

    Common Purpose:

    The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved. Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.

       Common Purpose

     

     

    have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.  Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £167 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.

     

    Among all the above are about 30,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 "useful idiots "implementing the EU’s corruption, and feeding off its gravy train. But there are 62 million of us; we need to shake off their disinformation, realise the truth, and kick them all out of office. To stop these 55,000 fraudsters, we need just 10,000 of you.

    David Noakes.

    http://eutruth,org.uk.

     

     

       
     

    Brought forward from 2009

    Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

    The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

    The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

     
    Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

    Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

    The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

    They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

    The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

    The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

    The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

    But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

    Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

    The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

    Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

    The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

    The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

     
    Auschwitz

    Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

    There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

    But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

    The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

    They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

    But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

    Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

    In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

    Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

    In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

    'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

    'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

     
    Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

    Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

    The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

    The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

    Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

    Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

    The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

    'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

    The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

    More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

    During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

    A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

    He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

    Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

    As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

    A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

    By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

    Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

    But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

    Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

    The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

    That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

    The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

    War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

    Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

    Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

    But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

    The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

    Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

    The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

    The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

    'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

    'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

    Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

    Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

    Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

    By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

    Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

    It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

    When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

    But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

    During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

    Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

    Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

    Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

    Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

    When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

    Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

    That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

    Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

    But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000.

    Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

    A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

    To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

    Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

    But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.'

    For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

    • The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

    Full ARTICLE


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich--EU.html#ixzz4oiNwdrtt
    Follow us:
    @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

     

    H.F.1270 -BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

       
     

    A REMINDER FROM 2004

     

     

    Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

     supports our

     Ancient Constitution

     

     The following letter was sent to This England by the late Viscount Tonypandy (Mr George Thomas) Speaker of the House of Commons

     

     Sir: Since I retired from the Speaker’s chair in the House of Commons in 1983, I have strictly adhered to our parliamentary tradition, which prevents former Speakers from being embroiled in party political controversies.

     

    It is because I am convinced that the question of our national sovereignty towers above all that I feel free to submit this address to the electors of Britain.

     

    Our Westminster Parliament is in danger of being denuded of its responsibilities, and of being supplanted by European assembly controlled by a hotchpotch of European politicians and bureaucrats, who have no love for this country. Our national destiny will be subject to foreign control.

     

    In our British heritage a special place of honour is reserved for Pym and Hampden, who so courageously fought for the rights of our Parliament against the claims of absolutism by the Crown. Their portraits hang in pride in Speaker’s House, along with that of Speaker Lenthall who defended Parliament’s independence when it was challenged by Charles 1

     

    Other parliamentary giants have followed in their wake. Names such as Palmerston and Pitt, Gladstone, Disraeli, Asquith, Lloyd George, Churchill, Attlee, and the like, shine in our history as fierce defenders of self-government by the British people.

     

    They should be living in this hour, for we need support to protect our national interests from being subject to foreign control.

     

     No political party in Britain has a mandate from the electorate to surrender our national sovereignty to foreign hands.

     

    The current slide towards a single European currency threatens both our economic and our political independence, and thus our sovereignty. Subterfuge and half-truths have been used to persuade the nation that neither our sovereignty nor our relationship with the Commonwealth is endangered.

     

    There appears to be a conspiracy of silence about the fact that the United Kingdom’s trade and oversees investments are still much greater with countries outside the European Union than they are with those within the Union, which is itself increasingly a puppet of a French and German alliance.

     

    It is not too late for us to save our sovereignty

     

    For more than 600 years Speakers of the House of Commons have fiercely defended the supremacy of the Westminster Parliament. As one whose privilege it was to follow humbly in the steps of the mighty Speakers of the past, I call upon our nation to awake, and to demand that the voice of all our people shall be heard before the next inter-governmental conference takes irrevocable decisions affecting our sovereignty.

     

    A national Referendum conducted before, and not after, further decisions are taken is our democratic right.

     

    This is the only sure way to prevent our parliamentary sovereignty, our judicial system and our Commonwealth relationships from being grievously undermined.

     

    *          *          *

     

    We believe that Lord Tonypandy would support our cause at this momentous time for our nation when the people will at last have their say after they have been honestly given the true facts of the dangers to the Constitution, Freedom and Independence of our Country.

    2004

     

       
     
    AT LAST!

    BREXIT

    GETS THROUGH

    COMMONS!

    Bill passes with 99 majority-now it goes to the Lords.

    By Jason Groves- Daily Mail-Political Editor

     

    BORIS Johnson's Brexit deal passed its final hurdle in

    the Commons last night despite a last-ditch effort by

    Labour to block it.

     

    MPs voted by 330 to 231 to pass the landmark

     

    WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT BILL

     

    which will allow Britain to finally

     

     

    LEAVE THE EU

     

    on

     

    JANUARY 31, 2020.

     

     

    The 99-vote majority was in stark contrast with the repeated maulings handed out to Theresa May's deal last year. Downing Street welcomed last night's result, saying 'Securing the legislation's passage through the Commons is a significant step.'

     

    Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay

     described the vote as

     

    'an important moment in our national story'.

     

    The legislation will move to the Lords next week. Peers waged a running battle against

     

    BREXIT

     

    in the last Parliament.

    Mr Barclay warned them not to obstruct the Bill., saying the public had given a 'resounding message' at the election that they wanted the

    2016 REFERENDUM RESULT

    TO BE RESPECTED.

    A total of 167 Labour MPs voted against the legislation.

    All six candidates to succeed Jeremy Corbyn voted against the Bill, including frontrunners Sir Keir Starmer and Rebecca Long Bailey.

    All 330 votes in favour were Conservative.

    Shadow Brexit minister Thangam Debbonaire said Labour was opposed to many elements of Mr Johnson's deal. She said: 'WE are voting against the entire Bill, but that is not voting against Brexit.

    The SNP's Westminster leader Ian Blackford predicted the vote would result in Scotland becoming 'an independent European country'.

    Conservative MPs welcomed the vote. Sir Bernard Jenkin said: ' Now we can stop banging on about Europe.'

    Sir Bill Cash described the event as a great moment in our democratic history.

    Sir John Hayes said the legislation was the 'first step not on a trip to a different place but on a return journey a return journey for this United Kingdom to hope, to patriotism and to greatness.

    It came as the EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier issued a warning over the Prime Minster's timetable to complete  talks on a trade deal by the end of the year[2022].The new legislation rules out any extension of the Brexit transition period, due to finish at the end of December.[2022]

    He also warned that the EU would not strike a deal on trade unless the UK agreed to keep open its fishing grounds to European trawlers.

    [THIS MUST NEVER EVER HAPPEN-PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH IN 1972 GAVE AWAY OUR FISHING GROUNDS FOR NOTHING! IT IS VITAL THAT WE REGAIN FULL SOVEREIGNTY OF OUR SEAS AS BEFITS A TRUE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    JANUARY 10,2020

     

    H.F.1952

     

       
     

     

    We Germans have insulted Britain. How can we have forgotten the huge debt we owe you.

     

    News for DAILY MAIL-WE GERMANS HAVE INSULTED BRITAIN by Alexander von Schoenburg

    EDITOR AT LARGE OF BILD-

    GERMANY'S BIGGEST SELLING NEWSPAPER

    As MARCH 29 looms closer, here in Germany, rabid anti-British sentiment is part of the daily discourse.

    The chattering classes-politicians and pundits alike-are urging our Angela Merkel, to harden her line towards the United Kingdom after suggestions that she was prepared to throw Theresa May a lifeline. Indeed last week Annegret Kramp -Karrenbauer, Merkel's successor -in-waiting calls for Britain to scrap Brexit completely. Germans are far from alone in this attitude. In the wake of the momentous Commons defeat for your Prime Minister's Brexit strategy, the European Commission twisted the thumbscrews still further. have been unshakable

    Michel Barnier, the EU's Brexit negotiator, suggested it was time for the EU to abandon its 'red lines' over ending freedom of movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

     Yet these issues have been unshakable stipulations for the British since the beginning of talks. To casually propose dumping them in this way is insulting to your country.

     Regret

    The French president, Emmanuel Macron, was, regrettably, similarly dismissive when he said that

     Brexit

    was a

    BRITISH PROBLEM

    and one it would have to solve on its own. Such blinkered and sour responses are, in my view, wrong-headed. They ignore the great debt that Germany, and the whole Continent, owes our friends across the Channel.

    However much we in Europe regret your decision  to leave our Community, we must always remember that, throughout your history, independence and sovereignty have been

    PARAMOUNT.

    Germany in particular should tread lightly when it comes to dealing with

    YOUR PROUD NATION.

    It was Great Britain that first stood up to Hitler in 1939. And it was Britain that opened its doors to the thousands of Jew-doors to the thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing certain death during the Holocaust.

    Put simply, there would be no free Europe without you and the bloody sacrifice you made to rescue the Continent. This plain fact has not always been a popular one, of course. The truth is that there has been a long tradition of policies aimed at excluding the British Isles from Europe, most notably those of French president Charles De Gaulle.

    After the war, inspired by dreams of the medieval empire that stretched across  the Continent under Charlemagne, De Gaulle poured his energy into setting up the European economic Community -the forerunner of the EU.

    But when Britain enquired about membership in the early Sixties, his answer was an emphatic 'Non' Thanks to De Gaulle's opposition, it took more than a decade for the UK to be accepted. And the driving force for unity for welcoming British membership with open arms was the German chancellor of the Sixties, Konrad Adenauer.

    For that, ultimately, we can thank the QUEEN

    [TREASON]

    This considerable and controversial article appears at a crucial moment in our long island history to recover our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE-will be completed shortly-in the meantime for the complete work click ]

    Here!

     

    *  *  *

    [We were against entry to

    Hitler's plan for Europe

    in 1972 and again in 1975.]

    [WHY De Gaulle VETOED OUR EEC MEMBERSHIP in 1963]

    THE ENEMY IS EVERY WHERE]

    [ PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

     

    HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

     

    AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

     

    H.F.1784

     

       
     

     

    DAILY MAIL :

     

    Man's 'transphobic' tweet was

     

     

    LAWFUL,

     

     

    High Court rules ...

     

     

     · A man's 'transphobic' tweets were lawful

     

     

    and police breached his right to freedom of expression

     

     

     by behaving like 'the Stasi' when they turned up at …

    Police 'Gestapo in transphobic tweet probe, blasts judge.

    Businessman's landmark win in FREE SPEECH CASE

     

    Businessman's landmark win in free speech case

     

    By Sue Reid

     

    A HIGH Court judge yesterday likened police to the Nazi Gestapo in the way they investigated a businessman accused of transphobic tweets

     

    Mr Justice Julian Knowles said officers violated Harry Miller's

     

     

    FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

     

     

     by recording his comments as a hate incident and threatening

     

    prosecution.

     

    He also blasted the heavy-handed manner in which they turned

     

    up to quiz him at his business last year.

     

    The probe was sparked after Mr Miller was reported for 31 posts,

     

    including a limerick about transgender issues.

     

    In a landmark ruling for

     

     

    FREE SPEECH

     

     

    Mr Justice Knowles said he did not break

     

     

    the law,,,

     

     

    He added:   'The effect of the police turning up at his place of

     

    work because of his political opinions must not be

     

    underestimated.

     

     

    'It would be to undervalue a cardinal democratic

     

     

    freedom in this country.

     

    WE have never had a Cheka, Gestapo or a Stasi'-a reference to

     

    the secret police forces in Stalin's Soviet Union, Nazi Germany

     

    and the former Communist East Germany.

     

     

    [The so-called Human Rights legislation has much to

     

     

    do with confounding English Justice. We need to exit

     

     

    this gross interference in English Law by the end of

     

     

    2020. Perhaps Prime Minister Boris Johnson has this

     

     

    already in mind?]

     

     

    'There is a tide in the affairs of men

    Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune,

    Omitted, all the voyage of their life

    Is bound in shallows and in miseries."

    Shakespeare.

     

     

    FULL ARTICLE

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

     

     

    *  *  *

     

    Brought forward from February-2005

    FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

     

    [In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

     

    Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

    *          *        *

    We all have a Right

    to

    Freedom of Speech

     

    Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

    What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

     The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

    Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

    Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

    How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

    The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

    The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

    This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

    The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

    Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

    It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

    The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

     

    No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

    A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

    The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

    To Irritate

     

    Annoy

     

    Dismay

     

    And Shock

     

    Anyone who Listens.

    The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

    I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

     As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

     

    The verse concludes:

     

    ‘In England today we can do what we like

    So long as we do what we’re told’

     

    How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

    ‘And that is why we can talk as we like

    So long as we talk as we’re told.’

    A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

     

    But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

     

    It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

     

    Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                              

     

    THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

    R I P

     

    PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

     

    ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

    A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

     ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

    Let her and Falsehood grapple!

    Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

    Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

     

     MAGNA CARTA

     

    FEBRUARY 2005

    *          *          *

    [Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

     

    H.F. 1325.

     

     

    1. Judges make it even harder to

       

      kick out foreign criminals ...

       

       

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

      14/06/2017 & 15/02/20· Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

    2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able

       

      to deport EU criminals ...

       

       

      https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

      08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

    H.F.1984/1

     

     

    H.F1984 NEED WE SAY MORE?

       
     

    [A WORLD OF CHANGE WILL SOON BE UPON US-WITH THE GOOD GUYS IN CHARGE.]

     

    US Presidential Election, Tokyo Olympics cancelled? Engineered pandemic ushers in World Government

     

    The controlled demolition of the Khazarian mafia financial system is now visible for all to see.  The 30% plunge in oil prices, the meltdown of stock and bond markets and a freeze in world travel and trade are all being orchestrated in tandem with a fake pandemic, multiple sources confirm.  The pandemic, which is mostly a media event, and the financial collapse, which is real, are the cover being used to usher in a world republic, P3 Freemason, Illuminati and CIA sources all confirm.  The trigger event was the default on February 16th of the U.S. Corporate Government, they say.

    The aim of this controlled demolition is to remove Satan-worshipping, genocidal criminals from the apex of world power, Pentagon and other sources say.  This will allow the release of forbidden technology and usher in a new age of wonder, they add.  For example, old age will soon be a treatable condition, the sources say.

    To make this possible, a ruling class that has been trying to kill us with pandemics, carcinogens, war, etc.  is being systematically hunted down and brought to justice, they add.  They elaborate:

    “U.S. troops sent to Europe for a NATO exercise may also engage in arrests of Zionist and deep state assets not just in Switzerland but Brussels, Antwerp, Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam, and London.”

    Inside the U.S. meanwhile, the Presidential election process has already degenerated into a farce with the Democratic nomination being obviously stolen for a senile, corrupt Joe Biden.  Here is an example of the nonsense Biden is spewing:

    “If you want to nominate a Democrat, a lifelong Democrat, a proud Democrat, an Obiden-Bama Democrat, join us. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/stop-calling-it-stutter-here-are-dozens-examples-bidens-dementia-symptoms

    One CIA source summed up the situation in this way:

    “Trump is set to be the next president as he will declare martial law, to protect the people of course.  It’s estimated that up to 70% of Americans will be affected.  He will cancel the elections.  May he be the last President standing?  He has been aware of this maneuver for a long time.  The dominos are starting to fall.”

    The number of sealed indictments in the U.S. is now close to 160,000 and 1,613 indictments have actually been acted upon.  So now it looks like many of these corporate crooks will finally end up in jail where they belong. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit#gid=1703320056

    There has also been a record number of corporate bosses quitting or losing their jobs since January.  An NSA source elaborated by saying, “The President has ordered a full-scale investigation of all communications across the…

    The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
    Please Log In or Register to create an account.
    March 9, 2020

    [COMMENTS AT TOP IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    H.F.1995

       
     
    ("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

     

    BANNED

     

     AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

    by

    Dr Taj Hargey-

    Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

    Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

     

    ...

    Tuesday, August 29,2017

    An

    An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

    The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

    Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

    But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

    Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

    One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

    ‘they don’t speak English’.

    A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

    When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

    Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

    In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

    (In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

    It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

    Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

    If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

    To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

    And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

    This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

    Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

    Alienation...

    *

    Poisonous...

    *

    Tolerance...

    *

    Full article

     

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
    Follow us:
    @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    *

     

     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    *

    ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

    *

    THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

    *

    THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

    *

    WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

    *

    TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

    WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

     

    H.F.1289

       
     

    VIGILANCE IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY!

    *

     QUOTE 684 of 900

    ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS

    Jewish objectives as outlined in Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

    1) Banish God from the heavens and Christianity from the earth.

    2) Allow no private ownership of property or business.

    3) Abolish marriage, family and home. Encourage sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, adultery, and fornication.

    4) Completely destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism.

    5) Establish a one-world government through which the Luciferian Illuminati elite can rule the world. All other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose.

    6) Take the education of children completely away from the parents. Cunningly and subtly lead the people thinking that compulsory school attendance laws are absolutely necessary to prevent illiteracy and to prepare children for better positions and life's responsibilities. Then after the children are forced to attend the schools get control of normal schools and teacher's colleges and also the writing and selection of all text books.

    7) Take all prayer and Bible instruction out of the schools and introduce pornography, vulgarity, and courses in sex. If we can make one generation of any nation immoral and sexy, we can take that nation.

    8) Completely destroy every thought of patriotism, national sovereignty, individualism, and a private competitive enterprise system.

    9) Circulate vulgar, pornographic literature and pictures and encourage the unrestricted sale and general use of alcoholic beverage and drugs to weaken and corrupt the youth.

    10) Foment, precipitate and finance large scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt the nations and thereby force them into a one-world government.

    11) Secretly infiltrate and control colleges, universities, labor unions, political parties, churches, patriotic organizations, and governments. These are direct quotes from their own writings (The Conflict of the Ages, by Clemens Gaebelein pp. 100-102).

    12) The creation of a World Government.

    KGB CHART NOW TO DESTROY A PEOPLE AND NATION

    More!

     

     

    H.F.741

     

     
    NOVEMBER 1-2019
     

     

    Let me recommend to you the following quotation.

    . When you have read it, try, before reading further, to think who might have said it.

    "Historians have noticed, all down the centuries, one peculiarity of the English people which has cost them dear. We have always thrown away, after a victory, the greatest part of the advantages we gained in the struggle. The worst  difficulties from which we suffer do not come from without. They come from within. They do not come from the cottages of the wage earners. They come from a peculiar type of brainy people found in our country who, if they add something to its culture, take much from its strength,"

    "Our difficulties come from the mood of unwarrantable self-abasement into which we have been cast by a powerful section of our own intellectuals. They come from the acceptance of defeatist doctrines by a large proportion of our politicians. But what have they to offer but a vague internationalism and promise of impossible utopia?"

    How on earth could he have described with pinpoint accuracy the entire Remainer clique of today, down to a T? Well the speaker was

    WINSTON CHURCHILL,

    out of office, speaking in April 1933.

    He was describing back then a mood in wide sections of the Establishment to trash this country in favour of

    GERMANY

    where a little Austrian with a postage -stamp moustache had just taken office as

    CHANCELLOR OF GERMANY

    It was later called

    APPEASEMENT

    and is still the

    RELIGION of the REMAINERS

    TALK ABOUT HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF...

    NOVEMBER 1-2019

     

     

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

     

    HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

     

     

     

     LIFE AND TIMES

    OF

    Christopher Story

    PATRIOT & TRUTHSEEKER

    2010

     

    The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill.

     

     

    To the Serbs -an Independent Kosovo is anathema -Kosovo is their Jerusalem

    Germany as the Strongman of Europe-A germanised Empire in the Making - PART 1

    The New Beginning  - PART2

    Germany's Third Reich -PART 3

    Taskmasters of Europe -PART 4

    A Warning Message To The Freedom Loving People Of England by Harry Beckhough

    *

    http://eutruth.org.uk

     

     

     

    AND THOUSANDS MORE BULLETINS ON THE TRUE NATURE OF THE EU

     

     

    FREEDOM-UNITY.

    *

    Image result for Winston Churchill-'We are a part of Europe but not of it...

     

    THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

    BY

    WINSTON CHURCHILL.

     

    *  *  *

    NOVEMBER 1-2019

    H.F.1915

     

     

    Conservative Friends of Israel

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
    Conservative Friends of Israel, abbreviated to CFI, is a British parliamentary group affiliated to the Conservative Party, which is dedicated to strengthening business, cultural and political ties between the United Kingdom and Israel. CFI is an unincorporated association. It also seeks to strengthen ties between the British Conservative Party and the Israeli Likud party.

    It was founded in 1974 by Conservative MP for Bury and Radcliffe, Michael Fidler. It is currently chaired by Stuart Polak. The Parliamentary Chairman is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary President is Baroness Shephard of Northwold. The Vice Chairmen are John Butterfill and James Clappison, the Secretary is David Amess, the Officers are Alistair Burt, Lee Scott, and Theresa Villiers, and the Chairman of CFI Europe is Timothy Kirkhope.

    In 1995 Conservative politician Robert Rhodes James called it "the largest organisation in Western Europe dedicated to the cause of the people of Israel".[1]

    By 2009, according to the Channel 4 documentary Dispatches – Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, around 80% of Conservative MPs were members of the CFI.[2] In 2013, Peter Oborne, the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator called CFI “by far Britain’s most powerful pro-Israel lobbying group”. The same is true of AIPAC in the US.”[3]

     

     

    Activities[edit]

    The group's 2005 strategy identified the following areas of activity: supporting Israel, promoting the British Conservative Party, fighting terrorism, combating anti-semitism, and promoting peace in the Middle East.[4] According to their website, "over two thirds" of Conservative MPs were members of Conservative Friends of Israel in 2006.[5] In 2007 the Political Director stated it had over 2000 members and registered supporters.[6] In 2009, at least half of the shadow cabinet were members of the group according to a Dispatches documentary.[7]

    Their website states the opinion that it is one of the fastest growing political lobby groups in the UK.[8] According to the Dispatches documentary, between 2006 and 2009 the CFI funded more than 30 Conservative parliamentary candidates to visit Israel.[7]

    In 2012 CFI reconstituted itself as a private company limited by guarantee.[9]

    CFI annual business lunch[edit]

    David Cameron, then newly elected leader of the Conservative Party, addressed the CFI annual business lunch on 30 January 2006, whose audience included half of the Conservative Parliamentary Party. As part of his speech, he stated "I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party. Israel is a democracy, a strong and proud democracy, in a region that is, we hope, making its first steps in that direction."[10]

    Former Conservative party leaders Iain Duncan Smith[11] and Michael Howard[12] have addressed the CFI lunch.

    The British Pakistani MP Sajid Javid has also made business lunch speeches which have been positively received by the CFI, the Jewish Chronicle even reporting Javid as a future Prime Minister.[13]

    Donations[edit]

    The Dispatches documentary claimed members of the group and their companies have donated over £10 million to the Conservative party between 2001 and 2009. The group called this figure "deeply flawed" saying that they have only donated £30,000 between 2004 and 2009 but that members of the group have undoubtedly made their own donations to the party. Dispatches described the CFI as "beyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groups".[2][7]

    Members of CFI[edit]

    According to the CFI website 80% of Tory MPs are members of Conservative Friends of Israel.[14]

    In alphabetical order, members of Conservative Friends of Israel include:

    See also[edit]

    References[edit]

    1. ^ Peter Oborne (12 December 2012). "The cowardice at the heart of our relationship with Israel". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
    2. ^ a b Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel Lobby, Channel 4, Monday 16 November 2009
    3. ^ Peter Oborne, Iran nuclear deal: ill-informed friends of Israel are refusing to face facts, Daily Telegraph, 27 November 2013, accessed 10 August 2015
    4. ^ CFI INFORMED Magazine, Second Edition (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, February 2007, p. 3, retrieved 29 May 2008 [dead link]
    5. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel – About Us
    6. ^ Robert Halfon (27 September 2007). "Introducing the CFI". ConservativeHome. Retrieved 20 August 2012. 
    7. ^ a b c Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 November 2009. 
    8. ^ Conservative Friends of Israel web site
    9. ^ "Companies House WebCHeck - CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS OF ISRAEL LIMITED". Companies House. Company No. 08114952. Archived from the original on 29 December 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2013. 
    10. ^ CFI INFORMED Weekly Briefing (PDF), Conservative Friends of Israel, 3 February 2006, retrieved 25 May 2006 [dead link]
    11. ^ Duncan Smith: Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorists, Conservatives.com, 10 December 2001
    12. ^ "Howard Speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel, at the Savoy Hotel, London". Conservatives.com. 6 December 2004. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004. 
    13. ^ http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/94117/muslim-tory-mp-after-britain-israel-best
    14. ^ a b "About CFI". Conservative Friends of Israel. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
    15. ^ "Ministers "will change" war crimes arrest law". Jewish Chronicle. 8 July 2010. 
    16. ^ "Altrincham and Sale West: Election 2010". Jewish Chronicle. 29 April 2010. 
    17. ^ "UK: Evangelical Christian appointed new UK Middle East Minister". The Muslim News. 15 May 2010. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
    18. ^ "British MPs furious after Israel President Shimon Peres accuses the English of being anti-semitic". Daily Mail. UK. 1 August 2010. 
    19. ^ a b "Cameron's Cabinet: Who are they?". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
    20. ^ "Mike's Biography". Retrieved 15 May 2011. 
    21. ^ "William Hague's Schmooze With The Jewish News". Totally Jewish. 25 March 2010. 
    22. ^ a b "Ministers lose seats in the East". East Anglia Daily Times. 7 May 2010. 
    23. ^ Black, Ian (16 November 2009). "Pro-Israel lobby group bankrolling Tories, film claims". The Guardian. London. 
    24. ^ "About Conservative Friends of Israel". cfoi.co.uk. Retrieved 22 September 2011. 
    25. ^ "Eric Pickles to lead MPs’ delegation to Israel". Jewish Chronicle. July 24, 2015. 
    26. ^ "Rifkind elected as Kensington MP". Jewish Chronicle. 7 May 2010. 
    27. ^ Sloan, Alaistair. "Ed Miliband will back Israel". Middle East Monitor. Retrieved 13 April 2015. 

    External links[edit]

     

    [GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND' LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-GERMANY.

    ADDED JULY 28,2018

    AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    OCTOBER 21,2017

    H.F.1355

       
     

    [There is a well-known phrase:

    'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

    We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

    Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

    JewsnotZionists

    *

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

    David-Cameron-doesn't-understand-Conservative-party.

    [Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

    'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

    -A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

    [As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

    CLICKStartpage

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/

    real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

    -an-attack-on-iran.

    *

    [GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

    LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

    GERMANY.

    ADDED JULY 28,2018

    AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2019.]

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    OCTOBER 21,2017

    H.F.1355

     

     
     

     

    Dr MAX PEMBERTON: Sorry, we shouldn't be afraid to use the F-WORD...

     

    march 5,2020

    1. Sorry, we shouldn't be

       

      afraid to use the

       

      F-word

    When did the word ‘fat’ stop being a description of someone’s body and start to become their identity?

    Being fat is now a choice that should be celebrated — a characteristic that deserves respect from others.

    To suggest otherwise — that, for example, being overweight is a fundamentally unhealthy state and might be something that an individual tries to address for their own benefit — is considered ‘shaming’.

    And now doctors and healthcare workers are being warned against calling patients fat in case it offends them!

    In fact, a group of academics at King’s College London — and 100 organisations that support them — have gone one step further. In a statement worthily entitled ‘Pledge to Eradicate Weight Stigma’, they outline how calling people fat is akin to racism and sexism.

    Escalating

     Have we all gone stark raving mad? Discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin or because of their gender is very different to stating a fact about someone’s physical state which is putting them at risk

    And I worry this hyperbole and, quite frankly, nonsense from hand-wringing liberals falling over themselves not to upset people at every turn, helps nobody, least of all those battling with their weight.

    Last year, a Freedom of Information request showed the NHS receives hundreds of complaints every year from patients who object to having health professionals suggest they lose weight. This ‘pledge’ will only encourage more complaints at a time when the consequences of obesity cost nearly half the entire NHS budget.

    It’s not old people or dementia or cancer that will cripple the NHS, it’s fat people. Being overweight is linked to a host of conditions, from cancer and heart disease to strokes, joint and breathing problems, and diabetes, to name but a handful.

    Managing type 2 diabetes alone costs us £10 billion a year, and the situation is escalating out of control.

    Of course, being fat or obese is not something one should be mocked or bullied over. But equally, nor is it something that should be ignored.

    And it’s certainly not something that we should pretend isn’t linked to a shortened life expectancy

    To be blunt: people just aren’t bothering to lose weight any more.

    In part, this may be because so many more people are now overweight, it is becoming viewed as ‘normal’. But I think increasingly people just refuse to take responsibility for their behaviour.

    Have we all gone stark raving mad? Discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin or because of their gender is very different to stating a fact about someone’s physical state which is putting them at risk

    And I worry this hyperbole and, quite frankly, nonsense from hand-wringing liberals falling over themselves not to upset people at every turn, helps nobody, least of all those battling with their weight.

    Last year, a Freedom of Information request showed the NHS receives hundreds of complaints every year from patients who object to having health professionals suggest they lose weight. This ‘pledge’ will only encourage more complaints at a time when the consequences of obesity cost nearly half the entire NHS budget.

    It’s not old people or dementia or cancer that will cripple the NHS, it’s fat people. Being overweight is linked to a host of conditions, from cancer and heart disease to strokes, joint and breathing problems, and diabetes, to name but a handful.

    Managing type 2 diabetes alone costs us £10 billion a year, and the situation is escalating out of control.

    Of course, being fat or obese is not something one should be mocked or bullied over. But equally, nor is it something that should be ignored.

    And it’s certainly not something that we should pretend isn’t linked to a shortened life expectancy.

    To me as a doctor, it seems bizarre that I'm now being urged to turn a blind eye to the waistline of my patients

    Because this is not an issue that we need to debate, nor is it a matter of opinion. It’s a simple fact: being fat can kill you.

    I’m sure this is upsetting for some overweight patients to hear, but it doesn’t make it any less true. I view it as my duty as a healthcare professional to warn them of it.

    So how did we get to this point? Like so many trends, it started in America — a country which is decades ahead of us in the obesity epidemic.

    There, people with weight issues have adopted the language of persecuted or marginalised minorities, such gay or black people, to justify their size and shape and deflect criticism. Now they are ‘proud’ of their fatness and ‘celebrate’ in what has become a ludicrous cult of ‘body positivity’.

    But what is there to celebrate if you are so fat you can only wear tent-like clothes, can’t fit into airline or theatre seats, and you need a reinforced bed and reinforced ambulances to ferry you to hospital for treatment for the myriad health issues you suffer?

    Where’s the pride in being unable to walk without a stick or having to sit on a mobility scooter?

    All this ‘body positivity’ movement is doing is facilitating a delusion. It stops people from attempting to make the lifestyle changes that will save their lives.

    Our attitudes towards weight are a major factor in the scale of the problem we face, as illustrated by a fascinating survey by the Department of Health, which compared data collected in 1967 with that from 2010.

     

    Sedentary

    Although the Sixties diet was high in fat and there was far less access to gyms, people were considerably slimmer than they are now, a fact attributed to greater daily activity.

    For example, fewer people had cars, and there was more manual work compared with our relatively sedentary lives.

    But the 1967 survey also found that nine out of ten people had attempted to lose weight in the past year compared with 57 per cent of adults questioned in 2010. Even more telling is the finding that, in the Sixties, of those who thought they were fat only 7 per cent failed to do anything about it. That figure compares with nearly 50 per cent now.

    To be blunt: people just aren’t bothering to lose weight any more.

    In part, this may be because so many more people are now overweight, it is becoming viewed as ‘normal’. But I think increasingly people just refuse to take responsibility for their behaviour

    Insidious

    Instead of acknowledging that they are fat because they stuff their faces on a regular basis, they prefer to blame the Government, the food manufacturers, their genes etc.

    And if someone is confronted with the reality of being fat or obese, they fall back on the insidious language of identity politics and claim they are being victimised or picked on.

    Some activists argue that being overweight is not a choice. Sorry, but it is. There may be complex reasons why someone is obese — poverty and poor education are factors — but this doesn’t absolve people of responsibility, of choosing to eat more food than their body needs.

    There is undoubtedly a group of obese people who have deep-rooted underlying psychological problems — they may use food as an emotional crutch —and I meet many of them in my outpatient clinics. They need help and it pains me that we are so lacking in adequate services for them.

    But I also know that the majority of overweight people simply don’t care. When their joints crumble because of their bulk, or they need surgery to clear out their blocked arteries, or they develop diabetes, they know the NHS — that is us taxpayers — will pick up the tab.

    It is incumbent on all of us to change this attitude — to make being overweight socially unacceptable, just as smoking is because of the risk it poses to health, and to the rest of us.

    We could sort out all the NHS’s funding problems in the bat of an eyelid if only people would take responsibility and lose pounds by eating less and moving more. What is at stake is the future of the NHS.

    And as a doctor I will continue to make patients aware of that fact, whether or not it hurts their feelings.

     *  *  *

     

     

    [freedom of expression-

     

     

    SERIES!]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    march 5,2020

    H.F.1993

       
     
     [A CAUSE WORTH FIGHTING FOR

    THE RETURN OF THE FREE NATION STATE

    OF

     ENGLAND

    -instead of remaining within a threatening-toxic totalitarian so-called European Union- a monstrous- cunning - controlling - captive - calamitous

    soon to be

    SUPER-STATE.

    *

    BUT

    TO REGAIN

    OUR RIGHTFULL INHERITANCE.]

    "WE must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of independence..."

     

    Part
    of an almost 1000 word speech by Winston Churchill at Fulton Missouri,USA in March,1946,

    *  *  *
    THE END OF THE ENGLISH

    By

    David Brown

     

    INTRODUCTION

    HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

     HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

    THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

    HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

     WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

    *

    [THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

    NOTHING!]

    2008

     

     

    292

    Remember constantly that it was Hitler's intention to unite Europe. (Just as it had been the ambitions of Charlemagne, Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon and the Kaiser.)

    Remember it was Adolf Hitler who first used the phrase

    'The United States of Europe.

    Remember  that it was Hitler who had the idea of establishing regions of Europe in order to

    DESTROY NATIONAL IDENTITIES.

     

    He wanted to break European nations  into regions so that they could be ruled from

    BERLIN.

     

    MORE!

    LINKS to A1136/A1121/A1137/C33/B56/B103/C34/B17/A1086/CON30/B404/B308

    (www.vernoncoleman.com)

     

     

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!}

    DECEMBER  5,2018

    H.F.1760

     

       
     
    WHY IT'S

     GOT HARDER TO DEPORT CRIMINALS

    Foreign convicts exploiting human rights loophole reaches a five year high.

    By David Barrett-Daily Mail-Home Affairs Correspondent-February 15,2020

     

    THE number of of foreign criminals avoiding

     

    deportation on human rights grounds has hit

     

    the highest level in five years.

     

    Cases have nearly tripled since political pressure over abuse of human rights helped force successful claims down to a record low.

     

    It comes amid concern about legal challenges to block deportations after dozens of Jamaican criminals had to be removed from a Home Office charter flight earlier this week.

     

    When Theresa May was home secretary, she told the 2011 Tory party conference that

     

    LABOUR''S HUMAN RIGHTS Act

     

    [To be precise-Tony Blair's.]

     

     

    'needs to go'

     

    and that the meaning of one

     crucial clause had been perverted' to prevent removals.

    The Home Office redoubled its efforts to fight cases in the immigration courts.

    By 2016 the European Convention on Human Rights and other humanitarian laws were used in only 60 successful applications by foreign criminals.

    The following year they more than doubled to 144.

    By 2018, the most recent figure whole year for which figures are available, the number reached a five-year-high of 172.-the most since 212 in 2013...

     

    The Mail revealed on Thursday that among the criminals who had been due to be removed from this country were killer Fitzroy Daley and rapist Fabian Henry.

     

    Government sources have said they fear the criminals remaining in Britain will win bail within days and be released from immigration detention centres.

     

    The Home Office is due to defend against the Jamaica deportation legal challenge in the High Court on Monday.

    A spokesman said. 'WE make no apology for seeking to remove dangerous foreign criminals. WE will continue to fight robustly in the courts to ensure foreign criminals are removed as quickly as possible.

     

    February 15,2020

     

    dailymail.co.uk

     

    *  *  *

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    1. Judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals ...

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Judges-make-harder-kick-foreign-criminals.html

      14/06/2017 · Now judges make it even harder to kick out foreign criminals: They say 'deport first, appeal later' rule breaches human rights law. Judges said two drug dealers shouldn't have been deported before ...

    2. Brexit news: UK WILL be able to deport EU criminals ...

      https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/877009/brexit-news-eu-uk-prison-deportation...

      08/11/2017 · BRITAIN is set to bring in a draft of new deportation laws to make it harder for EU criminals to stay in the country after Brexit, new Government papers have revealed. Under current rules, Brussels’ free movement policy means it’s considerably more difficult for UK authorities to deport EU citizens than other other foreign nationals. The UK Government is required to show the criminals

    H.F.1984/1

    H.F.1986

       
     

    [There is a well-known phrase:

    'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

    We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

    Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

    JewsnotZionists

    *

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

    David-Cameron-doesn't-understand-Conservative-party.

    [Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

    'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

    -A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

    [As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

    CLICKStartpage

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/

    real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

    -an-attack-on-iran.

    *

    [GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENDEAVOUR BE ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH ALL FOREIGN POWERS BUT IT  IS NOT HEALTHY IN A DEMOCRACY THAT  THERE IS UNDUE INFLUENCE IN  RESPECT OF LOBBYING OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO'S PRIME OCCUPATION IS TO REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND NOT FOREIGN DOMAINS OF WHICH WE MAY HAVE REASON  TO CENSOR OR EVEN TO ENTER INTO CONFLICT.  IN A DIVISION IN THE HOUSE WHERE DOES THEIR LOYALTY LAY -TO ENGLAND OR ISRAEL- OR  TO WHOSOEVER?  IN VIEW OF THE CENTURIES ZIONIST HOLD ON THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND NO DOUBT OF OTHER ADMINISTRATIONS AROUND THE WORLD IT MAY USE POWER TO FURTHER ITS OWN AGENDA AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF FREE NATION STATES. AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE THERE IS NO 'FRIENDS OF ENGLAND'

    LOBBY GROUP IN PARLIAMENT LOOKING AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE  ENGLISH PEOPLE.  IF THERE HAD BEEN IN THE 1970'S OUR COUNTRY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN AWAY TO A FOREIGN POWER -OUR ENEMY IN TWO WORLD WARS-

    GERMANY.

    ADDED JULY 28,2018

    AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE EU WITHIN 6 MONTHS. NOT STILL IN AFTER 2 YEARS WITH AN EXIT DATE OF MARCH 29,2009.]

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    OCTOBER 21,2017

    H.F.1355

     

       
     

    The Commonwealth Realms  V  The Constitution for Europe. - Part 1

    2001

    inasmuch as the Crown is the symbol of the free association of the members of the British Commonwealth of nations… united by the common allegiance to the Crown”

     

    The Statute of Westminster 1931

     

     

    A Paper delivered to a meeting held in the House of Lords London on the 21st April 2004.

     

    [THE ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY ORG UK WERE IN ATTENDANCE ON THIS MOMENTOUS DAY  TO HEAR THE

     GRAVE APPEAL TO THE

     MOTHER COUNTRY.]

     

    By

     

    Philip Benwell MBE

     

     

     

    The Commonwealth Realms

     

    Antigua and Barbuda          New Zealand

    Australia                                Papua New Guinea

    Bahamas                                Saint Kitts

    Barbados                                Saint Vincent

    Belize                                      Solomon Islands

    Canada                                   Tobago Tuvalu

    Grenada                                  Tonga

    Nevis Saint Lucia                    United Kingdom

     

     

    *          *          *

     

    My Lords, Ladies & Gentlemen,

     

    My task tonight is not to take sides on whether we should be in or out of Europe, but rather to explore what I consider to be the real danger to the Commonwealth of Australia and the fourteen Commonwealth Realms.

     

    The issues relating to individual sovereignties are indeed complex, particularly since the Statute of Westminster of 1931 which was enacted to provide for the maturing independence of those former colonies who remained ‘under The Crown of the United Kingdom’ which were termed ‘Dominions’, so named in 1907 as ‘the self-governing dominions beyond the seas’ to replace the term ‘Great Colonies’ and which today comprise the nations of Australia, Canada and New Zealand, each having unique constitutions with precedents and conventions developed to suit their individual environments and peoples.

     

    For instance, Canada is still essentially a ‘Royalist’ nation whereas Australia is not; and this is probably due to the comparative physical closeness of Canada to the United Kingdom and its greater number of Royal Visits, a privilege Australia has little experience of, due to our distance and the length of travel time to reach us.

     

    This may explain why Australia has a more constitutional – and lesser Royalist-approach to our Monarchy than Canada.  We tend to recognise The Crown as but an ingredient –albeit vital – within our system of Government.  It is this more sterile approach that has led Monarchists to explain that the Governor-General is effectively Australia’s Head of State with the Queen as Sovereign, whereas Canada still unashamedly recognises The Queen as their head of State.

     

    In the years leading up to 1931, the former British Prime Minister, Arthur, later lord Balfour, formulated a treaty between the United Kingdom and the then Dominions to encompass the views expressed during the preceding Imperial Conferences, particularly that of 1926.  The Conferences had been held in London between the United Kingdom Government and representatives of the Governments of the Dominions who were calling for a relaxation of control, which continued to be exerted by the British Government following their independence, particularly with regard to the decision of who would nominate their respective Governors-General.

     

    It was this Treaty, which was consolidated into an Act of the British Government called the Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the then Dominions, which included Australia, Canada, South Africa and New Zealand.

     

    The independent sovereignty of the Realms was clearly shown at the time of the Constitutional Referendum in 1999, for if Australia was not in charge of its own affairs, how else could the people themselves decide whether or not to retain The Crown?

     

    The concerns now facing Australia go far beyond the Republican / Monarchist divisions caused by the Referendum.  Whilst the British Parliament no longer has any right to legislate over the affairs of Australia, it is fettered from taking certain actions relating to the Crown of the United Kingdom and is specifically barred from legislating in matters of the Succession and the Royal Styles and Titles.

     

    In Zurich in September 1946, Churchill, still in Opposition, explained his motivation in working for Union: “When the Nazi power was broken, I asked myself what was the best advice I could give my fellow citizens in our ravaged and exhausted continent.  My counsel to Europe can be given in a single word: Unite!

     

    [Winston Churchill also stated in his Zurich speech his feelings of his own country when he said:

     

    We are with Europe but not a part of it.

     

    We are linked but not combined.

     

    We’re interested but not absorbed”]

     *

     In Volume IV of his ‘The Second World War’ Churchill wrote: “Hard as it is to say now, I trust that the European Family may act united as one under a Council of Europe…I look forward to a United States of Europe in which the barriers between nations will be greatly minimised and unrestricted travel will be possible. I hope to see the economy of Europe studied as a whole.”

     

    It was thus that Churchill founded the United Europe Movement in 1947 and it was Churchill who brought together persons of influence to create a bi –partisan committee and it was Churchill who persuaded France to allow a defeated Germany into the Alliance.  Indeed had not Churchill thrown his weight behind the early meetings the entire concept of a united Europe may have become a forgotten segment of history?

     

    Churchill, of course, knew that Britain had to provide the leadership in bringing the war-torn nations of Europe together and that in ding so there would be some loss of sovereignty.  Britain has been entering into treaties for nigh on a thousand years or more, all of which have resulted in a loss of some sovereignty.

     

    There is a statement attributed to Churchill:  “If the choice for Britain is Europe or the open sea, then Britain must choose the open sea.”

     

    This, however, has been taken from a conversation Churchill had with de Gaulle in 1944 and is often quoted out of context to indicate his opposition to European Union.  It is not necessary to take Churchill’s comments out of context for it was never in his mind that Britain would ever become a State subservient to a United Europe.

     

    And certainly not at the expense of the Empire and Commonwealth, but rather that Britain had to take the lead, jointly with the United States of America, in the reconstruction of Europe.  [Elsewhere in our Bulletins we have emphasised that the USA from the beginning of their support for a United Europe wished to include the UK in a Federal Union.]  

    When in Government, Churchill seemed to lose interest in European Union.  This was possibly because the Marshall Plan was working, but more probably because he was then in full command of the facts and he vehemently disagreed with the more extensive plans of pro-Unionists and would never be convinced that the sacrifice of British Sovereignty would be worth anything Europe could offer Britain.  It was not until Harold Macmillan became Conservative Prime Minister that Union was pursued by Britain with full vigour at whatever cost.

     

    Macmillan, of course, had been with Churchill as Churchill sought solutions to rebuild a war-torn Europe, but unlike Churchill, Macmillan never took into account the dangers of full integration.

     

    Macmillan was not the British Bulldog that Churchill was.  He was a Conservative as such and in his younger days had flirted with many different ideologies, including Mosley’s National Socialism and Roman Catholicism.

     

    For over fifty years, the British Parliament has been debating and legislating over matters pertaining to its entry into Union with Europe.  That there are economic benefits to Britain in a European Trading Bloc cannot be denied.  That there are disadvantages also cannot be denied.  Today (21st April 2004) however, we are not just talking about an economic Union, but a political one, one that denies, indeed saps, the natural right of member states to legislate and administer themselves without external interference or authority.  It is this, which is the greatest challenge to the independence of Britain’s sovereignty, and it is this, which provides a possible danger to the integrity of the Crown of the United Kingdom, without which the independent constitutions of the fifteen Commonwealth Realms cannot survive.  That is the question to be analysed tonight.

     

    End of Part 1

     

     

     

     

    WE WERE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS ON THAT DAY  -21ST APRIL-2004 TO HEAR MR BENWELL MBE SPEAK OF THE FAMILY OF COMMONWEALTH REALMS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING THOSE LINKS WHICH WERE IN 1970-72 TRAITOROUSLY GIVEN AWAY BY A PRIME MINISTER WHO WAS A NAZI SPY IN 1938 UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 2005 WHEN HE ADMITTED HIS DECEIT IN ORDER TO JOIN THE EEC KNOWING THAT IT WOULD EVENTUALLY BECOME HITLER'S WARTIME PLAN FOR GERMANY TO RULE EUROPE IN THE PEACE.

     

     

     



    Click Here for Part 2

     

     

    H.F.1932

     

       
       
       
       
     

     

    THE ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

     ORG. UK.

     

     

     

     

     

    WISHES THE

     

    SCOTTISH PEOPLE

    WELL

    IN THEIR DELIBERATIONS

    ON THE MATTER

    OF THEIR FUTURE

    AS A

    FREE

    INDEPENDENT

    NATION STATE

    *

    MATERIALISM

    IS NOT THE ANSWER

    FREEDOM

    IS!

    HISTORY SHOWS YOU THE WAY!

    'We fight not for glory

    Nor for wealth

    Nor for Honour

    But for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

    ( From the Arbroath Manifesto sent by the nobles and commons of SCOTLAND to the Pope in 1320)

     

     

     

    '...In 1320 the Scots drew up one of the most stirring documents in history. Their Declaration called on the Pope to recognize Scotland's just claim to INDEPENDENCE which she would defend to her last hundred men, even against the king, if need be.

    On page 130 of In Finlay's book SCOTLAND we found the following in the  last paragraph which we feel sums up the situation today in September 2014:

     

    ...'If the true outline and identity of SCOTLAND are taking shape through the haar, it must not be looked upon as a break-away from ENGLAND. Only through discovery of HER OWN IDENTITY will SCOTLAND ever contribute her full quota to the partnership [we would say FAMILY] to ENGLAND and to the commonwealth of nations. She is not an ancient nation as the romantics will have us believe, but merely a NATION with a long childhood and adelesence, which perhaps in the end are not bad things.'

     

     

    The rebirth of the Scottish Nation State will lead to a revival in time out of the three centuries conspiracy to destroy the FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE in order to bring about a new elitist world government of which the EU and the North American Union and others will be cohersed to follow.  The Scottish people will only remain  truly FREE! if they do not pass their hard-won freedom back to the :

    COLLECTIVIST-SOVIETISED-CORRUPT-COSTLY

    EUROPEAN UNION

     

    THOSE WHO FIGHT FOR THEIR FREEDOM HAVE A GREATER RIGHT THAN THOSE WHO SELL THEIR BIRTHRIGHT FOR MAMMON

     

    'Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a weed that grows in every soil.'

     

     EDMUND BURKE

     

     WHAT THE LABOUR PEER LORD SHORE SAID ABOUT FREE NATION STATES OUT OF THE EU

     

     

    THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

     

    SEPTEMBER 16-2014

     

     

    H F 328

       
     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

       
       
     

     

    ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE

    - TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY

    -NOT MULTICULTURAL.

    *

    THE DAILY TELEGRAPH

    Wednesday, June 7,2006

    *

     Britain is an old country and our ways deserve respect.

    by

    Simon Heffer

     There are few things more enjoyable than when a Leftie admits, or pretends to admit, he was wrong.

     We saw it a year ago when Trevor Phillips, commissioner-in-chief of the Commission for racial Equality, said that

    MULTICULTURLISM

     -had not been a huge success, and that those from other cultures who came here were better off learning to be British.

     

    [‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’ so those fortunate to find a home in England need to concentrate on English culture and those who go West or North of the border will soon get to know how to integrate with the local scene.

    We have a Queen of England -We have a Church of England- just about so long as the Man of many Faiths does not get his way. We have English Law -just about, and so many things of English origin and practice that we would be repeating ourselves to declare an interest.

     

    [The term British we leave as an overall label to embrace England as a partner with the other sister nation states in our island home and we hope one day our neighbours will come to the realisation that their interests should also include the interests of the People of England who by the way are getting quite fed-up with the way they pay the lion’s share of their increased benefits without the right to have their solely English issues raised in OUR House of Commons the concern of English MPs ONLY. ]

      

    To Continue:

     I think [Trevor Phillips] he was sincere. I am less sure about Gordon Brown, who bores about Britishness almost daily.

    It is a sort of thing that allows a socialist such as Mr Brown to fake some point of contact with conservative-minded patriots.

     It is also his way of trying to hide the fact that his own party’s policies have split up the United Kingdom and made his position, as a Scot sitting for a Scottish seat who wants to be Prime Minister mostly of

    ENGLAND

    -somewhat precarious.

    Not all the Left has, however twigged that

    MULTICULTURLISM

    -is rather last century.

    Someone of whom I hoped we had heard the last, the former

    Archbishop of Canterbury-Lord Carey

    -made a predictable intervention in this debate from beyond the grave last weekend.

     

    He proclaimed that the Coronation of our next monarch must be an “interfaith” event. The ceremony must, he added, “have “very significant changes”, so that it is “inclusive” of other religions in Britain.

     

    Lord Carey clearly has in mind what Private Eye would term a “Rocky Horror” coronation service. Never mind your archbishops, or even your Christians, your imams, your rabbis, ayatollahs, your assorted holy men and other diverse priests, layers -on-hands and speakers-in-tongues: in accordance with the professions of religious belief on the 2001 census forms, I expect to see a few Jedi knights in the sanctuary, while devotees of Ras Tafari smoke ganja at the high altar. And, as one of the realm’s noisiest atheists, I hope for a part in the proceedings, too, that I might feel “included”.

     

    Having long regarded the Church of England as many people regard EastEnders, I have steeled myself not to intrude in its private grief, but to lament the largely self-inflicted decline of this great institution. Though it has, to my great spiritual regret, nothing to offer me personally, I can appreciate not merely the potential it has to succour and strengthen millions of believers, but also its role in

    OUR CULTURE

    OUR CONSTITUTION

    OUR NATION

     

    At the heart of this remains the great legacy of the

     

    REFORMATION

      -that the

    Monarch

     

    is Supreme Governor

    of the

    Church of England.

    -which is the Established Church of this Realm.

     

    As the 37th of the 39 Articles (“on the Civil Magistrates”) puts it,

     

    “the Bishop of Rome hath no jurisdiction in this

    Realm of England.

     

    Quite right: and were we to update that Article as we fetishistically seek to update everything else, we might also add that no mullahs, rabbi, Jedi or Rastafarian has any jurisdiction here.

     

    However, intrude into the Church’s grief we now must: for Lord Carey’s successor on the throne of St Augustine, Dr Rowan Williams, who in many regards seems even more to inhabit the wilder shores of the theology than Lord Carey, is having none of this nonsense.

     

    He has picked up on the threat issued by our probable next monarch, the Prince of Wales, in 1994 about how (in that very “ last century” spirit) the Prince wanted to be

     

    “Defender of Faiths”

     

    Some of us boring old pedants saw the stupidity of this at the time. It is not in a King’s job description to defend “faiths”, and cannot be unless the whole constitutional arrangement that binds Church and State is unravelled.

     

    More to the point, the notion of defending “faiths” imposes the King on secular legal matters -for the practising of faiths other than that of the Established Church is defended in fact by various Acts of Parliament- in which he has no place.

     

    Although one has never been entirely sure that the Prince of Wales has fully grasped this point, he is NOT a politician; and few things these days are more political than the right to profess assorted faiths that NOT traditional to this country.

     

    Dr Williams said of the Prince in 2003 that “Unless something really radical happens with the Constitution, he is, like it or not,

     

    Defender of the Faith

     

    -and he has a relationship with the Christian Church of a kind that he does not have with other communities”.

     

    THAT IS SELF-EVIDENTLY THE CASE.

     

    Of course, were our Queen to emulate her late mother (and I fervently hope she does) there will be no Coronation for another 20 or so years.

     

    Perhaps the needless vandalism of

     

    OUR CONSTITUTION

     

    -will have been completed by then.

     

    Perhaps there will be a different heir to the throne [Prince William]. Perhaps the moon will be made of green cheese. Until such times as these things happen, Dr William’s view must prevail, and his predecessor would be best advised to keep his bizarre views to himself.

     

    For the Coronation Service, religious though it be, is about more than religion.

     

    When the time comes, only a relatively small section of our people (and by no means just Christians, let alone Anglicans) would savour the religious significance of the EVENT.

     

    For the rest of us, the symbolism will transcend the religious. Some will see the CONSTITUTIONAL point, and realise how the traditional form of words and practices provides us with a Monarch who will carry on business as usual.

     

    For most of those watching the their plasma screens, however, the day will be about a sense of familiar NATIONAL IDENTITY

    -embodied, however much or little they realise it, in the person of the

    NEW SOVEREIGN.

     

    Now, Lord Carey might argue that altering the service to “include” Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Jehovah’s Witnesses would not altar that symbolism:

     

    But he would be WRONG!

     

    It is not only that too many of our people have seen newsreels of the last Coronation 53 years ago, and therefore have a fixed cultural idea of what it is supposed to be. It is about the NEW MONARCH, and the CEREMONY of CORONATION of which he is the heart, fitting in with what his people understand, implicitly or explicitly, about THEMSELVES, and the NATION of which they are A PART.

     

    It is Trevor Philip’s point writ large: -it is about a country being given its cultural stability partly by

    HISTORY and TRADITION

    -and about people buying into that when they choose to become A PART of the COUNTRY.

     

    That is what inclusiveness means: It is how countries as diverse as France and America both do things. It is about having a template of Frenchness or American-ness, and welcoming people into that civilisation and THOSE humane values by asking them to participate in them. We still, despite the attempts of such VANDALS as LORD CAREY, have a core CULTURE in this COUNTRY.

     

    Christianity and the expectation that Christianity will, for historic reasons prevail and be accepted as prevalent, are central to that CULTURE. And a few events in the nation’s life symbolise such an understanding more than the traditional coronation service.

     

    The next CORONATION will be a formal renewal of

    OUR WAY OF LIFE

    And

    OUR VALUES.

     

    It will formally recognise not only the legitimacy of the MONARCH in the eyes of GOD and the BRITISH constitution, but also of the identification of the vast majority of his subjects with the process of doing so. For that reason above all others it must be clear, comprehensible and in keeping with public expectations of such an event.

     

    WE ARE NOT A MULTICUTURAL SOCIETY

     

    WE ARE A MONOCULTURAL ONE -TOLERANT OF OTHER CULTURES.

     

    AND WHOSE CLEAR IDENTITY IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE - IF NOT BY THEIR LEADERS.

     

    WE ARE AN OLD COUNTRY WITH A STRONG SENSE OF CONTINUITY.

     

    AND ANYONE WHO TRIFLES WITH SUCH MANIFESTATIONS OF OUR ANTIQUITY AND STABILITY DOES SO AT HIS PERIL.

     

    * * *

    [Font altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS

    *

    BRITISH CONSTITUTION

    BY HENRY LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

    MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE

    MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF NAPLES

    1844

     

    GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

     

    CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND

     

    Before we commence with extracts from the above we need to investigate the term British and what it meant in 1908 and the confusion that has arisen since the devolution has occurred in Scotland in their Scottish Parliament and the Assembly in Wales.

     

    To assist us in this regard we have the brilliant Constitutional History of England (1908) by the learned Professor F.W Maitland an authority of world renown.

    *

     

    Nationality and Domicile

     

    In speaking of king and parliament we are no longer speaking of what in strictness of language are merely English institutions; the parliament represents the United Kingdom, and king and parliament have supreme legislative power over territories which lie in every quarter of the globe.

     

    Of this parliament we must speak.

     

    Below it there are many institutions, some of which are specifically Scottish, Irish, Canadian, Australian, Indian; for example the judicial systems of England, Ireland and Scotland are distinct from each other, though at the supreme point they unite in the House of Lords.

     

    It is of great importance to distinguish those institutions which like the kingship and the parliament are (we can hardly avoid the term) imperial institutions, from those which like the

    HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

    -are specifically English, and I strongly advise you not to use the words England and English when you mean what is larger than England and more than English.

     

    When we have dealt with the institutions, which have power over all the British dominions, we shall, being Englishmen in an English university, deal with some purely English institutions the High Court of Justice, not with the Scottish Court of Sessions -but let us keep this distinction firmly in our minds; if we are Englishmen, we are subjects of a sovereign whose power extends over millions and millions of men who are not English. [1908]

     

    Let me illustrate this by a further remark. There are two conceptions, which are of great importance to students of international law:

     

    -the one nationality, the other domicile.

     

    Now there is no such thing as English nationality, and there is no such thing as British domicile. [1908]

    The Englishman, the Scot, the Irishman, the Canadian, and the Australian -all of these have a nationality in common. [1908]

     

    If there be a war between the United Kingdom and a foreign power, say France, all of them are enemies of the French, any of them who side with the French are traitors. [1908]

     

    But there is no such thing as British domicile -

    Because there is no one system of private law common to all the British dominions; a man is domiciled in England or Scotland or New Zealand, and to a very large extent the law under which he lives varies with his place of domicile.

     

    If I abandon my English domicile, and become domiciled in Scotland, this will have important legal results for me, but my nationality remains what it was. So by England let us mean England, a land, which consists of fifty-two counties [1908]

     

    We have included the above extracts from

    The

     

    CONSTITUTIONAL

    HISTORY

    OF

    ENGLAND

     

    by

     

    F.W MAITLAND [1908]

     

    -to show the destruction of the British Constitution over the past 75 years and particularly in the last nine years under Blairdom has shown that the title of British has led to much confusion as the foundation of that concept has now been undermined with the Englishman having to pretend that there is in fact a British Constitution when we have a Scottish Parliament and an Assembly in Wales no doubt in time to be a parliament.

     

    The term BRITISH should ONLY be used when it concerns ALL the nation States within our island home -such as with Defence as virtually all other matters have been handed over to the other national bodies in Scotland and Wales.

     

    Let us hear no more about Britishness but more about Englishness-Scottishness and Welshness because that is the situation we find ourselves in 2006.

    To return to Britishness in our shared island there needs to be a return of an

    English Parliament.

    Only then will the term British regain its true meaning.

    To continue:

    BRITISH CONSTITUTION

    BY

    LORD BROUGHAM

    *

    CHAPTER VIII

     THE National Resistance was not only, n point of Historical fact, the cause of the Revolutionary settlement, it was the main foundation of that settlement; the structure of the government was made to rest upon the people’s

    Right of Resistance

    [Even in 2006]

    -as upon its cornerstone; and it is of incalculable importance that this never should be lost sight of.

    But it is of equal importance that we should ever bear in mind how essential to the preservation of the CONSTITUTION, thus established and secured, this principle of RESISTANCE is; how necessary both for the governors and the governed it ever must be to regard the recourse to that extremity as always possible -an extremity, no doubt, and to be cautiously embraced as such, but still a remedy within the people’s reach; a protection to which they CAN and WILL resort as often as their rulers make such a recourse necessary for self-defence.

     

    [DO YOU UNDERSTAND

    TONY BLAIR?]

     

    The whole history of the CONSTITUTION, which we have been occupied, in tracing from the earliest ages, abounds with proofs how easily absolute power may be exercised, [AS in 2006] and the RIGHTS of the people best secured by LAW be trampled upon, while the theory of a FREE GOVERNMENT remains unaltered. [AS in 2006] and all institutions framed for the CONTROL of the EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [AS in 2006] and all the LAWS designed for the protection of the subject, continue as entire as at the moment they were first founded by the struggles of the PEOPLE, and cemented by their labour or their BLOOD.

    The thirty renewals of

    MAGNA CARTA

    -the constant and almost unresisted invasions of the exclusive right of PARLIAMENT to levy taxes by the Plantagenet Princes of the House of York -the base subserviency of the PARLIAMENT [AS in 2006] to the vindictive measures of parties, alternately successful, during the troubled times of the Lancaster line -the yet more vile submission to the same body to the first Tudors -their suffering arbitrary power to regain its pitch after it had been extirpated in the seventeenth century -the frightful lesson of distrust in Parliament, and in the institutions and all laws , taught by the ease with which Charles II [AS with Tony Blair in 2006] governed almost without control, at the very period fixed upon by our best writers as tat of the Constitution’s greatest theoretical perfection-and , above all, the very narrow escape which this country had of absolute Monarchy, by the happy accident of James II choosing to assail the religion of the people before he had destroyed their liberty, and making the Church his enemy instead of using it as his willing and potent ally against all civil liberty- these are such passages in the history of our government as may well teach us to distrust all mere STATUTORY securities; to remember that JUDGES, PARLIAMENTS, and MINISTERS, as well as KINGS, are frail men, the sport of sordid propensities, or vain fears, or factious passions; and that the people never can be safe without a constant determination to resist unto death as often as their

    RIGHTS are INVADED.

    The main security which our institutions afford, and that which will always render a recourse to the

    RIGHT of RESISTANCE

     

    -less needful, must ever consist in the pure constitution of Parliament-the extended basis of our popular representation. This is the great improvement, which it had received since the REVOLUTION…

     

    In 1831 and 1832 the Parliamentary constitution was placed upon a wider and more secure basis; and although much yet remains to be accomplished before we can justly affirm that all classes are duly represented in Parliament, assuredly we are no longer exposed to the same risks of seeing LIBERTIES destroyed, and the same hazard of having to protect ourselves by resistance; nor can any one now deny that the democratic principle enters largely into the frame of our MIXED MONARCHY

     

    This great change is much more than sufficient to counterbalance all the increase of influence that as been acquired by the CROWN since the REVOLUTION, including the vexations which unavoidably attend the administration of our fiscal laws for the collection and protection of a vast revenue, and the creation of a numerous and important body. Always averse to struggle under the worst oppressions, and always the sure ally of power- I mean the vast and wealthy body of public creditors, whose security is bound up with the existing order of things.

     

    The great virtue of the

     

    CONSTITUTION of ENGLAND

     

    -is the purity in which it recognises and establishes the fundamental principle of all mixed governments; that the supreme power of the STATE being invested in SEVERAL BODIES, the consent of each is required to the performance of any legislative act; and that no change can be made in the laws, nor any addition to them nor any act done affecting their lives, liberties, or property of the people, without the full and deliberate assent of each of the ruling powers.

     

    The ruling powers are three:

     

    The Sovereign

     

    The Lords

     

    The Commons

     

    -of whom the Lords represent themselves only, unless in so far as the Prelates may be supposed to represent the Clergy; and the Scotch Peers to represent, by election of parliament, and the Irish, by election for life, the peerages of Scotland and Ireland respectively; the Commons represent their constituents, by whom they are for each parliament elected [1844].

    If it should seem an exception to the fundamental principle now laid down that the CROWN has the power of making

     

    PEACE and WAR

     

    -and of entering into treaties with foreign states, operations, by which the welfare of the subject may be most materially affected, it is equally true that NO WAR can possibly be continued without the support of both Houses of Parliament; and that no peace concluded, or treaty made, can be binding, so as to affect any interests of the people, without subsequent approval in PARLIAMENT.

     

    The Sovereign, [PRIME MINISTER] therefore, never can enter into any war, or pursue negotiation, without a positive certainty that the Parliament will assent to it and support the necessary operations, whether of hostility or of commercial regulations; and thus the only effect of this prerogative is to give due vigour and authority to the action of the Government in its intercourse with foreign powers and its care of the

    NATIONAL DEFENCE.

     

    [In 2005] the CROWN or in other words the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom [no longer united -by the way] signed twenty-five times the TREATY of ROME for Britain to become part of a

    UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

    -without the consent of the electorate who had been promised a

     

    REFERENDUM

     

    - on the constitutional issue raised but no date was given to enable the People to decide their future in EUROPE.

     

    So we had Tony Blair signing a Treaty which had not received the consent of Parliament because of the obvious condition of a Referendum had not been satisfied.

    IF THIS IS NOT TYRANNY

     

    WHAT IS?

     

    The following extracts are from the

     

    PREFACE

     

    of the

    BRITISH CONSTITUION

     

    By

     

    HENRY, LORD BROUGHAM F.R.S.

    [1844]

     

    GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND

     

    It is quite impossible to understand accurately the principles of that Constitution without studying its history in all times; and an attentive examination of that history is fruitful of most important practical truths for the government of men’s conduct in the present day.

     

    It shows that is country alone of the European states has in all ages possessed the great benefit of a Legislature distinct from the Executive Government, the

     

    Sovereign of ENGLAND

     

    -never having at any period had the power of making general laws. But it likewise shows most clearly that this or any other institution

    can give little security to the liberties of the people, - little obstruction to the maladministration of public affairs.

     

    The lesson taught by the history of our Constitution in all ages, is that unless the people continue watchful over their rights and their own interests, the best constructed system of polity can afford them no shelter from oppression, no safeguard against the mismanagement of their concerns.

     

    It may be very wrong to say that forms of Government are of no importance, and that the best system is the one best administered.

     

    But it is assuredly a truth to which all History bears testimony, that the chief advantage of free institutions is there enabling men to obtain wise and an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps those that live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers, aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and, above all, that no

     

    CONSTITUTION

     

    -however excellent, can supersede the necessity or dispense with the duty of constant vigilance.

     *

    [In every Revolution there are those that decide on the crucial issues but there are many who leave the contesting to others but are themselves pleased to obtain the fruit of the victory without the toil and hardship that brings it about.

     

    It is the same today in JUNE 2006 as it was in the civil war of the seventeenth century when those passionate about their country and claimed their just rights and liberties while parts of England were a neutral zone.]

    WHICH PARTY ARE YOU?

    ARE YOU A LOOKER ON?

    ARE YOU CONTESTING?

     

    * * *

     

    MULTICULTURLISM

     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

    JUNE/06

    H.F.1472--BROUGHT FORWARD FROM JUNE 2006

       
       
       
     
     

    Illuminati

    The story starts about 45,000 years ago. There was a planet in an orbit closer to the sun than Jupiter. Many call this planet Maldek, Mars was it’s largest moon. The Reptilian people that lived there were very violent and negative. They went to war with the people that lived on Mars. They were greater in number, but the Martians had better technology. These people refused to quit attacking the peaceful Martians. So the Martians devised a plan to seriously damage Maldek, making it impossible for these people to stay there and get the war over. The weapon they used, turned out to be to strong and blew up Maldek, scattering pieces all over our solar system, making the asteroid belt, new moons for some of the outer planets and comets in the far reaches of our solar system.

    About 8,000 of these Reptilian people were in large space ships and survived. So they decided to go live in our moon and kick out the few Draconians that lived there. The Reptilians (Draconians) soon returned in force. So they had to leave in a hurry, while their ships were being blasted and crash landed in Antarctica, which at that time was in a tropical area. Now they soon no longer had space flight, because of the Draconian continued attacks. They had trouble living on Earth as their bodies didn’t agree with Earth’s elements. Humanity had just came out of cataclysms caused by Maldek blowing up, so they were few in number and lost their technology and now were sort of primitive.

    These people captured some Humans and using genetics made hybrids of themselves, so they could live on Earth. They made 2 kinds of hybrids, one kind was very similar to and could mate with Humanity. The other kind was different and had elongated heads and became the ruling class and could not mate with Humanity. There are still some of these left, although they stay secret. Within 2,000 years the brown dwarf star, came through our solar system as it does every 3,557 years. Earth was hit hard and had a devastating pole shift, making the south pole in about the center of Antarctica as it is today.

    Most all of the people on Earth died as there was a flash freeze in the new polar areas, killing a lot of animals too. So the Reptilian-Mammal hybrid people that were similar to Humanity lived with and bred with Humanity. When one of their females had children, the children would get one of their souls, regardless of who the father is. These people, the Illuminati today can tell each other apart from Humanity, but Humanity can’t seem to tell that they have different souls. They arranged to put each other into positions of power, like kings and queens and still hold these positions today. Although with the invention of the internet and spreading of knowledge, they are starting to lose control.

    With them in power, we have war, central banks, shortages and other forms of suffering. Because of them we live in a negative world. In 2021 our 3rd cycle will finish and positive soul groups get to move up to the 2nd realm, 5th dimension (4th density). We are in the 1st realm, 4th dimension (3rd density) now. So we must get the Illuminati out of power and turn positive, to move up to 4th density. A soul can either go through 1 cycle of 3rd or 4th density (or some of both) and make ascension to 5th density (12th dimension on Earth). If we get in 4th density life improves, our bodies will be a little better and matter a little different, the biggest change is another component of time. Many of us will gain some telepathy and see a wider range of the spectrum and other improvements.

    Searches related to EntriesSAVE OUR SOULS

    what is the soul made of

    afflict your souls in the bible

    what is a person's soul

    what is the soul of man

    afflict your soul means

    what is the soul according to the bible

    afflict your soul kjv

    what does it mean to afflict your soul in hebrew

     

    FEBRUARY 5-2016

     

     

    *  *  *

     

     

     

    ADDED JULY-2020

     

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/

    1959/black.htm

    This kind of subversion has been planned since the beginning of last century. Divide and conquer is a valuable tool for the elites.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.1424/2S

     

       
     
     

     UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

    by

    Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

     

    BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

    [MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

    SEE HERE!   ]

     

    JUNE 2-2015

    H.F.1388

       
     

     MAIN ARTICLE BELOW BROUGHT FORWARD FROM MAY, 2006

    THEY NEVER LEARN!

    [As we have said many times over the past decades governments fail to learn lessons about key matters vital to the public at large such as LAW & ORDER-IMMIGRATION-and a host of other matters which should have been finally resolved to the satisfaction of the GENERAL PUBLIC many years ago. The reason there is this constant CHAOS is that MINISTERS tread softly because there is always a shortage of FINANCE. Well! we  know where there is a mountain of GOLD in the so-called FOREIGN AID BUDGET! to supply resources to SECURITY-NHS-PENSIONS-ROADS and other ESSENTIAL NEEDS of the PEOPLE. BUT there will be NO CHANGE until PR -PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION is introduced into our POLITICAL SYSTEM. REMEMBER-THE GANG OF THREE or is it now the GANG of TWO have no fears of not alternating as a future government so it is IMPORTANT that the PEOPLE have other chooses to keep our POLITICAL SYSTEM in GOOD HEALTH. Soon we will be FREE of the EU and the their JUSTICE SYSTEM and their other ABOMINATIONS but unfortunately we still have the CURSE of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS with us which destroying the very FREEDOM of SPEECH and PERSON which our ANCESTORS fought for those centuries AGO.  WE see the once VOICE of the PEOPLE the once PARTY of the COMMON MAN in TURMOIL because of its links to a FOREIGN POWER. We have raised the QUESTION where are the FRIENDS of ENGLAND in our WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT?  yet there is a LOBBY of FRIENDS of ISRAEL in BOTH MAIN PARTIES with at least 80% of CONSERVATIVE MP's members. WE ASK should such INFLUENCE be PERMITTED in our HOUSE OF COMMONS.  This is NOT a RACIAL ISSUE but one of FAIRNESS to ALL NATIONS on our PLANET EARTH. WE have also raised the question of UNDUE INFLUENCE in the AFFAIRS of our ISLAND HOME and the difficulty of being CANDID of the MATTERS of the MOMENT of that FOREIGN POWER.       We have to ask ourselves if there was no FOREIGN LOBBY GROUP in PARLIAMENT there would have been no CRIES of RACISM echoing in our HALLOWED HOUSE in WESTMINSTER and what a great RELIEF that would be TO ALL CONCERNED.]

    *  *  *

    What PLANET are JUDGES living ON?

     

    *

    Daily Mail

    Wednesday, May 31-2006.

     

    by

     

    Melanie Phillips

     

    ARE OUR senior judges simply living on a different planet from the rest of us lesser mortals? Our most senior judge, The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, has launched yet another judicial broadside against apparent evils of imprisonment.

    In Lord Phillips’ UNIVERSE, it appears that PRISON is NOT the PLACE for CRIMINALS.

     

    Instead, wherever possible judges should pass community sentences -which he admits will not be tolerated by the public unless they include ‘significant punishment’ -because ‘the sensible place for rehabilitation is the community.’

     

    EXCUSE ME?

    COMMUNITY SENTENCES FAIL TO REHABILITATE CRIMINALS. THEY RESULT IN AN EVEN HIGHER RATE OF RECIDIVISM THAN JAIL SENTENCES.

     

    This is hardly surprising, since community sentences seem to be hardship-free zones.

    According to a recent report by the

    Chief Inspector of Probation

    -burglars and robbers in London are being set to restore antique furniture or make costumes for the Notting Hill carnival.

    [You couldn’t make it up if you tried]

     

    And thousands of criminals sentenced to unpaid community service do nothing at all some days.

     

    When they turn up, there are no probation staff to supervise them, so they are simply sent home. And those who don’t who don’t even bother to turn up are NOT taken back to COURT and re-sentenced.

     

    It may amaze Lord Phillips to learn that ‘significant punishment’ means going

     

    TO PRISON.

     

    YES, overcrowding means prisons don’t function properly. But the remedy for that is

     

    TO BUILD MORE PRISONS.

     

    YET our senior judges harbour an obsessive animosity towards prison, doubtless because of the way Human Rights doctrine has so muddled the way we look at the very concepts of

    CRIME AND PUNISHMENT.

     

    Lord Phillips’ remarks, however were more bizarre still. One reason prison numbers are rising, he said, was that drug users were deliberately committing crimes to get into prison drug programmes. He had come across prisoners offered community sentences who preferred to go to prison so that they could get treatment.

     

    Offenders

     

    What on earth does the Lord Justice have under his wig? There is no proper evidence for this at all.

     

    Indeed, an investigation by MPs said last year that fewer than half of all jails had drug treatment courses, that ONLY one in ten prisoners who use drugs got places on drug treatment programmes, and that half of those who did go on courses NEVER FINISHED THEM.

     

    As for supposedly non-existent community drug treatment programmes, they do EXIST-

    but are pretty useless in turning offenders away from crime.

     

    In a recent report, the Commons Public Accounts Committee observed that drug treatment orders were ‘more like a

    GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD’

    than a rehabilitation programme.

     

     

    Only 25 per cent of those who accepted them ever completed them.

     

    It is deeply worrying not only that a senior judge should make such odd and ill-informed remarks, BUT that the JUDICIARY should assume it knows better what policies should be pursued.

     

    Yesterday, the former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf [The burglars’ friend] expanded upon such arrogance.

    Apparently making a coded attack on the Prime Minister for his criticisms of a judge over the immigration ruling, Lord Woolf condemned politicians for ‘knocking’ individual judges, because it was ‘very damaging’.

     

    So lets get this right. Judges may make comments, which are not only wildly inappropriate because they are intensely political, but also reveal themselves to be woefully OUT OF TOUCH.

     

    Yet then they loftily inform us that we should not criticise them for doing so, because they apparently reside on some celestial plane above public debate.

     

    Of course, in principle politicians and judges should have a Chinese wall between them. And it was once clearly understood that politicians and judges stood on either side of the wall.

     

    But the problem is that the judges have torn up that understanding and are now getting involved in matters of POLICY such as the role of imprisonment or drug treatment, which ARE properly the territory of POLITICIANS.

     

    The judges have simply grown too big for their wigs.

     

    One of the main reasons is the Human Rights law. Lord Woolf robustly defended this yesterday and said that any resulting tension between GOVERNMENT and JUDICIARY was healthy in a democracy.

     

    Weakness

    But the fact is that Human Rights law has given the judges a weapon to undermine democracy, by setting up themselves rather than politicians as the people who should decide how the country should be ruled.

     

    This first surfaced back in the 1980s, when senior judges decided that the long years of Tory government and the weakness of the opposition posed such a threat to democracy that the judiciary should take upon itself the mantle of opposition instead.

     

    In the days before the passage of the Human Rights Act [1998], this took the form of challenges to immigration law through judicial review. Such attempts to change the direction of government policy through court rulings became known as judicial activism.

     

    When Tony Bair came to power, instead of putting the judges back behind the Chinese wall he attached a turbo-charge to their already burgeoning judicial activism by introducing the Human Rights Act.

     

    This change in the behaviour of judges was by no means restricted to Britain. Judicial activism had become a phenomenon throughout the

    WESTERN WORLD.

     

    In America, Australia, the countries of the EU and elsewhere, the judges -

    Acting as a kind of judicial fifth column around the world - are arrogating to themselves power, which belong to the world of politics.

     

    Earlier this year, in a little noticed address in London to the Law Commission, a prominent Australian judge, Michael Kirby - a key proponent of judicial activism- spelt out the judge’s agenda with unabashed frankness.

     

    The institutions of government in both Britain and Australia, he said, had become unbalanced. Governments had become too powerful, civil servants and MPs had lost influence to political advisers and ministerial accountability was a thing of the past.

     

    Amen to that.

     

    BUT he went on to say that as a result ‘the very notion of “sovereignty” of parliament has become a somewhat inapposite concept’

     

    There should be instead a new type of government led by judges and based on HUMAN RIGHTS LAW - which was already developing in BRITAIN.

     

    So the remedy for politicians who were abusing their powers was to replace them by JUDICIAL POWER.

     

    This was nothing less than an all-out attack on parliamentary democracy.

     

    [Whatever is left of it after nine years of Tony Blair]

     

    Yet Justice Kirby was given a platform by our principle legal reform body -the Law Commission - and before an appreciative audience, which included Lord Phillips, Lord Woolf and the Lord Chancellor.

     

    Despised

     

    English judges express similar alarming distain for democracy. Last year Lord Bingham, the Senior Law Lord, said that the Human Rights Convention existed to protect vulnerable minorities. Which were sometimes disliked, resented or despised.

     

    It should therefore come as no surprise, he went on, that decisions vindicating their rights ‘should provoke howls of criticism by politicians and the mass media. They generally reflect majority opinion.’

     

    So majority opinion, on this account, was essentially illegitimate, and the role of the JUDICIARY was to use HUMAN RIGHTS LAW to do it down.

     

    This unashamed justification of judicial supremacism is as anti m-democratic as it is arrogant. We are living through a kind of creeping judicial coup d’etat driven by a profound contempt for the

    PUBLIC OPINION

    -to which politicians are answerable.

     

    It is parliamentary weakness that is to blame. Only if Parliament reasserts itself will the

     

    RULE OF LAW

     

    -     be rescued from

     

    RULE OF LAWYERS

     

    -who have so high-handedly hijacked it?

     

    * * *

    [Font altered -bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

    *

     

    [Well it must occur to many in this country that the present sorry predicament of

     

    OUR PARLIAMENT

     

    - only benefits those in the Judiciary and of course the growing army of lawyers many of whom have grown rich on their human rights harvest which Tony Blair and his flatmate Lord Falconer have no doubt been sowing with hindsight for years. What better way to destroy an immemorial institution of over 700 in the making than to undermine it from within while professing that their attempts to govern are undermined by the JUDICIARY?

     

    WHO CAN WE POSSIBLY TRUST?

     

    THERE MUST SURELY BE A SEQUAL TO FOLLOW?

     

     

    * * *

    MAY/06

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

     

    H.F.1665BROUGHT  FORWARD FROM MAY-06

     

       
     

    PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

    PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

    BREXIT

    BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

    UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

    NULL AND VOID.

    JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

    JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

    JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

    *

    AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

    SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

    OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

    NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

    DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

    *

    H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

     

       
     

    PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

    MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

    2014

       
     

    IMMIGRATION FILE

    E U FILE

    IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

         9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

    MAGNA CARTA

    LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

    NAZI DVD

    ENGLAND FILE

    CRIMINAL EU

    THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

    SAY NO TO EU

    UNDERSTANDING EASTER

    EURO MUST FAIL

    ROTTEN HEART OF EU

    SOUL OF ENGLAND

    100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

    TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

    ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

    THE END OF THE ENGLISH

    ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

    MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

     by LORD PETER SHORE.

     

       
     
    Brought-forward from August 2003

    [THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

    Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

    J. Bingley

    Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

    The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

    The whole constitution originates its authority from

    COMMON LAW

    Supremacy resides in the

    LAW and PEOPLE

    NOT THE

    CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

    It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

    THE LAW IS SUPREME

    The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

    HANDS of the PEOPLE.

    This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

    The English Constitution's function is to

    PROTECT the

    "RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

     of ENGLISHMEN".

    These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

    [In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

    The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

    " Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

    It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

    This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

    All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

    The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

    A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

    Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

     It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

    There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

    The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

    Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

    The MAGNA CARTA

    made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

    [THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

    THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

    That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

    'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

    [Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

    'Right to be Done!']

    Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

    There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

     There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

     There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

     We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

     Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

    The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

    Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

    The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

    A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

    WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

    John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

    *

    [We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

     KEW-LONDON

     which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

    1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

    ". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

    Edward Heath.

    . It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

    [Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

    FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

    *

    [THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

    AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

     

    More!

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

    MAY 30-2016

    H.F.800

     

       
     
    A FREE PRESS!

    It's finest expression had already been given in

    MILTON'S

    AREOPAGITICA.

    Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

    One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

    *

    THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

    More!

     

     

     

     

     
    THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

    WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

    [Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

    *

    A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

     (1959-2016)

     

     

     

    THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

    THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

    THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

     

    THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

     

     

     

     

     

       
     
     

     

    A REMINDER!

     

     

     

    [ A MATTER OF FACT!]

    On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

    'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

    STATEMENT!

    [We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

     What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

      NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

    FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

    *

     

    Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

     Added OCTOBER 11-2017

    IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

    OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

    IS

    'GO TO HELL'

    BUT

    MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

    "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

    The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

    CHRISTOPHER STORY

     WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

    FOR

    TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

     

    FROM

    INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

    SEPTEMBER-2005

    *

     

    EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

     

    THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

     

    An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

    The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

    On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

    For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

    Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

    Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

    Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

     

    WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

     

    This means that the European Union’s Treaties

     are null and void,

    as they have been obtained by fraud. 

     

    That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

     

    It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

     

    John Major

     

    Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

     

    THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

    ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

     

    The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

     

    *          *

    International Currency Review

     

    (Vol 30- No 4)

    *

     

     

    www.worldreports.org

     

    *          *          *

     

    [Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

    in brackets]

     

    OCT/05

     

    THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

    Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

    Law of Treaties

    there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

    WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

    TREATY

    in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

    AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

    2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

     

    A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

    FOREIGN POWER.

    which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

    As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

    ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

    This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

    ACT of WAR

    against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

    It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

    Muslim Brotherhood,

    is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

    The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

    near Munich

    For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

    E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

    Website:

    www.worldreports.org

    *

    The European Union Collective:
    Enemy of Its Member States

    OCTOBER-2005

     

     

     LIFE AND TIMES

    OF

    Christopher Story

     PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

    2010

     

    *  *  *

    ADDED DECEMBER,2018

    [FIND OUT MORE OF YOUR WORLD THAT WILL SHOCK

    YOU.]

     

     

     

     

     

     

    H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

     

       
     

    Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

    ENGLAND FILE

     'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

    Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

    Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

    IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

     

     

       
       

     

     

    MAY-16 victory

    JUN-16

    REFERENDUM

    JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN - 17 FEB-17
    MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
    JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

    APL-18

    MAY-18

    JUN-18

    JUL-18

    AUG-18

    SEP-18

    OCT-18

    NOV-18

    DEC-18

    JAN-19

    FEB-19

    MAR-19

    APR-19

    MAY-19

    JUN-19

    JUL-19

    AUG-19

    SEP 19 OCT-19 NOV-19 DEC-19 JAN-20

    FEB-20

    MAR-20

    APRIL-20

    MAY-20 JUNE-20
    JULY-20 AUG-20 SEPT-20 OCT-20 NOV-20  FREE OF THE EU

    DEC-20

    AFTER  48 YEARS

    JAN-21

    A FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

    THE

    WORLD OUR OYSTER

     

     

     

     

     

     

    THE COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE

    IN THE

    NHS

     

    IS A SCAM.

    The individual involved was an 87 year old male with a registered disabled wife of 90-  recently a stair-lift became necessary.  It was after the husband had had a stroke over a year ago and that it was necessary to under go  four blood tests-a simple procedure one would have thought for trained medical staff.  The first three nurses introduced themselves-smiled and proceeded to carry out the blood test which was done leaving no discomfort to the patient but an hour later the person to carry out the fourth test was in his 40's did not introduce himself  or smile to put the patient at ease -he fumbled around for a few minutes in a carrier tray on a trolly to find the items needed and assemble- here again there was no smile and gave the impression that the procedure was beneath his ability- whereas the previous nurses came in with the appropriate kit in their hands whereas he appeared out of his depth- had no idea of how to carry out the simple procedure, in fact he made a number of attempts to carry out his mission but failed miserably-he left the patients arm like a pin cushion-it was almost two weeks when because the pain and discomfort the patient visited the doctor to ensure no long-term damage had been done.

    The point at issue is that the husband was in fact a full-time career for his wife and that entailed the use of two healthy arms to carry out the necessary tasks within the home. Fortunately he was apart from his recent stroke a healthy individual but the incident in the hospital made some tasks difficult to perform though again fortunately the husband was a healthy individual for his age.

    He decided that the individual who was responsible for the inept blood test should be reported because such an inability to carry out a basic procedure in nursing made the individual an apparent danger to patients and should be retrained or dismissed from the NHS. But when he approached the manager of the  COMPLAINTS DEPARTMENT the impression given that it was most unlikely the individual would be censored and that possibly no further action would be taken. WE have heard nothing and have received no communication about the incident.

    From the point of view of the husband the incident was a clear matter of 'assault on the person' but realised that it was pointless to expect an apology as it appears from recent headlines the

    NHS

    IS A LAW

    UNTO ITSELF.

    JULY 10-2020

    H.F.2045

       
     
       -  JULY -  PART 1- 2020 -    

    HOME

    -PART 2  - PART 3- PART 4

    PART 5

    PART 6

     

    -

     

          

    NOVEMBER- HOME-

    PART 2   -  PART 3   -PART  4  - PART 5 -   PART 6  - 

    - (1994 -Official Website - MARCH-PT 5- 2019 )-

    MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2019          MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2019

    MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2019         MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2019

    MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2019        MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2019

           MARCH-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME PAGE 2--2019

     

    *

    THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

     

    TOP OF PAGE

     

    CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012